Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2015 Oct 9;6:8491. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9491

Large cooperativity and microkelvin cooling with a three-dimensional optomechanical cavity

Mingyun Yuan 1, Vibhor Singh 1, Yaroslav M Blanter 1, Gary A Steele 1,a
PMCID: PMC4633713  PMID: 26450772

Abstract

In cavity optomechanics, light is used to control mechanical motion. A central goal of the field is achieving single-photon strong coupling, which would enable the creation of quantum superposition states of motion. Reaching this limit requires significant improvements in optomechanical coupling and cavity coherence. Here we introduce an optomechanical architecture consisting of a silicon nitride membrane coupled to a three-dimensional superconducting microwave cavity. Exploiting their large quality factors, we achieve an optomechanical cooperativity of 146,000 and perform sideband cooling of the kilohertz-frequency membrane motion to 34±5 μK, the lowest mechanical mode temperature reported to date. The achieved cooling is limited only by classical noise of the signal generator, and should extend deep into the ground state with superconducting filters. Our results suggest that this realization of optomechanics has the potential to reach the regimes of ultra-large cooperativity and single-photon strong coupling, opening up a new generation of experiments.

Inline graphicOptomechanics is the use of light to control the motion of a mechanical resonator, potentially cooling it to the quantum ground state. Here, the authors cool a millimetre-scale silicon nitride membrane to an effective temperature of 34 microkelvin by coupling it to a three-dimensional microwave cavity.

In recent years, cavity optomechanics has been used to realize a wide range of exciting experiments with mechanical resonators, including achieving exquisite measurement precision1,2,3, strong coupling between the mechanical and cavity modes4,5,6, cooling to the quantum ground state7,8, for microwave amplification9,10, to entangle propagating microwave photons with mechanical motion11, for microwave photon storage12,13, to observe quantum back-action noise14, to generate squeezed light15,16 and to transduce photons between the optical and microwave domains17,18,19. These successful experiments, performed in the regime of linear optomechanics, were enabled by improvements of the coherence of the optomechanical coupling between light and motion.

In linear optomechanics, the relevant figure of merit for the optomechanical coupling is a parameter called cooperativity. Cooperativity combines the optomechanical coupling rate g, the cavity decay rate κ and the mechanical decay rate γm into a dimensionless constant Inline graphic that quantifies the optomechanical system's efficiency in exchanging photons and phonons20. It is similar to the Purcell factor in atomic physics (also often referred to as cooperativity) describing the coupling between cavity fields and atoms. An advantage of linear optomechanics is that compared with the single-photon coupling rate g0, the multiphoton coupling rate g is significantly enhanced, given by Inline graphic where Nd is the number of photons used to drive the cavity. The relevant limit for cooperativity in quantum experiments is the so-called quantum coherent limit, in which the cooperativity is larger than the number of equilibrium thermal quanta in the mechanical resonator. In the quantum coherent limit, an exchange of a photon and phonon occurs faster than the time it takes for a phonon to leak into the mechanical resonator ground state from the thermal bath. Achieving higher cooperativity that is deeper in the quantum coherent limit in linear optomechanics would imply the ability to cool closer to the quantum ground state and the preparation of mechanical quantum states with high fidelity.

Beyond linear optomechanics, the field is striving to reach the limit of single-photon strong coupling, in which interaction of light and mechanical motion is coherent at the level of a single photon. In this limit, the single-photon coupling rate g0 exceeds both the cavity decay rate κ and the mechanical decay rate γm (g0>κ, γm). If one could reach this limit, one could take advantage of the intrinsic nonlinearity of the optomechanical coupling at the single-photon level to construct quantum superpositions of mechanical motion using optomechanics with classical light. In current experiments Inline graphic, and existing optomechanical implementations would require significant improvements in g0 and/or κ to approach single-photon strong coupling.

Here we present an optomechanical architecture with large optomechanical coupling that can potentially reach the single-photon strong coupling limit. The design combines two highly coherent elements that are applied for the first time in the microwave optomechanics domain. The first element is a millimetre-sized, nanometre-thick high-stress silicon nitride (SiNx) membrane, a technology that has demonstrated quality factors up to 1 × 107 at cryogenic temperatures21. Such membranes have been used extensively in the optical domain14,16,22,23,24 and in transducer applications18,19, but have not yet been explored as an element in a pure microwave optomechanical system. The second optomechanical element is a three-dimensional (3D) microwave cavity, recently popular in the superconducting qubit community for their exceptional coherence times25,26,27. By combining these two elements, we create an optomechanical platform with large cooperativity, demonstrate cooling to the lowest mechanical mode temperature reported to date, and show that this system has the potential to scale to couplings significantly beyond the state of the art.

Results

Description and characterization of the device

Figure 1 illustrates the principle of this 3D optomechanical platform. The mechanical resonator is made from high-stress SiNx membrane (Fig. 1a) that is metallized with an Al electrode. The cavity itself is an aluminium box (Fig. 1b) in which electromagnetic fields are confined by superconducting walls in all three dimensions. Coupling to the motion of the membrane is achieved by using a flip-chip technique to place the membrane on top of antenna electrodes on a separate substrate (Fig. 1c–e). Figure 1f shows an effective lumped-element circuit model of the assembled cavity and membrane. Optomechanical coupling results from the modulation of the effective shunt capacitance when the membrane displaces, changing the cavity frequency. From finite-element simulations, we estimate a single-photon coupling rate of g0=(dω0/dx)·xzpf=2π × 0.36 Hz, where ω0 is the cavity mode frequency, x is the mechanical displacement of the membrane and xzpf is the amplitude of its zero-point fluctuation. The simplicity of the assembly of this 3D cavity architecture also makes it attractive for implementing devices such as microwave-to-optical transducers17,18,19 by potentially incorporating an optical fibre into the superconducting box.

Figure 1. Microwave optomechanics with a 3D superconducting cavity and a millimetre-sized membrane.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Electron microscope image of a 50-nm-thick SiNx membrane. (b) One half of the Al cavity with an SMA connector for reflection measurements. The dimensions of the cavity are 28 × 28 × 8 mm. (c) Schematic showing the placement of the membrane over the antenna pads. The Al coating of the membrane forms a capacitor with the antennas below. (d) A complete assembly. The membrane is positioned in the centre of the cavity, supported by a sapphire substrate patterned with the Al antenna. (e) An optical microscope image looking from the top showing the Al-coated membrane and the underlying antenna pads. (f) Effective lumped-element model of the cavity and membrane. By changing the effective shunt capacitance, the frequency of the 3D cavity is modulated by the mechanical motion of the membrane.

Measurements are performed in a dilution refrigerator with a base temperature of Tb=13 mK (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 1). Figure 2a shows a measurement of the reflection coefficient Inline graphic of the cavity. From a fit to the data, we find a total linewidth of κ=2π × 45.5 kHz, corresponding to a loaded quality factor of QL=1.1 × 105. From power dependence, we find a maximum intracavity photon occupation Nmax=1.3 × 108 before the onset of a nonlinear response. The ratio η=κe/κ≈0.48 of the external decay rate κe and κ indicates that the cavity is slightly undercoupled (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 2).

Figure 2. High-quality factors of the microwave cavity and mechanical resonator.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Reflection coefficient Inline graphic measurement of the cavity. The loaded quality factor is QL=1.1 × 105, corresponding to a total decay rate κ=2π × 45.5 kHz. Internal dissipation rate is κ0=2π × 23.9 kHz, with internal quality factor Q0=2 × 105. (b) Power spectral density of the thermomechanical motion of the fundamental mode of the membrane ωm≈2π × 123 kHz with linewdith γm≈2π × 3.5 mHz, corresponding to Qm=3.5 × 107. Red: data; Grey: fit.

In Fig. 2b, we characterize the mechanical response of the membrane with the cavity using a resonant microwave tone injected at ω0. The thermomechanical motion of the membrane generates a peak in the sideband power spectral density (PSD) S(ω) of the microwave field leaving the cavity at a frequency offset Δω=ωm from the carrier signal, shown in Fig. 2b. We find a mechanical resonance frequency of ωm=2π × 123 kHz, consistent with expected fundamental mode frequency of the membrane. A Lorentzian fit yields a linewidth of γm=2π × 3.5 mHz, corresponding to an ultrahigh mechanical quality factor of Qm=3.5 × 107, significantly higher than the typical Inline graphic of membranes used in optomechanical and transducer experiments.

Large cooperativity

To quantify the strength of the optomechanical coupling, in Fig. 3 we measure the cooperativity C between the mechanical resonator and the cavity. Together with initial phonon occupancy of the mechanical resonator Inline graphic, several criteria can be conveniently expressed with C, such that for reaching the quantum ground state of motion, Inline graphic, or for reaching the radiation pressure shot noise limit, Inline graphic. To measure C, we use optomechanically induced transparency (OMIT)10,28,29, which allows one to directly determine the cooperativity with no free fit parameters. In OMIT, illustrated in Fig. 3a, the cavity is driven by a strong drive tone (ωd) while a second weak probe (ωp) is used to measure the cavity response. When driven on the red sideband (ωd=ω0−ωm), a transparency window appears within the broad resonance dip of the cavity reflection coefficient10. In the limit Inline graphic, the linewidth of the transparency window in Inline graphic is given by γm(C+1) and the peak value by C/(C+1). Figure 3b shows an example of an OMIT measurement with drive-photon number Nd=1.0 × 108: from the broadened linewidth of the feature together with its near unity transmission, we extract C=94,500. Figure 3c shows the extracted C for different drive powers: at the maximum power sustained by the cavity, we achieve Cmax=1.46 × 105.

Figure 3. Large cooperativity measured with OMIT.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Illustration showing the OMIT measurement scheme. The cavity reflection coefficient |S11| is measured with a weak probe tone (ωp) while driving the cavity with a second strong tone near the red sideband (ωd=ω0−ωm). A window of transparency appears in the cavity resonance (lower panel) with a width set by the mechanical linewdith. (b) Extracted cooperativity C versus driving photon number Nd. Grey line: expected linear scaling Inline graphic. At maximum Nd, the cooperativity reaches Cmax=1.46 × 105, corresponding to g=2π × 2.5 kHz.

Microkelvin cooling of the membrane resonator

The large cooperativity of our optomechanical set-up is, in principle, capable of cooling deep into the quantum ground state of motion if the mode is thermalized to the temperature of the fridge Inline graphic. To demonstrate the cooling of the resonator, in Fig. 4 we use the spectral density of the thermomechanical sideband to directly observe the phonon occupation of the membrane. While driving the cavity on the red sideband, the output microwave PSD S(ω0) at the cavity resonance frequency ω0 is given by:

Figure 4. Microkelvin cooling of a millimetre-sized mechanical resonator.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Measured microwave PSD S(ω) with red-sideband driving (top to bottom: C=324, 785, 3,810 and 94,500). Black dashed line: noise floor nadd of the amplifier chain. As the cooperativity C of the cooling tone is increased, S(ω0) is reduced and the mechanical linewdith is broadened. Initially, the thermal noise of the membrane appears as a peak with decreasing height. At higher C (lower two panels), the noise floor outside of the mechanical linewidth (green dashed line) begins to increase above nadd, indicating the presence of cavity noise. In the lowest panel, the output noise of the cavity is suppressed at ω0 due to correlations of the mechanical and cavity fluctuations. From the thermal peak and the cavity noise background level (green dashed line), we extract both nm and nc for all cooling powers (b). As a function of C, the mechanical occupancy nm (red circle) drops, closely following Inline graphic (blue line) until the onset of cavity noise nc (green squares) limits the final occupancy to a minimum of nm=5.2, corresponding to Tm=34 μK. The error bars indicate the uncertainty of the data points and are calculated with the errors from the Lorentzian fit. The green line in b shows the expected nc from the measured carrier sideband noise of the microwave generator.

graphic file with name ncomms9491-m12.jpg

where Svv(ω0) is the measured microwave PSD on the spectrum analyser, Inline graphic is the net gain of the signal path from the output of the cavity to the input of the spectrum analyser and nadd is the added photon noise quanta from the amplification chain referenced to the output of the cavity. By varying the bath temperature Tb and measuring Svv(ω), we obtain an absolute calibration of Inline graphic, nadd and Inline graphic (details provided in Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Notes 3 and 4). At the base temperature of the refrigerator, we find that the membrane is thermalized to Inline graphic mK, corresponding to Inline graphic. From the thermal calibration, we also extract g0=2π × 0.22 Hz, in good agreement with simulations (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 5).

Figure 4a shows S(ω) for different cooperativities C of the cooling tone. As C increases, S(ω0) from the thermomechanical noise peak decreases, indicating that the mode temperature of the mechanical resonator is reduced. At larger cooling powers, however, although S(ω0) continues to drop, the noise floor of S(ω) outside the mechanical bandwidth begins to increase, and the peak in the PSD becomes a dip (bottom two panels of Fig. 4a). The increase in the noise floor is an indication of noise fluctuations of the cavity field7. Owing to correlations between the fluctuations of the cavity and of the mechanical resonator, the spectrum shows a suppression of the total PSD at the cavity frequency30.

To extract the mechanical occupation factor in the presence of cavity noise, it is no longer sufficient to look only at S(ω0). In particular, with sufficiently large C (and in the absence of other sources of heating that would increase Inline graphic such as losses in the superconducting film or in the dielectric membrane or substrate), S(ω0) drops to the amplifier noise floor independent of the amount of cavity noise (equation (1)). This does not, however, imply that the mechanical mode is at zero temperature: due to the hybridization of the mechanical and optical fields, the final mechanical mode occupation in the presence of cavity noise is given by (Supplementary Note 6):

graphic file with name ncomms9491-m19.jpg

where nc is the cavity noise measured in energy quanta. To find the final occupation nm, one must also determine nc. In the limit Inline graphic, cavity noise appears as an increase in the noise floor outside of the mechanical sideband (green dashed line in Fig. 4a) with a spectral density (see Supplementary Note 6 for the more general equation of S(ω)):

graphic file with name ncomms9491-m21.jpg

where Inline graphic. From this expression, one can extract the cavity occupation nc and consequently nm for all powers, shown in Fig. 4b. As C is increased, we find that nm drops initially to a value of 5.2±0.7, corresponding to a mode temperature of 34±5 μK, beyond which the mechanical occupation begins to increase sharply due to heating from cavity noise. The temperature reported here is roughly a factor of two lower than that in recent experiments in the optical domain with silicon nitride membranes23,24 due to the very low frequency of our membrane.

Although the large cooperativity in our experiment should allow us to cool the membrane to nm=0.2 given the initial thermal occupation, in practice we are limited to nm=5.2±0.7 by cavity noise. To cool to lower occupation in future experiments, it is important to identify the source of this cavity noise. The green line in Fig. 4b shows the expected nc due to the carrier sideband noise of our microwave signal generator (Supplementary Note 7). The good agreement with the observed cavity noise data suggests that our final occupation is limited by the spectral purity of the microwave tone used for the sideband cooling.

Discussion

Having demonstrated the lowest temperature Tm=34 μK reported to date for a mechanical resonator, we analyse the potential of this implementation to reach the deep quantum coherent coupling limit. In the current experiment, the cooling is limited by the classical sideband noise of the signal generator. Removing this noise with a tunable superconducting cavity with a linewidth of 10 kHz would already provide sufficient suppression to cool to a final occupation of 0.2. A second approach would be to increase g0 by shrinking the capacitor gap: reducing the membrane-antenna gap from 3 μm to 100 nm would increase g0 by a factor of 103 and Cmax by 106. A third approach is to improve the cavity linewidth27, also yielding higher cooperativity at lower photon numbers. Finally, combining a smaller gap (g0∼300 Hz) with a better cavity (κ∼10 Hz) could yield ultrahigh cooperativities C>1012. Such a fully optimized design would also achieve single-photon strong coupling (g0>κ, γm)31,32, enabling preparation and detection of non-classical states of motion such as Fock states or Schrödinger cat states with optomechanics.

In conclusion, we have developed a novel optomechanical system coupling the motion of a millimetre-sized membrane to a 3D microwave cavity. Exploiting the high coherence of the membrane and of the cavity, we achieve a cooperativity of C>1.4 × 105 and perform sideband cooling of the millimetre-size membrane to 34 μK, corresponding to a thermal occupation nm=5.2. The scaling of this 3D optomechanical system offers the possibility to reach optomechanical couplings far beyond the state of the art, potentially entering the single-photon strong coupling regime in which a new generation of quantum experiments with mechanical objects would become possible.

Methods

Device preparation

We use commercial SiNx membranes manufactured by Norcada. The membranes have the dimensions of 50 nm × 1 mm × 1 mm, and are supplied with a 5 × 5-mm Si frame. We deposit a 20-nm-thick film of Al on top of the membrane without covering the clamping edges by using a physical mask. On a separate sapphire substrate, we pattern two Al antenna pads with 80 nm of Al followed by the deposition of SiNx spacer layer. To ensure the membrane does not come into contact with the substrate, a recess of 100 nm is etched. The metallized SiNx membrane is then placed on top of the antenna pads to form a capacitor using a vacuum pick-and-place technique. A single drop of 0.1 μl of two-part epoxy is applied on the substrate to attach one corner of the membrane's Si frame to the substrate. Using the depth of focus to locate the vertical position of the membrane and of the bottom antenna pads while looking through the membrane with an optical microscope, we estimate the gap to be ∼3 μm. The gap is much larger than that designed in the spacer, most likely due to contamination from dust in the large contact area between the Si frame of the membrane and the substrate. The 3D microwave cavity is formed by closing two halves of a machined block made out of 6061-aluminium. The inner surface of the cavity is polished using a polishing paste, but is not chemically etched. The cavity is assembled by screwing the two halves of the cavity together with no sealing mechanism. The dimension of the whole cavity is 28 mm (x) × 28 mm (y) × 8 mm (z), with rounded corners of radius 1 mm in the y–z plane.

Measurement

The bare frequency of the cavity without the antenna substrate and membrane is 7.4 GHz. The membrane attached to the antenna is placed at the centre of the cavity, coupling to the TE110 mode. We estimate the total mass of the membrane including the Al layer to be m=200 ng, corresponding to an estimated quantum zero-point fluctuation of xzpf=0.6 fm. Measurements are performed in a cryogen-free dilution refrigerator. To minimize cavity instability during the measurements, the sample is mounted on a mass-spring vibration isolation stage on the mixing chamber with resonance frequency of ∼1 Hz. During the cooling measurements, the pulse tube is temporarily turned off to minimize vibrations of the sample and the cables. Measurements are started 1.5 min after the switch-off and performed in an ∼2-min window before the temperature of the mixing chamber begins to increase.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Yuan, M. et al. Large cooperativity and microkelvin cooling with a three-dimensional optomechanical cavity. Nat. Commun. 6:8491 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9491 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-4, Supplementary Notes 1-7 and Supplementary References

ncomms9491-s1.pdf (795.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank S. J. Bosman, S. Yanai, S. Gröblacher, L. DiCarlo, D. Ristè and R. Hoogerheide for discussions and support. Fabrication is carried out in Kavli Nanolab and this project is supported by the Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM).

Footnotes

Author contributions G.A.S. conceived the device and supervised the project; M.Y. prepared the devices; M.Y. and V.S. set up the experiment and performed the measurements; M.Y., V.S. and G.A.S. analysed the data; M.Y. and Y.M.B. performed the theoretical calculation; all authors contributed to writing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Teufel J. D., Donner T., Castellanos-Beltran M. A., Harlow J. W. & Lehnert K. W. Nanomechanical motion measured with an imprecision below that at the standard quantum limit. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 820–823 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anetsberger G. et al. Measuring nanomechanical motion with an imprecision below the standard quantum limit. Phys. Rev. A 82, 061804 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  3. Wilson D. J. et al. Measurement and control of a mechanical oscillator at its thermal decoherence rate. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1410.6191 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Gröblacher S., Hammerer K., Vanner M. R. & Aspelmeyer M. Observation of strong coupling between a micromechanical resonator and an optical cavity field. Nature 460, 724–727 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Teufel J. D. et al. Circuit cavity electromechanics in the strong-coupling regime. Nature 471, 204–208 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Verhagen E., Deléglise S., Weis S., Schliesser A. & Kippenberg T. J. Quantum-coherent coupling of a mechanical oscillator to an optical cavity mode. Nature 482, 63–67 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Teufel J. D. et al. Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state. Nature 475, 359–363 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan J. et al. Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state. Nature 478, 89–92 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Massel F. et al. Microwave amplification with nanomechanical resonators. Nature 480, 351–354 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Singh V. et al. Optomechanical coupling between a multilayer graphene mechanical resonator and a superconducting microwave cavity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 820–824 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Palomaki T. A., Teufel J. D., Simmonds R. W. & Lehnert K. W. Entangling mechanical motion with microwave fields. Science 342, 710–713 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Palomaki T. A., Harlow J. W., Teufel J. D., Simmonds R. W. & Lehnert K. W. Coherent state transfer between itinerant microwave fields and a mechanical oscillator. Nature 495, 210–214 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhou X. et al. Slowing, advancing and switching of microwave signals using circuit nanoelectromechanics. Nat. Phys. 9, 179–184 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. Purdy T. P., Peterson R. W. & Regal C. A. Observation of radiation pressure shot noise on a macroscopic object. Science 339, 801–804 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Safavi-Naeini A. H. et al. Squeezed light from a silicon micromechanical resonator. Nature 500, 185–189 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Purdy T. P., Yu P.-L., Peterson R. W., Kampel N. S. & Regal C. A. Strong optomechanical squeezing of light. Phys. Rev. X 3, 031012 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  17. Bochmann J., Vainsencher A., Awschalom D. D. & Cleland A. N. Nanomechanical coupling between microwave and optical photons. Nat. Phys. 9, 712–716 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. Andrews R., Peterson R. & Purdy T. Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light. Nat. Phys. 10, 321–326 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. Bagci T. et al. Optical detection of radio waves through a nanomechanical transducer. Nature 507, 81–85 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Aspelmeyer M., Kippenberg T. J. & Marquardt F. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391–1452 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  21. Zwickl B. M. et al. High quality mechanical and optical properties of commercial silicon nitride membranes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 103125 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  22. Thompson J. D. et al. Strong dispersive coupling of a high-finesse cavity to a micromechanical membrane. Nature 452, 72–75 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Purdy T. P. et al. Optomechanical raman-ratio thermometry. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.7247 (2014).
  24. Lee D. et al. Observation of quantum motion in a nanogram-scale object. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.7254 (2014).
  25. Paik H. et al. Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240501 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kirchmair G. et al. Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the single-photon kerr effect. Nature 495, 205–209 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Reagor M. et al. Reaching 10ms single photon lifetimes for superconducting aluminum cavities. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 192604 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  28. Weis S. et al. Optomechanically induced transparency. Science 330, 1520–1523 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Agarwal G. S. & Huang S. Electromagnetically induced transparency in mechanical effects of light. Phys. Rev. A 81, 041803 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  30. Poggio M., Degen C. L., Mamin H. J. & Rugar D. Feedback cooling of a cantilever's fundamental mode below 5 mk. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 017201 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rabl P. Photon blockade effect in optomechanical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 063601 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nunnenkamp A., Børkje K. & Girvin S. M. Single-photon optomechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 063602 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-4, Supplementary Notes 1-7 and Supplementary References

ncomms9491-s1.pdf (795.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES