Skip to main content
Toxins logoLink to Toxins
. 2015 Aug 17;7(8):3167–3178. doi: 10.3390/toxins7083167

Anthrax Toxins in Context of Bacillus anthracis Spores and Spore Germination

Christopher K Cote 1,*, Susan L Welkos 1
Editor: Shihui Liu1
PMCID: PMC4549744  PMID: 26287244

Abstract

The interaction of anthrax toxin or toxin components with B. anthracis spores has been demonstrated. Germinating spores can produce significant amounts of toxin components very soon after the initiation of germination. In this review, we will summarize the work performed that has led to our understanding of toxin and spore interactions and discuss the complexities associated with these interactions.

Keywords: anthrax, Bacillus anthracis, spores, anthrax toxins, PA, germination

1. Toxins Are Crucial for Bacillus anthracis Pathogenesis

Bacillus anthracis, a gram-positive spore-forming bacterium, is the etiologic agent of anthrax [1,2,3,4]. It is important to note that, outside of the laboratory, the spore is the only infectious form of B. anthracis [5,6,7,8]. In most cases of anthrax acquired by inhalation, the spores are thought to be transported from their site of deposition in the lungs to regional lymph nodes where they germinate and outgrow into the vegetative bacilli [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The bacilli multiply within the lymph nodes and are then released, rapidly spread systemically, and produce large amounts of the anthrax toxins. Germination near the entry site or in epithelial/nonlymphoidal tissues has also been demonstrated though the significance of these events is uncertain [8,16,17,18,19]. B. anthracis spore germination and subsequent disease progression has been reported to be substantially different in cutaneous models of disease [20,21,22]. Nevertheless, evidence exists for toxin production during the earliest stages of spore germination, as will be reviewed.

In a natural setting anthrax is predominantly a disease of herbivores feeding on vegetation from fields contaminated with B. anthracis spores. Carnivores can become exposed to/infected by B. anthracis when feeding on animals which previously died of anthrax [23,24,25]. In humans, there are three major forms of anthrax as delineated by the route of spore exposure, cutaneous, gastrointestinal and inhalational [26].

The large majority of reported anthrax cases are cutaneous infections. Although cutaneous infections can be fatal, they are more typically self-limited, with mortality rates in untreated cases of about 20% [27,28,29]. A comparatively new form of human disease, injectional anthrax, has been observed among intravenous drug users, i.e., heroin addicts in Western Europe [29,30,31,32,33,34]. This disease can range from cutaneous/intradermal to septicemic anthrax [32]. Gastrointestinal infections in humans have been reported, but are considered rare [35,36,37,38]. The biodefense community is most concerned with the third major form of disease, inhalational anthrax, due to the potential ease of aerosol exposure to lethal doses of spores, non-specific clinical symptoms, and rapid progression; if left untreated it has a mortality rate approaching 100% [39,40]. Thus, early diagnosis of inhalational anthrax can be very challenging and unless there is a high index of suspicion, the disease can rapidly progress to a stage which is no longer treatable with antibiotics. All of these forms of infection are initiated by the introduction of ungerminated spores into the susceptible host. Ultimately, fatal anthrax is the result of acute intoxication and massive bacteremia [39].

The overwhelming effects of anthrax lethal and anthrax edema toxins are well characterized and have been reviewed extensively [13,41,42,43,44,45]. The EF is a calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase [46,47] and the LF is a zinc-matalloproteinase known to induce MAPKK cleavage [48,49]. Both the EF and LF require the protective antigen (PA) component, encoded by the pagA gene, to facilitate translocation into the host cells cytosol where they can act [50,51,52,53]. Importantly, the PA protein has been shown to elicit a strong and protective immune response and accordingly has served as the primary vaccine antigen in effective human anthrax vaccines [54]. The exact mechanisms and interactions of these toxins and individual toxin components are described in detail in numerous review articles [41,42,43,55,56]. Our focus will be to summarize the interactions of these toxins and toxin components with B. anthracis spores. The potential ramifications of these interactions will be described.

2. Ungerminated Bacillus anthracis Spores Contain Detectable Levels of PA and Are Affected by Anti-PA Antibodies

One of the earliest reports of the phenomena resulting from spore and anti-toxin antibody interactions was published in 1996. Stepanov et al. demonstrated that immunoglobulins arising from vaccination with the live attenuated ST-1 vaccine strain had anti-toxin effects as expected, but also had effects on B. anthracis spores [57]. These observations suggested that the immune response resulting from such a vaccination could prevent lethal intoxication but also potentially alter the earliest stages of the disease pathogenesis (i.e., when the ungerminated spores are first introduced into the host). IgM collected from rabbits vaccinated with ST-1 strain opsonized germinating spores resulting in a significantly increased rate of phagocytosis. Antibodies to the anthrax toxin components also inhibited spore germination, whereas other presumably unrelated antibodies (i.e., antibodies induced by Clostridium botulinum, Francisella tularensis, Yersinia pestis, and measles virus) did not inhibit spore germination. They demonstrated that anti-staphylococcal antibodies inhibited germination, but maintained that this finding supported the existence of significant similarities between B. anthracis and Staphylococcus bacteria. These results clearly set the stage for further characterization of vaccine-induced antibody and spore interactions, in particular the potential ability of anti-toxin antibodies to modify spore germination and subsequent host-interactions. This concept was novel because, based upon previous understanding of the anthrax life cycle, significant amounts of toxin should not be present until vegetative cell replication was well underway, as described in the previous section. It should be noted that since toxin-based vaccines effectively protect animals against infection with B. anthracis and not just against intoxication, it follows logically that the toxins (and presumably the immune response to them) would have major roles from the initial stages of infection [58].

Later work clearly demonstrated that ungerminated B. anthracis spores contained a detectable level of toxin components (at least PA). This was demonstrated initially by electron microscopy, SDS PAGE gel analyses, and subsequently additional sensitive assays as described below [59,60,61]. Whether this spore-associated PA is an innate product of the spores or merely represents an artifact from sporulation conditions and/or spore purification procedures has not been fully resolved. It was, however, clearly shown that the amount of PA on ungerminated spores was sufficiently adequate to interfere with spore germination and influence opsonization of the spores in in vitro macrophage assays performed in the presence of anti-PA antibodies. These antibody interactions were hypothesized to potentially impact the earliest stages of infection soon after the first introduction of spores into the host.

3. Anthrax Toxin Components Are Produced by Germinating Spores

In order to initiate disease, ungerminated B. anthracis spores that were introduced into the host must germinate and replicate. The transition from ungerminated spore to germinated cell is a complex cascade of events that can occur very rapidly in a suitable environment [62,63,64,65]. An early publication by Guidi-Rontani et al., detailing spore-macrophage interactions early after infection, demonstrated that the LF component of anthrax toxin was produced by germinating spores associated with macrophages within 3 h post-infection [66]. This was the first account demonstrating toxin component production at such an early time point.

Electron microscopy studies have clearly identified an association of PA and germinating spores [61,67]. The morphologically distinct germinated spores appeared to interact less with anti-PA antibodies than ungerminated spores [59]. This observation led to experiments to quantify PA production by germinating spores. Defined minimal germination induction solutions were used in order to induce germination but not allow outgrowth or replication of bacilli. Media used in these studies included AI (l-alanine and inosine) and AAC (l-alanine, adenosine, and casamino acids) [59]. AI will not permit vegetative growth even after 24 h incubations and AAC medium (more complex/metabolically complete than AI) will not permit replication during short term assay periods [59] but will allow vegetative outgrowth after extended incubations [68]. Spores exposed to AAC medium were lysed and the RNA extracted. The pagA transcript was detected by reverse-transcription PCR analysis after only 15 min of exposure to AAC.

Additionally, an immunomagnetic electrochemiluminescense assay (ECL) was employed in these studies to detect PA production using anti-PA antibodies, as described previously [59,69]. ECL utilizes antibodies (in this case a pool of monoclonal anti-PA antibodies) conjugated to microbeads. Detection was then achieved by the addition of ruthenium labeled polyclonal rabbit anti-PA antibodies. It was determined that the limit of detection under these conditions was approximately 100 pg/mL [59]; other similar ECL assays have achieved sensitivities in the femtogram range, demonstrating the very high sensitivity that can be achieved with such detection assays [69]. PA was detected on spores incubated in AAC medium within 60 min. The data acquired using the less nutritive AI medium suggested that PA could be observed on these germinating spores within a 2 h incubation period. The fact that the amount of PA found on the germinating spores appeared to correlate with the complexity of the medium, was further proof that germinating spores can produce detectable levels of toxin components. Supernatants collected from germinating spores were also tested for the presence of PA. Regardless of the medium used, AI or AAC, detectable levels of PA were observed in the supernatants. These findings indicated that spores can potentially synthesize and secrete or release these toxin components during early stages of germination.

4. The Interactions among Bacillus anthracis Spores, Toxins and Host Macrophages Are Complex

The interactions among spores, toxins and host cells can be complex in nature. The deleterious effects of anthrax toxins on the host immune response have been well documented [55]. In the traditional anthrax paradigm, systemically replicating vegetative bacilli produce dramatically enhanced quantities of anthrax toxins during the later stages of infection. The toxins and/or toxin components interact with anthrax toxin receptors on the cell surface and are subsequently translocated into the cytosol of the cell. To date, there are two known anthrax toxin receptors, TEM8 [70] and CMG2 [71,72]. Other work has documented that the LDL receptor-related protein LRP6 and the β-1 integrin can impact anthrax toxin receptor function and that complexes containing β1-integrin can also act independently as low affinity toxin receptors [73,74]. Anthrax toxins have been shown to negatively impact macrophages [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84], neutrophils [85,86,87], dendritic cells [20,88,89,90], and other host cell types [91,92,93]. In 2005, Banks et al. presented a model which suggests that after phagocytosis of spores by host cells (i.e., macrophages), the spore can germinate and begin producing toxins within the phagolysosome [94]. Anthrax toxin receptors can be located on the inside of the phagolysosomes [94,95], and thus are available to interact with the toxins secreted by the newly germinated spores. The toxin components LF and EF are then translocated into the cell cytosol, resulting in intoxication by the germinating spores from within the macrophage and the subsequent downstream events described above. Thus, this model highlighted alternate interactions that could potentially take place among spores, toxins and host cells.

It was previously demonstrated that macrophages were important in limiting the ensuing anthrax infection in a mouse model of anthrax. In these studies mice that were chemically depleted of macrophage populations were significantly more susceptible to anthrax initiated by the intraperitoneal injection or inhalation of spores [67,96]. Conversely, mice that received supplementary treatments with tissue culture macrophage-like cells (RAW264.7 cells) or mice that received starch as an eliciting agent for native macrophage recruitment were significantly more likely to survive challenge with lethal doses of spores [96]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that treatment with RAW264.7 cells harboring an inactivated anthrax toxin receptor, protected the mice from B. anthracis infection at rates even greater than did treatment with wild-type RAW264.7 cells [97], further documenting the interplay between spore infections and intoxications. Specifically these results appear to demonstrate both the susceptibility of macrophages to the lethal effects of toxin produced by the germinating organisms and paradoxically the ability of macrophages to protect the host against B. anthracis infection.

Hanna et al. demonstrated that macrophage depletion results in mice becoming more resistant to intoxication. In these studies mice were challenged with anthrax lethal toxin alone and did not initiate an infection [98]. This report suggested a role for macrophages in facilitating infection or intoxication (i.e., the Trojan horse concept) [14,15,98]. Collectively these data as well as more recent studies may contribute towards explaining the basis of the long-observed inverse correlation between sensitivity to infection and to toxin challenge in some animals [99,100]. The presence of increased numbers of macrophages might protect better against spore infection but increase sensitivity to toxin. The potential role(s) of other host cells types and other bacterial factors in anthrax mortality remains to be completely elucidated and is beyond the scope of this review.

Thus, taken together, these data demonstrate several scenarios that might be observed during the pathogenesis of anthrax. It is important to note that these situations are rarely synchronous and their potential outcomes can vary depending on many factors including strain of mouse, strain of B. anthracis, challenge route/site, or cell type(s) studied. Additionally, even in the same model system (i.e., in vitro macrophage assay) there can be variables which can alter the outcome. Such variables include the number of spores phagocytosed by the cell, and the proportions of spores which germinate after phagocytosis and which survive the anti-bacterial environment of the phagolysosome [7,97]. For example, in a single macrophage with a relatively heavy spore burden, some spores may remain ungerminated, others may germinate and succumb to killing prior to outgrowth, and another subpopulation may germinate (potentially causing intoxication of the macrophage), outgrow, and escape from the cell.

Antibodies directed against spore-specific antigens have been shown to be opsonic [101,102,103,104]. Similar effects of anti-PA antibodies on the spore macrophage interactions have also been documented. In tissue culture assays, anti-PA antibodies are opsonic and significantly augment the rate of spore phagocytosis by macrophages as well as enhance the sporicidal activity of the macrophages. These studies were performed using ungerminated spores as well as germinated spores. Interestingly, the opsonic and augmented killing effects were generally lost approximately 24 h after spore germination, further supporting the concept that spores rapidly release PA upon germination [60,61]. An additional and separate spore effect attributed to anti-PA antibodies has been the demonstration that anti-PA antibodies inhibit germination of B. anthracis spores in vitro. This was demonstrated by using a semi-automated fluorescence-based germination assay, by showing antibody-mediated inhibition of spore stainability in the presence of germinant, and by examining spore refractility using phase contrast microscopy [59,105]. The significance of these in vitro and in situ antibody-mediated effects in the immune responses of the host animal to spore challenge remains to be determined.

Our goal in this brief review has been to highlight the complexity as well as the importance of spore, toxin, and host interactions. Anti-toxin antibodies undoubtedly play an essential role in protecting vaccinated individuals from a lethal anthrax infection. However, the data reviewed herein also help to reinforce the concept that these anti-PA antibodies (and conceivably anti-LF or anti-EF antibodies) likely play a role in infection control very soon after the introduction of spores into the host. Because of emerging and engineered threats it is crucial to continue investigating novel vaccine strategies to protect the warfighter and potentially civilian populations. A better understanding of these early interactions may hold the key to such strategies.

Acknowledgments

Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Army.

Author Contributions

Christopher K. Cote and Susan L. Welkos contributed to the research and the writing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Koch R. The aetiology of anthrax based on the ontogeny of the anthrax bacillus. Beirt. Biol. Pflanz. 1877;2:277–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Turnbull P.C.B. Introduction: Anthrax history, disease, and ecology. In: Koehler T.M., editor. Anthrax. Springer-verlag; Berlin, Germany: 2002. pp. 1–19. Chapter 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cote C.K., Chabot D.J., Scorpio A., Blank T.E., Day W.A., Welkos S.L., Bozue J.A. Bacillus anthracis: Agent of bioterror and disease. In: Anderson B., Friedman H., Bendinelli M., editors. Microorganisms and Bioterrorism. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2006. pp. 83–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mock M., Fouet A. Anthrax. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2001;55:647–671. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Turnbull P. Anthrax in Humans and Animals. 4th ed. WHO Press; Geneva, Switzerland: 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cote C.K., Bozue J., Twenhafel N., Welkos S.L. Effects of altering the germination potential of Bacillus anthracis spores by exogenous means in a mouse model. J. Med. Microbiol. 2009;58:816–825. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.008656-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cote C.K., Welkos S.L., Bozue J. Key aspects of the molecular and cellular basis of inhalational anthrax. Microbes Infect. 2011;13:1146–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Weiner Z.P., Glomski I.J. Updating perspectives on the initiation of Bacillus anthracis growth and dissemination through its host. Infect. Immun. 2012;80:1626–1633. doi: 10.1128/IAI.06061-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lincoln R.E., Hodges D.R., Klein F., Mahlandt B.G., Jones W.I., Jr., Haines B.W., Rhian M.A., Walker J.S. Role of the lymphatics in the pathogenesis of anthrax. J. Infect. Dis. 1965;115:481–494. doi: 10.1093/infdis/115.5.481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ross J.M. The pathogenesis of anthrax following the administration of spores by the respiratory route. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 1957;73:485–494. doi: 10.1002/path.1700730219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cleret A., Quesnel-Hellmann A., Vallon-Eberhard A., Verrier B., Jung S., Vidal D., Mathieu J., Tournier J.N. Lung dendritic cells rapidly mediate anthrax spore entry through the pulmonary route. J. Immunol. 2007;178:7994–8001. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Russell B.H., Vasan R., Keene D.R., Koehler T.M., Xu Y. Potential dissemination of Bacillus anthracis utilizing human lung epithelial cells. Cell. Microbiol. 2008;10:945–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01098.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tournier J.N., Quesnel-Hellmann A., Cleret A., Vidal D.R. Contribution of toxins to the pathogenesis of inhalational anthrax. Cell. Microbiol. 2007;9:555–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00866.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guidi-Rontani C. The alveolar macrophage: The trojan horse of Bacillus anthracis. Trends Microbiol. 2002;10:405–409. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(02)02422-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guidi-Rontani C., Mock M. Macrophage interactions. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2002;271:115–141. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-05767-4_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Glomski I.J., Dumetz F., Jouvion G., Huerre M.R., Mock M., Goossens P.L. Inhaled non-capsulated Bacillus anthracis in A/J mice: Nasopharynx and alveolar space as dual portals of entry, delayed dissemination, and specific organ targeting. Microbes Infect. 2008;10:1398–1404. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2008.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sanz P., Teel L.D., Alem F., Carvalho H.M., Darnell S.C., O’Brien A.D. Detection of Bacillus anthracis spore germination in vivo by bioluminescence imaging. Infect. Immun. 2008;76:1036–1047. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00985-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Glomski I.J., Piris-Gimenez A., Huerre M., Mock M., Goossens P.L. Primary involvement of pharynx and peyer’s patch in inhalational and intestinal anthrax. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e76. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lowe D.E., Ernst S.M., Zito C., Ya J., Glomski I.J. Bacillus anthracis has two independent bottlenecks that are dependent on the portal of entry in an intranasal model of inhalational infection. Infect. Immun. 2013;81:4408–4420. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00484-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hahn A.C., Lyons C.R., Lipscomb M.F. Effect of Bacillus anthracis virulence factors on human dendritic cell activation. Hum. Immunol. 2008;69:552–561. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hahn B.L., Bischof T.S., Sohnle P.G. Superficial exudates of neutrophils prevent invasion of Bacillus anthracis bacilli into abraded skin of resistant mice. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2008;89:180–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2008.00584.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Corre J.P., Piris-Gimenez A., Moya-Nilges M., Jouvion G., Fouet A., Glomski I.J., Mock M., Sirard J.C., Goossens P.L. In vivo germination of Bacillus anthracis spores during murine cutaneous infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;207:450–457. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lindeque P.M., Turnbull P.C. Ecology and epidemiology of anthrax in the Etosha National Park, Namibia. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 1994;61:71–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Turnbull P.C., Doganay M., Lindeque P.M., Aygen B., McLaughlin J. Serology and anthrax in humans, livestock and Etosha National Park wildlife. Epidemiol. Infect. 1992;108:299–313. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800049773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hugh-Jones M.E., de Vos V. Anthrax and wildlife. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2002;21:359–383. doi: 10.20506/rst.21.2.1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dixon T.C., Meselson M., Guillemin J., Hanna P.C. Anthrax. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999;341:815–826. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909093411107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tekin R., Sula B., Deveci O., Tekin A., Bozkurt F., Ucmak D., Kaya S., Bekcibasi M., Erkan M.E., Ayaz C., et al. Cutaneous anthrax in southeast Anatolia of Turkey. Cutan. Ccular Toxicol. 2015;34:7–11. doi: 10.3109/15569527.2014.880844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gilliland G., Starks V., Vrcek I., Gilliland C. Periorbital cellulitis due to cutaneous anthrax. Int. Ophthalmol. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s10792-015-0057-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Doganay M., Metan G., Alp E. A review of cutaneous anthrax and its outcome. J. Infect. Public Health. 2010;3:98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2010.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ringertz S.H., Hoiby E.A., Jensenius M., Maehlen J., Caugant D.A., Myklebust A., Fossum K. Injectional anthrax in a heroin skin-popper. Lancet. 2000;356:1574–1575. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03133-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Booth M.G., Hood J., Brooks T.J., Hart A. Anthrax infection in drug users. Lancet. 2010;375:1345–1346. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60573-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Powell A.G., Crozier J.E., Hodgson H., Galloway D.J. A case of septicaemic anthrax in an intravenous drug user. BMC Infect. Dis. 2011;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Inverarity D.J., Forrester V.M., Cumming J.G., Paterson P.J., Campbell R.J., Brooks T.J., Carson G.L., Ruddy J.P. Injectional anthrax at a Scottish district general hospital. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015;143:1311–1321. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814001885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ascough S., Altmann D.M. Anthrax in injecting drug users: The need for increased vigilance in the clinic. Exp. Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2015;13:681–684. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1032255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Owen J.L., Yang T., Mohamadzadeh M. New insights into gastrointestinal anthrax infection. Trends Mol. Med. 2015;21:154–163. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hashemi S.A., Azimian A., Nojumi S., Garivani T., Safamanesh S., Ghafouri M. A case of fatal gastrointestinal anthrax in north eastern Iran. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2015;2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/875829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Beatty M.E., Ashford D.A., Griffin P.M., Tauxe R.V., Sobel J. Gastrointestinal anthrax: Review of the literature. Arch. Intern. Med. 2003;163:2527–2531. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.20.2527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mayo L., Dionne-Odom J., Talbot E.A., Adamski C., Bean C., Daly E.R. Gastrointestinal anthrax after an animal-hide drumming event–New Hampshire and Massachusetts. CDC MMWR Wkly. 2009;59:872–877. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Friedlander A.M. Anthrax: Clinical features, pathogenesis, and potential biological warfare threat. Curr. Clin. Top. Infect. Dis. 2000;20:335–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Abramova F.A., Grinberg L.M., Yampolskaya O.V., Walker D.H. Pathology of inhalational anthrax in 42 cases from the Sverdlovsk outbreak of 1979. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:2291–2294. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Banks D.J., Ward S.C., Bradley K.A. New insights into the functions of anthrax toxin. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2006;8:1–18. doi: 10.1017/S1462399406010714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Collier R.J., Young J.A. Anthrax toxin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2003;19:45–70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.140655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Leppla S.H. Anthrax Toxin. Volume 145. Springer-Verlag; Berlin, Germany: 2000. Bacterial protein toxins; pp. 445–472. Chapter 19. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Moayeri M., Leppla S.H., Vrentas C., Pomerantsev A., Liu S. Anthrax pathogenesis. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2015;69 doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu S., Moayeri M., Leppla S.H. Anthrax lethal and edema toxins in anthrax pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:317–325. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Leppla S.H. Anthrax toxin edema factor: A bacterial adenylate cyclase that increases cyclic AMP concentrations of eukaryotic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1982;79:3162–3166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.10.3162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Leppla S.H. Bacillus anthracis calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase: Chemical and enzymatic properties and interactions with eucaryotic cells. Adv. Cycl. Nucleotide Protein Phosphorylation Res. 1984;17:189–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Park J.M., Greten F.R., Li Z.W., Karin M. Macrophage apoptosis by anthrax lethal factor through p38 map kinase inhibition. Science. 2002;297:2048–2051. doi: 10.1126/science.1073163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Park J.M., Greten F.R., Wong A., Westrick R.J., Arthur J.S., Otsu K., Hoffmann A., Montminy M., Karin M. Signaling pathways and genes that inhibit pathogen-induced macrophage apoptosis–CREB and NF-kappaB as key regulators. Immunity. 2005;23:319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cunningham K., Lacy D.B., Mogridge J., Collier R.J. Mapping the lethal factor and edema factor binding sites on oligomeric anthrax protective antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:7049–7053. doi: 10.1073/pnas.062160399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kintzer A.F., Thoren K.L., Sterling H.J., Dong K.C., Feld G.K., Tang I.I., Zhang T.T., Williams E.R., Berger J.M., Krantz B.A. The protective antigen component of anthrax toxin forms functional octameric complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;392:614–629. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mogridge J., Cunningham K., Lacy D.B., Mourez M., Collier R.J. The lethal and edema factors of anthrax toxin bind only to oligomeric forms of the protective antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:7045–7048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052160199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nassi S., Collier R.J., Finkelstein A. Pa63 channel of anthrax toxin: An extended beta-barrel. Biochemistry. 2002;41:1445–1450. doi: 10.1021/bi0119518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pittman P.R., Norris S.L., Barrera Oro J.G., Bedwell D., Cannon T.L., McKee K.T., Jr. Patterns of antibody response in humans to the anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) primary (six-dose) series. Vaccine. 2006;24:3654–3660. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.01.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Baldari C.T., Tonello F., Paccani S.R., Montecucco C. Anthrax toxins: A paradigm of bacterial immune suppression. Trends Immunol. 2006;27:434–440. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2006.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Duesbery N.S., Vande Woude G.F. Anthrax toxins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1999;55:1599–1609. doi: 10.1007/s000180050399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Stepanov A.V., Marinin L.I., Pomerantsev A.P., Staritsin N.A. Development of novel vaccines against anthrax in man. J. Biotechnol. 1996;44:155–160. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(95)00092-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tournier J.N., Ulrich R.G., Quesnel-Hellmann A., Mohamadzadeh M., Stiles B.G. Anthrax, toxins and vaccines: A 125-year journey targeting Bacillus anthracis. Exp. Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2009;7:219–236. doi: 10.1586/14787210.7.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cote C.K., Rossi C.A., Kang A.S., Morrow P.R., Lee J.S., Welkos S.L. The detection of protective antigen (PA) associated with spores of Bacillus anthracis and the effects of anti-PA antibodies on spore germination and macrophage interactions. Microb. Pathog. 2005;38:209–225. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Welkos S., Friedlander A., Weeks S., Little S., Mendelson I. In-vitro characterisation of the phagocytosis and fate of anthrax spores in macrophages and the effects of anti-PA antibody. J. Med. Microbiol. 2002;51:821–831. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-10-821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Welkos S., Little S., Friedlander A., Fritz D., Fellows P. The role of antibodies to Bacillus anthracis and anthrax toxin components in inhibiting the early stages of infection by anthrax spores. Microbiol. 2001;147:1677–1685. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-6-1677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ireland J., Hanna P.C. Amino acid- and purine ribonucleoside-induced germination of Bacillus anthracis delta-Sterne endospore: GerS mediates responses to aromatic ring structures. J. Bacteriol. 2002;184:1293–1303. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.5.1296-1303.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ireland J., Hanna P.C. Macrophage-enhanced germination of Bacillus anthracis endospores requires gers. Infect. Immun. 2002;70:5870–5872. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5870-5872.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Moir A., Corfe B.M., Behravan J. Spore germination. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2002;59:403–409. doi: 10.1007/s00018-002-8432-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Moir A., Smith D. The genetics of bacterial spore germination. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 1990;44:5331–5553. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.44.100190.002531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Guidi-Rontani C., Weber-Levy M., Labruyere E., Mock M. Germination of Bacillus anthracis spores within alveolar macrophages. Mol. Microbiol. 1999;31:9–17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cote C.K., Rea K.M., Norris S.L., van Rooijen N., Welkos S.L. The use of a model of in vivo macrophage depletion to study the role of macrophages during infection with Bacillus anthracis spores. Microb. Pathog. 2004;37:169–175. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2004.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Omotade T.O., Bernhards R.C., Klimko C.P., Matthews M.E., Hill A.J., Hunter M.S., Webster W.M., Bozue J.A., Welkos S.L., Cote C.K. The impact of inducing germination of Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus thuringiensis spores on potential secondary decontamination strategies. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014;117:1614–1633. doi: 10.1111/jam.12644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gatto-Menking D.L., Yu H., Bruno J.G., Goode M.T., Miller M., Zulich A.W. Sensitive detection of biotoxoids and bacterial spores using an immunomagnetic electrochemiluminescence sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1995;10:501–507. doi: 10.1016/0956-5663(95)96925-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bradley K.A., Mogridge J., Mourez M., Collier R.J., Young J.A. Identification of the cellular receptor for anthrax toxin. Nature. 2001;414:225–229. doi: 10.1038/n35101999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Scobie H.M., Rainey G.J., Bradley K.A., Young J.A. Human capillary morphogenesis protein 2 functions as an anthrax toxin receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:5170–5174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0431098100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Liu S., Crown D., Miller-Randolph S., Moayeri M., Wang H., Hu H., Morley T., Leppla S.H. Capillary morphogenesis protein-2 is the major receptor mediating lethality of anthrax toxin in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:12424–12429. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905409106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Martchenko M., Jeong S.Y., Cohen S.N. Heterodimeric integrin complexes containing betal-integrin promote internalization and lethality of anthrax toxin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:15583–15588. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010145107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wei W., Lu Q., Chaudry G.J., Leppla S.H., Cohen S.N. The LDL receptor-related protein LRP6 mediates internalization and lethality of anthrax toxin. Cell. 2006;124:1141–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bergman N.H., Passalacqua K.D., Gaspard R., Shetron-Rama L.M., Quackenbush J., Hanna P.C. Murine macrophage transcriptional responses to Bacillus anthracis infection and intoxication. Infect. Immun. 2005;73:1069–1080. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.2.1069-1080.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Comer J.E., Galindo C.L., Zhang F., Wenglikowski A.M., Bush K.L., Garner H.R., Peterson J.W., Chopra A.K. Murine macrophage transcriptional and functional responses to Bacillus anthracis edema toxin. Microb. Pathog. 2006;41:96–110. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Erwin J.L., DaSilva L.M., Bavari S., Little S.F., Friedlander A.M., Chanh T.C. Macrophage-derived cell lines do not express proinflammatory cytokines after exposure to Bacillus anthracis lethal toxin. Infect. Immun. 2001;69:1175–1177. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.2.1175-1177.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Friedlander A.M. Macrophages are sensitive to anthrax lethal toxin through an acid-dependent process. J. Biol. Chem. 1986;261:7123–7126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Friedlander A.M., Bhatnagar R., Leppla S.H., Johnson L., Singh Y. Characterization of macrophage sensitivity and resistance to anthrax lethal toxin. Infect. Immun. 1993;61:245–252. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.1.245-252.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kim J., Park H., Myung-Hyun J., Han S.H., Chung H., Lee J.S., Park J.S., Yoon M.Y. The effects of anthrax lethal factor on the macrophage proteome: Potential activity on nitric oxide synthases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008;472:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pellizzari R., Guidi-Rontani C., Vitale G., Mock M., Montecucco C. Anthrax lethal factor cleaves mkk3 in macrophages and inhibits the LPS/IFNgamma-induced release of no and tnfalpha. FEBS Lett. 1999;462:199–204. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01502-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pellizzari R., Guidi-Rontani C., Vitale G., Mock M., Montecucco C. Lethal factor of Bacillus anthracis cleaves the N-terminus of MAPKKs: Analysis of the intracellular consequences in macrophages. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2000;290:421–427. doi: 10.1016/S1438-4221(00)80056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Popov S.G., Villasmil R., Bernardi J., Grene E., Cardwell J., Wu A., Alibek D., Bailey C., Alibek K. Lethal toxin of Bacillus anthracis causes apoptosis of macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002;293:349–355. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00227-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Vitale G., Pellizzari R., Recchi C., Napolitani G., Mock M., Montecucco C. Anthrax lethal factor cleaves the N-terminus of mapkks and induces tyrosine/threonine phosphorylation of MAPKs in cultured macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998;248:706–711. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.During R.L., Li W., Hao B., Koenig J.M., Stephens D.S., Quinn C.P., Southwick F.S. Anthrax lethal toxin paralyzes neutrophil actin-based motility. J. Infect. Dis. 2005;192:837–845. doi: 10.1086/432516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.O’Brien J., Friedlander A., Dreier T., Ezzell J., Leppla S. Effects of anthrax toxin components on human neutrophils. Infect. Immun. 1985;47:306–310. doi: 10.1128/iai.47.1.306-310.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wright G.G., Mandell G.L. Anthrax toxin blocks priming of neutrophils by lipopolysaccharide and by muramyl dipeptide. J. Exp. Med. 1986;164:1700–1709. doi: 10.1084/jem.164.5.1700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Agrawal A., Lingappa J., Leppla S.H., Agrawal S., Jabbar A., Quinn C., Pulendran B. Impairment of dendritic cells and adaptive immunity by anthrax lethal toxin. Nature. 2003;424:329–334. doi: 10.1038/nature01794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Tournier J.N., Quesnel-Hellmann A., Mathieu J., Montecucco C., Tang W.J., Mock M., Vidal D.R., Goossens P.L. Anthrax edema toxin cooperates with lethal toxin to impair cytokine secretion during infection of dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2005;174:4934–4941. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Cleret A., Quesnel-Hellmann A., Mathieu J., Vidal D., Tournier J.N. Resident CD11c+ lung cells are impaired by anthrax toxins after spore infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2006;194:86–94. doi: 10.1086/504686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Raymond B., Batsche E., Boutillon F., Wu Y.Z., Leduc D., Balloy V., Raoust E., Muchardt C., Goossens P.L., Touqui L. Anthrax lethal toxin impairs IL-8 expression in epithelial cells through inhibition of histone H3 modification. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kirby J.E. Anthrax lethal toxin induces human endothelial cell apoptosis. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:430–439. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.1.430-439.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Warfel J.M., Steele A.D., D’Agnillo F. Anthrax lethal toxin induces endothelial barrier dysfunction. Am. J. Pathol. 2005;166:1871–1881. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62496-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Banks D.J., Barnajian M., Maldonado-Arocho F.J., Sanchez A.M., Bradley K.A. Anthrax toxin receptor 2 mediates Bacillus anthracis killing of macrophages following spore challenge. Cell. Microbiol. 2005;7:1173–1185. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00545.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Averette K.M., Pratt M.R., Yang Y., Bassilian S., Whitelegge J.P., Loo J.A., Muir T.W., Bradley K.A. Anthrax lethal toxin induced lysosomal membrane permeabilization and cytosolic cathepsin release is Nlrp1b/Nalp1b-dependent. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Cote C.K., van Rooijen N., Welkos S.L. The roles of macrophages and neutrophils in the early host response to Bacillus anthracis spores using a mouse model of infection. Infect. Immun. 2006;74:469–480. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.1.469-480.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Cote C.K., Dimezzo T.L., Banks D.J., France B., Bradley K.A., Welkos S.L. Early interactions between fully virulent Bacillus anthracis and macrophages that influence the balance between spore clearance and development of a lethal infection. Microbes Infect. 2008;10:613–619. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2008.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hanna P.C., Acosta D., Collier R.J. On the role of macrophages in anthrax. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:10198–10201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Lincoln R.E., Walker J.S., Klein F., Rosenwald A.J., Jones W.I., Jr. Value of field data for extrapolation in anthrax. Fed. Proc. 1967;26:1558–1562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Terra J.K., Cote C.K., France B., Jenkins A.L., Bozue J.A., Welkos S.L., LeVine S.M., Bradley K.A. Cutting edge: Resistance to Bacillus anthracis infection mediated by a lethal toxin sensitive allele of Nalp1b/Nlrp1b. J. Immunol. 2010;184:17–20. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cote C.K., Bozue J., Moody K.L., DiMezzo T.L., Chapman C.E., Welkos S.L. Analysis of a novel spore antigen in Bacillus anthracis that contributes to spore opsonization. Microbiology. 2008;154:619–632. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/008292-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Brahmbhatt T.N., Darnell S.C., Carvalho H.M., Sanz P., Kang T.J., Bull R.L., Rasmussen S.B., Cross A.S., O’Brien A.D. Recombinant exosporium protein BclA of Bacillus anthracis is effective as a booster for mice primed with suboptimal amounts of protective antigen. Infect. Immun. 2007;75:5240–5247. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00884-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Cybulski R.J., Jr., Sanz P., McDaniel D., Darnell S., Bull R.L., O’Brien A.D. Recombinant Bacillus anthracis spore proteins enhance protection of mice primed with suboptimal amounts of protective antigen. Vaccine. 2008;26:4927–4939. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yu L.H., Cutting S.M. The effect of anti-spore antibody responses on the use of spores for vaccine delivery. Vaccine. 2009;27:4576–4584. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.05.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Welkos S.L., Cote C.K., Rea K.M., Gibbs P.H. A microtiter fluorometric assay to detect the germination of Bacillus anthracis spores and the germination inhibitory effects of antibodies. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2004;56:253–265. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Toxins are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES