Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1984 Sep;39(9):657–662. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.9.657

Switching to low tar cigarettes: are the tar league tables relevant?

R G Rawbone
PMCID: PMC459894  PMID: 6474400

Abstract

Representative samples of smokers of regular middle tar and regular low tar cigarettes responded to a questionnaire concerning their smoking habits and participated in a blind product test, returning 24 hour butt collections from the smoking of both middle tar and low tar cigarettes. An estimate of the mouth intake of tar derived from a measurement of filter nicotine confirmed partial compensation by the low tar smokers relative to the middle tar smokers, resulting in 32% lower tar delivery rather than the 46% expected from the standard machine values. Most middle tar smokers (98%) achieved an estimated tar delivery within or below that of the league table middle tar band when smoking middle tar cigarettes, while 70% of low tar smokers had a mouth intake of 10 X 49 mg or below within the low tar band when smoking low tar cigarettes. These results support the current tar league tables as a guide to the smoker in selecting a lower delivery cigarette.

Full text

PDF
659

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashton H., Stepney R., Thompson J. W. Self-titration by cigarette smokers. Br Med J. 1979 Aug 11;2(6186):357–360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6186.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Garfinkel L. Changes in the cigarette consumption of smokers in relation to changes in tar/nicotine content of cigarettes smoked. Am J Public Health. 1979 Dec;69(12):1274–1276. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.12.1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gust S. W., Pickens R. W. Does cigarette nicotine yield affect puff volume? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982 Oct;32(4):418–422. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1982.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kozlowski L. T., Frecker R. C., Khouw V., Pope M. A. The misuse of 'less-hazardous' cigarettes and its detection: hole-blocking of ventilated filters. Am J Public Health. 1980 Nov;70(11):1202–1203. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.11.1202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kozlowski L. T., Rickert W. S., Pope M. A., Robinson J. C., Frecker R. C. Estimating the yield to smokers of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide from the 'lowest yield' ventilated filter-cigarettes. Br J Addict. 1982 Jun;77(2):159–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1982.tb01417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kozlowski L. T. Tar and nicotine delivery of cigarettes. What a difference a puff makes. JAMA. 1981 Jan 9;245(2):158–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lombardo T., Davis C. J., Prue D. M. When low tar cigarettes yield high tar: cigarette filter ventilation hole blocking and its detection. Addict Behav. 1983;8(1):67–69. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(83)90058-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Russell M. A., Jarvis M., Iyer R., Feyerabend C. Relation of nicotine yield of cigarettes to blood nicotine concentrations in smokers. Br Med J. 1980 Apr 5;280(6219):972–976. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6219.972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stepney R. Would a medium-nicotine, low-tar cigarette be less hazardous to health? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Nov 14;283(6302):1292–1296. doi: 10.1136/bmj.283.6302.1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tobin M. J., Sackner M. A. Monitoring smoking patterns of low and high tar cigarettes with inductive plethysmography. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Aug;126(2):258–264. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.2.258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wald N. J., Idle M., Boreham J., Bailey A. Inhaling habits among smokers of different types of cigarette. Thorax. 1980 Dec;35(12):925–928. doi: 10.1136/thx.35.12.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES