Abstract
Antiretroviral neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses are often evaluated in the absence of Fc-dependent immune effectors. In murine Friend retrovirus infection, Apobec3/Rfv3 promotes a potent polyclonal NAb response. Here, we show that the Apobec3/Rfv3-dependent NAb response correlated with virus-specific IgG2 titers and that the in vivo neutralization potency of Apobec3/Rfv3-resistant antisera was dependent on activating Fcγ receptors but not complement. The data strengthen retroviral vaccine strategies aimed at eliciting NAbs that activate specific Fcγ receptors.
TEXT
Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are critical for an effective vaccine response (1). However, antibody neutralization is often evaluated in vitro in the absence of immune cells (2). In vivo, the crystallizable fragment of IgG (Fcγ) can trigger innate immune effectors to neutralize the pathogen. Cross-linking of Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) on the surface of effector leukocytes can induce antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) of immune complexes or antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) of infected cells (3). Fcγ also activates the complement cascade leading to the lysis or opsonization of immune complexes (4). Recent studies show that the in vivo activity of HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) is highly dependent on interactions with FcγRs but not complement (5, 6). However, it remains unclear whether a polyclonal NAb response, such as one elicited by a vaccine, would have similar requirements.
Mouse models of retroviral infection provide a genetically tractable system to investigate the role of Fcγ-mediated effector mechanisms. Mice carry three activating FcγRs (i.e., FcγRI, FcγRIII, and FcγRIV), each of which consists of an Fcγ-binding α-chain and a signal-transducing common γ-chain. Mice deficient in the common γ-chain (Fcer1g−/−) lack surface expression of the activating FcγRs and produce macrophages and NK cells abrogated in ADCP and ADCC activity, respectively (3, 7). The murine IgG subclasses IgG1, IgG2a (and its equivalent in C57BL/6 [B6] mice, IgG2c), IgG2b, and IgG3 exhibit various affinities to each FcγR, resulting in different potencies in vivo. IgG2a and IgG2b (referred to here as IgG2) are the most potent in autoimmune and tumor models (8). Of note, FcγRIV exclusively binds IgG2 (9), and the in vivo activity of IgG2 is impaired in mice deficient in the α-chain of FcγRIV (Fcgr4−/−) (10).
Friend retrovirus (FV) infection in mice is a well-characterized model to investigate retroviral immunity. FV is a complex of a replication-competent Friend murine leukemia virus (F-MuLV) and a replication-defective spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV) that causes erythroleukemia in adult immunocompetent mice (11). Our group and others showed that mouse APOBEC3 (mA3) encodes Recovery from Friend retrovirus 3 (Rfv3), a gene that influences the recovery from viremia by promoting a stronger NAb response (12). Rfv3-resistant mice such as B6 express about 10-fold more mA3 mRNA than Rfv3-susceptible strains such as BALB/c and A.BY mice (13). As in other viral systems, the data on the antibody neutralization differences between mA3/Rfv3-resistant and -susceptible mice were based on in vitro NAb assays (12, 14, 15). The mA3/Rfv3 paradigm thus provides a potentially useful system to confirm whether in vitro neutralization predicts in vivo neutralization and, through the use of gene knockout (KO) mice, directly test the role of Fc effectors in polyclonal antibody neutralization.
Rfv3 was originally defined in (B6 × A.BY)F1 mice that are highly susceptible to infection with FV containing lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (LDV) but eventually recover from viremia and splenomegalic disease (16). We showed that deletion of B6 mA3 in (B6 × A.BY)F1 mice resulted in weaker NAb responses and abrogated recovery from viremia and disease by 28 days postinfection (dpi) (14, 17). Removal of B6 mA3 in a pure B6 genetic background also resulted in weaker NAb responses (14, 15). However, B6 mice are Fv2 resistant, and thus, splenomegalic disease does not occur (18). To more closely capture conditions resulting in immune pathology that is countered by mA3/Rfv3, we infected (B6 × A.BY)F1 mice (referred to as mA3+/s) and (B6 mA3−/− × A.BY)F1 mice (referred to as mA3−/s) with 1,400 spleen focus-forming units (SFFU) of FV/LDV and then harvested and heat-inactivated plasma at 28 dpi (Fig. 1A). Mice (<1 year of age) were handled in accordance with IACUC guidelines [permit B-89709(10)1E]. As expected, mA3+/s antisera had significantly higher NAb titers using a previously described in vitro NAb assay (Fig. 1B) (12, 14, 15). Antisera were pooled at equal volumes, and 3 μl of pooled antisera was coincubated with 140 SFFU of FV in 300 μl for 1 h at 37°C prior to administration in susceptible BALB/c mice. At 7 dpi, the percentages of infected bone marrow cells were evaluated by flow cytometry using a monoclonal antibody (MAb) against the FV glyco-gag protein (Fig. 1A) (19). Compared to control sera from uninfected mice, mA3+/s antisera conferred significant protection, whereas mA3−/s antisera did not (Fig. 1C). Thus, the mA3/Rfv3-dependent NAb response was recapitulated by passive transfer in vivo. We note that the in vivo neutralization potency of mA3+/s antisera at a 1:100 dilution is likely an underestimation in the mice that generated these antibodies, as we were unable to utilize neat plasma due to the limited amounts of plasma that can be obtained from individual mice.
FIG 1.

Rfv3-dependent antibody neutralization in vitro and in vivo. (A) Overview of FV NAb assays. (B6 × A.BY)F1 and (B6 mA3−/− × A.BY)F1 mice (n = 8 and n = 7, respectively) were infected with 1,400 SFFU of FV/LDV. At 28 dpi, plasma was harvested and heat inactivated. (B) In vitro neutralization titers of individual plasma samples. The 75% inhibitory concentration (IC75) values per plasma sample are shown. Solid lines represent mean values. The data passed the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) normality test (P < 0.05); thus, the differences were evaluated using a 2-tailed unpaired Student's t test. (C) In vivo neutralization by pooled plasma. Plasma samples were pooled at equal volumes and then incubated with 140 SFFU of FV prior to injection into BALB/c mice. Control plasma was derived from uninfected mA3+/s mice. At 7 dpi, bone marrow cells were harvested from the BALB/c mice and the percentage of FV-infected cells was quantified by flow cytometry. Each column represents the mean percentage of infected bone marrow cells. The numbers of BALB/c mice used (n) are shown. Error bars correspond to standard deviations (SD). The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P = 0.0046), followed by Tukey's multiple comparison posttest. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, not significant.
We recently derived and characterized 176 FV-specific MAbs from mA3+/s and mA3−/s mice at 21 and 28 dpi (20) (Fig. 2A). We observed a trend for higher levels of IgG2 MAbs in mA3+/s mice than in mA3−/s mice but not for the other isotypes or IgG subclasses (Fig. 2A). To test if infected mA3+/s mice produce higher titers of FV-specific IgG2 antibodies, we quantified virus-specific titers of the different isotypes and IgG subclasses by endpoint titration enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (19). mA3+/s mice produced higher levels of virus-specific IgG2 against native virions than mA3−/s mice but similar IgG1, IgG3, and IgM titers (Fig. 2B). Similar results were observed for a different genetic background, (B6 × BALB/c)F1 (Fig. 2C). These data suggest that mA3/Rfv3 resistance is associated with higher IgG2 titers against native virions.
FIG 2.

The mA3/Rfv3-dependent NAb response correlates with higher IgG2 FV binding titers. (A) Characterization of FV-specific MAbs. MAbs (n = 1,109) generated from mA3+/s and mA3−/s mice at 21 and 28 dpi (20) were screened for reactivity to FV virions by ELISA; signals 2.5× the background level were considered positive. The numbers of FV-specific MAbs that could be categorized as IgM, IgA, or a specific IgG subclass by ELISA or sequencing are shown. Percentages are shown in parentheses. Differences between cohorts were evaluated by Fisher's exact test. (B and C) Endpoint-titer ELISAs were performed on antisera from mA3+/s and mA3−/s mice in the (B6 × A.BY)F1 (B) and (B6 × BALB/c)F1 (C) genetic backgrounds. IgG2 corresponds to endpoint titers on ELISAs performed with combined anti-IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG2c conjugates. Data in panels B and C were first evaluated using the K-S normality test. Two panels with non-Gaussian (NG) data were analyzed using a 2-tailed nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, and medians were used as a measure of central tendency (solid lines). The other data sets had normal distributions and were analyzed using a 2-tailed unpaired Student's t test, with solid lines corresponding to mean values. **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05; ns, not significant. The arrow in panel C corresponds to a data point that was a significant outlier using Grubb's test (P < 0.05). Removal of this data point still resulted in a significant difference between the 2 cohorts (P = 0.018).
To test if the in vivo potency of mA3/Rfv3-resistant antisera is dependent on FcγRs or complement, we performed an in vivo neutralization assay in common-γ-chain KO (B6 Fcer1g−/−) (7) and complement component 3 KO (B6 C3−/−) mice (21). Pooled 28-dpi antisera from FV-infected mA3+/s or uninfected mice (3 μl) were incubated with 100 SFFU of FV prior to injection into B6 wild-type (WT), B6 Fcer1g−/−, or B6 C3−/− mice (Fig. 3A). At 7 dpi, splenocytes were harvested and evaluated for infection levels using a spleen infectious-center (IC) assay (13). For each host genetic background, the in vivo neutralization potency of mA3+/s antisera was compared to that of control antisera from uninfected mice. B6 WT mice were significantly protected by the mA3+/s antisera, but B6 Fcer1g−/− mice were not (Fig. 3B). Of note, we detected lower viral loads in the B6 C3−/− mice, consistent with enhanced FV infection of B cells through complement opsonization (22). Interestingly, mA3+/s antisera significantly protected B6 C3−/− mice. These results suggested that FcγR, but not complement, was required for the neutralization activity of mA3/Rfv3-resistant antisera in vivo.
FIG 3.

Antisera from Rfv3-resistant mice require Fcγ-mediated effectors to neutralize FV in vivo. (A) Overview of in vivo NAb assay. Pooled antisera from mA3+/s mice at 28 dpi or control antisera from uninfected mA3+/s mice were incubated with 100 SFFU of FV prior to inoculation of various strains of B6 mice. At 7 dpi, splenocytes were harvested and subjected to spleen infectious-center assays. (B) Recipient mice included B6 WT, B6 Fcer1g−/−, B6 C3−/−, and B6 Fcgr4−/− mice. Infectious centers per spleen are shown, where each dot represents spleen from one mouse. Bars represent medians, and differences were evaluated by the 2-tailed nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05; ns, not significant.
The characterization of several FV-specific MAbs in the early 1980s suggested that IgG2 MAbs may be particularly effective at neutralizing FV in vitro and in vivo (23). However, the contribution of IgG2 antibodies in the in vivo neutralization activity of mA3/Rfv3-resistant antisera remains unclear. To selectively assess the role of FcγR-mediated effectors induced by IgG2 antibodies, we performed passive immunization studies in B6 Fcgr4−/− mice (10) and found no significant protection in these mice (Fig. 3B). These data suggested that the in vivo activity of mA3/Rfv3-resistant antisera depends on the interactions between IgG2 antibodies and FcγRIV.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that the mA3/Rfv3-dependent NAb response can be recapitulated by passive transfer in vivo. Notably, the passive protection conferred by anti-FV polyclonal NAbs was dependent on activating FcγRs but not complement. These results parallel data obtained for monoclonal bNAbs against HIV-1 (5, 6), suggesting that FcγR-mediated effector mechanisms are evolutionarily conserved processes for IgG-mediated retroviral clearance and play an important role even if multiple B cell epitopes are targeted simultaneously. Of note, our findings seemed at odds with a recent report that concluded that antibody class switching—and, by extension, IgG antibodies—is dispensable for recovery from FV infection (24). However, the first part of this study utilized B6 mice, which are Fv2 resistant and spontaneously recover. Fv2-susceptible (B6 × BALB/c)F1 mice were also studied at 14 dpi, but potent FV IgG NAbs do not develop until later (14, 25). We analyzed neutralizing antisera from Fv2-susceptible mice at 28 dpi to directly link our data to immune recovery mediated by mA3/Rfv3.
Interestingly, mA3/Rfv3 resistance was associated with higher FV-specific IgG2 titers. Moreover, in vivo passive protection was dependent on FcγRIV, suggesting a central role for IgG2 antibodies in plasma neutralization. Although uninfected B6 mA3−/− mice do not have defects in antibody class switching (26), mA3 could enhance IgG somatic hypermutation during FV infection (20). Thus, mA3 may directly enhance IgG2 class switching. Alternatively, the increased number of infectious virions in mA3−/s mice (19, 27) may lead to deregulated class switching. Further studies are needed to determine which FcγRIV-expressing cells are required for in vivo antibody neutralization. Overall, our findings support the emerging concept that retroviral vaccines should account not only for direct antibody neutralization but also for the ability to activate specific Fcγ receptors through the induction of the appropriate IgG subclasses.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank J. V. Ravetch, K. J. Hasenkrug, R. Pelanda, L. van Dyk, E. Janoff, and B. Palmer for reagents, technical advice, and/or assistance.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 AI090795 and R21 AI112418 (to M.L.S.) and the University of Colorado Department of Medicine Early Career Scholar Program (to M.L.S.). K.H. was the recipient of a Robert D. Watkins Predoctoral Fellowship from the American Society for Microbiology.
K.H. and M.L.S. designed the research; K.H., B.S.B., K.J.H., and M.L.S. performed the research; T.E.M. contributed reagents and expertise; K.H., B.S.B., K.J.H., and M.L.S. analyzed data; K.H. and M.L.S. wrote the paper; and M.L.S. supervised the work.
REFERENCES
- 1.Excler JL, Ake J, Robb ML, Kim JH, Plotkin SA. 2014. Nonneutralizing functional antibodies: a new “old” paradigm for HIV vaccines. Clin Vaccine Immunol 21:1023–1036. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00230-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.deCamp A, Hraber P, Bailer RT, Seaman MS, Ochsenbauer C, Kappes J, Gottardo R, Edlefsen P, Self S, Tang H, Greene K, Gao H, Daniell X, Sarzotti-Kelsoe M, Gorny MK, Zolla-Pazner S, LaBranche CC, Mascola JR, Korber BT, Montefiori DC. 2014. Global panel of HIV-1 Env reference strains for standardized assessments of vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies. J Virol 88:2489–2507. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02853-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. 2008. Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 8:34–47. doi: 10.1038/nri2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stoermer KA, Morrison TE. 2011. Complement and viral pathogenesis. Virology 411:362–373. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.12.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hessell AJ, Hangartner L, Hunter M, Havenith CE, Beurskens FJ, Bakker JM, Lanigan CM, Landucci G, Forthal DN, Parren PW, Marx PA, Burton DR. 2007. Fc receptor but not complement binding is important in antibody protection against HIV. Nature 449:101–104. doi: 10.1038/nature06106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bournazos S, Klein F, Pietzsch J, Seaman MS, Nussenzweig MC, Ravetch JV. 2014. Broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 antibodies require Fc effector functions for in vivo activity. Cell 158:1243–1253. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Takai T, Li M, Sylvestre D, Clynes R, Ravetch JV. 1994. FcR gamma chain deletion results in pleiotrophic effector cell defects. Cell 76:519–529. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90115-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. 2005. Divergent immunoglobulin g subclass activity through selective Fc receptor binding. Science 310:1510–1512. doi: 10.1126/science.1118948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nimmerjahn F, Bruhns P, Horiuchi K, Ravetch JV. 2005. FcgammaRIV: a novel FcR with distinct IgG subclass specificity. Immunity 23:41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nimmerjahn F, Lux A, Albert H, Woigk M, Lehmann C, Dudziak D, Smith P, Ravetch JV. 2010. FcgammaRIV deletion reveals its central role for IgG2a and IgG2b activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:19396–19401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014515107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hasenkrug KJ, Chesebro B. 1997. Immunity to retroviral infection: the Friend virus model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:7811–7816. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Halemano K, Harper MS, Guo K, Li SX, Heilman KJ, Barrett BS, Santiago ML. 2013. Humoral immunity in the Friend retrovirus infection model. Immunol Res 55:249–260. doi: 10.1007/s12026-012-8370-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Halemano K, Barrett BS, Li SX, Harper MS, Smith DS, Heilman KJ, Santiago ML. 2013. Fv1 restriction and retrovirus vaccine immunity in Apobec3-deficient 129P2 mice. PLoS One 8:e60500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santiago ML, Montano M, Benitez R, Messer RJ, Yonemoto W, Chesebro B, Hasenkrug KJ, Greene WC. 2008. Apobec3 encodes Rfv3, a gene influencing neutralizing antibody control of retrovirus infection. Science 321:1343–1346. doi: 10.1126/science.1161121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tsuji-Kawahara S, Chikaishi T, Takeda E, Kato M, Kinoshita S, Kajiwara E, Takamura S, Miyazawa M. 2010. Persistence of viremia and production of neutralizing antibodies differentially regulated by polymorphic APOBEC3 and BAFF-R loci in friend virus-infected mice. J Virol 84:6082–6095. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02516-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chesebro B, Wehrly K, Doig D, Nishio J. 1979. Antibody-induced modulation of Friend virus cell surface antigens decreases virus production by persistent erythroleukemia cells: influence of the Rfv-3 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:5784–5788. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Santiago ML, Smith DS, Barrett BS, Montano M, Benitez RL, Pelanda R, Hasenkrug KJ, Greene WC. 2011. Persistent Friend virus replication and disease in Apobec3-deficient mice expressing functional B-cell-activating factor receptor. J Virol 85:189–199. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01838-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Persons DA, Paulson RF, Loyd MR, Herley MT, Bodner SM, Bernstein A, Correll PH, Ney PA. 1999. Fv2 encodes a truncated form of the Stk receptor tyrosine kinase. Nat Genet 23:159–165. doi: 10.1038/13787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Smith DS, Guo K, Barrett BS, Heilman KJ, Evans LH, Hasenkrug KJ, Greene WC, Santiago ML. 2011. Noninfectious retrovirus particles drive the APOBEC3/Rfv3 dependent neutralizing antibody response. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002284. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Halemano K, Guo K, Heilman KJ, Barrett BS, Smith DS, Hasenkrug KJ, Santiago ML. 2014. Immunoglobulin somatic hypermutation by APOBEC3/Rfv3 during retroviral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:7759–7764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403361111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Morrison TE, Simmons JD, Heise MT. 2008. Complement receptor 3 promotes severe Ross River virus-induced disease. J Virol 82:11263–11272. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01352-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bila C, Oberhauser V, Ammann CG, Ejaz A, Huber G, Schimmer S, Messer R, Pekna M, von Laer D, Dittmer U, Hasenkrug KJ, Stoiber H, Banki Z. 2011. Complement opsonization enhances friend virus infection of B cells and thereby amplifies the virus-specific CD8+ T cell response. J Virol 85:1151–1155. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01821-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Britt WJ, Chesebro B. 1983. Use of monoclonal anti-gp70 antibodies to mimic the effects of the Rfv-3 gene in mice with Friend virus-induced leukemia. J Immunol 130:2363–2367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kato M, Tsuji-Kawahara S, Kawasaki Y, Kinoshita S, Chikaishi T, Takamura S, Fujisawa M, Kawada A, Miyazawa M. 2015. Class switch recombination and somatic hypermutation of virus-neutralizing antibodies are not essential for the control of Friend retrovirus infection. J Virol 89:1468–1473. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02293-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Doig D, Chesebro B. 1979. Anti-Friend virus antibody is associated with recovery from viremia and loss of viral leukemia cell-surface antigens in leukemic mice. Identification of Rfv-3 as a gene locus influencing antibody production. J Exp Med 150:10–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Santiago ML, Benitez RL, Montano M, Hasenkrug KJ, Greene WC. 2010. Innate retroviral restriction by Apobec3 promotes antibody affinity maturation in vivo. J Immunol 185:1114–1123. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Harper MS, Barrett BS, Smith DS, Li SX, Gibbert K, Dittmer U, Hasenkrug KJ, Santiago ML. 2013. IFN-alpha treatment inhibits acute Friend retrovirus replication primarily through the antiviral effector molecule Apobec3. J Immunol 190:1583–1590. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
