Abstract
Carbenicillin indanyl sodium, ampicillin, or cephalexin was administered orally to 61 patients with urinary tract infections. Assignment of drug was made by a computer-generated, randomized plan in a double-blind fashion. The rates of cure 4 weeks after therapy were 50, 42, and 50% for patients treated with carbenicillin, ampicillin, and cephalexin, respectively. Failure of therapy was correlated with chronicity of infection and sensitivity of the microorganism to the antibiotic used. Thirty-nine percent of the patients developed side effects, but there were no significant differences in side effects among the three antibiotics. This double-blind study demonstrates that carbenicillin indanyl sodium is as effective as ampicillin and cephalexin in treatment of urinary tract infections.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9666/b966611f35233200e1de27fe1614bc97455d9447" alt="593"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9896/f9896e6931af2e05f66a32a73392d26f1fae8991" alt="594"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40453/404538f95dd9e77ce20a0a7d20538969ee1653a7" alt="595"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f220/5f22002c0901a59ed14f92c1b481eafe5e602075" alt="596"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bran J. L., Karl D. M., Kaye D. Human pharmacology and clinical evaluation of an oral carbenicillin preparation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1971 May-Jun;12(3):525–530. doi: 10.1002/cpt1971123525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- English A. R., Retsema J. A., Ray V. A., Lynch J. E. Carbenicillin indanyl sodium, an orally active derivative of carbenicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Mar;1(3):185–191. doi: 10.1128/aac.1.3.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wallace J. F., Atlas E., Bear D. M., Brown N. K., Clark H., Turck M. Evaluation of an indanyl ester of carbenicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda) 1970;10:223–226. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.2.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]