Abstract
This review studies the impact of whole genome sequencing on Aspergillus secondary metabolite research. There has been a proliferation of many new, intriguing discoveries since sequencing data became widely available. What is more, the genomes disclosed the surprising finding that there are many more secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways than laboratory research had suggested. Activating these pathways has been met with some success, but many more dormant genes remain to be awakened.
1 Introduction
Aspergillus, a genus of filamentous fungi, is renowned for its medical and commercial importance. Species in Aspergillus have been sources of lifesaving drugs, devastating toxins, or mass-produced industrial enzymes. Some species are pathogenic and pose a danger to immunocompromised patients. Laboratory research on Aspergillus has also contributed much knowledge about fundamental cell biology and biochemistry.
The significance of Aspergillus was cause for the sequencing of the genomes of some of the most well-known members of this genus. A. fumigatus is a common airborne pathogen, threatening susceptible patients with infection and life-threatening illness. Neosartorya fischeri (anamorph A. fischerianus) is genetically closely related to A. fumigatus, but it is rarely pathogenic. A chief motivation for its sequencing was thus to learn more about A. fumigatus pathogenicity. In parallel, A. oryzae is a close genetic cousin to A. flavus. Remarkably, whereas A. flavus is a contaminant of food stocks and a generator of the potent toxic and carcinogenic aflatoxins, A. oryzae has been safely used in East Asian cuisine for centuries.
A. terreus, like A. fumigatus, is a significant cause of aspergillosis, but it is also the main source of the anticholesterol drug lovastatin, with worldwide sales topping $10 billion annually. A. nidulans is a model organism that has been used for the past 60 years to study genetics and cell biology. Unlike many other Aspergilli, it has a well-characterized sexual cycle. A. niger has also served as an important model organism; it is also a major producer of enzymes and metabolites, including citric acid. The genomes of these species, and in addition A. clavatus and A. carbonarius, are now publicly available.
One of the predictions coming from the genome sequencing projects was that our understanding of Aspergillus secondary metabolism would profit from the provided data. Sequence information greatly facilitates the identification of natural product genes, the function of which can be demonstrated by molecular biological and biochemical approaches. When a set of genes involved in the formation of the same secondary metabolite are recognized, a biosynthesis can be proposed. Down the road, such advances should be useful for enhanced production of secondary metabolites of interest and the development of second-generation compounds with improved pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics.
This review examines the benefits genomic sequencing has brought to Aspergillus secondary metabolite research. As will be detailed below, one of the major findings from the data is that, given the number of putative secondary metabolite genes that have been found, many corresponding natural products have yet to be discovered. This untapped potential of Aspergillus has inspired researchers to undertake various strategies to induce the generation of previously unknown natural products. And for compounds that had already been reported, the genomic data has been instrumental in identifying genes and biosynthetic pathways at a rapid pace.
Unquestionably, much important work on Aspergillus secondary metabolism was completed or in progress before genome sequencing information became available. The study of the aforementioned aflatoxins1 and lovastatin2 were among the many works that not only taught us much about secondary metabolite regulation and organization but were part of the inspiration to sequence genomes in order to learn more. The interested reader is well-advised to turn to these achievements, too,3 but this review is devoted to projects that were largely a product of the post-genomic era.
2 The status of Aspergillus genomic sequencing efforts
The task of fully sequencing the first Aspergillus genomes was a community effort, involving private companies, academic laboratories, and research institutes and funded by private and public entities. For example, A. nidulans FGSC A4 was initially sequenced by Cereon Genomics (Monsanto) in 1998, the threefold coverage becoming publicly available in 2003. Shortly thereafter the Whitehead Institute/MIT Center for Genome Research rereleased the sequence with additional coverage sequence to afford 13-fold coverage. A seminal article on the genome sequence was published in 2005, with authors representing The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR), and over 20 universities around the world.4
The work, and the teamwork, do not stop with the sequence data. Many times the initial gene annotations are incomplete or contain inaccuracies, such as merged genes and missed exon calls. On the subject of A. nidulans, a goal spearheaded by the Euro-fungbase in collaboration with TIGR/J. Craig Venter Institute and university laboratories is to raise the number of functionally assigned proteins. Since then, over 2500 genes have been edited, and the percent of gene products with an informative name has increased from about 3% to 19%.5 Table 1 lists several features of sequenced Aspergillus genomes.
Table 1. Features of Aspergillus genomes.
| Species | Strain | Size (Mb) | Chromosomes | Protein-coding Genes | Putative SM Core Genesa | PKS | PKS-likeb | NRPS | NRPS-likeb | Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. carbonarius126 | IMI 388653 | 36.30126 | 8 | 11,624126 | 61 | 28 | — | 33 | — | — |
| A. clavatus127 | NRRL 1 | 27.86128 | 8 | 9,121128 | 39 | 16 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 4 |
| N.fischeri127 | NRRL 181 | 32.55128 | 10,406128 | 46 | 17 | 1 | 19 | 9 | 0 | |
| A. flavus129 | NRRL 3357 | 36.79128 | 8 | 12,604128 | 62 | 25 | 3 | 18 | 14 | 2 |
| A. fumigatus130 | Af293 | 29.38128 | 8 | 9,887128 | 34 | 13 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 1 |
| A. fumigatus127 | A1163 | 29.20128 | 8 | 9,906128 | 33 | 13 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 1 |
| A. nidulans4 | FGSC A4 | 30.07128 | 8 | 11,214131 | 52 | 24 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 1 |
| A. niger132 | CBS 513.88 | 37.20128 | 8 | 14,071131 | 79 | 35 | 4 | 17 | 16 | 7 |
| A. nigerc 133,134 | ATCC 1015 | 34.85135 | 8 | 11,197135 | 57 | 33 | — | 15 | — | 9 |
| A. oryzae136 | RIB40 | 37.12128 | 8 | 12,063128 | 61 | 27 | 0 | 16 | 16 | 2 |
| A. terreus | NIH2624 | 29.33128 | 8 | 10,406128 | 65 | 28 | 2 | 20 | 14 | 1 |
The future will likely bring additional Aspergillus sequencing and annotation data that is the result of collaborations among institutions around the world. But there may also be a trend in which individual laboratories alone may sequence an Aspergillus genome (over 180 species left). Because fungal genomes tend to be compact, with few repetitive sequences, they may be amenable to assembly from the short sequence reads that come from low-cost, next-generation sequencing techniques, as demonstrated by the de novo assembly of raw sequence data from Sordaria macrospora.6 The bioactive secondary metabolite profile of Penicillium aethiopicum motivated researchers to undertake 454 shotgun sequencing of a P. aethiopicum strain, covering approximately 90% of the genome.7
3 Technological progress in genome mining endeavors
3.1 Methods to study existing secondary metabolites
Published sequenced genomes allow investigators to pinpoint putative secondary metabolite genes based on sequence similarity to established genes from other species. BLAST analysis allows assignment of putative polyketide synthase (PKS), non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), and hybrid PKS–NRPS genes, coding for the core, backbone structures of many fungal natural products. What is more, these genes together with tailoring and regulatory genes tend to exist in clusters, which is not the case for fungal primary metabolic genes or for secondary metabolism genes from other kingdoms, such as plants. Alternative explanations for this phenomenon have been proposed,8–10 and although no one explanation has been universally accepted, it is unmistakable that this feature is fortuitous for researchers, as the identification of one secondary metabolite gene automatically implicates neighboring genes as suspects in the formation of the same metabolite. Web-based tools assist in systematically locating secondary metabolite clusters. One of them, Secondary Metabolite Unknown Regions Finder (SMURF; www.jcvi.org/smurf), is exclusively tailored to fungi.11 Another, antibiotics and Secondary Metabolite Analysis Shell (antiSMASH), locates biosynthetic loci involved with the entire range of secondary metabolite classes.12 Guided by SMURF, Tables 2–5 lists backbone genes in A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, A. terreus and A. niger, and actual or predicted products. When candidate genes are identified, several approaches can be taken to study their function in relation to a natural compound.
Table 2. Secondary metabolism gene clusters in A. nidulans.
| No. | Broad designation | Gene name | Gene typea | Actual or predicted productb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AN0016.3 | pes1 | NRPS | |
| 2 | AN0150.3 | mdpG | NR-PKS | monodictyphenone (18), emodin (17),54 xanthones (30–33)66 |
| 3 | AN0523.3 | NR-PKS | ||
| 4 | AN0607.3 | sidC | NRPS | ferricrocin137 |
| 5 | AN1034.3 | afoE | NR-PKS | asperfuranone (15)34 |
| 6 | AN1036.3 | afoG | PR-PKS | asperfuranone (15)34 |
| 7 | AN1242.3 | NRPS | cyclotripeptide | |
| 8 | AN1680.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 9 | AN1784.3 | PR-PKS | ||
| 10 | AN2032.3 | NR-PKS | ||
| 11 | AN2035.3 | PR-PKS | ||
| 12 | AN2064.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 13 | AN2545.3 | easA | NRPS | emericellamides (1–5)26 |
| 14 | AN2547.3 | easB | PR-PKS | emericellamides (1–5)26 |
| 15 | AN2621.3 | acvA | NRPS | penicillin138 |
| 16 | AN2924.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 17 | AN3230.3 | NR-PKS | ||
| 18 | AN3386.3 | NR-PKS | ||
| 19 | AN3396.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 20 | AN3495.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 21 | AN3496.3 | NRPS | ||
| 22 | AN3612.3 | PR-PKS | ||
| 23 | AN4827.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 24 | AN5318.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 25 | AN6000.3 | aptA | NR-PKS | asperthecin (21)55 |
| 26 | AN6236.3 | sidD | NRPS | siderophore |
| 27 | AN6431.3 | PR-PKS | ||
| 28 | AN6444.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 29 | AN6448.3 | NR-PKS | ||
| 30 | AN6791.3 | PR-PKS | ||
| 31 | AN7071.3 | NR-PKS | ||
| 32 | AN7084.3 | PKS-like | ||
| 33 | AN7489.3 | PKS-like | ||
| 34 | AN7815.3 | stcJ | FAS subunit alpha | sterigmatocystin139 |
| 35 | AN7825.3 | stcA (pksST) | NR-PKS | sterigmatocystin139 |
| 36 | AN7838.3 | PKS-like | ||
| 37 | AN7884.3 | NRPS | ||
| 38 | AN7909.3 | orsA | NR-PKS | orsellinic acid (22),59,60 F-9775A (19), B (20)54,59 |
| 39 | AN8105.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 40 | AN8209.3 | wA | NR-PKS | naphthopyrone (YWA1)140 |
| 41 | AN8383.3 | NR-PKS | ||
| 42 | AN8412.3 | apdA | Hybrid | aspyridone A (13), B (14)33 |
| 43 | AN8513.3 | tdiA | NRPS | terrequinone A (9)46 |
| 44 | AN8910.3 | PR-PKS | ||
| 45 | AN9005.3 | PR-PKS | ||
| 46 | AN9226.3 | NRPS | ||
| 47 | AN9244.3 | NRPS | ||
| 48 | AN9291.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 49 | AN10297.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 50 | AN10430.3 | NR-PKS | ||
| 51 | AN10486.3 | NRPS-like | ||
| 52 | AN10576.3 | NRPS | ||
| 53 | AN11191.3 | PR-PKS |
abbreviations: polyketide synthase (PKS), non ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), PKS–NRPS (Hybrid), fatty acid synthase (FAS), nonreduced polyketide synthase (NR-PKS), partially reduced polyketide synthase (PR-PKS), highly reduced polyketide synthase (HR-PKS)
Actual products are highlighted in bold.
Table 5. Secondary metabolism gene clusters in A. niger.
| No. | CBS 513.88 gene (NCBI Designation) | ATCC 1015 gene146 (JGI Designation) | Gene name | Gene typea | Actual or predicted productb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | An01g00060c | Aspni1:55511 | FAS subunit alpha | ||
| 2 | An01g01130 | no homolog | PKS | ||
| 3 | An01g06930 | Aspni1:225574 | fum1 | HR-PKS | fumonisins147,148 |
| 4 | An01g06950 | Aspni1:225587 | PR-PKS | ||
| 5 | An01g11770 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 6 | An02g00210 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 7 | An02g00450 | Aspni1:118617 | HR-PKS | ||
| 8 | An02g00840 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 9 | An02g05070 | Aspni1:36929 | NRPS | ||
| 10 | An02g08290 | Aspni1:118624 | Hybrid | ||
| 11 | An02g09430 | Aspni1:37260 | HR-PKS | ||
| 12 | An02g10140 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 13 | An02g14220 | und | PKS-like | ||
| 14 | An03g00650 | Aspni1:128584 | NRPS | ||
| 15 | An03g01820 | no homolog | PKS | ||
| 16 | An03g03520 | Aspni1:191228 | sidD | NRPS | siderophore |
| 17 | An03g05140 | Aspni1:118598 | HR-PKS | ||
| 18 | An03g05440 | Aspni1:191422 | NR-PKS | ||
| 19 | An03g05680 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 20 | An03g06010 | Aspni1:44571 | NRPS | ||
| 21 | An03g06380 | Aspni1:191702 | HR-PKS | ||
| 22 | An04g01150 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 23 | An04g04340 | Aspni1:44005 | PR-PKS | ||
| 24 | An04g04380 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 25 | An04g06260 | Aspni1:118635 | NRPS | ||
| 26 | An04g09530 | Aspni1:51499 | NR-PKS | ||
| 27 | An04g10030 | Aspni1:118662 | HR-PKS | ||
| 28 | An05g01060 | Aspni1:118599 | NRPS | ||
| 29 | An06g00430c | Aspni1:175936 | PKS | ||
| 30 | An06g01300 | Aspni1:207636 | sidC | NRPS | siderophore |
| 31 | An07g01030 | no homolog | PKS | ||
| 32 | An08g02310 | Aspni1:52774 | NRPS | ||
| 33 | An08g03790 | Aspni1:176722 | Hybrid | ||
| 34 | An08g04820 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 35 | An08g09220 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 36 | An08g10930 | und | PKS-like | ||
| 37 | An09g00450 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 38 | An09g00520 | no homolog | NRPS | ||
| 39 | An09g01290 | Aspni1:43495 | HR-PKS | ||
| 40 | An09g01690 | Aspni1:212679 | NRPS | ||
| 41 | An09g01860 | Aspni1:56946 | NR-PKS | ||
| 42 | An09g01930 | Aspni1:188817 | HR-PKS | ||
| 43 | An09g02100 | und | PKS-like | ||
| 44 | An09g05110 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 45 | An09g05340 | Aspni1:188697 | HR-PKS | ||
| 46 | An09g05730 | Aspni1:56896 | fwnA or albA | NR-PKS | naphtho-γ-pyrones, melanin122,123 |
| 47 | An10g00140 | Aspni1:44965 | PR-PKS | ||
| 48 | An10g00630 | und | PKS-like | ||
| 49 | An11g00050 | Aspni1:118659 | NRPS | ||
| 50 | An11g00250 | Aspni1:179585 | Hybrid | ||
| 51 | An11g03920 | Aspni1:179079 | HR-PKS | ||
| 52 | An11g04280 | Aspni1:39026 | PR-PKS | ||
| 53 | An11g05500 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 54 | An11g05570 | Aspni1:47991 | HR-PKS | ||
| 55 | An11g05940 | no homolog | PKS | ||
| 56 | An11g05960 | no homolog | PKS | ||
| 57 | An11g06460 | Aspni1:118644 | Hybrid | ||
| 58 | An11g07310 | no homolog | PKS | ||
| 59 | An11g09720 | Aspni1:118629 | PR-PKS | ||
| 60 | An12g02050c | Aspni1:190014 | NR PKS | ||
| 61 | An12g02670 | Aspni1:189378 | HR-PKS | ||
| 62 | An12g02730 | no homolog | PKS | ||
| 63 | An12g02840 | Aspni1:43807 | NRPS | ||
| 64 | An12g07070 | Aspni1:118666 | HR-PKS | ||
| 65 | An12g07230 | Aspni1:42205 | NRPS | ||
| 66 | An12g10090 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 67 | An12g10860 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 68 | An13g02430 | Aspni1:128638 | HR-PKS | ||
| 69 | An13g02460 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 70 | An13g02960 | no homolog | PKS | ||
| 71 | An13g03040 | no homolog | NRPS | ||
| 72 | An14g01910 | Aspni1:41618 | Hybrid | ||
| 73 | An14g04850 | Aspni1:41846 | Hybrid | ||
| 74 | An15g02130 | Aspni1:181803 | HR-PKS | ||
| 75 | An15g04140 | Aspni1:210217 | HR-PKS | ||
| 76 | An15g05090 | Aspni1:118744 | PR-PKS | ||
| 77 | An15g07530 | Aspni1:182031 | NRPS | ||
| 78 | An15g07910 | no homolog | NRPS | ochratoxin147 | |
| 79 | An15g07920 | no homolog | PKS | ochratoxin147 | |
| 80 | An16g00600 | und | NRPS-like | ||
| 81 | An16g06720 | Aspni1:118601 | NRPS | ||
| 82 | An18g00520 | Aspni1:187099 | Hybrid | ||
| 83 | no homolog | Aspni1:55153 | NRPS | ||
| 84 | no homolog | Aspni1:118581 | Hybrid | ||
| 85 | no homolog | Aspni1:128601 | Hybrid | ||
| 86 | no homolog | Aspni1:138585 | HR PKS | ||
| 87 | no homolog | Aspni1:171221 | PR PKS | ||
| 88 | no homolog | Aspni1:194381 | NR-PKS | ||
| 89 | no homolog | Aspni1:211885 | PR-PKS |
abbreviations: polyketide synthase (PKS), non ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), PKS–NRPS (Hybrid), fatty acid synthase (FAS), nonreduced polyketide synthase (NR-PKS), partially reduced polyketide synthase (PR-PKS), highly reduced polyketide synthase (HR-PKS).
Actual products are highlighted in bold.
gene not identified by SMURF abbreviations: und = undetermined.
3.1.1 The development of efficient genetic deletion systems
Gene targeting is a useful technique to study fungal secondary metabolism. Deletion of the gene, or the replacement of its promoter with a regulatable promoter, should indicate its significance (if any) in the formation of a particular product. Knocking out genes has the additional advantage in that intermediates in a biosynthesis may accumulate in a deletant strain and offer clues to how a natural product is pieced together. However, the susceptibility of some intermediates to spontaneous rearrangements, degradation, or catalysis by endogenous enzymes can complicate analysis.
High rates of correct gene targeting will hasten progress in studying gene function. However, in Aspergillus species, rates hover as low as 0–20%.13 Human Ku protein is a heterodimer of two polypeptides, Ku70 and Ku80. It plays a chief role in nonhomologous endjoining repair. In Neurospora crassa, correct homologous integration occurs only 3–5% of the time, but when the homologs to Ku70 and Ku80 were separately disrupted, each strain was able to integrate exogenous DNA into homologous sequences at a frequency of 100%.14 Based on this finding, Ku homologs in Aspergillus have been deleted with the effect of substantially improving homologous integration efficiency. This approach has been demonstrated in A. nidulans (nkuAΔ),15 A. fumigatus (akuAΔ and akuBKU80Δ),16,17 A. niger (kusAΔ),18 A. terreus (akuBΔ),19 and A. oryzae (ku70Δ and ku80Δ).20,21 Because correct gene targeting frequencies are somewhat lower in A. oryzae compared with other Aspergilli, an alternative method was developed in which a homolog of human DNA ligase IV (ligD) was disrupted.22,23 As a further aid to experiments, fusion PCR allows transforming sequences to be developed without ligation, and, if the genomic sequence is known, the targeted gene does not have to be cloned.13,24,25
Efficient gene knockout was used in the study of the emericellamides (1–5) in A. nidulans.26 The emericellamides are molecules of mixed polyketide/peptide origin that were shown to have antibiotic activity, first found from a marine Emericella species.27 Emericellamide A and four other related molecules (thus labeled C–F) were soon after isolated from A. nidulans. As expected, both a polyketide and a nonribosomal peptide synthetase gene are responsible for the formation of the emericellamides, as deletion of these genes eliminated the compounds' production. Two additional crucial genes (EasC and EasD) were identified within the cluster.

Efficient genetic targeting also allowed investigators to delete 32 known and putative PKS genes and search for any link to observed metabolites.28 The study revealed that inactivating the PKS gene AN8383 eliminated production of two compounds of mixed polyketide-terpene origin, austinol (6) and dehydroaustinol (7). AN8383 under the control of an inducible promoter generated 3,5-dimethylorsellinic acid (8), a likely precursor in the synthesis of the meroterpenoids (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.

The biosynthetic pathway for austinol and dehydroaustinol.
3.1.2 Gene amplification and overexpression
A common method to study a secondary metabolite gene is to amplify the gene of interest, overexpress it in a heterologous host, purify the enzyme, and then examine the enzyme's function, often by incubating it with a supposed secondary metabolite intermediate and any cofactors that are predicted to be necessary. Examples provided below illustrate that the approach has filled in many gaps in our knowledge of various biosynthetic pathways. Given the substrate promiscuity of many secondary metabolite enzymes, however, it may be difficult to assign specific function when the encoding gene is not clustered with other secondary metabolite genes that give context to the overall biosynthesis.
As one example, a consideration of the structure of the mycotoxin acetylaszonalenin (9), a dipeptide derivative of tryptophan and anthranilic acid that has been prenylated and acetylated, prompted experimenters to mine the N. fischeri genome for a cluster containing NRPS, prenylation, and acetylation genes.29 The prenyltransferase gene AnaPT in such a cluster was cloned and overexpressed. To serve as the starting molecule, the predicted first intermediate, (R)-benzodiazepinedione (10) was acquired through synthesis. Recombinant AnaPT catalyzed reverse prenylation at the C-3 position, and at this stage ring formation between C-2 of the indole ring and N-12 of the diketopiperazine seems to occur as well (Scheme 2). Isolated product aszonalenin (11) and acetyl coenzyme A were then incubated with the acetylating protein in the cluster, AnaAT. The enzymatic product was confirmed to be acetylaszonalenin.
Scheme 2.

The biosynthetic pathway for acetylaszonalenin.
3.1.3 Heterologous production of natural products
A whole set of genes from one organism may be transferred to a host organism that does not naturally contain these genes. This is a well-established method to induce the expression of genes from a strain that is less-than-optimal in generating the associated natural product.30 Ideally, heterologous expression can be used to assess the function of these transferred genes. However, the approach has some limitations, including the difficulty of handling large genes and gene clusters, as well as finding a suitable host.
Despite these challenges, researchers succeeded in reconstituting up to five steps of the biosynthesis of the meroterpenoid pyripyropene A (12) from A. fumigatus, a potent inhibitor of acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase, using A. oryzae M-2-3 as a host.31 In the search for a terpene cyclase they discovered a protein with unusual sequence and primary structure. The protein bears homology to an efflux pump, raising the possibility that it in fact serves a dual purpose: catalyzing a late-stage cyclization step and, perhaps as a self-resistance move, exporting the metabolite from the cell. Further, the experimenters fed benzoic acid, instead of the natural precursor nicotinic acid, to a transformant and ultimately obtained a close analog to a compound that is an inhibitor of inducible nitric-oxide synthase in human cells. Their approach points to the flexibility of secondary metabolite biosynthetic enzymes, allowing the formation of novel metabolites with distinct biological properties.

3.2 Uncovering hidden biosynthetic pathways
It came as a surprise to many researchers that Aspergillus genomes were indicating that the number of putative biosynthetic genes far exceed the number of secondary metabolites that had been acquired from those species. Because of the extensive investigation of some of these fungi, it is unlikely that many secondary metabolites have simply escaped notice. Rather, it is plausible to conclude that most of the genes that have not yet been associated with a secondary metabolite are not expressed or expressed in very low amounts in a laboratory culture setting. The discovery of the untapped metabolic potential of Aspergillus both inspires excitement and poses a challenge: How can researchers unearth the hidden secondary metabolites of Aspergillus, especially with an incomplete knowledge of their regulation?
Remarkably, various strategies have been successful to this end, many of which take advantage of some interesting characteristics of fungal secondary metabolism. Besides the aforementioned clustering phenomenon, many (but not all) secondary metabolite gene clusters contain a class of zinc binuclear (Zn(ii)2Cys6) transcription factor genes, which are unique to fungi.32
3.2.1 Controlling expression of cluster-specific transcriptional activators
In A. nidulans a plasmid carrying the transcriptional gene apdR under the control of the inducible alcA promoter was transformed, leading to the upregulation of the putative entire cluster to which the gene belongs.33 As a result, two new related polyketide–nonribosomal peptide hybrids, aspyridones A and B (13–14), were acquired.

In another approach that also took note of the fact that many secondary metabolite gene clusters contain their own regulatory gene, the native promoter of one of these genes, afoA, was replaced by an inducible promoter, and as a result the novel polyketide asperfuranone (15), with structural similarities to the azaphilone class of natural products, was generated.34 Under alcA-inducing conditions, the nearby genes could be deleted and analyzed for their effect on asperfuranone formation. Asperfuranone was found to come from the product of a highly reduced PKS, which was then loaded onto a nonreduced PKS and then further tailored to lead to the final product.

3.2.2 LaeA, a global regulator of secondary metabolism
LaeA (Loss of aflR expression A), a nuclear protein, was first found in A. nidulans,8,35 and orthologs have since been identified in A.fumigatus, A. terreus, A. flavus,36 as well as in fungi beyond Aspergillus.37–40 Its deletion was found to cause the decrease of sterigmatocystin and penicillin production in A. nidulans and of gliotoxin production in A. fumigatus,41 and lovastatin in A. terreus.8 Deletion also leads to reduced virulence in A. fumigatus41,42 and A. flavus.43 Over-expression of LaeA, on the other hand, boosted the generation of the above products. The data suggest that the protein has a broad, global role in secondary metabolite regulation. Indeed, microarray data from A. fumigatus revealed that up to 13 of 22 studied gene clusters were affected by LaeA.44 Comparing the deletion and overexpression mutants of LaeA in A. nidulans was instrumental in defining the terrequinone A (16) gene cluster.45,46
Each of the five terrequinone A genes was characterized by another group through heterologous overexpression.47 TdiD was established as a pyridoxal-5′-phosphate-dependent l-tryptophan aminotransferase that converted tryptophan to indole pyruvic acid (17). Next, the tridomain NRPS TdiA couples two tethered units together to yield dimethylasterriquinone D (18). The combination of TdiB, TdiC, and TdiE was reported to be necessary to proceed substantially to terrequinone A, and that TdiC is an NADH-dependent quinone reductase, generating a hydroquinone that is primed for two prenylations catalyzed by TdiB.47 TdiE is necessary to direct the pathway away from a shunt metabolite (Scheme 3). Concurrent independent research was in agreement about the roles of TdiA and TdiD48 and characterizes TdiB as a catalyst for reverse prenylation of the indole moiety.49
Scheme 3.

The biosynthetic pathway for terrequinone A.
Recent methodology, including the employment of suppressor screens that can remediate loss of laeA, may uncover new global regulators of secondary metabolism. For example, such a screen identified a bZIP protein called RsmA (Restorer of secondary metabolism A), which was independently able to enhance secondary metabolite production in A. nidulans.50
Based on its homology to histone and arginine methyltransferases, LaeA is believed to function by influencing chromatin. As chromatin can exist in an “open” (euchromatin) or “closed” (heterochromatin) state, experimenters considered the possibility that the manipulation of the interplay between these two states may open up previously closed sections of the genome to the transcriptional machinery. LaeA, in fact, was shown to reverse the establishment of heterochromatic marks.51 Subsequent research has confirmed that control of chromatin remodeling in Aspergillus and elsewhere may affect its metabolic profile.
3.2.3 Chromatin restructuring through enzyme inhibitors or by deletion of a chromatin remodeling protein
Various enzymes catalyze the addition or removal of small functional groups, such as acetyl, methyl, and phosphoryl, onto the tails of histone proteins. These groups appear to influence the architecture of the surrounding chromatin; for instance, acetylated histone tails are generally associated with the open state, whereas deacetylated histones are related with closed chromatin. It was postulated that blocking the enzymes that catalyze deacetylation could potentially open up previously inaccessible secondary metabolite genetic loci and in turn bring about its associated natural product. Indeed, treatment of Alternaria alternata and Penicilium expansum with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) induced the production of a number of undefined metabolites.52 In A. niger, the addition of the HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilidehydroxamic acid (SAHA) generated the production of nygerone A (19), containing a unique 1-phenyl-pyridin-4(1H)-one core.53

Investigators also considered the effects of removing critical members of chromatin regulatory proteins through targeted gene deletion. A. nidulans contains CclA, a putative ortholog of the Saccharomyces cerivisiae Bre2 protein, belonging to a complex (COMPASS), which both activates and represses chromatin-related processes through lysine 4 histone H3 methylation. Two classes of secondary metabolites emerged when the cclA gene was knocked out: emodin (20), monodictyphenone (21), and related compounds, which all depend on the PKS gene AN0150; and F9775 A/B (22–23), which stems from the gene AN7909.54

The research so far on the epigenetic link to secondary metabolites suggests that alterations in the chromatin landscape can have a dramatic effect on a fungus's metabolic profile, although no work to date has reported that one single approach yields the entire array of hidden natural products from one fungus. Nevertheless, epigenetic strategies, if they cannot access an entire genome, are still useful in opening up at least part of the secondary metabolome that had previously been closed off to researchers.
In addition to histone proteins, other targets may touch upon secondary metabolite regulation. The single sumoylation gene of A. nidulans, sumO, was shown to affect the production of several metabolites.55 The gene's removal led to decreased amounts of austinol (6) and dehydroaustinol (7) production but also a significant increase in the generation of the polyketide asperthecin (24). The substantial amount of asperthecin permitted researchers to identify a cluster of three genes containing the responsible polyketide synthase gene, a gene thought to be needed for the release of the polyketide from its enzyme, and a monooxygenase gene. It is not yet clear how the deletion of sumO affects A. nidulans secondary metabolism, but as the small product SUMO is added post-translationally to a variety of proteins, it may play a role in the regulation of at least some secondary metabolites.

3.2.4 Mimicking ecological systems through co-incubation with microorganisms
Another successful strategy was based on the realization that, in nature, fungi often co-inhabit ecosystems with other species, and indeed the purpose of many secondary metabolites apparently is to assist the producing organism secure its niche, whether the interaction is antagonistic or symbiotic. This has indeed translated to the induction of secondary metabolites when a fungus is co-incubated with another organism.27,56–58 Again in A. nidulans, it was demonstrated that cultivation with a particular actinomycete, Streptomyces rapa-mycinicus, prompted the upregulation of 248 genes including a PKS and NRPS gene.59 It was demonstrated that, rather than arising from a chemical signal, the induction was triggered by the physical interaction of the two organisms. Metabolic profiling revealed the emergence of the polyketide orsellinic acid (25) as well as lecanoric acid (26) and F9775 A and B (22–23), which may be derived from the simple tetraketide, found to be encoded by orsA (AN7909).59,60

3.2.5 One strain many compounds (OSMAC)
Despite the unmistakable value of sophisticated molecular biological research in uncovering previously undetected secondary metabolites, a potentially equally powerful method involves little more than a change in recipe. Articulated as OSMAC (One Strain – Many Compounds), the strategy endeavors to expose the metabolic diversity of fungi (among other organisms) by subjecting the same strain to a number of different culture conditions.61 A frequent approach is to alter the broth composition in which the organism is cultivated. Other parameters may be adjusted, such as temperature, shaking speed, and even flask shape and size.
Our understanding of the mechanisms that make OSMAC effective can only be as complete as our knowledge of the complex regulatory networks that influence secondary metabolism. It is realized that heightened glucose, ammonium, or phosphate concentrations often (but not necessarily) curb secondary metabolism formation.62,63 However, in many cases it is not clear why a certain environment results in the desired effect of a new metabolite. Considering the facts that altering culture conditions is usually not labor intensive, but that many attempts will not lead to a different metabolic profile, a sensible course of action is to test out many different conditions at once.
OSMAC inspired the discovery that simple culture conditions, namely A. nidulans in a sucrose-based media without shaking, led to the formation of orsellinic acid (25) and F-9775 A and B (22–23).60 Interestingly, F-9775 A and B has now been demonstrated to be a result of three separate approaches: chromatin remodeling,54 co-incubation with an actinomycete,59 and alteration of culture conditions. The straightforward nature of changing conditions facilitated the discovery of a three-gene cluster through genetic deletion analysis and the acquisition of two bioactive compounds, gerfelin and diorcinol, from two of the knockout strains.
As other examples, one group prepared 40 different conditions and found that one (and not the 39 others) yielded four related quinoline-2-one alkaloids named aspoquinolones (27–30).64 An additional round of investigation was rewarded with the discovery of the prenylated isoindolinone alkaloids, aspernidine A and B (31–32).65

4 Genetic characterization of other Aspergillus secondary metabolites
4.1 Prenylated xanthones from A. nidulans
Investigation into the biosynthesis of the naturally occurring prenyl xanthones of A. nidulans (33–36) revealed that the identified genes are separated into three distinct genomic loci.66 The two necessary prenyltransferase genes are distant from a main cluster, and another gene is proximal to one of the prenyl-transferase genes (Scheme 4). This and other examples of “non-clustering” in the literature67–69 suggest that fungal secondary metabolite genetic clustering should be thought of as a guiding principle rather than an unbreakable rule. The study also detailed that the main cluster of genes was the same as the one responsible for emodin (17), monodictyphenone (18), and related compounds, which were only detected in a chromatin remodeling mutant strain. The genes outside the cluster complete a biosynthesis in which emodin and monodictyphenone may be intermediates.
Scheme 4.

The biosynthetic pathway for prenyl xanthones in A. nidulans.
These findings suggest that applications of strategies that aim to upregulate a genetic cluster may not equally influence genes that pertain to the biosynthesis but reside outside the cluster. Consequently, the “real” natural product may not be formed, but rather one or more molecules representing a portion of the biosynthesis. However, since many intermediates on their own possess potent biological activity, an original aim of these aforementioned approaches, the generation of bioactive secondary metabolites, may be satisfied after all.
4.2 A. fumigatus secondary metabolites
4.2.1 Gliotoxin
Of all the metabolites generated by A. fumigatus, gliotoxin (37) may be the most scrutinized of them all. Gliotoxin is an epipolythiodioxopiperazine containing a transannular disulfide bridge. This structure is believed to a major factor in the metabolite's – and the organisms's – harmful effects, via the generation of reactive oxygen species from cycling between the oxidized and reduced forms, and/or the formation of mixed disulfides with proteins in the host cell.70,71 The metabolite has been associated with the virulence of the producing species.72,73
The gliotoxin cluster (gli) was identified promptly after the sequence information for A. fumigatus strain Af293 became available.74 The 12-membered cluster includes a gene for an NRPS (gliP),75,76 a transcription factor (gliZ),77 and a protein with a putative pyridoxal 5′-phosphate binding domain (gliI),78 and a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (gliC)79 each of which was determined to be essential for gliotoxin formation (Scheme 5).
Scheme 5.

The biosynthetic pathway for gliotoxin.
Work with recombinant GliP showed that it assembles an l-Phe-l-Ser-thioester intermediate, tethered to one of the thiolation domains of the three-module NRPS (38).80
At the other end of the biosynthesis, gliT encodes a flavin-dependent oxidoreductase which mediates oxidation of the dithiol precursor (39) to gliotoxin.81,82 This protein has been shown to confer resistance from exogenous gliotoxin, suggesting a protective role for this gene product.
Investigators are attempting to unfold the secrets of gliotoxin biosynthesis between beginning and end stages. The deletion of the glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene homolog gliG led to a putative shunt metabolite lacking sulfur, suggesting that GliG may not be a usual GST but somehow provides the sulfur groups.79,83 In another experiment, differential analysis by 2D NMR spectroscopy (DANS) was utilized to observe differences in the metabolic profile between wild type and gliZ knockout strains.84 Remarkably, nineteen metabolites, nine of them novel, were detected in the wild type strain alone, allowing researchers to outline a biosynthesis in which many of the intermediates remain tethered to the NRPS.
4.2.2 Fumigaclavine C
Fumigaclavine C (40) belongs to the ergot alkaloid class of natural products, a diverse group with many potent pharmacological activities. A putative gene cluster for fumigaclavine C was detected in A. fumigatus through bioinformatic investigations.85,86 From this cluster the gene (dmaW/fgaPT2) was both deleted87 and cloned and overexpressed.85 Examination revealed that it functions as a dimethylallyltryptophan synthase (DMATS), appending a dimethylallyl group on the 4-position of tryptophan to give 41 (Scheme 6). The X-ray structure of FgaPT2 was determined with a resolution of 1.76 Å.88 Interestingly, it showed significant structural similarity to the ABBA family of bacterial prenyltransferases without having any significant similarity at the amino acid level.
Scheme 6.

The biosynthetic pathway for fumigaclavine C.
FgaMT was also cloned and overexpressed and was found to catalyze the N-methylation of 4-dimethylallyltryptophan (41) with the addition of S-adenosylmethionine.89 This methylated product (42) was accumulated upon deletion of either the putative catalase gene easC or the putative oxidoreductase easE.90 Their specific contributions, and whether they work in tandem or sequentially, await discovery. The possible product, chanoclavine I (43), is oxidized to yield chanoclavine-1-aldehyde (44), as evidenced by the in vitro reaction with cloned and overexpressed FgaDH.91
A homolog of the Old Yellow Enzyme gene in yeast, easA, was amplified and overexpressed.92 By incubating with chanoclavine I-aldehyde (44) and subsequently reducing with sodium cyanoborohydride, researchers obtained festuclavine (45). Reducing the alkene of chanoclavine-1 aldehyde allows the new single bond to rotate and orient the aldehyde group for iminium formation. Another team, using purified recombinant proteins, showed that EasA (named FgaOx3 here) and FgaFS, of unknown function, were crucial for the transformation of chanoclavine-1 aldehyde to festuclavine.93 Festuclavine formation could only be observed if the enzymes were incubated together or in a sequence with FgaOx3 preceding FgaFS.
An undetermined step hydroxylates festuclavine to fumigaclavine B (46), then the putative acetyltransferase FgaAT catalyzes the conversion of fumigaclavine B to fumigaclavine A (47), as elaborated by a similar overexpression study.94 A second prenyltransferase gene product (FgaPT1) was shown to catalyze the addition of a prenyl group to the late-stage intermediate fumigaclavine A to fumigaclavine C (40).95
4.2.3 Pseurotin A
The structure of pseurotin A (48), together with previous feeding experiments, suggested that the molecule is a product of a hybrid PKS/NRPS, and there is only one obvious PKS/NRPS gene in the A. fumigatus genome. Researchers both deleted and overexpressed this gene, psoA, to find that pseurotin A was eliminated or accumulated, respectively.96 Pseurotin A was recently found to be induced in laboratory hypoxic conditions, an environment designed to mimic the conditions A. fumigatus may encounter in the human lung.97

4.2.4 Fumiquinazolines
Researchers validated that an adenylation domain of the acetylaszonalenin NRPS (see above) activates anthranilic acid as anthranilyl-AMP,98 which is then loaded onto the corresponding thiolation domain. Because adenylation domains feature ten-residue long sequence “codes” that correspond to the amino acid they are specific for, the experimenters used the presumed code for anthranilic acid to search for similar sequences in other fungi. This information was used to confirm that an NRPS module from A. fumigatus also activates anthranilate.98
Next, the group identified two adjacent genes, coding for a monomodular NRPS and a flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent monooxygenase. Starting with chemically synthesized fumiquinazoline F (49), the group showed that the recombinant monooxygenase oxidizes the 2′–3′ double bond in the indole ring, and the NRPS presents l-alanine to acylate the oxidized indole (Scheme 7). Intramolecular cyclization completes the synthesis of fumiquinazoline A (50).99
Scheme 7.

The biosynthetic pathway for fumiquinazoline D.
Subsequent work has shown that another gene codes for an FAD-dependent amide oxidase that generates a nascent imine in fumiquinazoline A that is captured by the –OH group of the oxidized indole ring to form the remarkably complex, seven-ring spirohemiaminal fumiquinazoline C (51). This molecule undergoes slow spontaneous conversion to fumiquinazoline D (52).100
4.2.5 Fumitremorgins
The diverse family of fumitremorgins includes brevianamide F (53), fumitremorgins A (54), B (55), and C (56), and verruculogen (57).101 As research validated, the structural similarities suggest a common biosynthetic origin. Interestingly, different members of the family have different biological properties. Fumitremorgin C, for one, is a potent and specific inhibitor of breast cancer resistance protein.102,103 Verruculogen, on the other hand, is a tremorgenic mycotoxin.104
Experimenters noticed that two prenyltransferases are expected to be involved in the biosynthesis of fumitremorgin B (55) and related compounds.105 The identification of two putative prenyltransferase genes in proximity with each other prompted the overexpression of ftmPT1 and its recognition as a catalyst for the prenylation of synthetic brevianamide F (53) (Scheme 8). As expected, the bimodular NRPS gene in the cluster, upon overexpression in both A. fumigatus and A. nidulans, was shown to be the generator of brevianamide F.106
Scheme 8.

The biosynthetic pathway for fumitremorgin A.
Disruption of cytochrome P450 gene ftmC led to a metabolite profile in which trypostatin B (58), the prenylated derivative of brevianamide F (53), was most prominent.107 A strain with a deletion of another cyctochrome P450 gene, ftmE, revealed trypostatin A (59), and to a smaller extent, 60, suggesting that the biosynthetic steps after trypostatin B are hydroxylation of C-6 followed by methylation of the new hydroxyl group, then C–N bond closure to form a five-ring system.107 FtmG was also disrupted, resulting in fumitremorgin C (56) and suggesting the corresponding enzyme dihydroxylates the intermediate.107 Reconsitution experiments confirmed roles for FtmC, FtmE, and FtmG.
The second prenyltransferase gene, ftmPT2, was overex-pressed and shown to be responsible for appending a prenyl group to the indole nitrogen of 61.108 Purified FtmOx1, a non-heme Fe(ii) and α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase catalyzes endoperoxide formation to yield verruculogen (57).109 Incubation with an 18O2-enriched atmosphere reveals that both oxygen atoms come from one molecule of O2. Gene knockout results of the same gene agreed with its role as verruculogen synthase.110 An unidentified prenyltransferase is expected to convert verruculogen to fumitremorgin A (54).
4.2.6 Helvolic acid
Plants are the major producers of triterpenes with biological activity, but the large number of candidate tailoring genes makes it difficult to assign function to them. A. fumigatus, however, is a producer of the terpene-derived antibiotic helvolic acid (62). A putative oxidosqualene cyclase gene with some sequence identity to fungal lanosterol synthase genes was identified in the A. fumigatus genome, as well as tailoring genes and a transporter gene that all cluster together and could plausibly contribute to helvolic acid biosynthesis.111 The OSC gene, AfuOSC3, was PCR amplified and expressed in yeast, the transformant bearing a known precursor to helvolic acid. Coexpression with the cluster's dehydrogenase/reductase gene or a P450 gene yielded oxidized backbone products that are in agreement with the idea the cluster is responsible for forming a tetracyclic ring system which is then tailored to helvolic acid.

4.3 A. oryzae secondary metabolites
4.3.1 Kojic acid
Kojic acid (63) has been found to have a number of properties, including antibacterial and antifungal, and it is used in cosmetics to lighten skin. Experimenters scrutinized gene transcription profiles from DNA microarray data.112 Based on observations that kojic acid production increased with time until day 7 and that it was inhibited by sodium nitrate, the laboratory compared gene expression levels in a pair of conditions (7-day culture vs. 4-day culture, 4-day culture vs. 2-day culture, and without nitrate vs. with nitrate) and identified genes that were highly expressed in one condition relative to the other condition. No gene was commonly more than 2-fold enhanced from all three experiments, but the two most strongly induced genes in the 7 day vs. 4 day experiment were validated, upon gene disruption, to be responsible for kojic acid synthesis. The genes are separated by a third gene, which, too, was deleted and found to be behind the formation of the metabolite.113 The genes encode for an enzyme with an oxidoreductase motif, a transcription factor, and a transporter protein. Glucose, rather than a backbone polyketide, peptide, or terpene, is believed to serve as the starting material.

4.3.2 Csypyrone B1 and DHBA
The formation of most fungal polyketides is catalyzed by iterative type I PKSs. However, it was noted that in A. oryzae several genes, csyA, csyB, csyC, and csyD, encode type III PKSs, which have a simple ketosynthase architecture with an active site for multistep reactions.114 They are independent of acyl carrier proteins. Interestingly, no ortholog of csyB is present in A. flavus, despite the genetic similarity with A. oryzae. A plasmid carrying csyB was transformed into A. oryzae M-2-3 strain. A new product was isolated and characterized as csypyrone B1 (64).115 In a similar fashion, the transformation of csyA led to the tetraketide 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHBA) (65).116

4.4 A. flavus secondary metabolites
4.4.1 Aflatrem
Prior to the availability of A. flavus genome sequence data, researchers studying the tremorgenic indole-diterpene aflatrem (66) had used degenerate primers for conserved domains of geranylgeranyl synthases to clone a GGPP synthase gene (atmG) and used chromosome walking to identify a cluster containing two additional secondary metabolite genes (atmC and atmM).117 Penicillium paxilli generates a structurally similar indole-diterpene, paxilline (67). A plasmid containing a copy of atmM was introduced into a strain of P. paxilli missing the ortholog paxM, rescuing paxilline production and implicating atmM (and the clustered genes) in aflatrem biosynthesis.

Following the whole genome sequencing of A. flavus, four additional candidate aflatrem genes were located, on another chromosome, based on their homology to paxilline genes.67 This time, the monooxygenase gene atmP was introduced into a P. paxilli paxP mutant, which resulted predominantly in the synthesis of paxilline.
4.4.2 α-cyclopiazonic acid
The mycotoxin α-cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) (68) is a nanomolar inhibitor of Ca2+-ATPase. It is produced by, among others, A. flavus and a strain of A. oryzae, and it is noted to be co-expressed with aflatoxin. Experimenters located the putative CPA prenyltransferase gene in the region between the aflatoxin gene cluster and the next telomere in CPA-nonproducing A. oryzae RIB40.118 Sequence comparison of this region with CPA-producing A. oryzae NBRC4177 showed that NBRC4177 has an extension of 17–18 kb, and that RIB40 contains only a portion of the putative PKS–NRPS gene cpaA. Deletion of cpaA in NBRC4177 and resulting removal of CPA confirmed its role. Heterologous expression of cpaA leads to cyclo-acetoacetyl-l-tryptophan (69) (Scheme 9).119 An analysis of the subtelomeric region of A. flavus flanking aflatoxin genes also identified putative CPA genes.120 Gene deletion identified a crucial PKS–NRPS (pks-nrps), monoamine oxidase (maoA), and prenyltransferase gene (dmaT).
Scheme 9.

The proposed biosynthetic pathway for CPA.
The study of the CPA PKS–NRPS afforded intriguing information that may pertain to many reductase R domains belonging to this class of protein. Using a recombinant PTP-R didomain and PTP and R monodomains, a team established that the R domain of CpdA actually does not function as a reductase, because Leu is in place of the Ser-Tyr-Lys catalytic triad for reduction, providing evidence that the R domain instead functions as a Dieckmann cyclase.121
4.5 Naptho-γ-pyrones and melanin from A. niger
A. niger generates a number of structurally similar, dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrones. Its genome features a homolog to a gene, alb1, in A. fumigatus that was demonstrated to encode a naphtho-γ-pyrone synthase upon heterologous expression. The A. niger albA gene was disrupted, resulting both in the elimination of all the naptho-γ-pyrones and in a white/colorless conidial phenotype.122 The deletant of aygA, homologous to A. fumigatus ayg1 whose protein converts a polyketide product to the tetrahydroxynapthalene precursor of melanin had little effect on naphtho-γ-pyrone formation but resulted in orange pigmented conidia, prompting researchers to propose that AlbAp produces a polyketide that is a branch point in both naphtho-γ-pyrone and melanin synthesis and that AygAp directs some of the polyketide to melanin formation.
Another team obtained three different strains with lighter pigmentation compared to wild type.123 Candidate genes behind the phenotypes were identified, based on homologues in A. fumigatus. Complementation with the fwnA mutant with the same gene labeled alb1 in the other study, restored pigmentation. The other mutants, olvA and brnA, were complemented with the ayg1 homolog and a multicopper oxidase homolog, respectively, to restore color. In agreement with the other work, the fwnAΔ strain cannot accumulate naphtho-γ-pyrones, but it was also noted that funalenone (70) is dependent on fwnA, olvA, and brnA, suggesting that it may be a product of the pigmentation pathway.

4.6 A. terreus secondary metabolites
Experimenters located a PKS–NRPS gene in the A. terreus genome, but initial attempts to acquire the corresponding compound from culture were unsuccessful.19 A reporter strain was then engineered, with the gene's promoter fused with the E. coli lacZ gene. Investigations with pH and media composition revealed that transcription was repressed when various sugars were utilized but activated when casamino acids (CAs) were introduced instead. Transcription was also stimulated by alkaline pH. The metabolite profile agreed, as two compounds of apparent polyketide and peptide origin, flavipucine (71), and isoflavipucine (72), were obtained from CA-containing media. The NRPS portion of the PKS-NRPS was reconstituted, and by incubating the NRPS with various amino acids and thiols, researchers obtained over 60 different thiopyrazine compounds in good yields, demonstrating the substrate promiscuity of this part of the megasynthase.124

Experimenters noted a candidate emodin anthrone synthase PKS gene, ACAS, in A. terreus NIH2624 that was highly homologous to one in A. terreus RED1.125 They found that the recombinant protein could catalyze loading and condensation of malonyl-CoA units, but, lacking a TE/CYC domain, it was unable to release its product. However, coincubation with the enzyme coded by the gene upstream by ACAS, ACTE, which is homologous to metallo-β-lactamases, resulted in the release of several products, chiefly atrochrysone (73). Heterologous expression of the two genes in A. oryzae led to a number of metabolites that supported the notion that atrochrysone carboxylic acid (74) was the product of the PKS gene, and that the metallo-β-lactamase was responsible for hydrolyzing the thioester bond between the PKS and the octaketide.

5 Conclusion
A few years' hindsight has validated predictions that genomic sequencing of Aspergillus members would remarkably catalyze our advances in fungal secondary metabolite research. The above examples have illustrated that the data provided by sequencing projects have facilitated the identification of secondary metabolite genes and accelerated their characterization. What is more, the information has revealed to us that many more compounds await discovery, and the same information has helped to enable ways to bring these compounds to light.
In the course of this research as a whole, much has also been learned about the kinds of chemical transformations related to these pathways and their mechanistic detail. Because this large body of knowledge could constitute another comprehensive review, it has been left out here but is elaborated in many of the cited articles.
So what lies in the future? It may become clear that much of the “low-hanging fruit” of the well-studied A. nidulans and A. fumigatus species may have been depleted, and it will be up to scientists to persist in developing creative ways to unfold the secrets of the pathways that have been more resistant to discovery. In these organisms still, the majority of putative secondary metabolite genes have not been assigned to a known compound. It is not clear how many of them will be ultimately expressed, but as a comprehension of secondary metabolite regulation grows, it is likely that this knowledge will have a positive impact on efforts to give a voice to silent genes.
For the other Aspergillus species with sequenced genomes, the next several years are likely to continue to see new secondary metabolite developments as experimenters continue to devote effort to these organisms. Beyond, literally dozens of other Aspergillus members may be replete with compounds with remarkable biological properties. Expect again that future sequence data will translate into an abundance of discoveries of new secondary metabolites, and an understanding about how they came to be.
Table 3. Secondary metabolism gene clusters in A. fumigatus.
| No. | Af293 gene (Broad designation) | A1163 gene (Cadre designation) | Gene name | Gene typea | Actual or predicted productb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Afu1g01010 | no homolog | PR-PKS | ||
| 2 | Afu1g10380 | AFUB_009800 | pesB (pes1) | NRPS | |
| 3 | Afu1g17200 | AFUB_016590 | sidC | NRPS | ferricrocin, hydroxyferricrocin141,142 |
| 4 | Afu1g17740 | AFUB_045790 | PR-PKS | ||
| 5 | Afu2g01290 | AFUB_018370 | PR-PKS | ||
| 6 | Afu2g05760 | AFUB_022790 | PKS-like | ||
| 7 | Afu2g17600 | AFUB_033290 | alb1(pksP) | NR-PKS | YWA1143 |
| 8 | Afu3g01410 | AFUB_046990 | PR-PKS | ||
| 9 | Afu3g02530 | no homolog | PKS-like | ||
| 10 | Afu3g02570 | no homolog | NR-PKS | ||
| 11 | Afu3g02670 | AFUB_045610 | NRPS-like | ||
| 12 | Afu3g03350 | AFUB_044900 | sidE | NRPS | |
| 13 | Afu3g03420 | AFUB_044830 | sidD | NRPS | fusarinine C, triacetylfusarinine C141,142 |
| 14 | Afu3g12920 | AFUB_036270 | pesF | NRPS | |
| 15 | Afu3g13730 | AFUB_035460 | pesG | NRPS | |
| 16 | Afu3g14700 | AFUB_034520 | PR-PKS | ||
| 17 | Afu3g15270 | AFUB_033950 | pesH | NRPS | |
| 18 | Afu4g00210 | AFUB_100730 | NR-PKS | ||
| 19 | Afu4g14560 | AFUB_071800 | NR-PKS | ||
| 20 | Afu5g10120 | AFUB_057720 | NRPS-like | ||
| 21 | Afu5g12730 | AFUB_060400 | pesI144 | NRPS | |
| 22 | Afu6g03480 | AFUB_094810 | NRPS-like | ||
| 23 | Afu6g08560 | AFUB_074520 | NRPS-like | ||
| 24 | Afu6g09610 | AFUB_075660 | pesJ | NRPS | |
| 25 | Afu6g09660 | AFUB_075710 | gliP | NRPS | gliotoxin (37)74–76 |
| 26 | Afu6g12050 | AFUB_078040 | NRPS | fumiquinazolines (49–52)99 | |
| 27 | Afu6g12080 | AFUB_078070 | NRPS | fumiquinazolines (49–52)98 | |
| 28 | Afu6g13930 | AFUB_000820 | pyr2 | PR-PKS | pyripyropene A (12)31 |
| 29 | Afu7g00160 | AFUB_086700 | NR-PKS | ||
| 30 | Afu8g00170 | AFUB_086360 | ftmA | NRPS | fumitremorgins (53–59)106 |
| 31 | Afu8g00370 | AFUB_086200 | PR-PKS | ||
| 32 | Afu8g00540 | AFUB 086030 | psoA | hybrid | pseurotin A (48)96 |
| 33 | Afu8g01640 | AFUB_084950 | NRPS-like | ||
| 34 | Afu8g02350 | AFUB_084240 | NR-PKS | ||
| 35 | no homolog | AFUB 079710 | PKS | ||
| 36 | no homolog | AFUB_045640 | PKS |
abbreviations: polyketide synthase (PKS), non ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), PKS–NRPS (Hybrid), non reduced polyketide synthase (NR-PKS), partially reduced polyketide synthase (PR-PKS), highly reduced polyketide synthase (HR-PKS).
Actual products are highlighted in bold.
Table 4. Secondary metabolism gene cluster in A. terreus.
| No. | Broad designation | Gene name | Gene typea | Actual or predicted productb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ATEG_00145.1 | pes1 | ||
| 2 | ATEG_00228.1 | NRPS | ||
| 3 | ATEG_00282.1 | |||
| 4 | ATEG_00325.1 | ftmA | Hybrid | flavipucine (71), isoflavipucine (72)19 |
| 5 | ATEG_00700.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 6 | ATEG_00881.1 | NRPS | ||
| 7 | ATEG_00913.1 | NR-PKS | ||
| 8 | ATEG_01002.1 | NRPS | ||
| 9 | ATEG_01052.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 10 | ATEG_01894.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 11 | ATEG_02004.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 12 | ATEG_02403.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 13 | ATEG_02434.1 | NR-PKS | ||
| 14 | ATEG_02831.1 | NRPS | ||
| 15 | ATEG_02944.1 | NRPS | ||
| 16 | ATEG_03090.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 17 | ATEG_03432.1 | NR-PKS | ||
| 18 | ATEG_03446.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 19 | ATEG_03470.1 | NRPS | ||
| 20 | ATEG_03528.1 | NRPS | ||
| 21 | ATEG_03576.1 | NRPS | ||
| 22 | ATEG_03629.1 | NR-PKS | ||
| 23 | ATEG_03630.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 24 | ATEG_04322.1 | NRPS | ||
| 25 | ATEG_04323.1 | NRPS | ||
| 26 | ATEG_04718.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 27 | ATEG_04975.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 28 | ATEG_05073.1 | sidC | NRPS | siderophore |
| 29 | ATEG_05795.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 30 | ATEG_06056.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 31 | ATEG_06113.1 | NRPS | ||
| 32 | ATEG_06206.1 | NR-PKS | ||
| 33 | ATEG_06275.1 | atX | PR-PKS | 6-methylsalicyclic acid (MSAS)145 |
| 34 | ATEG_06680.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 35 | ATEG_06765.1 | PKS-like | ||
| 36 | ATEG_06998.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 37 | ATEG_07067.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 38 | ATEG_07279.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 39 | ATEG_07282.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 40 | ATEG_07358.1 | NRPS | ||
| 41 | ATEG_07379.1 | NR-PKS | ||
| 42 | ATEG_07380.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 43 | ATEG_07488.1 | sidD | NRPS | siderophore |
| 44 | ATEG_07500.1 | NR-PKS | YWA1 | |
| 45 | ATEG_07659.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 46 | ATEG_07661.1 | NR-PKS | ||
| 47 | ATEG_07894.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 48 | ATEG_08172.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 49 | ATEG_08427.1 | NRPS | ||
| 50 | ATEG_08448.1 | NRPS | ||
| 51 | ATEG_08451.1 | NR-PKS | atrochyrsone (73)125 | |
| 52 | ATEG_08662.1 | NR-PKS | ||
| 53 | ATEG_08678.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 54 | ATEG_09019.1 | NRPS | ||
| 55 | ATEG_09033.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 56 | ATEG_09064.1 | NRPS | ||
| 57 | ATEG_09068.1 | NRPS | ||
| 58 | ATEG_09088.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 59 | ATEG_09100.1 | PKS | ||
| 60 | ATEG_09142.1 | NRPS-like | ||
| 61 | ATEG_09617.1 | PR-PKS | ||
| 62 | ATEG_09961.1 | lovB | HR-PKS | lovastatin2 |
| 63 | ATEG_09968.1 | lovF | HR-PKS | lovastatin2 |
| 64 | ATEG_10080.1 | PKS-like | ||
| 65 | ATEG_10305.1 | NRPS |
abbreviations: polyketide synthase (PKS), non ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), PKS–NRPS (Hybrid), nonreduced polyketide synthase (NR-PKS), partially reduced polyketide synthase (PR-PKS), highly reduced polyketide synthase (HR-PKS).
Actual products are highlighted bold.
Acknowledgments
C.C.C.W. and N.P.K. gratefully acknowledge the National Institutes of Health (GM084077) for supporting research on fungal secondary metabolism.
Biographies

James F. Sanchez: James Sanchez has recently earned his doctorate in pharmaceutical sciences at the University of Southern California, previously receiving a B.S. in chemistry at the University of California, Irvine. His research has focused on the molecular genetic analysis of secondary metabolites from Aspergillus nidulans.

Amber D. Somoza: Amber Somoza is completing her doctoral research in chemistry at the University of Southern California after having received her B.S. from California State University of Long Beach in chemistry. Her research focuses on applying synthetic chemistry and metabolic engineering to generate structurally diverse natural products analogs using Aspergillus nidulans.

Nancy P. Keller: Nancy Keller is a Professor in the Departments of Medical Microbiology and Bacteriology at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Her interest in fungal secondary metabolism dates back to her days in the Peace Corps in Lesotho, Africa from first hand knowledge of moulded and toxic food supplies. Her interests range from basic science studies of genetic regulation of fungal secondary metabolism to the role of these metabolites in pathogenicity of plant (e.g. A. flavus) and human (e.g. A. fumigatus) pathogenic fungi.

Clay C. C. Wang: Clay Wang is currently Associate Professor in the Departments of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chemistry at the University of Southern California. While as an undergrad at Harvard he attended a seminar given by Professor Chaitan Khosla, which sparked his lifelong interest in natural product biosynthesis. He obtained his Ph.D. in chemistry at Caltech with Professor Peter Dervan and completed a NIH post-doctoral fellowship with Professor Chaitan Khosla at Stanford University. The current focus of his laboratory is in fungal natural product biosynthesis, regulation, and engineering.
References
- 1.Payne GA, Nystrom GJ, Bhatnagar D, Cleveland TE, Woloshuk CP. Appl Environ Microb. 1993;59:156–162. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.1.156-162.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kennedy J, Auclair K, Kendrew SG, Park C, Vederas JC, Hutchinson CR. Science. 1999;284:1368–1372. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hoffmeister D, Keller NP. Nat Prod Rep. 2007;24:393–416. doi: 10.1039/b603084j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Cuomo C, Ma LJ, Wortman JR, Batzoglou S, Lee SI, Basturkmen M, Spevak CC, Clutterbuck J, Kapitonov V, Jurka J, Scazzocchio C, Farman M, Butler J, Purcell S, Harris S, Braus GH, Draht O, Busch S, D'Enfert C, Bouchier C, Goldman GH, Bell-Pedersen D, Griffiths-Jones S, Doonan JH, Yu J, Vienken K, Pain A, Freitag M, Selker EU, Archer DB, Penalva MA, Oakley BR, Momany M, Tanaka T, Kumagai T, Asai K, Machida M, Nierman WC, Denning DW, Caddick M, Hynes M, Paoletti M, Fischer R, Miller B, Dyer P, Sachs MS, Osmani SA, Birren BW. Nature. 2005;438:1105–1115. doi: 10.1038/nature04341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wortman JR, Gilsenan JM, Joardar V, Deegan J, Clutterbuck J, Andersen MR, Archer D, Bencina M, Braus G, Coutinho P, von Dohren H, Doonan J, Driessen AJM, Durek P, Espeso E, Fekete E, Flipphi M, Estrada CG, Geysens S, Goldman G, de Groot PWJ, Hansen K, Harris SD, Heinekamp T, Helmstaedt K, Henrissat B, Hofmann G, Homan T, Horio T, Horiuchi H, James S, Jones M, Karaffa L, Karanyi Z, Kato M, Keller N, Kelly DE, Kiel J, Kim JM, van der Klei IJ, Klis FM, Kovalchuk A, Krasevec N, Kubicek CP, Liu B, MacCabe A, Meyer V, Mirabito P, Miskei M, Mos M, Mullins J, Nelson DR, Nielsen J, Oakley BR, Osmani SA, Pakula T, Paszewski A, Paulsen I, Pilsyk S, Pocsi I, Punt PJ, Ram AFJ, Ren QH, Robellet X, Robson G, Seiboth B, van Solingen P, Specht T, Sun JB, Taheri-Talesh N, Takeshita N, Ussery D, Vankuyk PA, Visser H, de Vondervoort P, de Vries RP, Walton J, Xiang X, Xiong Y, Zeng AP, Brandt BW, Cornell MJ, van den Hondel C, Visser J, Oliver SG, Turner G. Fungal Genet Biol. 2009;46:S2–S13. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nowrousian M, Stajich JE, Chu ML, Engh I, Espagne E, Halliday K, Kamerewerd J, Kempken F, Knab B, Kuo HC, Osiewacz HD, Poggeler S, Read ND, Seiler S, Smith KM, Zickler D, Kuck U, Freitag M. PLoS Genet. 2010;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chooi YH, Cacho R, Tang Y. Chem Biol. 2010;17:483–494. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bok JW, Keller NP. Eukaryotic Cell. 2004;3:527–535. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.2.527-535.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rosewich UL, Kistler HC. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2000;38:325. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Walton JD. Fungal Genet Biol. 2000;30:167–171. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khaldi N, Seifuddin FT, Turner G, Haft D, Nierman WC, Wolfe KH, Fedorova ND. Fungal Genet Biol. 2010;47:736–741. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Medema MH, Blin K, Cimermancic P, de Jager V, Zakrzewski P, Fischbach MA, Weber T, Takano E, Breitling R. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W339–W346. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yu JH, Hamari Z, Han KH, Seo JA, Reyes-Dominguez Y, Scazzocchio C. Fungal Genet Biol. 2004;41:973–981. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ninomiya Y, Suzuki K, Ishii C, Inoue H. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12248–12253. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402780101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nayak T, Szewczyk E, Oakley CE, Osmani A, Ukil L, Murray SL, Hynes MJ, Osmani SA, Oakley BR. Genetics. 2006;172:1557–1566. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.052563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Krappmann S, Sasse C, Braus GH. Eukaryotic Cell. 2006;5:212–215. doi: 10.1128/EC.5.1.212-215.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ferreira MED, Kress M, Savoldi M, Goldman MHS, Hartl A, Heinekamp T, Brakhage AA, Goldman GH. Eukaryotic Cell. 2006;5:207–211. doi: 10.1128/EC.5.1.207-211.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Meyer V, Arentshorst M, El-Ghezal A, Drews AC, Kooistra R, van den Hondel C, Ram AFJ. J Biotechnol. 2007;128:770–775. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gressler M, Zaehle C, Scherlach K, Hertweck C, Brock M. Chem Biol. 2011;18:198–209. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Takahashi T, Masuda T, Koyama Y. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2006;275:460–470. doi: 10.1007/s00438-006-0104-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Takahashi T, Masuda T, Koyama Y. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006;70:135–143. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mizutani O, Kudo Y, Saito A, Matsuura T, Inoue H, Abe K, Gomi K. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45:878–889. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Maruyama JI, Kitamoto K. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30:1811–1817. doi: 10.1007/s10529-008-9763-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kuwayama H, Obara S, Morio T, Katoh M, Urushihara H, Tanaka Y. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30 doi: 10.1093/nar/30.2.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang L, Ukil L, Osmani A, Nahm F, Davies J, De Souza CPC, Dou XW, Perez-Balaguer A, Osmani SA. Eukaryotic Cell. 2004;3:1359–1362. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.5.1359-1362.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chiang YM, Szewczyk E, Nayak T, Davidson AD, Sanchez JF, Lo HC, Ho WY, Simityan H, Kuo E, Praseuth A, Watanabe K, Oakley BR, Wang CCC. Chem Biol. 2008;15:527–532. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Oh DC, Kauffman CA, Jensen PR, Fenical W. J Nat Prod. 2007;70:515–520. doi: 10.1021/np060381f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nielsen ML, Nielsen JB, Rank C, Klejnstrup ML, Holm DK, Brogaard KH, Hansen BG, Frisvad JC, Larsen TO, Mortensen UH. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;321:157–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yin WB, Grundmann A, Cheng J, Li SM. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:100–109. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807606200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang HR, Boghigian BA, Armando J, Pfeifer BA. Nat Prod Rep. 2011;28:125–151. doi: 10.1039/c0np00037j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Itoh T, Tokunaga K, Matsuda Y, Fujii I, Abe I, Ebizuka Y, Kushiro T. Nat Chem. 2010;2:858–864. doi: 10.1038/nchem.764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yin WB, Keller NP. J Microbiol. 2011;49:329–339. doi: 10.1007/s12275-011-1009-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bergmann S, Schumann J, Scherlach K, Lange C, Brakhage AA, Hertweck C. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:213–217. doi: 10.1038/nchembio869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chiang YM, Szewczyk E, Davidson AD, Keller N, Oakley BR, Wang CCC. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2965–2970. doi: 10.1021/ja8088185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Butchko RAE, Adams TH, Keller NP. Genetics. 1999;153:715–720. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kale SP, Milde L, Trapp MK, Frisvad JC, Keller NP, Bok JW. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45:1422–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kosalkova K, Garcia-Estrada C, Ullan RV, Godio RP, Feltrer R, Teijeira F, Mauriz E, Martin JF. Biochimie. 2009;91:214–225. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xing W, Deng C, Hu CH. Biotechnol Lett. 2010;32:1733–1737. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0375-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang MY, Miyake T. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:4162–4167. doi: 10.1021/jf9004109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wiemann P, Brown DW, Kleigrewe K, Bok JW, Keller NP, Humpf HU, Tudzynski B. Mol Microbiol. 2010;77:972–994. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07263.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bok JW, Balajee SA, Marr KA, Andes D, Nielsen KF, Frisvad JC, Keller NP. Eukaryotic Cell. 2005;4:1574–1582. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.9.1574-1582.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dagenais TRT, Keller NP. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:447–465. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00055-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Amaike S, Keller NP. Eukaryotic Cell. 2009;8:1051–1060. doi: 10.1128/EC.00088-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Perrin RM, Fedorova ND, Bok JW, Cramer RA, Wortman JR, Kim HS, Nierman WC, Keller NP. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:508–517. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bok JW, Hoffmeister D, Maggio-Hall LA, Murillo R, Glasner JD, Keller NP. Chem Biol. 2006;13:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bouhired S, Weber M, Kempf-Sontag A, Keller NP, Hoffmeister D. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007;44:1134–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Balibar CJ, Howard AR, Walsh CT. Nature Chemical Biology. 2007;3:584–592. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Schneider P, Weber M, Rosenberger K, Hoffmeister D. Chem Biol. 2007;14:635–644. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2007.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schneider P, Weber M, Hoffmeister D. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45:302–309. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shaaban MI, Bok JW, Lauer C, Keller NP. Eukaryotic Cell. 2010;9:1816–1824. doi: 10.1128/EC.00189-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Reyes-Dominguez Y, Bok JW, Berger H, Shwab EK, Basheer A, Gallmetzer A, Scazzocchio C, Keller N, Strauss J. Mol Microbiol. 2010;76:1376–1386. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07051.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shwab EK, Bok JW, Tribus M, Galehr J, Graessle S, Keller NP. Eukaryotic Cell. 2007;6:1656–1664. doi: 10.1128/EC.00186-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Henrikson JC, Hoover AR, Joyner PM, Cichewicz RH. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7:435–438. doi: 10.1039/b819208a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bok JW, Chiang YM, Szewczyk E, Reyes-Domingez Y, Davidson AD, Sanchez JF, Lo HC, Watanabe K, Strauss J, Oakley BR, Wang CCC, Keller NP. Nature Chemical Biology. 2009;5:462–464. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Szewczyk E, Chiang YM, Oakley CE, Davidson AD, Wang CCC, Oakley BR. Appl Environ Microb. 2008;74:7607–7612. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01743-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zuck KM, Shipley S, Newman DJ. J Nat Prod. 2011;74:1653–1657. doi: 10.1021/np200255f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Oh DC, Jensen PR, Kauffman CA, Fenical W. Bioorg Med Chem. 2005;13:5267–5273. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.05.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cueto M, Jensen PR, Kauffman C, Fenical W, Lobkovsky E, Clardy J. J Nat Prod. 2001;64:1444–1446. doi: 10.1021/np0102713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Schroeckh V, Scherlach K, Nutzmann HW, Shelest E, Schmidt-Heck W, Schuemann J, Martin K, Hertweck C, Brakhage AA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:14558–14563. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901870106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sanchez JF, Chiang YM, Szewczyk E, Davidson AD, Ahuja M, Oakley CE, Bok JW, Keller N, Oakley BR, Wang CCC. Molecular Biosystems. 2010;6:587–593. doi: 10.1039/b904541d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bode HB, Bethe B, Hofs R, Zeeck A. Chembiochem. 2002;3:619–627. doi: 10.1002/1439-7633(20020703)3:7<619::AID-CBIC619>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Masuma R, Tanaka Y, Tanaka H, Omura S. J Antibiot. 1986;39:1557–1564. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.39.1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Omura S, Iwai Y, Hinotozawa K, Tanaka H, Takahashi Y, Nakagawa A. J Antibiot. 1982;35:1425–1429. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.35.1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Scherlach K, Hertweck C. Org Biomol Chem. 2006;4:3517–3520. doi: 10.1039/b607011f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Scherlach K, Schuemann J, Dahse HM, Hertweck C. J Antibiot. 2010;63:375–377. doi: 10.1038/ja.2010.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sanchez JF, Entwistle R, Hung JH, Yaegashi J, Jain S, Chiang YM, Wang CCC, Oakley BR. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:4010–4017. doi: 10.1021/ja1096682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Nicholson MJ, Koulman A, Monahan BJ, Pritchard BL, Payne GA, Scott B. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7469–7481. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02146-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Inderbitzin P, Asvarak T, Turgeon BG. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2010;23:458–472. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-4-0458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.O'Donnell K, Kistler HC, Tacke BK, Casper HH. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:7905–7910. doi: 10.1073/pnas.130193297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kwon-Chung KJ, Sugui JA. Med Mycol. 2009;47:S97–S103. doi: 10.1080/13693780802056012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gardiner DM, Waring P, Howlett BJ. Microbiology-(UK) 2005;151:1021–1032. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27847-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kupfahl C, Michalka A, Lass-Floerl C, Fischer G, Haase G, Ruppert T, Geginat G, Hof H. Int J Med Microbiol. 2008;298:319–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lewis RE, Wiederhold NP, Chi JD, Han XY, Komanduri KV, Kontoyiannis DP, Prince RA. Infect Immun. 2005;73:635–637. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.1.635-637.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gardiner DM, Howlett BJ. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;248:241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.05.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cramer RA, Gamcsik MP, Brooking RM, Najvar LK, Kirkpatrick WR, Patterson TF, Balibar CJ, Graybill JR, Perfect JR, Abraham SN, Steinbach WJ. Eukaryotic Cell. 2006;5:972–980. doi: 10.1128/EC.00049-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kupfahl C, Heinekamp T, Geginat G, Ruppert T, Hartl A, Hof H, Brakhage AA. Mol Microbiol. 2006;62:292–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bok JW, Chung D, Balajee SA, Marr KA, Andes D, Nielsen KF, Frisvad JC, Kirby KA, Keller NP. Infect Immun. 2006;74:6761–6768. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00780-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Fox EM, Howlett BJ. Mycol Res. 2008;112:162–169. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Scharf DH, Remme N, Habel A, Chankhamjon P, Scherlach K, Heinekamp T, Hortschansky P, Brakhage AA, Hertweck C. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:12322–12325. doi: 10.1021/ja201311d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Balibar CJ, Walsh CT. Biochemistry. 2006;45:15029–15038. doi: 10.1021/bi061845b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Schrettl M, Carberry S, Kavanagh K, Haas H, Jones GW, O'Brien J, Nolan A, Stephens J, Fenelon O, Doyle S. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Scharf DH, Remme N, Heinekamp T, Hortschansky P, Brakhage AA, Hertweck C. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:10136–10141. doi: 10.1021/ja103262m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Davis C, Carberry S, Schrettl M, Singh I, Stephens JC, Barry SM, Kavanagh K, Challis GL, Brougham D, Doyle S. Chem Biol. 2011;18:542–552. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Forseth RR, Fox EM, Chung D, Howlett BJ, Keller NP, Schroeder FC. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:9678–9681. doi: 10.1021/ja2029987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Unsold IA, Li SM. Microbiology-(UK) 2005;151:1499–1505. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27759-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Coyle CM, Kenaley SC, Rittenour WR, Panaccione DG. Mycologia. 2007;99:804–811. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.99.6.804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Coyle CM, Panaccione DG. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:3112–3118. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3112-3118.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Metzger U, Schall C, Zocher G, Unsold I, Stec E, Li SM, Heide L, Stehle T. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:14309–14314. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904897106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Rigbers O, Li SM. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:26859–26868. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804979200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Goetz KE, Coyle CM, Cheng JZ, O'Connor SE, Panaccione DG. Curr Genet. 2011;57:201–211. doi: 10.1007/s00294-011-0336-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wallwey C, Matuschek M, Li SM. Arch Microbiol. 2010;192:127–134. doi: 10.1007/s00203-009-0536-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Cheng JZ, Coyle CM, Panaccione DG, O'Connor SE. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:1776. doi: 10.1021/ja910193p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wallwey C, Matuschek M, Xie XL, Li SM. Org Biomol Chem. 2010;8:3500–3508. doi: 10.1039/c003823g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Liu XQ, Wang L, Steffan N, Yin WB, Li SM. ChemBioChem. 2009;10:2325–2328. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200900395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Unsold IA, Li SM. ChemBioChem. 2006;7:158–164. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200500318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Maiya S, Grundmann A, Li X, Li SM, Turner G. ChemBioChem. 2007;8:1736–1743. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200700202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Vodisch M, Scherlach K, Winkler R, Hertweck C, Braun HP, Roth M, Haas H, Werner ER, Brakhage AA, Kniemeyer O. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:2508–2524. doi: 10.1021/pr1012812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ames BD, Walsh CT. Biochemistry. 2010;49:3351–3365. doi: 10.1021/bi100198y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ames BD, Liu XY, Walsh CT. Biochemistry. 2010;49:8564–8576. doi: 10.1021/bi1012029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Ames BD, Haynes SW, Gao X, Evans BS, Kelleher NL, Tang Y, Walsh CT. Biochemistry. 2011 doi: 10.1021/bi201302w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Frisvad JC, Rank C, Nielsen KF, Larsen TO. Med Mycol. 2009;47:S53–S71. doi: 10.1080/13693780802307720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Wu GF, Liu JW, Bi LY, Zhao M, Wang C, Baudy-Floc'h M, Ju JF, Peng SQ. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:5510–5528. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Rabindran SK, Ross DD, Doyle LA, Yang WD, Greenberger LM. Cancer Res. 2000;60:47–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Frisvad JC. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1989;18:452–467. doi: 10.1007/BF01062373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Grundmann A, Li SM. Microbiology-(UK) 2005;151:2199–2207. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27962-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Maiya S, Grundmann A, Li SM, Turner G. ChemBioChem. 2006;7:1062–1069. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200600003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Kato N, Suzuki H, Takagi H, Asami Y, Kakeya H, Uramoto M, Usui T, Takahashi S, Sugimoto Y, Osada H. ChemBioChem. 2009;10:920–928. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200800787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Grundmann A, Kuznetsova T, Afiyatullov SS, Li SM. ChemBioChem. 2008;9:2059–2063. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200800240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Steffan N, Grundmann A, Afiyatullov S, Ruan HL, Li SM. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7:4082–4087. doi: 10.1039/b908392h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Kato N, Suzuki H, Takagi H, Uramoto M, Takahashi S, Osada H. ChemBioChem. 2011;12:711–714. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201000562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Mitsuguchi H, Seshime Y, Fujii I, Shibuya M, Ebizuka Y, Kushiro T. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:6402–6411. doi: 10.1021/ja8095976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Terabayashi Y, Sano M, Yamane N, Marui J, Tamano K, Sagara J, Dohmoto M, Oda K, Ohshima E, Tachibana K, Higa Y, Ohashi S, Koike H, Machida M. Fungal Genet Biol. 2010;47:953–961. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Marui J, Yamane N, Ohashi-Kunihiro S, Ando T, Terabayashi Y, Sano M, Ohashi S, Ohshima E, Tachibana K, Higa Y, Nishimura M, Koike H, Machida M. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;112:40–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Seshime Y, Juvvadi PR, Fujii I, Kitamoto K. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;331:253–260. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Seshime Y, Juvvadi PR, Kitamoto K, Ebizuka Y, Fujii I. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18:4542–4546. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.04.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Seshime Y, Juvvadi PR, Kitamoto K, Ebizuka Y, Nonaka T, Fujii I. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20:4785–4788. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.06.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Zhang S, Monahan BJ, Tkacz JS, Scott B. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:6875–6883. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6875-6883.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Tokuoka M, Seshime Y, Fujii I, Kitamoto K, Takahashi T, Koyama Y. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45:1608–1615. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Seshime Y, Juvvadi PR, Tokuoka M, Koyama Y, Kitamoto K, Ebizuka Y, Fujii I. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19:3288–3292. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.04.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Chang PK, Horn BW, Dorner JW. Fungal Genet Biol. 2009;46:176–182. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Liu XY, Walsh CT. Biochemistry. 2009;48:8746–8757. doi: 10.1021/bi901123r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Chiang YM, Meyer KM, Praseuth M, Baker SE, Bruno KS, Wang CCC. Fungal Genet Biol. 2011;48:430–437. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Jorgensen TR, Park J, Arentshorst M, van Welzen AM, Lamers G, vanKuyk PA, Damveld RA, van den Hondel CAM, Nielsen KF, Frisvad JC, Ram AFJ. Fungal Genet Biol. 2011;48:544–553. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Qiao KJ, Zhou H, Xu W, Zhang WJ, Garg N, Tang Y. Org Lett. 2011;13:1758–1761. doi: 10.1021/ol200288w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Awakawa T, Yokota K, Funa N, Doi F, Mori N, Watanabe H, Horinouchi S. Chem Biol. 2009;16:613–623. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Aspca3.
- 127.Fedorova ND, Khaldi N, Joardar VS, Maiti R, Amedeo P, Anderson MJ, Crabtree J, Silva JC, Badger JH, Albarraq A, Angiuoli S, Bussey H, Bowyer P, Cotty PJ, Dyer PS, Egan A, Galens K, Fraser-Liggett CM, Haas BJ, Inman JM, Kent R, Lemieux S, Malavazi I, Orvis J, Roemer T, Ronning CM, Sundaram JP, Sutton G, Turner G, Venter JC, White OR, Whitty BR, Youngman P, Wolfe KH, Goldman GH, Wortman JR, Jiang B, Denning DW, Nierman WC. PLoS Genet. 2008;4 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Aspergillus Comparitive Sequencing Project, Broad Institute od Harvard and MIT. http://www.broadinstitute.org/
- 129.http://aspergillusflavus.org/genomics.
- 130.Nierman WC, Pain A, Anderson MJ, Wortman JR, Kim HS, Arroyo J, Berriman M, Abe K, Archer DB, Bermejo C, Bennett J, Bowyer P, Chen D, Collins M, Coulsen R, Davies R, Dyer PS, Farman M, Fedorova N, Feldblyum TV, Fischer R, Fosker N, Fraser A, Garcia JL, Garcia MJ, Goble A, Goldman GH, Gomi K, Griffith-Jones S, Gwilliam R, Haas B, Haas H, Harris D, Horiuchi H, Huang J, Humphray S, Jimenez J, Keller N, Khouri H, Kitamoto K, Kobayashi T, Konzack S, Kulkarni R, Kumagai T, Lafton A, Latge JP, Li WX, Lord A, Majoros WH, May GS, Miller BL, Mohamoud Y, Molina M, Monod M, Mouyna I, Mulligan S, Murphy L, O'Neil S, Paulsen I, Penalva MA, Pertea M, Price C, Pritchard BL, Quail MA, Rabbinowitsch E, Rawlins N, Rajandream MA, Reichard U, Renauld H, Robson GD, de Cordoba SR, Rodriguez-Pena JM, Ronning CM, Rutter S, Salzberg SL, Sanchez M, Sanchez-Ferrero JC, Saunders D, Seeger K, Squares R, Squares S, Takeuchi M, Tekaia F, Turner G, de Aldana CRV, Weidman J, White O, Woodward J, Yu JH, Fraser C, Galagan JE, Asai K, Machida M, Hall N, Barrell B, Denning DW. Nature. 2005;438:1151–1156. doi: 10.1038/nature04332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Arnaud MB, Binkley J, Chibucos MC, Costanzo MC, Crabtree J, Inglis DO, Orvis J, Shah P, Skrzypek MS, Binkley G, Miyasato SR, Wortman JR, Sherlock G. Aspergillus Genome Database. 2011 Sep 30; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp751. http://www.aspergillusgenome.org/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 132.Pel HJ, de Winde JH, Archer DB, Dyer PS, Hofmann G, Schaap PJ, Turner G, de Vries RP, Albang R, Albermann K, Andersen MR, Bendtsen JD, Benen JAE, van den Berg M, Breestraat S, Caddick MX, Contreras R, Cornell M, Coutinho PM, Danchin EGJ, Debets AJM, Dekker P, van Dijck PWM, van Dijk A, Dijkhuizen L, Driessen AJM, d'Enfert C, Geysens S, Goosen C, Groot GSP, de Groot PWJ, Guillemette T, Henrissat B, Herweijer M, van den Hombergh J, van den Hondel C, van der Heijden R, van der Kaaij RM, Klis FM, Kools HJ, Kubicek CP, van Kuyk PA, Lauber J, Lu X, van der Maarel M, Meulenberg R, Menke H, Mortimer MA, Nielsen J, Oliver SG, Olsthoorn M, Pal K, van Peij N, Ram AFJ, Rinas U, Roubos JA, Sagt CMJ, Schmoll M, Sun JB, Ussery D, Varga J, Vervecken W, de Vondervoort P, Wedler H, Wosten HAB, Zeng AP, van Ooyen AJJ, Visser J, Stam H. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:221–231. doi: 10.1038/nbt1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Andersen MR, Salazar MP, Schaap PJ, van de Vondervoort PJI, Culley D, Thykaer J, Frisvad JC, Nielsen KF, Albang R, Albermann K, Berka RM, Braus GH, Braus-Stromeyer SA, Corrochano LM, Dai ZY, van Dijck PWM, Hofmann G, Lasure LL, Magnuson JK, Menke H, Meijer M, Meijer SL, Nielsen JB, Samson RA, Stam H, Tsang A, van den Brink JM, Atkins A, Aerts A, Shapiro H, Pangilinan J, Salamov A, Lou YG, Lindquist E, Lucas S, Grimwood J, Grigoriev IV, Kubicek CP, Martinez D, van Peij N, Roubos JA, Nielsen J, Baker SE. Genome Res. 2011;21:885–897. doi: 10.1101/gr.112169.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Baker SE. Med Mycol. 2006;44:S17–S21. doi: 10.1080/13693780600921037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.http://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Aspni5.
- 136.Machida M, Asai K, Sano M, Tanaka T, Kumagai T, Terai G, Kusumoto KI, Arima T, Akita O, Kashiwagi Y, Abe K, Gomi K, Horiuchi H, Kitamoto K, Kobayashi T, Takeuchi M, Denning DW, Galagan JE, Nierman WC, Yu JJ, Archer DB, Bennett JW, Bhatnagar D, Cleveland TE, Fedorova ND, Gotoh O, Horikawa H, Hosoyama A, Ichinomiya M, Igarashi R, Iwashita K, Juvvadi PR, Kato M, Kato Y, Kin T, Kokubun A, Maeda H, Maeyama N, Maruyama J, Nagasaki H, Nakajima T, Oda K, Okada K, Paulsen I, Sakamoto K, Sawano T, Takahashi M, Takase K, Terabayashi Y, Wortman JR, Yamada O, Yamagata Y, Anazawa H, Hata Y, Koide Y, Komori T, Koyama Y, Minetoki T, Suharnan S, Tanaka A, Isono K, Kuhara S, Ogasawara N, Kikuchi H. Nature. 2005;438:1157–1161. doi: 10.1038/nature04300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Eisendle M, Oberegger H, Zadra I, Haas H. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49:359–375. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03586.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Maccabe AP, Vanliempt H, Palissa H, Unkles SE, Riach MBR, Pfeifer E, Vondohren H, Kinghorn JR. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:12646–12654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Brown DW, Adams TH, Keller NP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:14873–14877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Watanabe A, Fujii I, Sankawa U, Mayorga ME, Timberlake WE, Ebizuka Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:91–94. [Google Scholar]
- 141.Reiber K, Reeves EP, Neville CM, Winkler R, Gebhardt P, Kavanagh K, Doyle S. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;248:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Schrettl M, Bignell E, Kragl C, Sabiha Y, Loss O, Eisendle M, Wallner A, Arst HN, Haynes K, Haas H. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:1195–1207. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Watanabe A, Fujii I, Tsai HF, Chang YC, Kwon-Chung KJ, Ebizuka Y. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;192:39–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.O'Hanlon KA, Cairns T, Stack D, Schrettl M, Bignell EM, Kavanagh K, Miggin SM, O'Keeffe G, Larsen TO, Doyle S. Infect Immun. 2011;79:3978–3992. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00192-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Fujii I, Ono Y, Tada H, Gomi K, Ebizuka Y, Sankawa U. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;253:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s004380050289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Fisch KM, Gillaspy AF, Gipson M, Henrikson JC, Hoover AR, Jackson L, Najar FZ, Wagele H, Cichewicz RH. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;36:1199–1213. doi: 10.1007/s10295-009-0601-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Frisvad JC, Larsen TO, Thrane U, Meijer M, Varga J, Samson RA, Nielsen KF. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Frisvad JC, Smedsgaard J, Samson RA, Larsen TO, Thrane U. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:9727–9732. doi: 10.1021/jf0718906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
