Abstract
Background
Obesity in type 2 diabetes patients is a serious health issue by itself; it is also associated with other health problems including psychiatric illnesses. The psychological effects of dieting and weight loss have been a matter of controversy in the field of obesity management.
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the impact of weight loss because of aerobic exercise training and dietary measures on psychological wellbeing and biochemical modulation in obese type 2 diabetes patients.
Material and methods
One hundred obese type 2 diabetes patients of both sexes participated in this study, and were included into two equal groups. The first group (A) received aerobic exercise training, three sessions per week for three months combined with dietary measures. The second group (B) received no training intervention for three months.
Results
There was a significant decrease in body mass index (BMI), leptin, total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), triglycerides(TG), homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance- index (HOMA-IR) , beck depression inventory (BDI ) & profile of mood states(POMS) and increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) & Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES) of group (A) after treatments, but the changes of group (B) were not significant. Moreover, there were significant differences between mean levels of the investigated parameters of group (B) and group (A) at the end of the study.
Conclusion
Physical training and dietary measures can be used as methods of choice for psychological wellbeing and biochemical modulation in obese type 2 diabetes patients.
Keywords: Obesity, type 2 diabetes, aerobic exercise training, dietary measures, psychological wellbeing
Introduction
The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes has been rising steadily over the past 3 decades, and is largely attributable to the dramatic increase in obesity rate1,2. Over 300 million people worldwide live with diabetes now, and if the current prevalence rate continues unabated, over 550 million people will be living with diabetes by 20303,4. Diabetes represents a major health problem because of its high prevalence, morbidity and mortality, its influence on patient quality of life, and its impact on the health system5. It is now widely accepted that the obesity epidemic continues to be the principal driver for the rising global prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus6, cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disease, cancers and all-cause mortality7.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a serious chronic disease whereby the body is unable to effectively use glucose as a fuel due to relative insulin deficiency caused by insulin resistance8. Untreated acute and chronic states of hyperglycemia could lead to debilitating long-term complications. Heart attacks and strokes are two to three fold higher in people with diabetes, along with increased risks for retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy. Life expectancy can be shortened by as much as 10–15 years because of premature and accelerated atherosclerosis, and the attendant medical complications9.
Depression is a health complication that is commonly associated with obesity as risk of depression is 20–50% higher among obese individuals than normal weight persons10,11. Extremely obese persons are at even greater risk12. The relationship between obesity and depression appears to be bi-directional; some longitudinal studies have shown that depression is associated with subsequent weight gain and obesity13–15, whereas others have found that obesity is associated with the development of depression16,17.
As the lifetime risk of diabetes increases substantially and proportionally with the magnitude of overweight and obesity18, a major effort of the fight against diabetes is focused on diabetes prevention through weight loss and health behavior changes, and aggressive glycemic and overall management of diabetes to prevent the deadly complications18,19. However, health behavior modification, aiming at achieving a healthier body weight through dietary therapy and regular physical activity, is the cornerstone therapy for people with diabetes recommended by the American Diabetes Association20. The 2013 American Diabetes Association standards of medical care in diabetes guidelines recommend a 7% body weight loss for all overweight or obese individuals who have or are at risk for diabetes through dietary strategies and regular physical activity21. Physical activity combined with calorie restriction improves not only parameters of well-being and prevention of major morbidity but also embeds longer-term weight maintenance22,23.
The aim of this study was to measure the impact of weight loss because of aerobic exercise training and dietary measures on psychological wellbeing and biochemical modulation in obese type 2 diabetes patients
Patients and methods
Subjects
One hundred obese type 2 diabetes patients of both sexes (56 males & 44 females) were randomly selected from the Internal Medicine Department at King Abdul Aziz University hospital and other hospitals at Jeddah area. Their age was between 35 – 45 years, the body mass index (BMI) ranged from 32 to 36 Kg/m2, free from other co-morbidities as respiratory, kidney, liver, neurological disorders and orthopedic problems inhibiting treadmill training or renal disease. Participants were included into two equal groups; the first group (A) received aerobic exercise training, three sessions per week for three months combined with dietary measures. The second group (B) received no training intervention for three months. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. All participants were in sedentary lifestyle prior to the study and they received only oral hypoglycemic drugs and did not receive any medications, which can affect the mood, moreover they were free to withdraw from the study at any time.
Equipment
Treadmill (Enraf Nonium, Model display panel Standard, NR 1475.801, Holland) was used in performance of aerobic walking exercise.
Commercial kits (Randox, Tokyo, Japan) with K2EDTA was used to measure leptin, total cholesterol, triacylglycerol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES) was used for self-esteem evaluation, the profile of mood states (POMS) was used for mood disturbance evaluation and Beck depression inventory (BDI) was used for Depression evaluation24.
Weight and height scale (JENIX DS 102, Dongsang, South Korea) was used to measure weight and height to calculate the body mass index (BMI). Body mass index was calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms by the square of the height in meters (Kg/m2). According to the WHO classification, a BMI of <18.5 Kg/m2 is under weight, 18.5–24.9 Kg/m2 is normal 25–29.9 Kg/m2 is overweight. A BMI of > 30 Kg/m2 is classified as obese and this group was further divided into moderate obesity (30–34.9 Kg/m2), sever obesity (35–39.9 Kg/m2) and very severe obesity (≥40 Kg/m2).
Measurements
1. Laboratory analysis
Venous blood samples were collected in polystyrene tubes after a 12-h fasting, by venipuncture of the antecubital vein while patients rested in a supine position. The blood samples were transported to a laboratory within 1 h and centrifuged at + 4 °C to remove serum (1000 = g for 10 min). Plasma sample with K2EDTA was collected after centrifugation (2000 × g for 10 min at 4°C) and stored at −80°C to analyze leptin, total cholesterol, triacylglycerol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. All analyses were carried out on a Hitachi 7170 Autoanalyser (Tokyo, Japan) or with commercial kits (Randox). Also, kits (Bioclin, Quibasa, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil) were used to measure homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index for insulin sensitivity.
2. Psychological well-being
Data was collected at baseline and at the end of treatment. Participants were asked to attend two laboratory sessions in order to complete all psychological assessments, in each evaluation period. Self-esteem was assessed with the Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES), a 10-item scale that measures global self-worth by measuring both positive and negative feelings about the self. The scale is believed to be unidimensional. All items are answered using a 4-point Likert scale format ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Mood disturbance was assessed with the profile of mood states (POMS). Originally, the POMS included sixty five items which load on seven different scales: “depression”, “anxiety”, “fatigue”, “vigour”, “irritability”, “tension”, and “confusion”. The questions refer to the time period of the “last week including today”. The response scale is divided into five categories ranging from “not at all” to “very strong”. The items are defined from 1 to 5 (“not at all”, “a little”, “moderately”, “quite a bit”, and “extremely”, respectively). The questionnaire assessed six dimensions of mood that can be used to calculate a total mood disturbance score, which was used in the present study. Questions pertain to emotional states of the previous month. Depression was evaluated with the Beck depression inventory (BDI), a 21-item inventory measuring several symptoms of depression. It uses a 4-point ordered scale and results in a total score (Items 1 – 3 assess symptoms that are psychological in nature, while items 14 – 21 assess more physical symptoms. This was rated as follows: 1 – 10: Normal; 11 – 16: Mild mood disturbance; 17 – 20: Borderline clinical depression; 21 – 30: Moderate depression and >30: Severe depression)24.
3. Evaluation of anthropometric parameters
All measurements were performed at pretreatment and after three months at the end of the study. The participants were measured whilst wearing their undergarments and hospital gowns. Height was measured with a digital stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm (JENIX DS 102, Dongsang, South Korea). Body weight was measured on a calibrated balance scale to the nearest 0.1 kg (HC4211, Cas Korea, South Korea), and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as BMI = Body weight / (Height)2.
All measurements of leptin, total cholesterol, triacylglycerol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, BMI, HOMA-IR, BDI and POMS were taken before the starting of the study (pretest) and after three months at the end of the study (post-test).
Procedures
Following the previous evaluation, all patients were divided randomly into the following groups:
1. Patients in Group (A) were submitted to forty minutes moderate intensity aerobic exercise sessions on a treadmill (the initial, 5-minute warm-up phase performed on the treadmill (Enraf Nonium, Model display panel Standard, NR 1475.801, Holland) at a low load, each training session lasted 30 minutes and ended with 5-minute recovery and relaxation phase) either walking or running, based on heart rate, until the target heart rate was reached, according to American College of Sport Medicine guidelines25. The program begun with 10 min of stretching and was conducted using the maximal heart rate index (HRmax) estimated by 220-age. First 2 weeks = 60–70% of HRmax, 3rd to 12th weeks = 70–80% of HRmax. Each session was continued for 30 minutes; 3 sessions / week for 3 months26.
All subjects of group (A) were instructed to take an individual balanced energy-restricted dietary program to obtain weight loss .The mean daily caloric intake was about 1200 kcal/day, based on a macronutrient content <30% fat and 15% protein as recommended by the World Health Organization27. At the initial interview with a dietitian, obese subjects was given verbal and written instructions on how to keep diet records, with food weighed and measured. Dietary intake was monitored by the same dietitian. The subjects maintained a detailed record of food intake, and received weekly nutritional counseling. Obese subjects were instructed to substitute low-fat alternatives for typical high-fat foods, to increase the consumption of vegetables and fresh fruits, and to substitute complex carbohydrates, such as whole-grain bread and cereals. Dietetic help was given every 2 weeks by the dietitian when anthropometric measurements were performed; in addition, each subject was seen by a physician monthly to perform a clinical evaluation, standard electrocardiogram, and measurement of blood pressure and heart rate26,28.
2. Patients in Group (B) received no training or diet regimen for three months.
Statistical analysis
The mean values of BMI, Leptin, TC, HDL-c, LDL-c, TG, RSES, BDI and POMS obtained before and after three months in both groups were compared using paired “t” test. Independent “t” test was used for the comparison between the two groups (P<0.05).
Results
The two groups were considered homogeneous regarding the baseline characteristics (Table 1).
Table (1).
Parameters | Mean ± SD | p value | |
Group A (N = 50) | Group B (N = 50) | ||
Age (years) | 36.35 ± 5.11 | 37.16 ± 4.32 | P > 0.05 |
Waist circumference (cm) | 107.54 ± 8.38 | 106.18 ± 7.13 | P > 0.05 |
Hip circumference (cm) | 113.17 ± 7.82 | 112.95 ± 8.11 | P > 0.05 |
Waist to hip ratio | 0.91 ± 0.14 | 0.89 ± 0.13 | P > 0.05 |
Body weight (kg) | 94.26 ± 8.27 | 92.97 ± 7.82 | P > 0.05 |
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) |
142.16 ± 10.54 | 140.34 ± 11.12 | P > 0.05 |
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) |
87.13 ± 8.23 | 85.15 ± 7.21 | P > 0.05 |
Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 128.37 ± 10.18 | 127.87 ± 9.87 | P > 0.05 |
HbA1c % | 7.93 ± 1.86 | 7.26 ± 1.55 | P > 0.05 |
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 192.30 ± 12.86 | 193.54 ± 11.22 | P > 0.05 |
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 34.54 ± 2.71 | 33.73 ± 2.95 | P > 0.05 |
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 132.93 ± 9.78 | 133.64 ± 9.03 | P > 0.05 |
Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 154.15 ± 10.21 | 155.18 ± 9.82 | P > 0.05 |
BMI = Body Mass Index; HbA1c = Hemoglobin A1C; HDL= High Density Lipoprotein; LDL= Low Density Lipoprotein
There was a significant decrease in body mass index (BMI), leptin, total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), triglycerides(TG), homeostasis model assessmentinsulin resistance- index (HOMA-IR), Beck depression inventory (BDI ) & profile of mood states(POMS) and increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) & Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES) of group (A) after treatments (Table 2), but the changes of group (B) were not significant (Table 3).
Table (2).
Mean ±SD | T-value | P-value | ||
Before | After | |||
BMI (Kg/m2) | 32.86 ± 5.29 | 30.13 ± 4.32 | 5.26 | P <0.05 |
Leptin (Ng/ml) | 39.72 ± 5.75 | 36.21 ± 5.195 | 6.31 | P <0.05 |
TC (mg/dl) | 192.30 ± 12.86 | 176.54 ± 11.66 | 9.75 | P <0.05 |
HDL-c (mg/dl) | 34.54 ± 2.71 | 36.35 ± 2.48 | 6.24 | P <0.05 |
LDL-c (mg/dl) | 132.93 ± 9.78 | 120.27 ± 8.94 | 7.22 | P <0.05 |
TG (mg/dl) | 154.15 ± 10.21 | 129.61 ± 9.83 | 8.35 | P <0.05 |
HOMA-IR | 7.21 ± 2.13 | 5.65 ± 1.94 | 4.31 | P <0.05 |
Self-esteem (RSES) | 21.12 ± 3.45 | 26.73 ± 3.22 | 5.61 | P <0.05 |
Depression (BDI) | 7.98 ± 2.05 | 5.21 ± 1.97 | 3.32 | P <0.05 |
Total mood disturbance (POMS) |
23.95 ± 4.42 | 19.61 ± 4.13 | 5.11 | P <0.05 |
BMI = Body Mass index; TC = Total cholesterol; HDL-c = High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c= Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG = Triglyceride; HOMA-IR = Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance Index; RSES = Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; POMS = Profile of Mood States.
Table (3).
Mean ±SD | T-value | P-value | ||
Before | After | |||
BMI (Kg/m2) | 33.15 ± 4.87 | 33.45 ± 4.16 | 0.82 | P > 0.05 |
Leptin (Ng/ml) | 38.64 ± 5.16 | 38.91 ± 4.37 | 0.98 | P > 0.05 |
TC (mg/dl) | 193.54 ± 11.22 | 195.12 ± 10.25 | 1.25 | P > 0.05 |
HDL-c (mg/dl) | 33.73 ± 2.95 | 32.81 ± 2.74 | 0.89 | P > 0.05 |
LDL-c (mg/dl) | 133.64 ± 9.03 | 133.88 ± 8.72 | 0.95 | P > 0.05 |
TG (mg/dl) | 155.18 ± 9.82 | 156.11 ± 9.23 | 1.12 | P > 0.05 |
HOMA-IR | 7.53 ± 2.32 | 7.81 ± 2.15 | 0.81 | P > 0.05 |
Self-esteem (RSES) | 20.54 ± 3.72 | 19.82 ± 3.43 | 0.93 | P > 0.05 |
Depression (BDI) | 8.15 ± 2.14 | 8.41 ± 2.11 | 0.62 | P > 0.05 |
Total mood disturbance (POMS) |
24.04± 4.31 | 24.22± 4.16 | 0.86 | P > 0.05 |
BMI = Body Mass index; TC = Total cholesterol; HDL-c = High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c= Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG = Triglyceride; HOMA-IR = Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance Index; RSES = Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; POMS = Profile of Mood States.
Moreover, there were significant differences between mean levels of the investigated parameters of group (B) and group (A) at the end of the study (Table 4). (P<.05).
Table (4).
Mean ±SD | T-value | P-value | ||
Group (A) | Group (B) | |||
BMI (Kg/m2) | 30.13 ± 4.32 | 33.45 ± 4.16 | 4.75 | P <0.05 |
Leptin (Ng/ml) | 36.21 ± 5.195 | 38.91 ± 4.37 | 5.62 | P <0.05 |
TC (mg/dl) | 176.54 ± 11.66 | 195.12 ± 10.25 | 8.55 | P <0.05 |
HDL-c (mg/dl) | 36.35 ± 2.48 | 32.81 ± 2.74 | 5.42 | P <0.05 |
LDL-c (mg/dl) | 120.27 ± 8.94 | 133.88 ± 8.72 | 6.34 | P <0.05 |
TG (mg/dl) | 129.61 ± 9.83 | 156.11 ± 9.23 | 7.61 | P <0.05 |
HOMA-IR | 5.65 ± 1.94 | 7.81 ± 2.15 | 3.45 | P <0.05 |
Self-esteem (RSES) | 26.73 ± 3.22 | 19.82 ± 3.43 | 4.21 | P <0.05 |
Depression (BDI) | 5.21 ± 1.97 | 8.41 ± 2.11 | 3.12 | P <0.05 |
Total mood disturbance (POMS) |
19.61 ± 4.13 | 24.22± 4.16 | 4.10 | P <0.05 |
BMI = Body Mass index; TC = Total cholesterol; HDL-c = High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c= Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG = Triglyceride; HOMA-IR = Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance Index; RSES = Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; POMS = Profile of Mood States.
Discussion
The psychological effects of dieting and weight loss have been a matter of controversy in the field of obesity management. Several early studies (before the 1970s) described negative emotional consequences to dieting29, whereas later studies found an improvement or no changes in the symptoms of depression, self-esteem, mood and anxiety in patients that are obese treated by behavior modification combined with moderate calorie restriction30–33. These conflicting results constitute an incentive to conduct our study to the impact of weight loss as a result of aerobic exercise training and dietary measures on psychological wellbeing and biochemical modulation in obese type 2 diabetes patients.
The findings of this study showed that weight loss because of aerobic exercise training and dietary measures by obese type 2 diabetic patients led to decreased BMI, Leptin, TC, LDL-c, TG& HOMA-IR and increased HDL-c. Accumulating evidence confirms these findings indicates that lifestyle changes such as weight loss and regular physical activity are recognized as effective non-pharmacological interventions with beneficial effects and biochemical modulation in obese type 2 diabetes patients34–36.
Pi-Sunyer etal. found that an intensive lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes patients was associated with an average of 8.6% body weight loss compared with 0.7% in the diabetes support and education (control) group after one year ,this was accompanied by an A1C reduction from 7.3% to 6.6%, along with improved fitness level, blood pressure and lipid values. The weight changes were significantly correlated with changes in glycemic control, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides; larger weight loss resulted in greater improvements in each of the cardiovascular risk factors34.
Snel et al. included 27 obese type 2 diabetes patients in a 16-week very low calorie diet and exercise program and found that a significant weight loss, glycemic control and major improvements in health-related quality of life35. Moreover, Jazet etal. applied a study on eighteen insulin-treated obese type 2 diabetes patients who were followed for 18 months after they followed a 30-day very low calorie diet (VLCD, 450 k Cal/day) with the cessation of all glucose-lowering medication. After the 30-day VLCD, caloric intake was slowly increased and glucose-lowering medication was restarted if necessary. On day 0 and 30 of the VLCD and after 18 months follow-up, bodyweight, blood pressure, glycemic control and lipid levels were measured. The 30-day VLCD significantly reduced bodyweight and waist circumference and improved dyslipidemia, hypertension and glycaemia36.
This study also showed weight loss because of aerobic exercise training and dietary measures by obese type 2 diabetes patients led to decreased Beck depression inventory (BDI) & profile of mood states (POMS) and increased Rosenberg self-esteem Scale (RSES). In this regard, some studies revealed that the weight loss has a strong impact on psychological wellbeing in obese type 2 diabetes patients37–41.
Grave et al. investigated the effects of weight loss on psychological distress and binge eating in 500 patients that are obese of both sexes remaining in continuous treatment at different centers with slightly different strategies. At baseline and after 12 months all subjects were evaluated by the SymptomCheckList-90 Global Severity Index (SCL-GSI) and by the Binge eating scale (BES). In both males and females, weight loss was associated with improved psychometric testing of psychological distress37. However, in a systematic review of 22 studies of long-term non-pharmacological weight loss interventions in type 2 diabetes through health behavior changes for 1 to 5 years, the pooled weight loss was a modest 1.7 kg, or 3.1%34. The compelling evidence on modest weight loss in the prevention or delay in type 2 diabetes raised the tantalizing question of whether long-term lifestyle intervention exert beneficial health and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes38.
Imayama et al. Conducted a randomized controlled trial on overweight/obese postmenopausal women randomly for 12 months and found that a combined diet and exercise intervention resulted in weight loss and had positive effects on health-related quality of life and psychological health which included depression, anxiety and social support39. While, Wycherley etal. conducted in a parallel design, a study on 106 obese men and women with type 2 diabetes who were randomized to a prescriptive 16-week caloric restricted diet (6,000–7,000 kJ/day), with supervised resistance exercise training (n = 65) or without supervised resistance exercise training (n = 41) (three times per week) and found that structured caloric restricted diet with or without resistance exercise training improves body weight, glycated hemoglobin, diabetes-specific emotional distress and quality of life questionnaire in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes40. Moreover, Faulconbridge etal. studied the response of depression symptoms to changes in body weight and stated that intentional weight loss is often accompanied by improvements in mood of depressed individuals41.
Our results revealed that BMI and serum leptin were significantly decreased upon weight loss among obese type 2 diabetes patients. Our findings were consistent with Sartorio and colleagues who proved that the circulating levels of leptin have been shown to decrease in response to decreases in energy availability42, also Volek and colleagues suggested that significant decreases in leptin occur as part of an 8-week weight loss program43, which similarly occurred in the present study.
Leptin is recognized to play an integral role in endocrine regulation of metabolism. The higher serum leptin level in obese subjects was clearly evident to be decreased during calorie restriction44. Reduction in leptin concentrations is not only due to decreased body fat mass but potentially through an increase in leptin sensitivity45. Moreover, leptin signaling to brain stem hypothalamic pathways potentially increases the brain's motor and autonomic responses to satiety signals, leading to smaller individual meals; reduce cumulative food intake, and a lowers body weight46. The decrease in serum leptin level after weight reduction was correlated with reduction in BMI47. Weight loss and decrease in BMI in obese diabetes patients was due to enhanced fat oxidation48.
Finally, the results of the present study regarding HOMA-IR showed that weight loss resulted in decrease in HOMA-IR, this result confirmed by Younger and colleagues reported that increased physical activity leads to improvement in insulin resistance and increase in muscle oxidative capacity which are likely contribute to the beneficial effects of exercise training on insulin action49. Also, Kriska and colleagues confirmed that physical activity in obese non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus decreased blood glucose level through improving insulin sensitivity and decreasing deposition of total fat and intra-abdominal fat. Also, physical activity is negatively associated with insulin concentration as a defense mechanism50. However, Roland and colleagues stated that exercise training improves insulin sensitivity and glycemic control, increases muscle mass, strength and endurance51. Also, Sato and colleagues and Short et al. found that physical exercise promotes utilization and lowering of blood glucose. This improvement in insulin action was attributed to the increase in insulin sensitive glucose transporter on the plasma membrane and oxidative enzymes in skeletal muscle52,53. While, Albu and colleagues mentioned that lifestyle modifications with diet and exercise are essential part of the management of the diabetes obese patient as weight loss leads to improvement in the glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, reductions in lipid levels54. Weight reduction program consisted of diet restriction and exercise which was conducted on thirty-five obese NIDDM patients for twelve weeks (diet restriction and exercise) induced significant reductions in body weight, serum leptin levels, improvements in lipoprotein profile, insulin sensitivity and glucose control55. Energy restriction resulting in even modest weight loss suppresses endogenous cholesterol synthesis which leads to a decline in circulating lipid concentrations and as a result increased insulin sensitivity56,57. Through decreasing deposition of total fat and intra-abdominal fat58.
Conclusion
Weight loss because of aerobic exercise training and dietary measures can be considered as methods of choice for psychological wellbeing and biochemical modulation in obese type 2 diabetes patients.
Acknowledgment
The Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, funded this project, under grant no. (58 /142 /1434). The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR technical and financial support.
References
- 1.Finucane M, Stevens G, Cowan M, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377:557–567. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62037-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Whiting D, Guariguata L, Weil C, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94:311–321. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McCrimmon R, Ryan C, Frier B. Diabetes and cognitive dysfunction. Lancet. 2012;379:2291–2299. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lau DCW. “Let's take control of diabetes. Now” Why and How? Can J Diabetes. 2010;34:317–319. [Google Scholar]
- 5.DePablos-Velasco P, Salguero-Chaves E, Mata-Poyo J, DeRivas-Otero B, Garcia-Sanchez R, Viguera-Ester P. Quality of life and satisfaction with treatment in subjects with type 2 diabetes: Results in Spain of the PANORAMA study. Endocrinol Nutr. 2014;61(1):18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2013.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lau D. New insights in the prevention and early management of type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2011;35:239–241. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sharma A, Lau D. Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Can J Diabetes. 2013;37:63–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.03.360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Defronzo R. A new paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 2009;58:773–795. doi: 10.2337/db09-9028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:2215–2222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Simon G, Von Korff M, Saunders K, Miglioretti D, Crane P, van Belle G, et al. Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:824–830. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mather A, Cox B, Enn M, Sareen J. Associations of obesity with psychiatric disorders and suicidal behaviors in a nationally representative sample. J Psychosom Res. 2009;66:277–285. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Petry N, Barry D, Pietrzak R, Wagner J. Overweight and obesity are associated with psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychosom Med. 2008;70:288–297. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181651651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pine D, Cohen P, Brook J, Coplan J. Psychiatric symptoms in adolescence as predictors of obesity in early adulthood: a longitudinal study. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1303–1310. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.8.1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stice E, Presnell K, Shaw H, Rohde P. Psychological and behavioral risk factors for obesity onset in adolescent girls: a prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73:195–202. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Murphy J, Horton N, Burke J, Monson R, Laird N, Lesage A, et al. Obesity and weight gain in relation to depression: findings from the Stirling County Study. Int J Obes. 2009;33:335–341. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Herva A, Laitinen J, Miettunen J, Veijola J, Karvonen J, Läksy K, et al. Obesity and depression: results from the longitudinal Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort Study. Int J Obes. 2006;30:520–527. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Roberts R, Deleger S, Strawbridge W, Kaplan G. Prospective association between obesity and depression: evidence from the Alameda County Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:514–521. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Narayan K, Boyle J, Thompson T, Gregg E, Williamson D. Effect of BMI on lifetime risk for diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1562–1566. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lau D. Fight diabetes: the Tsunami of non-communicable diseases. Can J Diabetes. 2009;33:348–349. [Google Scholar]
- 20.American Diabetes Association, author. Executive Summary. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:S4–S10. doi: 10.2337/dc12-s004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.American Diabetes Association, author. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:S67–S74. doi: 10.2337/dc13-S067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wu T, Gao X, Chen M, van Dam RM. Long-term effectiveness of diet-plus exercise interventions vs. diet-only interventions for weight loss: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2009;10:313–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Deed G. Integrative care of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Advances in Integrative Medicine. 2014;1:55–58. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Palmeira A, Branco T, Martins S, Minderico C, Silva M, Vieira P, et al. Change in body image and psychological well-being during behavioral obesity treatment: Associations with weight loss and maintenance. Body Image. 2010;7(3):187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thompson WR, Gordon NF, Pescatello LS. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Hubsta Ltd; 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sciacqua A, Candigliota M, Ceravolo R, Scozzafava A, Sinopoli F, Corsonello A, Sesti G, Perticone F. Weight loss in combination with physical activity improves endothelial dysfunction in human obesity. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1673–1678. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.World Health Organization, author. Diet, nutrition, and the prevention of chronic diseases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1990;797:1–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Murakami T, Horigome H, Tanaka K, Nakata Y, Ohkawara K, Katayama Y, Matsui A. Impact of weight reduction on production of platelet-derived microparticles and fibrinolytic parameters in obesity. Thrombosis Research. 2007;119:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2005.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stunkard A, Rush J. Dieting and depression re-examined a critical review of reports of untoward responses during weight reduction for obesity. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1974;81:526–533. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-81-4-526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bryan J, Tiggemann M. The effect of weight-loss dieting on cognitive performance and psychological well-being in overweight women. Appetite. 2001;36:147–156. doi: 10.1006/appe.2000.0389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wing R, Blair E, Marcus M, Epstein L, Harvey J. Year-long weight loss treatment for obese patients with type II diabetes: does including an intermittent very-low-calorie diet improve outcome? American Journal of Medicine. 1994;97:354–362. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90302-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Butryn M, Wadden T. Treatment of overweight in children and adolescents: does dieting increase the risk of eating disorders? International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2005;37:285–293. doi: 10.1002/eat.20098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Werrij M, Mulkens S, Hospers H, Smits-de B, Jansen A. Dietary treatment for obesity reduces BMI and improves eating psychopathology, selfesteem, and mood. Netherlands Journal of Psychology. 2008;64:8–14. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pi-Sunyer X, Blackburn G, Brancati F, Bray G, Bright R, Clark J, et al. Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the look AHEAD trial. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1374–1383. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Snel M, Sleddering M, vd Peijl I, Romijn J, Pijl H, Meinders A, Jazet I. Quality of life in type 2 diabetes mellitus after a very low calorie diet and exercise. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2012;23:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jazet I, de Craen A, van Schie E, Meinders A. Sustained beneficial metabolic effects 18 months after a 30-day very low calorie diet in severely obese, insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2007;77:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Grave R, Calugi S, Petroni M, Di Domizio S, Marchesini G. Weight management, psychological distress and binge eating in obesity. A reappraisal of the problem. Appetite. 2010;54:269–273. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lau DC, Teoh H. Benefits of Modest Weight Loss on the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Can J Diabetes. 2013;7:128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Imayama I, Alfano C, Kong A, Foster-Schubert K, Bain C, Xiao L, et al. Dietary weight loss and exercise interventions effects on quality of life in overweight/obese postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2011;8:118–129. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wycherley T, Clifton P, Noakes M, Brinkworth G. Weight loss on a structured hypocaloric diet with or without exercise improves emotional distress and quality of life in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Investigation. 2014;5:94–98. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Faulconbridge L, Wadden T, Rubin R, Walkup A, Fabricatore A, Coday M, et al. One-year changes in weight and symptoms of depression in depressed vs. non-depressed individuals in the Look AHEAD study. Obesity. 2009;(17 suppl 2):576. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sartorio A, Agosti F, Resnik M, Lafortuna CL. Effects of a 3-week integrated body weight reduction program on leptin levels and body composition in severe obese subjects. J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26:250–256. doi: 10.1007/BF03345165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Volek JS, Gomez AL, Love DM, Weyers AM, Hesslink R, Jr, Wise JA, Kraemer WJ. Effects of an 8-week weight-loss program on cardiovascular disease risk factors and regional body composition. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56:585–592. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Harder H, Dinesen B, Astrup A. The effect of a rapid weight loss on lipid profile and glycemic control in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:180–192. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chu N, Stampfer M, Splegelman D. Dietary and lifestyle factors in relation to plasma leptin concentrations among normal weight and overweight men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Dis. 2001;25:106–114. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.WHO, author. Preventing and managing the global epidemic WHO technical report series 894. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2000. Obesity; pp. 5–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sandoval D, Davis S. Leptin, Metabolic control and regulation. J Diabetes Complications. 2003;17:108–113. doi: 10.1016/s1056-8727(02)00167-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Compbell L, Rossner S. Management of obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Med. 2001;18:345–354. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00546.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Youngren J, Keen S, Kulp J. Enhanced muscle insulin receptor autophosphorylation with short term aerobic exercise training. Am J Physiol Endocrinal Metab. 2001;280:528–533. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.280.3.E528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kriska A, Pereira M, Hanson R. Association of physical activity and serum insulin concentration in two populations at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1175–1182. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.7.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Roland J, Glen P, David H, Carmen C. Physical activity, exercise and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2518–2539. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sato Y, Masaru N, Naoya N, Takashi F. Physical exercise improves glucose metabolism in lifestyle-related diseases. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2003;228:1208–1212. doi: 10.1177/153537020322801017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Short K, Vittone J, Bigelow M, Proctor D. Impact of aerobic exercise training on age related changes in insulin sensitivity and muscle oxidative capacity. Diabetes. 2003;52:1888–1896. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.8.1888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Albu J, Raja-Khan N. The management of the obese diabetic patient. Prim Care. 2003;30:457–491. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(03)00043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ruche R, McDonald R. Use of antioxidants nutrients in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. J Coll Nutr. 2001;20:S 363–S 369. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2001.10719169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Di Buono M, Hannah JS, Katzel LL, Jones PJ. Weight loss due to energy restriction suppresses cholesterol biosynthesis in overweight, mildly hypercholesterolemic men. J Nutr. 1999;129:1545–1548. doi: 10.1093/jn/129.8.1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lamarche B, Despress J, Pouliot MC, Moorjani S, Lupien P, Jheriault G, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Bouchard C. Is body fat loss a determinant factor in the improvement of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism following aerobic exercise training in obese women? Metabolism. 1992;41:1249–1256. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(92)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kriska A, Pereira M, Hanson R. Association of physical activity and serum insulin concentration in two populations at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1175–1182. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.7.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]