Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Jun 5;5:10981. doi: 10.1038/srep10981

Mutual Information between Discrete Variables with Many Categories using Recursive Adaptive Partitioning

Junhee Seok 1, Yeong Seon Kang 2,a
PMCID: PMC4456943  PMID: 26046461

Abstract

Mutual information, a general measure of the relatedness between two random variables, has been actively used in the analysis of biomedical data. The mutual information between two discrete variables is conventionally calculated by their joint probabilities estimated from the frequency of observed samples in each combination of variable categories. However, this conventional approach is no longer efficient for discrete variables with many categories, which can be easily found in large-scale biomedical data such as diagnosis codes, drug compounds, and genotypes. Here, we propose a method to provide stable estimations for the mutual information between discrete variables with many categories. Simulation studies showed that the proposed method reduced the estimation errors by 45 folds and improved the correlation coefficients with true values by 99 folds, compared with the conventional calculation of mutual information. The proposed method was also demonstrated through a case study for diagnostic data in electronic health records. This method is expected to be useful in the analysis of various biomedical data with discrete variables.

Mutual information is a statistic to measure the relatedness between two variables1. It provides a general measure based on the joint probabilities of two variables assuming no underlying relationship such as linearity. Compared with traditional measures such as correlation, mutual information can detect a wider range of relationships. For example, zero correlation coefficient does not necessarily imply that two variables are independent while zero mutual information is mathematically equivalent to independence. Mutual information has a strong theoretical ground in information theory2, which has been intensively studied and applied in the various areas of informatics, engineering, communications, and computer science (reviewed by Cover and Thomas1). In addition, mutual information is directly interpreted as the amount of shared information between two data sets in the unit of bits. Benefiting from such advantages, mutual information has been actively utilized in the analyses of biomedical data; sequence analysis3, gene expression analysis4,5,6, molecular network reconstruction7,8, biomedical image processing9, and the analyses of electronic health records10.

Although the calculation of mutual information is straightforward given a joint probability distribution of two variables, in many cases it should be estimated from random samples without knowing the underlying distribution. There have been numerous efforts to estimate mutual information from random samples, especially for continuous variables. A common way is a binning approach using two-dimensional histogram, where the whole sample space is separated into several bins and the joint probabilities are estimated by counting the number of samples in each bin11,12. To improve the efficiency of binning, partitioning after data transformation to a favored coordinate system has been suggested13. As an alternative to the binning approaches, algorithms estimating the joint probability distribution with smoothing functions or kernels have been studied14.

Until now, many studies for mutual information have focused on its calculation between continuous variables. While the mutual information between discrete and continuous variables has been studied recently15, mutual information between discrete variables hasn’t been studied much. It is mainly because the estimation of the joint probabilities between discrete variables has been considered to be straightforward, just by counting the number of samples in each combination of categories of two variables15. In fact, even without sophisticated techniques, the conventional calculation of mutual information works well for discrete variables of a few categories with a relatively large sample size.

With recent developments in data generation, storage, and management, new types of data with many categories have been introduced. For example, electronic health records have diagnosis codes, operations, and prescribed drugs, each of which has thousands of different categories. In order to investigate their relations, we have to examine millions of distinct combinations with a limited sample size. In population genomics, the genotype of a SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) position can be encoded as a discrete variable with three values (AA, AB, and BB). However, when we consider n SNPs together, the number of genotype categories exponentially increases. In an association study between genotypes and phenotypes, such as phenome-wide association studies that consider many phenotypes together16, several millions of possible combinations may need to be explored. In genome sequence analyses, while a nucleotide can have only four categories (A, C, G and T), a codon, three consecutive nucleotides as a unit of amino acid translation, can have 64 distinct values. In immunology, the VDJ recombination of B-cell and T-cell receptors is a key mechanism for the variety of immune repertoires. The investigation of recombination patterns through immune repertoire sequencing17 requires examining the combinations of ~80 V, ~30 D, and ~6 J segments. Examples of available data sets are listed in Supplementary Table S1. These data types commonly have many categories or discrete values, among which orders and distances are ill-defined.

For such discrete variables with many categories, the conventional calculation of mutual information based on frequencies of all possible combinations is not efficient. It has been known that in the binning approaches11,12, the calculated mutual information between two continuous variables depends on quantization and sample sizes18, and it can be distorted if too many bins are used15. Similarly, the calculation of mutual information between discrete variables with many categories can be easily distorted, simply because there are only a few observations for each combination of categories. For the continuous variables, this problem, at least partially, can be solved by techniques based on data transformation and smoothing13,14. However, for discrete variables with fixed categories without an order, there is no room to apply such techniques. This problem still remains unsolved for discrete variables and needs to be explored more.

In this paper, we propose a method to calculate the mutual information between two discrete variables with many categories by using recursive adaptive partitioning. The method is for discrete variables of which values are not orderable. The conventional approach suffers from the relative sparseness of observed samples because there are too many possible combinations of the categorical values of two discrete variables. By recursively rearranging categories in the order of marginal populations and partitioning the sample spaces, the method separates the whole sample space into much fewer subregions within which the samples are considered to be uniformly distributed. Since all samples in a subregion are considered together regardless of their actual combinations of categorical values, the proposed method virtually reduces the effective number of possible choices, and consequently increases the relative sample density. The proposed method was evaluated by intensive simulation studies, where it showed superior robustness and accuracy compared with the conventional calculation. As a case study, this method was applied to the analysis of electronic health records of intensive care unit patients in MIMIC-II Clinical Database19. The results of both simulation and case studies show the usefulness of the proposed method in the analysis of relation between discrete variables with many categories.

Methods

Conventional Calculation of Mutual Information

Consider two discrete variable X and Y with x1, x2, …, xn, and y1, y2, …, ym distinct values or categories, respectively. Let N(xi,yj) denote the number of samples with xi and yj values, and NT be the total number of samples. The joint probability mass p(xi, yj) = Pr(X = xi,Y = yj) is often empirically estimated by the number of samples with xi and yj, i.e. p(xi, yj) = N(xi,yj)/NT. The marginal probability mass p(xi) and p(yj) can be accordingly calculated. Then, the mutual information between X and Y, I(X;Y), is calculated by

graphic file with name srep10981-m1.jpg

with the naively estimated joint probabilities1. The mutual information of X and Y is 0 if they are independent.

Recursive Adaptive Partitioning

For the calculation of mutual information between two discrete variables with many categories, we first partition the whole sample space into several subregions where samples are supposed to be uniformly distributed. Categorical values cannot be ordered by themselves. Instead, here we sort them in the order of their marginal populations. Figure 1 illustrates the procedure of the proposed recursive adaptive partitioning. As shown in Fig. 1A, consider a subspace where discrete variable X and Y have n and m distinct categories, respectively. This subspace exclusively has mn possible combinations of X and Y categories. This subspace is further partitioned through the following steps.

Figure 1. Procedure of recursive adaptive partitioning.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) A given subspace of data with two discrete variables X and Y are shown. X has n distinct categories of x1 to xn, and Y has m categories of y1 to ym. (B) The first partitioning for X is made between x(k) and x(k+1). x(i) represents the i-th categorical value of X in the order of the marginal populations. (C) The first partitioning for Y which is made between y(l) and y(l+1). (D) In the case that the first partitioning is made for X, the potential results of the second partitioning are shown.

1. We test the uniformity of the sample distribution in the subspace using a chi-square statistic20. The chi-square statistic is calculated by

graphic file with name srep10981-m2.jpg

where E(xi,yj) denote the expected number of samples with xi and yj categories when the samples are uniformly distributed, i.e. E(xi,yj) = Σi,jN(xi,yj)/nm. The corresponding p-value is calculated under a chi-square distribution with the degree of freedom of nm−1. If the p-value is larger than a certain threshold, then the sample distribution is considered to be uniform. In this case, we stop at this point and no further partitioning is made. Otherwise, since the samples are not uniformly distributed, the subspace is further partitioned by the next steps.

2. The subspace can be partitioned for either X (Fig. 1B) or Y (Fig. 1C). The proposed method splits a subspace into two regions (binary partitioning) at the optimal point that minimizes the mean-square-errors when the uniformity is assumed. To find the optimal split point for X, we sort xi’s, the categorical values of X, in the order of their marginal populations within the subspace. The marginal population of xi is given as NM(xi) = ΣjN(xi,yj). We present the ordered values as x(1), x(2), …, x(n) where NM(x(1)) ≤ NM(x(2)) ≤ … ≤ NM(x(n)). Then, the optimal split point sX for X can be found by minimizing TX given as

graphic file with name srep10981-m3.jpg

where c1 and c2 are naturally given by the averages of the corresponding NM(xi)’s. Similarly, we can calculate the optimal split point sY for Y and TY. By comparing TX and TY, the given subspace (Fig. 1A) is partitioned for X at sX if TX>TY (Fig. 1B). Otherwise, it is partitioned for Y at sY (Fig. 1C). Since the categories are rearranged at every step of recursion, the pre-arrangement of categorical values before the analysis does not affect the result.

3. Each of the partitioned subspaces is considered as a new subspace. Step 1 and 2 are repeated for these new subspaces. Figure 1D shows the potential partitions in the next round when the subspace of Fig. 1A is partitioned for X.

The proposed method assumes that unobserved proper categories can be efficiently found using marginal populations. The method aims to find blocks within which observed samples are uniformly distributed. These blocks can be considered as unobserved proper categories because the relation of two variables can be captured by these blocks instead of the fine combinations of observed categories. However, since it is difficult to directly find such jointly uniform blocks, the proposed method uses the marginal uniformity. While the marginal uniformity does not guarantee the joint uniformity, partitioning by maximizing the marginal uniformity of the separated subregions can help to extract the jointly uniform regions because the joint uniformity guarantees the marginal uniformity. Especially, by recursively applying this maximization and partitioning procedure, the jointly uniform blocks are expected to be finally found in many practical cases.

The Proposed Calculation of Mutual Information

Through the recursive adaptive partitioning, the whole sample space is partitioned into non-overlapping subregions. Subregion A is defined by exclusive combinations of X and Y categories, i.e.Inline graphic. The total probability mass assigned to A is given as Inline graphic where NT is the total number of samples. Since the samples are considered to be uniformly distributed in A, the joint probability mass of xi and yj is given as p(xi, yj) = Pr(A)/kl. Using this joint probability masses, we can calculate the corresponding marginal probabilities. Finally, we can calculate the mutual information as equation (1). Note that if all subregion A’s have only one combination of xi and yj, i.e. k = l = 1, the proposed calculation is equivalent to the conventional one.

Related Previous Works

While the proposed method is for discrete variables, similar ideas of adaptive partitioning have been introduced for the estimation of mutual information between continuous variables21,22. They recursively divide a continuous sample space until the sample distribution uniformity within partitions is confirmed. Then, they estimate the joint probability distribution and calculate mutual information. Such methods often find the partitioning points at certain quantiles, such as median (50% quantile), of the cumulative probability of each variable, which is not possible for discrete variables whose categorical values have no order. Instead, the proposed method finds the partitioning point over the sorted categories in the order of marginal populations. Moreover, the methods for continuous variables require to partition one step further to check the uniformity of the sample distribution because the uniformity in a region cannot be determined without discretization. In contrast, our method checks the uniformity over the combinations of categories in a subregion without further partitioning. Even with some similarity of the basic idea, our method for discrete variables is quite distinct from the previous ones for continuous variables.

For mutual information between continuous variables, as an alternative of adaptive partitioning, the use of regular partitioning with bias correction has been proposed23. These methods divide a continuous sample space into equal-size partitions, estimated the joint probability density, and calculate entropies and mutual information by correcting partitioning biases using polynomial approximations. While the idea of the bias correction is developed for continuous variables, it might be possible to apply for discrete variables as an alternative of the adaptive partitioning described in this work.

The adaptive partitioning approach also has been used to improve the sampling strategy of pixel densities in the estimation of the mutual information between two images24. Here, an image is spatially adaptively partitioned by a recursive process. By sampling pixel densities from such partitions, the probability distribution of the pixel density of the image can be estimated with the consideration of spatial patterns. However, the mutual information between the pixel density distributions of two images is simply estimated in the conventional way1. This method applies the adaptive partitioning for sampling before the calculation of mutual information while the proposed method directly applies for the mutual information calculation.

Results And Discussion

Simulation Results

The proposed method was evaluated through simulation studies with discrete variables of which values cannot be ordered. Simulation settings are described in Supplementary Methods. Figure 2 shows the simulation results for data structured by step functions (simulation setting (1) and (2) in Supplementary Methods). In this simulation, variable X and Y are considered to have two super categories for each. Their joint probability masses are shown in Fig. 2A. Instead of the super categories, five categories per each super category are assumed to be observed. The combinations of the observed categories are assumed to be uniformly distributed within the corresponding combination of the super categories. Since the categorical values have no order, we observe 10 × 10 complicated combination patterns between X and Y instead of 2 × 2 simple pattern (Fig. 2B). This simulation reflects cases that we observe and analyze fine categories while truly informative super categories are unobserved.

Figure 2. Mutual information of step structure.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The upper panels are for simulation setting (1) and the lower panels are for (2). (A) Each variable has 10 distinct categories, and their joint probability masses are structured by step functions. (B) Observed data with randomly ordered categorical values. (C) Mutual information as a function of sample sizes, by the conventional method (black) as well as by the proposed method (RAP: recursive adaptive partitioning) with different p-value thresholds (red: 0.1, green: 0.5, blue: 0.9). The true mutual information is shown with a dashed black line. (D) Mutual information as the numbers of distinct categories for each variable. 10, 50, 100, 250 and 500 samples were used for 2, 10, 20, 50 and 100 categories, respectively.

The proposed calculation of mutual information with recursive adaptive partitioning provides much closer estimations than the conventional calculation in a wide range of simulation parameters. Figure 2C shows the calculated mutual information for 20 categories for each variable as the numbers of samples. All tested calculations converge to the true value with the increase of sample sizes. While varying with the p-value thresholds, our method shows faster convergences than the conventional calculation, and closer estimations to the true value at a given sample size. In the example of the lower panel of Fig. 2C where the true mutual information is 0.61 bits, the estimated mutual information by the proposed method is 0.69 bits (sample size = 200, p-value threshold = 0.5), and the error is 0.08 bits. For the same setting, the conventional calculation provides 1.07 bits as its estimation, and the error is 0.56 bits, which is seven times larger than that of the proposed method.

The proposed estimation is robust to the number of distinct categories of variables. Figure 2D shows the change of the estimated mutual information according to the numbers of categories for variable X and Y. With the increase of the number of categories, conventionally calculated mutual information is dramatically deviated from the true value. In the example of the upper panel of Fig. 2D, the mutual information is conventionally calculated as 2.81 bits for the 100 categories per variable, and the error to the true value (0.09 bits) is 2.72 bits. In contrast, the proposed method provides stable estimations even with very many categories. For the same 100 categories, its estimation is 0.14 bits (p-value threshold = 0.5) and the error is 0.05 bits, which is more than a 50-fold deduction from the conventional calculation.

Simulation studies with other data structures also show the similar accuracy and robustness of the proposed method. Figure 3 shows data where the joint histogram of two categorical variables is characterized by a joint Gaussian distribution (simulation setting (3) and (4) in Supplementary Methods). It reflects the case that the category populations of variables have bell shapes marginally and they are correlated with each other. The data structure can be easily recognized with properly arranged categorical values (Fig. 3A). However, when the data is actually observed, the structure is difficult to be perceived because the categories are likely to be randomly arranged without an order (Fig. 3B). Figure 4 shows the randomly structured data, where each joint probability is randomly chosen from exponential distributions (simulation setting (5) and (6) in Supplementary Methods). As a result, the designed data structure (Fig. 4A) has visually no significant difference from the observed data (Fig. 4B). Since the theoretical mutual information is difficult to be calculated in these cases, we empirically estimated the true values with very large sample sizes. For both data sets with Gaussian and random structures, the proposed method provides close estimations to the true values even with small sample sizes (Figs. 3C,4C) as well as robust estimations even with many categories per variable (Figs. 3D,4D).

Figure 3. Mutual information of Gaussian structure.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The upper panels are for simulation setting (3) and the lower panels are for (4). (A) Each variable has 10 distinct categories, and their joint probability masses are structured by a joint Gaussian function. (B) Observed data with randomly ordered categorical values. (C) Mutual information as the numbers of samples, by the conventional method (black) as well as by the proposed method (RAP: recursive adaptive partitioning) with different p-value thresholds (red: 0.1, green: 0.5, blue: 0.9). The true mutual information is shown with a dashed black line. (D) Mutual information as the numbers of distinct categories for each variable. 10, 50, 100, 250 and 500 samples were used for 2, 10, 20, 50 and 100 categories, respectively.

Figure 4. Mutual information of random structure.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The upper panels are for simulation setting (5) and the lower panels are for (6). (A) Each variable has 10 distinct categories, and their joint probability masses are randomly structured. (B) Observed data with randomly ordered categorical values. (C) Mutual information as the numbers of samples, by the conventional method (black) as well as by the proposed method (RAP: recursive adaptive partitioning) with different p-value thresholds (red: 0.1, green: 0.5, blue: 0.9). The true mutual information is shown with a dashed black line. (D) Mutual information as the numbers of distinct categories for each variable. 10, 50, 100, 250 and 500 samples were used for 2, 10, 20, 50 and 100 categories, respectively.

The systematic evaluation is summarized in Table 1 for the cases with 500 samples and 100 categories per variable. Table 1 also reports the average ratios of the errors to the true values (|MItrue−MIestimated|/MItrue) as well as the Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the estimated and true mutual information values of the six simulations. The conventional method always over-estimates the mutual information. Data sets with low and high mutual information, such as (1) vs. (2), are hardly distinguishable with the conventional method. In contrast, the proposed method achieves significantly smaller errors and higher correlations with the true values. The performance of the proposed method varies as p-value thresholds. Although it is very difficult to guess the optimal p-value threshold or to derive a parameter-free way of estimating it, one can choose a threshold from a wide range of p-values that shows reasonably good performance. Especially, our method with p-value threshold 0.5 shows the best performance in the simulations with low errors (0.27 bits on average) as well as high correlations with true values (0.99). Compared with the results of the conventional methods (error: 12.20 bits, correlation: 0.01), the average error was reduced by 45 folds and the correlation coefficient was improved by 99 folds, which are significant improvements.

Table 1. Summary of the simulation tests.

  (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Err. Cor.
True MI 0.09 0.61 0.14 0.53 0.16 0.43 N/A N/A
Conventional 2.81 2.70 2.12 2.17 2.63 2.84 12.20 0.01
Random Partition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.54
RAP, pv=0.1 0.02 0.31 0.10 0.24 0.09 0.12 0.55 0.91
RAP, pv=0.3 0.06 0.42 0.14 0.35 0.14 0.25 0.27 0.98
RAP, pv=0.5 0.14 0.52 0.21 0.54 0.22 0.43 0.27 0.99
RAP, pv=0.7 0.42 0.82 0.50 0.98 0.48 0.88 1.76 0.92
RAP, pv=0.9 2.02 2.01 1.62 1.91 1.97 2.52 8.98 0.35
Open in a new tab

For the simulation setting (1) to (6), shown are the mutual information values estimated from 500 samples when each variable has 100 categories. Shown are the averages of ratios of the errors to the true values (Err) as well as the correlation coefficients between the true and estimated values (Cor) across the six simulations.

We also compared our method with random partitioning to evaluate the efficiency of our partitioning scheme. In the random partitioning, one of X and Y is randomly chosen for split, and the corresponding categories are randomly separated into two groups. Table 1 shows the result of random partitioning with the same number of final subregions with the proposed method with p-value threshold 0.5. Random partitioning hardly captures the relation between variables, and provides almost zero mutual information for all cases. This comparison shows that our method efficiently learns the relation of variables through adaptive partitioning and consequently provides accurate estimations.

Additionally, we investigated the noise effects on the mutual information calculation. The noise of a discrete variable can be interpreted as mistakes in categorization. The noise level can be measured as the proportion of these mistakes among the total samples. Since a noise sample can be mis-categorized as any value, noise samples are distributed uniformly over the whole sample space. Therefore, mutual information between two discrete random variables is distorted toward zero by noise. Using the simulation setting (4), we evaluated the noise effect (Supplementary Figure S1). The expected mutual information was estimated from 1 million samples using the conventional method at each noise ratio. The mutual information was estimated from subsampling by the proposed method (p-value = 0.5) and the conventional method. As shown in Supplementary Figure S1, the expected mutual information was distorted toward zero by noise. The estimation by our method followed the expected mutual information well while the conventional method hardly captured the noise effect. The proposed method can sensitively capture the distortion of mutual information by noise.

A Case Study for the Diagnoses in Critical Care

For a case study, we applied the proposed method to investigate the relation between the primary and secondary diagnoses of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. 4,928 pairs of primary and secondary diagnoses for admissions were collected from 3,854 patients in the publically available subset of MIMIC-II Clinical Database19. Diagnoses are represented by the 3-digit ICD9 (International Classification of Diseases 9) codes (www.icd9data.com). Among about a thousand disease codes in the ICD9 codes, the primary and secondary diagnoses in the data have 296 and 252 disease codes, respectively. Since the disease codes are discrete and have no order, the primary and secondary diagnoses can be represented as discrete variables with those numbers of distinct categories.

We estimated the mutual information between the primary and secondary diagnoses. For the proposed method, we used 0.5 as a p-value threshold because it showed the reasonably good performance through the simulation studies. The mutual information was estimated as 0.34 bits by the proposed method. In contrast, it was estimated as 1.13 bits by the conventional calculation. Since the true value is unknown, it is difficult to evaluate the accuracy of these estimations. However, on average there are 0.066 (=4,928/296/252) samples per distinct combination of primary and secondary diagnoses in the data, which is comparable with the simulation of Table 1 (0.05 sample/combination). In such sparse data, the conventional calculation of mutual information is easy to over-estimate while the proposed method provides relatively robust estimations. Therefore, we can reasonably consider that the estimation of the proposed method will be closer to the true mutual information.

In addition, we evaluated the mutual information calculations in the hierarchy of the ICD9 codes. According to the similarity of disease signs, symptoms, and causes, the 3-digit ICD9 codes are further classified into fewer super categories. For example, ICD9 codes corresponding to ‘Cholera’, ‘Shigellosis’, ‘Amebiasis’, and other 6 diseases (level-3 category) are grouped into level-2 ‘Intestinal Infectious Diseases’ category, which is further grouped into level-1 ‘Infectious and Parasitic Diseases’ category with other 15 level-2 super categories. The hierarchy of the ICD9 code system has 17 level-1 super categories except supplementary codes. Among them level-1 ‘Infectious and Parasitic Diseases’ category has 138 level-3 categories, each of which corresponds to a 3-digit ICD9 code. In the ICU data here, 296 categories of the primary diagnoses are grouped into 89 level-2 categories, and further into 16 level-1 categories. Similarly, the secondary diagnosis has 252 level-3, 76 level-2, and 17 level-1 categories. Figure 5 shows the estimated mutual information values between the primary and secondary diagnoses with level-1, 2, and 3 categories by the proposed and conventional methods. The proposed method has relatively less changes across the different levels of categories while the conventional calculation has dramatic changes. Since the level-1 and 2 super categories partially reflect the hidden data structure of the level-3 fine categories by grouping diseases according to their similarity, the mutual information values with different categories are not expected to have huge difference. Therefore, this analysis also supports the robustness of the proposed method.

Figure 5. Mutual information between the primary and secondary diagnoses of the ICU patients.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Shown are the mutual information values calculated from 296 × 252 3-digit ICD9 codes (level-3 categories) as well as 17 × 16 level-1 and 89 × 76 level-2 categories, by the proposed method with p-value threshold 0.5 (red) and the conventional method (black).

The mutual information was also estimated with various p-value thresholds (Supplementary Figure S2). The estimated mutual information was closer to the result of the conventional method with a higher p-value, which is a similar pattern with the cases of the simulation studies. This result is expected because the sample space becomes easier to be partitioned with higher p-values. Also as shown in Figs 2-4, the MI calculated by the proposed method depends on the p-value thresholds. For practical applications, we can determine the proper threshold using the results of intensive simulation studies such as Table 1. Even though, it is still important to study a parameter-free way of estimating the threshold.

The structure learned by the proposed method brings interesting insights for the ICU diagnosis data. First, the learned structure identifies sparse regions with rare samples. A large block with 234 primary and 157 secondary codes has only 44 samples. The combinations of this block have only one or zero sample. The density is 0.001 sample/combination, which is much lower than the average density (=0.066). In addition, 12 blocks have lower densities than the average density. The rare samples of these blocks have little contribution to the analysis of the data, and they might be ignorable in the data analysis. Second, some diseases tend to be partitioned together in the secondary diagnoses. For example, ‘Cardiac Dysrhythmias’ and ‘Heart Failure’, which are closely related and have the same level-2 category, are often partitioned into one block as the secondary diagnoses for the primary diagnoses of ‘Acute Bronchitis and Bronchiolitis’, ‘Acute and Subacute Endocarditis’, ‘Chronic Bronchitis’, and so on. More interestingly, ‘Heart Failure’ is often grouped together with ‘Other Diseases of Lung’ while cardiovascular and respiratory diseases are not close at all in the disease classification. It can be also observed for ‘Acute Kidney Failure’ and ‘Symptoms Involving Cardiovascular System’. Even with different disease signs and symptoms, the diseases grouped together for the secondary diagnoses might have a common underlying mechanism according to the primary diagnoses, which might be worth to be further studied.

Conclusion

In this paper, we propose a method for the calculation of mutual information between discrete variables with many categories. By adaptively partitioning a sample space into subregions with uniform distributions, the proposed method robustly provides estimation for mutual information. Through the simulation studies for various types of data, the proposed method was shown to have superior accuracy and robustness to the sample size and the number of categories, compared with the conventional calculation of mutual information. The average error was reduced by 45 folds (12.20 to 0.27), and the correlation coefficient with true values was improved by 99 folds (0.01 to 0.99). In a case study to investigate the relation between the primary and secondary diagnoses of ICU patients, the proposed method provided reasonable mutual information without over-estimating the dependency between two diagnoses. The overall result demonstrates the benefits of the proposed method. In the future, we will further investigate the theoretical aspects of the method to guess the optimal p-value thresholds that can yield nearly perfect mutual information, which will be very useful for practical cases. We will also study a parameter-free way of estimating the p-value threshold. Another important issue is the efficient implementation of the method so as to overcome the high time complexity for the number of variable categories. We believe that the proposed method will be useful in the analysis of various biomedical data as well as data in the other areas of natural sciences, engineering, business, and social sciences.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Seok, J. and Kang, Y.S. Mutual Information between Discrete Variables with Many Categories using Recursive Adaptive Partitioning. Sci. Rep. 5, 10981; doi: 10.1038/srep10981 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep10981-s1.pdf (206.5KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant (No. NRF- 2014R1A1A2A16050527) and the Korea University Grant. We thank Mr. Minhyeok Lee for his valuable comments on the proposed method.

Footnotes

Author Contributions YSK designed the study. JH and YSK developed the method, performed the research, and wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Cover T. M. & Thomas J. A. Elements of information theory (Wiley-Interscience, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  2. Shannon C. E. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. AT&T Tech J 27, 623–656 (1948). [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark G. W., Ackerman S. H., Tillier E. R. & Gatti D. L. Multidimensional mutual information methods for the analysis of covariation in multiple sequence alignments. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 157 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Steuer R., Kurths J., Daub C. O., Weise J. & Selbig J. The mutual information: detecting and evaluating dependencies between variables. Bioinformatics 18 Suppl 2, S231–240 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daub C. O., Steuer R., Selbig J. & Kloska S. Estimating mutual information using B-spline functions–an improved similarity measure for analysing gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 118 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Priness I., Maimon, O. & Ben-Gal, I. Evaluation of gene-expression clustering via mutual information distance measure. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 111 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang X. et al. Inferring gene regulatory networks from gene expression data by path consistency algorithm based on conditional mutual information. Bioinformatics 28, 98–104 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Villaverde A. F., Ross J., Moran F. & Banga J. R. MIDER: network inference with mutual information distance and entropy reduction. PLoS One 9, e96732 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maes F., Collignon A., Vandermeulen D., Marchal G. & Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE T Med Imaging 16, 187–198 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang X., Hripcsak G. & Friedman C. Characterizing environmental and phenotypic associations using information theory and electronic health records. BMC Bioinformatics 10 Suppl 9, S13 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Butte A. J. & Kohane I. S. Mutual information relevance networks: functional genomic clustering using pairwise entropy measurements. Pac Symp Biocomput 5, 418–429 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Michaels G. S. et al. Cluster analysis and data visualization of large-scale gene expression data. Pac Symp Biocomput 3, 42–53 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rapp P. E. et al. The Algorithmic Complexity of Neural Spike Trains Increases during Focal Seizures. J Neurosci 14, 4731–4739 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Moon Y. I., Rajagopalan B. & Lall U. Estimation of Mutual Information Using Kernel Density Estimators. Phys Rev E 52, 2318–2321 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ross B. C. Mutual information between discrete and continuous data sets. PLoS One 9, e87357 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Denny J. C. et al. PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. Bioinformatics 26, 1205–1210 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Georgiou G. et al. The promise and challenge of high-throughput sequencing of the antibody repertoire. Nat Biotechnol 32, 158–168 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roulston M. S. Estimating the errors on measured entropy and mutual information. Physica D 125, 285–294 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  19. Scott D. J. et al. Accessing the public MIMIC-II intensive care relational database for clinical research. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13, 9 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pearson K. On the Criterion that a given System of Deviations from the Probable in the Case of a Correlated System of Variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from Random Sampling. Philos Mag 50, 157–175 (1900). [Google Scholar]
  21. Fraser A. M. & Swinney H. L. Independent Coordinates for Strange Attractors from Mutual Information. Phys Rev A 33, 1134–1140 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Darbellay G. A. & Vajda I. Estimation of the information by an adaptive partitioning of the observation space. IEEE T Inform Theory 45, 1315–1321 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  23. Paninski L. Estimation of entropy and mutual information. Neural Comput 15, 1191–1253 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  24. Sundar H., Shen D., Biros G., Xu C. & Davatzikos C. Robust computation of mutual information using spatially adaptive meshes. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 10, 950–958 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep10981-s1.pdf (206.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES