Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1534. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38075.467569.EE

Offending in psychiatric patients after discharge from medium secure units: prospective national cohort study

A Maden 1, F Scott 2, R Burnett 2, G H Lewis 3, P Skapinakis 4
PMCID: PMC437143  PMID: 15169742

Medium secure units admit patients for the assessment and treatment of mental disorder associated with risk. We investigated how many patients offend after discharge.

Participants, methods, and results

We collected demographic and clinical data on all 959 patients discharged from medium secure units in England and Wales between 1 April 1997 and 31 March 1998 and used the offenders' index to find details of subsequent convictions.

A total of 145 patients (15%) were convicted within two years, including 60 (6%) who were convicted of violent offences (table).

Table 1.

Risk factors for conviction over two years for patients discharged from medium secure units in England and Wales (n=959)

Variable Total No convicted Odds ratio*(95% CI)
Sex:
Male 843 135 1
Female 116 10 1.20 (0.5 to 2.87)
Ethnic group:
White 674 94 1
Black 204 37 1.69 (0.94 to 3.02)
Other 81 14 1.72 (0.80 to 3.66)
Length of stay:
≤540 days (75th centile) 719 131 1
>540 days 240 14 0.37 (0.17 to 0.78)
History of self harm:
No 525 94 1
Yes 397 43 0.48 (0.29 to 0.78)
History of alcohol or drug problem:
No 348 24 1
Yes 584 118 2.20 (1.27 to 3.81)
History of sexual abuse:
No 788 112 1
Yes 134 21 2.13 (1.06 to 4.30)
Index offence:
None 148 15 1
Violent 419 53 0.42 (0.17 to 1.00)
Property 147 49 0.95 (0.36 to 2.48)
Sexual 71 8 0.31 (0.09 to 1.08)
Other 167 19 0.19 (0.07 to 0.55)
Previous convictions:
0 251 7 1
1 71 9 3.60 (1.28 to 10.30)
2-5 242 35 3.44 (1.47 to 8.01)
6-10 134 25 3.68 (1.41 to 9.63)
>10 213 64 6.83 (2.66 to 17.53)
Lost contact with services:
No 800 105 1
Yes 143 40 2.16 (1.22 to 3.81)
*

Odds ratios of conviction over two years are adjusted for all other variables included in the model.

Comment

The rate of violent offending is low and the strongest association with offending was previous offending. Psychiatric variables were less important, with diagnosis and number of previous admissions showing no significant association. Substance misuse and sexual abuse were associated with increased offending risk, although patients were less likely to be convicted after a lengthy admission or if they had a history of self harm.

What is already known on this topic

Offending by psychiatric patients is of great public concern

What this study adds

In the two years after discharge from medium security, only 6% of patients commit a violent offence and the strongest association with reoffending is previous offending

Patients who lost contact with services were more likely to be convicted but this finding is ambiguous, as the sample included patients found to have no psychiatric diagnosis. It is consistent with the possibility that aftercare is effective in preventing reconviction, and we know that compulsory aftercare in restricted patients is associated with a rate of serious offending below 0.6% a year.1

Our study cannot establish causal relationships, but it shows that offending is uncommon. The rate of violent offending is so low that there is little scope for overall reduction and it would be better to concentrate on the identification of high risk patients. The American Macarthur study2 identified the “psychopathy checklist—screening version” (PCL-SV)3 as the best single predictor of violence in psychiatric patients, and we recommend further exploration of its use in medium security hospitals in England and Wales.

Contributors: AM designed and supervised the study and wrote the paper. FS and RB collected the data. FS, RB, and PS analysed the data and wrote the paper. GHL gave epidemiological advice on analysis, supervised the analysis, and wrote the paper. AM is guarantor.

Funding: Department of Health.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethical approval: South Thames Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee.

This article was posted on bmj.com on 28 May 2004: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.38075.467569.EE

References

  • 1.Home Office. Statistical bulletin: statistics of mentally disordered offenders 2000. London: Home Office, Research Development and Statistics Directorate, 2001.
  • 2.Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Silver E, Appelbaum PS, Robbins PC, Mulvey EP, et al. Rethinking risk assessment: the Macarthur study of mental disorder and violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  • 3.Hart S, Cox D, Hare R. The Hare PCL-SV: psychopathy checklist: screening version. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, 1995.

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES