Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1976 Jun;73(6):2086–2090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.2086

Rates of evolution in seed plants: Net increase in diversity of chromosome numbers and species numbers through time

D A Levin *, A C Wilson
PMCID: PMC430454  PMID: 16592327

Abstract

An approach was made to the problem of estimating rates of chromosomal evolution in plants. This was done by considering variability in chromosome number within genera whose ages are known approximately from fossil and biogeographic evidence. The relative increases in chromosome number diversity per lineage per unit time were as follows: herbaceous angiosperms, 100; woody angiosperms, 14; conifers, 2; and cycads, 0. Rates of increase in species diversity were estimated in an analogous way. These rates were strongly correlated with the karyotypic rates.

These evolutionary rate differences between major groups of seed plants are largely explicable in terms of the breeding structures of populations. Herbs usually have small to moderate effective population sizes, and relatively high dispersability. By contrast, woody angiosperms and gymnosperms are usually obligate outbreeders with large effective population sizes and low dispersability. Thus the probability of fixing and dispersing new karyotypes or novel character ensembles is higher in herbs than in other seed plants.

Keywords: polyploidy, aneuploidy, population structure, speciation, fossil record

Full text

PDF
2087

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. GRANT V. The regulation of recombination in plants. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1958;23:337–363. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1958.023.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lewis H. Speciation in flowering plants. Science. 1966 Apr 8;152(3719):167–172. doi: 10.1126/science.152.3719.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. STEBBINS G. L. The inviability, weakness, and sterility of interspecific hybrids. Adv Genet. 1958;9:147–215. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60162-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stanley S. M. A theory of evolution above the species level. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Feb;72(2):646–650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.2.646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wilson A. C., Bush G. L., Case S. M., King M. C. Social structuring of mammalian populations and rate of chromosomal evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Dec;72(12):5061–5065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.12.5061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilson A. C., Sarich V. M., Maxson L. R. The importance of gene rearrangement in evolution: evidence from studies on rates of chromosomal, protein, and anatomical evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Aug;71(8):3028–3030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.8.3028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wright S. Isolation by Distance. Genetics. 1943 Mar;28(2):114–138. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.2.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES