Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2014 Nov 30;4(24):4598–4608. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1336

Seasonal flooding regime and ecological traits influence genetic structure of two small rodents

Rita Gomes Rocha 1,2, Eduardo Ferreira 1, Carlos Fonseca 1, Juliana Justino 3, Yuri Luiz Reis Leite 2, Leonora Pires Costa 2
PMCID: PMC4278813  PMID: 25558355

Abstract

Although codistributed species are affected by the same abiotic factors, such as rivers and seasonal flooding regimes, ecological traits, such as locomotion habits and habitat preferences, may also influence differences in levels of genetic diversity and differentiation. We examined population genetic structure and diversity of Hylaeamys megacephalus and Oecomys aff. roberti, two cricetid rodent species from the mid-Araguaia River in central Brazil, using mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Specifically, we aim to test whether the Araguaia River acts as a barrier to the gene flow of these two species and to assess how ecological traits, such as locomotion habits and habitat preferences, may influence differences in levels of genetic diversity and differentiation. As both species occur in flooded forests, neither showed genetic differences related to river banks. Oecomys aff. roberti showed stronger population structure that appears to be associated with isolation by distance. This arboreal species maintained stable populations in the Araguaia River, while the terrestrial H. megacephalus was more affected by seasonal floods, resulting in a genetic signature of population expansion. Our initial predictions were largely supported by our results given that locomotion habits and habitat preferences of each species appears to have played a role on the genetic structure of these two sympatric rodent species.

Keywords: Amazonia-Cerrado ecotone, Araguaia river, Cricetidae, mitochondrial DNA, Rodentia

Introduction

Genetic differentiation is the result of the interaction of both historical and ongoing evolutionary processes (e.g., Moritz et al. 2000; Patton et al. 2000). Landscape features such as rivers and mountains have been considered important factors in shaping the genetic structure of Neotropical species (Antonelli et al. 2010; Leite and Rogers 2013). However, the ability to disperse across these landscape features and to recover from bottlenecks is also related with species ecology and life history (Matocq et al. 2000). Indeed, dispersal tendencies, habitat preferences, life span, and mating system and success determine population sizes and gene flow rates among populations, which in turn will determine levels of genetic diversity and differentiation (Allendorf and Luikart 2007).

The Araguaia River in central Brazil is one of the main drainage basins of the Cerrado biome and lies in the transition to Amazonia (Latrubesse et al. 2009). This river represents a relatively stable geographical barrier due to its anabranching pattern, consisting of multiple channels separated by vegetated semipermanent alluvial islands, with low sinuosities (Latrubesse 2008), which are expected to limit gene flow between population of forest dwellers from opposite river banks (e.g., Aleixo 2004; Bates et al. 2004; Antonelli et al. 2010; Faria et al. 2013; Leite and Rogers 2013). River geomorphology has been argued as a possible cause of differences in the genetic differentiation of populations by river bank, and anabranching rivers like the Araguaia are probably stronger barriers than meandering rivers, such as the Juruá (e.g., Moritz et al. 2000; Patton et al. 2000; and Antonelli et al. 2010). Indeed, previous studies have shown that the Araguaia is an important barrier to sister species of the climbing rats of the genus Rhipidomys (Bonvicino et al. 2008; Rocha et al. 2011), but it is not known to what extent this finding is consistent across other cricetid rodents with different ecological traits.

Here, we examine two species, Hylaeamys megacephalus and Oecomys aff. roberti, that were the two most abundant cricetid rodents captured in the mid-Araguaia River basin (Rocha et al. 2011). Hylaeamys megacephalus is a terrestrial and generalist species with high habitat tolerance (Emmons and Feer 1997; Percequillo et al. 2008), occurring in both flooded and unflooded forests of the Araguaia River (Rocha et al. 2011). Oecomys aff. roberti (treated as Oecomys sp. in Rocha et al. 2011) is so far known only from the Araguaia River, where it presents arboreal habits and prefers flooded forests (Rocha et al. 2011; Ramos Pereira et al. 2013), like its closely related congener O. roberti in the Juruá River (Patton et al. 2000).

We used two mitochondrial molecular markers (cytochrome B and D-loop) to compare population genetic structure and diversity of these two cricetid rodent species from the mid-Araguaia River in central Brazil. Specifically, we aim to test whether the Araguaia River acts as a barrier to the gene flow of these two species and to assess how ecological traits, such as locomotion habits and habitat preferences, may influence differences in levels of genetic diversity and differentiation. These two similar-sized species co-occur along the Amazonia-Cerrado ecotone, but they show distinct ecological traits, leading to different predictions regarding levels of genetic diversity and differentiation (Table 1). As both species occur in flooded forests, we hypothesize that both will exhibit low differentiation across river banks, showing haplotype sharing between river banks and islands. However, H. megacephalus will likely present lower overall genetic differentiation than O. aff. roberti, as the former is a more generalist species in terms of habitat. We also hypothesize that the ground-dwelling species, H. megacephalus, is more prone to reveal population size fluctuations following seasonal flooding regime, while the arboreal species, O. aff. roberti, is more likely to maintain stable populations in the Araguaia River throughout the year (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of ecological traits and genetic predictions for Hylaeamys megacephalus and Oecomys aff. roberti in mid-Araguaia River, central Brazil

Species Ecological traits Genetic predictions
H. megacephalus Terrestrial, more prone to local extinction due to seasonal flooding regime Unimodal mismatch distribution; evidence of population expansion in neutrality tests; proportionally less haplotypes in islands and shared between river banks and islands due to higher rate of extinction
Habitat generalist Weaker genetic structure (lower FST) and no evidence of isolation by distance
Occurs in both seasonally flooded and unflooded forests Low differentiation across river banks, shared haplotypes between river banks and islands
O. aff. roberti Arboreal, less prone to local extinctions due to seasonal flooding regime Multiple peaks in mismatch distribution; no evidence of population expansion in neutrality tests; proportionally more haplotypes present in islands and shared between river banks and islands due to lower rate of extinction
Habitat specialist Stronger genetic structure (higher FST) and isolation by distance
Prefers seasonally flooded forests Low differentiation across river banks, shared haplotypes between river banks and islands
Open in a new tab

Methods

Study area and sample collecting

Specimens of Hylaeamys megacephalus and Oecomys aff. roberti were collected from 26 sampling points in the mid-Araguaia River and its surroundings (Fig. 1, see gazetteer in Supplementary material for locality names and geographical localization). The Araguaia River is an anabranching river consisting of multiple channels separated by vegetated semipermanent alluvial islands excised from preexisting floodplain or formed by within-channel or deltaic accretion (Narson and Knighton 1996; Latrubesse 2008). The landscape is characterized by a mosaic of seasonally flooded and unflooded gallery forests located along the margins of the streams and channels. In well-drained areas, vegetation physiognomies more typical of the Cerrado occur (Oliveira-Filho and Ratter 2002). The climate is tropical, with a rainy season lasting from October to April and a dry season from May to September (INMET 2011).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Study area in the mid-Araguaia River basin. Location of study area in Brazil (upper left corner); Map including all the sampling localities (middle) and detail of sampling points in the Araguaia River and its tributaries (right, source: Google Earth). Sampling points in white corresponds to the eastern river bank, in black to the western river bank, and in gray to the islands of the Araguaia River.

Sampling was carried out between June 2007 and November 2008, using a standardized trapping protocol to sample small nonvolant mammals in upland and floodplain gallery forests. Live traps (Sherman and Tomahawk) and pitfalls (30 L and 60 L) were set in each sampling point. Three sampling periods averaging seven nights (between five and nine nights) were performed in each sampling point (see Rocha et al. 2011 for detailed information on habitat, sampling, and specimens). Tissue samples have been deposited at Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, Brazil.

DNA extraction and amplification

DNA was extracted from liver and ear tissue samples preserved in ethanol using the salt-extraction method (Bruford et al. 1992). An 801-bp fragment of the cyt B was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers MVZ05 and MVZ16 (Smith and Patton 1993) for both species. 860-bp fragments of D-loop were amplified by PCR using the primers L15774M and H651B (Fumagalli et al. 1997) for H. megacephalus. 496-bp fragments of D-loop were amplified by PCR using the primers L0 and E3 (Douzery and Randi 1997; Huchon et al. 1999) for O. aff. roberti. Amplifications were performed using the following PCR profiles: (1) cyt B: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 39 cycles with denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 48°C for 45 s, polymerization at 72°C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min; (2) D-loop: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles with denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 54°C (H. megacephalus) or 45°C (O. aff. roberti) for 90 s, polymerization at 68°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Mitochondrial fragments were purified using ExoSap-IT® (USB Corporation, Cleveland Ohio, US) and sequenced using an automatic sequencer ABI 3130-XL (Perkin Elmer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California), with the above-listed primers.

Sequence alignment was performed using CLUSTALW algorithm implemented in MEGA version 5 (Tamura et al. 2011), with posterior manual edition. All sequences generated in this study have been deposited in GenBank (Table 2).

Table 2.

List of the cytochrome B and D-loop haplotypes (h) of Hylaeamys megacephalus and Oecomys aff. roberti, with frequencies (F), sampling localities, and GenBank accession numbers. Sampling locality numbers correspond to those mapped in Figure 1. See Gazetteer in Supplementary material for locality names and geographical localization

cyt B D-loop
Taxon h F Locality GenBank accession h F Locality GenBank accession
H. megacephalus HHc1 12 4, 13, 15, 16 KP027738 HHd1 9 4, 13, 15, 16 KP027770
HHc2 1 8 KP027739 HHd2 1 8 KP027771
HHc3 1 1 KP027740 HHd3 1 1 KP027772
HHc4 3 5, 10, 14 KP027741 HHd4 3 5, 10, 14 KP027773
HHc5 6 5, 6, 16, 26 KP027742 HHd5 3 5, 6 KP027774
HHc6 1 5 KP027743 HHd6 1 5 KP027775
HHc7 1 5 KP027744 –
HHc8 3 6, 8, 22 KP027745 HHd7 1 6 KP027776
HHc9 2 5, 17 KP027746 –
HHc10 1 2 KP027747 HHd8 1 2 KP027777
– HHd9 1 13 KP027778
– HHd10 1 16 KP027779
HHc11 1 16 KP027748 HHd12 1 16 KP027781
HHc12 1 21 KP027749 HHd11 1 21 KP027780
HHc13 4 21, 23 KP027750 HHd13 2 21 KP027782
HHc14 1 21 KP027751 HHd14 1 21 KP027783
– HHd15 1 22 KP027784
HHc15 1 19 KP027752 HHd16 1 19 KP027785
HHc16 1 16 KP027753 HHd17 2 15, 16 KP027786
– HHd18 1 17 KP027787
HHc17 4 15, 25, 26 KP027754 HHd19 1 25 KP027788
HHc18 2 23 KP027755 –
HHc19 1 23 KP027756 –
HHc20 1 23 KP027757 HHd20 1 23 KP027789
– HHd21 1 25 KP027790
– HHd22 1 26 KP027791
HHc21 1 26 KP027758 HHd23 2 25, 26 KP027792
O. aff. roberti HOc1 14 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14 HM594599 HOd1 3 1, 6, 14 KP027759
HOc2 5 1, 2, 12, 13 HM594598 HOd2 6 1, 2, 12, 13, 22 KP027760
– HOd3 12 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 13 KP027761
– HOd4 1 3 KP027762
HOc3 5 1, 11, 13 HM594602 HOd5 6 1, 11, 13 KP027763
– HOd6 9 11, 12, 13 KP027764
HOc4 1 6 KP027736 –
HOc5 1 2 HM594601 HOd7 1 2 KP027765
– HOd8 1 17 KP027766
HOc6 1 22 KP027737
HOc7 6 18, 19, 20, 22 HM594600 HOd9 1 19 KP027767
– HOd10 4 18, 20, 22 KP027768
HOc8 1 23 HM594596 –
HOc9 1 23 HM594595 HOd11 1 23 KP027769
Open in a new tab

Genetic diversity indices and population genetic structure

Number of haplotypes and polymorphic sites, haplotype and nucleotide diversity values were estimated with DnaSP v.5 (Librado and Rozas 2009) for both molecular markers from each species. Phylogeographic relationships among haplotypes (concatenated cyt B and D-loop loci) from both species were estimated through Bayesian inference (BI) in MrBayes v.3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). The model of nucleotide substitution was selected using MrModeltest (Nylander 2004). Haplotype trees were sampled every 100 of 107 generations until Markov chain became stationary, that is, when standard deviation of split frequencies was below 0.01 (Ronquist et al. 2009). A 50% majority rule consensus tree was obtained after “burn-in” of 25% of the sample points to generate Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP). Trees were then edited in FigTree v1.4 (available at http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

Median-joining (MJ) networks were produced for both markers separately using NETWORK (Bandelt et al. 1999) and using only variable nucleotide sites. We divided the samples into three subpopulations based on geography (one from each river bank and another from the islands) to test the role of the river in population structuring.

Spatial analyses of molecular variance were performed for both markers separately using SAMOVA 1.0 (Dupanloup et al. 2002) to identify groups of populations, which accounted for genetic differentiation and geographic distances. Analyses were performed for K = 2 to 10 to select the optimal number of groups (K), with the 26 sampling points for each species. K was selected based on the maximum (or plateau) value of fixation index FCT (variance among groups relative to the total variance) and on the minimum number of groups with single populations.

The genetic differentiation between sampling points was assessed with pairwise FST estimates, using ARLEQUIN 3.5.1.3 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). The P-value was estimated using 10,000 permutations. Isolation by distance was assessed using a simple Mantel test. The correlation between matrices of pairwise estimates of genetic differentiation (FST) and matrix of geographic distances was estimated with the Mantel test, using Isolation by Distance web service v.3.23 (Jensen et al. 2005).

Demographic history

Neutrality and demographic history were evaluated for both markers separately from the entire sample distribution of each species using DnaSP v.5 (Librado and Rozas 2009). Populations under expansion are expected to exhibit smooth and unimodal mismatch distributions, while populations at demographic equilibrium are characterized by ragged and erratic mismatch distributions (Harpending 1994). Deviations from the sudden population expansion model were further tested using the Harpending's raggedness statistics, which quantify the smoothness of the observed distribution (Harpending 1994). We also used statistics to detect demographic events based on frequency spectrum of mutations, Tajima's (1989) D and Ramos-Onsins and Rozas's (2002) R2, and based on haplotype frequencies, Fu's (1997) Fs. Coalescence simulations with 1000 replicates were applied to determine the P-value of each statistics.

Results

Genetic diversity indices

Partial sequences of cyt B and D-loop were obtained from 49 and 38 individuals of H. megacephalus, respectively, resulting in 21 haplotypes and 36 polymorphic sites for cyt B, and 23 haplotypes and 79 polymorphic sites for D-loop (Table 3). Partial sequences of cyt B and D-loop were obtained from 35 and 45 individuals of O. aff. roberti, respectively, resulting in nine haplotypes and 16 polymorphic sites for cyt B, and 11 haplotypes and 18 polymorphic sites for D-loop (Table 3). Haplotype and nucleotide diversities were relatively higher for D-loop than cyt B for both species (Table 3).

Table 3.

Number of individual sequences (n), base pairs (bp), haplotypes (h), polymorphic sites (S), haplotype diversity (Hd), nucleotide diversity (π), raggedness statistics (r), and deviation from neutrality tests (D, Fs, R2)

Species Marker n Bp h S Hd π r D Fs R2
H. megacephalus cyt B 49 801 21 36 0.914 0.006 0.035 −1.269 −6.042* 0.063
D-loop 38 860 23 79 0.936 0.016 0.015 −1.252 −2.483 0.082
O. aff. roberti cyt B 35 801 9 16 0.788 0.005 0.153 −0.035 0.785 0.122
D-loop 45 460 11 18 0.858 0.007 0.101 0.172 0.280 0.115
Open in a new tab
*

Significant values (P < 0.05).

Population genetic structure

Median-joining networks from both markers revealed intraspecific haplotype sharing across the mid-Araguaia River and also on islands (Figs 2 and 3). Two H. megacephalus cyt B haplotypes (HHc1 and HHc5) and one D-loop haplotype (HHd1) were shared by specimens from both river banks; and one haplotype of each marker (HHc4 and HHd4) was also shared with specimens from the islands (Fig. 2). One O. aff. roberti cyt B haplotype (HOc1) was shared by specimens from both river banks, along with specimens from the islands; one cyt B haplotype (HOc2) and three D-loop haplotypes (HOd1, HOd2, and HOd6) were shared by specimens from the eastern river bank and the islands; and one D-loop haplotype (HOd3) was shared by specimens from both river banks (Fig. 3). Bayesian inference (BI) trees obtained for concatenated haplotypes resulted in a basal polytomy (Fig. S1). The BI tree for H. megacephalus lacked a clear geographic structure and no haplogroups could be identified (Fig. S1A). In O. aff. roberti, on the other hand, two haplogroups were identified, but without clear geographic structure (Fig. S1B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Median-joining networks of cyt B (A) and D-loop (B) sequences of Hylaeamys megacephalus. Length of connection branches corresponds to the nucleotide substitutions; size of the circles is proportional to the number of individuals sharing each haplotype (for details see Table 1); white corresponds to the eastern river bank, black to the western river bank, and gray to the islands of the Araguaia River.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Median-joining networks of cyt B (A) and D-loop (B) sequences of Oecomys aff. roberti. Length of connection branches corresponds to the nucleotide substitutions; size of the circles is proportional to the number of individuals sharing each haplotype (for details see Table 1); white corresponds to the eastern river bank, black to the western river bank, and gray to the islands of the Araguaia River.

Using SAMOVA, we found three (K = 3) and four (K = 4) groups of populations in both species based on cyt B and D-loop, respectively (Table 4). These groups were not geographically consistent, but two main patterns were observed for both species. Sampling points from the mid-Araguaia River are consistently grouped (H. megacephalus: SHc3 and SHd4; O. aff. roberti: SOc2, SOd1, and SOd4), and sampling points from Uburu and Tocantins were grouped separately (H. megacephalus: SHd3; O. aff. roberti: SOc1 and SOd2), with the exception of groups SHc1, SHc2, and SHd1 of H. megacephalus and groups SOc2 and SOd3 of O. aff. roberti, which cluster sampling points from both regions (Table 4).

Table 4.

Spatial analyses of molecular variance (SAMOVA) results for both species based on cytochrome B and D-loop markers

Species Marker K FCT Group Sampling points
H. megacephalus cyt B 3 0.50** SHc1 1, 8, 10, 21, 22, 23
SHc2 14, 19
SHc1 2, 4, 5, 6, 13, 15, 16, 17
D-loop 4 0.51** SHd1 1, 10, 14, 19
SHd2 8
SHd3 21, 22, 23
SHd4 2, 4, 5, 6, 13, 15, 16, 17, 25, 26
O. aff. roberti cyt B 3 0.75** SOc1 18, 19, 20, 22, 23
SOc2 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14
SOc3 11, 24
D-loop 4 0.48** SOd1 6, 14
SOd2 19, 20, 22, 18
SOd3 1, 2, 11, 13, 23
SOd4 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 17
Open in a new tab
**

Significant values (P < 0.001).

Most FST values were not significant in either species (Table S1 and S2). Only sampling points 21 and 23 revealed moderate-to-high levels of differentiation in H. megacephalus, and sampling points 12 and 20 revealed high levels of differentiation in O. aff. roberti (Table S1 and S2).

We found no correlation between genetic and geographic distances in H. megacephalus (cyt B: r = 0.001, P = 0.545; D-loop: r = −0.19, P = 0.828), refuting a scenario of isolation by distance; but a positive correlation was found in O. aff. roberti (cyt B: R = 0.364, P = 0.001; D-loop: R = 0.318, P = 0.002), indicating isolation by distance.

Demographic history

We found no evidence of population expansion in the mismatch distributions of either species (Fig. 4). Consistently, the observed raggedness values were not significantly lower than the expected in an expansion model for both markers (Table 3). The only significant negative value was Fu's Fs for the cyt B dataset of H. megacephalus (Table 3). All other neutrality tests showed nonsignificant values (Table 3), therefore rejecting the population expansion model.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Mismatch distribution graphs of Hylaeamys megacephalus (A) and Oecomys aff. roberti (B). The dashed curves indicate the observed frequency distribution of pairwise differences; and solid curves indicate the distribution that would be expected under a population growth–decline model. ⊖ and τ were estimated using DnaSP software. Hylaeamys megacephalus: ⊖ = 2.261 and τ = 2.789 and Oecomys aff. roberti: ⊖ = 2.338 and τ = 1.746.

Discussion

Although previous studies have shown that the Araguaia River is an important barrier to some small mammals (Rocha 2011; Rocha et al. 2011; Faria et al. 2013), we found no evidence of this riverine barrier on the two rodent species analyzed. Molecular phylogenies showed no geographic structure, and there are shared haplotypes across river banks and throughout the islands of the Araguaia River. This pattern of haplotype sharing indicates that these islands are important stepping stones facilitating gene flow between river banks.

Because the Araguaia River has not been acting as an effective abiotic barrier to gene flow among populations of O. aff. roberti and H. megacephalus, differences in genetic structure and diversity between these two species may be related to biotic factors, like their ecological traits. Differences in overall patterns of genetic diversity at a local scale can be explained by the combination of historical and ongoing processes of differentiation, but also by the ecological traits of each species (Patton et al. 1996). For example, Matocq et al. (2000) compared the genetic structure of two sympatric and ecologically distinct echimyid rodents, Proechimys steerei and P. simonsi, and found that the former, which inhabits the seasonally flooded forest, exhibits high gene flow, while the latter, which occupies upland, unflooded habitats, shows little or no evidence of ongoing gene flow among populations.

Hylaeamys megacephalus is a generalist species with high habitat tolerance (Percequillo et al. 2008), thus allowing higher gene flow among populations, even across long distances. The lack of correlation between genetic and geographic distances, even for samples that are very distant (e.g., sampling points 25 and 26), corroborates a scenario of gene flow instead of isolation by distance for this species. In addition, H. megacephalus is terrestrial, and we therefore expect population declines during the flooding season, followed by expansions in the dry season when more ground habitat is available. Although an erratic mismatch distribution may indicate a population in equilibrium, significant negative values in neutrality tests, such as shown by the cyt B data from H. megacephalus, as well as star-like genealogies showing very short and very long branch lengths, suggest population expansion (Ray et al. 2003). Maruyama and Fuerst (1985) also argue that population bottlenecks followed by rapid expansion increase the number of rare alleles in natural populations. Indeed, a higher number of rare haplotypes were recorded for H. megacephalus in the Araguaia River. Additionally, the maintenance of high haplotype diversity of populations that experience demographic declines during the seasonal floods is possible due to high reproductive potential of the species, allowing rapid expansion after the flooding, and to the intermixing of the surviving populations (Matocq et al. 2000).

In contrast, O. aff. roberti is more specialized, showing arboreal habits, and preference for flooded forests, thus influencing gene flow among distant populations and resulting in higher genetic differentiation. Although most FST values were not significant, this pattern is corroborated by a significant positive correlation between genetic and geographic distances, suggesting isolation by distance. Additionally, O. aff. roberti is less prone to be affected by the flooding regime in the Araguaia River because of its arboreal habits. Indeed, O. aff. roberti showed nonsignificant values for the neutrality tests and also an erratic mismatch distribution, which indicate stable rather than expanding populations.

When comparing several small mammal species within Araguaia River basin, we corroborate previous hypothesis by Moritz et al. (2000), which pointed out that upland forest specialists are more prone to exhibit riverine diversification than specialists of floodplain forests. Indeed, both H. megacephalus and O. aff. roberti are well distributed across flooded forests, while other sympatric small mammals, such as the mouse opossum Marmosa murina and the climbing rats Rhipidomys spp., are upland specialists (Patton et al. 2000; Rocha et al. 2011) genetically differentiated by the Araguaia River banks (see Rocha 2011; Rocha et al. 2011 and Faria et al. 2013).

Our initial genetic predictions based on ecological traits were largely supported by the results of both H. megacephalus and O. aff. roberti from the mid-Araguaia River. We showed that species with different ecological adaptations have different responses to physical and temporal events, and such events can leave fingerprints on the genetic diversity and differentiation patterns. Although the two rodent species co-occurring in flooded forests are not genetically structured by river bank, the fact that H. megacephalus is terrestrial and O. aff. roberti is arboreal made them more or less prone to local extinction due to the seasonal flooding regime of the Araguaia River. Additionally, differences in habitat tolerance are also important in differentiating populations from distant locations. Further comparative studies will help elucidate in which ways differences in ecological traits may influence the geographic distribution of genetic diversity. The combination of molecular and ecological studies is a powerful tool in understanding evolutionary processes that determine species diversification in the Neotropics.

Acknowledgments

We thank all field assistants who helped with logistics and fieldwork. We also thank staff from Parque Estadual do Cantão, Fazendas Santa Fé and Águas do Papagaio, Fazenda Lago Verde, Universidade Federal do Tocantins/Fundação de Apoio Científico e Tecnológico do Tocantins (UFT/FAPTO), Ecotropical (a partnership between Instituto Ecológica and Universidade de Aveiro), and NATURATINS, for logistic support. We thank Ana Valente who kindly helped us with the map of sampling localities. We also thank the Associate Editor and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments and suggestions that improved this manuscript. Samples were collected under federal permits (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade-CMBio, permits 200/2006 and 14307-1) and state permits (NATURATINS, permits: 019/2006 and 001/2008). This project was partially supported by two PhD grants from Fundação Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT, Program POPHQREN) to RGR (ref: SFRH/BD/24767/2005) and EF (ref: SFRH/BD/23191/2005), and by European Funds through COMPETE and by National Funds through FCT (PEst-C/MAR/LA0017/2013). RGR, YL, and LPC have research grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tenológico (CNPq, Brazil) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo (FAPES, Brazil).

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Supporting Information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article:

Figure S1. Bayesian inference tree of concatenated haplotypes of Hylaeamys megacephalus (A) and Oecomys aff. roberti (B).

Table S1. Pairwise FST values based on cyt B sequences (below diagonal) and d-loop sequences (above diagonal) of H. megacephalus. FST values in bold were significantly different from zero.

Table S2. Pairwise FST values based on cyt B sequences (below diagonal) and d-loop sequences (above diagonal) of O. aff. roberti. FST values in bold were significantly different from zero.

Data S1. Gazetteer List 26 collecting localities of Oecomys aff. roberti and Hylaeamys megacephalus, sorted by Brazilian states.

ece30004-4598-sd1.docx (375.4KB, docx)
ece30004-4598-sd2.tif (324KB, tif)

References

  1. Aleixo A. Historical diversification of a terra-firme forest bird superspecies: a phylogeographic perspective on the role of different hypotheses of Amazonian diversification. Evolution. 2004;58:1303–1317. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allendorf FW, Luikart G. Conservation and the genetics of populations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. p. 642. [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonelli A, Quijada-Mascarenas A, Crawford AJ, Bates JM, Velazco PM. Molecular studies and phylogeography of Amazonian tetrapods and their relation to geological and climatic models. In: Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, Wuster W, editors. Amazonia, landscape and species evolution: a look into the past. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 386–404. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999;16:37–48. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates JM, Haffer J, Grismer E. Avian mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence across a headwater stream of the Rio Tapajós, a major Amazonian river. J. Ornithol. 2004;145:199–205. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonvicino CR, Oliveira JA, D'Andrea PS. Guia dos roedores do Brasil com chaves para géneros baseadas em caracteres externos. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Pan-Americano de Febre Aftosa-OPAS/OMS; 2008. p. 120. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruford MW, Hanotte O, Brookfield JFY. Single-locus and DNA fingerprinting. In: Hoelzel AR, Burke T, editors. Molecular genetic analyses of populations. A pratical approach. Oxford: IRL Press; 1992. pp. 225–269. [Google Scholar]
  8. Douzery E, Randi E. The mitochondrial control region of Cervidae: evolutionary patterns and phylogenetic content. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1997;14:1154–1166. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dupanloup I, Schneider S, Excoffier L. A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol. Ecol. 2002;11:2571–2581. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01650.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Emmons LH, Feer F. Neotropical rainforest mammals. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1997. p. 396. [Google Scholar]
  11. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010;10:564–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Faria MB, de Oliveira JA, Bonvicino CR. Filogeografia de populações brasileiras de Marmosa (Marmosa) murina (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae) Rev. Bras. Biol. 2013;21:27–52. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997;147:915–925. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fumagalli L, Pope LC, Taberlet P, Moritz C. Versatile primers for the amplification of the mitochondrial DNA control region in marsupials. Mol. Ecol. 1997;6:1199–1201. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1997.00298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Harpending HC. Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. Hum. Biol. 1994;66:591–600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huchon D, Delsuc F, Catzeflis FM, Douzery EJP. Armadillos exhibit less genetic polymorphism in North America than in South America: nuclear and mitochondrial data confirm a founder effect in Dasypus novemcinctus (Xenarthra) Mol. Ecol. 1999;8:1743–1748. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. INMET. 2011. Normais climatológicas – dados de 1961 a 1991. Instituto Nacional de Metereologia, Brazil. Available via http://www.inmet.gov.br (Accessed on 14 March 2011)
  18. Jensen JL, A. J Bohonak, S. T Kelley. 2005. Isolation by distance, web service. BMC Genetics 6: 13. v.3.23. http://ibdws.sdsu.edu/
  19. Latrubesse EM. Patterns of anabranching channels: the ultimate end-member adjustment of mega rivers. Geomorphology. 2008;101:130–145. [Google Scholar]
  20. Latrubesse EM, Amsler ML, Morais RP, Aquino S. The geomorphologic response of a large pristine alluvial river to tremendous deforestation in the South American tropics: the case of the Araguaia River. Geomorphology. 2009;113:239–252. [Google Scholar]
  21. Leite R, Rogers D. Revisiting Amazonian phylogeography: insights into diversification hypotheses and novel perspectives. Org. Divers. Evol. 2013;13:639–664. doi: 10.1007/s13127-013-0140-8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451–1452. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Maruyama T, Fuerst PA. Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetic. II. Number of alleles in a small population that was formed by recent bottleneck. Genetics. 1985;111:675–689. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.3.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matocq MD, Patton JL, da Silva MNF. Population genetic structure of two ecologically distinct Amazonian spiny rats: separating history and current ecology. Evolution. 2000;54:1423–1432. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Moritz C, Patton JL, Schneider CJ, Smith TB. Diversification of Rainforest faunas: an integrated molecular approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000;31:533–563. [Google Scholar]
  26. Narson GC, Knighton AD. Anabranching rivers: their cause, character and classification. Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 1996;21:217–239. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nylander JAA. MrModeltest, version 2. Program distributed by the author. Sweden: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  28. Oliveira-Filho AT. Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the Cerrado biome. In: Oliveira PA, Marquis RJ, Ratter JA, editors. The Cerrados of Brazil, ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. New York: Columbia University Press; 2002. pp. 91–120. [Google Scholar]
  29. Patton JL, da Silva MNF, Malcolm JR. Hierarchical genetic structure and gene flow in three sympatric species of Amazonian rodents. Mol. Ecol. 1996;5:229–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Patton JL, da Silva MNF, Malcolm JR. Mammals of the Rio Juruá and the evolutionary and ecological diversification of Amazonia. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2000;244:1–306. [Google Scholar]
  31. Percequillo A, Patton JP, Pires-Costa L, D'Elia G, Patterson B. 2008. Hylaeamys megacephalus. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 15 May 2014.
  32. Ramos Pereira MJ, Rocha RG, Ferreira E, Fonseca C. Structure of small mammal assemblages across flooded and unflooded gallery forests of the Amazonia-Cerrado ecotone. Biotropica. 2013;45:489–496. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ramos-Onsins SE, Rozas J. Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002;19:2092–2100. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ray N, Currat M, Excoffier L. Intra-deme molecular diversity in spatially expanding populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003;20:76–86. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rocha RG. Evolutionary diversification in central Brazil: where Amazonia and Cerrado meet. 2011. p. 134. PhD Thesis. Universidade de Aveiro. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rocha RG, Ferreira E, Oliveira BMA, Martins ICM, Leite YLR, Costa LP, et al. Small mammals of the mid-Araguaia river in Central Brazil, with the description of a new species of climbing rat. Zootaxa. 2011;2789:1–34. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ronquist F, van der Mark P. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using MrBayes. In: Lemey P, Salemi M, Vandamme AM, Huelsenbeck JP, editors. The phylogenetic handbook: a practical approach to phylogenetic analysis and hypothesis testing. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. pp. 111–141. [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith MF, Patton JL. The diversification of South American murid rodents: evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequence data for the akodontine tribe. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1993;50:149–177. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123:585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Bayesian inference tree of concatenated haplotypes of Hylaeamys megacephalus (A) and Oecomys aff. roberti (B).

Table S1. Pairwise FST values based on cyt B sequences (below diagonal) and d-loop sequences (above diagonal) of H. megacephalus. FST values in bold were significantly different from zero.

Table S2. Pairwise FST values based on cyt B sequences (below diagonal) and d-loop sequences (above diagonal) of O. aff. roberti. FST values in bold were significantly different from zero.

Data S1. Gazetteer List 26 collecting localities of Oecomys aff. roberti and Hylaeamys megacephalus, sorted by Brazilian states.

ece30004-4598-sd1.docx (375.4KB, docx)
ece30004-4598-sd2.tif (324KB, tif)

Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES