Skip to main content
Journal of Food Science and Technology logoLink to Journal of Food Science and Technology
. 2013 Oct 10;52(3):1705–1711. doi: 10.1007/s13197-013-1178-5

Effect of radiation and/or traditional processings on antinutrients and HCl extractability of calcium, phosphorus and iron of sorghum cultivars

Ismat G Abdalla 1, Khogali E Ahmed 1, Azhari O Abdelbagi 2, Elfadil E Babiker 3,
PMCID: PMC4348317  PMID: 25745244

Abstract

Whole flours of sorghum cultivars Dabar, WadAhmed and Karamaka were irradiated and then fermented and/or cooked. Tannin and phytic acid contents were assayed for all treatments. Traditional processings (fermentation and cooking) were significantly (P ≥ 0.05) decreased tannin and phytate of the cultivars and further reduction was observed when the flour was irradiated before processing for all cultivars. Radiation process alone had no great effect on tannin and phytate contents but when followed by traditional processing the reduction level was significant (P ≥ 0.05) for all cultivars. Radiation alone had no significant (P ≥ 0.05) effect in increment of total and extractable calcium (Ca). However, radiation followed by fermentation and/or cooking significantly (P ≥ 0.05) increased both total and extractable Ca. Total phosphorus (P) was not significantly (P ≥ 0.05) increased at all levels of radiation and/or processing but the extractable P was increased. Total iron (Fe) was not affected by radiation and/or processings but the extractable Fe was increased significantly (P ≥ 0.05) with the radiation dose for all cultivars.

Keywords: Calcium, Iron, Phosphorus, Irradiation, HCl extractability, Sorghum

Introduction

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Monech) is one of the major food crops of the semiarid regions of Africa and Asia (Correia et al. 2005). Sudanese people consumed sorghum as fermented flat bread (Kisra), thick porridge (Aceda), thin fermented gruel (Nasha), boiled grains (Balella) and beverages (Abreh and Hulumur), which provide about 97 % of the protein and 75 % of the calories in the diet of the people residing in central and western Sudan. Sorghum nutritional quality is dictated mainly by its chemical composition and one of the constraints on the utilisation of sorghum grain as food or feed is the occurrence of phytate and tannins. Phytate and tannin bind minerals that are necessary as cofactors, thus interfering with several essential metabolic processes, especially the utilization of protein (Idris et al. 2007). Removal of undesirable components such as phytate and tannin is essential to improve the nutritional quality of sorghum and effectively utilize its full potential as human food by processing methods such as germination (Idris et al. 2007; AbdelRahaman et al. 2007), soaking (Babiker and El Tinay 1993), cooking (Mohiedeen et al. 2010), fermentation (Sokrab et al. 2012a, b; Osman et al. 2010) and gamma irradiation (Mohamed et al. 2010; Osman et al. 2012) which are known to reduce anti-nutritional factors effectively and upgrade the nutritional quality of cereals. However, most of these treatments adversely affect the sensory characteristics of the final product. Food irradiation has been recognized as a reliable, safe and cheap method for preservation of food; improve hygienic quality and nutritional value of foods (Mohamed et al. 2010; Osman et al. 2012; Al-Kaisey et al. 2002). It has been reported that irradiation of phytate (IP6), known to bind essential minerals in beef, soy and soy-extended beef, at an absorbed dosage of less than 4 kGy caused no difference (P ≥ 0.05) in the level of IP3-6 compared to non-irradiated samples (Engeljohn et al. 1999). Research on the basic interaction of radiation with biological systems has contributed to human society through applications in medicine, agriculture, pharmaceutical uses and other technological developments. In agricultural science and food technology, recent research has elucidated new potential applications for radiation. For example, high doses of ionising radiation have been shown to inhibit growth of microbial infestations in seeds. There are also many reports supporting the use of gamma irradiation as a fungicidal agent (Aziz et al. 2007; Al-Bachir and Laham 2002; Dogbevi et al. 2000). However, the viability, and sometimes the developmental process, of the seedling or the plant has been seriously hampered by radiation (Casarett 1996). There are insufficient reports about possible effects of gamma radiation on nutritional value of the seeds associated with seed radiation. Seeds of different plants that are consumed as food have varying nutrient values, which are dependent on the basic constituents of seed proteins. The chemical structure of irradiating food is less modified than heat-treated food and this technique avoids the use of potentially harmful chemicals (Siddhuraju et al. 2002). Sorghum flour had a severe problem during storage and was observed to produce off-flavor. In order to minimize losses occurring during storage of sorghum flour, the radiation process emerges as an attractive and healthy alternative when compared with chemical conventional treatments. Therefore, in this study we would like to investigate the effect of radiation process followed by traditional processings on the antinutritional factors and total and extractable Ca, P and Fe of sorghum cultivars flour.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and preparation

Grains of sorghum cultivars (Dabar, WadAhmed and Karamaka) were collected from Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Sudan. Collected seeds (4 kg) of each cultivar were ground to pass a 0.4 mm screen. All chemicals used for the experiments were of reagent grade.

Irradiation procedure

The flour with a moisture content of 5.45 % was spread uniformally and stored in polythene bags of mass of 100 gm, Gamma radiation process was conducted at Kaila irradiation processing unit, Sudanese Atomic Energy Corporation (SAEC). The flour was exposed to gamma rays generated by a cobalt-60 source (Gammacell 220, MDS Nordion, Ottawa, Canada). The flour was irradiated at 0, 5, 10 and 15 kGy following the procedures described by Helinski et al. (2008) with a dose rate of ca. 3.2 kGy/h at 24 ± 1 °C and normal relative humidity. Double side irradiation (exposure to both sides) was performed for uniform dose delivery. A dosimetry system was used to measure the dose received by the batch based on the Gafchromic HD-810 film (International Specialty Products, NJ, USA; FAO/IAEA/USDA 2003). Three dosimeters were included with each batch of flour and read after irradiation with a Radiachromics reader (Far West Technology Inc., CA, USA). All experiments were repeated 3 times and 3 replicates of each flour type were irradiated.

Processing and storage of the samples

Treated and untreated samples of the whole flour of each cultivar were either fermented till the pH of the dough reached 4.50 or cooked for 20 min in a water bath and then dried and ground to pass a 0.4 mm screen for further analysis.

Tannin determination

Quantitative determination of tannins was carried out using the modified vanillin-HCl method according to Price and Butler (1978). A 200 mg sample was extracted with 10 ml 1 % (v/v) conc. HCl in methanol for 20 min in capped rotating test tubes. Vanillin reagent (0.5 %, 5 ml) was added to extract (1 ml) and the absorbance of the colour developed after 20 min at 30 °C was read at 500 nm. A standard curve was prepared expressing the results as catechin equivalents, i.e. amount of catechin (mg/ml) which gives a colour intensity equivalent to that given by tannins after correcting for blank.

Phytic acid determination

Phytic acid content was determined by the method described by Wheeler and Ferrel (1971) using 2.0 g dried sample. A standard curve was prepared expressing the results as Fe(NO3)3 equivalent. Phytate phosphorus was calculated from the standard curve assuming a 4:6 iron to phosphorus molar ratio.

Total minerals determination

Minerals were extracted from the samples by the dry ashing method described by Chapman and Pratt (1982). About 2.0 g of sample was acid-digested with diacid mixture (HNO3:HClO4, 5:1, v/v) in a digestion chamber. The digested samples were dissolved in double-distilled water and filtered (Whatman No. 42). The filtrate was made to 50 mL with double-distilled water and was used for determination of total calcium, phosphorus and iron. Calcium was determined by a titration method. Iron was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer 2380). Phosphorus was determined spectrophotometrically using molybdovanadate method.

HCl extractability of minerals (in vitro bioavailability)

Minerals in the samples were extracted by the method described by Chauhan and Mahjan (1988). About 1.0 g of the sample was shaken with 10 mL of 0.03 M HCl for 3 h at 37 °C and then filtered. The clear extract obtained was oven-dried at 100 °C and then acid-digested. The amount of extractable minerals was determined by the methods described above. HCl extractability (%) was determined as follows:

Mineralextractability%=Mineralextractablein0:03NHCImg/100gTotalmineralsmg/100g×100

Statistical analysis

Each determination was carried out on three separate samples and analysed in triplicate on dry weight basis; the figures were then averaged. Data were assessed by the analysis of variance (Snedecor and Cochran 1987). Comparisons of means for treatments were made using Duncan’s multiple range tests. Significance was accepted at P ≥ 0.05.

Results and discussion

Effect of radiation process on tannin and phytate of raw and processed sorghum flour

The effect of gamma irradiation and/or traditional processing on tannin content of sorghum cultivars are shown in Table 1. Radiation of raw flour at 5 KGy resulted in a significantly (P ≤ 0.05) decreased tannin content by 7.0, 8.4 and 11.3 % for Dabar, Wad Ahmed and Karamaka, respectively. While irradiation at 10KGy significantly (P ≤ 0.05) decreased tannin content by 27.6, 20.9 and 22.7 % for the cultivars, respectively and at 15 KGy was 29, 21, and 23.2 %, for the cultivars, respectively. The results are in agreement with those reported by 108 Brigide and Canniatti-Brazaca (2006) who observed that tannin content was inversely correlated with the applied irradiation doses. Also Osman et al. (2012) reported that application of gamma irradiation up to 1.0 kGy significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced tannin content of faba bean. Fermentation of raw flour significantly (P ≤ 0.05) decreased tannin content by 34.4, 33.6 and 39.6 % for Dabar, Wad Ahmed and Karamaka, respectively. The results obtained agree with the findings of Idris et al. (2005), who found that fermentation caused reduction in tannin content of Tabat and Wad Ahmed cultivars by 35.1 and 38.1 %, respectively. Osman (2004) reported that fermentation markedly reduced tannin content of three sorghum cultivars namely Hamra, Shahla and Baidha by 31, 15 and 35 %, respectively. The reduction in tannin content due to fermentation is likely to be due to biochemical activity of fermenting organisms. Cooking of raw flour significantly (P ≤ 0.05) decreased tannin content by 49.1 %, 56.1 % and 60.8 % for the cultivars, respectively. Idris et al. (2005) reported that cooking treatment markedly reduced tannin content of sorghum cultivars Tabat and Wad Ahmed by 55.2 and 48.6 %, respectively. Cooking of fermented dough significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced tannin content by 66, 72.9 and 79.8 % for the cultivars, respectively. AbdelHaleem et al. (2008) reported that combination of fermentation and cooking of sorghum improved the nutritional quality and drastically reduced the tannin content to safe levels than any other processing methods. Further Idris et al. (2007) reported that fermentation and cooking greatly improved the extractability of Ca, P and Fe. As shown in Table 1 irradiation at 5, 10 and 15 KGy followed by fermentation and/or cooking significantly (P ≤ 0.05) decreased tannin content of the three cultivars compared to raw flour. The highest reduction percent in tannin content was observed at 15KGy for cooked fermented flour as 74.33, 79.7 and 84.69 % for Dabar, Wad Ahmed and Karamaka, respectively. These results indicated that tannin content was reduced by irradiation followed by processing more than irradiation or processing alone. The effect of gamma radiation on phytate content of Dabar, Wad Ahmed and Karamaka are shown in Table 2. Irradiation of raw flour at 5KGy resulted in a reduction of phytate content by 13.69,11.89 and 13.09 % for the cultivars Dabar, Wad Ahmed and Karamaka, respectively and that at 10 KGy significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced phytate content by 17.6, 17.62 and 16.69 % for the cultivars, respectively. The highest reduction level of phytate was obtained at 15 KGy as 19.1, 17.8 and 20.09 % for the cultivars, respectively. The results clearly showed that irradiation alone had an effect on phytate content which was increased with increasing dose of radiation. Osman et al. (2012) reported that phytic acid and tannin contents of broad bean were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced as a result of radiation. El-Niely (2007) stated that radiation significantly (P ≤ 0.05) decreased the level of phytic acid of legumes. The reduction in phytic acid during radiation process is likely to be due to chemical degradation of phytate to the lower inositol phosphates and inositol by the action of free radicals produced by radiation or might be due to cleavage of the phytate ring itself (Siddhuraju et al. 2002). Fermentation of raw flour significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced phytate content of Dabar, Wad Ahmed and Karamaka cultivars by 57.0, 51.4 and 52.5 %, respectively. Similar results were reported by Osman (2004) who reported that phytic acid contents of three sorghum varieties namely Hamra, Shahla and Baidha were markedly reduced as a result of fermentation. Both cereal and microbial phytases can contribute to a reduction in phytate during the fermentation process. Cooking of raw flour significantly (P ≤ 0.05) decreased phytate content for the cultivars by 16.1, 21.0 and 20 %, respectively. Idris et al. (2005) reported that cooking significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced phytate content of two sorghum cultivars. The low reduction in phytate level caused by cooking may be due to limited activation of phytase enzyme during cooking before it is denatured by heat, or partially due to formation of insoluble complexes between phytate and other compounds such as phytate-protein and phytate-protein-mineral complexes. Cooking of fermented dough of raw flour significantly decrease phytate content for the three cultivars by 41.5, 37.7 and 41 %, respectively. The results are similar to those reported by Idris et al. (2005) and AbdelHaleem et al. (2008). Processing of irradiated flour significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced phytate content when compared to raw flour. Duodu et al. (1999) reported that cooking did not decrease phytic acid in sorghum porridge, but cooking and irradiation caused a significant decrease (40 %). Higher reduction in phytate content was observed at 15 KGy of fermented dough as 65.2, 60.5 and 61.6 % for the three cultivars, respectively.

Table 1.

Tannin content (%) of sorghum cultivars as affected by irradiation followed by processing

Radiation dose (KGy) Treatment Sorghum cultivars
Dabar Wad Ahmed Karamaka
0 Raw 0.100 ± 0.002a 1.400 ± 0.190a 2.900 ± 0.234a
Fermented 0.066 ± 0.009e 0.930 ± 0.205e 1.752 ± 0.072e
Cooked 0.039 ± 0.005i 0.615 ± 0.014i 1.137 ± 0.004i
Fermented cooked 0.034 ± 0.006k 0.379 ± 0.035m 0.586 ± 0.023m
5 Raw 0.093 ± 0.018b 1.282 ± 0.051b 2.572 ± 0.223b
Fermented 0.062 ± 0.013f 0.866 ± 0.023f 1.657 ± 0.016f
Cooked 0.036 ± 0.004j 0.559 ± 0.019j 1.050 ± 0.024j
Fermented cooked 0.030 ± 0.001m 0.339 ± 0.008n 0.528 ± 0.003n
10 Raw 0.072 ± 0.021c 1.109 ± 0.052c 2.242 ± 0.101c
Fermented 0.042 ± 0.011h 0.754 ± 0.153g 1.352 ± 0.291h
Cooked 0.031 ± 0.006l 0.492 ± 0.028k 0.913 ± 0.050k
Fermented cooked 0.027 ± 0.002o 0.299 ± 0.025o 0.465 ± 0.015o
15 Raw 0.071 ± 0.006d 1.106 ± 0.115d 2.227 ± 0.024d
Fermented 0.050 ± 0.003g 0.722 ± 0.071h 1.358 ± 0.022g
Cooked 0.027 ± 0.001n 0.464 ± 0.017l 0.840 ± 0.005l
Fermented cooked 0.026 ± 0.002p 0.284 ± 0.053p 0.444 ± 0.015p

Values are means ± SD (n = 3)

Means not sharing a common superscript(s) in a column are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05

Table 2.

Phytate content (mg/100 g) of sorghum cultivars as affected by irradiation followed by processing

Radiation dose (KGy) Treatment Sorghum cultivars
Dabar Wad Ahmed Karamaka
0 Raw 266.00 ± 0.45a 268.00 ± 1.50a 272.00 ± 0.16a
Fermented 114.38 ± 0.42m 130.20 ± 0.12m 129.20 ± 1.98m
Cooked 223.44 ± 1.02c 211.72 ± 0.18e 217.61 ± 0.23d
Fermented cooked 155.61 ± 1.00i 166.96 ± 0.05i 160.48 ± 0.11h
5 Raw 229.56 ± 1.61b 236.11 ± 1.92b 236.37 ± 2.13b
Fermented 99.17 ± 1.04n 113.58 ± 0.12n 112.53 ± 0.11n
Cooked 196.85 ± 0.10f 185.89 ± 3.16f 191.92 ± 0.21f
Fermented cooked 136.00 ± 1.98j 147.34 ± 0.99 j 138.98 ± 0.13i
10 Raw 219.18 ± 0.17d 220.76 ± 0.11c 226.58 ± 0.05c
Fermented 97.68 ± 0.87o 110.19 ± 0.02o 132.30 ± 1.95k
Cooked 191.49 ± 0.12g 179.54 ± 0.10g 109.69 ± 0.11o
Fermented cooked 133.98 ± 0.11k 141.37 ± 2.01k 136.41 ± 0.84j
15 Raw 215.19 ± 0.18e 220.28 ± 0.06d 217.33 ±0.04e
Fermented 92.53 ± 0.19p 105.76 ± 0.12p 104.40 ± 0.12p
Cooked 181.21 ± 0.01h 171.71 ± 0.10h 176.91 ± 1.56g
Fermented cooked 126.51 ± 0.11l 135.24 ± 0.29l 131.11 ± 0.92l

Values are means ± SD (n = 3)

Means not sharing a common superscript(s) in a column are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05

Effect of radiation process on total and extractable Ca, P and Fe of raw and processed sorghum flour

Table 3 shows the content and HCl extractability of Ca, P and Fe of sorghum cultivar Dabar flour as affected by radiation and/or traditional processings. For the raw flour, Ca content was found to be 14.2 mg/100 g and out of this amount about 35.0 % was extractable; P was 340 mg/100 g with extractability of 43.5 % and Fe was 3.5 mg/100 g and out of this amount about 5.1 % was extractable. Radiation of raw flour had no effect on total and extractable Ca and Fe. However, at 10 kGy it increased both total and extractable P. Mohamed et al. (2010) reported that radiation of millet flour significantly decreased the antinutritional factors and increased the extractability of minerals. Fermentation of raw flour significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased Ca, P and Fe extractability but had no effect on total Ca, P and Fe. It has been reported that fermentation significantly reduced the level of antinutrients with a concomitant increase in minerals extractability of millet cultivars (AbdelRahaman et al. 2005). Cooking of raw flour slightly increased the extractable Ca and decreased extractable P and Fe but had no effect on total Ca, 164 P and Fe. Cooking of fermented dough significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased the extractable Ca, P and Fe and did not change the level of total minerals. Irradiation of raw flour at 5KGy followed by cooking gave varying changes in total and extractable minerals for Dabar cultivars but there is a significant (P ≤ 0.05) increase in total P as well as in extractable Ca and Fe but significant (P ≤ 0.05) decrease in total Fe. Cooking of irradiated fermented dough caused further improvement in total and extractable minerals. Moreover, as the level of radiation increased, the degree of improvement in minerals extractability was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased. Processing of irradiated flour significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased the extractable Ca, P and Fe with an increase in radiation dose but had no significant (P ≤ 0.05) effect on total minerals. Generally the increase in extractable minerals during traditional processing before and after radiation could be attributed to the reduction in the level of antinutrients as a result of such treatments. The trend of the results obtained for the cultivars WadAhmed (Table 4) and Karamaka (Table 5) regarding the effect of radiation process followed by fermentation and/or cooking were more or less similar to those reported for the cultivar Dabar.

Table 3.

Total (mg/100 g) and extractable (%) Ca, P and Fe of sorghum cultivar (Dabar) as affected by irradiation followed by processing

Radiation dose (KGy) Treatment Minerals
Ca P Fe
Total (mg/100 g) Extractable (%) Total (mg/100 g) Extractable (%) Total (mg/100 g) Extractable (%)
0 Raw 14.2 ± 1.03c 35.0 ± 0.12k 340.0 ± 0.01k 43.5 ± 0.01m 3.5 ± 0.03ef 5.1 ± 0.06d
Fermented 15.4 ± 2.06a 76.7 ± 0.65f 351.0 ± 0.98g 56.0 ± 0.41i 3.7 ± 0.01d 21.5 ± 0.11c
Cooked 14.3 ± 0.11bc 37.5 ± 0.19j 339.2 ± 0.01l 41.7 ± 0.83n 4.0 ± 0.01ab 4. 9 ± 0.11d
Fermented cooked 14.3 ±0.11bc 81.7 ± 0.49c 340.0 ± 0.19k 53.5 ± 0.71j 3.0 ± 1.03g 21.2 ± 0.12c
5 Raw 14.2 ± 0.52c 39.1 ± 0.64i 339.0 ± 0.03l 45.7 ± 0.02 l 3.5 ± 1.04ef 5.1 ± 2.17d
Fermented 15.0 ± 0.23a 78.0 ± 0.02e 361.0 ± 0.82f 68.6 ± 0.24f 3.7 ± 0.09d 22.0 ± 0.02b
Cooked 14.1 ± 0.12c 34.9 ± 0.09k 344.0 ± 0.72j 43.9 ± 0.02m 3.0 ± 0.13g 5.0 ± 0.82d
Fermented cooked 14.1 ± 0.54c 80.5 ± 0.65d 362.0 ± 0.32e 75.0 ± 0.02e 3. 9 ± 0.76ab 22.1 ± 0.76ab
10 Raw 13.9 ± 0.79cd 35.0 ± 1.18k 346.0 ± 0.67i 61.7 ± 0.05g 3.6 ± 0.81e 5.1 ± 0.02d
Fermented 14.8 ± 0.21b 86.0 ± 0.13b 375.5 ± 0.12a 81.5 ± 0.02c 4.0 ± 0.97a 22.0 ± 0.09b
Cooked 13.7 ± 0.23d 63.7 ± 0.08h 335.5 ± 0.53m 57.1 ± 0.02h 3.0 ± 0.76g 4.9 ± 0.72d
Fermented cooked 14.4 ± 0.72bc 90.7 ± 0.43a 373.0 ± 0.96b 82.6 ± 0.02b 3.8 ± 0.54cd 22.0 ± 0.05b
15 Raw 14.1 ± 1.05c 35.0 ± 0.52k 347.4 ± 1.13h 52.1 ± 0.16k 3.5 ± 0.85ef 5.0 ± 0.98d
Fermented 15.2 ± 0.01a 85.5 ± 0.86b 365.4 ± 0.95d 78.5 ± 0.02d 3.9 ± 0.23ab 22.7 ± 0.08a
Cooked 13.9 ± 0.65cd 67.8 ± 0.09g 344.0 ± 0.23j 53.3 ± 0.02j 3. 5 ± 0.76f 5.1 ± 0.12d
Fermented cooked 14.0 ± 0.06cd 91.2 ± 0.78a 369.3 ± 0.23c 83.7 ± 0.88a 3.9 ± 0.21bc 22.5 ± 0.53a

Values are means ± SD (n = 3)

Means not sharing a common superscript(s) in a column are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05

Table 4.

Total (mg/100 g) and extractable (%) Ca, P and Fe of sorghum cultivar (WadAhmed) as affected by irradiation followed by processing

Radiation dose (KGy) Treatment Minerals
Ca P Fe
Total (mg/100 g) Extractable (%) Total (mg/100 g) Extractable (%) Total (mg/100 g) Extractable (%)
0 Raw 15.3 ± 0.12ef 32.0 ± 0.65k 330.0 ± 0.43l 44.3 ± 1.76j 3.3 ± 0.21bcd 6.0 ± 0.01f
Fermented 20.4 ± 3.42c 73.3 ± 0.43d 355.0 ±1.64c 60.7 ± 0.52e 3.4 ± 1.07b 20.1 ± 1.54c
Cooked 14.9 ±0.16f 38.9 ± 0.16i 328.0 ± 2.06m 43.1 ± 1.71k 3.8 ±0.37a 5. 9 ± 0.59e
Fermented cooked 17.1 ± 0.43d 71.1 ± 1.98e 333.0 ± 0.18j 57.2 ± 2.04f 3.4 ± 0.11bc 20.0 ± 0.72d
5 Raw 15.6 ± 0.02e 36.7 ± 0.20j 330.0 ±0.74l 45.7 ± 1.63i 3.3 ± 0.23bcd 16.0 ± 0.94f
Fermented 20.5 ± 0.29bc 70.0 ± 0.98f 343.0 ± 0.76e 66.6 ± 0.0d 3.1 ± 0.32efg 22.1 ± 0.98c
Cooked 15.3 ± 0.43ef 25.0 ± 0.34l 331.0 ±0.31k 48.3 ± 0.90h 3.0 ± 0.98gh 15.9 ± 0.65f
Fermented cooked 17.0 ± 0.22d 68.0 ± 0.76g 341.0 ± 0.54f 67.6 ± 0.65d 3.4 ± 0.43bc 22.9 ± 0.12b
10 Raw 15.2 ± 0.73ef 50.0 ± 0.07h 337.0 ± 1.02h 46.4 ± 0.04i 3.3 ± 0.13cde 6.8 ± 0.19e
Fermented 21.0 ± 0.12b 101.0 ± 0.87a 355.0 ±0.65c 74.7 ± 0.16c 3.2 ± 0.35ef 22.2 ± 0.45c
Cooked 14.9 ± 0.08f 38.8 ± 0.07i 327.5 ± 0.24n 51.0 ± 0.36g 3.2 ± 0.68efg 6.0 ± 0.76f
Fermented cooked 16.6 ± 0.05d 75.0 ± 0.87c 344.0 ±0.75d 73.9 ± 0.45c 3.2 ± 0.97def 22.6 ± 0.43b
15 Raw 15.2 ± 0.83ef 50.0 ± 0.71h 338.6g ±0.09 46.9 ± 0.27i 3.3 ± 0.67bcd 15.9 ± 0.23f
Fermented 27.0 ± 1.93a 92.6 ± 0.70b 356.0 ± 0.87b 76.7 ± 0.98b 3.0 ± 0.87h 23.7 ± 0.23a
Cooked 13.8 ± 0.86g 36.7 ± 0.63j 335.0 ± 1.83i 48.1 ± 0.34h 3.1 ± 0.43fgh 6.1 ± 0.18f
Fermented cooked 20.6 ± 0.63bc 75.0 ± 0.06c 360.0 ± 0.76a 83.4 ± 0.31a 3.0 ± 0.32gh 22.8 ± 0.43b

Values are means ± SD (n = 3)

Means not sharing a common superscript(s) in a column are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05

Table 5.

Total (mg/100 g) and extractable (%) Ca, P and Fe of sorghum cultivar (Karamaka) as affected by irradiation followed by processing

Radiation dose (KGy) Treatment Minerals
Ca P Fe
Total (mg/100 g) Extractable (%) Total (mg/100 g) Extractable (%) Total (mg/100 g) Extractable (%)
0 Raw 14.7 ± 0.02de 30.0 ± 0.09k 333.0 ± 0.01k 45.2 ± 0.45l 4.4 ± 0.03a 4.6 ± 0.08g
Fermented 17.2 ± 0.13b 66.0 ± 0.71f 340.0 ± 2.08f 58.4 ± 0.86f 4.5 ± 1.09a 33.2 ± 1.03d
Cooked 14.6 ± 1.95de 30.0 ± 0.14k 329.0 ± 0.00m 42.8 ± 0.78n 4.4 ± 0.01a 4.7 ±0.17g
Fermented cooked 14.9 ± 0.09d 57.9 ± 0.06g 335.2 ± 0.07 i 49.7 ± 0.13i 4.4 ± 0.34a 32.9 ± 0.91e
5 Raw 14.6 ± 1.65de 31.1 ± 1.12j 330.0 ± 0.09 l 45.5 ± 0.60l 4.4 ± 0.94a 4.0 ± 0.76i
Fermented 16.9 ± 0.09b 75.0 ± 0.18d 341.0 ± 0.75e 60.0 ± 0.09e 4.5 ± 0.05a 33.9 ± 0.51bc
Cooked 14.7 ± 0.25de 37.5 ± 0.45h 329.0 ± 0.96m 43.9 ± 0.23m 4.4 ± 0.85a 4.3 ± 0.75h
Fermented cooked 15.1 ± 0.75d 70.0 ± 0.95e 336.0 ± 0.64h 52.7 ± 0.76h 4.4 ± 0.75a 33.8 ± 0.76c
10 Raw 14.4 ± 0.51e 31.0 ± 0.96j 334.0 ± 2.23j 46.2 ± 0.01k 4.4 ± 0.93a 4.6 ± 0.16g
Fermented 18.2 ± 0.87a 90.0 ± 0.64c 342.0 ± 0.08d 69.5 ± 0.98c 4.5 ± 0.54a 34.1 ± 0.01b
Cooked 14.8 ± 0.96de 35.1 ± 0.98i 329.0 ± 0.53m 58.8 ± 0.76f 4.4 ± 0.63a 5.0 ± 0.18f
Fermented cooked 15.8 ± 0.13c 94.0 ± 0.07a 344.0 ± 0.79c 63.3 ± 0.43d 4.4 ± 0.01a 34.0 ± 0.97b
15 Raw 14.9 ± 0.06d 30.0 ± 0.87k 337.0 ± 0.06g 46.7 ± 0.28j 4.5 ± 0.45a 4.7 ± 0.76g
Fermented 18.0 ± 0.36a 89.7 ± 0.91c 352.0 ± 0.78a 72.2 ± 0.01a 4.5 ± 0.81a 34.3 ± 0.43a
Cooked 13.8 ± 0.97g 30.2 ± 1.22k 336.0 ± 0.71h 57.5 ± 0.12g 4.4 ± 0.36a 4. 9 ± 0.01f
Fermented cooked 15.1 ± 0.64d 92.6 ± 0.53b 351.0 ± 0.01b 71.7 ± 0.96b 4.4 ± 0.42a 34.1 ± 1.01a

Values are means ± SD (n = 3)

Means not sharing a common superscript(s) in a column are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05

Conclusion

The observations about antinutrional factors and minerals content and extractability in the studied samples suggest that radiation processing up to 15 kGy had little effects on their value and had no effects on minerals quality of the flour by improving the extractability or bioavailability of such minerals. Therefore, radiation can be applied to alleviate the severe problem of antinutrients and off-flavor of flour during storage. Moreover, radiation process when compared with chemicals or heat treatment emerges as an attractive and healthy alternative.

References

  1. AbdelHaleem WH, AbdelMoniem IM, El Tinay AH, Babiker EE. Effect of fermentation, malt-pretreatment and cooking on antinutritional factors and in vitro protein digestibility of sorghum cultivars. Pakistan J Nutr. 2008;7:335–341. doi: 10.3923/pjn.2008.335.341. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. AbdelRahaman SM, Babiker EE, El Tinay AH. Effect of fermentation on antinutritional factors and HCl extractability of minerals of pearl millet cultivars. J Food Tech. 2005;3(4):516–522. doi: 10.1080/09637480601093236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. AbdelRahaman SM, ElMaki HB, Idris WH, Hassan AH, Babiker EE, El Tinay AH. Antinutritional factors content and hydrochloric acid extractability of minerals in pearl millet cultivars as affected by germination. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2007;58:6–17. doi: 10.1080/09637480601093236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Bachir M, Laham G. The effect of gamma irradiation on the microbial load, mineral concentration and sensory characteristics of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L) J Sci Food Agric. 2002;83:170–175. [Google Scholar]
  5. Al-kaisey MT, Mohammed MA, Alwan AH, Mohammed MH. The effect of gamma irradiation on the viscosity of two barley cultivars for broiler chicks. Rad Phy Chem. 2002;63:295–297. doi: 10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00587-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aziz NH, El-Far FM, Shahin AAM, Roushy SM. Control of fusarium moulds and fumonisin B1 in seeds by gamma-irradiation. Food Con. 2007;18:1337–1342. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.12.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Babiker EE, El Tinay AH. Effect of soaking in water or in sodium carbonate on tannin content and in vitro protein digestibility of sorghum cultivars. Int J Food Sci Tech. 1993;28:389–395. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brigide P, Canniatti-Brazaca Anti-nutrients and in vitro availability of iron in irradiated common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) Food Chem. 2006;98:85–89. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Casarett AP. Rad Biol. New York: Prentice-Hall Inc; 1996. pp. 284–312. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chapman HD, Pratt PF. Method for the analysis of soil, plant and water. 2. California: California University Agricultural Division; 1982. p. 170. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chauhan BM, Mahjan L. Effect of natural fermentation on the extractability of minerals from pearl millet flour. J Food Sci. 1988;53:1576–1577. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb09330.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Correia I, Nune A, Duarte IF, Barros A, Delgadillo I. Sorghum fermentation followed by spectroscopic techniques. Food Chem. 2005;90:853–859. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.05.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dogbevi MK, Vachon C, Lacroix M. Effect of gamma irradiation on the microbiological quality and on the functional properties of proteins in dry red kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) Radiat Phys Chem. 2000;57:265–268. doi: 10.1016/S0969-806X(99)00442-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Duodu KG, Minnaar A, Taylor JRN. Effect of cooking and irradiation on the labile vitamins and anti-nutrient content of a traditional African sorghum porridge and Spinach relish. Food Chem. 1999;66:21–27. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00070-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. El-Niely HFG. Effect of radiation processing on anti-nutrients, in vitro protein digestibility and protein efficiency ratio bioassay of legume seeds. Rad Phy Chem. 2007;76:1050–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Engeljohn DL, Bell BB, Thayer DW, Harland BF. Effects of gamma irradiated, cooked, soy-, beef-, and soy-meat-based diets in rats. Ecol Food Nut. 1999;38:469–490. doi: 10.1080/03670244.1999.9991590. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Helinski MEH, Hassan MM, El-Motasim WM, Malcolm CA, Knols BGJ, El-Sayed B. Methodology towards a sterile insect technique field release of Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Sudan: irradiation, transportation, and field cage experimentation. Mal J. 2008;7(65):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Idris WH, AbdelRahman SM, ELMaki HB, Babiker EE, EL Tinay AH. Effect of germination, fermentation and cooking on phytic acid and tannin contents and HCl-extractability of minerals of sorghum (Sorghum biocolor) cultivars. J Food Tech. 2005;3(3):410–416. [Google Scholar]
  19. Idris WH, Abdel Rahaman SM, ElMaki HB, Babiker EE, El Tinay AH. Effect of malt pretreatment on HCl extractability of calcium, phosphorus and iron of sorghum (Sorghum biocolor) cultivars. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2007;42:194–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01207.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mohamed EA, Ali NA, Ahamed SH, Mohamed Ahmed IA, Babiker EE. Effect of radiation process on antinutrients and HCl extractability of calcium, phosphorus and iron during processing and storage of millet flour. Rad Phy Chem. 2010;79:791–796. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2010.01.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mohiedeen IE, El Tinay AH, Elkhalifa AO, Babiker EE, Mallasy LO. Effect of fermentation and cooking on protein quality of maize (Zea Mays Linnaus) cultivars. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2010;45:1284–1290. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02272.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Osman MA. Changes in sorghum enzyme inhibitors, phytic acid, tannins and in vitro protein digestibility during Khamir (local bread) fermentation. Food Chem. 2004;88:129–134. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.12.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Osman NM, Mohamed Ahmed IA, Babiker EE. Fermentation and cooking of Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) leaves: Changes in chemical and amino acid composition, antinutrients and protein fractions and digestibility. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2010;45:124–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02111.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Osman AMA, Hassan AB, Osman GAM, Nagat M, Mohamed AH, Eiman ED, Babiker EE. Effects of gamma irradiation and/or cooking on nutritional quality of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) cultivars seeds. J Food Sci Technol. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s13197-012-0662-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Price ML, Butler LG. Rapid visual estimation and spectrophotometric determination of tannin content of sorghum grain. J Agric Food Chem. 1978;25:1268–1273. doi: 10.1021/jf60214a034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Siddhuraju D, Osoniyi O, Makkar HPS, Becker K. The effect of soaking and ionizing radiation on various anti-nutritional factors of seeds from different species of an unconventional legume sesvaria and common legume, green gram (Vigna radiate) Food Chem. 2002;79:273–276. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00140-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 7. Ames: The Iowa State University Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sokrab AM, Ahmed IAM, Babiker EE. Effect of malting and fermentation on antinutrients, and total and extractable minerals of high and low phytate corn genotypes. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2012;47:1037–1043. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.02938.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sokrab AM, Mohamed Ahmed IA, Babiker EE. Effect of fermentation on antinutrients and total and extractable minerals of high and low phytate corn genotypes. J Food Sci Tech. 2012b doi: 10.1007/s13197-012-0787-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wheeler EL, Ferrel RE. A method for phytic acid determination in wheat and wheat fractions. Cereal Chem. 1971;48:312–320. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Food Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES