Abstract
Background
The recent discovery that methylated cytosines are converted to 5-hydroxymethylated cytosines (5hmC) by the family of ten-eleven translocation enzymes has sparked significant interest on the genomic location, the abundance in different tissues, the putative functions, and the stability of this epigenetic mark. 5hmC plays a key role in the brain, where it is particularly abundant and dynamic during development.
Results
Here, we comprehensively characterize 5hmC in the prefrontal cortices of 24 subjects. We show that, although there is inter-individual variability in 5hmC content among unrelated individuals, approximately 8 % of all CpGs on autosomal chromosomes contain 5hmC, while sex chromosomes contain far less. Our data also provide evidence suggesting that 5hmC has transcriptional regulatory properties, as the density of 5hmC was highest in enhancer regions and within exons. Furthermore, we link increased 5hmC density to histone modification binding sites, to the gene bodies of actively transcribed genes, and to exon-intron boundaries. Finally, we provide several genomic regions of interest that contain gender-specific 5hmC.
Conclusions
Collectively, these results present an important reference for the growing number of studies that are interested in the investigation of the role of 5hmC in brain and mental disorders.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1875-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, Prefrontal cortex, Human, Epigenetics, Brain
Background
In mammalian cells, 5-methylcytosine (5mC) has been the most widely studied epigenetic mark, and has long been regarded as a stable DNA modification. Recently, however, research has shown that 5mC can be oxidized to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) by the ten-eleven translocation (TET) family of proteins [1–3]. 5hmC has been shown to be most abundant in brain tissue [4–6] and to influence transcriptional regulatory activity [7–10].
Although its role is not yet completely understood, 5hmC has been increasingly investigated in neuropsychiatric phenotypes, likely due to its involvement in neuronal development and enrichment in brain tissue [11, 12]. In humans, global levels of 5hmC have been shown to be reduced in Alzheimer’s disease [13], while site-specific differences have been demonstrated in autism spectrum disorder [14], Huntington’s disease [15], and psychosis [16]. In mouse models, genome-wide alterations have also been observed in Huntington’s disease [17], as well as in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome [18]. Taken together, these observations suggest a significant role of 5hmC in the etiology of neuropsychiatric diseases.
To date, however, investigations of 5hmC in the human brain have either been in very small samples or have utilized low-throughput techniques. Here, we use a sample with good power and sequencing resolution to provide insight into genomic characteristics of 5hmC in the brain. Although we observe sizable variability of 5hmC between subjects, lending to the hypothesis of a dynamic cytosine-modifying pathway, we also demonstrate a strong association between stable 5hmC and epigenetic properties. In its entirety, the descriptive data presented here provide a map of 5hmC at single base resolution, which is of interest to future studies of 5hmC in the cortex of the human brain.
Results
Sequencing characteristics
Several high-throughput epigenetic sequencing protocols rely on restriction enzymes, such as MspI and HpaII. In this study, we used AbaSI, an enzyme that recognized glucosyl-modified cytosines and created a cut site 11–13 base pairs downstream of this modified cytosine [19], followed by sequencing to conduct a whole-genome 5hmC analysis at single-base resolution. We initially studied DNA from prefrontal cortical samples from 19 male subjects. As expected, our sequencing results consistently showed that 40–45 % of all reads contained cytosine and guanine bases, respectively, at the 11th and 12th positions after the adaptor sequence (Fig. 1a). This confirmed the specificity of the enzyme, as 5hmC occurs almost exclusively in CpG sequences in both fetal and adult mammalian brain [8, 9]. This value was also expected since, methodologically, half of the sequenced reads were not expected to contain a CpG dinucleotide at these positions and, therefore, were discarded during bioinformatic analyses. We generated an average of 109,394,675 single end reads per subject, of which an average of 82,210,131 ± 4,498,459 reads passed multiple filtering steps and were used to generate the data presented here (Additional file 1). We plotted the number of aligned reads against the number of unique 5hmC sites detected and found that 60–80 million reads was an optimal range; there were four subjects with >90 million uniquely aligned reads and the number of 5hmC sites in these subjects was not notably different from most subjects with 60–80 million reads (Fig. 1b). This sugested diminishing returns of 5hmC detectabiliy under these experimental parameters after ~60–80 million reads. We next assessed the effects of age and post-mortem delay, two factors that might affect 5hmC leves, and found no signficant correlation (Fig. 1c, d).
Genome-wide inter-individual differences of 5hmC
A major focus of this study was to determine whether 5hmC sites were present at similar genomic locations in brain tissue from different individuals. We first investigated what proportion of all 5hmC sites were common to multiple individuals. We identified a total of 17,368,538 unique 5hmC sites across 19 individuals, of which 81.3 % were also identified in a previous study examining 5hmC content in the prefrontal cortex using Tet-assisted bisulfite sequencing (TAB-Seq) [9]. We found that 41.7 % of all 5hmC sites observed were found in at least 5 individuals, whereas 12.2 % of all 5hmC sites were common to at least 10 individuals, and only 1.3 % were common to at least 15 individuals (Additional file 2). As a point of comparison, we investigated the proportion of 5mC sites common to multiple individuals by whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS). 5mC showed considerable stability across the 19 subjects investigated when considering 5, 10, or 15 individuals, however we observed an abrupt decrease in the percentage of sites common to all 19 subjects (Additional file 3). Although these data indicated that 5hmC is considerably more variable than 5mC, they also suggested a relative degree of stability of 5hmC sites in brain tissue from different individuals.
We next assessed the probability of detecting similar 5hmC sites between any two individuals. To do so, we selected two representative samples with respect to sequencing depth and number of unique 5hmC sites. We subsequently calculated the hypergeometric probability of detecting the same 5hmCs in sequencing reads across independent samples. First, we estimated the total number of 5hmC sites in the human brain genome to be around 27 million, based on previously published data [9]. We observed 6,793,582 and 3,818,749 total 5hmC sites in each of the representative samples considered in this analysis, of which 1,999,493 5hmC sites were common to both subjects (P < 3.34e−178), suggesting that the pattern of common 5hmC sites observed between samples was not random.
Chromsomal distribution of 5hmC in human prefrontal cortex
While we observed a strong overlap of 5hmC across individuals, we opted to perform the following analyses according to three levels of stringency; low, intermediate, and high stringencies, which represented all 5hmC sites common to ~25, 50, and 75 % of the total sample, respectively. In the low stringency group, an average of 25.7 ± 1.1 % of all autosomal CGs contained a hydroxymethyl mark, while 7.4 ± 2.3 % and 0.8 ± 0.4 % of CGs contained a hydroxymethyl mark in the intermediate and high stringency groups, respectively (Fig. 2a–f, Additional file 4).
The total number of 5hmC sites analyzed in the intermediate stringency model was 2,121,951, which was slightly lower than the average number of 5hmC sites observed in any single individual (4,277,308 ± 319,846). Furthermore, 94.75 % of sites in the intermediate stringency were also present in a recent TAB-Seq study of the prefrontal cortex of one individual human female [9]. For these reasons, we focused further analyses on the intermediate stringency model.
5hmC densities across chromosomal features
We next determined the density of 5hmC on each chromsome and within specific chromosomal features. We defined the density as being the total number of 5hmC sites corrected for the total number of CGs on the chromosome and the chromosome length. We observed the density of 5hmC to be quite stable across autosomal chromosomes, although a relative increase in density was observed in chromosomes 18, 20, 21, and 22 compared to other chromosomes. Interestingly, in comparison to the autosomes, the density of 5hmC was greatly decreased in the sex chromosomes and increased in mitochondrial DNA (Fig. 3a).
The density of 5hmC across chromosomal features is of interest as it may provide insight into its potential functional properties. Genomic features were defined based on GRCh37/hg19 genomic annotations downloaded from the UCSC browser and Ensembl release 75. Our data showed an increase in 5hmC density in both poised and active enhancers, as well as in exons (Fig. 3b). The increase in 5hmC in these regions has been previously observed in human embryonic stem cells [20, 21] and both fetal and adult mouse brain [8]. In contrast, 5hmC density appeared to be relatively depleted in transcription start sites (TSS), CpG shores, and, most strikingly, CpG islands and both long and short interspersed elements (LINEs and SINEs, respectively).
Potential functional properties of 5hmC
The observed increase in 5hmC density in enhancer regions of the genome led to the hypothesis that 5hmC may also be associated with histone marks on an individual basis. Using data from chromatin maps in the frontal lobe [22], we calculated the mean 5hmC levels in contiguous 100 bp bins flanking the proposed histone modification binding site. Consistent with the results showing increased density of 5hmC in poised enhancer regions (Fig. 3b), we also observed an increase in 5hmC density at the H3K4me1 ChIP-Seq peak (Fig. 3c). In addition, opposite results were seen at both the H3K4me3 and H3K27ac ChIP-Seq peaks, as the density of 5hmC decreased at the midpoint for both histone marks (Fig. 3c).
Similar to histone and cytosine methylation, 5hmC may be an epigenetic mark that associates with altered gene transcription. To explore this possibility further, we compared 5hmC densities across the gene body to available RNA-Seq data from the prefrontal cortex of 11 independent control samples [23]. We plotted 5hmC density along the gene body for all genes separated in quartiles by their expression levels. We found that 5hmC was enriched in the gene bodies of highly expressed genes (Fig. 4a). This was consistent with similar associations between gene body 5hmC and actively transcribed genes reported previously in limited human and mouse brain samples [8, 9], as well as mouse neuronal cells [7]. In addition to gene body 5hmC, genes with the highest expression also showed the greatest reduction in 5hmC at the TSS (Fig. 4a), even though the TSS of highly expressed genes had an overall increase in CpG density compared to the TSS of lowly expressed genes.
Along with the putative function of 5hmC in regulating gene transcription, two previous reports have also suggested an association between 5hmC and exon-intron boundaries [9, 24]. We looked at 5hmC content across 20 bp flanking the 5’ and 3’ ends of 144,157 internal exons spanning 20,745 genes. We observed patterns of increased 5hmC at exon-intron boundaries, specifically at the 5’ splice site and four bases downstream (Fig. 4b). This spike in 5hmC was not strand-specific, as similar results were obtained on both the sense and anti-sense strands (Fig. 4c). The present results may be indicative of a potential splicing mechanism, perhaps through the association of 5hmC and the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF). Not only is CTCF a transcription factor that has been linked to alternative splicing by regulating the activity of RNA polymerase II [25], but it has also been shown to interact with 5hmC and TET enzymes in both mouse and human embryonic stem cells [21, 26, 27]. Taken together, these results provide an interesting avenue for further research into alternative splicing mechanisms.
Brain 5hmC clusters are predominant in genes associated with neurodevelopment
Given the association of 5hmC with regulatory processes, we next wanted to determine whether 5hmC aggregated in specific genes. We defined a cluster as being a region containing at least three 5hmCs, each within 200 bp of each other. Using the 2,121,951 5hmC sites in the intermediate stringency category, we identified a total of 65,898 clusters. The midpoint of each cluster was then associated to the TSS of the nearest gene. A total of 8,713 genes were analyzed using GeneTrail [28] for gene ontology (GO). A variety of terms related to cellular, metabolic, and signaling processes were significantly associated with 5hmC clusters. Furthermore, of particular interest, we observed an enrichment of terms associated with neurological processes and neurodevelopment, including terms related to nervous system development, neurogenesis, and gliogenesis (Table 1). Additional significant terms included those related to other areas of development and epigenetic processes. The complete list of GO terms can be found in Additional file 5.
Table 1.
Neurological | Expected | Observed | p-value (fdr) | Enrichment |
Neurological system process | 616.197 | 485 | 2.86E-13 | down |
Neurogenesis | 332.402 | 396 | 7.11E-06 | up |
Neuron projection | 190.242 | 237 | 1.74E-05 | up |
Generation of neurons | 309.405 | 366 | 4.80E-05 | up |
Neuron differentiation | 281.183 | 333 | 0.000109238 | up |
Axon | 91.4627 | 117 | 0.00142957 | up |
Cell morphogenesis involved in neuron differentiation | 124.389 | 151 | 0.00563766 | up |
Neuron projection morphogenesis | 127.525 | 154 | 0.00684608 | up |
Glial cell differentiation | 39.721 | 53 | 0.0202685 | up |
Regulation of neuron differentiation | 93.0307 | 113 | 0.0215321 | up |
Gliogenesis | 46.5153 | 60 | 0.0317942 | up |
Regulation of neurogenesis | 113.414 | 134 | 0.0340942 | up |
Epigenetic | Expected | Observed | p-value (fdr) | Enrichment |
Protein amino acid methylation | 25.0869 | 35 | 0.0332904 | up |
Lysine N-methyltransferase activity | 18.8152 | 27 | 0.0455873 | up |
Protein-lysine N-methyltransferase activity | 18.8152 | 27 | 0.0455873 | up |
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase activity | 18.8152 | 27 | 0.0455873 | up |
N-methyltransferase activity | 29.7907 | 40 | 0.0461752 | up |
Histone H2A acetylation | 6.27173 | 11 | 0.0496797 | up |
Development | Expected | Observed | p-value (fdr) | Enrichment |
Sensory perception of smell | 189.197 | 33 | 1.42E-66 | down |
Sensory perception of chemical stimulus | 209.58 | 50 | 3.33E-61 | down |
Sensory perception | 389.37 | 253 | 6.42E-22 | down |
Developmental process | 1748.24 | 1912 | 1.16E-08 | up |
System development | 1318.63 | 1463 | 2.08E-08 | up |
Anatomical structure development | 1460.79 | 1608 | 4.39E-08 | up |
Multicellular organismal development | 1593.54 | 1744 | 6.81E-08 | up |
Nervous system development | 603.131 | 699 | 1.78E-07 | up |
Regulation of developmental process | 413.934 | 494 | 1.94E-07 | up |
Positive regulation of developmental process | 182.925 | 236 | 3.04E-07 | up |
Neuron development | 205.399 | 249 | 0.000157004 | up |
Forebrain development | 90.4174 | 118 | 0.000419088 | up |
Central nervous system development | 239.371 | 282 | 0.000802517 | up |
Neuron projection development | 166.723 | 200 | 0.00211809 | up |
Sensory organ development | 129.093 | 154 | 0.0128753 | up |
Regulation of nervous system development | 123.344 | 146 | 0.0233886 | up |
Brain development | 163.588 | 189 | 0.0279154 | up |
Post-embryonic development | 33.4492 | 45 | 0.0307565 | up |
Regulation of neuron projection development | 56.4456 | 71 | 0.0355767 | up |
Embryonic development | 321.949 | 354 | 0.0476929 | up |
Sex differences in 5hmC in the human prefrontal cortex
In males, the density of 5hmC on the sex chromosomes (mean = 4.43e−11 ± 2.37e−12) was nearly 10-fold lower (two-tailed P < 0.0001) compared to the autosomes (mean = 6.08e−10 ± 3.56e−11) (Fig. 3a), suggesting differential 5hmC patterns between chromosome types. To further explore this finding, we performed another AbaSI-Seq analysis using DNA from the prefrontal cortex from females (n = 5). Similar to our experiment in males, we used all sites common to a proportion of subjects (at least 3 individuals), which is equivalent to the intermediate stringency model, to plot the density of 5hmC across all chromosomes. As in the analysis with males only, the density of 5hmC was increased on chromosomes 18, 20, 21, and 22, while remaining quite stable across all other autosomes (Fig. 5a). Interestingly, the difference in 5hmC density between males and females became larger as the chromosome size decreased (Fig. 5b).
To identify differences in 5hmC patterns between males and females, we reasoned that differential clusters of 5hmC on any chromosome might indicate potential regulatory regions. As such, to identify 5hmC clusters unique to males, we sampled five randomly selected sets of 5 males and compared 5hmC sites in each set to those found in the females. We identified 27,410 5hmC clusters, associated with 7,064 genes, which were both unique to males and common in all five randomly selected sets. Subsequent GO analysis identified an enrichment in genes related to anatomical and system development, among others (Additional file 6). To determine female-specific 5hmC clusters, we compared all 5hmC sites on autosomes and the sex chromosomes, found in both the female (11,054,815 sites) and male samples (17,368,538 5hmC sites). In doing so, we identified 707,549 5hmC sites unique to the females included in this study, which might represent gender-specific 5hmC sites. A cluster analysis of these 5hmC sites specific to females indicated a total of 12,034 clusters, which were associated to 4,417 genes. GO analysis identified terms related to organ morphogenesis, anatomical structure development, and system development, among others (Table 2, Additional file 7). Of particular interest were 2 clusters on the anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) gene, one of which contained three 5hmC sites within a 188 bp region spanning intron 2 and exon 3 and the other containing seven 5hmC sites within a 557 bp region of the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) (Fig. 6a). According to the RNA-Seq data, AMH was expressed in the frontal cortex. We observed increased 5hmC density in the gene body and a spike in 5hmC density at the transcription end site (TES), both of which were in agreement with the two clusters found in the AMH gene. AMH is associated with gender-specific development as it is expressed in males up to puberty to suppress the development of the fallopian tubes and ovaries [29]. In females, however, AMH is most highly expressed between puberty and menopause, as it recruits primary follicles in the ovaries [29]. Given the hypothesis that 5hmC is associated with active transcription, one would expect few to no 5hmC clusters in the AMH gene in males. Indeed, none of the 65,898 clusters found in the male cluster analysis, using all sites common in at least 10 males, were in the AMH gene.
Table 2.
GO term | Expected | Observed | p-value (fdr) | Enrichment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Organ morphogenesis | 172.483 | 249 | 2.94E-09 | up |
Anatomical structure morphogenesis | 362.983 | 462 | 5.47E-08 | up |
Anatomical structure development | 740.538 | 864 | 5.41E-07 | up |
System development | 668.472 | 785 | 8.92E-07 | up |
Organ development | 502.877 | 603 | 2.39E-06 | up |
Tissue development | 215.405 | 269 | 0.000475655 | up |
Anatomical structure formation involved in morphogenesis | 121.878 | 161 | 0.0010206 | up |
Regulation of anatomical structure morphogenesis | 81.6049 | 109 | 0.00786336 | up |
Using the publicly available RNA-Seq data [23], we investigated genes showing differential expression between genders (Additional file 8). This data showed the X-linked zinc finger protein (ZFX) gene on the X chromosome to be one of the most significantly differentially expressed genes in females (log2 FC = 0.653; FDR-corrected P < 0.0001). Of the 5hmC clusters unique to females, two are located within the ZFX intergenic region (Fig. 6b). ZFX, which has been shown to escape X-inactivation, is analogous to the Y-linked zinc finger protein (ZFY) on the Y chromosome, and both have been linked to sex determination [30–33]. Similar to AMH, none of the clusters, using all sites common in at least 10 males, were found in the ZFX gene.
Genes escaping X-inactivation show greater gene body 5hmC density
Following the results showing gender-specific differentially hydroxymethylated regions (DhmRs) in genes related to sexual anatomical development, we hypothesized that 5hmC may play a role in additional gender related developmental processes. 5mC plays an important role in X-inactivation, and previous literature showed that genes escaping X-inactivation have a decrease in promoter CG methylation and an increase in intragenic CH methylation [8]. Previous studies have separated genes on a scale from 1 to 9, with 1 and 9 respectively indicating genes least or most likely to escape inactivation. Using all sites found in our female subjects, our results indicated that these same genes that escape X-inactivation also show a significant increase in gene body 5hmC compared to genes that remain inactivated (Fig. 6c). Furthermore, genes that are most likely to escape X-inactivation showed even greater intergenic 5hmC density. Although this is only an initial characterization, it provides an interesting avenue for future studies investigating the potential etiology of X-linked diseases or disorders.
Discussion and conclusions
In this study, we provide a deep characterization of the genomic locations of 5hmC in the human prefrontal cortex in a large sample. Using AbaSI-Seq, a high-throughput technique, we confirm previously published work using either low-throughput techniques or single samples. Furthermore, we extend the current knowledge of the role of 5hmC in the brain by linking stable 5hmC sites to enhancer regions and exon-intron junctions, both of which are involved in gene transcription. We also show the existence of regions of the genome that contain gender-specific 5hmC patterns, in addition to providing a putative mechanism for how certain genes escape X-inactivation. These data are of interest, as genomic mapping of 5hmC in the prefrontal cortex will likely be of reference for future studies investigating brain and mental disorders.
Inter-individual variability is common across many fields of study. This is especially true in epigenetics, where both the environment and the genetic landscape are contributing factors in establishing epigenetic features [34–37]. It is, therefore, not surprising to see varying degrees of 5hmC across the chromosomes and specific genomic features. These findings provide a basis for a dynamic DNA demethylation pathway. More importantly, our data show regions of the genome that are consistently hydroxymethylated in many individuals. These results confirm the stability of 5hmC in the human genome and provide a foundation for furthering our understanding of the epigenetic properties of 5hmC. Similarly, we show that, in order to increase our understanding of 5hmC, future research will have to be performed on large samples. Furthermore, increased stringency of bioinformatics analyses will reduce levels of random variability, thereby enhancing the power of studies to infer biological relevance from the 5hmC sequencing data.
In this study, we show that an intermediate level of stringency, defined as 5hmC sites present in at least half the total sample, was appropriate in discovering regions with a consistently high density of 5hmC across subjects. Our results provide reliable evidence that 5hmC is associated with gene regulatory features, such as enhancer regions and histone marks that associate with active gene transcription. Furthermore, we add to the available data in mammalian cells and tissues showing a clear correlation between gene body 5hmC and highly expressed genes. Finally, our cluster analyses show an increased density of 5hmC in genes associated with many developmental processes, specifically those related to neurogenesis and nervous system development. These results are of interest considering the many publications that have linked 5hmC to neurodevelopment, neurodegenerative, and neuropsychiatric phenotypes, and are consistent with the role of 5hmC and 5mC in tissue-specific gene regulation [7, 38], thus supporting the internal validity of our findings. Although the exact function of 5hmC remains unknown, our findings lend to the idea that 5hmC may act as an epigenetic mark by regulating gene transcription.
In addition to characterizing 5hmC in a large sample, we also provide evidence to suggest that 5hmC may be an important factor in anatomical development. Not only do GO analyses of unique DhmRs in females show clusters of 5hmC on genes associated with gender-specific properties and functions, but our results also indicate that genes escaping X-inactivation have increased intragenic 5hmC density. Early research into 5hmC and TET proteins showed specific properties of each based on developmental stages. For example, TET1 and TET2 are more highly expressed in primordial germ cells, while TET3 is primary found in zygotes [39, 40]. Similarly, levels of 5hmC tend to be high in zygotes, decrease rapidly during cell division, and are reestablished in the blastocyst [41]. Interestingly, TET protein knockdown and knockout experiments show that TET proteins appear to have redundant and compensatory roles in establishing 5hmC patterns [40, 42, 43]. As such, although the exact function of 5hmC in development remains unclear, the presence of gender-specific DhmRs highlights the putative roles of 5hmC and TET proteins in embryonic and adult development.
Whether 5hmC is solely an intermediate molecule in the process of DNA demethylation or whether this 6th DNA base may have additional regulatory properties is a question that remains at the forefront of 5hmC research. Recent literature has shown that the oxidation of 5mC to 5hmC occurs on the parental strand after replication, and in the presence of a stable pool of 5hmC in multiple tissues from adult mice [44]. Furthermore, several studies have shown the existence of 5hmC in RNA, from archaeal species to mammalian cells, that occurs through the TET-mediated oxidation of 5mC [45, 46]. Certainly, although 5hmC marks may continue through the oxidation pathway and ultimately lead to a demethylated cytosine, mounting evidence, including those presented here, all suggest that 5hmC does regulate gene transcription. Its mechanism of action, however, remains to be elucidated.
In addition to providing characterizations of 5hmC genomic location and function, we also confirm the efficacy of a high-throughput method to appropriately detect 5hmC sites at single base resolution. AbaSI-Seq, which has been used previously in embryonic stem cells, bases itself on a 5hmC-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion. This technique is valuable as it avoids the biases caused by antibody-based approaches [47] and does not cause DNA damage like other methods that employ bisulfite conversion [48]. Furthermore, AbaSI has independently been shown to recognize both glucosylated and non-glucosylated 5hmC [49], thereby increasing its validity as an effective tool in studying 5hmC.
In summary, this manuscript provides a comprehensive assessment of 5hmC in human prefrontal cortex using a high-throughput technique. Moreover, we provide a reference for comparison of 5hmC in other mammalian species, and shed light on potential avenues of interest for further research in determining the functional relevance of 5hmC.
Methods
Subjects
Post-mortem human brain tissue from the prefrontal cortex was obtained from the Douglas – Bell Canada Brain Bank. The prefrontal cortex was chosen given its diverse functions relative to human cognition and of importance to neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Additionally, the prefrontal cortex has been widely implicated in a variety of mental illnesses through dysregulation of epigenetic mechanisms [50–56]. Brain tissue used in this study was dissected at 4 °C, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C following standard procedures. The Quebec Coroner’s office assessed the cause of death for each subject, and subsequently, we obtained information on the subjects’ mental health using psychological autopsies using the Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV Axis 1 [57]. In addition, brain tissue samples from all subjects were assessed for absence of pathological processes by a neuropathologist. Subjects died from either natural (n = 11) or accidental (n = 13) causes, and all were psychiatrically and neurologically healthy. All subjects were French-Canadian. Mean age was 43.33 ± 4.46 years. Written informed consent was obtained from next-of-kin for all subjects, and the Douglas Institute Research Ethics Board approved this study.
AbaSI-Seq
Genomic DNA was extracted from the prefrontal cortex using QIAGEN’s QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, cat. # 51304). Concentrations of genomic DNA were assessed using the Thermo Scientific Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer and each sample had a 260/280 ratio greater than 1.8. AbaSI-Seq library construction was performed as described previously [19]. Briefly, DNA was glucosylated by using UDP-glucose and T4-β-glucosyltransferase (New England Biolabs, cat. #M0357L). The DNA was then digested using AbaSI (New England Biolabs, cat. #R0665S) and custom biotinylated adaptors were ligated to DNA ends. The DNA was then sheared using the Covaris S220 Focused-Ultrasonicator (peak incident power = 140; duty % = 10; cycles per burst = 200; time = 120 s). Sheared DNA was captured using Dynabeads® MyOne™ Streptavidin C1 beads (Life Technologies, cat. # 65001). NEBNext™ End Repair Module (New England Biolabs, cat. #E6050L) and NEBNext™ dA-Tailing Module (New England Biolabs, cat. #E6053L) were used to generate blunt ended fragments and create an adenosine tail, respectively. A second set of custom adaptors were ligated to the DNA, followed by PCR amplification using NEBNext™ High-Fidelity 2x PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, cat. #E6013AA). Illumina TruSeq indices 1 through 12 were used to barcode samples. 50 cycle, single-read sequencing was performed on Illumina’s HiSeq 2000. A minimum of 60,000,000 sequencing reads was obtained per subject. Sequencing quality control metrics can be found in Additional file 1.
Data processing
FASTQ reads were filtered based on a quality score greater than 30 and were then aligned to the human reference genome (UCSC Hg19) using Bowtie 2 (http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/index.shtml), with the preset parameters of very-sensitive (−D 20 -R 3 -N 0 -L 20 -i S,1,0.50). Duplicates were removed using Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) and realignment was performed using the GATK alignment procedures from the Broad Institute (https://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/). Subsequent filtering of aligned reads was based on a quality score of greater or equal to 10. 5hmC sites were identified using a custom PERL script [19] that detected potential 5hmC sites based on their expected distance from the AbaSI enzymatic cleavage site. A combination of BEDtools, R packages, and custom scripts were used for downstream analyses. Exact specifications are found below.
Density plots
Chromosomes
All 5hmC sites in the intermediate stringency were used to assess chromosomal 5hmC density. Density was defined as the total number of 5hmC sites per chromosome, corrected for the length of the chromosome and the total number of CGs on the chromosome.
Genetic features
5hmC sites in the intermediate stringency category were plotted against genomic regions and corrected for the length of the region and the number of CGs within the region. All genomic features were defined based on the GRCh37/hg19 genomic annotation downloaded from the UCSC database. Different genic elements, including transcription start sites (TSS), exons, introns, and transcription end sites (TES), were defined based on the Ensembl (release 75). Since genes can have multiple transcripts, we selected the 5’-most TSS on the positive strand as the single TSS associated with each gene. The reverse (3’ most TSS) was done for genes on the negative strand. We limited downstream analysis to protein-coding genes, resulting in 20,745 TSSs in total. Similarly, annotations for retro-elements (i.e., LINEs and SINEs) and CpG islands were acquired from the UCSC database. CpG shores were defined as the 2 kb flanking a CpG island. Coordinates of predicted of promoter and enhancer regions were obtained from recently published genome-wide maps of chromatin states in the adult brain midfrontal lobe [22], including H3K4me3, H3K4me1 and H3K27ac. Two types of enhancers were distinguished: active enhancers that were simultaneously marked by distal H3K4me1 and H3K27ac, and poised enhancers that were solely marked by distal H3K4me1 [9, 58].
ChIP-Seq peaks
To plot 5hmC profiles around ChIP-Seq peaks, the mean 5hmC was calculated for each contiguous 100 bp bin from 3 kb upstream to 3 kb downstream of the central position of the peak.
RNA-Seq
Gene expression counts were obtained from RNA-seq data from the preferontal cortex of 11 controls subjects from previously published work [23]. Genes were then classified into quartiles based on their basal gene expression levels: 1st quartile is lowest and 4th is highest. Gene bodies and 20 kb regions upstream and downstream were each divided into 50 intervals. We gathered hydroxymethylation data from windows within each of these intervals and plotted the mean hydroxymethylation level for all windows overlapping each position.
Exon-intron boundaries
A total of 144,157 internal exons representing 20,745 genes were retrieved from the Ensembl database, with exclusion of all first and last exons and single-exon genes. 5hmC count was plotted against the 20 bp flanking the 5’ and 3’ exon-intron boundaries on both the sense and anti-sense strands.
Cluster analyses and gene ontology (GO)
Cluster analyses were performed using online software. Briefly, a region was deemed to have a cluster of 5hmC if there were at least three 5hmCs each within 200 bp of each other. 5hmC clusters was located within a gene body were assigned to that gene, otherwise 5hmC cluster were assigned to the closest TSS from the center position of the 5hmC cluster. GeneTrail [28] was used to test for enrichment of functional annotations among genes nearby 5hmC clusters (<250 kb), using the set of all Ensembl genes as a background. Analysis was done with default parameters and results corrected for multiple testing by the method of Benjamini and Hochberg to control the False Discovery Rate (FDR). GO terms were deemed significant if they had an FDR-corrected P ≤ 0.05. The background set included all protein-coding genes.
Gender analyses
Cluster analyses for sites unique to females
5hmC sites in all 5 females were compared to 5hmC sites detected in all 19 males. Cluster analyses, as described above, were performed using only the 5hmC sites unique to females.
Cluster analyses for sites unique to males
5 randomly selected sets of 5 males were used to determine male-specific 5hmC clusters. Briefly, all 5hmC sites in each set, separately, were compared to 5hmC sites in all 5 females. Cluster analyses, as described above, were performed in each set using only the 5hmC sites unique to the males in the respective set. Only the clusters that were common in all of the 5 sets of males were deemed to be male-specific.
X-inactivation
Genes involved in X-chromosome inactivation were taken from previously published data [59]. Briefly, surveyed genes were given a score from 0–9 based on the number of individual hybrid lines detected from the inactivated X chromosome. A score of 0 corresponds to complete inactivation, whereas a score of 9 corresponds to complete escape from X-inactivation. Intragenic 5hmC patterns on human X-linked genes were then compared between our female and male subjects.
Availability of supporting data
The data sets supporting the results of this article will be deposited in the GEO database.
Acknowledgements
This study benefited from access to tissue from the Douglas-Bell Canada Brain Bank, which is supported by the Réseau québécois sur le suicide, les troubles de l'humeur et les troubles associés and Brain Canada. J.A.G. is supported by a CIHR Frederick Banting And Charles Best Doctoral fellowship. GT is supported by grants from the Canadian Institute of Health Research MOP93775, MOP11260, MOP119429, and MOP119430; from the National Institutes of Health 1R01DA033684-01; and by the Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé through a Chercheur National salary award and through the Quebec Network on Suicide, Mood Disorders, and Related Disorders.
Abbreviations
- 5hmC
5-hydroxymethylcytosine
- 5mC
5-methylcytosine
- TET
Ten-eleven translocation
- TAB-Seq
Tet-assisted bisulfite sequencing
- WGBS
Whole genome bisulfite sequencing
- TSS
Transcription start sites
- LINEs
Long interspersed elements
- SINEs
Short interspersed elements
- CTCF
CCCTC-binding factor
- GO
Gene ontology
- AMH
Anti-Müllerian Hormone
- UTR
Untranslated region
- TES
Transcription end site
- ZFX
X-linked zinc finger protein
- ZFY
Y-linked zinc finger protein
- DhmRs
Differentially hydroxymethylated regions
Additional files
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
JAG, GGC, CE, and GT designed the study. JAG and GGC performed all laboratory experiments. JAG, AP, LBB, and CE performed all bioinformatics and data analyses. J.A.G. and G.T. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Contributor Information
Jeffrey A. Gross, Email: jeffrey.gross@mail.mcgill.ca
Alain Pacis, Email: vapacis@gmail.com.
Gary G. Chen, Email: gang.chen@douglas.mcgill.ca
Luis B. Barreiro, Email: luis.barreiro@umontreal.ca
Carl Ernst, Email: carl.ernst@mcgill.ca.
Gustavo Turecki, Phone: +1-514-761-6131, Email: gustavo.turecki@mcgill.ca.
References
- 1.Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, Pastor WA, Bandukwala H, Brudno Y, et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 2009;324(5929):930–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1170116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kriaucionis S, Heintz N. The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science. 2009;324(5929):929–30. doi: 10.1126/science.1169786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ito S, D'Alessio AC, Taranova OV, Hong K, Sowers LC, Zhang Y. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature. 2010;466(7310):1129–33. doi: 10.1038/nature09303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li W, Liu M. Distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in different human tissues. J Nucleic Acids. 2011;2011:870726. doi: 10.4061/2011/870726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kinney SM, Chin HG, Vaisvila R, Bitinaite J, Zheng Y, Esteve PO, et al. Tissue-specific distribution and dynamic changes of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian genomes. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(28):24685–93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.217083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nestor CE, Ottaviano R, Reddington J, Sproul D, Reinhardt D, Dunican D, et al. Tissue type is a major modifier of the 5-hydroxymethylcytosine content of human genes. Genome Res. 2012;22(3):467–77. doi: 10.1101/gr.126417.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mellen M, Ayata P, Dewell S, Kriaucionis S, Heintz N. MeCP2 binds to 5hmC enriched within active genes and accessible chromatin in the nervous system. Cell. 2012;151(7):1417–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lister R, Mukamel EA, Nery JR, Urich M, Puddifoot CA, Johnson ND, et al. Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science. 2013;341(6146):1237905. doi: 10.1126/science.1237905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wen L, Li X, Yan L, Tan Y, Li R, Zhao Y, et al. Whole-genome analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and 5-methylcytosine at base resolution in the human brain. Genome Biol. 2014;15(3):R49. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gabel HW, Kinde B, Stroud H, Gilbert CS, Harmin DA, Kastan NR, et al. Disruption of DNA-methylation-dependent long gene repression in Rett syndrome. Nature. 2015;522:89–83. doi: 10.1038/nature14319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Szulwach KE, Li X, Li Y, Song CX, Wu H, Dai Q, et al. 5-hmC-mediated epigenetic dynamics during postnatal neurodevelopment and aging. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(12):1607–16. doi: 10.1038/nn.2959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hahn MA, Qiu R, Wu X, Li AX, Zhang H, Wang J, et al. Dynamics of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and chromatin marks in Mammalian neurogenesis. Cell reports. 2013;3(2):291–300. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Coppieters N, Dieriks BV, Lill C, Faull RL, Curtis MA, Dragunow M. Global changes in DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in Alzheimer's disease human brain. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(6):1334–44. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhubi A, Chen Y, Dong E, Cook EH, Guidotti A, Grayson DR. Increased binding of MeCP2 to the GAD1 and RELN promoters may be mediated by an enrichment of 5-hmC in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) cerebellum. Transcult. Psychiatry. 2014;4:e349. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Villar-Menendez I, Blanch M, Tyebji S, Pereira-Veiga T, Albasanz JL, Martin M, et al. Increased 5-methylcytosine and decreased 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels are associated with reduced striatal A2AR levels in Huntington's disease. Neruomol Med. 2013;15(2):295–309. doi: 10.1007/s12017-013-8219-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dong E, Gavin DP, Chen Y, Davis J. Upregulation of TET1 and downregulation of APOBEC3A and APOBEC3C in the parietal cortex of psychotic patients. Transcult. Psychiatry. 2012;2:e159. doi: 10.1038/tp.2012.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang F, Yang Y, Lin X, Wang JQ, Wu YS, Xie W, et al. Genome-wide loss of 5-hmC is a novel epigenetic feature of Huntington's disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(18):3641–53. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yao B, Lin L, Street RC, Zalewski ZA, Galloway JN, Wu H, et al. Genome-wide alteration of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in a mouse model of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(4):1095–107. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sun Z, Terragni J, Borgaro JG, Liu Y, Yu L, Guan S, et al. High-resolution enzymatic mapping of genomic 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell reports. 2013;3(2):567–76. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Szulwach KE, Li X, Li Y, Song CX, Han JW, Kim S, et al. Integrating 5-hydroxymethylcytosine into the epigenomic landscape of human embryonic stem cells. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(6):e1002154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stroud H, Feng S, Morey Kinney S, Pradhan S, Jacobsen SE. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is associated with enhancers and gene bodies in human embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol. 2011;12(6):R54. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhu J, Adli M, Zou JY, Verstappen G, Coyne M, Zhang X, et al. Genome-wide chromatin state transitions associated with developmental and environmental cues. Cell. 2013;152(3):642–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Akula N, Barb J, Jiang X, Wendland JR, Choi KH, Sen SK, et al. RNA-sequencing of the brain transcriptome implicates dysregulation of neuroplasticity, circadian rhythms and GTPase binding in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19(11):1179–85. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Khare T, Pai S, Koncevicius K, Pal M, Kriukiene E, Liutkeviciute Z, et al. 5-hmC in the brain is abundant in synaptic genes and shows differences at the exon-intron boundary. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19(10):1037–43. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shukla S, Kavak E, Gregory M, Imashimizu M, Shutinoski B, Kashlev M, et al. CTCF-promoted RNA polymerase II pausing links DNA methylation to splicing. Nature. 2011;479(7371):74–9. doi: 10.1038/nature10442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Feldmann A, Ivanek R, Murr R, Gaidatzis D, Burger L, Schubeler D. Transcription factor occupancy can mediate active turnover of DNA methylation at regulatory regions. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(12):e1003994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gao F, Xia Y, Wang J, Luo H, Gao Z, Han X, et al. Integrated detection of both 5-mC and 5-hmC by high-throughput tag sequencing technology highlights methylation reprogramming of bivalent genes during cellular differentiation. Epigenetics. 2013;8(4):421–30. doi: 10.4161/epi.24280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Backes C, Keller A, Kuentzer J, Kneissl B, Comtesse N, Elnakady YA, et al. GeneTrail--advanced gene set enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W186–92. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zec I, Tislaric-Medenjak D, Megla ZB, Kucak I. Anti-Mullerian hormone: a unique biochemical marker of gonadal development and fertility in humans. Biochemia medica. 2011;21(3):219–30. doi: 10.11613/BM.2011.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schneider-Gadicke A, Beer-Romero P, Brown LG, Nussbaum R, Page DC. ZFX has a gene structure similar to ZFY, the putative human sex determinant, and escapes X inactivation. Cell. 1989;57(7):1247–58. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90061-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Palmer MS, Berta P, Sinclair AH, Pym B, Goodfellow PN. Comparison of human ZFY and ZFX transcripts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(5):1681–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Erickson RP, Zwingman T, Ao A. Gene expression, X-inactivation, and methylation during spermatogenesis: the case of Zfa, Zfx, and Zfy in mice. Mol Reprod Dev. 1993;35(2):114–20. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080350203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mayer A, Lahr G, Swaab DF, Pilgrim C, Reisert I. The Y-chromosomal genes SRY and ZFY are transcribed in adult human brain. Neurogenetics. 1998;1(4):281–8. doi: 10.1007/s100480050042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lienert F, Wirbelauer C, Som I, Dean A, Mohn F, Schubeler D. Identification of genetic elements that autonomously determine DNA methylation states. Nat Genet. 2011;43(11):1091–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McVicker G, van de Geijn B, Degner JF, Cain CE, Banovich NE, Raj A, et al. Identification of genetic variants that affect histone modifications in human cells. Science. 2013;342(6159):747–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1242429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kasowski M, Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou S, Grubert F, Zaugg JB, Kundaje A, Liu Y, et al. Extensive variation in chromatin states across humans. Science. 2013;342(6159):750–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1242510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kilpinen H, Waszak SM, Gschwind AR, Raghav SK, Witwicki RM, Orioli A, et al. Coordinated effects of sequence variation on DNA binding, chromatin structure, and transcription. Science. 2013;342(6159):744–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1242463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pai AA, Bell JT, Marioni JC, Pritchard JK, Gilad Y. A genome-wide study of DNA methylation patterns and gene expression levels in multiple human and chimpanzee tissues. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(2):e1001316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hajkova P, Jeffries SJ, Lee C, Miller N, Jackson SP, Surani MA. Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway. Science. 2010;329(5987):78–82. doi: 10.1126/science.1187945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gu TP, Guo F, Yang H, Wu HP, Xu GF, Liu W, et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature. 2011;477(7366):606–10. doi: 10.1038/nature10443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ruzov A, Tsenkina Y, Serio A, Dudnakova T, Fletcher J, Bai Y, et al. Lineage-specific distribution of high levels of genomic 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian development. Cell Res. 2011;21(9):1332–42. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dawlaty MM, Breiling A, Le T, Raddatz G, Barrasa MI, Cheng AW, et al. Combined deficiency of Tet1 and Tet2 causes epigenetic abnormalities but is compatible with postnatal development. Dev Cell. 2013;24(3):310–23. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dawlaty MM, Ganz K, Powell BE, Hu YC, Markoulaki S, Cheng AW, et al. Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9(2):166–75. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bachman M, Uribe-Lewis S, Yang X, Williams M, Murrell A, Balasubramanian S. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is a predominantly stable DNA modification. Nat Chem. 2014;6(12):1049–55. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fu L, Guerrero CR, Zhong N, Amato NJ, Liu Y, Liu S, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in RNA. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(33):11582–5. doi: 10.1021/ja505305z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Huber SM, van Delft P, Mendil L, Bachman M, Smollett K, Werner F, et al. Formation and Abundance of 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in RNA. Chembiochem. 2015;16:752–5. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201500013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Thomson JP, Hunter JM, Nestor CE, Dunican DS, Terranova R, Moggs JG, et al. Comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(22):e206. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Grunau C, Clark SJ, Rosenthal A. Bisulfite genomic sequencing: systematic investigation of critical experimental parameters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(13):E65–65. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.13.e65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Horton JR, Borgaro JG, Griggs RM, Quimby A, Guan S, Zhang X, et al. Structure of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine-specific restriction enzyme, AbaSI, in complex with DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(12):7947–59. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cheung I, Shulha HP, Jiang Y, Matevossian A, Wang J, Weng Z, et al. Developmental regulation and individual differences of neuronal H3K4me3 epigenomes in the prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(19):8824–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001702107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shulha HP, Cheung I, Whittle C, Wang J, Virgil D, Lin CL, et al. Epigenetic signatures of autism: trimethylated H3K4 landscapes in prefrontal neurons. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(3):314–24. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Numata S, Ye T, Hyde TM, Guitart-Navarro X, Tao R, Wininger M, et al. DNA methylation signatures in development and aging of the human prefrontal cortex. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(2):260–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.12.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gross JA, Fiori LM, Labonte B, Lopez JP, Turecki G. Effects of promoter methylation on increased expression of polyamine biosynthetic genes in suicide. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;47:513–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cruceanu C, Alda M, Nagy C, Freemantle E, Rouleau GA, Turecki G. H3K4 tri-methylation in synapsin genes leads to different expression patterns in bipolar disorder and major depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;16(2):289–99. doi: 10.1017/S1461145712000363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nagy C, Suderman M, Yang J, Szyf M, Mechawar N, Ernst C, et al. Astrocytic abnormalities and global DNA methylation patterns in depression and suicide. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;20:320–8. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lopez JP, Lim R, Cruceanu C, Crapper L, Fasano C, Labonte B, et al. miR-1202 is a primate-specific and brain-enriched microRNA involved in major depression and antidepressant treatment. Nat Med. 2014;20(7):764–8. doi: 10.1038/nm.3582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dumais A, Lesage AD, Lalovic A, Seguin M, Tousignant M, Chawky N, et al. Is violent method of suicide a behavioral marker of lifetime aggression? Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(7):1375–8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Creyghton MP, Cheng AW, Welstead GG, Kooistra T, Carey BW, Steine EJ, et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(50):21931–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016071107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Carrel L, Willard HF. X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature. 2005;434(7031):400–4. doi: 10.1038/nature03479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]