Abstract
Precise frequency discrimination is a hallmark of auditory function in birds and mammals and is required for distinguishing similar sounding words, like ‘bat,’ ‘cat’ and ‘hat.’ In the cochlea, tuning and spectral separation result from longitudinal differences in basilar membrane stiffness and numerous individual gradations in sensory hair cell phenotypes, but it is unknown what patterns the phenotypes. Here we used RNA-seq to compare transcriptomes from proximal, middle and distal regions of the embryonic chicken cochlea, and found opposing longitudinal gradients of expression for retinoic acid (RA)-synthesizing and degrading enzymes. In vitro experiments showed that RA is necessary and sufficient to induce the development of distal-like hair cell phenotypes and promotes expression of the actin-crosslinking proteins, Espin and Fscn2. These and other findings highlight a role for RA signalling in patterning the development of a longitudinal gradient of frequency-tuned hair cell phenotypes in the cochlea.
In the elongated cochleae of reptiles, birds and mammals, sound stimulation causes peaks of vibration at different longitudinal positions extending from the high-frequency-sensitive proximal (tympanic) end to the low-frequency-sensitive distal end1. In reptiles and birds, auditory tuning stems in large measure from the electrical resonance properties of hair cells (HCs), which differ with the expression and response kinetics of large-conductance Ca2+-activated BK channels that vary along the cochlea’s length2–6. HCs in these cochleae also exhibit striking differences in the number and length of actin-filled stereocilia that make up their apical mechanoreceptive hair bundles. In the auditory sensory epithelium of the chicken basilar papilla (BP), hair bundles at the proximal, high-frequency-sensitive end contain >250 stereocilia that reach a maximum length of 1.5 mm, while those in the distal, low-frequency-sensitive end contain <50 stereocilia with a maximum length of 5.5 mm (Fig. 1a – c)7,8. At locations between those ends, the number and length of the tallest stereocilia vary progressively along the tonotopic axis. Similar spatial gradients occur in the mammalian cochlea9,10.
The tonotopic (longitudinally frequency-tuned) gradients in HC phenotypes form even in cochleae derived from otocysts that have been denervated after 3 days of incubation (E3)11,12. Yet, the signals that pattern the phenotypes are unknown. Hypothesizing that morphogen levels might differ as the gradient of phenotypes developed, we sequenced the transcriptomes of the proximal, middle and distal thirds of the chicken cochlea at E6.5, when post-mitotic HCs first form13. Of >1,000 differentially expressed genes, one involved in the synthesis of RA (Raldh3) and one involved in its degradation (Cyp26c1) displayed opposing longitudinal gradients of expression. In the developing retina and hindbrain, morphogenetic gradients of RA are established and confined between regions of high Raldh and Cyp26 expression14,15, and such gradients play crucial roles in patterning the anterior–posterior axis of the early embryo, the spinal cord and the early otocyst (E2–E3)15–18.
To investigate whether RA plays a role in patterning the gradient of HC phenotypes, we developed an in vitro model that supports cochlear development, free from potentially confounding influences of most neighbouring tissues. Using that model, we found that proximal HCs acquired distal-like phenotypes when they differentiated in the presence of exogenous RA, and distal HCs developed proximal-like phenotypes when they differentiated in the presence of RA antagonists. These, and other findings, show that RA signalling is both necessary and sufficient for the specification of important features of distal-like HC phenotypes.
Results
RNA-seq analysis
We isolated mRNA from proximal, middle and distal sections of E6.5 BPs for Illumina sequence analysis aimed at identifying gradients of gene expression along the tonotopic axis. The data sets for all three regions comprise >10,000 detectably expressed genes and are available in Supplementary Data 1. Raw sequences have been submitted to NCBI GEO (accession number GSE56888). In addition to the developing BP, the avian cochlear duct also houses the lagena, an otolithic organ, which we were not able to distinguish or separate from the BP at E6.5. Therefore, the sequencing results from the distal E6.5 BP may contain lagena-expressed genes.
To identify transcripts that might reveal gradients of morphogen expression, we applied three filters. First, we selected only genes that exhibited ≥2-fold change between the proximal and distal regions. We then eliminated genes that failed to pass a ≥0.5 RPKM (reads per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped; ref. 19) abundance threshold in either region, and we removed genes that exhibited peaks or valleys of expression in the middle of the BP. The resulting data set includes 1,254 genes that exhibit gradients of transcript abundance between the two ends of the BP. These are listed in Supplementary Data 2, along with their abundance profiles and some functional annotations. Interestingly, this list is heavily biased towards genes that show much higher transcript abundance in the proximal BP (1,104 genes) than in the distal BP (150 genes). Among these results are genes in seven signalling pathways that play a role in inner ear development: Retinoic acid (RA), Hedgehog, FGF, Wnt, Notch, TGF-β and IGF signalling.
Our RNA-seq results suggested the presence of a source and sink for RA at opposing ends of the BP at E6.5, as indicated by the high expression of Raldh3 in the proximal BP and the high expression of Cyp26c1 in the distal BP (Table 1). Retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 3, Raldh3 (also Aldh1a3), is one of three dehydrogenases that catalyse retinaldehyde oxidation to produce RA, and is required for patterning the retina20. Cyp26c1 is one of three cytochrome p450 (Cyp26) enzymes that regulate RA signalling by catalysing RA degradation14. The RNA-seq results also show that RARα and RXRγ, which encode two retinoid receptors, and Crabp1, which encodes the cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 1, are expressed at levels that are respectively 2.2-fold, 3.1-fold and 5-fold higher proximally than distally. Although Crabp1 function is not completely resolved, evidence suggests it may have a role in binding and sequestering RA in the cytoplasm21.
Table 1.
Gene symbol |
Normalized reads in proximal BP |
Normalized reads in middle BP |
Normalized reads in distal BP |
Log2 (distal/ proximal) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Raldh2 | 1,274 | 962 | 447 | − 1.51 |
Raldh3 | 11,619 | 741 | 725 | −4.00 |
Cyp26a1 | 130.5 | 24.5 | 50 | −1.38 |
Cyp26b1 | 980.5 | 1,041.5 | 286 | − 1.78 |
Cyp26c1 | 159 | 562.9 | 1,880.5 | 3.56 |
Expression levels (normalized reads) and differential expression level comparisons between the distal and proximal cochlea are depicted. Sequencing results from the distal end of the BP also include genes that may be expressed in the developing lagena macula (LM), an otolithic organ. Genes with Log2>1 expression level differences are more significantly expressed in the distal cochlea (Log2< − 1 significant in proximal). Raldh3 encodes an enzyme that synthesizes RA; Cyp26c1 encodes for an enzyme that is involved in the breakdown of RA.
Additional evidence for the involvement of RA was provided by network analysis, through which we identified 112 transcription-factor-encoding genes that are expressed in gradients along the BP (Supplementary Data 3). The data in Supplementary Data 2 were uploaded to g:Profiler and analysed by gene group functional profiling22, which showed literature-supported interactions among 75 genes that are differentially expressed along the BP, including RARα and RXRγ and 21 additional transcription factor genes (Supplementary Fig. 1). Among these are RA-responsive genes, such as Hoxd4, and the nuclear hormone receptor genes for Thyroid Hormone Receptor β (THRB) and the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR). Network analysis also identified the Androgen Receptor (AR), which is known to have inhibitory interactions with RXR family members23. In the BP, AR is expressed in a distally high gradient, opposite to the gradient of RXRγ expression. Supplementary Data 2 was also analysed with the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) Upstream Regulator analytic to search out candidate upstream transcriptional regulators that might be involved in establishing gene expression differences between the proximal and distal parts of the BP. All-trans retinoic acid (aka tretinoin) was the most significant candidate detected (by absolute activation z score, Supplementary Table 1), further implicating RA as a candidate patterning signal.
The gradients of RA pathway genes reverse as the BP develops
To validate the RNA-seq results and determine whether expression levels change between E6.5 and P14, we isolated samples from the proximal and distal ends of BPs over the course of development and performed qRT–PCR (Fig. 1d,e). The PCR results confirmed the presence of reciprocal Raldh3 and Cyp26c1 expression gradients at E6.5 consistent with higher levels of RA at the proximal end of the BP. However, analysis at later developmental time points revealed marked changes in expression. Raldh3 expression increased dramatically in the distal BP at E8, and continued to increase through P14. At the same time points expression in the proximal BP decreased such that by E10 the gradient of Raldh3 had reversed and was higher at the distal end. At the same time points Cyp26c1 expression declined to barely detectable levels (Fig. 1d,e).
To confirm the qPCR data, we performed western blots for Raldh3 protein levels in tissue isolated from distal and proximal regions of the BP at E6.5, E10 and E18. Results indicated that Raldh3 protein is expressed at 4.43-fold greater levels in proximal versus distal BP at E6.5 (Fig. 1f). But by E10 proximal and distal samples appear equivalent. Finally, at E18 Raldh3 is expressed at 3.87-fold greater levels in the distal BP. These data are consistent with the qPCR data and confirm a marked switch in expression of Raldh3 between E6.5 and E10.
To determine which cells within the BP express Raldh3, immunohistochemistry was performed on whole-mount BPs. At E8, Raldh3 was strongly expressed in presumptive supporting cells (SCs), while HCs were negative (Fig. 2). At E10, however, Raldh3 appeared to be expressed in both SCs and HCs. In addition, consistent with the qPCR and western results, the overall level of Raldh3 appeared higher in the distal region of the BP. By E18, Raldh3 was expressed predominately in HCs in both the proximal and distal ends of the BP. We hypothesize that the reversal of the longitudinal gradient of Raldh3 mRNA expression that occurs between E6.5 and E10 is linked to the change from expression of Raldh3 protein in SCs to expression that is predominantly in HCs.
The longitudinal gradient in the number of stereocilia per HC becomes evident by E10.5 and the developing gradient in the height of the hair bundles becomes evident by E12 (refs 24–27). Consistent with the possibility that high distal RA promotes distal-like hair bundle phenotypes, the reversal of the Raldh3 expression gradient shown in the qRT–PCR and western blot data occurs during the stages when the longitudinal gradients of HC phenotypes first become evident. To confirm that expression levels of Raldh3 correspond with actual levels of RA, we dissected E10 BPs, then separately cultured their proximal and distal halves on RA reporter cells28,29. E10 retina and media that contained either 5 nM or 100nM RA were used as positive controls. Few reporter cells in the vicinity of the proximal halves were positive for the blue LacZ signal, but many were positive in the vicinity of the distal halves (Fig. 3). These results demonstrate that by E10, the levels of Raldh3 mRNA, Raldh3 protein and soluble RA are higher in the distal BP than in the proximal BP.
The cellular effects of RA are mediated through members of the RAR and RXR nuclear receptor families, which form functional heterodimers18. Our sequencing results from the E6.5 BP showed significant expression of two RARs, RARα and RARβ, but only one of the RXR nuclear receptors, RXRγ. Like the RNA-seq analysis, qRT–PCR showed that RXRγ is expressed in a proximal-high gradient at E6.5, but the RXRγ expression gradient reverses and becomes a distal-high gradient at E8 and E10, contemporaneous with the reversal of the Raldh3 expression gradient (Fig. 4a). Throughout the stages of development that we assessed, the potential RXRγ dimerization partners, RARα and RARβ, were expressed at essentially equivalent levels in both ends of the BP (Fig. 4c).
HCs in the developing mouse cochlea are known to express RA receptors and are responsive to RA signals30. In the BPs of E18 chickens, immunolabelling with an antibody against RXRγ clearly labelled HCs, while a negative control antibody (to Red Fluorescent Protein) produced no labelling (Fig. 4b,d). Since our results show that HCs express the RA-synthesizing enzyme, Raldh3, and the nuclear receptor, RXRγ, RA may have autocrine signalling effects in these sensory cells. The release of soluble RA that was detected by reporter cells growing in the vicinity of cultured BP tissues (Fig. 3) is also consistent with RA-mediated paracrine signalling. Thus, autocrine or paracrine signalling may both potentially play roles during BP development, perhaps at different stages.
RA signalling induces distal-like HC phenotype formation
To determine whether the distally high RA gradient influences the patterning of HC phenotypes along the tonotopic axis, we cultured E6.5 BPs for 7 days, which allowed the HCs to progress through differentiation of their location-specific phenotypes. Experimental cultures were maintained in medium supplemented with 500nM all-trans-retinoic acid (hereafter RA) and control cultures were maintained in medium containing vehicle alone. We then fixed the cultures and assessed the phenotypic characteristics of the HCs that developed near the proximal and distal ends. The resulting quantified HC phenotypes and number of BPs analysed for each experimental treatment (control, RA or the RA antagonist citral) are shown in Table 2. In the control cultures, proximal HCs developed more stereocilia than distal HCs, paralleling the gradient that forms in ovo (Fig. 5c). BPs cultured with RA also developed a gradient of stereocilia number, but with fewer stereocilia per cell. HCs in the proximal end of RA-treated BPs developed 68.6% of the number of stereocilia that formed in proximal HCs of control cultures, while distal HCs formed 53.5% of the number in the distal HCs of controls (Fig. 5c; P<0.05 for each, nBPs = 6; except when indicated, P-values were from one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Newman–Keuls post-test).
Table 2.
Control |
RA |
Citral |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proximal | Distal | Proximal | Distal | Proximal | Distal | |
Stereocilia number (mean±s.e.m.) | 79.3 ±5.6 | 48.6 ±3.2 | 54.4 ±3.1 | 26.0 ±1.8 | 104.6 ± 10.1 | 56.9 ±3.2 |
nBPs = 8 | nBPs = 8 | nBPs = 6 | nBPs = 6 | nBPs = 8 | nBPs = 8 | |
nHCS = 96 | nHCS = 65 | nHCS = 54 | nHCS = 53 | nHCS = 68 | nHCS = 76 | |
Hair bundle height (µm) | 2.14 ±0.23 | 3.03 ±0.13 | 3.48 ±0.17 | 2.79 ±0.23 | 1.42 ±0.12 | 1.80 ±0.21 |
nBPs = 8 | nBPs = 8 | nBPs = 9 | nBPs = 9 | nBPs = 6 | nBPs = 6 | |
nHCS = 169 | nHCS = 282 | nHCS = 218 | nHCS = 181 | nHCS = 156 | nHCS = 114 | |
Luminal surface area (µm2) | 28.4 ±2.44 | 11.17 ±0.85 | 14.82 ±1.48 | 9.15 ±0.72 | 33.07 ±3.37 | 13.74 ±0.94 |
nBPs = 15 | nBPs = 15 | nBPs = 20 | nBPs = 20 | nBPs = 12 | nBPs = 12 | |
nHCS = 242 | nHCS = 228 | nHCS = 359 | nHCS = 322 | nHCS = 189 | nHCS = 197 |
Quantitative analyses of the hair cell phenotypes that formed in proximal and distal regions of E6.5 BPs treated with control media or media supplemented with RA or citral. Values shown are mean±s.e.m.
Next we investigated whether exogenous RA affected the size of the luminal surfaces of the HCs. In control cultures, proximal HCs formed larger luminal surfaces than distal HCs (Fig. 6i). In contrast, proximal HCs in BPs that were cultured with added RA developed luminal surfaces that reached just 52.2% of the size formed in control (P<0.05, nBPs = 20). All of these results are consistent with a role for the E8–E10 distal-to-proximal gradient of RA in the specification of location-specific HC phenotypes along the BP.
Finally, we used confocal micrographs and 3D images produced using Imaris software (Bitplane) to make preliminary measurements of hair bundle heights in BPs cultured under different conditions. In control cultures, proximal HCs formed shorter hair bundles than distal HCs (Fig. 6j). In contrast, proximal HCs in BPs that were cultured with added RA developed hair bundles that were 62.6% longer than those of proximal HCs in the controls (P<0.05, nBPs = 9). Surprisingly, the direction of the longitudinal gradient of hair bundle heights reversed in BPs that were cultured with exogenous RA. Proximal HCs developed significantly longer hair bundles than distal HCs in RA-treated BPs (P<0.05, Student’s t-test). Taken together, these results indicate that RA signalling is sufficient to induce distal-like HC phenotypes, even in the proximal BP.
Since z axis resolution is severely limited in light microscopy, we used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as an independent, higher-resolution method for measuring hair bundle heights. For this, we sampled different locations along the length of BPs that were fixed and processed for SEM after culturing for 7 days in media containing 500 nM RA or vehicle alone. Although fixation and processing for SEM lead to significant shrinkage errors over measurements in unfixed hydrated tissue31, SEM provides high-resolution measurements for assessing relative bundle height differences along the BP’s length. At each location sampled we captured SEM images in stereo pairs and then measured hair bundle heights using a double-blind approach. Calculations from this unbiased and higher-resolution measurement method showed that proximal HCs in the RA-treated BPs grew hair bundles that were more than two times the height (128% higher) than those in control BP cultures (P<0.05, nBPs = 4, Fig. 7b). Thus, low-resolution 3D confocal imaging and higher-resolution stereoimaging measurements from SEM were consistent and supported the same conclusions.
To determine whether RA signalling is necessary for the formation of distal-like HC phenotypes, we cultured E6.5 BPs for 7 days in medium containing 5 µM citral, a competitive inhibitor of Raldhs that has been used to block RA synthesis in multiple systems, including the mouse cochlea and retina30,32–35. HCs that developed in the citral-treated BPs formed bundles with significantly more stereocilia regardless of whether they were located in the distal or proximal region of the BP (P<0.05 for each, nBPs = 8, Fig. 5c). However when presented as a percentage change, the effect was more pronounced in the proximal region where the increase in stereocilia was 31.9% over control as compared with an increase of 17.1% over control in the distal region. Distal HCs that differentiated in the presence of citral developed luminal surface that were 23% larger than their counterparts in controls (P<0.05, nBPs = 12, Fig. 6i). The higher-resolution measurements of hair bundle heights that we made using SEM stereoimaging showed that distal HCs in citral-treated BPs developed hair bundles that averaged just 62.7% of the mean height of bundles in the distal half of the control cultures (P<0.05, nBPs = 4, Fig. 7).
As an additional means of examining cellular responses to RA signalling, we cultured E6.5 BPs in medium containing 10 µM BMS 493, which antagonizes RA signalling by strongly enhancing nuclear corepressor binding to RARs36. In BMS 493-treated cultures, distal HCs formed luminal surfaces that were 43% larger (P<0.05, nBPs = 6, Fig. 6i) and hair bundles that were 71.3% of the mean hair bundle height that developed in distal HCs of controls (P<0.05, nBPs =6, Fig. 6j).
To rule out the possibility that the exogenous RA might have prevented differentiation of HCs at the proximal end of the cultured BPs or that the citral treatments might have prevented differentiation of HCs at the distal end, we immunostained BPs with the HCS-1 antibody and Alexa Fluor 488-phalloidin, then used ImageJ (NIH) to count hair bundles and HCS-1+ HC somata that differentiated under those conditions. The counts showed that BPs cultured in control medium developed 8,478±196 HCs (mean±s.e.m.; nBPs = 3), while BPs cultured with 500nM RA developed 8,390±128 HCs (nBPs = 3) and those cultured with citral developed 8,511±326 HCs (nBPs = 3). Since the BPs that developed in control medium and media containing RA or citral all formed 80–85% of the ~10,500 HCs that develop in ovo37, it is unlikely that the effects of the RA and citral treatments result from suppression of HC differentiation. Thus, RA signalling appears to be necessary to induce the formation of distal-like HC phenotypes.
Evidence of a role for RA in patterning electrical tuning
Electrical tuning in reptile and avian HCs is dependent on differences in the gating kinetics of calcium-activated, large-conductance potassium (BK) channels2–5,38. BK channels consist of a pore-forming α subunit, encoded by Kcnma1, and auxillary β1 subunits, encoded by Kcnmb1. β1 is preferentially expressed in the low-frequency-tuned distal HCs, and appears to slow BK channel kinetics38–41. Chicken cochlear HCs express Kcnma1 as early as E11 (ref. 40) and exhibit functional Ca2+-activated K+ channels by E16–E18 (ref. 41).
Since expression of these channels is fundamental to HC frequency responses, we tested whether RA signalling would influence the development of the gradient of Kcnmb1 mRNA by establishing cultures of BPs at two stages before the onset of Kcnma1 expression. For these experiments, we placed E6.5 and E10 BPs in culture with 500nM RA or control media for 3 days, then divided each into proximal and distal halves. We pooled samples from six BPs from each group, and measured Kcnmb1 mRNA levels using qRT–PCR. In the proximal halves of RA-treated BPs, Kcnmb1 expression was 7.9-fold higher and 17.5-fold higher than in controls at E6.5 + 3DIV and E10+3 DIV, respectively (E6.5 + 3DIV: P = 0.0402, Student’s t-test, n = 6; E10+3DIV: P = 0.0103, Student’s t-test, n = 3). In the distal halves of RA-treated BPs, Kcnmb1 expression was 4.8-fold higher than in controls at E6.5 + 3DIV (P = 0.0302, Student’s t-test, n = 7), but it was not significantly different between RA and control cultures in the E10 +3DIV samples (P = 0.1820, Student’s t-test, n = 3). Consistent with expectations, in the proximal half of the BP, where HCs exhibit faster BK channel kinetics and less expression of Kcnmb1 in ovo5,6,39, the RA treatments produced greater upregulation of Kcnmb1 expression (relative to controls). While in the distal half of the BP, RA treatments yielded modest, but significant increase in Kcnmb1 expression early in development (E6.5 + 3DIV), but did not change Kcnmb1 expression at the later time point (E10+3DIV), when RA levels are high distally (Fig. 3).
Local application of RA induces distal-like phenotypes
To determine whether a local source of exogenous RA would cause proximal HCs to develop distal-like properties, we soaked 80–100 µm ion-exchange beads (AGIX-8, Bio-Rad) in RA or vehicle alone and implanted a single bead in the proximal end of E6.5 BPs before culturing them for 6 days. HCs that differentiated within 100 µm of the RA-soaked beads developed smaller luminal surfaces (P = 0.0013, Student’s t-test, n = 6, Supplementary Fig. 2d) and longer hair bundles (P = 0.0015, Student’s t-test, n = 6, Supplementary Fig. 2e) than HCs that developed in similar locations adjacent to DMSO-soaked beads that were implanted in the controls.
RA upregulates the expression of two actin crosslinkers
The results presented above demonstrated a role for RA in the specification of stereocilia bundle length and number. To explore the potential mechanism of this regulation, expression of Espin, Fascin-2 (Fscn2), Fimbrin (Pls1) and T-plastin (Pls3), cross-linking proteins that regulate the elongation of the actin-filled stereocilia42–47 was examined by qPCR following RA treatment for 3 days beginning on E6.5. Control and the RA-treated BPs showed no differences in Pls1 or Pls3 expression (Supplementary Fig. 3), but mRNA levels for Espin increased 1.9-fold proximally and 2.3-fold distally in RA-treated versus control BPs. Likewise, Fscn2 expression increased 3-fold and 2.8-fold in proximal and distal halves, respectively (Fig. 8a,b). Since it is well established that Espin levels regulate stereocilia length44,48, we cultured BPs in RA or vehicle control media for 24 h to investigate whether brief treatments would influence its expression. This resulted in a pronounced 19.2-fold upregulation of Espin proximally and a 4.8-fold upregulation distally, compared with controls (P<0.05 for each, Student’s t-test, n = 6). The greater apparent increase in RA-induced Espin expression at the proximal end of the BP likely stems in part from the relatively low Espin expression that occurs at that location in controls, and is consistent with longitudinal differences in Espin expression onset in ovo, where distal expression precedes proximal expression by 2–3 days49.
Ultrastructural observations have shown that differences in the onset times and the durations of phases of stereocilia elongation underlie the length gradations that develop within and among the hair bundles in the chicken BP25. To test whether increasing the duration of the exposure to exogenous RA would stimulate precocious elongation in proximal hair bundles, we cultured four pairs of BPs from E6.5 chicken embryos for 4 days. The BP from the right ear of each pair was cultured in RA medium and the BP from the left was cultured in control medium. When we fixed and immunolabelled the BPs for Espin, we observed that the proximal hair bundles in the control cultures were circular in outline and exhibited limited Espin expression. After 4 days in culture with exogenous RA, proximal cells in the BPs from the right ears of the same embryos developed taller, semicircular hair bundles and more pronounced Espin immunofluorescence (Fig. 8c – e). In ovo, E10.5 BPs have hair bundles that are circular in outline and contain uniformly short stereocilia37. The bundles will begin to elongate and express Espin as they progress from circular to rectangular outlines between E10–E12 (refs 27,49). Since the bundles in the proximal halves of the RA-treated BPs exhibit characteristics that normally do not develop in ovo until E12 (ref. 8), these findings raise the possibility that the 4-day exposure to exogenous RA stimulated precocious development of the hair bundles.
Interactions between RA and Bmp7 signalling pathways
A distal-to-proximal gradient of bone morphogenetic protein 7 (Bmp7) occurs in BPs from E6.5 through post-hatch ages50. In other systems, RA can act as either an inhibitor or an activator of Bmp7 expression51,52, so we investigated whether RA signalling would influence the Bmp7 gradient. For this, we cultured groups of six E6.5 BPs in media that contained 500nM RA, 5 µM citral or vehicle alone for 24 h and used qRT–PCR to assess Bmp7 mRNA levels in the proximal and distal halves. Bmp7 mRNA levels in proximal and distal regions of citral-treated BPs and the levels in the distal regions of RA-treated BPs did not show clear differences from controls. However, levels of Bmp7 mRNA in the proximal half of RA-treated BPs decreased to 59.9% of the levels measured in controls, suggesting that RA suppressed Bmp7 expression (n = 10, Supplementary Fig. 4a). To determine whether Bmp7 would have a reciprocal inhibitory effect on RA signalling, we cultured groups of six E6.5 BPs in media containing either 400 ng ml−1 Bmp7, 100 ng ml−1 noggin, a potent antagonist of Bmp and TGF-β, or vehicle alone and assessed Raldh3 mRNA. We did not detect differences in Raldh3 expression levels between the proximal and distal halves of the Bmp7-treated BPs or between the distal halves of noggin-treated BPs and distal halves of controls, but the noggin treatment increased Raldh3 mRNA 2.26-fold in the proximal end (n = 4, Supplementary Fig. 4b), suggesting that Bmp signalling may normally inhibit proximal Raldh3 expression at E6.5. Taken together with our RA treatment results, these data are consistent with the possibility that the longitudinal counter gradients of Bmp7 and Raldh3 expression are maintained at E6.5 through reciprocal inhibitory feedback.
Since the Raldh3 expression gradient reverses between E6.5 and E10 and becomes a distal-to-proximal gradient, like the gradient of Bmp7 expression, we next tested for positive interactions of these signalling pathways at E10. For this, we cultured groups of six E10 BPs in media containing 500nM RA, 5 µM citral or vehicle alone for 24 h and measured Bmp7 expression. There were no detectable differences in Bmp7 expression in either region of the citral-treated BPs or in the distal region of RA-treated BPs, but Bmp7 expression increased 2.96-fold in the proximal end of RA-treated BPs (n = 5, Supplementary Fig. 4c). While there may be a trend towards elevated Bmp7 in the distal halves of RA-treated BPs, the sampled data values were not significantly different (P>05; ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post-test, n = 5). We then measured Raldh3 expression in E10 BPs cultured with 400 ng ml−1 Bmp7, 100 ng ml−1 noggin, or vehicle alone for 24 h. Similar to the effects of noggin at E6.5, Raldh3 mRNA increased 2.41-fold in the distal end of noggin-treated BPs. In contrast to the E6.5 BPs where Raldh3 levels were suppressed by Bmp signalling, in the E10 BPs Raldh3 expression increased 2.29-fold and 4.06-fold in the proximal and distal ends with the Bmp7 treatments (n = 7, Supplementary Fig. 4d). In E10 BPs, the increase in Bmp7 expression after RA treatments and increased Raldh3 expression after Bmp7 treatments suggest these signalling pathways may positively reinforce their distal-to-proximal gradients at the stage when HC phenotypes differentiate.
Discussion
Despite the importance of tonotopic organization within auditory sensory epithelia for speech comprehension and communication, our understanding of how the phenotypic characteristics of HCs are organized at different positions along these epithelia is rudimentary. In this study RNA-seq analysis identified signalling pathways that are expressed in patterns consistent with a role in regulation of the developmental acquisition of HC phenotypes in the chicken BP. We chose to focus on RA signalling because the RNA-seq data suggested the existence of a gradient of RA along the tonotopic axis. Also, RA is known to play roles in patterning other embryonic tissues18,53, including the early embryonic otocyst that will eventually form the inner ear16,29,30.
While our initial RNA-seq data suggested a proximal-to-distal decreasing gradient of RA at E6.5, subsequent experiments demonstrated that this gradient rapidly switches to a distal-to-proximal decreasing gradient. Moreover, the results of functional experiments indicated that the distal-to-proximal gradient seems to be the relevant gradient in terms of patterning HC phenotypes along the tonotopic axis. The significance of the proximal-to-distal Raldh3 expression gradient evident in both the RNA-seq and qPCR data at E6.5 is unclear. As our results show (Supplementary Fig. 4), RA can inhibit Bmp7 signalling, so the proximally high Raldh3 expression at E6.5 may underlie RA-mediated enforcement of a distal-to-proximal gradient of Bmp7 that has been shown to exist within the BP between E6 and E8 (ref. 50).
It is intriguing that the gradient of Raldh3 mRNA (Fig. 1) reverses after E6.5 and becomes an increasingly strong distal-to-proximal gradient as HCs within the BP begin to develop location-specific phenotypes. Since HCs are the primary source of Raldh3 at E10, we hypothesize that local differences in the numbers and spatial densities of HCs may underlie the reversal. As the BP develops, its proximal end becomes narrower while the distal end becomes broad and rounded (Fig. 1b). This results in a marked difference in the number of HCs at each end of the BP. A transverse section through the distal end of the BP contains as many as 46 HCs, but a similar section through the much narrower proximal end contains far fewer HCs54.
Exposure to exogenous RA caused HCs in the proximal part of the BP to develop fewer and taller stereocilia, smaller luminal surfaces and higher levels of expression of the β subunit of the BK channel These results are consistent with increased RA signalling promoting the development of a distal-like HC phenotype. Moreover, the positive effects of RA on the expression of Espin and Fscn2, factors encoding proteins that crosslink actin filaments and are known to be expressed in developing stereocilia at levels that correlate with their eventual length47,55, suggest a potential mechanism whereby RA signalling could directly regulate the patterning of bundle morphology. Consistent with this hypothesis, studies in other systems have demonstrated that RA can induce RAR binding at Espin’s transcriptional start site, and a consensus retinoic acid response element (RARE) has been identified within the Fscn2 promoter56,57. Finally, while stereocilia on proximal HCs cease elongating by E12 in ovo, those on distal HCs continue to elongate for the first 2 weeks post hatching25,37. Raldh3 may have a role in this extended distal stereocilia elongation since it continues to be highly expressed in the distal region of the BP through P14 (Fig. 1d).
It has been proposed that each HC may use the same amount of F-actin when forming a hair bundle, because proximal HC bundles in the BP contain large numbers of short stereocilia, while distal HC bundles contain low numbers of much longer stereocilia58. If this proposal is correct, then the hair bundle phenotypes observed at different longitudinal positions along the BP might result from the utilization of a fixed cellular pool of actin that is controlled by oppositely directed signals to regulate stereocilia elongation versus number in each HC. As a result of stimulating HCs to form longer stereocilia, RA signalling, by extension, may subsequently limit the number of stereocilia that can be formed on an individual HC.
The results in this and the accompanying article (Mann et al.50) suggest a model in which gradients of Bmp7 and RA each play roles in patterning the development of a longitudinally ordered sequence of HC phenotypes along the chicken BP. At E6.5, a distal-to-proximal gradient of Bmp7 appears to specify overall positional identity. The role of the proximal-to-distal counter gradient of Raldh3 mRNA expression at E6.5 is unclear, but the early Raldh3 gradient could lead to suppression of Bmp7 transcription proximally, which would reinforce the distal-to-proximal gradient of Bmp7 protein. At E10, the expression of Bmp7 has decreased throughout the BP, and a distal-to-proximal gradient of Raldh3 becomes evident and strengthens through at least P14. In fact, levels of soluble RA appear to be higher distally than proximally at E10, which would be consistent with a role for RA in controlling differentiation of location-specific aspects of HC phenotypes, such as luminal surface size, bundle height, stereocilia number and some aspects of HC physiology. RA appears to regulate the stereocilia growth, in part, by upregulating the transcription of Espin and Fscn2.
Methods
Embryonic basilar papilla dissection
White Leghorn chicken embryos (Spafas) were incubated at 38–39 °C in a humidified chamber with turning. Embryos were removed from the shell, transferred to DMEM/F-12 at 4°C under sterile conditions, staged according to Hamburger and Hamilton59, and then decapitated. Throughout the text, the embryonic age at the time of dissection is given (that is, E6.5, E8, E10 and E13), but experiments with E6.5 embryos were carried out only using embryos at stage 29, E8 at stage 34, E10 at stage 36 and E13.5 at stage 39.
All subsequent dissections and harvesting were performed under aseptic conditions while the tissue was held at 4 °C on the dissection microscope. A transverse cut posterior to the midbrain and eyes was made to bisect the head, leaving the inner ears in the posterior portion. The skin, dorsal cranium and brain were removed to allow visualization of the cochlear ducts that lie in the base of the skull, projecting ventromedially. The mandible was removed and the cochlear ducts were dissected from a ventral approach using fine forceps. Connective tissues were teased away with fine forceps and the proximal attachment to the remainder of the labyrinth was cut off using a sapphire knife. The cochlear and lagena nerve branches were trimmed off using a sapphire knife and fine forceps.
Organ culture
Explants were cultured nerve-side-down on nucleopore filters atop stainless steel grids (Small Parts Inc., Seattle, WA, USA) in 35-mm dishes with 1 ml DMEM/F-12 containing 1% FBS, 0.25 µgml−1 Fungizone (Invitrogen) and 10 µgml−1 Ciprofloxacin (Bayer, Berlin, Germany). Either complete medium changes were made every 2 days or half the medium was changed every 24 h. Explants were cultured with 500 nM all-trans retinoic acid (Sigma), 5 − µM citral (Sigma), 10 −µM BMS 493 (Tocris Bioscience), 400 ng ml−1 Bmp7 (R&D Systems), 100 ng ml−1 Noggin (R&D Systems) or with 0.1% DMSO vehicle as a control.
RNA extraction and quantitative PCR
RNA was extracted using the RNAqueous kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and was reverse transcribed using a High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems). Quantitative PCR was performed in triplicates using a SensiMix SYBR Green and Fluorescein kit (Quantace) on a MyIQ/iCycler (Bio-Rad). The number of times each experiment was independently replicated is indicated throughout the results. Gene expression was analysed using the Real-time PCR miner algorithm60. Rplp0 was used as an endogenous reference (forward: 5′-GCTTTGTGTTCACCAAGGAG; reverse: 5′-GTCACATCACAGGGAGCAAT). Gene-specific primer sets were used as described for Kcnbm1 (ref. 39) (forward: 5′-ACATGAGCGTGGGCCAAAGGA-3′; reverse: 5′-CCCCGGCAACTCCGAGAACG-3′). Other primers used were Aldh1a2 (Raldh2) (forward: 5′-AGATCCTGCCGCTCTGATGGC-3′; reverse: 5′-GCGAGCTGCTCTCACTGCCTT-3′), Aldh1a3 (Raldh3) (forward: 5′-ACGG CCTCTGAGGGGTTTGGA-3′; reverse: 5′-TGCTGCCTTTGCTGCTTCCAC-3′), Espin (forward: 5′-ATCTACGTGCAGGCCAAGAA-3′; reverse: 5′-GTAGTAGT CACCTGTGCTCGG-3′), Cyp26b1 (forward: 5′-TAAGGACTACGCCGATGC AC-3′; reverse: 5′-CGAAGATGAGCTCCAGGGTG-3′), Cyp26c1 (forward: 5′-TTC TGCTGGGACTCCGTCTGGAG-3′; reverse: 5′-ATGCAGCATGTCCCGTGCTTT GA-3′), Pls1 (forward: 5′-CTCCCTGGTCGGTATTGCTG-3′; reverse: 5′-ACCCT CTCCAAGGTCTGACA-3′), Pls3 (forward: 5′-AAAAAGTTGCCAGGCACT CG-3′; reverse: 5′-AGATCGCATGGTGACAGCC-3′), Fscn2 (forward: 5′-AACGGCAGATTCGTCTCCAT-3′; reverse: 5′-GCGCCACTCGATGTCAAA CA-3′), RXRg (forward: 5′-TCATTAAGTTTCCTGCGGGCT-3′; reverse: 5′-TGG ATGATGGGCTCACAGAC-3′), RARa (forward: 5′-CAGAAGTGCTTCGAGGTC GG-3′; reverse: 5′-TTCGGCACGTCCTTCTTCTT-3′), RARb (forward: 5′-GTGTCAGTGCTTGTGAGGGA-3′; reverse: 5′-TGCAGTACTGGCAGCGAT TT-3′) and Bmp7 (forward: 5′-TGGTCATGAGCTTCGTCAAC; reverse: 5′ -CCTCTGGGATTCTGGAGAGA-3′).
Next-gen sequencing
RNA preparation
Three samples were collected from each cochlear duct by cutting the duct into three approximately equal sized pieces to produce proximal, middle and distal pieces. Each sample contained a portion of the future tegmentum vasculosum and the basilar papilla sensory epithelium. The distal piece also contained region of the future lagena. The pieces were immediately transferred into three 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes containing 0.5 ml Tri Reagent RT (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) and kept on ice until all pieces were collected. The samples were stored at − 20 °C until further processing.
Samples from each section of the basillar papilla were processed using Illumina mRNA-seq or TrueSeq preparation kits. Separate biological replicates were also prepared and similarly analysed. In brief, mRNA was selected by oligo-dT magnetic beads and fragmented. First-strand cDNA was generated using random primers. Second-strand synthesis, end repair, addition of a single A base and adaptor ligation were then performed. Each RNA-seq library was DNA-sequenced using either the Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx or HiSeq 2000.
RNA-Seq data analyses
Raw reads in FASTQ format were aligned to the Ensembl Gallus gallus reference genome (WUGSC2.1) using Tophat v1.4.0 (ref. 61). The output.bam file was processed by Partek Genomics Suite v6.6 (Partek Inc., St Louis, MO, USA) to assemble reads into transcripts and estimate their abundances. A gene model data set combining Ensembl and NCBI annotations was used to generate RPKM for known genes and potential novel transcripts. Statistical significance levels were calculated by one-way ANOVA. Reads mapped to different isoforms of a given gene were combined for analysis. At least one region of the basilla papilla (proximal, middle or distal) was required to be ≥0.5 RPKM. A fold change of ≥ 2 was imposed for the comparison between distal and proximal regions. An additional filter was imposed where middle samples had to exhibit RPKM values intermediate between the two ends of the basilla papilla in order to selectively capture transcripts that exhibit a gradient between the two ends. Gene lists from clustering analysis were uploaded to g:Profiler and analysed by gene group functional profiling22. Pathways that were predicted from g:Profilers database of literature-supported interaction data sets were visualized by Cytoscape62 .
Ingenuity pathway analysis
IPA was performed to discover potential upstream activators. Supplementary Data 2, which contains both the list of genes that are differentially expressed between the E6.5 proximal and distal thirds of the cochlea and the fold-change difference in those genes that are expressed between the proximal and distal ends, were uploaded to IPA. The IPA Upstream Regulator analytic was then performed, which generated a list of 747 potential upstream transcriptional regulators that may be involved in establishing the differences in gene expression between the proximal and distal ends of the E6.5 BP. Potential regulators were ranked based upon absolute activation Z scores, and the top 10 most significant potential regulators are shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Retinoic acid reporter cell line
The RARE reporter cell line F9-RARE-LacZ, which has a RARE driving LacZ expression, was obtained from Tuanlian Luo (Harvard University)28. Cells were grown to confluence in 0.1% gelatin-coated 24-well plates in DMEM/F-12 containing 10% FBS, 0.5 mg ml−1 G418, 0.25 µgml−1 Fungizone and 10 µgml−1 Ciprofloxacin. Immediately before co-culturing with cochlea, the medium was changed to DMEM/F-12 containing 1% FBS, 0.25 µgml−1 Fungizone and 10 µgml−1 Ciprofloxacin. E10 cochleae were dissected, the tegmentum vasculosum was carefully removed with fine forceps and the nerve was trimmed with a sapphire blade. The lagena maculae were then cut away using a sapphire blade and the non-sensory regions of the cochlea were trimmed close to the sensory epithelium. BPs were then cut in half to produce proximal and distal segments. Retinal tissue from E10 embryos was also isolated and used as a positive control tissue. Proximal and distal cochlea segments and retina epithelium were plated on top of the reporter cells and maintained at 37 °C. RARE-LacZ cells in some wells were exposed to media that were supplemented with 5nM RA or 100 nM RA. After 12 h in culture, the samples were fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M PBS for 15min at room temperature (RT), washed three times with 0.1M PBS containing 0.1% deoxycholate, 0.2% NP-40 and 2mM MgCl2, and then X-Gal-stained overnight at 37 °C (1 mgml−1 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galacto-pyranoside with 5mM potassium ferricyanide and 5mM potassium ferrocyanide at pH 7.3 in 0.1M PBS and with 0.1% deoxycholate, 0.2% NP-40 and 2 mM MgCl2). Bright-field images were acquired using an Olympus SZX12 stereomicroscope.
Immunohistochemistry
The primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-Raldh3 (Aldh1a3; Abgent), rabbit anti-pan-Espin (generous gift from Dr James Bartles, Northwestern University), rabbit anti-RXR-gamma (Abgent) and the monoclonal antibody HCS-1. Rabbit anti-RFP (Rockland Immunochemicals) was used as a negative control. The RXR-gamma, HCS-1 and Espin antibodies recognize those antigens in chicken tissue. The Raldh3 antibody was tested via western blotting of chicken kidney tissue and it labelled a band at 56 kDa, the expected size for Raldh3 protein (Fig. 1f).
Explants were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 25 min at room temperature. Then, the tegmentum vasculosum and the tectorial membrane were removed. Samples were then blocked at RT for 1 h in PBS/0.02% Triton X-100 (PBST) containing 10% normal goat serum (Vector Laboratories), then incubated overnight in primary antibodies, followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen). Samples were mounted in SlowFade (Invitrogen) and images were taken with Zeiss LSM 510 or Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscopes.
Immunoblots
Eight cochleae from E6.5, E10 and E18 embryos were dissected as described above. Proximal and distal tissues were then separately pooled and analysed through immunoblotting with the rabbit antibody against Raldh3. Kidney from E18 chicken embryos was used as a positive control. Organs were homogenized in reducing SDS–PAGE sample buffer, heated to 70 °C for 15 min and microcentrifuged for 30 s to remove insoluble debris. Protein was resolved with Bis–Tris SDS–PAGE gel (Novex 4–12%, Invitrogen and TGX gels from Bio-Rad), transferred to PVDF membranes and stained with India ink. Blots were blocked in blocking buffer (ECL primer blocking reagent, GE Healthcare) for 1 h and probed with goat anti-rabbit Aldh1a3 primary antibody (Abgent; 1:1,000) in blocking buffer overnight at RT. β-actin was used as a loading control. The following day, blots were washed four times for 5min with PBS/0.3% Tween 20, then incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology) for 1 h at RT. Bands were then visualized with ECL reagent (GE Healthcare). Chemiluminescence was detected using an ImageQuant LAS4000 mini imager (GE Healthcare), and band intensity was measured and normalized against the average intensity of the actin band using ImageJ densitometry software analysis. Raldh3 levels were normalized to actin values from the same lane. Each experiment was independently analysed three times.
Scanning electron microscope
Immediately before fixation, the tegmentum vasculosum was carefully opened with fine forceps and the tectorial membrane was pulled away to expose the sensory epithelium. Cultures were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.10M cacodylate buffer and 2mM CaCl2 at pH 7.35 for 2 h at RT. After post-fixation in 1% OsO4 in the same buffer for 1 h at RT, the tissue was washed in cacodylate buffer and processed by the Osmium–Thiocarbohydrazide– Osmium method63. Cochleae were then dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, critical point-dried, mounted on stubs and sputter-coated with gold palladium. Samples were examined in either a JEOL 6400 or Zeiss Sigma VP HD field emission SEM.
Analysis
To minimize bias, all measurements relating to HC phenotype, that is, hair bundle height, stereocilia number and area of the luminal HC surface, were made in regions located midway between the superior (neural) and inferior (abneural) edges of the BP.
Stereocilia number
Scanning electron micrographs were used to quantify numbers of stereocilia. To characterize the HC phenotypes, we took high-magnification SEM images (~ 20 HCs per image) midway between the inferior (abneural) and superior (neural) edges of the BP. To avoid bias, the regions selected for analysis were chosen from a low-magnification view of the BP where HC phenotypes were not distinguishable. The extreme proximal and distal edges and the superior or inferior edges of the BP were avoided in image capture. Once regions were selected, high-magnification images were captured from three neighbouring fields in the proximal region and three neighbouring fields in the distal region (six images per BP). From each micrograph, all of the stereocilia were counted on at least three HCs. HCs that had any stereocilia blocked from view or stereocilia that were not clearly discernable were excluded.
The quantification was performed blindly. One investigator took high-magnification scanning electron micrographs and then coded them. A different investigator performed the stereocilia counts without knowledge of the specific treatment or the region the micrographs were from. Stereocilia counts from the three micrographs were used to determine the average number of stereocilia that formed in HCs from proximal and distal regions of each BP. The data set was then decoded and statistically analysed using one-way ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post-test (GraphPad Prism).
Hair bundle height measurements from confocal microscopy
Using a 63 × 1.4 NA oil-immersion objective, we captured stacks of confocal images from the proximal and distal regions with 0.37 mm steps and a 2.0 × zoom factor. At least three images from neighbouring fields were captured at the midpoint between the superior (neural) and inferior (abneural) edges of the BP at each proximal-to-distal location. Hair bundle height was determined by measuring only the tallest stereocilia. This measurement was obtained by measuring from the middle of the base to the tip of the tallest stereocilia with the 3D Imaris software (Bitplane). Values were typically measured for eight hair bundles per image. Stereocilia lengths were then averaged from the micrographs to obtain an average length that formed in HCs from proximal and distal regions for each BP. Tests for statistical significance were conducted with GraphPad Prism 8.0.
Luminal surface area
HC luminal surface areas were measured from LSM 510 and LSM 710 confocal micrographs using NIH ImageJ. Tests for statistical significance were conducted with GraphPad Prism 8.0.
HC counts
To count the number of HCs that formed in the cultured explants, BPs that were cultured for 7 days were fixed as above and then labelled with Alexa Fluor 488-phalloidin and HCS-1. Low-magnification micrographs were taken on a Zeiss 710 confocal microscope. HCs were counted using NIH ImageJ.
Hair bundle height measurements from SEM stereoimaging
For an independent method of measuring stereocilia lengths, we used SEM stereoimaging64. E6.5 BPs were cultured in media containing 500nM RA or 5 µM citral or 0.1% DMSO alone for 7 days, then fixed for SEM as described above. To make unbiased selections of sites in the BPs for these measurements, low-magnification images of the entire BP were taken to determine the relative positions of regions located midway between the neural and abneural edges and a distance approximately equivalent to 18% of the total length of the BP away from the distal tip and 18% of the total length of the BP away from the proximal tip. Hair bundles were viewed from behind the longest stereocilia in the hair bundle. To measure hair bundle height, stereo pairs of images were captured with 8 degrees of tilt, and height was calculated. Stereopair images from four neighbouring fields were then taken at these two regions (proximal and distal) at 15,000 × magnifications. The hair bundle heights were then analysed blindly. One individual investigator took high-magnification scanning electron micrographs and then coded them. A different investigator performed the stereocilia measurements with no information on specific treatment or which region the images were from. Stereocilia lengths were then averaged from the four micrographs to obtain an average length of stereocilia that formed in HCs from proximal and distal regions for each BP. The data set was then unblinded, quantified and statistically analysed using one-way ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post-test (GraphPad Prism).
Bead implantation
Anion exchange resin beads AGI-X8 (80–100 µm diameter; Bio-Rad) were washed in 100% DMSO, then soaked in either DMSO containing 0.5 mg ml−1 RA or 100% DMSO alone for 20 min at RT. Beads were then briefly washed three times in 100% DMEM/F-12 and then carefully implanted inside the proximal tip of an E6.5 BP. Implanted cochleae were cultured on stainless steel grids for 6 days, fixed with 4% PFA and stained with Alexa Fluor 488-phalloidin as described.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank James Pagana, Wendy Baker and Jung-Bum Shin for technical advice. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health RO1 DC000200 (J.T.C.), RC1 DC010677 (M.L.), F31 DC012485 (B.R.T.) and the American Hearing Research Foundation (M.L.).
Footnotes
Author contributions
B.R.T. and J.T.C. designed the experiments. B.R.T., Z.F.M., W.C., Y.C.K and M.L. performed the experiments. B.R.T., Y.K.S., Z.F.M. and M.L. analysed the data. B.R.T., M.L. and J.T.C wrote the paper.
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Competing financial interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Mann ZF, Kelley MW. Development of tonotopy in the auditory periphery. Hear. Res. 2011;276:2–15. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Crawford AC, Fettiplace R. An electrical tuning mechanism in turtle cochlear hair cells. J. Physiol. 1981;312:377–412. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Art JJ, Fettiplace R. Variation of membrane properties in hair cells isolated from the turtle cochlea. J. Physiol. 1987;385:207–242. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fuchs PA, Nagai T, Evans MG. Electrical tuning in hair cells isolated from the chick cochlea. J. Neurosci. 1988;8:2460–2467. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-07-02460.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fettiplace R, Fuchs PA. Mechanisms of hair cell tuning. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1999;61:809–834. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ramanathan K, Fuchs PA. Modeling hair cell tuning by expression gradients of potassium channel beta subunits. Biophys. J. 2002;82:64–75. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75374-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tilney LG, Saunders JC. Actin filaments stereocilia hair cells of the bird cochlea. I. Length, number, width, and distribution of stereocilia of each hair cell are related to the position of the hair cell on the cochlea. J. Cell Biol. 1983;96:807–821. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.3.807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tilney LG, Tilney MS, DeRosier DJ. Actin filaments, stereocilia, and hair cells: how cells count and measure. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 1992;8:257–274. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.001353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lim DJ. Cochlear anatomy related to cochlear micromechanics. A review. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1980;67:1686–1695. doi: 10.1121/1.384295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lim DJ. Functional structure of the organ of Corti: a review. Hear. Res. 1986;22:117–146. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90089-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Corwin JT, Cotanche DA. Development of location-specific hair cell stereocilia in denervated embryonic ears. J. Comp. Neurol. 1989;288:529–537. doi: 10.1002/cne.902880402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Swanson GJ, Howard M, Lewis J. Epithelial autonomy in the development of the inner ear of a bird embryo. Dev. Biol. 1990;137:243–257. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(90)90251-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Katayama A, Corwin JT. Cell production in the chicken cochlea. J. Comp. Neurol. 1989;281:129–135. doi: 10.1002/cne.902810110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reijntjes S, Gale E, Maden M. Generating gradients of retinoic acid in the chick embryo: Cyp26C1 expression and a comparative analysis of the Cyp26 enzymes. Dev. Dyn. 2004;230:509–517. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schilling TF, Nie Q, Lander AD. Dynamics and precision in retinoic acid morphogen gradients. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2012;22:562–569. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bok J, et al. Transient retinoic acid signaling confers anterior-posterior polarity to the inner ear. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:161–166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010547108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Duester G. Retinoic acid synthesis and signaling during early organogenesis. Cell. 2008;134:921–931. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maden M. Retinoic acid in the development, regeneration and maintenance of the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;8:755–765. doi: 10.1038/nrn2212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods. 2008;5:621–628. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Suzuki R, et al. Identification of RALDH-3, a novel retinaldehyde dehydrogenase, expressed in the ventral region of the retina. Mech. Dev. 2000;98:37–50. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00450-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Napoli JL. Physiological insights into all-trans-retinoic acid biosynthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1821:152–167. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reimand J, Arak T, Vilo J. g:Profiler—a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2011 update) Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W307–W315. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chuang KH, et al. 9-cis-retinoic acid inhibits androgen receptor activity through activation of retinoid X receptor. Mol. Endocrinol. 2005;19:1200–1212. doi: 10.1210/me.2004-0181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tilney LG, Cotanche DA, Tilney MS. Actin filaments stereocilia hair cells of the bird cochlea. VI. How the number and arrangement of stereocilia are determined. Development. 1992;116:213–226. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.1.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tilney LG, Tilney MS, Cotanche DA. Actin filaments stereocilia hair cells of the bird cochlea. V. How the staircase pattern of stereociliary lengths is generated. J. Cell Biol. 1988;106:355–365. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.2.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tilney LG, DeRosier DJ. Actin filaments stereocilia hair cells of the bird cochlea. IV. How the actin filaments become organized in developing stereocilia and in the cuticular plate. Dev. Biol. 1986;116:119–129. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90048-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cotanche DA, Sulik KK. The development of stereociliary bundles in the cochlear duct of chick embryos. Brain Res. 1984;318:181–193. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(84)90024-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wagner M, Han B, Jessell TM. Regional differences in retinoid release from embryonic neural tissue detected by an in vitro reporter assay. Development. 1992;116:55–66. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.1.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kelley MW, Xu XM, Wagner MA, Warchol ME, Corwin JT. The developing organ of Corti contains retinoic acid and forms supernumerary hair cells in response to exogenous retinoic acid in culture. Development. 1993;119:1041–1053. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.4.1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Raz Y, Kelley MW. Retinoic acid signaling is necessary for the development of the organ of Corti. Dev. Biol. 1999;213:180–193. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rowe MH, Peterson EH. Autocorrelation analysis of hair bundle structure in the utricle. J. Neurophysiol. 2006;96:2653–2669. doi: 10.1152/jn.00565.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kikonyogo A, Abriola DP, Dryjanski M, Pietruszko R. Mechanism of inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase by citral, a retinoid antagonist. FEBS J. 1999;262:704–712. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.McCaffery P, Mey J, Dräger UC. Light-mediated retinoic acid production. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:12570–12574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McCaffery P, Lee MO, Wagner MA, Sladek NE, Dräger UC. Asymmetrical retinoic acid synthesis in the dorsoventral axis of the retina. Development. 1992;115:371–382. doi: 10.1242/dev.115.2.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Marsh-Armstrong N, McCaffery P, Gilbert W, Dowling JE, Dräger UC. Retinoic acid is necessary for development of the ventral retina in zebrafish. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:7286–7290. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Germain P, et al. Differential action on coregulator interaction defines inverse retinoid agonists and neutral antagonists. Chem. Biol. 2009;16:479–489. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tilney LG, Tilney MS, Saunders JS, DeRosier DJ. Actin filaments stereocilia hair cells of the bird cochlea. III. The development and differentiation of hair cells and stereocilia. Dev. Biol. 1986;116:100–118. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90047-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ramanathan K, Michael TH, Jiang GJ, Hiel H, Fuchs PA. A molecular mechanism for electrical tuning of cochlear hair cells. Science. 1999;283:215–217. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5399.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bai JP, Surguchev A, Navaratnam D. beta4-subunit increases Slo responsiveness to physiological Ca2 + concentrations and together with beta1 reduces surface expression of Slo in hair cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2011;300:C435–C446. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00449.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li Y, et al. Developmental expression of BK channels in chick cochlear hair cells. BMC Dev. Biol. 2009;9:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-9-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fuchs PA, Sokolowski BH. The acquisition during development of Ca-activated potassium currents by cochlear hair cells of the chick. Proc. Biol. Sci. 1990;241:122–126. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1990.0075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Avenarius MR, et al. Correlation of actin crosslinker and Capper expression levels with stereocilia growth phases. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2013;13:606–620. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.033704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Flock A, Bretscher A, Weber K. Immunohistochemical localization of several cytoskeletal proteins in inner ear sensory and supporting cells. Hear. Res. 1982;7:75–89. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(82)90082-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rzadzinska A, Schneider M, Noben-Trauth K, Bartles JR, Kachar B. Balanced levels of Espin are critical for stereociliary growth and length maintenance. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 2005;62:157–165. doi: 10.1002/cm.20094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Loomis PA, et al. Espin cross-links cause the elongation of microvillus-type parallel actin bundles in vivo . J. Cell Biol. 2003;163:1045–1055. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200309093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Daudet N, Lebart MC. Transient expression of the t-isoform of plastins/ fimbrin in the stereocilia of developing auditory hair cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 2002;53:326–336. doi: 10.1002/cm.10092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shin JB, et al. The R109H variant of fascin-2, a developmentally regulated actin crosslinker in hair-cell stereocilia, underlies early-onset hearing loss of DBA/2J mice. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:9683–9694. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1541-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sekerkova G, Richter CP, Bartles JR. Roles of the espin actin-bundling proteins in the morphogenesis and stabilization of hair cell stereocilia revealed in CBA/CaJ congenic jerker mice. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li H, et al. Correlation of expression of the actin filament-bundling protein espin with stereociliary bundle formation in the developing inner ear. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004;468:125–134. doi: 10.1002/cne.10944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mann ZF, et al. A gradient of Bmp7 specifies the tonotopic axis in the developing inner ear. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3839. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Guo L, Zhao YY, Zhang SL, Liu K, Gao XY. Retinoic acid down-regulates bone morphogenetic protein 7 expression in rat with cleft palate. Chin. Med. Sci. J. 2008;23:28–31. doi: 10.1016/s1001-9294(09)60006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Paralkar VM, et al. Regulation of BMP-7 expression by retinoic acid and prostaglandin E(2) J. Cell Physiol. 2002;190:207–217. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gavalas A. ArRAnging the hindbrain. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:61–64. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02067-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tanaka K, Smith CA. Structure of the chicken’s inner ear: SEM and TEM study. Am. J. Anat. 1978;153:251–271. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001530206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sekerkova G, Zheng L, Mugnaini E, Bartles JR. Differential expression of espin isoforms during epithelial morphogenesis, stereociliogenesis and postnatal maturation in the developing inner ear. Dev. Biol. 2006;291:83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tubb BE, et al. Characterization of human retinal fascin gene (FSCN2) at 17q25: close physical linkage of fascin and cytoplasmic actin genes. Genomics. 2000;65:146–156. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Moutier E, et al. Retinoic acid receptors recognize the mouse genome through binding elements with diverse spacing and topology. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:26328–26341. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.361790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tilney LG, Tilney MS. The actin filament content of hair cells of the bird cochlea is nearly constant even though the length, width, and number of stereocilia vary depending on the hair cell location. J. Cell Biol. 1988;107:2563–2574. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hamburger V, Hamilton H. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 1951;88:49–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhao S, Fernald RD. Comprehensive algorithm for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. J. Comput. Biol. 2005;12:1047–1064. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2005.12.1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1105–1111. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:431–432. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Davies S, Forge A. Preparation of the mammalian organ of Corti for scanning electron microscopy. J. Microsc. 1987;147:89–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02821.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lelli A, Asai Y, Forge A, Holt JR, Geleoc GS. Tonotopic gradient in the developmental acquisition of sensory transduction in outer hair cells of the mouse cochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 2009;101:2961–2973. doi: 10.1152/jn.00136.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.