Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2015 Jul 8;71(Pt 8):890–894. doi: 10.1107/S2056989015012384

Structure of a dinuclear cadmium complex with 2,2′-bi­pyridine, monodentate nitrate and 3-carb­oxy-6-methyl­pyridine-2-carboxyl­ate ligands: intra­molecular carbon­yl(lone pair)⋯π(ring) and nitrate(π)⋯π(ring) inter­actions

Juan Granifo a,*, Sebastián Suarez b, Ricardo Baggio c,*
PMCID: PMC4571349  PMID: 26396748

A dinuclear Cd 3-carb­oxy-6-methyl­pyridine-2-carboxyl­ate complex is reported, in which the anionic ligand displays an unusual μ23 coordination mode. The crystal structure consists of hydrogen-bonded planar arrays held by X—H⋯O (X = O,C) and X—O⋯π(ring) (X = N,O) inter­actions, leaving inter­stitial columnar voids.

Keywords: crystal structure, dinuclear Cd complex, intra­molecular C—O⋯π(ring) and N—O⋯π(ring) inter­actions

Abstract

The centrosymmetric dinuclear complex bis­(μ-3-carb­oxy-6-methyl­pyridine-2-carboxyl­ato)-κ3 N,O 2:O 23 O 2:N,O 2-bis­[(2,2′-bi­pyridine-κ2 N,N′)(nitrato-κO)cadmium] methanol monosolvate, [Cd2(C8H6NO4)2(NO3)2(C10H8N2)2]·CH3OH, was isolated as colourless crystals from the reaction of Cd(NO3)2·4H2O, 6-methyl­pyridine-2,3-di­carb­oxy­lic acid (mepydcH2) and 2,2′-bi­pyridine in methanol. The asymmetric unit consists of a CdII cation bound to a μ-κ3 N,O 2:O 2-mepydcH anion, an N,N′-bidentate 2,2′-bi­pyridine group and an O-mono­dentate nitrate anion, and is completed with a methanol solvent mol­ecule at half-occupancy. The Cd complex unit is linked to its centrosymmetric image through a bridging mepydcH carboxyl­ate O atom to complete the dinuclear complex mol­ecule. Despite a significant variation in the coordination angles, indicating a considerable departure from octa­hedral coordination geometry about the CdII atom, the Cd—O and Cd—N distances in this complex are surprisingly similar. The crystal structure consists of O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonded chains parallel to a, further bound by C—H⋯O contacts along b to form planar two-dimensional arrays parallel to (001). The juxtaposed planes form inter­stitial columnar voids that are filled by the methanol solvent mol­ecules. These in turn inter­act with the complex mol­ecules to further stabilize the structure. A search in the literature showed that complexes with the mepydcH ligand are rare and complexes reported previously with this ligand do not adopt the μ-κ3 coordination mode found in the title compound.

Chemical context  

Pyridinedi­carboxyl­ate ligands derived from pyridine-2,3-di­carb­oxy­lic acid (pydcH2) have been extensively used in the construction of a large variety of structural motifs. The two deprotonated forms pydcH and pydc2− have been shown to adopt a wide range of coordination modes through their carboxyl­ate oxygen and pyridyl nitro­gen atoms (Wang et al., 2009). A search in the CSD (Version 5.3; Groom & Allen, 2014) disclosed ca 200 complexes displaying diverse topologies, viz. monomers (Gao et al., 2010; Drew et al., 1971), dimers (Shankar et al., 2013), oligomers (Yu et al., 2003) as well as one-dimensional (Semerci et al., 2014), two-dimensional (Çolak et al., 2011) and three-dimensional (Kanoo et al., 2012) polymers. In the vast majority of cases the ligand adopts an N,O-chelating mode, although there are a few exceptions to this where the binding sites attach to different metal atoms (e.g. Wang et al., 2014). By contrast, when complexes containing similar ligands but with methyl substituents in the 6-position were sought, namely those generated from 6-methyl­pyridine-2,3-di­carb­oxy­lic acid (mepydcH 2), only a single structure was found involving the monoanionic mepydcH ligand similar to that reported here (Gurunatha & Maji, 2009). This unique structural motif appears in the form of three isostructural, monomeric M II (M = Fe, Co, Ni) complexes [M(bpee)2(mepydcH)2] (bpee = 1,2-bis­(4-pyrid­yl)ethyl­ene) with octa­hedral geometry around M II. Both mepydcH fragments act in a simple κ2 N,O2-chelating mode binding to a single nucleus while the two N-bound bpee ligands are trans-monodentate. The formation of these mononuclear complexes is unusual considering the obvious bridging potential of the bpee ligands. Mixed-ligand complexes based on non-methyl­ated 2,3-pyridinedi­carboxyl­ate and 4,4′-bi­pyridine-like ligands usually generate stable polymeric structures with the exo-bidentate ligands adopting a bridging role (Kanoo et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2009; Maji et al., 2005).graphic file with name e-71-00890-scheme1.jpg

In an attempt to understand the coordination behaviour of this unusual monoanionic mepydcH ligand better, we report the structure of the dinuclear complex [Cd2(2,2′-bi­pyridine)2(mepydcH)2(NO3)2]·MeOH (I). The uncommon bridging-chelating μ2-(κ3 N,O2:O2) coordination behaviour and the fact that the ligand is only singly deprotonated has no counterpart in complexes of the non-methyl­ated ligands and makes this a genuinely novel structure. The closest relatives with 2,2′-bi­pyridine as the auxiliary ligand are found with di-anionic pydc2− ligands, but these are either mononuclear (Wang & Okabe, 2005) or form coordination polymers (Li et al., 2013; Yin & Liu, 2009; Zhang et al. 2013).

Structural commentary  

The complex consists of a CdII cation to which a singly protonated 3-carb­oxy-6-methyl­pyridine-2-carboxyl­ate ion (mepydcH ) chelates through the pyridine N and carboxyl­ate O atoms. A chelating 2,2′-bi­pyridine that binds through both nitro­gen atoms and a unidentate nitrate anion complete the coordination sphere; the asymmetric unit also contains a non-coordinating half-occupancy methanol solvate. This five coordinate CdII unit, in turn, binds to its centrosymmetric image through the carboxyl­ate oxygen atom of the mepydcH ligand, forming a pair of Cd–O–Cd bridges. As a result, a dimeric unit forms (Fig. 1) with each CdII atom in a six-coordinate N3O3 ligand environment. The Cd—X (X = N or O) distances are reasonable, spanning the range 2.304 (2)–2.332 (3) Å. However, the coordination angles vary widely [X–Cd–X ranges: cis 71.15 (10)–115.79 (9)°; trans 142.36 (8)–159.48 (9)°]; the result is a rather distorted octa­hedral geometry around Cd1. Selected geometric parameters are shown in Table 1; the bridging Cd—O distances are the shortest in the coordination sphere, 2.304 (2) and 2.310 (2) Å, resulting in a Cd⋯Cd separation of 3.700 (3) Å. This value is slightly larger than the mean for similar environments found in the CSD (3.61 Å for 885 cases), though well within the sample standard deviation (0.22 Å).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Displacement ellipsoid plot of (I) (with 40% probability ellipsoids), showing the dimeric unit with atom and ring labelling. Inter­actions within the dimeric unit are also shown, C—H⋯O as dashed lines, C—O⋯π(ring) as double-dashed lines. For symmetry codes see Tables 2 and 3; additional symmetry code: (i) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z.

Table 1. Selected bond lengths ().

Cd1O1B i 2.304(2) Cd1N1A 2.323(3)
Cd1O1B 2.310(2) Cd1O1C 2.329(2)
Cd1N2A 2.310(3) Cd1N1B 2.332(3)

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Supra­molecular features  

The crystal structure, made up of isolated dimers, is sustained by three different types of non-covalent inter­action, viz., hydrogen bonds (Table 2), C=O⋯π and nitrate(π)⋯π contacts (Table 3). These inter­actions can be clearly differentiated according to the substructure that they support:

Table 2. Hydrogen-bonding interactions (, ) in (I).

Cg1 is the centroid of the N1A/C1AC5A ring.

Int.# DHA DH HA DA DHA
#1 C10AH10AO1C 0.93 2.52 3.143(5) 124
#2 O4BH4BOO3C ii 0.84(3) 1.83(3) 2.670(5) 176(6)
#3 C7AH7AO2B iii 0.93 2.42 3.339(4) 168
#4 C8AH8AO2C iii 0.93 2.59 3.51(4) 167
#5 C9AH9AO4B iv 0.93 2.53 3.186(5) 127
#6 C8BH8BCO1M 0.960 2.54 3.361(8) 144
#7 O1MH1MO3B iii 0.85(5) 2.42(9) 2.951(9) 121(9)
#8 C1MH1M3Cg1 0.96 2.78 3.640 149

Symmetry codes: (ii) 1+x, y, z; (iii) x, 1+y, z; (iv) 1+x, 1+y, z.

Table 3. XO interactions (, )in (I).

Cg1 is the centroid of the N1A/C1AC5A ring and Cg2 is the centroid of the N2A/C6AC10A ring.

Int.# XOCg OCg XOCg
#9 C6BO2B Cg2i 3.637(3) 126.6(2)
#10 N1CO2C Cg1i 3.442(4) 104.2(2)

Symmetry code: (i) 1x, 1y, 1z.

a) Contacts #1 (Table 2) and #9, #10 (Table 3) are inter­nal to the dinuclear motif, as shown in Fig. 1. The first one links the bi­pyridine C10A—H10A group with the coordinating nitrate oxygen O1C. Contact #9 is a typical lone pair–π inter­action with a dihedral angle of 72.19° between the carboxyl­ate and the ring plane, and a C—O⋯Cg2 angle of 126.63°. These values are close to those for the ideal geometry (90° and 120°, respectively) when a lone pair provided by a carbonyl oxygen points toward the centroid of an aromatic ring (Egli & Sarkhel, 2007). By contrast, in contact #10 the orientation of the nitrate plane is more or less parallel to the ring plane (6.84°), suggesting a π–π inter­action with the π-orbitals of the nitrate fragment inter­acting with those of the aromatic ring. A similar argument has already been applied by Frontera et al. (2011) and García-Raso et al. (2009) when nitrate anions inter­act with pyrimidinium rings. These carbon­yl(lone pair)⋯π(ring) (#9) and nitrate(π)⋯π(ring) (#10) inter­actions in (I) fulfill a relevant function, serving to strengthen the dimeric unit (Fig. 1).

b) Strong inter­molecular O—H⋯O contacts #2 (Table 2) involving the hydrogen atom of the free carb­oxy­lic acid group of the mepydcH ligand with a non-bonded oxygen atom of a nitrate ligand, has the pivotal action of linking the dimers along a, forming chains parallel to [100] (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The [100] chain defined by O—H⋯O inter­action #2 (Table 2).

c) C—H⋯O inter­actions #3, #4 and #5 (Table 2), in turn, serve to link the above chains laterally along b, to form 2D substructures parallel to (001) (Fig. 3 a). These planes juxtapose along [001] with rather weak direct inter­actions. In the process, however, significant columnar voids parallel to the chains are formed (with a volume 13% of the total cell volume, Fig. 3 b) in which the partial occupancy methanol solvate mol­ecules reside. These are not free, but enter instead into a number of weak C—H⋯O, O—H⋯O and C—H⋯π interactions (#6, #7 and #8 in Table 2) linking them to a framework of complex mol­ecules, further stabilizing the structure.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Two projections along [100], presenting (within square brakets) views of the two-dimensional substructures parallel to (001), formed by the [100] columns linked along b. (a) Showing a single plane, with inter­action details. (b) Displaying the columnar voids (coloured) generated by juxtaposition of the planes.

ATR (attenuated total reflectance) FT–IR spectroscopy  

The IR spectra of mepydcH 2, 2.2′-bi­pyridine and (I) were recorded on an Agilent Cary 630 FT–IR spectrometer with Varian Resolutions Pro software, using a Diamond ATR accessory. The FT–IR spectrum of (I) (Fig. 4) was recorded in the 4000–600 cm−1 range, and confirms the structural data indicating the presence of the coordinating nitrate and mepydcH anions. Bands due to the unidentate NO3 group were found at 1478 and 1298 cm−1 and appear due to the νasym(ONO) and νsym(ONO) vibrations, with a shoulder at 1010 cm−1 due to the ν(NO) stretching modes of nitrate groups (Nakamoto, 1997). The carb­oxy­lic acid group (COOH) of the mepydcH ligand in complex (I) is identified by a weak band at 3083 cm−1, ν(OH) stretching for a hydrogen-bonded system (Alisir et al., 2013), and a very strong band at 1738 cm−1, ν(C=O) stretch. The deprotonated carboxyl­ate (COO) is characterized by the asymmetric and symmetric stretching modes νas at 1593 cm−1 and νs at 1322 cm−1. This confirms the unidentate coordination of the carboxyl­ate O atom, with the difference between these frequencies being > 200 cm−1(Δ = νas − νs = 271 cm−1) (Deacon & Phillips, 1980). Finally, around 1400 cm−1, a set of three bands appears (1412, 1391 and 1369 cm−1) of almost equal intensity due to the ν(C=C) + ν(C=N) vibrations from the coordinating 2,2′-bi­pyridine ligand (Yan et al., 2011).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

FT–IR spectrum of (I)

Synthesis and crystallization  

Solid 2,2′-bi­pyridine (0.031 g, 0.20 mmol) was added to a solution prepared by disolving Cd(NO3)·4H2O (0.062 g, 0.20 mmol) and mepydcH 2 (0.036 g, 0.20 mmol) in MeOH (4.0 mL). The mixture was stirred to dissolve the 2,2′-bi­pyridine and was then allowed to stand undisturbed at room temperature in an uncovered 10 mL beaker. Colourless single crystals of compound (I) suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained within 8 h. The crystals were separated by filtration, washed with MeOH (2 x 2 mL) and diethyl ether (2 x 3 mL) (yield: 0.045 g, 44%).

Refinement  

Relevant crystallographic data for (I) as well as pertinent experimental details are provided in Table 4. H atoms bonded to C were found in a difference Fourier map, but were then idealized and refined as riding atoms; C—Harom: 0.93 Å, U eq(H) = 1.2U eq(C); C—Hmeth­yl: 0.97 Å, U eq(H) = 1.5U eq(C). The O—H hydrogen atom was refined with a restrained O—H distance [0.85 (1)Å], and with U(H) = 1.2U eq(O). The methanol solvate was refined at half occupancy.

Table 4. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Cd2(C8H6NO4)2(NO3)2(C10H8N2)2]CH4O
M r 1053.50
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, P Inline graphic
Temperature (K) 295
a, b, c () 8.4096(5), 10.9626(6), 11.5056(4)
, , () 71.241(4), 86.537(4), 86.803(5)
V (3) 1001.79(9)
Z 1
Radiation type Mo K
(mm1) 1.14
Crystal size (mm) 0.36 0.14 0.10
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Oxford Diffraction Gemini CCD S Ultra
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections 21744, 4819, 4155
R int 0.057
(sin /)max (1) 0.684
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.036, 0.092, 1.01
No. of reflections 4819
No. of parameters 298
No. of restraints 4
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
max, min (e 3) 1.07, 0.74

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009), SHELXS97 and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015012384/sj5468sup1.cif

e-71-00890-sup1.cif (642.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015012384/sj5468Isup2.hkl

e-71-00890-Isup2.hkl (383.6KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1409269

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Universidad de La Frontera (Proyecto DIUFRO DI15–0027) and ANPCyT (project No. PME 2006–01113) for the purchase of the Oxford Gemini CCD diffractometer.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

[Cd2(C8H6NO4)2(NO3)2(C10H8N2)2]·CH4O Z = 1
Mr = 1053.50 F(000) = 526
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 1.746 Mg m3
a = 8.4096 (5) Å Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 10.9626 (6) Å Cell parameters from 2675 reflections
c = 11.5056 (4) Å θ = 3.8–28.8°
α = 71.241 (4)° µ = 1.14 mm1
β = 86.537 (4)° T = 295 K
γ = 86.803 (5)° Block, colourless
V = 1001.79 (9) Å3 0.36 × 0.14 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Gemini CCD S Ultra diffractometer 4155 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.057
ω scans, thick slices θmax = 29.1°, θmin = 3.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009) h = −11→11
Tmin = ?, Tmax = ? k = −14→14
21744 measured reflections l = −15→15
4819 independent reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 4 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.092 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0394P)2 + 1.5425P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
4819 reflections Δρmax = 1.07 e Å3
298 parameters Δρmin = −0.74 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
Cd1 0.47993 (3) 0.63548 (2) 0.35527 (2) 0.01961 (9)
N1A 0.6981 (3) 0.7364 (3) 0.3922 (3) 0.0229 (6)
N2A 0.4198 (3) 0.8540 (3) 0.3047 (2) 0.0223 (6)
C1A 0.8378 (4) 0.6740 (4) 0.4272 (3) 0.0279 (7)
H1A 0.8516 0.5882 0.4306 0.033*
C2A 0.9614 (4) 0.7331 (4) 0.4581 (3) 0.0292 (8)
H2A 1.0575 0.6883 0.4821 0.035*
C3A 0.9393 (4) 0.8601 (4) 0.4526 (3) 0.0312 (8)
H3A 1.0204 0.9020 0.4740 0.037*
C4A 0.7968 (4) 0.9252 (4) 0.4152 (3) 0.0286 (7)
H4A 0.7812 1.0114 0.4104 0.034*
C5A 0.6771 (4) 0.8603 (3) 0.3851 (3) 0.0196 (6)
C6A 0.5211 (4) 0.9244 (3) 0.3409 (3) 0.0201 (6)
C7A 0.4801 (4) 1.0501 (3) 0.3369 (3) 0.0263 (7)
H7A 0.5504 1.0976 0.3629 0.032*
C8A 0.3343 (4) 1.1041 (3) 0.2940 (3) 0.0286 (8)
H8A 0.3048 1.1877 0.2920 0.034*
C9A 0.2327 (4) 1.0328 (3) 0.2540 (3) 0.0303 (8)
H9A 0.1348 1.0679 0.2230 0.036*
C10A 0.2801 (4) 0.9084 (3) 0.2614 (3) 0.0280 (7)
H10A 0.2116 0.8599 0.2351 0.034*
O1B 0.6097 (3) 0.4384 (2) 0.44192 (19) 0.0216 (5)
O2B 0.7028 (3) 0.2598 (2) 0.4031 (2) 0.0256 (5)
O3B 0.8147 (3) 0.1816 (3) 0.1644 (3) 0.0390 (6)
O4B 0.9923 (3) 0.2717 (3) 0.2400 (3) 0.0340 (6)
H4BO 1.004 (6) 0.344 (2) 0.248 (4) 0.051 (14)*
N1B 0.5964 (3) 0.5661 (3) 0.1972 (2) 0.0200 (5)
C1B 0.6745 (4) 0.4503 (3) 0.2349 (3) 0.0185 (6)
C2B 0.7605 (4) 0.3994 (3) 0.1523 (3) 0.0226 (7)
C3B 0.7607 (5) 0.4714 (4) 0.0288 (3) 0.0316 (8)
H3B 0.8164 0.4402 −0.0288 0.038*
C4B 0.6796 (5) 0.5880 (4) −0.0090 (3) 0.0343 (9)
H4B 0.6799 0.6361 −0.0919 0.041*
C5B 0.5963 (4) 0.6345 (3) 0.0780 (3) 0.0255 (7)
C6B 0.6608 (4) 0.3736 (3) 0.3714 (3) 0.0185 (6)
C7B 0.8543 (4) 0.2739 (3) 0.1893 (3) 0.0265 (7)
C8B 0.5036 (5) 0.7606 (4) 0.0418 (3) 0.0376 (9)
H8BA 0.5131 0.7999 −0.0457 0.056*
H8BB 0.3934 0.7462 0.0669 0.056*
H8BC 0.5448 0.8166 0.0811 0.056*
N1C 0.1872 (3) 0.5118 (3) 0.2872 (2) 0.0248 (6)
O1C 0.2228 (3) 0.6168 (3) 0.3000 (3) 0.0350 (6)
O2C 0.2871 (3) 0.4227 (3) 0.2993 (3) 0.0341 (6)
O3C 0.0460 (3) 0.5009 (3) 0.2619 (3) 0.0374 (6)
O1M 0.7710 (10) 0.9624 (9) 0.0748 (8) 0.072 (2) 0.5
H1M 0.816 (4) 1.0346 (13) 0.046 (17) 0.18 (9)* 0.5
C1M 0.8993 (11) 0.8676 (10) 0.0932 (8) 0.060 (3) 0.5
H1M1 0.9936 0.9068 0.0490 0.090* 0.5
H1M2 0.8713 0.7994 0.0637 0.090* 0.5
H1M3 0.9189 0.8331 0.1792 0.090* 0.5

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cd1 0.02114 (13) 0.01596 (13) 0.02201 (13) 0.00148 (9) −0.00289 (9) −0.00650 (9)
N1A 0.0207 (14) 0.0214 (14) 0.0274 (14) −0.0001 (11) −0.0030 (11) −0.0087 (11)
N2A 0.0226 (14) 0.0178 (14) 0.0259 (14) 0.0016 (11) −0.0031 (11) −0.0062 (11)
C1A 0.0255 (17) 0.0252 (18) 0.0331 (18) 0.0027 (14) −0.0037 (14) −0.0095 (15)
C2A 0.0201 (16) 0.038 (2) 0.0293 (18) −0.0008 (15) −0.0038 (14) −0.0105 (16)
C3A 0.0261 (18) 0.040 (2) 0.0324 (19) −0.0088 (16) −0.0041 (15) −0.0166 (16)
C4A 0.0336 (19) 0.0228 (18) 0.0327 (18) −0.0046 (15) −0.0020 (15) −0.0129 (15)
C5A 0.0216 (15) 0.0188 (16) 0.0192 (14) −0.0028 (12) 0.0002 (12) −0.0069 (12)
C6A 0.0231 (16) 0.0182 (16) 0.0181 (14) −0.0022 (13) 0.0004 (12) −0.0048 (12)
C7A 0.0312 (18) 0.0193 (17) 0.0279 (17) −0.0039 (14) 0.0003 (14) −0.0069 (14)
C8A 0.036 (2) 0.0169 (17) 0.0293 (18) 0.0031 (14) 0.0055 (15) −0.0043 (14)
C9A 0.0277 (18) 0.0239 (18) 0.0374 (19) 0.0089 (15) −0.0044 (15) −0.0083 (15)
C10A 0.0248 (17) 0.0228 (18) 0.0363 (19) 0.0030 (14) −0.0067 (14) −0.0089 (15)
O1B 0.0278 (12) 0.0180 (11) 0.0185 (11) 0.0049 (9) 0.0004 (9) −0.0062 (9)
O2B 0.0328 (13) 0.0168 (12) 0.0271 (12) 0.0025 (10) −0.0033 (10) −0.0073 (10)
O3B 0.0471 (17) 0.0307 (15) 0.0461 (16) 0.0020 (12) −0.0037 (13) −0.0221 (13)
O4B 0.0265 (13) 0.0314 (15) 0.0481 (16) 0.0076 (11) −0.0078 (11) −0.0182 (13)
N1B 0.0196 (13) 0.0185 (14) 0.0216 (13) −0.0010 (11) −0.0033 (10) −0.0055 (11)
C1B 0.0173 (14) 0.0193 (16) 0.0208 (15) −0.0016 (12) −0.0047 (12) −0.0082 (12)
C2B 0.0197 (16) 0.0245 (17) 0.0259 (16) −0.0017 (13) −0.0012 (13) −0.0110 (14)
C3B 0.038 (2) 0.035 (2) 0.0234 (17) 0.0039 (16) 0.0038 (15) −0.0126 (15)
C4B 0.047 (2) 0.032 (2) 0.0203 (16) 0.0064 (17) −0.0004 (15) −0.0051 (15)
C5B 0.0295 (18) 0.0226 (17) 0.0234 (16) 0.0013 (14) −0.0052 (13) −0.0055 (13)
C6B 0.0156 (14) 0.0181 (16) 0.0237 (15) −0.0006 (12) −0.0029 (12) −0.0088 (12)
C7B 0.0265 (17) 0.0270 (19) 0.0283 (17) 0.0012 (14) 0.0046 (14) −0.0135 (15)
C8B 0.051 (2) 0.032 (2) 0.0256 (18) 0.0103 (18) −0.0058 (17) −0.0053 (16)
N1C 0.0250 (15) 0.0292 (16) 0.0218 (13) −0.0013 (12) −0.0019 (11) −0.0104 (12)
O1C 0.0264 (13) 0.0315 (15) 0.0561 (17) 0.0001 (11) −0.0092 (12) −0.0254 (13)
O2C 0.0268 (13) 0.0282 (14) 0.0484 (16) 0.0019 (11) −0.0004 (11) −0.0143 (12)
O3C 0.0253 (13) 0.0381 (16) 0.0555 (17) −0.0034 (11) −0.0108 (12) −0.0224 (14)
O1M 0.078 (6) 0.075 (6) 0.077 (5) −0.016 (5) −0.010 (4) −0.039 (5)
C1M 0.052 (6) 0.097 (9) 0.036 (5) −0.018 (6) −0.010 (4) −0.023 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Cd1—O1Bi 2.304 (2) O1B—C6B 1.281 (4)
Cd1—O1B 2.310 (2) O2B—C6B 1.220 (4)
Cd1—N2A 2.310 (3) O3B—C7B 1.205 (4)
Cd1—N1A 2.323 (3) O4B—C7B 1.326 (4)
Cd1—O1C 2.329 (2) O4B—H4BO 0.845 (10)
Cd1—N1B 2.332 (3) N1B—C5B 1.336 (4)
N1A—C5A 1.336 (4) N1B—C1B 1.348 (4)
N1A—C1A 1.342 (4) C1B—C2B 1.397 (4)
N2A—C10A 1.336 (4) C1B—C6B 1.525 (4)
N2A—C6A 1.349 (4) C2B—C3B 1.386 (5)
C1A—C2A 1.377 (5) C2B—C7B 1.496 (5)
C1A—H1A 0.9300 C3B—C4B 1.367 (5)
C2A—C3A 1.375 (5) C3B—H3B 0.9300
C2A—H2A 0.9300 C4B—C5B 1.398 (5)
C3A—C4A 1.378 (5) C4B—H4B 0.9300
C3A—H3A 0.9300 C5B—C8B 1.497 (5)
C4A—C5A 1.387 (5) C8B—H8BA 0.9600
C4A—H4A 0.9300 C8B—H8BB 0.9600
C5A—C6A 1.490 (4) C8B—H8BC 0.9600
C6A—C7A 1.389 (5) N1C—O2C 1.230 (4)
C7A—C8A 1.379 (5) N1C—O3C 1.260 (4)
C7A—H7A 0.9300 N1C—O1C 1.261 (4)
C8A—C9A 1.380 (5) O1M—C1M 1.431 (8)
C8A—H8A 0.9300 O1M—H1M 0.855 (10)
C9A—C10A 1.377 (5) C1M—H1M1 0.9600
C9A—H9A 0.9300 C1M—H1M2 0.9600
C10A—H10A 0.9300 C1M—H1M3 0.9600
O1Bi—Cd1—O1B 73.38 (8) N2A—C10A—C9A 123.1 (3)
O1Bi—Cd1—N2A 101.83 (9) N2A—C10A—H10A 118.4
O1B—Cd1—N2A 159.48 (9) C9A—C10A—H10A 118.4
O1Bi—Cd1—N1A 94.90 (9) C6B—O1B—Cd1i 128.9 (2)
O1B—Cd1—N1A 89.17 (9) C6B—O1B—Cd1 118.42 (19)
N2A—Cd1—N1A 71.15 (10) Cd1i—O1B—Cd1 106.62 (8)
O1Bi—Cd1—O1C 88.36 (9) C7B—O4B—H4BO 109 (3)
O1B—Cd1—O1C 112.97 (9) C5B—N1B—C1B 120.4 (3)
N2A—Cd1—O1C 86.44 (9) C5B—N1B—Cd1 124.9 (2)
N1A—Cd1—O1C 157.56 (10) C1B—N1B—Cd1 114.7 (2)
O1Bi—Cd1—N1B 142.36 (8) N1B—C1B—C2B 121.7 (3)
O1B—Cd1—N1B 71.66 (8) N1B—C1B—C6B 117.5 (3)
N2A—Cd1—N1B 115.79 (9) C2B—C1B—C6B 120.7 (3)
N1A—Cd1—N1B 98.09 (9) C3B—C2B—C1B 117.6 (3)
O1C—Cd1—N1B 92.65 (9) C3B—C2B—C7B 118.4 (3)
C5A—N1A—C1A 119.8 (3) C1B—C2B—C7B 124.1 (3)
C5A—N1A—Cd1 117.1 (2) C4B—C3B—C2B 120.4 (3)
C1A—N1A—Cd1 123.0 (2) C4B—C3B—H3B 119.8
C10A—N2A—C6A 118.9 (3) C2B—C3B—H3B 119.8
C10A—N2A—Cd1 123.4 (2) C3B—C4B—C5B 119.6 (3)
C6A—N2A—Cd1 116.7 (2) C3B—C4B—H4B 120.2
N1A—C1A—C2A 122.1 (3) C5B—C4B—H4B 120.2
N1A—C1A—H1A 119.0 N1B—C5B—C4B 120.4 (3)
C2A—C1A—H1A 119.0 N1B—C5B—C8B 117.7 (3)
C3A—C2A—C1A 118.3 (3) C4B—C5B—C8B 121.9 (3)
C3A—C2A—H2A 120.9 O2B—C6B—O1B 126.7 (3)
C1A—C2A—H2A 120.9 O2B—C6B—C1B 118.0 (3)
C2A—C3A—C4A 119.9 (3) O1B—C6B—C1B 115.3 (3)
C2A—C3A—H3A 120.0 O3B—C7B—O4B 120.6 (3)
C4A—C3A—H3A 120.0 O3B—C7B—C2B 122.0 (3)
C3A—C4A—C5A 118.9 (3) O4B—C7B—C2B 117.1 (3)
C3A—C4A—H4A 120.5 C5B—C8B—H8BA 109.5
C5A—C4A—H4A 120.5 C5B—C8B—H8BB 109.5
N1A—C5A—C4A 121.0 (3) H8BA—C8B—H8BB 109.5
N1A—C5A—C6A 116.7 (3) C5B—C8B—H8BC 109.5
C4A—C5A—C6A 122.3 (3) H8BA—C8B—H8BC 109.5
N2A—C6A—C7A 121.0 (3) H8BB—C8B—H8BC 109.5
N2A—C6A—C5A 116.6 (3) O2C—N1C—O3C 121.1 (3)
C7A—C6A—C5A 122.4 (3) O2C—N1C—O1C 121.0 (3)
C8A—C7A—C6A 119.4 (3) O3C—N1C—O1C 117.9 (3)
C8A—C7A—H7A 120.3 N1C—O1C—Cd1 118.4 (2)
C6A—C7A—H7A 120.3 C1M—O1M—H1M 104.7 (13)
C7A—C8A—C9A 119.4 (3) O1M—C1M—H1M1 109.5
C7A—C8A—H8A 120.3 O1M—C1M—H1M2 109.5
C9A—C8A—H8A 120.3 H1M1—C1M—H1M2 109.5
C10A—C9A—C8A 118.2 (3) O1M—C1M—H1M3 109.5
C10A—C9A—H9A 120.9 H1M1—C1M—H1M3 109.5
C8A—C9A—H9A 120.9 H1M2—C1M—H1M3 109.5

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.

References

  1. Alisir, S. H., Sariboga, B., Topcu, Y. & Yang, S.-Y. (2013). J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 23, 1061–1067.
  2. Çolak, A. T., Pamuk, G., Yeşilel, O. K. & Yüksel, F. (2011). Solid State Sci. 13, 2100–2104.
  3. Deacon, G. B. & Phillips, R. J. (1980). Coord. Chem. Rev. 33, 227–250.
  4. Drew, M. G. B., Matthews, R. W. & Walton, R. A. (1971). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 2959–2962.
  5. Egli, M. & Sarkhel, S. (2007). Acc. Chem. Res. 40, 197–205. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Frontera, A., Gamez, P., Mascal, M., Mooibroek, T. J. & Reedijk, J. (2011). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 9564–9583. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Gao, E.-J., Zhu, M.-C., Huang, Y., Liu, L., Liu, H.-Y., Liu, F.-C., Ma, S. & Shi, C.-Y. (2010). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45, 1034–1041. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. García-Raso, A., Albertí, F. M., Fiol, J. J., Tasada, A., Barceló-Oliver, M., Molins, E., Estarellas, C., Frontera, A., Quiñonero, D. & Deyà, P. M. (2009). Cryst. Growth Des. 9, 2363–2376.
  9. Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662–671. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Gurunatha, K. L. & Maji, T. K. (2009). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 362, 1541–1545.
  11. Kanoo, P., Matsuda, R., Kitaura, R., Kitagawa, S. & Maji, T. K. (2012). Inorg. Chem. 51, 9141–9143. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Li, W., Li, C.-H., Li, H.-F., Xu, J.-S. & Li, L. (2013). Jiegou Huaxue, 32, 1567–1571.
  13. Maji, T. K., Mostafa, G., Matsuda, R. & Kitagawa, S. (2005). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 17152–17153. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Nakamoto, K. (1997). Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, 5th ed. New York: Wiley & Sons.
  15. Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.
  16. Semerci, F., Yeşilel, O. Z., Ölmez, H. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2014). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 409, 407–417.
  17. Shankar, K., Das, B. & Baruah, J. B. (2013). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 6147–6155.
  18. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  20. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, G.-H., Li, Z.-G., Jia, H.-Q., Hu, N.-H. & Xu, J.-W. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 292–297.
  22. Wang, Y. & Okabe, N. (2005). Chem. Pharm. Bull. 53, 366–373. [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, D.-F., Wang, Z.-H., Zhang, T., Huang, R.-B. & Zheng, L.-S. (2014). J. Mol. Struct. 1068, 210–215.
  24. Yan, B., Hodsdon, S. A., Li, Y.-F., Carmichael, C. N., Cao, Y. & Pan, W.-P. (2011). J. Solid State Chem. 184, 3179–3184.
  25. Yin, H. & Liu, S.-X. (2009). J. Mol. Struct. 918, 165–173.
  26. Yu, Z.-T., Li, G.-H., Jiang, Y.-S., Xu, J.-J. & Chen, J.-S. (2003). Dalton Trans. pp. 4219–4220.
  27. Zhang, C., Zhang, L.-Y., Wang, S.-L. & Huang, Q. (2013). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 228, 265–266.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015012384/sj5468sup1.cif

e-71-00890-sup1.cif (642.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015012384/sj5468Isup2.hkl

e-71-00890-Isup2.hkl (383.6KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1409269

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES