Skip to main content
Tissue Engineering. Part A logoLink to Tissue Engineering. Part A
. 2015 Jan 21;21(7-8):1261–1274. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0240

Knockdown of the Cell Cycle Inhibitor p21 Enhances Cartilage Formation by Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Brian O Diekman 1,,*, Pratiksha I Thakore 2,,*, Shannon K O'Connor 1,,2, Vincent P Willard 1, Jonathan M Brunger 1,,2, Nicolas Christoforou 2,,3, Kam W Leong 2, Charles A Gersbach 1,,2,,4,, Farshid Guilak 1,,2,,5,
PMCID: PMC4394871  PMID: 25517798

Abstract

The limited regenerative capacity of articular cartilage contributes to progressive joint dysfunction associated with cartilage injury or osteoarthritis. Cartilage tissue engineering seeks to provide a biological substitute for repairing damaged or diseased cartilage, but requires a cell source with the capacity for extensive expansion without loss of chondrogenic potential. In this study, we hypothesized that decreased expression of the cell cycle inhibitor p21 would enhance the proliferative and chondrogenic potential of differentiated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Murine iPSCs were directed to differentiate toward the chondrogenic lineage with an established protocol and then engineered to express a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) to reduce the expression of p21. Cells expressing the p21 shRNA demonstrated higher proliferative potential during monolayer expansion and increased synthesis of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in pellet cultures. Furthermore, these cells could be expanded ∼150-fold over three additional passages without a reduction in the subsequent production of GAGs, while control cells showed reduced potential for GAG synthesis with three additional passages. In pellets from extensively passaged cells, knockdown of p21 attenuated the sharp decrease in cell number that occurred in control cells, and immunohistochemical analysis showed that p21 knockdown limited the production of type I and type X collagen while maintaining synthesis of cartilage-specific type II collagen. These findings suggest that manipulating the cell cycle can augment the monolayer expansion and preserve the chondrogenic capacity of differentiated iPSCs, providing a strategy for enhancing iPSC-based cartilage tissue engineering.

Introduction

Articular cartilage provides a low-friction load-bearing surface in diarthrodial joints such as the knee and hip.1 However, cartilage degeneration or loss that occurs with osteoarthritis (OA) is associated with significant pain and joint dysfunction.2 The risk for cartilage degeneration is enhanced by the presence of focal damage,3,4 prompting efforts to treat cartilage defects using techniques such as marrow stimulation.5 Using a combination of cells, scaffolds, and growth factors to engineer cartilage for transplantation has been proposed as a potential therapy, but the optimal cell source has yet to be identified.6 The use of autologous chondrocytes requires an additional procedure to harvest healthy cartilage and follow-up studies have indicated the presence of suboptimal fibrocartilage tissue after repair.7 Adult stem cells also have limitations, as bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) display a propensity for mineralization8,9 and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) may need additional growth factors for full chondrogenesis in some systems.10,11 Embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have emerged as other alternatives, but require extensive differentiation protocols to avoid a remnant of undifferentiated cells with tumor-forming potential.12

A major obstacle to using many of the proposed cell types for treating cartilage injury is the loss of chondrogenic capacity with monolayer cell expansion. Expansion is required to achieve necessary cell numbers for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI),13 but primary chondrocytes rapidly progress to a de-differentiated phenotype during monolayer culture.14–16 Under certain circumstances, expanded chondrocytes can be grown in three-dimensional (3D) culture with defined conditions to promote redifferentiation to a chondrocyte phenotype,17 although these cells may not regain the ability to synthesize sufficient matrix.18 Certain adult stem cells such as MSCs also demonstrate a limited capacity for expansion before loss of chondrogenic potential,19 whereas other cell types such as ASCs retain chondrogenic ability even after numerous passages.20 Even iPSCs, which have virtually unlimited self-renewal capability in the undifferentiated state, exhibit a loss of chondrogenic potential with expansion once they have been differentiated toward the chondrogenic lineage.21

Among the factors that influence the phenotypic change associated with prolonged culture are cell cycle inhibitors such as p21Waf1/Cip1 (hereafter referred to as p21).22 p21 regulates proliferation by binding cyclin and cyclin-dependent kinase complexes and preventing G0/G1 and G1/S phase progression,23 and a reduction of p21 levels is a shared mechanism by which growth factor treatment and hypoxic culture mediate enhanced proliferation of MSCs while maintaining differentiation potential.24–26 Evidence from mouse strains with enhanced healing capabilities support these findings, as reduced levels or a complete loss of p21 expression results in increased cell proliferation and recapitulation of native tissue architecture after injury.27 Thus, the modulation of p21 provides a potential mechanism that could be used to prevent the loss of chondrogenic potential during extensive cell expansion.

Chondrocytes display very limited proliferation during normal tissue homeostasis, but immature growth plate chondrocytes undergo a phase of both proliferation and abundant matrix synthesis.28 Studies on the chondrogenesis of MSCs support the concept of coordinated cell growth and matrix synthesis, suggesting that proliferation may be important to recapitulate the developmental paradigms of cartilage.29 We hypothesized that knockdown of p21 expression in iPSC-derived chondrocytes would lead to increased cell proliferation in monolayer expansion while maintaining robust chondrogenic potential. To test this hypothesis, we used short hairpin RNA (shRNA) to silence the expression of the cell cycle inhibitor p21 in differentiated iPSCs and investigated the proliferative capacity and potential for utilizing these cells as a source for cartilage tissue engineering.

Materials and Methods

iPSC culture and differentiation

Murine iPSCs were derived and differentiated toward the chondrogenic lineage as previously described21 and outlined in Figure 1. Briefly, pluripotency was initiated through the doxycycline-inducible expression of Oct4 (Pou5f1), Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc.30 iPSCs were maintained in an undifferentiated state through culture on mouse embryonic fibroblasts (Millipore) in the presence of 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlanta Biologicals) and mouse leukemia inhibitory factor (Millipore). Cells were differentiated toward the chondrogenic lineage using a multi-step process that resulted in a purified population of iPSC-derived chondrocytes. Differentiation included 15 days of high density micromass culture with 50 ng/mL BMP-4 (R&D Systems) and 100 nM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich) provided during days 3–5 only. After micromass culture, chondrocyte-like cells were sorted with flow cytometry based on the presence of green fluorescent protein (GFP) driven by a type II collagen promoter.31 These cells were expanded in monolayer on gelatin-coated plates at a density of 10,000 cells/cm2 in chondrogenic expansion medium consisting of Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium-high glucose (DMEM-HG, Sigma-Aldrich), 10% FBS, 100 nM nonessential amino acids (Gibco), 55 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Gibco), ITS+ (Becton Dickinson), 50 μg/mL l-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (Sigma), 40 μg/mL l-proline (Sigma), and 4 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; Roche) as previously described.21 After 3–4 days of expansion, cells were trypsinized and stored in liquid nitrogen to serve as a predifferentiated cell stock. We defined this cell population to be at passage 1 when plated from frozen stocks.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Overview of experimental approach. Undifferentiated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were expanded on a feeder layer of mouse embryonic fibroblasts, plated in high density micromass cultures for 15 days of differentiation, which included the growth factor bone morphogenetic protein 4 during days 3–5. After differentiation, chondrocyte-like cells expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) driven by a type II collagen promoter were sorted by flow cytometry. Sorted cells were expanded in primary passage and then stored as frozen stocks for future experiments. Cells were subsequently plated into passage 1 (p1) and transduced the following day with virus encoding short hairpin RNA (shRNA) to reduce the expression of p21 (p21sh) or kept as nontransduced (NT) cells. Both cell groups were expanded and then trypsinized to obtain passage 2 (p2) cells. Cells were either replated for continued expansion or used for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis and the formation of chondrogenic pellet cultures. After three additional passages, the same analysis was performed on passage 5 (p5) cells. See Materials and Methods section for additional details and media formulations. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

p21 knockdown with shRNA

shRNA targeting the mouse p21 transcript was expressed in a modified pLVTHM lentiviral vector (Addgene #12447).32 The GFP reporter in the pLVTHM vector was replaced with a dsRedExpress2-IRES-puromycin resistance cassette using PacI and SpeI restriction sites. shRNA specific to the p21 transcript (p21sh) had the following target sequence: 5′-GGAGCAAAGTGTGCCGTTG-3′ as reported.33 A vector delivering a “scrambled” shRNA sequence (scr) to control for the effects of the transduction process was also generated using the following target sequence: 5′-GATTACCGTATGGGCTGTC-3′. The scrambled sequence was confirmed to have no homology to the mouse transcriptome by an NCBI BLAST search and contained fewer than 15 base pair identities with any predicted mRNA sequence. To produce vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein pseudotyped lentivirus, HEK293T cells were plated at a density of 5.1e3 cells/cm2 in DMEM-HG (Gibco, cat #11995) supplemented with 10% FBS. The next day, cells in 10-cm plates were co-transfected with the shRNA lentiviral expression plasmid (20 μg), the second-generation packaging plasmid psPAX2 (Addgene #12260, 15 μg), and the envelope plasmid pMD2.G (Addgene #12259, 6 μg) by calcium phosphate precipitation.34 After 12–14 h, transfection medium was exchanged for 10 mL of fresh 293T medium. Conditioned medium containing lentivirus was collected 24 h after the first media exchange. Lentiviral supernatant was cleared of producer cells by filtration through 0.45 μm cellulose acetate filters and then concentrated 20-fold by centrifugation through a 100 kDa molecular weight cutoff filter (Millipore). Concentrated viral supernatant was then snap-frozen and stored at −80°C for future use. Frozen stocks of passage 1 iPSC-derived chondrocytes were plated into chondrogenic expansion medium and were transduced the following day. For transduction, concentrated viral supernatant containing the p21 shRNA (p21sh) or scrambled sequence (scr) was diluted 1:40 with chondrogenic expansion media. The cationic polymer polybrene was added at a concentration of 4 μg/mL to facilitate transduction. Nontransduced cells did not receive virus but were treated with polybrene as a control. After 16 h of transduction, the medium was exchanged to remove the virus, and 2 μg/mL puromycin was used to initiate selection for transduced cells ∼36 h after transduction. Cells were passaged once they reached ∼90% confluence for further expansion or used for chondrogenic pellet cultures as described below.

Expansion rates and cell cycle analysis

To determine cell expansion rates, cells were seeded at ∼10,500 cells/cm2 (100,000 cells in 9.5 cm2 wells of Corning plates) at passages 2, 3, and 4. Cells were passaged every 3 days and an automated cell counter (Countess; Invitrogen) was used to determine the cumulative fold-expansion for each well over the three passages. Additionally, cells at the end of passage 2 were used to analyze the cell cycle distribution with propidium iodide staining based on a previously described method.35 Briefly, cells were fixed in cold 70% ethanol and stained with a solution of 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μg/mL propidium iodide (Biolegend), and 100 μg/mL DNase-free RNase A (Sigma-Aldrich) for at least 30 min before analysis by flow cytometry. The percentage of cells in S phase was determined from the region between the two maximal peaks. For comparison, undifferentiated iPSCs and expanded murine chondrocytes isolated from the hips of 12-day-old mice were analyzed in the same fashion.

qRT-PCR

At the end of passages 1 and 4 (denoted as passage 2 and passage 5 to indicate analysis was performed after trypsinization), cells were harvested for total RNA isolation using the RNeasy Plus RNA isolation kit (Qiagen). cDNA synthesis was performed using the SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) using SsoFast EvaGreen SYBR Green Supermix was performed with the CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) with the oligonucleotide primers reported in Supplementary Table S1; Supplementary Data are available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea. The results are expressed as fold-increase mRNA expression of the gene of interest normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) expression by the ΔΔCt method.

Pellet culture for chondrogenic differentiation

Cells were used to establish chondrogenic pellet cultures at the end of passages 1 and 4 (denoted as passage 2 and passage 5 pellets). The chondrogenic differentiation medium contained the same components as chondrogenic expansion medium but with the addition of 10 ng/mL transforming growth factor β3 (R&D Systems) and 100 nM dexamethasone (Sigma) and without the FBS or bFGF. Cells were distributed to individual wells of 96-well round bottom plates (BD Falcon) with 150,000 cells in each well. Plates were centrifuged twice at 200×g for 5 min, and samples were cultured for up to 28 days with media changes every 2–3 days to maintain 250 μL of media per well. Pellets were harvested at days 9, 18, and 28 for biochemical and histological analyses.

Assessment of proliferation in pellet cultures with BrdU

Separate pellet cultures were incubated with 10 μg/mL of the nucleotide analog 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU; Sigma) for the duration of days 0–9, 9–18, or 18–28. Pellets were harvested immediately after the end of the treatment window. Cryosections were denatured in 2N HCl for 20 min at room temperature and then washed thrice for 20 min in neutralizing buffer containing 50 mM NaCl and 100 mM Tris–HCl. Samples were blocked for 20 min in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin, 5% FBS, and 0.1% Triton X-100 (Invitrogen) and then incubated overnight at 4°C in mouse anti-BrdU (Sigma) at 1:1000 in blocking solution. Sections were then labeled with anti-mouse secondary conjugated to AlexaFluor 594 (Molecular Probes) at a 1:500 dilution in blocking serum for 60 min. Sections were incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Invitrogen) before mounting in ProLong Gold Antifade reagent (Life Technologies). Images were analyzed using a custom ImageJ macro. The percentage of BrdU-positive nuclei was calculated by normalizing the number of BrdU-positive particles over a threshold size to the number of DAPI-positive nuclei.

Biochemical analysis for DNA, GAG, and collagen content

Pellets were washed with PBS and stored frozen until digestion with papain for subsequent analysis of DNA and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content as previously described.36 Briefly, the PicoGreen assay (Molecular Probes) was used to measure DNA content and GAGs were analyzed using the 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue assay with a 525 nm wavelength. Aliquots of the cell suspension used to establish pellet cultures were harvested at day 0 and analyzed in parallel to provide a reference value for the starting DNA content of each group. Total collagen was determined by measuring the hydroxyproline content using a previously described assay.37

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Pellets were harvested for cryosectioning by washing with PBS, embedding in optical cutting temperature compound (Tissue-Tek), and snap freezing in liquid nitrogen before storage at −20°C. Cryosections of 8–10 μm were collected on glass slides. For histology, slides were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and then stained with safranin-O/fast-green/hematoxylin as described.36 For immunohistochemistry, unfixed sections were digested with pepsin for 5 min (10 min for type I collagen), treated with primary antibody (II-II6B3 from Iowa hybridoma bank for type II collagen at a dilution of 1:3, 8D4A1 from Chondrex for type I collagen at 1:200, c7974 from Sigma for type X collagen at 1:200), incubated with secondary antibody for type II and type X (ab97021; AbCam), and stained with Histostain Plus kit and AEC Single (Life Technologies). Appropriate positive and negative controls confirmed specificity of staining.

Western blots

Cells were lysed in 50 mM Tris–Cl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS). Total protein was quantified using the BCA assay (Pierce). Lysates were mixed with loading buffer and boiled for 5 min; equal amounts of total protein were run in NuPAGE Novex 10% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels (Life Technologies) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Nonspecific antibody binding was blocked with 5% nonfat milk in TBS-T (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% Tween-20) for 30 min. The membranes were then incubated with primary antibody in 5% milk in TBS-T: mouse anti-p21 (clone F-5; Santa Cruz) diluted 1:1000 overnight at 4°C or anti-GAPDH (clone 14C10; Cell Signaling) diluted 1:5000 for 60 min at room temperature. Membranes labeled with primary antibodies were incubated with anti-mouse (Santa Cruz) or anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 1:5000 for 30 min and washed with TBS-T for 30 min. Membranes were visualized using the Immun-Star WesternC Chemiluminescence Kit (Bio-Rad) and images were captured using a ChemiDoc XRS+ system and processed using ImageLab software (Bio-Rad).

Statistical analysis

Samples were analyzed using student's t-test or two-way ANOVA with Fisher's PLSD post hoc test when applicable (α=0.05).

Results

Knockdown of p21 expression

Expression of the shRNA targeting p21 caused a reduction in p21 mRNA levels of ∼80% as assessed by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2A, p<0.05) and also caused a reduction in p21 protein as determined by western blot (Fig. 2B). This reduction in p21 protein was maintained throughout the 28 days of chondrogenic pellet culture (Fig. 2C). A scrambled shRNA sequence showed a small increase in p21 protein expression (Fig. 2D) and a decrease in the size of chondrogenic pellet cultures (Fig. 2E) compared with nontransduced (NT) cells that was potentially an effect of viral transduction. To ensure that effects of p21 knockdown were significant relative to the unaltered state, subsequent experiments compared differentiated iPSCs with silenced p21 expression (p21sh) to NT cells.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

p21 knockdown. (A) mRNA expression of p21 in passage 2 cells either NT or expressing p21 shRNA (p21sh). Expression was normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) and NT controls. Data from n=3 of a representative experiment. Asterisk indicates p<0.05 compared to NT cells. (B) Western blot for protein levels of p21 and GAPDH in passage 2 cells. (C) Western blot for protein levels of p21 and GAPDH after passage 2 cells were in chondrogenic pellet culture for 28 days. (D) Western blot for protein levels of p21 and GAPDH in passage 2 cells. Cells were either NT or transduced with a lentivirus expressing a scrambled (scr) control shRNA. (E) Chondrogenic pellet cultures from passage 2 NT or scr cells. Pellets were cryosectioned and stained with safranin-O (sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), red), fast-green (collagen, green), and hematoxylin (nuclei, blue). Scale bar=100 μm. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

Effect of knockdown on cell expansion

p21sh cells demonstrated an enhanced potential for cell expansion, with approximately double the level of total expansion compared with NT cells over three passages (Fig. 3A, p<0.05). The three additional expansion passages with p21sh cells generated almost 150 times the number of cells available for tissue engineering at passage 5 as compared to passage 2 (Fig. 3A). To determine whether p21 knockdown altered the cell cycle profile, the percentage of cells in S phase was determined with propidium iodide analysis. p21sh cells showed a significant increase in the percentage of cells in S phase compared with NT cells at the same passage (Fig. 3B, p<0.05). Mouse primary chondrocytes and undifferentiated iPSCs of the same line as the differentiated cells were used as controls to establish the dynamic range expected for the assay. With knockdown, iPSC-derived chondrocytes had a slightly higher percentage of cells in S phase compared with mouse chondrocytes (Fig. 3B, p<0.05), but without knockdown this percentage was lower than mouse chondrocytes (Fig. 3B, p<0.05). All iPSC-derived chondrocytes showed an S phase percentage that was more similar to chondrocytes than to undifferentiated iPSCs, nearly half of which were in S phase.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Cell expansion. (A) Cumulative fold increase of cell number over three passages, measured following plating NT or p21sh cells into passage 2. Data from n=6 total combined from two independent cell preparations. Asterisk indicates p<0.05 compared to NT. (B) Percentage of cells in S phase as measured by propidium iodide cell cycle analysis. Undifferentiated iPSCs and primary mouse chondrocytes served as controls. Data from n=3 and groups not sharing a letter indicate p<0.05.

Gene expression during monolayer expansion

Analysis of gene expression with qRT-PCR showed that knockdown of Cdkn1a (p21) expression was maintained through passage 5 (Fig. 4, p<0.05). This effect appears to be specific to p21, as a cell cycle inhibitor from a different family, Ink4a (p16), did not show reduced expression (Fig. 4, p>0.05). In NT cells, the expression of p21 decreased (p<0.05) and p16 was unaffected (p>0.05) with continued passaging, suggesting that iPSC-derived chondrocytes do not upregulate G1/S phase cell cycle inhibitors under the expansion conditions used in this study. The chondrogenic markers type II collagen (Col2a1) and aggrecan (Acan) decreased with monolayer expansion (p<0.05), as expected, and p21 knockdown did not preserve expression of these chondrogenic markers (Fig. 4). The expression of collagens that are not typically expressed by chondrocytes, types I (Col1a1) and X (Col10a1), were also monitored over passage. Knockdown of p21 significantly reduced the expression of Col1a1 at passage 2 (p<0.05), and caused nearly a three-fold reduction in Col10a1 at passage 5 (p<0.05).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

qRT-PCR during cell expansion. mRNA expression of cells either NT (black bars) or expressing p21 shRNA (p21sh, gray bars) was analyzed at passages 2 and 5. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and to passage 2 NT cells. Data from n=6 total combined from two independent cell preparations. Groups not sharing a letter indicate p<0.05.

DNA synthesis and cell content during pellet culture

To determine whether the knockdown of p21 affected the synthesis of new DNA under chondrogenic differentiation conditions, we analyzed the incorporation of BrdU into newly replicated DNA during distinct time periods. When BrdU was provided from the time of pellet formation until day 9, pellets from p5 p21sh cells had an increased percentage of BrdU-positive cells compared with NT cells (representative images in Fig. 5A, quantitative results in 5B, p<0.05). When BrdU was added during days 9–18 or 18–28 of culture, BrdU analysis indicated less proliferation in pellets from p5 p21sh cells compared with days 0–9 (p<0.05), and no significant difference to corresponding NT pellets was found at later time points (p>0.05). Additionally, BrdU incorporation showed no significant differences with time in pellets from p5 NT cells (p>0.05). The BrdU analysis was corroborated by measurements of total DNA content, which was significantly higher in p21sh cells compared with NT cells at day 9 in both p2 and p5 pellets (Fig. 5C, p<0.05). For both p2 and p5 cells, the difference between DNA content in p21sh and NT pellets was maintained at the days 18 and 28 time points (p<0.05), but DNA content decreased in p21sh pellets at day 28 compared with day 9 (p<0.05). Together, these results indicate that p21 knockdown increases the total cells present during the earlier stages of pellet culture. However, DNA synthesis is slowed and cell loss eventually occurs in later stage pellet cultures even with p21 knockdown.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

BrdU incorporation during chondrogenic pellet culture. (A) Passage 5 cells, either NT or expressing p21 shRNA (p21sh), were formed into chondrogenic pellet cultures that were harvested immediately after BrdU treatment windows of days 0–9, 9–18, and 18–28. Representative overlayed fluorescence images show 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained nuclei (blue) and BrdU positive nuclei (red). (B) Percentage of BrdU-positive nuclei in passage 5 pellets harvested immediately after BrdU treatment windows of days 0–9, 9–18, and 18–28. NT, black bars; p21sh, gray bars. Data from n=3 and groups not sharing a letter indicate p<0.05. (C) DNA content measured in pellets digested with papain at days 9, 18, and 28 and expressed as percentage of DNA present at day 0 of pellet formation. Pellets from passage 2 (left) and passage 5 (right) cells shown. Data from n≥5 combined from two independent cell preparations. Groups not sharing a letter indicate p<0.05. BrdU, 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

GAG production

Pellets made with passage 2 NT cells and pellets made with passage 2 p21sh cells contained sulfated GAGs that stained positive for safranin-O, although p21 knockdown enhanced staining at the day 9 time point (Fig. 6A). Pellets made from passage 5 NT cells were small and showed minimal staining, while pellets made from passage 5 p21sh cells were larger and showed significant GAG staining (Fig. 6B). Pellets from passage 2 p21sh cells demonstrated a higher GAG content than pellets from passage 2 NT cells, as assessed via the DMMB assay (Fig. 7A, p<0.05). The higher total GAG content observed in p21sh pellets at the day 18 and 28 time points was likely due to higher cell content, as GAG/DNA levels were similar in the NT and p21sh groups at those latter time points (p>0.05). However, GAG/DNA values at day 9 showed that p21 knockdown did result in greater synthesis of GAGs on a per cell basis in pellets from passage 2 cells (p<0.05). In pellets made with passage 5 cells, p21 knockdown had a dramatic effect on both total GAG and GAG/DNA at all time points (Fig. 7B, p<0.05). The pellets made with passage 5 NT cells showed minimal GAG production compared with pellets made with passage 2 NT cells (p<0.05). In contrast, pellets made with passage 5 p21sh cells showed total GAG and GAG/DNA values that were even higher than levels in pellets made with passage 2 p21sh cells (Fig. 7A vs. Fig. 7B). Together, these data indicate that p21 knockdown maintains the potential for GAG production with extended passaging.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Histology for GAGs. (A) Passage 2 cells, either NT or expressing p21 shRNA (p21sh), were formed into chondrogenic pellet cultures that were harvested at days 9, 18, and 28. Pellets were cryosectioned and stained with safranin-O (sulfated GAGs, red), fast-green (collagen, green), and hematoxylin (nuclei, blue). Images are representative of pellets from two independent cell preparations. (B) Pellets from passage 5 cells cryosectioned and stained as in (A). Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

Quantification of GAG content. (A) Passage 2 cells, either NT (black bars) or expressing p21 shRNA (p21sh, gray bars), were formed into chondrogenic pellet cultures that were harvested at days 9, 18, and 28. Papain-digested samples were analyzed for GAG content by DMMB assay. Data are presented as total GAGs per pellet (left) or GAGs normalized to DNA content (right), combined from n≥5 total from two independent cell preparations. Groups not sharing a letter indicate p<0.05. (B) Pellets from passage 5 cells harvested and analyzed as in (A).

Collagen production

Total collagen content was assessed quantitatively with the hydroxyproline assay, while immunohistochemical labeling for types I, II, and X collagen was used to determine which collagen proteins were produced. Total collagen in the pellet was increased in passage 2 p21sh cells compared with NT cells, but p21 knockdown did not alter the amount of collagen/DNA (Fig. 8, p>0.05). At passage 5, pellets from p21sh cells had higher total collagen at all time points but lower collagen/DNA at days 9 and 18 (p<0.05). Staining for cartilage-specific type II collagen was present in all pellets made from passage 2 cells, even at the day 9 time point (Fig. 9A). Type II collagen labeling was less intense for pellets made from passage 5 NT cells, especially at the day 9 time point, but pellets from passage 5 p21sh cells retained robust staining at all time points (Fig. 9B). Additional labeling was used to assess the relative contribution of collagens indicative of either a fibrocartilage (type I) or the hypertrophic chondrocyte (type X) phenotype. Pellets did not label for the presence of type I collagen except in passage 5 pellets made from NT cells, which showed labeling at the periphery and in the center of the pellets at all time points (Fig. 10B). The presence of type X collagen was investigated at day 28 and NT pellets showed enhanced labeling as compared to pellets from p21sh cells at both passages, with greater labeling at passage 5 (Fig. 10C). The immunohistochemistry findings showed that the predominant collagen in all pellets was type II collagen, with some contribution of types I and X collagen in p5 pellets.

FIG. 8.

FIG. 8.

Quantification of total collagen content. (A) Passage 2 cells, either NT (black bars) or expressing p21 shRNA (p21sh, gray bars), were formed into chondrogenic pellet cultures that were harvested at days 9, 18, and 28. Papain-digested samples were analyzed for total collagen content by hydroxyproline assay. Data are presented as total collagen per pellet (left) or total collagen normalized to DNA content (right), combined from n≥5 total from two independent cell preparations. Groups not sharing a letter indicate p<0.05. (B) Pellets from passage 5 cells harvested and analyzed as in (A).

FIG. 9.

FIG. 9.

Immunohistochemistry for type II collagen. (A) Passage 2 cells, either NT or expressing p21 shRNA (p21sh), were formed into chondrogenic pellet cultures that were harvested at days 9, 18, and 28. Pellets were cryosectioned and labeled with primary antibody to type II collagen (red) and hematoxylin (nucleus, blue). Images are representative of pellets from two independent cell preparations. (B) Pellets from passage 5 cells cryosectioned and labeled as in (A). Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

FIG. 10.

FIG. 10.

Immunohistochemistry for type I and type X collagen. (A) Passage 2 cells, either NT or expressing p21 shRNA (p21sh), were formed into chondrogenic pellet cultures that were harvested at days 9, 18, and 28. Pellets were cryosectioned and labeled with primary antibody to type I collagen (red) and hematoxylin (nucleus, blue). Images are representative of pellets from two independent cell preparations. (B) Pellets from passage 5 cells were cryosectioned and labeled for type I collagen as in (A). (C) Pellets from passage 2 (left) or passage 5 (right) cells were harvested at day 28, cryosectioned, and stained for type X collagen (red) and hematoxylin (nucleus, blue). Images representative of pellets from two independent cell preparations. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

Discussion

Cartilage tissue engineering necessitates a cell source that can maintain chondrogenic potential even after the monolayer expansion that is often required to provide sufficient cell quantities. We showed that knockdown of the cell cycle inhibitor p21 preserved the potential of iPSC-derived chondrocytes to synthesize GAGs after three additional passages that increased the cell number by nearly 150-fold. Furthermore, p21 knockdown allowed the cells to remain in the cell cycle during initial stages of chondrogenic differentiation in 3D culture without sacrificing matrix synthesis. These results support the feasibility of an approach for generating a sufficient supply of chondrogenic cells for tissue engineering strategies: (1) iPSCs provide a self-renewing starting cell population that is genetically matched to the donor without an invasive tissue harvest; (2) multi-step differentiation and purification protocols provide an intermediate cell stock that can undergo quality control characterization; (3) p21 knockdown can be utilized for significant monolayer expansion and continued proliferation without a loss of GAG synthesis in a 3D engineered construct.

The most dramatic effect of p21 knockdown in this study was the preservation of chondrogenic potential over extensive passaging. While undifferentiated iPSCs show virtually unlimited expansion potential, our previous studies indicated that twice-passaged iPSC-derived chondrocytes generated the most robust cartilage matrix in this system,21 and this study confirmed that pellets from passage 5 cells had reduced production of GAGs and decreased staining for type II collagen. However, p21 knockdown during expansion eliminated the loss in subsequent GAG production, with even higher levels of total GAG and GAG per cell from passage 5 p21sh cells compared with pellets from passage 2 cells with or without p21 knockdown. Our findings that altering p21 levels affects the expansion rates and GAG production of iPSC-derived chondrocytes are consistent with previous results in human MSCs showing that reduced p21 expression through the use of hypoxia, growth factors, or siRNA can increase both proliferative and differentiation potential.24,25,38

An important result of p21 silencing was attenuation of the sharp decrease in cell number associated with early stages of pellet culture in control cells, a phenomenon that also occurs in other cell types.29 BrdU staining indicated that increased DNA synthesis was one factor in the higher DNA content of pellets from p5 p21sh cells compared with controls, but silencing p21 may also have played a role in modulating cell survival. It is also important to note that DNA synthesis did decrease in p21sh cells after the first 9 days of pellet culture and that cell loss did occur in this group by day 28. Cell density is an important variable in the process of chondrogenesis for a variety of cell types due to signaling pathways active in cartilage development (reviewed in Bobick et al.39), and it is possible that the effects of p21 knockdown on GAG synthesis were at least partially due to altering the cellular dynamics during early pellet culture. Further investigation using hydrogels that can be modified to isolate variables such as cell density and cell–matrix interactions would be valuable in pursuing this question.40

Upregulation of cell cycle inhibitors during in vitro expansion is believed to contribute to cellular senescence,25,41 and levels of p21 expression are involved in guiding cell fate decisions regarding cell cycle reentry, temporary exit, or permanent exit associated with senescence.22,42 The role for p21 in mediating the cell cycle during chondrogenic differentiation is supported by studies with mouse chondroprogenitor lines43–45 and from observations of developmental abnormalities related to cartilage growth.46 Interestingly, we showed dramatic effects of p21 knockdown on chondrogenesis despite the observation that NT iPSC-derived chondrocytes continue to expand in monolayer and the mRNA expression of p21 or p16Ink4a did not increase with passage. Furthermore, p21 knockdown preserved GAG synthesis in subsequent pellet culture without preventing the loss of chondrogenic gene expression during monolayer expansion, as Col2a1 and Acan decreased similarly with further expansion in both groups. This observation is similar to experiments with human articular chondrocytes that show bFGF treatment does not prevent de-differentiation in culture but does enhance the ability of cells to redifferentiate when placed in appropriate conditions.47–50 These data suggest that p21 may interact with one of the many signaling pathways controlled by cell–matrix interactions during the chondrogenesis of stem cells.51 The contrast between the effects of p21 knockdown during two-dimensional and 3D culture extends to the regulation of collagens associated with fibroblastic (type I) and hypertrophic chondrocyte (type X) phenotypes, as knockdown resulted in modest changes in monolayer gene expression but did alter the degree of immunohistochemical staining of these collagen types in p5 pellets. Additional studies are needed to define the molecular pathways by which reduced p21 levels specifically modulate chondrogenic differentiation and to determine how a single factor regulates both cell expansion and the capacity for subsequent matrix synthesis.

The use of a cell source that can be significantly expanded before subsequent differentiation presents new possibilities compared to differentiated cells or adult stem cells. One such possibility is generating individual lots of chondrogenic cells that could serve a large number of patients, with the advantage of reduced cost in terms of lot characterization. Notably, this strategy is consistent with an emerging concept that the clinical application of iPSCs will benefit from proliferative intermediate cell populations that can be frozen and stored to allow for quality control of every lot.52 The feasibility of using allogeneic adult stem cell transplantation for musculoskeletal applications has been demonstrated in clinical trials,53 but using iPSC-derived chondrocytes with appropriate expansion would allow for larger lots that could be immunologically matched to a significant percentage of the population.54 A second possibility is obtaining sufficient cell numbers to move from developing tissue engineering solutions for cartilage defects to whole joint resurfacing strategies for patients with widespread OA. The average defect in ACI procedures is ∼5 cm2 and requires ∼12 million cells,13,55 but the restoration of an entire joint surface would most likely involve a large scaffold seeded at high density and would therefore require significantly more cells.6 The features of continued cell expansion in a 3D context and rapid matrix production indicate that this cell source may be particularly well suited for use with scaffolds designed to limit or eliminate in vitro culture before implantation.56,57 Furthermore, iPSCs can be derived from OA patients58,59 and thus allow for autologous approaches to treatment of widespread joint disease.

While iPSCs have several advantages as a starting cell source,12 the manner in which pluripotent cell lines are derived affects the potential for uncontrolled growth and some established lines display tumorigenic potential during chondrogenic differentiation.60 Efforts to derive iPSCs from adult chondrocytes using nonintegrating methods such as mRNA delivery may address some of these concerns,61 and methods to isolate successfully differentiated cells can add additional control over the phenotype of cells transplanted for therapy.62,63 Indeed, the multi-step differentiation strategy employed in this study uses positive selection with a Col2 reporter as an additional safeguard to exclude nondifferentiated iPSCs. The paradigm of producing differentiated cell types from human iPSCs for clinical applications is being established in the use of retinal pigment epithelium for age-related macular degeneration,64 with encouraging preclinical safety profiles being used as the basis for clinical trials.

One potential concern with utilizing the knockdown of a cell cycle inhibitor is that this approach may increase the oncogenic risk, as spontaneous tumorigenesis has an incidence of 40% at 16 months in mice with germline knockouts of p21.65 However, reduced p21 levels alone have not been associated with increased formation of tumors of mesenchymal origin65–67 and germline knockouts of p21 demonstrate increased tumor latency compared with similar studies performed with germline knockouts of p53 or p16Ink4a.68,69 Importantly, our study shows that the growth advantage conferred by reducing p21 expression is mostly present during monolayer expansion and lessens with time during chondrogenic pellet culture. This knowledge should help inform future strategies that may build on this work by using transient means to alter p21 levels, such as the development of small molecule inhibitors to temporarily block p21 activity. Systems designed for temporary reduction of p21 levels would alleviate concerns that p21 silencing may increase the risk of tumor formation. The use of means other than viral transduction to manipulate the cell cycle would also avoid effects of the transduction process itself, as we noted an increase in protein levels of p21 and reduced chondrogenesis after treatment with a scrambled shRNA sequence that has no homology to the mouse transcriptome.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the cell cycle inhibitor p21 can be targeted to augment the proliferation and tissue production by chondrogenically differentiated iPSCs. Silencing p21 with RNA interference resulted in higher monolayer expansion rates of differentiated iPSCs and limited the extent of cell loss that occurred during early cartilage pellet culture. Unlike control cells, iPSCs with reduced p21 levels maintained the ability to synthesize a high level of GAGs even after extensive monolayer expansion. These findings provide a potential strategy for enhancing the regenerative capability of donor cell sources for cartilage tissue engineering strategies.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data
Supp_Data.pdf (16.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

Supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants OD008586, AR061042, AR50245, AR48852, AG15768, AG46927, AR48182, and AR065956; NSF grant CBET-1151035; the Nancy Taylor Foundation for Chronic Diseases; the Collaborative Research Center, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland,; the AOSpine Foundation; and the Arthritis Foundation. Training was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (B.O.D., P.I.T.); an American Heart Association Predoctoral Fellowship (P.I.T.); NIH T32AI007217 (V.P.W.); an Arthritis Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship (V.P.W.); and the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (N.C.).

Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.Mow V.C., and Ratcliffe A.Structure and function of articular cartilage. In: Mow V.C., and Hayes W.C., eds. Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997, pp. 113–177 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Loeser R.F., Goldring S.R., Scanzello C.R., and Goldring M.B.Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum 64,1697, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cicuttini F., Ding C., Wluka A., Davis S., Ebeling P.R., and Jones G.Association of cartilage defects with loss of knee cartilage in healthy, middle-age adults: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 52,2033, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hjelle K., Solheim E., Strand T., Muri R., and Brittberg M.Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 18,730, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hunziker E.B.Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 10,432, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Johnstone B., Alini M., Cucchiarini M., Dodge G.R., Eglin D., Guilak F., et al. Tissue engineering for articular cartilage repair—the state of the art. Eur Cells Mater 25,248, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peterson L., Brittberg M., Kiviranta I., Akerlund E.L., and Lindahl A.Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability. Am J Sports Med 30,2, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dickhut A., Pelttari K., Janicki P., Wagner W., Eckstein V., Egermann M., et al. Calcification or dedifferentiation: requirement to lock mesenchymal stem cells in a desired differentiation stage. J Cell Physiol 219,219, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pelttari K., Winter A., Steck E., Goetzke K., Hennig T., Ochs B.G., et al. Premature induction of hypertrophy during in vitro chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells correlates with calcification and vascular invasion after ectopic transplantation in SCID mice. Arthritis Rheum 54,3254, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hennig T., Lorenz H., Thiel A., Goetzke K., Dickhut A., Geiger F., et al. Reduced chondrogenic potential of adipose tissue derived stromal cells correlates with an altered TGFbeta receptor and BMP profile and is overcome by BMP-6. J Cell Physiol 211,682, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Diekman B.O., Rowland C.R., Lennon D.P., Caplan A.I., and Guilak F.Chondrogenesis of adult stem cells from adipose tissue and bone marrow: induction by growth factors and cartilage-derived matrix. Tissue Eng Part A 16,523, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cheng A., Hardingham T.E., and Kimber S.J.Generating cartilage repair from pluripotent stem cells. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 20,257, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Batty L., Dance S., Bajaj S., and Cole B.J.Autologous chondrocyte implantation: an overview of technique and outcomes. ANZ J Surg 81,18, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gosset M., Berenbaum F., Thirion S., and Jacques C.Primary culture and phenotyping of murine chondrocytes. Nat Protoc 3,1253, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Benya P.D., Padilla S.R., and Nimni M.E.Independent regulation of collagen types by chondrocytes during the loss of differentiated function in culture. Cell 15,1313, 1978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.von der Mark K., Gauss V., von der Mark H., and Muller P.Relationship between cell shape and type of collagen synthesised as chondrocytes lose their cartilage phenotype in culture. Nature 267,531, 1977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Benya P.D., and Shaffer J.D.Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels. Cell 30,215, 1982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Darling E.M., and Athanasiou K.A.Rapid phenotypic changes in passaged articular chondrocyte subpopulations. J Orthop Res 23,425, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Solchaga L.A., Penick K., Goldberg V.M., Caplan A.I., and Welter J.F.Fibroblast growth factor-2 enhances proliferation and delays loss of chondrogenic potential in human adult bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A 16,1009, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Estes B.T., Wu A.W., Storms R.W., and Guilak F.Extended passaging, but not aldehyde dehydrogenase activity, increases the chondrogenic potential of human adipose-derived adult stem cells. J Cell Physiol 209,987, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Diekman B.O., Christoforou N., Willard V.P., Sun H., Sanchez-Adams J., Leong K.W., et al. Cartilage tissue engineering using differentiated and purified induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109,19172, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chang B.D., Watanabe K., Broude E.V., Fang J., Poole J.C., Kalinichenko T.V., et al. Effects of p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 on cellular gene expression: implications for carcinogenesis, senescence, and age-related diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97,4291, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harper J.W., Adami G.R., Wei N., Keyomarsi K., and Elledge S.J.The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell 75,805, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dombrowski C., Helledie T., Ling L., Grunert M., Canning C.A., Jones C.M., et al. FGFR1 signaling stimulates proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells by inhibiting the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors P21 and P27. Stem Cells 31,2724, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tsai C.C., Chen Y.J., Yew T.L., Chen L.L., Wang J.Y., Chiu C.H., et al. Hypoxia inhibits senescence and maintains mesenchymal stem cell properties through down-regulation of E2A-p21 by HIF-TWIST. Blood 117,459, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ito T., Sawada R., Fujiwara Y., Seyama Y., and Tsuchiya T.FGF-2 suppresses cellular senescence of human mesenchymal stem cells by down-regulation of TGF-beta2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 359,108, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bedelbaeva K., Snyder A., Gourevitch D., Clark L., Zhang X.M., Leferovich J., et al. Lack of p21 expression links cell cycle control and appendage regeneration in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107,5845, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kronenberg H.M.Developmental regulation of the growth plate. Nature 423,332, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dexheimer V., Frank S., and Richter W.Proliferation as a requirement for in vitro chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 21,2160, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Carey B.W., Markoulaki S., Hanna J., Saha K., Gao Q., Mitalipova M., et al. Reprogramming of murine and human somatic cells using a single polycistronic vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106,157, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Grant T.D., Cho J., Ariail K.S., Weksler N.B., Smith R.W., and Horton W.A.Col2-GFP reporter marks chondrocyte lineage and chondrogenesis during mouse skeletal development. Dev Dyn 218,394, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wiznerowicz M., and Trono D.Conditional suppression of cellular genes: lentivirus vector-mediated drug-inducible RNA interference. J Virol 77,8957, 2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pajalunga D., Mazzola A., Salzano A.M., Biferi M.G., De Luca G., and Crescenzi M.Critical requirement for cell cycle inhibitors in sustaining nonproliferative states. J Cell Biol 176,807, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Salmon P., and Trono D.Production and titration of lentiviral vectors. In: Crawley J.N., et al., eds. Current Protocols in Neuroscience. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006, pp. 4.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pozarowski P., and Darzynkiewicz Z.Analysis of cell cycle by flow cytometry. Methods Mol Biol 281,301, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Estes B.T., Diekman B.O., Gimble J.M., and Guilak F.Isolation of adipose-derived stem cells and their induction to a chondrogenic phenotype. Nat Protoc 5,1294, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Detamore M.S., and Athanasiou K.A.Effects of growth factors on temporomandibular joint disc cells. Arch Oral Biol 49,577, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yew T.L., Chiu F.Y., Tsai C.C., Chen H.L., Lee W.P., Chen Y.J., et al. Knockdown of p21(Cip1/Waf1) enhances proliferation, the expression of stemness markers, and osteogenic potential in human mesenchymal stem cells. Aging Cell 10,349, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bobick B.E., Chen F.H., Le A.M., and Tuan R.S.Regulation of the chondrogenic phenotype in culture. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 87,351, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kloxin A.M., Kasko A.M., Salinas C.N., and Anseth K.S.Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties. Science 324,59, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shibata K.R., Aoyama T., Shima Y., Fukiage K., Otsuka S., Furu M., et al. Expression of the p16INK4A gene is associated closely with senescence of human mesenchymal stem cells and is potentially silenced by DNA methylation during in vitro expansion. Stem Cells 25,2371, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Spencer S.L., Cappell S.D., Tsai F.C., Overton K.W., Wang C.L., and Meyer T.The proliferation-quiescence decision is controlled by a bifurcation in CDK2 activity at mitotic exit. Cell 155,369, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Negishi Y., Ui N., Nakajima M., Kawashima K., Maruyama K., Takizawa T., et al. p21Cip-1/SDI-1/WAF-1 gene is involved in chondrogenic differentiation of ATDC5 cells in vitro. J Biol Chem 276,33249, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Owen H.C., Ahmed S.F., and Farquharson C.Chondrocyte p21(WAF1/CIP1) expression is increased by dexamethasone but does not contribute to dexamethasone-induced growth retardation in vivo. Calcif Tissue Int 85,326, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Simsa-Maziel S., and Monsonego-Ornan E.Interleukin-1beta promotes proliferation and inhibits differentiation of chondrocytes through a mechanism involving down-regulation of FGFR-3 and p21. Endocrinology 153,2296, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Su W.C., Kitagawa M., Xue N., Xie B., Garofalo S., Cho J., et al. Activation of Stat1 by mutant fibroblast growth-factor receptor in thanatophoric dysplasia type II dwarfism. Nature 386,288, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jakob M., Demarteau O., Schafer D., Hintermann B., Dick W., Heberer M., et al. Specific growth factors during the expansion and redifferentiation of adult human articular chondrocytes enhance chondrogenesis and cartilaginous tissue formation in vitro. J Cell Biochem 81,368, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barbero A., Ploegert S., Heberer M., and Martin I.Plasticity of clonal populations of dedifferentiated adult human articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum 48,1315.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Martin I., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Yang J., Langer R., and Freed L.E.Mammalian chondrocytes expanded in the presence of fibroblast growth factor 2 maintain the ability to differentiate and regenerate three-dimensional cartilaginous tissue. Exp Cell Res 253,681, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bradham D.M., and Horton W.E., Jr In vivo cartilage formation from growth factor modulated articular chondrocytes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 239,1998 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Guilak F., Cohen D.M., Estes B.T., Gimble J.M., Liedtke W., and Chen C.S.Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 5,17, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen K.G., Mallon B.S., McKay R.D., and Robey P.G.Human pluripotent stem cell culture: considerations for maintenance, expansion, and therapeutics. Cell Stem Cell 14,13, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Vangsness C.T., Jr., Farr J., II, Boyd J., Dellaero D.T., Mills C.R., and Leroux-Williams M.Adult human mesenchymal stem cells delivered via intra-articular injection to the knee following partial medial meniscectomy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96,90, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gourraud P.A., Gilson L., Girard M., and Peschanski M.The role of human leukocyte antigen matching in the development of multiethnic “haplobank” of induced pluripotent stem cell lines. Stem Cells 30,180, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jones D.G., and Peterson L.Autologous chondrocyte implantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88,2502, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Moutos F.T., Freed L.E., and Guilak F.A biomimetic three-dimensional woven composite scaffold for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Nat Mater 6,162, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Brunger J.M., Huynh N.P., Guenther C.M., Perez-Pinera P., Moutos F.T., Sanchez-Adams J., et al. Scaffold-mediated lentiviral transduction for functional tissue engineering of cartilage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111,E798, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kim M.J., Son M.J., Son M.Y., Seol B., Kim J., Park J., et al. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from osteoarthritis patient-derived synovial cells. Arthritis Rheum 63,3010, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wei Y., Zeng W., Wan R., Wang J., Zhou Q., Qiu S., et al. Chondrogenic differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells from osteoarthritic chondrocytes in alginate matrix. Eur Cells Mater 23,1, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yamashita A., Liu S., Woltjen K., Thomas B., Meng G., Hotta A., et al. Cartilage tissue engineering identifies abnormal human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep 3,1978, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Borestrom C., Simonsson S., Enochson L., Bigdeli N., Brantsing C., Ellerstrom C., et al. Footprint-free human induced pluripotent stem cells from articular cartilage with redifferentiation capacity: a first step toward a clinical-grade cell source. Stem Cells Transl Med 3,433, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xin X., Jiang X., Wang L., Stover M.L., Zhan S., Huang J., et al. A site-specific integrated Col2.3GFP reporter identifies osteoblasts within mineralized tissue formed in vivo by human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 3,1125, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Blin G., Nury D., Stefanovic S., Neri T., Guillevic O., Brinon B., et al. A purified population of multipotent cardiovascular progenitors derived from primate pluripotent stem cells engrafts in postmyocardial infarcted nonhuman primates. J Clin Invest 120,1125, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kamao H., Mandai M., Okamoto S., Sakai N., Suga A., Sugita S., et al. Characterization of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium cell sheets aiming for clinical application. Stem Cell Rep 2,205, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Martin-Caballero J., Flores J.M., Garcia-Palencia P., and Serrano M.Tumor susceptibility of p21(Waf1/Cip1)-deficient mice. Cancer Res 61,6234, 2001 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rodriguez R., Rubio R., Masip M., Catalina P., Nieto A., de la Cueva T.,et al. Loss of p53 induces tumorigenesis in p21-deficient mesenchymal stem cells. Neoplasia 11,397, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Abbas T., and Dutta A.p21 in cancer: intricate networks and multiple activities. Nat Rev Cancer 9,400, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Harvey M., McArthur M.J., Montgomery C.A., Jr, Butel J.S., Bradley A., and Donehower L.A.Spontaneous and carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis in p53-deficient mice. Nat Genet 5,225, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sharpless N.E., Bardeesy N., Lee K.H., Carrasco D., Castrillon D.H., Aguirre A.J., et al. Loss of p16Ink4a with retention of p19Arf predisposes mice to tumorigenesis. Nature 413,86, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data
Supp_Data.pdf (16.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Tissue Engineering. Part A are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES