Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
letter
. 2015 May 14;53(6):1996–1998. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03026-14

Evaluation of the Blue-Carba Test for Rapid Detection of Carbapenemases in Gram-Negative Bacilli

Fernando Pasteran 1, Omar Veliz 1, Paola Ceriana 1, Celeste Lucero 1, Melina Rapoport 1, Ezequiel Albornoz 1, Sonia Gomez 1, Alejandra Corso 1,, ReLAVRA Network Group
Editor: K C Carroll
PMCID: PMC4432054  PMID: 25809971

LETTER

The Blue-Carba test (BCT) is a biochemical test for rapid (<2 h) detection of carbapenemase production in Gram-negative bacilli directly from bacterial culture (1). It is based on the in vitro hydrolysis of imipenem by bacterial colonies (direct inoculation without prior lysis), which is detected by changes in pH values revealed by the indicator bromothymol blue (blue to green/yellow or green to yellow). It was reported to be 100% sensitive and specific for Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp., and Acinetobacter spp. harboring carbapenemases (1). We evaluated a simplified protocol of the BCT against various Gram-negative species, including combinations of bacterial species/resistance mechanisms that were not previously evaluated.

A total of 300 clinical isolates were included (188 carrying known carbapenemase-encoding genes and 112 without carbapenemase production) (Table 1). The isolates, belonging to the collection of the National and Regional Reference Lab, correspond to submissions from very diverse locations in Latin America (21 countries, 1,226 labs surveyed from 2010 to 2014) (2) and thus should represent minimal clonal and enzyme bias. PCR analysis was considered the gold standard for β-lactamases characterization (for the primer pairs used, see Table S1 in the supplemental material) (3). Outer membrane protein analysis was performed by SDS-PAGE (4, 5). Efflux pump inhibitors were used for phenotypic screening of efflux pump activity (6). Chromosomally mediated cephalosporinase hyperproduction was evaluated by spectrophotometric analyses as described previously (3). Identification to the species level was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (Bruker, Germany). Imipenem MICs (agar dilution) and the modified Hodge test (MHT) were performed and interpreted by using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (6).

TABLE 1.

Isolates tested,i imipenem susceptibility, and test results

Group and β-lactamase (no. of isolates) Bacterial species included (no. of isolates) % of isolates
No. of isolates BCT positive/no. (%) of isolates testeda
Imipenem nonsusceptible MHT positive
Class A carbapenemase producers
    KPC-2 (51) K. pneumoniae (34), E. coli (5), E. cloacae (4), P. aeruginosa (3), C. freundii (2), C. braakii (1), K. oxytoca (1), L. adecarboxylata (1) 88 100 51/51 (100)
    KPC-3 (1) K. pneumoniae (1) 100 100 1/1 (100)
    Sme-1b (3) S. marcescens (3) 100 0 3/3 (100)
    GES-3 (2) E. cloacae (1), K. pneumoniae (1) 100 100 2/2 (100)
    GES-5 (1) P. aeruginosa (1) 100 100 1/1 (100)
    IMI-1/NMC-A (2) E. cloacae (2) 100 100 2/2 (100)
    All (60) 90 95 60/60 (100)
Class B carbapenemase producers
    NDM-1 (14) K. pneumoniae (4), E. coli (3), P. rettgeri (3), A. pittii (2), A. baumannii (1), P. mirabilis (1) 100 21 14/14 (100)
    IMP-1 (9) A. ursingii (4), A. lwoffii (2), A. junii (2), A. johnsonii (1) 89 100 9/9 (100)
    IMP-8 (8) E. cloacae (4), E. coli (2), C. freundii (1), K. oxytoca (1) 88 100 8/8 (100)
    IMP-13 (5) P. aeruginosa (5) 60 40 5/5 (100)
    IMP-16 (4) P. aeruginosa (4) 50 50 4/4 (100)
    IMP-18 (1) P. aeruginosa (1) 100 100 1/1 (100)
    VIM-2 (26) P. aeruginosa (7), P. putida (7), P. monteilii (4), E. cloacae (1), K. pneumoniae (1), P. chlororaphis (1), P. fulva (1), P. fluorescens, (1), P. oleovorans (1), P. rettgeri (1), P. stutzeri (1) 92 92 26/26 (100)
    VIM-11 (3) P. aeruginosa (2), E. cloacae (1) 67 100 3/3 (100)
    VIM-1 (1) E. coli (1) 100 100 1/1 (100)
    SPM-1 (5) P. aeruginosa (5) 100 100 5/5 (100)
    All (76) 89 89 76/76 (100)
Class D carbapenemase producers
    OXA-48 (5) E. coli (3), K. oxytoca (1), K. pneumoniae (1) 60 100 4/5 (80)
    OXA-163 (5) K. pneumoniae (3), E. cloacae (1), K. georgiana (1) 20 100 2/5 (40)
    OXA-247 (2) E. coli (1), K. pneumoniae (1) 50 100 1/2 (50)
    OXA-181 (1) K. pneumoniae (1) 100 100 1/1 (100)
    OXA-438 (1)b E. coli (1) 100 100 1/1 (100)
    All Enterobacteriaceae OXA producers (14) 46 100 9/14 (64)
    OXA-58 (20) A. baumannii (7), A. lwoffii (6), A. junii (5), A. pittii (1), A. ursingii (1) 90 90 20/20 (100)
    OXA-23 (14) A. baumannii (9), A. lwoffii (3), A. junii (2) 100 100 14/14 (100)
    OXA-23 + OXA-58 (3) A. baumannii (3) 100 100 3/3 (100)
    OXA-143 (1) A. baumannii (1) 100 100 1/1 (100)
    All Acinetobacter OXA producers (38) 94 94 38/38 (100)
Carbapenemase nonproducers
    ESBLs + porin loss (38)c K. pneumoniae (30), E. coli (4), E. cloacae (2), S. marcescens (2) 87 45 0/38 (0)
    ESBLs (11)d A. baumannii (4), P. aeruginosa (4), S. flexneri (2), P. putida (1) 0 0 0/11 (0)
    AmpCs + porin loss (16)e E. cloacae (10), E. aerogenes (3), C. freundii (2), E. coli (1) 88 81 0/16 (0)
    AmpCs (12)f P. aeruginosa (9), E. coli (1), K. pneumoniae (1), P. mirabilis (1) 0 0 0/12 (0)
    Narrow spectrum (5)g A. baumannii (2), P. aeruginosa (2), E. coli (1) 0 0 0/5 (0)
    None (30)h P. aeruginosa (29), E. coli (1) 77 0 0/30 (0)
    All nonproducers (112) 62 27 0/112 (0)
a

A color change from blue or green (control tube) to green/yellow or yellow (reaction tube), respectively, was interpreted as a positive result; when both tubes (control and reaction) remained either blue or green, the test was interpreted as negative. No invalid results were obtained (a yellow control tube).

b

Novel OXA-48-like variant (GenBank accession no. KP410734).

c

CTX-M-2, n = 31; CTX-M-15, n = 5; SHV-18, n = 1; SHV-5, n = 1.

d

GES-1, n = 5; CTX-M-2, n = 2; PER-2, n = 2; VEB-1, n = 2.

e

Hyperproduction of chromosomally mediated cephalosporinase, n = 15; CMY-2, n = 1.

f

Hyperproduction of chromosomally mediated cephalosporinase, n = 9; CMY-2, n = 2; DHA-1, n = 1.

g

OXA-1, n = 2; OXA-51 (without upstream ISAbaI), n = 2; TEM-1, n = 1.

h

Nonenzymatically carbapenem-resistant isolates and quality control strains, i.e., Pseudomonas aeruginosa carbapenem resistant because of efflux overproduction (n = 5), porin loss (n = 3), or dual mechanisms (n = 20) and quality control strains P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922.

i

Tested were 155 Enterobacteriaceae, 89 Pseudomonas, and 56 Acinetobacter isolates.

The BCT was performed by using a modified protocol as follows. Strains were grown on Mueller-Hinton agar, Trypticase soy agar, and Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood plates. Subsequently, a 5-μl loop of a pure bacterial culture from each type of agar was resuspended in the test mixture, which consisted of an aqueous solution of bromothymol blue at 0.04% (Sigma) and 0.1 mmol/liter ZnSO4 (Sigma) with (reaction tube) or without (control tube) supplementation with 6 mg of Tienam (MSD) (equivalent to 3 mg of imipenem) and adjusted to a final pH of 7.0. Unsupplemented mixture solution was stored at 4°C (pH adjustments were needed every 4 to 6 weeks). The test solution was supplemented with Tienam immediately before being used. Strains were tested in duplicate. Two independent readers interpreted the results (interpretation discrepancies were recorded as equivocal results).

The results of BCT according to our modified protocol were 100% coincident on all three agar types used for bacterial subcultures. The BCT detected all class A carbapenemases (Table 1), including those of two Klebsiella pneumoniae KPC-2 producers with imipenem MICs of 0.12 μg/ml (M15222) and 0.03 μg/ml (M13403) (7) and enzymes with slow imipenem hydrolysis, such as the GES-type (n = 3) or Sme-type (n = 3) enzymes. All metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) tested positive (Table 1), including those from three strains with an imipenem MIC of 0.25 μg/ml. The BCT detected all Acinetobacter species isolates with acquired OXA carbapenemases but only 9 of 14 OXA-48-like enzyme-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates (Table 1). Misdetections occurred among all of those OXA-48-like enzyme-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates with MICs of <1.0 μg/ml; one OXA-48 producer and one OXA-247 producer (MIC, 0.5 μg/ml), both with equivocal results, and three OXA-163 producers (MICs, 0.12 to 0.5 μg/ml) were negative. Therefore, the overall sensitivity and negative predictive value of the BCT were 97 and 96%, respectively. All carbapenemase nonproducers were negative by the BCT (Table 1), which confirmed the high specificity and positive predictive value (100%) of the method described previously (1).

The BCT is an accurate and inexpensive way to unequivocally identify class A and B carbapenemases as described previously (1). Unlike other similar tests, such as the Carba NP (6, 8), the BCT detected KPC/MBL production in isolates with extremely low imipenem MICs. However, in our study, the BCT gave suboptimal results for the identification of OXA-48-like enzyme producers, with the largest amount of misdetections among the OXA-163 producers. The Carba NP has also shown limitations in the detection of OXA-48-like enzyme-producing Enterobacteriaceae, with reported sensitivities of 11 to 100% (6, 810). The results observed in this work could be linked to the low hydrolytic profile of OXA-163 producers, although there is still an open debate on its role as a carbapenemase. Whereas in vitro kinetic assays showed weak carbapenemase activity (11), in vivo data have suggested that OXA-163 per se could cause carbapenem treatment failure or favor the intrapatient selection of new OXA variants (12, 13).

In conclusion, for labs concerned with the widely disseminated class A KPC producers, class D MBL (e.g., NDM) producers, and class D OXA carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter, the BCT could be an accurate and cost-effective way to rapidly identify potential carrier isolates. For some mechanisms, such as OXA-48-like enzyme-producing Enterobacteriaceae, the total number of isolates studied was low; however, preliminary results suggest that in scenarios with an increasing prevalence of this mechanism, a negative result with the BCT could require additional tests such as the MHT (which showed 100% sensitivity in this study), preferably in combination with temocillin or piperacillin-tazobactam susceptibility results (14).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The ReLAVRA Network consists of Pilar Ramon-Pardo and Jorge Matheu, on behalf of The Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network in Latin America and the Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control Program, International Regulations, Alert and Response and Epidemic Diseases and Water Borne Diseases, Communicable Diseases and Health Analysis (CHA), Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, DC.

We are indebted to members of the WHONET-Argentina Network and The National Quality Assurance Program in Bacteriology, Ministry of Health of Argentina. We thank Roberto Melano for providing OXA-48 and OXA-181 reference strains and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD, Argentina) for providing imipenem (Tienam).

This work was supported by the regular federal budget of the Ministry of Health of Argentina.

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03026-14.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Pires J, Novais Â, Peixe L. 2013. Blue-Carba, an easy biochemical test for detection of diverse carbapenemase producers directly from bacterial cultures. J Clin Microbiol 51:4281–4283. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01634-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schmunis G, Salvatierra-Gonzalez R. 2006. Birth of a public surveillance system: PAHO combats the spread of antimicrobial resistance in Latin America. APUA Newsl 24:6–8. http://www.tufts.edu/med/apua/news/APUA_v24n1.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pasteran F, Mendez T, Rapoport M, Guerriero L, Corso A. 2010. Controlling false-positive results obtained with the Hodge and Masuda assays for detection of class a carbapenemase in species of Enterobacteriaceae by incorporating boronic acid. J Clin Microbiol 48:1323–1332. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01771-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Martínez-Martínez L, Hernández-Allés S, Abertí S, Tomás J, Benedi V, Jacoby G. 1996. In vivo selection of porin-deficient mutants of Klebsiella pneumoniae with increased resistance to cefoxitin and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:342–348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hamzehpour M, Pecher J, Plesiat P, Kohler T. 1995. OprK and OprM define two genetically distinct multidrug efflux systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:2392–2396. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.11.2392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2015. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 25th informational supplement M100-S25. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Veliz O, Pasteran F, Guerriero L, Gomez S, Faccone D, KPC-Group Corso A. 2013. Emergence of ertapenem-susceptible KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae with conflicting susceptibility results by reference and routine methods, abstr D-598. Abstr. 53rd ICAAC, Denver, CO, 2013. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Limbago B, Traczewski M, Cunningham S, Anderson K, Hackel M, Hindler J, Sahm D, Schuetz A, Jenkins S, Humphries R, Palavecino E, Vasoo S, Patel R. 2014. Multicenter evaluation of the Carba NP test for rapid detection of carbapenemase production, abstr D-900b Abstr 54th ICAAC, Washington DC, 2014. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tijet N, Boyd D, Patel S, Mulvey M, Melano R. 2013. Evaluation of the Carba NP test for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:4578–4580. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00878-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Osterblad M, Hakanen A, Jalava J. 2014. Evaluation of the Carba NP test for carbapenemase detection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:7553–7556. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02761-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Poirel L, Castanheira M, Carrër A, Rodriguez CP, Jones RN, Smayevsky J, Nordmann P. 2011. OXA-163, an OXA-48-related class D β-lactamase with extended activity toward expanded-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2546–2551. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00022-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abdelaziz MO, Bonura C, Aleo A, El-Domany RA, Fasciana T, Mammina C. 2012. OXA-163-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Cairo, Egypt, in 2009 and 2010. J Clin Microbiol 50:2489–2491. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06710-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gomez S, Pasteran F, Faccone D, Bettiol M, Veliz O, De Belder D, Rapoport M, Gatti B, Petroni A, Corso A. 2013. Intrapatient emergence of OXA-247: a novel carbapenemase found in a patient previously infected with OXA-163-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E233–E235. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huang T, Poirel L, Bogaerts P, Berhin C, Nordmann P, Glupczynski Y. 2014. Temocillin and piperacillin/tazobactam resistance by disc diffusion as antimicrobial surrogate markers for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in geographical areas with a high prevalence of OXA-48 producers. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:445–450. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES