Skip to main content
PMC home page
PhytoKeys logoLink to PhytoKeys
. 2015 Feb 4;(46):21–33. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.46.8963

Thismia hongkongensis (Thismiaceae): a new mycoheterotrophic species from Hong Kong, China, with observations on floral visitors and seed dispersal

Shek Shing Mar 1, Richard MK Saunders 2
PMCID: PMC4391955  PMID: 25878547

Abstract Abstract

A new species, Thismia hongkongensis S.S.Mar & R.M.K.Saunders, is described from Hong Kong. It is most closely related to Thismia brunonis Griff. from Myanmar, but differs in the number of flowers per inflorescence, the colour of the perianth tube, the length of the filaments, and the shape of the stigma lobes. We also provide inferences on the pollination ecology and seed dispersal of the new species, based on field observations and interpretations of morphology. The flowers are visited by fungus gnats (Myctophilidae or Sciaridae) and scuttle flies (Phoridae), which are likely to enter the perianth tube via the annulus below the filiform tepal appendages, and exit via small apertures between the filaments of the pendent stamens. The flowers are inferred to be protandrous, and flies visiting late-anthetic (pistillate-phase) flowers are possibly trapped within the flower, increasing chances of pollen deposition on the receptive stigma. The seeds are likely to be dispersed by rain splash.

Keywords: Burmanniaceae, China, mycoheterotrophic, pollination, rain splash dispersal, Thismia, Thismiaceae, new species

Introduction

Thismia Griff. species are small herbaceous plants with a highly reduced vegetative structure. They are invariably mycoheterotrophic, relying on fungal symbionts to obtain nourishment from decaying organic material, and they therefore lack chlorophyll. Individuals remain underground throughout most of the year, only emerging briefly to flower and fruit after periods of heavy rain; as a consequence, Thismia species are rarely collected and relatively little is known of their taxonomy, distribution and reproductive biology.

The floral morphology of the genus is complex. The tepals are congenitally fused (Caddick et al. 2000) to form a perianth tube with apically free lobes that are arranged in two whorls of three. These tepal lobes are often morphologically very elaborate, sometimes apically coherent and forming a mitre or dome, and often adorned with elongated tentacles that are either free or united. Although the functional significance of these morphologically complex tepals is obscure, they presumably perform a role in pollinator attraction. The aperture at the apex of the perianth tube is surrounded by a prominent annulus. Each flower has six stamens, the lateral margins of which are often postgenitally connate with each other, forming a ring that is suspended from the annulus. Since the stamens are pendent, the abaxial surface faces the centre of the flower, and the adaxial surface, which bears the thecae, faces the inner surface of the perianth tube. The flowers are epigynous, with the fused carpels surrounded by an expansion of the receptacle (Caddick et al. 2000).

Although Thismia was historically classified in the tribe Thismieae Miers (Miers 1847) within the Burmanniaceae (e.g., Jonker 1938; Maas-van der Kamer 1998), recent molecular phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences have revealed that it is more closely aligned with the Taccaceae (Merckx et al. 2006, 2009). The third iteration of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification (APG 2009) adopts a very conservative approach in which Thismia is retained within the Burmanniaceae; we follow the majority of contemporary taxonomists, however, in separating Thismia and related genera (Afrothismia Schltr., Haplothismia Airy Shaw and Oxygyne Schltr.) in the Thismiaceae.

Govaerts et al. (2007) listed 41 Thismia species in their global checklist of the Dioscoreales, of which 24 were recorded from Asia; these statistics increase to 42 and 25, respectively, if Geomitra clavigera Becc. is recognized as a Thismia species, as suggested by morphological data (Stone 1980) and molecular phylogenetic analysis (Merckx et al. 2006). The discovery of new species in the genus has accelerated significantly in recent years, with 10 new Thismia species described from Asia (Larsen and Averyanov 2007; Chantanaorrapint 2008, 2012; Chiang and Hsieh 2011; Tsukaya and Okada 2012; Dančák et al. 2013; Li and Bi 2013; Nuraliev et al. 2014; Truòng et al. 2014) since the publication of the checklist by Govaerts et al. (2007). In addition to these newly described species, there are several reports of significant extensions to distributional ranges in Asia, including Thismia alba Holttum ex Jonker (Peninsular Malaysia and Peninsular Thailand: Chantanaorrapint and Sridith 2007), Thismia clavigera (Becc.) F.Muell. (Borneo, Langkawi, Sumatra and Peninsular Thailand: Stone 1980; Chantanaorrapint and Chantanaorrapint 2009), and Thismia tentaculata K.Larsen & Aver. (Vietnam and southern China: Ho et al. 2009).

In this paper we describe a new species, Thismia hongkongensis, recently collected from Hong Kong. This is the fourth species in the genus recorded from China, supplementing earlier reports of Thismia taiwanensis S.Z.Yang, R.M.K.Saunders & C.J.Hsu from Taiwan (Yang et al. 2002; Wu et al. 2010), Thismia tentaculata from Hong Kong (Ho et al. 2009; Wu et al. 2010; Zhang and Saunders 2011), and Thismia gongshanensis H.Q.Li & Y.K.Bi from Yunnan (Li and Bi 2013). We also present some new observational data and inferences on the pollination ecology and seed dispersal mechanism of the new species. Although this information is limited in scope, it is of significance given the paucity of existing data on the reproductive biology of the genus.

New species description

Thismia hongkongensis

S.S.Mar & R.M.K.Saunders sp. nov.

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77145069-1

Figs 1 , 2 , 3 , 4

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Flower development in Thismia hongkongensis sp. nov. A, B Root system, with young flowering stalk developing (arrowed). C–H Developing flower, photographed over a 17-day period (10th, 14th, 16th, 19th, 23rd and 27th May, respectively) (S.S. Mar 1, HK). I, J Post-fertilization flower, showing abscission of perianth tube. Photos by S.S. Mar.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Flower structure in Thismia hongkongensis sp. nov. A Mature flower, showing outer tepals (ot), inner tepals (it) and abscission zone (ab) at the base of the perianth tube. B Entire plant (S.S. Mar 1, HK). C Perianth tube with annulus (a), following removal of the proximal face of the tube, exposing pendent stamens with filament (f), thecae (th), connective (c) and lateral appendage (la) (S.S. Mar 2, HK). D Inner face of perianth tube, showing network patterning and putative nectaries (arrowed) (S.S. Mar 2, HK). Scale bars: A, D = 2 mm; B = 5 mm; C = 1 mm. Photos: A, B S.S. Mar; C, D R.M.K. Saunders.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Fruit structure in Thismia hongkongensis sp. nov. A Flower (rear right), immature fruit, shortly after fertilization (left), and mature fruit with exposed seeds (front). B Two fruiting individuals, each with three fruits. C Lateral view of fruiting specimen, illustrating elongated fruit stalk. D Mature fruit with exposed seeds. E Dehydrated fruit. F Rehydrated fruit, after rainfall. Photos by S.S. Mar.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Thismia hongkongensis sp. nov. (S.S. Mar 2, HK). A Entire flower. B Flower with proximal part of perianth tube removed, showing pendent stamens. C Apex of the perianth tube, showing annulus (a) and pendent stamens, with filament (f), thecae (th), lateral appendage (la), and aperture (ap) between filaments. D Longitudinal section through fused carpels. Scale bars: A, B, D = 2 mm; C = 1 mm. Drawings by Caren Pearl Shin.

Diagnosis.

Similar to Thismia brunonis Griff., but differing in bearing a maximum of only three flowers (with a single flower at anthesis), and having a dark red perianth tube with the filiform appendages on the outer tepals remaining upright and forming a loose mitre over the annulus, longer staminal filaments with two distinct teeth at connective apex, and rounded stigmas.

Type.

China: 22°25'N, 114°11'E, Tai Po Kau Nature Reserve, New Territories, Hong Kong, 19 May 2014, S.S. Mar 1 (holotype: HK, in spirit).

Description.

Small achlorophyllous holomycotrophic herbs. Roots clustered, ± horizontal, vermiform, fleshy, 1.2–1.3 mm in diameter, cream-coloured. Stem cream-coloured, unbranched, erect, ca. 1.7 cm tall, 1.8–2 mm in diameter, glabrous, terete, with ca. 12 longitudinal ridges. Leaves white, appressed, clasping stem, narrowly triangular with acute apex, scale-like, 3–5.5 mm long, 1.7–2 mm wide; basal leaves smallest, upper leaves (equivalent to floral bracts) largest. Flowers in clusters of up to 3, developing sequentially with only one anthetic. Perianth actinomorphic, of 6 fused tepals, forming a perianth tube with free apical lobes. Perianth tube pinkish-white, membranous, urceolate, ca. 6.7 mm long, ca. 6.1 mm in diameter, with 12 dark red vertical ribs, abaxial surface distinctly verrucose; apex of perianth tube fused to form a dark red, rounded-hexagonal annulus, ca. 1.4 mm wide (top, externally), ca. 2.3 mm wide (base, externally) and ca. 1 mm (internal aperture); dark red, inverted V-shaped structures (putative nectaries) at apex of adaxial surface of perianth tube, opposite apertures between staminal filaments. Outer tepal lobes triangular, ca. 1.8 mm long, ca. 1.5 mm wide at base; inner tepal lobes spathulate, concave adaxially, ca. 3.3 mm long, ca. 1.7 mm wide at widest point, bearing a dark red filiform appendage on the abaxial surface, ca. 4 mm long, ca. 0.5 mm in diameter (towards base), 0.4 mm in diameter (towards apex); the three filiform appendages remain upright and cross each other, forming a persistent mitre. Stamens 6, pendent from the inner margin of perianth annulus, ca. 2.9 mm long, ca. 1.1 mm wide at widest point; filaments free, ca. 1 mm long; stamens laterally connate, forming an anther tube; individual stamens with two thecae (adaxial, dehiscing towards inner surface of perianth tube), ca. 0.7 mm long; apical connective of stamens ca. 1 mm long, with two distinct teeth, adorned with trichomes, ca. 0.5 mm long. Ovary inferior, obconical, ca. 2.7 mm long, ca. 4 mm wide towards apex; style ca. 0.6 mm long, ca. 0.6 mm in diameter, with three bilobed, rounded stigmas; stigmatic head ca. 1 mm long, ca. 1 mm in diameter. Fruit a capsule ca. 4 mm long, ca. 4.8 mm wide, cup-shaped, carnose, pale orange-brown, dehiscing apically; fruiting peduncle ca. 2.5 mm diameter. Seeds numerous, yellow-brown.

Phenology.

Flowering was observed between May and September. Flower development extends over several weeks (Fig. 1C–H). Based on our field observations, mature flowers are functional for up to three weeks, with up to three flowers developing successively in each individual (Fig. 3A). The perianth tube abscises after fertilization (Fig. 1I, J), with a clear abscission zone (ab in Fig. 2A); the epidermis on the upper surface of the carpel subsequently disintegrates and the stigma is shed, exposing the seeds (Fig. 3A, D). Fruiting was observed between June and October.

Distribution and habitat.

Thismia hongkongensis is only known from the type locality in Hong Kong. The habitat is lowland secondary forest (west-facing slope, ca. 240 m above sea level); the site is not close to a stream and is therefore likely to dry out during periods of low precipitation. Cooccurring species include Adiantum flabellulatum L. (Adiantaceae), Ardisia quinquegona Blume (Myrsinaceae), Breynia fruticosa (L.) Hook.f. (Euphorbiaceae), Burmannia wallichii (Miers) Hook.f. (Burmanniaceae), Clematis meyeniana Walp. (Ranunculaceae), Cratoxylum cochinchinense (Lour.) Blume (Clusiaceae), Desmos chinensis Lour. (Annonaceae), Diplospora dubia (Lindl.) Masam. (Rubiaceae), Garcinia oblongifolia Champ. ex Benth. (Clusiaceae), Lindsaea orbiculata (Lam.) Mett. ex Kuhn (Lindsaeaceae), Lophatherum gracile Brogn. (Poaceae), Lygodium japonicum (Thunb.) Sw. (Lygodiaceae), Machilus chekiangensis S.K.Lee (Lauraceae), Psychotria asiatica L. (Rubiaceae), Psychotria serpens L. (Rubiaceae), Rourea microphylla (Hook. & Arn.) Planch. (Connaraceae), Sarcandra glabra (Thunb.) Nakai (Chloranthaceae), and Sciaphila ramosa Fukuy. & T.Suzuki (Triuridaceae).

Etymology.

The specific epithet reflects the geographical origin of the species in Hong Kong.

Additional specimens examined

(paratypes). China. Hong Kong: 22°25'N, 114°11'E, Tai Po Kau Nature Reserve, New Territories, 29 May 2014, S.S. Mar 2 (HK, dissected flower in spirit); idem, 2 October 2014, S.S. Mar 3 (HK, immature fruit in spirit).

Discussion.

Thismia hongkongensis is most similar to Thismia brunonis Griff. (1844, 1845; as ‘Thismia brunoniana’ in the latter), the type species in the genus. Thismia brunonis is only known from a single collection from Tenasserim in Myanmar, dating from October 1834. According to Jonker’s (1938) supraspecific classification of the genus, both species would be included in sect. Thismia (‘Euthismia’) subsect. Brunonithismia Jonker as they have unequal and free tepal lobes. Comparison of the two species reveals several significant differences, however, including flower number per inflorescence. The protologue of Thismia brunonis includes reference to flowers clustered in a terminal raceme (“Flores pauci, in racemum brevem terminalem dispositi”: Griffith 1845: 341) with the accompanying illustration in the same publication (Fig. 1 in Pl. XXXIX) showing inflorescences with four and six flowers; Jonker (1938) subsequently described the species as bearing 3–8 flowers per raceme. In contrast, Thismia hongkongensis invariably has fewer flowers, with a maximum of three per inflorescence, reaching anthesis consecutively. The perianth tube of Thismia brunonis is pale yellow with red ribs (Griffith 1845), whilst it is pink with red ribs in Thismia hongkongensis (Figs 1G–J, 2A, B). The filiform appendages on the outer tepals of Thismia brunonis appear to be spreading at maturity (Griffith 1845: Pl. XXXIX), whereas those of Thismia hongkongensis invariably remain upright and cross each other to form a loose mitre over the annulus (Figs 1G–J, 2A, B, 4A). Thismia brunonis also differs from Thismia hongkongensis as it has a much shorter filament: although a measurement was not included in Griffith’s descriptions of Thismia brunonis, the accompanying plate (Griffith 1845: Fig. 7 in Pl. XXXIX) indicates that it is considerably shorter than the rest of the stamen. The shape of the stigma lobes also differs: it is acute in Thismia brunonis (Griffith 1845: Fig. 9 in Pl. XXXIX; Jonker 1938), but rounded in Thismia hongkongensis (Fig. 4D).

Thismia hongkongensis is strikingly different from its congener in Hong Kong. Thismia tentaculata has a white perianth tube with a bright yellow annulus, and three divergent orange-red filiform appendages on the inner tepals (Ho et al. 2009).

IUCN conservation status.

CR D (IUCN 2001). Only one population is known, consisting of ca. 10 individuals, covering an area of approximately 4–5 m2. The population is located within the Tai Po Kau Nature Reserve, but is close to a major hiking path and the population is therefore susceptible to human disturbance and vegetation clearance.

Pollination ecology

Although the Burmanniaceae s.l. (inclusive of Thismia) are reported to be protandrous (Vogel 1998), this inference was based on a paraphyletic circumscription of the family and it is unclear whether protandry has specifically been observed in Thismia. Dissections of late-anthetic flowers of Thismia hongkongensis allow tentative confirmation of protandry, however, as the thecae are completely devoid of pollen (th in Fig. 2C).

Little is known of the pollinators of Thismia, although several authors have suggested that the flowers may be visited by small flies (Vogel 1962; Stone 1980; Rübsamen 1986). These inferences were based on perianth morphology, the presence of osmophores on the tepals (Vogel 1962), the presence of nectaries either at the base of the perianth (Poulsen 1890) or along the suture between contiguous anthers (e.g., Groom 1895; Pfeiffer 1918; Jonker 1938, 1948; Cribb 1986, 1995; Thiele and Jordan 2002; Ho et al. 2009), and the formation of sticky pollen (Cranwell 1953). The only previous observational report of insect visitors to Thismia flowers is of small, unidentified flies entering the perianth tube of Thismia gongshanensis (Li & Bi, 2013).

Several researchers have inferred that fungus gnats are likely to pollinate Thismia flowers based on structural mimicry (e.g., tepal extensions and reticulate patterning on the inner surface of the perianth tube), perianth colour and the emission of fungus-like floral scents (Vogel 1978; Rübsamen 1986; Thiele and Jordan 2002). We retrieved a fungus gnat (belonging to either the Mycetophilidae or Sciaridae) from within the perianth tube of a late-anthetic specimen of Thismia hongkongensis; unfortunately the poor state of preservation of the fly precluded further identification. We also retrieved an isolated insect wing from within the floral chamber which had the characteristic venation typical of a scuttle fly (Phoridae). Fungus gnats and scuttle flies are generally associated with decaying organic matter and are often reported to feed on fungi (Hill et al. 1982).

The pollinators presumably enter the floral chamber of Thismia hongkongensis via the aperture within the annulus (a in Figs 2C, 4C). Assuming that the flower is protandrous as suggested, the movements of the pollinators are likely to differ depending on whether the flower is in its early anthetic (staminate) or late anthetic (pistillate) phase. In staminate-phase flowers, the flies are likely to be attracted to the putative nectaries (arrowed in Fig. 2D) located at the apex of the perianth tube, behind the pendent staminal ring. We hypothesize that the irregular surface on the adaxial surface of the perianth tube resulting from the reticulate venation (Fig. 2D) possibly enables the insects to climb and access these nectaries. The flies are likely to make contact with the thecae (th in Figs 2C, 4C) and inadvertently collect pollen whilst feeding from the nectaries, before departing via the small apertures (ca. 0.5 mm diameter) located between the filaments (f in Figs 2C, 4C) of adjacent stamens. If the flies enter late-anthetic pistillate-phase flowers, however, it is possible that they might be prevented from accessing the nectaries because of the raised lateral appendages of the stamens (la in Figs 2C, 4C), thereby increasing the time in which contact with the stigma is possible. The possible trapping of flies may explain the frequency with which flies are observed inside the perianth tube of late-anthetic flowers. Similar interpretations of pollinator movement, involving climbing the inner wall of the perianth tube and exiting via the apertures between the filaments, has previously been suggested by Maas et al. (1986) and Thiele and Jordan (2002) for other Thismia species.

Seed dispersal

Several different interpretations of seed dispersal have been proposed for Thismia, including movement by earthworms with secondary dispersal possible if the worms are eaten by birds (Beccari 1890). Stone (1980) suggested that Thismia seeds are likely to be dispersed by raindrops that splash seeds out of the fruit-cup. The size and shape of the fruit-cups of Thismia hongkongensis closely resemble functionally similar rain-splash dispersal structures in phylogenetically disparate groups (Nakanishi 2002): the upper surface of the fruit disintegrates at maturity (Fig. 3A), resulting in an upright, cup-like hypanthium (ca. 4.8 mm in diameter) with seeds that are fully exposed (Fig. 3D). Studies of other plant groups indicate dispersal of up to 1 m (Nakanishi 2002), although there are inevitably many variables (including plant height, seed weight, etc.) that affect potential dispersal distance; it is perhaps significant that the stem of Thismia hongkongensis elongates as the fruit matures (Fig. 3C), thereby possibly increasing seed dispersal distance.

Brodie (1951) observed that seeds of species that are rain-splash dispersed are often coated with a hydrophilic colloid that rapidly absorbs water, and which may act as a lubricant, facilitating separation of seeds by rain drops. Thismia hongkongensis seeds are surrounded by a conspicuous mucilage-like substance (Fig. 3D) that may function in this way.

The fruits of Thismia hongkongensis appear to remain functional for several weeks. Although the plants are inevitably subjected to periods of desiccation, the fruits appear to be able to rehydrate effectively (Fig. 3E, F), thereby prolonging the period for seed dispersal.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Thismia hongkongensis
phytokeys.46.8963-treatment1.xml (49.5KB, xml)

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Prof. Shiuh-Feng Shiao (Department of Entomology, National Taiwan University) for his help in identifying the floral visitors of Thismia hongkongensis. We are also very grateful to Pang Chun Chiu for field assistance, Caren Pearl Shin for preparing the line drawings, and Laura Wong for general technical assistance.

Citation

Mar SS, Saunders RMK (2015) Thismia hongkongensis (Thismiaceae): a new mycoheterotrophic species from Hong Kong, China, with observations on floral visitors and seed dispersal. PhytoKeys 46: 21–33. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.46.8963

References

  1. APG [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group] (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Beccari O. (1890) Le Triuridaceae della Malesia. Malesia 3: 318–344. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brodie HK. (1951) The splash-cup dispersal mechanism in plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 29: 224–234. doi: 10.1139/b51-022 [Google Scholar]
  4. Caddick LR, Rudall PJ, Wilkin P. (2000) Floral morphology and development in Dioscoreales. Feddes Repertorium 111: 189–230. doi: 10.1002/fedr.20001110313 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chantanaorrapint S. (2008) Thismia angustimitra (Thismiaceae), a new species from Thailand. Blumea 53: 524–526. doi: 10.3767/000651908X607477 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chantanaorrapint S. (2012) Thismia filiformis, a new species of Thismiaceae (formerly Burmanniaceae) from Thailand. Kew Bulletin 67: 69–73. doi: 10.1007/s12225-012-9340-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chantanaorrapint S, Chantanaorrapint A. (2009) Thismia clavigera (Thismiaceae), a new record for Thailand. Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany) 37: 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chantanaorrapint S, Sridith K. (2007) Thismia alba (Thismiaceae), a new record for Thailand. Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany) 35: 34–37. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chiang P-Y, Hsieh T-H. (2011) Thismia huangii (Thismiaceae), a new species from Taiwan. Taiwania 56: 138–142. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cranwell LM. (1953) New Zealand pollen studies. The monocotyledons. A comparative account. Bulletin of the Auckland Institute and Museum 3: 1–91. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cribb AB. (1986) An extension of the range of Thismia rodwayi to Queensland. Queensland Naturalist 27: 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cribb AB. (1995) The saprophytic flowering plant, Thismia yorkensis sp. nov., from Australia. Queensland Naturalist 33: 51–54. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dančák M, Hroneš M, Sochor M, Kobrlová L, Hédl R, Hrázsky Z, Vildomcová A, Sukri RS, Metali F. (2013) A new species of Thismia (Thismiaceae) from Brunei Darussalam, Borneo. Phytotaxa 125: 33–39. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.125.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Govaerts R, Wilkin P, Saunders RMK. (2007) World Checklist of Dioscoreales: Yams and their Allies. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London. [Google Scholar]
  15. Griffith W. (1844) On the root parasites referred by authors to Rhizantheæ and their allies. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 1: 216–221. [Google Scholar]
  16. Griffith W. (1845) On the root-parasites referred by authors to Rhizantheæ; and on various plants related to them. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 19: 303–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1842.tb00369.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Groom P. (1895) On Thismia aseroe (Beccari) and its mycorrhiza. Annals of Botany (London) 9: 327–361. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill DS, Hore PM, Thornton IWB. (1982) Insects of Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ho GWC, Mar SS, Saunders RMK. (2009) Thismia tentaculata (Burmanniaceae tribe Thismieae) from Hong Kong: first record of the genus and tribe from continental China. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 47: 605–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00037.x [Google Scholar]
  20. IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, ver. 3.1. IUCN, Gland Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jonker FP. (1938) A monograph of the Burmanniaceae. Mededeelinger van het Botanisch Museum en Herbarium van de Rijks Universiteit te Utrecht 51: 1–279. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jonker FP. (1948) Burmanniaceae. Flora Malesiana, series I4: 13–26. [Google Scholar]
  23. Larsen K, Averyanov LV. (2007) Thismia annamensis and T. tentaculata, two new species of Thismiaceae from central Vietnam. Rheedea 17: 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li H-Q, Bi Y-K. (2013) A new species of Thismia (Thismiaceae) from Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa 105: 25–28. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.105.1.4 [Google Scholar]
  25. Maas PJM, Maas-van der Kamer H, van Benthem J, Snelders HCM, Rübsamen T. (1986) Burmanniaceae.Flora Neotropica. Monograph 42 New York Botanical Garden, New York. [Google Scholar]
  26. Maas-van der Kamer H. (1998) Burmanniaceae. In: Kubitzki K. (Ed.) The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Vol. 3 Springer, Berlin, 154–164. [Google Scholar]
  27. Merckx V, Bakker FT, Huysmans S, Smets E. (2009) Bias and conflict in phylogenetic inference of myco-heterotrophic plants: a case study in Thismiaceae. Cladistics 25: 64–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00241.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Merckx V, Schols P, Maas-van der Kamer H, Maas P, Huysmans S, Smets E. (2006) Phylogeny and evolution of Burmanniaceae (Dioscoreales) based on nuclear and mitochondrial data. American Journal of Botany 93: 1684–1698. doi: 10.3732/ajb.93.11.1684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Miers J. (1847) On a new genus of plants of the family Burmanniaceae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 1: 328–329. [Google Scholar]
  30. Nakanishi H. (2002) Splash seed dispersal by raindrops. Ecological Research 17: 663–671. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00524.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Nuraliev MS, Beer AS, Kuznetsov AN, Kuznetsova SP. (2014) Thismia mucronata (Thismiaceae), a new species from Southern Vietnam. Phytotaxa 167: 245–255. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.167.3.3 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pfeiffer NE. (1918) The sporangia of Thismia americana. Botanical Gazette (Crawfordsville) 66: 354–363. doi: 10.1086/332348 [Google Scholar]
  33. Poulsen V. (1890) Thismia Glaziovii nov. sp. Bidrag til de brasilianske Saprofyters Naturhistorie. Oversigt over det kongelige danske videnskabernes selskabs forhandlinger og dets medlemmers arbeider 1890: 18–38. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rübsamen T. (1986) Morphologische, embryologische und systematische Untersuchungen an Burmanniaceae und Corsiaceae (Mit Ausblick auf die Orchidaceae-Apostasioideae). Dissertationes Botanicæ 92: 1–310 + pl. 1–98. [Google Scholar]
  35. Stone BC. (1980) Rediscovery of Thismia clavigera (Becc.) F. v. M. (Burmanniaceae). Blumea 26: 419–425. [Google Scholar]
  36. Thiele KR, Jordan P. (2002) Thismia clavarioides (Thismiaceae), a new species of Fairy lantern from New South Wales. Telopea 9: 765–771. [Google Scholar]
  37. Truòng LH, Tich NT, Gioi T, Diêp DQ, Long VN, Bách NLX, Dung NTT, Trung NT. (2014) Thismia okhaensis (Thismiaceae)—a new fairy lantern from Vietnam. Phytotaxa 164: 190–194. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.164.3.4 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsukaya H, Okada H. (2012) A new species of Thismia (Thismiaceae) from West Kalimantan, Borneo. Systematic Botany 37: 53–57. doi: 10.1600/036364412X616639 [Google Scholar]
  39. Vogel S. (1962) Duftdrüsen im Dienste der Bestäubung. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 10: 601–763. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vogel S. (1978) Pilzmückenblumen als Pilzmimeten. Flora 167: 329–398. [Google Scholar]
  41. Vogel S. (1998) Floral biology. In: Kubitzki K. (Ed.) The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Vol. 3 Springer, Berlin, 34–48. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu D, Zhang D, Saunders RMK. (2010) Burmanniaceae. In: Wu Z, Raven PH, Hong D. (Ed.) Flora of China. Vol. 23 Science Press, Beijing: / Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St Louis, 121–124. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang S-Z, Saunders RMK, Hsu C-J. (2002) Thismia taiwanensis sp. nov. (Burmanniaceae tribe Thismieae): first record of the tribe in China. Systematic Botany 27: 485–488. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang D-X, Saunders RMK. (2011) Burmanniaceae. In: Hong Kong Herbarium & South China Botanical Garden (Ed.) Flora of Hong Kong. Vol. 4 Agriculture, Fisheries & Conservation Department, Hong Kong, 291–293. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Thismia hongkongensis
phytokeys.46.8963-treatment1.xml (49.5KB, xml)

Articles from PhytoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES