Abstract
Background
Reduced microbial diversity has been associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and probiotic bacteria have been proposed for its prevention and/or treatment. Nevertheless, comparative studies of strains of the same subspecies for specific health benefits are scarce. Here we compared two Bifidobacterium longum ssp. longum strains for their capacity to prevent experimental colitis.
Methods
Immunomodulatory properties of nine probiotic bifidobacteria were assessed by stimulation of murine splenocytes. The immune responses to B. longum ssp. longum CCM 7952 (Bl 7952) and CCDM 372 (Bl 372) were further characterized by stimulation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cell, HEK293/TLR2 or HEK293/NOD2 cells. A mouse model of dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis was used to compare their beneficial effects in vivo.
Results
The nine bifidobacteria exhibited strain-specific abilities to induce cytokine production. Bl 372 induced higher levels of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in spleen and dendritic cell cultures compared to Bl 7952. Both strains engaged TLR2 and contain ligands for NOD2. In a mouse model of DSS-induced colitis, Bl 7952, but not Bl 372, reduced clinical symptoms and preserved expression of tight junction proteins. Importantly, Bl 7952 improved intestinal barrier function as demonstrated by reduced FITC-dextran levels in serum.
Conclusions
We have shown that Bl 7952, but not Bl 372, protected mice from the development of experimental colitis. Our data suggest that although some immunomodulatory properties might be widespread among the genus Bifidobacterium, others may be rare and characteristic only for a specific strain. Therefore, careful selection might be crucial in providing beneficial outcome in clinical trials with probiotics in IBD.
Introduction
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), comprises a variety of chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Although their aetiology and pathogenesis are not completely understood, it is becoming clear that the combination of genetic, immunological, environmental, and microbial factors play an important role in the development and progression of these conditions [1, 2].
Once considered rather rare, IBD has been raising dramatically over the past few decades in the high income countries [3, 4]. It has been suggested that modern style of life, such as modern sanitation systems, modifications in diet, decline in endemic parasitism, smaller family size or overuse of antibiotics changed the structure and function of the intestinal microbiota [5]. Indeed, dysbiosis, such as reduction in mucosa-associated Bifidobacterium spp. or Lactobacillus spp., along with an increased relative abundance in pathogenic Escherichia coli was observed in IBD patients [6–8]. Current pharmaceutical treatment of IBD, which includes anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs, biological agents and antibiotics, induces or maintain remission, but is not curative [9]. Moreover, long-term use of these drugs can lead to substantial side effects such as allergic reactions or liver problems [10]. Since IBD is clearly multifactorial and results from complex host-microbiota interactions, preventive strategies targeting the aberrant composition of the intestinal microbiota may have the potential to open new possibilities to tackle these diseases.
Probiotic bacteria, most notably the Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus genera have been used for the prevention and/or treatment of gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases [11, 12]. Application of multispecies product VSL#3, which is a mixture of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus strains, has been used successfully to treat UC [11, 13, 14]. Controversially, clinical trials using different strains have not confirmed the beneficial effects [15–18]. It is getting clear that not only the type of disease and the immunological status of the host, but also the selection of probiotic strain and the mode of application are important factors to be taken into consideration. Essentially, the immunomodulatory potential and beneficial effect of probiotic bacteria seems to be strictly strain-specific and cannot be automatically applied to another strain, or even if to another species.
Several animal models have been developed to understand aetiology and pathogenesis of IBD and to evaluate novel prophylactic/therapeutic strategies [19–21]. Colitis induced by dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) is one of the most extensively used experimental models due to its simplicity, reliability and applicability. Acute or chronic disease can be induced by administration of adaptable concentration of DSS in drinking water [19, 22, 23]. Despite certain differences, DSS model resembles crucial clinical and histopathological features of human IBD; such as changes in morphology of inflamed colon, body weight loss, bloody diarrhoea and aberrant regulatory mechanisms in colon followed by cytokine dysregulation [19, 21, 22, 24].
Other important factors which are shared by human IBD and DSS-induced colitis are reduced expression and/or reorganization of tight junction proteins (e.g. zonulin-1 or occludin) in the epithelium, and increased intestinal permeability for luminal bacteria [25]. The breakdown of the gut barrier function have been shown to precede the clinical relapses in UC patients and also the development of intestinal inflammation in DSS-induced colitis [26].
The genus Bifidobacterium is considered as a key member of the human gut microbiota which has been shown to exert a range of beneficial effects on the immune system [27–29]. Notably, the representatives of the species B. longum are one of the dominant bacterial members of the gut microflora of healthy breast-fed infants [30, 31]. Interestingly, a double blinded randomised controlled clinical trial showed that B. longum reduced clinical appearance of chronic mucosal inflammation in patients with active UC [32]. Moreover, Fujiwara et al. described inhibitory effect of B. longum strain on DSS-induced experimental colitis [33]. Along these lines, we have shown recently that mucosal application of B. longum prevented the development of experimental allergy in mice [34, 35]. Although these data suggest that B. longum might be a promising candidate for prevention/treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, question remains whether different B. longum strains, belonging to one subspecies, are equal in their health-beneficial effect.
In the present study, nine different probiotic strains of the genus Bifidobacterium, which were originally collected from healthy children and adults, were tested for their ability to induce cytokine production by murine splenocytes. Based on the cytokine profiles, two candidates of one subspecies: i) Bifidobacterium longum ssp. longum CCDM 372 (Bl 372), the strain with high stimulatory capacity and ii) B. longum ssp. longum CCM 7952 (Bl 7952), the strain with low stimulatory capacity, were selected for further comparative in vitro and in vivo studies. In experimental model of acute ulcerative colitis, administration of Bl 7952, but not Bl 372, prevented the disruption of gut barrier function by enhanced expression of tight junction proteins in epithelial layer which was associated with reduced development of DSS-induced symptoms.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
Nine Bifidobacterium strains: B. longum ssp. longum CCDM 372 (Bl 372) and CCM 7952 (Bl 7952); B. longum ssp. infantis CCDM 369 (Bi 369); B. animalis CCDM 218 (Ban 218) and CCDM 366 (Ban 366); B. adolescentis CCDM 368 (Bad 368), CCDM 370 (Bad 370), CCDM 371 (Bad 371) and CCDM 373 (Bad 373) were isolated from faecal samples of healthy adults and breast-fed infants and kindly provided by Prof. V. Rada (Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Agriculture, Prague, Czech Republic) and Prof. J. Nevoral (Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic). These strains were deposit in Culture Collection of Dairy Microorganisms (Milcom, Prague, Czech Republic) and Czech Collection of Microorganisms (Brno, Czech Republic). The isolates were cultivated in MRS medium (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) supplemented with 0.05% L-cysteine-hydrochloride (MRSC) at 37°C in anaerobic conditions for 48 to 72 hours.
Selection and identification of probiotic strains
Nine bifidobacterial isolates were positively selected on the basis of the resistance to bile salt and low pH (data not shown), further identified and analysed for their immunomodulatory properties in in vitro assays. Identification of these isolates was performed by the genus-, species- and subspecies-specific PCR and Amplified Ribosomal DNA Restriction Analysis (ARDRA) as previously described [36, 37]. Please see S1 Materials and Methods for details.
Inactivation of bacterial strains
Nine probiotic Bifidobacterium strains were cultivated in MRSC medium at 37°C in anaerobic condition to the end of exponential growth phase. Bacterial cells were inactivated with 1% phosphate-buffered formalin for 3 h at room temperature, washed 3 times with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and stored at 4°C as previously described [38].
Stimulation of mouse splenocytes with inactivated Bifidobacterium strains
Immunomodulatory potential of Bifidobacterium strains was tested in vitro on splenocytes derived from naïve BALB/c mice (8 weeks of age; n = 5) in two independent experiments. Spleens were removed aseptically and single cell suspensions were prepared by disruption of the tissues through a cell strainer into culture medium (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 10mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin). Spleen cells (6 x 105/well) were stimulated with formalin-inactivated Bifidobacterium strains (6 x 106/well), Pam3CSK4 (1 μg/ml, InvivoGen, USA) or media alone in 96-well plates at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 48 h. Concentration of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 was determined in cell supernatants by the MILLIPLEX MAP Mouse Cytokine/Chemokine Panel (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions and analysed with Bio-Plex System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).
Preparation and activation of mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells
Mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BM-DC) derived from naïve BALB/c mice (8 weeks of age; n = 3) were prepared as previously described [34, 39]. Briefly, bone marrow precursors isolated from femurs and tibias were seeded at 2 x 105 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 culture medium containing 10% FCS, 150 μg/ml gentamycin, and 20 ng/ml mouse GM-CSF (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and incubated for 8 days. BM-DC (106 cells/well) were stimulated with formalin-inactivated B. longum strains Bl 7952 and Bl 372 (107 CFU/well), Pam3CSK4 (1 μg/ml), ultrapure LPS (1 μg/ml, InvivoGen, USA) or left untreated for 18 h. The levels of IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-6 and TNF-α were analysed in supernatants of stimulated cells by ELISA using Ready-Set-Go! kits (eBioscience, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For cell surface marker analysis, BM-DC were labelled for 30 min at 4°C with anti-mouse FITC-conjugated CD11c, APC-conjugated MHC II and PE-conjugated CD40, CD80 or CD86 monoclonal antibodies (eBioscience, USA). The data were acquired on a BD FACSAria III flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA) and analysed with FlowJo software 7.6.2 (TreeStar, USA).
Stimulation of Human embryonic kidney 293 cells stably transfected with TLRs and NOD2
Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells stably transfected with plasmid carrying human (h)TLR2/CD14 gene were kindly provided by Prof. M. Yazdanbakhsh (Leiden, Netherlands), hTLR4/MD2/CD14 were a gift of Prof. B. Bohle, PhD (Vienna, Austria) and hNOD2 expressing cells were purchased from InvivoGen (USA). Cells were stimulated for 20 h with Pam3CSK4 (1 μg/ml), LPS (1 μg/ml), muramyl dipeptide (100 ng/ml, InvivoGen) and formalin-inactivated Bl 7952 and Bl 372 at concentrations of 106, 107, or 108 CFU/ml in 96-well plates. Concentrations of IL-8 were analysed in cell supernatants by ELISA (Thermo Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Animals
All experimental mice (female 8-week-old BALB/c) were kept in IVC cages (Tecniplast, Italy), exposed to 12: 12-h light-dark cycles, and fed with standard pellet diet (ST1, Bergman, Kocanda, Czech Republic) and tap water ad libitum. All experiments were approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of the Institute of Microbiology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and conducted in accordance with the “European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (CETS No.: 123)”.
Experimental design and induction of colitis
Female 8-week-old BALB/c mice were divided into 4 experimental groups. Two groups were treated with 200 μl of live bacterial suspension containing 2 x 108 CFUs of Bl 7952 (Bl 7952/DSS; n = 10) or Bl 372 (Bl 372/DSS; n = 8) in PBS by intragastric gavage. Controls (PBS/DSS; n = 10) received PBS only. The administration of bacterial suspensions or PBS was repeated daily for 10 days followed by treatment with 2.5% w/v DSS in drinking water in order to induce acute colitis. Age-matched untreated mice (Naïve; n = 5) were used as healthy controls. Dextran sulphate sodium (DSS, molecular weight 40 kDa; ICN Biomedicals, Cleveland, OH, USA) was administered in the drinking water (2.5% w/v) for 7 days. Clinical symptoms of inflammation were evaluated daily, degree of colitis was determined as disease activity index (DAI) according to Cooper et al. [40] with minor modifications (S1 Table). Animals were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation and cervical dislocation. The colon was aseptically removed, the length was measured and segments of colon descendens (approximately 0.5 cm in length located 1 cm proximal to the anus) were fixed in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde (Sigma Aldrich, Germany) for histological and immunohistochemical analysis.
Determination of cytokine response of mesenteric lymph node cells
Mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) were excised aseptically from all experimental mice; cell suspensions in concentration 6 x 106 cells/ml were prepared and cultivated as described previously [34, 39]. Production of IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-10 was determined in cell supernatants by the MILLIPLEX MAP Mouse Cytokine/Chemokine Panel (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instruction and analysed with Bio-Plex System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).
Histopathological evaluation of inflammation in colonic mucosa
Colon descendens from all experimental mice (one segment from each mouse) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed to paraffin blocks as previously described [41]. For determination of inflammation in colonic mucosa and mucin production, the tissue specimens were sliced to 5-μm thickness, deparaffined and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or Alcian Blue with post-staining by Nuclear Fast Red (All from Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). The degree of pathophysiology of the tissue was characterized by presence of ulcerations, damage to the surface epithelium, crypt distortion, signs of oedema, infiltration of inflammatory cells into lamina propria or submucosa and reduction of goblet cells and mucin production according to Cooper et al. [40]. The histopathological evaluation was performed blindly by two investigators.
Immunohistochemical determination of zonulin-1 and occludin in colon
For immunohistochemical staining, the 5-μm deparaffined colon sections (3 sections from each mouse) were treated with protease type XIV (1 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) for 8 min at 37°C. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in 100% methanol for 15 min. Nonspecific adsorption was eliminated by incubation of the sections in 10% normal goat serum in PBS for 30 min. Samples were incubated overnight with polyclonal rabbit anti-zonulin-1 (2.5 μg/ml) or anti-occludin (2.5 μg/ml) (ZYMED Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA) at 4°C. After washing in PBS, section were incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1: 200 in PBS) (Jackson, ImmunoLabs.,West Grove, PA, USA) for 1 hour and stain by AEC chromogen solution (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) for 5 min. The counterstain was carried out with haematoxilin and samples were mounted in the Histotec Aqueous Mountant (Serotec, UK) and viewed under an Olympus BX 40 microscope equipped with an Olympus DP 70 digital camera. Photographs were taken on proposal of Camedia Master 2.5 and DP-Soft (Olympus, Germany).
Western blot analysis of zonulin-1 and occludin
Segment of colon descendens (approximately 0.5 cm in length located 1.5 cm proximal to the anus) from all experimental mice was homogenized on ice in protein extract buffer (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Pierce) for 10 min and sonicated. Samples were centrifuged at 10,000 x rpm for 10 min at 4°C and stored at −80°C until use. Protein concentration was measured using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce). Western blotting was performed as described by Cinova et al. [42] using antibodies against occludin (1:1000) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), zonulin-1 (1:1000) (ZYMED Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA), and β-actin (1:5000) (Abcam, Cambridge, CA, USA). After incubation with the respective primary antibodies, secondary staining was performed using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated species-specific antibodies (1:1000) (ZYMED Laboratories). The reaction was developed using the SuperSignal Weat Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Scientific, USA) and the signal intensities were measured on the G:BOX (Syngene, UK) and processed with Adobe Photoshop CS5.
Evaluation of the intestinal permeability in vivo
The intestinal permeability was measured by determination of the amount of FITC-dextran in blood after oral administration as described previously [43]. Briefly, female BALB/c mice were intragastrically gavaged by Bl 7952 (Bl 7952/DSS; n = 5) or PBS (PBS/DSS; n = 5) for ten consecutive days prior to intestinal inflammation was induced by drinking of 2.5% DSS in water for 7 days. Naïve mice served as healthy controls (Naïve; n = 5). On the last day of DSS administration, each mouse received 360 mg/kg of the body weight of FITC-dextran (molecular weight 4.0 kDa; Sigma-Aldrich) by intragastric gavage. Blood samples were obtained after 5 hours, centrifuged at 3,000 x rpm for 30 min, and serum was collected. The concentration of FITC-dextran was determined by spectrophotofluorometry (Safire2, Tecan Group Ltd., Mannedorf, Switzerland) with an excitation wavelength of 483 nm and an emission wavelength of 525 nm using serially diluted FITC-dextran as standard.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For the in vitro assays, data were analysed by One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-hoc test. For the in vivo assays, unpaired Student’s t-test was used. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 Software (San Diego, CA, USA).
Results
Identification of probiotic Bifidobacterium isolates to the species, subspecies and strain level
Nine bacterial isolates of the genus Bifidobacterium from healthy children and adults have been selected for their probiotic properties based on resistance to low pH and resistance to bile salt (data not shown). These isolates were identified to the species, subspecies and strain level. PCR-based methods (S1 Materials and Methods) let to identification of three species and two subspecies of the genus Bifidobacterium: B. longum ssp. longum CCDM 372 (Bl 372) and CCM 7952 (Bl 7952); B. longum ssp. infantis CCDM 369 (Bi 369), B. animalis CCDM 218 (Ban 218) and CCDM 366 (Ban 366) and B. adolescentis CCDM 368 (Bad 368), CCDM 370 (Bad 370); CCDM 371 (Bad 371), and CCDM 373 (Bad 373). Discrimination of the B. longum strains into subspecies longum and infantis was performed on the basis of Amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis by the enzyme Sau3AI (S1 Fig) as described previously [36].
Immunostimulatory properties of probiotic strains from the genus Bifidobacterium are strictly strain-specific
The in vitro stimulation of spleen cells collected from naïve BALB/c mice with nine Bifidobacterium strains revealed distinct and strain-specific pattern of cytokine production (Table 1). Production of IL-10 by probiotic strains has been associated with their protective effect on inflammatory diseases [44]. Various levels of IL-10 were detected in spleen cultures with values ranging between 100–700 pg/ml, depending on the used strain, where Bi 369, Bad 371, and Bl 372 were the most robust inducers of this anti-inflammatory cytokine (Table 1). On the other hand, Ban 218 and Bad 373 induced low levels of IL-10, but high levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and IFN-γ. Strains Bl 372 and Bad 370 induced substantial production of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ. Strains Bl 7952 and Ban 366 led to only moderate production of TNF-α and IFN-γ, but significantly elevated levels of IL-10. According to this in vitro analysis, we selected two strains of one subspecies B. longum ssp. longum: Bl 372 and Bl 7952, which provided contrasting cytokines pattern and used them for further characterization.
Table 1. Cytokine production by splenocytes stimulated with inactivated bacteria of different Bifidobacterium strains.
Control/ Bifidobacterium strain | IL-10 | TNF-α | IL-6 | IFN-γ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medium | 7 ± 1 | 6 ± 3 | 13 ± 4 | 12 ± 11 | |
PAM3C | 628 ± 57** | 166 ± 20 | 175 ± 84** | 790 ± 332 | |
B. longum | Bl 7952 | 270 ± 25** | 138 ± 12 | 452 ± 35 | 173 ± 80 |
B. longum | Bl 372 | 532 ± 39** | 451 ± 37** | 638 ± 80** | 744 ± 183 |
B. infantis | Bi 369 | 542 ± 85** | 384 ± 56** | 493 ± 117 | 108 ± 59 |
B. animalis | Ban 218 | 187 ± 14** | 935 ± 198** | 650 ± 62** | 1865 ± 422** |
B. animalis | Ban 366 | 268 ± 14** | 200 ± 22 | 229 ± 13 | 55 ± 24 |
B. adolescentis | Bad 368 | 92 ± 4 | 189 ± 17 | 334 ± 52 | 154 ± 91 |
B. adolescentis | Bad 370 | 243 ± 16** | 357 ± 36** | 923 ± 114** | 669 ± 151* |
B. adolescentis | Bad 371 | 606 ± 52** | 290 ± 8* | 675 ± 70** | 145 ± 65 |
B. adolescentis | Bad 373 | 186 ± 14* | 495 ± 60** | 987 ± 87** | 1819 ± 275** |
Splenocytes isolated from naïve mice (n = 5) were stimulated with formalin-inactivated bifidobacteria (6 x 107 CFU/ml) for 48 h. Pam3CSK4 (PAM3C, 1μg/ml) was use as a positive control. Non-stimulated splenocytes (Medium) were evaluated as control of basal cytokine levels. Concentration of cytokines in supernatants was determined by multiplex assay. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Results are representatives of two repeat experiments. Significant difference to medium was calculated using One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-hoc test *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Strains Bl 7952 and Bl 372 have differential ability to activate dendritic cells in vitro
Dendritic cells (DC) have been shown to play a central role in regulating intestinal immune homeostasis by induction of tolerance to harmless antigens and commensals or initiating protective immunity against pathogens, contributing to control of intestinal diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases [45]. In our study, BM-DCs derived from naïve BALB/c mice were used as in vitro model to investigate the immunostimulatory potential of both B. longum spp. longum strains. Expression of co-stimulatory markers CD40, CD80, and CD86 were measured to investigate the activation status of BM-DC after stimulation with each bacterial strain. The induction of these surface markers differed between the tested strains. Higher levels of CD40, CD80 and CD86 were observed in DC incubated with Bl 372 than with Bl 7952 (Fig 1A). Levels of IL-10, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12p70 were measured in the supernatants of BM-DC stimulated with both B. longum spp. longum strains (Fig 1B). The data show that stimulation of BM-DC with Bl 372 resulted in significantly higher levels of secreted cytokines than stimulation with Bl 7952.
Both Bl 7952 and Bl 372 signal through TLR2 and NOD2 receptor
To assess the role of TLR2 and NOD2 in recognition of Bl 7952 and Bl 372, HEK293 cells stably transfected with TLR2/CD14 or NOD2 were stimulated with increasing concentrations of both strains. Pam3CSK4 and MDP were used as positive controls for TLR2 and NOD2, respectively. After 20 h of incubation, supernatants were harvested and analysed for IL-8 production. At all three tested concentrations, both Bl 7952 and Bl 372 activated TLR2 in an analogous and dose-dependent manner (Fig 2A). In contrast, stimulation of HEK293/NOD2 with Bl 372 induced markedly higher levels of IL-8 in comparison to stimulation with Bl 7952 (Fig 2B). These results suggest that both Bl 7952 and Bl 372 have similar pattern of usage of TLR2 but distinct patterns of interaction with NOD2. There was no stimulation of HEK293/TLR4 cells with any of B. longum strains (data not shown).
Prophylactic application of Bl 7952, but not Bl 372, ameliorates DSS-induced colitis
Here we have shown that two strains of one subspecies B. longum ssp. longum, Bl 7952 and Bl 372, possess different immunomodulatory properties in vitro (Table 1, Figs 1 and 2). To compare their properties in vivo, the mouse model of acute ulcerative colitis induced by administration of 2.5% DSS in drinking water was used. Animals received Bl 7952 or Bl 372 on 10 consecutive days prior to colitis induction (Fig 3A). Disease progression was characterized by weight loss, appearance of diarrhoea or loose faeces and visible faecal blood and summarized in disease activity index (DAI) assessed according to the scale (0–4) of Cooper et al. [40] (S1 Table). DSS-treatment increased DAI, reduced the colon length, and reduced body weight in control mice (PBS/DSS) in comparison to naïve animals (Fig 3B–3D). Mice pre-treated with Bl 7952 showed improvement of DAI, and reduction of DSS-induced colon shortening and weight loss compare to PBS/DSS mice (Fig 3B–3D). In contrast, pre-treatment with Bl 372 had no impact on any of these parameters and Bl 372-treated mice did not significantly differ from PBS/DSS group (Fig 3B–3D).
Histopathological evaluation of the colonic mucosa after DSS-treatment was performed to establish a score (0–4) as described before [40]. The scoring was based on infiltration of inflammatory cells into lamina propria and submucosa, submucosa thickening, and loss of the entire crypt with retained surface epithelium [40, 41]. On sacrifice, histological finding encompassed infiltration of inflammatory cells into lamina propria, thickening of submucosa, loss of epithelial layer and disappearance of mucosal crypt in colonic wall of DSS-treated controls (PBS/DSS; grade 3.5 ± 0.5) and in Bl 372 pre-treated/DSS-treated mice (Bl 372/DSS; grade 3.5 ± 0.3) (Fig 4E). In contrast, Bl 7952-pre-treated mice displayed inhibitory effect on DSS-induced histological changes (Bl 7952/DSS; grade 0.75 ± 0.25) compared to controls. Bl 7952 reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells and pathological changes in mucosa or epithelial layer (Fig 3E).
In control mice with colitis (PBS/DSS) and in mice treated with Bl 372 (Bl 372/DSS), colonic mucin production by goblet cells (Alcian Blue staining) was decreased in comparison to naïve mice (Fig 3F). Markedly, application of Bl 7952 preserved the thinning of the mucus layer and goblet cell depletion (Bl 7952/DSS).
Administration of Bl 7952 has an impact on the production of cytokines in the mesenteric lymph node cells
Changes in cytokine microenvironment in the gut associated lymphoid tissue, such as mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), might impact the development of intestinal inflammation in colitis. Therefore, we investigated whether the protective effect of B. longum Bl 7952 on colitis is associated with changes in production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. MLN cells collected from naïve, PBS/DSS, Bl 7952/DSS or Bl 372/DSS animals were cultivated for 48 h. Level of cytokines in supernatant was measured by ELISA. We found that pre-treatment with Bl 7952 but not with Bl 372 decreased significantly the production of TNF-α (Fig 4B). Although the levels of IL-10 and IFN-γ were reduced in MLN cell cultures by Bl 7952 in comparison to DSS-controls, the difference did not reach significant level (Fig 4A and 4C).
Bl 7952 preserves the expression of zonulin-1 and occludin and decreases colon permeability in DSS-treated mice
Altered intestinal barrier function (breakdown or impairment of the epithelial barrier), which is associated with increased intestinal permeability through decreased expression of tight junction proteins, has been implicated as a critical factor in the development of intestinal inflammation in mouse models of colitis or in human IBD. Occludin and zonulin-1 are proteins involved in the maintenance of the integrity of intact tight junction complexes and barrier function [46]. Here we investigated whether pre-treatment with Bl 7952 interferes with the disruption of these tight junction proteins induced by DSS-treatment. As shown by immunohistochemistry staining (Fig 5A) and Western blotting (Fig 5B), expression of occludin and zonulin-1 was reduced in PBS/DSS mice in comparison to naïve animals. There were no differences between levels of these tight junction proteins in PBS/DSS mice and mice pre-treated with Bl 372 (Fig 5A and 5B). In contrast, application of Bl 7952 preserved the loss of expression and alteration of distribution of both proteins (Fig 5A and 5B).
In order to investigate whether preventive application of Bl 7952 could improve the altered gut barrier function in DSS-colitis, single dose of FITC-dextran was administered by gavage and the intensity of fluorescence was measured in serum 5 h later. The data show that pre-treatment with Bl 7952 markedly decreased FITC-dextran serum concentration in comparison to PBS/DSS mice, reaching similar levels found in naïve mice (Fig 5C). Thus, Bl 7952 preserved the expression of tight junction proteins, which was associated with improved intestinal barrier function in DSS-treated mice.
Discussion
It is clearly established that the altered composition of the intestinal microbiota plays a role in initiating and maintaining of IBD [47]. Several studies have reported reduction in potentially beneficial Bifidobacterium species in IBD patients [6, 48]. Moreover, recent study has shown that B. longum was one of the dominant species decreased in paediatric patients with new-onset Crohn’s disease [49]. Therefore, modulation of the gut habitat with probiotics, particularly species from the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, represents a novel and exciting strategy in prevention/treatment of microbial dysbiosis associated with mucosal inflammation [50].
In this study we investigated immunomodulatory properties of nine Bifidobacterium strains which were obtained from faeces of healthy breast-fed infants and healthy adults, and which possess probiotic properties, such as resistance to gastric acidity (low pH) and bile toxicity, conditions simulating those of the gut environment (data not shown). These probiotic strains were classified by PCR based methods on the species, subspecies, and strain level as B. longum ssp. longum and B. longum ssp. infantis, B. adolescentis and B. animalis. In order to call a bacterial strain “probiotic”, it should be well-characterized, classified and specified for its effect on human health. Probiotic bacteria exert their beneficial effects in different ways, among which the immunomodulation of local and systemic immune responses is an important mechanism [51]. In this respect, we tested all strains for the ability to induce cytokine production in spleen cell cultures derived from naïve mice. Results indicate that all strains possess intrinsic immunostimulatory potential, but their ability to induce cytokine expression varies significantly from one bacterial strain to other. We have shown that some Bifidobacterium strains, such as Bad 368, Ban 366 or Bl 7952, are poor inducers of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, while other strains belonging to the same species or subspecies, such as Bad 370, Ban 218 or Bl 372, can stimulate high levels of all evaluated cytokines. These strain-specific effects are in accordance with previous observations on human immunocompetent cells [52–55]. Nonetheless, comparative studies on the immunomodulatory properties of Bifidobacterium strains of the same species or subspecies are limited [54–56].
Regulatory cytokine IL-10, which can be produced by multiple cell types, has been shown to play an important role in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis [44]. Mice with defects in IL-10 production spontaneously develop severe intestinal inflammation in conventional conditions [57]. Relevant to this point, it has been reported that intragastric administration of IL-10-producing recombinant Lactococcus lactis reduced colitis in DSS-treated or IL-10-/- mice [58]. Therefore, the capacity of probiotic strain to induce production of IL-10 may be one factor contributing to their beneficial effects [44]. We observed that the majority of tested Bifidobacterium strains, except for Bad 368, induced significant levels of IL-10 from naïve spleen cell cultures. Along these lines, bifidobacteria have been shown to induced IL-10 also in human monocyte-derived DC [53], PBMC [59, 60] or in human colonic lamina propria DC [52].
Innate immune cells, such as DC, play an important role in orchestrating the appropriate responses to the enteric luminal microbiota [61]. Defects in how DC recognize and respond to gut bacteria may contribute to IBD pathogenesis [62]. Here we compared the effects of Bl 7952 and Bl 372 on the maturation pattern of BM-DC, as well as their ability to induce cytokine secretion. We found that the activation potential of the two strains varied significantly, suggesting their different functional roles. These results are well in line with previous studies which show that stimulation of DC with different strains of B. longum led to strain-specific production of pro-inflammatory or regulatory cytokines [55].
Although there have been several studies linking immunomodulatory properties of probiotic strain in vitro and its ability to prevent experimental colitis in mice, no clear association has been established so far. In an experimental model of TNBS-induced colitis, Foligne at al. demonstrated that probiotic strains with high IL-10/IL-12 ratio in vitro provided the best protection in vivo [63]. Similarly, Kwon et al. demonstrated that administration of probiotic mixture with potent anti-inflammatory properties (high levels of the IL-10/IL-12 production ratio) suppressed the progression of experimental colitis in mice [64]. Along these lines, we have shown recently that B. longum NCC 3001, a probiotic strain with high IL-10/IFN-γ ratio, offered long term protection in a mouse model of birch pollen allergy [35]. Moreover, we have demonstrated that neonatal colonization of germ-free mice with B. longum ssp. longum CCM 7952 prevented experimental sensitization in a mouse model of allergy [34].
In this study we employed both in vitro culture system and in vivo mouse model of DSS-induced colitis to compare the immunomodulatory potential of two probiotic strains of the genus Bifidobacterium which belong to the same subspecies B. longum ssp. longum. We found that the activity of these two strains, Bl 372 and Bl 7952, differs significantly. While Bl 7952, the strain with low stimulatory potential in vitro (as demonstrated on stimulated splenocytes and BM-DC), was able to prevent clinical symptoms in a mouse model of DSS-induced colitis, preserved the tight junction proteins expression and protected epithelial barrier function, the strain Bl 372, which induced high levels of cytokines in vitro, had no beneficial effect. Our results are consistent with those reported by Mileti et al. who tested the effect of application of three different probiotic strains before exposure to DSS, and observed that only one strain, which was characterized by low levels of induced cytokines, reduced severity of DSS-induced colitis [65].
It has recently been shown, that certain probiotic strains exert their immunomodulatory effects through the interaction with TLRs. Administration of L. plantarum to healthy subjects increased levels of tight junction-associated zonulin-1 and occludin in the duodenal epithelium and this beneficial effect was shown to be dependent on TLR2-signalling [66]. In our study, both Bl 7952 and Bl 372 have been shown to signal through the TLR2. The fact that only Bl 7952 but not Bl 372 was protective, suggests that TLR2 is not the key player in preserving the gut epithelial barrier in our model.
There is a strong body of evidence suggesting the link between NOD2 and the development of IBD [67, 68]. Within the colonic mucosa, NOD2 can be expresses by various cell populations, such as epithelial cells [69]. In a mouse model, Nod2 deficiency led to an altered composition of the gut microbiota, predisposing mice to colitis [70]. NOD2 senses many types of peptidoglycan-derived muropeptides, which can vary significantly in their capacity to stimulate NOD2 [71]. Fernandez et al. showed that anti-inflammatory capacity of probiotic-derived peptidoglycan was linked to the presence of a NOD2 ligand [72]. In our present study, we demonstrate that although both Bl 7952 and Bl 372 possess ligands which are recognised by NOD2, they potential to stimulate NOD2 differ. Still, the role of NOD2 in recognition of these strains in vivo remains to be evaluated.
In humans, IBD is associated with increased intestinal permeability and reduced expression of tight junction proteins, [73] which leads to exposure of luminal antigens to the lamina propria [74, 75]. Therefore, several recently proposed therapeutic approaches to treat IBD are focused on enhancing/restoring of gut barrier integrity [76, 77]. It is of interest, that perfusion of lactic acid bacteria into the small intestine of a healthy subject increased the localization of the scaffold zonula occludens protein zonulin-1 and the transmembrane protein occludin [66]. In an experimental model of colitis, probiotic bacteria have been shown to decrease the intestinal permeability and restore gut barrier integrity by modulation of tight junction proteins [43, 78–80]. In this study we showed that Bl 7952 but not Bl 372 increased expression of zonulin-1 and occludin in the intestinal epithelium which was associated with reduced leakiness of colonic epithelium. Thus, our data show that the choice of Bifidobacterium strain for specific benefit, such as maintenance of healthy and functional gut barrier should be considered on a strain-by-strain basis, and interspecies extrapolations are not valid.
In conclusion, our data show strictly strain-specific immune effects of B. longum subspecies. Thus, it is getting clear, that the beneficial effects of one probiotic strain cannot be extended to other bacteria of the same genus, species or even subspecies. Our work shows that prophylactic administration of probiotic strain B. longum ssp. longum CCM 7952 is capable to preserve the disruption of tight junctions proteins associated with ulcerative colitis pathophysiology. Therefore, this bacterial strain plays the role as regulator of the integrity of the intestinal barrier, which might have important implications for understanding of probiotic mechanisms and for the control of intestinal homeostasis.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
Supported by grants 303/09/0449 and P303/12/0535 of the Czech Science Foundation, grants CZ.3.22/2.1.00/09.01574 and CZ.3.22/2.1.00/13.03892, OeAD-GmbH grant CZ 15/2015 and grant SFB F46 from Austrian Science Fund. The financial support of internal grant FCH-S-14-2325 is gratefully acknowledged. Excellent technical assistance of A. Smolova, J. Jarkovska, I. Grimova, B. Drabonova and D. Drasnarova is gratefully acknowledged.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
Supported by grants 303/09/0449 and P303/12/0535 of the Czech Science Foundation, grants CZ.3.22/2.1.00/09.01574 and CZ.3.22/2.1.00/13.03892, OeAD-GmbH grant CZ 15/2015 and grant SFB F46 from Austrian Science Fund. The financial support of internal grant FCH-S- 14-2325 is gratefully acknowledged. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ. Crohn's disease. The Lancet. 2012;380(9853):1590–605. 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60026-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Boirivant M, Cossu A. Inflammatory bowel disease. Oral Dis. 2012;18(1):1–15. Epub 2011/05/14. 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01811.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Molodecky NA, Soon IS, Rabi DM, Ghali WA, Ferris M, Chernoff G, et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(1):46–54 e42; quiz e30. Epub 2011/10/18. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Weinstock JV, Elliott DE. Translatability of helminth therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases. Int J Parasitol. 2013;43(3–4):245–51. Epub 2012/11/28. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.10.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Manichanh C, Borruel N, Casellas F, Guarner F. The gut microbiota in IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9(10):599–608. Epub 2012/08/22. 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.152 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Favier C, Neut C, Mizon C, Cortot A, Colombel JF, Mizon J. Fecal beta-D-galactosidase production and Bifidobacteria are decreased in Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42(4):817–22. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sartor RB. Microbial influences in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(2):577–94. Epub 2008/02/05. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.11.059 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Guarner F, Malagelada JR. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet. 2003;361(9356):512–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12489-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Triantafillidis JK, Merikas E, Georgopoulos F. Current and emerging drugs for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2011;5:185–210. Epub 2011/05/10. 10.2147/DDDT.S11290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Zenlea T, Peppercorn MA. Immunosuppressive therapies for inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(12):3146–52. Epub 2014/04/04. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bibiloni R, Fedorak RN, Tannock GW, Madsen KL, Gionchetti P, Campieri M, et al. VSL#3 probiotic-mixture induces remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(7):1539–46. Epub 2005/06/30. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41794.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Verbeke KA, Boesmans L, Boets E. Modulating the microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases: prebiotics, probiotics or faecal transplantation? Proc Nutr Soc. 2014;73(4):490–7. Epub 2014/06/28. 10.1017/S0029665114000639 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Venturi A, Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Johansson R, Zucconi E, Brigidi P, et al. Impact on the composition of the faecal flora by a new probiotic preparation: preliminary data on maintenance treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;13(8):1103–8. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Miele E, Pascarella F, Giannetti E, Quaglietta L, Baldassano RN, Staiano A. Effect of a probiotic preparation (VSL#3) on induction and maintenance of remission in children with ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(2):437–43. Epub 2009/01/29. 10.1038/ajg.2008.118 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Prantera C, Scribano ML, Falasco G, Andreoli A, Luzi C. Ineffectiveness of probiotics in preventing recurrence after curative resection for Crohn's disease: a randomised controlled trial with Lactobacillus GG. Gut. 2002;51(3):405–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Rahimi R, Nikfar S, Rahimi F, Elahi B, Derakhshani S, Vafaie M, et al. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of probiotics for maintenance of remission and prevention of clinical and endoscopic relapse in Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(9):2524–31. 10.1007/s10620-007-0171-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Rolfe VE, Fortun PJ, Hawkey CJ, Bath-Hextall F. Probiotics for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD004826 10.1002/14651858.CD004826.pub2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wildt S, Nordgaard I, Hansen U, Brockmann E, Rumessen JJ. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial with Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2011;5(2):115–21. Epub 2011/04/02. 10.1016/j.crohns.2010.11.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Perse M, Cerar A. Dextran sodium sulphate colitis mouse model: traps and tricks. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:718617 Epub 2012/06/06. 10.1155/2012/718617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Neurath MF. Animal models of inflammatory bowel diseases: illuminating the pathogenesis of colitis, ileitis and cancer. Dig Dis. 2012;30 Suppl 1:91–4. Epub 2012/10/25. 10.1159/000341131 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Alex P, Zachos NC, Nguyen T, Gonzales L, Chen TE, Conklin LS, et al. Distinct cytokine patterns identified from multiplex profiles of murine DSS and TNBS-induced colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(3):341–52. Epub 2008/10/24. 10.1002/ibd.20753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Okayasu I, Hatakeyama S, Yamada M, Ohkusa T, Inagaki Y, Nakaya R. A novel method in the induction of reliable experimental acute and chronic ulcerative colitis in mice. Gastroenterology. 1990;98(3):694–702. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Strober W, Fuss IJ, Blumberg RS. The immunology of mucosal models of inflammation. Annual review of immunology. 2002;20:495–549. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064816 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wirtz S, Neufert C, Weigmann B, Neurath MF. Chemically induced mouse models of intestinal inflammation. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(3):541–6. 10.1038/nprot.2007.41 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Poritz LS, Garver KI, Green C, Fitzpatrick L, Ruggiero F, Koltun WA. Loss of the tight junction protein ZO-1 in dextran sulfate sodium induced colitis. The Journal of surgical research. 2007;140(1):12–9. Epub 2007/04/10. 10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.050 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wyatt J, Vogelsang H, Hubl W, Waldhoer T, Lochs H. Intestinal permeability and the prediction of relapse in Crohn's disease. Lancet. 1993;341(8858):1437–9. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Turroni F, Foroni E, Pizzetti P, Giubellini V, Ribbera A, Merusi P, et al. Exploring the diversity of the bifidobacterial population in the human intestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(6):1534–45. 10.1128/AEM.02216-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Turroni F, Marchesi JR, Foroni E, Gueimonde M, Shanahan F, Margolles A, et al. Microbiomic analysis of the bifidobacterial population in the human distal gut. ISME J. 2009;3(6):745–51. 10.1038/ismej.2009.19 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ventura M, Turroni F, Lugli GA, van Sinderen D. Bifidobacteria and humans: our special friends, from ecological to genomics perspectives. J Sci Food Agric. 2014;94(2):163–8. 10.1002/jsfa.6356 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Matsuki T, Watanabe K, Tanaka R, Fukuda M, Oyaizu H. Distribution of bifidobacterial species in human intestinal microflora examined with 16S rRNA-gene-targeted species-specific primers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(10):4506–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Makino H, Kushiro A, Ishikawa E, Muylaert D, Kubota H, Sakai T, et al. Transmission of intestinal Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum strains from mother to infant, determined by multilocus sequencing typing and amplified fragment length polymorphism. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2011;77(19):6788–93. 10.1128/AEM.05346-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Furrie E, Macfarlane S, Kennedy A, Cummings JH, Walsh SV, O'Neil D A, et al. Synbiotic therapy (Bifidobacterium longum/Synergy 1) initiates resolution of inflammation in patients with active ulcerative colitis: a randomised controlled pilot trial. Gut. 2005;54(2):242–9. 10.1136/gut.2004.044834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Fujiwara M, Kaneko T, Iwana H, Taketomo N, Tsunoo H, Kanno J, et al. Inhibitory effects of Bifidobacterium longum on experimental ulcerative colitis induced in mice by synthetic dextran sulfate sodium. Digestion. 2003;67(1–2):90–5. 69704. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Schwarzer M, Srutkova D, Schabussova I, Hudcovic T, Akgun J, Wiedermann U, et al. Neonatal colonization of germ-free mice with Bifidobacterium longum prevents allergic sensitization to major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1. Vaccine. 2013;31(46):5405–12. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Schabussova I, Hufnagl K, Wild C, Nutten S, Zuercher AW, Mercenier A, et al. Distinctive anti-allergy properties of two probiotic bacterial strains in a mouse model of allergic poly-sensitization. Vaccine. 2011;29(10):1981–90. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.101 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Srutkova D, Spanova A, Spano M, Drab V, Schwarzer M, Kozakova H, et al. Efficiency of PCR-based methods in discriminating Bifidobacterium longum ssp. longum and Bifidobacterium longum ssp. infantis strains of human origin. J Microbiol Methods. 2011;87(1):10–6. 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.06.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Krizova J, Spanova A, Rittich B. Evaluation of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) and species-specific PCR for identification of Bifidobacterium species. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2006;29(1):36–44. 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.07.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Repa A, Grangette C, Daniel C, Hochreiter R, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Thalhamer J, et al. Mucosal co-application of lactic acid bacteria and allergen induces counter-regulatory immune responses in a murine model of birch pollen allergy. Vaccine. 2003;22(1):87–95. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Schabussova I, Hufnagl K, Tang ML, Hoflehner E, Wagner A, Loupal G, et al. Perinatal maternal administration of Lactobacillus paracasei NCC 2461 prevents allergic inflammation in a mouse model of birch pollen allergy. PloS one. 2012;7(7):e40271 10.1371/journal.pone.0040271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Cooper HS, Murthy SN, Shah RS, Sedergran DJ. Clinicopathologic study of dextran sulfate sodium experimental murine colitis. Lab Invest. 1993;69(2):238–49. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hudcovic T, Stepankova R, Cebra J, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H. The role of microflora in the development of intestinal inflammation: acute and chronic colitis induced by dextran sulfate in germ-free and conventionally reared immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice. Folia microbiologica. 2001;46(6):565–72. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Cinova J, De Palma G, Stepankova R, Kofronova O, Kverka M, Sanz Y, et al. Role of intestinal bacteria in gliadin-induced changes in intestinal mucosa: study in germ-free rats. PloS one. 2011;6(1):e16169 10.1371/journal.pone.0016169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Zakostelska Z, Kverka M, Klimesova K, Rossmann P, Mrazek J, Kopecny J, et al. Lysate of probiotic Lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 ameliorates colitis by strengthening the gut barrier function and changing the gut microenvironment. PloS one. 2011;6(11):e27961 10.1371/journal.pone.0027961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kole A, Maloy KJ. Control of intestinal inflammation by interleukin-10. Current topics in microbiology and immunology. 2014;380:19–38. Epub 2014/07/10. 10.1007/978-3-662-43492-5_2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Persson EK, Scott CL, Mowat AM, Agace WW. Dendritic cell subsets in the intestinal lamina propria: ontogeny and function. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43(12):3098–107. 10.1002/eji.201343740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Groschwitz KR, Hogan SP. Intestinal barrier function: molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(1):3–20; quiz 1–2. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Kostic AD, Xavier RJ, Gevers D. The microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: current status and the future ahead. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(6):1489–99. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Schwiertz A, Jacobi M, Frick JS, Richter M, Rusch K, Kohler H. Microbiota in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr. 2010;157(2):240–4 e1 Epub 2010/04/20. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.02.046 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gevers D, Kugathasan S, Denson LA, Vazquez-Baeza Y, Van Treuren W, Ren B, et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn's disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(3):382–92. Epub 2014/03/19. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Geier MS, Butler RN, Howarth GS. Inflammatory bowel disease: current insights into pathogenesis and new therapeutic options; probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;115(1):1–11. Epub 2006/12/02. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506–14. 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Hart AL, Lammers K, Brigidi P, Vitali B, Rizzello F, Gionchetti P, et al. Modulation of human dendritic cell phenotype and function by probiotic bacteria. Gut. 2004;53(11):1602–9. Epub 2004/10/14. 10.1136/gut.2003.037325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Latvala S. Potentially probiotic bacteria induce efficient maturation but differential cytokine production in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008;14(36):5570 10.3748/wjg.14.5570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Lopez P, Gueimonde M, Margolles A, Suarez A. Distinct Bifidobacterium strains drive different immune responses in vitro. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;138(1–2):157–65. Epub 2010/01/15. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.12.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Medina M, Izquierdo E, Ennahar S, Sanz Y. Differential immunomodulatory properties of Bifidobacterium logum strains: relevance to probiotic selection and clinical applications. Clinical and experimental immunology. 2007;150(3):531–8. Epub 2007/10/25. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03522.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Preising J, Philippe D, Gleinser M, Wei H, Blum S, Eikmanns BJ, et al. Selection of bifidobacteria based on adhesion and anti-inflammatory capacity in vitro for amelioration of murine colitis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(9):3048–51. 10.1128/AEM.03127-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Kuhn R, Lohler J, Rennick D, Rajewsky K, Muller W. Interleukin-10-deficient mice develop chronic enterocolitis. Cell. 1993;75(2):263–74. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Steidler L. Treatment of Murine Colitis by Lactococcus lactis Secreting Interleukin-10. Science. 2000;289(5483):1352–5. 10.1126/science.289.5483.1352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Dong H, Rowland I, Yaqoob P. Comparative effects of six probiotic strains on immune function in vitro. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(3):459–70. Epub 2011/11/08. 10.1017/S0007114511005824 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kekkonen R-A. Probiotic intervention has strain-specific anti-inflammatory effects in healthy adults. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008;14(13):2029 10.3748/wjg.14.2029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Mann ER, Landy JD, Bernardo D, Peake ST, Hart AL, Al-Hassi HO, et al. Intestinal dendritic cells: their role in intestinal inflammation, manipulation by the gut microbiota and differences between mice and men. Immunol Lett. 2013;150(1–2):30–40. Epub 2013/01/29. 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.01.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Steinbach EC, Plevy SE. The role of macrophages and dendritic cells in the initiation of inflammation in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(1):166–75. Epub 2013/08/27. 10.1097/MIB.0b013e3182a69dca [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Foligne B, Nutten S, Grangette C, Dennin V, Goudercourt D, Poiret S, et al. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory properties of lactic acid bacteria. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(2):236–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Kwon HK, Lee CG, So JS, Chae CS, Hwang JS, Sahoo A, et al. Generation of regulatory dendritic cells and CD4+Foxp3+ T cells by probiotics administration suppresses immune disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(5):2159–64. 10.1073/pnas.0904055107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Mileti E, Matteoli G, Iliev ID, Rescigno M. Comparison of the immunomodulatory properties of three probiotic strains of Lactobacilli using complex culture systems: prediction for in vivo efficacy. PloS one. 2009;4(9):e7056 Epub 2009/09/17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Karczewski J, Troost FJ, Konings I, Dekker J, Kleerebezem M, Brummer RJ, et al. Regulation of human epithelial tight junction proteins by Lactobacillus plantarum in vivo and protective effects on the epithelial barrier. American journal of physiology Gastrointestinal and liver physiology. 2010;298(6):G851–9. 10.1152/ajpgi.00327.2009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Ogura Y, Bonen DK, Inohara N, Nicolae DL, Chen FF, Ramos R, et al. A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Nature. 2001;411(6837):603–6. 10.1038/35079114 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Hugot JP, Chamaillard M, Zouali H, Lesage S, Cezard JP, Belaiche J, et al. Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Nature. 2001;411(6837):599–603. 10.1038/35079107 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Biswas A, Kobayashi KS. Regulation of intestinal microbiota by the NLR protein family. International immunology. 2013;25(4):207–14. 10.1093/intimm/dxs116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Couturier-Maillard A, Secher T, Rehman A, Normand S, De Arcangelis A, Haesler R, et al. NOD2-mediated dysbiosis predisposes mice to transmissible colitis and colorectal cancer. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123(2):700–11. 10.1172/JCI62236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Inohara N, Ogura Y, Fontalba A, Gutierrez O, Pons F, Crespo J, et al. Host recognition of bacterial muramyl dipeptide mediated through NOD2. Implications for Crohn's disease. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278(8):5509–12. 10.1074/jbc.C200673200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Macho Fernandez E, Valenti V, Rockel C, Hermann C, Pot B, Boneca IG, et al. Anti-inflammatory capacity of selected lactobacilli in experimental colitis is driven by NOD2-mediated recognition of a specific peptidoglycan-derived muropeptide. Gut. 2011;60(8):1050–9. 10.1136/gut.2010.232918 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Pastorelli L, De Salvo C, Mercado JR, Vecchi M, Pizarro TT. Central role of the gut epithelial barrier in the pathogenesis of chronic intestinal inflammation: lessons learned from animal models and human genetics. Front Immunol. 2013;4:280 Epub 2013/09/26. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Schulzke JD, Ploeger S, Amasheh M, Fromm A, Zeissig S, Troeger H, et al. Epithelial tight junctions in intestinal inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1165:294–300. Epub 2009/06/23. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04062.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Buning C, Geissler N, Prager M, Sturm A, Baumgart DC, Buttner J, et al. Increased small intestinal permeability in ulcerative colitis: rather genetic than environmental and a risk factor for extensive disease? Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(10):1932–9. Epub 2012/02/22. 10.1002/ibd.22909 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Neurath MF. New targets for mucosal healing and therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7(1):6–19. 10.1038/mi.2013.73 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Gyires K, Toth EV, Zadori SZ. Gut inflammation: current update on pathophysiology, molecular mechanism and pharmacological treatment modalities. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(7):1063–81. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Ukena SN, Singh A, Dringenberg U, Engelhardt R, Seidler U, Hansen W, et al. Probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 inhibits leaky gut by enhancing mucosal integrity. PloS one. 2007;2(12):e1308 10.1371/journal.pone.0001308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Zyrek AA, Cichon C, Helms S, Enders C, Sonnenborn U, Schmidt MA. Molecular mechanisms underlying the probiotic effects of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 involve ZO-2 and PKCzeta redistribution resulting in tight junction and epithelial barrier repair. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9(3):804–16. Epub 2006/11/08. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00836.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Mennigen R, Nolte K, Rijcken E, Utech M, Loeffler B, Senninger N, et al. Probiotic mixture VSL#3 protects the epithelial barrier by maintaining tight junction protein expression and preventing apoptosis in a murine model of colitis. American journal of physiology Gastrointestinal and liver physiology. 2009;296(5):G1140–9. 10.1152/ajpgi.90534.2008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.