Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Oct 26;5:15557. doi: 10.1038/srep15557

The nasopharyngeal microbiota of feedlot cattle

Devin B Holman 1, Edouard Timsit 2, Trevor W Alexander 1,a
PMCID: PMC4620444  PMID: 26497574

Abstract

The bovine nasopharyngeal tract plays an important role in animal health and welfare by acting as a site for the carriage of pathogens causing bovine respiratory disease, a condition which results in significant morbidity and mortality in feedlot cattle. We characterized the bacterial nasopharyngeal microbiota in cattle at feedlot entry (day 0) and day 60 using 454 pyrosequencing. We also identified the most frequently isolated aerobic bacteria from nasopharyngeal swabs after plating onto three types of media. The cattle nasopharyngeal microbiota was composed primarily of Proteobacteria (68.9%) and Firmicutes (19.2%). At the genus-level, there was more inter-individual variability and a total of 55 genera were identified. The genera Pseudomonas (23.7%), Shewanella (23.5%), Acinetobacter (17.5%), and Carnobacterium (12.2%) were most prevalent at entry, while after 60 days in the feedlot, Staphylococcus (20.8%), Mycoplasma (14.9%), Mannheimia (10.4%), and Moraxella (9.4%) were dominant. The nasopharyngeal microbiota also became more homogenous after 60 days in the feedlot and differed in structure at day 0 and 60. Using culture-based methods, the most frequently isolated bacteria from nasopharyngeal swabs were Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Moraxella, Pasteurella, and Mannheimia. These results provide insight into the nasopharyngeal microbiota of cattle and demonstrate that specific changes take place during feedlot production.

The bovine nasopharynx serves as a niche for opportunistic bacterial pathogens and also a site of entry for infectious agents that can cause bovine respiratory disease (BRD1). In the United States, the most recent survey indicated that 16.2% of all feedlot cattle were diagnosed with BRD at some point during production and that 96.9% of all large feedlots (>1000 head cattle) were affected1. Consequently, it is the most common reason for treatment and the most expensive disease to treat in feedlot cattle. It is also a significant cause of mortality as BRD is fatal in 4% of cattle treated for BRD1.

The primary treatment for cattle diagnosed with BRD is an injectable antimicrobial. In the United States 100% of large feedlots use injectable antibiotics to treat BRD and in Canada 20 to 50% of cattle receive an injectable antimicrobial upon entry to the feedlot as a metaphylactic measure to control BRD1,2. However, the use of antimicrobial agents in cattle can select for antimicrobial-resistant bacteria3,4. The development of mitigation strategies (e.g. probiotics and prebiotics) to reduce antimicrobial use in treating BRD would be greatly aided with the characterization of the nasopharyngeal tract microbiota in cattle. Presently, studies involving the nasopharyngeal tract microbiota have been mostly limited to the pathogenic bacteria associated with BRD such as Mannheimia haemolytica, Mycoplasma bovis, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni5.

The objective of the current study was therefore to characterize the nasopharyngeal tract microbiota of feedlot cattle at entry (day 0) and after 60 days in the feedlot using high throughput sequencing. This culture-independent approach was complemented with culture-based methods for comparison.

Results

Analysis of 16S rRNA sequences from cultured bacteria

Aerobic bacteria from nasopharyngeal swabs taken from steers at entry and 60 days after feedlot placement were cultivated on three different media: brain heart infusion (BHI), 5% sheep blood, and de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar. In total, 605 bacterial isolates were selected for sequencing (Tables 1 and 2). Using near full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences from each isolate and BLAST analysis, 32 different genera were identified across all samples using the three different media. On blood and BHI media, the most frequently isolated bacteria were members of the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria (Table 1). The genera Moraxella, Pasteurella, Mannheimia, Corynebacterium and Acinetobacter accounted for the majority of bacteria isolated on these media and all were detected at both feedlot entry and after 60 days (Table 1). Notably, bacteria belonging to the genera Mannheimia and Pasteurella comprised greater than 7% of the isolates at both day 0 and day 60. Two species of these genera, P. multocida and M. haemolytica, are often isolated from cattle suffering from BRD6. The most abundant genera observed were cultured from both BHI and blood media. Certain genera however, such as Aerococcus and Psychrobacter were isolated only from a single medium.

Table 1. Taxonomy of bacterial isolates from nasopharynx of feedlot cattle identified by 16S rRNA sequencing and BLAST at day 0 and day 60, expressed as proportions (%) of bacterial isolates identified on Blood and BHI agar.

Phylum Genus Blood
 BHI
 Total
Day 0 Day 60 Day 0 Day 60 Day 0 Day 60
Proteobacteria Moraxella 22.7 27.0 19.4 10.5 21.0 18.5
Proteobacteria Pasteurella 11.4 13.5 18.3 24.2 14.9 19.0
Proteobacteria Mannheimia 10.2 7.9 18.3 6.3 14.4 7.1
Actinobacteria Corynebacterium 3.4 15.7 3.2 8.4 3.3 12.0
Proteobacteria Acinetobacter 13.6 2.2 10.8 2.1 12.2 2.2
Firmicutes Staphylococcus 5.7 6.7 9.7 2.1 7.7 4.3
Firmicutes Streptococcus 2.3 3.4 6.5 11.6 4.4 7.6
Firmicutes Bacillus 4.5 7.9 5.4 3.2 5.0 5.4
Proteobacteria Psychrobacter ND ND ND 16.8 ND 8.7
Firmicutes Micrococcus/Macrococcus 6.8 4.5 2.2 3.2 4.4 3.8
Firmicutes Aerococcus 8.0 2.2 ND ND 3.9 1.1
Bacteroidetes Sphingobacterium 4.5 ND 1.1 1.1 2.8 0.5
Actinobacteria Dietzia ND 4.5 ND ND ND 2.2
Proteobacteria Neisseria ND 2.2 ND 2.1 ND 2.2
Firmicutes Exiguobacterium 1.1 ND 2.2 ND 1.7 ND
Proteobacteria Proteus 1.1 ND 2.2 ND 1.7 ND
Actinobacteria Actinomyces ND ND ND 3.2 0.0 1.6
Actinobacteria Sanguibacter 1.1 ND ND 1.1 0.6 0.5
Actinobacteria Rothia ND 1.1 ND 1.1 ND 1.1
Actinobacteria Arthrobacter ND ND 1.1 ND 0.6 ND
Proteobacteria Enterobacter 1.1 ND ND ND 0.6 ND
Bacteroidetes Wautersiella 1.1 ND ND ND 0.6 ND
Firmicutes Geobacillus 1.1 ND ND ND 0.6 ND
Actinobacteria Microbacterium 0.0 1.1 ND ND ND 0.5
Firmicutes Brevibacillus ND ND ND 1.1 ND 0.5
Actinobacteria Tessaracoccus ND ND ND 1.1 ND 0.5
Actinobacteria Cellulomonas ND ND ND 1.1 ND 0.5
  Total number of isolates 88 89 93 95 181 184
Open in a new tab

For each isolate, the genus with the highest identity to the 16S rRNA gene sequence is listed. ND = not detected.

Table 2. Taxonomy of bacterial isolates from nasopharynx of feedlot cattle identified by 16S rRNA sequencing and BLAST at day 0 and day 60, expressed as proportions (%) of bacterial isolates identified on MRS agar.

Phylum Genus Day 0 Day 60
Firmicutes Bacillus 42.7 41.9
Firmicutes Staphylococcus 33.1 41.9
Firmicutes Lactobacillus 4.5 9.7
Firmicutes Aerococcus 3.9 3.2
Firmicutes Streptococcus 5.6 0.0
Firmicutes Enterococcus 3.9 1.6
Firmicutes Micrococcus/Macrococcus 1.1 1.6
Actinobacteria Corynebacterium 1.7 0.0
Proteobacteria Escherichia 1.7 0.0
Firmicutes Rummeliibacillus 0.6 0.0
Firmicutes Pediococcus 0.6 0.0
Proteobacteria Moraxella 0.6 0.0
  Total number of isolates 178 62
Open in a new tab

For each isolate, the genus with the highest identity to the 16S rRNA gene sequence is listed. ND = not detected.

There was considerably less bacterial growth on MRS agar compared to the BHI and blood agars. In some instances, no colonies were observed from nasopharyngeal samples plated on MRS agar. This was expected, given that MRS agar is the most selective of the three media used. For this reason, all isolates observed were subcultured and sequenced. The majority of bacteria from MRS media were from the phylum Firmicutes and the Bacillus and Staphylococcus genera (Table 2). Four genera (Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Rummeliibacillus, and Pediococcus) that were isolated from MRS agar were not observed on the BHI and blood media.

Analysis of 16S rRNA sequences from metagenomic DNA

A total of 51,118 sequences with an average length of 457 bp remained following quality-filtering and chimera removal. These sequences were clustered into OTUs (97%) using the de novo method and the removal of singletons resulted in a total of 864 OTUs. All samples were rarefied to 3000 sequences per sample to account for uneven sequencing depth. Good’s coverage was 97% for all samples indicating that most of the OTUs were captured during sequencing.

Taxonomy was assigned to OTUs using the RDP classifier and the SILVA database (Fig. 1). A total of eight bacterial phyla were identified during the study although four of these phyla were only found in individual steers after 60 days in the feedlot. At entry into the feedlot the large majority of sequences were classified as Proteobacteria. In two entry samples, Proteobacteria comprised greater than 93% of all sequences while at day 60, only one steer had greater than 50% Proteobacteria in their nasopharyngeal tract. At feedlot entry, Firmicutes was the only other phylum with more than 1% of the sequences, while at day 60, Actinobacteria, Tenericutes, and Bacteroidetes were found at a relative abundance of greater than 1% of sequences. Overall, only 1.8% of sequences could not be classified at the phylum-level (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Classification of 16S rRNA gene sequences at the (A) phylum and (B) genera level for each individual day 0 and day 60 nasopharyngeal sample. Numbers on the x-axis indicate animal identification number. All phyla are shown in (A) and in (B) only those genera comprising greater than 1% of the sequences at either entry or exit are displayed.

The sequences were assigned to 55 different genera with 15 of these comprising greater than 1% of sequences at either day 0 or day 60 (Fig. 1B). Overall, 15.8% of the sequences from entry samples and 13.1% of sequences from day 60 samples could not be classified at the genus-level. The dominate genera were very different between the two sampling points. While Staphylococcus, Mycoplasma, Mannheimia, and Moraxella were the four most prevalent genera in day 60 samples, they accounted for less than 0.1% of the sequences in entry samples. The four most dominate genera in entry samples, Pseudomonas, Shewanella, Acinetobacter, and Carnobacterium, were also found in day 60 samples although at a much lower abundance (Fig. 1B).

The alpha diversity of the cattle nasopharyngeal samples was assessed using several metrics (Table 3). None of the alpha diversity measures differed between day 0 and day 60 feedlot samples (p < 0.05), although the day 0 nasopharyngeal samples were more diverse and had a greater number of OTUs. The beta diversity was measured using the phylogeny-based unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances and visualized using PCoA plots (Fig. 2). When the unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances for nasopharyngeal day 0 and day 60 samples were compared using ANOSIM, the two time points were different (p < 0.05) from one another and the associated R-value was relatively large for both unweighted (0.833) and weighted (0.677) UniFrac indicating that the two time points are separated from each other.

Table 3. Alpha diversity measures for the nasopharyngeal microbiota of steers at feedlot entry and after 60 days in the feedlot.

  PD whole tree Chao1 Observed species Shannon
Day 0 4.56 ± 0.67 305.92 ± 36.04 238.75 ± 34.66 3.69 ± 0.33
Day 60 5.36 ± 1.13 202.42 ± 60.98 165.75 ± 45.22 3.39 ± 0.40
Open in a new tab

n = 4 ± standard error of the mean.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the (A) unweighted UniFrac distances and (B) weighted UniFrac distances for day 0 and day 60 nasopharyngeal samples. The percent variation explained by each principal coordinate is indicated on the axes.

The core microbiota of the nasopharyngeal samples was also determined. The core microbiota can be defined as those OTUs found in all samples at a particular time point. Including both entry and day 60 samples together, only one OTU was common to all samples, which was classified as belonging to the Carnobacterium genus. Entry samples shared nine OTUs with each other, with all but one belonging to the Proteobacteria phylum (Supplementary Table S1). The core microbiota of the day 60 nasopharyngeal samples was comprised of 16 OTUs, four of which were classified at the genus-level as Staphylococcus and two each as Pseudomonas and Mycoplasma (Supplementary Table S2). When the relative abundance of OTUs was compared between entry and day 60 nasopharyngeal samples using the G-test, 34 OTUs were found to be differentially abundant between the two time points (FDR < 0.05; Supplementary Table S3). Of these differentially abundant OTUs, 29 were more abundant in the day 0 samples and five in the day 60 samples. Not surprisingly given the relative abundance of Proteobacteria at entry, all but one of the OTUs that were more abundant at this time point belonged to this phylum.

Discussion

In this study we describe for the first time the nasopharyngeal microbiota of feedlot steers at two different time points, entry and after 60 days in the feedlot, using high throughput sequencing. In addition, we used culture-based techniques to assess the cultivable fraction. The bovine nasopharyngeal tract is of particular interest as respiratory infections (i.e. BRD) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in post-weaned feedlot cattle in North America7,8. We selected the time point 60 days for analysis because the majority of BRD mortalities occur within the first 60 days of feedlot placement6, suggesting that the microbiota within this period may be important to cattle health.

It has been estimated that perhaps 1% of bacteria in some ecological niches such as the mammalian intestine are culturable in the laboratory9. A comparison of the 454 pyrosequencing and culture-based analysis from these same animals highlights some of the limitations of culture-dependent analysis. For example, the Bacillus genus was cultured frequently from the nasopharynx of the steers on all three media yet Bacillus was identified in only one steer at day 60 when analyzed using 454 pyrosequencing and at a relative abundance of less than 0.1%, indicating that culturing over-represented this genus. The same is true for the genus Pasteurella which was found only in two of day 60 samples, at levels of less than 0.05% of sequences, while culturing on non-selective media indicated that 17.1% of isolated bacteria belonged to this genus. At the same time, several of the most frequently isolated bacterial genera such as Acinetobacter, Moraxella, Mannheimia, Pyschrobacter, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus were also among the most commonly identified sequences in the 454 pyrosequencing samples (Tables 1 and 2; Fig. 1). The Proteobacteria and Firmicutes phyla also dominated both the culture-based and culture-independent analyses.

Overall, while 32 genera could be isolated using culture-based methods, 454 pyrosequencing revealed that at least 55 genera were present in the nasopharynx of the steers. These results indicate that while the culture media used in this study can identity some of the major bacterial taxa, it can also produce a limited view of the diversity of the microbiota and miss some of the more difficult to culture, yet prevalent bacteria, such as Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma10. Interestingly though, the Aerococcus, Dietzia, Proteus, Rothia, and Microccoccus/Macrococcus genera were identified using culturing but were not among the 454 sequences analyzed in these same steers (data not shown; Fig. 1A). This finding is a well-documented phenomenon in studies that compare culture vs. molecular-based methods11,12,13. It is possible that bacterial genera identified using culturing but not with pyrosequencing were at a very low abundance in the samples or that greater sequencing depth was necessary to identify them. Other technical reasons for this discrepancy could be due to the primer pair used, the DNA extraction procedure, or the sequences could be among those that could not be assigned taxonomy by the RDP classifier. Nonetheless, all of the most frequently isolated genera identified through culturing were also identified using pyrosequencing.

The dominant phylum in the nasopharynx of all cattle was the Proteobacteria, a finding that is consistent with studies characterizing the nasopharyngeal tract of swine14, cats, dogs15, and even in human infants16. Correspondingly, the most abundant genera in entry nasopharyngeal samples were members of this phylum (Fig. 1B). At day 60, genera from the Firmicutes and Tenericutes phyla were also prevalent. During their time in the feedlot the emergence of Mycoplasma, Mannheimia, Staphylococcus, and Moraxella was particularly striking as these genera were found almost exclusively in the day 60 samples. The relatively high abundance of Mycoplasma in all day 60 nasopharyngeal samples is notable as certain Mycoplasma species, e.g. Mycoplasma bovis and Mycoplasma arginini, are associated with the BRD complex in feedlot cattle17,18. These data indicate that feedlots may act as a reservoir of Mycolplasma or as an environment that can favour colonization and growth in the upper respiratory tract.

Another finding of particular clinical importance was the observation that 41.5% of all 16S rRNA gene sequences in one steer at day 60 belonged to the genus Mannheimia. The species Mannheimia haemolytica is often isolated from fatal BRD cases and is considered the leading cause of BRD in feedlot cattle6,19. In addition, 10.6% of the bacterial isolates on non-selective media were identified as Mannheimia spp. (Table 1). It is generally thought that rapid growth of BRD pathogens in the upper respiratory tract predisposes to BRD. Despite these findings, none of the cattle were treated for BRD throughout the 60 day period. While it is possible that BRD cases were missed by the feedlot staff, these data support the colonization of healthy cattle by BRD pathogens and the importance of factors other than pathogen prevalence for BRD onset5,20,21. It should be noted however that a limitation of 16S rRNA gene analysis is the inability to identify strain virulence or serotype. For M. haemolytica, serotype 2 is most often identified in healthy cattle, and serotypes 1 and 6 are found in most BRD cases22.

Although Shewanella was the 2nd most abundant genera in the entry samples, this was a result of 77.0% of the sequences in one sample being classified as Shewanella. It is possible that contamination during sampling or DNA sequencing might have been responsible, particularly since at day 60 the same steer had less than 1% of its sequences identified as Shewanella. However, despite the fact that Shewanella spp. are primarily considered marine and environmental bacteria23, they have occasionally been isolated from cattle24,25 and all samples had detectable Shewanella sequences in the present study. With the exception of one entry sample, all steers also had detectable Enterobacter sequences in their nasopharynx. While this may represent fecal contamination from the exterior portion of the nasopharynx of the steers, the relatively low abundance of sequences from the phylum Bacteroidetes indicates that swabs were not heavily contaminated during sampling. This conclusion is based on the fact that in cattle feces, the Bacteroidetes phylum typically comprises 20 to 40% of sequences26,27,28 and none of the samples in the current study had more than 1.75% Bacteroidetes sequences.

The differences observed among taxa, OTUs, and the microbial community structure between the two sampling times could be due to several factors (Figs 1. and 2; Supplementary Table S3). Steers sampled at day 0 had recently arrived at the feedlot and stress related to transport is known to influence bacteria in the bovine respiratory tract29. The steers in the current study also had been fed a backgrounding diet prior to arrival and were transitioned to a feedlot finishing diet. This alteration in diet together with the changes in their environment may have affected the nasopharyngeal microbiota. In addition, the age of the steers may have had a significant role in the composition of the nasopharyngeal microbiota as has been demonstrated in the upper respiratory tract of mice30.

As expected, the microbial diversity of the bovine nasopharyngeal tract was much lower than other locations such as the bovine gut26, rumen31, and in uterine fluid32. Despite this, a large variety of taxa and OTUs were observed in the present study. As a measure of the alpha diversity in the nasopharyngeal microbiota of the steers, the Shannon index (Table 3) was similar to that reported for the upper respiratory tract in mice (3.52–3.83)30 and the human adult nasopharyngeal microbiota (1.8 to 4.0)33. The PD whole tree values for the bovine nasopharyngeal microbiota were also comparable to those reported for the human adult nasopharyngeal tract (<6.0)33.

The day 60 samples tended to cluster together when unweighted UniFrac distances were calculated and visualized using PCoA (Fig. 2A). The entry samples did not cluster as closely together but were still well separated from the day 60 samples. When the weighted UniFrac distances were analyzed (Fig. 2B), the time points were still significantly different but they were not as well separated from one another. This is related to the fact that there was more variability in the relative abundance of several taxa in the entry samples compared to the day 60 samples (Fig. 1B). Although inter-individual variability still existed among the day 60 samples, the nasopharyngeal microbiota of the steers tended to become more homogenous during their time in the feedlot.

Conclusions

The nasopharyngeal microbiota of feedlot cattle is diverse but dominated by two phyla, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Significant changes occurred in the community membership and structure of the nasopharyngeal microbiota of the steers after 60 days in the feedlot. During this period, the nasopharyngeal microbiota of the steers became more homogenous and genera of bacteria that have been associated with BRD became detectable. Mannheimia was highly abundant in one steer at day 60 while Mycoplasma constituted a significant portion of 16S rRNA gene sequences in all steers at day 60. The bovine nasopharyngeal tract also appears susceptible to being dominated by one bacterial genus as observed with Pseudomonas and Shewanella at feedlot entry. Culturing of bacteria from the nasopharyngeal swabs reflected a portion of the microbial diversity but as expected, this technique was biased towards certain groups of bacteria.

Methods

Animal husbandry and experimental design

Seventy crossbred steers (initial body weight 495 ± 37.9 kg) were blocked by weight and then randomly assigned to seven pens at the Lethbridge Research Centre feedlot (Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada). Steers were purchased from local auction markets and were fed diets typical of feedlots in Western Canada. Steers were gradually adapted from a silage-based diet (70% barley silage, 25% barley grain, and 5% mineral and vitamin supplement; dry matter basis) to a barley grain-based finishing diet (85% barley, 10% barley silage, and 5% supplement; dry matter basis) over the first 30 days in the feedlot, and remained on the finishing diet from day 30 onwards. Rations were prepared daily using a feed mixer and offered ad libitum with a daily minimum of 5 – 10% orts in each feed bunk. Cattle were cared for according to the guidelines set by the Canadian Council on Animal Care34. All experimental protocols using cattle were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Lethbridge Research Centre (protocol #1227). All cattle remained healthy during the course of the study and were not treated for BRD nor did they receive any antimicrobial agents. For 454 pyrosequencing, four steers were randomly selected and sampled at entry (day 0) and 60 days after feedlot placement.

Isolation of bacteria from nasopharyngeal samples

Nasopharyngeal samples were collected from each animal at entry (day 0) and then 60 days after feedlot placement, according to Alexander et al.4 Double-guarded swabs were used for sampling and were transported to the lab on ice for processing, within 1 hour of collection. The end of each swab was removed and vortexed in 0.7 ml brain heart infusion (BHI) broth containing 20% glycerol and 0.1 ml of serial 10-fold dilutions were spread onto BHI, MRS, or 5% sheep blood agar. All agar plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h in a 5% CO2-enriched environment. Up to seven randomly selected bacterial isolates were chosen from each plate and subcultured onto fresh agar plates. The same individuals were responsible for picking all the colonies at both time points. Subcultured isolates were transferred to 50 μl of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and kept at −80 °C until use. The remaining swab-BHI mixtures were also stored at −80 °C.

Identification of nasopharyngeal isolates

Randomly selected isolates from blood (n = 188) and BHI (n = 177) plates were selected for sequencing. Growth on MRS plates was limited and therefore all isolates observed (n = 240) were analyzed. Bacterial cells in TE buffer were lysed at 98 °C for 15 min with agitation at 300 rpm. For isolates that did not lyse by application of heat, the Soil Powerlyzer kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to extract DNA, according to manufacturer protocols. The near full length 16S rRNA gene (>1400 bp) was amplified using the universal bacterial primers 27F (5′-AGRGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG)35 and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT)36. Each PCR reaction consisted of: 1x Herculase II Fusion polymerase (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), 0.4 μM of each primer (Eurofins MWG Operon LLC, Huntsville, AL, USA), 2 μl of the lysed bacterial solution as template, and sterile distilled water in total volume of 20 μl. The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation of 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 90 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR reactions were performed using a Bio-Rad S1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd., Mississauga, ON, CAN). PCR products were visualized on a 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel stained with GelRed Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Biotium Inc., Burlington, ON, CAN). PCR amplicons were sent to Eurofins MWG Operon (Huntsville, AL, USA) for sequencing using a 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA). Bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences from the nasopharyngeal isolates were manually trimmed in both directions and subjected to NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) analysis for classification.

DNA extraction, amplification, and 454 pyrosequencing

Total DNA was extracted from nasopharyngeal swabs using a Qiagen DNeasy Tissue kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada), with the following modifications: cotton tips were removed from the applicators and then placed back in BHI-glycerol mixture, followed by centrifugation (13,000 × g for 5 min) to pellet the cotton and bacteria in solution. The pellets were re-suspended in 180 μl of enzymatic buffer that contained mutanolysin (300 U ml−1) in addition to lysozyme (20 mg ml−1). The mixtures were vortexed and then incubated for one hour at 37 °C. Twenty five μl of proteinase K and 200 μl Buffer AL (without ethanol) were then added, followed by vortexing and incubation at 56 °C for 30 min. Approximately 600 mg of 0.1 mm zircon/silica beads were added and mixed using a Tissue Lyser II (Qiagen) at maximum amplitude for three min. The mixtures were then centrifuged (13,000× g for 5 min), and 200 μl of ethanol was added to the supernatants, followed by vortexing. From this point, the protocol of the DNEasy Tissue Kit was followed as per manufacturer instructions.

The universal eubacterial primers 27-F (AGRGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG) and 519-R (GWATTACCGCGGCKGCTG)37 were used to amplify the V1 to V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene. A unique 8-bp barcode was added to the forward primer to allow for pooling prior to sequencing. All amplification and sequencing steps were carried out at Molecular Research LP (MR DNA; Shallowater, TX, USA). Briefly, 16S rRNA gene amplicons were generated using a HotStarTaq Plus Master Mix Kit (Qiagen) with the following PCR conditions: a 3 min initial denaturation at 94 °C followed by 28 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. Amplicons from all samples were then mixed together in equal concentrations and purified with Agencourt Ampure beads (Agencourt Bioscience Corporation, MA, USA). Amplicons were subjected to pyrosequencing on a 454 Genome Sequencer FLX Titanium system (454 Life Sciences, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Branford, CT).

Raw 16S rRNA gene sequences were processed and analyzed using the QIIME software package v. 1.8.038. Sequences were initially demultiplexed with the removal of primers and barcodes. Sequences were also subjected to quality filtering using the default parameters of the split_libraries.py command; the removal of sequences having a length <200 bp, a Phred score of <25, and homopolymer runs of >6 bp. Chimeric sequences were removed using the UCHIME algorithm39 implemented in USEARCH v. 6.154440 and sequences were then assigned de novo to OTUs at 97% similarity using USEARCH. Taxonomy was assigned using the naïve Bayesian classifier and the SILVA database (v. 111) with a confidence cutoff of 0.8041,42 and sequences were aligned using PyNAST43. Singletons, that is those OTUs found only once in the entire dataset, were also removed prior to downstream analysis. Sequences were submitted to: NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under project accession number PRJNA275356 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra).

For subsequent alpha and beta diversity analysis, the OTU table was randomly subsampled and rarefied to 3000 sequences per sample. Alpha diversity was calculated within QIIME using the Shannon index44, Chao145, and phylogenetic diversity (PD whole tree)46. Good’s coverage was also measured47. Alpha-diversity metrics were compared between day 0 and day 60 samples using a non-parametric t-test with 999 Monte Carlo permutations. Beta-diversity was analyzed using unweighted and weighted UniFrac48 and visualized as principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots using Emperor49. The unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances for day 0 and day 60 samples were compared using ANOSIM (analysis of similarities) with 999 permutations. OTU abundance was also compared between day 0 and day 60 samples using the G-test with the false discovery rate (FDR) correction50. All results were considered significant at P < 0.05.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Holman, D. B. et al. The nasopharyngeal microbiota of feedlot cattle. Sci. Rep. 5, 15557; doi: 10.1038/srep15557 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep15557-s1.doc (97KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Pamela Lussier, Greg Travis, and Shawn Whitfield for technical support and the feedlot crew at the Lethbridge Research Centre for animal care and sampling. This work was supported by Alberta Livestock and Meat Association and the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada AgriFlex program. D.B.H. was supported by a NSERC visiting postdoctoral fellowship.

Footnotes

Author Contributions T.W.A. and E.T. designed the experiment. D.B.H. performed 454 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. D.B.H. and T.W.A. wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript. This is LRC contribution #387-15060.

References

  1. Feedlot 2011 Part IV: Health and Health Management on U.S. Feedlots with a Capacity of 1,000 or More Head (2013). Available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/feedlot/downloads/feedlot2011/Feed11_dr_PartIV.pdf. (Accessed: March 3, 2015).
  2. Checkley S. L., Campbell J. R., Chirino-Trejo M., Janzen E. D. & Waldner C. L. Associations between antimicrobial use and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle in western Canada. Can. Vet, J. 51, 853–861 (2010). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zaheer R. et al. Effect of subtherapeutic vs. therapeutic administration of macrolides on antimicrobial resistance in Mannheimia haemolytica and enterococci isolated from beef cattle. Front. Microbiol. 4, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00133 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexander T. et al. Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 4405–4416 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Klima C. L. et al. Pathogens of bovine respiratory disease in North American feedlots conferring multidrug resistance via integrative conjugative elements. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52, 438–448 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Booker C. W. et al. Microbiological and histopathological findings in cases of fatal bovine respiratory disease of feedlot cattle in western Canada. Can. Vet, J. 49, 473–81 (2008). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Taylor J., Holland B., Step D., Payton M. & Confer A. Nasal isolation of Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida as predictors of respiratory disease in shipped calves. Res. Vet. Sci. 99, 41–45 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Portis E., Lindeman C., Johansen L. & Stoltman G. A ten-year (2000–2009) study of antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria that cause bovine respiratory disease complex—Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni—in the United States and Canada. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 24, 932–944 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dowd S. E. et al. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). BMC Microbiol. 8, 125, doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-125 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gdoura R. et al. Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum, Mycoplasma hominis and Mycoplasma genitalium infections and semen quality of infertile men. BMC Infect. Dis. 7, 129, doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-129 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. VanInsberghe D., Hartmann M., Stewart G. R. & Mohn W. W. Isolation of a substantial proportion of forest soil bacterial communities detected via pyrotag sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 2096–2098 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rhoads D. D., Cox S. B., Rees E. J., Sun Y. & Wolcott R. D. Clinical identification of bacteria in human chronic wound infections: culturing vs. 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing. BMC Infect. Dis. 12, 321, doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-321 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rhoads D. D., Wolcott R. D., Sun Y. & Dowd S. E. Comparison of culture and molecular identification of bacteria in chronic wounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 2535–2550 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Weese J. S., Slifierz M., Jalali M. & Friendship R. Evaluation of the nasal microbiota in slaughter-age pigs and the impact on nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage. BMC Vet. Res. 10, 69, doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-69 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Misic A. M. et al. The shared microbiota of humans and companion animals as evaluated from Staphylococcus carriage sites. Microbiome 3, 2, doi: 10.1186/s40168-014-0052-7 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bogaert D. et al. Variability and diversity of nasopharyngeal microbiota in children: a metagenomic analysis. PLOS ONE 6, e17035, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017035 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gagea M. I. et al. Naturally Occurring Mycoplasma Bovis—Associated Pneumonia and Polyarthritis in Feedlot Beef Calves. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 18, 29–40 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Caswell J. L., Bateman K. G., Cai H. Y. & Castillo-Alcala F. Mycoplasma bovis in respiratory disease of feedlot cattle. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 26, 365–379 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Blondeau J., Borsos S., Blondeau L., Blondeau B. & Hesje C. Comparative minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention drug concentrations of enrofloxacin, ceftiofur, florfenicol, tilmicosin and tulathromycin against bovine clinical isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica. Vet. Microbiol. 160, 85–90 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Edwards T. Control methods for bovine respiratory disease for feedlot cattle. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 26, 273–284 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schneider M., Tait R., Busby W. & Reecy J. An evaluation of bovine respiratory disease complex in feedlot cattle: Impact on performance and carcass traits using treatment records and lung lesion scores. J. Anim. Sci. 87, 1821–1827 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Klima C. L., Alexander T. W., Hendrick S. & McAllister T. A. Characterization of Mannheimia haemolytica isolated from feedlot cattle that were healthy or treated for bovine respiratory disease. Can. J. Vet. Res. 78, 38–45 (2014). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fredrickson J. K. et al. Towards environmental systems biology of Shewanella. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6, 592–603 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Barlow R. S., Pemberton J. M., Desmarchelier P. M. & Gobius K. S. Isolation and characterization of integron-containing bacteria without antibiotic selection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 838–842 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hattori K. & Matsui H. Diversity of fumarate reducing bacteria in the bovine rumen revealed by culture dependent and independent approaches. Anaerobe 14, 87–93 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shanks O. C. et al. Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 2992–3001 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Xu Y. et al. Escherichia coli O157: H7 super-shedder and non-shedder feedlot steers harbour distinct fecal bacterial communities. PLOS ONE 9, e98115, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098115 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim M. et al. Investigation of bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle fed different diets. J. Anim. Sci. 92, 683–694 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Catry B. et al. Variability in acquired resistance of Pasteurella and Mannheimia isolates from the nasopharynx of calves, with particular reference to different herd types. Microb. Drug Resist. 11, 387–394 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krone C. L., Biesbroek G., Trzciński K., Sanders E. A. & Bogaert D. Respiratory microbiota dynamics following Streptococcus pneumoniae acquisition in young and elderly mice. Infect. Immun. 82, 1725–1731 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thoetkiattikul H. et al. Comparative analysis of microbial profiles in cow rumen fed with different dietary fiber by tagged 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. Curr. Microbiol. 67, 130–137 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Santos T. M. & Bicalho R. C. Diversity and succession of bacterial communities in the uterine fluid of postpartum metritic, endometritic and healthy dairy cows. PLOS ONE 7, e53048, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053048 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Cremers A. J. et al. The adult nasopharyngeal microbiome as a determinant of pneumococcal acquisition. Microbiome 2, 44, doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-44 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Olfert E. D., Cross B. M. & McWilliam A. A. Guide to The Care and Use of Experimental Animals. Vol. 1. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. (1993). [Google Scholar]
  35. Sunna A. & Bergquist P. L. A gene encoding a novel extremely thermostable 1,4-β-xylanase isolated directly from an environmental DNA sample. Extremophiles 7, 63–70 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Reysenbach A.-L., Giver L. J., Wickham G. S. & Pace N. R. Differential amplification of rRNA genes by polymerase chain reaction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 3417–3418 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gunderson J., McCutchan T. & Sogin M. Sequence of the Small Subunit Ribosomal RNA Gene Expressed in the Bloodstream Stages of Plasmodium berghei: Evolutionary Implications1. The Journal of protozoology 33, 525–529 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Caporaso J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Edgar R. C., Haas B. J., Clemente J. C., Quince C. & Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Edgar R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pruesse E. et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 7188–7196 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang Q., Garrity G. M., Tiedje J. M. & Cole J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Caporaso J. G. et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26, 266–267 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shannon C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. 27, 623 (1948). [Google Scholar]
  45. Chao A. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat, 265–270 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  46. Faith D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  47. Good I. J. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40, 237–264 (1953). [Google Scholar]
  48. Lozupone C. & Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8228–8235 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vázquez-Baeza Y., Pirrung M., Gonzalez A. & Knight R. EMPeror: a tool for visualizing high-throughput microbial community data. Gigascience. 2, 16, doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-2-16 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Benjamini Y. & Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. Met. 289–300 (1995). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep15557-s1.doc (97KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES