Abstract
Rickettsia felis (Alphaproteobacteria: Rickettsiales) is the causative agent of an emerging flea-borne rickettsiosis with worldwide occurrence. Originally described from the cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis, recent reports have identified R. felis from other flea species, as well as other insects and ticks. This diverse host range for R. felis may indicate an underlying genetic variability associated with host-specific strains. Accordingly, to determine a potential genetic basis for host specialization, we sequenced the genome of R. felis str. LSU-Lb, which is an obligate mutualist of the parthenogenic booklouse Liposcelis bostrychophila (Insecta: Psocoptera). We also sequenced the genome of R. felis str. LSU, the second genome sequence for cat flea-associated strains (cf. R. felis str. URRWXCal2), which are presumably facultative parasites of fleas. Phylogenomics analysis revealed R. felis str. LSU-Lb diverged from the flea-associated strains. Unexpectedly, R. felis str. LSU was found to be divergent from R. felis str. URRWXCal2, despite sharing similar hosts. Although all three R. felis genomes contain the pRF plasmid, R. felis str. LSU-Lb carries an additional unique plasmid, pLbaR (plasmid of L. bostrychophila associated Rickettsia), nearly half of which encodes a unique 23-gene integrative conjugative element. Remarkably, pLbaR also encodes a repeats-in-toxin-like type I secretion system and associated toxin, heretofore unknown from other Rickettsiales genomes, which likely originated from lateral gene transfer with another obligate intracellular parasite of arthropods, Cardinium (Bacteroidetes). Collectively, our study reveals unexpected genomic diversity across three R. felis strains and identifies several diversifying factors that differentiate facultative parasites of fleas from obligate mutualists of booklice.
Keywords: flea, booklouse, genomes, plasmid, phylogeny, transitional group rickettsiae, Rickettsiales amplified genetic element, RTX-type I secretion system
Introduction
Included in the Alphaproteobacteria, all known species of Rickettsiales (within the families Holosporaceae, Rickettsiaceae, Anaplasmataceae, and Midichloriaceae) are Gram-negative obligate intracellular bacteria associated with a wide range of eukaryotes (Gillespie, Nordberg, et al. 2012). The genus Rickettsia (Rickettsiaceae) is an extraordinarily diverse assemblage of species known from plants, amoebae, ciliates, arthropods, annelids, leeches, and vertebrates (Driscoll et al. 2013; Kang 2014). Although early-branching lineages of Rickettsia remain poorly characterized (Perlman et al. 2006), the derived lineage contains over 20 described species, many of which are pathogenic to their eukaryotic host and/or vector (Sahni et al. 2013). These described species, which are all associated with arthropods (e.g., ticks, mites, fleas, and body lice), and most with vertebrates (e.g., humans, cats and rodents), are currently organized into four groups: Ancestral Group (AG), Typhus Group (TG), Transitional Group (TRG), and Spotted Fever Group (SFG) (Gillespie et al. 2008). Collectively, this clade of rickettsial species transmitted by hematophagous arthropods, which contains several agents of human disease (e.g., Epidemic typhus, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, murine typhus, Mediterranean spotted fever), provides an opportunity to identify rickettsial determinants of transmission and pathogenicity.
Among the more recently recognized emerging rickettsial agents is Rickettsia felis, a member of TRG rickettsiae (Gillespie et al. 2007) and the causative agent of a typhus-like flea-borne rickettsiosis (Azad et al. 1997). Since initially identified in the cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Adams et al. 1990), R. felis has been acknowledged as an increasingly important emerging pathogen (Richards et al. 2010; Socolovschi et al. 2010; Parola 2011; Maina et al. 2012). Although the genome sequence of R. felis str. URRWXCal2 revealed a coding repertoire distinct from other rickettsial genomes (Ogata, Renesto, et al. 2005), little is known regarding intraspecific genetic diversity. Several R. felis strains have been identified in a broad range of invertebrate hosts (reviewed in Reif and Macaluso [2009]), including a novel isolate of R. felis from the nonhematophagous, parthenogenic booklouse Liposcelis bostrychophila (Insecta: Psocoptera) (Yusuf and Turner 2004; Behar et al. 2010; Thepparit et al. 2011). In its booklouse host, R. felis is an obligate mutualist required for the early development of the oocyte and is maintained 100% transovarially (Yusuf and Turner 2004; Perotti et al. 2006). Clearance of the organism from larvae by increased temperature (Perotti et al. 2006) and adult insects through antibiotics (Yusuf and Turner 2004) results in decreased longevity and fecundity, as well as nonviable egg production. Conversely, no overt fitness effect on cat fleas infected with R. felis has been identified, and transovarial transmission is highly variable, likely due to differences in protocols for the maintenance of laboratory-infected fleas (Higgins et al. 1994; Reif and Macaluso 2009). Thus, R. felis strains infecting cat fleas can be considered facultative parasites (as opposed to “symbionts” because all Rickettsia species demand considerable metabolites from host cells). Accordingly, the potential exists that genetic diversity between R. felis isolates contributes to the observed variation in host fitness effects as well as the divergent lifecycles of these bacteria.
In an effort to determine whether genetic variability underlays R. felis host specialization, we sequenced the genomes of two strains: 1) R. felis (str. LSU-Lb), which is 100% present within an all-female L. bostrychophila colony (Thepparit et al. 2011), and 2) R. felis str. LSU, which has a variable infection rate within an established C. felis colony (Pornwiroon et al. 2006). These genomes were compared extensively with the complete genome of R. felis str. URRWXCal2, which was also isolated from C. felis (Ogata, Robert, et al. 2005). Surprisingly, genetic variation was found to underlie all three strains, revealing heretofore unknown diversity associated with not only host specialization (flea vs. booklouse) but also spatial isolation (str. URRWXCal2 vs. str. LSU). This genomic comparison of host-dependent R. felis strains, that is, hematophagous (cat flea) versus nonhematophagous (booklice) arthropod hosts, provides novel insight into the molecular basis for rickettsial virulence and horizontal transmission. Our work also underscores the potential of the mobilome for orchestrating Rickettsia host adaptations.
Materials and Methods
R. felis Cultivation, Bacterial Purification, and DNA Isolation
Rickettsia felis str. LSU (Pornwiroon et al. 2006) and R. felis str. LSU-Lb (Thepparit et al. 2011), which were isolated from LSU colonies of C. felis (cat fleas) and L. bostrychophila (booklice), respectively, were propagated in the tick-derived ISE6 cell line in modified L15B growth medium (Pornwiroon et al. 2006). Cultures (passage 4) were partially purified from ISE6 cells as previously described (Sunyakumthorn et al. 2008). Briefly, R. felis-infected ISE6 were needle lysed and passed through a 2-μM syringe filter. Rickettsiae were collected by centrifugation (21,000 × g) and rinsed with NaCl solution (0.85 w/v). Concentrated bacteria was resuspended in 200 μM of manufacturer’s PBS buffer and total DNA was extracted using the PureLink Genomic DNA mini Kit (Invitrogen) as described by the manufacturer’s instructions.
Genome Sequencing
The Ion Torrent Next Generation Sequencing technology was utilized for sequencing the genomes of R. felis str. LSU and R. felis str. LSU-Lb. Ion Xpress Plus Fragment Library Kit (Life Technologies) was used to prepare high-quality fragment libraries from total gDNA for sequencing on the Ion Personal Genome Machine (PGM) System. This kit includes: Ion Shear Plus Reagents for enzymatic fragmentation of genomic DNA and Ion Plus Fragment Library Kit for library preparations from the enzymatically fragmented DNA (a total of 1 μg of DNA was used for library construction). Template-positive Ion Sphere Particles (ISPs) containing clonally amplified DNA were produced using the Ion OneTouch 200 Template Kit v2 (for 200 base-read libraries) with the Ion OneTouch Instrument. The Ion OneTouch ES instrument was used to enrich ISPs intended for the Ion PGM System using the Ion PGM 200 Sequencing Kit and an Ion 316 sequencing chip. A total sequence output of Q20 quality, derived from the predicted per-base quality scores and corresponding to an error rate of 1%, is approximately 600 Mb for the Ion 316 chip.
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Analysis
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Estimation
For R. felis str. LSU and R. felis str. LSU-Lb genomes, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined as follows. Raw sequence reads from R. felis str. LSU and R. felis str. LSU-Lb libraries were independently mapped to the R. felis str. URRWXCal2 genome (National Center for Biotechnology Information [NCBI] taxonomy ID 315456) using the long-read option of the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA) v0.5.9 and a minimum score threshold of 200. Variants were called with mpileup and bcftools, part of the samtools v0.1.19 package, using the following settings: A maximum allowed depth of 10,000 reads per position (-d); indels called only when the average per-sample depth does not exceed 1,000 (-L); a minimum base quality of 7 (-Q); a coefficient for modeling homopolymer errors of 50 (-h); a gap-opening sequencing error probability of 10 (-o); a gap extension error probability of 17 (-e); and a minimum of four gapped reads required to consider indel candidates (-m). Genomic context (intergenic, repeat, or coding region) and substitution impact (synonymous, nonsynonymous, or silent) were determined using the R. felis str. URRWXCal2 chromosome (GenBank ID CP000053) and plasmid pRF (CP000054) annotations.
SNP Validation
For gene variant confirmation, all 23 SNPs predicted from the R. felis str. LSU reads, as well as 15 selected SNPs predicted from the R. felis str. LSU-Lb reads, were selected for sequencing. Genomic and plasmid DNA was extracted using Qiagen DNEasy Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). Primers for each variant were designed from flanking regions on contigs using Primer3Plus (Untergasser et al. 2007) and synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies. Primers are listed in supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online. Gene variants were polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified using FastStart PCR Master Mix (Roche) 50 ng of DNA template, and 300 μM of each primer under standard thermocycling conditions on a PTC-200 PCR machine (MJ Research, Waltham, MA). The amplified PCR products were gel purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN) and bidirectionally sequenced with corresponding primers on an ABI PRISM 3130 Automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems) at the GeneLab core facility in the School of Veterinary Medicine at LSU. In several cases where direct sequencing failed, purified PCR products were cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (InvitrogenTM, Life Technologies) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmid inserts were sequenced by the LSU Gene Lab using the M13 forward (-20) and M13 reverse (-24) primer pairs.
Genome Assembly
Raw reads from each strain were subsequently assembled de novo to the level of contig using Mira v3.4.1.1 under default settings, except the number of passes was set to 4, “skim each pass” was enabled, and minimum read length was set to 50. Homology searches (vs. NCBI’s NR database) were used to partition the contigs into rickettsial and nonrickettsial sequences. Additionally, reads from each LSU strain were mapped to full-length 16S rDNA sequences in the GreenGenes database from May 2013 (v. 13_5) using the long-read option of BWA v0.5.9, and binned by taxonomy to assess the microbial diversity in each sample. Rickettsial sequences were subsequently ordered against R. felis str. URRWXCal2 (CP000053 and CP000054) using ABACAS 1.3.1, and overlapping contigs merged into supercontigs. Additional contigs from R. felis str. LSU that matched to Wolbachia spp. were similarly ordered against Wolbachia endosymbiont of Cimex lectularius (AP013028), a close relative identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis (data not shown). The assemblies and related information for the R. felis str. LSU and R. felis str. LSU-Lb genomes were deposited in GenBank and assigned the Bioproject IDs PRJNA258182 and PRJNA258188, respectively.
Gene Prediction and Annotation
Gene models were predicted on rickettsial supercontigs from each LSU strain using two approaches: 1) The ab initio gene prediction program fgenesb (Tyson et al. 2004), trained on coding sequence (CDS) from R. felis str. URRWXCal2, and 2) the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) v2.0 server (Aziz et al. 2008). The fgenesb-based gene models were used for all comparisons among R. felis strains, whereas the RAST-based gene models were used for analyses across all Rickettsiaceae genomes. RAST-based annotations were transferred to the fgenes gene models using BLASTP to identify common gene predictions across both approaches. Gene models were also predicted on Wolbachia-like supercontigs within the R. felis str. LSU assembly, using RAST as described above. The gene models and annotations for the R. felis str. LSU and R. felis str. LSU-Lb genomes were deposited in GenBank and assigned accession numbers JSEM00000000 and JSEL00000000, respectively. All data for the uncharacterized Wolbachia species will be published elsewhere.
Comparative Genomic Analysis
Protein Family Clustering
Utilizing FastOrtho, an in-house modified version of OrthoMCL (Li et al. 2003), four separate sets of orthologous groups (OGs) of proteins were generated: 1) 62 Rickettsiaceae genomes (supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online); 2) the chromosomes of R. felis strains URRWXCal2 (NC_007109), LSU, and LSU-Lb; 3) 20 Rickettsia plasmids (supplementary table S3, Supplementary Material online); and 4) the pRF plasmid sequences of R. felis strains URRWXCal2 (NC_007110), LSU, “AUS-Lb” (GQ329881), and LSU-Lb. AUS-Lb refers to an unnamed R. felis strain collected from L. bostrychophila in the Darling Downs region of Queensland, Australia (Behar et al. 2010). Generated OGs were used in various analyses, as further outlined below.
Genome Phylogeny Estimation
To estimate a robust phylogeny of Rickettsiaceae, 310 perfect OGs (exactly one CDS from each taxon of Rickettsiaceae) were selected for analysis. Multiple sequence alignment of each OG was performed using MUSCLE (default parameters) (Edgar 2004), with regions of poor alignment (length heterogeneous regions) masked using Gblocks (Castresana 2000; Talavera and Castresana 2007). All modified alignments were concatenated into a single data set for phylogeny estimation. Using PhyloBayes v3.3 (Lartillot et al. 2009), we analyzed the data set with the CAT model of substitution, a nonparametric method for modeling site-specific features of sequence evolution (Lartillot and Philippe 2004, 2006). Given the strong base compositional bias of Rickettsiaceae genomes (∼30 %GC), the ability of the CAT model to accommodate saturation due to convergences and reversions (Lartillot et al. 2007) is of substantial importance for estimating rickettsial phylogeny, as demonstrated by us (Driscoll et al. 2013) and others (Rodriguez-Ezpeleta and Embley 2012; Viklund et al. 2012). Two independent Markov chains were run in parallel using PhyloBayes MPI v.1.2e (Lartillot et al. 2013) under the CAT–general time reversible (GTR) model, with the bipartition frequencies analyzed at various time points using the bpcomp program. For tree-building, appropriate burn-in values were determined by plotting the log likelihoods for each chain over sampled generations (time). Analyses were considered complete when the maximum difference in bipartition frequencies between the two chains was less than 0.1. Ultimately, a burn-in value of 1,000, with sampling every two trees, was used to build a consensus tree.
Chromosomes
Comparative analysis of the three R. felis genomes alone was carried out to identify a core genome and determine the composition of the accessory genome. To provide consistency in gene predictions across all three assemblies, we implemented the bacterial gene prediction program fgenesb (Tyson et al. 2004), using the “generic BACTERIAL” model. These annotated assemblies were used for generating OGs, as described above. Results from OG clustering were fit to a three-way Venn diagram to determine the conservation of protein families across all three genomes. Results were further processed manually to identify split open reading frames (ORFs) containing fragments that were not binned into the appropriate OG; left unchecked, this problem inflates the number of predicted ORFs. Adjusted OGs were further subdivided into several categories to facilitate the identification of other artifacts likely stemming from the sequencing technology, particularly poor coverage through repeat regions. To identify extended regions of synteny, a genome sequence alignment was performed using Mauve v.2.3.1, utilizing the “progressiveMauve” option (Darling et al. 2010). The results from OG generation and synteny analysis were used together to evaluate the major differences across all three R. felis genomes.
The final alignment of the “Rickettsiaceae” OG data set was processed to include only the three R. felis genomes and the R. akari genome. This allowed for retention of more sites of the alignment (less sites culled with Gblocks), providing a more robust determination of the divergence pattern of all three R. felis strains from their closest relative (R. akari). A phylogeny was estimated under maximum likelihood using RAxML v.7.2.8 (Stamatakis et al. 2008), implementing a gamma model of rate heterogeneity and estimation of the proportion of invariable sites. Branch support was assessed with 1,000 bootstrap pseudoreplications. To determine the degree of divergence of all three strains, only variable positions of the alignment were retained (no. sites = 116 aa) for calculation of an approximation of genome divergence. The program DIVEIN (Deng et al. 2010) was used to estimate percent protein divergence using both the Blosum62 and WAG (Whelan and Goldman) amino acid substitution models.
To determine whether the variation observed in R. felis str. LSU-Lb might be characteristic of host specialization in booklice, we compared flea-associated strains (strains Cal2 and LSU) with additional booklouse-associated strains. Despite no other sequenced genomes from booklouse-associated R. felis strains being available for comparison, we utilized several conserved genes (16S rDNA, gltA, sca0, sca4, and sca5) sequenced from various L. bostrychophila-associated R. felis strains from geographically isolated regions (Arizona, USA and Queensland, Australia) (Behar et al. 2010). Nucleotide alignments for each data set were performed using MUSCLE v3.6 (default parameters), with variable positions identified from the consensus sequence. SNPs were only considered within regions of alignments in which all sequences were represented.
Plasmids
Comparative analysis of the four R. felis pRF plasmid sequences was carried out to evaluate the conservation of genes. The 68 CDS of pRF from R. felis str. URRWXCal2 were used as a reference, with OGs from all strains mapped on a circular plot using Circos (Krzywinski et al. 2009). An alignment of all four plasmids was performed using Mauve as described above. To determine the relationship of pRF plasmids to other Rickettsia plasmids, the sole protein encoded across all sequenced Rickettsia plasmids, DnaA-like protein (DALP), was utilized for phylogeny estimation. Rickettsia DALP proteins are extremely variable across homologs except for the C-terminal regions, which encode a DnaA_N domain (pfam11638) typical of chromosome and plasmid replication initiation proteins. The OG including DALP sequences was combined with a sequence from Orientia tsutsugamushi encoding a DnaA_N domain (YP_001937581) that was closest to Rickettsia DALP sequences in BLASTP analyses. All sequences were aligned using MUSCLE v3.6 (default parameters). A phylogeny was estimated under maximum likelihood using RAxML v.7.2.8 (Stamatakis et al. 2008). A gamma model of rate heterogeneity was used with estimation of the proportion of invariable sites. Branch support was assessed with 1,000 bootstrap pseudoreplications.
An additional contig, c6440, within the assembly of R. felis str. LSU-Lb was further evaluated as a second divergent plasmid carried by this species. We used fgenesb to predict 38 CDS on c6440, subsequently using these CDS as queries in BLASTP searches. The NR (All GenBank+RefSeq Nucleotides+EMBL+DDBJ+PDB) database was used, coupled with a search against the Conserved Domains Database (Marchler-Bauer et al. 2011). Searches were performed with composition-based statistics across “all organisms, excluding Rickettsiales,” as well as “Rickettsiales.” No filter was used. Default matrix parameters (BLOSUM62) and gap costs (Existence: 11 Extension: 1) were implemented, with an inclusion threshold of 0.005. The predicted 38 CDS, results from BLASTP searches, and GC skew, (G − C)/(G + C), calculated on a fixed 50-nt window, were all mapped on a circular plot using Circos (Krzywinski et al. 2009). An alignment of c6440 with several diverse Rickettsia plasmids was performed using Mauve as described above.
Several proteins encoded on c6440 were selected for further analysis. Within a Rickettsiales amplified genetic element (RAGE), 14 proteins encoding components of an F-like type IV secretion system (F-T4SS), were combined with homologs from other rickettsial RAGEs and an F-T4SS from “Candidatus Protochlamydia amoebophila” UWE25 and aligned using MUSCLE v3.6 (default parameters). Alignments were concatenated into one data set and used in phylogeny estimation with RAxML as described above. An additional protein (DUF1016) encoded within the RAGE was combined with homologs retrieved from BLASTP searches against several taxon-specific databases: 1) “Rickettsiales,” 2) “Alphaproteobacteria (minus Rickettsiales),” 3) “Proteobacteria (minus Alphaproteobacteria),” 4) “Bacteria (minus Proteobacteria),” and 5) “minus Bacteria.” The top 20–50 (query-dependent) subjects from each search resulting in significant (>40 bits) alignments were all compiled, aligned using MUSCLE v3.6 (default parameters), and analyzed with RAxML as described above.
ORFs 38–41 of c6440 were predicted to encode an operon of a large toxin and adjacent repeats-in-toxin (RTX)-like type I secretion system (T1SS). Two proteins homologous to ABC transporters of RTX-like T1SSs were combined with homologs retrieved from BLASTP analyses as described for DUF1016, with a similar protocol for phylogeny estimation. Finally, the large toxin encoded immediately upstream of the RTX-like T1SS (ORF 38) was analyzed using BLASTP searches against the NR database. The Conserved Domains Database was used to identify modular domains at the N- and C-termini, which were collectively used to characterize the protein as a putative toxin.
Results
SNP Analysis
Polymorphism across R. felis strains was estimated prior to genome assembly. Relative to strain URRWXCal2, 23 and 92 SNPs were calculated for strains LSU and LSU-Lb, respectively (table 1). Estimated SNPs (all 23 for strain LSU, 15 selected SNPs for strain LSU-Lb) were confirmed through sequencing (supplementary table S4, Supplementary Material online). Inspection of the genomic positions of SNPs revealed different patterns of divergence within strains LSU and LSU-Lb relative to str. URRWXCal2. For strain LSU-Lb, 15 SNPs were detected in repeat regions, either within or near Rickettsia palindromic elements (RPEs). RPEs are short (∼100–150 nt), selfish elements that insert in intergenic regions and functional RNAs, as well as CDS, wherein ORFs are not disrupted (Ogata et al. 2000). Under a dozen classes of RPEs have been identified in Rickettsia genomes (Ogata et al. 2002; Matsutani et al. 2013). In the R. felis str. LSU-Lb genome, several RPEs are divergent as compared with those from the genomes of flea-associated R. felis strains, suggesting that RPE insertion and decay are active processes that continue to impact Rickettsia genomes. Most of the 71 SNPs occurring in CDS of the R. felis str. LSU-Lb were found in genes highly conserved across Rickettsia genomes (supplementary table S4, Supplementary Material online). Notable exceptions include SNPs in genes encoding two putative effector proteins (RalF, Sca7), a member of the proliferated ProP osmoregulatory transporters, and two proteins on the pRF plasmid.
Table 1.
CDS |
RNA | IGR | RR | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URRWXCal2 | FS | Sy | Ns | E | T | ||||
Versus LSU | 3 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 23 |
Versus LSU-Lb | 0 | 28 | 41 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 92 |
Note.—RNA, ribosomal RNA; IGR, intergenic region; RR, repeat region; FS, frameshift mutation; Sy, synonymous substitution; Ns, nonsynonymous substitution; E, mutation extending CDS; T, nonsense mutation.
For R. felis str. LSU, half of the estimated SNPs occurred in either one intergenic region or within the ORF encoding an NACHT domain-containing ATPase (pfam05729) that is pseudogenized in all other Rickettsia genomes (supplementary table S4, Supplementary Material online). Of the other half of estimated SNPs, five were found in four genes that we previously determined to be commonly associated with mobile elements (Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012). These encode a member of the ProP transporter family, the ATP-dependent RNA helicase RhlE, the ribonucleotide translocase Tlc3, and a large (1,179 aa) multidomain protein containing a SpoT-like ppGpp synthetase (SpoT_S) and ankyrin (ANK) repeat domain. The latter protein appears to be a gene fusion unique to R. felis genomes, as the recently sequenced genome of R. monacensis str. IrR/Munich has adjacent genes encoding the SpoT (CDI29635) and ANK (CDI29634) domains. Like R. felis str. LSU-Lb, an SNP was determined in the gene encoding the autotransporter Sca7, although it introduced a frameshift. As Sca7 proteins are not conserved across Rickettsia genomes (Blanc et al. 2005), this may indicate a loss of function of this uncharacterized protein relative to other well-studied proteins of the Sca superfamily.
Collectively, the number of SNPs estimated from the sequencing reads generated for R. felis str. LSU and R. felis str. LSU-Lb reveal different patterns of divergence relative to the utilized reference genome, R. felis str. URRWXCal2. As can be expected by their association with the cat flea, R. felis strains URRWXCal2 and LSU are minimally divergent, with estimated SNPs (all confirmed by sequencing) more prevalent in genes that are derived from lateral gene transfer (LGT). Rickettsia felis str. LSU-Lb is more divergent when compared with strain URRWXCal2, with SNPs found predominantly in intergenic regions, repeat regions, and conserved Rickettsia genes. The greater divergence in R. felis str. LSU-Lb is more reflective of genetic drift, likely due to its presumed obligate symbiosis with L. bostrychophila.
Genome Architecture
The R. felis str. LSU sequencing run yielded 3,036,844 reads which assembled into 10,578 total contigs (737 > 1,000 nt); 7,827 contigs (258 > 1,000 nt) with a top BLASTn match to Rickettsia were subsequently ordered and combined into 21 chromosomal and 1 plasmid sequence. In similar fashion, the R. felis str. LSU-Lb run yielded 5,463,632 reads which assembled into 59,374 total contigs (1,028 > 1,000 nt); 5,266 Rickettsia-like contigs (128 > 1,000 nt) were ordered and combined into 35 chromosomal and 8 plasmid sequences. An additional 52,299 nt sequence, suspected to be a novel plasmid, was identified as a single contig within the initial LSU-Lb assembly and removed prior to ordering. The assembled genomes of R. felis strains LSU and LSU-Lb are similar to the previously published R. felis str. URRWXCal2, despite neither assembly resulting in a closed chromosome (table 2). Both LSU and LSU-Lb genomes are comparable to the URRWXCal2 genome in base composition (∼33 %GC) and the presence of the pRF plasmid, as well as encoded stable RNA genes, which have a distinct rickettsial profile (Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012). Relative to the URRWXCal2 genome (reannotated with fgenesb, n = 1,468), the numbers of predicted ORFs are variable in the LSU (n = 1,970) and LSU-Lb (n = 1,691) genomes. As described below, these predictions were manually evaluated separately for the chromosomes and pRF plasmids, improving the total numbers of predicted ORFs across all three genomes. The identification of split ORFs that inflated automated ORF predictions, coupled with lack of single contigs despite high coverage for both LSU and LSU-Lb genomes, suggests that the high repeat content of R. felis genomes is difficult to resolve with current, short-read sequencing technology.
Table 2.
Source | Reads |
Contigs |
Scaffolded | Scaffolds | Final Consensus | %GC | ORFs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Used | Assembled | No. | Largest | N50 | ||||||
LSU | 3,036,844 | 2,725,860 | 10,578 | 45,231 | 688 | 7,827 | 22 | 1,546,910 | 32.82 | 1,970 |
chr | 6,576 | 21 | 1,483,097 | 32.4 | 1,859 | |||||
pRF | 1,251 | 1 | 63,813 | 33.24 | 111 | |||||
Wolbachia | 678 | 438 | 750,706 | 35.73 | NA | |||||
LSU-Lb | 5,463,632 | 2,612,084 | 59,374 | 53,712 | 413 | 5,266 | 44 | 1,579,225 | 33.15 | 1,691 |
chr | 2,404 | 35 | 1,467,654 | 32.35 | 1,576 | |||||
pRF | 2,861 | 8 | 59,272 | 33.76 | 72 | |||||
pLbaR | 1 | 1 | 52,299 | 33.35 | 43 |
Two divergent Wolbachia species are known to exist in the LSU C. felis colony (Pornwiroon et al. 2007), an uncharacterized species and a species closely related to Wolbachia spp. previously detected in fleas (Gorham et al. 2003). Infection of fleas with R. felis str. LSU was associated with the absence of seven other resident microbes identified in Rickettsia-uninfected fleas, but not the two Wolbachia species (Pornwiroon et al. 2007). Previously, characterization of R. felis LSU through the tick-derived ISE6 cell line identified Wolbachia-like organisms in the low passage isolate of R. felis LSU (Sunyakumthorn et al. 2008). Thus, the generation of Wolbachia sequencing data from the ISE6 cell line infected with R. felis str. LSU was expected. Accordingly, we assembled a complete 16S rDNA sequence that was identical to the 16S rDNA of the uncharacterized Wolbachia species (EF121347) previously reported from the LSU colony (supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online). Additionally, we identified 438 contigs that contained genes encoding proteins with top BLASTP hits to Wolbachia spp. The characterization of this genome sequence will be reported elsewhere.
No additional microbial genomes were detected in assembling the R. felis str. LSU-Lb genome; however, one 52.3-kb contig was built that contained mostly plasmid-like genes, yet the profile of these genes, as well as the estimated size of the replicon, did not match plasmid pRF. This putative plasmid is discussed extensively below.
Phylogenomics
Genome Phylogeny Estimation of Rickettsiaceae
Phylogeny estimation of 310 conserved proteins encoded in 62 Rickettsiaceae genomes illustrates the placement of R. felis strains, together with R. akari and R. australis, within the TRG rickettsiae (fig. 1A). In response to earlier reports classifying R. felis as belonging to either TG (Higgins et al. 1996) or SFG (Bouyer et al. 2001) rickettsiae, we created the TRG to account for the “transitional” lineage between these long standing Rickettsia groups (Gillespie et al. 2007). Although standard models of amino acid substitution (e.g., WAG, LG) group TRG and SFG rickettsiae as a monophyletic clade (Gillespie et al. 2008; Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012), our recent use of the CAT model demonstrated for the first time the monophyly of TG and TRG rickettsiae (Driscoll et al. 2013). The phylogeny estimation presented here also recovered the monophyly of TG and TRG rickettsiae, with the CAT substitution model accounting for similar base composition shared by TRG and SFG rickettsiae genomes (32.5 %GC) relative to the more AT-rich genomes of TG rickettsiae (29 %GC) (supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online). Collectively, robust genome-based phylogeny estimation unambiguously supports the derivation of three Rickettsia groups (TG, TRG, and SFG) from the poorly understood AG rickettsiae, consistent with unique host specialization and genome characteristics that define each distinct lineage (Gillespie et al. 2008).
Genomic Heterogeneity in Strains of R. felis
Genome Sequence Evolution
Consistent with the results from SNP analysis, phylogeny estimation recovered the split of R. felis str. LSU-Lb from the flea-associated strains (fig. 1B). Unexpectedly, far more divergence separated the flea-associated strains relative to the SNP analysis; this is partially a consequence of our somewhat conservative SNP calling routine but also may be a reflection of the shorter reads and poorer assembly of R. felis str. LSU relative to R. felis str. URRWXCal2, which was assembled into one chromosome (table 2). Estimations of amino acid divergence illustrate that, despite sharing common ancestry relative to R. felis str. LSU-Lb, the flea-associated strains are highly divergent, with str. LSU evolving more rapidly subsequent to the split from R. felis str. LSU-Lb (fig. 1C). Nonetheless, compared with R. akari, it is evident that all three R. felis strains collectively comprise a species that is clearly distinct from other members of TRG rickettsiae (∼4.5% aa divergence).
Genome Architecture Conservation
OGs of proteins generated across all three R. felis genomes resulted in a core genome encoding 1,261 proteins (fig. 1D). Despite this, only roughly half (46.8%) of these conserved proteins are of uniform length across all three genomes, reflecting the unequal distribution of RPEs and other insertion elements, as well as minor discrepancies in gene start sites (supplementary fig. S2, Supplementary Material online). Still, a manual assessment of generated OGs revealed that, relative to R. felis str. URRWXCal2, split and truncated proteins from str. LSU (n = 347) and str. LSU-Lb (n = 109) grossly contributed to overestimation of the accessory genome (supplementary fig. S2, Supplementary Material online). This likely reflects the shorter reads generated by next-generation sequencing, in conjunction with the high repeat density of R. felis genomes, preventing a portion of genes to assemble properly. Once adjusted for, the accessory genome revealed similar numbers for proteins unique to each genome, as well as proteins shared by any two combinations (fig. 1D).
An approximation of synteny conservation across the closed genome of R. felis str. URRWXCal2 and the multicontig assemblies of strains LSU and str. LSU-Lb revealed substantial colinearity across all three genomes (supplementary fig. S3, Supplementary Material online). In conjunction with the minimal accessory genome, minor deviations in synteny can be attributed to differential numbers of transposases and repeat regions, which are probable factors preventing closure of the LSU and str. LSU-Lb genomes. It is likely that such duplicate transposases and other insertion sequences have mediated several homologous recombination events resulting in minor synteny breaks across these genomes; such has been observed in Rickettsia (Felsheim et al. 2009; Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012) and other Rickettsiales (Gillespie, Nordberg, et al. 2012) genomes with elevated genes encoding transposases (and inactive derivatives) and other repeat elements. Notwithstanding, the three R. felis genomes are highly conserved in relation to other Rickettsia genomes, with the defining characteristics of R. felis str. URRWXCal2 (e.g., split sca0, presence of sca3, duplicate pat1, elevated toxin–antitoxin modules, split ppcE; presence of both rickA and ralF, etc.) conserved in the LSU and str. LSU-Lb genomes (data not shown).
Lack of Booklouse-Associated SNPs
Five highly conserved Rickettsia genes (16S rDNA, gltA, sca0, sca4, and sca5) were utilized for comparing R. felis flea-associated strains (URRWXCal2 and LSU) with R. felis str. LSU-Lb and other L. bostrychophila-associated strains (supplementary fig. S4, Supplementary Material online). Importantly, these other booklouse-associated strains are from regions (Arizona, USA and Queensland, Australia) geographically isolated from the LSU L. bostrychophila colony (Behar et al. 2010). Surprisingly, of 11 SNPs identified from four genes (sca4 was invariant), all but one (in sca5) united R. felis str. LSU-Lb with the flea-associated genomes to the exclusion of the other L. bostrychophila-associated R. felis strains (fig. 1E), indicating a potential host shift to L. bostrychophila that occurred independent of the geographically isolated L. bostrychophila-associated R. felis strains.
pRF Plasmids
Both LSU and LSU-Lb strains of R. felis carry the pRF plasmid, which was originally identified in strain URRWXCal2 (Ogata, Renesto, et al. 2005) and subsequently shown to vary minimally in an R. felis strain associated with L. bostrychophila from Australia (Behar et al. 2010), hereafter referred to as str. “AUS-Lb.” A comparison of all four pRF plasmids illustrates limited conservation in CDS (fig. 2A) but high synteny (supplementary fig. S5, Supplementary Material online). A core set of 54 CDS is present across all four plasmids, yet many genes are either split or truncated in one or more plasmids. Only 15 CDS are conserved in length across all four plasmids (supplementary fig. S6, Supplementary Material online). One of these, pRF_56, was originally annotated as a hyaluronidase, an enzyme thought to facilitate pathogen spread through host tissues. Characterization of a similar protein from Streptococcus pyogenes did not reveal a hyaluronidase function, but rather beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase activity, with the ability to remove beta-O-linked N-acetylglucosamine from mammalian glycoproteins (Sheldon et al. 2006). As homologs of pRF_56 are unknown from other Rickettsia genomes, these proteins may be a factor unique to the biology of R. felis.
We previously noted that one particular pRF-encoded hypothetical protein, pRF_68, is conserved in the chromosomes of TG rickettsiae, but variably present in other Rickettsia genomes (Gillespie et al. 2007). Thus, pRF_68 is one a few factors strongly conserved in insect-associated Rickettsia genomes (Ammerman et al. 2009; Gillespie, Ammerman, Beier-Sexton, et al. 2009). Homologs of pRF_68 have since been identified on the pMC5_1 plasmid of R. australis str. Cutlack (YP_005389775), as well as on the chromosomes of Rickettsia bellii str. RML369-C (YP_538411), Rickettsia endosymbiont of Ixodes scapularis (REIS) (EER21570), and R. monacensis str. IrR/Munich (CDI29587). Remarkably, a homolog (CDG49776) is also encoded on the chromosome of the obligate intracellular bacterium Cardinium cBtQ1 (Bacteroidetes), a facultative endosymbiont of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Santos-Garcia et al. 2014). These results further bolster our original observations that plasmid pRF is a modular array of LGTs exchanged with other Rickettsia spp. as well as other divergent bacteria (Gillespie et al. 2007).
Two gene fusions were identified in pRF of R. felis str. LSU-Lb, but not str. “AUS-Lb,” consistent with the near dearth of shared SNPs in the conserved chromosomal genes (discussed above). Despite this, a phylogeny of conserved pRF genes grouped the L. bostrychophila-associated strains together relative to the pRF plasmids of strains LSU and URRWXCal2 (data not shown). Consistent with this, a phylogeny estimation of DALPs, the sole protein encoded across all sequenced Rickettsia plasmids as revealed by our OG generation, grouped strains LSU-Lb and “AUS-Lb” and strains LSU and URRWXCal2 as sister clades (fig. 2B). Thus, despite considerable decay in gene content across pRF plasmids, these extrachromosomal elements share a common origin and have diverged in tandem with their respective chromosomes.
R. felis str. LSU-Lb Carries a Second Unique Plasmid
Inspection of the R. felis str. LSU-Lb assembly revealed a single contig comprised many plasmid-like genes. This contig, hereafter referred to as plasmid of L. bostrychophila associated Rickettsia (pLbaR), encodes 43 predicted proteins, including a ParA gene typically present on Rickettsia plasmids (supplementary fig. S7, Supplementary Material online). Multiple attempts to circularize this putative plasmid through PCR were unsuccessful, potentially due to transposases flanking the large contig. Despite this, the contig size (52.3 kb) and %GC (33) of pLbaR are typical of other Rickettsia plasmids, and 29 predicted proteins were grouped into OGs in a clustering analysis across 20 Rickettsia plasmids (fig. 2B). Importantly, the DALP encoded on pLbaR is most closely related to the DALP from plasmid pRPR (Rickettsia peacockii), which is substantially divergent from pRF plasmids (Felsheim et al. 2009), supporting pLbaR as a unique Rickettsia plasmid (fig. 2B).
pLbaR Integrative Conjugative Element
Remarkably, ORFs 2–23 of pLbaR encode an integrative conjugative element, named RAGE, known from the genomes of some rickettsial species (Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012). The prototypical RAGE comprised genes encoding an F-T4SS, a mobilization module, nonconjugative proteins with a variety of predicted functions, and an integrase that facilitates insertion into tRNA genes (fig. 3A). RAGEs are extensively proliferated and highly pseudogenized in the genomes of the Scrub Typhus agent, Orientia tsutsugamiushi (Cho et al. 2007; Nakayama et al. 2008), yet usually occur in a single insertion site (tRNA Val-GAC) in Rickettsia genomes; for example, R. bellii (Ogata et al. 2006) and Rickettsia massiliae (Blanc et al. 2007). Aside from an extraordinary nine chromosomal RAGEs, the REIS genome contains two additional RAGEs each on two of its four plasmids (pREIS1 and pREIS3) (Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012). Although the RAGE encoded on pLbaR contains only the F-T4SS genes, it shares near perfect colinearity with the RAGE encoded on plasmid pREIS3 (fig. 3B). Thus, R. felis str. LSU-Lb is the second Rickettsia species harboring a plasmid with an RAGE, lending further insight on the dynamic nature of these fascinating mobile elements.
The RAGEs of pLbaR and pREIS3 share five genes unknown from other RAGEs, and are also the only RAGEs with the N- and C-terminal domains of TraK (a VirB9 homolog) fused into a single protein (fig. 3B). This underscores the common origin of these elements, despite R. felis and REIS being well diverged from one another in the estimated phylogeny of Rickettsiaceae (fig. 1A). Relative to most chromosomal encoded RAGEs, the plasmid-encoded RAGEs of REIS lack a toxin-encoding gene between the genes coding for TraU and TraW; on pLbaR, a unique gene encoding a protein DUF1016 is found in this position. DUF1016 proteins belong to a diverse family of restriction endonucleases (Kinch et al. 2005). BLASTP analysis identified duplicate DUF1016 proteins encoded in the chromosomes of R. bellii strains and all three R. felis strains, as well as a single protein encoded in the REIS genome. Phylogeny estimation grouped all of these chromosomal-encoded proteins in a clade with other alphaproteobacterial homologs, including uncharacterized phage proteins encoded in several Wolbachia genomes (supplementary fig. S8, Supplementary Material online). Remarkably, the DUF1016 protein of pLbaR grouped with a homolog from Legionella longbeachae (WP_003636576) in a separate clade well diverged from that containing the alphaproteobacterial DUF1016 proteins. This LGT underscores the modular nature of RAGEs (Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012).
Phylogeny estimation of 14 F-T4SS proteins encoded within 14 Rickettsia RAGEs further bolsters the close relatedness of the pLbaR and pREIS3 RAGEs, and indicates the three plasmid encoded RAGEs are divergent from the chromosomal encoded RAGEs (fig. 3C). Relative to the F-T4SS of “Candidatus Protochlamydia amoebophila” UWE25, the plasmid encoded RAGEs branch off even before an RAGE encoded in the O. tsutsugamushi Ikeda genome, illustrating that multiple invasions of divergent RAGEs have occurred within Rickettsia genomes throughout evolution. The presence of RAGEs on plasmids from two Rickettsia species indicates that plasmids are the likely vehicles by which RAGEs spread across Rickettsia genomes. Their incorporation into Rickettsia chromosomes indicates that RAGE invasions are an active process shaping the composition of rickettsial genomes, equipping recipients with many genes important for survival within eukaryotic cells (Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012).
pLbaR T1SS Operon
ORFs 39–41 of plasmid pLbaR encode components of a T1SS most similar to the RTX-T1SSs (fig. 4). Like RTX-T1SSs of Vibrio spp., ORFs 39 and 41 encode ABC transporters that flank a membrane fusion protein (ORF40) (fig. 4A). In Vibrio RTX-T1SSs, secretion of the large MARTX toxin requires two ABC transporters, RtxB and RtxE (Boardman and Satchell 2004; Lee et al. 2008; Li et al. 2008), and it has been suggested that these proteins may form a heterodimer within the RTX T1SS complex (Boardman and Satchell 2004). Importantly, ORFs 39–41 are distinct from the Apr-like Rickettsiales T1SS (Gillespie 2014), which contains one ABC transporter and one membrane fusion protein that presumably assemble with TolC to form a functional secretion channel (fig. 4B). Remarkably, BLASTP analysis of ORFs 39–41 revealed highest similarity to a Cardinium cBtQ1 T1SS operon that is duplicated and thought to have arisen from an LGT event with Vibrio spp. (Santos-Garcia et al. 2014). Compared with Cardinium RTX-like T1SS operons, a TolC homolog is not encoded on pLbaR; however, the chromosomal TolC protein that is highly conserved and functional in Rickettsia genomes (Kaur et al. 2012) would serve as the outer membrane channel component of this RTX-like T1SS. The presence of a flanking gene (ORF 43) encoding a PD-(D/E)XK nuclease family transposase (pfam12784) that shares highest similarity to four transposases in the Cardinium cBtQ1 genome strongly implies LGT of these RTX-like T1SS operons between these divergent obligate intracellular bacteria.
Phylogeny estimation of T1SS ABC transporters grouped the two RTX-like ABC transporters of pLbaR within the Group 2 transporter clade (fig. 4C). Given that the conserved rickettsial AprD-like transporters belong to the Group 3 transporter clade, this is the first report of an RTX-like T1SS from any species of Rickettsiales. Within the Group 2 transporter clade, the duplicate ABC transporters of RTX and RTX-like T1SSs form separate clades (RtxB and RtxE), and assemblage within each clade indicates substantial LGT across divergent obligate intracellular bacteria and other Gammaproteobacteria, including species of Vibrio. Aside from R. felis and Cardinium cBtQ1, three gammaproteobacterial endosymbionts of insects (“Candidatus Hamiltonella defensa,” “Candidatus Regiella insecticola R5.15,” and Arsenophonus nasoniae) have acquired RTX-like T1SSs, despite reductive genomes due to obligate intracellular lifestyles. As RTX-T1SSs and associated MARTX toxins are known from Vibrio plasmids (Le Roux et al. 2011), it is likely that LGTs have equipped these obligate intracellular endosymbionts with a common secretion apparatus and associated toxin(s), which are likely factors for adaptation to specific host environments.
pLbaR RHS-Like Toxin
On pLbaR, immediately upstream of the RTX-like T1SS operon lies a gene (ORF 38) encoding a large protein of 3,241 aa, hereafter referred to as pLbaR_38 (fig. 4A). Given that large RTX toxins are often encoded nearby the RTX T1SS genes, we investigated whether pLbaR_38 had characteristics of RTX toxins. RTX proteins are highly modular and extraordinarily diverse in protein domain composition across species, with a wide range of ascribed functions (Linhartova et al. 2010). Nevertheless, these toxins are almost always secreted by T1SSs, and also contain hallmark Gly/Asp-rich nonapeptide repeat sequences near the C-terminus (Satchell 2011). pLbaR_38 is not a classical RTX toxin, as it lacks Gly/Asp-rich nonapeptide repeat sequences near its C-terminus (data not shown). However, BLASTP analysis revealed the protein to be modular, having substantially different matches across specific regions of the protein. Three distinct domains were identified: 1) An NT (N-terminal) (pos. 22–180) OTU (Ovarian tumor)-like cysteine protease domain, pfam02338 (Makarova et al. 2000), 2) an internal (pos. 2813–2924) salivary gland secreted toxin (Tox-SGS) domain, pfam15651 (Arca et al. 2005; Korochkina et al. 2006), and 3) a C-terminal ANK repeat domain (pos. 3079–3161), which contains two ANK repeats (supplementary fig. S9, Supplementary Material online). Tox-SGS domains are associated with recombination hot spot (RHS) proteins of insects and crustaceans, with domain architecture indicative of an origin from bacterial polymorphic toxin systems (Zhang et al. 2012). Large bacterial proteins with RHS domains function as insecticidal toxins (Joo Lee et al. 2004) as well as bacteriocins in intercellular completion (Koskiniemi et al. 2013). Accordingly, pLbaR_38 is best classified as an RHS-like toxin.
Remarkably, pLbaR_38 shares significant similarity with two RHS-like proteins encoded in the Cardinium cBtQ1 genome (fig. 4A), consistent with the close relatedness of the RTX-like T1SSs of these two species. The internal sequence of this RHS-like toxin also shares similarity with proteins encoded in the genomes of some Wolbachia spp, very few Rickettsia spp., Diplorickettsia massiliensis, and Orientia tsutsugamishi (supplementary fig. S9, Supplementary Material online). Although none of these proteins has characterized functions, it is clear that diverse sequences have recombined into the large ORF that encodes pLbaR_38. Furthermore, minimal regions within pLbaR_38 and the two RHS-like toxins of Cardinium cBtQ1 have low similarity with RTX-like toxins encoded in the genomes of “Candidatus Hamiltonella defensa” and “Candidatus Regiella insecticola” (data not shown), consistent with the similar RTX-like T1SSs common to all of these genomes. Interestingly, a nearby ORF on pLbaR encoding a hypothetical protein of 614 aa (pLbaR_36) is similar (22% ID) to a protein (NP_966396) encoded in the genome of the Wolbachia endosymbiont of Drosophila melanogaster (wMel). Curiously, in the wMel genome, NP_966396 is directly adjacent to an ORF encoding a protein (NP_966397) with similarity to pLbaR_38, indicating that a multigene transfer has likely occurred between wMel and pLbaR. This is also reflected by the ANK repeats encoded by pLbaR_38, which are most similar to dozens of ANK-repeat domain containing proteins encoded within many Wolbachia genomes, some of which also encode an OTU-like cysteine protease domain like pLbaR_38 (data not shown). Collectively, pLbaR_38 is a highly modular protein containing eukaryotic-like domains and regions similar to proteins encoded in other intracellular bacterial genomes. Its close proximity to an RTX-like T1SS suggests a potential mechanism for secretion of this large toxin by R. felis LSU-Lb into its booklouse host.
Discussion
In arthropods, vertical (inherited) versus horizontal transmission of rickettsial species is believed to play an important role in determining whether mutualistic or parasitic interactions evolve (Werren 1997); therefore, vertical transmission favors the evolution of benign and mutualistic associations, whereas frequent horizontal (infectious) transmission favors virulent rickettsiae (Hackstadt 1996). Thus, the level of virulence is expected to depend on the relative importance of vertical and horizontal transmission for maintenance of the rickettsiae within arthropod host populations. Yet, the constituents of the complex interplay between Rickettsia spp. and arthropod hosts, and also the checkpoint at which species diverge into pathogens or symbionts, are ill defined. Flea-borne transmission of R. felis has proved challenging to characterize (Bouyer et al. 2001; Ogata, Renesto, et al. 2005) as both horizontal (Hirunkanokpun et al. 2011) and vertical (Wedincamp and Foil 2002) transmission mechanisms are employed. Also, similar to R. typhi, R. felis is shed in flea feces (Reif et al. 2011), possibly providing an alternative avenue for vertebrate host infection. The unique dualistic nature of R. felis, in which distinct strains employ different transmission routes for sustained infection of arthropod populations, makes this an ideal model organism for studying rickettsial determinants of transmission and pathogenicity.
R. felis Genomic Heterogeneity
Despite earlier reports of negligible variation across strains of R. felis (Pornwiroon et al. 2006; Thepparit et al. 2011), we determined SNPs in both R. felis str. LSU and R. felis str. LSU-Lb, in relation to the published URRWXCal2 strain, suggesting that spatial isolation (LSU) and potential host specialization (LSU-Lb) have resulted in genetic divergence (table 1). Rickettsia felis str. LSU-Lb had four times more SNPs than R. felis str. LSU, yet the majority of these polymorphisms were found in intergenic regions, repeat regions, and conserved Rickettsia genes. In contrast, the majority of SNPs determined for R. felis str. LSU were found in genes previously identified as dynamic components of the Rickettsia mobilome, particular those encoding proliferated protein families involved in adaptations to intracellular lifestyle (Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012). Thus, although both of the strains we sequenced are divergent from the published URRWXCal2 strain, each new genome paints a different portrait of the selective forces operating on R. felis genomes from strains associated with different arthropod vectors. Importantly, the intraspecific variation we report here for R. felis strains will add to the list of markers used to distinguish R. felis and R. felis-like organisms (Jiang et al. 2013; Odhiambo et al. 2014).
Chromosome and pRF Plasmid Divergence
Consistent with the SNP analysis, analyses of the assembled genomes suggest that R. felis str. LSU-Lb is divergent from the flea-associated strains (fig. 1B and C). Unexpectedly, assembly of the R. felis str. LSU genome revealed more divergence not witnessed by initial SNP estimation, though manual assessment of gene predictions revealed many split genes and gene fragments that appear to be artifacts of sequencing and assembly. Such artifacts were far less observed for R. felis str. LSU-Lb. One possible reason for the difficulty encountered with the R. felis str. LSU sequencing and assembly is the presence of many Wolbachia reads in the generated data. Another is a higher instance of repeat regions and encoded transposases in R. felis str. LSU relative to R. felis str. LSU-Lb. Notwithstanding, future sequencing efforts, ideally utilizing a combination of short- and long-read sequencing methods, will be needed to resolve the incomplete genes models within both R. felis str. LSU and R. felis str. LSU-Lb genomes, as well as to evaluate the few missing genes that are present in the Rickettsia core genome and/or the R. felis str. URRWXCal2 genome.
Despite neither assembly of the LSU and LSU-Lb genomes resulting in single chromosomes (table 2), manual curation allowed for an approximation of a core R. felis genome (1,261 genes) and dynamic accessory genome (fig. 1D). Relative to R. felis str. URRWXCal2, both LSU and LSU-Lb genomes lacked 21 genes, which are all probable pseudogenes (average size of 80 aa) relative to other Rickettsia homologs. Similar profiles were found for genes shared by R. felis str. URRWXCal2 and either LSU or LSU-Lb strain, indicating a pseudogene-laden accessory genome characteristic of rickettsial reductive genome evolution (Andersson et al. 1998). Additionally, singletons encoded within the LSU and LSU-Lb genomes are also probable pseudogenes, having much larger counterparts in other Rickettsia genomes. Collectively, cursory analysis of the composition and divergence of the chromosomes of all three strains of R. felis does not reveal any specific factors that might account for host specialization.
As with chromosomes, the composition and degree of pseudogenization across pRF plasmids from four R. felis strains (URRWXCal2, LSU, “AUS-Lb,” and LSU-Lb) does not show a pattern consistent with strict divergence between flea- and booklouse-associated strains (fig. 2A). Since its discovery in 2005 as the first plasmid from an obligate intracellular bacterium (Ogata, Renesto, et al. 2005), virtually nothing is known regarding the function of the 68 proteins encoded on pRF, other than the expression of two of its small heatshock proteins (Ogawa et al. 2007). Our comparative analysis of four complete pRF plasmids from diverse strains of R. felis revealed some insight on the conservation of genes that are potentially critical for the biology of R. felis (fig. 2). However, like the chromosomes of all three strains, the pRF plasmids do not contain any particular distinct features that might account for host specialization.
pLbaR: A Factor Mediating Host Specialization?
The discovery of a second, unique plasmid (pLbaR) in the R. felis str. LSU-Lb assembly provides a set of unique genes that might play a role in this strain’s unique biology with L. bostrychophila (fig. 5). Rickettsia felis str. LSU-Lb is the third Rickettsia genome identified that carries multiple divergent plasmids, with the genomes of REIS and “Candidatus Rickettsia amblyommii” GAT-30V carrying four and three distinct plasmids, respectively. Additionally, this is the second report of a genome harboring a plasmid that encodes an RAGE. Although RAGEs tend to carry genes encoding DNA methyltransferases (D12 class), PolC-like DNA helicases, stringent response hydrolases and synthetases, and proteins containing histidine kinase and tetratricopeptide domains, many other genes with diverse functions are known to piggyback on these elements (Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012). Adding to this list is the DUF1016 protein encoded within the RAGE of pLbaR. Proteins annotated as DUF1016 are similar to the uncharacterized protein YhcG of Escherichia coli, which has been grouped in the PD-(D/E)XK phosphodiesterase superfamily (Kosinski et al. 2005; Steczkiewicz et al. 2012). Bacterial DUF1016 proteins are known from other mobile elements, for example, the integrative conjugative elements of Enterococcus spp. and Clostridium difficile that carry vancomycin resistance (Garnier et al. 2000; Sebaihia et al. 2006). The closest homolog to the pLbaR-encoded DUF1016 protein is from another intracellular species, Legionella longbeachae, consistent with previous reports identifying LGT between species of Legionella and Rickettsia (Cox et al. 2004; Ogata et al. 2006; Gillespie, Ammerman, Dreher-Lesnick, et al. 2009; Gillespie et al. 2010; Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012). The presence of divergent DUF1016 proteins in the genomes of several different Wolbachia spp. might hint at a common role these proteins serve rickettsiae in their arthropod hosts.
The pLbaR operon encoding the RTX-like T1SS and associated RHS-like toxin also likely arose from LGT, as the Cardinium endosymbiont cBtQ1 genome encodes highly similar homologs to all of these proteins. Gene exchanges between Rickettsia spp. and Cardinium endosymbionts of diverse arthropod species have previously been reported. Originally described from pseudogenes of R. peacockii (Simser et al. 2005), the transposase ISRPe1 is sporadically encoded across Rickettsia genomes (Felsheim et al. 2009; Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012), yet highly similar proteins are encoded across species of Cardinium and Rickettsia, as well as some other intracellular bacterial species (Duron 2013). We previously reported the first occurrence of an entire biotin synthesis operon on a bacterial plasmid, pREIS2 of REIS, with phylogeny estimation indicating that this unique operon was also found in the chromosomes of Neorickettsia spp. and the deltaproteobacterium Lawsonia intracellularis (Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012). This same operon was subsequently found in the genome of the Cardinium hertigii, an endosymbiont of the wasp Encarsia pergandiella, despite a near lack of genes encoding all other major biosynthesis pathways (Penz et al. 2012). Remarkably, the same biotin operon was recently found in the genome of the Wolbachia endosymbiont of the bedbug Cimex lectularius (wCle), with wCle provisioning biotin to its insect host in an established obligate mutualism (Nikoh et al. 2014).
Other LGTs were also predicted between Rickettsia spp. and Cardinium hertigii (Penz et al. 2012), as were dozens of exchanges between Rickettsia spp. and the amoeba symbiont “Candidatus Amoebophilus asiaticus” (Schmitz-Esser et al. 2010; Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012), another member of the Bacteroidetes that is closely related to Cardinium spp. (Santos-Garcia et al. 2014). These findings are reflective of intracellular bacterial species occupying similar niches within their eukaryotic hosts, the so-called “intracellular arena” (Bordenstein and Wernegreen 2004). Cardinium and Rickettsia coinfect whiteflies (Chiel et al. 2007; Skaljac et al. 2010, 2013), and both were detected together in the bacteriocyte, as well as in other host tissues (Skaljac et al. 2010). This co-occurrence increases opportunities for genetic exchange, with factors such as the RAGE (Gillespie, Joardar, et al. 2012) and bacteriophage (Bordenstein and Wernegreen 2004; Degnan and Moran 2008) facilitating LGT.
Our estimated phylogeny of T1SS ABC transporters suggests that, along with the Cardinium endosymbiont cBtQ1, several gammaproteobacterial arthropod endosymbionts utilize a similar RTX-like T1SS to deliver substrates into their intracellular environments. The genomes of A. nasoniae (Wilkes et al. 2010), “Candidatus Hamiltonella defensa” (Degnan et al. 2009), and “Candidatus Regiella insecticola R5.15” (Hansen et al. 2012) all encode RTX toxins in addition to these specialized T1SSs. Regarding R. insecticola 5.15, its RTX-like T1SS and RTX toxins are among several pathogenicity factors that are absent in a closely related strain, R. insecticola LSR1, which unlike strain 5.15 does not protect host pea aphids from attack by the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) (Hansen et al. 2012). Thus, it is likely that RTX-like T1SSs of these endosymbionts are utilized to secrete substrates that serve as facilitators of intracellular survival, acting directly against species that harm the host. An overall role in equipping resident symbionts with tools to outcompete other microbes and maintain a consistent microbiota is also probable for RTX and RHS substrates, as has recently been suggested for elevated genes encoding these toxins in the genomes of honey bee endosymbionts (Kwong et al. 2014).
Although the type VI secretion system (T6SS) has been implicated in the secretion of some bacterial RHS proteins (Koskiniemi et al. 2013), the lack of T6SS genes in the genomes of Cardinium endosymbiont cBtQ1 and R. felis str. LSU-Lb suggests another means for the putative secretion of their RHS proteins. The RTX-like T1SSs encoded in both genomes would serve to facilitate secretion of such large substrates, especially given that T6SS substrates are typically smaller in size than large RHS proteins (Silverman et al. 2012). Collectively, the operon encoding the RTX-like T1SS and associated RHS-like toxin, as well as the DUF1016 gene piggybacking on the RAGE, are the major factors encoded on pLbaR that distinguish the R. felis str. LSU-Lb genome from the genomes of the flea-associated R. felis strains. These factors are promising for investigating the genetic mechanisms that differentiate R. felis as an obligate mutualist of L. bostrychophila from R. felis as a facultative parasite of fleas and other arthropods (Behar et al. 2010). Given that R. felis str. LSU-Lb lacks nearly all SNPs unique to other L. bostrychophila-associated R. felis strains (fig. 1E), it is imperative to determine whether these strains also carry plasmid pLbaR, or contain different factors that are associated with independent colonization(s) of L. bostrychophila.
TRG Rickettsiae and Reproductive Parasitism
Since its discovery, R. felis has been difficult to sort in the traditional TG/SFG rickettsiae classification scheme, consistent with it possessing attributes of both groups. Based on 1) its phylogenetic position (ancestral to SFG rickettsiae), 2) its predominant association with insects, and 3) substantial LGT of pRF plasmid genes with species of AG rickettsiae, R. felis was grouped together with R. akari and R. australis in the TRG rickettsiae (Gillespie et al. 2007). Subsequent phylogenomics analysis supported TRG rickettsiae as a distinct rickettsial lineage (Gillespie et al. 2008). Although convincing evidence for minimal LGT between R. typhi and R. felis has been shown (Merhej et al. 2011), hundreds of genes in the core Rickettsia genome possess a strong pattern of vertical descent (Gillespie et al. 2008; Hernandez-Lopez et al. 2013). Along with our recent report (Driscoll et al. 2013), the CAT model-based phylogeny estimation of the core Rickettsia genome presented here supports the common ancestry of TG and TRG rickettsiae, refuting the classification of R. felis as a member of SFG rickettsiae (fig. 1).
Relative to TG (body lice and fleas) and SFG (ticks) rickettsiae, a broader host range has been reported for TRG rickettsiae (e.g., ticks, mites, fleas, booklice, other insects) (Gillespie, Nordberg, et al. 2012). Although little is known regarding the nature of the relationships that species of TRG rickettsiae have with their hosts, it is clear that multiple reproductive parasites have emerged within the lineage of R. felis, R. felis-like organisms, and the recently described “Candidatus Rickettsia asemboensis” (Jiang et al. 2013). For the wasp Neochrysocharis formosa (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), which is an endoparasitoid of the leafminer Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae), an uncharacterized Rickettsia species has been shown to induce thelytokous parthenogenesis (Hagimori et al. 2006). A BLASTN search with the 16S rDNA of this uncharacterized species (AB185963) yields the best match to 16S rDNA of R. felis str. URRWXCal2 (1,341/1,346 identity). Interestingly, other members of this lineage have been reported from the Birch Catkin Bug, Kleidocerys resedae (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) (Matsuura et al. 2012), as well as several species of the weevil genera Curculio, Koreoculio, and Archarius (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) (Toju and Fukatsu 2011; Toju et al. 2013). The effects of these uncharacterized species on host fitness and reproductive mode are unknown and warrant future investigation.
For unnamed strains of R. felis infecting L. bostrychophila, reproductive parasitism has evolved into obligate mutualism, supported by 1) a paucity of males known in nature, 2) the near 100% rickettsial infection rate, and 3) no viable males after eliminating rickettsia (Yusuf and Turner 2004; Perotti et al. 2006). Despite SNP analyses revealing it is a divergent strain (fig. 1E), the lack of males in our LSU L. bostrychophila colony, coupled with a 100% infection rate, suggests R. felis str. LSU-Lb is also an obligate mutualist, though this needs to be substantiated. It is unknown how exactly R. felis contributes to parthenogenesis, other than having a probable role in oocyte development (Perlman et al. 2006). In stark contrast, R. felis has never been implicated in the induction of parthenogenesis in the cat flea, and it is clear that C. felis does not undergo parthenogenesis in the absence of males (Zakson-Aiken et al. 1996). Thus, R. felis strains URRWXCal2 and LSU are best described as facultative parasites of fleas, with unknown potential as reproductive parasites of other arthropods.
For several Rickettsia species belonging to ancestral lineages, the mechanisms that govern parthenogenesis (Perotti et al. 2006; Giorgini et al. 2010), male killing (Werren et al. 1994; Lawson et al. 2001; von der Schulenburg et al. 2001; Majerus and Majerus 2010), and feminization (Zchori-Fein et al. 2006) are unknown, though future sequencing of the genomes of these organisms may yield potential factors that promote reproductive parasitism. However, genome sequence data may not readily reveal these factors, as a recent attempt to identify common factors in Cardinium and Wolbachia species that are involved in cytoplasmic incompatibility proved futile (Penz et al. 2012). Although several factors encoded on plasmid pLbaR of R. felis str. LSU-Lb were also identified in the genomes of some Cardinium and Wolbachia species, their presence in the genomes of other Rickettsia reproductive parasites remains to be determined.
Pathogenicity of R. felis str. LSU-Lb?
Aside from plasmid pLbaR, the minimal genomic divergence distinguishing R. felis str. LSU-Lb from flea-associated strains suggests that it has the potential to be a human pathogen (fig. 5). While provisional, our hypothesis that different strains of R. felis have independently colonized L. bostrychophila is consistent with a report of liposcelids feeding on dead insects and insect eggs (Turner 1994). Considering that L. bostrychophila occupies common niches with fleas, such as bird and rat nests, as well as canine fur (Mockford 1971; Baz 1990; Turner 1994), dead fleas and flea eggs would serve as prime sources for the acquisition of R. felis. Although primary endosymbionts of arthropods are nearly always found in specialized organs (mycetomes), R. felis is found in a variety of tissues throughout L. bostrychophila, including single cell mycetocytes and an organ-forming mycetome (Perotti et al. 2006; Thepparit et al. 2011). For this early stage of evolutionary transition from a facultative parasite into an obligate endosymbiont, vertical transmission may still be periodically supplemented with horizontal transmission. This scenario best explains why R. felis LSU-Lb lacks nearly all SNPs unique to other L. bostrychophila-associated R. felis strains, yet possesses the same host–symbiont relationship as these strains relative to the facultative parasitic nature of the flea-associated strains.
As a closely related lineage to parasitic lice (Grimaldi and Engel 2006), liposcelids have an intimate association with human habitats (Baz 1990), and have been observed feeding on nails (Lin et al. 2004) and infesting scalps (Burgess et al. 1991). The distribution of rickettsia in the liposcelid digestive tract and fat bodies (Chapman 2003; Perotti et al. 2006) indicates that bacteria may be present in host feces, similar to that reported for flea-associated R. felis (Reif et al. 2011) and R. typhi (Azad and Beard 1998; Reif and Macaluso 2009). Thus, although R. felis str. LSU-Lb is a probable obligate mutalist of a nonhematophagous arthropod, its potential to be horizontally transmitted to vertebrates needs to be addressed. As a corollary, another critical aspect to determine is whether or not R. felis str. LSU-Lb can infect fleas. If both of these scenarios are possible, then in theory fleas could acquire R. felis str. LSU-Lb by feeding on infected vertebrates. To this end, the potential for R. felis str. LSU-Lb to disrupt sexual reproduction in fleas, as well as other arthropod vectors, has profound implications for infections disease research and arthropod pest management.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary tables S1–S4 and figures S1–S9 are available at Genome Biology and Evolution online (http://www.gbe.oxfordjournals.org/).
Acknowledgments
This research was supported with funds from the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (awards R56AI104923 to K.R.M., R01AI017828 and R01AI043006 to A.F.A., and HHSN272200900040C to Bruno W. Sobral at the Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia tech). Sequencing was supported in-part by P30GM110760. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Literature Cited
- Adams JR, Schmidtmann ET, Azad AF. Infection of colonized cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouche), with a rickettsia-like microorganism. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990;43:400–409. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1990.43.400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ammerman NC, Gillespie JJ, Neuwald AF, Sobral BW, Azad AF. A typhus group-specific protease defies reductive evolution in rickettsiae. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:7609–7613. doi: 10.1128/JB.01077-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andersson SG, et al. The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria. Nature. 1998;396:133–140. doi: 10.1038/24094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arca B, et al. An updated catalogue of salivary gland transcripts in the adult female mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. J Exp Biol. 2005;208:3971–3986. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azad AF, Beard CB. Rickettsial pathogens and their arthropod vectors. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:179–186. doi: 10.3201/eid0402.980205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azad AF, Radulovic S, Higgins JA, Noden BH, Troyer JM. Flea-borne rickettsioses: ecologic considerations. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:319–327. doi: 10.3201/eid0303.970308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aziz RK, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baz A. Psocoptera from weaver bird nests (Aves: Ploceidae) in Equatorial Guinea (West-Africa) Ann Soc Entomol Fr. 1990;26:33–38. [Google Scholar]
- Behar A, McCormick LJ, Perlman SJ. Rickettsia felis infection in a common household insect pest, Liposcelis bostrychophila (Psocoptera: Liposcelidae) Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:2280–2285. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00026-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blanc G, et al. Molecular evolution of rickettsia surface antigens: evidence of positive selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:2073–2083. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blanc G, et al. Lateral gene transfer between obligate intracellular bacteria: evidence from the Rickettsia massiliae genome. Genome Res. 2007;17:1657–1664. doi: 10.1101/gr.6742107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boardman BK, Satchell KJ. Vibrio cholerae strains with mutations in an atypical type I secretion system accumulate RTX toxin intracellularly. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:8137–8143. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.23.8137-8143.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bordenstein SR, Wernegreen JJ. Bacteriophage flux in endosymbionts (Wolbachia): infection frequency, lateral transfer, and recombination rates. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21:1981–1991. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouyer DH, et al. Rickettsia felis: molecular characterization of a new member of the spotted fever group. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:339–347. doi: 10.1099/00207713-51-2-339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burgess I, Coulthard M, Heaney J. Scalp infestation by Liposcelis mendax. Br J Dermatol. 1991;125:400–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:540–552. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapman GB. Pharynx, esophagus, and associated structures in the booklouse, Liposcelis divinatorius. Invertebr Biol. 2003;122:52–60. [Google Scholar]
- Chiel E, et al. Biotype-dependent secondary symbiont communities in sympatric populations of Bemisia tabaci. Bull Entomol Res. 2007;97:407–413. doi: 10.1017/S0007485307005159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cho NH, et al. The Orientia tsutsugamushi genome reveals massive proliferation of conjugative type IV secretion system and host-cell interaction genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:7981–7986. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611553104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox R, Mason-Gamer RJ, Jackson CL, Segev N. Phylogenetic analysis of Sec7-domain-containing Arf nucleotide exchangers. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:1487–1505. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-06-0443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Degnan PH, Moran NA. Diverse phage-encoded toxins in a protective insect endosymbiont. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:6782–6791. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01285-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Degnan PH, Yu Y, Sisneros N, Wing RA, Moran NA. Hamiltonella defensa, genome evolution of protective bacterial endosymbiont from pathogenic ancestors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9063–9068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900194106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deng W, et al. DIVEIN: a web server to analyze phylogenies, sequence divergence, diversity, and informative sites. Biotechniques. 2010;48:405–408. doi: 10.2144/000113370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Driscoll T, Gillespie JJ, Nordberg EK, Azad AF, Sobral BW. Bacterial DNA sifted from the Trichoplax adhaerens (Animalia: Placozoa) genome project reveals a putative rickettsial endosymbiont. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5:621–645. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duron O. Lateral transfers of insertion sequences between Wolbachia, Cardinium and Rickettsia bacterial endosymbionts. Heredity. 2013;111:330–337. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felsheim RF, Kurtti TJ, Munderloh UG. Genome sequence of the endosymbiont Rickettsia peacockii and comparison with virulent Rickettsia rickettsii: identification of virulence factors. PLoS One. 2009;4:e8361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garnier F, Taourit S, Glaser P, Courvalin P, Galimand M. Characterization of transposon Tn1549, conferring VanB-type resistance in Enterococcus spp. Microbiology. 2000;146(Pt 6):1481–1489. doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-6-1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie JJ. Secretome of obligate intracellular Rickettsia. FEMS Microbiol Rev. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12084. Advance Access published August 28, 2014, doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie JJ, Ammerman NC, Beier-Sexton M, Sobral BS, Azad AF. Louse- and flea-borne rickettsioses: biological and genomic analyses. Vet Res. 2009;40:12. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2008050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie JJ, Ammerman NC, Dreher-Lesnick SM, et al. An anomalous type IV secretion system in Rickettsia is evolutionarily conserved. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie JJ, et al. Plasmids and rickettsial evolution: insight from Rickettsia felis. PLos One. 2007;2:e266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie JJ, et al. Phylogenomics reveals a diverse Rickettsiales type IV secretion system. Infect Immun. 2010;78:1809–1823. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01384-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie JJ, Joardar V, et al. A Rickettsia genome overrun by mobile genetic elements provides insight into the acquisition of genes characteristic of an obligate intracellular lifestyle. J Bacteriol. 2012;194: 376–394. doi: 10.1128/JB.06244-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie JJ, Nordberg EK, Azad AF, Sobral BW. Phylogeny and comparative genomics: the shifting landscape in the genomics era. In: Azad AF, Palmer GH, editors. Intracellular pathogens II: Rickettsiales. Boston: American Society of Microbiology; 2012. pp. 84–141. [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie JJ, et al. PATRIC: the comprehensive bacterial bioinformatics resource with a focus on human pathogenic species. Infect Immun. 2011;79:4286–4298. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00207-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillespie JJ, et al. Rickettsia phylogenomics: unwinding the intricacies of obligate intracellular life. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giorgini M, Bernardo U, Monti MM, Nappo AG, Gebiola M. Rickettsia symbionts cause parthenogenetic reproduction in the parasitoid wasp Pnigalio soemius (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:2589–2599. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03154-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gorham CH, Fang QQ, Durden LA. Wolbachia endosymbionts in fleas (Siphonaptera) J Parasitol. 2003;89:283–289. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2003)089[0283:WEIFS]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimaldi D, Engel MS. Fossil Liposcelididae and the lice ages (Insecta: Psocodea) Proc Biol Sci. 2006;273:625–633. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hackstadt T. The biology of rickettsiae. Infect Agents Dis. 1996;5:127–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hagimori T, Abe Y, Date S, Miura K. The first finding of a Rickettsia bacterium associated with parthenogenesis induction among insects. Curr Microbiol. 2006;52:97–101. doi: 10.1007/s00284-005-0092-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen AK, Vorburger C, Moran NA. Genomic basis of endosymbiont-conferred protection against an insect parasitoid. Genome Res. 2012;22:106–114. doi: 10.1101/gr.125351.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernandez-Lopez A, et al. To tree or not to tree? Genome-wide quantification of recombination and reticulate evolution during the diversification of strict intracellular bacteria. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5:2305–2317. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higgins JA, Radulovic S, Schriefer ME, Azad AF. Rickettsia felis: a new species of pathogenic rickettsia isolated from cat fleas. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:671–674. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.3.671-674.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higgins JA, Sacci JB, Jr, Schriefer ME, Endris RG, Azad AF. Molecularidentification of rickettsia-like microorganisms associated with colonized cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) Insect Mol Biol. 1994;3:27–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1994.tb00147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirunkanokpun S, Thepparit C, Foil LD, Macaluso KR. Horizontal transmission of Rickettsia felis between cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:4577–4586. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05289.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang J, et al. Molecular detection of rickettsia felis and candidatus rickettsia asemboensis in fleas from human habitats, Asembo, Kenya. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013;13:550–558. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2012.1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joo Lee P, et al. Cloning and heterologous expression of a novel insecticidal gene (tccC1) from Xenorhabdus nematophilus strain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;319:1110–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.04.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang YJ, et al. Extensive diversity of Rickettsiales bacteria in two species of ticks from China and the evolution of the Rickettsiales. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14:167. doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0167-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanonenberg K, Schwarz CK, Schmitt L. Type I secretion systems—a story of appendices. Res Microbiol. 2013;164:596–604. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2013.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaur SJ, et al. TolC-dependent secretion of an ankyrin repeat-containing protein of Rickettsia typhi. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:4920–4932. doi: 10.1128/JB.00793-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinch LN, Ginalski K, Rychlewski L, Grishin NV. Identification of novel restriction endonuclease-like fold families among hypothetical proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:3598–3605. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korochkina S, et al. A mosquito-specific protein family includes candidate receptors for malaria sporozoite invasion of salivary glands. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:163–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00611.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kosinski J, Feder M, Bujnicki JM. The PD-(D/E)XK superfamily revisited: identification of new members among proteins involved in DNA metabolism and functional predictions for domains of (hitherto) unknown function. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koskiniemi S, et al. Rhs proteins from diverse bacteria mediate intercellular competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:7032–7037. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300627110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krzywinski M, et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639–1645. doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kwong WK, Engel P, Koch H, Moran NA. Genomics and host specialization of honey bee and bumble bee gut symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:11509–14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405838111. Advance Access published July 22, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lartillot N, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2286–2288. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lartillot N, Philippe H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21:1095–1109. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lartillot N, Philippe H. Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. Syst Biol. 2006;55:195–207. doi: 10.1080/10635150500433722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lartillot N, Rodrigue N, Stubbs D, Richer J. PhyloBayes MPI: phylogenetic reconstruction with infinite mixtures of profiles in a parallel environment. Syst Biol. 2013;62:611–615. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawson ET, Mousseau TA, Klaper R, Hunter MD, Werren JH. Rickettsia associated with male-killing in a buprestid beetle. Heredity. 2001;86:497–505. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Roux F, et al. Virulence of an emerging pathogenic lineage of Vibrio nigripulchritudo is dependent on two plasmids. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:296–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02329.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee BC, et al. Vibrio vulnificus rtxE is important for virulence, and its expression is induced by exposure to host cells. Infect Immun. 2008;76:1509–1517. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01503-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee M, et al. Membrane fusion proteins of type I secretion system and tripartite efflux pumps share a binding motif for TolC in gram-negative bacteria. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L, Rock JL, Nelson DR. Identification and characterization of a repeat-in-toxin gene cluster in Vibrio anguillarum. Infect Immun. 2008;76:2620–2632. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01308-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Jr, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of orthologgroups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13:2178–2189. doi: 10.1101/gr.1224503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin YC, Chan ML, Ko CW, Hsieh MY. Nail infestation by Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2004;29:620–621. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2004.01609.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linhartova I, et al. RTX proteins: a highly diverse family secreted by a common mechanism. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010;34:1076–1112. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00231.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maina AN, et al. Rickettsia felis infection in febrile patients, western Kenya, 2007-2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:328–331. doi: 10.3201/eid1802.111372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Majerus TM, Majerus ME. Discovery and identification of a male-killing agent in the Japanese ladybird Propylea japonica (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Makarova KS, Aravind L, Koonin EV. A novel superfamily of predicted cysteine proteases from eukaryotes, viruses and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000;25:50–52. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01530-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marchler-Bauer A, et al. CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D225–D229. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsutani M, et al. Complete genomic DNA sequence of the East Asian spotted fever disease agent Rickettsia japonica. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsuura Y, Kikuchi Y, Meng XY, Koga R, Fukatsu T. Novel clade of alphaproteobacterial endosymbionts associated with stinkbugs and other arthropods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:4149–4156. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00673-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merhej V, Notredame C, Royer-Carenzi M, Pontarotti P, Raoult D. The rhizome of life: the sympatric Rickettsia felis paradigm demonstrates the random transfer of DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:3213–3223. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mockford EL. Psocoptera from sleeping nests of the dusky-footed wood rat in southern California. Pan-Pac Entomol. 1971;47:127–140. [Google Scholar]
- Nakayama K, et al. The whole-genome sequencing of the obligate intracellular bacterium Orientia tsutsugamushi revealed massive gene amplification during reductive genome evolution. DNA Res. 2008;15:185–199. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsn011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nikoh N, et al. Evolutionary origin of insect-Wolbachia nutritional mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:10257–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409284111. Advance Access published June 30, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Odhiambo AM, Maina AN, Taylor ML, Jiang J, Richards AL. Development and validation of a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay specific for the detection of Rickettsia felis and not Rickettsia felis-like organisms. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014;14:476–481. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2013.1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogata H, Audic S, Abergel C, Fournier PE, Claverie JM. Protein coding palindromes are a unique but recurrent feature in Rickettsia. Genome Res. 2002;12:808–816. doi: 10.1101/gr.227602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogata H, et al. Selfish DNA in protein-coding genes of Rickettsia. Science. 2000;290:347–350. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5490.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogata H, et al. Genome sequence of Rickettsia bellii illuminates the role of amoebae in gene exchanges between intracellular pathogens. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e76. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogata H, Renesto P, et al. The genome sequence of Rickettsia felis identifies the first putative conjugative plasmid in an obligate intracellular parasite. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogata H, Robert C, et al. Rickettsia felis, from culture to genome sequencing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1063:26–34. doi: 10.1196/annals.1355.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogawa M, et al. Proteome analysis of Rickettsia felis highlights the expression profile of intracellular bacteria. Proteomics. 2007;7:1232–1248. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200600721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parola P. Rickettsia felis: from a rare disease in the USA to a common cause of fever in sub-Saharan Africa. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:996–1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03516.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Penz T, et al. Comparative genomics suggests an independent origin of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Cardinium hertigii. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1003012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perlman SJ, Hunter MS, Zchori-Fein E. The emerging diversity of Rickettsia. Proc Biol Sci. 2006;273:2097–2106. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perotti MA, Clarke HK, Turner BD, Braig HR. Rickettsia as obligate and mycetomic bacteria. FASEB J. 2006;20:2372–2374. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-5870fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pornwiroon W, Kearney MT, Husseneder C, Foil LD, Macaluso KR. Comparative microbiota of Rickettsia felis-uninfected and -infected colonized cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis. ISME J. 2007;1:394–402. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2007.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pornwiroon W, Pourciau SS, Foil LD, Macaluso KR. Rickettsia felis from cat fleas: isolation and culture in a tick-derived cell line. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5589–5595. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00532-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reif KE, Kearney MT, Foil LD, Macaluso KR. Acquisition of Rickettsia felis by cat fleas during feeding. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:963–968. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2010.0137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reif KE, Macaluso KR. Ecology of Rickettsia felis: a review. J Med Entomol. 2009;46:723–736. doi: 10.1603/033.046.0402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards AL, et al. Human Infection with Rickettsia felis, Kenya. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1081–1086. doi: 10.3201/eid1607.091885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N, Embley TM. The SAR11 group of alpha-proteobacteria is not related to the origin of mitochondria. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sahni SK, Narra HP, Sahni A, Walker DH. Recent molecular insights into rickettsial pathogenesis and immunity. Future Microbiol. 2013;8:1265–1288. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos-Garcia D, et al. The genome of Cardinium cBtQ1 provides insights into genome reduction, symbiont motility, and its settlement in Bemisia tabaci. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6:1013–1030. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Satchell KJ. Structure and function of MARTX toxins and other large repetitive RTX proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011;65:71–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmitz-Esser S, et al. The genome of the amoeba symbiont “Candidatus Amoebophilus asiaticus” reveals common mechanisms for host cell interaction among amoeba-associated bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:1045–1057. doi: 10.1128/JB.01379-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sebaihia M, et al. The multidrug-resistant human pathogen Clostridium difficile has a highly mobile, mosaic genome. Nat Genet. 2006;38:779–786. doi: 10.1038/ng1830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheldon WL, et al. Functional analysis of a group A streptococcal glycoside hydrolase Spy1600 from family 84 reveals it is a beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase and not a hyaluronidase. Biochem J. 2006;399:241–247. doi: 10.1042/BJ20060307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silverman JM, Brunet YR, Cascales E, Mougous JD. Structure and regulation of the type VI secretion system. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:453–472. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-121809-151619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simser JA, Rahman MS, Dreher-Lesnick SM, Azad AF. A novel and naturally occurring transposon, ISRpe1 in the Rickettsia peacockii genome disrupting the rickA gene involved in actin-based motility. Mol Microbiol. 2005;58:71–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04806.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skaljac M, Zanic K, Ban SG, Kontsedalov S, Ghanim M. Co-infection and localization of secondary symbionts in two whitefly species. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skaljac M, et al. Diversity and localization of bacterial symbionts in three whitefly species (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from the east coast of the Adriatic Sea. Bull Entomol Res. 2013;103:48–59. doi: 10.1017/S0007485312000399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Socolovschi C, et al. Rickettsia felis-associated uneruptive fever, Senegal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:1140–1142. doi: 10.3201/eid1607.100070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol. 2008;57:758–771. doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steczkiewicz K, Muszewska A, Knizewski L, Rychlewski L, Ginalski K. Sequence, structure and functional diversity of PD-(D/E)XK phosphodiesterase superfamily. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:7016–7045. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sunyakumthorn P, et al. Characterization and growth of polymorphic Rickettsia felis in a tick cell line. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:3151–3158. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00025-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talavera G, Castresana J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007;56:564–577. doi: 10.1080/10635150701472164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thepparit C, et al. Isolation of a rickettsial pathogen from a non-hematophagous arthropod. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toju H, Fukatsu T. Diversity and infection prevalence of endosymbionts in natural populations of the chestnut weevil: relevance of local climate and host plants. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:853–868. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04980.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toju H, Tanabe AS, Notsu Y, Sota T, Fukatsu T. Diversification of endosymbiosis: replacements, co-speciation and promiscuity of bacteriocyte symbionts in weevils. ISME J. 2013;7:1378–1390. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner BD. Liposcelis bostrychophila (Psocoptera, Liposcelidae), a stored food pest in the UK. Int J Pest Manag. 1994;40:179–190. [Google Scholar]
- Tyson GW, et al. Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature. 2004;428:37–43. doi: 10.1038/nature02340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Untergasser A, et al. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W71–W74. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viklund J, Ettema TJ, Andersson SG. Independent genome reduction and phylogenetic reclassification of the oceanic SAR11 clade. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:599–615. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- von der Schulenburg JH, et al. Incidence of male-killing Rickettsia spp. (alpha-proteobacteria) in the ten-spot ladybird beetle Adalia decempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:270–277. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.1.270-277.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wattam AR, et al. PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D581–D591. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wedincamp J, Jr, Foil LD. Vertical transmission of Rickettsia felis in the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis Bouche) J Vector Ecol. 2002;27:96–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werren JH. Wolbachia run amok. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:11154–11155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werren JH, et al. Rickettsial relative associated with male killing in the ladybird beetle (Adalia bipunctata) J Bacteriol. 1994;176:388–394. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.2.388-394.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkes TE, et al. The draft genome sequence of Arsenophonus nasoniae, son-killer bacterium of Nasonia vitripennis, reveals genes associated with virulence and symbiosis. Insect Mol Biol. 2010;19(Suppl 1):59–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yusuf M, Turner B. Characterisation of Wolbachia-like bacteria isolated from the parthenogenetic stored-product pest psocid Liposcelis bostrychophila (Badonnel) (Psocoptera) J Stored Prod Res. 2004;40:207–225. [Google Scholar]
- Zakson-Aiken M, Gregory LM, Shoop WL. Reproductive strategies of the cat flea (Siphonaptera:Pulicidae): parthenogenesis and autogeny? J Med Entomol. 1996;33:395–397. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/33.3.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zchori-Fein E, Borad C, Harari AR. Oogenesis in the date stone beetle, Coccotrypes dactyliperda, depends on symbiotic bacteria. Physiol Entomol. 2006;31:164–169. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D, de Souza RF, Anantharaman V, Iyer LM, Aravind L. Polymorphic toxin systems: comprehensive characterization of trafficking modes, processing, mechanisms of action, immunity and ecology using comparative genomics. Biol Direct. 2012;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.