Skip to main content
PMC home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1993 Feb;48(2):154–159. doi: 10.1136/thx.48.2.154

Pulmonary deposition of a nebulised aerosol during mechanical ventilation.

S H Thomas 1, M J O'Doherty 1, H M Fidler 1, C J Page 1, D F Treacher 1, T O Nunan 1
PMCID: PMC464293  PMID: 8493630

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increasing use of therapeutic aerosols in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Few studies have measured aerosol delivery to the lungs under these conditions with adequate experimental methods. Hence this study was performed to measure pulmonary aerosol deposition and to determine the reproducibility of the method of measurement during mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Nine male patients were studied during mechanical ventilation after open heart surgery and two experiments were performed in each to determine the reproducibility of the method. A solution of technetium-99m labelled human serum albumin (99mTc HSA (50 micrograms); activity in experiment 1, 74 MBq; in experiment 2, 185 MBq) in 3 ml saline was administered with a Siemens Servo 945 nebuliser system (high setting) and a System 22 Acorn nebuliser unit. Pulmonary deposition was quantified by means of a gamma camera and corrections derived from lung phantom studies. RESULTS: Pulmonary aerosol deposition was completed in 22 (SD 4) minutes. Total pulmonary deposition (% nebuliser dose (SD)) was 2.2 (0.8)% with 1.5% and 0.7% depositing in the right and left lungs respectively; 0.9% of the nebuliser activity was detected in the endotracheal tube or trachea and 51% was retained within the nebuliser unit. Considerable variability between subjects was found for total deposition (coefficient of variation (CV) 46%), but within subject reproducibility was good (CV 15%). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of aerosol in this way is inefficient and further research is needed to find more effective alternatives in patients who require mechanical respiratory support. This method of measurement seems suitable for the assessment of new methods of aerosol delivery in these patients.

Full text

PDF
155

Images in this article

157Image
on p.157

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahrens R. C., Ries R. A., Popendorf W., Wiese J. A. The delivery of therapeutic aerosols through endotracheal tubes. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1986 Jan-Feb;2(1):19–26. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950020108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. American Lung Association 80th annual meeting; American Thoracic Society 79th annual meeting; Congress of Lung Association Staff 72nd annual meeting. May 20-23, 1984, Miami Beach. Abstracts. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984 Apr;129(4 Pt 2):A1–362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flavin M., MacDonald M., Dolovich M., Coates G., O'Brodovich H. Aerosol delivery to the rabbit lung with an infant ventilator. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1986 Jan-Feb;2(1):35–39. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950020110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frankel L. R., Wilson C. W., Demers R. R., Parker J. R., Lewiston N. J., Stevenson D. K., Smith D. W. A technique for the administration of ribavirin to mechanically ventilated infants with severe respiratory syncytial virus infection. Crit Care Med. 1987 Nov;15(11):1051–1054. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198711000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fuller H. D., Dolovich M. B., Posmituck G., Pack W. W., Newhouse M. T. Pressurized aerosol versus jet aerosol delivery to mechanically ventilated patients. Comparison of dose to the lungs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Feb;141(2):440–444. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/141.2.440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gay P. C., Rodarte J. R., Tayyab M., Hubmayr R. D. Evaluation of bronchodilator responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Oct;136(4):880–885. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/136.4.880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Girard P. M., Clair B., Certain A., Bidault R., Matheron S., Regnier B., Farinotti R. Comparison of plasma concentrations of aerosolized pentamidine in nonventilated and ventilated patients with pneumocystosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Dec;140(6):1607–1610. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/140.6.1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MacIntyre N. R., Silver R. M., Miller C. W., Schuler F., Coleman R. E. Aerosol delivery in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 1985 Feb;13(2):81–84. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198502000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Newman S. P., Woodman G., Clarke S. W. Deposition of carbenicillin aerosols in cystic fibrosis: effects of nebuliser system and breathing pattern. Thorax. 1988 Apr;43(4):318–322. doi: 10.1136/thx.43.4.318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Doherty M. J., Thomas S. H., Page C. J., Bradbeer C., Nunan T. O., Bateman N. T. Does inhalation of pentamidine in the supine position increase deposition in the upper part of the lung? Chest. 1990 Jun;97(6):1343–1348. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.6.1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Doherty M. J., Thomas S. H., Page C. J., Treacher D. F., Nunan T. O. Delivery of a nebulized aerosol to a lung model during mechanical ventilation. Effect of ventilator settings and nebulizer type, position, and volume of fill. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Aug;146(2):383–388. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.2.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Doherty M. J., Thomas S., Page C., Clark A. R., Mitchell D., Heduan E., Nunan T. O., Bateman N. T. Does 99Tcm human serum albumin alter the characteristics of nebulized pentamidine isethionate? Nucl Med Commun. 1989 Jul;10(7):523–529. doi: 10.1097/00006231-198907000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. O'Doherty M., Thomas S., Page C., Bradbeer C., Nunan T., Bateman N. Pulmonary deposition of nebulised pentamidine isethionate: effect of nebuliser type, dose, and volume of fill. Thorax. 1990 Jun;45(6):460–464. doi: 10.1136/thx.45.6.460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. O'Riordan T. G., Greco M. J., Perry R. J., Smaldone G. C. Nebulizer function during mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 May;145(5):1117–1122. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thomas S. H., Langford J. A., George R. J., Geddes D. M. Aerosol deposition in the human lung: effect of high-frequency oscillation on the deposition characteristics of an inhaled nebulized aerosol. Clin Sci (Lond) 1988 Nov;75(5):535–542. doi: 10.1042/cs0750535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vezina W., Chamberlain M., Vinitski S., King M., Nicholson R., Morgan W. K. Radioaerosol ventilation imaging in ventilator-dependent patients. Technical considerations. Clin Nucl Med. 1985 Nov;10(11):759–766. doi: 10.1097/00003072-198511000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wegener T., Wretman S., Sandhagen B., Nyström S. O. Effect of ipratropium bromide aerosol on respiratory function in patients under ventilator treatment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1987 Oct;31(7):652–654. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1987.tb02638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES