Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Proteomics. 2011;8(4):325–336. doi: 10.2174/157016411798220871

Analysis of Glycosaminoglycans Using Mass Spectrometry

Gregory O Staples 1, Joseph Zaia 1,*
PMCID: PMC4334465  NIHMSID: NIHMS634242  PMID: 25705143

Abstract

The glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are linear polysaccharides expressed on animal cell surfaces and in extracellular matrices. Their biosynthesis is under complex control and confers a domain structure that is essential to their ability to bind to protein partners. Key to understanding the functions of GAGs are methods to determine accurately and rapidly patterns of sulfation, acetylation and uronic acid epimerization that correlate with protein binding or other biological activities. Mass spectrometry (MS) is particularly suitable for the analysis of GAGs for biomedical purposes. Using modern ionization techniques it is possible to accurately determine molecular weights of GAG oligosaccharides and their distributions within a mixture. Methods for direct interfacing with liquid chromatography have been developed to permit online mass spectrometric analysis of GAGs. New tandem mass spectrometric methods for fine structure determination of GAGs are emerging. This review summarizes MS-based approaches for analysis of GAGs, including tissue extraction and chromatographic methods compatible with LC/MS and tandem MS.

Keywords: Mass spectrometry, glycosaminoglycan, proteoglycan, heparin, heparan sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate, hyaluronan, keratan sulfate

Introduction

Interest in the structure of GAGs is driven by their biology relevant to human health. The expression of GAG classes is required for embryogenesis (1) and for normal functioning of nearly every adult physiological system (2). GAGs are expressed on cell surfaces and in extracellular matrices in a spatially and temporally regulated manner so as to modulate the functions of the proteins to which they are attached (3). It is now appreciated that GAG expression plays important roles in development (1, 4, 5), pathogenesis (6, 7), anticoagulation (8, 9), metastasis (1013), homeostasis (14), and angiogenesis (15). Key to the understanding of the diverse glycobiology of the GAG classes is the ability to determine their structures related to normal and disease phenotypes. Mass spectrometric methods have been developing rapidly over the past few years, to the point that large scale glycomics experiments are now possible. This review summarizes MS-based analytical methods for GAGs and their applications in biomedicine.

Glycosaminoglycan structure

Hyaluronan

As shown in Figure 1, hyaluronan (HA) consists of repeating disaccharide units of [4GlcAβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-]n and serves important structural roles in extracellular matrices. It is unique among animal carbohydrates because it is biosynthesized by extrusion from the plasma membrane (16). Unlike other GAG classes, it is not covalently linked to core proteins during biosynthesis. A number of extracellular matrix proteins contain lectin domains that bind HA. As a result, HA serves as a molecular tether that organizes arrays of proteins at the cell surface. Intact HA polymers range up to several megadaltons in size, and cleavage products are found in a number of biological contexts. Thus, molecular weight determination is a key aspect of analysis of HA structure. HA may also become covalently attached to proteins in the blood serum related to several diseases (17, 18) and analysis of such complexes is thus of interest.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structures of the glycosaminoglycan classes. The nascent polysaccharide repeats are given in parenthesis in the figure. Hyaluronan is expressed as an unmodified polysaccharide. The mature HS chains have some uronic acid residues epimerized to IdoA. Sulfation of HS may occur at the 2O-position of uronic acids and at the N-, 3O-, and 6O-positions of GlcN. CS chains may undergo epimerization to create IdoA residues. Sulfation may occur at the 2O-position of uronic acids, and the 4O- and 6O-positions of GalNAc residues. KS chains are sulfated at many 6O-positions of GlcNAc and 6O-positions of Gal residues.

Keratan sulfate

As shown in Figure 1, keratan sulfate (KS) consists of repeating disaccharide units of [3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-]n that may be sulfated at the 6O-positions of Gal and GlcNAc. KS may be viewed as a sulfated neo-N-acetyllactosamine extension that occurs on either N-linked or O-linked glycan classes (19). KS proteoglycans in extracellular matrices serve in roles related to tissue hydration and collagen fibril structure.

Chondroitin/dermatan sulfate

As shown in Figure 1, chondroitin sulfate (CS) consists of repeating units of [4GlcAβ1-3GalNAcβ1-]n. The chains are attached to Ser via the tetrasaccharide linker GlcAβ1-3Galβ1-3Galβ1-4Xylβ1-. Sulfation may occur at the C2 position of GlcA, and the C4 and C6 positions of GalNAc. CS with a high content of 4O-sulfated GalNAc is known as CS type A (CSA), that with a high content of 6O-sulfated GalNAc as CS type C (CSC). Dermatan sulfate (DS) is a sub-class of CS in which GlcA has been enzymatically epimerized during biosynthesis to IdoA and is also known as CS type B (CSB). The extent to which uronic acid residues are epimerized to form DS-like sequences varies among different tissues. IdoA residues are often found adjacent to a 4O-sulfated GalNAc residue. CS is abundant in cartilage and other extracellular matrices where it provides swelling pressure necessary for viscoelasticity (20). CS/DS also interacts with growth factors, including the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family and others, modulating their bioavailability for signaling (2123). The sulfation patterns of CS/DS change during development and with progression of osteoarthritis (24).

Heparan sulfate

As shown in Figure 1, heparan sulfate (HS) is biosynthesized as a repeating unit of [4GlcAβ1-4GlcNAcα1-]n that is subsequently modified by a series of enzymes in the Golgi apparatus. The chains are linked to Ser residues via the same tetrasaccharide linker as CS/DS. The chain is first subjected to the activity of N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferases that replace a subset of Ac groups with sulfate groups. The extent of these modifications defines the overall domain structure that characterizes HS chains in a given biological environment. Domains containing N-sulfated GlcN may be acted upon by a uronic acid epimerase and a series of O-sulfotransferases. Mature chains may be modified at the 2O-position of IdoA, the 6O- and 3O-positions of GlcNS/GlcNAc. The structure of HS consists of a regulated domain structure over which is superimposed a degree of heterogeneity. This gives rise to cell-type and temporally regulated diversity of HS structure and function (25). Heparin is a variant of HS, which has [4IdoA2Sα1-4GlcNS6Sα1-]n, where S = sulfate, as the most abundant repeating disaccharide unit.

HS chains modify proteoglycans found on cell surfaces (for example syndecans and glypicans) and in extracellular matrices (for example perlecan). They bind many families of growth factors and growth factor receptors (26) and serve as cell surface co-receptors (27). The wide variety of growth factors to which HS binds and the importance of these interactions in developmental and adult physiological processes drives the need for effective analytical methods for analysis of this compound class.

Extraction of GAGs from tissue for mass spectrometric analysis

Because the structure and functions of GAGs are regulated in a spatial and temporal manner, it is essential to be able to extract GAGs from small quantities of biological tissue. Methods used for extraction of GAGs from tissue that are appropriate for chromatographic analysis (28, 29) need to be validated because they may produce unacceptable chemical noise background when mass spectrometry is used. Therefore, tissue extraction methods demonstrated to be appropriate for mass spectrometric analysis will be summarized here.

Classically, GAGs are extracted from tissue using guanidine hydrochloride and other chaotropic agents in combination with non-specific proteases (28, 30). The bond between the Xyl residue of the tetrasaccharide linker and Ser residue of the protein backbone is typically cleaved using alkaline β-elimination under reducing conditions, so as to prevent oligosaccharide peeling (31). Following release, the GAG chains are often enriched using anion exchange chromatography or with solvent precipitation.

For extraction of CS/DS from connective tissue, a procedure employing papain digestion, alkaline borohydride release, solid phase extraction, and ethanol precipitation has been found to eliminate contaminants causing high mass spectral background (32, 33). HS may be extracted for mass spectral analysis from homogenized and pronase digested tissue using anion exchange and size exclusion cartridges (34). KS oligosaccharides have been analyzed directly from frozen tissue sections by outlining a region with a hydrophobic pen and digesting the area with keratanases before subsequent ESI MS analysis (35, 36).

Analysis of GAGs using MALDI mass spectrometry

Highly sulfated GAG oligosaccharides were shown in the 1990s to produce weak signals and abundant losses of SO3 due to in-source dissociation (37, 38). It was shown at that time that pairing of GAG oligosaccharides with a basic peptide enables detection of a complex without losses of SO3, thus allowing the determination of the oligosaccharide molecular weight. This approach was used in a series of biochemical studies on HS (9, 3942) and formed the basis of a method for sequencing the oligosaccharides using a series of enzymatic and chemical modifications (43). Subsequent effort has focused on development of MALDI matrix conditions sufficient to improve the signal strength and eliminate the in-source dissociation problem without the need to add basic peptides. A number of studies have been published toward these ends, with improvements in signal but with the same problems of dissociative losses of sulfate groups during the ionization process (4448). The ion abundances of CS disaccharides produced by exhaustive enzymatic depolymerization have been used in a quantitative assay in which a linear response is observed over a range of 4–40 pmol of disaccharide on the MALDI target. Derivatization of KS oligosaccharides with pyrenebutyric acid hydrazide has been used to increase their hydrophobicity and detectability using MALDI-TOF MS. Hyaluronan degree of polymerization (dp) 4–24 have been characterized using MALDI-TOF in a study that found that the strongest signals were obtained when the oligosaccharides were methyl esterified (49). Additionally, MALDI has been used to quantify hyaluronan oligosaccharides with a reported linear response between 40 fmol and 800 fmol (50). MALDI-TOF MS has also been used to characterize monodisperse hyaluronan oligomers synthesized using an immobilized enzyme reactor (51).

Analysis of GAGs using ESI mass spectrometry

ESI is well suited to analysis of GAGs due to the soft nature of the ionization process (52). As a result, GAGs may be ionized directly using negative polarity ESI without adding ion pairs to stabilize sulfate groups. It is generally advised that investigators use a standard molecule, such as the commercially available octasulfated pentasaccharide Arixtra, to test the source conditions of the mass spectrometer. Arixtra is representative of the most highly sulfated GAG oligosaccharides, and it may be considered an effective performance test for ion source settings. Once source conditions are set correctly, the extent of sulfate losses that occur during ionization will be minimal.

GAG disaccharide analysis

Direct infusion ESI has been used to quantify GAG disaccharide mixtures, with collisional activated dissociation (CAD) tandem MS used to differentiate positional isomers (5356). Sample quantities may be minimized using a nano-ESI interface, such as has recently been demonstrated for CS and DS derived from neural tissue (57). A reversed phase ion pairing (RPIP) LC/MS system (vide infra) has been used to quantify reductively aminated GAG disaccharides (58, 59). This approach utilizes a stable isotope labeled variant of the reductive amination tag to insure accuracy of quantification. A size exclusion chromatography (SEC) LC/MS platform has been used to quantify HS disaccharides extracted from tissue with on-line tandem MS to resolve structural isomers (34). This approach quantifies saturated disaccharides derived from the non-reducing end of the parent HS chain and thus enables determination of average chain length. A set of 13C/15N-labeled HS disaccharides has been synthesized and used as internal standards for quantitative analysis using LC/MS (60).

GAG oligosaccharide analysis

Partial depolymerization of GAG chains using chemicals or enzymes is an effective means of producing oligosaccharides that are amenable to MS analysis. A number of bacterial GAG polysaccharide lyases (61) are available commercially and are widely used. The digestion products of these enzymes are mixtures that contain a complex distribution of oligosaccharides, necessitating the use of separations prior to MS analysis. Several LC approaches have been developed for this purpose, as summarized below and in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of GAG LC/MS methods

Method Advantages Disadvantages References
SEC Very robust, non-adsorptive mechanism Poor sensitivity and resolution, not scalable (34, 8285, 135)
Reversed phase Robust, sensitive, scalable Retention time decreases with glycan mass, polarity (64, 65)
Reversed phase ion pairing Sensitive, high resolution, scalable Amines contaminate MS source (58, 60, 6870, 74)
Hydrophilic interaction chromatography Robust, sensitive, predictable retention times, scalable Low chromatographic resolution (32, 7981, 136)
Porous graphitized carbon Sensitive, high resolution, chemical stability, scalable Poisoning of GPC column by contaminants, recovery problems (90, 91, 137)

Reversed phase LC/MS

The hydrophobicity of GAG saccharides may be increased to enable their binding to reversed phase columns using a variety of reducing end labels. Generally speaking, as the size of the glycan increases, the interaction with the reversed phase matrix will decrease. As a result, this approach is most applicable to relatively short GAG oligomers. Derivatization with 1-phenyl-3-methyl pyrazolone (PMP) has been used for LC/MS of GAG metabolites from biological fluids (62, 63). After chemical modification, the samples are solvent extracted and analyzed using off-line or on-line ESI MS (64). The advantage to this method is the minimal sample manipulation required in order to quantify GAG metabolites. Derivatization with PMP is also an effective means of derivatization of HS and DS oligosaccharides from urine of mucopolysaccharidosis patients (65). This approach was used to develop multiple reaction monitoring methods for quantification of PMP-oligosaccharides. The LC/MS-MRM data allowed a cohort of patient urine samples to be discriminated from those of healthy control subjects.

Reversed phase ion pairing (RPIP LC/MS)

RPIP (66) entails addition of millimolar concentrations of an amine to the LC mobile phase to cause pairing of alkyl ammonium cations with the negatively charged GAG oligosaccharides so as to facilitate their interaction with a stationary reversed phase column (67). The amine reagent must be sufficiently volatile to be compatible with ESI MS while providing sufficient hydrophobicity for interaction with the stationary reversed phase. Dibutylamine has been shown to be effective for pairing with GAG oligosaccharides, and unsulfated heparosan oligomers up to dp40 were detected (68). An RPIP LC/MS system using tributylamine was effective for separating heparin oligosaccharides from dp2–20, clearly demonstrating the high chromatographic resolution of this approach (69). An RPIP LC/MS method using tripropylamine was used to separate a partially depolymerized heparin oligosaccharide mixture with >200 components (70). In this case, an on-line ion suppressor was used to remove the amine prior to the MS ion source. Recently, a microflow RPIP system was developed for quantification of HS disaccharides in which isotopically enriched disaccharides were used as internal standards (60). Ultra performance RPIP LC/MS has also been applied to HS disaccharide analysis and the results show analysis times as short as 5 min and chromatographic resolution of disaccharide anomers was observed (71, 72). The RPIP LC/MS approach has been used to characterize GAGs expressed in animal species throughout the evolutionary tree (58, 73). A set of detailed protocols for extraction of GAGs from animal tissue, bacterial cells, enzymatic depolymerization methods, and RPIP LC/MS has recently been published (74).

Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) LC/MS

HILIC entails use of a polar stationary phase and a mobile phase gradient in which water serves as the elutropic solvent (75). Capillary scale LC/MS using an amide-silica stationary phase has been demonstrated for N- and O-linked glycans, glycopeptides, and GAGs (32, 7678). The typical mobile phase uses an ammonium formate modifier that is MS compatible. HILIC LC/MS has been used in the analysis of CS/DS oligosaccharides from connective tissue (32) and antithrombin-binding heparin hexamers (79). This chromatography mode has also been adapted for use with a chip-based LC/MS interface (80). Improved negative ion ESI performance was observed using an acetonitrile makeup flow (81), permitting quantification of heparin oligosaccharides up to dp18 in size.

Size exclusion chromatography

SEC has the advantage of its universal separation mechanism and is therefore applicable to GAGs on account of their free solubility in aqueous solvents. SEC LC/MS has been used to analyze mixtures of partially depolymerized CS oligosaccharides, enabling detection of oligosaccharides up to dp14 (82). This approach was also used in combination with on-line tandem MS for determination of sulfation and epimerization states for CS/DS extracted from connective tissue (83, 84). The sensitivity of SEC is limited because this chromatography mode cannot be scaled down. Despite this, it was possible to produce data rfor 10 microgram quantities of CS/DS extracted from tissue. An SEC LC/MS platform has been used for LC/MS and LC/tandem MS of HS disaccharides (34). An SEC LC/MS system can be fitted with an on-line ion suppressor to reduce chemical noise background from ammonium salts. This approach has been used for the analysis of low molecular weight heparins of biomedical interest (85).

Graphitized carbon chromatography (GCC) LC/MS

GCC produces very high resolution chromatographic separation for glycans and can withstand a wide range of pH, chemical, and physical conditions (86). The retention mechanism results from a combination of the polarizability of the graphitized carbon in interacting with polar analytes and its ability to bind planar molecules. Retention of oligosaccharides increases with molecular weight and the number of acidic residues. GCC is well suited for use in LC/MS (87) due to the relatively low concentration of additives required for effective chromatography and has been adapted for nanoscale LC/MS (88, 89). GCC necessitates reduction of released glycans to prevent chromatographic splitting of reducing end anomers.

Negative ion GCC LC/MS has been used to analyze enzymatic digests of GAGs including hyaluronan, KS, heparin and HS (90). For this work, the GCC column was operated at relatively high pH using an ammonium bicarbonate modifier. A similar LC/MS approach was used to analyze CS released by in-gel polysaccharide lyase digestion of aggrecan samples (91, 92). The GCC stage allowed separation of isomeric disaccharides and tandem MS was used to assign sulfation positions. An acidic mobile phase has been used for LC/MS disaccharide analysis of CS disaccharides from lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (93). No reduction was used and the chromatography separated the anomeric forms with identification of sulfation positions based on retention times.

Multidimensional LC separations combined with MS

Analysis of GAG structural isomers is of considerable interest, owing to the prevalence of isomeric mixtures in biological systems. HS chains are expressed in domains of high and low degree of sulfation, respectively. Heparin lyase III deolymerizes the low degree of sulfation domains while leaving the high degree of sulfation domains intact. An HS samples was partially depolymerized using polysaccharide heparin lyase III, subjected to SEC and then to high resolution strong anion exchange (SAX) chromatography (94). MS analysis showed the presence of the same hexasaccharide composition in two different SAX fractions, indicating the existence of two structural isomers. The tandem mass spectra of the two fractions showed differences in terms of product ion abundances for a common set of m/z values. However, losses of SO3 were observed in the tandem mass spectra, making direct assignment of the positions of sulfation not possible. The two fractions were the analyzed using ion mobility MS, showing distinct mobility arrival time distributions. These results were consistent with the conclusion that the two structural isomers had differing shapes in the gas phase that were resolved by mobility analysis. One dimensional proton nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of the two fractions was consistent with the presence of two hexamers differing only by C5-epimerization at one position. These results illustrate the value of a mobility dimension for resolving GAG oligosaccharide structural isomers in MS studies.

Capillary electrophoresis (CE)

The acidity of GAGs makes them attractive candidates for analysis by CE/MS (95, 96). A forward polarity CE method has been used to separate hyaluronan oligosaccharides using a polyacrylamide coated fused silica capillary with negative polarity ESI MS detection (97). The MS detection enabled identification of the hyaluronan oligosaccharides, many of which had similar migration times. A reversed polarity CE method has been used to separate HS disaccharides with negative polarity ESI MS detection (98). This approach is advantageous because the MS dimension enables identification of disaccharides for which no electrophoretic standards exist. An on-line sheathless forward polarity CE method has been used to analyze CS/DS oligosaccharide mixtures (99101). Using this system, it was possible to acquire on-line tandem MS of a CS/DS dp18 oligosaccharide and to assign the sulfation pattern. A forward polarity CE method has also been used for on-line CE/MS of heparin oligosaccharides (102). Frontal analysis capillary electrophoresis entails continuous electrokinetic injection of a mixture of a protein and oligosaccharide and has been used to detect complexes between antithrombin and a synthetic heparin oligosaccharide (103).

Reducing end tags for GAG MS

The addition of a reducing end tag may be employed to add a chromophore or fluorophore to a GAG oligosaccharide to facilitate optical detection, as a hydrophobic group to facilitate chromatographic separation, and/or as a mass tag to enable mass spectrometric quantification (104). Anthranilic acid in two stable isotope forms (d0/d4) has been used to enable glycomics of CS/DS in connective tissue using HILIC LC/MS (32, 83, 84). For these studies, the light form of the tag was used to label a standard CS/DS oligosaccharide mixture as an internal instrument performance control. A tetraplex (d0, d4, d8, d12) reductive amination tag has been developed to enable simultaneous MS analysis of four samples (105). Results were shown for MS of CS, heparin, and N-linked glycans (106). A tag based on stable isotopes of aniline (12C6/13C6) has been used with RPIP LC/MS in a study of evolutionary differences in GAG structure based on disaccharide profiles (58). This tag has the advantage of a mass shift (6 Da) and of carbon backbone labeling to minimize chromatographic resolution of heavy and light forms.

Tandem MS of GAGs

In order to specify the structures of GAG oligosaccharides it is desirable to produce information on (1) the number of sulfate and acetate groups per monosaccharide, (2) the positions of sulfates and acetates on the residues and (3) the positions of uronic acid epimers. For KS oligosaccharides, only the 6O- positions of Gal and GlcNAc can be sulfated, and thus the mass of the modified residue suffices. For CS/DS, sulfation is possible at the 4O- and/or 6O-positions of GalNAc in addition to the 2O-position of HexA. Thus, additional experiments are needed for determination of sulfation position for GalNAc. CAD dissociation of oligosaccharides derived from CS types A, B, and C, respectively produces distinct product ions, the abundances of which correlate with patterns of sulfation and epimerization (84, 107, 108). It is therefore possible to determine the percentages of the three types of oligosaccharides in a biological sample by comparing the CAD tandem MS product ion abundances with those of standards. CS/DS oligosaccharides are amenable to CAD tandem mass spectrometric analysis using negative ESI, as has been demonstrated by several groups (107, 109111). Recently, a CS from decorin were digested separately with chondroitinase ACI so as to produced oligosaccharides with a high content of IdoA and with chondroitinase B so as to produce oligosaccharides with a high content of GlcA. Mult-stage MS was then used to determine the presence of over-, under- and regular-sulfated oligosaccharides (112). Oligosaccharides from dp10–14 derived from CS types A, B and C, respectively, have been analyzed using negative ion ESI MS3 (113). The results showed that the MS3 stage determined information on the epimerization of individual uronic acid residues beyond that obtained in the MS2 stage.

For HS oligosaccharides, purified standards with defined patterns of sulfation, acetylation, and epimerization do not exist. Thus, it is very important to produce as much information as possible when analyzing HS samples from biological sources. The tendency of HS oligosaccharides to undergo undesirable losses of SO3 during CAD tandem MS depends on the negative ion charge state (114116). Thus, the abundances of product ions from glycosidic bond and cross-ring cleavages increase with the negative charge state. Unfortunately, charge-charge repulsion limits the ability to produce such charge states for highly sulfated HS oligosaccharides. The problem is exacerbated when using on-line LC/MS, where the charge states are not as high as observed using direct infusion (81). Pairing of GAG oligosaccharides with metal cations serves to reduce the extent to which losses of SO3 are observed during CAD tandem MS (115). This effect is now being exploited for electron detachment dissociation (EDD) tandem MS of GAGs (see below).

Activated electron dissociation of negatively charged analytes in the form of EDD or negative electron transfer dissociation (nETD) has potential to produce highly informative glycosidic bond and cross-ring cleavages (117, 118). EDD of pairs of disulfated heparin tetramers differing by the C5-epimeric position of the third residue showed that 0,2A3, B3 and B3-CO2 ions were present in the GlcA form and absent in the IdoA form (119). The authors proposed a radical fragmentation mechanism dependant on the C5 epimeric position. Electron induced dissociation (EID) occurs as a result of electron irradiation of singly negatively charged precursor ions (120). When the same pair of heparin tetrasaccharides was subjected to EID, a series of abundant glycosidic bond and cross-ring cleavages was observed, but the spectra were the same for both epimers (121). These results indicate that electronic excitation and radical fragmentation are key to differentiating C5 epimers of GAGs. Recently, nETD in a commercial ion trap was shown to be capable of uronic acid epimers from heparin tetrasaccharides (122). The tetrasaccharides were chemically de-N-sulfated prior to analysis and the products analyzed by nETD were unsulfated.

Tandem mass spectra of GAGs are relatively complex owing to the relatively high charge states of the precursor ions resulting in product ions that may be present with more than one charge state. As a result, computational approaches for interpretation of GAG tandem mass spectra are of considerable interest. Product ion patterns resulting from multi-stage tandem MS of GAGs and disaccharide analysis data have been analyzed using the heparin oligosaccharide sequencing tool (HOST) (53). This algorithm calculates all possible sequences for a given GAG composition and eliminates those that are not consistent with the disaccharide analysis and MS compositional data, digestion enzyme activities, and tandem MS data. A software tool for analysis of GAG mass spectra has been developed based on the Glycoworkbench platform (123). This tool calculates GAG compositions and all possible tandem mass spectrometric product ions thereof to facilitate interpretation of the data.

Analysis of GAG-protein complexes

Mass spectrometry is emerging as a key technology in the analysis of GAG-protein complexes. The biological effects of GAG expression are mediated to a large degree by the protein molecules to which they bind (124). In the biological setting, proteins are likely to interact with the domains of GAG chains having appropriate densities and patterns of backbone modifications in terms of sulfate, acetate and uronic acid epimerization. The structures of these domains are likely to reflect a series of variants on a core structure. Thus, methods for analysis of GAG-protein interactions need to account for the likelihood that a series of structural variants will be observed.

An MS method has been developed to analyze GAG oligosaccharides that bind proteins of interest using a combination of reversed phase trapping and ultrafiltration (125). The method was used to analyze complexes between chemokines and heparin octasaccharides, yielding both the distribution of GAG oligosaccharides present and the protein-carbohydrate stoichiometries (126, 127). Tandem MS was also used to determine the pattern of heparin octasaccharide sulfation for structures that bound to chemokines (128). The approach of direct MS analysis of protein-oligosaccharide complexes has also been used to evaluate inhibitors of chemokine function. The binding data were used to determine dissociation constants between chemokines and small molecule inhibitors (129).

Studies on binding between chemokines, a heparin oligosaccharide, and a competitor demonstrate the state-of-the art for GAG-protein binding analysis. Chemokines function in inflammatory processes by inducing leukocytes to undergo chemotaxis and extravazation. Binding between chemokines and heparan sulfate is essential for formation chemokine gradients. ESI MS has been used to study binding between heparin and heparan sulfate oligosaccharides (94, 125127, 130, 131). Recently, ESI MS was used to probe competitive interactions between C-C motif chemokine 7 (CCL7), a peptide derived from chemokine receptor CCR2 and the synthetic heparin pentasaccharide Arixtra (see Figure 2 for structures) (132). The CCR2 peptide contains sulfated tyrosine residues. As shown by the ESI MS analysis (Figure 3), this peptide competes with the heparin pentasaccharide for binding to CCL7. The disulfated form of the peptide was shown to have a higher binding affinity than does the Arixtra pentasaccharide, as demonstrated by the increased abundance of the peak corresponding to CCL7+disulfated CCR2 peptide in Figure 3b. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of ESI MS for analysis of competitive inhibitors of GAG-protein binding.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Structures for Arixtra (A) and disulfated CCR2 21–30 peptide (B)

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mass spectra of C-C motif chemokine 7 (CCL7) and Arixtra with the addition of competing ligand, disulfated CCR2 21–30. The upper spectrum (A) represents a sample containing 10 μM CCL7, 10 μM Arixtra, and 1 μM disulfated CCR2. The lower spectrum (B) represents a sample containing 10 μM CCL7, 10 μM Arixtra, and 10 μM disulfated CCR2. Structures for Arixtra and disulfated CCR2 21–30 peptide are defined in Figure 2. © 2010, Elsevier, Inc. Used with permission.

ESI-MS has been used to analyze binding stoichiometries for mixtures of FGF1, FGF receptor (FGFR) and heparin dp24 oligosaccharides (133). The data demonstrate the formation of two FGF:FGFR complexes on a single heparin chain and have implications for binding between GAG chains and growth factors in vivo. Complexes between antithrombin (AT) and heparin oligosaccharides have also been studied using ESI MS (134). These studies showed the distribution of heparin dp6 that bind AT under conditions where a fraction of the protein remains free in solution, and thus all binding-competent dp6 compositions are observed. The approach was extended to include analysis of binding of a low molecular weight heparin preparation to AT. A combination of SEC and hydrophobic trapping was used to isolate heparin dp6 that bind specifically to AT (79). The data showed high affinity for dp6 with 8–9 sulfate groups and no acetate groups. The bound oligosaccharides had high activity for inhibiting Factor Xa cleavage of a synthetic substrate. Such a method has potential for analysis of GAG oligosaccharides that bind any soluble protein of interest.

Conclusions

The fact that GAG expression is essential for myriad aspects of human physiology drives the need for analytical methods development. These glycans are expressed in a spatially and temporally regulated and dynamic manner. As a result, methods rapid and sensitive enough for high throughput are needed. There are now effective methods for extracting GAGs from tissue for mass spectrometric analysis. These methods remain relatively labor intensive, and it may be possible for more rapid methods used for chromatographic analysis to be applied with MS (29).

Mass measurement serves to define the compositions of GAGs with respect to monosaccharides, sulfate and acetate groups. Such mass measurement may be carried out using either MALDI or ESI methods. MALDI MS is most effective when basic peptides are used to pair with the GAG oligosaccharide analytes to prevent dissociation to sulfate groups during the desorption/ionization process. GAG oligosaccharides may be analyzed directly using ESI MS with minimal sulfate losses during ionization. Several chromatography methods LC/MS are now used, including SEC, RP, RPIP, HILIC, and PGC (see Table 1). These methods are very effective. CE/MS may also be used but the interface with the mass spectrometer remains a challenge to robust performance. The heterogeneity inherent in GAGs drives the use of multidimensional chromatography prior to MS analysis. The ion mobility dimension clearly shows great potential for resolving structural isomers in the gas phase to maximize the value of tandem mass spectra acquired thereafter for differentiating the isomers.

Tandem MS using collisional dissociation remain limited by the losses of sulfate observed. Such losses are least significant for CS/DS oligosaccharides in which there is approximately one sulfate group be disaccharide repeat. Sulfate loss is a significant problem for highly sulfated heparin and HS oligosaccharides. The most promising approaches for sequencing GAG oligosaccharides using tandem MS are EDD and nETD. These techniques are capable of distinguishing oligosaccharides differing only by a uronic acid epimers via specific product ions. The analysis requires extended instrument acquisition times and are most appropriate for analysis of highly purified samples.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from NIH grants P41RR10888, R01HL098950 and contract N01 HV28178.

Abbreviations used

CS

chondroitin sulfate

DS

dermatan sulfate

ESI

electrospray ionization

EDD

electron detachment dissociation

ETD

electron transfer dissociation

FGF

fibroblast growth factor

FGFR

fibroblast growth factor receptor

GAG

glycosaminoglycan

GCC

graphitized carbon chromatography

HA

hyaluronan

HILIC

hydrophilic interaction chromatography

HS

heparan sulfate

KS

keratan sulfate

LC

liquid chromatography

MALDI

matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization

MS

mass spectrometry

RP

reversed phase

RPIP

reversed phase ion pairing

SAX

strong anion exchange chromatography

SEC

size exclusion chromatography

TOF

time-of-flight

References

  • 1.Perrimon N, Bernfield M. Specificities of heparan sulphate proteoglycans in developmental processes. Nature. 2000;404:725–728. doi: 10.1038/35008000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bishop JR, Schuksz M, Esko JD. Heparan sulphate proteoglycans fine-tune mammalian physiology. Nature. 2007;446:1030–1037. doi: 10.1038/nature05817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bulow HE, Hobert O. The Molecular Diversity of Glycosaminoglycans Shapes Animal Development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:375–407. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010605.093433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dhoot GK, Gustafsson MK, Ai X, Sun W, Standiford DM, Emerson CP., Jr Regulation of Wnt signaling and embryo patterning by an extracellular sulfatase. Science. 2001;293:1663–1666. doi: 10.1126/science.293.5535.1663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hwang HY, Olson SK, Esko JD, Horvitz HR. Caenorhabditis elegans early embryogenesis and vulval morphogenesis require chondroitin biosynthesis. Nature. 2003;423:439–443. doi: 10.1038/nature01634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shukla D, Liu J, Blaiklock P, Shworak NW, Bai X, Esko JD, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Rosenberg RD, Spear PG. A Novel Role for 3-O-Sulfated Heparan Sulfate in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Entry. Cell. 1999;99:13–22. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80058-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu D, Shriver Z, Venkataraman G, El Shabrawi Y, Sasisekharan R. Tumor cell surface heparan sulfate as cryptic promoters or inhibitors of tumor growth and metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:568–573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012578299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Casu B, Guerrini M, Torri G. Structural and conformational aspects of the anticoagulant and anti-thrombotic activity of heparin and dermatan sulfate. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10:939–949. doi: 10.2174/1381612043452794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shriver Z, Raman R, Venkataraman G, Drummond K, Turnbull J, Toida T, Linhardt R, Biemann K, Sasisekharan R. Sequencing of 3-O sulfate containing heparin decasaccharides with a partial antithrombin III binding site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:10359–10364. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.19.10359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dai Y, Yang Y, MacLeod V, Yue X, Rapraeger AC, Shriver Z, Venkataraman G, Sasisekharan R, Sanderson RD. HSulf-1 and HSulf-2 are potent inhibitors of myeloma tumor growth in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:40066–40073. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508136200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sasisekharan R, Shriver Z, Venkataraman G, Narayanasami U. Roles of heparan-sulphate glycosaminoglycans in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:521–528. doi: 10.1038/nrc842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vlodavsky I, Friedmann Y. Molecular properties and involvement of heparanase in cancer metastasis and angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:341–347. doi: 10.1172/JCI13662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Denholm EM, Cauchon E, Poulin C, Silver PJ. Inhibition of human dermal fibroblast proliferation by removal of dermatan sulfate. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;400:145–153. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00381-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang H, Spang A, Sullivan MA, Hryhorenko J, Hagen FK. The terminal phase of cytokinesis in the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryo requires protein glycosylation. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:4202–4213. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-05-0472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fuster MM, Wang L, Castagnola J, Sikora L, Reddi K, Lee PH, Radek KA, Schuksz M, Bishop JR, Gallo RL, Sriramarao P, Esko JD. Genetic alteration of endothelial heparan sulfate selectively inhibits tumor angiogenesis. The Journal of cell biology. 2007;177:539–549. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200610086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Itano N, Kimata K. Expression cloning and molecular characterization of HAS protein, a eukaryotic hyaluronan synthase. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:9875–9878. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.17.9875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang L, Yoneda M, Kimata K. A serum-derived hyaluronan-associated protein (SHAP) is the heavy chain of the inter alpha-trypsin inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:26725–26730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lauer ME, Fulop C, Mukhopadhyay D, Comhair S, Erzurum SC, Hascall VC. Airway smooth muscle cells synthesize hyaluronan cable structures independent of inter-alpha-inhibitor heavy chain attachment. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:5313–5323. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807979200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Funderburgh JL. Keratan sulfate: structure, biosynthesis, and function. Glycobiology. 2000;10:951–958. doi: 10.1093/glycob/10.10.951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Knudson CB, Knudson W. Cartilage proteoglycans. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2001;12:69–78. doi: 10.1006/scdb.2000.0243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lyon M, Deakin JA, Gallagher JT. The mode of action of heparan and dermatan sulfates in the regulation of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:1040–1046. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107506200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Penc SF, Pomahac B, Winkler T, Dorschner RA, Eriksson E, Herndon M, Gallo RL. Dermatan sulfate released after injury is a potent promoter of fibroblast growth factor-2 function. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:28116–28121. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.43.28116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Trowbridge JM, Rudisill JA, Ron D, Gallo RL. Dermatan sulfate binds and potentiates activity of keratinocyte growth factor (FGF-7) J Biol Chem. 2002;277:42815–42820. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204959200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shinmei M, Miyauchi S, Machida A, Miyazaki K. Quantitation of chondroitin 4-sulfate and chondroitin 6-sulfate in pathologic joint fluid. Arthritis and rheumatism. 1992;35:1304–1308. doi: 10.1002/art.1780351110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lindahl U, Kusche-Gullberg M, Kjellen L. Regulated diversity of heparan sulfate. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:24979–24982. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.39.24979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bernfield M, Gotte M, Park PW, Reizes O, Fitzgerald ML, Lincecum J, Zako M. Functions of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:729–777. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lander AD. Proteoglycans: master regulators of molecular encounter? Matrix Biol. 1998;17:465–472. doi: 10.1016/s0945-053x(98)90093-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ledin J, Staatz W, Li JP, Gotte M, Selleck S, Kjellen L, Spillmann D. Heparan sulfate structure in mice with genetically modified heparan sulfate production. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:42732–42741. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405382200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guimond SE, Puvirajesinghe TM, Skidmore MA, Kalus I, Dierks T, Yates EA, Turnbull JE. Rapid purification and high sensitivity analysis of heparan sulfate from cells and tissues: towards glycomics profiling. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:25714–25722. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.032755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Esko JD. Special considerations for proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans and their purification. In: Ausubel Frederick M, et al., editors. Current protocols in molecular biology. Chapter 17. 2001. Unit17 12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Conrad HE. β-Elimination for Release of O-Linked Glycosaminoglycans from Proteoglycans. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. 2001;17.15A:1–3. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1715as31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hitchcock A, Yates KE, Costello C, Zaia J. Comparative Glycomics of Connective Tissue Glycosaminoglycans. Proteomics. 2008;8:1384–1397. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hitchcock A, Bowman M, Staples G, Zaia J. Improved Workup for Glycosaminoglycan Disaccharide Analysis using Capillary Electrophoresis with Laser-Induced Fluorescence Detection. Electrophoresis. 2008;29:4538–4548. doi: 10.1002/elps.200800335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shi X, Zaia J. Organ-specific heparan sulfate structural phenotypes. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:11806–11814. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M809637200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Conrad AH, Zhang Y, Walker AR, Olberding LA, Hanzlick A, Zimmer AJ, Morffi R, Conrad GW. Thyroxine affects expression of KSPG-related genes, the carbonic anhydrase II gene, and KS sulfation in the embryonic chicken cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:120–132. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang Y, Conrad AH, Tasheva ES, An K, Corpuz LM, Kariya Y, Suzuki K, Conrad GW. Detection and Quantification of Sulfated Disaccharides from Keratan Sulfate and Chondroitin/Dermatan Sulfate during Chick Corneal Development by ESI-MS/MS. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:1604–1614. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Juhasz P, Biemann K. Utility of non-covalent complexes in the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry of heparin-derived oligosaccharides. Carbohydr Res. 1995;270:131–147. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(94)00012-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Juhasz P, Biemann K. Mass spectrometric molecular-weight determination of highly acidic compounds of biological significance via their complexes with basic polypeptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:4333–4337. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shriver Z, Sundaram M, Venkataraman G, Fareed J, Linhardt R, Biemann K, Sasisekharan R. Cleavage of the antithrombin III binding site in heparin by heparinases and its implication in the generation of low molecular weight heparin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:10365–10370. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.19.10365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rhomberg AJ, Shriver Z, Biemann K, Sasisekharan R. Mass spectrometric evidence for the enzymatic mechanism of the depolymerization of heparin-like glycosaminoglycans by heparinase II. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:12232–12237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rhomberg AJ, Ernst S, Sasisekharan R, Biemann K. Mass spectrometric and capillary electrophoretic investigation of the enzymatic degradation of heparin-like glycosaminoglycans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:4176–4181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ernst S, Rhomberg AJ, Biemann K, Sasisekharan R. Direct evidence for a predominantly exolytic processive mechanism for depolymerization of heparin-like glycosaminoglycans by heparinase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:4182–4187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Venkataraman G, Shriver Z, Raman R, Sasisekharan R. Sequencing complex polysaccharides. Science. 1999;286:537–542. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Laremore TN, Murugesan S, Park TJ, Avci FY, Zagorevski DV, Linhardt RJ. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Uncomplexed Highly Sulfated Oligosaccharides Using Ionic Liquid Matrices. Anal Chem. 2006;78:1774–1779. doi: 10.1021/ac051121q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Laremore TN, Linhardt RJ. Improved matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric detection of glycosaminoglycan disaccharides as cesium salts. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21:1315–1320. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Laremore TN, Zhang F, Linhardt RJ. Ionic liquid matrix for direct UV-MALDI-TOF-MS analysis of dermatan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharides. Anal Chem. 2007;79:1604–1610. doi: 10.1021/ac061688m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tissot B, Gasiunas N, Powell AK, Ahmed Y, Zhi ZL, Haslam SM, Morris HR, Turnbull JE, Gallagher JT, Dell A. Towards GAG glycomics: analysis of highly sulfated heparins by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Glycobiology. 2007;17:972–982. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwm072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ohara K, Jacquinet JC, Jouanneau D, Helbert W, Smietana M, Vasseur JJ. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric analysis of polysulfated-derived oligosaccharides using pyrenemethylguanidine. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2009;20:131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sakai S, Hirano K, Toyoda H, Linhardt RJ, Toida T. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry analysis of hyaluronan oligosaccharides. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;593:207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Busse K, Averbeck M, Anderegg U, Arnold K, Simon JC, Schiller J. The signal-to-noise ratio as a measure of HA oligomer concentration: a MALDI-TOF MS study. Carbohydr Res. 2006;341:1065–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2006.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.DeAngelis PL, Oatman LC, Gay DF. Rapid chemoenzymatic synthesis of monodisperse hyaluronan oligosaccharides with immobilized enzyme reactors. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:35199–35203. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306431200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zaia J. Mass Spectrometric Ionization of Carbohydrates. In: Gross MG, editor. Encyclopedia of Mass Spectrometry. Vol. 6. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Saad OM, Leary JA. Heparin sequencing using enzymatic digestion and ESI-MSn with HOST: a heparin/HS oligosaccharide sequencing tool. Anal Chem. 2005;77:5902–5911. doi: 10.1021/ac050793d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Saad OM, Ebel H, Uchimura K, Rosen SD, Bertozzi CR, Leary JA. Compositional profiling of heparin/heparan sulfate using mass spectrometry: assay for specificity of a novel extracellular human endosulfatase. Glycobiology. 2005;15:818–826. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwi064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Desaire H, Sirich TL, Leary JA. Evidence of block and randomly sequenced chondroitin polysaccharides: sequential enzymatic digestion and quantification using ion trap tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2001;73:3513–3520. doi: 10.1021/ac010385j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Behr JR, Matsumoto Y, White FM, Sasisekharan R. Quantification of isomers from a mixture of twelve heparin and heparan sulfate disaccharides using tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2005;19:2553–2562. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Flangea C, Schiopu C, Sisu E, Serb A, Przybylski M, Seidler DG, Zamfir AD. Determination of sulfation pattern in brain glycosaminoglycans by chip-based electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009;395:2489–2498. doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-3167-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lawrence R, Olson SK, Steele RE, Wang L, Warrior R, Cummings RD, Esko JD. Evolutionary Differences in Glycosaminoglycan Fine Structure Detected by Quantitative Glycan Reductive Isotope Labeling. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:33674–33684. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804288200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Xia B, Feasley CL, Sachdev GP, Smith DF, Cummings RD. Glycan reductive isotope labeling for quantitative glycomics. Anal Biochem. 2009;387:162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhang Z, Xie J, Liu H, Liu J, Linhardt RJ. Quantification of heparan sulfate disaccharides using ion-pairing reversed-phase microflow high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization trap mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2009;81:4349–4355. doi: 10.1021/ac9001707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ernst S, Langer R, Cooney CL, Sasisekharan R. Enzymatic degradation of glycosaminoglycans. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1995;30:387–444. doi: 10.3109/10409239509083490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ramsay SL, Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ. Determination of monosaccharides and disaccharides in mucopolysaccharidoses patients by electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry. Mol Genet Metab. 2003;78:193–204. doi: 10.1016/s1096-7192(03)00018-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Crawley A, Ramsay SL, Byers S, Hopwood J, Meikle PJ. Monitoring dose response of enzyme replacement therapy in feline mucopolysaccharidosis type VI by tandem mass spectrometry. Pediatr Res. 2004;55:585–591. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000113789.30640.5C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mason KE, Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ, Fuller M. Characterization of sulfated oligosaccharides in mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2006;78:4534–4542. doi: 10.1021/ac052083d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nielsen TC, Rozek T, Hopwood JJ, Fuller M. Determination of urinary oligosaccharides by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry: Application to Hunter syndrome. Anal Biochem. 2010;402:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Garcia MC. The effect of the mobile phase additives on sensitivity in the analysis of peptides and proteins by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B. 2005;825:111. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lee GJ-L, Tieckelmann H. High-performance liquid chromatographic separation of unsaturated disaccharides derived from heparan sulfate and heparin. J Chromatogr. 1980;195:402. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kuberan B, Lech M, Zhang L, Wu ZL, Beeler DL, Rosenberg R. Analysis of Heparan Sulfate Oligosaccharides with Ion Pair-Reverse Phase Capillary High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Microelectrospray Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:8707–8718. doi: 10.1021/ja0178867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Thanawiroon C, Rice KG, Toida T, Linhardt RJ. LC/MS sequencing approach for highly sulfated heparin-derived oligosaccharides. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2608–2615. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304772200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Henriksen J, Roepstorff P, Ringborg LH. Ion-pairing reversed-phased chromatography/mass spectrometry of heparin. Carbohydr Res. 2006;341:382–387. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2005.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Korir AK, Limtiaco JF, Gutierrez SM, Larive CK. Ultraperformance ion-pair liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry for compositional profiling and quantification of heparin and heparan sulfate. Anal Chem. 2008;80:1297–1306. doi: 10.1021/ac702235u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Solakyildirim K, Zhang Z, Linhardt RJ. Ultraperformance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry for chondroitin disaccharide analysis. Anal Biochem. 2010;397:24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.09.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Im AR, Park Y, Sim JS, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Linhardt RJ, Kim YS. Glycosaminoglycans from earthworms (Eisenia andrei) Glycoconj J. 2010;27:249–257. doi: 10.1007/s10719-009-9273-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Volpi N, Linhardt RJ. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for mapping and sequencing glycosaminoglycan-derived oligosaccharides. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:993–1004. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Alpert A. Hydrophilic-Interaction Chromatography for the Separation of Peptides, Nucleic Acids and Other Polar Compounds. J Chromatogr. 1990;499:177–196. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)96972-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mattu TS, Royle L, Langridge J, Wormald MR, Van den Steen PE, Van Damme J, Opdenakker G, Harvey DJ, Dwek RA, Rudd PM. O-glycan analysis of natural human neutrophil gelatinase B using a combination of normal phase-HPLC and online tandem mass spectrometry: implications for the domain organization of the enzyme. Biochemistry. 2000;39:15695–15704. doi: 10.1021/bi001367j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wuhrer M, Koeleman CA, Hokke CH, Deelder AM. Protein glycosylation analyzed by normal-phase nano-liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry of glycopeptides. Anal Chem. 2005;77:886–894. doi: 10.1021/ac048619x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wuhrer M, Koeleman CAM, Deelder AM, Hokke CN. Normal-phase nanoscale liquid chromatography – Mass spectrometry of underivatized oligosaccharides at low-femtomole sensitivity. Anal Chem. 2004;76:833–838. doi: 10.1021/ac034936c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Naimy H, Leymarie N, Bowman M, Zaia J. Characterization of heparin oligosaccharides binding specifically to antithrombin III using mass spectrometry. Biochemistry. 2008;47:3155–3161. doi: 10.1021/bi702043e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Staples G, Bowman M, Costello CE, Hitchcock A, Lau J, Leymarie N, Miller C, Naimy H, Shi X, Zaia J. A Chip-based Amide-HILIC LC/MS Platform for Glycosaminoglycan Glycomics. Proteomics. 2009;9:686–695. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200701008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Staples GO, Naimy H, Yin H, Kileen K, Kraiczek K, Costello CE, Zaia J. Improved hydrophilic interaction chromatography LC/MS of heparinoids using a chip with postcolumn makeup flow. Anal Chem. 2010;82:516–522. doi: 10.1021/ac901706f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zaia J, Costello CE. Compositional analysis of glycosaminoglycans by electrospray mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2001;73:233–239. doi: 10.1021/ac000777a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hitchcock AM, Yates KE, Shortkroff S, Costello CE, Zaia J. Optimized extraction of glycosaminoglycans from normal and osteoarthritic cartilage for glycomics profiling. Glycobiology. 2006;17:25–35. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwl046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hitchcock AM, Costello CE, Zaia J. Glycoform quantification of chondroitin/dermatan sulfate using an LC/MS/MS platform. Biochemistry. 2006;45:2350–2361. doi: 10.1021/bi052100t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Henriksen J, Ringborg LH, Roepstorrf P. On-line size-exclusion chromatography/mass spectrometry of low molecular mass heparin. J Mass Spectrom. 2004;39:1305–1312. doi: 10.1002/jms.723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Koizumi K, Okada Y, Fukuda M. High-performance liquid chromatography of mono- and oligo-saccharides on a graphitized carbon column. Carbohydr Res. 1991;215:67. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Davies M, Smith KD, Harbin AM, Hounsell EF. High-performance liquid chromatography of oligosaccharide alditols and glycopeptides on a graphitized carbon column. J Chromatogr. 1992;609:125. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(92)80155-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Niñonuevo M, An H, Yin H, Killeen K, Grimm R, Ward R, German B, Lebrilla C. Nanoliquid chromatography-mass spectrometry of oligosaccharides employing graphitized carbon chromatography on microchip with a high-accuracy mass analyzer. Electrophoresis. 2005;26:3641–3649. doi: 10.1002/elps.200500246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Alley WR, Jr, Mechref Y, Novotny MV. Use of activated graphitized carbon chips for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometric and tandem mass spectrometric analysis of tryptic glycopeptides. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009;23:495–505. doi: 10.1002/rcm.3899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Karlsson NG, Schulz BL, Packer NH, Whitelock JM. Use of graphitised carbon negative ion LC-MS to analyse enzymatically digested glycosaminoglycans. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005;824:139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Estrella RP, Whitelock JM, Packer NH, Karlsson NG. Graphitized Carbon LC-MS Characterization of the Chondroitin Sulfate Oligosaccharides of Aggrecan. Anal Chem. 2007;79:3597–3606. doi: 10.1021/ac0622227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Estrella RP, Whitelock JM, Roubin RH, Packer NH, Karlsson NG. Small-scale enzymatic digestion of glycoproteins and proteoglycans for analysis of oligosaccharides by LC-MS and FACE gel electrophoresis. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;534:171–192. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-022-5_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Barroso B, Didraga M, Bischoff R. Analysis of proteoglycans derived sulphated disaccharides by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2005;1080:43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Schenauer MR, Meissen JK, Seo Y, Ames JB, Leary JA. Heparan Sulfate Separation, Sequencing, and Isomeric Differentiation: Ion Mobility Spectrometry Reveals Specific Iduronic and Glucuronic Acid-Containing Hexasaccharides. Anal Chem. 2009;81:10179–10185. doi: 10.1021/ac902186h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zamfir A, Peter-Katalinić J. Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for glycoscreening in biomedical research. Electrophoresis. 2004;25:1949–1963. doi: 10.1002/elps.200405825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Prabhakar V, Capila I, Sasisekharan R. The structural elucidation of glycosaminoglycans. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;534:147–156. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-022-5_11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kuhn AV, Ruttinger HH, Neubert RH, Raith K. Identification of hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides by direct coupling of capillary electrophoresis with electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2003;17:576–582. doi: 10.1002/rcm.950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ruiz-Calero V, Moyano E, Puignou L, Galceran MT. Pressure-assisted capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry for the analysis of heparin depolymerised disaccharides. J Chromatogr A. 2001;914:277–291. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)01181-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zamfir A, Seidler DG, Kresse H, Peter-Katalinc J. Structural characterization of chondroitin/dermatan sulfate oligosaccharides from bovine aorta by capillary electrophoresis and electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. RAPID COMMUN MASS SP. 2002;16:2015–2024. doi: 10.1002/rcm.820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zamfir A, Peter-Katalinić J. Glycoscreening by on-line sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray ionization-quadrupole time of flight-tandem mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis. 2001;22:2448–2457. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683(200107)22:12<2448::AID-ELPS2448>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zamfir A, Seidler DG, Schonherr E, Kresse H, Peter-Katalinić J. Online sheathless capillary electrophoresis/nanoelectrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of glycosaminoglycan oligosaccharides. Electrophoresis. 2004;25:2010–2016. doi: 10.1002/elps.200405925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Gunay NS, Linhardt RJ. Capillary electrophoretic separation of heparin oligosaccharides under conditions amenable to mass spectrometric detection. J Chromatogr A. 2003;1014:225–233. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(03)01288-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Fermas S, Gonnet F, Varenne A, Gareil P, Daniel R. Frontal analysis capillary electrophoresis hyphenated to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for the characterization of the antithrombin/heparin pentasaccharide complex. Anal Chem. 2007;79:4987–4993. doi: 10.1021/ac070146h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Skidmore M, Atrih A, Yates E, Turnbull JE. Labelling heparan sulphate saccharides with chromophore, fluorescence and mass tags for HPLC and MS separations. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;534:157–169. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-022-5_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bowman M, Zaia J. Novel tags for the stable isotopic labeling of carbohydrates and quantitative analysis by mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2007;76:5777–5784. doi: 10.1021/ac070581b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bowman MJ, Zaia J. Comparative glycomics using a tetraplex stable-isotope coded tag. Anal Chem. 2010;82:3023–3031. doi: 10.1021/ac100108w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Miller MJC, Costello CE, Malmström A, Zaia J. A tandem mass spectrometric approach to determination of chondroitin/dermatan sulfate oligosaccharide glycoforms. Glycobiology. 2006;16:502–513. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwj093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Zaia J, Li XQ, Chan SY, Costello CE. Tandem mass spectrometric strategies for determination of sulfation positions and uronic acid epimerization in chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharides. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2003;14:1270–1281. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(03)00541-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Mormann M, Zamfir AD, Seidler DG, Kresse H, Peter-Katalinic J. Analysis of oversulfation in a chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharide fraction from bovine aorta by nanoelectrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight and Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2007;18:179–187. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zamfir A, Seidler DG, Kresse H, Peter-Katalinić J. Structural investigation of chondroitin/dermatan sulfate oligosaccharides from human skin fibroblast decorin. Glycobiology. 2003 doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwg086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Chai W, Beeson JG, Lawson AM. The structural motif in chondroitin sulfate for adhesion of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes comprises disaccharide units of 4-O-sulfated and non-sulfated N-acetylgalactosamine linked to glucuronic acid. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:22438–22446. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111401200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zamfir AD, Flangea C, Sisu E, Serb AF, Dinca N, Bruckner P, Seidler DG. Analysis of novel over- and under-sulfated glycosaminoglycan sequences by enzyme cleavage and multiple stage MS. Proteomics. 2009;9:3435–3444. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Bielik AM, Zaia J. Multistage Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Chondroitin Sulfate and Dermatan Sulfate. Int J Mass Spectrom accepted 10/5/10. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2010.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Naggar EF, Costello CE, Zaia J. Competing fragmentation processes in tandem mass spectra of heparin-like glycosaminoglycans. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2004;15:1534–1544. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2004.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zaia J, Costello CE. Tandem mass spectrometry of sulfated heparin-like glycosaminoglycan oligosaccharides. Anal Chem. 2003;75:2445–2455. doi: 10.1021/ac0263418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.McClellan JM, Costello CE, O’Connor PB, Zaia J. Influence of charge state on product ion mass spectra and the determination of 4S/6S sulfation sequence of chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharides. Anal Chem. 2002;74:3760–3771. doi: 10.1021/ac025506+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Wolff JJ, Amster IJ, Chi L, Linhardt RJ. Electron detachment dissociation of glycosaminoglycan tetrasaccharides. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2007;18:234–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Leach FE, Wolff JJ, Laremore TN, Linhardt RJ, Amster IJ. Evaluation of the Experimental Parameters Which Control Electron Detachment Dissociation, and Their Effect on the Fragmentation Efficiency of Glycosaminoglycan Carbohydrates. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2008;276:110–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2008.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Wolff JJ, Chi L, Linhardt RJ, Amster IJ. Distinguishing glucuronic from iduronic acid in glycosaminoglycan tetrasaccharides by using electron detachment dissociation. Anal Chem. 2007;79:2015–2022. doi: 10.1021/ac061636x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Budnik BA, Haselmann KF, Elkin YN, Gorbach VI, Zubarev RA. Applications of electron-ion dissociation reactions for analysis of polycationic chitooligosaccharides in Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2003;75:5994–6001. doi: 10.1021/ac034477f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wolff JJ, Laremore TN, Aslam H, Linhardt RJ, Amster IJ. Electron-induced dissociation of glycosaminoglycan tetrasaccharides. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2008;19:1449–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.06.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Wolff JJ, Leach FE, Laremore TN, Kaplan DA, Easterling ML, Linhardt RJ, Amster IJ. Negative Electron Transfer Dissociation of Glycosaminoglycans. Anal Chem. 2010;82:3460–3466. doi: 10.1021/ac100554a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Ceroni A, Maass K, Geyer H, Geyer R, Dell A, Haslam SM. GlycoWorkbench: A Tool for the Computer-Assisted Annotation of Mass Spectra of Glycans. J Proteome Res. 2008 doi: 10.1021/pr7008252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Esko JD, Selleck SB. Order out of chaos: assembly of ligand binding sites in heparan sulfate. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:435–471. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Yu Y, Sweeney MD, Saad OM, Crown SE, Handel TM, Leary JA. Chemokine-glycosaminoglycan binding: specificity for CCR2 ligand binding to highly sulfated oligosaccharides using FTICR mass spectrometry. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:32200–32208. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505738200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Crown SE, Yu Y, Sweeney MD, Leary JA, Handel TM. Heterodimerization of CCR2 chemokines and regulation by glycosaminoglycan binding. J Biol Chem. 2006 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601518200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Schenauer MR, Yu Y, Sweeney MD, Leary JA. CCR2 Chemokines Bind Selectively to Acetylated Heparan Sulfate Octasaccharides. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:25182–25188. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703387200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sweeney MD, Yu Y, Leary JA. Effects of Sulfate Position on Heparin Octasaccharide Binding to CCL2 Examined by Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Yu Y, Sweeney MD, Saad OM, Leary JA. Potential Inhibitors of Chemokine Function: Analysis of Noncovalent Complexes of CC Chemokine and Small Polyanionic Molecules by ESI FT-ICR Mass Spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2006;17:524–535. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Meissen JK, Sweeney MD, Girardi M, Lawrence R, Esko JD, Leary JA. Differentiation of 3-O-sulfated heparin disaccharide isomers: identification of structural aspects of the heparin CCL2 binding motif. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2009;20:652–657. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Jen CH, Moore KL, Leary JA. Pattern and temporal sequence of sulfation of CCR5 N-terminal peptides by tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase-2: an assessment of the effects of N-terminal residues. Biochemistry. 2009;48:5332–5338. doi: 10.1021/bi900285c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Jen CH, Leary JA. A competitive binding study of chemokine, sulfated receptor, and glycosaminoglycan interactions by nano-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2010;407:134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Harmer NJ, Robinson CJ, Adam LE, Ilag LL, Robinson CV, Gallagher JT, Blundell TL. Multimers of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-FGF receptor-saccharide complex are formed on long oligomers of heparin. Biochem J. 2006;393:741–748. doi: 10.1042/BJ20050985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Abzalimov RR, Dubin PL, Kaltashov IA. Glycosaminoglycans as naturally occurring combinatorial libraries: developing a mass spectrometry-based strategy for characterization of anti-thrombin interaction with low molecular weight heparin and heparin oligomers. Anal Chem. 2007;79:6055–6063. doi: 10.1021/ac0710432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Ziegler A, Zaia J. Size-exclusion chromatography of heparin oligosaccharides at high and low pressure. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2006;837:76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Naimy H, Leymarie N, Zaia J. Screening for anticoagulant heparan sulfate octasaccharides and fine structure characterization using tandem mass spectrometry. Biochemistry. 2010;49:3743–3752. doi: 10.1021/bi100135d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Thomsson KA, Karlsson H, Hansson G. Sequencing sulfated oligosaccharides from mucins by liquid chromatography and electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2000;72:4543–4549. doi: 10.1021/ac000631b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES