Skip to main content
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews logoLink to The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
. 2014 Sep 11;2014(9):CD010678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010678.pub2

Artemether for severe malaria

Ekpereonne Esu 1,, Emmanuel E Effa 2, Oko N Opie 3, Amirahobu Uwaoma 4, Martin M Meremikwu 5
PMCID: PMC4455227  PMID: 25209020

Abstract

Background

In 2011 the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended parenteral artesunate in preference to quinine as first‐line treatment for people with severe malaria. Prior to this recommendation, many countries, particularly in Africa, had begun to use artemether, an alternative artemisinin derivative. This review evaluates intramuscular artemether compared with both quinine and artesunate.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of intramuscular artemether versus any other parenteral medication in treating severe malaria in adults and children.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS, ISI Web of Science, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. We also searched the WHO clinical trial registry platform, ClinicalTrials.gov and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) for ongoing trials up to 9 April 2014.

Selection criteria

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intramuscular artemether with intravenous or intramuscular antimalarial for treating severe malaria.

Data collection and analysis

The primary outcome was all‐cause death.Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. We summarized dichotomous outcomes using risk ratios (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean differences (MD), and presented both measures with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where appropriate, we combined data in meta‐analyses and assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

Main results

We included 18 RCTs, enrolling 2662 adults and children with severe malaria, carried out in Africa (11) and in Asia (7).

Artemether versus quinine

For children in Africa, there is probably little or no difference in the risk of death between intramuscular artemether and quinine (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.20; 12 trials, 1447 participants, moderate quality evidence). Coma recovery may be about five hours shorter with artemether (MD ‐5.45, 95% CI ‐7.90 to ‐3.00; six trials, 358 participants, low quality evidence), and artemether may result in fewer neurological sequelae, but larger trials would be needed to confirm this (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.07; seven trials, 968 participants, low quality evidence). Artemether probably shortens the parasite clearance time by about nine hours (MD ‐9.03, 95% CI ‐11.43 to ‐6.63; seven trials, 420 participants, moderate quality evidence), and may shorten the fever clearance time by about three hours (MD ‐3.73, 95% CI ‐6.55 to ‐0.92; eight trials, 457 participants, low quality evidence).

For adults in Asia, treatment with intramuscular artemether probably results in fewer deaths than treatment with quinine (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.83; four trials, 716 participants, moderate quality evidence).

Artemether versus artesunate

Artemether and artesunate have not been directly compared in randomized trials in African children.

For adults in Asia, mortality is probably higher with intramuscular artemether (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.97, two trials,494 participants, moderate quality evidence).

Authors' conclusions

Although there is a lack of direct evidence comparing artemether with artesunate, artemether is probably less effective than artesunate at preventing deaths from severe malaria. In circumstances where artesunate is not available, artemether is an alternative to quinine.

Keywords: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Africa; Antimalarials; Antimalarials/administration & dosage; Antimalarials/adverse effects; Artemether; Artemisinins; Artemisinins/administration & dosage; Artemisinins/adverse effects; Artesunate; Asia; Injections, Intramuscular; Malaria, Cerebral; Malaria, Cerebral/drug therapy; Malaria, Cerebral/mortality; Malaria, Falciparum; Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy; Malaria, Falciparum/mortality; Oceania; Quinine; Quinine/administration & dosage; Quinine/adverse effects; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Artemether injection for treating people with severe malaria

In this review, researchers from The Cochrane Collaboration examined the effects of treating people that have severe malaria with artemether injected intramuscularly, and compared it to treatment with other antimalarial drugs given intramuscularly or intravenously. After searching for relevant trials up to 9 April 2014, we included 18 randomized controlled trials that recruited 2662 adults and children and were conducted mainly in Africa and Asia.

What is severe malaria and how might artemether injection reduce deaths

Severe malaria is caused by infection with the Plasmodium parasite, which is transmitted to people through the bite of an infected female Anopheles mosquito. It is a serious medical condition and can cause vomiting, anaemia, convulsions and death. People need to be treated as quickly as possible.

Injection of artesunate is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for treating adults and children that have severe malaria as trials have shown that it results in fewer deaths compared to quinine treatment. Artemether is an alternative artemisinin derivative but is only available as a pre‐mixed oil‐based solution for intramuscular injection. Artemether is now widely available and is used in many African countries, although it is not specifically recommended by the WHO.

What the research says

Artemether versus quinine:

For children in Africa, intramuscular artemether is probably as good as quinine at preventing deaths from severe malaria (moderate quality evidence). Artemether may shorten recovery time from coma by about five hours (low quality evidence), and may reduce the number of children with signs of brain damage at the time of hospital discharge (low quality evidence).

In older children (> 15 years) and adults in Asia, treatment with artemether probably results in fewer deaths than quinine (moderate quality evidence).

Artemether versus artesunate:

In adults from Asia, artesunate probably prevents more deaths than artemether (moderate quality evidence), but no trials have been conducted in young children from Africa.

Authors conclusions

Although there is a lack of direct evidence comparing artemether with artesunate, artemether is probably less effective than artesunate at preventing deaths from severe malaria. In circumstances where artesunate is not available, artemether is an alternative to quinine.

Summary of findings

Summary of findings for the main comparison.

Summary of findings table 1

Artemether compared with quinine for treating children with severe malaria
Patient or population: Children with severe malaria Settings: Malaria‐endemic countries Intervention: Intramuscular artemether Comparison: Intravenous or intramuscular quinine
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) No of participants (trials) Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Quinine Artemether
Death 170 per 1000 164 per 1000 (129 to 204) RR 0.96 (0.76 to 1.2) 1447 (12 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1,2,3,4
Coma resolution time The mean coma resolution time ranged across control groups from 17.4 to 42.4 hours The mean coma resolution time in the intervention groups was 5.45 hours shorter (7.90 to 3.00 shorter) 358 (6 trials) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low3,5,6,7
Neurological sequelae at discharge 220 per 1000 185 per 1000 (145 to 235) RR 0.84 (0.66 to 1.07) 968 (7 trials) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low 1,2,3,8
Parasite clearance time The mean parasite clearance time ranged across control groups from 22.4 to 61.25 hours The mean parasite clearance time in the intervention groups was 9.03 hours shorter (11.43 to 6.63 shorter) 420 (7 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1,3,7,9
Fever clearance time The mean fever clearance time ranged across control groups from 18 to 61.25 hours The mean fever clearance time in the intervention groups was 3.73 shorter (6.55 to 0.92 shorter) 457 (8 trials) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low3,10,11,12
*The assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 No serious risk of bias: Trials were variable in their risk of bias, but exclusion of the trials at high or unclear risk of selection bias did not change this result. 2 No serious inconsistency: None of the individual trials found statistically significant effects, and there was no statistical heterogeneity between trials. 3 No serious indirectness: Trials were from West Africa, East Africa and one from India. All were in children with severe malaria (aged under 15 years), and most compared the standard dose of intramuscular artemether with the WHO recommended dose of intravenous quinine. 4 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: These trials, and the overall meta‐analysis are underpowered to detect a difference or to prove equivalence. 5 Downgraded by 2 for serious risk of bias: Four of the six trials were at unclear risk of selection bias. When these four trials are excluded the result becomes non‐significant. 6 No serious inconsistency: Statistically significant differences were only seen in two of the six trials. However, statistical heterogeneity between trials was low and the overall meta‐analysis is statistically significant. 7 No serious imprecision: The result is statistically significant and the overall meta‐analysis is adequately powered to detect this effect. 8 Downgraded by 2 for very serious imprecision: These trials, and the overall meta‐analysis are underpowered to detect a difference or to prove equivalence. The 95% CI is very wide and includes clinically important differences and no effect. 9 Downgraded by 1 for serious inconsistency: The mean difference in parasite clearance time ranged from a two hour increase with artemether to a 15 hour decrease. 10 Downgraded by 1 for serious risk of bias: Four of the seven trials were at unclear risk of selection bias. When these four trials are excluded the result becomes non‐significant. 11 Downgraded by 1 for serious inconsistency: The mean difference in fever clearance time ranged from a 25 hour increase with artemether to an 18 hour decrease. 12 No serious imprecision: The overall meta‐analysis is powered to detect this effect. The result is statistically significant but may not be clinically important.

Summary of findings 2.

Summary of findings table 2

Artemether compared with quinine for treating adults with severe malaria
Patient or population: Adults with severe malaria Settings: Malaria endemic countries Intervention: Intramuscular artemether Comparison: Intravenous or intramuscular quinine
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) No of participants (trials) Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Quinine Artemether
Death 208 per 1000 123 per 1000 (87 to 173) RR 0.59 (0.42 to 0.83) 716 (4 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1,2,3,4
Coma resolution time Not pooled. Little difference. 657 (2 trials) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,5,6, 7
Neurological sequelae at discharge 4 per 1000 12 per 1000
(1 to 111)
RR 2.92 (0.31 to 27.86) 560 (1 trial) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low7,8
Parasite clearance time Not pooled. Little difference apparent. 716 (4 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1,3,6,9
Fever clearance time Not pooled. Little difference apparent. 716 (4 trials) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,3,6,10
*The assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 No serious risk of bias: Trials are generally well conducted and at low risk of bias. 2 No serious inconsistency: Statistically significant differences were only seen in one of the four trials. However, statistical heterogeneity between trials was low and the overall meta‐analysis is statistically significant. 3 No serious indirectness: All four trials compared intramuscular artemether with intravenous quinine in adults; two trials from Thailand, one each from Vietnam and Papua New Guinea 4 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: These trials, and the overall meta‐analysis are very underpowered to detect a difference in mortality or to prove equivalence. 5Hien 1996 VNM and Karbwang 1995 THA reported median coma time for artemether vs. quinine (Hien 1996 VNM: 66 vs. 48, P = 0.003; Karbwang 1995 THA: 48 vs. 48). Downgraded by 1 for inconsistency: One trial found a shorter median coma resolution time with quinine, and one trial found no difference. 6 Downgraded by 1 for imprecision: The data could not be pooled.

7 No serious risk of bias: This single trial was at low risk of bias.

8 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: Neurological sequelae in adults were uncommon. This trial is underpowered to detect or exclude clinically important differences. 9 Two trials found no significant difference between parasite clearance time for artemether vs. quinine (Karbwang 1992 THA: mean 63.6 vs. 61.6, P = 0.85 and Seaton 1998 PNG: median 48 vs. 52, P = 0.381). Two other trials reported significantly shorter median parasite clearance times for artemether vs. quinine (Hien 1996 VNM: 72 vs. 90 P < 0.001 and Karbwang 1995 THA: 54 vs.78, P = 0.007). No serious inconsistency: The two largest trials both found shorter median clearance times with artemether. 10 Three trials (Hien 1996 VNM, Seaton 1998 PNG and Karbwang 1995 THA) reported median fever clearance time for artemether vs. quinine (127 vs. 90, P < 0.001; 32 vs. 48, P =  0.034 and 79 vs. 84, no significant difference). Karbwang 1992 THAreported mean fever clearance time and found a statistically significant reduction of about 30 hours with artemether. Downgraded by 1 for inconsistency: One trial found a shorter median fever clearance time with quinine, and two trials found a shorter time with artemether.

Summary of findings 3.

Summary of findings table 3

Artemether compared with artesunate for treating adults with severe malaria
Patient or population: Adults with severe malaria Settings: Malaria endemic countries Intervention: Intramuscular artemether Comparison: Intravenous or intramuscular artesunate
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) No of participants (trials) Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Artesunate Artemether
Death 87 per 1000 156 per 1000 (95 to 258) RR 1.80 (1.09 to 2.97) 494 (2 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1,2,3,4
Coma resolution time Not pooled. No significant difference 494 (2 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1,3,5,6
Neurological sequelae at discharge 0 (0 trials)
Parasite clearance time Not pooled. No significant difference 494 (2 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1,3,6,7
Fever clearance time Not pooled. No significant difference 494 (2 trials) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,3,6,8
*The assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 No serious risk of bias: Trials were generally well conducted and at low risk of bias. 2 No serious inconsistency: There is no statistical heterogeneity 3 No serious indirectness: The two trials were conducted in Vietnam and Thailand and both compared intramuscular artemether with intravenous artesunate in adults. 4 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: These trials, and the overall meta‐analysis are very underpowered to detect a difference in mortality or to prove equivalence. 5Phu 2010 VNM and Vinh 1997 VNM reported median coma resolution time for artemether vs. artesunate (Phu 2010 VNM: 72 vs. 60, P = 0.11; Vinh 1997 VNM: 47 (artemether) vs. 30 (artesunate IM) vs. 24 (artesunate IV). No serious inconsistency: Both trials suggest an advantage with artesunate although not statistically significant. 6 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: We could not pool these data as median data were presented for both trials. 7Phu 2010 VNM and Vinh 1997 VNM reported median parasite clearance time (Phu 2010 VNM: 72 vs. 72, P = 0.97; Vinh 1997 VNM: 30 (artemether) vs. 24 (artesunate IM) vs. 24 (artesunate IV). No serious inconsistency: Both trials found no difference between treatments. 8Phu 2010 VNM and Vinh 1997 VNM reported median fever clearance time (Phu 2010 VNM: 108 vs. 108, P = 0.27; Vinh 1997 VNM: 48 (artemether) vs. 36 (artesunate IM) vs. 30 (artesunate IV). No serious inconsistency: Both trials found no statistically significant difference between artemether and artesunate.

Background

Description of the condition

Malaria is a febrile illness caused by Plasmodium parasites, which are transmitted to humans through the bite of infected female anopheline mosquitoes. Five species of Plasmodium cause this disease in humans, of which P. falciparum is the most common worldwide, and is responsible for almost all of the severe disease and deaths (WHO 2000; WHO 2008).

Severe malaria is diagnosed on the basis of a positive blood slide or antigen test for malaria, plus the presence of clinical or laboratory features of vital organ dysfunction. These include impaired consciousness, coma, convulsions, respiratory distress, shock (systolic blood pressure < 70 mmHg in adults, < 50 mmHg in children), jaundice, haemoglobinuria, hypoglycaemia, severe metabolic acidosis or anaemia (WHO 2010). Cerebral malaria is one form of severe malaria, where the patient has some impairment of consciousness and cognition. This can vary from slight disorientation through to deep coma where the patient is unconscious and unrousable. Even with correct treatment cerebral malaria can cause a mortality rate of up to 20%, and a small proportion of people that survive infection can have persistent neurological sequelae (Jaffar 1997).

People living in malaria‐endemic regions can develop a naturally acquired immunity to malaria through repeated exposure to the parasite over five to 10 years (Doolan 2009). This partial immunity is protective against the most severe forms of the disease, and as a consequence, in high transmission settings mortality from severe malaria is highest in young children and decreases with increasing age (WHO 2010).

The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends parenteral artesunate as the first‐line treatment for severe malaria, followed by a complete course of an effective artemisinin‐based combination therapy (ACT) as soon as the patient can take oral medications (WHO 2010). The WHO based their recommendation on evidence from two large multi‐centre clinical trials that demonstrated the superiority of intravenous artesunate over the standard treatment quinine (Dondorp 2005; Dondorp 2010). A Cochrane Review of available data concluded that treating people that have severe malaria with artesunate instead of quinine would reduce the risk of death by 39% in adults and 24% in children (Sinclair 2011).

Description of the intervention

Artesunate is only one of a number of antimalarials derived from artemisinin, which is extracted from the herb Artemesia annua and is the active ingredient in a Chinese herbal remedy for fever. Once ingested or injected, artemisinin derivatives undergo conversion to dihydroartemisinin, the active metabolite, which has a broad spectrum of activity against the blood stage asexual Plasmodium parasites (Navaratnam 2000; ter Kuile 1993). Artemisinin derivatives clear parasites from the peripheral blood quicker than other antimalarials, but only artesunate has been shown to impact mortality.

Unlike artesunate, artemether is poorly soluble in water and the parenteral formulation is only available as a pre‐mixed oil‐based solution for intramuscular injection (80 mg/mL for use in adults and 40 mg/mL for children). The standard dose is 3.2 mg/kg on admission followed by 1.6 mg/kg once daily until oral therapy is tolerated (WHO 2010). Peak plasma concentrations typically occur around six hours after intramuscular injection, but in severely ill children with poor peripheral perfusion, absorption can be highly erratic (Karbwang 1997; Mithwani 2004; Murphy 1997).

Conversely, artesunate is supplied as a dry powder for mixing with sodium bicarbonate prior to either intravenous or intramuscular injection (WHO 2010). Compared with artemether, the absorption of artesunate is more reliable with peak plasma concentrations following intramuscular injection occurring at around one hour (Hien 2004; Illet 2002; Nealon 2002). These more favourable pharmacokinetic properties of artesunate moved research attention away from artemether and artesunate now has a stronger evidence‐base and is the preferred therapy (Sinclair 2011; WHO 2010).

Why it is important to do this review

A number of African countries incorporated intramuscular artemether into their national guidelines prior to the WHO recommendation for artesunate. Systematic reviews concluded that intramuscular artemisinin derivatives (including both artesunate and artemether) were not inferior to quinine in preventing deaths from malaria, but were safer and easier to administer (AQMSG 2001; Kyu 2009; McIntosh 2000).

Following the WHO recommendation for artesunate as the preferred treatment for severe malaria, there is a need to re‐evaluate the role of intramuscular artemether in the management of severe malaria in adults and children.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of intramuscular artemether versus any other parenteral medication in the treatment of severe malaria in adults and children.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Types of participants

Adults and children (under 15 years of age) with severe malaria.

Types of interventions

Intervention
  • Intramuscular artemether

Control
  • Any other parenteral medication for the treatment of severe malaria

Types of outcome measures

Primary outcomes
  • Death from any cause

Secondary outcomes
  • Coma resolution time

  • Neurological sequelae (such as blindness, deafness, hemiplegia and others)

  • Time to hospital discharge

  • Parasite clearance time

  • Fever clearance time

  • Need for blood transfusion

  • Severe anaemia

  • Adverse events (including hypoglycaemia, tinnitus, nausea, vomiting, haematological and cardiac‐related adverse events)

Search methods for identification of studies

We attempted to identify all relevant trials regardless of language or publication status (published, unpublished, in press and in progress).

Electronic searches

Databases

We searched the following databases on 09 April 2014 using the search terms detailed in Table 6:  Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2014, Issue 4), published in The Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (1966 to April 2014); EMBASE (1974 to April 2014), LILACS (1982 to April 2014) and ISI Web of Science (1900 to April 2014). We also searched the WHO clinical trial registry platform, ClinicalTrials.gov and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) up to 09 April 2014 for ongoing trials using 'artemether', 'severe malaria', 'complicated malaria', 'artesunate', 'arteether', and 'child*' as search terms.

Table 1.

Search strategy

Search set CIDG SR1 CENTRAL MEDLINE2 Embase2 LILACS2 ISI Web of Science
1 malaria Malaria ti, ab, MeSH Malaria ti, ab, MeSH Malaria ti, ab, Emtree malaria malaria
2 artemether Artemether ti, ab Artemether ti, ab Artemether ti, ab, Emtree artemether artemether
3 Artemisinin* Artemisinin* ti, ab Artemisinin* ti, ab Artemisinin* ti, ab Artemisinin* Artemisinin*
4 intramuscular Intramuscular ti, ab Intramuscular ti, ab Intramuscular ti, ab intramuscular intramuscular
5 parenteral Injections, Intramuscular [MeSH] Injections, Intramuscular [MeSH] Intramuscular drug administration [Emtree] parenteral parenteral
6 2 or 3 Parenteral ti, ab Parenteral ti, ab Parenteral drug administration [Emtree] 2 or 3 2 or 3
7 4 or 5 2 or 3 2 or 3 2 or 3 4 or 5 4 or 5
8 1 and 5 and 7 4 or 5 or 6 4 or 5 or 6 4 or 5 or 6 1 and 5 and 7 1 and 5 and 7
9 1 and 7 and 8 1 and 7 and 8 1 and 7 and 8 Randomised clinical trial*
10 8 and 9

1Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register. 2Search terms used in combination with the search strategy for retrieving trials developed by The Cochrane Collaboration (Lefebvre 2011).

Searching other resources

Conference proceedings

We searched relevant proceedings of the following meetings for trial information; Multilateral Initiative on Malaria (MIM) Pan‐African Malaria Conference, European Congress of Tropical Medicine and American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (09 April 2014).

Researchers

We contacted researchers working in the field and the WHO for unpublished and ongoing trials.

Reference lists

We checked the reference lists of existing reviews and of all trials identified by the above methods.

Data collection and analysis

Selection of studies

Two authors (EE and EEE) independently screened the literature search results and obtained the full reports of such potentially relevant trials. EE and EEE independently applied the inclusion criteria to the full reports using an eligibility form and scrutinized publications to ensure each trial was included only once. We resolved any disagreements through discussion with a third author and, when necessary, by consulting a member of the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group (CIDG) editorial team. Also, we listed the excluded studies and the reasons for their exclusion.

Data extraction and management

EE and EEE independently extracted data using a specifically developed piloted data extraction form. We resolved any disagreements through discussion with all of the review authors and, when necessary, by consulting a member of the CIDG editorial team. We contacted the corresponding publication author in the case of unclear information or missing data. For each outcome we aimed to extract the number of participants randomized and the number analysed in each treatment group. For dichotomous outcomes, we recorded the number of participants experiencing the event and the number assessed in each treatment group. For continuous outcomes, we extracted arithmetic means and standard deviations for each treatment group, together with the numbers assessed in each group.

Where baseline proportions of participants in the intervention and control arms in whom antipyretics were administered varied, we only included trials that reported fever clearance time and provided additional information about antipyretics use at baseline for participants in both intervention and control arm to avoid confounding in the summary estimate for fever clearance. Where there was significant difference between antipyretic use at baseline in intervention and control arms, we only reported fever clearance time in a table. We defined cure rates in this review as time from first dose to first negative parasite reading for two consecutive readings.

Assessment of risk of bias in included studies

EE and EEE independently assessed the risk of bias of each trial using a risk of bias form. We attempted to contact the trial authors if this information was not specified or if it was unclear. We resolved any disagreements by discussion between review authors. Six components were assessed: generation of the randomization sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting and other biases (such as the trial stopped early). We categorized our judgements as either 'low', 'high', or 'unclear' risk of bias, and described our reasons for doing so.

Measures of treatment effect

We calculated results using risk ratios for dichotomous data, and mean difference values for continuous data, and presented these effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We treated time‐to‐event outcomes as continuous data and accordingly mean difference calculated from mean time in intervention versus control groups.

Unit of analysis issues

For multiple arm trials, we combined all relevant experimental intervention groups of the trial into a single group, and also combined all relevant control intervention groups into a single control group. For dichotomous outcomes, both the sample sizes and the numbers of people with events were added across groups. For continuous outcomes, we combined means and standard deviations using methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Dealing with missing data

We analysed data according to the intention‐to treat principle (all randomized participants should be analysed in the groups to which they were originally assigned). If there were discrepancies between the number randomized and the number analysed, we calculated the percentage loss to follow‐up for each treatment group and reported this information.

However, if for some trials it was unclear whether there was loss to follow‐up, we entered the number analysed into Review Manager (RevMan) whenever these figures were available. By attempting to carry out a complete case analysis, we avoided making assumptions about the outcomes of participants lost to follow‐up. Where possible, we contacted authors for missing data.

Assessment of heterogeneity

We looked for statistical heterogeneity by inspecting the forest plots for overlapping CIs, applying the Chi2 test (P < 0.10 considered statistically significant) and the I2 statistic (I2 value < 50% used to denote moderate levels of heterogeneity).

Assessment of reporting biases

We planned to construct funnel plots to look for evidence of publication bias provided we included a sufficient number of trials to make this informative.

Data synthesis

We analysed the data using Review Manager (RevMan). In the first instance, we applied a fixed‐effect meta‐analysis. However, if we detected moderate heterogeneity but still considered it appropriate to combine the trials, we then used a random‐effects approach. Where heterogeneity was very high such that meta‐analysis was not appropriate, we displayed the results in forest plots or tables but did not combine the results. Where data were only presented as medians and ranges, we presented the results in tables.

We presented the main results of the review alongside a GRADE appraisal of the quality of evidence in the 'Summary of Findings' tables.

Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity

We grouped the analysis and results by children and adults. We reported results by whether the studies were carried out in Africa or in Asia. We examined whether loading dose or quinine influenced outcomes.

Sensitivity analysis

We conducted a sensitivity analysis to investigate the robustness of the results to the risk of bias components by including only trials that concealed the allocation and had low incomplete outcome data (< 10%).

Assessment of the quality of evidence

We assessed the quality of the evidence following the GRADE approach and defined 'quality' as an assessment of our confidence in the estimates of effect (Guyatt 2008).

Results

Description of studies

See the Characteristics of included studies section for details of the included trials.

Results of the search

We conducted the literature search up to 09 April 2014 and identified 77 references (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Included studies

We included 18 RCTs, enrolling 2662 participants, in this review. Twelve trials enrolled children only (1447 participants aged between six months and 15 years), and six trials enrolled older children and adults (1215 participants aged between 13 and 79 years).

Location

The trials in children were primarily conducted in Africa: Nigeria (five trials), Sudan (two trials), the Gambia (one trial), Kenya (one trial), Malawi (one trial), and Mali (one trial); with only one trial from Asia (India).

Five adult trials were conducted in Asia: Vietnam (three trials), and Thailand (two trials); and one in Oceania; Papua New Guinea (one trial). We have attached a three letter country code to each trial ID to aid forest plot interpretation.

Interventions

All 12 trials in children compared artemether with quinine. Artemether was given by intramuscular injection, with a loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg body weight followed by maintenance doses of 1.6 mg/kg for three to six days (see Table 7 for details). Only three trials followed this with oral therapy once tolerated (Murphy 1996 KEN; Taylor 1998 MWI; van Hensbroek 1996 GMB). For quinine, nine trials administered the WHO recommended loading dose of 20 mg/kg of intravenous or intramuscular quinine followed by a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg. However, van Hensbroek 1996 GMB administered the maintenance dose at 12‐hourly intervals instead of eight‐hour intervals (see Table 7).

Table 2.

Characteristics of trials comparing artemether and quinine in children

Trial ID Year of study Age limits Quinine dosing schedule Artemether dosing schedule
Loading dose Maintainance Follow‐on therapy Loading dose Maintainance Follow‐on therapy
Adam 2002 SDN 2002 'Children' 20 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every eight hours for 72 hours Oral quinine for 7 days 3.2 mg/kg IM 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days None
Aguwa 2010 NGA 2007 6 months to 12 yrs 20 mg/kg IV or IM 10 mg/kg IV/IM every eight hours None 3.2 mg/kg IM 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 2 days None
Huda 2003 IND 2001 < 14 yrs 20 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every eight hours Quinine to complete 7 days 1.6 mg/kg IM twice daily 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 5 days None
Minta 2005 MLI 2004 3 months to 15 yrs 20 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every eight hours Quinine 10 mg/kg every eight hours 3.2mg/kg IM twice daily 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days None
Murphy 1996 KEN 1996 5 months to 12 yrs 20 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every eight hours SP once 3.2 mg/kg IM 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days SP once
Ojuawo 1998 NGA 1998 Mean age about 4 yrs 10 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every eight hours Quinine to complete 7 days 3.2 mg/kg IM 1.6 mg/kg IM 12 hrs later, then once daily for 2 days None
Olumese 1999 NGA 1999 11 months to 5 yrs 20mg/kg IV 10mg/kg IV every eight hours Quinine to complete 7 days 3.2 mg/kg IM 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days None
Osonuga 2009 NGA 2009 1 to 12yrs 10 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every eight hours Quinine to complete 7 days 1.6 mg/kg IM twice daily 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days None
Satti 2002 SDN 1996 3 months to 15yrs 10 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every eight hours Quinine to complete 7 days 1.6 mg/kg IM twice daily 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days None
Taylor 1998 MWI 1994 Mean age of 3 yrs 20 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every eight hours for at least 2 doses SP once 3.2 mg/kg IM 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 2 days at least SP once
van Hensbroek 1996 GMB 1994 1 to 9yrs 20 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every twelve hours Quinine to complete 5 days 3.2 mg/kg IM 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 3 days SP once1
Walker 1993 NGA 1993 1 to 5yrs 20 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every eight hours Quinine to complete 7 days 3.2 mg/kg IM 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days None

IM = intramuscular; IV = intravenous; SP = sulphadoxine‐pyrimethamine.

1Only in the second and third years of the study.

In adults, four trials compared artemether with quinine (Hien 1996 VNM; Karbwang 1992 THA; Karbwang 1995 THA; Seaton 1998 PNG) and two trials compared artemether with artesunate (Phu 2010 VNM; Vinh 1997 VNM). Artemether was given intramuscularly, over three to seven days with slight variations in dosing (see Table 8 and Table 9) and all four trials administered quinine at the WHO‐recommended loading dose.

Table 3.

Characteristics of trials comparing artemether and quinine in adults

Trial ID Year of study Age limits Quinine dosing schedule Artemether dosing schedule
Loading dose Maintainance Follow‐on therapy Loading dose Maintainance Follow‐on therapy
Hien 1996 VNM 1996 15 to 79 yrs 20 mg/kg IM 10 mg/kg IM every eight hours Quinine or mefloquine to complete 7 days 4 mg/kg IM 2 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days Quinine or mefloquine to complete 7 days
Karbwang 1992 THA 1991 15 to 45 yrs 20 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg every eight hours for 7 days Quinine to complete 7 days 160 mg IM 80 mg IM once daily for 6 days None
Karbwang 1995 THA 1994 15 to 55 yrs 20 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg every eight hours for 7 days Quinine to complete 7 days 160 mg IM 80 mg IM once daily for 6 days None
Seaton 1998 PNG 1995 > 12 yrs 20 mg/kg IV 10 mg/kg IV every eight hours Quinine to complete 7 days 3.2 mg/kg IM 1.6 mg/kg IM once daily for 4 days None

IM = intramuscular; IV = intravenous.

Table 4.

Characteristics of studies comparing artemether and artesunate in adults

Trial ID Year of study Age limits Artemether dosing schedule Artesunate dosing schedule
Loading dose Maintainance Follow‐on therapy Loading dose Maintainance Follow‐on therapy
Phu 2010 VNM 2003 15 to 77 yrs 3.2 mg/kg IM 1.6 mg/kg IM daily None 2.4 mg/kg IM 1.2 mg/kg IM once daily 2 mg/kg of artesunate to complete 7 days
Vinh 1997 VNM 1994 15 to 66 yrs 200 mg IM 100 mg IM once daily for 3 days Mefloquine once 120 mg IM or IV 60 mg IM or IV once daily for 3 days Mefloquine once

IM = intramuscular; IV = intravenous.

Supportive care

All 12 trials in children reported measurement of blood glucose on admission, but only nine trials reported any subsequent active monitoring for hypoglycaemia.

Only one trial in adults reported measuring blood glucose on admission and monitored hypoglycaemia up to 24 hours after admission (Hien 1996 VNM).

Outcome measures

All 18 trials reported death, a measure of coma resolution, fever clearance and parasite clearance as outcomes. Eleven trials reported neurological sequelae at discharge. Only two trials (Aguwa 2010 NGA; Phu 2010 VNM) reported duration of hospital stay and two trials (Hien 1996 VNM; Olumese 1999 NGA) reported on the number of children requiring blood transfusions. Eleven trials (Adam 2002 SDN; Hien 1996 VNM; Huda 2003 IND; Karbwang 1992 THA; Karbwang 1995 THA; Minta 2005 MLI; Murphy 1996 KEN; Phu 2010 VNM; Seaton 1998 PNG; van Hensbroek 1996 GMB; Walker 1993 NGA) reported on adverse events including episodes of hypoglycaemia. We have listed the outcome definitions used in the included trials in Table 10.

Table 5.

Definitions of outcome measures used in the review

Trial ID Coma resolution time Fever clearance time Parasite clearance time Hypoglycaemia
Adam 2002 SDN Mean value (h) reported and defined as a Blantyre coma score of 5 recorded for at least 24 hours Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time after which the temperature remained normal (axillary temperature < 37.5°C) Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time passed from admission and start of treatment until two consecutive negative smears. Blood films repeated every 8 hours. Number of episodes (n/N) reported but not defined
Aguwa 2010 NGA Proportions with coma resolution on D3 reported but not defined Proportions with fever clearance on D3 and D14 reported and defined as body temperature ≤ 37.5°C after commencement of treatment Proportions with parasite clearance on D3 and D14. Parasite clearance was taken as adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) at days 3 and 14. Parasite count taken on D0, D3 and D14. Not reported
Hien 1996 VNM Median value (h) reported and defined as the time to reach a score of 15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale Median value (h) reported but not defined. Median value (h) reported and defined as the time to Assessed every 4 hours for the first 24 hours and every 6 hours until three consecutive negative blood smears Number of episodes (n/N) reported but not defined
Huda 2003 IND Glasgow coma scale was used in grading the level of consciousness of the patients
every eight hours
Mean value (h) reported and defined as time to clearance of fever Mean value (h) reported but not defined Not reported
Karbwang 1992 THA Unclear if values reported are means or medians (h) Mean value (h) reported and defined as time for the temperature to fall below 37.5°C and remain that value for 72 hours Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time for the parasite count to fall below the level of microscopic detection (thick film) Not reported
Karbwang 1995 THA Median value (h) reported and defined as the time taken for the patients to recover completely from unconciousness Mean value (h) reported and defined as time for the temperature to fall below 37.5°C and remain that value for 72 hours Median value (h) reported and defined as the time taken for parasite count to fall below the level of microscopic detection (thick film) Not reported
Minta 2005 MLI Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time to normalization of consciousness Mean value (h) reported but not defined Mean value (h) reported and defined as time till negative parasitaemia result Not reported
Murphy 1996 KEN Median value (h) reported but not described Median value (h) reported but not described Median value (h) reported but not described. Every four hours until clearance Not reported
Ojuawo 1998 NGA Mean value (h) reported and defined as the interval between onset of therapy and the attainment of full consciousness Mean value (h) reported and defined as the interval between the onset of therapy and the time the body temperature is ≤ 37°C and remained so Defined as two successive thick blood films done at 12 hours interval are negative for asexual forms of plasmodium species Not reported
Olumese 1999 NGA Mean value (h) reported and defined as time to regain full consciousness Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time for temperature to fall below 37.5°C and remain so for at least 48 hours Mean value (h) reported and defined as
the time from start of drug administration to the first of two consecutive negative thick smears remaining negative until day 7
Not reported
Osonuga 2009 NGA Mean value (h) reported and defined as time to attainment of a Blantyre score of 5 for at least 24 hours from initiation of treatment Mean value (h) reported but not defined Mean value (h) reported but not defined. Thick and thin film done on D0 and repeated on Days 3, 7 and 14 Not reported
Phu 2010 VNM Median value (h) reported and defined as time to Glasgow coma score of 15. Median value (h) reported and defined as the time for temperature to fall below 37.5°C and remain so Median value (h) reported and defined as the time to clear all parasites Number of episodes (n/N) reported but not defined
Satti 2002 SDN Mean value (h) reported and defined as time to regaining consciousness Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time for temperature to fall below 37.5°C Mean value (h) reported and defined as time to clear parasites measured every six hours till clearance Not reported
Seaton 1998 PNG Median value (h) reported but not defined Median value (h) reported and defined as a temperature <37.5 °C on two successive readings Median value (h) reported and defined as as the time at which the blood films were negative for P. falciparum for at least eight hours Number of episodes (n/N) reported but not defined
Taylor 1998 MWI Median value (h) reported and defined as time required for a
child to achieve a Blantyre Coma Score of 5
Median value (h) reported and defined as the time at which the rectal or axillary temperature dropped below 37.5°C and remained < 37.5°C for 24 consecutive hours Median value (h) reported and defined as the time at which the first of two negative (0 parasites/200 WBC) thick blood films was prepared. Every four hours till clearance Not reported
van Hensbroek 1996 GMB Median value (h) reported and defined as time to regain full consciousness Median value (h) reported and defined as time needed for the rectal temperature to fall below 38.0°C for at least 24 hours Median value (h) reported and defined as time needed for all parasites to clear relative to parasite density at admission and assessed every 12 hours till clearance Number of episodes (n/N) reported and defined as a blood glucose level below 40 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L)
Vinh 1997 VNM Median value (h) reported and defined as time to regain full consciousness Median value (h) reported and defined as time for axillary temperature to fall to, and remain for ≥ 24 hours at 37.5°C or lower Median value (h) reported and defined as time to clear parasites Not reported
Walker 1993 NGA Mean value (h) reported but not defined Mean value (h) reported Mean value (h) reported and defined as the time for parasitaemia to be cleared and to remain so up to Day 7. Assessed every six hours during period of coma and then every 12 hours. Not reported

WBC = white blood cell.

Other outcomes reported by trials which we did not include in this review were time to death (Murphy 1996 KEN; Taylor 1998 MWI; van Hensbroek 1996 GMB), survival rate (Karbwang 1992 THA; Karbwang 1995 THA), cause of death (Karbwang 1992 THA), fatality rate (Vinh 1997 VNM), time to ambulation (Olumese 1999 NGA; Phu 2010 VNM), time to sit unaided and time to drink (Phu 2010 VNM; Walker 1993 NGA), time to eating (Phu 2010 VNM), gametocyte carriage (Adam 2002 SDN), recrudescence (Adam 2002 SDN; Minta 2005 MLI; Taylor 1998 MWI; Walker 1993 NGA), 28th day cure rate (Satti 2002 SDN; van Hensbroek 1996 GMB; Walker 1993 NGA). Other outcomes included duration of parenteral treatment and time for plasma lactate levels to fall below 2.5 mmol/L (Hien 1996 VNM).

Excluded studies

We excluded 14 trials and listed the reasons for their exclusion in the 'Characteristics of excluded studies' section.

Risk of bias in included studies

See Figure 2 for a summary of the risk of bias assessments. We presented further details in the 'Characteristics of included studies' tables.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.

Allocation

Seven trials were at low risk of bias regarding the generation of allocation sequence while one trial was at high risk of bias (Aguwa 2010 NGA). Ten trials were at unclear risk of bias because review authors did not provide enough information to permit us to make a judgement.

Eleven trials were at low risk of bias regarding allocation concealment and the remaining trials provided insufficient information to make a judgement.

Blinding

In all trials, except Hien 1996 VNM and Phu 2010 VNM, investigators and participants were aware of treatment allocation. Participants were also not blind to the intervention as two different routes (intramuscular (artemether) and intravenous (quinine) were used to administer the interventions. Blinding was unlikely to affect the assessment of outcome death in all trials. In one trial, microscopists were blinded to the intervention and clinical status of the patients (Huda 2003 IND). The other subjective outcomes were thus at high risk of bias in all open included trials or at unclear risk of bias where trial provided did not provide information.

Incomplete outcome data

Fourteen trials reported no losses to follow‐up. The remaining four trials (Aguwa 2010 NGA; Satti 2002 SDN; Seaton 1998 PNG; Taylor 1998 MWI) reported over 10 per cent attrition in either one or both trial arms. Two trials used the per protocol number of participants as a denominator in the analysis (Taylor 1998 MWI; Seaton 1998 PNG). The other two trials used the number of participants randomized as the denominator in the analysis.

Selective reporting

We did not detect any evidence of selective outcome reporting.

Other potential sources of bias

We did not identify any other sources of bias.

Effects of interventions

See: Table 1; Table 2; Table 3

Artemether versus quinine

Children

Twelve trials were conducted in children, Eleven in Africa and one in Asia. All used loading doses of quinine.

Death: there was no overall difference in all‐cause mortality between intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.20; 12 trials, 1447 participants, Analysis 1.1). However, these 12 trials were too small to detect or exclude clinically important differences, and the overall meta‐analysis remains significantly underpowered to prove equivalence (see Table 11 and Table 12). The current total sample size has adequate power to exclude effects as large as seven extra deaths per 100 patients.

Table 6.

Optimal information size calculations; dichotomous outcomes

Outcome Type of test Proportion in control group3 Proportion in Intervention group Estimated RR Total sample size1,2
Death Superiority 0.17 0.136 0.80 3514
Equivalence 0.17 0.14 to 0.204 6592
Neurological sequelae Superiority 0.25 0.20 0.80 2184
Equivalence 0.25 0.22 to 0.284 8760

1 These calculation were performed using a power calculator available at: http://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/ 2 All calculation were performed for a power of 80% and an α error of 0.05. 3 The proportion in the control group is taken from the median control group risk across trials. 4 A maximum 3% risk difference was chosen to represent equivalence.

Table 7.

Optimal information size calculations; continuous outcomes

Outcome Type of test Mean in control group3 Mean in Intervention group4 SD of outcome Total sample size1,2
Coma resolution time Superiority 25 19 20 350
Equivalence 25 19 to 31 20 382
Parasite clearance time Superiority 42 36 20 350
Equivalence 42 36 to 48 20 382
Fever clearance time Superiority 48 42 20 350
Equivalence 48 36 to 54 20 382

1 These calculations were performed using a power calculator available at: http://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/ 2 All calculation were performed for a power of 80% and an α error of 0.05. 3 The mean in the control group is taken from the median control group across studies. 4 A six‐hour time difference was chosen to represent a clinically important benefit.

Analysis 1.1.

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 1 Death.

Coma resolution time: the mean coma resolution time was about five hours shorter with artemether (26 hours) compared with quinine (30.55 hours) (MD ‐5.45 hours, 95% CI ‐7.90 to ‐3.00; six trials, 358 participants, Analysis 1.3). This effect was largest in trials without adequate allocation concealment and therefore at unclear or high risk of bias. A sensitivity analysis excluding these trials found no significant difference between groups. In addition, three trials reported median time to coma resolution (see Table 13). Two trials found no significant difference (Murphy 1996 KEN; Taylor 1998 MWI), and one trial found the median time to be longer with artemether (26 hours versus 20 hours, P = 0.046, van Hensbroek 1996 GMB). Two other trials (Minta 2005 MLI; Osonuga 2009 NGA) reported mean coma resolution time as mean (SD) but the data was not normally distributed and so we have reported this an additional table (Table 13).

Table 8.

Additional data: Artemether versus quinine in children

Pre‐specified outcome Trial reported outcome Trial No. of participants Artemether Quinine Comparative results reported in article
Coma resolution time (h) Median
(IQR)
Murphy 1996 KEN 160 12 (2.8 to 96) 13 (2.8 to 96) Not significantly different
Median
(IQR)
van Hensbroek 1996 GMB 576 26 (15 to 48) 20 (12 to 43) P = 0.046
Median
(IQR)
Taylor 1998 MWI 164 18 (8 to 30) 20 (10 to 54) Not significantly different
Coma recovery (%) on Day 3 Aguwa 2010 NGA 90 15.9% 21.4% RR = 0.763 (95% CI 0.065 to 9.015)
Mean (SD) Osonuga 2009 NGA 32 4.5 (13.05) 9 (24.59) P = 0.523
Mean (SD) Minta 2005 MLI 67 30.57 (29.02) 25.15 (31.62) P = 0.53
Time to hospital discharge % spending less than one week in
hospital
Aguwa 2010 NGA 90 61.76% 71.74% P = 0.829
Fever clearance (h) Median
(IQR)
Murphy 1996 KEN 160 32 (4 to 86) 32 (4 to 96) Not significantly different
van Hensbroek 1996 GMB 576 30 (16 to 48) 33 (12‐60) P = 0.8
Taylor 1998 MWI 164 31 (24 to 52) 45 (33 to 60) "Significant"
Fever clearance (%) on Day 3 Aguwa 2010 NGA 90 90.0% 87.7% P = 0.753
Parasite clearance (h) Median
(IQR)
Murphy 1996 KEN 160 39.5 (24 to 45) 48
(37 to 56)
P < 0.001
van Hensbroek 1996 GMB 576 48 (36 to 60) 60 (48 to 72) P < 0.001
Taylor 1998 MWI 164 32 (25 to 36) 40 (32 to 48) 'significant'
Parasite clearance (%) on Day 3 Aguwa 2010 NGA 90 99.0%
n = 44
96.8%
n = 46
P = 0.422
Needing blood transfusion van Hensbroek 1996 GMB "The two groups were similar in terms of the need for blood transfusions,and the incidence of secondary bacterial infections (data not shown)."

IQR = interquartile range.

Analysis 1.3.

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 3 Coma resolution time (hours).

Neurological sequelae: there was no overall difference in the risk of neurological sequelae at hospital discharge between artemether (185 per 1000) and quinine (220 per 1000) (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.07; seven trials, 968 participants, Analysis 1.4). Again these trials were too small to enable us to confidently detect or exclude what may be clinically important differences between treatments (see Table 11). The overall meta‐analysis is adequately powered to exclude effects larger than eight additional sequelae per 100 patients.

Analysis 1.4.

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 4 Neurological sequelae at discharge.

Three trials continued to monitor patients with neurological sequelae after hospital discharge. Satti 2002 SDN found no difference at day seven, Taylor 1998 MWI found most sequelae had resolved and van Hensbroek 1996 GMB found no difference at day 28 (Analysis 1.5).

Analysis 1.5.

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 5 Neurological sequelae at follow‐up.

Parasite clearance time (PCT): the mean parasite clearance time in children was approximately nine hours shorter with artemether (MD ‐9.03 hours, 95% CI ‐11.43 to ‐6.63; seven trials, 420 participants, Analysis 1.6. The statistical significance of this result remained after we excluded trials at unclear or high risk of selection bias. The mean parasite clearance times for artemether and quinine were 36.25 and 43.18 hours respectively.

Analysis 1.6.

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 6 Parasite clearance time.

Three additional trials reported median parasite clearance time and all showed a statistically significant benefit with artemether (see Table 13). One trial (Ojuawo 1998 NGA) expressed parasite clearance as the proportion of patients with parasite clearance at 72 hours and at seven days, with no statistically significant differences between groups (see Analysis 1.7). Trials differed with respect to the frequency with which they repeated malaria blood smears (see Table 10).

Analysis 1.7.

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 7 Proportion with parasite clearance.

Fever clearance time (FCT): eight trials reported mean fever clearance time with a statistically significant reduction of about three hours with artemether overall (MD ‐3.73 hours, 95% CI ‐6.55 to ‐0.92; eight trials, 457 participants, Analysis 1.8). The mean fever clearance times for artemether and quinine were 43.69 and 46.26 hours respectively. However, only two of the individual trials showed a statistically significant difference between the groups. Three trials in children reported median fever clearance time and two trials found no statistically significant difference between the two groups (see Table 13).

Analysis 1.8.

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 8 Fever clearance time (hours).

The definitions of fever varied across the included trials. Six trials used a cut off of body temperature less than 37.5°C from initiation of treatment to define fever clearance (see Table 10).

Need for blood transfusion: one trial reported on the number of patients requiring blood transfusions for severe malarial anaemia in both artemether and quinine arms (Olumese 1999 NGA) (see Analysis 1.9). No statistically significant difference was observed between both arms (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.59; 103 participants, one trial).

Analysis 1.9.

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 9 Need for blood transfusion.

Adverse effects: six trials reported on the frequency of adverse events (Adam 2002 SDN; Huda 2003 IND; Minta 2005 MLI; Murphy 1996 KEN; van Hensbroek 1996 GMB; Walker 1993 NGA). Two trials reported no adverse events had occurred during the trial duration (see Table 14). One trial reported the absence of adverse events in the artemether arm (Minta 2005 MLI). No trial reported discontinuation of medication.

Table 9.

Adverse event monitoring and reporting

Study ID Sample size Clinical symptoms monitoring Biochemistry Haematological Electrocardiogram Additional comments on adverse events
Adam 2002 SDN 41 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported "Neurological deficits were not observed in any patient during the follow‐up period"
Aguwa 2010 NGA 90 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported None
Hien 1996 VNM 560 Clinical assessment every 4 hours for the first 24 hours and 6 hourly afterwards Blood glucose, lactate and cytokine levels measured 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after admission Full blood count on admission Pre‐treatment and 12 hours after initiation of treatment on Day 0, 4 hours after last dose and at discharge None
Huda 2003 IND 46 Lumbar puncture
Chest x‐ray on day 0
Blood Glucose, Renal Function Test,
Liver Function Test and Serum Electrolyte on Days 0 and 3
Full Blood Count on Days 0 and 3 Day 0 "No serious side effects of either of the drugs were observed in our study...... Closer and more frequent monitoring and larger sample size would have probably revealed more subtle adverse drug effects."
Karbwang 1992 THA 26 Clinical evaluation daily for at least 7 days
Lumbar puncture
Chest x‐ray on day 0
Biochemistry on Days 0, 2, 4 and 7 Full Blood Count on Days 0, 2, 4 and 7 On admission for all patients; then once daily and every six hours for quinine and artemether patients respectively "The side effects in the quinine group were dizziness and vertigo. No side effects were detected with artemether".
Karbwang 1995 THA 102 Clinical evaluation on admission and twice daily for at least 7 days
Lumbar puncture
Chest x‐ray on day 0
Biochemistry on Days 0, 2, 4 and 7 FBC on Days 0, 2, 4 and 7 On admission for all patients; then once daily and every six hours for quinine and artemether patients respectively QTc prolongation and tinnitus were the major adverse events in Quinine arm.
Mild transient pain at injection site for approximately 15 mins after artemether treatment.
Minta 2005 MLI 67 Clinical examination daily on Days 1 to7, and 14 Blood glucose on Days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 14
Urea and Serum Electrolyte, transaminases, phosphatases on Days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14
FBC on Days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 Once daily on Days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 None
Murphy 1996 KEN 160 Clinical assessment on admission, then at six, then 12 hour intervals till discharge Blood glucose, urea, electrolytes, blood gases and when clinically indicated FBC on Day 0 and when clinically indicated
Blood cultures on Day 0
On admission and at 6, 24, 30, 48 and 54 hours None
Ojuawo 1998 NGA 37 Clinical assessment on Day 0 Urea and electrolyte
Blood sugar and liver function test on Day 0
FBC on Day 0 None None
Olumese 1999 NGA 103 Clinical assessments on Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28 Blood glucose, Urea and creatinine, electrolytes on Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28 WBC count on Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28 None "No adverse reactions to the two drugs were recorded during the study".
Osonuga 2009 NGA 32 Clinical examination on Days 0 to 7 and 14 None None None None
Phu 2010 VNM 370 Clinical examination on admission
Chest x‐ray on admission
Lumbar puncture
Blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine transaminase, plasma lactate Full blood count on admission None None
Satti 2002 SDN 77 Clinical evaluation on admission and every six hours on Days 0 to 4, and then once daily on Days 14, 21 and 28 Blood glucose, serum creatinine, serum aspartate, aminotransferase on Day 0 WBC, Haemoglobin on Days 0 and 3 None None
Seaton 1998 PNG 33 Chest X‐ray on admission Renal and Liver function tests on admission, Days 3 and 7 Full Blood Count on Days 0, 3 and 7 None None
Taylor 1998 MWI 183 CSF collected on admission Blood glucose,
Blood pH, on D0 (every four hours for the first 24 hours
Haematocrit every eight hours
Full Blood Count, urea and electrolytes on Days 0, 3, 7 and 28
On admission, 6, 48,54 and 96 hours "Of the initial 127 patients on whom serial electrocardiographic tracings were made, more patients in the quinine group showed prolongation of the corrected QT intervals after treatment, but the differences were not statistically or clinically significant." "There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of adverse effects associated with antimalarial treatment (i.e. new signs and symptoms which develop within seven days of the start of treatment)."
van Hensbroek 1996 GMB 576 Clinical examination on Day 0
Lumbar puncture on admission
Blood glucose on admission, after 4hours and 12 hours PCV, Haemoglobin, Blood culture on Day 0 None None
Vinh 1997 VNM 124 Clinical examination on admission Blood glucose, serum creatinine, serum bilirubin on admission Full blood count on admission None None
Walker 1993 NGA 54 Clinical examination twice daily
Spinal taps
Urea and Electrolyte, on days 3, 7, 14, 28 PCV on days 3, 7, 14, 28 On admission, at 4 and 6 hours None

Only two trials reported episodes of hypoglycaemia (Analysis 1.10). Other adverse effects reported were QT prolongation, local skin reaction at the injection site, abscess, urticarial rash, pruritus, supraventricular tachycardia and urinary tract infection.. However, these trials were insufficiently powered to detect differences in adverse events. The trials had similar definitions of adverse events (included only adverse effects that could not be attributable to malaria).

Analysis 1.10.

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 10 Episodes of hypoglycaemia.

Time to hospital discharge: none of the included trials reported time to discharge. One trial reported the proportion of patients that spent less than one week in hospital and found no significant difference between groups (see Table 13).

Adults

Four trials were conducted in adults, three in Asia and one in Oceania. All used loading doses of quinine.

Death: artemether resulted in fewer deaths compared with quinine (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.83; four trials, 716 participants, Analysis 1.1) from trials conducted mostly in Asia.

Coma resolution time: three trials reported a measure of coma resolution time. Hien 1996 VNM reported median coma resolution time, which was shorter in the quinine arm. Karbwang 1995 THA found both arms to be comparable in terms of coma resolution time. The third trial, Karbwang 1992 THA reported mean coma resolution time but the data were incompletely reported (see Table 15).

Table 10.

Additional data: Artemether versus quinine in adults

Pre‐specified outcome Trial reported outcome Trial No. of participants Artemether Quinine Comparative results reported in article
Coma resolution time (h) Median (IQR) Hien 1996 VNM 560 66 (30 to 132) 48 (20 to 84) P = 0.003
Median (Range) Karbwang 1995 THA 97 48 (6 to 144) 48 (6 to 144) Not significantly different
Fever clearance (h) Median (IQR) Hien 1996 VNM 560 127 (60 to 216) 90 (54 to 144) < 0.001
Median (Range) Seaton 1998 PNG 33 32 (20 to 112) 48 (28 to 88) P = 0.034
Median (Range) Karbwang 1995 THA 97 79 (16 to 147) 84 (36 to 144) Not significantly different
Parasite clearance (h) Median (IQR) Hien 1996 VNM 560 72 (54 to 102) 90 (66 to 108) < 0.001
Median (range) Seaton 1998 PNG 33 48(4 to 72) 52 (12 to112) P = 0.381
Median (Range) Karbwang 1995 THA 97 54 (30 to 164) 78 (18 to 168) P = 0.007

IQR = interquartile range.

Neurological sequelae: only one trial Hien 1996 VNM reported neurological sequelae at discharge. Four neurological sequelae were reported with no difference between groups (one trial; 560 participants, Analysis 1.4).

Parasite clearance time (PCT): one trial reported mean parasite clearance time but showed no statistically significant difference between artemether and quinine (MD 1.70 hours, 95% CI ‐15.56 to 18.96; 26 participants, one trial, Analysis 1.6). Three other trials reported median parasite clearance time. Two trials reported a significantly shorter time to clearance of parasites with artemether (Hien 1996 VNM; Karbwang 1995 THA; see Table 13). Seaton 1998 PNG found no significant difference between artemether and quinine with respect to parasite clearance time.

Trials differed with respect to the frequency with which they repeated malaria blood smears (see Table 10).

Fever clearance time (FCT): four trials reported a measure of fever clearance time. Karbwang 1992 THA reported mean fever clearance time and found a statistically significant reduction of about 30 hours with artemether (MD ‐29.7 hours, 95% CI ‐54.14 to ‐5.26; 26 participants, one trial). The other three trials in adults reported median fever clearance time and two (Hien 1996 VNM; Seaton 1998 PNG) reported a statistically significant reduction in fever clearance time in favour of quinine and artemether respectively. Karbwang 1995 THA found both groups were comparable (see Table 15).

The definitions of fever varied across the included trials. Three trials used a cut off of body temperature less than 37.5°C from initiation of treatment to define fever clearance (see Table 10).

Need for blood transfusion: one trial reported on the number of patients requiring blood transfusions for severe malarial anaemia in both artemether and quinine arms (Hien 1996 VNM) (see Analysis 1.9). No statistically significant difference was observed between both arms (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.29; 560 participants, one trial).

Adverse events: one trial reported episodes of hypoglycaemia (Analysis 1.10). Other adverse effects reported were abscess, induration at injection site, leg discomfort, chest infection and gastrointestinal bleeding. However, these trials were insufficiently powered to detect differences in adverse events. The trials had similar definitions of adverse events (included only adverse effects that could not be attributable to malaria).

Artemether versus artesunate

Adults

Two trials were conducted in adults; both from Asia.

Death: only two trials directly compared intramuscular artemether and intravenous artesunate. Overall, the risk of all‐cause mortality was significantly higher following treatment with artemether (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.97; 494 participants, two trials, Analysis 2.1). However, both trials were too small to detect or exclude clinically important differences, and the overall meta‐analysis remains significantly underpowered to prove superiority (see Table 11 and Table 12).

Analysis 2.1.

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 1 Death.

Coma resolution time: two trials reported median coma resolution times. Both trials reported a shorter coma resolution time with artesunate. However, these differences were not statistically significant (Table 16).

Table 11.

Additional data: Artemether versus artesunate in adults

Pre‐specified outcome Trial reported outcome Trial No. of participants Artemether Artesunate IM Artesunate IV Comparative results reported in article
Coma resolution time (h) Median (range) Phu 2010 VNM 370 72(2 to 2232) n = 184 60(4 to 2136) n = 186 P = 0.11
Median (95% CI) Vinh 1997 VNM 124 47 (31 to 63) 30 (18 to 42) 24 (4 to 44)
Fever clearance (h) Median (range) Phu 2010 VNM 370 108 (0 to 888) n = 184 108 (0 to 888) n = 186 P = 0.27
Median (95% CI) Vinh 1997 VNM 124 48 (38 to 58) 36 (30 to 42) 30 (18 to 42)
Parasite clearance (h) Median (range) Phu 2010 VNM 370 72
(2 to 204)
72
(7 to 330)
P = 0.97
Median (95% CI) Vinh 1997 VNM 124 30 (26 to 34) 24 (15 to 33) 24 (15 to 33) Not statistically significant

IM = intramuscular; IV = intravenous.

Parasite clearance time: two trials found no overall difference in median parasite clearance time (Phu 2010 VNM; Vinh 1997 VNM).

Fever clearance time:Phu 2010 VNM found no statistically significant difference in median fever clearance time between intramuscular artemether and intravenous artesunate. The additional small trial (Vinh 1997 VNM) found a benefit in favour of artesunate although this was not statistically significant.

Need for blood transfusion:Phu 2010 VNM found no difference between treatments with respect to the need for blood transfusion in adult severe malaria patients (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.32; 370 participants, one trial, Analysis 2.2).

Analysis 2.2.

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 2 Need for blood transfusion.

Adverse effects: only Phu 2010 VNM reported adverse events. The risk of hypoglycaemia was significantly higher in adults treated with intramuscular artemether compared with artesunate (RR 1.70. 95% CI 0.4 to 7.24; 370 participants, one trial, Analysis 2.4).

Analysis 2.4.

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 4 Adverse events.

Discussion

Summary of main results

We included 18 RCTs, enrolling 2662 children and adults with severe malaria. Eleven trials were conducted in Africa and seven trials were undertaken in Asia.

Artemether versus quinine

For children (trials mostly conducted in Africa), there is probably little or no difference in the risk of death between intramuscular artemether and quinine (moderate quality evidence). Artemether may shorten the coma recovery time by about five hours (low quality evidence), and may reduce the number of children with subsequent neurological sequelae (low quality evidence). Artemether probably shortens the parasite clearance time by about nine hours (moderate quality evidence), and may shorten the fever clearance time by about three hours (low quality evidence).

For older children (> 15 years) and adults in Asia, artemether probably reduces deaths compared with quinine (moderate quality evidence), but larger trials are required to have full confidence in this finding.

Artemether versus artesunate

Artemether and artesunate have only been compared in two trials in adults from Asia, and mortality is probably higher with intramuscular artemether (moderate quality evidence) but larger trials are required to have confidence in this finding.

Overall completeness and applicability of evidence

Although 16 trials directly compared artemether versus quinine, none were adequately powered to detect clinically important differences. The total number of participants included in these trials (2163 participants) remains far short of the 7429 participants included in trials of artesunate versus quinine. The majority of data comparing artemether and quinine were from trials conducted in sub‐Saharan Africa where artemether is most widely used.

The two trials directly comparing artemether and artesunate were conducted in adults in Asia, and the results are therefore poorly applicable to children in Africa. However, in the absence of direct comparisons in children, the low quality evidence of equivalence between artemether and quinine suggests that artesunate will be as superior to artemether as it has been shown to be superior to quinine.

Artemether is prone to erratic and partial absorption and takes longer to achieve peak plasma concentrations as demonstrated in animal and human studies. These pharmacokinetic attributes make artemether that is injected intramuscularly less readily available in the human body and may explain the difference in outcomes between artesunate and intramuscular artemether we have observed in this review.

Quality of the evidence

We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach and have presented it in three 'Summary of Findings' tables (Table 1; Table 2; Table 3).

The evidence of equivalence between intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine in children is of moderate quality due to the small sample sizes of the included trials and the overall lack of power to fully exclude clinically important differences.

Similarly, we downgraded the evidence for reductions in mortality in adults treated with artemether compared with quinine, and artesunate compared with artemether, to moderate due to imprecision. Larger trials are needed to have full confidence in these effects.

Authors' conclusions

Although there is a lack of direct evidence comparing artemether with artesunate, artemether is probably less effective than artesunate at preventing deaths from severe malaria. In circumstances where artesunate is not available, artemether is an alternative to quinine.

Larger, adequately powered clinical trials are necessary for conclusive evidence on the relative effects of artemether. However, given the low bioavailability of artemether when given intramuscularly, it is unlikely that these trials will be done or indeed whether they are necessary.

Acknowledgements

The academic editor for this review was Dr Michael Eisenhut; Dr David Sinclair provided support in the preparing the 'Summary of findings' tables.

The protocol for this review was developed during the Reviews for Africa Fellowship Programme organized by the Nigerian Branch of the South Africa Cochrane Centre in July 2012. The UK Department for International Development (DFID) supports this programme through the Effective Health Care Research Consortium (EHCRC) at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM). This document is an output from a project funded by UKaid for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of UKAid or the Department for International Development (DFID).

The editorial base for the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group is funded by UKaid from the UK Government for the benefit of developing countries.

Data and analyses

Comparison 1.

Artemether versus quinine

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Death 16 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Children 12 1447 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.76, 1.20]
1.2 Adults 4 716 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.59 [0.42, 0.83]
2 Death: Time since admission to hospital 1 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Death within 24 hours 1 41 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.35 [0.02, 8.10]
3 Coma resolution time (hours) 6 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Children 6 358 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐5.45 [‐7.90, ‐1.00]
4 Neurological sequelae at discharge 8 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 Children 7 968 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.66, 1.07]
4.2 Adults 1 560 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.92 [0.31, 27.86]
5 Neurological sequelae at follow‐up 2 566 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.49, 1.38]
5.1 Day 7 1 134 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.27, 2.14]
5.2 Day 28 1 432 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.46, 1.53]
6 Parasite clearance time 8 446 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐8.82 [‐11.20, ‐6.45]
6.1 Children 7 420 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐9.03 [‐11.43, ‐6.63]
6.2 Adults 1 26 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.70 [‐15.56, 18.96]
7 Proportion with parasite clearance 1 74 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.75, 1.04]
7.1 At 72 hours 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.70, 1.11]
7.2 At 7 days 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.70, 1.11]
8 Fever clearance time (hours) 9 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
8.1 Children 8 457 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐3.73 [‐6.55, ‐0.92]
8.2 Adults 1 26 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐29.70 [‐54.14, ‐5.26]
9 Need for blood transfusion 2 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
9.1 Children 1 103 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.27 [0.62, 2.59]
9.2 Adults 1 560 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.73, 1.29]
10 Episodes of hypoglycaemia 3 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
10.1 Children 2 617 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.68 [0.44, 1.05]
10.2 Adults 1 560 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.44 [0.30, 0.64]
11 Adverse events 6 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
11.1 QT prolongation 2 229 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.10 [1.33, 7.19]
11.2 Local skin reactions 1 576 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.12 [0.03, 0.50]
11.3 Abscess 2 1136 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.04, 0.90]
11.4 Urticarial rash 1 576 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 8.15]
11.5 Supraventricular tachycardia 1 54 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.23 [0.01, 4.59]
11.6 Pruritus 1 67 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.01, 8.13]
11.7 Urinary tract infection 1 54 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.46 [0.15, 81.36]
11.8 Induration at injection site 1 33 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 15.44 [0.94, 253.49]
11.9 Leg discomfort 1 560 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.22, 2.16]
11.10 Chest infection 1 560 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.81, 1.53]
11.11 GI bleeding 1 560 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.79 [0.52, 1.20]

Analysis 1.2.

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 2 Death: Time since admission to hospital.

Analysis 1.11.

Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Artemether versus quinine, Outcome 11 Adverse events.

Comparison 2.

Artemether versus artesunate

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Death 2 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Adults 2 494 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.80 [1.09, 2.97]
2 Need for blood transfusion 1 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Adults 1 370 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.78, 1.32]
3 Episodes of hypoglycaemia 1 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Adverse events 1 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 Spontaneous bleeding 1 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 2.3.

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Artemether versus artesunate, Outcome 3 Episodes of hypoglycaemia.

Differences between protocol and review

In the protocol, we specified that we would include only trials in children (aged < 15 years). However, we amended the inclusion criteria to include trials in adults and children.

We said we would explore data by drug regimen, type of severe malaria (cerebral versus non‐cerebral malaria), time since admission to hospital, length of follow‐up and geographical region, but data were insufficient.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Methods Trial design: Open label RCT Trial dates: November 2001 to January 2002
Participants Number of participants: 41 children enrolled Inclusion criteria: Children with severe malaria (age range not stated); cerebral malaria, repeated convulsions severe anaemia with haemoglobin <5g/dL, hyper parasitaemia (parasite count > 100,000 rings/µL or combinations of these criteria.
Exclusion criteria: None stated
Interventions 1.  Intramuscular artemether (Kunming Pharmaceuticals; China)
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg on day 1

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg once daily for the following four days   


2. Intravenous quinine 
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg of quinine dihydrochloride in 10 mL/kg 5% dextrose over four hours

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg of quinine dihydrochloride in 10 mL/kg 5% dextrose solution over four hours, every eight hours for at least 72 hours

  • Followed by oral quinine (for seven days as soon as patient could tolerate)

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Parasite clearance time

  4. Fever clearance time

  5. Episodes of hypoglycaemia


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Gametocyte carriage

  2. Recrudescence

Notes Location: Outpatient clinic in New Halfa, Eastern Sudan Transmission: "meso‐endemic"
Funding: None stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Each child was randomized". No further details provided.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Envelopes containing the assigned treatment were opened sequentially at the time when each patient was recruited to the study".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk Described as open‐label. However, lack of blinding is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk An open‐label trial.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up were reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: RCT
Trial dates: July to October 2007
Participants Number of participants: 90 children enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Children between six months and 12 years of age presenting with fever (> 37.5°C ) and P. falciparum infection with one or more general danger signs of severe or complicated malaria based on the WHO criteria for severe malaria
Exclusion criteria: Serious concomitant illness, for example, sickle cell anaemia, HIV, tuberculosis and other chronic diseases, severe malnutrition, known hypersensitivity to one of the trial drugs.
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether (Paluther; May and Baker)
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg on admission

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg once daily for two days


2.Intravenous or intramuscular quinine (Quinimax; Sanofi)
  • Loading dose 20 mg salt/kg body weight on admission

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg every eight hours; the infusion rate did not exceed 5 mg salt/kg per hour

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Proportion of patients recovered from coma on day 3

  3. Proportion of patients discharged by day 7

  4. Proportion of patients with fever clearance on day 3 and day 14

  5. Proportion of patients with parasite clearance on day 3 and day 14


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Hospital bed‐days

Notes Location: Federal Medical Centre, Birnin Kudu, Jigawa State of Nigeria
Transmission: Stable perennial transmission
Funding: None stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk "Patients were assigned to receive quinine if the last digit of their hospital identification number was odd and to receive artemether if the last digit of their hospital identification number was even or zero".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Trial authors did not describe any methods of allocation concealment, and this would not be possible using this randomization method.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk No blinding was described. However, lack of blinding is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk No blinding is described, and blinding would not be feasible.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Losses to follow‐up at day 14 were > 10% in both trial arms.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Double blind RCT
Trial dates: Not stated
Participants Number of participants: 560 adults aged 15 to 79 years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Patients were included in the trial if they (or an accompanying relative) gave informed consent, had asexual forms of P. falciparum on a peripheral‐blood smear, were older than 14 years, were not in the first trimester of pregnancy, were not intravenous drug users, had received less than 3 g of quinine or two doses of artemisinin or a derivative in the previous 48 hours, and had one or more of the following: a score on the Glasgow Coma Scale of less than 11 (indicating cerebral malaria); anaemia (hematocrit, 20 percent), with a parasite count exceeding 100,000 parasites/mm3 on a peripheral‐blood smear; jaundice (serum bilirubin, 2.5 mg/dL (50 mmol per litre)), with a parasite count of more than 100,000 parasites/mm3 on a peripheral‐blood smear; renal impairment (urine output, 400 mL per 24 hours; and serum creatinine, 3 mg/dL (250 mmol/L)); hypoglycaemia (blood glucose, 40 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L)); hyperparasitaemia (10% parasitaemia); and systolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg with cool extremities (indicating shock).
Exclusion criteria: None stated
Interventions 1.Intramuscular artemether (Kunming Pharmaceutical)
  • Loading dose of 4 mg/kg

  • Followed by 2 mg/kg eight hourly for a minimum of three days

  • Followed by either a single oral dose of 15 mg of mefloquine or oral dose of 10 mg quinine sulphate for up to four days


2.Intramuscular quinine
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg per kilogram eight hourly

  • Followed by either a single oral dose of 15 mg/kg of mefloquine or oral dose of 10 mg/kg quinine sulphate for up to four days

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Neurological sequelae

  4. Fever clearance time

  5. Parasite clearance time

  6. Hypoglycaemia

  7. Need for blood transfusion

  8. Adverse effects


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Duration of parenteral antimalarial treatment

  2. Time for plasma lactate level to fall below 2.5 mmol/L

Notes Location: Special Research Ward, Centre for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Transmission: Not stated
Funding: Wellcome Trust
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Trial authors provided no information on methods of sequence generation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "The drugs for each patient were placed in a coded sealed envelope and the envelopes were randomized in blocks of 20. Once a patient was enrolled in the study the envelope was opened".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk "To maintain blinding, a separate team of nurses, who were not otherwise involved with the care of the study patients, drew up and gave the injections. The drugs were kept in an opaque packet in a locked cabinet during the study". Both interventions were administered by intramuscular injection so blinding was feasible."
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others Low risk "To maintain blinding, a separate team of nurses, who were not otherwise involved with the care of the study patients, drew up and gave the injections. The drugs were kept in an opaque packet in a locked cabinet during the study". Both interventions were administered by intramuscular injection so blinding was feasible."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up were recorded.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Open RCT
Trial dates: April 2000 to July 2001
Participants Number: 46 children aged 6 months to 12 years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Asexual forms of P. falciparum from peripheral blood smear. One or more clinical manifestations of severe malaria present which included – cerebral malaria, severe anaemia (haemoglobin < 5 g/dL or hematocrit < 15%) metabolic abnormalities (hypoglycaemia: plasma glucose < 40 mg/dL or < 2.2 mmol/L), algid malaria (associated with peripheral circulatory failure or shock), black‐water fever, renal failure, spontaneous bleeding (thrombocytopenia, DIC), pulmonary edema and jaundice.
Exclusion criteria: History of having received artemether /quinine within 24 hours preceding admission. Severe protein energy malnutrition or clinical/laboratory evidence of other significant illness not attributable to severe malaria.
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether
  • Loading dose of 1.6 mg/kg twice a day on admission

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg once a day for five days


2. Intravenous quinine
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg every eight hours by infusion

  • Followed by oral quinine sulphate once the patient was conscious, for a total period of seven days


Supportive therapy was given to all patients.
Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Parasite clearance time

  3. Fever resolution time

  4. Coma recovery


Outcomes not included in the review: None
Notes Location: Inpatient unit of Department of Pediatrics, and Parasitology laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Uttar Pradesh, India
Transmission: Unknown
Funding: None stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Trial authors provided no information on methods of sequence generation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Trial authors provided no information on allocation concealment.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk An open‐label trial is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others Low risk "The slides for malarial parasites were transported to the parasitology laboratory where the person examining the slides was unaware of the clinical status of the patient and also the treatment assignment group".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up were recorded.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: RCT
Trial dates: May to December 1991
Participants Number of participants: 26 adults aged 15 to 45 years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Patients with severe falciparum malaria (WHO definition) with no history of antimalarials within 24 hours prior to admission, aged between 15 to 45 years and weighed 45 to 60kg
Exclusion criteria: None stated
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether (Arthermin®)
  • Loading dose of 160 mg

  • Followed by 80 mg once daily for six days


2. Intravenous quinine
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg eight hourly for seven days

  • Followed by quinine sulphate tablets as soon as oral medication was possible

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Neurological sequelae

  4. Fever clearance time

  5. Parasite clearance time

  6. Adverse effects


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Survival rate

  2. Cause of death

Notes Location: Prapokklao Hospital, Chantaburi, Thailand
Transmission: Not stated
Funding: Support from United Medical Ltd., Bangkok (provided artemether)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "The patients were randomized to receive either quinine or artemether".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Trial authors provided no information on allocation concealment.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk Trial authors provided no information on blinding.
However, lack of blinding is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk Trial authors provided no information on blinding, however it may not be feasible due to different routes of administration for both interventions.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: RCT
Trial dates:1992 to 1994
Participants Number of participants: 102 adults aged between 15 and 55 years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Male and female (non‐pregnant) patients with severe falciparum malaria (WHO definition) with no history of antimalarial treatment within 24 hours before admission aged 15 to 65 years and weighing 45 to 75kg
Exclusion criteria: Patients with concurrent diseases were excluded
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether
  • Loading dose of 160 mg

  • Followed by 80 mg once daily for six days


2. Intravenous quinine
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg eight hourly for seven days

  • Followed by quinine sulphate tablets as soon as oral medication was possible

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Neurological sequelae

  4. Fever clearance time

  5. Parasite clearance time

  6. Adverse effects


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Survival rate

Notes Location: Prapokklao Hospital, Chantaburi, Thailand
Transmission: Not stated
Funding: UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Central randomization at WHO Office.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Each treatment was enclosed in a sealed envelope, which was opened only after the physician in charge had decided to recruit the patient into the study".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk Trial authors provided no information on blinding.
However, lack of blinding is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk Trial authors provided no information on blinding, however it may not be feasible due to different routes of administration for both interventions.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Loss to follow‐up about 5%.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Open RCT
Trial dates: June 1993 to February 1994 and June 1994 to December 1994
Participants Number of participants: 67 children aged three months to 15 years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Fever (core temperature ≥ 38 °C), positive blood smear for P. falciparum with ≥ 0.1% of parasitized erythrocytes, one major criterion or two minor criteria for severe malaria cases (WHO criteria) and parental consent
Exclusion criteria: Patients with infection who had been treated within 24 hours with quinine or intramuscular injection was not eligible.
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether (Paluther)
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg on admission (two times)

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg once daily for four days


2. Intravenous quinine
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg on admission

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg every eight hours until oral drug administration was possible (10 mg/kg every eight hours)

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Fever clearance

  4. Parasite clearance

  5. Adverse events


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Recrudescence

Notes Location: Gabriel Touré's Hospital, Mali
Transmission: Unknown
Funding: Rhône‐Poulenc Rorer Doma (France)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Central randomization by clinical monitor.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Opaque envelopes used to conceal allocation.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk An open‐label trial is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
No blinding is described, and blinding would not be feasible.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk An open‐label trial.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Open RCT
Trial dates: Not stated
Participants Number: 160 children aged five months to 12 years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Children were admitted to the trial if they had P. falciparum asexual parasitaemia, were comatose and parental consent was obtained.
Exclusion criteria: Children were excluded if there was evidence of a pre‐existing neurological deficit, head injury, or history of recent treatment with antimalarial drugs other than chloroquine.
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether (Paluther, Rhône‐Poulenc)
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg once daily. At least three doses of artemether were given

  • Followed by sulphadoxine‐pyrimethamine if parasitaemia had cleared and the child could drink. Otherwise artemether was continued for a total of five days (four maintenance doses)


2. Intravenous quinine (Laboratoires Renaudin, Paris)
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg infused over four hours

  • Folowed by 10 mg/kg every eight hours with dose given over two hours. At least three doses of parenteral quinine were given, and continued until the child was able to drink and parasitaemia had cleared

  • Then a single dose of sulphadoxine‐pyrimethamine (sulphadoxine 25 mg/kg, pyrimethamine 1.25 mg/kg) given orally or intramuscularly

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Time to death

  2. Coma resolution

  3. Neurological sequelae

  4. Fever clearance

  5. Parasite clearance

  6. Adverse effects


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Mortality with respiratory distress

Notes Location: Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Coastal Research Unit, Kilifi district hospital, Kenya.
Transmission: Unknown
Funding:
  1. KEMRI

  2. UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR)

  3. The Wellcome Trust

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Centrally‐coded unique trial numbers.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes prepared by the clinical monitor.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk An open‐label trial is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk An open‐label trial.
Blinding unlikely as artemether and quinine were given by 2 different routes.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk 40 patients (14 from artemether arm and 26 from quinine arm) excluded. Mostly for not meeting inclusion criteria.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: RCT
Trial dates: Not stated
Participants Number of participants: 37 children enrolled (age range not stated)
Inclusion criteria: Children with unrousable coma, asexual forms of P. falciparum parasitaemia and no other identifiable cause of coma.
Exclusion criteria: None stated
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg on admission

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg 12 hours later

  • Then 1.6 mg/kg once daily for two days


2. Intravenous quinine
  • Loading dose of 10 mg/kg infused over two hours

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg every eight hours until patient regained consciousness then switched to oral dose for a total of seven days

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Neurologic sequelae

  4. Fever clearance time

  5. Percentage of children with parasites clearance at days 3 and 7


Outcomes not included in the review: None
Notes Location: University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
Transmission: Unknown
Funding: None stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Patients were randomly assigned to either of the two treatment modalities".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information about the sequence generation process to permit judgement.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk Unlikely to be biased whether blinding was done or not.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk No information about blinding provided by trial authors.
Blinding unlikely as artemether and quinine were given by 2 different routes.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up recorded.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Most relevant outcomes reported.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Open label RCT
Trial dates: Not stated
Participants Number of participants: 103 children aged 11 months to five years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Children aged six months to 5 years satisfying the WHO criteria for cerebral malaria, viz. unrousable coma lasting more than 30 minutes (with or without convulsions) with the presence of peripheral P. falciparum parasitaemia were included in the trial.
Exclusion criteria: None stated
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg on admission

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg once daily for four days


2. Intravenous quinine (Lemquine®)
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg infused over four hours

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg infused over two hours given every eight hours until the patient is conscious and oral quinine continued at 10 mg/kg orally every eight hours to complete a total of 21 doses or seven days


Loading dose quinine was omitted in patients with a positive history of quinine or mefloquine ingestion in the preceding 24 hours before hospital presentation.
Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Parasite clearance time

  3. Fever clearance time

  4. Survival and neurological symptoms

  5. Coma recovery time

  6. Neurological deficits

  7. Blood transfusions


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Time to full ambulation

Notes Location: Emergency Paediatric ward, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Transmission: Unknown
Funding: World Bank/UNDP/WHO special fund for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated allocation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Methods not described by trial authors.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk Unlikely to be biased whether blinding was done or not.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk No information of blinding reported by authors.
Blinding unlikely as artemether and quinine were given by 2 different routes.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up recorded.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: RCT
Trial dates: Not stated
Participants Number: 32 children aged one to 12 years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Children aged one to 12 years, with fever (temperature > 37.5°C), presence of convulsion, vomiting, hypoglycaemia, anaemia and headache. Informed consent obtained from the parents and guardians. Assurance that patients will be resident within catchments of trial for follow‐up. Absence of concomitant illness such as bronchopneumonia, typhoid, meningitis, urinary tract infection.
Exclusion criteria: History of blood transfusion in the last two months, presence of concomitant illness, history of previous allergy to quinine and artemether.
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether (Rhône‐Poulence, Rorer France)
  • Loading dose of 1.6 mg/kg twice on day 0

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg once daily for the next four days


2. Intravenous quinine (Evans)
  • Loading dose of 10 mg/kg infused over four hours

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg given at eight hour intervals and oral quinine (10 mg/kg body weight, eight hour intervals) as soon as the patient's condition allowed.


Treatment with quinine was for a total of seven days.
Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Coma resolution time

  2. Fever clearance time

  3. Parasite clearance time


Outcomes not included in the review: None
Notes Location: Overcomers Specialist Clinic Ileshan and General Hospital Ikenne, Nigeria
Transmission: Unknown
Funding: None stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "The children were randomly allocated into 2 treatment groups; treatment Q and A for quinine and artemether respectively".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information on allocation concealment provided by trial authors.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk Unlikely to be biased whether blinding was done or not.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk No information of blinding reported by authors.
Blinding unlikely as artemether and quinine were given by two different routes.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Attrition about 6% and not likely to affect outcomes.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting. Authors have published three outcomes in three different publications from the same trial.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Double blind RCT
Trial dates: May 1996 to June 2003
Participants Number of participants: 370 adults aged between 15 and 77 years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Peripheral blood smears had asexual forms of P. falciparum and had at least one of the following severe complications: cerebral malaria (Glasgow Coma Score was less than 11), renal acute failure (oliguria and serum creatinine > 250 μmol/L), jaundice (total serum bilirubin > 50 μmol/L) with a parasite count of more than 100,000/μL or with serum creatinine > 250 μmol/L, hypoglycaemia (blood glucose < 2.2 mmol/L), anaemia (haematocrit < 20%) with a parasite count of more than 100,000/μL, hyperparasitaemia (parasite count > 500,000/μL), hyperlactataemia (plasma lactate > 4 mmol/L), metabolic acidosis (standard base excess > ‐ 5 mmol/L, base deficit < 10 mmol/L) and shock (systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg with cool extremities).
Exclusion criteria: Patients were not included if they were < 14 years, were pregnant in the first trimester, were known intravenous drug abusers, had received more than 3 g of quinine or two doses of any artemisinin derivatives in the previous 48 hours before admission, had a past history of allergy to any artemisinin derivatives, or if known to be HIV positive.
Interventions 1.Intramuscular artemether (Kunming Pharmaceutical Company, Kunming, China)
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg daily for at least two days


2.Intramuscular artesunate (Guilin No 2 Pharmaceutical Factory, Guangxi,China)
  • Loading dose of 2.4 mg/kg on admission

  • Followed by 1.2 mg/kg once daily for at least two days

  • Followed by 2 mg/kg of oral artesunate to complete a total of seven days

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Time to discharge

  4. Fever clearance time

  5. Parasite clearance time

  6. Episodes of hypoglycaemia

  7. Adverse effects


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Time to drinking

  2. Time to eating

  3. Time to sitting

  4. Time to standing

  5. Time to walking

Notes Location: Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Transmission: Not stated
Funding: Wellcome Trust, UK
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "The randomization was generated from random number tables".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Labels with the name of drug for each patient were put in coded sealed opaque envelopes, and the envelopes were randomized in blocks of 20. Once a patient was enrolled in the study the envelope was opened".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk "An independent team of nurses, not otherwise involved in the study or responsible for the care of these patients, open the envelope, randomized the patient and prepared the injection. Neither the treating physicians, study doctors and nurses, or patients knew which anti‐malarial drugs was administered".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others Low risk "An independent team of nurses, not otherwise involved in the study or responsible for the care of these patients, open the envelope, randomized the patient and prepared the injection. Neither the treating physicians, study doctors and nurses, or patients knew which anti‐malarial drugs was administered".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up recorded.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: RCT
Trial dates: May 1995 to June 1996
Participants Number: 77 children enrolled aged three months to 15 years
Inclusion criteria: Children who satisfied the WHO criteria for diagnosis of cerebral malaria (such as unrousable coma for at least half an hour following convulsions, positive blood film for malaria, exclusion of other causes of encephalopathy and informed consent by parent or guardian).
Exclusion criteria: Concomitant acute illness such as pneumonia, meningitis or acute renal failure and any contraindication to IM injection.
Interventions 1.Intramuscular artemether
  • Loading dose of 1.6 mg/kg, repeated after 12 hours

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg once daily for four days


2. Intravenous quinine
  • Loading dose of 10 mg/kg

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg repeated every eight hours and changed to oral dose when patient was able to drink.


Treatment with quinine was for a total of seven days
Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Neurological sequelae

  4. Fever clearance time

  5. Parasite clearance time


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. 28th day cure rate

Notes Location: Khartoum Children's Emergency Hospital and Ahmed Gasim Specialist Hospital for Children, Sudan
Transmission: Unknown
Funding:
  1. Danish Development Agency (DANIDA)

  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "The cases were randomly allocated into two groups".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided by trial authors about allocation concealment.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk Unlikely to be biased whether blinding was done or not.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk No information of blinding reported by authors.
Blinding unlikely as artemether and quinine were given by 2 different routes.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk > 10% of participants in each arm dropped out before Day 28.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Open‐label, RCT
Trial dates: June 1992 to May 1995
Participants Number: 33 adults aged above 12 years
Inclusion criteria: Blood smear showed asexual forms of P. falciparum; in addition to fulfilling one or more of the WHO criteria for severe or complicated malaria
Exclusion criteria: Patients under the age of 12 years, pregnant women, those who had received parenteral antimalarial treatment prior to admission and those with a co‐existent bacterial, viral, fungal or mixed malarial infection were excluded.
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether (Rhone‐Poulenc Rorer)
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg once daily for 4 days


2. Intravenous Quinine (Medipharma)
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg eight hourly and patients able to tolerate oral medication were switched to oral quinine after 48hours to complete a total of seven days.

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Fever clearance time

  4. Parasite clearance time

  5. Episodes of hypoglycaemia

  6. Adverse effects


Outcomes not included in the review:None
Notes Location:Port Moresby General Hospital, Papua New Guinea
Transmission: Seasonal/Sporadic
Funding:
  1. UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR)

  2. Colt Foundation

  3. Wellcome Trust

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with quinine or artemether.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Envelopes containing the assigned treatment were opened sequentially when a patient was recruited.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk Unlikely to be biased whether blinding was done or not.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk No information of blinding reported by authors.
Blinding unlikely as artemether and quinine were given by two different routes.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Differential proportion of withdrawals from both arms (25% versus 10%).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Open label RCT
Trial dates: January 1992 to June 1994
Participants Number: 183 children enrolled (age range not stated)
Inclusion criteria: Children with asexual forms of P. falciparum detected in a peripheral blood smear, and a Blantyre Coma Score ≤ 2, and if no other cause of fever or altered consciousness could be discovered.
Exclusion criteria: None stated
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg on admission

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg once daily. A minimum of three doses were given.

  • Then oral sulphadoxine‐pyrimethamine (approximately 25 mg/kg sulphadoxine and 1.25 mg/kg pyrimethamine) if parasitaemia had cleared and the patient was fully conscious.


2. Intravenous quinine
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg infused over four hours.

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg infused over two hours at eight hour intervals. After a minimum of three intravenous quinine doses oral quinine given in 10 mg/kg doses at eight hour intervals if the patient was able to drink

  • Then oral sulphadoxine‐pyrimethamine (same as above).

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Neurological sequelae

  4. Fever clearance time

  5. Parasite clearance time


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Recurrent parasitaemia

  2. Reticulocyte response

Notes Location: Paediatric ward at the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Malawi
Transmission: Unknown
Funding: UNDP/World Bank/WHO special programme for research and training in tropical diseases (TDR)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Block randomization.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Randomized treatment assignments were prepared in blocks of ten by the sponsoring agency.Following initial stabilization, diagnosis and examination, a sealed envelope containing the treatment group was opened, and the patient was allocated to treatment".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk An open‐label trial is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk An open‐label trial.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Differential proportion of withdrawals from both arms (13% versus 8%).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Open label trial
Trial dates: 1992 to 1994
Participants Number: 576 children aged one to nine years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Unconscious children one to nine years of age with a Blantyre coma score of 2 or less, asexual forms of P. falciparum were identified on a thick blood film, and a parent or guardian gave informed consent.
Exclusion criteria: Patients with diseases other than malaria at the time of admission and those who recovered consciousness immediately after correction of hypoglycaemia or within one hour if they were convulsing on admission. Patients treated with quinine before admission.
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether (Paluther, Rhone‐Poulenc)
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg on admission

  • Followed by daily doses of 1.6 mg/kg for three days


2. Intravenous quinine (Rotexmedica, Germany)
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg every 12 hours

  • Then oral quinine once patient was able to swallow for a total of five days


An oral dose of approximately 1.25 mg/kg pyrimethamine and 25 mg/kg sulfadoxine was given to both arms to reduce recrudescence (in the 2nd and 3rd years of the trial).
Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Neurological sequelae at discharge

  4. Neurological sequelae at 28 days

  5. Fever clearance time

  6. Parasite clearance time

  7. Adverse effects


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Residal neurological sequelae (five months follow‐up)

  2. 28th day cure rate

Notes Location: Royal Victoria Hospital and Sibanor Health Centre,Banjul Gambia
Transmission:Unknown
Funding:
  1. UNDP/World Bank/WHO special programme for research and training in tropical diseases (TDR)

  2. The Netherlands Foundation for the Advancement of Tropical Research

  3. The Ter Meulen Foundation

  4. The Medical Research Council

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Trial authors do not provide details of sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "The treatment code for each child was stored in a sealed envelope that was opened after the admission procedure was completed and parental consent had been obtained".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk An open‐label trial is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others Low risk "Each blood film was examined by two independent observers who were unaware of the treatment code".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up were recorded.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Open RCT
Trial dates: March 1992 to September 1994
Participants Number: 124 adults aged between 16 and 66 years
Inclusion criteria: 15 years of age or older, with clinical symptoms and signs of malaria and the presence of asexual forms of P. falciparum in their peripheral blood. In addition to having at least one of the following signs: (i) unrousable coma (Glasgow coma score < ll); (ii) hypoglycaemia (blood glucose < 2.2 mmol/L (40 mg %); (iii) acute renal failure (plasma creatinine > 265.2 µmol/L (3 mg %) with or without oliguria); (iv) jaundice (total bilirubin > 51.3 mol/L (3 mg %)) with parasitaemia > 100,000/µL or with plasma creatinine >1.5 mg %; (v) anaemia (haematocrit < 20%) with parasitaemia > 100000/µL; (vi) shock (systolic arterial pressure < 80 mmHg with a thready pulse and cold clammy extremities); and (vii) hyper parasitaemia >500000/µL.
Exclusion criteria: Patients were excluded from the trial if prior treatment with more than 3 g of quinine or two doses of artemisinin or a derivative had been recorded by the peripheral health care worker. Pregnant patients in the first trimester, and patients with concomitant diseases (such as active tuberculosis, bacterial meningitis), or mixed infections with P. vivax were also excluded from the trial.
Interventions 1.Intramuscular artemether (Kunming Pharmaceutical, Yunnan, China)
  • Loading dose of 200 mg

  • Followed by 100 mg once daily for three days


2.Intramuscular artesunate (Guilin No. 2 Pharmaceutical Factory, Guangxi, China)
  • Loading dose of 120 mg

  • Followed by 60 mg once daily for three days


3. Intravenous artesunate (Guilin No. 2 Pharmaceutical Factory, Guangxi, China)
  • Loading dose of 120 mg

  • Followed by 60 mg once daily for three days


All patients received 750 mg mefloquine (Lariam®, Roche) as a single dose after regaining consciousness or at day 4.
Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Fever clearance time

  4. Parasite clearance time


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Fatality rate

Notes Location: Tan Phu regional Hospital, Vietnam
Transmission: Endemic
Funding: Roche Asian Research Foundation, Hong Kong
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Trial authors do not provide details about random sequence generation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "When a patient fulfilled the enrolment criteria, a sealed envelope containing the code for the treatment regimen was opened to allocate him/her to one of the following 4 treatment groups".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk Described as open‐label. However, lack of blinding is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk An open‐label trial.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up were reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.
Methods Trial design: Open RCT
Trial dates: Not stated
Participants Number: 54 children aged one to five years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Patients were admitted if they satisfied the strict WHO definition of cerebral malaria.
Exclusion criteria: None stated
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether
  • Loading dose of 3.2 mg/kg on admission

  • Followed by 1.6 mg/kg for four days


2. Intravenous quinine
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg infused over four hours on admission

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg every eight hours until patient regained consciousness and oral medication was continued at 10 mg/kg, every eight hours for a total of seven days

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Neurological sequelae

  4. Fever clearance time

  5. Parasite clearance time

  6. Adverse effects


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Time to sit unaided

  2. Time to drink

  3. Discharge packed cell volume

  4. Mortality rate

  5. 28th day cure rate

  6. Parasite recrudescence

Notes Location: University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Transmission:Unknown
Funding: World Bank/UNDP/WHO special fund for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random numbers used.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Each child was then assigned a random number from a list prepared by an independent collaborator and thus allocated at random to receive either intramuscular artemether or intravenous quinine".
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk An open‐label trial is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk "This was a randomized, open, controlled study in which no attempt was made to ‘blind’ the investigators, as the test drug and the control drug were given by 2 different routes".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Only one patient excluded from fever clearance time outcome assessment because of urinary tract infection.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study Reason for exclusion
Aceng 2005 Intervention was rectal artemisinin.
Bhattacharya 1997 Not a RCT.
Bunnag 1992 Drug‐resistant malaria not severe malaria.
Dunyo 2011 Uncomplicated malaria.
Falade 2007 Comparison not parenteral treatment.
Fargier 1999 Not a RCT.
Karbwang 1994 Comparison not parenteral treatment.
Karunajeewa 2006 Not a RCT.
Myint 1987 Not a RCT.
Osonuga 2006 No desired review outcomes.
Reham 2012 Patients not randomly selected (non‐probability consecutive sampling used).
Rehman 2013 Design is a case‐control prospective study.
Shwe 1988 Not a RCT.
Shwe 1992 Participants in the artemether arm also received single dose of mefloquine.
White 1992 Participants not randomized.

Characteristics of studies awaiting assessment [ordered by study ID]

Methods Multicentre trial
Participants Information not available
Interventions Information not available
Outcomes Information not available
Notes Information not available
Methods RCT
Participants 105 adults enrolled
Interventions Information not available
Outcomes Information not available
Notes Information not available

Contributions of authors

Ekpereonne Esu (EE) and Emmanuel E. Effa (EEE) identified and extracted data from eligible trials for this review. EE entered data into Review Manager (RevMan). EEE and EE performed risk of bias assessment and analysed data. EE prepared the 'Summary of findings' tables and the first draft of the review. All authors read, gave input to all sections and approved the final version.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Calabar, Nigeria.

  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK.

External sources

  • Department for International Development, UK.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Unchanged

References

References to studies included in this review

  1. Adam I, Idris HM, Mohamed‐Ali AA, Aelbasit, Elbashir MI. Comparison of intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine in the treatment of Sudanese children with severe falciparum malaria. East African Medical Journal 2002;79(12):621‐5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguwa CN, Ukwe CV, Adibe MO. A comparative study of quinine and artemether in the treatment of severe malaria in Nigerian children. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2010;9(1):11‐7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tran TH, Day NP, Nguyen HP, Nguyen TH, Tran TH, Pham PL, et al. A controlled trial of artemether or quinine in Vietnamese adults with severe falciparum malaria. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;335(2):76‐83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huda SN, Shahab T, Ali SM, Afzal K, Khan HM. A comparative clinical trial of artemether and quinine in children with severe malaria. Indian Pediatrics 2003;40(10):939‐45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Karbwang J, Sukontason K, Rimchala W, Namsiripongpun W, Tin T, Auprayoon P, et al. Preliminary report: a comparative clinical trial of artemether and quinine in severe falciparum malaria. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 1992;23(4):768‐72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Karbwang J, Tin T, Rimchala W, Sukontason K, Namsiripongpun V, Thanavibul A, et al. Comparison of artemether and quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in south‐east Thailand. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1995;89(6):668‐71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Minta D, Sissoko M, Sidibe I, Dolo A, Poudiougou B, Dembele M, et al. Efficacy and safety of artemether in the treatment of severe and complicated malaria in Mali [Efficacite et tolerance de l'artemether dans le traitement du paludisme grave et complique au Mali]. Mali Médical 2005;20(1‐2):28‐32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Murphy S, English M, Waruiru C, Mwangi I, Amukoye E, Crawley J, et al. An open randomized trial of artemether versus quinine in the treatment of cerebral malaria in African children. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1996;90(3):298‐301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ojuawo A, Adegboye AR, Oyewalo O. Clinical response and parasite clearance in childhood cerebral malaria: A comparison between intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine. East African Medical Journal 1998;75:450‐2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Olumese PE, Björkman A, Gbadegesin RA, Adeyemo AA, Walker O. Comparative efficacy of intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine in Nigerian children with cerebral malaria. Acta Tropica 1999;73(3):231‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Osonuga O, Osonuga AA, Osonuga IO, Osonuga A. Temperature changes in the course of treatment of severe malaria patients with artemether and quinine. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 2011;2(1):41‐5. [Google Scholar]; Osonuga OA, Osonuga AA, Osonuga IO, Osonuga A. Comparison of Coma Resolution Time in the Course of Treating Childrenwith Severe Falciparum Malaria with Quinine and Artemether. World Journal of Medical Sciences 2011;6(2):42‐45. [Google Scholar]; Osonuga OA, Osonuga IO. Parasitaemia changes in the course of treatment of severe malaria patients with artemether and quinine (A preliminary study). Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 2009;2(4):319‐23. [Google Scholar]
  12. Phu NH, Tuan PQ, Day N, Mai NT, Chau TT, Chuong LV, et al. Randomized controlled trial of artesunate or artemether in Vietnamese adults with severe falciparum malaria. Malaria Journal 2010;9:97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Satti GM, Elhassan SH, Ibrahim SA. The efficacy of artemether versus quinine in the treatment of cerebral malaria. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 2002;32(2):611‐23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Seaton RA, Trevett AJ, Wembri JP, Nwokolo N, Naraqi S, Black J, et al. Randomized comparison of intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine in adult, Melanesian patients with severe or complicated, Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Papua New Guinea. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 1998;92(2):133‐9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Taylor TE, Wills BA, Courval JM, Molyneux ME. Intramuscular artemether vs intravenous quinine: an open, randomized trial in Malawian children with cerebral malaria. Tropical Medicine and International Health 1998;3(1):3‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hensbroek MB, Onyiorah E, Jaffar S, Schneider G, Palmer A, Frenkel J, et al. A trial of artemether or quinine in children with cerebral malaria. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;335(2):69‐75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ha V, Nguyen NH, Tran TB, Bui MC, Nguyen HP, Tran TH, et al. Severe and complicated malaria treated with artemisinin, artesunate or artemether in Viet Nam. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1997;91(4):465‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walker O, Salako LA, Omukhodion SI, Sowunmi A. An open randomized comparative study of intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine in cerebral malaria in children. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1993;87(5):564‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

References to studies excluded from this review

  1. Aceng JR, Byarugaba JS, Tumwine JK. Rectal artemether versus intravenous quinine for the treatment of cerebral malaria in children in Uganda: randomised clinical trial. British Medical Journal 2005;330(7487):334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhattacharya PC, Pai‐dhungat AJ, Patel K. Artemether in moderate to severe malaria: a multicenter trial in India. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 1997;28(4):736‐40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bunnag D, Karbwang J, Harinasuta T. Artemether in the treatment of multiple drug resistant falciparum malaria. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 1992;23(4):762‐7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dunyo S, Sirugo G, Sesay S, Bisseye C, Njie F, Adiamoh M, et al. Randomized trial of safety and effectiveness of chlorproguanil‐dapsone and lumefantrine‐artemether for uncomplicated malaria in children in the Gambia. PLoS One 2011;6(6):e17371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Falade CO, Fadero FF, Happi CT, Dada‐Adegbola HO, Gbotosho GO, Ayede I, et al. Dihydroartemisinin suppository in moderately severe malaria: comparative efficacy of dihydroartemisinin suppository versus intramuscular artemether followed by oral sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine in the management of moderately severe malaria in Nigerian children. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2007;76(1):1‐6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fargier JJ, Louis FJ, Duparc S, Hounsinou C, Ringwald P, Danis M. Comparative study of artemether and quinine in severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria in adults and older children in Cameroon. Médicine Tropicale 1999;59(2):151‐6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Karbwang J, Na‐Bangchang K, Wattanakoon Y, Thanavibul A, Harinasuta T. Artemether 5 versus 7 day regimen for severe falciparum malaria. Southeast Asian Journal ofTropical Medicine and Public Health 1994;25(4):702‐6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karunajeewa HA, Reeder J, Lorry K, Dabod E, Hamzah J, Page‐Sharp M, et al. Artesunate suppositories versus intramuscular artemether for treatment of severe malaria in children in Papua New Guinea. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2006;50(3):968‐74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pe Than Myint, Tin Shwe. A controlled clinical trial of artemether (qinghaosu derivative) versus quinine in complicated and severe falciparum malaria. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1987;81(4):559‐61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Osonuga OA, Osonuga IO, Akinsomisoye OS, Raji Y, Ademowo OG. Packed cell volume changes in the treatment of severe malarial patients with artemether and quinine (a preliminary study). Journal of Medical Sciences 2006;6(5):853‐7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rehman HU, Bilal H, Ali Q. Comparative study of intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine in the treatment of cerebral malaria in children. Pakistan Paediatric Journal 2012;36(2):75‐80. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rehman MU, Shrestha B, Zehri T, Thapa S. Efficacy of quinine versus artemether in the treatment of severe malaria. Journal of the Nepal Health Research Council 2013;11(23):17‐21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tin Shwe, Pe Than Myint, Ye Htut, Win Myint, Lin Soe. The effect of mefloquine artemether compared with quinine on patients with complicated falciparum malaria. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1988;82(5):665‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shwe T, Hla KK. The effect of artemether plus mefloquine on Myanmar patients with complicated falciparum malaria. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 1992;23(Suppl 4):117‐21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. White NJ, Waller D, Crawley J, Nosten F, Chapman D, Brewster D, et al. Comparison of artemether and chloroquine for severe malaria in Gambian children. Lancet 1992;339(8789):317‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

References to studies awaiting assessment

  1. Danis M, Chandenier J, Doumbo O, Kombila M, Kouame J, Louis F, et al. Results obtained with i.m. artemether versus i.v. quinine in the treatment of severe malaria in a multi‐centre study in Africa. Japan Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1996;24(Suppl 1):93‐6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Faiz MA, Rahman E, Hossain MA, Rahman MR, Yunus EB, Samad R, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing artemether and quinine in the treatment of cerebral malaria in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Malariology 2001;38(1‐2):9‐18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Additional references

  1. Artemether‐Quinine Meta‐analysis Study Group. A meta‐analysis using individual patient data of trials comparing artemether with quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2001;95(6):637‐50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dondorp A, Nosten F, Stepniewska K, Day N, White N, South East Asian Quinine Artesunate Malaria Trial (SEAQUAMAT) group. Artesunate versus quinine for treatment of severe falciparum malaria: a randomised trial. Lancet 2005;366(9487):717‐25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dondorp AM, Fanello CI, Hendriksen IC, Gomes E, Seni A, Chhaganlal KD, et al. Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): an open‐label, randomised trial. Lancet 2010;376(9753):1647‐57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doolan DL, Dobaño C, Baird JK. Acquired immunity to malaria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2009;22(1):13‐36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck‐Ytter Y, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal 2008;336(7650):924‐6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hien TT, Davis TM, Chuong LV, Ilett KF, Sinh DX, Phu NH, et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics of intramuscular artesunate and artemether in patients with severe falciparum malaria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2004;48(2):871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ilett KF, Batty KT, Powell SM, Binh TQ, Thu le TA, Phuong HL, et al. The pharmacokinetic properties of intramuscular artesunate and rectal dihydroartemisinin in uncomplicated falciparum malaria. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2002;53(1):23‐30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jaffar S, Hensbroek M, Palmer A, Schneider G, Greenwood B. Predictors of a fatal outcome following childhood cerebral malaria. American Journal of TropicalMedicine and Hygiene 1997;57(1):20–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karbwang J, Na‐Bangchang K, Congpuong K, Molunto P, Thanavibul A. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of oral and intramuscular artemether. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1997;52(4):307–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kyu HH, Fernández E. Artemisinin derivatives versus quinine for cerebral malaria in African children: a systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009;87(12):896‐904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
  12. McIntosh HM, Olliaro P. Artemisinin derivatives for treating severe malaria. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000527] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mithwani S, Aarons L, Kokwaro GO, Majid O, Muchohi S, Edwards G, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of artemether and dihydroartemisinin following single intramuscular dosing of artemether in African children with severe falciparum malaria. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2004;57(2):146–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murphy SA, Mberu E, Muhia D, English M, Crawley J, Waruiru C, et al. The disposition of intramuscular artemether in children with cerebral malaria; a preliminary study. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1997;91(3):331‐4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Navaratnam V, Mansor SM, Sit NW, Grace J, Li Q, Olliaro P. Pharmacokinetics of artemisinin‐type compounds. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2000;39(4):255‐70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nealon C, Dzeing A, Müller‐Römer U, Planche T, Sinou V, Kombila M, et al. Intramuscular bioavailability and clinical efficacy of artesunate in Gabonese children with severe malaria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2002;46(12):3933–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
  18. Sinclair D, Donegan S, Lalloo DG. Artesunate versus quinine for treating severe malaria. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005967.pub3] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. ter Kuile F, White NJ, Holloway P, Pasvol G, Krishna S. Plasmodium falciparum: in vitro studies of the pharmacodynamic properties of drugs used for the treatment of severe malaria. Experimental Parasitology 1993;76(1):85–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. World Health Organization. Severe falciparum malaria. World Health Organization, Communicable Diseases Cluster. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2000;94(Suppl 1):S1–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  22. World Health Organization. Roll Back Malaria Department. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. Second Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010. [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES