Abstract
Background
Several clinical studies point to a high prevalence of psychotic symptoms in frontotemporal dementia associated with C9ORF72 mutations, but clinicopathological studies addressing the association between C9ORF72 mutations and delusions are lacking.
Method
Seventeen patients with pathologically proven frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) associated with C9ORF72 mutations were identified from Neurodegenerative Disease Brain Bank. Of the 17 cases with C9ORF72 mutation, 4 exhibited well-defined delusions. The clinical history, neurological examination, neuropsychological testing, neuroimaging analysis, and postmortem assessment of the patients with delusions were evaluated and compared with the other cases.
Result
The content of the delusions was mixed including persecution, infidelity, and grandiosity. All cases showed parkinsonism; voxel-based morphometry analysis showed greater precuneus atrophy in patients with delusions than those without delusions. All 4 had unclassifiable FTLD with TAR DNA-binding protein inclusions, with characteristics of both type A and type B. Three cases had additional τ pathology and another had α-synuclein pathology.
Conclusion
C9ORF72 carriers with well-defined delusions likely associated with additional pathologies and parietal atrophy in neuroimaging. Patients presenting with middle-aged onset of delusions should be screened for C9ORF72 mutations, especially if family history and parkinsonism are present.
Keywords: C9ORF72, neurodegeneration, frontotemporal dementia, delusion, neuropathology, neuroimaging
Background
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the second most common cause of early onset dementia and is characterized by changes in personality, behavior, or language.1,2 Frontotemporal dementia is associated with neurodegeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes and occurs in both sporadic and genetic forms. A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) was recently reported as the most frequent genetic cause of behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), FTD with motor neuron disease (FTD-MND), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).3,4 Several clinical studies on patients with C9ORF72 mutation highlight a high prevalence of psychotic features (delusions and hallucinations) associated with this mutation.5–8
Delusional symptoms are frequently linked to schizophrenic psychoses but are also observed in neurodegenerative diseases.9 It has been suggested that the dysfunction of dopaminergic neurons projecting to the striatum contributes to delusion formation in patients with schizophrenia10; however, other hypotheses also have been proposed for the neurobiological basis of delusions with schizophrenia. Delusions also have been linked to frontal cortex dysfunction causing deficits in cognitive control or executive functions. This may result in premature probabilistic reasoning bias and/or lack of top-down control leading to release of other brain areas and manifesting as delusions.11,12
Although patients with FTD show severe frontal, temporal, and basal ganglia dysfunction, delusions have been considered a relatively rare feature of FTD,13–15 and the presence of delusions in FTD has ranged from 2.3% to 12.7% in clinical cohorts.15,16 However, delusions appear to be more common in patients with C9ORF72 mutations: 50% in 32 cases5 and 42% in 14 cases.6 The anatomical underpinnings of delusions in FTD remain unclear, and cases with C9ORF72 mutation may contribute to an understanding of the neurobiological basis of delusions.
Here, we report the clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging, and neuropathological findings of patients with FTD and delusions who, at autopsy, showed FTD with TAR DNA-binding protein inclusions (FTLD-TDP) associated with the C9ORF72 mutation, who had delusions along the clinical course of their disease.
Method
All 17 patients belonging to the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Neurodegenerative Disease Brain Bank, with a neuropathological diagnosis of FTLD-TDP due to C9ORF72 expansion were included. Diagnosis of C9ORF72 expansion was made by genetic testing and confirmed by the finding of p62-positive/TDP-43-negative intraneuronal inclusions in cerebellum and hippocampus.17 All patients and their informants signed an institutional review board-approved research consent form to participate in the study. Patients were seen at the Memory and Aging Center at the UCSF between 2004 and 2010 and had undergone at least 1 neurological evaluation, including extensive neuropsychological assessment and neuroimaging. Medical history including psychiatric history is confirmed independently by neurologist and research nurse through caregiver interviews using structured questionnaires. Of the 17 patients identified as C9ORF72 expansion positive, 4 of them presented with well-defined delusions during the disease evolution. Delusion was defined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) as “a false belief based upon an incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what almost everyone else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary, the belief is not one ordinarily accepted by other members of the person’s culture or subculture.”18 Clinical data collected included the time of onset of delusions in relation to other symptoms, previous psychiatric history, the presence of associated hallucinations, and the phenomenological content of the delusions. Patients’ demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Clinical diagnosis | Right-Handed Male | Right-Handed Male | Right-Handed Male | Right-Handed Male |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
bvFTD | bvFTD | bvFTD | bvFTD | |
Disease onset | 56 | 62 | 46 | Late 30s |
Initial symptom | Perseveration | Executive dysfunction | Executive dysfunction | Apathy |
Delusion onset | 58 | 40s | 54 | 54 |
Delusion content | Paranoia about neighbors/Capgras | Infidelity | Grandiose | Paranoia/grandiose/Capgras |
Prognosis of delusion | Progressive | Continued | Continued | Slight improve with medication |
Medication for delusion | Quetiapine | None | None | Quetiapine |
Behavioral symptoms | Sexually inappropriate | Reduction in motivation | Apathy/lack of interest | Hyperorality |
Roaming | Increase in appetite | Rigid inflexible in schedule | Apathy | |
Stereotypy | Irritable | Utilization behavior | ||
Loss of personal hygiene | Environmental dependent | Loss of personal hygiene | ||
Preference for sweets | Preference for sweets | |||
Family history | Negative | Unknown (adaption) | Mother/maternal family | Mother |
Neuropsychological examination | ||||
Mini-Mental State Examination | 17/30 | 20/30 | 28/30 | 19/30 |
CVLT-Short Forma | 2-3-3-2-0-0 | 5-4-5-6-4-3 | 6-6-6-6-6-7 | 2-3-4-4-3-2 |
Benson Figure Copy and Recall | 14/17 and 6/17 | 16/17 and 8/17 | 16/17 and 9/17 | 16/17 and 8/17 |
Digit span Forward/Backward | 5/2 | 7/2 | 7/2 | 6/3 |
Stroop inhibition | Unable | 9 with 19 uncorrected errors | 21 with 5 uncorrected errors | 6 with 11 uncorrected errors |
Modified Trails, s | Unable | 62 s | Unable | Unable |
Boston Naming Test | 11/15 | 11/15 | 13/15 | 15/15 |
Phonemic and Category fluency | 3 and 5 | 2 and 6 | 6 and 13 | 2 and 2 |
Geriatric Depression Scale | 12 | 4 | 0 | 15 |
Neuropsychiatric Inventory | 45 | 8 | 20 | 52 |
Delusion Scale | 8 | 2 | 2 | 12 |
Unified Parkinson | 9 | 10 | − | 6 |
Disease Rating Scale | ||||
MRI imagingb | ||||
Dorsolateral frontal atrophy | ++ | + | + | + |
Medial frontal atrophy | ++ | + | − | ++ |
Orbitofrontal atrophy | ++ | − | + | + |
Striatum atrophy | + | + | + | + |
Parietal atrophy | ++ | + | + | ++ |
Cerebellum atrophy | + | − | − | − |
Age at death | 64 | 69 | 60 | 58 |
Main pathological changes | FTLD-TDP, unclassifiable argyrophilic grain disease | FTLD-TDP, unclassifiable atypical tauopathy | FTLD-TDP, unclassifiable argyrophilic grain disease | FTLD-TDP, unclassifiable Lewy body pathology |
Abbreviation: bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test; FTLD-TDP, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration with TAR DNA-binding protein inclusions; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
California Verbal Learning Test, 4 times registration, 30-second recall, and 10 minutes recall of 9 words.
+ means mild atrophy and ++ means severe atrophy, based on expert neurologist who is blind to patients’ clinical information.
Neuropsychological Data
The patients underwent a detailed neuropsychological battery during their visits. General intellectual function was assessed using the UCSF screening battery as described elsewhere.19
Genotyping
The presence of expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeats in C9ORF72 was detected using the repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction as described elsewhere.3 The PCR products were run on an ABI3730 DNA analyzer and analyzed using the Peak Scanner Software.
Neuroimaging
Each patient was scanned with a structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on a 1.5- or 3-T scanner within 1 year of the first UCSF visit. Structural T1-weighted images were preprocessed for voxel-based morphometry (VBM) using Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie running in Statistical Parametric Mapping 8 with MatLab. Group comparison of VBM gray matter images was conducted between 4 patients having pathologically proven FTLD-TDP with C9ORF72 mutation who had delusions and remaining 13 patients who did not.
Neuropathology
All patients were subjected to an extensive dementia-oriented postmortem assessment at UCSF or at the University of Pennsylvania, following a standard protocol described previously.20,21 The brains were procured within 18 hours postmortem. The majority of the brains was cut into 8- to 10-mm thick coronal slabs and alternately fixed, in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 72 hours, or rapidly frozen; the remaining were hemi-sectioned sagittally with 1 hemisphere fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and the other rapidly frozen. Tissue blocks covering dementia-related regions of interest were dissected from the fixed slabs, and basic and immunohistochemical stains were applied following standard diagnostic procedures developed for patients with dementia.21 All immunohistochemical runs included positive control sections to exclude technical factors as a cause of absent immunoreactivity. The FTLD-TDP subtyping followed the current “harmonized” nomenclature.22 All cases were also screened for p62-positive/TDP-43-negative intraneuronal inclusions, pathognomonic markers of C9ORF72 expansion in amygdala,10,23 a brain area involved in different kind of delusions. Finally, the presence of additional overlapping neurodegenerative disorders was compared between the 2 groups.
Results
Case Presentation
Case 1
Mr A, a right-handed man, presented first symptoms at the age of 56. Previously psychiatrically healthy, he became fixated on specific topics, developed paranoia about his neighbors and became frightened by them when they performed yard work. As the disease progressed he also became suspicious of close friends. At the age of 58, he vocalized that he felt his life was threatened and that his wife had been replaced by a demon. He did not have any self-awareness that these thoughts were irrational and false. He was seen by a psychiatrist and a neurologist at the age of 60, after he made obscene gestures to a woman and propositioned his neighbor’s wife. He was started with quetiapine first at 25 mg, increasing to a maximum of 150 mg. It reduced his fears, especially about his wife; however, he progressively became more fearful of others around him.
At the age of 61, he became quieter, mellower, and progressively slower. Fluoxetine started at that time reduced his inappropriate behaviors in public. He habitually strolled around the house and exhibited motor restlessness. He developed increased interest in chocolate. His personal grooming declined. At the age of 62, he went out alone and returned after 8 hours sunburned and dehydrated; he reported that he had been looking for his friend who was actually living in another state.
Mr A was evaluated at the UCSF Memory and Aging Center at the age of 62. He demonstrated utilization behavior and perseverations and was impulsive and easily distracted. On neurological examination, he had mild cogwheeling in the arms, mild to moderate hypomimia, and mild bradykinesia. Cognitive testing revealed deficits in all domains except for copying tasks and language. His working memory and executive function were most severely impaired (see Table 1). Past medical history was unremarkable for psychiatric symptoms. His family history was negative for dementia. His medications included fluoxetine (30 mg) and quetiapine (150 mg). Magnetic resonance imaging revealed bilateral frontal atrophy. He died suddenly by choking at the age of 64, 8 years after the onset of his symptoms.
Neuropathological examination demonstrated brain atrophy (weight: 1170 g), with most severe degenerative changes involving the dorsal and opercular frontal cortices, as well as the dorsal striatum. Microscopic examination revealed hippocampal sclerosis. Immunohistochemical analysis showed unequivocal evidence of FTLD-TDP, featuring TDP-43 immunoreactive inclusions in many cortical regions examined, especially the dorsal and opercular frontal regions. TDP-43 pathology was consistent with FTLD-TDP, with features of type A and type B.22 Argyrophilic grain disease (AGD), a 4-repeat tauopathy, was noted in limbic areas and orbital frontal cortex.
Case 2
Mr B, a left-handed man started to believe that his wife was cheating on him around the age of 40. This delusion spontaneously remitted after several years, however, it reemerged at age of 62. The couple underwent marriage counseling, but the delusion did not remit again. Concomitantly, he developed difficulty in completing his usual tasks, such as fixing light sockets or cars. Subsequently, he had difficulty in understanding directions and conversation. Other language problems included poor repetition and reduction in speech. He became apathetic but showed increase in appetite. He had no awareness of his cognitive deficits.
Mr B was evaluated at the UCSF at the age of 65 years. On neurological examination, language was abnormal with evidence of paraphasic errors and some difficulty with reading. He exhibited parkinsonism with masked faces and reduced blink frequency; however, there was no increased tone at rest, no tremor, and he walked without difficulty. Verbal and visual memories were moderately impaired, but visuospatial abilities remained normal. Neuropsychological tests confirmed the language deficits and showed moderate executive dysfunction (for details see Table 1). Past medical history was unremarkable. His medications were donepezil and fexofenadine (60 mg). Family history was unknown because he was adopted. Structural imaging showed generalized atrophy, with frontal predominance.
The parkinsonism, executive loss, and memory dysfunction all progressed, followed by the appearance of progressive apathy. At the age of 68, he had difficulty in swallowing, increased tone in all extremities, upper limb fasciculations, and a prominent jaw jerk. He died from pneumonia at the age of 70, 7 years after the onset of symptoms.
Fresh brain weight was 1066 g. Neuropathology showed atrophy with most severe degenerative changes in the frontal lobes, in particular, the anterior orbital and inferior frontal gyri and the anterior cingulate cortex. Immunohistochemical analysis showed FTLD-TDP with features of type A and type B, consistent with unclassifiable FTLD-TDP. Co-occurring 4-repeat τ pathology was seen and characterized by deposition of neurofibrillary tangles and astrocytic inclusions mostly in limbic areas, inferior temporal gyrus, and in precentral gyrus. This tauopathy did not fit into existing criteria for a specific entity and was classified as an atypical tauopathy.
Case 3
Mr C, a right-handed man, presented with problems in his management skills and an increased number of business-related judgment errors at the age of 46. Three years later, he had uncharacteristic loss of empathy for his wife who was hospitalized at that time. At the age of 51, he closed his business and found a job for a local manager of a discount store, but he soon started to have trouble at work. He had the grandiose delusion that “they were saving a large store for him.” He became socially withdrawn and spent more time watching television. He was fired at the age of 53 years due to his inability to keep the store in good condition, but his delusion continued.
Also around that time, he became emotionally and physically more distant from his wife, refused to do jobs around the house, and showed increasing apathy. He exhibited other strange behaviors such as sneaking into the home and peeking around the corner at his wife. He maintained the grandiose delusion that someone was saving highly paid jobs for him. He became more rigid and inflexible about his schedule at home, showing anxiety if meals were not served on time. He became irritable and developed environmental dependence playing with items placed in front of him and mimicking other people’s actions. Also, he developed compulsive symptoms such as repetitive checking of the temperature. Later on, he inappropriately greeted strangers and developed a preference for sweets.
Mr C was evaluated at the UCSF at the age of 54 years. On neurological examination, he had a fine resting and action tremor on the left hand. Tone was increased in the arm with evidence of paratonia on the left greater than right. Gait changes were notable for a decreased arm swing on the left. He had no awareness of his deficits or delusion. He performed poorly on neuropsychological assessment of frontal and executive function with relatively intact language and visuospatial function (for details see Table 1). Past medical history was significant for hypercholesterolemia, borderline hypertension, and a loss of hearing after a motor accident. Family history was significant for a strong history of autosomal-dominant dementia with parkinsonism in many relatives. His mother died at age 60 with similar symptoms of dementia and parkinsonism, but she did not have an autopsy. The patient’s MRI showed mild frontal lobe and striatal atrophy.
He died of pneumonia at the age of 59, 13 years after the onset of his symptoms. Neuropathological examination showed general atrophy and marked ventricular dilatation. The fresh brain weighed 1050 g. TDP-43 immunopositive neuropil threads were found in multiple regions of the central nervous system and features were consistent with unclassifiable FTLD-TDP. In addition, he showed AGD restricted to limbic area.
Case 4
Mr D, a right-handed man, started to exhibit social withdrawal and executive dysfunction in his late 30s. He became reluctant to join in conversations, completed tasks more slowly, and had difficulty concentrating and multi-tasking. In his 40s, he became careless and failed to finish his tasks at work. By his late 40s, he became even slower and less talkative. At the age of 54, he developed auditory hallucinations and delusions, believing that various “friends” were talking to him and to each other through TV. Also, he thought that people were watching him through the bathroom mirrors. He believed he was a “sex God” and that various neighbors dated him. He also believed that an imposter replaced his physician. He occasionally accused his wife of infidelity. He exhibited less emotion but inappropriately laughed at serious TV shows. At the age of 56, his speech output declined and his response time became delayed, he walked more slowly. He accompanied his family to work but did little work by himself. Table manners deteriorated and he ate enormous quantities of food voraciously in a messy fashion, including eating food off the floor. He also became apathetic.
Mr D was evaluated at the UCSF Memory and Aging Center at the age of 57. His affect was flat, his speech was effortful, and he was perseverative, stimulus-bound, and demonstrated poor insight. His neurological examination showed jerky ocular pursuit, increased arm tone with cogwheeling in the left greater than right, slowed finger taps, fasciculations throughout the arms and legs, a fine postural tremor of the outstretched hands, and a slow stooped gait. His examination was also notable for delayed response times, marked utilization behavior, and inability to perform tasks. Neuropsychological testing showed moderate impairments in episodic memory encoding and consolidation; impaired language comprehension, verbal agility, and repetition; marked executive impairment; and impaired abstract reasoning, with relatively spared visuospatial skills (see Table 1).
His past medical history includes hypertension, ankylosing spondylitis, and prostate resection. Regarding family history, his mother was diagnosed with Parkinson disease dementia and had a brain autopsy showing neuronal loss in the substantia nigra without Lewy bodies. His medications included donepezil (10 mg), quetiapine (800 mg), divalproex sodium (500 mg), and trazodone (300 mg). His MRI showed moderate bilateral lateral parietal atrophy as well as bifrontal atrophy, vermian atrophy, and bilateral caudate atrophy.
He died at 58 years of age. The fresh brain weighed 1340 g. Neuropathological examination showed atrophy with most severe degenerative changes involving the prefrontal and perirolandic cortices, substantia nigra, and lower motor neurons of the brainstem and spinal cord. Immunohistochemical analysis showed an unclassifiable FTLD-TDP with frequent granular or compact neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, in superficial and deep layers of affected cortices, subcortical, and brainstem and spinal cord structures. Although primary motor cortex showed TDP-43 pathology, no corticospinal tract demyelination was observed, making motor neuron disease a more appropriate pathological characterization than ALS. In addition, Lewy body pathology was observed in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, corresponding a very early Parkinson disease Braak stage I.24
All the 17 cases fulfilled the most recent bvFTD clinical consensus criteria.2 Among the remaining 13 cases lacking well-defined delusions, 1 case showed confabulation that disappeared within 2 years from its appearance. The other cases did not show any other psychotic symptoms. Seven cases had motor neuron symptoms to variable extend, and 1 case had family history of ALS. Two cases have parkinsonism. Mean age at disease onset is 60.4 years old and mean age at death is 68.2 years old. Neuropathologically, in addition to TDP-43 pathology, 3 nondelusional cases had additional non-Alzheimer disease (AD) τ pathology.
Neuroimaging Results
The VBM analysis showed greater atrophy in left parietal precuneus area at the level of uncorrected P < .005 in the 4 cases with delusions compared with other 13 cases without delusions (Figure 1). In the small volume correction analysis for left parietal precuneus area, the atrophy was also significant at a Family Wise Error-corrected P level of <.05.
Neuropathological Analyses
p62-Positive/TDP-43-negative characteristic inclusions in the amygdala were seen in most of the 17 cases and no notable difference was found between the 2 groups. Among the 13 patients without delusions, 3 showed overlapping AGD restricted to limbic areas and 1 showed an atypical tauopathy.
Discussion
We report the clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging, and neuropathological findings in 4 cases having FTLD-TDP with delusions associated with C9ORF72 mutations. C9ORF72 mutation cases account for 12% of familial and 3% of sporadic FTD cases.3,6 Pathologically, C9ORF72 mutations are associated with FTLD-TDP, type B,25 as well as type A,5 or a unclassifiable type that features both type A and type B characteristics. Additionally, depositions of ubiquitin or p62-positive/TDP-negative characteristic inclusions are found in cerebellum, hippocampus, and thalamus. These inclusions contain dipeptide-repeat proteins translated in an ATG-independent fashion from the hexanucleotide repeats and are pathognomonic of C9ORF72 expansion. On structural imaging, in addition to atrophy in frontal, insular, and anterior temporal areas commonly affected in bvFTD, patients with C9ORF72 mutations show atrophy in parietal, occipital, cerebellar, and thalamus.6–8,26
Psychotic features (particularly delusions) are seen in up to 50%of C9ORF72 mutation carriers,5,6 a much larger frequency than in other FTLD types.15 Therefore, the distinctive anatomical and neurochemical features of C9ORF72 may reveal insights into the neurobiological basis of psychosis.5–8,27
Before the discovery of C9ORF72 mutation, delusions were thought to be a relatively rare symptom in patients with FTD. Some of these reports show patients with younger onset FTD who were diagnosed with psychotic disorders before the dementia onset.28,29 Paranoid delusions were the most frequent symptoms in these series. Other case reports showed complex delusions,30 grandiose delusions,31 and Cotard delusions.32 Snowden et al reported that most of the delusions with their C9ORF72 mutation cases were somatic delusions such as alterations in temperature perception, preoccupation with bowel movements, and leg pain,5 which was different from our series showing various delusions.
Delusions are a relatively common symptom in AD and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLBs) than FTD. A review article reported a median prevalence of 36% (9.3%–63%) for delusions in AD, most involving delusion of theft, which can be included in the persecutory delusion category.10,33 Studies focusing on the underlying biological background of delusions in AD have suggested that persecutory delusions occur early in the disease course and are associated with neurochemical and neuropathological changes in frontostriatal and temporal-limbic circuits.34 On the other hand, delusional misidentification in AD is associated with greater global cognitive deficits and advanced limbic pathology.34 In patients with DLB, hallucinations are the most frequent psychotic symptoms, with a prevalence from 63% to 78%, followed by misidentifications (56%) and paranoid delusions (25%–28%).35,36 Paranoid or persecutory delusions in patients with DLB were hypothesized to be associated with dysfunction in the frontal cortex in addition to occipital cortex dysfunction.35
Several studies on schizophrenia suggest that development of delusion is associated with a dysfunction of dopamine regulation in the ventral striatum, which leads to aberrant assignment of salience to stimuli.11,37 Also, dysfunction in brain areas associated with executive behavioral control such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC) may lead to alterations in affective state, disinhibition, and ways of thinking that might increase the risk of delusion formation.38 Prefrontal cortex was found to be implicated in prediction-error processing,39,40 and reality monitoring tasks,41 structural volume loss in the PFC correlates with symptoms of delusion.42 Thalamic dysfunction may also result in reduced ability to adjust sensory responsiveness to ongoing behaviors in patients with schizophrenia.43 Psychosis in schizophrenia is associated with source-monitoring deficits whereby self-initiated behaviors become attributed to outside sources, and one of the functions of the thalamus is to adjust sensory responsiveness in accordance with the behavioral contextual cues. Lower numbers of cerebellar Purkinje neurons also seen in association with psychosis in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.44 The decreased synthesis and release of reelin from cerebellar granule cells could be associated with the pathophysiologies that regulate GABAergic neuron dysfunction in the cerebellum of these patients.
There are a variety of neurological disorders strongly associated with psychosis. Often, psychosis occurs in association with temporal lobe dysfunction and is seen in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, herpes simplex encephalitis, and autoimmune encephalitis that target the temporal lobes.45–47 Disorders of the basal ganglia and brain stem have a higher prevalence of delusions than expected and psychosis as is seen with Huntington disease, Fahr syndrome, and Wilson disease.48–50 These results suggest that various neurobiological substrates may predispose to delusions.
Why, then did the 4 cases having FTD with C9ORF72 mutations presented here exhibit delusions? Mahoney et al hypothesize that dysfunction of thalamic and cerebellar projections could be related to the neuropsychiatric features associated with these cases with C9ORF72 mutation, including hallucinations and delusions.7 This thalamic and cerebellar pathology is relatively unique to cases having FTD with C9ORF72 mutation. Although this hypothesis remains appealing, it is important to note that the other 13 cases in our series without delusions also showed changes in thalamus and cerebellar structures.
Thus, based on the above-mentioned knowledge of delusions in other neurodegenerative disorders and schizophrenia, we hypothesized that in addition to PFC dysfunction that is common in patients with FTD, other regions might have contributed to development of delusions in our series of patients.23 The VBM analysis showed more atrophy in left parietal precuneus area in patients with delusion compared to the nondelusional patients. Although the result is significant even after correction, our sample is small and the time gap latency between delusion onset and MRI acquisition should be taken into consideration. This parietal involvement has also been reported in other C9ORF72 mutation series.3,6 Precuneus is involved in discriminating self-relevant information from self-irrelevant information and in retrieving source memories.51 Therefore, in addition to executive dysfunction, failing to discriminate between self-relevant and self-irrelevant information and to retrieve the information source must make the patients hypersensitive to all information. Although the precuneus is very vulnerable to AD and to associate with delusions in patients with AD,52–54 such delusions are typically delusions of theft, rather than bizarre delusions as observed in our C9ORF72 mutation series. Thus, we speculate that degree of frontal involvement may contribute to the variety of delusions in our cases.
Downey et al suggested a distributed anatomical correlate in thalamo-cerebello-cortical circuitry including parietal cortex as a key terminus to explain altered body schema processing in patients with C9ORF72-related FTD.55 Our findings corroborate their observations. In fact, their results provide a useful framework for interpreting our findings, in particular the candidate mechanism of self/non–self-regulation. However, as they point out, the spectrum of neuropsychiatric phenomena attributable to altered body schema processing is potentially much wider than delusions and hallucinations. Thus, our results have to be interpreted causally. Although precuneus changes may be neuroanatomical basis underlying delusions in patients with C9ORF72-related FTD, it is not possible to rule out a broader change in network vulnerable to this disease.
Neuropathological information revealed that 3 of the 4 patients with delusion presented an overlapping tauopathy (2 AGD and 1 atypical tauopathy). This 75% frequency is significantly higher than frequency (23%) of tauopathies in nondelusional cases (3 of 13) and may indicate an association. Patients with AGD are prone to present persecutory delusions.56,57 Thus, the mixture of τ pathology and FTLD-TDP pathology, especially in frontal cortex and ventral striatum, may have contributed to the clinical picture of delusions. In case 4, there was an additional Lewy body pathology. Lewy body pathology is associated with visual hallucinations, which were present in this patient, but the link is weakened because Lewy body pathology was restricted to the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve. None of the previous 3 patients showed hallucinations in any modality. This may indicate a difference in pathological background between delusions and hallucinations. However, Snowden et al reported that among 4 pathological confirmed cases with psychosis, 1 had τ pathology without TDP-43 pathology and the others had TDP-43 pathology without accompanying τ pathology.5 Synergistic effects of FTLD-TDP and certain tauopathies in causing delusions deserve investigation in a larger cohort, once it becomes available.
Although postmortem examination can potentially identify the underlying basis of neuropsychiatric symptoms, its power is limited by the long lag between the onset of delusions and expiration. It is possible that the advance stage of the disease by the time of passing precludes identification of more subtle differences between patients with specific symptoms. It might explain why we could not find any distinctive pathological findings in parietal and precuneus in the delusional group. This also supports the hypothesis that precuneus can be a component of a network that may show differential vulnerability.
Interestingly, all of our 4 cases with delusion had parkinsonism, compared to 2 of the 13 nondelusional cases. However, iatrogenic parkinsonism cannot be discarded as 2 cases with delusion (case 1 and case 4) and 1 nondelusional case were treated with atypical antipsychotics. This may indicate higher sensibility of patients with delusion to dopamine dysfunction, both associated to delusions and to parkinsonism. Association between delusions and parkinsonism in cases with C9ORF72 mutation suggests an overlapping vulnerability of certain brain areas to both Lewy body disease and C9ORF72 mutation-related pathology, even though both have different abnormal protein deposition signatures. One clinicopathological study with 68 patients shows a greater loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of patients with C9ORF72 mutations than those without.58 Parkinson disease itself is not associated with C9ORF72 mutations.59
Finally, delusions in our series often preceded the behavioral and cognitive disabilities. This observation may increase the likelihood of misdiagnosis and delayed appropriate treatment. Cases with FTD are often diagnosed as having atypical psychosis such as late-onset schizophrenia or late-life depression with psychotic features.60 Indeed, patients with FTD receive a prior psychiatric diagnosis significantly more often than patients with AD (FTD, 50.7% vs AD, 23.1%).61 Clinicians need to consider the possibility of this mutation and assess the family history when a patient presents with middle-aged onset delusions.
Conclusion
All of our FTD series with the C9ORF72 mutation presenting delusions had some additional pathology and parkinsonism, which suggests a common anatomy or neurochemistry underlying these delusions. The VBM analysis suggests relationship between precuneus and appearance of delusions, although the number of cases is small enough to draw conclusions. Further work with larger cohorts will be required to investigate the biological correlates of delusions in this genetic FTD group. Their presentations of this mutation carrier are heterogeneous and may be at higher risk of being misdiagnosed with primary psychosis. Clinicians need to consider the possibility of this mutation and assess the family history when a patient presents with middle-aged onset delusions.
Acknowledgments
We thank patients and their families for the time and effort they dedicated to our research.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Shinagwa has received a fellowship grant from Mitsukoshi Health and Welfare Foundation. Dr Grinberg receives institutional support from these NIH grants P50AG023501, P01AG019724. Dr Seeley receives institutional support from these NIH grants: P50AG023501 and P01AG019724. Dr Miller receives institutional support from these NIH grants: P50AG023501, P01AG019724, and P50AG1657303. Other authors have no financial or other relationship relevant to the subject of this manuscript.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- 1.Ratnavalli E, Brayne C, Dawson K, Hodges JR. The prevalence of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2002;58(11):1615–1621. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.11.1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman DS, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of fronto-temporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134(pt 9):2456–2477. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.DeJesus-Hernandez M, Mackenzie IR, Boeve BF, et al. Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron. 2011;72(2):245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Renton A, Majounie E, Waite A, et al. A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron. 2011;72(2):257–268. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Snowden J, Rollinson S, Thompson JC, et al. Distinct clinical and pathological characteristics of frontotemporal dementia associated with C9ORF72 mutations. Brain. 2012;135(3):693–708. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sha SJ, Takada LT, Rankin KP, et al. Frontotemporal dementia due to C9ORF72 mutations: clinical and imaging features. Neurology. 2012;79(10):1002–1011. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318268452e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mahoney CJ, Beck J, Rohrer JD, et al. Frontotemporal dementia with the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion: clinical, neuroanatomical and neuropathological features. Brain. 2012;135(pt 3):736–750. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boeve BF, Boylan KB, Graff-Radford NR, et al. Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72. Brain. 2012;135(pt 3):765–783. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bhat R, Rockwood K. Psychiatric complications of dementia. Can J Psychiatry. 2011;56(7):398–407. doi: 10.1177/070674371105600703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pankow A, Knobel A, Voss M, Heinz A. Neurobiological correlates of delusion: beyond the salience attribution hypothesis. Neuropsychobiology. 2012;66(1):33–43. doi: 10.1159/000337132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Heinz A, Schlagenhauf F. Dopaminergic dysfunction in schizophrenia: salience attribution revisited. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36(3):472–485. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lakhan SE, Vieira KF. Schizophrenia pathophysiology: are we any closer to a complete model? Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2009;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-8-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bathgate D, Snowden J, Varma A, Blackshaw A, Neary D. Behaviour in frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Acta Neurol Scand. 2001;103(6):367–378. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2001.2000236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mendez MF, Lauterbach ECE, Sampson SMS. An evidence-based review of the psychopathology of frontotemporal dementia: a report of the ANPA Committee on Research. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;20(2):130–149. doi: 10.1176/jnp.2008.20.2.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mendez MF, Shapira J, Woods RJ, Licht EA, Saul RE. Psychotic symptoms in frontotemporal dementia: prevalence and review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25(3):206–211. doi: 10.1159/000113418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mourik JC, Rosso SM, Niermeijer MF, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Swieten JC, Tibben A. Frontotemporal dementia: behavioral symptoms and caregiver distress. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;18(3–4):299–306. doi: 10.1159/000080123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mori K, Lammich S, Mackenzie IR, et al. hnRNP A3 binds to GGGGCC repeats and is a constituent of p62-positive/TDP43-negative inclusions in the hippocampus of patients with C9orf72 mutations. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125(3):413–423. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1088-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Pub; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kramer JH, Jurik JJ, Sha SJ, et al. Distinctive neuropsychological patterns in frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and Alzheimer disease. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2003;16(4):211–218. doi: 10.1097/00146965-200312000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Forman MS, Farmer J, Johnson JK, et al. Frontotemporal dementia: clinicopathological correlations. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(6):952–962. doi: 10.1002/ana.20873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimers disease. Neurology. 1991;41(4):479–486. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.4.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Baborie A, et al. A harmonized classification system for FTLD-TDP pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;122(1):111–113. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0845-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Holt AEM, Albert ML. Cognitive neuroscience of delusions in aging. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2006;2(2):181–189. doi: 10.2147/nedt.2006.2.2.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rüb U, de Vos RAI, Jansen Steur ENH, Braak E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24(2):197–211. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00065-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dobson-Stone C, Hallupp M, Bartley L, et al. C9ORF72 repeat expansion in clinical and neuropathologic frontotemporal dementia cohorts. Neurology. 2012;79(10):995–1001. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182684634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Whitwell JL, Weigand SD, Boeve BF, et al. Neuroimaging signatures of frontotemporal dementia genetics: C9ORF72, tau, progranulin and sporadics. Brain. 2012;135(3):794–806. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Takada LT, Sha SJ. Neuropsychiatric features of C9orf72-associated behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and frontotemporal dementia with motor neuron disease. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2012;4(5):38–38. doi: 10.1186/alzrt141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Velakoulis D, Walterfang M, Mocellin R, Pantelis C, McLean C. Frontotemporal dementia presenting as schizophrenia-like psychosis in young people: clinicopathological series and review of cases. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194(4):298–305. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.057034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Omar R, Sampson EL, Loy CT, et al. Delusions in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neurol. 2009;256(4):600–607. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-0128-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Loy CT, Kril J, Trollor JN, et al. The case of a 48 year-old woman with bizarre and complex delusions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6(3):175–179. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Duggal HS, Singh I. Frontotemporal dementia presenting with psychotic symptoms. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;21(1):103–104. doi: 10.1176/jnp.2009.21.1.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mendez MF, Ramírez-Bermúdez J. Cotard syndrome in semantic dementia. Psychosomatics. 2011;52(6):571–574. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ropacki SA, Jeste DV. Epidemiology of and risk factors for psychosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a review of 55 studies published from 1990 to 2003. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(11):2022–2030. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Reeves SJ, Gould RL, Powell JF, Howard RJ. Origins of delusions in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(10):2274–2287. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Casanova MF, Starkstein SE, Jellinger KA. Clinicopathological correlates of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Acta Neuropathologica. 2011;122(2):117–135. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0821-3. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00401-011-0821-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nagahama Y, Okina T, Suzuki N, Matsuda M. Neural correlates of psychotic symptoms in dementia with Lewy bodies. Brain. 2010;133(pt 2):557–567. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Guillin O, Abi-Dargham A, Laruelle M. Neurobiology of dopamine in schizophrenia. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2007;78:1–39. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(06)78001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kapur S, Agid O, Mizrahi R, Li M. How antipsychotics work-from receptors to reality. NeuroRx. 2006;3(1):10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.nurx.2005.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Corlett PR, Aitken MRF, Dickinson A, et al. Prediction error during retrospective revaluation of causal associations in humans: fMRI evidence in favor of an associative model of learning. Neuron. 2004;44(5):877–888. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Turner DC, Aitken MRF, Shanks DR, et al. The role of the lateral frontal cortex in causal associative learning: exploring preventative and super-learning. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14(8):872–880. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lagioia A, Eliez S, Schneider M, Simons JS, Van der Linden M, Debbané M. Neural correlates of reality monitoring during adolescence. NeuroImage. 2011;55(3):1393–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Buchy L, Ad-Dab’bagh Y, Lepage C, et al. Symptom attribution in first episode psychosis: a cortical thickness study. Psychiatry Res. 2012;203(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vukadinovic Z, Rosenzweig I. Abnormalities in thalamic neurophysiology in schizophrenia: could psychosis be a result of potassium channel dysfunction? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(2):960–968. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Maloku E, Covelo IR, Hanbauer I, et al. Lower number of cerebellar Purkinje neurons in psychosis is associated with reduced reelin expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(9):4407–4411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914483107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Elliott B, Joyce E, Shorvon S. Delusions, illusions and hallucinations in epilepsy: 2. Complex phenomena and psychosis. Epilep Res. 2009;85(2–3):172–186. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nadkarni S, Arnedo V, Devinsky O. Psychosis in epilepsy patients. Epilepsia. 2007;48(suppl 9):17–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01394.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mocellin RR, Walterfang M, Velakoulis D. Hashimoto’s encephalopathy: epidemiology, pathogenesis and management. CNS Drugs. 2007;21(10):799–811. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200721100-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jellinger KA. Cerebral correlates of psychotic syndromes in neurodegenerative diseases. J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16(5):995–1012. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01311.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rosenblatt A, Leroi I. Neuropsychiatry of Huntington’s disease and other basal ganglia disorders. Psychosomatics. 2000;41(1):24–30. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(00)71170-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lauterbach EC, Cummings JL, Duffy JR, et al. Neuropsychiatric correlates and treatment of lenticulostriatal diseases: a review of the literature and overview of research opportunities in Huntington’s, Wilson’s, and Fahr’s diseases. A report of the ANPA Committee on Research. American Neuropsychiatric Association. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998;10(3):249–266. doi: 10.1176/jnp.10.3.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lundstrom BN, Ingvar M, Petersson KM. The role of precuneus and left inferior frontal cortex during source memory episodic retrieval. NeuroImage. 2005;27(4):824–834. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fukuhara R, Ikeda M, Nebu AA, et al. Alteration of rCBF in Alzheimer’s disease patients with delusions of theft. Neuroreport. 2001;12(11):2473–2476. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200108080-00037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nomura KK, Kazui H, Wada TT, et al. Classification of delusions in Alzheimer’s disease and their neural correlates. Psychogeriatrics. 2012;12(3):200–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2012.00427.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jedidi H, Daury N, Capa R, et al. Brain metabolic dysfunction in capgras delusion during Alzheimer’s disease: a positron emission tomography study [published online June 30, 2013] Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement. 2013 doi: 10.1177/1533317513495105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Downey LE, Fletcher PD, Golden HL, et al. Altered body schema processing in frontotemporal dementia with C9ORF72 mutations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(9):1016–1023. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Asaoka T, Tsuchiya K, Fujishiro H, et al. Argyrophilic grain disease with delusions and hallucinations: a pathological study. Psychogeriatrics. 2010;10(2):69–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2010.00318.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Togo T, Isojima D, Akatsu H, et al. Clinical features of argyrophilic grain disease: a retrospective survey of cases with neuropsychiatric symptoms. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;13(12):1083–1091. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.12.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cooper-Knock J, Frolov A, Highley JR, et al. C9ORF72 expansions, parkinsonism, and Parkinson disease: a clinicopathologic study. Neurology. 2013;81(9):808–811. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a2cc38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Harms MB, Neumann D, Benitez BA, et al. Parkinson disease is not associated with C9ORF72 repeat expansions. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(5):1519.e1–e2. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Passant U, Elfgren C, Englund E, Gustafson L. Psychiatric symptoms and their psychosocial consequences in frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2005;19(suppl 1):S15–S18. doi: 10.1097/01.wad.0000183084.22562.5a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Woolley JD, Khan BK, Murthy NK, Miller BL, Rankin KP. The diagnostic challenge of psychiatric symptoms in neurodegenerative disease. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(2):126–133. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06382oli. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]