Abstract
To study the role of WNT/β-catenin signaling in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, human BxPC-3 cell lines deficient of the central canonical WNT signaling protein β-catenin were established by using zinc-finger nuclease mediated targeted genomic disruption of the β-catenin gene (CTNNB1). Comparison of the global transcription levels in wild type cells with two β-catenin gene disrupted clones identified 85 transcripts that were the most differentially regulated. Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis of these transcripts identified “cell adhesion” as the most significantly enriched GO term. Here we describe the data from the transcription profiling analysis published in the article “Implications of Targeted Genomic Disruption of β-Catenin in BxPC-3 Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cells” [1]. Data have been deposited to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database repository with the dataset identifier GSE63072.
Keywords: WNT, Beta-catenin, Pancreatic cancer
| Specifications | |
|---|---|
| Organism/cell line/tissue | Human BxPC-3 pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line |
| Sex | Female |
| Sequencer or array type | Illumina HumanHT-12 V4.0 expression beadchip |
| Data format | Raw and processed |
| Experimental factors | Wild type versus β-catenin deficient BxPC-3 cells |
| Experimental features | BxPC-3 cells deficient of β-catenin was generated by zinc-finger nuclease mediated targeted gene disruption. |
| Consent | N/A |
| Sample source location | BxPC-3 wild type cell line was obtained from ATCC (CRL-1687) |
Direct link to deposited data
Experimental design, materials and methods
Cell culture
The human pancreatic adenocarcinoma BxPC-3 (ATCC CRL-1687) epithelial cell line was grown in RPMI-1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 0.002 × insulin–transferrin–selenium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) cells were propagated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
Generation of β-catenin deficient cells
BxPC-3 cells with targeted disruption of the β-catenin gene (CTNNB1) were established using CompoZr custom Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs) (Sigma-Aldrich). Briefly, following transfection of the cells with ZFN mRNA targeting exon 3 of the CTNNB1 gene, monoclonal cell populations were obtained by limiting dilution cloning and analyzed for β-catenin expression. From 150 initial clones five β-catenin gene disrupted clones negative for β-catenin expression were identified and selected for further analysis (clone #4, #31, #79, #93 and #111).
RNA isolation microarray analysis
Total RNA from exponentially growing wild type BxPC-3 cells and β-catenin gene disrupted clones #4 and #111 was isolated using the GenElute Mammalian Total RNA Purification Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). The RNA was subjected to microarray analysis using Illumina HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChips (Illumina, CA, USA) at the Norwegian Genomics Consortium core facility (Oslo University Hospital, Norway). For each sample 6 biological replicates were analyzed. Data extraction and quality control was performed in GenomeStudio (Illumina) and the data analysis was performed using J-Express [2].
Differential expression quantification and classification
To identify the most differentially expressed genes between wild type BxPC-3 cells and the β-catenin gene disrupted clones #4 and #111 (average) Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) analysis was carried out [3]. From the SAM analysis a threshold of fold change > 2 and q-value = 0 was selected to identify the most regulated probes. In Table 1 the resulting list of the 85 most differentially regulated probes is shown. To identify relevant shared biological functions associated with the identified 85 most differentially regulated transcripts, Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis was done using DAVID [4] with the GOTERM_BP_2 annotation (Table 2).
Table 1.
List of the most differentially regulated probes from significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) comparing wild type BxPC3 cells and the gene disrupted clones #4 and #111 (average).
The list was generated by selecting the probes that displayed a fold change > 2 and q-value = 0 in the SAM analysis of all probes. The list is sorted by the d-score and genes up- and down-regulated in the gene disrupted clones have a positive and a negative fold change value, respectively.
| Probe_Id | Symbol | ILMN_GENE | d-Score | Fold change | q-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILMN_1686664 | MT2A | MT2A | 22.155 | 2.45 | 0 |
| ILMN_1659688 | LGALS3BP | LGALS3BP | 15.656 | 2.358 | 0 |
| ILMN_2042771 | PTTG1 | PTTG1 | 14.42 | 2.109 | 0 |
| ILMN_1672503 | DPYSL2 | DPYSL2 | 12.37 | 2.368 | 0 |
| ILMN_2183409 | SCARB1 | SCARB1 | − 12.283 | − 2.43 | 0 |
| ILMN_1673356 | FAM83C | FAM83C | − 11.125 | − 2.327 | 0 |
| ILMN_3247895 | LOC728188 | LOC728188 | 10.777 | 2.446 | 0 |
| ILMN_1713147 | MCRS1 | MCRS1 | 10.703 | 2.178 | 0 |
| ILMN_1655347 | SCGB1A1 | SCGB1A1 | − 10.414 | − 2.055 | 0 |
| ILMN_2320250 | NOL6 | NOL6 | − 10.404 | − 2.087 | 0 |
| ILMN_1799098 | LOC652846 | LOC652846 | 10.398 | 2.289 | 0 |
| ILMN_1750324 | IGFBP5 | IGFBP5 | − 9.748 | − 6.458 | 0 |
| ILMN_1733756 | COL12A1 | COL12A1 | − 9.342 | − 2.076 | 0 |
| ILMN_2145116 | TMEM173 | TMEM173 | 9.246 | 2.264 | 0 |
| ILMN_1811972 | MYCBP2 | MYCBP2 | − 9.226 | − 2.024 | 0 |
| ILMN_1678707 | TAF15 | TAF15 | − 9.141 | − 2.081 | 0 |
| ILMN_1765641 | SEMA3A | SEMA3A | − 9.018 | − 2.024 | 0 |
| ILMN_1753196 | PTTG1 | PTTG1 | 8.995 | 2.523 | 0 |
| ILMN_1673023 | EP400 | EP400 | − 8.897 | − 2.068 | 0 |
| ILMN_1765701 | LOC399942 | LOC399942 | 8.74 | 2.077 | 0 |
| ILMN_2400759 | CPVL | CPVL | 8.644 | 2.023 | 0 |
| ILMN_1661366 | PGAM1 | PGAM1 | 8.606 | 2.736 | 0 |
| ILMN_1740233 | UGT1A10 | UGT1A10 | 8.476 | 2.096 | 0 |
| ILMN_1676358 | RALB | RALB | 8.265 | 2.493 | 0 |
| ILMN_2321153 | MUC4 | MUC4 | − 8.15 | − 2.477 | 0 |
| ILMN_3247578 | FAT1 | FAT1 | − 8.034 | − 2.08 | 0 |
| ILMN_2411915 | ATG4B | ATG4B | 7.981 | 2.191 | 0 |
| ILMN_1754795 | FAT1 | FAT1 | − 7.879 | − 3.211 | 0 |
| ILMN_1678757 | BCYRN1 | BCYRN1 | − 7.775 | − 3.991 | 0 |
| ILMN_1695917 | C5orf15 | C5ORF15 | 7.679 | 2.148 | 0 |
| ILMN_2395389 | PSMC4 | PSMC4 | 7.197 | 2.627 | 0 |
| ILMN_2132982 | IGFBP5 | IGFBP5 | − 7.174 | − 4.242 | 0 |
| ILMN_1676763 | PIPSL | PIPSL | 7.021 | 2.131 | 0 |
| ILMN_2109708 | ECGF1 | ECGF1 | 6.793 | 2.086 | 0 |
| ILMN_1795778 | P4HA2 | P4HA2 | 6.646 | 2.211 | 0 |
| ILMN_2095610 | ANXA8 | ANXA8 | 6.489 | 2.124 | 0 |
| ILMN_1691563 | GAGE12I | GAGE12I | − 6.241 | − 2.119 | 0 |
| ILMN_1704342 | UBE3C | UBE3C | − 6.183 | − 2.136 | 0 |
| ILMN_1779353 | PUS7 | PUS7 | − 6.17 | − 2.483 | 0 |
| ILMN_2326737 | PPIE | PPIE | 6.061 | 2.363 | 0 |
| ILMN_1800131 | LOC652826 | LOC652826 | 6.011 | 2.061 | 0 |
| ILMN_1788108 | TXNDC5 | TXNDC5 | − 5.947 | − 2 | 0 |
| ILMN_2332105 | WRNIP1 | WRNIP1 | − 5.922 | − 2.222 | 0 |
| ILMN_1687887 | PSMC4 | PSMC4 | 5.851 | 2.251 | 0 |
| ILMN_1685798 | MAGEA6 | MAGEA6 | 5.832 | 2.07 | 0 |
| ILMN_1744765 | KRT4 | KRT4 | − 5.788 | − 3.158 | 0 |
| ILMN_3308295 | MIR205 | MIR205 | 5.548 | 2.083 | 0 |
| ILMN_3204734 | LOC100134648 | LOC100134648 | 5.337 | 2.551 | 0 |
| ILMN_1766762 | DYNLRB1 | DYNLRB1 | 5.207 | 2.955 | 0 |
| ILMN_1732074 | LOC648210 | LOC648210 | 5.099 | 2.925 | 0 |
| ILMN_2261076 | NEDD9 | NEDD9 | − 5.097 | − 2.074 | 0 |
| ILMN_1681301 | AIM2 | AIM2 | 5.083 | 2.042 | 0 |
| ILMN_2371169 | ZYX | ZYX | − 5.063 | − 2.451 | 0 |
| ILMN_2174127 | DCBLD2 | DCBLD2 | − 5.038 | − 2.605 | 0 |
| ILMN_1696187 | PYGL | PYGL | − 5.02 | − 2.216 | 0 |
| ILMN_1690259 | RAE1 | RAE1 | 4.98 | 2.121 | 0 |
| ILMN_1680246 | MAT2B | MAT2B | 4.961 | 3.137 | 0 |
| ILMN_1798454 | MAD2L1BP | MAD2L1BP | 4.925 | 2.136 | 0 |
| ILMN_1711702 | CLEC2D | CLEC2D | 4.921 | 2.116 | 0 |
| ILMN_1753449 | CST1 | CST1 | 4.802 | 2.783 | 0 |
| ILMN_1746465 | FJX1 | FJX1 | − 4.758 | − 2.225 | 0 |
| ILMN_1715175 | MET | MET | − 4.688 | − 2.751 | 0 |
| ILMN_1795342 | MLPH | MLPH | 4.626 | 2.108 | 0 |
| ILMN_1703108 | UBE2L6 | UBE2L6 | 4.599 | 2.721 | 0 |
| ILMN_2129572 | F3 | F3 | − 4.593 | − 2.65 | 0 |
| ILMN_1660345 | NGRN | NGRN | 4.578 | 2.387 | 0 |
| ILMN_1658053 | DYNLRB1 | DYNLRB1 | 4.504 | 3.005 | 0 |
| ILMN_2150856 | SERPINB2 | SERPINB2 | − 4.471 | − 2.41 | 0 |
| ILMN_1664543 | IFIT3 | IFIT3 | 4.47 | 2.218 | 0 |
| ILMN_1766650 | FOXA1 | FOXA1 | − 4.469 | − 2.072 | 0 |
| ILMN_1829845 | HS.553301 | HS.553301 | 4.408 | 3.363 | 0 |
| ILMN_3231944 | LOC100130516 | LOC100130516 | − 4.399 | − 6.137 | 0 |
| ILMN_1784602 | CDKN1A | CDKN1A | 4.381 | 2.092 | 0 |
| ILMN_1768470 | EIF4G1 | EIF4G1 | − 4.297 | − 2.061 | 0 |
| ILMN_2405233 | FAM133B | FAM133B | − 4.278 | − 2.054 | 0 |
| ILMN_2148527 | H19 | H19 | − 4.25 | − 7.3 | 0 |
| ILMN_1756071 | MFGE8 | MFGE8 | 4.125 | 3.204 | 0 |
| ILMN_1739645 | ANLN | ANLN | − 4.096 | -2.037 | 0 |
| ILMN_3215206 | LOC100133836 | LOC100133836 | 4.001 | 2.078 | 0 |
| ILMN_1673880 | EFEMP1 | EFEMP1 | 3.963 | 2.289 | 0 |
| ILMN_2073604 | EBP | EBP | 3.916 | 2.207 | 0 |
| ILMN_1777765 | C12orf10 | C12ORF10 | 3.909 | 2.098 | 0 |
| ILMN_2239754 | IFIT3 | IFIT3 | 3.879 | 4.952 | 0 |
| ILMN_1774077 | GBP2 | GBP2 | 3.856 | 3.317 | 0 |
| ILMN_2279635 | EIF4G2 | EIF4G2 | 3.832 | 2.469 | 0 |
Table 2.
Gene ontology enrichment analysis of the most differentially regulated transcripts between the wild type BxPC3 cells and the β-catenin deficient clones #4 and #111 (average).
The GO analysis was performed using the top 85 most regulated transcripts from Table 1.
| Category | Term | Count | % | Genes/transcripts | Fold enrichment | Bonferroni |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0007155 ~ cell adhesion | 9 | 1.4 | DCBLD2, LGALS3BP, FAT1, NEDD9, COL12A1, SCARB1, MFGE8, ZYX, MUC4 | 3.26 | 0.46 |
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0008037 ~ cell recognition | 3 | 0.5 | SCARB1, MFGE8, SEMA3A | 13.83 | 0.90 |
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0040008 ~ regulation of growth | 5 | 0.8 | DCBLD2, CDKN1A, NEDD9, SEMA3A, IGFBP5 | 3.72 | 0.99 |
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0065008 ~ regulation of biological quality | 11 | 1.8 | DCBLD2, UGT1A10, CDKN1A, ANXA8, PYGL, TXNDC5, F3, FOXA1, MT2A, SCARB1, SEMA3A | 1.90 | 1.00 |
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0006950 ~ response to stress | 12 | 1.9 | DCBLD2, UGT1A10, CDKN1A, TMEM173, LGALS3BP, ANXA8, F3, WRNIP1, GAGE12I, SERPINB2, SCARB1, PTTG1 | 1.81 | 1.00 |
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0009605 ~ response to external stimulus | 8 | 1.3 | DCBLD2, UGT1A10, CDKN1A, ANXA8, F3, SERPINB2, SCARB1, SEMA3A | 2.22 | 1.00 |
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0042445 ~ hormone metabolic process | 3 | 0.5 | UGT1A10, FOXA1, SCARB1 | 7.18 | 1.00 |
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0022402 ~ cell cycle process | 6 | 1.0 | EIF4G2, CDKN1A, PSMC4, NEDD9, ANLN, PTTG1, LOC652826 | 2.69 | 1.00 |
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0045926 ~ negative regulation of growth | 3 | 0.5 | DCBLD2, CDKN1A, SEMA3A | 6.91 | 1.00 |
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0032879 ~ regulation of localization | 6 | 1.0 | F3, SCARB1, MFGE8, SEMA3A, IGFBP5, MYCBP2 | 2.49 | 1.00 |
| GOTERM_BP_2 | GO:0044419 ~ interspecies interaction between organisms | 4 | 0.6 | EIF4G1, SCARB1, MFGE8, ZYX | 3.58 | 1.00 |
Discussion
We describe the dataset from the transcriptome analysis comparing wild type and β-catenin deficient BxPC-3 cells. In this analysis 85 transcripts were identified to be the most differentially regulated between the two groups. GO term enrichment analysis of the transcripts identified “cell adhesion” as the GO term that was most significantly enriched for. These results together with the rest the data from the previous published article [1] points towards a central role of β-catenin in enabling cell-cell contacts in BxPC3 cells.
References
- 1.Olsen P.A., Solberg N.T., Lund K., Vehus T., Gelazauskaite M., Wilson S.R., Krauss S. Implications of targeted genomic disruption of beta-catenin in BxPC-3 pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dysvik B., Jonassen I. J-Express: exploring gene expression data using Java. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:369–370. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.4.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tusher V.G., Tibshirani R., Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001;98:5116–5121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091062498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huang D.W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
