Skip to main content
Virulence logoLink to Virulence
editorial
. 2015 Apr 23;6(5):410–411. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1036218

Paving the way to acceptance of Galleria mellonella as a new model insect

Andrew P Desbois 1,*, Stuart McMillan 1
PMCID: PMC4601485  PMID: 25906067

The larva of the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella is an alternative host used commonly in studies of microbial infection and innate immunity. Indeed, this insect host is often used when quantifying or comparing the virulence of bacterial and fungal pathogens of vertebrates and it has been used successfully to establish the importance of microbial virulence factors and to determine the relative virulence of different isolates of the same species.1–5 The recent popularity of G. mellonella as an alternative host system stems from numerous benefits, including the ability to perform experiments at a range of temperatures including human body core temperature; the technical simplicity of establishing infections by various routes such as through feeding, topical application or injection; the convenient size of the insect, which means it is large enough to permit simple injection of inoculums or chemicals but small enough to require little space in the laboratory; the ability to assess the efficacy and toxicity of antimicrobial therapies; and the ease and reliability with which these insects can be sourced in their final instar stage from commercial suppliers.6 It has also found approval among many researchers due to the favorable reproducibility between experiments in the same laboratory. Nevertheless, relatively small variations in susceptibility to infection can occur between batches of larvae from the same supplier and such variation probably arises from factors such as age, size and nutritional status on receipt; conditions encountered during transit to the laboratory; and the presence of any underlying natural infections. These issues are largely uncontrollable when purchasing larvae from a commercial supplier but on reaching the laboratory standardised pre-experimentation storage conditions can improve reproducibility between studies. In recent years the Kavanagh group have raised awareness for the role of a number of variables during storage that require consideration to ensure optimal reproducibility when experimenting with this insect, and factors influencing G. mellonella susceptibility to infections include physical stress,7 incubation temperature8 and access to food.9 In this edition of Virulence, the Kavanagh group report that larvae become increasingly susceptible to infection by pathogens as laboratory storage time increases, highlighting the need to consider this parameter when using the G. mellonella model. Browne et al.10 elaborate further in the study and relate this observation to a reduction in the total abundance of haemocytes that function in immune defense against pathogens and changes in the relative flux of metabolic pathways. Interestingly, the number of haemocytes after 3 weeks of incubation was approximately half that compared to the population at one week, while qualitative changes in the relative abundance of the various types of haemocytes were also reported.10 Both these factors probably contribute to reduced immune capacity and thus increased susceptibility to infection.

The Browne et al. study10 and other related works raise awareness of ways to reduce inter-experimental variability and may help to standardise methods and permit more meaningful comparisons between certain types of experiment. Moreover, studies of this nature are underpinning the development of this alternative host and, importantly, serving as part of a broader worthwhile pursuit to secure greater recognition for the value of this insect to infection biology.11 There is a desire among the growing community of researchers using this insect for it to achieve a status similar to other accepted model organisms for infection studies like Drosophila melanogaster or Caenorhabditis elegans, and this journal in particular is working hard to raise the profile of G. mellonella and other alternative hosts. Certainly there is justification for another model insect to complement the existing models and approaches, and an opportunity exists for G. mellonella to be developed to fill this niche. G. mellonella studies should permit deeper insight into immune functioning because we know already that fundamental differences exist compared to the immune responses of D. melanogaster and deeper understanding could be gleaned from studying both organisms.12 In addition to the favorable attributes mentioned above, G. mellonella is already associated with characteristics seen as desirable for a model organism including a long and rich history in the academic literature through studies on physiology, reproduction biology and innate immune responses. Thus, G. mellonella seems a reasonable choice to pursue as a model species especially given the rapid rise in popularity for using this insect in infection studies.6

Looking to the future, if G.mellonella is to be established as an accepted model species, particularly for infection studies, certain key advancements need to be made (Table 1). Top priority has to be the completion and publication of a fully annotated genome sequence, as well as integrated database resources for access to genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic information13 akin to the situation for other model organisms with Flybase14 and Wormbase.15 Following on from this, it would be desirable to determine the genetic diversity of the G.mellonella strains currently being used in experiments, and this should result in the defining of standard strains and perhaps the creation of a commercial strain resource. Of course, access to well-defined insect strains from trusted sources reared under standard conditions can be expected to reduce experimental variability even further. Beyond these requirements, the wish list of the G. mellonella research community includes the development of an improved molecular biology toolkit to enable the reliable genetic manipulation of this insect. Ultimately, the creation of a collection of knockout strains would be an important addition to the scientific community and this would be a valuable resource for many researchers even those working in fields beyond infection biology. Meeting the requirements of this wish list will further increase the popularity of this model, which should help to unlock the tremendous potential of this alternative host for providing deeper insight into the innate immune response including the key networks and pathways; the mechanisms employed by pathogens to avoid and surmount the innate immune response; and the interplay between the host and pathogen during infection. The number of G. mellonella users is growing rapidly and there is momentum toward achieving greater recognition for this alternative host, and prompt collective action should help us to overcome the barriers currently preventing wider acceptance of this insect as a model organism.

Table 1.

Important resources currently unavailable to G. mellonella user community

Resource
Access to fully annotated genome(s)
Integrated database for Galleria mellonella information
Well-defined strains, including knockouts
A comprehensive molecular biology toolkit

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • 1.Cotter G, Doyle S, Kavanagh K. Development of an insect model for the in vivo pathogenicity testing of yeasts. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2000; 27:163-9; PMID:10640612; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2000.tb01427.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jander G, Rahme LG, Ausubel FM. Positive correlation between virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants in mice and insects. J Bacteriol 2000; 182:3843-5; PMID:10851003; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/JB.182.13.3843-3845.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brennan M, Thomas DY, Whiteway M, Kavanagh K. Correlation between virulence of Candida albicans mutants in mice and Galleria mellonella larvae. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2002; 34:153-7; PMID:12381467; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2002.tb00617.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Evans BA, Rozen DE. A Streptococcus pneumoniae infection model in larvae of the wax moth Galleria mellonella. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012; 31:2653-60; PMID:22466968; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10096-012-1609-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Waterfield NR, Sanchez-Contreras M, Eleftherianos I, Dowling A, Wilkinson P, Parkhilll J, Thomson N, Reynolds SE, Bode HB, Dorus S, et al.. Rapid Virulence Annotation (RVA): identification of virulence factors using a bacterial genome library and multiple invertebrate hosts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:15967-72; PMID:18838673; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0711114105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Desbois AP, Coote PJ. Utility of greater wax moth larva (Galleria mellonella) for evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of new antimicrobial agents. Adv App Microbiol 2012; 78:25-53; PMID:22305092; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/B978-0-12-394805-2.00002-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mowlds P, Barron A, Kavanagh K. Physical stress primes the immune response of Galleria mellonella larvae to infection by Candida albicans. Microb Infect 2008; 10:628-34; PMID:18457977; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.micinf.2008.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mowlds P, Kavanagh K. Effect of pre-incubation temperature on susceptibility of Galleria mellonella larvae to infection by Candida albicans. Mycopathologia 2008; 165:5-12; PMID:17922218; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11046-007-9069-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Banville N, Browne N, Kavanagh K. Effect of nutrient deprivation on the susceptibility of Galleria mellonella larvae to infection. Virulence 2012; 3:497-503; PMID:23076277; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/viru.21972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Browne N, Surlis C, Maher A, Gallagher C, Carolan JC, Clynes M, Kavanagh K. Prolonged pre-incubation increases the susceptibility of Galleria mellonella larvae to bacterial and fungal infection. Virulence 2015; PMID:25785635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mylonakis E. Galleria mellonella and the study of fungal pathogenesis: making the case for another genetically tractable model host. Mycopathologia 2008; 165:1-3; PMID:18060516; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11046-007-9082-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lionakis MS. Drosophila and Galleria insect model hosts: new tools for the study of fungal virulence, pharmacology and immunology. Virulence 2011; 2:521-7; PMID:22186764; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/viru.2.6.18520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vogel H, Altincicek B, Glockner G, Vilcinskas A. A comprehensive transcriptome and immune-gene repertoire of the lepidopteran model host Galleria mellonella. BMC Genomics 2011; 12:308; PMID:21663692; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2164-12-308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.dos Santos G, Schroeder AJ, Goodman JL, Strelets VB, Crosby MA, Thurmond J, Emmert DB, Gelbart WM, Flybase Consortium . FlyBase: introduction of the Drosophila melanogaster Release 6 reference genome assembly and large-scale migration of genome annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:D690-7; PMID:25398896; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gku1099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yook K, Harris TW, Bieri T, Cabunoc A, Chan J, Chen WJ, Davis P, de la Cruz N, Duong A, Fang R, et al.. WormBase 2012: more genomes, more data, new website. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:D735-D41; PMID:22067452; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gkr954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Virulence are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES