Abstract
Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) is a widely used noninvasive method to evaluate the morphology, vasculature, and pathologies of the brain. The advantages of IOUS include realtime depiction of neuroanatomy, accurate localization and characterization of a lesion, reduced surgical exploration and surgical time, and presumably decreased patient morbidity. IOUS is useful in the intraoperative monitoring of lesion resection as well as intraoperative localization and characterization of focal parenchymal lesions. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical application of IOUS in pediatric intracranial neurosurgery.
Keywords: Monitoring, intraoperative; Neuronavigation; Neurosurgery; Pediatrics; Ultrasonography
Introduction
Image-guided neurosurgery based on neuronavigation is widely used and has become an essential tool for intracranial neurosurgery in recent decades [1-3]. However, the accuracy of neuronavigation systems based on preoperative imaging data is limited due to intraoperative changes such as “brain shift.” Brain shift may be caused by various factors, including the effect of gravity on the brain, loss of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pneumocephalus, brain swelling, and surgical procedures [4,5]. Both intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative computed tomography (CT) are able to address this limitation [6,7]. Unfortunately, these techniques require long image acquisition times, enormous economic investment, special surgical equipment, and specialized workspaces. In addition, intraoperative CT is rarely acceptable for pediatric patients because of the ionizing radiation [2]. Further improvements in imaging modalities, such as advanced intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS), present a promising alternative. IOUS is truly produced in real time. The ability to depict realtime anatomic data during a surgical procedure is very useful for surgical decision making. IOUS is an effective way to localize and characterize juxtacortical lesions and to assist with the monitoring of the surgical field for the improvement of resectability and reduction of the risk of parenchymal injury [2,8,9]. The aim of this study was to review the clinical application of IOUS and to show representative cases of IOUS as an effective tool for neuronavigation.
Basic Considerations
IOUS requires a high-end ultrasound machine, combined with a 5-7-MHz sector transducer and a 7-12-MHz linear transducer, for optimal lesion detection and depiction. The transducer should be wrapped in a sterile sheath and applied directly to the intact dura or the exposed brain through craniostomy. The use of sterile saline before the application of the transducer improved the acoustic coupling (Fig. 1). An overview of the cerebral structures is easily obtained using a sector transducer with deep penetration to identify reliable anatomic landmarks. Both the anechoic CSF in the lateral ventricle and the echogenic falx cerebri are useful landmarks for lesion orientation. During the examination, the insonation depth can be sequentially reduced to provide more detailed observations [8-10]. With a relatively high-frequency linear transducer, the low-echoic cortical ribbon can be differentiated from the brighter echogenicity of the subcortical white matter (Fig. 2).
Color Doppler ultrasonography is useful for the evaluation of tumor vascularity. It can provide important anatomical information about the location of feeding and draining vessels and the displacement of normal brain vessels (Fig. 3). The power mode may be recommended for the depiction of low-flow vessels within tumors. The pulse repetition frequency should be set as low as possible to avoid aliasing in normal vessels [11,12].
Localization of Brain Tumors
The goal of cerebral glioma surgery is not only maximal but also safe tumor resection; that is, the maximum neurologically permissible tumor volume should be resected, but eloquent areas must be spared and neurological damage minimized. These two antagonistic goals can be achieved through accurate localization of the extent of tumors, and intraoperative mapping of eloquent areas required for functions such as language, sensation, or movement. The main advantage of IOUS in brain tumor surgery lies in its realtime property. It can generate a complete overview of the tumor and the surrounding structures within seconds (Fig. 4). In deepseated lesions, IOUS can be used to find a suitable cleavage plane for resection. It also allows sonographic guidance of a tumor biopsy or puncture of the cystic tumor components. IOUS can repeatedly evaluate the extent and location of residual tumorous tissue at any stage of the operation. This greatly facilitates both resection control and the goal of safe but maximum volume reduction. In diffuse infiltrating gliomas, the extent of resection is associated with survival and ultrasonography has the potential to increase the extent of resection and thereby increase survival [11-14].
The evaluation of echogenicity depends on the tumor components. Most tumors are hyperechoic when compared with the surrounding brain tissue. In gliomas, the echogenic patterns change with increasing tumor grades. High-grade gliomas often show a heterogeneous pattern with a hypoechoic necrotic portion (Fig. 5) [15]. Intratumoral calcification, as is often found in meningiomas, oligodendrogliomas, craniopharyngiomas, or cavernous angiomas, can be easily depicted as hyperechoic dots or nodules within the lesion (Fig. 6). In contrast, peritumoral edema cannot be depicted as easily, because it is isoechogenic in comparison to the surrounding brain parenchyma (Fig. 5B) [2,16].
IOUS imaging can be used in brain tumor surgery to identify tumor remnants. The resection cavity should be flooded with sterile saline solution to obtain an appropriate sonic window (Fig. 7). By integrating ultrasonography data into the neuronavigational system, we can mark and display sonographically detected residual tumors in the microscope image superimposed on the brain surface [2,3,14,16,17].
Localization of Focal Cortical Dysplasia
Medically intractable focal epilepsy is an important health issue affecting 0.15%-0.2% of the population. Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is the most common underlying cause in these patients [18]. The ability to define and completely excise the dysplastic cortex is the most important factor for determining surgical outcomes in patients with FCD [19,20]. Because imaging plays such a vital role in preoperative planning in patients with intractable epilepsy, there is strong interest in the use of high-end technologies to improve the rate of lesion detection. Despite the use of modern imaging techniques, the intraoperative definition of cortical dysplasia can be challenging. During surgery, it is difficult for the surgeon to distinguish dysplastic lesions from the normal cortex for several reasons: first, visual and tactile differentiation can be difficult; second, the spatial accuracy of neuronavigation based on preoperative MRI images may be weakened by brain shift, and electrocorticographic recordings only provide two-dimensional information about the epileptogenic zone [21,22]. There is thus a need for unique intraoperative imaging methods. IOUS can depict cortical dysplasia with high resolution. This is particularly true in type-IIB FCD. Type-IIB FCD is usually the subtype of FCD best visualized by MRI (Fig. 8), whereas type-1 FCD lesions are more difficult to visualize. The extent to which IOUS can contribute to resection control and the postoperative outcomes will therefore depend on further comparative studies.
MRI-negative focal symptomatic epilepsy constitutes only 16% of the cases with focal symptomatic epilepsy and has a surgical success rate of only 38% [23]. The surgical outcome depends on the extent of cortical dysplasia resection required [24]. Chassoux et al. [25] reported a high rate of freedom from seizures (88%) following surgery in this group; however, 20% of the patients underwent a further procedure.
Drainage of Entrapped Ventricle
The symptoms of hydrocephalus can be relieved using ventriculostomy. In this procedure, an external ventricular drain (EVD) placed into the cerebral ventricles removes excess CSF. In approximately 50% of the cases, free-handed EVD cannulation results in misplacement, increasing the risk of iatrogenic complications. Current technical approaches to improve ventriculostomy guidance are often considered too complex or inaccurate [26].
IOUS guidance can be used to detect and localize the targeted ventricle. A transfontanelle approach is good for the visualization of the catheter tip in the lateral ventricle (Fig. 9), and both the transfontanelle and the transmastoid approaches are appropriate for the visualization of the catheter tip in the entrapped lateral ventricle or the fourth ventricle [26-28].
Recent Developments
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has shown promising results for both displaying and monitoring tumor vascularization. Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is useful, particularly in tumors with ill-defined borders on B-mode ultrasonography, in highlighting the lesion and its boundaries, and in possibly differentiating between the tumor and the edematous brain tissue [29]. A novel technique of elasticity imaging, called shearwave elastography (SWE), could be employed to improve the detection of epileptogenic foci. This is a noninvasive tissue elasticity imaging technique that maps tissue stiffness in real time. Using intraoperative SWE, we can outline dysplastic lesions as abnormally stiff lesions compared to the normal brain [30]. Ultrasound-linked neuronavigation plays an important role in the improvement of surgical accuracy when applied for the detection of brain shift. Real-time intraoperative fusion imaging between preoperative imaging and IOUS for virtual navigation allows true real-time feedback during surgery and is less expensive and time-consuming than other intraoperative imaging techniques. Moreover, the adjustments are very helpful in correcting brain shift and tissue distortion [31].
Limitations
IOUS requires the knowledge of neuroradiologic abnormalities that are not routinely evaluated by ultrasonography. Radiologists who performed IOUS should be familiar with CT and magnetic resonance (MR) anatomy as well as ultrasound anatomy. The application of IOUS may be limited by difficulties in distinguishing a space-occupying lesion from normal tissue and lesions can be obscured by the surrounding edema. The ultrasonograms may sometimes be difficult to interpret in the later stage of operation in terms of whether there are remnant lesions because of surgically induced ultrasound artifacts. Its role may also be diminished by the widespread use of intraoperative CT and MRI. Additionally, IOUS guidance by a radiologist requires a large time commitment.
Conclusion
IOUS is a noninvasive imaging modality that improves lesion detection and localization and contributes to resection control in pediatric tumor and epilepsy surgery. It also improves the safety and accuracy of ventricular drainage, particularly in cases of complicated ventricle dilation. IOUS has an alternative role in combination with MR and CT techniques. Large-scale studies are recommended to validate the utility of intraoperative sonography compared with intraoperative as well as preoperative MRI or CT.
Footnotes
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References
- 1.Preuss M, Werner P, Barthel H, Nestler U, Christiansen H, Hirsch FW, et al. Integrated PET/MRI for planning navigated biopsies in pediatric brain tumors. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30:1399–1403. doi: 10.1007/s00381-014-2412-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ulrich NH, Burkhardt JK, Serra C, Bernays RL, Bozinov O. Resection of pediatric intracerebral tumors with the aid of intraoperative realtime 3-D ultrasound. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28:101–109. doi: 10.1007/s00381-011-1571-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roth J, Beni-Adani L, Biyani N, Constantini S. Classical and realtime neuronavigation in pediatric neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22:1065–1071. doi: 10.1007/s00381-006-0103-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Kober H, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging combined with neuronavigation: a new concept. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:1082–1089. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200105000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O, Nimsky C. Intraoperative imaging with open magnetic resonance imaging and neuronavigation. Childs Nerv Syst. 2000;16:829–831. doi: 10.1007/s003810000344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jolesz FA. Future perspectives in intraoperative imaging. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;85:7–13. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6043-5_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Broggi G, Ferroli P, Franzini A, Dones L, Marras C, Marchetti M, et al. CT-guided neurosurgery: preliminary experience. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;85:101–104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6043-5_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.van Leyen K, Klotzsch C, Harrer JU. Brain tumor imaging with transcranial sonography: state of the art and review of the literature. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32:572–581. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Quencer RM, Montalvo BM. Intraoperative cranial sonography. Neuroradiology. 1986;28:528–550. doi: 10.1007/BF00344105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) American College of Radiology (ACR) Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) AIUM practice guideline for the performance of neurosonography in neonates and infants. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33:1103–1110. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.6.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lam AM, Newell DW. Intraoperative use of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1996;7:709–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seibert JJ, Avva R, Hronas TN, Mocharla R, Vanderzalm T, Cox K, et al. Use of power Doppler in pediatric neurosonography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 1998;18:879–890. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.18.4.9672972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cohen HL, Haller JO. Advances in perinatal neurosonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:801–810. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.4.7916529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.El Beltagy MA, Aggag M, Kamal M. Role of intraoperative ultrasound in resection of pediatric brain tumors. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26:1189–1193. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang J, Liu X, Hou WH, Dong G, Wei Z, Zhou H, et al. The relationship between intra-operative ultrasonography and pathological grade in cerebral glioma. J Int Med Res. 2008;36:1426–1434. doi: 10.1177/147323000803600632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Serra C, Stauffer A, Actor B, Burkhardt JK, Ulrich NH, Bernays RL, et al. Intraoperative high frequency ultrasound in intracerebral highgrade tumors. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:E306–E312. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1325369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bai HM, Wang WM, Li TD, He H, Shi C, Guo XF, et al. Three core techniques in surgery of neuroepithelial tumors in eloquent areas: awake anaesthesia, intraoperative direct electrical stimulation and ultrasonography. Chin Med J (Engl) 2011;124:3035–3041. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Forsgren L, Beghi E, Oun A, Sillanpaa M. The epidemiology of epilepsy in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12:245–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tassi L, Colombo N, Garbelli R, Francione S, Lo Russo G, Mai R, et al. Focal cortical dysplasia: neuropathological subtypes, EEG, neuroimaging and surgical outcome. Brain. 2002;125:1719–1732. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Palmini A, Najm I, Avanzini G, Babb T, Guerrini R, Foldvary-Schaefer N, et al. Terminology and classification of the cortical dysplasias. Neurology. 2004;62(6 Suppl 3):S2–S8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000114507.30388.7e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Luders H, Awad I, Burgess R, Wyllie E, Van Ness P. Subdural electrodes in the presurgical evaluation for surgery of epilepsy. Epilepsy Res Suppl. 1992;5:147–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Miller D, Knake S, Bauer S, Krakow K, Pagenstecher A, Sure U, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound to define focal cortical dysplasia in epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2008;49:156–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bien CG, Szinay M, Wagner J, Clusmann H, Becker AJ, Urbach H. Characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients with refractory magnetic resonance imaging-negative epilepsies. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:1491–1499. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cohen-Gadol AA, Ozduman K, Bronen RA, Kim JH, Spencer DD. Long-term outcome after epilepsy surgery for focal cortical dysplasia. J Neurosurg. 2004;101:55–65. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chassoux F, Landre E, Mellerio C, Turak B, Mann MW, Daumas-Duport C, et al. Type II focal cortical dysplasia: electroclinical phenotype and surgical outcome related to imaging. Epilepsia. 2012;53:349–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03363.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Strowitzki M, Moringlane JR, Steudel W. Ultrasound-based navigation during intracranial burr hole procedures: experience in a series of 100 cases. Surg Neurol. 2000;54:134–144. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00267-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Metellus P, Hsu W, Kharkar S, Kapoor S, Scott W, Rigamonti D. Accuracy of percutaneous placement of a ventriculoatrial shunt under ultrasonography guidance: a retrospective study at a single institution. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:867–870. doi: 10.3171/2008.10.17674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Phillips SB, Gates M, Krishnamurthy S. Strategic placement of bedside ventriculostomies using ultrasound image guidance: report of three cases. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:255–259. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Prada F, Perin A, Martegani A, Aiani L, Solbiati L, Lamperti M, et al. Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound for brain tumor surgery. Neurosurgery. 2014;74:542–552. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chan HW, Pressler R, Uff C, Gunny R, St Piers K, Cross H, et al. A novel technique of detecting MRI-negative lesion in focal symptomatic epilepsy: intraoperative ShearWave elastography. Epilepsia. 2014;55:e30–e33. doi: 10.1111/epi.12562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Prada F, Del Bene M, Mattei L, Lodigiani L, DeBeni S, Kolev V, et al. Preoperative magnetic resonance and intraoperative ultrasound fusion imaging for real-time neuronavigation in brain tumor surgery. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1385347. Ultraschall Med 2014 Nov 27 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1385347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]