Abstract
Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) affects infant and young children. A viral metagenomic approach was used to identify the eukaryotic viruses in fecal samples from 29 Thai children with clinical diagnosis of HFMD collected during the 2012 outbreak. These children had previously tested negative by PCR for enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 and A6. Deep sequencing revealed nine virus families: Picornaviridae, Astroviridae, Parvoviridae, Caliciviridae, Paramyxoviridae, Adenoviridae, Reoviridae, Picobirnaviridae, and Polyomaviridae. The highest number of viral sequences belonged to human rhinovirus C, astrovirus-MLB2, and coxsackievirus A21. Our study provides an overview of virus community and highlights a broad diversity of viruses found in feces from children with HFMD.
Introduction
Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is an infectious disease that usually affects infants and young children under 5 years of age worldwide. HFMD typically causes self-limiting illness, but development of severe cardiopulmonary and neurologic complications have also been reported [1, 2]. The clinical manifestations are typically ulcerations in the oral cavity, buccal mucosa (enanthema) and tongue with peripherally distributed cutaneous lesions and vesicular rash (exanthema) on the palms of hands and soles of feet. Other parts of the limbs including knees, elbows and buttocks may also be affected. Transmission occurs via person-to-person through direct contact with respiratory secretion, saliva, fluid from blisters, and feces from infected individuals. A number of enteroviruses belonging to the family Picornaviridae cause HFMD, although human enterovirus 71 (EV71) and coxsackievirus (CV) type A16 are two of the most important enteroviruses implicated in many large-scale outbreaks in Asian-Pacific countries including Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore, and China [2–4]. Additional enterovirus species including CV-A6, CV-A10 and CV-A4 also cause HFMD [5–9]. Clinical symptoms resulting from CV-A16 as well as other enteroviruses are usually relatively mild and indistinguishable with low incidence of severe complications. In contrast, serious complications such as encephalitis, myocarditis, and poliomyelitis-like illness were observed when EV71 were reported as the causative pathogen [10–12].
HFMD has been continuously present and remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality of young children particularly in Asia. Typically, HFMD exhibits cyclical pattern of outbreaks every two to three years. Factors underlying the prevalence of HFMD remain controversial. Data from countries with long history of HFMD outbreaks suggest that dissemination is associated with socio-economic status, population ethnicity [13], regional climate [14–16], and attendance in school or care centers of school-age children [17]. The magnitude of HFMD outbreaks appears to fluctuate [3, 18, 19]. HFMD in tropical climate countries, such as Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, typically showed years-round activity with no discrete epidemic periods although peaks during the rainy and winter seasons were also detected depending on season, year, and geographic regions [20, 21]. At present, no specific treatment for HFMD exists. Vaccines or antiviral drug against EV71 are currently being developed in Taiwan, China and Singapore but are not yet commercially available [22–24]. Prompted by geographically widespread outbreaks, careful monitoring of the spatial and temporal epidemiology is considered to be of great importance to control the spread of HFMD according to the different regional characteristics. As reported by the Bureau of Epidemiology, Ministry of Public Health of Thailand, HFMD has shown an upward trend in the last five to six years. In June 2012, the largest recorded outbreak of HFMD occurred throughout the country. This outbreak affected more than 39,000 individuals, including three deaths, over a period of four to five months with hot spots in Chiang Rai and Mae Hong Son provinces [25]. In our previous study, we monitored HFMD activity in Thailand between 2008 and 2012. Our results revealed that the HFMD epidemic in 2012 was significantly different from previous ones in Thailand including the size of the epidemic and the viruses detected [26, 27]. During the 2012 epidemic, beside a high prevalence of EV71 and CV-A16, multiple EV types such as CV-A6 were also detected. Even though the standardized 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) pan-enterovirus PCR and viral capsid protein 1 (VP1) gene typing PCR assays were used [27], approximately one third of the suspected cases, mostly young children, were negative for enterovirus by these assays. These findings raised questions regarding the sensitivity of the current assay in identifying causative viruses other than EV71 and CV-A16 that may be present below the limit of detection by conventional PCR. In recent years, metagenomic has become an important strategy for virus discovery in human and animal diseases [28–30]. This technique, based on recognition of sequence similarities following non-specific nucleic acid amplification, circumvents some of the limitations of virus isolation, serology, and the amplification of only known conserved genomic regions [31]. To evaluate circulating enterovirus and previously uncharacterized viruses associated with HFMD, we describe here the virus community (virome) in fecal samples negative by RT-PCR for EV71 and CV-A16/A6 obtained from 29 pediatric patients with HFMD during the outbreak in Thailand in 2012.
Materials and Methods
Sample preparation for metagenomic analysis
The research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University. Since the samples were anonymized and could not be traced back to individual patients, the ethical board determined that the need for informed consent was waived. All clinical investigation was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
A total of 29 fecal samples were selected from a collection of archived samples obtained from children with HFMD who were admitted to medical centers and hospitals in Bangkok and Khon Kaen province during the nationwide outbreak in 2012. The inclusion criterion for patient enrollment has been described elsewhere [26, 32]. All samples were previously tested using a 5' UTR pan-enterovirus and EV71, CV-A16/A6 specific VP1 PCRs and found to be PCR negative for enteroviruses [27]. Demographic information of the patients for the 29 selected patients is summarized in Table 1. The HFMD patients were between 8 months and 5 years old (1 male: 1.4 female). Stool was suspended in 1x phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution and subjected to a vigorous vortex to yield fecal supernatants. Then 140 μl of fecal supernatant from each of 29 HFMD patient samples were mixed into three pools, designated as HFMD-lib01 (10 samples), HFMD-lib02 (10 samples), and HFMD-lib03 (9 samples). The sample pools were centrifuged at 12,000x g and the supernatants were adjusted to 2 ml final volume using PBS. The pooled supernatants were filtered through a 0.45-μm membrane (Millipore, MA, USA) to remove eukaryotic- and bacterial-cell-sized particle and to enrich for viral contents. The filtrates were concentrated using ultracentrifugation at 22,000 x g for 2 hours and the pellets were resuspended with 100 μl 1X PBS. To eliminate host genome and other non-viral nucleic acids, a mixture of DNases [Turbo DNase (Life Technologies, NY, USA) and Baseline-ZERO (Epicentre, WI, USA)] and RNase (Fermentas, Ontario, Canada) were added to 120 μl of the concentrated suspension to the final volume of 140 μl followed by enzymatic digestion at 37°C for 1.5 hours. Viral particle-protected nucleic acids were then extracted using the QIAamp viral RNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instruction. Total nucleic acids were eluted in 25μl RNase free water (Life Technologies, NY, USA).
Table 1. Summary of sequencing data of eukaryotic viruses and picornaviruses detected in HFMD pool samples.
| Eukaryotic viruses detected | Picornaviruses detected | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Library Sample | List of Virus | Read | List of Virus | Read |
| HFMD-lib01 | Picornaviruses | 1,244 | Saffold virus | 788 |
| Bocaparvovirus | 1,291 | Coxsackie virus A10 | 433 | |
| Astrovirus | 10 | Coxsackie virus A16 | 17 | |
| Calicivirus | 7 | Enterovirus 71 | 3 | |
| Adenovirus | 9 | Enterovirus 68 | 3 | |
| Reovirus | 30 | |||
| HFMD-lib02 | Picornaviruses | 1,784 | Rhinovirus C | 1,772 |
| Calicivirus | 11 | Coxsackie virus A8 | 6 | |
| Adenovirus | 3 | Saffold virus | 4 | |
| Coxsackie virus A21 | 2 | |||
| HFMD-lib03 | Picornaviruses | 1,678 | Coxsackie virus A21 | 1,334 |
| Astrovirus | 1,469 | Coxsackie virus B1 | 125 | |
| Calicivirus | 703 | Enterovirus B | 200 | |
| Paramyxovirus | 187 | Echovirus 3 | 17 | |
| Adenovirus | 21 | Enterovirus A | 2 | |
| Picobirnavirus | 29 | |||
| Polyomavirus | 6 | |||
Library construction for deep sequencing
DNA for sequencing were prepared by using a ScriptSeq RNA-Seq library preparation kit (Epicentre, WI, USA) according the manufacturer’s recommendation. Terminal-tagged oligomer were subsequently annealed at the 3′-end. The di-tagged single strand cDNAs were purified using 8x volume of Agencourt AMPure magnetic-bead (Beckmann Coulter, CA, USA) and used as starting templates for second-strand synthesis. The libraries were enriched by 15 cycles of PCR amplification. During the amplification, different tagged random primers containing short nucleotides signature at the 3′-end of the primers (barcodes) were used to assign sequences to the corresponding pool. Finally, amplified adaptor-tagged libraries were further cleaned up by using Agencourt AMPure magnetic bead purification followed by library quantification using KAPA library quantification kit (Kapa Biosystems, MA, USA). The purified products from the three pools were combined in equal concentrations and subjected to sequencing on the MiSeq Illumina platform (Illumina, CA, USA)
Data processing and analysis
Pair-end products of 250 bp in length were automatically binned into 3 groups according to their barcodes using in-house bioinformatics analysis pipeline [33]. The primers and low quality sequences were trimmed and the remaining sequences assembled into contigs using Sequencher program with the assembly criteria described previously [34]. The assembled contigs and singlet sequences longer than 100 bp were queried for sequence similarity using BLASTn, BLASTx and tBLASTx against non-redundant nucleotide and protein databases. Sequences were classified according to their closest BLAST match if they were found to have 80% sequence coverage with a stringent e-value ≤ 1E-5.
Recombination analysis
To determine whether the virus sequences identified in this study contained any potential recombinants, nucleotide sequences of viruses were retrieved from GenBank and ViPR databases (November, 2014). The sequences were aligned by using MAFF program (v7.0) to adjust for the correct open reading frame [35]. Prediction of recombination event was performed using Recombination Detection Program (RDP v4.36) with the parameter setting as previously described [36]. Potential recombination event was considered if the subsequent event from two or more analyses were found with statistically significant support (P-values < 1E-5). In addition, crossover site was consistently checked by performing similarity plot and boot-scanning analysis using SimPlot software.
Specific PCR for taxonomic species assignment of deep sequencing-derived contigs confirmation
To confirm the taxonomic species assigned to the contig sequences by deep sequencing, semi-nested PCR was done on the original fecal samples comprising the pools. Enteroviruses were detected using concensus-degenerate hybrid oligonucleotide primers specific towards the VP1 gene according to a previously described amplification protocol [27, 37]. The detection of rhinovirus was performed using the primer targeting 5′UTR through the VP2 gene as previous described [38].
Phylogenetic analysis
To evaluate the genetic relationship among the virus-related sequences within the same species and/or family, phylogenetic trees were constructed using the neighbor-joining method with maximum composite likelihood nucleotide substitution model and pairwise deletion for missing data implemented in MEGA program (v5.2.2). Branch support and nodal confidence were assessed by bootstrap resampling with 1,000 replicates and bootstrap value of 70% was used as the cut-off for cluster analysis. Percent nucleotide and amino acid sequence identities from pairwise comparison were calculated using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor (v7.0.9.0).
Results
Since the amplification of virus sequences was performed using pooled specimens, virus-related sequences identified in this study would be referred for virus population in the pools rather than per individual specimens. Contigs and reads related to viral origin were further sorted into families and species based on BLAST homologous classifications. The number of sequence reads was directly proportional to the relative abundance of DNA in the original samples, our study therefore compared the number of reads derived from the assembled contigs rather than the number of contigs alone. Virus enrichment followed by random nucleic acid amplification and MiSeq Illumina sequencing yielded 8,482 sequence contigs and singlets from HFMD patients that showed similarity to eukaryotic viruses, comprising 2,591 sequences from HFMD-lib01, 1,798 sequences from HFMD-lib02 and 4,093 sequences from HFMD-lib03. The sequences could be classified into nine viral families and twelve species including six families of RNA viruses: Picornaviridae, Astroviridae, Caliciviridae, Paramyxiviridae, Reoviridae, and Picobirnaviridae, and 3 families of DNA viruses: Parvoviridae, Adenoviridae, and Polyomaviridae. The proportions of the identified virus families in decreasing number of reads are summarized in Fig 1 and general information of the sample in the HFMD pool is shown in S1 Table.
Fig 1. The distribution of the different viral families found in the fecal samples of patients with HFMD.
The viral sequences identified from the pooled samples were grouped based on the closest homolog and arranged into families. The derived number of reads was noted in the parentheses.
Viral families found in HFMD
Family Picornaviridae
The family Picornaviridae consists of 29 ICTV-approved genera, many of which are implicated in a wide range of infectious diseases in human and animals. Picornaviruses are non-enveloped, icosahedral viruses with single-stranded RNA segments (ssRNA) of positive polarity that typically range in size from 7 to 9 kb. In the present study, picornaviruses constituted the majority of the virome sequences, accounting for 55.5% (4,706/8,482) of the HFMD eukaryotic viral sequences (Fig 1). Most picornavirus sequences in the HFMD pools were from the genus Enterovirus [83.2% (3,914/4,706)], including enterovirus and rhinovirus species. The remaining sequences were human saffold virus from the genus Cardiovirus [16.8% (792/4,706)].
Human Enterovirus
The genus Enterovirus currently consists of nine enterovirus species (designated species A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and J) and 3 rhinovirus species. Only enterovirus (EV) species A to D and rhinovirus are human viruses. EV infections primarily cause diseases in the alimentary and respiratory tract, sometimes with manifestation in the central nervous system, most frequently in infants and young children [39]. EV-like sequences could be characterized abundantly in the pooled clinical samples including sequences most closely related to EV species A, B and D (2,142 reads) and rhinovirus (1,772 reads) (Fig 2). Approximately 45.9% (1,797/3,914) of enterovirus sequences were similar to several types within EV species A including CV-A21 [74.3% (1,336/1,797)] (Fig 2). In general, CV-A21 infection is thought to cause mild illness and is not typically associated with HFMD. The CV-A21 sequences identified in this study shared 80%-97% nucleotide identity, depending on the genomic region, to previous strains in the GenBank database. Other EV species A related sequences included 24.1% CV-A10 (433), 0.9% CV- A16 (17), 0.3% CV-A8 (6), and 0.2% EV71 (3) (Table 1). Sequences homologous to EV species B constituted 16% (342) of enterovirus reads, including CV-B1 (125) and echovirus (Echo) type 3 (17). On the basis of sequence similarity, another 200 reads were classified as EV-B but were unassignable to a specific type. In addition to EV BLAST analysis results, three nucleotide sequences from the lib01 pool, which could be assembled into a 371 nt long contig (accession number KP242036), were assigned to EV species D type 68 VP1 gene. Phylogenetic analysis showed that EV68-lib01clustered with the previous reported strain identified from many countries worldwide with more than 92% nucleotide identity (Fig 3).
Fig 2. An overview of the picornaviruses found in the HFMD samples.
The numbers of reads when the nucleotide sequence alignment showed e-value ≤ 1E-5 were indicated.
Fig 3. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees of the virus strains identified from the HFMD pools and their relationship to other related viruses.
They include nearly complete genome sequence of (a) human rhinovirus strain “HRV-lib02” (6,892 nucleotides) and (b) human bocavirus strain “HBoV-lib01” (5,126 nucleotides), (c) partial capsid VP1 sequence of human enterovirus serotype 68 strain “EV68-lib01” (371 nucleotides) and (d) partial serene protease encoding sequence of human astrovirus strain “HAstV-lib03” (2,305 nucleotides). Sequences reported in this study were marked with black circles. Scale bar indicated the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.
Human Rhinovirus
Human rhinovirus (HRV) has a high level of genetic diversity as exemplified by the 80 types for HRV-A, 32 types for HRV-B, and at least 54 phylogenetically distinct lineages of HRV-C [40]. Infections by HRV are most often associated with respiratory tract infection from self-limiting to life-threatening illnesses [35, 41]. Furthermore, a number of recent studies demonstrated an association between HRV infections and gastroenteritis [42, 43]. In the present study, a total of 1,772 HRV-like sequences was recovered from HFMD-lib02 (HRV-lib02), accounting for 45.2% of the enterovirus reads. These sequences could be assembled into one long contig spanning 6,892 nucleotides (nt) representing 96% of the HRV genome (KP242035) spanning from a partial 5′UTR (581 nt) through the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) encoding gene (Table 2). HRV-related sequences displayed at least 96% nucleotide identity to the respiratory tract-derived HRV isolate LZY101 from China (JF317017) and could be phylogenetically classified as HRV-C12.
Table 2. Description of assembly results of the sequences of human rhinovirus, saffold virus, bocavirus, and astrovirus.
| Sequence | Virus strain | Total Read | Genomic coverage | Coverage | Identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRV-lib02 | HRV-C12 | 1,772 | 5'UTR to RdRp | 96% | 96% |
| SAFV-lib01 | SAFV3 | 792 | L protein, VP2 to 3C, 3C to 3'UTR | 75% | 98.6% |
| HAstV-lib03 | MLB2 | 1,479 | Serine protease to RdRp, Capsid proteins | 93% | 99% |
| HBoV-lib01 | HBoV4 | 1,291 | 5′UTR to partial 3′UTR | 99% | 99% |
Virus type or strain was assigned based on the BLAST analysis; Identity was selected from the highest nucleotide similarity to reference sequences; nt, nucleotide; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase
Recombination is known to occur frequently among picornaviruses and is considered a major driving force of viral evolution and antigenic diversification [44]. Some HRV-C strains appear to originate from recombination between the ancestors of HRV-A and HRV-C in 5′UTR, resulting in the classification of two separate subspecies designated as HRV-Ca (sharing the 5′UTR with HRV-A) and HRV-Cc (possessing a unique 5′UTR) [45, 46]. Phylogenetic analyses of the viral capsid genes VP4/VP2 and VP1 and 5′UTR suggested that the HRV-related sequence strain from pooled HFMD clinical samples formed a unique branch with HRV-Cc subspecies. The recombination analysis of these HRV-related sequences showed no evidence of recombination. Characteristic features of HRV-C, including deletions in the BC and DE loops and nucleotide non-synonymous substitution in the immune-dominant VP1 gene that decreased viral susceptibility to the antiviral drug plecornaril (Y152 and T191 substitutions) [47, 48], were also identified in this strain.
Human Saffold Virus
Human saffold viruses (SAFV) are members of the genus Cardiovirus, family Picornaviridae. First identified in 2007 from a child with febrile illness, SAFV are found in the stool of children with nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis and healthy children in Pakistan [34]. However, pathogenicity and clinical relevance of SAFV infection remain to be fully elucidated. SAFV replicates efficiently in the alimentary tract and is transmitted through oral-fecal route, consistent with possible association with gastrointestinal tract illnesses and diarrhea [49]. Infections by SAFV might also contribute to more severe symptoms in children such as HFMD-associated encephalitis, acute flaccid paralysis, myocarditis, and aseptic meningitis [50–53]. In this study, SAFV-related sequences were found in two HFMD pools, contributing to the third most picornavirus sequence reads detected [16.8% (792/4,706)] after HRV-C and CV-A21. Amongst the SAFV-like sequences, two contigs (5,405 nt and 524 nt) and a singlet (176 nt) were recovered from a sample pool. Together, these sequences spanned approximately 75% of the entire genome and encompassed partial L protein encoding region (176 nt), VP2 through 3C (5,405 nt), and the 3′end of 3C through 3′UTR (524 nt) (Table 2). BLAST searches of full-length sequences and phylogenetic analysis of the individual regions suggest that these samples contained a genotype similar to the strain JPN404 from Japan (HQ902242). Sequences shared 87.1%-98.6% nucleotide identity with other SAFV3 cardioviruses. The overall nucleotide identity in the partial polyproteins 1 (P1) and P2 regions to other SAFV genotypes were 66.3%-68.9% and 72.2%-90.6%, respectively. Genome identity to SAFV3 were highest in VP2 (206 nt; 70%-99.5%)) and VP3 (696 nt; 71%-98%), and lowest with VP1 (813 nt; 62%-99.2%).
In order to investigate possible recombination event in the SAFV-like sequence identified from HFMD clinical sample pool, we performed a scan of the full reference set of completed and nearly completed genome sequences of eleven SAFV genotypes (41 sequences) and theilovirus-like members (13 sequences) using a suite of recombination detection program in RDP4. Results showed that the SAFV-like sequence appeared to result from intertypic recombination between SAFV2 (major parent: EU681176) and SAFV3 (minor parent: EU681178) (Fig 4, Table 3 and S2 Table). The SAFV-like sequence shared 93.8% nucleotide identity to SAFV3 in the P1 region (p < 0.05). These similarity patterns were also observed for the strain JPN404. Based on boot-scanning analysis, the presence of one putative recombination breakpoint was detected within the beginning of 2A gene (around nucleotide position 1,871 of the contig or position 3,936 of the strain JPN404). Our findings together with recent reports on SAFV genetic diversity [54, 55], suggest the important role of recombination in the emergence of SAFV genotypes and strains.
Fig 4. Potential intratypic recombination event in the nonstructural region of SAFV-like sequence.
The x-axis indicated the nucleotide position of the alignment, and the y-axis showed the percentage of bootstrap pseudo-replicates that supported grouping of the query sequences with other SAFV. The potential recombination breakpoint near nucleotide 3,936 was labeled with a solid black triangle.
Table 3. Recombination analysis of SAFV using sequences from the reference set and the pooled samples from HFMD patients based on P-value.
| Parental Strains | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major | Minor | Recombinant | Breaking point | RDP | BootScan | MaxChi | Chimera | Siscan | 3Seq |
| EU681176 | EU681178 | SAFV-lib01 | VP2, 2A | 2.12E-14 | 3.58E-45 | 5.89E-26 | 2.55E-24 | 5.54E-64 | 3.59E-24 |
P-value was calculated using Recombination Detection Program
Human Astrovirus
Human astrovirus (HAstV) is a small positive ssRNA virus which belonged to the Mamastrovirus genus, family Astroviridae. It is associated with gastroenteritis predominantly effecting young children [56]. We found astrovirus-related sequences in HFMD-lib01 and HFMD-lib03, constituting the second most abundant viral reads in the HFMD virome [17.4% (1,479/8,482)]. The relative ratio of HAstV-like sequences to the total number of virus reads was 35.9% in HFMD-lib03 (1,469/4,093) and 0.4% in HFMD-lib01 pool (10/2,591). HAstV-like sequence fragments identified from HFMD-lib01 pool covered approximately 18% of the genome. HAstV-lib03 (KP242038) provided nearly complete sequence spanning more than 93% of the genome including serine protease to RdRp (603 nt, 2,351 nt and 372 nt) and capsid protein encoding genes(2,493 nt) (Table 2). Phylogenetic analyses of the HAstV-like sequences demonstrated that the HAstV-lib01and HAstV-lib03 clustered within the new classified lineage of HAstV MLB1 and MLB2, respectively.
Human Bocavirus
Sequences relating to human bocavirus (HBoV) comprised the third most abundant viruses of the virome. HBoV belongs to the genus Bocavirus (subfamily Parvovirinae, family Parvoviridae) and can be classified into 4 genotypes designated as HBoV1 to HBoV4 by the structural VP1 sequence-based phylogenetic tree. HBoV plays a role in RTI and enteropathogenesis and may be associated with neurologic complications [57–59]. Currently, a new classification in the family Parvoviridae using phylogenetic relationship of the nonstructural gene DNA sequences has been proposed [60]. According to this proposed criteria, HBoV1 and HBoV3 have been re-categorized into the group of bocaparvovirus 1, while HBoV2 and HBoV4 are members of bocaparvovirus 2. HBoV-like sequences were found in the HFMD01 pool (HBoV-lib01), constituting 15.2% (1,291/8,482) of total virus reads in HFMD. The sequences could be assembled into single long contig covering 5′UTR to partial 3′UTR (5,271 nt) with 99% nucleotide sequence identity (KP242037) (Table 2). BLAST and phylogenetic analysis of the complete sequence length of HBoV-lib01 indicated that this virus was HBoV4 in bocaparvovirus 2 and shared more than 99% nucleotide identity to the previous reported strains.
Human Norovirus and Sapovirus
The Caliciviridae family of small, non-enveloped, positive ssRNA viruses now comprises five recognized genera: Norovirus, Sapovirus, Lagovirus, Vesivirus, and Nebovirus. Caliciviruses infect humans and animals of economic importance. Frequently, noroviruses (NoV) and sapoviruses (SaV) are responsible for outbreaks of nonbacterial gastroenteritis worldwide [61, 62]. Both NoV and SaV are each segregated into at least five genogroups (GI to GV) on the basis of sequence comparison of the RNA polymerase and capsid gene. The virome of the HFMD comprising viruses in the family Caliciviridae accounts for 8.5% (721/8,482) of the sequence reads consisting of 98.5% (710/721) and 1.5% (11/721) of SaV-related and NoV-related reads, respectively (Fig 1). Sequences relating to SaV were found in the pool HFMD-lib01 (7 reads) and HFMD-lib03 (703 reads). Nucleotide identity to the known strains of SaV varied between 94% to 99% for alignments covering between 114 nt to 1,032 nt. Despite the fewer number of sequence reads for NoV, the analysis of one contig (237 nt) and two singletons (129 nt and 165 nt) showed homology to NoV genogroup I. The NoV-like sequences shared at least 80% and 87% nucleotide identity to the known strains in ORF1 and ORF2, respectively.
Human Adenovirus
Human adenoviruses (HAdV), family Adenoviridae, are non-enveloped icosahedral viruses with a linear, double-stranded DNA genome. Infection by HAdV is associated with a wide spectrum of clinical diseases including RTI, gastroenteritis, and keratoconjunctivitis [63–65]. Seven HAdV species, designated A to G, are formally recognized. We found 0.4% (33/8,482) HAdV-related sequences in the HFMD sample pool. The amplified fragments were between 120 nt and 280 nt in length and covered several parts of the genome including the U exon, single-stranded DNA binding protein, DNA polymerase, E4 control protein, and E1B large T antigen encoding regions. All of the contigs and singleton reads were homologous to AdeV species C, which is commonly associated with RTI and gastroenteristis [66], sharing 100% amino acid identity for local alignments.
Human Rotavirus
Group A human rotaviruses (RVA) are contagious viruses responsible for acute gastroenteritis and severe watery diarrhea and found at high prevalence in infants, young children and immunocompromised individuals [67, 68]. Currently, RVA classification is based on phylogenetic relations of the outermost layer of the structural genes VP7 (G type) and VP4 (P type), referred to as G/P genotypes. Sequences similar to RVA were detected in the HFMD01 pool with a total number of 30 reads, assembling into 10 contigs (171 nt to 338 nt) and 2 singletons (172 nt and 178 nt). The fragments covered 4 of the structural genes including VP2, VP3, VP6, and VP7 and nonstructural genes NSP1 and NSP4. Phylogenetic analyses showed that the RVA-like strain were clustered within lineage 1 (G1-I1-C1-M1-A1-N1 genes constellations) with nucleotide sequence identity 98%-99% to the references in GenBank.
Human Picobirnavirus
Human picobirnavirus (HPBV) are non-enveloped, spherical viruses with two double-stranded RNA genomes. The virus has frequently been found in human feces as environmental contaminants as well as a pathogen in outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis and diarrhea [69]. However, clinical importance of the viruses remains unclear. The HFMD-lib03 pool contained 29 reads which could be assembled into 3 contigs (208 nt, 307 nt, and 531 nt) with 62%-77% amino acid identity to the RdRp gene of HPBV and the 2 singleton reads (121 nt and 163 nt) showed the best hit to the capsid protein genes of the different HPBV strains with 46%-67% amino acid identity. Study of enteric virus infections in infants showed that HPBV was one of the most common viruses frequently detected over a period of time [70]. In this study, the sequence we recovered was relatively distant from previously reported HPBV sequences, and its classification was unclear.
Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) belongs to the genus Pneumovirus, family Paramyxoviridae. RSV is one of the leading causes of lower RTI in infants and hospitalized children [41, 71] and associated with the subsequent development of childhood asthma [72]. Although there is no evidence indicating that RSV is an enteric pathogen, the HFMD-lib03 pool in this study contained sequences similar to RSV, which constituted 2.2% (187/8,482) of the virome. Compared to their closest database match, all of the sequences aligned with RSV species A and showed nucleotide sequence identity between 84% and 100%, while the amino acid sequence identities varied between 78% and 100% to other RSV type A
Human Polyomavirus
In HFMD virome, 2 contigs of 5 reads (195 nt and 257 nt) and 1 singlet (158 nt) were identified as BK polyomavirus (BKV) with approximately 99% nucleotide similarity to the previous sequences. BKV is a non-enveloped virus with a circle dsDNA genome that belongs to the Papovaviridae family. BKV has been detected in a wide range of tissue types and can persist without causing symptoms [73]. BKV can establish latent infection of the kidneys and causes neuropathy and nephropathy in immunosuppressed transplant patients [74, 75]. It has been suggested that the gastrointestinal tract is the latency site for BKV [76]. In addition, BKV can cause colonic ulceration in kidney transplant patient under immunosuppressive drug [77]. So far, route of transmission of BKV has not been clearly determined. However, accumulating evidence suggests that BKV can also be detected in the stool samples of hospitalized children and from gastroenteritis patients as well as healthy adults [78, 79].
Re-evaluation of enteroviruses among individual samples in HFMD-lib01, HFMD-lib02, and HFMD-lib03
Given the observation that picornavirus sequences generated high number of reads in all 3 pools examined by deep sequencing, we asked whether type-specific enteroviruses could be identified among the individual samples comprising each pool. Towards this, we tested each sample for the virus identified from the most frequent virus reads found in each pool using RT-PCR. For HFMD-lib01, we found one sample positive for CV-A16 after conventional sequencing and BLAST analysis, while the rest of the samples in this pool tested negative. In pool HFMD-lib02, which showed high number of reads for rhinovirus-C, we also found that only one sample tested positive for rhinovirus. Finally, we identified one sample positive for CV-A21 in HFMD-lib03 pool. Taken together, these results verified that the presence of enterovirus originated from a unique sample and contributed to the high number of reads observed in each pool.
Discussion
Our study characterized the virome in fecal samples of pediatric HFMD patients during a 2012 widespread outbreak in Thailand. We used high-throughput next-generation sequencing to better understand the viruses present in HFMD patients who tested negative for enterovirus species A EV-71 and CV-A16/A6, predominant causes of HFMD and the main focus of many existing diagnostic assays [26, 27]. Analysis of the sequences either assembled into contigs or as singletons revealed a complexity of the virus population. Although previous examination of these samples did not initially detect enteroviruses using PCR-based assays, the present study utilizing deep sequencing enabled the detection of enterovirus sequences as well as other enteric virus at concentration as low as a few genome copies, providing a more systematic analysis of the prevalence of the viral genome.
The majority of viral reads identified here belonged to the family Picornaviridae, and were dominated by several members of the genus Enterovirus, namely HRV-C, CV-A21, and CV-A10. In addition to the commonly identified EV71 and CV-A16, other enteroviruses have been reported to cause HFMD outbreaks in different countries including CV-A10 and CV-A6 in Finland [5] and France [80] in 2010 and in China during 2008–2012 [81]. CV-A21 was least reported to cause HFMD with only 42 detections throughout the 36 years of surveillance in the United States [8]. However, a study in China cited a high incidence rate of CV-A21 infection in adults with RTI [82]. Another rarely detected virus found was EV68, originally isolated in the USA in 1962 from patients with RTI [83] and has been detected sporadically thereafter. EV68 is unusual among EV in that it shares phenotypic properties of both enterovirus and rhinovirus [84]. Reports suggested that this virus was associated with RTI including pneumonia and bronchiolitis with greater severity in infant and school-aged children. Between 2008 and 2010, an increasing number of EV68 clusters in cases of RTI have been reported worldwide [85–88]. Outbreaks have also been reported in the USA in 2014 when EV68 infection affected more than a thousand people, mostly young children and resulting in at least 12 deaths. The association of EV68 infection and diseases other than RTI remains uncertain. Studies have linked the virus with infection of the central nervous system including acute flaccid paralysis [8] and fatal meningomyeloencephalitis [89]. In addition, by using un-biased metagenomic analysis, our results not only expanded the number of identified types of enterovirus, both common and rare, but also revealed possible circulation of multiple enterovirus types during the outbreak.
Nearly completed genome of HRV species C was detected in the virome. Although the ability for HRV to replicate in the gastrointestinal tract is unknown, the detection of HRV in fecal samples has been reported [42, 43]. The amount of HRV RNA detected in feces could be as abundant as enteroviruses [90] and feces-derived HRV can retain infectivity in cell culture [91, 92]. No role for HRV has been postulated for HFMD and the virus is typically present in respiratory secretion and associated with asthma exacerbation [93]. Nucleic acids from HRV and other typical respiratory viruses such as RSV in feces may reflect inactivated particles in swallowed respiratory secretions or actual replication in the digestive tract possibly aided by adaptive mutations [90].
The second most abundant viral sequences identified belonged to astroviruses. The classic HAstV species consisting of eight serotypes has been associated with diarrhea particularly in immunodeficient patients [94]. Astroviruses detected here belonged to recently described species MLB1 and MLB2. MLB1 was initially sequenced from the fecal samples of a child with diarrhea [95] and serological survey revealed it to be a common childhood infection [96]. A study of children in India failed to associate MLB1 with diarrhea [97]. Meanwhile, MLB2 was also initially detected in fecal samples from Indian children with diarrhea [98] and in the plasma of a child with undifferentiated fever [97], suggesting replication beyond the digestive tract. Other astroviruses in human and animal tissues have also indicated likely neurological involvement [99–101], therefore a wide range of diseases may be associated with astrovirus infections.
Viral metagenomic studies of human fecal samples have been reported [102–105] and had suggest evidence of frequent co-infections with known enteric viruses from the family Picornaviridae, Astroviridae, and Parvoviridae [106, 107]. Our study found enterovirus, cardiovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, norovirus, adenovirus, bocavirus, and picobirnavirus in stools from pediatric HFMD patients. Several of these viruses are known to cause gastrointestinal diseases. Although co-infections with different viruses and correlates of disease severity are ongoing, it is conceivable that viral co-infections may aggravate clinical manifestation of an otherwise mild virus infection, which could result in compromised gut function and upregulated immune response leading to increased risk of morbidity. For example, during an HFMD outbreak in Sarawak, Malaysia in 1997, a subgroup of adenovirus and enterovirus were isolated from three fatal cases [108]. It is therefore conceivable that co-infection could precipitate or aggravate HFMD symptoms. Future studies to examine viral profile in individual clinical samples are warranted to clarify the possible role of co-infection with disease severity.
Since a significant fraction of HFMD cases remains negative for the viral enterovirus pathogens and a direct or aggravating role for other viruses is conceivable, our study illustrates an overview of the virus community in stools from pediatric HFMD patients using unbiased sequencing approach. Our finding shows that such EV71, CV-A16/A6 PCR-negative children shed multiple types of picornaviruses and other enteric viruses in their feces including enterovirus, cardiovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, norovirus, adenovirus, bocavirus, and picobirnavirus. Such overview information may help clinicians figure out the contribution of different types of picornaviruses as well as other pathogens to HFMD, with potential public health implications on the disease control.
The analysis of pooled samples and the deep sequencing method used presented limitations in the interpretation of the results. First, it was not possible to equate viral read numbers with the number of children infected. Second, comparison of the viral loads of viruses with different genome types (e.g. ssRNA, dsRNA, dsDNA) was not possible since the relative efficiency of converting their genomes into next-generation sequencing-compatible DNA may vary. Although stool samples used in this study were convenient samples collected for our previous study, inclusion of other clinical specimens such as throat swab, vesicular fluid, and skin lesions would be ideal. Stool samples may harbor unknown inhibitors of PCR and present nucleic acids of non-viral origin, thus complicating analysis. Nevertheless, our findings highlight the potential advantage of next generation sequencing to detect viruses from clinical specimens, which may be present below the limit of detection by conventional PCR assay. Assessing the role, if any, of these viruses in HFMD will require the study of larger populations, including epidemiologically matched healthy controls, and the analysis of individual, rather than pooled, clinical samples.
Supporting Information
(DOCX)
Results are shown for all recombination events with P <1E-5 by at least two analyses mode.
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank Jiratchaya Puenpa, Jira Chansaenroj, and Prapaporn Khoonta for sample collection and the results of enterovirus and rhinovirus screening.
Data Availability
All relevant data are available from GenBank (Accession Numbers KP242035-KP242038 and KF661110).
Funding Statement
This project described was supported by the Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund to Dr. Piyada Linsuwanon; The Blood Systems Research Institute (BSRI), NIH R01 HL083254 and NIH R01HL105770 to Dr. Eric Delwart; The Research Chair Grant National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA); the National Research University Project, Office of Higher Education Commission (HR1155A, WCU-001, 007-HR-57); the Centenary Academic Development Project, Integrated Innovation Academic Center; Chulalongkorn University Centenary Academic Development Project (CU56-HR01); the Outstanding Professor of the Thailand Research Fund (DPG5480002); MK Restaurant Company Limited and The Siam Cement Pcl; and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Thai Red Cross Society to Professor Yong Poovorawan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. McMinn P, Stratov I, Nagarajan L, Davis S. Neurological manifestations of enterovirus 71 infection in children during an outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Western Australia. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32(2):236–42. 10.1086/318454 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ho M, Chen ER, Hsu KH, Twu SJ, Chen KT, Tsai SF, et al. An epidemic of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan. Taiwan Enterovirus Epidemic Working Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(13):929–35. 10.1056/NEJM199909233411301 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Xing W, Liao Q, Viboud C, Zhang J, Sun J, Wu JT, et al. Hand, foot, and mouth disease in China, 2008–12: an epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(4):308–18. Epub 2014/02/04. doi: S1473-3099(13)70342-6 [pii] 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70342-6 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ooi MH, Wong SC, Lewthwaite P, Cardosa MJ, Solomon T. Clinical features, diagnosis, and management of enterovirus 71. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(11):1097–105. Epub 2010/10/23. doi: S1474-4422(10)70209-X [pii] 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70209-X . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Blomqvist S, Klemola P, Kaijalainen S, Paananen A, Simonen ML, Vuorinen T, et al. Co-circulation of coxsackieviruses A6 and A10 in hand, foot and mouth disease outbreak in Finland. J Clin Virol. 2010;48(1):49–54. Epub 2010/03/02. doi: S1386-6532(10)00053-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.02.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Downing C, Ramirez-Fort MK, Doan HQ, Benoist F, Oberste MS, Khan F, et al. Coxsackievirus A6 associated hand, foot and mouth disease in adults: clinical presentation and review of the literature. J Clin Virol. 2014;60(4):381–6. 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.04.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hu YF, Du J, Zhao R, Xue Y, Yang F, Jin Q. Complete genome sequence of a recombinant coxsackievirus B4 from a patient with a fatal case of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Guangxi, China. J Virol. 2012;86(19):10901–2. 10.1128/JVI.01808-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Khetsuriani N, Lamonte-Fowlkes A, Oberst S, Pallansch MA. Enterovirus surveillance—United States, 1970–2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006;55(8):1–20. Epub 2006/09/15. doi: ss5508a1 [pii]. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tian H, Zhang Y, Sun Q, Zhu S, Li X, Pan Z, et al. Prevalence of multiple enteroviruses associated with hand, foot, and mouth disease in Shijiazhuang City, Hebei province, China: outbreaks of coxsackieviruses a10 and b3. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84233 10.1371/journal.pone.0084233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Chang LY, Huang LM, Gau SS, Wu YY, Hsia SH, Fan TY, et al. Neurodevelopment and cognition in children after enterovirus 71 infection. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(12):1226–34. Epub 2007/03/23. doi: 356/12/1226 [pii] 10.1056/NEJMoa065954 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lee HF, Chi CS. Enterovirus 71 infection-associated acute flaccid paralysis: a case series of long-term neurologic follow-up. Journal of child neurology. 2014;29(10):1283–90. 10.1177/0883073813516193 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wu JM, Wang JN, Tsai YC, Liu CC, Huang CC, Chen YJ, et al. Cardiopulmonary manifestations of fulminant enterovirus 71 infection. Pediatrics. 2002;109(2):E26–. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ang LW, Koh BK, Chan KP, Chua LT, James L, Goh KT. Epidemiology and control of hand, foot and mouth disease in Singapore, 2001–2007. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. 2009;38(2):106–12. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Onozuka D, Hashizume M. The influence of temperature and humidity on the incidence of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Japan. Sci Total Environ. 2011;410–411:119–25. Epub 2011/10/22. doi: S0048-9697(11)01089-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.055 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Podin Y, Gias EL, Ong F, Leong YW, Yee SF, Yusof MA, et al. Sentinel surveillance for human enterovirus 71 in Sarawak, Malaysia: lessons from the first 7 years. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:180 10.1186/1471-2458-6-180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Centers for Disease, Control and Prevention (2012) Notes from the field: severe hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with coxsackievirus A6—Alabama, Connecticut, California, and Nevada, November 2011-February 2012. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 61(12):213–4. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chang LY, King CC, Hsu KH, Ning HC, Tsao KC, Li CC, et al. Risk factors of enterovirus 71 infection and associated hand, foot, and mouth disease/herpangina in children during an epidemic in Taiwan. Pediatrics. 2002;109(6):e88 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chang LY, Lin TY, Huang YC, Tsao KC, Shih SR, Kuo ML, et al. Comparison of enterovirus 71 and coxsackie-virus A16 clinical illnesses during the Taiwan enterovirus epidemic, 1998. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18(12):1092–6. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gopalkrishna V, Patil PR, Patil GP, Chitambar SD. Circulation of multiple enterovirus serotypes causing hand, foot and mouth disease in India. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61(Pt 3):420–5. Epub 2011/11/05. doi: jmm.0.036400–0 [pii] 10.1099/jmm.0.036400-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Huang SW, Hsu YW, Smith DJ, Kiang D, Tsai HP, Lin KH, et al. Reemergence of enterovirus 71 in 2008 in taiwan: dynamics of genetic and antigenic evolution from 1998 to 2008. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(11):3653–62. Epub 2009/09/25. doi: JCM.00630-09 [pii] 10.1128/JCM.00630-09 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhang X, Wang H, Ding S, Wang X, Chen X, Wo Y, et al. Prevalence of enteroviruses in children with and without hand, foot, and mouth disease in China. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:606. Epub 2013/12/29. doi: 1471-2334-13-606 [pii] 10.1186/1471-2334-13-606 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kung YA, Hung CT, Liu YC, Shih SR. Update on the development of enterovirus 71 vaccines. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2014;14(10):1455–64. 10.1517/14712598.2014.935330 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Li R, Liu L, Mo Z, Wang X, Xia J, Liang Z, et al. An inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in healthy children. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(9):829–37. 10.1056/NEJMoa1303224 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhu F, Xu W, Xia J, Liang Z, Liu Y, Zhang X, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an enterovirus 71 vaccine in China. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(9):818–28. 10.1056/NEJMoa1304923 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Samphutthanon R, Tripathi NK, Ninsawat S, Duboz R. Spatio-temporal distribution and hotspots of Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease (HFMD) in northern Thailand. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(1):312–36. Epub 2013/12/25. doi: ijerph110100312 [pii] 10.3390/ijerph110100312 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Puenpa J, Chieochansin T, Linsuwanon P, Korkong S, Thongkomplew S, Vichaiwattana P, et al. Hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by coxsackievirus A6, Thailand, 2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(4):641–3. Epub 2013/05/02. 10.3201/eid1904.121666 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Puenpa J, Mauleekoonphairoj J, Linsuwanon P, Suwannakarn K, Chieochansin T, Korkong S, et al. Prevalence and Characterization of Enterovirus Infections among Pediatric Patients with Hand Foot Mouth Disease, Herpangina and Influenza Like Illness in Thailand, 2012. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e98888 Epub 2014/06/03. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098888 PONE-D-13-52350 [pii]. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Yozwiak NL, Skewes-Cox P, Stenglein MD, Balmaseda A, Harris E, DeRisi JL. Virus identification in unknown tropical febrile illness cases using deep sequencing. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(2):e1485 Epub 2012/02/22. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001485 PNTD-D-11-00551 [pii]. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Delwart E. A roadmap to the human virome. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(2):e1003146 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. He B, Li Z, Yang F, Zheng J, Feng Y, Guo H, et al. Virome Profiling of Bats from Myanmar by Metagenomic Analysis of Tissue Samples Reveals More Novel Mammalian Viruses. PLoS One. 2013;8(6). Epub 2013/08/21. 10.1371/annotation/68f77773-a2a0-4bfe-b5e6-950dc30b79f9 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Delwart EL. Viral metagenomics. Rev Med Virol. 2007;17(2):115–31. Epub 2007/02/14. 10.1002/rmv.532 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Linsuwanon P, Puenpa J, Huang SW, Wang YF, Mauleekoonphairoj J, Wang JR, et al. Epidemiology and seroepidemiology of human enterovirus 71 among Thai populations. J Biomed Sci. 2014;21:16 10.1186/1423-0127-21-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Li L, Diab S, McGraw S, Barr B, Traslavina R, Higgins R, et al. Divergent astrovirus associated with neurologic disease in cattle. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(9):1385–92. 10.3201/eid1909.130682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Victoria JG, Kapoor A, Li L, Blinkova O, Slikas B, Wang C, et al. Metagenomic analyses of viruses in stool samples from children with acute flaccid paralysis. J Virol. 2009;83(9):4642–51. 10.1128/JVI.02301-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Jackson DJ, Gangnon RE, Evans MD, Roberg KA, Anderson EL, Pappas TE, et al. Wheezing rhinovirus illnesses in early life predict asthma development in high-risk children. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2008;178(7):667–72. 10.1164/rccm.200802-309OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Palmenberg AC, Spiro D, Kuzmickas R, Wang S, Djikeng A, Rathe JA, et al. Sequencing and analyses of all known human rhinovirus genomes reveal structure and evolution. Science. 2009;324(5923):55–9. Epub 2009/02/14. doi: 1165557 [pii] 10.1126/science.1165557 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Nix WA, Oberste MS, Pallansch MA. Sensitive, seminested PCR amplification of VP1 sequences for direct identification of all enterovirus serotypes from original clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(8):2698–704. Epub 2006/08/08. doi: 44/8/2698 [pii] 10.1128/JCM.00542-06 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Linsuwanon P, Payungporn S, Samransamruajkit R, Posuwan N, Makkoch J, Theanboonlers A, et al. High prevalence of human rhinovirus C infection in Thai children with acute lower respiratory tract disease. J Infect. 2009;59(2):115–21. 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.05.009 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Tapparel C, Siegrist F, Petty TJ, Kaiser L. Picornavirus and enterovirus diversity with associated human diseases. Infect Genet Evol. 2013;14:282–93. Epub 2012/12/04. doi: S1567-1348(12)00349-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.meegid.2012.10.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. McIntyre CL, Knowles NJ, Simmonds P. Proposals for the classification of human rhinovirus species A, B and C into genotypically assigned types. J Gen Virol. 2013;94(Pt 8):1791–806. Epub 2013/05/17. doi: vir.0.053686–0 [pii] 10.1099/vir.0.053686-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Edwards MR, Bartlett NW, Hussell T, Openshaw P, Johnston SL. The microbiology of asthma. Nature reviews Microbiology. 2012;10(7):459–71. 10.1038/nrmicro2801 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Rovida F, Campanini G, Piralla A, Adzasehoun KM, Sarasini A, Baldanti F. Molecular detection of gastrointestinal viral infections in hospitalized patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;77(3):231–5. Epub 2013/09/17. doi: S0732-8893(13)00439-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.07.020 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lau SK, Yip CC, Lung DC, Lee P, Que TL, Lau YL, et al. Detection of human rhinovirus C in fecal samples of children with gastroenteritis. J Clin Virol. 2012;53(4):290–6. Epub 2012/02/10. doi: S1386-6532(12)00013-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.01.008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lukashev AN, Shumilina EY, Belalov IS, Ivanova OE, Eremeeva TP, Reznik VI, et al. Recombination strategies and evolutionary dynamics of the Human enterovirus A global gene pool. J Gen Virol. 2014;95(Pt 4):868–73. 10.1099/vir.0.060004-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. McIntyre CL, McWilliam Leitch EC, Savolainen-Kopra C, Hovi T, Simmonds P. Analysis of genetic diversity and sites of recombination in human rhinovirus species C. J Virol. 2010;84(19):10297–310. Epub 2010/07/30. doi: JVI.00962-10 [pii] 10.1128/JVI.00962-10 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Schibler M, Gerlach D, Martinez Y, Belle SV, Turin L, Kaiser L, et al. Experimental human rhinovirus and enterovirus interspecies recombination. J Gen Virol. 2010;93(Pt 1):93–101. Epub 2011/09/24. doi: vir.0.035808–0 [pii] 10.1099/vir.0.035808-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Lau SK, Yip CC, Lin AW, Lee RA, So LY, Lau YL, et al. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of human rhinovirus C in children and adults in Hong Kong reveals a possible distinct human rhinovirus C subgroup. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(7):1096–103. Epub 2009/08/28. 10.1086/605697 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ledford RM, Patel NR, Demenczuk TM, Watanyar A, Herbertz T, Collett MS, et al. VP1 sequencing of all human rhinovirus serotypes: insights into genus phylogeny and susceptibility to antiviral capsid-binding compounds. J Virol. 2004;78(7):3663–74. Epub 2004/03/16. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Nielsen AC, Gyhrs ML, Nielsen LP, Pedersen C, Bottiger B. Gastroenteritis and the novel picornaviruses aichi virus, cosavirus, saffold virus, and salivirus in young children. J Clin Virol. 2013;57(3):239–42. Epub 2013/04/23. doi: S1386-6532(13)00116-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.03.015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Himeda T, Ohara Y. Saffold virus, a novel human Cardiovirus with unknown pathogenicity. J Virol. 2012;86(3):1292–6. Epub 2011/11/25. doi: JVI.06087-11 [pii] 10.1128/JVI.06087-11 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Blinkova O, Kapoor A, Victoria J, Jones M, Wolfe N, Naeem A, et al. Cardioviruses are genetically diverse and cause common enteric infections in South Asian children. J Virol. 2009;83(9):4631–41. Epub 2009/02/06. doi: JVI.02085-08 [pii] 10.1128/JVI.02085-08 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Chiu CY, Greninger AL, Kanada K, Kwok T, Fischer KF, Runckel C, et al. Identification of cardioviruses related to Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus in human infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(37):14124–9. Epub 2008/09/05. doi: 0805968105 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0805968105 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Zhang XA, Lu QB, Wo Y, Zhao J, Huang DD, Guo CT, et al. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Saffold cardiovirus in China from 2009 to 2012. Sci Rep. 2015;5:7704 10.1038/srep07704 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Naeem A, Hosomi T, Nishimura Y, Alam MM, Oka T, Zaidi SS, et al. Genetic diversity of circulating Saffold viruses in Pakistan and Afghanistan. J Gen Virol. 2014;95(Pt 9):1945–57. 10.1099/vir.0.066498-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Drexler JF, Baumgarte S, Luna LK, Stocker A, Almeida PS, Ribeiro TC, et al. Genomic features and evolutionary constraints in Saffold-like cardioviruses. J Gen Virol. 2010;91(Pt 6):1418–27. Epub 2010/02/05. doi: vir.0.018887–0 [pii] 10.1099/vir.0.018887-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kapoor A, Li L, Victoria J, Oderinde B, Mason C, Pandey P, et al. Multiple novel astrovirus species in human stool. J Gen Virol. 2009;90(Pt 12):2965–72. 10.1099/vir.0.014449-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ma X, Endo R, Ishiguro N, Ebihara T, Ishiko H, Ariga T, et al. Detection of human bocavirus in Japanese children with lower respiratory tract infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(3):1132–4. 10.1128/JCM.44.3.1132-1134.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Kapoor A, Simmonds P, Slikas E, Li L, Bodhidatta L, Sethabutr O, et al. Human bocaviruses are highly diverse, dispersed, recombination prone, and prevalent in enteric infections. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(11):1633–43. 10.1086/652416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Mori D, Ranawaka U, Yamada K, Rajindrajith S, Miya K, Perera HK, et al. Human bocavirus in patients with encephalitis, Sri Lanka, 2009–2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(11):1859–62. 10.3201/eid1911.121548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Cotmore SF, Agbandje-McKenna M, Chiorini JA, Mukha DV, Pintel DJ, Qiu J, et al. The family Parvoviridae. Archives of virology. 2014;159(5):1239–47. 10.1007/s00705-013-1914-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Chen SY, Tsai CN, Chen CL, Chao HC, Lee YS, Lai MW, et al. Severe viral gastroenteritis in children after suboptimal rotavirus immunization in Taiwan. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32(12):1335–9. 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182a5f5b6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Hall AJ, Wikswo ME, Pringle K, Gould LH, Parashar UD, Division of Viral Diseases NCfI, et al. Vital signs: foodborne norovirus outbreaks—United States, 2009–2012. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2014;63(22):491–5. . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Wurzel DF, Mackay IM, Marchant JM, Wang CY, Yerkovich ST, Upham JW, et al. Adenovirus Species C Is Associated With Chronic Suppurative Lung Diseases in Children. Clin Infect Dis. 2014. 10.1093/cid/ciu225 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Chhabra P, Payne DC, Szilagyi PG, Edwards KM, Staat MA, Shirley SH, et al. Etiology of viral gastroenteritis in children <5 years of age in the United States, 2008–2009. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(5):790–800. 10.1093/infdis/jit254 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Centers for Disease Control, Prevention. Adenovirus-associated epidemic keratoconjunctivitis outbreaks—four states, 2008–2010. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2013;62(32):637–41. . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Berciaud S, Rayne F, Kassab S, Jubert C, Faure-Della Corte M, Salin F, et al. Adenovirus infections in Bordeaux University Hospital 2008–2010: clinical and virological features. J Clin Virol. 2012;54(4):302–7. 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.04.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Tate JE, Burton AH, Boschi-Pinto C, Steele AD, Duque J, Parashar UD, et al. 2008 estimate of worldwide rotavirus-associated mortality in children younger than 5 years before the introduction of universal rotavirus vaccination programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(2):136–41. 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70253-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Anderson EJ, Weber SG. Rotavirus infection in adults. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4(2):91–9. 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)00928-4 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. van Leeuwen M, Williams MM, Koraka P, Simon JH, Smits SL, Osterhaus AD. Human picobirnaviruses identified by molecular screening of diarrhea samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(5):1787–94. 10.1128/JCM.02452-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Kapusinszky B, Minor P, Delwart E. Nearly constant shedding of diverse enteric viruses by two healthy infants. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(11):3427–34. 10.1128/JCM.01589-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Hall CB, Weinberg GA, Iwane MK, Blumkin AK, Edwards KM, Staat MA, et al. The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(6):588–98. 10.1056/NEJMoa0804877 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Sigurs N, Bjarnason R, Sigurbergsson F, Kjellman B. Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis in infancy is an important risk factor for asthma and allergy at age 7. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2000;161(5):1501–7. 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9906076 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. De Gascun CF, Carr MJ. Human polyomavirus reactivation: disease pathogenesis and treatment approaches. Clinical & developmental immunology. 2013;2013:373579 10.1155/2013/373579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Petrogiannis-Haliotis T, Sakoulas G, Kirby J, Koralnik IJ, Dvorak AM, Monahan-Earley R, et al. BK-related polyomavirus vasculopathy in a renal-transplant recipient. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(17):1250–5. 10.1056/NEJMoa010319 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Dropulic LK, Jones RJ. Polyomavirus BK infection in blood and marrow transplant recipients. Bone marrow transplantation. 2008;41(1):11–8. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Wong AS, Cheng VC, Yuen KY, Kwong YL, Leung AY. High frequency of polyoma BK virus shedding in the gastrointestinal tract after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective and quantitative analysis. Bone marrow transplantation. 2009;43(1):43–7. 10.1038/bmt.2008.266 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Kim GY, Peji J, Nuovo G, Thomas F. BK virus colonic ulcerations. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2004;2(2):175–7. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Vanchiere JA, Abudayyeh S, Copeland CM, Lu LB, Graham DY, Butel JS. Polyomavirus shedding in the stool of healthy adults. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(8):2388–91. 10.1128/JCM.02472-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Vanchiere JA, Nicome RK, Greer JM, Demmler GJ, Butel JS. Frequent detection of polyomaviruses in stool samples from hospitalized children. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(4):658–64. 10.1086/432076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Mirand A, Henquell C, Archimbaud C, Ughetto S, Antona D, Bailly JL, et al. Outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease/herpangina associated with coxsackievirus A6 and A10 infections in 2010, France: a large citywide, prospective observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(5):E110–8. Epub 2012/03/13. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03789.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. He YQ, Chen L, Xu WB, Yang H, Wang HZ, Zong WP, et al. Emergence, circulation and spatiotemporal phylogenetic analysis of Coxsackievirus A6 and Coxsackievirus A10 associated hand, foot and mouth disease infections from 2008 to 2012 in Shenzhen, China. J Clin Microbiol. 2013. Epub 2013/08/24. doi: JCM.01231-13 [pii] 10.1128/JCM.01231-13 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Xiang Z, Gonzalez R, Wang Z, Ren L, Xiao Y, Li J, et al. Coxsackievirus A21, enterovirus 68, and acute respiratory tract infection, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(5):821–4. Epub 2012/04/21. 10.3201/eid1805.111376 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Schieble JH, Fox VL, Lennette EH. A probable new human picornavirus associated with respiratory diseases. American journal of epidemiology. 1967;85(2):297–310. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Blomqvist S, Savolainen C, Raman L, Roivainen M, Hovi T. Human rhinovirus 87 and enterovirus 68 represent a unique serotype with rhinovirus and enterovirus features. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(11):4218–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Opanda SM, Wamunyokoli F, Khamadi S, Coldren R, Bulimo WD. Genetic diversity of human enterovirus 68 strains isolated in Kenya using the hypervariable 3'-end of VP1 gene. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102866 10.1371/journal.pone.0102866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Meijer A, van der Sanden S, Snijders BE, Jaramillo-Gutierrez G, Bont L, van der Ent CK, et al. Emergence and epidemic occurrence of enterovirus 68 respiratory infections in The Netherlands in 2010. Virology. 2012;423(1):49–57. 10.1016/j.virol.2011.11.021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Tokarz R, Kapoor V, Wu W, Lurio J, Jain K, Mostashari F, et al. Longitudinal molecular microbial analysis of influenza-like illness in New York City, May 2009 through May 2010. Virol J. 2011;8:288 10.1186/1743-422X-8-288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Linsuwanon P, Puenpa J, Suwannakarn K, Auksornkitti V, Vichiwattana P, Korkong S, et al. Molecular epidemiology and evolution of human enterovirus serotype 68 in Thailand, 2006–2011. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35190 10.1371/journal.pone.0035190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Kreuter JD, Barnes A, McCarthy JE, Schwartzman JD, Oberste MS, Rhodes CH, et al. A fatal central nervous system enterovirus 68 infection. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2011;135(6):793–6. 10.1043/2010-0174-CR.1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Harvala H, McIntyre CL, McLeish NJ, Kondracka J, Palmer J, Molyneaux P, et al. High detection frequency and viral loads of human rhinovirus species A to C in fecal samples; diagnostic and clinical implications. J Med Virol. 2012;84(3):536–42. Epub 2012/01/17. 10.1002/jmv.23203 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Savolainen-Kopra C, Simonen-Tikka ML, Klemola P, Blomqvist S, Suomenrinne S, Nanto-Salonen K, et al. Human rhinoviruses in INDIS-study material-evidence for recovery of viable rhinovirus from fecal specimens. J Med Virol. 2013;85(8):1466–72. Epub 2013/06/15. 10.1002/jmv.23593 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Honkanen H, Oikarinen S, Peltonen P, Simell O, Ilonen J, Veijola R, et al. Human rhinoviruses including group C are common in stool samples of young Finnish children. J Clin Virol. 2013;56(3):250–4. Epub 2013/01/01. doi: S1386-6532(12)00441-6 [pii] 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.11.020 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Kistler A, Avila PC, Rouskin S, Wang D, Ward T, Yagi S, et al. Pan-viral screening of respiratory tract infections in adults with and without asthma reveals unexpected human coronavirus and human rhinovirus diversity. J Infect Dis. 2007;196(6):817–25. 10.1086/520816 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Grohmann GS, Glass RI, Pereira HG, Monroe SS, Hightower AW, Weber R, et al. Enteric viruses and diarrhea in HIV-infected patients. Enteric Opportunistic Infections Working Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(1):14–20. 10.1056/NEJM199307013290103 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Finkbeiner SR, Kirkwood CD, Wang D. Complete genome sequence of a highly divergent astrovirus isolated from a child with acute diarrhea. Virol J. 2008;5:117 10.1186/1743-422X-5-117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Holtz LR, Bauer IK, Jiang H, Belshe R, Freiden P, Schultz-Cherry SL, et al. Seroepidemiology of astrovirus MLB1. Clinical and vaccine immunology: CVI. 2014;21(6):908–11. 10.1128/CVI.00100-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Holtz LR, Bauer IK, Rajendran P, Kang G, Wang D. Astrovirus MLB1 is not associated with diarrhea in a cohort of Indian children. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28647 10.1371/journal.pone.0028647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Finkbeiner SR, Holtz LR, Jiang Y, Rajendran P, Franz CJ, Zhao G, et al. Human stool contains a previously unrecognized diversity of novel astroviruses. Virol J. 2009;6:161 10.1186/1743-422X-6-161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Quan PL, Wagner TA, Briese T, Torgerson TR, Hornig M, Tashmukhamedova A, et al. Astrovirus encephalitis in boy with X-linked agammaglobulinemia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(6):918–25. 10.3201/eid1606.091536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Blomstrom AL, Widen F, Hammer AS, Belak S, Berg M. Detection of a novel astrovirus in brain tissue of mink suffering from shaking mink syndrome by use of viral metagenomics. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(12):4392–6. 10.1128/JCM.01040-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Bouzalas IG, Wuthrich D, Walland J, Drogemuller C, Zurbriggen A, Vandevelde M, et al. Neurotropic astrovirus in cattle with nonsuppurative encephalitis in Europe. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(9):3318–24. 10.1128/JCM.01195-14 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Reyes A, Haynes M, Hanson N, Angly FE, Heath AC, Rohwer F, et al. Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers. Nature. 2010;466(7304):334–8. 10.1038/nature09199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Nakamura S, Yang CS, Sakon N, Ueda M, Tougan T, Yamashita A, et al. Direct metagenomic detection of viral pathogens in nasal and fecal specimens using an unbiased high-throughput sequencing approach. PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4219 10.1371/journal.pone.0004219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Greninger AL, Runckel C, Chiu CY, Haggerty T, Parsonnet J, Ganem D, et al. The complete genome of klassevirus—a novel picornavirus in pediatric stool. Virol J. 2009;6:82 10.1186/1743-422X-6-82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Minot S, Sinha R, Chen J, Li H, Keilbaugh SA, Wu GD, et al. The human gut virome: inter-individual variation and dynamic response to diet. Genome research. 2011;21(10):1616–25. 10.1101/gr.122705.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Martinez M, Phan TG, Galeano ME, Russomando G, Parreno V, Delwart E, et al. Genomic characterization of a rotavirus G8P[1] detected in a child with diarrhea reveal direct animal-to-human transmission. Infect Genet Evol. 2014. 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.08.015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Finkbeiner SR, Allred AF, Tarr PI, Klein EJ, Kirkwood CD, Wang D. Metagenomic analysis of human diarrhea: viral detection and discovery. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4(2):e1000011 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Cardosa MJ, Krishnan S, Tio PH, Perera D, Wong SC. Isolation of subgenus B adenovirus during a fatal outbreak of enterovirus 71-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease in Sibu, Sarawak. Lancet. 1999;354(9183):987–91. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11032-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(DOCX)
Results are shown for all recombination events with P <1E-5 by at least two analyses mode.
(DOCX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are available from GenBank (Accession Numbers KP242035-KP242038 and KF661110).




