Abstract
Invasion and metastasis of glioblastoma-initiating cells (GICs) are thought to be responsible for the progression and recurrence of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). A safe drug that can be applied during the rest period of temozolomide (TMZ) maintenance cycles would greatly improve the prognosis of GBM patients by inhibiting GIC invasion. Resveratrol (RES) is a natural compound that exhibits anti-invasion properties in multiple tumor cell lines. The current study aimed to evaluate whether RES can inhibit GIC invasion in vitro and in vivo. GICs were identified using CD133 and Nestin immunofluorescence staining and tumorigenesis in non-obese diabetic severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice. Invasive behaviors, including the adhesion, invasion and migration of GICs, were determined by tumor invasive assays in vitro and in vivo. The activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) was measured by the gelatin zymography assay. Western blotting analysis and immunofluorescence staining were used to determine the expression of signaling effectors in GICs. We demonstrated that RES suppressed the adhesion, invasion and migration of GICs in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, we proved that RES inhibited the invasion of GICs via the inhibition of PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signal transduction and the subsequent suppression of MMP-2 expression.
Keywords: glioblastoma-initiating cells, RES, invasion, PI3K/Akt, NF-κB, MMP-2
1. Introduction
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most common and fatal tumors originating in the central nervous system, with a median survival time of little more than one year [1]. GBM is characterized by indistinct boundaries and diffuse infiltration throughout the brain parenchyma, which result in unsatisfactory outcomes of surgical excision and/or whole- or partial-brain irradiation [2]. Temozolomide (TMZ) is currently the best chemotherapeutic drug available on the market against GBM and was shown to significantly improve survival in patients with newly diagnosed GBM when administered concomitantly with radiotherapy and as maintenance therapy thereafter [3]. In maintenance therapy, TMZ is usually given in cycles (28 days each). Chemotherapy is administered on the mornings of days 1–5 (treatment period), and no drug is taken on days 6–28 (rest period). The rest period gives normal cells time to recover from the drug’s side effects, and for as long as 23 days, TMZ cannot be administered, despite the risk of invasion and progression of the remaining tumor cells [4].
GBM is composed of heterogeneous cell populations concerning their morphological and differentiation status. It was proposed that a small population of tumor cells named glioblastoma-initiating cells (GICs) play a crucial role in the origin and growth of GBM [5]. After surgical treatment, the residual GICs are thought to be a main cause of tumor recurrence [6,7]. Recent findings have noted that after long-term exposure to therapeutic concentrations of TMZ, differentiated GBM cells convert into glioma stem-like cells and cause the significant expansion of a newly converted GIC population in vitro and in vivo [8]. Meanwhile, GICs display greater migratory and invasive potential compared with differentiated tumor cells [9,10,11]. The invasion potential of the remaining GICs makes it difficult to prevent the recurrence of GBM, especially during the rest period without TMZ treatment.
Resveratrol (RES) is a polyphenolic antioxidant found in peanuts, grapes and red wine, and although parent RES bioavailability might be insufficient to elicit systemic levels commensurate with cancer chemopreventive efficacy, the anti-oncogenic properties of RES in cells in vitro and in rodent models have been amply documented [12,13,14]. In addition, the pharmacologic properties of RES conjugates are unknown, and conjugated metabolites of naturally occurring flavonoids, polyphenols chemically resembling RES, have been suggested to be responsible for, or contribute to, the pharmacologic activity of the parent molecule. Recent studies have elucidated the large role of RES in inhibiting tumor cell adhesion, invasion, and migration by decreasing the invasive phenotype of cancer cells, which alters matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression [15]. Previous studies have proven that increased expression of MMPs is involved in tumor invasion and metastasis in many cancer types [16]. To date, over 20 human MMPs have been identified. Among them, MMP-2 and MMP-9 are the enzymes that are most crucial to tumor invasion due to their ability to degrade the extracellular matrix (ECM) and basement membrane [17]. Several upstream pathways controlling MMPs, such as the PI3K/Akt, MAPK, JAK/STAT, and NF-κB pathways, have been implicated in the regulation of invasion by RES [15]. In this study, we investigated the effect of RES against GIC invasion in vitro and in vivo and studied the underlying mechanisms of RES against highly invasive GICs.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Culture of GICs
GICs (400, 411, 412) were derived from neurosurgical samples of three different GBM patients at the Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, which is affiliated with Capital Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from patients, and the study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee. Tumor tissues were washed with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F-12 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and minced into 1-mm3 fragments using scissors. The fragments were then dissociated into single cells by trypsinization. The cells were resuspended and maintained in DMEM/F-12 complete medium consisting of DMEM/F-12 medium, 2 mM GlutaMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 20 ng·mL−1 recombinant human epidermal growth factor (EGF) (R & D, USA), 20 ng·mL−1 basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (Invitrogen, USA), an N2 supplement (Invitrogen, USA), and a B27 supplement (Invitrogen, USA). To induce differentiation, the GICs were cultured in DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for two weeks.
2.2. Determination of GICs in Vitro
To determine the characteristics of GICs in vitro, immunofluorescence was performed. Cells grown in suspension or slides were fixed with 4% formaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, and then blocked with 10% normal goat serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) for 5 min. The levels of proteins in the GICs were determined by staining with various primary antibodies at the appropriate dilutions. The primary antibodies included those specific for CD133 (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA, MAB4399), Nestin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab82375), glial acidic fibrillary protein (GFAP) (GeneTex, inc. Hsinchu city, Taiwan, GTX84438), NF (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA, #2837), and CNP (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA, #5664). The cells were incubated at 4 °C overnight. After washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with 100 μL of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibody (Life Science Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). The cell nuclei were stained by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and visualized using a Leica DMI 4000 fluorescent microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
2.3. Determination of GICs in NOD/SCID Mice
The GICs (2 × 105/mice, 6 mice) were injected stereotactically into the right corpus striatum (2.5 mm anterior and 2.5 mm lateral to the bregma and 3.0 mm deep) of six-week-old male NOD/SCID mice (VitalStar, Beijing, China), which were housed in a sterile environment (in a specific pathogen-free room) with a light/dark cycle of 12/12 h. Once the mice were anesthetized, the brains were harvested, fixed with formalin, and then embedded with paraffin. The brains were stained with hematoxylin/eosin (H & E), Nestin (GeneTex, inc. Hsinchu city, Taiwan, GTX39578), and glial acidic fibrillary protein (GFAP) (GeneTex, inc. Hsinchu city, Taiwan, GTX84438). All of the studies involving animals were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Beijing Tiantan Hospital.
2.4. Cell Viability and Stemness Assay
Cell growth inhibition was determined using a colorimetic assay with MTT followed by RES treatment. Briefly, GICs (400, 411, 412) were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 2 × 104/well and then treated with RES at various concentrations (0 μM, 5 μM, 10 μM, 20 μM). After 48 h of incubation, cells were incubated with a 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-dipheyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) solution for another 4 h and then harvested by centrifugation. MTT was solubilized by adding 300 μL of DMSO. The absorbance in each well at 492 nm was measured using a Multiskan Plate Reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). To further determine the stemness of GICs, the representative stemness and differentiation markers of GICs (CD133, Nestin and GFAP) were investigated by western blotting analysis.
2.5. Cell Adhesion Assay
Ninety-six-well plates were coated with growth factor reduced matrigel (1:300 dilution) overnight at 4 °C. The plates were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.6) and blocked with a solution of 1% BSA/PBS (pH 7.6) for 1 h at 37 °C. GIC cells (5 × 104 cells/well) pre-treated with the indicated concentrations of RES for 48 h were added to the plates and allowed to attach for 30 min at 37 °C. Unattached cells were aspirated, and the cells that were still adherent were stained and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with DAPI. The number of adherent cells were counted with a Leica DMI 4000 fluorescence microscope. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times.
2.6. Invasion and Migration Assays
The invasion and migration assays were performed using transwell inserts (Merck Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA; 8 μm pore size) in 24-well plates. Approximately 5 × 104 cells in 200 μL of serum-free DMEM-F12 medium were placed in the upper chamber, and 600 μL of the GICs medium containing 10% FBS were placed in the lower chamber. For the invasion assay, transwell membranes were precoated with matrigel (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA). The cells were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. For the migration assay, the cells were incubated in the uncoated transwells for 24 h. Then, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and stained with 0.05% crystal violet in PBS for 30 min. The cells on the upper side of the filters were removed with cotton-tipped swabs, and the filters were washed with PBS. The cells on the underside of the filters were examined and counted with a total 200× magnification under a Leica DMI 4000 microscope. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times.
2.7. Immunofluorescence of NF-κB p65
To determine the translocation of NF-κB p65, immunofluorescence was performed. Cells were seeded in 24-well dishes and incubated with vehicle and 20 μM RES, respectively, for 48 h. Following immunofluorescence, steps were performed as described in “Determination of GICs in vitro” except that the primary antibody was anti-NF-κB p65 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA).
2.8. Gelatin Zymography Assay
Cells were incubated in serum-free medium for 48 h with different concentrations of RES treatment. The supernatants containing 20 μg of total protein were separated at 4 °C in a 7.5% SDS polyacrylamide gel containing 0.2% gelatin. After electrophoresis, the gels were washed in renaturing buffer (pH 7.5, 2.5% Triton X-100) for 30 min, 4 times; equilibrated in developing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 10 mM CaCl2, and 1 mM ZnCl2) for 30 min; and finally incubated in fresh developing buffer at 37 °C for 24 h to allow digestion of the gelatin. The gel was incubated with staining buffer (0.5% Coomassie blue R-250 in 45% methanol, 10% acetic acid) and then destained with washing buffer (45% methanol, 10% acetic acid) until clear bands suggestive of gelatin digestion appeared. The gel was photographed and then quantitatively measured by scanning densitometry.
2.9. Isolation of Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Fractionation
Nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts were prepared with a NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific, USA). The purity of nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts was assessed by western blotting with primary antibodies against lamin A (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), respectively.
2.10. Western Blotting Analysis
GICs (3 × 105/well) seeded in six-well plates and were treated as mentioned previously. The cells were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 4 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100 mM NaF, and 1:500 protease inhibitor mixture (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Equal amounts of proteins were separated by 7%–15% SDS-PAGE and then electro-transferred onto a PVDF membrane. The membrane was then blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h at room temperature, and the protein levels were determined by overnight incubation with primary antibodies, which included antibodies specific for phospho-IKKα/β (H-470), Akt, phospho-Akt (Ser 473), IKKα/β, JNK, phospho-JNK (Thr183/185), IκBα, phospho-IκBα (Ser 32/36), p38, phospho-p38 (Thr 180), mmp-2, GFAP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), ERK1/2, phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/204), mTOR, phospho-mTOR (Ser 2448), NF-κB p65, Lamin A (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), Nestin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD133 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and β-actin. The PVDF membranes were washed in 0.05% Tween-20/TBS and then incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. The bound antibodies were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescent reagent (Merck Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) and quantified by densitometry using a ChemiDoc XRS+ image analyzer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The protein bands were quantified using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), and the results were normalized to the β-actin level.
2.11. In Vivo Tumor Invasion Assay
The GICs (2 × 105/mice) were injected stereotactically into the right corpus striatum of six-week-old male NOD/SCID mice as previously described. After 7 days, the tumor-bearing mice were randomly separated into two groups (n = 6/group). Mice in group A were treated with intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of propyleneglycol (vehicle, 0.1 mL), whereas mice in groups B were i.p. injected with 10 mg·kg−1 RES (in 0.1 mL propylene glycol) once daily. All of the mice were sacrificed at day 28, and the brains were removed and processed for paraffin embedding. Tumors in the hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) coronal sections were measured to determine the tumor depth of invasion. Slides were photographed with an Aperio CS scanscope (Aperio Technologies, CA, USA) and analyzed at 40× magnification by the ImageScope_v12.0.1.5027 software to assess the depth of invasion. A line was drawn along each evaluable surface, establishing a border of the tumor core without any invading cells or projections of groups of cells. Then, at an interval of 200 to 400 μm along this line, measurements were taken from the previously drawn line to the furthest invading cell perpendicular to the solid line away from the tumor border corresponding to the drawn line. Two independent experiments were performed. The number of measurements per animal averaged 64. The total number of measurements for each tumor was analyzed for statistical significance.
2.12. Statistical Analysis
Data were presented as the means ± SD and were analyzed by Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA. Multiple between-group comparisons were performed using the Student-Newman-Keuls (S-N-K) method. A p-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS/Win13.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Characterization of GICs in Vitro and in Vivo
We sorted CD133+ tumor cells from three different surgical specimens of different patients. As shown in Figure 1A–D, Immunofluorescent staining of 412 revealed the presence of stem-cell-related stemness markers such as CD133 and Nestin. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 1E–H, CD133+ cells also exhibited multilineage differentiation potential, demonstrated by high expression levels of GFAP (astrocytes)-, NF (neuron)-, and CNP (oligodendrocytes)-directed morphology in accordance of differentiation. The characteristics of GICs were also confirmed by the assay of tumorigenesis in NOD/SCID mice. As shown in Figure 1I, GICs have the distinguished character of tumorigenesis. The brain tumors were determined through H & E staining (Figure 1J). The brain samples also presented high expression levels of Nestin (Figure 1K) and acicular expression of GFAP (Figure 1L). The other two cell lines showed similar characteristics.
3.2. Effects of RES on GIC Viability and Stemness
We first examined the cytotoxicity of RES at the concentration below 20 μM on GICs (400, 411, 412). By the MTT assay, we found that RES had mild cytotoxicity to GICs. The administrations of RES 20 μM for 48 h reduced GICs by 9.76%, 14.58% and 16.99%, respectively. (Figure 2A). To further determine the stemness of GICs, the representative stemness and differentiation markers of GICs (CD133, Nestin and GFAP) were investigated by Western blotting analysis. We noticed a decrease of CD133 but without the decrease of Nestin and the appearance of differentiation marker (GFAP) (Figure 2B). These results suggested that RES at the concentration below 20 μM exhibited low toxicity and had little effect on the survival and stemness of GICs, but showed a specific inhibition of CD133.
3.3. RES Inhibits Adhesion, Migration, and Invasion of GIC Cells in Vitro
Tumor cells exhibit a variety of properties, including altered adhesiveness, increased motility and invasive capacity, to complete the invasion process [18]. As shown in Figure 3A, RES significantly decreased GICs adhesion in a dose-dependent manner. RES treatment (20 μM) suppressed GICs (400, 411, 412) adhesion to matrigel by 45.57%, 52.86% and 55.34%, respectively. As shown in Figure 3B, RES also inhibited GICs invasion in a concentration-dependent manner. RES treatment (20 μM) reduced the invasion ability of GICs by 57.54.3%, 61.84% and 76.30%, respectively. Finally, the effect of RES on cell migration was detected. As shown in Figure 3C, the migrated cells treated with 20 μM RES went through the transwell membrane were decreased by 38.49%, 45.21%, and 47.43%, respectively. These results demonstrate that treatment with RES dramatically attenuated invasion of GICs at non-cytotoxic concentrations in a concentration-dependent manner.
3.4. RES Suppresses the Activity and Expression of MMP-2 in GICs
We further determined the activity and expression of MMP-9 and MMP-2 by applying gelatin zymography and western blotting. As shown in Figure 4A, RES markedly reduced the gelatinolytic activity of MMP-2 produced from GICs cells; however, low activity of MMP-9 was observed in GICs. Consistent with the decrease of gelatinolytic activity, western blotting analysis also revealed that RES down-regulated the level of MMP-2 expression (Figure 4B). These results indicated that RES inhibited the invasiveness of GICs cells by decreasing both the activity and expression of MMP-2.
3.5. RES Represses Cell Invasion by Inhibiting the Activation of the NF-κB Pathway
The NF-κB pathway was investigated by western blotting analysis. The data in Figure 5A demonstrated that RES inhibited the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65, with a decreased nuclear level but an increased cytoplasmic level, and this effect was confirmed by immunofluorescence assay (Figure 5B). Meanwhile, the phosphorylation levels of IKKα/β and IkBα were detected by western blotting. As shown in Figure 5C, RES efficiently inhibited the phosphorylation of IKKα/β and IkBα, whereas the expression of IKKα/β remained unchanged. These results further indicated that RES suppressed cell invasion by inhibiting NF-κB activation, which is the upstream activator for MMP-2 expression.
3.6. The PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway is Involved in the Inhibitory Effect of RES on NF-κB Activation
It was reported that the MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways can regulate fundamental cellular processes by the induction of IKK-dependent NF-κB activation [19,20]. In our study, RES significantly reduced the phosphorylation of Akt and mTOR in GICs without affecting the total level (Figure 6A). However, RES had little effect on the MAPK signaling pathway, which was supported by the unchanged phosphorylation of the ERK1/2, p38, and JNK pathways (Figure 6B).
To confirm whether the suppression of the invasion of GICs by RES was mainly regulated through the PI3K/Akt pathway, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), one of the most potent activators of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway [21], and wortmannin (a strong PI3K/Akt inhibitor [22]) were used to evaluate the underlying mechanism. As shown in Figure 6C and Figure 6D, treatment with RES (10 μM) substantially inhibited the phosphorylation of Akt induced by IGF-1 as well as the IGF-1-activated secretion of MMP-2 and subsequent cell invasion. Meanwhile, wortmannin markedly decreased the levels of the phosphorylated Akt as well as the secretion of MMP-2 and subsequent cell invasion. In addition, RES enhanced the effects of wortmannin on the phosphorylation of Akt, the secretion of MMP-2, and GIC invasion. Taken together, these results indicate that RES could suppress GIC invasion by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt pathway.
3.7. RES Reduces Invasion of GICs in Vivo
As shown in Figure 7, tumors treated with RES were significantly less invasive compared with control tumors treated with vehicle, as assessed by H & E staining. The control tumors have an irregular shape with single cells and cell clusters that invade along white matter tracts as well as into gray matter (Figure 7A–a,b). In contrast, mice treated with RES formed oval shaped tumors with a smoother border (Figure 7A–c,d). The mean depth of invasion in the control tumors was 317.9 ± 95.6 μm compared with 219.2 ± 70.7 μm in tumors treated with RES (p < 0.05, Figure 7B). These results suggested that RES could suppress GIC invasion in vivo.
4. Discussion
In the current study, we showed that RES conspicuously inhibited the invasive behaviors of GICs in vitro and in vivo at a rather low concentration. The underlying mechanisms in this process involved the suppression of the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway and inhibition of MMP-2 secretion.
In most previous studies, RES exerts its effect in the middle or high micromolar range. RES at 100 μM induces apoptosis through the activation of caspase-3 in a human glioma U251 cell line [23]. At 50 μM, RES inhibits TNF-α-mediated MMP-9 expression and invasion of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells [24]. However, in the circulation, attainable concentrations of RES are in the low micromolar range [25]. In the current study, we showed that RES, at a relative low dose of 20 μM, effectively inhibited GICs’ invasive behaviors. Tumor invasion is a complex and multistage process. A multistep model of invasion suggests that cancer cells must first adhere to the ECM (adhesion), proteolytically degrade the matrix (invasion), and finally migrate through this barrier to surrounding tissue (migration) [26]. In a previous study, Ryu et al. (2011) showed that RES reduces TNF-α-induced U373MG human glioma cell activity in the invasion phase [27]. In our study, we show that RES could effectively restrain the invasive behaviors of GICs in the adhesion, invasion, and migration phases.
MMPs are a family of metal-containing enzymes. Evidence of the important role of MMPs in the invasive potential of tumors in vitro and in vivo has been well documented [28]. Meanwhile, the overexpression MMPs has been reported in cancer stem cells (CSCs). Yang et al. (2011) found that there is an upregulation of MMP expression in gastric cancer stem-like cells compared with gastric cancer tumor cells [29]; increased MMP-2 significantly contributes to their enhanced capabilities of invasion in vitro and metastasis in vivo. Some studies have proven that RES reduces tumor invasion by suppressing MMPs. Tang et al. (2008) showed that RES can inhibit MMP-9 expression and cell invasion in human breast cancer cells [30]. Weng et al. (2010) demonstrated that RES down-regulates the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in human hepatocarcinoma cells [31]. Our acquired data manifested that RES could inhibit gelatinolytic activity and suppress the expression of MMP-2 in GICs and that MMP-2 was a RES-responsive mediator, which leads to the degradation of ECM, causing subsequent tumor invasion and migration.
A recent study showed that glioma CSCs present constitutive activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway and the up-regulation of NF-κB-dependent genes [32]. The NF-κB pathway can work as the upstream regulatory elements of the transcription of the MMP-2 gene [33]. Our data indicated that RES inhibited the activation of NF-κB and exerted this effect by blocking IkB-a phosphorylation and NF-κB P65 translocation. It has been widely accepted that the PI3K/Akt or MAPK signaling pathway is an important upstream element for the regulation of NF-κB activation in multiple tumor cell lines. Tang et al. (2008) demonstrated that RES inhibits heregulin-β1-mediated MMP expression and cell invasion in human breast cancer cells through regulation of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway [30]. Sheth et al. (2012) showed that RES reduces prostate cancer growth and metastasis by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt pathway [34]. Our data showed that the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway rather than the MAPK signaling pathway was involved in the inhibition of NF-κB activation by RES and that RES could reduce the activation of the PI3K/Akt signal pathway induced by insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Therefore, PI3K/Akt might be an effective target for RES in influencing GIC invasion behaviors.
At high or median doses, RES can decrease CSC cell proliferation, leading to apoptosis, and it can induce GIC differentiation [35,36]. Reducing CSCs’ invasive power can be achieved by affecting their viability and stemness. Our study showed that low-dose RES did not inhibit the growth of GICs and that there were no obvious alterations in the expression of Nestin and GFAP in the GICs, which implied that low-dose RES did not alter GICs’ viability and their stemness. However, our result also showed that the expression of another CSC surface marker, CD133, decreased after treatment with RES, which was inconsistent with previous data. CD133 is a transmembrane glycoprotein and is used to isolate and characterize CSCs from GBM specimens. Mechanisms regulating the expression and modification of the CD133 epitope remain unclear; its use as a universal marker to identify GBM stem cells is still controversial [37]. Meanwhile, a recent study indicated that a regulatory relationship exists between CD133 and the PI3K/Akt pathway. As an upstream element, CD133 knockdown potently inhibits the activity of the PI3K/Akt pathway [38]. Whether RES decreases CD133 to inactivate the PI3K/Akt pathway in GIC invasion needs further research.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that low-dose RES significantly inhibited GICs’ invasive abilities, which might imply that administrating RES during the rest period of TMZ maintaining therapy may be a potential choice for inhibiting tumor infiltration and metastasis.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Pingyang Liu at the University of California, San Francisco for critically reading and discussing this manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81102463), funds from the China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Training Plan for Beijing High-Level Healthcare Personnel (2011-3-28), and the Funds of the Capital Medical University Clinical-Basic Cooperation Research (11JL16).
Supplementary Files
Author Contributions
Yuming Jiao, Yong Cao and Ye Li conceived and designed the experiments; Yuming Jiao, Hao Li, Yaodong Liu and Anchen Guo performed the experiments; Anchen Guo and Xiaoxue Xu contributed reagents/materials; Yuming Jiao and Ye Li analyzed the data; Yuming Jiao and Yong Cao wrote the paper; Xianjun Qu, Shuo Wang and Jizong Zhao provided intellectual support and helped write the paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Louis D.N. Molecular pathology of malignant gliomas. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2006;1:97–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.1.110304.100043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Furnari F.B., Fenton T., Bachoo R.M., Mukasa A., Stommel J.M., Stegh A., Hahn W.C., Ligon K.L., Louis D.N., Brennan C., et al. Malignant astrocytic glioma: Genetics, biology, and paths to treatment. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2683–2710. doi: 10.1101/gad.1596707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Minniti G., Muni R., Lanzetta G., Marchetti P., Enrici R.M. Chemotherapy for glioblastoma: Current treatment and future perspectives for cytotoxic and targeted agents. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:5171–5184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Friedman H.S., Kerby T., Calvert H. Temozolomide and treatment of malignant glioma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000;6:2585–2597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bonavia R., Inda M.M., Cavenee W.K., Furnari F.B. Heterogeneity maintenance in glioblastoma: A social network. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4055–4060. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yu Y., Ramena G., Elble R.C. The role of cancer stem cells in relapse of solid tumors. Front. Biosci. 2012;4:1528–1541. doi: 10.2741/E478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bao S., Wu Q., McLendon R.E., Hao Y., Shi Q., Hjelmeland A.B., Dewhirst M.W., Bigner D.D., Rich J.N. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 2006;444:756–760. doi: 10.1038/nature05236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Auffinger B., Tobias A.L., Han Y., Lee G., Guo D., Dey M., Lesniak M.S., Ahmed A.U. Conversion of differentiated cancer cells into cancer stem-like cells in a glioblastoma model after primary chemotherapy. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:1119–1131. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen X., Chen L., Chen J., Hu W., Gao H., Xie B., Wang X., Yin Z., Li S., Wang X., et al. Adam17 promotes u87 glioblastoma stem cell migration and invasion. Brain Res. 2013;1538:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Inoue A., Takahashi H., Harada H., Kohno S., Ohue S., Kobayashi K., Yano H., Tanaka J., Ohnishi T. Cancer stem-like cells of glioblastoma characteristically express mmp-13 and display highly invasive activity. Int. J. Oncol. 2010;37:1121–1131. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Annabi B., Lachambre M.P., Plouffe K., Sartelet H., Beliveau R. Modulation of invasive properties of cd133+ glioblastoma stem cells: A role for mt1-mmp in bioactive lysophospholipid signaling. Mol. Carcinog. 2009;48:910–919. doi: 10.1002/mc.20541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jang M., Cai L., Udeani G.O., Slowing K.V., Thomas C.F., Beecher C.W., Fong H.H., Farnsworth N.R., Kinghorn A.D., Mehta R.G., et al. Cancer chemopreventive activity of resveratrol, a natural product derived from grapes. Science. 1997;275:218–220. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5297.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oi N., Jeong C.H., Nadas J., Cho Y.Y., Pugliese A., Bode A.M., Dong Z. Resveratrol, a red wine polyphenol, suppresses pancreatic cancer by inhibiting leukotriene a(4)hydrolase. Cancer Res. 2010;70:9755–9764. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Puissant A., Robert G., Fenouille N., Luciano F., Cassuto J.P., Raynaud S., Auberger P. Resveratrol promotes autophagic cell death in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells via jnk-mediated p62/sqstm1 expression and ampk activation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:1042–1052. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kundu J.K., Surh Y.J. Cancer chemopreventive and therapeutic potential of resveratrol: Mechanistic perspectives. Cancer Lett. 2008;269:243–261. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stamenkovic I. Matrix metalloproteinases in tumor invasion and metastasis. Semin. Cancer Boil. 2000;10:415–433. doi: 10.1006/scbi.2000.0379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vu T.H., Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: Effectors of development and normal physiology. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2123–2133. doi: 10.1101/gad.815400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ellenrieder V., Adler G., Gress T.M. Invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Ann. Oncol. 1999;10(Suppl. 4):46–50. doi: 10.1093/annonc/10.suppl_4.S46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ozes O.N., Mayo L.D., Gustin J.A., Pfeffer S.R., Pfeffer L.M., Donner D.B. Nf-Kappab activation by tumour necrosis factor requires the akt serine-threonine kinase. Nature. 1999;401:82–85. doi: 10.1038/43466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kefaloyianni E., Gaitanaki C., Beis I. Erk1/2 and p38-mapk signalling pathways, through msk1, are involved in nf-kappab transactivation during oxidative stress in skeletal myoblasts. Cell. Signal. 2006;18:2238–2251. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhou M., Song X., Huang Y., Wei L., Li Z., You Q., Guo Q., Lu N. Wogonin inhibits h2o2-induced angiogenesis via suppressing pi3k/akt/nf-kappab signaling pathway. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2014;60:110–119. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2014.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ui M., Okada T., Hazeki K., Hazeki O. Wortmannin as a unique probe for an intracellular signalling protein, phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1995;20:303–307. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)89056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jiang H., Zhang L., Kuo J., Kuo K., Gautam S.C., Groc L., Rodriguez A.I., Koubi D., Hunter T.J., Corcoran G.B., et al. Resveratrol-induced apoptotic death in human u251 glioma cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005;4:554–561. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-04-0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu H., Pan C., Zhao S., Wang Z., Zhang H., Wu W. Resveratrol inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha-mediated matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression and invasion of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2008;62:366–372. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Asensi M., Medina I., Ortega A., Carretero J., Bano M.C., Obrador E., Estrela J.M. Inhibition of cancer growth by resveratrol is related to its low bioavailability. Free Radic. Boil. Med. 2002;33:387–398. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)00911-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fidler I.J., Kripke M.L. Metastasis results from preexisting variant cells within a malignant tumor. Science. 1977;197:893–895. doi: 10.1126/science.887927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ryu J., Ku B.M., Lee Y.K., Jeong J.Y., Kang S., Choi J., Yang Y., Lee D.H., Roh G.S., Kim H.J., et al. Resveratrol reduces tnf-alpha-induced u373mg human glioma cell invasion through regulating nf-kappab activation and upa/upar expression. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:4223–4230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Deryugina E.I., Quigley J.P. Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25:9–34. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-7886-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yang L., Ping Y.F., Yu X., Qian F., Guo Z.J., Qian C., Cui Y.H., Bian X.W. Gastric cancer stem-like cells possess higher capability of invasion and metastasis in association with a mesenchymal transition phenotype. Cancer Lett. 2011;310:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tang F.Y., Chiang E.P., Sun Y.C. Resveratrol inhibits heregulin-beta1-mediated matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression and cell invasion in human breast cancer cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2008;19:287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2007.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Weng C.J., Wu C.F., Huang H.W., Wu C.H., Ho C.T., Yen G.C. Evaluation of anti-invasion effect of resveratrol and related methoxy analogues on human hepatocarcinoma cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:2886–2894. doi: 10.1021/jf904182y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Garner J.M., Fan M., Yang C.H., Du Z., Sims M., Davidoff A.M., Pfeffer L.M. Constitutive activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (stat3) and nuclear factor kappab signaling in glioblastoma cancer stem cells regulates the notch pathway. J. Boil. Chem. 2013;288:26167–26176. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.477950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tai K.Y., Shieh Y.S., Lee C.S., Shiah S.G., Wu C.W. Axl promotes cell invasion by inducing mmp-9 activity through activation of nf-kappab and brg-1. Oncogene. 2008;27:4044–4055. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sheth S., Jajoo S., Kaur T., Mukherjea D., Sheehan K., Rybak L.P., Ramkumar V. Resveratrol reduces prostate cancer growth and metastasis by inhibiting the akt/microrna-21 pathway. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e51655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sato A., Okada M., Shibuya K., Watanabe E., Seino S., Suzuki K., Narita Y., Shibui S., Kayama T., Kitanaka C., et al. Resveratrol promotes proteasome-dependent degradation of nanog via p53 activation and induces differentiation of glioma stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 2013;11:601–610. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pandey P.R., Okuda H., Watabe M., Pai S.K., Liu W., Kobayashi A., Xing F., Fukuda K., Hirota S., Sugai T., et al. Resveratrol suppresses growth of cancer stem-like cells by inhibiting fatty acid synthase. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011;130:387–398. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1300-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Facchino S., Abdouh M., Bernier G. Brain cancer stem cells: Current status on glioblastoma multiforme. Cancers. 2011;3:1777–1797. doi: 10.3390/cancers3021777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wei Y., Jiang Y., Zou F., Liu Y., Wang S., Xu N., Xu W., Cui C., Xing Y., Liu Y., et al. Activation of pi3k/akt pathway by cd133-p85 interaction promotes tumorigenic capacity of glioma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:6829–6834. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217002110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.