Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2014 Oct 31;9(11):e973818. doi: 10.4161/15592324.2014.973818

Calcium signaling and biotic defense responses in plants

Lei Zhang 1,2,, Liqun Du 2,3, BW Poovaiah 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC4623097  PMID: 25482778

Abstract

Calcium (Ca2+) acts as an important second messenger in plant cells. Cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration in plant cells changes rapidly and dynamically in response to various endogenous or environmental cues. Elevation in calcium concentration in plant cells is an essential early event during plant defense responses. Alterations in the Ca2+ concentration are sensed by Ca2+-binding proteins, including calmodulin, calcium-dependent protein kinases and calcineurin B-like proteins, which relay or decode the encoded Ca2+ signals into specific cellular and physiological responses in order to survive challenges by pathogens. Genetic and functional studies have revealed that Ca2+ signaling plays both positive and negative roles in regulating the establishment of defense responses. Furthermore, recent studies revealed that actions of Ca2+-mediated signaling could be regulated by other cell signaling systems such as the ubiquitin-proteasome system to mount precise and prompt plant defense responses.

Keywords: calcium signaling, calmodulin, CaM-binding proteins, CDPKs, plant defense


Transient and drastic changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration in plant cells upon pathogen infection have been shown to be an essential early signaling event for plant defense responses.1,2 The information encoded by the Ca2+ transients is interpreted by Ca2+-binding proteins into specific physiological responses to cope with pathogen attacks.3 This mini-review summarizes the current knowledge on the roles of Ca2+ signaling-encoding and decoding networks during plant-pathogen interactions.

Ca2+ transients: an essential early event during plant-pathogen interactions

In unstimulated cells, cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations are usually maintained at lower levels, around 100 nM.4 Elevation in calcium concentration in plant cells is an early event upon pathogen challenge and is believed to be caused by Ca2+ influx into cytosol.5 Ca2+ transients have been observed in both compatible and incompatible plant-pathogen interactions. Changes in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration had been monitored in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia cells following treatment of cryptogein, an elicitor secreted by oomycete Phytophthora cryptogea.6 Other elicitors such as Pep-13 peptide from P. megasperma and an oligopeptide elicitor derived from a cell wall protein of P. sojae were also shown to induce Ca2+ transients in suspension-cultured cells of parsley.7-9 Changes in Ca2+ concentration had also been detected during effector-triggered immunity (ETI), specifically in the incompatible interactions between Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (containing avrRpm1) and RPM1 in Arabidopsis.10 Interestingly, the pattern and dynamics of changes in Ca2+ concentrations were quite different in compatible and incompatible plant-pathogen interactions,2 which may be related to the distinct defense responses in pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI). These changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration were shown to correlate with the subsequent defense related physiological responses in host cells such as production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO), as well as induced expression of PR genes.

Calmodulin (CaM) and CaM-binding proteins in plant defense responses

Changes in Ca2+ concentrations evoked by a specific stimulus is usually perceived by sensor proteins which interpret the encoded Ca2+ signals with signature features into appropriate molecular and biochemical responses.11 In plants, there are diverse Ca2+-binding proteins that serve as sensors to monitor cellular Ca2+ changes. Calmodulins belong to a primary and prototypical class of calcium sensor in all eukaryotic cells. It has 2 separate globular domains, each having a pair of EF-hands, connected by a flexible helical region, so each CaM binds to 4 Ca2+ ions. Generally, CaM has no catalytic activities of its own, but upon binding to Ca2+ via the EF-hand motif it changes its configuration leading to exposure of hydrophobic regions that form high affinity binding sites for downstream target proteins.12 Hence, CaM functions by binding and regulating the activities of various downstream CaM-binding proteins (CaMBPs). Thus, CaMBPs provide another level of specificity for Ca2+ signaling since different CaMBPs trigger specific physiological responses.3

AtSR1/CAMTA3 in Arabidopsis is one of the best-studied CaMBPs involved in plant defense. The early ethylene-responsive gene, NtER1, an ortholog of AtSR1, was first identified in tobacco plants.13 Later, 6 homologs of NtER1, AtSR1–6/CAMTA1–6, were identified in Arabidopsis and found to be induced rapidly and differently by various external stimuli.14, 15 Further functional analysis of one of these genes, AtSR1, connected Ca2+ signals directly to plant pathogen defense response through negative regulation of the activation of pathway of the well-known plant defense hormone, salicylic acid (SA).16,17 SA is recognized as a necessary endogenous signal mediating plant defense against pathogens. Detailed studies revealed that EDS1, a positive regulator of SA biosynthesis, is a direct target of AtSR1. Most importantly, the CaM-binding to AtSR1 is required for its proper function in suppressing the expression of EDS1ref.16 The negative regulation of plant immunity by Ca2+/CaM/AtSR1 is believed to prevent mis-activation of plant defense or to balance defense response. In addition, genetic screening for Arabidopsis mutants led to the discoveries of gain-of-function mutation of AtSR1, and confirming the negative role of AtSR1 in plant defense.18,19 In addition, barley CaM-binding protein, MLO, acts as a repressor of plant defense against powdery mildew, and also, CaM-binding to MLO is important for its negative regulation of plant defense.20

Another CaM-binding transcription factor, CBP60g, has also been shown to be involved in plant defense by regulating SA biosynthesis. Unlike AtSR1, CBP60g plays a positive role in SA-mediated defense response.21-23 CBP60 is believed to bind to and activate the expression of SA biosynthesis gene ICS1, providing a direct channel for Ca2+ signal to activate defense responses.

Identification and functional characterization of other CaMBPs revealed that Ca2+/CaM also regulate other aspects of plant defense. Pathogen attacks induce rapid production of nitric oxide (NO) in plants, which serves as a modulator of disease resistance by triggering hypersensitive cell death and activating the expression of several defense genes.24 AtNOS1 (nitric oxide synthase) in Arabidopsis contains CaM-binding motifs and Ca2+/CaM is necessary for the full activation of the enzyme.25 Furthermore, the atnos1 mutant exhibited more susceptibility to pathogenic bacteria, thus AtNOS1 may serve as a hub linking Ca2+/CaM signaling to NO-mediated defense response. Besides, rapid production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is another early event during plant response to pathogen invasion, and accumulation of ROS is critical for the onset of hypersensitive response (HR) which limits the spread of disease from the infection site. Ca2+ influx has been shown to be necessary for the controlled generation of H2O2.26 NAD kinase was found to be a CaMBP involved in the generation of elicitor-induced ROS burst. The possible underlying mechanism is that NAD kinase activated by Ca2+/CaM enhanced ROS production by increasing the NAD(H)/NADP(H) ratio.27

Besides canonic CaMs, there are multiple (50 in Arabidopsis) CaM-like proteins (CMLs) in plants which contain EF-hand motifs but no other known functional domains and share at least 16% amino acid identity with CaM.28 In contrast to the 7 CaM genes which are uniformly and highly expressed, the expression patterns of different CMLs vary at developmental stages, in different tissues and in response to environmental stimuli, indicating that distinct CMLs in plants may have specific roles.28 Recently, the Arabidopsis CML9 was reported to act as a positive regulator of plant defense against different strains of bacterial pathogen P. syringae29

Ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is another signaling pathway that is well conserved in different organisms.30 UPS is one of the best characterized pathways for selective protein degradation and it has been connected to almost all aspects of plant biology.31 Furthermore, UPS has been shown to play both positive and negative regulation on plant defense responses. UPS has been reported to be actively involved in plant immune responses by regulating the actions of defense-related hormones including jasmonate (JA), ethylene (ET) and SA.32-35 In Arabidopsis, the U-box E3 ligases PUB12 and PUB13 have been shown to attenuate plant defense by promoting the protein degradation of pattern recognition receptor (PRR) Flagellin Sensing2 (FLS2).36, 37 However, involvement of cross-talk between Ca2+ signaling and UPS in plant defense responses is not clear. Our recent study of Ca2+/CaM/AtSR1 signaling revealed that an AtSR1-interaction protein, SR1IP1 which functions as substrate adaptor in E3 ligase, could contribute to the transient derepression of SA-mediated defense exerted by AtSR1/CAMTA3 at a time of necessity,38 suggesting a mechanism of precise control on the establishment of plant immunity through the crosstalk between Ca2+/CaM- and UPS-mediated signal pathways. In addition, other types of Ca2+-binding proteins which are different from CaM or CMLs in structure and function are also known to play active roles in regulating plant immune responses.

Ca2+-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) in plant-pathogen interactions

Another well-studied type of Ca2+ sensor-effector is Ca2+-dependent protein kinase. The canonical structure of CDPK contains a Ca2+−binding domain of 4 EF-hand motifs fused to the C-terminus of a Ser/Thr kinase domain with a junction of an autoinhibiotory domain (Harmon et al., 2000). The binding of Ca2+ to the EF-hand motif induces a conformational change leading to relief of the inhibition of kinase activity, so specific substrates are phosphorylated by CDPKs. Therefore, changes in Ca2+ concentrations are translated into phosphorylation events and eventually to downstream physiological responses.39

CDPKs have been shown to be involved in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses, as well as plant growth and development.40 CDPKs participate in hormone signaling, oxidative burst and gene expression network to regulate plant defense responses.41 The Nicotiana tabaccum NtCDPK2 was the first CDPK known to be involved in ETI triggered by the fungal elicitor Avr9.42 The Arabidopsis AtCPK1 is able to phosphorylate phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) in vitro, and PAL has been shown to be a critical player in an alternate pathway to produce SA.43 In Arabidopsis, the bacterial elicitor flg22 induced multiple CDPK activities. Furthermore, 4 AtCDPKs (AtCPK4, 5, 6, and 11) have been shown to function as early transcriptional regulators in PAMP signal pathways.44 In addition, a subset of CDPKs were able to phosphorylate the NADPH oxidase isoform, RBOHD, indicating the involvement of CDPKs in ROS-mediated signal transduction.45 Besides, a few CDPKs have been shown to be negative regulators in plant defense responses. Overexpression of OsCPK12 in rice led to hypersensitivity to both virulent and avirulent blast fungi, probably due to compromised ROS production.46 In summary, CDPKs serve as important Ca2+ sensors to translate the information to downstream processes during plant responses to pathogen challenges. CDPKs participate in plant defense by interacting and phosphorylating diverse substrates to regulate different aspects of immune responses.

Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs)

Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) are plant-specific Ca2+ sensor proteins. CBLs are very similar to both the regulatory β subunit of calcineurin and neuronal calcium sensors.47 CBLs contain EF-hand motifs as Ca2+-binding domain and interact specifically with a family of Ser/Thr protein kinases, CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) to relay Ca2+signals.48,49 CIPKs are closely related to sucrose non-fermenting-like and cAMP-dependent kinases from other organisms. Protein interaction analysis identified a conserved 24-amino acid motif in the C-terminal non-kinase region of CIPKs that is sufficient and necessary to mediated CBL-CIPK interaction.50 Recently, the tomato calcineurin B-like protein 10 (Cbl10)/ calcineurin B-like interacting protein kinase 6 (Cipk6) signaling module has been shown to be involved in ROS signaling during plant-pathogen interactions.51 Besides, 2 CIPKs, OsCIPK14 and OsCIPK15, have been shown to participate in PTI.52

Conclusion

Changes in cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations in plant cells upon pathogen challenge has been observed for almost a decade and recognized as an early event essential for plant defense responses. Identification and analysis of CaM-binding proteins,CDPKs and other Ca2+ sensors revealed that Ca2+ signaling participates in diverse aspects of plant defense responses. Interestingly, it is known that Ca2+ signaling plays both positive and negative roles in plant-pathogen interactions. The complexity of Ca2+ signaling may be coordinated by other regulatory pathways including the ubiquitin/proteasome system to reach effective and balanced plant defense responses. Further functional studies of more signaling components in Ca2+ signaling may help to better understand its roles in plant immunity and help to improve disease resistance of crop plants.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

We thank Lorie Mochel and Ade Snider, Washington State University, for their help in preparing the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant 1021344, and the National Science Foundation of China grant U1130304.

References

  • 1. DeFalco TA, Bender KW, Snedden WA. Breaking the code: Ca2+ sensors in plant signalling. Biochem J 2010; 425:27-40; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1042/BJ20091147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lecourieux D, Ranjeva R, Pugin A. Calcium in plant defence-signalling pathways. New Phytol 2006; 171:249-69; PMID:16866934; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01777.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Poovaiah BW, Du L, Wang H, Yang T. Recent advances in calcium/calmodulin-mediated signaling with an emphasis on plant-microbe interactions. Plant Physiol 2013; 163:531-42; PMID:24014576; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.113.220780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sanders D, Brownlee C, Harper JF. Communicating with calcium. Plant Cell 1999; 11:691-706; PMID:10213787; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.11.4.691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ma W, Berkowitz GA. The grateful dead: calcium and cell death in plant innate immunity. Cell Microbiol 2007; 9:2571-85; PMID:17714518; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01031.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lecourieux D, Mazars C, Pauly N, Ranjeva R, Pugin A. Analysis and effects of cytosolic free calcium increases in response to elicitors in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia cells. The Plant cell 2002; 14:2627-41; PMID:12368509; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.005579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Blume B, Nurnberger T, Nass N, Scheel D. Receptor-mediated increase in cytoplasmic free calcium required for activation of pathogen defense in parsley. The Plant cell 2000; 12:1425-40; PMID:10948260; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.12.8.1425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Nurnberger T, Nennstiel D, Jabs T, Sacks WR, Hahlbrock K, Scheel D. High affinity binding of a fungal oligopeptide elicitor to parsley plasma membranes triggers multiple defense responses. Cell 1994; 78:449-60; PMID:8062387; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90423-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zimmermann S, Nurnberger T, Frachisse JM, Wirtz W, Guern J, Hedrich R, Scheel D. Receptor-mediated activation of a plant Ca2+-permeable ion channel involved in pathogen defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:2751-5; PMID:11038609; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Grant M, Brown I, Adams S, Knight M, Ainslie A, Mansfield J. The RPM1 plant disease resistance gene facilitates a rapid and sustained increase in cytosolic calcium that is necessary for the oxidative burst and hypersensitive cell death. Plant J 2000; 23:441-50; PMID:10972870; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00804.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. McAinsh MR, Hetherington AM. Encoding specificity in Ca2+ signalling systems. Trends Plant Sci 1998; 3:32-6; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S1360-1385(97)01150-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ishida H, Vogel HJ. Protein-peptide interaction studies demonstrate the versatility of calmodulin target protein binding. Protein Pept Lett 2006; 13:455-65; PMID:16800798; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2174/092986606776819600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yang T, Poovaiah BW. An early ethylene up-regulated gene encoding a calmodulin-binding protein involved in plant senescence and death. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:38467-73; PMID:10952977; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M003566200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yang T, Poovaiah BW. A calmodulin-binding/CGCG box DNA-binding protein family involved in multiple signaling pathways in plants. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:45049-58; PMID:12218065; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M207941200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bouche N, Scharlat A, Snedden W, Bouchez D, Fromm H. A novel family of calmodulin-binding transcription activators in multicellular organisms. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:21851-61; PMID:11925432; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M200268200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Du L, Ali GS, Simons KA, Hou J, Yang T, Reddy AS, et al. . Ca(2+)/calmodulin regulates salicylic-acid-mediated plant immunity. Nature 2009; 457:1154-8; PMID:19122675; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature07612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Galon Y, Nave R, Boyce JM, Nachmias D, Knight MR, Fromm H. Calmodulin-binding transcription activator (CAMTA) 3 mediates biotic defense responses in Arabidopsis. FEBS letters 2008; 582:943-8; PMID:18298954; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nie H, Zhao C, Wu G, Wu Y, Chen Y, Tang D. SR1, a calmodulin-binding transcription factor, modulates plant defense and ethylene-induced senescence by directly regulating NDR1 and EIN3. Plant Physiol 2012; 158:1847-59; PMID:22345509; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.111.192310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jing B, Xu S, Xu M, Li Y, Li S, Ding J, et al. . Brush and spray: a high-throughput systemic acquired resistance assay suitable for large-scale genetic screening. Plant Physiol 2011; 157:973-80; PMID:21900483; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.111.182089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kim MC, Panstruga R, Elliott C, Muller J, Devoto A, Yoon HW, Park HC, Cho MJ, Schulze-Lefert P. Calmodulin interacts with MLO protein to regulate defence against mildew in barley. Nature 2002; 416:447-51; PMID:11919636; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/416447a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wang L, Tsuda K, Truman W, Sato M, Nguyen le V, Katagiri F, Glazebrook J. CBP60g and SARD1 play partially redundant critical roles in salicylic acid signaling. Plant J 2011; 67:1029-41; PMID:21615571; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04655.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wang L, Tsuda K, Sato M, Cohen JD, Katagiri F, Glazebrook J. Arabidopsis CaM binding protein CBP60g contributes to MAMP-induced SA accumulation and is involved in disease resistance against Pseudomonas syringae. PLoS Pathog 2009; 5:e1000301; PMID:19214217; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhang Y, Xu S, Ding P, Wang D, Cheng YT, He J, Gao M, Xu F, Li Y, Zhu Z, et al. . Control of salicylic acid synthesis and systemic acquired resistance by two members of a plant-specific family of transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:18220-5; PMID:20921422; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1005225107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hong JK, Yun BW, Kang JG, Raja MU, Kwon E, Sorhagen K, Chu C, Wang Y, Loake GJ. Nitric oxide function and signalling in plant disease resistance. J Exp Bot 2008; 59:147-54; PMID:18039741; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/erm244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Guo FQ, Okamoto M, Crawford NM. Identification of a plant nitric oxide synthase gene involved in hormonal signaling. Science 2003; 302:100-3; PMID:14526079; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1086770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Neill SJ, Desikan R, Clarke A, Hurst RD, Hancock JT. Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide as signalling molecules in plants. J Exp Bot 2002; 53:1237-47; PMID:11997372; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Harding SA, Oh SH, Roberts DM. Transgenic tobacco expressing a foreign calmodulin gene shows an enhanced production of active oxygen species. Embo J 1997; 16:1137-44; PMID:9135130; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/emboj/16.6.1137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. McCormack E, Tsai YC, Braam J. Handling calcium signaling: Arabidopsis CaMs and CMLs. Trends Plant Sci 2005; 10:383-9; PMID:16023399; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Leba LJ, Cheval C, Ortiz-Martin I, Ranty B, Beuzon CR, Galaud JP, Aldon D. CML9, an Arabidopsis calmodulin-like protein, contributes to plant innate immunity through a flagellin-dependent signalling pathway. Plant J 2012; 71:976-89; PMID:22563930; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05045.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Li W, Ye Y. Polyubiquitin chains: functions, structures, and mechanisms. Cell Mol Life Sci : CMLS 2008; 65:2397-406; PMID:18438605; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s00018-008-8090-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chen L, Hellmann H. Plant E3 ligases: flexible enzymes in a sessile world. Mol Plant 2013; 6:1388-404; PMID:23307436; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/mp/sst005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Perez AC, Goossens A. Jasmonate signalling: a copycat of auxin signalling? Plant Cell Environ 2013; 36:2071-84; PMID:23611666; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/pce.12121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Hayashi K. The interaction and integration of auxin signaling components. Plant Cell Physiol 2012; 53:965-75; PMID:22433459; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pcs035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yan S, Dong X. Perception of the plant immune signal salicylic acid. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2014; 20C:64-8; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lyzenga WJ, Stone SL. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis through protein degradation. Plant Signal Behav 2012; 7:1438-42; PMID:22990452; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/psb.21930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Lu D, Lin W, Gao X, Wu S, Cheng C, Avila J, Heese A, Devarenne TP, He P, Shan L. Direct ubiquitination of pattern recognition receptor FLS2 attenuates plant innate immunity. Science 2011; 332:1439-42; PMID:21680842; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1204903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Smith JM, Salamango DJ, Leslie ME, Collins CA, Heese A. Sensitivity to Flg22 is modulated by ligand-induced degradation and de novo synthesis of the endogenous flagellin-receptor FLAGELLIN-SENSING2. Plant Physiol 2014; 164:440-54; PMID:24220680; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.113.229179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zhang L, Du L, Shen C, Yang Y, Poovaiah BW. Regulation of plant immunity through ubiquitin-mediated modulation of Ca(2+) -calmodulin-AtSR1/CAMTA3 signaling. Plant J 2014; 78:269-81; PMID:24528504; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/tpj.12473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wernimont AK, Artz JD, Finerty P Jr., Lin YH, Amani M, Allali-Hassani A, Senisterra G, Vedadi M, Tempel W, Mackenzie F, et al. . Structures of apicomplexan calcium-dependent protein kinases reveal mechanism of activation by calcium. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010; 17:596-601; PMID:20436473; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nsmb.1795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ludwig AA, Romeis T, Jones JD. CDPK-mediated signalling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. J Exp Bot 2004; 55:181-8; PMID:14623901; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/erh008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Schulz P, Herde M, Romeis T. Calcium-dependent protein kinases: hubs in plant stress signaling and development. Plant Physiol 2013; 163:523-30; PMID:24014579; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.113.222539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Romeis T, Ludwig AA, Martin R, Jones JD. Calcium-dependent protein kinases play an essential role in a plant defence response. EMBO J 2001; 20:5556-67; PMID:11597999; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/emboj/20.20.5556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Cheng SH, Sheen J, Gerrish C, Bolwell GP. Molecular identification of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase as a substrate of a specific constitutively active Arabidopsis CDPK expressed in maize protoplasts. FEBS Lett 2001; 503:185-8; PMID:11513879; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02732-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Boudsocq M, Willmann MR, McCormack M, Lee H, Shan L, He P, Bush J, Cheng SH, Sheen J. Differential innate immune signalling via Ca(2+) sensor protein kinases. Nature 2010; 464:418-22; PMID:20164835; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature08794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Gao X, Chen X, Lin W, Chen S, Lu D, Niu Y, et al. . Bifurcation of Arabidopsis NLR immune signaling via Ca(2)(+)-dependent protein kinases. PLoS Pathog 2013; 9:e1003127; PMID:23382673; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Asano T, Hayashi N, Kobayashi M, Aoki N, Miyao A, Mitsuhara I, Ichikawa H, Komatsu S, Hirochika H, Kikuchi S, et al. . A rice calcium-dependent protein kinase OsCPK12 oppositely modulates salt-stress tolerance and blast disease resistance. Plant J 2012; 69:26-36; PMID:21883553; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04766.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Kudla J, Xu Q, Harter K, Gruissem W, Luan S. Genes for calcineurin B-like proteins in Arabidopsis are differentially regulated by stress signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:4718-23; PMID:10200328; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Kim KN, Cheong YH, Gupta R, Luan S. Interaction specificity of Arabidopsis calcineurin B-like calcium sensors and their target kinases. Plant Physiol 2000; 124:1844-53; PMID:11115898; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.124.4.1844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Shi J, Kim KN, Ritz O, Albrecht V, Gupta R, Harter K, Luan S, Kudla J. Novel protein kinases associated with calcineurin B-like calcium sensors in Arabidopsis. The Plant cell 1999; 11:2393-405; PMID:10590166; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.11.12.2393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Albrecht V, Ritz O, Linder S, Harter K, Kudla J. The NAF domain defines a novel protein-protein interaction module conserved in Ca2+-regulated kinases. EMBO J 2001; 20:1051-63; PMID:11230129; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/emboj/20.5.1051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. de la Torre F, Gutierrez-Beltran E, Pareja-Jaime Y, Chakravarthy S, Martin GB, del Pozo O. The tomato calcium sensor Cbl10 and its interacting protein kinase Cipk6 define a signaling pathway in plant immunity. Plant Cell 2013; 25:2748-64; PMID:23903322; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1105/tpc.113.113530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Kurusu T, Hamada J, Hamada H, Hanamata S, Kuchitsu K. Roles of calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinases in innate immunity in rice. Plant Signal Behav 2010; 5:1045-7; PMID:20724838; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/psb.5.8.12407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES