Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2015 Apr 6;66(11):3215–3227. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv144

Intraspecific variability of cadmium tolerance and accumulation, and cadmium-induced cell wall modifications in the metal hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri

Claire-Lise Meyer 1, Michal Juraniec 1, Stéphanie Huguet 2, Elena Chaves-Rodriguez 1, Pietro Salis 1, Marie-Pierre Isaure 2, Erik Goormaghtigh 3, Nathalie Verbruggen 1,*
PMCID: PMC4449548  PMID: 25873677

Highlight

A huge variability in Cd tolerance and accumulation exist within A. halleri, and the relationship between tolerance, accumulation, and edaphic type is not straightforward. Cd-induced cell wall modifications suggest various shoot detoxification mechanisms.

Key words: Accumulation, Arabidopsis halleri, cadmium, cell wall, FT-IR, tolerance.

Abstract

Certain molecular mechanisms of Cd tolerance and accumulation have been identified in the model species Arabidopsis halleri, while intraspecific variability of these traits and the mechanisms of shoot detoxification were little addressed. The Cd tolerance and accumulation of metallicolous and non-metallicolous A. halleri populations from different genetic units were tested in controlled conditions. In addition, changes in shoot cell wall composition were investigated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Indeed, recent works on A. halleri suggest Cd sequestration both inside cells and in the cell wall/apoplast. All A. halleri populations tested were hypertolerant to Cd, and the metallicolous populations were on average the most tolerant. Accumulation was highly variable between and within populations, and populations that were non-accumulators of Cd were identified. The effect of Cd on the cell wall composition was quite similar in the sensitive species A. lyrata and in A. halleri individuals; the pectin/polysaccharide content of cell walls seems to increase after Cd treatment. Nevertheless, the changes induced by Cd were more pronounced in the less tolerant individuals, leading to a correlation between the level of tolerance and the extent of modifications. This work demonstrated that Cd tolerance and accumulation are highly variable traits in A. halleri, suggesting adaptation at the local scale and involvement of various molecular mechanisms. While in non-metallicolous populations drastic modifications of the cell wall occur due to higher Cd toxicity and/or Cd immobilization in this compartment, the increased tolerance of metallicolous populations probably involves other mechanisms such as vacuolar sequestration.

Introduction

For more than a decade, a great deal of attention has been paid to metal hyperaccumulator plants, particularly to two Brassicaceae, Arabidopsis halleri and Noccaea caerulescens. In contrast to the majority of metallophytes that stored metals in root cells, these species possess the ability to accumulate and tolerate high metal concentrations in their shoots [>1% zinc (Zn) and >0.01% cadmium (Cd) in dry leaf biomass] (Krämer, 2010). They constitute powerful models to study the mechanisms of metal homeostasis, adaptation to extreme environments, and evolution of complex naturally selected traits. By means of quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping, transcriptomic studies, and functional analyses, important progress has been achieved in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying metal tolerance and accumulation in N. caerulescens and A. halleri (reviewed by Verbruggen et al., 2009; Krämer, 2010). A model mainly based on studies in A. halleri emerges for Zn tolerance and accumulation in which constitutive high expression levels of genes involved in root uptake (several ZIP members), root to shoot translocation (HMA4 and NAS2), and vacuolar sequestration (MTP1) play a central role.

In contrast, the mechanisms underlying Cd tolerance in hyperaccumulators are still poorly understood. The HMA4 gene was shown to be a major determinant of Cd hypertolerance and accumulation in A. halleri (Courbot et al., 2007; Hanikenne et al., 2008; Willems et al., 2010). A high transcript level was also reported in N. caerulescens and explained, as for A. halleri, by genomic copy number expansion and altered cis-regulation (Ó Lochlainn et al., 2011; Craciun et al., 2012). Up to now, there have been no clear candidates to account for Cd uptake from soil and Cd unloading. In leaves of N. caerulescens, vacuolar sequestration seems to be the main mechanism for Cd detoxification (Küpper et al., 2004; Ma et al., 2005; Ebbs et al., 2009). The extraordinary vacuolar sequestration capacity of some populations was explained by high transcript levels of the tonoplast Cd transporter NcHMA3 (Ueno et al., 2011). There is no vacuolar transporter of Cd described in A. halleri. MTP1, which seems to be a strong Zn transporter (Kawachi et al., 2012), as well as HMA3 do not co-localize with the QTLs identified for Cd tolerance or accumulation (Courbot et al., 2007; Willems et al., 2010). X-ray absorption spectroscopy revealed that in A. halleri shoot Cd binds to carboxyl and/or hydroxyl groups provided by organic acids and/or cell wall (CW) components (Huguet et al., 2012; Isaure et al., 2015). The role of CW/apoplast in Cd trapping was recently supported by microfocused X-ray fluorescence (μXRF) on A. halleri leaves. In the mesophyll, which is one of the main storage tissues, Cd seems to be present in intra- and extracellular compartments at similar levels (Isaure et al., 2015). It is well known that plant CWs are rich in compounds able to bind metallic cations. Preferential accumulation of Cd in this compartment was reported for aquatic species such as Phragmites australis or Halimione portulacoides (Jiang and Wang, 2008; Sousa et al., 2008) as well as for terrestrial plants, in roots (collenchyma of Salix viminalis; Vollenweider et al., 2006) and in leaves (mesophyll of N. praecox after CdSO4 treatment; Koren et al., 2013).

The challenge is now to work towards a more comprehensive understanding of the genetic basis of Cd tolerance and accumulation. This means identifying and validating other candidate genes involved in metal uptake and detoxification in shoots and verifying whether the mechanisms previously identified are specific to the ecotypes analysed or widespread in the species. To reach this goal, a good understanding of the polymorphism of tolerance and accumulation abilities is crucial. While Zn tolerance and accumulation seem constitutive, a huge variability of these traits was found between and within populations of A. halleri and N. caerulescens. On average, the non-metallicolous (NM) populations are less tolerant and more accumulator than the metallicolous (M) populations (Meerts and Van Isacker, 1997; Bert et al., 2000; Roosens et al., 2003; Pauwels et al., 2006). Analysis of differentiation of Zn tolerance with that of neutral molecular markers suggested that this trait has been increased in M A. halleri populations through selection on standing genetic variation within local NM ancestral populations (Meyer et al., 2010). Variability of Cd tolerance and accumulation was investigated in seven N. caerulescens populations in controlled conditions. An inverse relationship between accumulation and tolerance has been reported in most populations, but exceptions were found for some populations (Roosens et al., 2003). Up to now, knowledge about the distribution of Cd tolerance and accumulation in A. halleri populations is scarce. These traits are assumed to occur throughout the species, but only three M populations were studied in controlled conditions (Bert et al., 2003; Cosio et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2006; Przedpełska-Wąsowicz et al., 2012).

Arabidopsis halleri is a clonal, self-incompatible and highly outcrossing perennial Brassicaceae with a disjunct distribution in central Europe and eastern Asia. In Europe, this species is found at low altitude in industrial sites polluted by Zn, Cd, and Pb (in Northern France, Poland, Germany, and Italy among others) and at moderate to high altitude on soils with low levels of metals. Phylogeographic studies have demonstrated independent colonizations of metalliferous sites in distant geographic areas and the existence of two allopatric divergent genetic units in Europe (NW and SE) and a hybrid zone (HZ, from Slovenia to southern Poland) (Pauwels et al., 2012). Populations from the two genetic units seem to have experienced a long-term barrier to gene flow, whereas in the HZ a secondary contact probably occurred among previously isolated genetic pools (Pauwels et al., 2012). In the last decade, A. halleri has become a model for studies on metal tolerance and accumulation. It is indeed the closest metal-tolerant relative of the model species Arabidopsis thaliana (Al-Shehbaz and O’Kane, 2002), sharing 94% coding sequence identity and high syntheny (Roosens et al., 2008).

The aim of the present study is to investigate the genetic variability of Cd tolerance, accumulation, and shoot detoxification in M and NM A. halleri populations belonging to the different genetic units. In the natural range of Cd contamination, shoots seems to be the main storage site (Dahmani-Muller et al., 2001; Zhao et al., 2006). Quantitative variation was captured with a sequential growth test classically used to demonstrate the level of tolerance of populations (Schat and Ten Bookum, 1992; Pauwels et al., 2006), and a single dose test with an exposure concentration that can be found in metal rich-habitats. Given that a part of Cd is bound to CWs in A. halleri, changes in CW composition triggered by Cd treatment in different populations were investigated using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. This technique in conjunction with data compression methods [such as principal component analysis (PCA)] is a powerful tool to screen large numbers of plants in a species or from different species for CW-related phenotypes (Chen et al., 1998; Carpita et al., 2001; Mouille et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2012). This approach was successfully applied in the monitoring of the modifications to CW composition induced by biotic and abiotic stress factors (Martin et al., 2005; Fernandes et al., 2013).

Materials and methods

Plant material

Seeds were harvested in two regions where M and NM populations of A. halleri ssp. halleri could be found in close proximity: the North of Italy and the South of Poland–North of Slovakia (GPS co-ordinates are given in Table 1). The edaphic type (metallicolous or non-metallicolous) of the sampled populations was established according to the total concentration of Zn, Cd, and Pb in soil (see Bert et al., 2002; Table 1). In addition, seeds were collected in the populations Auby (AU) and Langelsheim (LAN) which have been used as reference populations for genetic and molecular studies on metal tolerance and accumulation in A. halleri (Talke et al., 2006; Courbot et al., 2007; Hanikenne et al., 2008; Sarret et al., 2009; Frérot et al., 2010, among others). These nine populations belong to the different genetic units of A. halleri ssp. halleri (NW, SE, and HZ according to Pauwels et al., 2012). As control non-tolerant non-accumulating species, seeds from A. thaliana ecotype Col-0 and A. lyrata ssp. petraea originating from an uncontaminated site in the Czech Republic (Unhost, Central Bohemia; Macnair et al., 1999) were used.

Table 1.

Geographic location and edaphic type of the investigated Arabidopsis halleri populations

Name Type Localization Habitat GPS co-ordinates Total concentration in soil (μg g–1)
N E Zn Cd Pb pH
I28 NM Val Paisco, Italy Roadside, underwood 46°03’26.36 10°14’33.74 323a 5a 237a 5.8a
I30 NM Sommaprada, Italy Meadow 45°59’28.03 10°16’19.38 183a 4a 168a 5.8a
I16  M Val del Riso, Italy Meadow near a metallurgic plant 45°51’34.40 9°52’34.94 13 779a 68a 1517a 6.9a
SK2 NM Kosica Bela, Slovakia Meadow 48°46’10.20 21° 07’48.60 51b <1b 26b ND
PL22  M Bukowno, Poland Meadow near a metallurgic plant 50°16’58.08 19°28’43.38 3911c 27c 1047c 6.9c
PL15  M Katowice, Poland heap from Zn smelter 50°17’12.96 19°01’32.04 10 163c 68c 3109c 6.2c
AU  M Auby, France Meadow near a metallurgic plant 50°24’23.91 03°04’56.38 25 945 137 4364 7.7
LAN  M Langelsheim, Germany ND 51°56’34.08 10°20’56.40 1179d 14d ND ND

NM, non-metallicolous; M, metallicolous; ND, not determined.

a In Decombeix (2011).

b In Bert et al. (2002).

c In Kostecka (2009).

d In Deinlein et al. (2012).

Sequential growth test of Cd tolerance

Seeds from each population were sown on sand in a controlled growth chamber (16h light d–1, 100 μmol photons m–2 s–1 irradiance, 20 °C day/18 °C night, and 70% humidity). After 4 weeks of growth, a maximum of 20 seedlings per population were transferred to 4 litre vessels filled with a modified Murashige and Skoog solution consisting of: K2SO4 (0.88mM), KH2PO4 (0.25mM), NaCl (10 μM), Ca(NO3)2 (2mM), MgSO4 (1mM), FeEDDHA (20 μM), H3BO3 (10 μM), ZnSO4 (10 μM), MnSO4 (0.6 μM), CuSO4 (0.1 μM), and (NH4)6Mo7O24 (0.01 μM). To ensure metal bioavailability, the pH of the solution was buffered using 0.25mM MES (2-morpholino-ethanesulphonic acid) adjusted to 5.8 with KOH. To minimize local environment effects, seedlings were randomly distributed in the vessels so that each population was represented by at least one individual in each vessel. Vessels were randomly distributed in the growth chamber and moved around once a week during change of nutrient solution. After 3 weeks in nutrient solution, the sequential test started following the method described in Bert et al., (2003). Plants were sequentially transferred to increasing concentration of Cd: 10, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, and 450 μM CdSO4. At the end of each week, the roots of each plant were gently dried with tissue paper and the whole plant was weighed. Tolerance was determined as the lowest concentration at which no increase in fresh biomass was observed (effective concentration for 100% growth inhibition, EC100). Sample sizes varied from four to 16 and were determined by the availability of the seeds and the survivors during the acclimation step. The range of concentrations used in this test are far in excess of the metal contamination found in natural soil solution but were demonstrated to be useful to discriminate the tolerance of species, populations, or progeny (Schat and Ten Bookum, 1992; Bert et al., 2003; Pauwels et al., 2005).

Cd accumulation and mineral profile

After 4 weeks growth on sand, seedlings of each population were transferred to 4 litre vessels containing the nutrient solution. Seedlings and vessels were randomized as for the sequential test and the solution was changed each week during 3 weeks. Then, half of the seedlings were transferred to vessels containing 5 μM CdSO4. The sample size of each population in each condition ranged from four to 16 and was determined by the availability of the seeds and the survivors during the acclimation step. After 3 weeks, the plants were harvested, and the shoots were separated from the roots, washed with deionized water, and dried at 37 °C until constant weight. Root samples were not analysed due to their low biomass and the possible metal precipitation on the root surface. The Cd exposure concentration used in this experiment is in the natural range of Cd contamination and was described as the median toxic concentration in plants (Kopittke et al., 2010). Further, after 3 weeks of contamination, the root to shoot translocation is not saturated for both A. lyrata and A. halleri populations (data not shown), allowing identification of different behaviours of accumulation. Before harvesting, the relative chlorophyll content of three leaves per individual was measured using a CCM-200 chlorophyll meter (Opti-Sciences, Hudson, NH, USA) which determines the relative content using dual wavelength optical absorbance (653nm and 931nm). Finally, the shoot dry weight (DW) was measured and the samples ground. Aliquots of 75mg of shoot material (DW) were digested in a 1:1 volume of H2O2 and HNO3 for 3h at 80 °C and filtered at 0.45 μm. Total Cd, Zn, Fe, K, Mg, and Ca in digests were measured after dilution using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS; CRC 7500cs; Agilent Technologies). Quality control for plant samples was based on the use of certified standard samples (spinach leaves: SRM 1570a–NIST).

Preparation of cell walls

Individuals from five populations of the Cd accumulation experiment were used for further analysis of the CWs: M populations AU, I16, and PL22; NM population I28; and the control species A. lyrata petraea. These populations display contrasting levels of Cd tolerance and accumulation. Extraction of CWs from the shoots was carried out according to Zornoza et al. (2002) with minor modifications. Briefly, 100mg of dried ground samples were successively washed with 80% ethanol (three times), chloroform/methanol (2/1, v/v) (once), and acetone (three times). Between each step, the supernatant was eliminated by centrifugation at 1200g for 5min. The final pellets of CWs were dried at 67 °C overnight.

Fourier transform infrared/attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy of the cell wall

The response of the CW to Cd in A. lyrata and A. halleri populations from different edaphic types was characterized using FT-IR spectroscopy. All measurements were carried out on a Bruker Equinox 55 FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) equipped with a liquid N2 refrigerated mercury cadmium Telluride detector. All spectra were recorded by attenuated total reflection (Goormaghtigh et al., 1999). A diamond internal reflection element was used on a Golden Gate Micro-ATR from Specac (Orpington, UK). The angle of incidence was 45 °. Around 0.5mg of dried CW material was resuspended in 20 μl of dionized water, and 1 μl of this mixture was deposited on the diamond crystal. The sample was quickly evaporated in N2 flux. In order to tackle CW modification, the FT-IR measurements were recorded between 1800cm–1 and 800cm–1. Each spectrum was obtained by averaging 256 scans recorded at a resolution of 2cm–1. For each sample, corresponding to an individual plant CW extract, three technical replicates were analysed. Overall, at least 12 spectra were collected for each population and treatment.

Statistical analysis

In order to analyse differences in Cd tolerance among populations, the survival curves obtained from the sequential growth test were fitted to a sigmoidal dose–response curve with a variable slope by non-linear regression using GraphPad Prism version 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). The equation used for the non-linear regression was a three-parameter logistic equation established as follows: Pi=100/{1+10^[(logXb–X)Bi]}^Si where logXb=LogT50i+(1/Bi) {Log[(2^(1/Si))–1]}. The variable ‘Pi represents the survival proportion of population i, ‘X’ is the concentration of Cd in the solution, ‘T50i’ is the concentration for which 50% of individuals from population i had reached their EC100, ‘Bi’ is the slope factor, and ‘Si’ is the symmetry parameter. The standard error (SE) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by GraphPad Prism. Differences among populations were tested using extra sum-of-squares F test (GraphPad Prism), and differences between edaphic type using Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney exact test (StatXact v.8, Cytel Studio, MA, USA). T50i and Bi from distinct populations were declared significantly different if their 95% CIs did not overlap.

Results of the experiment at a fixed concentration of Cd were analysed using non-parametric exact tests (StatXact v.8) which make no assumptions about distributions and are suitable for small and/or unbalanced samples. Differences among populations were investigated using Kruskal–Wallis exact test followed by non-parametric post-hoc test for multiple comparisons according to Siegel and Castellan (1988). Differences between treatments (NC and C conditions) were tested using Mann–Whitney test. Correlations between DW, relative chlorophyll content, and concentration of Cd, Zn, Ca, Mg, Fe, and K were examined using the Spearman coefficient (GraphPad Prism).

FT-IR data were analysed with Kinetics (a custom-made program running under Matlab 7.1, Mathworks Inc.) as follows. The water vapour contribution was subtracted with 1562cm–1 - 1555cm–1 as the reference peaks. The spectra were then baseline-corrected over the whole spectrum and normalized for equal area between 1800cm–1 and 900cm–1. The spectra were also smoothed at a final resolution of 4cm–1 by apodization of their Fourier transform by a Gaussian line. In order to evidence spectral variations induced by Cd, the mean spectra of untreated plants from population i were subtracted from the mean spectra of Cd-treated plants from population i. The ‘difference spectra’ were thus obtained for the population i, which represent the actual modifications caused by Cd in this population. In order to test statistically the modifications induced by Cd, Student’s t-tests were performed at every wave number. To account for multiple testing, adjusted P-values were computed using the Bonferroni procedure (Sokal and Rohlf, 1995). To identify differences among populations, two complementary statistical analyses were performed. First, hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on the ‘difference spectra’ of the five populations. Groups with most similar data were built using Ward’s algorithm. This method, which is based on the similarity among group members with respect to many variables (Ward, 1963; Johnson and Wichern, 2002), allows hierarchical clustering of n groups with minimum loss of information. Secondly, PCA was used to pinpoint spectral contributions that explain most of the variance present in the data set (individual IR spectrum). PCA is an unsupervised statistical method that enables a reduction of variables by building linear combinations of variables that vary together (Johnson and Wichern, 2002).

Results

Intraspecific variability of Cd tolerance

In order to characterize intraspecific variability of Cd tolerance, a sequential growth test in hydropony was performed on A. halleri populations from M and NM sites located in the north and south of its distribution. As expected, individuals from the non-tolerant species A. thaliana and A. lyrata reached their EC100 at the first doses of exposure (i.e. 50 μM and 100 μM). Irrespective of the type of population, the range of Cd doses tolerated by A. halleri individuals was very large (Fig. 1). The first mortality events were observed at 100 μM for most populations, whereas some individuals remained alive at the highest dose (450 μM) in M populations and in one NM population. Besides this high variability, two interesting results have to be noted. First, the high proportion of individuals reaching their EC100 at 100 μM (like A. thaliana) in the NM population SK2 from Slovakia (four out of 10) and, secondly, the survival curve of the M population AU (France) which is similar to those of the NMs. All survival data were well fitted by dose–response curves (all R 2>0.97; see Table 2). Estimated values for T50i (the concentration for which 50% of individuals from population i had stopped growing) were significantly different among populations (P<0.001) and the mean value for M populations was significantly higher than for NM populations (P=0.0357). Comparison of the T50 CIs confirmed that Cd tolerance increased from NM populations to M populationss (Table 2). The most sensitive population was SK2 (NM from Slovakia, T50 CI 111.8–143 μM), followed by I28 (NM from Italy, T50 CI 167.5–197.2 μM), I30 (NM from Italy, T50 CI 209.1–236.7 μM), and AU (M from France, T50 CI 217.3–254.8 μM). Other M populations (PL15 and PL22 from Poland, I16 from Italy, and LAN from Germany) showed overlapping T50 CIs (317.8–392.7 μM) which are significantly higher than those of the NMs (Table 2). The slope factor of the dose–response curves which estimates the range of within-population polymorphism did not reveal any difference between edaphic types.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Cadmium tolerance of NM (SK2, I28, I31) and M (AU, PL22, I16, PL15, LAN) A. halleri populations and of A. thaliana (ecotype Col-0) and A. lyrata petraea (LYR). At each experimental dose, growth was encoded for each plant as a binary variable and interpreted as individual tolerance or sensitivity. n= 4–16. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Table 2.

Estimations of T50 and slope factor obtained from fitting population survival curves to a sigmoidal dose–response model

T50 values and slope factors are considered as estimations of the average tolerance of populations and of the within-population polymorphism, respectively.

Pop Type T50 (μM CdSO4) Slope factor R 2 n
Estimated ±SE 95% CI Estimated ±SE 95% CI
I28 NM 188.7±1.03 175.5 to 202.9 –2.462±0.20 –2.937 to –1.986 0.99 8
I30 NM 230.1±1.02 215.4 to 245.7 –2.215±0.38 –3.131 to –1.300 0.99 16
SK2 NM 133.2±1.06 115.8 to 153.2 –2.004±0.61 –3.448 to –0.559 0.98 10
AU  M 235.3±1.03 217.3 to 254.8 –2,669±0.62 –4.145 to –1.193 0.98 8
PL22  M 352.5±1.03 324.6 to 382.7 –2.158±0.34 –2.981 to –1.335 0.97 12
PL15  M 379.2±1.01 368.5 to 390.1 –5.282±0.42 –6.289 to –4.276 0.99 5
LAN  M 370.9±1.02 347.6 to 395.8 –2.947±0.58 –4.319 to –1.574 0.97 5
I16  M 337.1±1.01 324.1 to 350.7 –3.830±0.29 –4.534 to –3.127 0.99 14

NM, non-metallicolous; M, metallicolous; SE, standar error; CI, confidence interval; n, sample size.

Intraspecific variability of Cd accumulation

Six-week-old hydroponically grown plants were subjected to 0 μM (NC condition) or 5 μM CdSO4 (C condition) treatments during 3 weeks. Under NC conditions, all populations tested showed similar values for shoot dry biomass and leaf chlorophyll content (Supplementary Fig. S1 available at JXB online). After Cd treatment, signs of toxicity were observed in A. lyrata petraea (LYR), all NM A. halleri populations, and in the M population AU. These individuals displayed marked chlorosis, and the relative chlorophyll content decreased by 78–86% (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig S1). Inhibition of shoot growth by Cd was only significant in LYR and the NM populations (Fig. 2). Hence, three different phenotypes were observed (see Supplementary Fig. S2): chlorosis and inhibition of shoot growth (LYR and NM populations I28 and SK2); chlorosis without an effect on shoot growth (M population AU); and unchanged chlorophyll content and shoot growth (M populations PL15, PL22, and I16).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Effect of Cd on (A) chlorophyll content and (B) dry shoot biomass in hydroponically grown A. halleri NM (I28, SK2) and M (AU, PL15, PL22. I16) populations and A. lyrata petraea (LYR). Plants were cultivated for 3 weeks in a solution containing 5 μM CdSO4. Values are expressed relative to control conditions (0 μM CdSO4). Data are the mean ±SD, n=7, 10, 4, 10, 11, 7, and 16, respectively. Asterisks and letters indicate significant differences at the 5% level between treatments and among populations, respectively. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Large differences in shoot Cd concentrations were found among A. halleri populations (P<0.0001), with mean values ranging from 569 μg g–1 (I16) to 1372 μg g–1 (PL22). Apart from I16, the A. halleri populations displayed significantly higher shoot Cd concentration than LYR (376±59 μg g–1; Fig. 3). The ratio between shoot Cd concentration in AU and LYR (3.3) is in agreement with previous studies in soil (3.9; Willems et al., 2010). The highest Cd concentrations and intrapopulation variability were found in the NM populations and in two M populations (AU and PL22), whereas in the populations accumulating less Cd the variability seems reduced (see SD on Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Cd concentration (μg –1) in shoots of NM (I28, SK2) and M (AU, PL15, PL22, I16) A. halleri populations and A. lyrata petraea (LYR) after a 3 week exposure to 5 μM CdSO4. Data are the mean ±SD, n= 7, 10, 4, 10, 11, 7, and 16, respectively; letters indicate significant differences at the 5% level. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Effect of Cd treatment on the ionome

Under the NC condition, the mean Ca and Mg concentration in shoots did not differ among species or populations (Supplementary Fig. S3 at JXB online). As expected, the Zn concentration was significantly higher in all A. halleri populations (mean values ranging from 2930 μg g–1 to 6900 μg g–1) as compared with LYR (348 μg g–1). Significant differences among some populations were also found for Fe and K, but these differences were not specific to edaphic type or species (Supplementary Fig. S3). The 5 μM CdSO4 treatment leads to a decrease in Fe concentration in shoots of all populations (Fig. 4; Supplementary Fig. S4). This decrease was, on average, more severe in populations AU and I28 (–48% and –49% respectively; P<0.05). Shoot Ca and Zn concentrations were significantly affected by the Cd treatment in populations LYR and PL15 (–14% and –30% for Ca) and SK2, AU, and I16 (–43, –45, and –10% for Zn). The concentrations of Mg and K were similar in both treatments (Fig. 4). In A. halleri, the Cd concentration in shoots showed a significant correlation with Fe, Mg, and Ca (Supplementary Table S1; r= –0.443, P=0.0008; r=0.389, P=0.004; r=0.413, P=0.002; n=58). A strong negative correlation was found between the Cd and chlorophyll concentration (Supplementary Table S1; r= –0.718, P<0.0001). There was no significant correlation between Cd and Zn or between Cd and dry shoot biomass. Correlations between mineral nutrients were very similar in NC and C conditions (Supplementary Table S1).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Changes in shoot mineral content of A. halleri NM (I28, SK2) and M (AU, PL15, PL22, I16) populations and A. lyrata petraea (LYR) after a 3 week exposure to 5 μM CdSO4. For each individual, the following ratio was calculated: (value in C condition - mean of the population in NC condition) / mean of the population in NC condition, and expressed in %. Data are the mean ±SD, n=7, 10, 4, 10, 11, 7, and 16; asterisks indicate statistical differences between treatments at the 5% level. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

FT-IR analysis on cell wall

The differences in CW composition among the populations LYR, I28, AU, PL22, and I16 were monitored in NC and C conditions (3 weeks at 5 μM CdSO4) by FT-IR spectroscopy applied to at least 12 samples per population and per treatment. For a clear analysis of the putative differences among populations, a multivariate analysis (PCA) was performed in each condition with the entire data set (Figs 5, 6). In the NC condition, principal component (PC) 1 which explained 58.2% of the total variance, was not useful to separate the samples. In contrast, PC2 (22.6% of the total variance) clearly differentiated the LYR samples from those of A. halleri (Fig. 5A). The PC2 loading factor plot (Fig. 5B) showed negative associations, with peaks corresponding to carboxylic acid groups (1540cm–1 and 1380cm–1 assigned to antisymmetric and symmetric -COO vibration, respectively; Séné et al., 1994; Goormaghtigh et al., 1994a ; Jones et al., 2005). These peaks are generally attributed to pectins with a low degree of methylesterification, which are rich in free carboxyl groups (Kakurakova, 2000). Proteins also give absorption at ~1550cm–1 (amide II N-H vibration; Goormaghtigh et al., 1994b, 2006; Séné et al., 1994). However, the peak of amide I expected at 1650cm–1 (C=O vibration; Goormaghtigh et al., 1994b ; Séné et al., 1994) with an intensity ratio to amide II of ~2:1 was not detected. In the C condition, separation of the samples according to their Cd tolerance occurs on the basis of PC1 (81.8% of the total variance; Fig. 6A). The PC1 loading factor plot (Fig. 6B) showed positive associations, with peaks similar to those previously identified in NC conditions (1565cm–1 and 1396cm–1 assigned to -COO vibration; Séné et al., 1994; Goormaghtigh et al., 1994a ; Jones et al., 2005). Some negative peaks (1120cm–1 and 1075cm–1) were also observed in the region associated with ring vibrations as well as C-OH and C-O-C glycosidic bond vibration of polysaccharides (1200–900cm–1; Kakuracova, 2000). Since many complex vibrations of carbohydrates overlap in this region, unambiguous assignment of particular peaks is difficult (Kakuracova, 2000; Carpita et al., 2001).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

PCA analysis of FT-IR spectra obtained from all individuals in the NC condition (0 μM CdSO4). (A) Each dot is the projection of one spectrum on the first and second PCs. Green dots, A. lyrata petraea; blue dots, A. halleri NM population I28; from light to dark orange, A. halleri M populations AU, PL22, and I16. (B) Loading factor plots for PC1 (black line) and PC2 (blue line) explaining PCA clustering. Arrows point to the discussed wave numbers. Note that the curve of PC2 has been offset for better readability.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

PCA analysis of FT-IR spectra obtained from all individuals in the C condition (5 μM CdSO4). (A) Each dot is the projection of one spectrum on the first and second PCs. Green dots, A. lyrata petraea; blue dots, A. halleri NM population I28; from light to dark orange, A. halleri M populations AU, PL22, and I16. (B) Loading factor plots for PC1 (black line) and PC2 (blue line) explaining PCA clustering. Arrows point to the discussed wave numbers. Note that the curve of PC2 has been offset for better readability.

To acquire additional information on the response of populations to Cd treatment, a subtraction of the spectra was also performed (Fig. 7; Supplementary Figs S5–S9 at JXB online). Differences in spectra between NC and C conditions and Student t-test at each wave number were calculated for each population (Fig. 7A). It can be observed that spectral variations are very similar in LYR and A. halleri populations I28 (NM), AU (M), and PL22 (M). Nevertheless, most of the differences are not significant for the last population. A hierarchical classification of the difference spectra clearly shows the similarity between LYR, I28, and AU (Fig. 7B). The major differences between NC and C spectra (thicker lines in Fig. 7A) appear at wave numbers associated with carboxyl groups of unesterified pectin (negative peak at ~1550cm–1; Séné et al., 1994; Goormaghtigh et al., 1994a ; Jones et al., 2005) and with polysaccharides (several positive peaks between 1200cm–1 and 900cm–1). For LYR, strong differences were also observed in the region 1470–1355cm–1 (-COO vibration; Séné et al., 1994; Goormaghtigh et al., 1994a ; Jones et al., 2005). In order to identify the most significant peaks, PCA was performed on the total data set (NC+C) of each population (Supplementary Figs S5–S9). For LYR, I28, and AU, PC1 clearly differentiated the NC and C samples. As expected, the separation between NC and C was mainly explained by two negative peaks associated with carboxyl groups of unesterified pectin (1582–1560cm–1 and 1410–1390cm–1 depending on the population) and several positive peaks associated with polysaccharides. Separation between treatments was weaker for population PL22 and linked to negative peaks at 1567cm–1 and positive peaks at 1146, 1100, 1052, and 1020cm–1 (polysaccharides). The behaviour of the population I16 is different from that of the other tested populations. In the difference spectrum (Fig. 7), significant variations were found between 1725 and 1630cm–1, 1560 and 1520cm–1, and 1395 and 1165cm–1, but no significant changes were identified in the polysaccharide region (1200–900cm–1). Separation between treatments occurs on the basis of PC2 (33.7% of the total variance; Supplementary Fig. S9). PC2 loading factor plots showed major association with positive peaks at 1610cm–1 and 1550cm–1.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

(A) Difference between the mean FT-IR spectra obtained at 0 and 5 μM CdSO4 for NM (I28) and M (AU, PL22, I16) A. halleri individuals and A. lyrata petraea (LYR). Student t-test was computed at every wave number with the significant level of 1%. Each marked wave number (thicker stars) indicates a statistically significant difference between treatments. Analysis was made on at least 12 FT-IR spectra per treatment and per population. Note that spectra have been offset for better readability. (B) Hierarchical classification of the difference spectra presented in (A). Classification was based on euclidian distances. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Discussion

In order to investigate the natural variability of Cd tolerance and accumulation, and the mechanisms of shoot Cd detoxification of the model species A. halleri, sequential and single dose experiments were conducted with M and NM populations from the European genetic units NW, SE, and HZ (according to Pauwels et al., 2012).

It was clearly demonstrated in this study that a huge polymorphism exists for Cd tolerance and accumulation between and within populations. Individuals displaying levels of tolerance similar to sensitive species were found in all tested NM populations, and the proportion of these individuals reaches 40% in the least tolerant population. As previously described for Zn (Pauwels et al., 2006; Meyer et al., 2010), on average the M populations are more tolerant than the NM populations whatever the genetic unit. The difference between edaphic types seems to be more pronounced than for Zn tolerance. Pauwels et al. (2006) have reported for Zn a continuum from the least tolerant to the most tolerant populations, while in the present study two groups of populations could be distinguished. However, this interpretation needs to be confirmed given the difference in sample size. Furthermore, a wide polymorphism was observed within NM populations, which suggests that the enhanced tolerance found in recently founded M populations may result from selection on standing genetic variation existing in NM populations, as previously proposed for Zn tolerance (Meyer et al., 2010).

An unexpected and interesting result comes from the relatively low tolerance ability of the model M population AU. This population has been used in many experiments on Cd uptake and tolerance (Marquès et al., 2002; Bert et al., 2003; Cosio et al., 2004), transcriptomics and proteomics (Craciun et al., 2006; Farinati et al., 2009), Cd localization (Huguet et al., 2012; Isaure et al., 2015), and quantitative genetics (Courbot et al., 2007; Willems et al., 2010). Both tolerance tests (sequential and at fixed concentration) showed a lower tolerance for this population as compared with the other M populations. After 3 weeks of culture with 5 μM CdSO4, all AU plants displayed chlorosis (Supplementary Fig S2 at JXB online) as pronounced as in the NM and A. lyrata petraea individuals. The bleaching of leaves could result from less efficient Cd detoxification mechanisms in the AU population compared with other M populations or from starvation of some essential elements. This population showed a strong competition between Cd and Zn as well as between Cd and Fe.

In the last few years, several studies have questioned the Cd hyperaccumulator status of A. halleri (Dahmani-Muller et al., 2001; Bert et al., 2002, 2003; Cosio et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2006; Huguet et al., 2012; Przedpełska-Wąsowicz et al., 2012). Experiments conducted in controlled conditions on a few populations have shown that A. halleri is able to accumulate high amounts of Cd in shoots on soil and in hydroponic conditions, namely up to 5722 μg g–1 DW after 14 weeks treatment with 100 μM Cd (Küpper et al., 2000). However, much lower Cd concentrations have been measured in A. halleri shoots under more realistic contamination levels. The question of intraspecific variability was only investigated in situ by Bert et al. (2002) on a few individuals (n=1–2) of 33 European populations. Although they concluded that hyperaccumulation is a property of the species, in metalliferous sites the proportion of individuals with Cd content above the threshold value used to define Cd hyperaccumulation (100 μg g–1 shoot DW; Brooks, 1998) was <20%. The present study is the first to investigate inter- and intrapopulation variability of Cd accumulation in controlled conditions. High levels of accumulation (>1100 μg g–1 DW) were reported in all NM populations tested and in one M population. Interestingly, the two other M populations coming from two different genetic units showed lower accumulation capacities which are close to the non-accumulating species A. lyrata petraea. Therefore, the results confirm that Cd hyperaccumulation is not constitutive at the level of the species and suggest that different strategies could have evolved in M populations to deal with high Cd content in soils.

Several experiments on A. halleri have reported Zn and Cd competition at the uptake or translocation sites (Küpper et al., 2000; Zhao et al., 2006; Ueno et al., 2008; Przedpełska-Wąsowicz et al., 2012). Conversely, Huguet et al., (2012) did not observe a decrease in Zn accumulation after 3 and 9 weeks exposure to 20 μM CdCl2, suggesting that competition could depend on experimental conditions (Zn/Cd balance, exposure time, mineral composition of the solution, age of the plants) and/or genotypes. In the present experiment, the shoot Zn concentration was decreased by 5 μM CdSO4 treatment only in some populations (M and NM) and in very different proportions (9, 35, and 45%). This result suggests that despite the high transcript level of AhHMA4 (Hanikenne et al., 2013), some A. halleri populations could control the pathways of individual movements of these metals. In N. caerulescens, different pathways seem to exist, as highlighted by competition experiments (Küpper et al., 2000; Roosens et al., 2003). In addition, there was a possible competition between Cd and Fe in all populations tested as well as in A. lyrata petraea. This phenomenon was previously described by Küpper et al. (2000) and Zhao et al. (2006) in the population AU and one M population from Germany, but seems species-wide in the present experiments. In the non-tolerant and non-accumulator species, moderate to strong Cd-induced Fe deficiency is well known (Cohen et al., 1998; Solti et al., 2008). Indeed, given the similarity between Cd2+ and Fe2+ cations, the uptake of Cd from soil could occur via Fe2+ transporters such as IRT1 which is the major transporter responsible for iron uptake from soil and can transport Cd and Zn in addition to Fe (Vert et al., 2002). However, expression of this gene in A. halleri is lower than in A. thaliana, thereby decreasing the disturbance of Fe homeostasis under metal excess (Shanmugam et al., 2013).

The CW can play a major role in the immobilization of toxic metal ions by binding them to acidic pectins, histidyl groups, and negatively charged cellulose, or by constituting, through their carbohydrates, a barrier to metal uptake into the cytosol (Redjala et al., 2009; Krzesłowska, 2011). Recently, the implication of the CW in shoot Cd detoxification was demonstrated in A. halleri. Using μXRF imaging, Isaure et al. (2015) showed in leaves of Auby individuals Cd location both inside the cells and at the rim, clearly supporting a CW/apoplast localization in addition to an intracellular pool. Hence, in order to better understand the polymorphism of Cd tolerance in A. halleri, differences in CW compositions in populations from different edaphic types were investigated using FT-IR. Although the analytical tools based on fractionation and fragmentation of CW glucans can give information of greater precision on constituent monosaccharides, they are not comprehensive in terms of complex architectural and compositional changes. FT-IR is very efficient to screen large numbers of plants and to analyse complex changes. Using this technique, it is not always easy to assign spectral peaks unambiguously to specific wall modifications, especially in lignified secondary CWs, but differences between species and modifications after treatment are clearly detectable. While the overall FT-IR results in the NC condition showed similar CW composition among A. halleri populations, a constitutive difference between A. lyrata and A. halleri was found, probably due to higher content of unesterified pectin in A. lyrata samples. These compounds, rich in free carboxyl groups, are well known to bind divalent and trivalent cations and were reported to limit the radial swelling stress induced by Cd (Douchiche et al., 2010). Apart from the low accumulator I16, the effect of Cd on the CW composition was very similar between A. lyrata petraea and A. halleri individuals. CWs of plants growing in the presence of 5 μM CdSO4 seem to increase their polysaccharide content while reducing their unesterified pectin content probably due to compensation when a higher quantity of polysacchide occurs. The studies on the impact of Cd on plant CWs have reported an opposite response of pectin, namely an increase of the low-methylesterified fraction of pectin (Douchiche et al., 2007; Fan et al., 2011; Li et al., 2015). Nevertheless, these studies investigated only the effect of Cd on CWs of roots and hypocotyl and not mature leaves. Polysaccharides and especially cellulose may contribute to metal tolerance and accumulation in various ways. Increased synthesis of cellulose could solidify and harden the CW, thus preventing metals from entering the cytosol (Degenhardt and Gimmler, 2000). A major role for cellulose in Cd binding was demonstrated by absorption kinetics of CW extracts from Salix roots (Chen et al., 2013), and the increase of some polysacharides could contribute to metal tolerance by regulation of the glutathione-dependent phytochelatin synthesis pathway (Chen et al., 2014). Interestingly, in the present study, the changes induced by Cd were more pronounced in the less tolerant individuals (including A. lyrata petraea), leading to a correlation between the level of tolerance and the extent of modifications (see Figs 6, 7B). This finding suggests a limited role for CWs in the hypertolerance of some A. halleri populations. In the more tolerant populations, other mechanisms of Cd detoxification (such as vacuolar sequestration) probably take place, whereas in the sensitive populations drastic modifications of the CW occur due to higher Cd toxicity and/or Cd immobilization in this compartment.

In conclusion, a complex picture emerges from the present results on Cd tolerance, accumulation, and Cd-induced CW modifications in A. halleri. All populations analysed are on average hypertolerant to Cd, but widely different degrees seem to exist within A. halleri, and the relationship between tolerance and accumulation is not straightforward. The fact that the M populations are on average more tolerant than the NM populations, together with the variability of tolerance among M populations, suggests evolution of this trait at a local scale. Furthermore, this hypothesis is supported by the different levels of Cd accumulation found in the M populations. Similar patterns were previously observed for the other model species N. caerulescens (Assuncao et al., 2003; Roosens et al., 2003). In the experiments reported here, the similar phenotypes found in M populations from different genetic units address the question of the convergent or parallel genetic evolution; that is, evolution of the same phenotype through similar or different genetic mechanisms (Arendt and Reznick, 2008; Stern and Orgogozo, 2009). Hence, these results highlight the importance of investigating Cd tolerance and accumulation mechanisms in populations other than the classically used Auby and Langelsheim.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Figure S1. Dry shoot biomass and relative chlorophyll content in hydroponically growth A. halleri NM (blue bars) and M (orange bars) populations and A. lyrata petraea (green bars).

Figure S2. Different phenotypes of A. halleri populations and A. lyrata ssp. petraea after a 3 week exposure to 5 μM CdSO4.

Figure S3. Mineral concentration (μg g–1) in hydroponically grown A. halleri NM (blue bars) and M (orange bars) populations and A. lyrata petraea (green bars) after a 3 week culture in control solution (0 μM CdSO4).

Figure S4. Mineral concentration (μg g–1) in hydroponically grown A. halleri NM (blue bars) and M (orange bars) populations and A. lyrata petraea (green bars) after a 3week culture at 5 μM CdSO4.

Figure S5. Mean spectrum obtained at 0 (blue line) and 5 μM CdSO4 (black line) for A. lyrata petraea individuals and spectrum of the difference between these two average spectra (red line).

Figure S6. Mean spectrum obtained at 0 (blue line) and 5 μM CdSO4 (black line) for A. halleri individuals from the NM population I28 and spectrum of the difference between these two average spectra (red line).

Figure S7. Mean spectrum obtained at 0 (blue line) and 5 μM CdSO4 (black line) for A. halleri individuals from the M population AU and spectrum of the difference between these two average spectra (red line).

Figure S8. Mean spectrum obtained at 0 (blue line) and 5 μM CdSO4 (black line) for A. halleri individuals from the M population PL22 and spectrum of the difference between these two average spectra (red line).

Figure S9. Mean spectrum obtained at 0 (blue line) and 5 μM CdSO4 (black line) for A. halleri individuals from the M population I16 and spectrum of the difference between these two average spectra (red line).

Table S1. Correlations between the mineral concentrations, the concentration of chlorophyll, and the shoot dry biomass in the studied A. halleri individuals.

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research FNRS-PDR T.0206.13, by PHYMET ANR project no. 2010 JCJC 605 01, and by the international research group LOCOMET funded by the French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS). CLM and JM are FNRS post-doctoral researchers. We are grateful to Stephan Clemens for providing us with Langelsheim seeds. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Al-Shehbaz IA, O’Kane SL. 2002. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae). The Arabidopsis Book 1, e0001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt J, Reznick D. 2008. Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what have we learned about the genetics of adaptation? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23, 26–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Assuncao AGL, Bookum WM, Nelissen HJM, Vooijs R, Schat H, Ernst WHO. 2003. Differential metal-specific tolerance and accumulation patterns among Thlaspi caerulescens populations originating from different soil types. New Phytologist 159, 411–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bert V, Bonnin I, Saumitou-laprade P, De Laguérie P, Petit D. 2002. Do Arabidopsis halleri from nonmetallicolous populations accumulate zinc and cadmium more effectively than those from metallicolous populations? New Phytologist 155, 47–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bert V, Macnair MR, De Laguérie P, Saumitou-Laprade P, Petit D. 2000. Zinc tolerance and accumulation in metallicolous and nonmetallicolous populations of Arabidopsis halleri (Brassicaceae). New Phytologist 146, 225–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bert V, Meerts P, Saumitou-Laprade P, Salis P, Gruber W, Verbruggen N. 2003. Genetic basis of Cd tolerance and hyperaccumulation in Arabidopsis halleri . Plant and Soil 249, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brooks R. 1998. Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals . Wallingford, UK: CAB International. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpita NC, Defernez M, Findlay K, Wells B, Shoue DA, Catchpole G, Wilson RH, McCann MC. 2001. Cell wall architecture of the elongating maize coleoptile. Plant Physiology 127, 551–565. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen G, Liu Y, Wang R, Zhang J, Owens G. 2013. Cadmium adsorption by willow root: the role of cell walls and their subfractions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 20, 5665–5672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen J, Yang L, Gu J, et al. 2014. MAN3 gene regulates cadmium tolerance through the glutathione-dependent pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana . New Phytologist 205, 570–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen L, Carpita NC, Reiter WD, Wilson RH, Jeffries C, McCann MC. 1998. A rapid method to screen for cell-wall mutants using discriminant analysis of Fourier transform infrared spectra. The Plant Journal 16, 385–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen C, Fox T, Garvin D, Kochian L. 1998. The role of iron-deficiency stress responses in stimulating heavy-metal transport in plants. Plant Physiology 116, 1063–1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cosio C, Martinoia E, Keller C. 2004. Hyperaccumulation of cadmium and zinc in Thlaspi caerulescens and Arabidopsis halleri at the leaf cellular level. Plant Physiology 134, 716–725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Courbot M, Willems G, Motte P, Arvidsson S, Roosens N, Saumitou-Laprade P, Verbruggen N. 2007. A major quantitative trait locus for cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis halleri colocalizes with HMA4, a gene encoding a heavy metal ATPase. Plant Physiology 144, 1052–1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Craciun AR, Courbot M, Bourgis F, Salis P, Saumitou-Laprade P, Verbruggen N. 2006. Comparative cDNA-AFLP analysis of Cd-tolerant and -sensitive genotypes derived from crosses between the Cd hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri and Arabidopsis lyrata ssp. petraea . Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 2967–2983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Craciun AR, Meyer C-L, Chen J, Roosens N, De Groodt R, Hilson P, Verbruggen N. 2012. Variation in HMA4 gene copy number and expression among Noccaea caerulescens populations presenting different levels of Cd tolerance and accumulation. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 4179–4189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dahmani-Muller H, Van Oort F, Balabane M. 2001. Metal extraction by Arabidopsis halleri grown on an unpolluted soil amended with various metal-bearing solids. A pot experiment. Environmental Pollution 114, 77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Decombeix I. 2011. Etude de l’adaptation aux milieux calaminaires chez Arabidopsis halleri: approche écologique, génétique et phénotypique. PhD thesis, Lille 1 University.
  19. Degenhardt B, Gimmler H. 2000. Cell wall adaptations to multiple environmental stresses in maize roots. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 595–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Deinlein U, Weber M, Schmidt H, et al. 2012. Elevated nicotianamine levels in Arabidopsis halleri roots play a key role in zinc hyperaccumulation. The Plant Cell 24, 708–723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Douchiche O, Driouich A, Morvan C. 2010. Spatial regulation of cell-wall structure in response to heavy metal stress, cadmium-induced alteration of the methyl-esterification pattern of homogalacturonans. Annals of Botany 105, 481–491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Douchiche O, Schaumann A, Driouich A, Morvan C. 2007. Cadmium-induced alterations of the structural features of pectins in flax hypocotyl. Planta 225, 1301–1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ebbs SD, Zambrano MC, Spiller SM, Newville M. 2009. Cadmium sorption, influx, and efflux at the mesophyll layer of leaves from ecotypes of the Zn/Cd hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens . New Phytologist 181, 626–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fan J-L, Wei X-Z, Wan L-C, Zhang L-Y, Zhao X-Q, Liu W-Z, Hao H-Q, Zhang HY. 2011. Disarrangement of actin filaments and Ca2+ gradient by CdCl2 alters cell wall construction in Arabidopsis thaliana root hairs by inhibiting vesicular trafficking. Journal of Plant Physiology 168, 1157–1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Farinati S, DalCorso G, Bona E, Corbella M, Lampis S, Cecconi D, Polati R, Berta G, Vallini G, Furini A. 2009. Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis halleri shoots in response to the heavy metals cadmium and zinc and rhizosphere microorganisms. Proteomics 9, 4837–4850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fernandes JC, García-Angulo P, Goulao LF, Acebes JL, Amâncio S. 2013. Mineral stress affects the cell wall composition of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) callus. Plant Science 205–206 , 111–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Frérot H, Faucon M-P, Willems G, Godé C, Courseaux A, Darracq A, Verbruggen N, Saumitou-Laprade P. 2010. Genetic architecture of zinc hyperaccumulation in Arabidopsis halleri, the essential role of QTL×environment interactions. New Phytologist 187, 355–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Goormaghtigh E, Cabiaux V, Ruysschaert JM. 1994. a Determination of soluble and membrane protein structure by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. II. Experimental aspects, side chain structure and H/D exchange. Sub-cellular Biochemistry 23, 363–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Goormaghtigh E, Cabiaux V, Ruysschaert JM. 1994. b Determination of soluble and membrane protein structure by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. III. Second structures. Sub-cellular Biochemistry 23, 405–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Goormaghtigh E, Raussens V, Ruysschaert J. 1999. Attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy of proteins and lipids in biological membranes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1422, 105–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Goormaghtigh E, Ruysschaert J-M, Raussens V. 2006. Evaluation of the information content in infrared spectra for protein secondary structure determination. Biophysical Journal 90, 2946–2957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hanikenne M, Kroymann J, Trampczynska A, Bernal M, Motte P, Clemens S, Krämer U. 2013. Hard selective sweep and ectopic gene conversion in a gene cluster affording environmental adaptation. PLoS Genetics 9, e1003707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hanikenne M, Talke IN, Haydon MJ, Lanz C, Nolte A, Motte P, Kroymann J, Weigel D, Krämer U. 2008. Evolution of metal hyperaccumulation required cis-regulatory changes and triplication of HMA4 . Nature 453, 391–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huguet S, Bert V, Laboudigue A, Barthès V, Isaure M-P, Llorens I, Schat H, Sarret G. 2012. Cd speciation and localization in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri . Environmental and Experimental Botany 82, 54–65. [Google Scholar]
  35. Isaure M, Huguet S, Meyer C-L, Castillo-Michel H, Testemale D, Vantelon D, Saumitou-Laprade P, Verbruggen N, Sarret G. 2015. Evidence of various mechanisms of Cd sequestration in the hyperaccumalator Arabidopsis halleri, the non accumulator Arabidopsis lyrata, and their progeny by combined synchrotron-based techniques. Journal of Experimental Botany 66, 3201–3214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jiang X, Wang C. 2008. Zinc distribution and zinc-binding forms in Phragmites australis under zinc pollution. Journal of Plant Physiology 165, 697–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Johnson R, Wichern D. 2002. Applied multivariate statistical analysis . Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jones L, Milne JL, Ashford D, McCann MC, McQueen-Mason SJ. 2005. A conserved functional role of pectic polymers in stomatal guard cells from a range of plant species. Planta 221, 255–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kakuracova M. 2000. FT-IR study of plant cell wall model compounds, pectic polysaccharides and hemicelluloses. Carbohydrate Polymers 43, 195–203. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kawachi M, Kobae Y, Kogawa S, Mimura T, Krämer U, Maeshima M. 2012. Amino acid screening based on structural modeling identifies critical residues for the function, ion selectivity and structure of Arabidopsis MTP1. FEBS Journal 279, 2339–2356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kopittke PM, Blamey FPC, Asher CJ, Menzies NW. 2010. Trace metal phytotoxicity in solution culture: a review. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 945–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Koren S, Arčon I, Kump P, Nečemer M, Vogel-Mikuš 2013. Influence of CdCl2 and CdSO4 supplementation on Cd distribution and ligand environment in leaves of the Cd hyperaccumulator Noccaea (Thlaspi) praecox . Plant and Soil 370, 125–148. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kostecka A. 2009. Adaptation of Arabidopsis halleri to habitats rich in heavy metals in southern Poland. PhD thesis, Lille 1 University.
  44. Krämer U. 2010. Metal hyperaccumulation in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61, 517–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Krzesłowska M. 2011. The cell wall in plant cell response to trace metals, polysaccharide remodeling and its role in defense strategy. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 33, 35–51. [Google Scholar]
  46. Küpper H, Lombi E, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP. 2000. Cellular compartmentation of cadmium and zinc in relation to other elements in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri . Planta 212, 75–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Küpper H, Mijovilovich A, Meyer-klaucke W, Kroneck PMH. 2004. Tissue- and age-dependent differences in the complexation of cadmium and zinc in the cadmium/zinc hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens (Ganges Ecotype) revealed by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Plant Physiology 134, 748–757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Li T, Tao Q, Shohag MJI, Yang X, Sparks DL, Liang Y. 2015. Root cell wall polysaccharides are involved in cadmium hyperaccumulation in Sedum alfredii. Plant and Soil 389, 387–399. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ma JF, Ueno D, Zhao F-J, McGrath SP. 2005. Subcellular localisation of Cd and Zn in the leaves of a Cd-hyperaccumulating ecotype of Thlaspi caerulescens . Planta 220, 731–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Macnair MR, Bert V, Huitson SB, Saumitou-Laprade P, Petit D. 1999. Zinc tolerance and hyperaccumulation are genetically independent characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266, 2175–2179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Marquès L, Cossegal M, Bodin S, Czernic P, Lebrun M. 2002. Heavy metal specificity of cellular tolerance in two hyperaccumulating plants, Arabidopsis halleri and Thlaspi caerulescens . New Phytologist 164, 289–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Martin JA, Solla A, Woodward S, Gil L. 2005. Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy as a new method for evaluating host resistance in the Dutch elm disease complex. Tree Physiology 25, 1331–1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Meerts P, Van Isacker N. 1997. Heavy metal tolerance and accumulation in metallicolous and non-metallicolous populations of Thlaspi caerulescens from continental Europe. Plant Ecology 133, 221–231. [Google Scholar]
  54. Meyer C-L, Kostecka A a, Saumitou-Laprade P, Créach A, Castric V, Pauwels M, Frérot H. 2010. Variability of zinc tolerance among and within populations of the pseudometallophyte species Arabidopsis halleri and possible role of directional selection. New Phytologist 185, 130–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mouille G, Robin S, Lecomte M, Pagant S, Höfte H. 2003. Classification and identification of Arabidopsis cell wall mutants using Fourier-Transform InfraRed (FT-IR) microspectroscopy. The Plant Journal 35, 393–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ó Lochlainn S, Bowen HC, Fray RG, Hammond JP, King GJ, White PJ, Graham NS, Broadley MR. 2011. Tandem quadruplication of HMA4 in the zinc (Zn) and cadmium (Cd) hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens . PloS One 6, e17814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pauwels M, Frérot H, Bonnin I, Saumitou-Laprade P. 2006. A broad-scale analysis of population differentiation for Zn tolerance in an emerging model species for tolerance study, Arabidopsis halleri (Brassicaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19, 1838–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pauwels M, Vekemans X, Godé C, Frérot H, Castric V, Saumitou-Laprade P. 2012. Nuclear and chloroplast DNA phylogeography reveals vicariance among European populations of the model species for the study of metal tolerance, Arabidopsis halleri (Brassicaceae). New Phytologist 193, 916–928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Przedpełska-Wąsowicz E, Polatajko A, Wierzbicka M. 2012. The influence of cadmium stress on the content of mineral nutrients and metal-binding proteins in Arabidopsis halleri . Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 223, 5445–5458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Redjala T, Sterckeman T, Morel JL. 2009. Cadmium uptake by roots. Contribution of apoplast and of high- and low-affinity membrane transport systems. Environmental and Experimental Botany 67, 235–242. [Google Scholar]
  61. Roosens N, Verbruggen N, Meerts P, Smith JAC, Thlaspi J, Presl C. 2003. Natural variation in cadmium tolerance and its relationship to metal hyperaccumulation for seven populations of Thlaspi caerulescens from western Europe. Plant, Cell and Environment 26, 1657–1672. [Google Scholar]
  62. Roosens NHCJ, Willems G, Saumitou-Laprade P. 2008. Using Arabidopsis to explore zinc tolerance and hyperaccumulation. Trends in Plant Science 13, 208–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Salomé M, Cotte M, Baker R, et al. 2013. The ID21 scanning X-ray microscope at ESRF. Journal of Physics, Conference Series 425, 182004. [Google Scholar]
  64. Sarret G, Willems G, Isaure M-P, Marcus MA, Fakra SC, Frérot H, Pairis S, Geoffroy N, Manceau A, Saumitou-Laprade P. 2009. Zinc distribution and speciation in Arabidopsis halleri×Arabidopsis lyrata progenies presenting various zinc accumulation capacities. New Phytologist 184, 581–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sarret G, Pilon Smits EAH, Castillo Michel H, Isaure M-P, Zhao FJ, Tappero R. 2013. Use of synchrotron-based techniques to elucidate metal uptake and metabolism in plants. Advances in Agronomy 119, 1–82. [Google Scholar]
  66. Schat H, Ten Bookum W. 1992. Genetic control of copper tolerance in Silene vulgaris . Heredity 68, 219–229. [Google Scholar]
  67. Séné CFB, McCann MC, Wilson RH, Grinter R. 1994. Fourier-transform Raman and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (an investigation of five higher plant cell walls and their components). Plant Physiology 106, 1623–1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Shanmugam V, Lo J-C, Yeh K-C. 2013. Control of Zn uptake in Arabidopsis halleri: a balance between Zn and Fe. Frontiers in Plant Science 4, 281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Siegel S, Castellan N. 1988. Non parametric statistics for behavioural sciences . New York: MacGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  70. Sokal R, Rohlf F. 1995. Biometry . New York: Freeman and Co. [Google Scholar]
  71. Solti A, Gáspár L, Mészáros I, Szigeti Z, Lévai L, Sárvári E. 2008. Impact of iron supply on the kinetics of recovery of photosynthesis in Cd-stressed poplar (Populus glauca). Annals of Botany 102, 771–782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Sousa AI, Caçador I, Lillebø AI, Pardal MA. 2008. Heavy metal accumulation in Halimione portulacoides: intra- and extra-cellular metal binding sites. Chemosphere 70, 850–857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Stern DL, Orgogozo V. 2009. Is genetic evolution predictable? Science 323, 746–751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Talke IN, Hanikenne M, Krämer U. 2006. Zinc-dependent global transcriptional control, transcriptional deregulation, and higher gene copy number for genes in metal homeostasis of the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri . Plant Physiology 142, 148–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ueno D, Iwashita T, Zhao F-J, Ma JF. 2008. Characterization of Cd translocation and identification of the Cd form in xylem sap of the Cd-hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri . Plant and Cell Physiology 49, 540–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Ueno D, Milner MJ, Yamaji N, Yokosho K, Koyama E, Clemencia Zambrano M, Kaskie M, Ebbs S, Kochian L V, Ma JF. 2011. Elevated expression of TcHMA3 plays a key role in the extreme Cd tolerance in a Cd-hyperaccumulating ecotype of Thlaspi caerulescens . The Plant Journal 66, 852–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Verbruggen N, Hermans C, Schat H. 2009. Molecular mechanisms of metal hyperaccumulation in plants. New Phytologist 181, 759–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Vert G, Grotz N, Dédaldéchamp F, Gaymard F, Guerinot M Lou, Briat J-F, Curie C. 2002. IRT1, an Arabidopsis transporter essential for iron uptake from the soil and for plant growth. Plant Cell 14, 1223–1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Vollenweider P, Cosio C, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Keller C. 2006. Localization and effects of cadmium in leaves of a cadmium-tolerant willow (Salix viminalis L.): Part II Microlocalization and cellular effects of cadmium. Environmental and Experimental Botany 58, 25–40. [Google Scholar]
  80. Wang J, Zhu J, Huang R, Yang Y. 2012. Investigation of cell wall composition related to stem lodging resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by FTIR spectroscopy. Plant Signaling and Behavior 7, 856–863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Ward J. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 236–244. [Google Scholar]
  82. Willems G, Dräger DB, Courbot M, Godé C, Verbruggen N, Saumitou-Laprade P. 2007. The genetic basis of zinc tolerance in the metallophyte Arabidopsis halleri ssp. halleri (Brassicaceae): an analysis of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 176, 659–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhao FJ, Jiang RF, Dunham SJ, McGrath SP. 2006. Cadmium uptake, translocation and tolerance in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri . New Phytologist 172, 646–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Zornoza P, Vázquez S, Esteban E, Fernández-Pascual M, Carpena R. 2002. Cadmium-stress in nodulated white lupin: strategies to avoid toxicity. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 40, 1003–1009. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES