Skip to main content
PMC home page
Antioxidants & Redox Signaling logoLink to Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
. 2015 Sep 20;23(9):711–723. doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.6059

Impact of eNOS-Dependent Oxidative Stress on Endothelial Function and Neointima Formation

Tatsiana Suvorava 1, Nadine Nagy 1, Stephanie Pick 1, Oliver Lieven 2, Ulrich Rüther 2, Vu Thao-Vi Dao 1, Jens W Fischer 1, Martina Weber 3, Georg Kojda 1,✉
PMCID: PMC4580305  PMID: 25764009

Abstract

Aims: Vascular oxidative stress generated by endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) was observed in experimental and clinical cardiovascular disease, but its relative importance for vascular pathologies is unclear. We investigated the impact of eNOS-dependent vascular oxidative stress on endothelial function and on neointimal hyperplasia. Results: A dimer-destabilized mutant of bovine eNOS where cysteine 101 was replaced by alanine was cloned and introduced into an eNOS-deficient mouse strain (eNOS-KO) in an endothelial-specific manner. Destabilization of mutant eNOS in cells and eNOS-KO was confirmed by the reduced dimer/monomer ratio. Purified mutant eNOS and transfected cells generated less citrulline and NO, respectively, while superoxide generation was enhanced. In eNOS-KO, introduction of mutant eNOS caused a 2.3–3.7-fold increase in superoxide and peroxynitrite formation in the aorta and myocardium. This was completely blunted by an NOS inhibitor. Nevertheless, expression of mutant eNOS in eNOS-KO completely restored maximal aortic endothelium-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine. Neointimal hyperplasia induced by carotid binding was much larger in eNOS-KO than in mutant eNOS-KO and C57BL/6, while the latter strains showed comparable hyperplasia. Likewise, vascular remodeling was blunted in eNOS-KO only. Innovation: Our results provide the first in vivo evidence that eNOS-dependent oxidative stress is unlikely to be an initial cause of impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation and/or a pathologic factor promoting intimal hyperplasia. These findings highlight the importance of other sources of vascular oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease. Conclusion: eNOS-dependent oxidative stress is unlikely to induce functional vascular damage as long as concomitant generation of NO is preserved. This underlines the importance of current and new therapeutic strategies in improving endothelial NO generation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 23, 711–723.

Introduction

NO synthesis by NOS enzymes is known to strictly require several cofactors, such as flavin adenine dinucleotide, flavin mononucleotide, and (6R-)5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-L-biopterin (BH4) (10). According to the crystal structure of the heme domain (oxygenase domain) of bovine endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) (44), binding and correct orientation of BH4 is critically dependent on the three-dimensional structure of the homodimeric protein. Dimerization itself depends on a zinc ion tetrahedrally coordinated to pairs of cysteine residues, that is, Cys96 and Cys101 of bovine eNOS in each monomer. Thus, genetic disruption of the Zn ion complex would be expected to decrease dimer stability, to impair correct BH4 orientation and NO synthesis, and to increase eNOS-dependent superoxide and peroxynitrite formation. For example, replacement of cysteine 99 to alanine in human eNOS resulted in a reduction of BH4 affinity, enzyme stability, citrulline formation, and an irreversible loss of heme (5).

BH4 plays a key role for normal NOS function inasmuch as it inhibits the generation of superoxide instead of NO by auto-oxidation of the intermediate oxyferrous complex (14). Endothelial BH4 deficiency has been shown to be associated with eNOS-dependent vascular oxidative stress in several models of cardiovascular disease, such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, and diabetic endothelial dysfunction (10, 13, 17, 61). Moreover, supplementation of BH4 was reported to improve endothelial function in human studies (38), although clinical trials with BH4 analogs revealed contradictory results (6, 13).

Innovation.

The results of this study provide the first in vivo evidence that oxidative stress generated by an impairment of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) activity is unlikely to be an initial cause of impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation and/or a pathologic factor promoting intimal hyperplasia. Therefore, other important enzymatic sources of vascular oxidative stress such as the many known oxidases appear to be more important. Our findings might be explained by concomitant generation of NO by eNOS, which is a fundamental difference from oxidases. They are in line with beneficial effects of therapeutic strategies improving eNOS expression and/or activity and substantiate the importance of vasoprotection conferred by endothelial NO.

Many oxidative enzymes have been implicated in vascular pathologies and in a variety of cardiovascular diseases, including those mentioned above and stroke (18, 22, 29, 35, 43). This makes it difficult to define the relative role for eNOS-dependent formation of superoxide and peroxynitrite in cardiovascular pathologies using animal models. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of eNOS-dependent vascular oxidative stress on endothelial function and on neointimal hyperplasia. To accomplish this, a mutant of bovine eNOS where cysteine 101 was replaced by alanine was cloned and introduced into eNOS-KO in an endothelial-specific manner.

Results

C101A mutation of eNOS increases oxidative stress

Despite having similar protein levels of the respective wild-type bovine eNOS (WT-eNOS) and C101A-eNOS following transfection to human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells (Supplementary Fig. S1A; Supplementary Data are available online at www.liebertpub.com/ars), the basal WT-eNOS activity in cell homogenates was 6-fold higher than C101A-eNOS activity (WT: 601±233 and C101A-eNOS: 98±5 pmol citrulline/mg/min, Fig. 1A). With increasing concentrations of BH4, the specific eNOS activities increased, but the maximal specific C101A-eNOS activity in the cell homogenates (554±173 pmol citrulline/mg/min) was significantly lower than the maximal WT-eNOS activity (927±311 pmol citrulline/mg/min, p=0.0055, n=3). Similar results were obtained using purified enzyme preparations (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, the mutation destabilized the enzyme as evidenced by increased monomer formation corresponding to a decreased dimer/monomer ratio during separation on a low-temperature sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gel (Fig. 1C). Using electron spin resonance, it was demonstrated that basal and stimulated C101A-eNOS produced less NO (Supplementary Fig. S1B, C), but more superoxide (Supplementary Fig. S1D, E), than WT-eNOS. The latter increase was completely inhibited by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), identifying C101A-eNOS as the underlying source (Supplementary Fig. S1F). C101A-eNOS HEK cells showed a significantly higher amount of amino acid carbonyl groups, indicating increased oxidative protein modification, while in cells transfected with the pcDNA3 vector, carbonyl formation was identical to that observed in WT-eNOS-transfected HEK cells (Fig. 1D, E).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Open in a new tab

Characterization of C101A-eNOS in vitro. (A) Specific eNOS activity in purified WT- and C101A-eNOS preparations and (B) cell homogenates from stably transfected WT- and C101A-eNOS cells in dependence on BH4 concentrations. Both enzymes were activated by BH4, but the basal and the maximal specific eNOS activity in the C101A-eNOS cells was significantly lower than the activity of the WT cells (*p=0.006, n=3). (C) Western blot of a low-temperature SDS-gel representing a small amount of C101A-eNOS dimer in the purified mutant enzyme. Lane 1: denatured protein as monomer control, lane 2: 25 μg WT/MT-eNOS, lane 3: 50 μg WT/MT-eNOS. (D) Representative Western blot of pcDNA3-, WT-, and C101A-eNOS-transfected cells for detection of carbonyl groups as a marker for cellular protein oxidation. Twenty micrograms of total protein was loaded, and the band below 75 kDa was used for densitometric analysis. (E) Relative optical density (%) from six Oxyblots. The amount of carbonyl groups in the C101A-eNOS cells was significantly higher than in WT or pcDNA3- HEK 293 cells (*p=0.002, n=6). BH4, (6R-)5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-L-biopterin; eNOS, endothelial NO synthase; HEK 293, human embryonic kidney 293.

C101A-eNOS activity induces vascular oxidative stress in vivo

Mice expressing C101A-eNOS (C101A-Tg) were generated by cloning C101A-eNOS in a construct that allows endothelium-specific expression (Fig. 2A). Western blot analysis demonstrated increased eNOS protein signals in the aorta (151%±16%) and the left myocardium (135%±16%) of C101A-Tg (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Fig. S2A, B). Aortic endothelium-dependent relaxation of C101A-Tg and their transgene-negative littermates was indistinguishable (Fig. 2C), despite a significant increase of tyrosine nitration in C101A-Tg (Fig. 2D), which confirms the data obtained in HEK cells. Double transgenic mice expressing endothelial C101A-eNOS only (C101A/eNOS-KO) were obtained by crossing C101A-Tg with eNOS-deficient mice (eNOS-KO, backcrossed to C57BL/6) (51). The genotype of C101A/eNOS-KO was confirmed by sequencing the C101A mutation, by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using mutation-specific primers, by primers binding in the neomycin cassette, and by primers detecting the Tie-2-C101A-eNOS construct (Supplementary Fig. S2C–E). On visual inspection, C101A/eNOS-KO do not appear different from C57BL/6. However, compared with C57BL/6, their litter size is lower and they show increased blood pressure, decreased heart rate, and myocardial hypertrophy just like eNOS-KO (Supplementary Fig. S2F–H). Furthermore, 3 weeks of treatment with the NOS inhibitor, Nω-nitro-L-arginine (L-NA), evoked an increase of blood pressure in C57BL/6 to the level observed in eNOS-KO, while L-NA had no effect on blood pressure in eNOS-KO and C101A/eNOS-KO (Supplementary Fig. S2F). The localization of C101A-eNOS in vivo was restricted to endothelial cells as evidenced by fluorescence microscopy (Supplementary Fig. S3). Compared with C57BL/6, C101A/eNOS-KO expressed lower levels of eNOS in the aorta, the lung, the myocardium, and the skeletal muscle (Fig. 2E and Supplementary Fig. S4A–D) and increased eNOS phosphorylation on Ser 1176 (Ser 1179 in bovine eNOS) (Supplementary Fig. S4E). Similar to HEK cells, we observed increased eNOS monomer formation during separation of lung homogenates on a native SDS gel (Fig. 2F).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Open in a new tab

Generation and basal characterization of C101A-Tg and C101A/eNOS-KO. (A) Construct used for insertion into fertilized eggs of C57BL/6 to generate C101A-eNOS-expressing mice (C101A-Tg) consisting of a 2.1 kb Tie-2 promoter, 4.1 kb bovine C101A-eNOS DNA, and a 10.6 kb Tie-2 enhancer. SpeI restriction sites were used for linearization of the plasmid before insertion. (B) Aortic and myocardial eNOS protein expression standardized to actin in C101A-Tg (mean±SEM *p<0.05 vs. controls, n=5–7). (C) No effect of C101A-eNOS overexpression on aortic endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by cumulative addition of acetylcholine (ACh, p=0.5548, n=6, two-way ANOVA). (D) Significant increase in nitrotyrosine residues as a marker for peroxynitrite formation (mean±SEM upper panel, *p<0.05, n=6) and representative Western blot of protein nitrotyrosine residues (middle panel) standardized to actin (lower panel) in myocardial tissue of C101A-Tg versus C57BL/6. (E) Protein expression of eNOS in the aorta, skeletal muscle, lung, and myocardium of C101A/eNOS-Tg (*p<0.05 vs. C57BL/6, n=6–12). The control values referring to eNOS protein expression in every tissue of C57BL/6 were set to 100% and are reflected by just one bar. (F) A representative experiment showing an increase of eNOS monomer level in native and denatured lung homogenates of C101A/eNOS-KO versus C57BL/6 (100 μg of total protein per lane). ANOVA, analysis of variance.

Generation of superoxide was assessed by following the cumulative photon emission from thoracic aortic segments (Fig. 3A) and the left ventricular myocardium (Fig. 3B) incubated with 5 μM lucigenin at 37°C and found a 2.5- to 3-fold stronger formation of superoxide in tissues of C101A/eNOS-KO compared with C57BL/6 and eNOS-KO, while there was no difference between the latter two strains (Fig. 3A, B). Furthermore, this increase was dependent on C101A-eNOS as demonstrated by complete inhibition following in vitro incubation with L-NAME in the aortic (Fig. 3C) and myocardial tissues (Fig. 3D). In striking contrast, L-NAME tended to increase aortic and myocardial superoxide formation in C57BL/6, while having no effect in eNOS-KO (Fig. 3C, D). To investigate peroxynitrite formation, we used Western blot detection of tyrosine nitration in aortic and myocardial homogenates. In the aorta, myocardium, and skeletal muscle of C101A/eNOS-KO, we observed a significantly higher nitrotyrosine level compared with C57BL/6 and eNOS-KO (Supplementary Fig. S4F–H). The increase of nitrotyrosine levels was completely inhibited by oral treatment with L-NA, demonstrating the dependence on C101A-eNOS (Fig. 3E, F).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Open in a new tab

Role of C101A-eNOS as a source of increased vascular oxidative stress in C101A/eNOS-KO. Increased (A) aortic and (B) myocardial basal superoxide production in C101A/eNOS-KO, eNOS-KO, and C57BL/6. The cumulative counts/mg of dried tissue measured during incubation with 5 μM lucigenin are given (*p<0.05, two-way ANOVA, n=6–13). (C) Effect of NOS inhibition (L-NAME, 1 mM) on aortic and (D) myocardial superoxide production assessed by lucigenin chemiluminescence in C101A/eNOS-KO, eNOS-KO, and C57BL/6. Results are expressed as counts/tissue dry weight/min (mean±SEM) averaged over the last 8 min of measurement (*p<0.05 vs. all other conditions, one-way ANOVA, n=5–8). (E) Aortic and (F) myocardial nitrotyrosine levels before and after oral treatment with the NO synthase inhibitor, L-NA, in eNOS-KO and C101A/eNOS-KO. Results are given as mean±SEM percentage relative to eNOS-KO (upper panel, *p<0.05 vs. eNOS-KO, one-way ANOVA, n=5–11). The middle panel shows a representative Western blot for protein nitrotyrosine residues, the lower panel shows β-actin expression as loading control. L-NA, Nω-nitro-L-arginine; L-NAME, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester.

Similar to increase of protein carbonylation in C101A-eNOS HEK cells, a significantly higher amount of amino acid carbonyl groups was detected in aortic and myocardial tissues of C101A/eNOS-KO compared with wild type and eNOS-KO (Supplementary Fig. S5).

C101A-eNOS activity restores endothelial function in eNOS-KO

Endothelial function was studied using acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent dilation of aortic rings, as described previously (11). We found a concentration-dependent reduction of vascular tone in C101A/eNOS-KO, while there was just a slight vasoconstriction in eNOS-KO (Fig. 4A). These data suggest that the expression level of eNOS in the aortic endothelium may fall by as much as 60% without impairing maximal endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Furthermore, this vasorelaxation occurred despite a strong increase of vascular oxidative stress as shown in Figure 3A, C, and E. There was, however, a significant rightward shift of the concentration–response curves to acetylcholine in C101A/eNOS-KO versus C57BL/6 (Fig. 4A). The corresponding pD2 values were 6.85±0.08 (n=14) and 6.58±0.1 (n=11, p=0.0358), respectively. To study whether the rightward shift of the acetylcholine concentration–response curve is induced by increased superoxide generation, aortic rings of C57BL/6 and C101A/eNOS-KO were preincubated with 100 U/ml of pegylated superoxide dismutase (SOD), but the pD2 values for C57BL/6 (7.01±0.126) and C101A/eNOS-KO (6.573±0.07) remained significantly different (*p<0.05, n=4, Fig. 4B). Likewise, a direct comparison revealed that 100 U/ml of pegylated SOD did not change acetylcholine-dependent vasodilation in C57BL/6 or C101A/eNOS-KO (Supplementary Fig. S6A, B). Rubbing off the endothelial layer completely inhibited acetylcholine-induced vasodilation in C101A/eNOS-KO (data not shown).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Open in a new tab

Preserved endothelial function in C101A/eNOS-KO. (A) Relaxation response of aortic rings of C101A/eNOS-KO, eNOS-KO, and C57BL/6 induced by cumulative addition of acetylcholine (*p<0.05 vs. C57BL/6, two-way ANOVA, n=6–14). (B) Aortic acetylcholine-induced relaxation in C101A/eNOS-KO in the presence of 100 U/ml of pegylated SOD (*p<0.05, n=4). (C) Effect of the NOS inhibitor, L-NAME, (D) the sGC inhibitor, ODQ, and (E) the NO scavenger, Fe(DETC)2, on relaxation response to acetylcholine in aortic rings of C101A/eNOS-KO and C57BL/6 (*p<0.05 vs. C57BL/6, two-way ANOVA, n=4–9). (F) Aortic relaxation response to cumulative addition of NO donor, SNAP, in C101A/eNOS-KO, eNOS-KO, and C57BL/6 (*p<0.05 for pD2 and two-way ANOVA, n=5–6). ODQ, 1H-[1,2,4] oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one; sGC, soluble guanylyl cyclase; SNAP, S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine; SOD, superoxide dismutase.

Several approaches were accomplished to investigate the molecular mechanism of aortic vasodilation to acetylcholine in C101A/eNOS-KO. First, it was observed that L-NAME reversed endothelium-dependent vasodilation to vasoconstriction in C101A/eNOS-KO and C57BL/6 and that vasoconstriction did not differ between the strains (Fig. 4C). Thus, endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine in C101A/eNOS-KO is dependent on the activity of C101A-eNOS. Second, incubation of aortic rings with 1H-[1,2,4] oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ) to inhibit soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) completely abolished the vasodilator response to acetylcholine with no difference between both strains (Fig. 4D). These data demonstrate the crucial involvement of the NO/cGMP pathway. Third, these data were confirmed by subjecting aortic rings to the spin trap Fe(DETC)2. As shown in Figure 4E, scavenging of NO completely inhibited acetylcholine-induced vasodilation in both strains. Finally, it was investigated whether hydrogen peroxide might be involved in endothelium-dependent vasodilation. However, neither conventional nor pegylated catalase (Supplementary Fig. S6C, D) had any influence on the vasodilation. Investigation of the sensitivity of the NO/cGMP pathway confirmed the previously reported sensitization in eNOS-KO (25) and demonstrated that a similar hypersensitivity to NO donors, such as S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine (SNAP) (Fig. 4F) and diethylamine/nitric oxide (DEA/NO) (Supplementary Fig. S6E), occurred in C101A/eNOS-KO. There was no change of the expression of sGC subunit β1 (Supplementary Fig. S6F). In addition, aortic and skeletal muscle expression of nNOS was not changed in C101A/eNOS-KO (Supplementary Fig. S7A–C). Taken together, these data demonstrate that C101A-eNOS-dependent vascular oxidative stress had no influence on complete vasodilation to acetylcholine in aortic rings of C101A/eNOS-KO. The relaxation was entirely endothelium dependent and mediated by the same pathway as in C57BL/6, that is, generation of NO by eNOS and activation of the NO/cGMP pathway.

C101A-eNOS activity inhibits increased neointima formation in eNOS-KO

In an attempt to investigate whether increased vascular oxidative stress present in C101A/eNOS-KO may play a role in the development of vascular pathologies such as neointimal hyperplasia, we subjected C57BL/6, eNOS-KO, and C101A/eNOS-KO to ligation for 4 weeks of the left common carotid artery proximal to the bifurcation. In C57BL/6, this procedure resulted in a strong formation of neointima, which declined with increasing distance from the ligation as reported previously (Fig. 5A–C) (16). Likewise, the lumen area was largely decreased, while the media were enlarged (Supplementary Fig. S8A, B). This pronounced development of neointimal hyperplasia resulted in an increased intima/media ratio, which declined with increasing distance from the ligation (Fig. 5D, E). In eNOS-KO, neointimal hyperplasia was much more pronounced as evidenced by a significantly increased neointima area (Fig. 5A–C) and intima/media ratio (Fig. 5D, E). In striking contrast, neointimal hyperplasia in ligated carotid arteries of C101A/eNOS-KO resembled that observed in C57BL/6. The small increase of neointima and intima/media ratio versus C57BL/6 did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 5C, E). In addition, neointimal hyperplasia in C101A/eNOS-KO significantly differed from that in eNOS-KO. Thus, despite strongly increased vascular oxidative stress, mild hypertension, and a low level of C101A-eNOS expression, neointimal hyperplasia was not accelerated in C101A/eNOS-KO. These data suggest that the lack of NO rather than increased levels of eNOS-derived vascular oxidative stress accelerates neointimal hyperplasia in response to ligation.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Open in a new tab

Negligible effects of C101A-eNOS on neointimal hyperplasia. (A) Representative sections stained by hematoxylin and eosin demonstrate pronounced neointimal hyperplasia, media thickening, and luminal narrowing in the ligated A. carotis sinistra of all studied genotypes (450 μm from the ligation). Scale bar indicates 100 μm. (B) Neointima formation is shown for different distances from the ligation site in C57BL/6, eNOS-KO, and C101A/eNOS-KO. Values are mean±SEM, *p<0.05 vs. C57BL/6, two-way ANOVA, n=4–6). (C) Statistical evaluation of the neointimal area (*p<0.05 vs. C57BL/6, #p<0.05 vs. eNOS-KO, n=4–6). (D) Intima/media ratio for different distances from ligation in C57BL/6, eNOS-KO, and C101A/eNOS-KO (*p<0.05 vs. C57BL/6, two-way ANOVA, n=4–6) and (E) statistical analysis after summarizing the ratios for each animal at each distance point (*p<0.05 vs. C57BL/6, #p<0.05 vs. eNOS-KO, one-way ANOVA, n=4–6). To see this illustration in color, the reader is referred to the web version of this article at www.liebertpub.com/ars

C101A-eNOS activity partially restores vascular remodeling in eNOS-KO

To estimate remodeling following the ligation procedure, the left common carotid vessel area was measured 500–1000 μm distal to the ligation and the averaged values were compared with those obtained from the unligated right common carotid artery. As shown in Figure 6A, there was still considerable neointimal hyperplasia in this region of the ligated artery. In C57BL/6, there was a statistically significant difference between the vessel area of the left and right common carotid artery, suggesting the occurrence of vascular remodeling induced by the reduction of flow in the ligated and/or an increase of flow in the unligated vessels (Fig. 6B). In striking contrast, in eNOS-KO, the vessel area distal to the ligation was significantly increased over the vessel area of the unligated right common carotid artery (Fig. 6C), suggesting that vascular remodeling was inversed. In C101A/eNOS-KO, this abnormal vascular response was partially restored, that is, the vessel area of the ligated carotid artery was smaller than that of the unligated right common carotid artery, although the difference was not as pronounced as in C57BL/6 (Fig. 6D). In accordance, the ratio of the vessel area of the ligated versus the unligated carotid artery, which was calculated in each separate animal and then averaged for each distance point, clearly demonstrated a mouse strain-dependent significant increase over the investigated distance from the ligation in eNOS-KO, while C57BL/6 and C101A/eNOS-KO showed a decrease (Fig. 6E).

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Open in a new tab

Effects of C101A-eNOS on vascular remodeling. (A) Representative photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin-stained transverse sections of the right (unligated side, A. carotis dextra) and left (ligated side, A. carotis sinistra) common carotid arteries (850 μm from the ligation). Scale bar indicates 200 μm. (B) Effects of A. carotis sinistra ligation on the vessel area in C57BL/6, (C) eNOS-KO, and (D) C101A/eNOS-KO (*p<0.05 vs. A. carotis dextra, two-way ANOVA, n=4–5). (E) Vessel area ratio of left common carotid artery from the ligated animal over the intact right common carotid artery from the same mouse (*p<0.05 vs. C57BL/6, two-way ANOVA, n=4–5). To see this illustration in color, the reader is referred to the web version of this article at www.liebertpub.com/ars

Discussion

This study aimed to investigate the impact of eNOS-dependent vascular oxidative stress on endothelial function and on neointimal hyperplasia. A mutant destabilized eNOS, which was introduced in eNOS-KO in an endothelial-specific manner, (i) largely increased vascular generation of superoxide and protein nitrotyrosine formation, but (ii) had little impact on aortic endothelium-dependent vasodilation by acetylcholine, and (iii) corrected the accelerated neointimal hyperplasia and the abnormal vascular remodeling observed in eNOS-KO. These data suggest that vascular oxidative stress generated by an impairment of eNOS activity has a limited effect on endothelial function of conduit arteries, presumably because of concomitant generation of NO by eNOS.

As predicted by the crystal structure of the oxygenase domain of eNOS, genetic disruption of its Zn ion complex disturbs dimer formation and thereby binding and correct orientation of BH4 (44). BH4 deficiency promotes the transfer of an electron to molecular oxygen and thereby the generation of the superoxide (14). Thus, a replacement of cysteine 101 by alanine destabilizes eNOS, resulting in reduced NO formation and increased generation of superoxide in transfected HEK cells and in different tissues of C101A-Tg and C101A/eNOS-KO. Our data on decreased catalytic activity of C101A-eNOS are consistent with previous reports describing eNOS mutations at one or both Zn-binding cysteines (5, 9). Of note, mutation of eNOS by replacing both Zn-binding cysteines with serine did not abolish formation of L-citrulline from L-arginine (9), suggesting partial preservation of NO generation, despite decreased dimer stability as reported in this study with C101A-eNOS. The destabilization of C101A-eNOS was also evident by the decrease of the dimer/monomer ratio following separation on native SDS gels, and similar findings have been reported previously (45). Moreover, increased superoxide generation induced by C101A-eNOS in transfected HEK cells and in aortic and myocardial tissues of C101A/eNOS-KO was abolished by L-NAME, identifying C101A-eNOS as the underlying source both in cells and in transgenic mice.

Previous studies with purified eNOS have demonstrated that BH4 deficiency strongly increases the eNOS-derived superoxide electron spin resonance (ESR) signal and that BH4 supplementation inhibits this oxidase activity in a concentration-dependent manner (57, 58). In striking contrast, citrulline formation by purified C101A-eNOS never reached the maximal rate that was achieved with WT-eNOS, not even at BH4 concentrations of 50 μM in the reaction tube, demonstrating that the ability of C101A-eNOS to generate citrulline and hence NO cannot be improved by excess BH4. Taken together, these results are in line with previous investigations on the importance of BH4 (5, 14, 17, 44) and strongly suggest that an impairment of binding and correct orientation of BH4 underlies the increase of superoxide production observed in cells and tissues harboring C101A-eNOS.

A surprising finding of this study is that activation of C101A-eNOS by acetylcholine in aortic rings resulted in complete endothelium-dependent vasodilation in C101A-Tg and C101A/eNOS-KO, despite reduced NO formation and increased vascular oxidative stress induced by C101A-eNOS. The relaxation by acetylcholine in aortic rings of C101A/eNOS-KO was found to be mediated by NO and developed at tissue levels of superoxide and/or peroxynitrite, resembling those occurring in various animal models with clearly detectable impairment of eNOS function and/or endothelial-dependent vasodilation (2, 7, 15, 21, 32, 33, 61). However, in each of these studies, concomitant conditions, such as atherosclerosis, severe hypertension, diabetes, or disruption of certain genes such as interleukin 10 or Bmal1, were present, which might have contributed to endothelial dysfunction beside oxidative and/or nitrosative stress. Nevertheless, there was a significant rightward shift of the acetylcholine concentration–response curve, indicating a reduced efficacy of eNOS activation in aortic rings of C101A/eNOS-KO. A contribution of increased generation of superoxide is most likely not involved since pegylated SOD had no impact on acetylcholine-induced aortic dilation. It is also possible that the reduction of eNOS expression and its ability to generate NO in C101A/eNOS-KO compared with C57BL/6 is the underlying cause. According to the data obtained from the carotid-binding experiments, this small shift appears to be rather unimportant for NO bioavailability in vivo. Taken together, our data suggest that oxidative stress generated by eNOS appears to have little impact on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in conduit arteries.

It might be argued that the lack of effect of C101A-eNOS on mild hypertension of eNOS-KO demonstrates an effect of oxidative stress generated by an impairment of eNOS activity on resistance vessels and blood pressure. One would expect a blood pressure-lowering effect of endothelial expression of eNOS as reported previously (40, 41, 54); however, data of a further study have shown that even endothelial-specific expression of normal eNOS does not reduce the hypertension of eNOS-KO (55). Thus, the persistence of hypertension in C101A-eNOS-KO is probably not provoked by C101A-eNOS-dependent oxidative stress and is unlikely to represent a specific phenotype caused by pronounced vascular oxidative stress in this animal model. On the other hand, our data certainly do not exclude that oxidative stress due to an impairment of eNOS activity may have an impact on the regulation of blood pressure, for example, in more severe hypertensive cardiovascular disease states (34).

Smooth muscle proliferation is an obvious event during the development of atherosclerosis and restenosis (36, 39, 46). It is generally believed that oxidative stress plays a crucial role in this process (35, 48) and that this pathologic role of oxidative stress is closely linked to a downregulation of vascular NO bioavailability (56). Furthermore, inhibition of oxidative stress is considered to be a key component of the overall vasoprotective effect of endothelial eNOS activity (12). In this study, neointima formation following carotid ligation (26) was used to estimate the vascular bioavailability and vasoprotective activity of endothelial NO in vivo. In this model, neointima formation occurs in the presence of intact endothelial lining and is directly related to the alteration of the blood flow pattern, that is, turbulent rather than laminar flow, as well as to the infiltration of monocytes (20). Consequently, neointima formation is largest close to ligation and becomes smaller with increasing distance (26) and a similar pattern was observed in C57BL/6, C101A/eNOS-KO, and eNOS-KO. However, neointima formation was significantly more pronounced in eNOS-KO than in C57BL/6, confirming that vascular eNOS elicits protective effects in the setting of carotid ligation (59). Neointima formation in C101A/eNOS-KO tended to increase in comparison with C57BL/6, but the difference did not reach statistical significance, while the difference compared with eNOS-KO was obvious. Furthermore, this difference was evident, despite increased oxidative stress in C101A/eNOS-KO, which does not occur in eNOS-KO, suggesting that C101A/eNOS-KO generate bioavailable NO sufficiently to inhibit smooth muscle proliferation as observed in C57BL/6. Finally, these data obtained from the carotid ligation experiments indicate that increased neointima formation in eNOS-KO appears to be caused by the lack of endothelial NO formation and not by the presence of mild hypertension.

Another important role of NO is to mediate vascular remodeling in response to flow (28, 47). Although carotid ligation is not a good model to investigate flow-dependent vascular remodeling due to the neointima formation, the ratio of ligated to unligated vessel area, which indicates vascular remodeling, was almost similar in C57BL/6 and C101A/eNOS-KO. In these strains, the ratio decreased with increasing distance from the ligation and reached values well below one, while in eNOS-KO this was not the case. These data again suggest a limited impairment of NO bioavailability in C101A/eNOS-KO.

The alteration of activity of C101A-eNOS might resemble the features of uncoupled eNOS, a term which has been used to describe early findings with purified NOS protein showing increased production of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide in the absence of important cofactors such as BH4 (19). In contrast, mutant C101A-eNOS produces less NO and more superoxide in response to dimer destabilization and subsequent impairment of binding and correct orientation of BH4. Hence, this approach shows a direct relationship between a reduced stability of homodimers and eNOS function. In contrast, there is no evidence that the presence of monomers and a reduced dimer/monomer ratio are directly related to uncoupling of the enzyme since only the dimeric form has been shown to be active and generate NO and superoxide (46). Moreover, we believe that an advantage of this approach is the possibility to study the importance of eNOS dimer destabilization and impaired BH4 binding for vascular physiology and pathophysiology in otherwise healthy animals. This largely reduces unpredictable confounding factors, such as complex disease processes occurring in hypertension, atherosclerosis, and/or diabetes, which are associated with an impairment of eNOS cofactor availability or proven increases of other components such as the eNOS inhibitor, ADMA (3). Nevertheless, concomitant generation of NO and superoxide by C101A-eNOS probably closely resembles the situation in the endothelium of diseased vessels when uncoupled eNOS molecules and coupled eNOS molecules can exist in the same cell at the same time (35).

Taken together, the results of this study suggest that vascular oxidative stress generated by an impairment of eNOS activity might not be as important as estimated previously and rather highlight the contribution of oxidative stress to vascular pathologies caused by other enzymatic sources (18, 22, 29, 36, 43, 52). A reasonable explanation for the limited importance of eNOS-dependent oxidative stress for functional vascular damage might be the concomitant generation of NO by eNOS, which is a fundamental difference from oxidases. Hence, our findings substantiate the importance of vasoprotection conferred by endothelial NO (12), which appears to be able to cope with even larger increases of vascular oxidative stress. Similar findings have been reported for the vasoprotective activity of eNOS in murine atherosclerosis (42). Although it is difficult to extrapolate our data to clinical conditions as the transgenic approach used does not directly match clinically occurring disease pathologies, our data support previous observations on interventions associated with increased eNOS protein expression and improvement of endothelial NO production, such as regular exercise training (24), pharmacotherapy with statins (31), and treatment with inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin system (12) have provided superior cardiovascular prevention than targeting vascular oxidative stress (4, 18a, 37, 50, 60).

Materials and Methods

Stable transfection of HEK 293 cells

Using primer overlap extension PCR, we genetically destabilized bovine eNOS by replacement of Cys 101 to Ala (C101A). The mutation was confirmed by sequencing. The cDNAs for wild-type bovine eNOS (WT) and the mutant (MT) C101A eNOS were cloned into the pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA) and stably transfected in HEK 293 cells.

ESR measurements

ESR measurements were performed as described previously (8, 27). Cellular basal and Ca2+ ionophore A23187-stimulated NO production was measured using 0.2 M of the spin trap iron/diethyldithiocarbamic acid, Fe(DETC)2. CMH (1-hydroxy-3-methoxycarbonyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-pyrrolidine) at 100 μM was used for superoxide detection in the absence and presence of the NOS inhibitor, L-NAME (1 M).

eNOS activity

The specific activity of WT- and C101A-eNOS in cell homogenates from stably transfected HEK cells and in isolated enzyme preparations was determined by conversion of 14C-L-arginine to 14C-L-citrulline as described previously (49) in the presence of increasing concentrations of BH4 (0–50 μM).

Detection of oxidative protein modification

Protein modifications caused by additional carbonyl groups were detected in C101A-eNOS and WT-eNOS-transfected HEK cells and aortic and myocardial tissue of C57BL/6, eNOS-KO, and C101A/eNOS-KO using the Oxyblot™ system (Intergen, Burlington, MA).

Transgenic C101A-eNOS mice

We generated a DNA construct, in which C101A-eNOS cDNA (4.1 kb) was inserted between the murine Tie-2 promoter (2.1 kb) cDNA and a 10 kb Tie-2 intron fragment, designated as Tie-2 enhancer. This construct was used to target C101A-eNOS gene expression to the vasculature, as described previously (30). Double transgenic mice expressing endothelial C101A-eNOS only (C101A/eNOS-KO) were obtained by crossing C101A-Tg with eNOS-deficient mice (eNOS-KO, backcrossed >20 times to C57BL/6J) (51). Additional groups of C57BL/6J, eNOS-KO, and C101A/eNOS-KO received L-NA (100 mg L-NA/kg BW/day; Sigma, Munich, Germany) for 3 weeks before the experiments. Permission for the animal studies was provided by the regional government of Germany (AZ 50.05-230-3-94/00, AZ 50.05-230-18/06, AZ 8.87-51.04.20.09.383), and the experiments were performed according to the guidelines for the use of experimental animals, as given by the German “Tierschutzgesetz” and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Vasorelaxation studies

Function of the endothelium was examined in aortic rings of C57BL/6, eNOS-KO, and C101A/eNOS-KO by cumulative addition of acetylcholine (0.01 to 10 μM) after submaximal precontraction with 0.2 μM phenylephrine, as described previously (53). Thereafter, vasorelaxation to the NO donor, SNAP (1 nM to 10 μM) or DEA/NO (1 nM to 10 μM), was studied by cumulative application. In some experiments, the NOS inhibitor, L-NAME (1 mM), or the sGC inhibitor, ODQ (10 μM), was administrated 30 min before application of acetylcholine. To determine the contribution of hydrogen peroxide to aortic relaxation in C101A/eNOS-KO, acetylcholine concentration–response curves were recorded in the absence and presence of either conventional (1200 U/ml) or pegylated catalase (1400 U/ml). To investigate a possible interaction between endothelium-dependent relaxation in C101A/eNOS-KO and increased aortic superoxide formation, we studied the acetylcholine concentration–response curve in aortic segments of wild type and C101A/eNOS-KO preincubated for 30 min with pegylated SOD (100 U/ml). In another experimental set, aortic rings of C101A/eNOS-KO and C57BL/6 were incubated with the colloidal Fe(DETC)2 spin trap solution before application of the increasing acetylcholine concentrations. The spin trap was freshly prepared by mixing equal amounts of deoxygenated 1.6 mM FeSO4 and 3.2 mM diethyldithiocarbamate (DETC) solutions (Noxigen, Elzach, Germany). In all experiments, only one acetylcholine concentration–response curve per aortic ring was recorded and analyzed.

SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting

Western blots for eNOS, nNOS, immunoprecipitated eNOS phosphorylated at Ser1176 (Ser 1179 in bovine eNOS), sGC-β1, nitrotyrosine residues, von Willebrand factor, and actin were performed in different mouse tissues using standard techniques, as described previously (25, 41) (please also refer to Supplementary Materials and Methods section).

Immunohistochemistry

Colocalization of eNOS and endothelium-specific marker, CD31, in aortas of C57BL/6, eNOS-KO, and C101A/eNOS-KO was performed as described previously (41) (please also refer to Supplementary Materials and Methods section).

Lucigenin superoxide detection

Lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence detection of superoxide in the intact aorta and left ventricular myocardium of C101A/eNOS-KO, eNOS-KO, and C57BL/6 was measured as described previously (23).

Measurement of systolic blood pressure

Systolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured in awake, 3–4-month-old male C57BL/6, eNOS-KO, and C101A/eNOS-KO using an automated tail-cuff system (Visitech Systems, Apex, NC), as described previously (25). In some experiments, establishment of basal blood pressure was followed by L-NA treatment with the drinking water, and blood pressure recordings were continued for another 21 days.

Neointimal hyperplasia

Ten-week-old C57BL/6, eNOS-KO, and C101A/eNOS-KO (n=9–10) were anesthetized and the left common carotid artery was dissected and ligated near the carotid bifurcation, as described previously (26). All animals were sacrificed 28 days after ligation. After excision of the left and right common carotid arteries, the vessels were fixed in 4% p-formaldehyde for 6 h, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Serial 5-μm sections were cut, and sections of every 50 μm were used for morphometric analysis using hematoxylin–eosin staining (vessels with thrombus formation were excluded). Morphometric analysis was carried out using image analysis software (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The circumference of the lumen, elastic lamina interna, and elastic lamina externa were determined by tracing along the different vessel layers.

Statistics

All data were analyzed by standard computer programs (GraphPad Prism PC Software, version 4.0) and are expressed as mean±SEM of n individual samples. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed by t-tests, the Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons post-hoc test following one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, for more than two groups) or two-way ANOVA (concentration–response curves). p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Materials and reagents

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma or Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), except otherwise stated.

A more detailed description of the Materials and Methods section is provided in the online Supplementary Materials and Methods section.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data
Supp_Data.pdf (743.3KB, pdf)

Abbreviations Used

ANOVA

analysis of variance

BH4

(6R-)5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-L-biopterin

C101A-eNOS

bovine eNOS destabilized by replacement of Cys 101 to Ala

C101A/eNOS-KO

double transgenic mice expressing destabilized C101A-eNOS exclusively in the endothelium

C101A-Tg

mice with endothelium-specific overexpression of destabilized C101A-eNOS

DEA/NO

diethylamine/nitric oxide

DETC

diethyldithiocarbamate

eNOS

endothelial NO synthase

eNOS-KO

eNOS-deficient mice

ESR

electron spin resonance

HEK 293

human embryonic kidney 293

L-NA

Nω-nitro-L-arginine

L-NAME

NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester

ODQ

1H-[1,2,4] oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one

SDS-PAGE

sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

sGC

soluble guanylyl cyclase

SNAP

S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine

SOD

superoxide dismutase

WT-eNOS

wild-type bovine eNOS

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Forschungskommission of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (Project 9772 272 to G.K. and 9772 446 to T.S.) and by the DFG research grant, SU 783/1-1, to T.S.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.This reference has been deleted.
  • 2.Anea CB, Cheng B, Sharma S, Kumar S, Caldwell RW, Yao L, Ali MI, Merloiu AM, Stepp DW, Black SM, Fulton DJ, and Rudic RD. Increased superoxide and endothelial NO synthase uncoupling in blood vessels of Bmal1-knockout mice. Circ Res 111: 1157–1165, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boger RH. Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA): a novel risk marker in cardiovascular medicine and beyond. Ann Med 38: 126–136, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bonaa KH, Njolstad I, Ueland PM, Schirmer H, Tverdal A, Steigen T, Wang H, Nordrehaug JE, Arnesen E, and Rasmussen K. Homocysteine lowering and cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 354: 1578–1588, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen PF, Tsai AL, and Wu KK. Cysteine 99 of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS-III) is critical for tetrahydrobiopterin-dependent NOS-III stability and activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 215: 1119–1129, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cunnington C, Van Assche T, Shirodaria C, Kylintireas I, Lindsay AC, Lee JM, Antoniades C, Margaritis M, Lee R, Cerrato R, Crabtree MJ, Francis JM, Sayeed R, Ratnatunga C, Pillai R, Choudhury RP, Neubauer S, and Channon KM. Systemic and vascular oxidation limits the efficacy of oral tetrahydrobiopterin treatment in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 125: 1356–1366, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Didion SP, Kinzenbaw DA, Schrader LI, Chu Y, and Faraci FM. Endogenous interleukin-10 inhibits angiotensin II-induced vascular dysfunction. Hypertension 54: 619–624, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dikalov S. and Fink B. ESR techniques for the detection of nitric oxide in vivo and in tissues. Methods Enzymol 396: 597–610, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Erwin PA, Lin AJ, Golan DE, and Michel T. Receptor-regulated dynamic S-nitrosylation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 280: 19888–19894, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Forstermann U. and Sessa WC. Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function. Eur Heart J 33: 829–837d, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Furchgott RF. and Zawadzki JV. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature 288: 373–376, 1980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gewaltig MT. and Kojda G. Vasoprotection by nitric oxide: mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Cardiovasc Res 55: 250–260, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gielis JF, Lin JY, Wingler K, Van Schil PE, Schmidt HH, and Moens AL. Pathogenetic role of eNOS uncoupling in cardiopulmonary disorders. Free Radic Biol Med 50: 765–776, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gorren AC. and Mayer B. Nitric-oxide synthase: a cytochrome P450 family foster child. Biochim Biophys Acta 1770: 432–445, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grunfeld S, Hamilton CA, Mesaros S, McClain SW, Dominiczak AF, Bohr DF, and Malinski T. Role of superoxide in the depressed nitric oxide production by the endothelium of genetically hypertensive rats. Hypertension 26: 854–857, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Harmon KJ, Couper LL, and Lindner V. Strain-dependent vascular remodeling phenotypes in inbred mice. Am J Pathol 156: 1741–1748, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harrison DG, Chen W, Dikalov S, and Li L. Regulation of endothelial cell tetrahydrobiopterin pathophysiological and therapeutic implications. Adv Pharmacol 60: 107–132, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Harrison DG. and Gongora MC. Oxidative stress and hypertension. Med Clin North Am 93: 621–635, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18a.Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of antioxidant vitamin supplementation in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 360: 23–33, 2002. 12114037 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heinzel B, John M, Klatt P, Böhme E, and Mayer B. Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent formation of hydrogen peroxide by brain nitric oxide synthase. Biochem J 281: 627–630, 1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hui DY. Intimal hyperplasia in murine models. Curr Drug Targets 9: 251–260, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jung O, Schreiber JG, Geiger H, Pedrazzini T, Busse R, and Brandes RP. gp91phox-containing NADPH oxidase mediates endothelial dysfunction in renovascular hypertension. Circulation 109: 1795–1801, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kang DH. and Kang SW. Targeting cellular antioxidant enzymes for treating atherosclerotic vascular disease. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 21: 89–96, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kojda G, Hacker A, and Noack E. Effects of non-intermittent treatment of rabbits with pentaerythritol tetranitrate on vascular reactivity and vascular superoxide production. Eur J Pharmacol 355: 23–31, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kojda G. and Hambrecht R. Molecular mechanisms of vascular adaptations to exercise. Physical activity as an effective antioxidant therapy? Cardiovasc Res 67: 187–197, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kojda G, Laursen JB, Ramasamy S, Kent JD, Kurz S, Burchfield J, Shesely EG, and Harrison DG. Protein expression, vascular reactivity and soluble guanylate cyclase activity in mice lacking the endothelial nitric oxide synthase: contributions of NOS isoforms to blood pressure and heart rate control. Cardiovasc Res 42: 206–213, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kumar A. and Lindner V. Remodeling with neointima formation in the mouse carotid artery after cessation of blood flow. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17: 2238–2244, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kuzkaya N, Weissmann N, Harrison DG, and Dikalov S. Interactions of peroxynitrite with uric acid in the presence of ascorbate and thiols: implications for uncoupling endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Biochem Pharmacol 70: 343–354, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Langille BL. and O'Donnell F. Reductions in arterial diameter produced by chronic decreases in blood flow are endothelium-dependent. Science 231: 405–407, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lassegue B, San MA, and Griendling KK. Biochemistry, physiology, and pathophysiology of NADPH oxidases in the cardiovascular system. Circ Res 110: 1364–1390, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lauer N, Suvorava T, Rüther U, Jacob R, Meyer A, Harrison DG, and Kojda G. Critical involvement of hydrogen peroxide in exercise-induced upregulation of endothelial NO-synthase. Cardiovasc Res 65: 254–262, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Laufs U, La Fata V, Plutzky J, and Liao JK. Upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by HMG CoA reductase inhibitors. Circulation 97: 1129–1135, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Laursen JB, Rajagopalan S, Galis Z, Tarpey M, Freeman BA, and Harrison DG. Role of superoxide in angiotensin II-induced but not catecholamine-induced hypertension. Circulation 95: 588–593, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Laursen JB, Somers M, Kurz S, McCann L, Warnholtz A, Freeman BA, Tarpey M, Fukai T, and Harrison DG. Endothelial regulation of vasomotion in apoE-deficient mice: implications for interactions between peroxynitrite and tetrahydrobiopterin. Circulation 103: 1282–1288, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee MY. and Griendling KK. Redox signaling, vascular function, and hypertension. Antioxid Redox Signal 10: 1045–1059, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li H, Horke S, and Forstermann U. Vascular oxidative stress, nitric oxide and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 237: 208–219, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Libby P, Ridker PM, and Hansson GK. Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature 473: 317–325, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lonn E, Yusuf S, Arnold MJ, Sheridan P, Pogue J, Micks M, McQueen MJ, Probstfield J, Fodor G, Held C, and Genest J., Jr Homocysteine lowering with folic acid and B vitamins in vascular disease. N Engl J Med 354: 1567–1577, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Maier W, Cosentino F, Lutolf RB, Fleisch M, Seiler C, Hess OM, Meier B, and Luscher TF. Tetrahydrobiopterin improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 35: 173–178, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Napoli C, De Nigris F, Williams-Ignarro S, Pignalosa O, Sica V, and Ignarro LJ. Nitric oxide and atherosclerosis: an update. Nitric Oxide 15: 265–279, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ohashi Y, Kawashima S, Hirata K, Yamashita T, Ishida T, Inoue N, Sakoda T, Kurihara H, Yazaki Y, and Yokoyama M. Hypotension and reduced nitric oxide-elicited vasorelaxation in transgenic mice overexpressing endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J Clin Invest 102: 2061–2071, 1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Oppermann M, Suvorava T, Freudenberger T, Dao VT, Fischer JW, Weber M, and Kojda G. Regulation of vascular guanylyl cyclase by endothelial nitric oxide-dependent posttranslational modification. Basic Res Cardiol 106: 539–549, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ponnuswamy P, Schrottle A, Ostermeier E, Gruner S, Huang PL, Ertl G, Hoffmann U, Nieswandt B, and Kuhlencordt PJ. eNOS protects from atherosclerosis despite relevant superoxide production by the enzyme in apoE mice. PLoS One 7: e30193, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Radermacher KA, Wingler K, Langhauser F, Altenhofer S, Kleikers P, Hermans JJ, Hrabe de AM, Kleinschnitz C, and Schmidt HH. Neuroprotection after stroke by targeting NOX4 as a source of oxidative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal 18: 1418–1427, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Raman CS, Li H, Martasek P, Kral V, Masters BS, and Poulos TL. Crystal structure of constitutive endothelial nitric oxide synthase: a paradigm for pterin function involving a novel metal center. Cell 95: 939–950, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ravi K, Brennan LA, Levic S, Ross PA, and Black SM. S-nitrosylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase is associated with monomerization and decreased enzyme activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 2619–2624, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 340: 115–126, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rudic RD, Shesely EG, Maeda N, Smithies O, Segal SS, and Sessa WC. Direct evidence for the importance of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in vascular remodeling. J Clin Invest 101: 731–736, 1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Satoh K, Nigro P, and Berk BC. Oxidative stress and vascular smooth muscle cell growth: a mechanistic linkage by cyclophilin A. Antioxid Redox Signal 12: 675–682, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schmidt K, Andrew P, Schrammel A, Groschner K, Schmitz V, Kojda G, and Mayer B. Comparison of neuronal and endothelial isoforms of nitric oxide synthase in stably transfected HEK 293 cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H2053–H2061, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sesso HD, Buring JE, Christen WG, Kurth T, Belanger C, MacFadyen J, Bubes V, Manson JE, Glynn RJ, and Gaziano JM. Vitamins E and C in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in men: the Physicians' Health Study II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 300: 2123–2133, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shesely EG, Maeda N, Kim HS, Desai KM, Krege JH, Laubach VE, Sherman PA, Sessa WC, and Smithies O. Elevated blood pressures in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 13176–13181, 1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sugamura K. and Keaney JF., Jr Reactive oxygen species in cardiovascular disease. Free Radic Biol Med 51: 978–992, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Suvorava T, Lauer N, and Kojda G. Physical inactivity causes endothelial dysfunction in healthy young mice. J Am Coll Cardiol 44: 1320–1327, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Suvorava T, Lauer N, Kumpf S, Jacob R, Meyer W, and Kojda G. Endogenous vascular hydrogen peroxide regulates arteriolar tension in vivo. Circulation 112: 2487–2495, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Suvorava T, Stegbauer J, Thieme M, Pick S, Friedrich S, Rump LC, Hohlfeld T, and Kojda G. Sustained hypertension despite endothelial-specific eNOS rescue in eNOS-deficient mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 458: 576–583, 2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tabima DM, Frizzell S, and Gladwin MT. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in pulmonary hypertension. Free Radic Biol Med 52: 1970–1986, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Vásquez-Vivar J, Kalyanaraman B, Martásek P, Hogg N, Masters BSS, Karoui H, Tordo P, and Pritchard KA., Jr Superoxide generation by endothelial nitric oxide synthase: The influence of cofactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 9220–9225, 1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Xia Y, Tsai AL, Berka V, and Zweier JL. Superoxide generation from endothelial nitric-oxide synthase—a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent and tetrahydrobiopterin regulatory process. J Biol Chem 273: 25804–25808, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yogo K, Shimokawa H, Funakoshi H, Kandabashi T, Miyata K, Okamoto S, Egashira K, Huang P, Akaike T, and Takeshita A. Different vasculoprotective roles of NO synthase isoforms in vascular lesion formation in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20: E96–E100, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yusuf S, Dagenais G, Pogue J, Bosch J, and Sleight P. Vitamin E supplementation and cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 342: 154–160, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zou MH, Shi C, and Cohen RA. Oxidation of the zinc-thiolate complex and uncoupling of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by peroxynitrite. J Clin Invest 109: 817–826, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data
Supp_Data.pdf (743.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Antioxidants & Redox Signaling are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES