Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2014 Nov 4;6(2):1327–1339. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2675

Molecular profiling of endometrial carcinoma precursor, primary and metastatic lesions suggests different targets for treatment in obese compared to non-obese patients

Anna Berg 1,2, Erling A Hoivik 1,2, Siv Mjøs 1,2, Frederik Holst 1,2, Henrica M J Werner 1,2, Ingvild L Tangen 1,2, Amaro Taylor-Weiner 7,8,9, William J Gibson 7,8,9, Kanthida Kusonmano 1,2,3, Elisabeth Wik 4,5, Jone Trovik 1,2, Mari K Halle 1,2, Anne M Øyan 1,6, Karl-Henning Kalland 1,6, Andrew D Cherniack 7, Rameen Beroukhim 7,8,9, Ingunn Stefansson 4,5, Gordon B Mills 10, Camilla Krakstad 1,2, Helga B Salvesen 1,2
PMCID: PMC4359236  PMID: 25415225

Abstract

Obesity is linked to increased incidence of endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) and complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH). We here explore pattern and sequence of molecular alterations characterizing endometrial carcinogenesis in general and related to body mass index (BMI), to improve diagnostic stratification and treatment strategies. We performed molecular characterization of 729 prospectively collected EEC and CAH. Candidate biomarkers were identified in frozen samples by whole-exome and Sanger sequencing, oligonucleotide gene expression and Reverse Phase Protein Arrays (investigation cohort) and further explored in formalin fixed tissues by immunohistochemistry and Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (validation cohort). We here demonstrate that PIK3CA mutations, PTEN loss, PI3K and KRAS activation are early events in endometrial carcinogenesis. Molecular changes related to KRAS activation and inflammation are more common in obese CAH patients, suggesting different prevention and systemic treatment strategies in obese and non-obese patients. We also found that oncoprotein Stathmin might improve preoperative diagnostic distinction between premalignant and malignant endometrial lesions.

Keywords: endometrial carcinoma, endometrial hyperplasia, metastasis, body mass index, PI3Kinase

INTRODUCTION

Cancer of the corpus uteri is the most frequent gynecological cancer in developed countries, globally affecting more than 140, 000 new women each year [1]. Approximately 80% of these patients present with the endometrioid subtype of endometrial carcinoma (EEC) [2]. Endometrial hyperplasia (EH), and in particular complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) are considered to be precursor lesions for EEC [3].

Both EEC and CAH are associated with factors known to increase the level of biological available estrogen or an excess of estrogen relative to progesterone [3]. After menopause, adipose tissue becomes the primary source of estrogen, with levels correlating with increased body mass index (BMI) [4]. The obesity epidemic in the industrialized world has been linked to the increase in EEC and its precursor lesions [2, 5].

Premalignant endometrial lesions are commonly classified according to the WHO classification system [6]. This classification system has shown poor reproducibility and high risk of concurrent carcinoma or cancer progression [7-9]. One key clinical challenge in treating endometrial carcinoma precursor lesions is that some women with CAH are premenopausal and in childbearing age [10]. These aspects have stimulated the search for biomarkers to improve the distinction of premalignant from malignant lesions for these patients, and to learn more about the biology behind cancer progression. Recently the WHO classification system was revised and hopefully this will improve the diagnostic accuracy [11]. Still, the knowledge about the molecular pattern is scarce, and no biomarker is yet in widespread clinical use to date.

In particular for women wanting to preserve fertility and those medically inoperable, this is an unmet need. On this background, we aimed to explore CAH for biomarkers with a potential to improve diagnostic accuracy. Identifying targets for therapy, potentially improving systemic treatment strategies, would also be important. We have therefore performed a comprehensive molecular profiling of a unique collection of fresh frozen EEC precursor-, primary- and metastatic lesions in parallel, to explore the pattern and sequence of molecular alterations characterizing the disease progression in general and related to BMI in specific. Candidate markers were further explored in a larger sample collection of formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue for potential validation. Finally, validated markers were tested for their ability to improve the preoperative detection of malignant disease in patients with concordant (CAH/CAH) versus discordant (CAH/EEC) preoperative and postoperative histologic diagnoses.

RESULTS

Distribution of clinical characteristics for patients diagnosed by total hysterectomy included in this study is presented in Supplementary Table S1. The investigation cohort consists of 139 EEC and 18 CAH patients with fresh frozen tissue available for the comprehensive molecular profiling and the validation cohort of 494 EEC and 77 CAH patients. Patients with CAH were significantly younger and more often premenopausal compared to EEC patients in the validation cohort. A similar pattern was seen for the investigation cohort, although not statistically significant, probably due to the smaller sample set (Supplementary Table S1).

Missense PTEN and PIK3CA mutations are frequent in CAH

PTEN and PIK3CA were found to be significantly mutated and present in five and three of ten CAHs subjected to whole exome sequencing (WES), respectively (Figure 1). Two cases had coexisting mutations in PIK3CA and PTEN. All somatic mutations and details regarding the mutations found in the 10 CAH cases assessed by WES are included in Supplementary Data. Other mutations known to occur in premalignant endometrial lesions, like CTNNB1 and KRAS mutations were not detected. The mutation rate in CAH lesions is low compared to primary endometrial cancer lesions [12].

Figure 1. PTEN and PIK3CA protein and mutation view.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Results from whole exome sequencing of ten cases with complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH): PTEN (A) and PIK3CA (B) were significantly mutated indicated by protein view in the diagram. One diamond indicates one mutation. The red dotted line in PTEN overview indicates two mutations found in same case. Across the two proteins, PTEN L320* and PIK3CA E542K is found within same case, as is PTEN R55_splice and PIK3CA E545K.

As the majority of PIK3CA mutations have previously been reported to occur in exons 9 and 20 [13], these were characterized by Sanger sequencing in additional DNA from fresh frozen tissue available from 18 samples with CAH (of which 8 were included in the WES analyses) and 228 primary EEC lesions. Four (22.2%) CAH cases were found to have missense mutations in exon 9, in addition to one silent mutation in exon 20. Details regarding the mutations in PIK3CA are listed for CAH cases in Supplementary Table S2. Two cases were found to have PIK3CA mutations by both methods, revealing the same sequence alterations, and located at known PIK3CA mutation hotspot sites (E545K and E542K). One overlapping case had PIK3CA mutations in exon 20 by WES without the mutation being confirmed by Sanger sequencing, suggesting different detection ranges, with Sanger sequencing requiring a higher mutant allele frequency for detection. The PIK3CA mutation frequency in CAH was similar to what was found for grade 1 through 3 in the 228 primary EEC lesions investigated (Supplementary Table S3).

PIK3CA amplifications are infrequent in CAH and increase with dedifferentiation

Fifty-five CAH lesions were further assessed for PIK3CA copy number alterations by Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH). The mean PIK3CA/CEP3 Dual Colour Probe ratio was 1.02, ranging from 0.95 to 1.14 in CAH. Gene/centromere ratio was defined as increased if exceeding 1.3 [14] or an average of gene copy number above 2.6 per nucleus for absolute copy number increase. Of the 435 cases with EEC assessed for PIK3CA copy number by FISH for comparison, 8.7% demonstrated increased copy number, with the highest proportion of PIK3CA amplified cases in EEC grade 3 lesions (Supplementary Table S3). This difference in copy number between CAH and EEC was statistically significant (p=0.01), and in contrast to the similar proportion of PIK3CA mutations detected in CAH and different grades of primary EEC lesions (Supplementary Table S3).

PI3K pathway activation and PTEN loss occur early in endometrial carcinogenesis

The PI3K signaling pathway is known to be important in cancer initiation and progression through many mechanisms such as cell growth and cell survival [15]. PI3K activation is influenced by multiple changes in endometrial cancer, including most frequently PTEN loss of function, PIK3CA mutations and PIK3CA amplification [15-17]. On this background we further explored mRNA expression levels of an established gene signature representing the PI3K pathway [18], to compare the PI3K signaling activity in CAH to EEC lesions grade 1, 2 and 3 and metastatic lesions from EEC primary tumors (Figure 2). We found a highly significant increase in PI3K pathway signaling from CAH to EEC grade 1 (p<0.001). The increased PI3K pathway activation in EEC grade 1 samples could be due to higher glandular purity in these lesions compared to CAH samples. To better control the potential stromal contamination in CAH, we explored the validation cohort by immunohistochemical (IHC) protein staining of the epithelial component for the oncoprotein Stathmin, suggested as a surrogate marker for PI3K and PTEN dysregulation in endometrial and breast cancers [16, 19]. There was a highly significant association between Stathmin protein expression and PI3K activation score from overlapping specimens (p=0.004) (Figure 2). In parallel with evaluating Stathmin protein levels by IHC, Stathmin levels were also assessed by Reverse Phase Protein Arrays (RPPA). Protein levels by both methods were found to be highly significantly correlated with STMN1 mRNA level (p<0.001 and p=0.008, respectively) (Figure 2), supporting that higher level of stromal contamination in CAH is unlikely to be the sole explanation for the differences in PI3K activation levels demonstrated for CAH and EEC. We also explored immunohistochemical staining for phosphorylated Stathmin (pStathmin(S38)). We found it to be highly correlated with Stathmin protein expression (p<0.001), as reported previously [20]. However this marker was related to the PI3K activation score only with borderline significance (p=0.1).

Figure 2. PI3K mRNA signature score and Stathmin protein expression.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The PI3K mRNA signature score defined by Gustafson et al. [18] (A) in complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH), primary endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EEC), stratified for grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3 and metastatic lesions from EEC primary tumors. Stathmin protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC, Cell Signaling #3352) correlated to PI3K mRNA score (B), STMN1 mRNA level (C) and protein level assessed by Reverse Phase Protein Array (D) in EEC and CAH patients. Examples of Stathmin immunological tissue staining by IHC, showing low (E) and high expression (F). 20x magnification applied.

Also, PTEN protein expression was correlated to PTEN mRNA level, evaluated both by IHC and RPPA, supporting the feasibility for assessment of PTEN status by these methods for the applied antibody (Figure 3). The correlation between PTEN protein and mRNA expression was further supported in results from Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM), presenting PTEN as the one top-ranked gene differentially expressed in high versus low PTEN protein expression groups. We found no difference in PTEN mRNA expression or expression of PI3K signature level for mutated compared to wild type status for PIK3CA.

Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining of PTEN associates with mRNA and protein RPPA-expression.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

PTEN protein level by immunohistochemistry (IHC, Cell Signaling #9188) is significantly associated with PTEN mRNA expression in clinical samples from patients with complex atypical hyperplasia and endometrioid endometrial cancer (A) and PTEN protein level assessed by Reverse Phase Protein Array (B). Examples of PTEN protein expression by IHC, showing low (C), intermediate (D) and high (E) staining. 20x magnification applied.

After validating that Stathmin protein staining reflected PI3K signaling and PTEN protein staining PTEN mRNA level in clinical samples, we explored Stathmin as a surrogate marker for PI3K signaling in the independent validation cohort. In line with the observed increase in PI3K signaling from CAH to EEC, we observe a significant increase in PI3K signaling, measured by increased Stathmin protein level from premalignant to malignant lesions in this independent validation cohort (p<0.001) (Table 1). In the same patient cohort we find that PTEN protein loss is more frequent in CAH than EEC (p<0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1. Histological type and grade correlated to hormone receptor status, Stathmin and PTEN protein expression in a total of 57 complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) and 408 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC) lesions with representative data for type and grade.

Stathmina n(%) PTENb n (%) ERαc n (%) PRd n (%)
p-value <0.001 p-value <0.001 p-value <0.001 p-value <0.001
High Low Low Intermediate High Low High Low High
Histology
CAH 0 55 (100) 23 (40.4) 28 (49.1) 6 (10.5) 0 57 (100) 1 (1.8) 55 (98.2)
EEC Grade 1 11 (6.4) 162 (93.6) 19 (12.3) 95 (61.7) 40 (26.0) 18 (9.3) 175 (90.7) 12 (6.2) 182 (93.8)
EEC Grade 2 23 (15.8) 123 (84.2) 29 (23.0) 63 (50.0) 34 (27.0) 34 (21.7) 123 (78.3) 20 (12.7) 137 (87.3)
EEC Grade 3 11 (20.4) 43 (79.6) 9 (19.6) 20 (43.4) 17 (37.0) 21 (36.8) 36 (63.2) 22 (38.6) 35 (61.4)
Open in a new tab
a

Index 9 indicated as high, 0-6 is low, Cell Signaling (#3352).

b

Low is index 0, intermediate is 1-4, high is 6-9, Cell Signaling (#9188).

c

Index 0-2 is low, 3-9 is high, Dako (M7047).

d

Index 0 is low, 1-9 is high, Dako (M3569). Missing scoring data in two cases with CAH for Stathmin and one case for PR. Missing scoring data for ER in one, PTEN in 82 and Stathmin in 35 cases with EEC. Statistic assessed by Chi-square test.

Hormone receptor loss and epithelial to mesenchymal transition are rare in CAH

We further explored the primary investigation series for changes in mRNA expression levels for the genes encoding the hormone receptors ER and PR (ESR1 and PGR), as well as an Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) signature score, hypothesizing that this transition could be important for the early invasive step in carcinogenesis. We found however, that the most significant reduction in hormone receptor level and increase in EMT score were detected from grade 2 to grade 3 EEC, with no significant change from CAH to grade 1 EEC (Supplementary Fig. S1). The observation that the proportion of cases with low hormone receptor level increases from low to high grade EEC lesions, and that the increase is clearly most pronounced during dedifferentiation after the invasive step is validated in the larger cohort of 57 CAHs compared to 408 EEC (Table 1). We found ERα and PR protein expression to be present in the majority of premalignant lesions, with loss of expression in less than 2% (Table 1).

Oncogenic pathway alterations differ between obese and non-obese CAH patients

Obesity is a known risk factor for CAH and EEC [2]. Hypothesizing that the molecular alterations critical for cancer initiation are obesity-related, we explored gene expression in obese compared to non-obese patients in fresh frozen samples from CAH patients. Interestingly, we found KRAS and STMN1 mRNA levels to be amongst the top-ranked differentially expressed genes in a SAM analysis, comparing women with BMI above and below 30 kg/m2. We found that mRNA expression of STMN1 is significantly anti-correlated with BMI, contrasting KRAS mRNA expression being highly significantly correlated with high BMI (Figure 4). This strong association with BMI observed in the CAH group was not present in invasive EEC, suggesting that the molecular changes important in the initiation of the carcinogenic process in premalignant lesions are BMI context related (Supplementary Fig. S2). Although of borderline significance, we also observed the same tendency as for STMN1 with higher PI3K activation score in non-obese compared to obese EEC patients (p=0.058).

Figure 4. mRNA expression levels of STMN1 and KRAS in relation to body mass index in CAH patients.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

STMN1 expression is significantly anticorrelated (A) and KRAS significantly correlated (B) with BMI in CAH patients. Distribution of STMN1 and KRAS mRNA expression in 18 cases of complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) related to body mass index (BMI) (C, D).

We further explored the relationship between BMI and transcriptional alterations by applying Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), using pre-defined gene sets from the MsigDB (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp) to compare obese and non-obese CAH patients. In line with the initial observation that KRAS level was positively correlated with BMI, obese patients with CAH demonstrate a striking enrichment for oncogenic KRAS related gene sets (Supplementary Table S4), this was not observed in EEC. In addition, an oncogenic KRAS related gene set generated in breast cancer, another hormone and obesity related cancer [5], clearly demonstrated a different activation pattern for non-obese compared to obese CAH patients (Supplementary Fig. S3). Also, gene sets related to immunological processes in Gene Ontology (GO) gene sets, were enriched in obese compared to non-obese CAH patients (Supplementary Table S4), a pattern that was not seen for invasive EEC. Due to the small sample size for the premalignant subgroup, we re-explored the data and doubled the permutations, without observing any change in number of significant gene sets, supporting the validity of our primary results.

Targets for treatment differs between obese and non-obese patients

Further hypothesizing that optimal drugs for preventing and treating premalignant and low grade endometrial cancers may be different for obese and non-obese women, we queried Connectivity map (version 2) [21] for compounds anticorrelated to EEC grade 1 compared to CAH, also stratified for BMI groups. PI3K/mTOR inhibitors were found to be amongst the top ranked drugs, and thus suggested as treatment for patients with early EEC, and for the non-obese group in particular (Supplementary Table S5). This appears to be in line with the initial observation that STMN1 and PI3K pathway activation increase from CAH to EEC, in particular amongst non-obese patients (Supplementary Table S5). This is also supported by higher Stathmin protein expression in the non-obese compared to the obese EEC patients in the validation cohort (p=0.03). We also found pStathmin(S38) to be significantly higher in the non-obese patients (p=0.007).

Stathmin overexpression was frequently detected in preoperatively undetected EEC

Biomarkers that could identify cases with occult carcinoma, having a preoperative biopsy diagnosed as CAH, would be clinically useful. We therefore compared preoperative samples from 44 patients with EEC in hysterectomy specimens diagnosed as CAH in preoperative biopsies (discordant cases) to the 72 patients with CAH in both specimens (concordant cases). We find that Stathmin overexpression in preoperative biopsies is significantly more frequent in the discordant group (p=0.03), suggesting a potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy for detecting malignant disease preoperatively (Table 2). In line with these findings, there was a tendency, although not statistically significant, to higher pStathmin(S38) in discordant cases (p=0.06). Low PR protein expression also tended to be more common in preoperative biopsies for discordant compared to concordant cases (p=0.05). ERα and PTEN expression however, were similar for the two groups (Table 2).

Table 2. Protein expression in preoperative samples: Hormone receptors, Stathmin and PTEN in 44 patients classified as complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) in preoperative biopsies with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC)* after hysterectomy (CAH/EEC); and 72 patients with concordant pre and postoperative diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH/CAH).

Stathmina n(%) PTENb n(%) ERαc n(%) PRd n(%)
p-value=0.03 p-value=0.37 p-value=0.55 p-value=0.05
High Low Low Intermediate High Low High Low High
Histology
CAH/CAH 2 (2.9) 66(97.1) 41 (59.4) 27(39.1) 1(1.4) 1 (1.4) 68(98.6) 1 (1.4) 71(98.6)
CAH/EEC 7 (15.9) 37(84.1) 30 (71.4) 11(26.2) 1(2.4) 2 (5.0) 38(95.0) 4 (10.0) 36(90.0)
Open in a new tab
a

Index 6-9 is regarded as high, 0-4 as low, Cell Signaling (#3352), missing data for four cases of CAH.

b

Low is index 0, intermediate is 1-4, high is 6-9, Cell Signaling (#9188), missing data for two case of EEC and three cases of CAH.

c

Index 0-2 is low, 3-9 is high, Dako (M7047), missing data for four cases of EEC and three cases of CAH.

d

Index 0 is low, 1-9 is high, Dako (M3569), missing data for four cases of EEC. Statistical calculation: Fisher exact test was used, except for PTEN were Chi-square test was applied.

*

One case with carcinoma displayed a carcinosarcoma in final hysterectomy specimen.

DISCUSSION

The search for diagnostic markers and conservative treatment opportunities for patients with premalignant endometrial lesions and low grade malignant endometrial cancer is of importance as the incidence of these lesions are increasing. The need for non-invasive treatment opportunities is especially warranted in younger women wanting to preserve fertility. Currently hysterectomy is the preferred treatment for patients with atypical hyperplasia, due to risk of occult carcinoma, as well as the substantial risk of progression to invasive carcinoma [9, 22, 23]. In our material CAH patients were significantly younger than EEC patients. This appears to be in line with the knowledge of CAH as a condition preceding EEC, also supported by a nested case-control study demonstrating a cancer progression interval to be four to six years after initial diagnosis of complex or atypical hyperplasia [24].

Obesity is an increasing concern in both developed and less developed countries, and the link between high BMI, diet and cancer is a growing field of interest [5, 25]. Endometrial cancer, and especially endometrioid subtype and its precursor lesions, is strongly linked to obesity [5]. Interestingly we find that KRAS mRNA expression is significantly higher in obese patients with CAH, opposed to STMN1 expression, being significantly higher in non-obese CAH patients. Previously, KRAS alteration has been reported to be an early event in the endometrial carcinogenesis [26], and KRAS mutations have been associated with higher BMI [27], apparently in line with our finding that KRAS seems to play a different role in obese compared to non-obese patients in the earliest premalignant part of the carcinogenesis. We have demonstrated here a distinct enrichment of KRAS related oncogenic signatures and GO signatures linked to inflammation in obese compared to non-obese CAH patients. Apparently in line with our findings, inflammation in general, and particular obesity induced inflammation processes are believed to be important in cancer initiation, promotion and metastatic progression [28]. Furthermore, obesity related immunological processes have been linked to KRAS induced cancer initiation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in mice [29, 30]. Intriguingly, metformin, an anti-diabetic drug used to treat metabolic syndrome and obesity related diabetes, has been shown to inhibit cell proliferation in endometrial cancer cells with activated KRAS, further suggesting a link between KRAS status and the potential for targeting metabolic syndrome in obese patients with endometrial carcinoma (precursor) lesions [31]. Also, based on studies of obese rats, metformin has been demonstrated to decrease estrogen-related endometrial proliferation, partly through the MAPK/ERK pathway [32]. In our small set of 10 patients assessed by WES we found no KRAS mutation. Whether the observed KRAS activation in obese patients with CAH lesions could be explained by increased upstream signaling, post-translational modification or loss of DNA methylation needs further studies. We found that STMN1 and PI3K pathway activation increase before invasion in non-obese patients in particular, indicating their key-role in the initiation of carcinogenesis in the non-obese context. This is also in line with the clinical observation that tumors less related to hormonal risk factors more often demonstrate activated PI3K signaling [16] and are more common in non-obese women.

We demonstrate here a late loss of hormone receptors, both on mRNA and protein level in the endometrial carcinogenesis. In addition, a significant increase in a predefined EMT gene signature [33] seem to occur during dedifferentiation. This is in line with earlier findings proposing EMT as a late event in endometrial carcinogenesis, also linked to loss of hormone receptors [33]. Hormone receptor expression has, also in line with our results, previously convincingly been linked to the endometrioid subtype and is more common in low grade compared with high grade lesions [34]. Loss of PR protein expression has recently been demonstrated to be an independent negative prognostic marker in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer. Loss of protein expression increase from premalignant to malignant lesions and further during dedifferentiation [35]. Premalignant endometrial lesions, as well as low grade endometrioid malignant lesions often demonstrate preserved hormone receptor expression. Also, high expression of PR is proposed as a marker for progestin therapy response in patients with premalignant endometrial lesions [36]. The epigenetic mechanisms behind PR silencing have been suggested to differ between well differentiated and poorly differentiated endometrial cancer cell lines. Also, in early stage and grade endometrial cancer lesions miRNA seems important in post-transcriptional repression of PR [37]. Recently HAND2 methylation has emerged as a key step in the early endometrial carcinogenesis [38]. Aberrant DNA methylation is already detected in normal endometrial samples from women with CAH, and has been suggested as a biomarker of early detection of endometrial cancer. HAND2 is influenced by progesterone, also supported by the finding that HAND2 methylation status predicts response to progestin therapy [38]. Still, the clinical value of HAND2 methylation assessment needs to be further investigated. Another recent and interesting observation is that the DNA methylation status of the testis specific gene CTCFL/BORIS is linked to the level of PR expression in endometrial cancer and premalignant lesions, however causality needs to be explored [39].

The preoperative distinction between premalignant and low grade malignant endometrial lesions is challenging, and the reproducibility of the diagnosis have been found to be low, even among expert pathologist [7, 8]. The preoperative diagnostic criteria applied, as well as patient age and lesion characteristic, influence the proportion of undetected carcinoma [40]. Even so, further search for additional biomarkers for clinical use is required. We find Stathmin protein expression to be significantly higher in endometrial carcinomas preoperatively diagnosed as CAH. Also high pStathmin(S38) and low PR protein expression tended to be more common in discordant cases. Others have reported significantly lower expression of both ERα and PR in patients with concurrent carcinoma [41]. Further, as we demonstrate here, others have also reported assessment of PTEN expression as inadequate in predicting concurrent carcinoma [42]. Likewise, other immunohistochemical patterns including hormone receptors, COX-2, Mlh1 and Bcl-2 have been explored in the clinical setting as potential biomarkers, but without added value to the traditional histology assessment [41, 43]. For premalignant endometrial lesions the morphometric classification system of Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) has been suggested as a more objective and reproducible diagnostic tool, and superior to the WHO-system in predicting concurrent carcinoma or cancer progression [44-46]. This have led to a revised binary modification of the WHO classification recently published, hopefully to improve diagnostic reproducibility [11].

To our knowledge this is the first time CAH lesions have been characterized by WES. Although the number of included patients is small, PIK3CA and PTEN were significantly mutated, in line with earlier reports [47, 48]. Mutations in KRAS and CTNNB1, previously reported to be present in premalignant lesions and thus suggested as early events in the endometrial carcinogenesis [49, 50], were not detected in our material. This may be due to the relatively small sample set investigated in the current study by WES. Recently CTNNB1 mutation within exon 3 and related Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation have been linked to a subgroup of low grade and low stage EEC exhibiting a worse outcome [51]. Ctnnb1 has been demonstrated to be important in normal endometrial epithelial function, and dysregulation has been linked to squamous cell metaplasia in mice [52]. Also, knowing that CTNNB1 is regarded a premalignant phenomenon in endometrial carcinogenesis makes this pathway highly relevant to scrutinize in the premalignant setting in a larger cohort.

We validated and expanded the number of cases investigated for PIK3CA mutations by applying Sanger sequencing of the hot spot regions exons 9 and 20. Six PIK3CA mutations in altogether 20 cases with CAH were detected (including one silent mutation in exon 20), of which 10 cases were characterized by WES. In endometrial carcinogenesis PIK3CA mutations have previously been linked to invasion [47], while high frequency of PIK3CA amplification has been linked to dedifferentiation and aggressive phenotype [16] in line with our present findings. Mutation and amplifications are also considered to be independent events, where both may lead to PI3K pathway activation [15]. In breast carcinoma, apparently in line with our findings in endometrial carcinoma (precursor) lesions, mutation in PIK3CA is assumed to be an early event and associated to favorable prognosis [53, 54]. However, PIK3CA mutations are, by some, regarded as a late event in endometrial carcinogenesis, rarely found in premalignant lesions [47, 48]. In endometrial cancer, the reported effects of PIK3CA mutations are inconsistent, although mostly reported to be unrelated to outcome, also supported by being more frequent in grade 1 EEC compared to higher grade [16, 17, 47], others have reported specific PIK3CA mutations in exon 20 to associate with adverse prognostic parameters [55]. Our finding of 30% (6/20) of the examined premalignant lesions found to harbor PIK3CA mutations was surprising. Knowing that the distinction between premalignant and malignant lesions in the endometrium is challenging, introduces an uncertainty related to the conclusion. Also for our data, the report generated by one pathologist may be subjective, and such distinction between premalignant and malignant lesions may be inaccurate, although representing the routine clinical practice. Also our assessment of PIK3CA mutations targeted by Sanger sequencing is limited by the fact that only exon 9 and 20 are included. In endometrial cancer, several hot spot mutations are found within these two exons, but they still represent only around half of the PIK3CA mutations reported [56].

PTEN mutations are amongst the most commonly reported genetic alterations in the EEC, and have been reported to associate with favorable survival [57], although the effect on outcomes remains controversial. Apparently in line with PTEN being a marker for more favorable outcome, loss of PTEN protein expression has been demonstrated to implicate good prognosis in endometrial cancer, especially in obese patients [58, 59]. However conflicting results for protein assessment of PTEN status by IHC in prognostication has diminished its clinical utility [60]. In mice, knockout of PTEN has been demonstrated to be an important early event in the initiation of the endometrial carcinogenesis, possibly also relevant in humans [61]. PTEN mutations have also been reported to be present in a substantial portion of premalignant lesions of the endometrium, however one particular PTEN deficient cell clone is usually not persistent, but frequently replaced by other PTEN deficient clones over time [62, 63]. In our material, loss of PTEN protein expression is more frequent in premalignant lesions, consistent with PTEN loss being an early event, also known to occur in normal endometrium [62, 63]. Our finding that 40% of CAH lesions display PTEN loss is in line with previous reports [64].

PTEN aberrations, both mutations and loss of protein expression, have been demonstrated as preinvasive events [62, 64, 65]. PIK3CA mutations, on the other hand, have been reported to be infrequent or absent in premalignant endometrial lesions [47, 48]. We have here demonstrated molecular changes in PIK3CA and PTEN to be present already in the precursor lesion for EEC, with transcriptional changes in the PI3K pathway activation as early events in the invasive step to grade 1 EEC. These changes from precursor lesions to invasive cancers were confirmed by immunohistochemical staining for Stathmin, supporting the use of this protein as a surrogate marker for PI3K signaling [16, 19]. Mutations in PTEN and PIK3CA often coexist in EEC, and simultaneous mutations in these two genes have been linked to invasion [47]. Nevertheless, we find that two cases with CAH have this combination of mutations.

For assessing PTEN status, IHC has been found to be superior to sequencing in detecting loss of function [66], and in line with this, we find PTEN mRNA expression and protein level to be highly correlated. Thus, our results support that assessment of PI3K signaling and PTEN loss in FFPE tissue, by IHC staining for Stathmin and PTEN, respectively, is valid and more readily available for use in a routine clinical setting.

We conclude from the present study, to our knowledge the most comprehensive molecular characterization of specimens ranging from precursors through primary to metastatic EEC lesions, that PTEN mutations and loss, mutations in PIK3CA as well as PI3K and KRAS signaling activation are early events in the development from CAH to EEC, while hormone receptor loss and EMT occur during dedifferentiation. Interestingly, the molecular alterations in precursor lesions are BMI context related. KRAS and immunological activation is predominantly prevalent in obese women, while STMN1 and PI3K signaling activation is prevalent in non-obese women, suggesting different prevention and systemic treatment strategies in obese and non-obese patients.

METHODS

Patient samples

Tumor specimens were collected from the Bergen Gynecologic Cancer Biobank, and linked to comprehensive clinical and histopathological data as previously reported [67]. Patients were diagnosed and treated by hysterectomy at Haukeland University Hospital between May 2001 and July 2013.

Investigation cohort

Fresh frozen tissue from 18 CAH, 139 primary EEC and 17 metastatic lesions from EECs (one without corresponding primary tumor) were applied for comprehensive molecular profiling.

Validation cohort

Under the assumption that CAH is precursor lesions for the endometrioid histologic subtype, only patients with EEC were included for comparison with the CAH. 494 patients with EEC and 77 patients with CAH were prospectively included. From these, FFPE tissue from hysterectomy was available from 408 patients with EEC and 57 patients with CAH for further immunohistochemical studies and included in the analyses.

Both cohorts had clinical information including age at primary treatment, BMI, menopausal status, parity, histology and treatment available. For the carcinomas follow-up data, FIGO stage, histologic subtype and grade were recorded.

Discordant CAH/EEC samples

Samples from 44 patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma in hysterectomy specimens that were discordant with the diagnosis CAH in preoperative biopsies, were explored for potential biomarkers that could improve the preoperative detection of malignant disease, by comparing them to 72 cases with concordant CAH diagnosis in preoperative and hysterectomy samples.

This study was evaluated and approved according to Norwegian legislation and in line with international demands for ethical review. The study was approved by the Norwegian Data Inspectorate, Norwegian Social Sciences Data Services, and the Western Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, (NSD15501; REK 052.01). Patients signed an informed consent.

Fresh frozen tissue was collected from patients included in the investigation cohort and used for DNA and RNA extraction as previously reported [27, 33].

Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining

Tissue Micro Arrays (TMAs) were prepared and protein expression for ERα, PR, Stathmin and PTEN was assessed by immunohistochemistry as previously reported [34, 67-69] (Supplementary Method). The evaluation of the stained slides was conducted as described [34, 58, 67, 68].

Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH)

PIK3CA gene copy number was assessed by FISH on TMAs using the Histology FISH Accessory Kit (DAKO) according to the manufactures recommendations with minor modifications (Supplementary Method).

DNA sequencing

Fresh frozen tissue was used for DNA extraction. Corresponding normal DNA samples were obtained from blood or histological verified normal uterine tissue in cases where DNA from blood was unavailable. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on ten cases with CAH and matching normal samples using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform with analysis following the pipelines at the institute of BROAD [12]. Sample coverage of targeted base pairs was at averaged 85% with a mean read length of 76x. Mutational significance for this group of samples was assessed by MutSig analysis http://www.broadinstitute.org/cancer/cga/mutsig. Sanger sequencing was applied for mutational analyses of PIK3CA for exons 9 and 20 in 18 cases with CAH (eight overlapping with the samples used for whole exome sequencing) and 228 cases of EEC. Details for the procedure and primers used are previously described [27, 33].

Oligonucleotide DNA microarray analyses

Extracted RNA was hybridized to Agilent Whole Human Genome Microarrays (G4112F) according to manufacturer's instruction (http://www.agilent.com) as previously reported [33]. For single gene detection significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) was applied with default permutation set to 400 [70]. Gene set enrichment analysis was used to find relevant biological pathways [71], using a default permutation set to 1000. PI3K signature score was calculated using the gene expression signature reported by Gustafson et al. [18]. An EMT score was calculated as previously reported from EMT related genes [33]. For all gene signatures generated the expression values were mean normalized and scaled to the same SD [16]. Microarray data are publicly available at ArrayExpress, with accession number E-MTAB-2532.

Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA)

Protein level of Stathmin and PTEN was assessed by RPPA in 9 patients with CAH and 242 EEC patients. The procedure was done as previously reported [72] and described briefly in Supplementary Methods.

Statistical analyzes

The data was analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package of Social Science) version 21.0. All p-values are two-sided and considered statistically significant when <0.05. The differences in gene expression values between groups were calculated using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney-U test. Categorical data were compared using Pearson X2 or Fisher exact test as appropriate. Correlations between continuous variables are indicated by Spearman correlation coefficient.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL, FIGURES AND TABLES

Acknowledgments

We thank Ellen Valen, Britt Edvardsen, Kadri Madissoo, Bendik Nordanger, Tormund Njølstad, Hilde Engerud and Hua My Huang for technical assistance.

Footnotes

Financial support

HBS was supported by Helse Vest, the University of Bergen, the Norwegian Cancer Society (Harald Andersen Legat), and the Research Council of Norway, KC by Bergen Medisinske Forskningsstiftelse, GBM by P50 CA098258. RPPA analysis was supported by MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) CA016672 from the National Cancer Institute.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The University of Bergen/Haukeland University Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard through BTO (Bergen Teknologioverføring AS): Some aspects relating to STMN1/pSTMN1 as prognostic marker for endometrial cancer is subject on pending intellectual property rights (US 12/962,946).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005;366(9484):491–505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67063-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Silverberg SG, Kurman RJ, Nogales FF, Mutter GL, R.A K-H, Tavassoli FA. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Femal Genital Organs 2003 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baglietto L, English DR, Hopper JL, MacInnis RJ, Morris HA, Tilley WD, Krishnan K, Giles GG. Circulating steroid hormone concentrations in postmenopausal women in relation to body size and composition. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115(1):171–179. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0069-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bhaskaran K. Body-mass-index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5.25 million UK adults. The Lancet. 2014 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60892-8. Published Online. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sivridis E, Giatromanolaki A. Demystifying endometrial hyperplasia. Diagn Histopathol. 2013;19(7):223–230. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zaino RJ, Kauderer J, Trimble CL, Silverberg SG, Curtin JP, Lim PC, Gallup DG. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2006;106(4):804–811. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Trimble CL, Kauderer J, Zaino R, Silverberg S, Lim PC, Burke JJ, 2nd, Alberts D, Curtin J. Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2006;106(4):812–819. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lacey JV, Jr, Sherman ME, Rush BB, Ronnett BM, Ioffe OB, Duggan MA, Glass AG, Richesson DA, Chatterjee N, Langholz B. Absolute risk of endometrial carcinoma during 20-year follow-up among women with endometrial hyperplasia. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(5):788–792. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Reed SD, Newton KM, Clinton WL, Epplein M, Garcia R, Allison K, Voigt LF, Weiss NS. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(6):678, e671–676. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kurman RJ, Carcangui M.L., Herrington C.S., Young R.H. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. Fourth Edition 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, Akbani R, Liu Y, Shen H, Robertson AG, Pashtan I, Shen R, Benz CC, Yau C, Laird PW, Ding L, Zhang W, Mills GB, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497(7447):67–73. doi: 10.1038/nature12113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Samuels Y, Wang Z, Bardelli A, Silliman N, Ptak J, Szabo S, Yan H, Gazdar A, Powell SM, Riggins GJ, Willson JK, Markowitz S, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE. High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science. 2004;304(5670):554. doi: 10.1126/science.1096502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lebeau A, Grob T, Holst F, Seyedi-Fazlollahi N, Moch H, Terracciano L, Turzynski A, Choschzick M, Sauter G, Simon R. Oestrogen receptor gene (ESR1) amplification is frequent in endometrial carcinoma and its precursor lesions. J Pathol. 2008;216(2):151–157. doi: 10.1002/path.2405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Courtney KD, Corcoran RB, Engelman JA. The PI3K pathway as drug target in human cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(6):1075–1083. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Salvesen HB, Carter SL, Mannelqvist M, Dutt A, Getz G, Stefansson IM, Raeder MB, Sos ML, Engelsen IB, Trovik J, Wik E, Greulich H, Bo TH, Jonassen I, Thomas RK, Zander T, et al. Integrated genomic profiling of endometrial carcinoma associates aggressive tumors with indicators of PI3 kinase activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(12):4834–4839. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806514106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Oda K, Stokoe D, Taketani Y, McCormick F. High frequency of coexistent mutations of PIK3CA and PTEN genes in endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2005;65(23):10669–10673. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gustafson AM, Soldi R, Anderlind C, Scholand MB, Qian J, Zhang X, Cooper K, Walker D, McWilliams A, Liu G, Szabo E, Brody J, Massion PP, Lenburg ME, Lam S, Bild AH, et al. Airway PI3K pathway activation is an early and reversible event in lung cancer development. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(26):26ra25. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saal LH, Johansson P, Holm K, Gruvberger-Saal SK, She QB, Maurer M, Koujak S, Ferrando AA, Malmstrom P, Memeo L, Isola J, Bendahl PO, Rosen N, Hibshoosh H, Ringner M, Borg A, et al. Poor prognosis in carcinoma is associated with a gene expression signature of aberrant PTEN tumor suppressor pathway activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(18):7564–7569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702507104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wik E, Birkeland E, Trovik J, Werner HM, Hoivik EA, Mjos S, Krakstad C, Kusonmano K, Mauland K, Stefansson IM, Holst F, Petersen K, Oyan AM, Simon R, Kalland KH, Ricketts W, et al. High phospho-Stathmin(Serine38) expression identifies aggressive endometrial cancer and suggests an association with PI3K inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(9):2331–2341. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lamb J, Crawford ED, Peck D, Modell JW, Blat IC, Wrobel MJ, Lerner J, Brunet JP, Subramanian A, Ross KN, Reich M, Hieronymus H, Wei G, Armstrong SA, Haggarty SJ, Clemons PA, et al. The Connectivity Map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science. 2006;313(5795):1929–1935. doi: 10.1126/science.1132939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Antonsen SL, Ulrich L, Hogdall C. Patients with atypical hyperplasia of the endometrium should be treated in oncological centers. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(1):124–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.12.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kurman RJ, Kaminski PF, Norris HJ. The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients. Cancer. 1985;56(2):403–412. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<403::aid-cncr2820560233>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lacey JV, Jr, Ioffe OB, Ronnett BM, Rush BB, Richesson DA, Chatterjee N, Langholz B, Glass AG, Sherman ME. Endometrial carcinoma risk among women diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia: the 34-year experience in a large health plan. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(1):45–53. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vineis P, Wild CP. Global cancer patterns: causes and prevention. Lancet. 2014;383(9916):549–557. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62224-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mutter GL, Wada H, Faquin WC, Enomoto T. K-ras mutations appear in the premalignant phase of both microsatellite stable and unstable endometrial carcinogenesis. Mol Pathol. 1999;52(5):257–262. doi: 10.1136/mp.52.5.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Birkeland E, Wik E, Mjos S, Hoivik EA, Trovik J, Werner HM, Kusonmano K, Petersen K, Raeder MB, Holst F, Oyan AM, Kalland KH, Akslen LA, Simon R, Krakstad C, Salvesen HB. KRAS gene amplification and overexpression but not mutation associates with aggressive and metastatic endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(12):1997–2004. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140(6):883–899. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Philip B, Roland CL, Daniluk J, Liu Y, Chatterjee D, Gomez SB, Ji B, Huang H, Wang H, Fleming JB, Logsdon CD, Cruz-Monserrate Z. A high-fat diet activates oncogenic Kras and COX2 to induce development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(6):1449–1458. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khasawneh J, Schulz MD, Walch A, Rozman J, Hrabe de Angelis M, Klingenspor M, Buck A, Schwaiger M, Saur D, Schmid RM, Kloppel G, Sipos B, Greten FR, Arkan MC. Inflammation and mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation link obesity to early tumor promotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(9):3354–3359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802864106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Iglesias DA, Yates MS, van der Hoeven D, Rodkey TL, Zhang Q, Co NN, Burzawa J, Chigurupati S, Celestino J, Bowser J, Broaddus R, Hancock JF, Schmandt R, Lu KH. Another surprise from Metformin: novel mechanism of action via K-Ras influences endometrial cancer response to therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(12):2847–2856. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang Q, Celestino J, Schmandt R, McCampbell AS, Urbauer DL, Meyer LA, Burzawa JK, Huang M, Yates MS, Iglesias D, Broaddus RR, Lu KH. Chemopreventive effects of metformin on obesity-associated endometrial proliferation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(1):24, e21–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wik E, Raeder MB, Krakstad C, Trovik J, Birkeland E, Hoivik EA, Mjos S, Werner HM, Mannelqvist M, Stefansson IM, Oyan AM, Kalland KH, Akslen LA, Salvesen HB. Lack of estrogen receptor-alpha is associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and PI3K alterations in endometrial carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(5):1094–1105. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Engelsen IB, Stefansson IM, Akslen LA, Salvesen HB. GATA3 expression in estrogen receptor alpha-negative endometrial carcinomas identifies aggressive tumors with high proliferation and poor patient survival. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(5):543, e541–547. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tangen IT, Werner H.M.J., Berg A, Halle M.K., Kusonmano K., Trovik J., Hoivik E.A., Mills G.B., Krakstad C., Salvesen H.B. Loss of progesterone receptor links to high proliferationand increases from primary to metastatic endometrial cancer lesions. Eur J Cancer. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.09.003. Article in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Upson K, Allison KH, Reed SD, Jordan CD, Newton KM, Swisher EM, Doherty JA, Garcia RL. Biomarkers of progestin therapy resistance and endometrial hyperplasia progression. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):36, e31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yang S, Leslie KK, Jia Y, Liu X, Winters C, Wang X, Zhang Y, Devor EJ, Hovey AM, Reyes HD, Xiao X, Xu Y, Dai D, Meng X, Thiel KW, Domann FE. Systematic dissection of the mechanisms underlying progesterone receptor downregulation in endometrial cancer. Oncotarget. 2014 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jones A, Teschendorff AE, Li Q, Hayward JD, Kannan A, Mould T, West J, Zikan M, Cibula D, Fiegl H, Lee SH, Wik E, Hadwin R, Arora R, Lemech C, Turunen H, et al. Role of DNA methylation and epigenetic silencing of HAND2 in endometrial cancer development. PLoS Med. 2013;10(11):e1001551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hoivik EA, Kusonmano K, Halle MK, Berg A, Wik E, Werner HM, Petersen K, Oyan AM, Kalland KH, Krakstad C, Trovik J, Widschwendter M, Salvesen HB. Hypomethylation of the CTCFL/BORIS promoter and aberrant expression during endometrial cancer progression suggests a role as an Epi-driver gene. Oncotarget. 2014;5(4):1052–1061. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Leitao MM, Jr., Han G, Lee LX, Abu-Rustum NR, Brown CL, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Levine DA, Gardner GJ, Jewell EE, Barakat RR, Soslow RA. Complex atypical hyperplasia of the uterus: characteristics and prediction of underlying carcinoma risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):349, e341–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Orbo A, Kaino T, Arnes M, Larsen K, Pettersen I, Moe B. Prognostic markers for coexistent carcinoma in high-risk endometrial hyperplasia with negative D-score: significance of morphometry, hormone receptors and apoptosis for outcome prediction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(11):1234–1242. doi: 10.3109/00016340903281014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pavlakis K, Messini I, Vrekoussis T, Panoskaltsis T, Chrissanthakis D, Yiannou P, Stathopoulos EN. PTEN-loss and nuclear atypia of EIN in endometrial biopsies can predict the existence of a concurrent endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119(3):516–519. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gallos ID, Devey J, Ganesan R, Gupta JK. Predictive ability of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), COX-2, Mlh1, and Bcl-2 expressions for regression and relapse of endometrial hyperplasia treated with LNG-IUS: a prospective cohort study. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(1):58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hecht JL, Ince TA, Baak JP, Baker HE, Ogden MW, Mutter GL. Prediction of endometrial carcinoma by subjective endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(3):324–330. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Salman MC, Usubutun A, Boynukalin K, Yuce K. Comparison of WHO and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classifications in predicting the presence of coexistent malignancy in endometrial hyperplasia. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010;21(2):97–101. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Baak JP, Mutter GL, Robboy S, van Diest PJ, Uyterlinde AM, Orbo A, Palazzo J, Fiane B, Lovslett K, Burger C, Voorhorst F, Verheijen RH. The molecular genetics and morphometry-based endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification system predicts disease progression in endometrial hyperplasia more accurately than the 1994 World Health Organization classification system. Cancer. 2005;103(11):2304–2312. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hayes MP, Wang H, Espinal-Witter R, Douglas W, Solomon GJ, Baker SJ, Ellenson LH. PIK3CA and PTEN mutations in uterine endometrioid carcinoma and complex atypical hyperplasia. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(20 Pt 1):5932–5935. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Konopka B, Janiec-Jankowska A, Kwiatkowska E, Najmola U, Bidzinski M, Olszewski W, Goluda C. PIK3CA mutations and amplification in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas: relation to other genetic defects and clinicopathologic status of the tumors. Hum Pathol. 2011;42(11):1710–1719. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Saegusa M, Hashimura M, Yoshida T, Okayasu I. beta-Catenin mutations and aberrant nuclear expression during endometrial tumorigenesis. Br J Cancer. 2001;84(2):209–217. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sasaki H, Nishii H, Takahashi H, Tada A, Furusato M, Terashima Y, Siegal GP, Parker SL, Kohler MF, Berchuck A, et al. Mutation of the Ki-ras protooncogene in human endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1993;53(8):1906–1910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu Y, Patel L, Mills GB, Lu KH, Sood AK, Ding L, Kucherlapati R, Mardis ER, Levine DA, Shmulevich I, Broaddus RR, Zhang W. Clinical significance of CTNNB1 mutation and Wnt pathway activation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(9) doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jeong JW, Lee HS, Franco HL, Broaddus RR, Taketo MM, Tsai SY, Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ. beta-catenin mediates glandular formation and dysregulation of beta-catenin induces hyperplasia formation in the murine uterus. Oncogene. 2009;28(1):31–40. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kalinsky K, Jacks LM, Heguy A, Patil S, Drobnjak M, Bhanot UK, Hedvat CV, Traina TA, Solit D, Gerald W, Moynahan ME. PIK3CA mutation associates with improved outcome in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(16):5049–5059. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dunlap J, Le C, Shukla A, Patterson J, Presnell A, Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Troxell ML. Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase and AKT1 mutations occur early in breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120(2):409–418. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0406-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Catasus L, Gallardo A, Cuatrecasas M, Prat J. PIK3CA mutations in the kinase domain (exon 20) of uterine endometrial adenocarcinomas are associated with adverse prognostic parameters. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(2):131–139. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rudd ML, Price JC, Fogoros S, Godwin AK, Sgroi DC, Merino MJ, Bell DW. A unique spectrum of somatic PIK3CA (p110alpha) mutations within primary endometrial carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(6):1331–1340. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Risinger JI, Hayes K, Maxwell GL, Carney ME, Dodge RK, Barrett JC, Berchuck A. PTEN mutation in endometrial cancers is associated with favorable clinical and pathologic characteristics. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4(12):3005–3010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Akiyama-Abe A, Minaguchi T, Nakamura Y, Michikami H, Shikama A, Nakao S, Sakurai M, Ochi H, Onuki M, Matsumoto K, Satoh T, Oki A, Yoshikawa H. Loss of PTEN expression is an independent predictor of favourable survival in endometrial carcinomas. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(6):1703–1710. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dellas A, Jundt G, Sartorius G, Schneider M, Moch H. Combined PTEN and p27kip1 protein expression patterns are associated with obesity and prognosis in endometrial carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(7):2456–2462. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Terakawa N, Kanamori Y, Yoshida S. Loss of PTEN expression followed by Akt phosphorylation is a poor prognostic factor for patients with endometrial cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2003;10(2):203–208. doi: 10.1677/erc.0.0100203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Memarzadeh S, Zong Y, Janzen DM, Goldstein AS, Cheng D, Kurita T, Schafenacker AM, Huang J, Witte ON. Cell-autonomous activation of the PI3-kinase pathway initiates endometrial cancer from adult uterine epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(40):17298–17303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012548107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mutter GL, Lin MC, Fitzgerald JT, Kum JB, Baak JP, Lees JA, Weng LP, Eng C. Altered PTEN expression as a diagnostic marker for the earliest endometrial precancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(11):924–930. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.11.924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mutter GL, Monte NM, Neuberg D, Ferenczy A, Eng C. Emergence, Involution, and Progression to Carcinoma of Mutant Clones in Normal Endometrial Tissues. Cancer Res. 2014 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Monte NM, Webster KA, Neuberg D, Dressler GR, Mutter GL. Joint loss of PAX2 and PTEN expression in endometrial precancers and cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(15):6225–6232. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lee H, Choi HJ, Kang CS, Lee HJ, Lee WS, Park CS. Expression of miRNAs and PTEN in endometrial specimens ranging from histologically normal to hyperplasia and endometrial adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(11):1508–1515. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Djordjevic B, Hennessy BT, Li J, Barkoh BA, Luthra R, Mills GB, Broaddus RR. Clinical assessment of PTEN loss in endometrial carcinoma: immunohistochemistry outperforms gene sequencing. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(5):699–708. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Trovik J, Wik E, Stefansson IM, Marcickiewicz J, Tingulstad S, Staff AC, Njolstad TS, MoMaTec Study G, Vandenput I, Amant F, Akslen LA, Salvesen HB. Stathmin overexpression identifies high-risk patients and lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(10):3368–3377. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Trovik J, Wik E, Werner HM, Krakstad C, Helland H, Vandenput I, Njolstad TS, Stefansson IM, Marcickiewicz J, Tingulstad S, Staff AC, MoMa TECsg, Amant F, Akslen LA, Salvesen HB. Hormone receptor loss in endometrial carcinoma curettage predicts lymph node metastasis and poor outcome in prospective multicentre trial. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(16):3431–3441. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lotan TL, Gurel B, Sutcliffe S, Esopi D, Liu W, Xu J, Hicks JL, Park BH, Humphreys E, Partin AW, Han M, Netto GJ, Isaacs WB, De Marzo AM. PTEN protein loss by immunostaining: analytic validation and prognostic indicator for a high risk surgical cohort of prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(20):6563–6573. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(9):5116–5121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091062498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature. 2013;499(7456):43–49. doi: 10.1038/nature12222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

oncotarget-06-1327-s001.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)
oncotarget-06-1327-s002.xlsx (47.1KB, xlsx)

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES