Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: Biomater Sci. 2015 Jun 2;3(8):1171–1187. doi: 10.1039/c5bm00051c

PolyActives: Controlled and Sustained Bioactive Release Via Hydrolytic Degradation

ND Stebbins a, J J Faig a, W Yu b, R Guliyev a, KE Uhrich a,b
PMCID: PMC4519997  NIHMSID: NIHMS696701  PMID: 26222033

Abstract

Significant and promising advances have been made in the polymer field for controlled and sustained bioactive delivery. Traditionally, small molecule bioactives have been physically incorporated into biodegradable polymers; however, chemical incorporation allows for higher drug loading, more controlled release, and enhanced processability. Moreover, the advent of bioactive-containing monomer polymerization and hydrolytic biodegradability allows for tunable bioactive loading without yielding a polymer residue. In this review, we highlight the chemical incorporation of different bioactive classes into novel biodegradable and biocompatible polymers. The polymer design, synthesis, and formulation are summarized in addition to the evaluation of bioactivity retention upon release via in vitro and in vivo studies.

Graphical Abstract

This review discusses recent advances in the chemical incorporation of a wide range of bioactives into completely biodegradable and novel polymers

graphic file with name nihms696701u1.jpg

1. Introduction

Typically, small molecule drugs have short half-lives and undergo rapid and avid metabolism once implanted in vivo. To achieve an effective and therapeutic dose, repeated administration is often needed, which can contribute to a myriad of side effects, potential toxicity, and low patient compliance. Polymer-based delivery systems offer a solution to these issues. Many polymer-based bioactive delivery systems are physical admixtures of the active within the release-controlling polymer or encapsulations of the active within polymeric carrier molecules.112 However, physical incorporation of bioactives into polymeric matrices can suffer from low drug loadings as well as a burst release in which the vast majority of active is released after a short time.13, 14

Chemical incorporation of bioactives into polymeric systems addresses the potential limitations of physical admixtures; this approach offers higher drug loading in addition to sustained and tunable bioactive release. Many polymeric systems utilizing chemical incorporation have the bioactive covalently attached to polymethacrylamide backbones.1517 While many of these polymeric prodrug systems are water-soluble, they ultimately do not degrade, which may be a drawback; nonbiodegradable systems may require removal or additional modification once introduced in vivo. Nevertheless, polymeric delivery systems exhibit controlled release and have been successfully commercialized. Covalent bioactive attachment to commercially available or pre-made polymers such as poly(N- (2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (HPMA), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), and polysaccharides exhibiting sustained, controlled and targeted release has been reported in great detail.15, 1725 In this work, we focus on completely biodegradable and novel polymers in which the bioactive is chemically incorporated, whether attached as a pendant group or as a component of the polymer backbone (Figure 1). Additionally, bioactive attachment within the polymer backbone linker can follow one of two motifs: drug-linker-drug (i.e., two bioactives per repeat unit, Figure 2A), or linker-drug-linker (i.e., one bioactive per repeat unit, Figure 2B), depending on the available functionality of the drug. The linker molecule, often an inert, biocompatible small molecule, allows for the formation of bioactive-containing polymer precursors. In all examples, a bioactive-containing monomer is first synthesized and subsequently polymerized. Linker alterations and subsequent polymer property changes will be discussed in detail in Section 4.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pendant (A) versus backbone (B) incorporation of drug to polymer

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Bioactive attachment within polymer backbone: drug-linker-drug (A) versus linker-drug-linker (B)

The Uhrich group focuses exclusively on biodegradable and biocompatible polymers containing hydrolytically and enzymatically labile bonds (e.g., anhydrides, esters, and amides), with major focus on poly(anhydride-esters) (PAEs) and polyesters (PEs).. Polyanhydrides in particular are investigated due to their favorable properties for bioactive release. Because polyanhydrides are generally surface-eroding polymers exhibiting hydrolysis rates that are faster than diffusion rates, erosion is mostly limited to the outer surface of the polymer formulation. This erosion mechanism allows the polymer’s interior structural integrity to be maintained throughout the degradation process and allows controlled polymer degradation and linear mass loss, both desirable properties for bioactive delivery.26, 27 PAEs developed by the Uhrich group predominantly undergo surface erosion, which permits well-controlled polymer degradation with near zero-order bioactive release kinetics.28

In synthesizing polyanhydrides, other functional groups, such as amides and esters, can also be chemically incorporated into the backbone. For instance, our laboratory reported the synthesis of salicylate-based PAEs by melt-condensation and solution polymerization methods; these polymers are capable of achieving controlled and extended release of the salicylates through surface erosion.29 Salicylate-based polymers are unique because non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are chemically incorporated into the polymer backbone, instead of being physically admixed with the polymer.30, 31 Likewise, the Uhrich group has chemically incorporated other NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen and naproxen, as pendant groups into PE backbones through their propionic acid moiety.32, 33

To provide controlled therapeutic delivery, the Uhrich group has developed several types of polymeric bioactive delivery systems, namely PAEs and PEs. This review highlights the progress of polymeric bioactives investigated in our laboratory via two categories: pendant group and backbone attachments (Figure 1). In each of these categories, different classes of bioactives are explored. These bioactives include antioxidants (free radicals scavengers)34, antimicrobials (microorganisms killing agents),35 NSAIDs (providing anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic effects),36 antiseptics (kill microorganisms or inhibit their growth, especially on living tissue),37 antibiotics (kill bacteria or inhibit their growth),38 and opioids (potent analgesics).39 Additionally, this review addresses methodologies to tune polymer hydrophobicity, alter bioactive release rates through chemical and physical modifications, and to formulate the polymers for different applications.

2. Pendant Group Attachment

The attachment of a bioactive molecule to a polymer backbone as a side chain can be achieved utilizing two major approaches: 1) post-polymerization modification in which a bioactive is covalently linked to a pre-made polymer backbone, and 2) polymerization of a bioactive-containing monomer. In this review, the latter case will be the major focus, as this methodology allows for higher drug loading and more tunable structures.

2.1. Propionic Acid NSAIDs

NSAIDs are a class of drugs with anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic properties. Propionic acid NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen and naproxen, have short half-lives and may cause severe gastrointestinal side effects at high doses.40 Thus, the sustained, localized release from a polymer could mediate these issues. Ibuprofen (1a) or naproxen (1b), both of which have a carboxylic acid moiety, was coupled to a protected tartaric acid derivative (2) via carbodiimide-mediated esterification (3).32 Subsequent chemoselective deprotection afforded an NSAID-containing tartaric acid diacid (4). Using a linear aliphatic diol as comonomer (e.g., 1,8-octanediol, 5) and stannous octoate as catalyst, two PEs were synthesized (6a–b, Scheme 1). NSAID release rate under physiological conditions (pH 7.4, 37 °C) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was slower and glass transition temperature was higher for the more rigid naproxen-containing PE (6b) when compared to the ibuprofen PE (6a). Cytocompatibility studies deemed the polymers nontoxic toward fibroblasts and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy confirmed that the structure of the released NSAID was retained. This easily amenable methodology yields polymers whose ultimate degradation products yield a bioactive (ibuprofen or naproxen), sugar (tartaric acid), and biocompatible diol.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of ibuprofen- and naproxen-containing PEs using tartaric acid as a backbone. Adapted with permission from Rosario-Melendez R, et al. Macromolecules 2013, 14 (10), 3542. ©2013 American Chemical Society

Using similar types of reactions, PEs containing ibuprofen attached to a malic acid backbone were also synthesized with the intent to minimize excess regents and utilize nontoxic solvents. Using the Twelve Principles of Green Chemistry41 as a guide, a more environmentally friendly methodology to incorporate bioactives into polymer backbones was developed.33 A solvent-free esterification of malic acid with ibuprofen followed by catalytic deprotection in cyclopentylmethyl ether, a green solvent preferred by the personal care industry, yielded diacid. Polymerization with one of three aliphatic diol comonomers was accomplished via a commercially available lipase (lipase B from Candida antarctica, CAL-B) to afford three PEs with aliphatic chain lengths ranging from three to eight methylene units. Bioactive release rate and glass transition temperatures decreased with increasing aliphatic chain length. As with the tartaric acid analog, cytocompatibility was confirmed along with retention of drug composition. The reactions utilized here significantly reduce the amount of reagents and eliminate chlorinated solvents as outlined in previous methods.4244 Additionally, the tin catalyst often employed for polyesterification reactions was replaced with naturally-occurring and renewable lipase. The utilization of such green chemical processes for drug delivery and biomaterials can lead to a more environmentally friendly process.

Also utilizing CAL-B, Thompson et al. developed a novel polymer, poly(glycerol-adipate-co-pentadecalactone) (PGA-co- PL) in one step. The secondary hydroxyl group of PGA-co-PL, was then reacted with the acyl chloride derivative of ibuprofen to afford a polymer with pendant ibuprofen groups (Figure 3) with drug loading ranging from 3–13% for the three synthesized conjugates.45 Thermal characterization via differential scanning calorimetry revealed that the amount of ibuprofen did not have a significant impact on melting or glass transition temperatures, which were on average 34 °C and −28 °C, respectively. Ibuprofen release was quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC); initially, a burst release (13 % over 30 min) was observed; however, over the next seven days, near-zero order release was observed.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Structure of PGA-co-PL with pendant ibuprofen. R group will vary between H and ibuprofen depending on drug loading

Wang et al. also used CAL-B as catalyst to synthesize linear polyesters containing the NSAID ketoprofen as a pendant group.46 Sebacic acid, glycerol, and PEG functioned as the backbone (Figure 4). Polymers with PEG molecular weights of 200, 400 and 800 Da ranged from ~16–30 % drug loading. Under physiological conditions and over two weeks, twice as much ketoprofen was released from the PEG 800 polyester compared with the PEG 400 polyester (22 % vs. 11 %). This observation is likely due to the increased hydrophilicity of the longer PEG chain, causing faster release. Polyester with PEG 800 and 4.5 kDa total Mw exhibited 16 % release over two weeks under the same conditions. However, a vast difference is noted between release in simulated gastric fluid when compared with simulated intestinal fluid: negligible release occurred in the gastric fluid while 100 % of drug was released within two days in intestinal fluid, with both studies lasting two weeks. This observation elucidates the potential for oral delivery of this polyester system.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Structure of ketoprofen polyester prodrug with sebacate, PEG, and glycerol backbone

2.2. Antioxidants and Antimicrobials

Oxidative stress and the production of reactive oxygen species and free radicals have profound implications on aging and age-related diseases.34 Compounds with antioxidant properties can help eliminate free radicals and prevent oxidative stress.47 Especially for consumer products such as food and cosmetics, oxidation can lead to browning as well as spoilage. Similarly, bacterial contamination remains a significant issue in personal care and food industries. Antimicrobial compounds with a wide range of activities and properties could prevent food spoilage.

Many phenols derived from natural sources exhibit both antioxidant48 and antimicrobial49 properties. Carvacrol, thymol, and eugenol are examples of such compounds isolated from the essential oils of oregano, thyme, and clove, respectively.50, 51 The chemical incorporation of phenols into a polymer for bioactive sustained release has potential use in food packaging and personal care applications. Phenols have a single reactive moiety; however, dicarboxylic acids are often necessary as starting materials for PAE synthesis.52 Thus, a phenol-containing small molecule precursor was initially synthesized (Figure 5A).53 First, the ring opening of a cyclic dianhydride (e.g., pyromellitic anhydride, 8) was investigated, affording the phenol-containing dicarboxylic acid, or diacid (9). The diacid subsequently underwent solution polymerization using triphosgene as coupling agent to make the PAE (10); here, the phenols are linked to the backbone via ester bonds, whereas the repeat units are connected through anhydride bonds. The general structure of repeat units follows a pendant group motif (Figure 1A) with a pyromellitic backbone. To ensure polymer safety, cell studies using fibroblasts indicated that the PAEs were cytocompatible.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Synthesis of phenol-containing PAEs with pyromellitic linker. (B) DPPH reduction results comparing phenols released from EDTA polymer with free phenols. Adapted with permission from Carbone-Howell A, et al. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15 (5), 1889. ©2014 American Chemical Society

Using a similar synthetic method, but replacing the pyromellitic anhydride with ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA) dianhydride, a new series of PAEs containing carvacrol, thymol, and eugenol were developed.54 These polymers are unique in that all polymer degradation products (i.e., phenol and EDTA) are active and found on the FDA’s Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) list, leading to a high atom economy. Bioactive release via polymer degradation was determined under physiological conditions; polymer was completely degraded after 16 days. Additionally, it was determined via a 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay (Figure 5B) that all released bioactives retained their antioxidant activity after release from polymer. A disc diffusion assay also indicated that antimicrobial activity was preserved after release; in this assay, bioactive-impregnated discs are placed on bacteria-inoculated agar and incubated overnight. Antimicrobial activity is determined by the absence of bacterial growth surrounding the discs.55

3. Backbone Attachment

Previously, pendant group attachment (Figure 1A) of bioactives to a polymer backbone has been discussed in which the bioactive is conjugated to a monomer as a side group prior to polymerization. In this section, polymers in which the bioactives are chemically incorporated into the polymer backbone are discussed (Figure 2). Specifically, the bioactive is modified into a polymer precursor and subsequently polymerized, yielding high bioactive-loaded polymers. In the case of PAEs, this approach also offers fully biodegradable polymers capable of sustained, near zero-order bioactive release.

3.1 Anti-inflammatory Drugs

Salicylic acid (SA), a naturally occurring phenolic acid and active metabolite of aspirin, has an extensive tradition of medicinal use owing to its therapeutic effects, specifically its antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial capabilities.56, 57 While SA exhibits desirable therapeutic properties, its short half-life (~ 2 h) coupled with unwanted gastrointestinal side effects have limited its pharmaceutical use.58, 59 To overcome such limitations and develop a controlled release drug delivery system, the Uhrich lab incorporated SA into a polymer. SA-based PAEs were synthesized by first connecting two SA moieties through a linker molecule to acquire SA diacid, which is then activated and polymerized (Scheme 2).60 SA-based PAE synthesis was achieved using a stoichiometric amount of pyridine to activate and selectively react a diacyl chloride (12) (linker molecule) with SA (11) to acquire SA diacid (13). SA diacid was then activated using excess acetic anhydride and subsequently polymerized at elevated temperatures under vacuum, ultimately acquiring a bioactive-linker-bioactive repeat unit (Figure 2B). This synthetic methodology is adaptable to a wide variety of salicylates such as aminosalicylates,31, 61 iodinated salicylates,62 diflunisal and salsalate among others.30

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthetic scheme for SA-based PAEs with adipic (a) and diglycolic (b) linkages

Polymer degradation studies conducted under physiological conditions revealed that SA-based (adipic) PAEs fully hydrolyzed into SA and adipic acid (15) (Scheme 3), both GRAS-listed compounds, over 8 days.63 These studies also indicated a small lag period (1 day) in which a negligible amount of SA was released. Cytotoxicity studies conducted on polymer 14a determined the SA-based (adipic) PAEs to be cytocompatible at 0.01 mg/mL.64 To further investigate SA release, SA bioaccessibility was assessed using a dynamic in vitro gastrointestinal model (TIM-1).65 Here, SA bioaccessibility from SA-based (diglycolic) PAEs was approximately 21% over 5 hours of simulated digestion.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Hydrolysis of SA-based (adipic) PAE into SA (11) and adipic acid (15)

As described above, SA contains a variety of therapeutic properties, including antimicrobial capabilities. To elucidate the efficacy against bacterial pathogens, our group evaluated SA-based (adipic) PAEs’ ability to hinder biofilm formation. Polymer degradation was shown to significantly reduce Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation, preventing cell accumulation by five orders-of-magnitude when compared to an inactive control.66 Similarly, SA-based (adipic) PAEs hindered the formation of Salmonella biofilms, offering a means to overcome traditional issues associated with bacterial biofilms.67

The anti-inflammatory properties of SA, specifically its decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines production that are linked to compromised bone regeneration, have potential to be efficacious in bone repair.68 SA-based (adipic) PAE/bone graft mixtures have been shown to significantly enhance bone fill percentage in rats relative to a bone graft control.68 After four weeks, bone fill percentages in SA-based PAE bone graft mixtures were statistically greater than bone graft controls with diabetic and normoglycemic rats possessing 44 % and 37 % more bone fill than their respective bone graft control groups. Additionally, after 12 weeks, diabetic rats with SA-based (adipic) PAE/bone graft mixtures exhibited 43 % greater bone fill percentage than control rats and showed no statistical difference when compared to SA-based (adipic) PAE/bone graft mixture in normoglycemic rats (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Micro-CT images of bone formation within bone defect regions in diabetic (A, C, E, G) and normoglycemic (B, D, F, H) rats implanted with SA-based PAE and bone graft mixture (E, F, G, H) or with bone graft control alone (A, B, C, D). Scale bar = 1 m Adapted with permission from Wada K, et al. Journal of Controlled Release 2013, 171 (11), 33. ©Elsevier B.V.

Chandorkar et al. has also investigated incorporating SA into polymer backbones.69, 70 Here, SA diacid is first synthesized using sebacoyl chloride, similar to Scheme 2, followed by activation with acetic anhydride and melt-condensation polymerization with mannitol to acquire a cross-linked, fully biodegradable PE (SAP). Curing SAP was found to decrease SA content, 40 % to 25 % (w/w), and SA release rate under physiological conditions, ~20 % in approximately 5 days to ~3.5 % over 4 months, when compared to noncured SAP. Positive in vitro cytocompatibility results culminated into subcutaneous implantation in mice to investigate SAP as a wound-healing matrix. Although an initial foreign body response occurred, it subsided over the sixteen-week study as indicated by the reduction in systemic inflammatory cell density (i.e., neutrophil, macrophage and fibroblast) while vascularization surrounding the implant increased. Additionally, while poly(lactic-co- glycolic acid) (PLGA) displayed reduced foreign body response by the conclusion of the study, this result was likelydue to extensive bulk erosion. By sixteen-weeks, PLGA lost ~94 % of its mass whereas SAP had only ~8 % mass loss (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Normalized in vivo mass loss of SAP and PLGA at weeks 2, 4, and 16 where * is statistical significance (p < 0.05) of SAP compared to PLGA and # is statistical significance (p < 0.05) is PLGA compared to PLGA 2 weeks post-implantation. Adapted with permission from Chandorkar Y, et al. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (2), 636. ©2013 American Chemical Society

3.2 Antioxidants

As previously discussed, oxidative stress impacts a myriad of cellular functions, contributing to cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. As such, antioxidants have been incorporated into PAEs, offering localized delivery to quench radical oxygen species. Two classes that have been investigated are phenolic acids and hydroxycinnamic acids (HCAs).

Two phenolic acids, syringic acid (SGA) and vanillic acid (VA), were integrated into a polymer backbone by first synthesizing diacid units and then undergoing solution polymerization.71 Polymer degradation studies under physiological conditions found bioactive release to be controlled by polymer hydrophobicity; greater hydrophobicity decreased release rate. Released bioactive maintained antioxidant activity, as evident by a DPPH radical scavenging assay (Figure 8). Moreover, both polymers were found to be cytocompatible at higher concentrations (0.1 mg/mL) than those exhibited in the DPPH studies.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Antioxidant activity of VA and SGA released from adipic-based PAEs compared to free bioactives at identical concentrations.

Whereas SGA and VA were incorporated into PAEs via a two-step approach, a modified synthetic method was necessary for HCAs (Scheme 4).72, 73 HCAs, such as ferulic acid (FA), suffer from poor stability due to the double bond, readily undergoing decarboxylation and decreasing efficacy.74 Consequently, HCA-based PAEs (FA and p-coumaric acid, pCA) were first synthesized as t-butyl protected derivatives (15), which were then reacted with a diacyl chloride to acquire t-butyl HCA diester (16). The diester is then selectively deprotected and the resulting diacid (17) subjected to solution polymerization to acquire HCA (adipic) PAEs (18)

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Synthesis of HCA (adipic) PAEs and polymer precursors.

Polymer degradation studies, conducted under physiological conditions, revealed that FA-based PAEs released more quickly than the pCA counterpart (6.2% vs 4.5%) over 30 days. Released bioactives were also found to maintain or possess significantly better antioxidant activity compared to free bioactives of identical concentration. Released bioactives from FA (adipic) PAEs were additonally tested for their antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and found to possess statistically similar antibacterial effects compared to free FA. Interestingly, in both FA and pCA (adipic) PAEs, polymers released their respective bioactives with no measurable decomposition occurring (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

A. FA (adipic) PAE high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatograph demonstrating no FA degradation peaks. B. Free ferulic acid (left) and FA polymer containing the same amount of FA (right) after 20 days in PBS, illustrating a lack of yellowing indicative of decomposition in FA-based PAE media

Whereas our lab has focused on incorporating antioxidants into PAEs, various hydrolytically labile bonds have been explored by others to integrate antioxidants into polymer backbones. Dziubla et al. utilized carbodiimide coupling to polymerize trolox, a Vitamin E analog, acquiring Poly(trolox ester) (PTx), a PE comprised solely of trolox.75 PTx was further formulated into nanoparticles which displayed minimal cytotoxicity whilst possessing antioxidant activity in vitro. In vitro release studies measuring antioxidant activity revealed that Trolox (Tx) was only released in a sustained manner when in the presence of carbonic anhydrase (CA). Cellular antioxidant activity was investigated and PTx nanoparticles found to inhibit protein carbonyl (a known marker of oxidative stress) content when compared to Trolox alone (Figure 10).76

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Protein carbonyl content in human umbilical vein endothelial cells following 24 h treatment with two concentrations of Tx, and PTx. PTx treatment conducted with oligomeric PTx (PTx-1000) and polymeric PTx (PTx-2500). Protein was collected after lysing of cells and analyzed. A one-way ANOVA conducted on the data set revealed a significant trend (p < 0.05) for protein carbonyl levels Adapted with permission from Paritosh P, et al. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 2011, 99 (2), 184. ©2013 John Wiley and Sons

Similarly, Lee explored PEs and PE derivatives for the inclusion of antioxidants into polymer backbones.7779 A unique feature of these systems is that the polymer itself possesses inherent bioactivity through the presence of aromatic peroxalate-esters, which are known to scavenge hydrogen peroxide.77 Park et al. synthesized 4- hydroxybenzyl alcohol (HBA)-containing copolyoxalates (HPOX) by copolymerizing HBA and 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanl in the presence of oxalyl chloride.78 HPOX hydrolysis kinetics studies revealed degradation to be pH-independent as both physiological and endosomal (pH = 5.5) conditions and possessed similar half-lives (~12 h). To further investigate drug delivery applications, HPOX was formulated into nanoparticles that displayed better hydrogel-peroxide scavenging activity than HBA alone (~50 % vs. ~20 % reduction at 1 mg/mL).77 Additionally, intranasally delivered HPOX nanoparticles showed reduced instances of inflammation in ovalbumin sensitized mice. as indicated by inducible nitric oxide synthases (iNOS) staining.

Analogously, poly(oxalate-acetal) prodrugs of vanillin (PVO) have been synthesized and formulated into nanoparticles.79 Vanillin was first protected at its aldehyde with 2-(hydroxymethyl)-2- methylpropane-1,3-diol to generate an acetal-containing vanillin prodrug diol which was subsequently polymerized with oxalyl chloride. Following nanoparticle formulation in vitro, release studies revealed faster vanillin release occurring under endosomal conditions compared to physiological conditions (~80 % to >40 %, respectively; Figure 11). Consistent with previous studies, PVO nanoparticles displayed greater hydrogen peroxide scavenging then vanillin alone owing to the peroxalate-ester presence. Furthermore, PVO nanoparticles inhibited iNOS and tumor necrosis facter-alpha expression while intravenous PVO nanoparticle injection reduced acetaminophen-induced acute hepatic injury.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Cumulative release of vanillin from PVO nanoparticles under physiological and endosomal conditions as determined by HPLC Adapted with permission from Kwon J, et al. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14 (5), 1618. ©2013 American Chemical Society

3.3. Antiseptics

Heretofore, bioactives incorporated into PAE backbones have contained one phenolic and one carboxylic acid functionality, enabling a bioactive-linker-bioactive repeat unit. However, for bisphenol compounds, an alternate synthetic method is necessary (Scheme 5). To incorporate common antiseptics (e.g., catechol, fenticlor, and hexachlorophene) into PAEs, bis-phenols (19) were first reacted with cyclic anhydrides (20) to acquire antiseptic-diacids (21) which then underwent melt condensation polymerization.80 The resulting antiseptic-based PAEs (22) contained linker-bioactive-linker repeat units (Scheme 5). A 12-week release study displayed varying release profiles (0–55 %), with catechol-containing PAEs (22a) degrading the fastest.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Synthesis of bis-phenol, antiseptic-based PAE precursors (21) and polymer (22) through modified linker-bioactivelinker approach

3.4. Antibiotics

While antibiotics remain essential to treat dangerous infections, overprescription and systemic delivery encourage the development of resistant bacterial strains.81, 82 Local delivery at an infection site can lower dosing necessary to eradicate the infection and, therefore, lower toxicity and the development of resistant bacteria.83, 84 Ampicillin, a commonly used beta-lactam antibiotic, was chemically incorporated into a poly(anhydride-amide) backbone using a method similar to that described in Section 3.1 (Scheme 6).85 Bearing a primary amine and a carboxylic acid moiety, ampicillin (23) was reacted with a diacyl chloride (e.g., sebacoyl chloride, 24) to afford the diacid (25). Solution polymerization with triphosgene as coupling agent resulted in the poly(anhydride-amide) (26). The antibiotic-based polymer was cytocompatible; however, polymer degradation/release studies revealed that the polymer did not completely hydrolyze to free ampicillin. Rather, the anhydride bonds hydrolyzed but the amides remained intact, i.e., only diacid (25) was observed in the polymer degradation media. Nonetheless, the disc diffusion assay showed that the diacid (25) exhibited antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Although free ampicillin was not present in media, the diacid was determined to have antibacterial activity.

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Synthesis of ampicillin-containing poly(anhydride amide) (26)

3.5. Analgesics

Opioids are a class of potent analgesic drugs used to treat severe pain.86 Although they are widely used, opioids exhibit a short half-life,87 necessitating frequent dosing, causing low patient compliance and a higher likelihood of tolerance development.88 Moreover, opioids can be easily isolated from current formulations, leading to drug abuse and accidental overdoses.89, 90 The chemical incorporation of opioids into a polymer backbone could decrease abuse potential all while providing sustained analgesia for patients. Morphine, the most widely used opioid, was chemically incorporated into a PAE backbone using a similar procedure outlined in Section 3.3.91 Because morphine contains a phenol and secondary hydroxyl group, it was reacted with glutaric anhydride to produce the diacid. It was important to modify morphine such that the active groups (i.e., carboxylic acids) had equal reactivity, as the monomer underwent melt condensation polymerization to yield the PAE. Rather than a bioactive-linker-bioactive repeat unit motif, this PAE follows a linker-bioactive-linker motif (Figure 2B). Polymer degradation studies under physiological conditions revealed that free morphine was slowly released through hydrolytic cleavage of anhydride and ester bonds (Figure 12A). In vivo studies using intraperitoneal injection into mice determined that the analgesic effect of one dose of morphine-based polymer was sustained through 24 hours and for about 3 days, in comparison to the four hours of analgesia provided by free morphine (Figure 12B). Analgesia was evaluated via the tail flick latency (TFL) test, immersing the animal’s tail in hot water and measuring pain response through the time it takes the rat to lift its out of water. Through chemical incorporation to a polymer, a therapeutic dose of morphine can be administered for days, a drastic improvement for patient care.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

(A) HPLC chromatograms from in vitro degradation study depicting morphine-based polymer breaking down into diacid, monoacid, and morphine at time points indicated in upper left; (B) In vivo TFL test results showing prolonged analgesia for morphine-based polymer compared to free morphine. Adapted with permission from Rosario-Melendez R, et al. Journal of Controlled Release 2012, 162, 538. ©2012 Elsevier B.V.

4. Tunability and Manipulations of PAEs

4.1. Linkers

Depending on the applications, different polymer degradation rates and bioactive release rates may be desired. When long-term bioactive release is required, such as medical device coatings and chronic disease treatments, polymers with slower degradation rates and longer drug releasing windows are preferred. On the other hand, polymers with fast degradation rates are suitable where rapid bioactive release is needed, such as a cosmetic mask or topical cream. One effective way to control polymer degradation rate is to choose the appropriate linker molecule. PAEs with different linkers generally have different hydrophobicity and, thus, different hydrolysis rates. As an example, SA-based PAEs with a branched, hydrophobic diethylmalonic linker, released only ~18% of the SA incorporated in the polymer backbone in 30 days, whereas SA-based PAEs with a more hydrophilic malonic linker released 100% incorporated SA in 6 days.63

4.2. Copolymers and Blends

The combination of two polymer moieties, either through chemically copolymerizing two monomers or physically blending two polymers, can alter polymer mechanical properties, thermal properties and degradation rates, making them more versatile as needed for various applications. Chemical copolymerization of SA-based (sebacic) PAE and para-carboxyphenoxyhexane (pCPH) repeat units (Figure 13) yielded a copolymer with significantly higher Tg compared to the SA-based homopolymer (33 °C versus 27 °C), which greatly enhanced its processability at room temperature.92 In addition, different ratios between the SA-based (sebacic) PAE and pCPH units resulted in different copolymer properties: higher pCPH percentage yielded copolymers with lower tensile strength, lower Young’s modulus, lower ultimate elongation and lower toughness as the pCPH unit is more brittle than the SA-based unit.92 Copolymers with more pCPH units were also more hydrophobic, which led to a slower hydrolytic degradation rate and, thus, less significant changes in polymer properties when incubated in PBS.92 These parameters are important for choosing bioactive-releasing implant materials with stable properties after implantation.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Structure of SA-based (sebacic) PAE and pCPH copolymer

Physical blending of polymers is another method to tune properties. For example, blending an SA-based PAE with a more ductile polymer, such as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) or polycaprolactone (PCL), can form flexible electrospun mats that is not possible with SA-based PAE alone as it is too brittle.93 The physical combination of SA-based PAE and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) yielded a much more hydrophobic system than SA-based PAEs yet was able to absorb a significant amount of water to form a hydrogel.94 These different properties allow a broad range of applications of the SA-based PAEs, such as flexible wraps, wound dressing, nerve guidance conduits, etc.93, 94

4.3. Admixtures

Physical admix of bioactive compounds within polymer matrix has been intensively studied for decades by numerous laboratories. Taking the advantages of bioactive-based polymers and the various admixing methods, the Uhrich lab was able to physically incorporate secondary bioactive compounds into the bioactive-based polymers and generated dual-delivery systems, i.e. as the polymer degrades, both the admixed bioactive and the bioactive incorporated in the polymer are concurrently released. Molecules being admixed range from small molecules such as SA and antimicrobials (chlorhexidine, clindamycin, minocycline) to relatively bulky and complex proteins, such as insulin and fibroblast growth factor-2.9598 Concurrent release of the bioactive agents was observed (release time window ranging from ~6 days to ~2 weeks) with well-maintained chemical structures and bioactivities.95, 96, 98 Such dual-delivery systems are of particular interests to many applications. For example, SA-based PAEs with admixed antimicrobials delivers an antimicrobial and an anti-inflammatory drug at the same time, which may be an effective combination in treating infections. Furthermore, the combination of insulin and SA-based PAEs is a promising system to treat diabetes as the synergistic effects between insulin and SA have been clinically well-established.99106

4.4. Versatility of Formulations

Polymers are well-known for their versatile formulations, such as films, hydrogels, microspheres, coatings, and fibers. These bioactive-based polymers can be formulated with high drug loading that is not feasible to achieve using free bioactive molecules alone admixed into polymer matrices. For example, salicylic acid can be formed into tablets, but it cannot be formulated into microspheres.

SA-based PAEs with various linkers have been formulated into microspheres using standard oil/water emulsion method and yielded microspheres with smooth surface and well-defined spherical geometry (Figure 14).96, 98 Encapsulation of proteins into bioactive-based polymer microspheres was also achieved using the standard water/oil/water emulsion technique.96, 98 One example is the encapsulation of insulin into SA-based PAE microspheres, which yielded microspheres with smooth spherical geometry, high insulin loading (4.1%) and high insulin loading efficiency (~82.6%). Insulin and SA were concurrently released from the microspheres in PBS for about two weeks and their in vitro and in vivo bioactivities were well maintained.98

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Versatile formulations of SA-based PAEs

Other formulations include compressed polymer disks, solvent-casted and spin-coated SA-based PAE films, and dip-coated tubes of SA-based PAE and poly(lactic acid) blends.30, 67, 107 All these systems were able to release the bioactive in a sustained manner.

5. Future Directions

5.1. Green Chemistry and One-pot Synthesis

As the use of biodegradable polymers is continuously increasing toward various biomedical applications, the design and synthesis of these polymers with chemical approaches that eliminate the use or generation of toxic substances are essential. During biodegradable polymers synthesis, chemists can significantly reduce the risks to human health by implementing the Principles of Green Chemistry.41 For instance, utilization of non-hazardous reactant monomers, safe solvents, and enzymatic catalysts could be investigated. Furthermore, simplification of procedures during polymer synthesis (i.e. reducing number of steps) is another way of applying green chemistry principles.

As illustrated in Section 2.2, green chemistry is one of the primary criteria considered in biodegradable polymer synthesis. In the previously described example,33 solvent-free reactions and a naturally occurring catalyst were exploited to establish a green synthesis of PEs. Similarly, an alternative approach was developed for the preparation of the polymer precursor that minimized the number of synthetic steps and increased the overall yield. Scheme 7 demonstrates the three-step synthesis of SA-linker-SA type monomer with a less than 50% overall yield. However, with the new approach the same monomer was obtained by a direct coupling of SA and acyl chloride in one step through the acyl-pyridinium intermediate formation. One-pot synthesis and simple purification methods for the diacid monomer greatly enhanced the overall yield up to 97%. Among several solvents evaluated, polar aprotic tetrahydrofuran (THF) was preferred due to its low boiling point. By using various alkyl- and aryl- based acyl chlorides in the place of sebacoyl chloride, a wide variety of similar diacid monomers have been prepared following this procedure.60 Given the simplicity and ease of diacid isolation, this one-step method is the preferred choice for preparing a variety of diacids that will undergo melt condensation to yield PAE. This synthetic methodology was further improved by utilizing a one-pot method that eliminated solvent use and drastically decreased reaction time without impacting PAE properties.64 This implementation not only minimizes the use of hazardous components, but also improves the overall efficiency and yield of the total process, which enables the industrial level scale-up and low-cost manufacturing.

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

Comparison of three-step method versus optimized one step method to synthesize salicylic acid sebacic diacid

5.2. Dual Delivery and Synergism of Bioactives

The synergistic treatment approach has emerged as an effective and promising strategy for therapeutic applications, especially for cancer treatments. Combined therapy through simultaneous administration of two or more drugs (i.e., a drug and a genetic component), is found to have greater therapeutic efficacy compared to individual use of each drug.108 This enhanced therapeutic effectiveness is mainly due to the synergism amongst the drugs that suppress drug resistance (i.e., chemoresistance) following distinct biological mechanisms.109 As delivery of therapeutic agents without a nanocarrier system results in its rapid degradation in the bloodstream and low accumulation levels at the tumor site,110 a large number of biocompatible nanoscale delivery systems such as liposomes,111 micelles,112 nanoparticles113 have been developed. Prolonged circulation half-lives, improved accumulation, and limited collateral damage on healthy tissue make these nanovehicles more efficient and safer drug delivery systems. In recent years, a great effort has also been dedicated to develop single nanocarrier systems for the co-delivery of multiple types of therapeutic agents. Although, some of them exhibit sophisticated designs, several have unique features that enable a great level of control over the delivery properties.114

Biodegradable salicylate-based poly(anhydride-esters) have proven to be excellent delivery platforms for bioactives - ranging from small antimicrobial molecules to relatively complex therapeutic agents, examples of which were discussed in Section 4.3. To date, sustained and concurrent release of encapsulated bioactives as well as salicylic acid has been successfully demonstrated. Currently, we are striving to chemically incorporate specific targeting groups to the polymeric backbone together with the bioactive moieties. The encapsulation of complex and bulky biotherapeutic agents within this type of polymer matrix, would make it a highly efficient and elegant biodegradable delivery system. Moreover, controlled and sustained release of the actives as well as achieved synergism among them would make this type of delivery systems very promising for dual treatment approach.

In this review, current progress in polymeric bioactives developed by the Uhrich group are highlighted. Both pendant group and backbone attachment approaches prove to be rational strategies in the designing of bioactive-based polymeric systems. Examples of both type of systems illustrated in this review have successfully demonstrated the delivery of different classes of bioactives in a sustained manner. Moreover, reported dual-delivery systems to concurrently release multiple bioactives proved to be very promising in terms of certain applications Future works will include incorporating multifunctional bioactives and targeting moieties into PAEs while further exploring green chemistry synthetic methodologies. Research to develop more practical and efficient polymeric delivery systems is under progress in Uhrich group. With thousands of small molecule bioactives available, this approach can be applied to generate a plethora of new compounds.

Supplementary Material

Author biography - 1
Author biography - 2

Acknowledgments

Stephan Bien-Aime (Rutgers University, Chemistry) is thanked for his contribution. RG acknowledges the Fulbright Program for post-doctoral scholarship. All authors acknowledge grant funding from the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and various industrial collaborators.

Notes and references

  • 1.Rapoport N. Physical stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for anticancer drug delivery. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32(8–9):962–990. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li MH, Keller P. Stimuli-responsive polymer vesicles. Soft Matter. 2009;5(5):927–937. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Branco MC, Schneider JP. Self-assembling materials for therapeutic delivery. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(3):817–831. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kumari A, Yadav SK, Yadav SC. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf, B. 2010;75(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fredenberg S, Wahlgren M, Reslow M, Axelsson A. The mechanisms of drug release in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based drug delivery systems - a review. Int J Pharm. 2011;415(1–2):34–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tanner P, Baumann P, Enea R, Onaca O, Palivan C, Meier W. Polymeric vesicles: From drug carriers to nanoreactors and artificial organelles. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44(10):1039–1049. doi: 10.1021/ar200036k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (plga) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers (Basel, Switz) 2011;3(3):1377–1397. doi: 10.3390/polym3031377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chacko RT, Ventura J, Zhuang J, Thayumanavan S. Polymer nanogels: A versatile nanoscopic drug delivery platform. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2012;64(9):836–851. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dash TK, Konkimalla VB. Poly-∈-caprolactone based formulations for drug delivery and tissue engineering: A review. J Controlled Release. 2012;158(1):15–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Danhier F, Ansorena E, Silva JM, Coco R, Le Breton A, Preat V. Plga-based nanoparticles: An overview of biomedical applications. J Controlled Release. 2012;161(2):505–522. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang Q, Ko NR, Oh JK. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive degradable block copolymer micelles: Synthesis and controlled drug delivery applications. Chem Commun (Cambridge, U K) 2012;48(61):7542–7552. doi: 10.1039/c2cc32408c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krishnamurthy S, Vaiyapuri R, Zhang L, Chan JM. Lipid-coated polymeric nanoparticles for cancer drug delivery. Biomaterials Science. 2015 doi: 10.1039/c4bm00427b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu XS. Synthesis, characterization, biodegradation, and drug delivery application of biodegradable lactic/glycolic acid polymers: Part iii. Drug delivery application. Artif Cells, Blood Substitutes, Biotechnol. 2004;32(4):575–591. doi: 10.1081/bio-200039635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim SW, Shi YZ, Kim JY, Park KN, Cheng JX. Overcoming the barriers in micellar drug delivery: Loading efficiency, in vivo stability, and micelle-cell interaction. Expert Opin Drug Delivery. 2010;7(1):49–62. doi: 10.1517/17425240903380446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu S, Maheshwari R, Kiick KL. Polymer-based therapeutics. Macromolecules (Washington, DC, U S) 2009;42(1):3–13. doi: 10.1021/ma801782q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ulbrich K, Subr V. Structural and chemical aspects of hpma copolymers as drug carriers. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2010;62(2):150–166. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Larson N, Ghandehari H. Polymeric conjugates for drug delivery. Chem Mater. 2012;24(5):840–853. doi: 10.1021/cm2031569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.D'Souza AJM, Topp EM. Release from polymeric prodrugs: Linkages and their degradation. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(8):1962–1979. doi: 10.1002/jps.20096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hoste K, De Winne K, Schacht E. Polymeric prodrugs. Int J Pharm. 2004;277(1–2):119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khandare J, Minko T. Polymer-drug conjugates: Progress in polymeric prodrugs. Prog Polym Sci. 2006;31(4):359–397. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haag R, Kratz F. Polymer therapeutics: Concepts and applications. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45(8):1198–1215. doi: 10.1002/anie.200502113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pasut G, Veronese FM. Peg conjugates in clinical development or use as anticancer agents: An overview. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2009;61(13):1177–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kopecek J, Kopeckova P. Hpma copolymers: Origins, early developments, present, and future. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2010;62(2):122–149. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mahato R, Tai W, Cheng K. Prodrugs for improving tumor targetability and efficiency. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2011;63(8):659–670. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Obermeier B, Wurm F, Mangold C, Frey H. Multifunctional poly(ethylene glycol)s. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50(35):7988–7997. doi: 10.1002/anie.201100027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gopferich A, Tessmar J. Polyanhydride degradation and erosion. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2002;54(7):911–931. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00051-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goepferich A. Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion. Biomaterials. 1996;17(2):103–114. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85755-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Whitaker-Brothers K, Uhrich K. Investigation into the erosion mechanism of salicylate-based poly(anhydride-esters) J Biomed Mater Res, Part A. 2006;76A(3):470–479. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schmeltzer RC, Johnson M, Griffin J, Uhrich K. Comparison of salicylate-based poly(anhydride-esters) formed via melt-condensation versus solution polymerization. J Biomater Sci, Polym Ed. 2008;19(10):1295–1306. doi: 10.1163/156856208786052362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schmeltzer RCS, Uhrich KE. Synthesis and cytotoxicity of salicylate-based poly(anhydride esters) Biomacromolecules. 2005;6(1):359–367. doi: 10.1021/bm049544+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Anastasiou TJU, KE Aminosalicylate-based biodegradable polymers- syntheses and in vitro characterization of poly(anhydride-ester)s and poly(anhydride-amide)s. Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2003:413667–3679. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rosario-Melendez R, Yu W, Uhrich KE. Biodegradable polyesters containing ibuprofen and naproxen as pendant groups. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(10):3542–3548. doi: 10.1021/bm400889a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stebbins ND, Yu W, Uhrich KE. Enzymatic polymerization of an ibuprofen-containing monomer and subsequent drug release. Macromol Biosci. 2015 doi: 10.1002/mabi.201500030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature (London) 2000;408(6809):239–247. doi: 10.1038/35041687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tiwari BK, Valdramidis VP, O'Donnell CP, Muthukumarappan K, Bourke P, Cullen PJ. Application of natural antimicrobials for food preservation. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(14):5987–6000. doi: 10.1021/jf900668n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Simmons DL, Botting RM, Hla T. Cyclooxygenase isozymes: The biology of prostaglandin synthesis and inhibition. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56(3):387–437. doi: 10.1124/pr.56.3.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: Activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(1):147–179. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Collins JJ. How antibiotics kill bacteria: From targets to networks. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(6):423–435. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Przewlocki R, Przewlocka B. Opioids in chronic pain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;429(1–3):79–91. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01308-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Brooks PM, Day RO. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs-- differences and similarities. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(24):1716–1725. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106133242407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Anastas P, Eghbali N. Green chemistry: Principles and practice. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39(1):301–312. doi: 10.1039/b918763b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mahapatro A, Kumar A, Kalra B, Gross RA. Solvent-free adipic acid/1,8-octanediol condensation polymerizations catalyzed by candida antartica lipase b. Macromolecules. 2003;37(1):35–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sakakura A, Kawajiri K, Ohkubo T, Kosugi Y, Ishihara K. Widely useful dmap-catalyzed esterification under auxiliary base-free and solvent-free conditions. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(47):14775–14779. doi: 10.1021/ja075824w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Watanabe K, Yamagiwa N, Torisawa Y. Cyclopentyl methyl ether as a new and alternative process solvent. Organic Process Research & Development. 2007;11(2):251–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Thompson CJ, Hansford D, Munday DL, Higgins S, Rostron C, Hutcheon GA. Synthesis and evaluation of novel polyester-ibuprofen conjugates for modified drug release. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;34(8):877–884. doi: 10.1080/03639040801929075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang HY, Zhang WW, Wang N, Li C, Li K, Yu XQ. Biocatalytic synthesis and in vitro release of biodegradable linear polyesters with pendant ketoprofen. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11(12):3290–3293. doi: 10.1021/bm100712k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MTD, Mazur M, Telser J. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;39(1):44–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lin CW, Yu CW, Wu SC, Yih KH. Dpph free-radical scavenging activity, total phenolic contents and chemical composition analysis of forty-two kinds of essential oils. Yaowu Shipin Fenxi. 2009;17(5):386–395. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Burt S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods - a review. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;94(3):223–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lee SJ, Umano K, Shibamoto T, Lee KG. Identification of volatile components in basil (ocimum basilicum l.) and thyme leaves (thymus vulgaris l.) and their antioxidant properties. Food Chem. 2004;91(1):131–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chaieb K, Hajlaoui H, Zmantar T, Ben KNA, Rouabhia M, Mahdouani K, Bakhrouf A. The chemical composition and biological activity of clove essential oil, eugenia caryophyllata (syzigium aromaticum l. Myrtaceae): A short review. Phytother Res. 2007;21(6):501–506. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kumar N, Langer RS, Domb AJ. Polyanhydrides: An overview. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2002;54(7):889–910. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00050-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Prudencio A, Carbone AL, Griffin J, Uhrich KE. A novel approach for incorporation of mono-functional bioactive phenols into polyanhydrides. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2009;30(13):1101–1108. doi: 10.1002/marc.200900059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Carbone-Howell AL, Stebbins ND, Uhrich KE. Poly(anhydrideesters) comprised exclusively of naturally occurring antimicrobials and edta: Antioxidant and antibacterial activities. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(5):1889–1895. doi: 10.1021/bm500303a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jorgensen JHT, JD, Washington JA. Manual of clinical microbiology. ASM Press; Washington DC: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mahdi JGM, AJ, Mahdi AJ, Bowen ID. The historical analysis of aspirin discovery, its relation to the willow tree and antiproliferative and anticancer potential. Cell Proliferation. 2006:39147–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2006.00377.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Madan RK, Levitt J. A review of toxicity from topical salicylic acid preparations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mao P, Liu Z, Xie M, Jiang R, Liu W, Wang X, Meng S, She G. Naturally occurring methyl salicylate glycosides. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2014:1456–63. doi: 10.2174/1389557513666131211110004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rowland M, Riegelman S. Pharmacokinetics of acetylsalicylic acid after intravenous administration in man. J Pharm Sci. 1968;57(8):1313–1319. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Schmeltzer RCA, TJ, Uhrich KE. Optimized synthesis of salicylate-based poly(anhydride-esters) Polym Bull. 2003:49441–448. doi: 10.1007/s00289-003-0123-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kim Y, Uhrich KE. Synthesis and characterization of 5- aminosalicylic acid based poly(anhydride-esters) by solution polymerization. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2010;48(24):6003–6008. doi: 10.1002/pola.24381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Carbone ALSM, Uhrich KE. Iodinated salicylate-based poly(anhydride-esters) as radiopaque biomaterials. Biomacromolecules. 2008:91604–1612. doi: 10.1021/bm8000759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Prudencio AS, Uhrich RC, KE Effect of linker structure on salicylic acid-derived poly(anhydride-esters) Macromolecules. 2005;38(16):6895–6900. doi: 10.1021/ma048051u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Faig JJ, Smith K, Uhrich KE. Exploring green methods through a one-pot salicylic acid-based poly(anhydride-ester) synthesis. 248th ACS Meeting&Exposition; San Francisco, CA. 2014. p. POLY-489. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rogers MA, Yan YF, Ben-Elazar K, Lan Y, Faig J, Smith K, Uhrich KE. Salicylic acid (sa) bioaccessibility from sa-based poly(anhydrideester) Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(9):3406–3411. doi: 10.1021/bm500927r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bryers JD, Jarvis RA, Lebo J, Prudencio A, Kyriakides TR, Uhrich K. Biodegradation of poly(anhydride-esters) into non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and their effect on pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in vitro and on the foreign-body response in vivo. Biomaterials. 2006;27(29):5039–5048. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rosenberg LE, Carbone AL, Romling U, Uhrich KE, Chikindas ML. Salicylic acid-based poly(anhydride esters) for control of biofilm formation in salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008;46(5):593–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wada K, Yu W, Elazizi M, Barakat S, Ouimet MA, Rosario-Melendez R, Fiorellini JP, Graves DT, Uhrich KE. Locally delivered salicylic acid from a poly(anhydride-ester): Impact on diabetic bone regeneration. J Control Release. 2013;171(1):33–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.06.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chandorkar Y, Bhagat RK, Madras G, Basu B. Cross-linked, biodegradable, cytocompatible salicylic acid based polyesters for localized, sustained delivery of salicylic acid: An in vitro study. Biomacromolecules. 2014 doi: 10.1021/bm401715z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chandorkar Y, Bhaskar N, Madras G, Basu B. Long-term sustained release of salicylic acid from cross-linked biodegradable polyester induces a reduced foreign body response in mice. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16(2):636–649. doi: 10.1021/bm5017282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Prudencio A, Faig J, Sung M, Uhrich K. Phenolic acid-based poly(anhydride-esters) as antioxidant biomaterials. 2015 doi: 10.1002/mabi.201500244. in preparation. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ouimet MA, Griffin J, Carbone-Howell AL, Wu WH, Stebbins ND, Di R, Uhrich KE. Biodegradable ferulic acid-containing poly(anhydride-ester): Degradation products with controlled release and sustained antioxidant activity. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(3):854–861. doi: 10.1021/bm3018998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ouimet MA, Stebbins ND, Uhrich KE. Biodegradable coumaric acid-based poly(anhydride-ester) synthesis and subsequent controlled release. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2013;34(15):1231–1236. doi: 10.1002/marc.201300323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wang Q, Gao X, Gong H, Lin X, Saint-Leger D, Senee J. Chemical stability and degradation mechanisms of ferulic acid (f.A) within various cosmetic formulations. Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2011:62483–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wattamwar PP, Mo Y, Wan R, Palli R, Zhang Q, Dziubla TD. Antioxidant activity of degradable polymer poly(trolox ester) to suppress oxidative stress injury in the cells. Advanced Functional Materials. 2010;20(1):147–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wattamwar PP, Hardas SS, Butterfield DA, Anderson KW, Dziubla TD. Tuning of the pro-oxidant and antioxidant activity of trolox through the controlled release from biodegradable poly(trolox ester) polymers. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;99(2):184–191. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kim S, Park H, Song Y, Hong D, Kim O, Jo E, Khang G, Lee D. Reduction of oxidative stress by p-hydroxybenzyl alcohol-containing biodegradable polyoxalate nanoparticulate antioxidant. Biomaterials. 2011;32(11):3021–3029. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Park H, Kim S, Kim S, Song Y, Seung K, Hong D, Khang G, Lee D. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of hydroxybenzyl alcohol releasing biodegradable polyoxalate nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules. 2010:112103–2108. doi: 10.1021/bm100474w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kwon J, Kim J, Park S, Khang G, Kang PM, Lee D. Inflammation-responsive antioxidant nanoparticles based on a polymeric prodrug of vanillin. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14(5):1618–1626. doi: 10.1021/bm400256h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Schmeltzer RC, Uhrich KE. Synthesis and characterization of antiseptic-based poly(anhydride-esters) Polym Bull (Heidelberg, Ger) 2006;57(3):281–291. doi: 10.1007/s00289-006-0561-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Livermore D. Can better prescribing turn the tide of resistance? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(1):73–78. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wright GD. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: Enzymatic degradation and modification. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2005;57(10):1451–1470. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2005.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wu P, Grainger DW. Drug/device combinations for local drug therapies and infection prophylaxis. Biomaterials. 2006;27(11):2450–2467. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kost J, Langer R. Responsive polymeric delivery systems. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2012;64(Supplement 0):327–341. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00136-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Prudencio A, Stebbins ND, Johnson M, Song M, Langowski BA, Uhrich KE. Polymeric prodrugs of ampicillin as antibacterial coatings. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2014;29(3):208–220. 213. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hanks GW, de Conno F, Cherny N, Hanna M, Kalso E, McQuay HJ, Mercadante S, Meynadier J, Poulain P, Ripamonti C, Radbruch L, RiCasas J, Sawe J, Twycross RG, Ventafridda V, De Conno F, Caraceni A, Chemy N, Goncalves JF, Furst CJ, Hanks GW, Kaasa S, Mercadante S, Olarte JMN, Poulain P, Radbruch L, Ripamonti C, Stiefel F. Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: The eapc recommendations. Br J Cancer. 2001;84(5):587–593. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Upton RN, Semple TJ, Macintyre PE. Pharmacokinetic optimization of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;33(3):225–244. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733030-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Mao J, Price DD, Mayer DJ. Mechanisms of hyperalgesia and morphine tolerance: A current view of their possible interactions. Pain. 1995;62(3):259–274. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00073-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Joranson DE, Ryan KM, Gilson AM, Dahl JL. Trends in medical use and abuse of opioid analgesics. JAMA. 2000;283(13):1710–1714. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.13.1710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bailey CP, Connor M. Opioids: Cellular mechanisms of tolerance and physical dependence. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2005;5(1):60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2004.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Rosario-Melendez R, Harris CL, Delgado-Rivera R, Yu L, Uhrich KE. Polymorphine: An innovative biodegradable polymer drug for extended pain relief. J Controlled Release. 2012;162(3):538–544. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.07.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Whitaker-Brothers K, Uhrich K. Poly(anhydride-ester) fibers: Role of copolymer composition on hydrolytic degradation and mechanical properties. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;70(2):309–318. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Griffin J, Delgado-Rivera R, Meiners S, Uhrich KE. Salicylic acid-derived poly(anhydride-ester) electrospun fibers designed for regenerating the peripheral nervous system. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2011;97A(3):230–242. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ouimet MA, Fogaca R, Snyder SS, Sathaye S, Catalani LH, Pochan DJ, Uhrich KE. Poly (anhydride - ester) and poly (n - vinyl - 2 - pyrrolidone) blends: Salicylic acid - releasing blends with hydrogel - like properties that reduce inflammation. Macromolecular bioscience. 2014 doi: 10.1002/mabi.201400238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Johnson ML, Uhrich KE. Concurrent release of admixed antimicrobials and salicylic acid from salicylate-based poly(anhydrideesters) Journal of biomedical materials research Part A. 2009;91(3):671–678. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Delgado-Rivera RL, Rosario-Melendez R, Uhrich KE. Salicylate-based poly (anhydrideesters): A dual system delivery of fibroblast growth factor-2 and the suppression of inflammation. Polymer Prepr (Am Chem Soc, Div Polym Chem) 2010:51598–599. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ouimet MA, Snyder SS, Uhrich KE. Tunable drug release profiles from salicylate-based poly (anhydride-ester) matrices using small molecule admixtures. Journal of bioactive and compatible polymers. 2012;27(6):540–549. doi: 10.1177/0883911512464605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Delgado-Rivera R, Rosario-Melendez R, Yu W, Uhrich KE. Biodegradable salicylate-based poly(anhydride-ester) microspheres for controlled insulin delivery. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(8):2736–2742. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.EW Zur therapie des diabetes mellitus, insbesondere über die anwendung des salicylsauren natron bei demselben. Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift. 1876;13:337–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zegers de Beyl D, Naeije R, de Troyer A. Demeclocycline treatment of water retention in congestive heart failure. Br Med J. 1978;1(6115):760. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6115.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yan F, Polk DB. Aminosalicylic acid inhibits ikappab kinase alpha phosphorylation of ikappabalpha in mouse intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(51):36631–36636. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hundal RS, Petersen KF, Mayerson AB, Randhawa PS, Inzucchi S, Shoelson SE, Shulman GI. Mechanism by which high-dose aspirin improves glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2002;109(10):1321–1326. doi: 10.1172/JCI14955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Ebstein W. Invited comment on w. Ebstein: On the therapy of diabetes mellitus, in particular on the application of sodium salicylate. J Mol Med (Berl) 2002;80(10):618. discussion 619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Shoelson SE, Lee J, Yuan M. Inflammation and the ikk beta/i kappa b/nf-kappa b axis in obesity- and diet-induced insulin resistance. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(Suppl):3S49–52. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Jiang G, Dallas-Yang Q, Liu F, Moller DE, Zhang BB. Salicylic acid reverses phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (pma)- and tumor necrosis factor alpha (tnfalpha)-induced insulin receptor substrate 1 (irs1) serine 307 phosphorylation and insulin resistance in human embryonic kidney 293 (hek293) cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(1):180–186. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205565200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Arkan MC, Hevener AL, Greten FR, Maeda S, Li ZW, Long JM, Wynshaw-Boris A, Poli G, Olefsky J, Karin M. Ikk-beta links inflammation to obesity-induced insulin resistance. Nat Med. 2005;11(2):191–198. doi: 10.1038/nm1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lee YS. In vivo evaluation of nerve guidance conduits comprised of a salicylic acid-based poly(anhydride-ester) blend. 2012 Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3ZP44WH.
  • 108.Keith CT, Borisy AA, Stockwell BR. Multicomponent therapeutics for networked systems. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2005;4(1):71–U10. doi: 10.1038/nrd1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Harries M, Ellis P, Harper P. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23(31):7768–7771. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Smith MH, Lyon LA. Multifunctional nanogels for sirna delivery. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2012;45(7):985–993. doi: 10.1021/ar200216f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Shim G, Han SE, Yu YH, Lee S, Lee HY, Kim K, Kwon IC, Park TG, Kim YB, Choi YS, Kim CW, Oh YK. Trilysinoyl oleylamide-based cationic liposomes for systemic co-delivery of sirna and an anticancer drug. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011;155(1):60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Sutton D, Nasongkla N, Blanco E, Gao JM. Functionalized micellar systems for cancer targeted drug delivery. Pharmaceutical Research. 2007;24(6):1029–1046. doi: 10.1007/s11095-006-9223-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Greco F, Vicent MJ. Combination therapy: Opportunities and challenges for polymer-drug conjugates as anticancer nanomedicines. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2009;61(13):1203–1213. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hu CMJ, Aryal S, Zhang L. Nanoparticle-assisted combination therapies for effective cancer treatment. Therapeutic delivery. 2010;1(2):323–334. doi: 10.4155/tde.10.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Author biography - 1
Author biography - 2

RESOURCES