Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Neonatal Care. 2015 Dec;15(6):377–385. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000218

The Maternal Microbiome and Pregnancy Outcomes that Impact Infant Health: A Review

Anne L Dunlop 1,, Jennifer G Mulle 2, Erin P Ferranti 3, Sara Edwards 4, Alexis B Dunn 5, Elizabeth J Corwin 6
PMCID: PMC4658310  NIHMSID: NIHMS675900  PMID: 26317856

Abstract

The maternal microbiome is recognized as a key determinant of a range of important maternal and child health outcomes, and together with perinatal factors influences the infant microbiome. This manuscript provides a summary review of research investigating: (1) the role of the maternal microbiome in pregnancy outcomes known to adversely influence neonatal and infant health, including preterm birth, cardiometabolic complications of pregnancy such as preeclampsia and gestational diabetes, and excessive gestational weight gain; (2) factors with an established link to adverse pregnancy outcomes that are known to influence the composition of the maternal microbiome; and (3) strategies for promoting a healthy maternal microbiome, recognizing that much more research is needed in this area.

Keywords: Microbiota, Pregnancy Complications, Premature Birth, Women's health

Introduction

The human microbiome – that is the community of microorganisms that live on and in the human body – consists of upwards of 100 trillion cells,1,2 which outnumber human cells by a factor of ten and collectively contain 27 times more genes than the human genome.3-5 Different sites within and upon the human body harbor discrete populations of microbes. For example, the skin, mouth, nasal cavity, gut, reproductive tract, and possibly the placenta host unique microbial communities.6,7 Until recently, information about the microbes inhabiting the human body was obtained via conventional culture-based microbiology techniques,8 where fluid or epithelial swabs from a given body site are placed in culture media and the organisms that grow are phenotypically and genetically characterized. However, perhaps as many as 50% of the species that are common components of the human microbiome cannot be grown in culture.9-11 Culture-independent methods were initially developed in 1985,12 when polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology was used to exploit characteristics of the 16S ribosomal gene, a section of DNA found in all bacteria but not eukaryotic cells, that is comprised of regions that are highly conserved and regions that are highly variable. PCR primers could be designed to anneal to the conserved regions and amplify through the variable regions; the amplicon could then be sequenced and the variable region used for taxonomic identification of microbes. The potential of this method was realized when combined with next-generation sequencing methods, a mixture of amplicons from a microbiome could all be sequenced simultaneously, and all the taxa present in one microbiome could be identified in a single experiment.13 Next-generation sequencing strategies have decreased costs of sequencing while increasing throughput, and have precipitated a revolution in the detection of new microbial species. Another major scientific advantage of sequenced-based analysis is that phylogenetic relationships can be readily inferred from DNA-based comparisons, whereas older approaches to classification of bacterial species, which relied on phenotypic characteristics such as gross morphology (e.g., rods vs. cocci) or nutritional requirements for growth in culture, did not provide systematic information on evolutionary relationships among species. These recent technological advances have led to an explosion of information about the human microbiome.7 As such, it is becoming increasingly clear that the human microbiome plays a role in maintaining health, and may also serve to attenuate or exacerbate both genetic and environmental risks for poor health outcomes.8 The exciting potential of human microbiome research lies in understanding how this recently recognized “organ” functions to establish and maintain a healthy state, and whether it is possible to promote “healthy” microbiome configurations that protect from negative health outcomes.9

The Human Microbiome and Pregnancy Outcomes

A growing body of research demonstrates that the human microbiome, as characterized by new sequencing technologies methods, plays a role in maternal and child health outcomes. In the sections that follow, this manuscript will review research investigating the role of the maternal microbiome in pregnancy outcomes known to impact neonatal and infant health, including preterm birth, including preterm birth, cardiometabolic complications of pregnancy such as preeclampsia and gestational hypertension, and gestational weight gain. Finally, the manuscript will review research delineating the mechanisms by which the human microbiome may exert its effects upon pregnancy outcomes.

Preterm Birth

Overview of the Problem

Preterm birth (birth prior to 37 weeks' gestation) affects nearly 500,000 – or 1 of every 9 – infants born in the United States.14 Preterm birth is a leading cause of infant mortality, accounting for ∼35% of infant deaths, and substantially contributes to severe morbidity (involving many organ systems) and disability among survivors.15 Of the known risk factors for preterm birth, among the strongest is African American race. Compared to Caucasian women, African American women have more than 1.5 times the risk of preterm birth (16.8% vs. 10.5%), and more than double the risk of early preterm birth < 32 weeks'.14 While low socioenonomic status is a risk factor for preterm birth, less than half of the black-white disparity is explained by socioeconomic status and other known risk factors for preterm birth, such as age of the mother (< 20 or >35 years), sexually transmitted infections, underweight, obesity, chronic health conditions, short interpregnancy intervals, and tobacco and substance use.16-18

Vaginal Microbiome and Preterm Birth

The vaginal tract is home to > 50 microbial species considered non-pathogenic.19-21 Among asymptomatic women of reproductive age, the vaginal microbiome varies widely.22,23 There is growing evidence that the vaginal microbiome influences risk for preterm birth. The healthy vaginal microbiome plays a role in preventing bacterial vaginosis, sexually transmitted infections, urinary tract infections,24-27 and HIV.28,29 Protection is attributed to lactic acid-producing bacteria, mainly Lactobacillus sp.,30,31 and by competitive exclusion such that when Lactobacillus sp. are present other more virulent microbes are disadvantaged.32,33 Bacterial vaginosis is characterized by a reduction in Lactobacillus sp. The CDC estimates 30% of US women suffer from bacterial vaginosis, with prevalence surpassing 60% for AA women. The vaginal microbiome that accompanies bacterial vaginosis is associated with increased risks of sexually transmitted infections 27,29,34,35 which increase the risk for preterm birth36 and occur with increased incidence among African American women compared to other US women.37 Bacterial vaginosis is also a risk factor for preterm birth itself,38 although a systematic review found no significant reduction in preterm birth risk even with eradication of bacterial vaginosis.39

Characterization of the vaginal microbiome among 396 asymptomatic women from four ethnic groups (white, black, Hispanic, and Asian) reveals clustering of microbial communities into five groups, with lactobacilli predominant in four, with the proportion of each microbial group and the vaginal pH varying significantly by ethnicity.22 Notably, vaginal communities in which lactobacilli are not dominant are significantly more common in African American (33%) compared to Caucasian (7%) women.40 These studies suggest that varying levels of protective vaginal microbiota may partly explain observed racial disparities in bacterial vaginosis and sexually transmitted infections.40 Moreover, characterization of the vaginal microbiome of pregnant women reveals a substantial reduction in taxonomic diversity as pregnancy advances.41 Among Caucasian women a greater diversity of the vaginal microbiome was found for those with term compared with preterm births.42

Oral Microbiome and Preterm Birth

The oral cavity has a characteristic microbiome, with > 700 microbial taxa present.43,44 Microbial species commensal in the oral cavity but not found in the urogenital tract cause intrauterine infection.45-47 Interestingly, characterization of the microbiome of 48 term placentae reveals microbes more similar to the oral than the vaginal microbiota.48 The primary route theorized for oral microbes to cause intrauterine infection is hematogenous dissemination, particularly with periodontal disease,49 however, colonization of the vaginal tract with microbes from the oral cavity during receptive oral sex is also proposed.50 Studies show that periodontal disease is associated with a 2-to 7-fold increase in preterm birth51,52 and another links maternal periodontal disease to preeclampsia.53 A large US multicenter trial comparing women treated for periodontal disease at < 21 weeks' vs. post-delivery found no reduction in preterm birth but a trend for reduced early preterm birth < 32 weeks'.54

Gut Microbiome and Preterm Birth

The gastrointestinal tract is populated by a vast and diverse array of microbes that participates in host metabolism, protects from invading microbes, and facilitates immune system function.55 The gut microbiome is also proposed as a possible source of intrauterine infection after finding gut-associated taxa in amniotic fluid of women with preterm premature rupture of membranes.56 Gut-associated microbes could colonize the vagina and ascend;21,57 hematogenous spread by translocation from the gut lumen into the bloodstream also could occur.58

Cardiometabolic Complications of Pregnancy

Overview of the Problem

Gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational hypertension are the two most common cardiometabolic complications of pregnancy, affecting 7-14% and 10% of pregnancies, respectively.59,60 Gestational diabetes and gestational hypertension are associated with adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes as well as future cardiometabolic disease for both the offspring and the mother.61

Gestational diabetes increases the risk of maternal complications, such as gestational hypertension, that in turn, increase the risk of Cesarean delivery and indicated preterm birth. In addition, the resulting maternal hyperglycemia is associated with fetal hyperinsulinemia, which is linked to unbalanced fetal growth and macrosomia, increasing the risk for Cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia, and birth trauma. Hyperinsulinemia is also linked to neonatal metabolic complications that impact the well-being of the neonate, including hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, polycythemia, hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia, and respiratory distress syndrome.62-64 Also, children born to mothers affected by gestational hypertension have been found to have higher body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, glucose and insulin levels;65 this risk extends into adulthood, with an 8-fold increased risk of type 2 diabetes among young adults exposed to gestational diabetes during fetal life.66

Pregnancies complicated by severe gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, experience an increased risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity, with higher rates of abruption placentae, small-for-gestational-age, and preterm birth.67,68 Preeclampsia also poses significant risk for the offspring later in life, with a 2-fold increase risk for stroke.69 This elevated risk has been previously explained both by the “fetal origins of adult disease hypothesis”70 and by the shared genetic risk factors between mother and fetus. However, an emerging hypothesis suggests that shifts in the maternal gut microbiome that are associated with preeclampsia may alter fetal gut development and lead to future disease.71

Gut Microbiome and Cardiometabolic Complications of Pregnancy

There is mounting evidence supporting the role of the gut microbiome in cardiometabolic diseases.72,73 Influenced by dietary intake, the gut microbiome interacts with the host to alter energy harvest, energy expenditure and fat storage.74 Differences in gut microbiome composition, and its related metabolic activities, distinguish lean versus obese individuals, and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus versus those without,73,75 suggesting that imbalance in the gut microbiome contributes to the development of cardiometabolic disease.75 Moreover, a dysbiotic microbiome is implicated in the diffusion of gut bacterial endotoxin into systemic circulation, inducing a low-grade inflammatory response,76 which is a common feature of cardiometabolic diseases. Combined with insulin resistance, chronic subclinical inflammation characterizes the hallmark pathway to the development of both gestational diabetes and gestational hypertension.77-79

The gut microbiome of pregnant women has been associated with prepregnancy body weight and excessive weight gain during pregnancy.80 A recent study that examined the composition of gut microbiome during pregnancy found significant remodeling of the gut microbiome from the first through the third trimester.81 First trimester composition most resembled that of the non-pregnant state; whereas the changes from the first to the third trimester included a greater between-subject diversity, but a reduced within-subject diversity, with the majority of women demonstrating increasing abundance of Proteobacteria, a microorganism observed in inflammation-associated shifts in the gut microbiome.82 Women who developed gestational diabetes had the least diversity in their gut microbiome during the first trimester.81

While few studies have examined the role of the gut or vaginal microbiome in association with gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, the contribution of periodontal disease and the oral microbiome to the incidence of preeclampsia is established.83,84 Despite the significant association between periodontal disease and preeclampsia, periodontal therapy during pregnancy has not been effective in reducing the rate of preeclampsia.85 Furthermore, one study has examined the presence of microbes in amniotic fluid in preeclamptic women and concluded that the low presence of microbes and intra-amniotic infection plays a limited role in the incidence of preeclampsia.84

Gestational Weight Gain

Overview of the Problem

Prepregnancy obesity and excessive maternal weight gain increases the risk of fetal macrosomia, which in turn increases the risk of cesarean delivery, hyperinsulinemia in infancy, and metabolic syndrome in childhood. Among women who are overweight or obese, a healthy gestational weight gain is associated with a significantly lower risk of preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and large for gestational age birth.86 Also, as maternal BMI increases, folate intake decreases, contributing to an increased incidence of fetal neural tube and other birth defects.87-89 Maternal weight exceeding 200 pounds and gestational weight gain of over 40 pounds have each been found to be associated with increased risk of autism and other intellectual/developmental disabilities in the child.90

Nearly two-thirds of American women of childbearing age are classified as overweight or obese and nearly half of women, once pregnant, gain excess gestational weight.91 African American women are the most likely to enter pregnancy overweight or obese.92-100 In 2009, the Institute of Medicine published their latest recommendations for weight gain during pregnancy.91 Obese women are to gain only 11-20 pounds compared with the previous recommendation of “at least a 15 pound weight gain”.91,92 Among women in all BMI categories, only half of pregnant women achieve weight gain within the recommended range. Women who are overweight prior to becoming pregnant are six times more likely than normal weight women to gain more than the recommended amount of weight.91

While most women experience declining weight retention as time extends postpartum, weight retention remains a problem for a large proportion of women even at a year postpartum.95,101,102 Sixty percent of women retain 10-20 pounds at six months postpartum or later, regardless of prepregnant BMI.102-105 If women retain weight, their subsequent pregnancies are then subject to both the rise in maternal BMI and advancing age, further multiplying obstetrical risks.106,107

Gut Microbiome and Maternal Weight

A number of genetic and environmental factors are linked to obesity, including diet quality and quantity, cultural behaviors, and socio-economic factors.108 Also linked to obesity is the composition of the gut microbiome, which affects health by extracting nutrients and energy from ingested food, producing essential metabolites, serving as a barrier against harmful microbes, and promoting immune function. Those who are obese have a gut microbiome that varies compared to those who are not obese.109 Lean individuals have more Bacteroidetes, while obese individuals harbor more Firmicutes, including Clostridium clusters, in their gut.110-114 Differences in gut microbiota between normal versus obese pregnant women suggests the microbiome may be important in weight management during pregnancy, as in other populations.111,112,115 Among pregnant women, those who have greater numbers of Lactobacillus appear protected against the highest degrees of excessive gestational weight gain; likewise, their infants also appear less likely to be large for gestational age at birth.116-118

The Maternal Microbiome Sets the Neonatal Microbiome

The birth process plays an important role in the microbial colonization of the infant gut, and is influenced by the composition of the mother's microbiome, the mode of delivery, genetic, and other perinatal factors.119,120 Vaginally delivered infants acquire microbes resembling mother's vaginal microbiome, while caesarean delivered infants acquire those found on maternal skin.119,120 The size and gestational age of the neonate also affects the composition of the infant microbiome. Preterm infants lack two of the main bacterial genera of healthy term infants (Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) instead displaying a dominance of Proteobacteria.121 Further, the abundance of Proteobacteria is higher in neonates born large-for-gestational age whereas Firmicutes is more abundant in those appropriate-for-gestational age.122 As infants develop over the first month of life, they begin to develop body site-specific microbiomes, with feeding patterns heavily influencing gut microbiome composition. The microbiome of breastfed infants is characterized by substantially higher abundance of Bifidobacteria, believed to be beneficial to immune functioning.123,124 The type and timing of introduction of complementary foods in the first year influences microbiome composition, with their earlier introduction being associated with important microbiome shifts linked with risk for gastrointestinal infection. In fact, during the first 2-3 years the microbiome is a dynamic entity with each dietary juncture.125 Hospitalization and antibiotics also affect gut microbiome composition, being associated with substantial loss of diversity.126 Recent findings suggest that the fetal microbiome may even begin to be colonized in utero, further underscoring the important role of the maternal microbiome in neonatal and infant health.127

Factors that Influence the Maternal Microbiome and Pregnancy Outcomes

A variety of modifiable and non-modifiable factors are known to affect the human microbiome.128,129 In fact, the development of the microbiome begins in utero and is further influenced by factors at or soon after birth, such as gestational age at birth, mode of delivery, antibiotic use, and breastfeeding.130 Breastmilk is rich in viable skin and non-skin bacteria, suggesting a critical role of the maternal transfer of microbes, which may be enhanced further with skin to skin measures such as kangaroo care.131 The microbiome is thereafter influenced throughout life by environmental exposures, diet and nutrition, clinical infections and disease states, antibiotic and anti-inflammatory medication, the inflammatory-immune response, and myriad health behaviors.129 Dietary and weight status, health behaviors, and stress are a subset of biobehavioral factors with great potential to impact the human microbiome, and are theorized to contribute to the high and disparate rates of preterm birth and cardiovascular complications of pregnancy observed in the United States.132

Diet and Probiotics

Both low and high BMI are linked to risk of preterm birth and gestational hypertension and are known to influence the composition of the maternal microbiome. Low BMI (< 18.5 kg/m2) is linked to spontaneous preterm birth.133 There is conflicting evidence regarding the association between obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and preterm birth, with growing clarity that the association may be mediated by obesity's impact on indicated preterm birth due to preeclampsia, rather than spontaneous preterm birth.134

In addition to body weight status (discussed above), other aspects of the diet are key factors in determining the composition of the gut microbiome. The Western diet, high in simple carbohydrates, fats, and animal proteins, is linked with an imbalance of the gut microbiome, in which there are increased numbers of Clostridium innocuum, Eubacterium dolichum, Catenibacterium mitsuokai and Enterococcus spp. and decreasing Bifidobacteria and Bacteroidetes.135 Research supports that placing obese individuals on calorie-restricted diets and increasing physical activity changes the gut microbiome composition toward a pattern that is typical of non-obese individuals.136

Consumption of probiotic-rich food during pregnancy has been associated with lower rates of preterm birth and preeclampsia,137 which could be attributed to the beneficial effect of probiotic supplementation on placental inflammatory responses.138 While randomized trials of probiotic supplementation in pregnancy are few, there have been some investigating the role of probiotic supplementation on the occurrence of preterm birth, gestational hypertension, and excessive gestational weight gain. The two trials investigating the role of probiotics on preterm birth were small and could not conclude that the probiotic supplementation decreased preterm birth, however, they did find that probiotics shift the composition of the vaginal microbiome in a manner that inhibits pathogens and modulates the inflammation commonly associated with preterm birth.139,140 A single randomized controlled trial on gestational weight gain reports that probiotic supplementation did not significantly alter gestational weight gain or postpartum weight retention, but significantly decreased postpartum weight circumference.141 Another trial reports that the incidence of gestational diabetes was significantly reduced among those supplemented with probiotics vs. dietary alteration alone.142

There is some evidence that probiotics might have a role in preventing severe gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. In an observational Norwegian cohort, high maternal intake of dairy products containing Lactobacilli (>200 ml/day) was associated with reduced risk of overall preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia, controlling for maternal age, smoking, BMI, smoking, socioeconomic status, and diet;143 this study did not assess for changes in the composition of the vaginal and/or gut microbiome with the probiotic supplementation to establish if probiotics.

Health behaviors

A range of behaviors – including smoking and substance use and hygiene practices (e.g., douching, poor oral hygiene) – are linked with preterm birth and are known to impact the vaginal, oral, or gut microbiome.128,129,144 For most of these health behaviors, a mechanistic link with preterm birth remains to be elucidated, highlighting the microbiome as a potential connection. For example, many studies show a dose-response in risk of preterm birth and number of cigarettes smoked daily. Smoking also affects the composition of the oral microbiome. Periodontal pathogens are more common and persistent in smokers, and smokers demonstrate a pro-inflammatory response to colonization by these microbes.145

Oral hygiene practices alter the oral microbiome and also initiate imbalance in the gut microbiome.146 Poor oral hygiene is greatly responsible for the accumulation of bacteria within biofilms. Failure to detach accumulating plaque will lead to overgrowth of bacteria that may become pathogenic, reduce biodiversity of the oral cavity, and ultimately cause diseases such as dental caries or periodontal disease.147

A variety of health behaviors are also known to contribute to shifts in the composition of the vaginal microbiome. For example, frequent sexual intercourse, multiple sex partners, frequent episodes of receptive oral sex, douching and use of spermicides all contribute to destabilization of vaginal microbial bacterial communities and thereby increase the chance of pathogenic bacteria to colonize the reproductive tract and contribute to infection and inflammation.148

Stress

With mental or physical stress, a complex neuroendocrine-immune response is initiated,149 leading to increased pro-inflammatory cytokines and cortisol.150,151 Although protective against infection, acute inflammation increases the risk of preterm birth.152-154 Chronic inflammation increases risks for preterm birth,155 gestational hypertension,156-158 and diabetes, 159-161 each of which are associated with adverse maternal and infant consequences. Among low-income African American women, stressful exposures are associated with bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy, and stressors explain a significant proportion of the racial disparity in rates of bacterial vaginosis.162 Among non-pregnant women, there is also an association between stress and bacterial vaginosis.163

Chronic stress also affects gut microbiota and increases translocation of bacterial cell components from the gut into the blood stream.128 Animal models suggest that stress-induced shifts in gut microbiota increase circulating inflammatory cytokines and activate the HPA axis.164 Gut microbiota can also influence depression symptoms and psychological responses to stress, which are in turn associated with poor pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth.128

Summary

Perinatally the maternal microbiome serves as the source for the infant microbiome, and within the context of pregnancy, the maternal microbiome is being shown to play an important role in the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes that greatly influences the health of the neonate and infant. Further characterization of the maternal microbiome and identification of various factors that facilitate changes in microbial profiles preconceptionally and during pregnancy may elucidate preconception and prenatal strategies for improving pregnancy outcomes and, thereby, neonatal and infant health. Neonatal nurses who care for and investigate medical conditions and pregnancy outcomes that influence the well-being of neonates will be critical for advancing the research in this field and for drawing attention to the consequences of this knowledge gap on neonatal and infant health.

Furthermore, neonatal nurses are critical to the health and development of newborns and are well positioned to influence factors that are involved in the establishment of the microbiome. Key target areas for nursing intervention include promotion of breastfeeding, and encouragement of kangaroo care, and the appropriate selection and use of antibiotics, since nurses are key agents involved in breastfeeding initiation, skin to skin care, and medication administration.

What we know about this topic: The maternal oral, vaginal, and gut microbiome influence the risk of pregnancy outcomes that have profound impacts upon the health of the neonate and infant, including preterm birth, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and excessive gestational weight gain. Although incompletely elucidated, there are a number of modifiable factors that shape the composition of the maternal microbiome, including maternal diet, prepregnancy weight and gestational weight gain, and hygiene practices. The maternal microbiome and perinatal factors establish the fetal and infant microbiome.

What needs to be studied: There is a need for research to further elucidate maternal microbiome patterns that protect against and elevate the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes that impact neonatal and infant health and, thereafter, to identify modifiable factors that influence the composition of the maternal and infant microbiome to support the targeting of health strategies to improve pregnancy outcomes and infant health.

What we can do today: As a strategy for reducing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes that negatively impact neonatal and infant health, practitioners can further women's attainment of a healthy maternal microbiome before and during pregnancy (via preconception and prenatal care) through the promotion of a healthy diet, attainment of a healthy weight status and weight gain during pregnancy, and oral hygiene (such as regular brushing, flossing, and dental care). In the perinatal period, key target for promoting a healthy infant microbiome include the promotion of breastfeeding and kangaroo care along with the judicious use and appropriate selection of antibiotics.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR014800)

Footnotes

Institution: Emory University Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Atlanta, GA 30322

Contributor Information

Anne L. Dunlop, Email: amlang@emory.edu, Emory University School of Nursing, 1520 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, 404-712-8520 (phone); 404-727-6945 (fax).

Jennifer G. Mulle, Rollins School of Public Health & School of Medicine, Department of Human Genetics, Emory University Atlanta, GA 30322.

Erin P. Ferranti, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University,Atlanta, GA 30322.

Sara Edwards, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University,Atlanta, GA 30322.

Alexis B. Dunn, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University,Atlanta, GA 30322.

Elizabeth J. Corwin, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University,Atlanta, GA 30322.

References

  • 1.Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6578–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome research. 2009;19:2317–23. doi: 10.1101/gr.096651.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006;312:1355–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1124234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Qin J, Li R, Raes J, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59–65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu B, Wang X, Li L. Human gut microbiome: the second genome of human body. Protein & cell. 2010;1:718–25. doi: 10.1007/s13238-010-0093-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.A framework for human microbiome research. Nature. 2012;486:215–21. doi: 10.1038/nature11209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aagaard K, Ma J, Antony KM, Ganu R, P J, Versalovic J. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:237. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Staley JT, Konopka A. Measurement of in situ activities of nonphotosynthetic microorganisms in aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Annual review of microbiology. 1985;39:321–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.39.100185.001541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wade W. Unculturable bacteria--the uncharacterized organisms that cause oral infections. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2002;95:81–3. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.95.2.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Duncan SH, Louis P, Flint HJ. Cultivable bacterial diversity from the human colon. Letters in applied microbiology. 2007;44:343–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, et al. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science. 2005;308:1635–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1110591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lane DJ, Pace B, Olsen GJ, Stahl DA, Sogin ML, Pace NR. Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:6955–59. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.6955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shendure J, Ji H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature biotechnology. 2008;26:1135–45. doi: 10.1038/nbt1486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: Preliminary data for 2011. National Vital Statistics Report. 2012;61:1–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Callaghan WM, McDorman MF, Rasmussen SA. The contribution of preterm birth to infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1566–73. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marret S, A PY, Parpeau L, Marchad L, Pierrat V, Larroque B. Neonatal and 5-year outcomesa after birth at 30-34 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:72–80. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000267498.95402.bd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goldenberg RL, Cliver SP, Mulvihill FX, Hickey CA, Hoffman HJ, Klerman LV. Medical, psychosocial, and behavioral risk factors do not explain the increased risk for low birth weight among black women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1317–24. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70048-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McGrady GA, Sung JF, Rowley DL, Hogue CJ. Preterm delivery and low birth weight among firstborn infants of black and white college graduates. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oakley BB, Fieldler TL, Marrazzo JM, Fredricks DN. Diversity of human vaginal bacterial communities and associations with clinically defined bacterial vaginosis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008;2008:15. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02884-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Swidsinski A, Menddling W, Loening-Baucke V. Effect of Lactobacillus challenge on Gardnerella vaginalis biofilms. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1013–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cribby S, Taylor M, Reid G. Vaginal microbiota and the use of probiotics. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Disease. 2008:e256490. doi: 10.1155/2008/256490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ravel J, Gajera P, Abdob Z, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:4680–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002611107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. Bacterial community variation in h uman body habitats across space and time. Science. 2009;326:1694–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1177486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Donders GG, Dekeersmaeker A, Vereecken A, Van Bulck B, Spitz B. Pathogenesis of abnormal vaginal bacterial flora. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:872–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70338-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Landers DV, Sweet RL. Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:663–8. doi: 10.1086/367658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gupta K, Stapleton AE, Hooten TM, Roberts PL, Fennell CL, Stamm WE. Inverse association of H202-producing lactobacilli and vaginal Escherichia coli colonization in women with recurrent urinary tract infections. J Infect Dis. 1998;1998:446–50. doi: 10.1086/515635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cherpes TL, Meyn LA, Krohn MA, Lurie JG, Hillier SL. Association between acquisition of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women and bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:319–25. doi: 10.1086/375819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lai SK, Hida K, Shukair S, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is trapped by acidic but not by neutralized human cervicovaginal mucus. J Virol. 2009;83:11196–200. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01899-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martin HL, Richardson BA, Nyange PM, et al. Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora, and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and sexually transmitted disease acquisition. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1863–68. doi: 10.1086/315127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boskey ER, Cone RA, Whaley KJ, Moench TR. Origins of vaginal acidity: High D/L lactate ratio is consistent with bacteria being the primary source. Human Reproduction. 2001;16:1809–13. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kaewsrichan J, Peeyananjarassri K, Kongprasertkit J. Selection and identification of anaerobic lactobacilli producing inhibitory compouds against vaginal pathogens. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2006;48:75–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00124.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Klebanoff SJ, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA, Waltersdorph AM. Control of the microbial flora of the vagina by H202-generating lactobacilli. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:94–100. doi: 10.1093/infdis/164.1.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Voravuthikunchai SP, Bilasoi S, Supamala O. Antagonistic activity against pathogenic bacteria by human vaginal lactobacilli. Anaerobe. 2006;12:221–6. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Peipert JF, Lapane KL, Allsworth JE, Redding CA, BLume JD, Stein MD. Bacterial vaginosis, race, and sexually tramsitted infections: does race modify the association. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2008;35:363–7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815e4179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Brotman RM, Nansel TR, Yu KF, Andrews WW, Zhang J, Schwebke JP. Bacterial vaginosis assessed by gram stain and diminished colonization resistance to incident gonococcal, chlamydial, and trichomonal genital infection. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1907–15. doi: 10.1086/657320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mullick S, Watson-Jones D, Beksinska M, Mabey D. Sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy: prevalence, impact on pregnancy outcomes, and approach to treatment in developing countries. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81:294–302. doi: 10.1136/sti.2002.004077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hogben M, Leichliter JS. Social determinants and sexually transmitted disease disparities. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2008;35:S13–8. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31818d3cad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Leitich H, Kiss H. Asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis and intermediate flora as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21:375–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Brocklehurst P, Gordon A, Heatley E, Milan SJ. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2013;1 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000262.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Harwich MD, Serrano M, Fettweis JM, et al. Genomic sequence analysis and characterization of Sneathia amnii sp. nov BMC Genomics. 2012;13:S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-S8-S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Aagaard KM, Riehle K, Ma J, et al. A Metagenomic Approach to Characterization of the Vaginal Microbiome Signature in Pregnancy. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e364666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hyman RW, Fukushima M, Jiang H, et al. Diversity of the vaginal microbiome correlates with preterm birth. Reprod Sci. 2014;21:32–40. doi: 10.1177/1933719113488838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE. Defining the normal acterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5721–32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5721-5732.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Paster BJ, Boches SK, Galvin JL, et al. Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:3770–83. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.12.3770-3783.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hill GB. Preterm birth: Associations with genital and possibly oral microflora. Ann Periodontol. 1998;3:222–32. doi: 10.1902/annals.1998.3.1.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Han YW, Shen T, Chung P, Buhimschi IA, Buhimschi CS. Uncultivated bacteria as etiologic agents of intra-amniotic inflammation leading to preterm birth. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:38–47. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01206-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Han YW, Ikegami A, Bissada NF, Herbst M, Redline RW, Ashmead GG. Transmission of an uncultivated Bergeyella strain from the oral cavity to amniotic fluid in a case of preterm birth. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:1475–83. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1475-1483.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Aagaard KM, Ganu R, Ma J, et al. Abstract: Whole metagenomic shotgun sequencing reveals a vibrant placental microbiome harboring metabolic function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013:S5. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bearfield C, Davenport ES, Sivapathasandarem V, Allaker RP. Possible association between amniotic fluid micro-organism infection and microflora in the mouth. BJOG. 2002;109:527–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Alanen A, Laurikainen E. Second-trimester abortion caused by Capnocytophaga sputigena: case report. Am J Perinatol. 1999;16:181–3. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jeffcoat MK, Hauth JC, Geurs NC. Periodontal disease and preterm birth: results of a pilot intervention study. J Periodontol. 2003;74:1214–18. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Offenbacher S, Lieff S, Boggess KA. Maternal periodontitis and prematurity: Part I - Obstetric outcome of prematurity and growth restriction. Ann Periodontol. 2001;6:164–74. doi: 10.1902/annals.2001.6.1.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Boggess KA, Lieff S, Murtha AP, Moss K, Beck J, Offenbacher S. Maternal periodontal disease is associated with an increased risk for preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:227–31. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02314-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Michaelowica BS, Hodges JS, DiAngelis AJ. Treatment of periodontal disease and the risk of preterm birth. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;2006:1885–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wardwell LH, Huttenhower C, Garrett WS. Current concepts of the intestinal microbiota and pathogenesis of infection. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2011;13:28–34. doi: 10.1007/s11908-010-0147-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.DiGuilio DB, Romero R, Kusanovic JP. Prevalence and diversity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal inflammatory response, and pregnancy outcome in women with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;64:38–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00830.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC, Andrews WW. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. The New England journal of medicine. 2000;342:1500–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Abdulamir AS, Hafidh RR, Bakar FA. The association of Streptococcus bovis/gallolyticus with colorectal tumors: The nature and the underlying mechanisms of its etiological role. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 2011;30:11. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Association AD. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:S88–90. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2007.s88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wagner SJ, Barac S, Garovic VD. Hypertensive pregnancy disorders: current concepts. Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2007;9:560–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06695.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ryckman KK, Borwoski KS, Parikh NI, Saftlas AF. Pregnancy Complications and the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome for the Offspring. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2013;7:217–23. doi: 10.1007/s12170-013-0308-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lapolla A, Dalfrà MG, Fedele D. Management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity: targets and therapy. 2009;2:73. doi: 10.2147/dmsott.s3407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Group HSCR. The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (HAPO) study. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2002;78:69–77. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00092-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Fraser R, Heller SR. Gestational diabetes: aetiology and management. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine. 2007;17:345–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cho NH, Silverman BL, Rizzo TA, Metzger BE. Correlations between the intrauterine metabolic environment and blood pressure in adolescent offspring of diabetic mothers. J Pediatr. 2000;136:587–92. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.105129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Damm P. Future risk of diabetes in mother and child after gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;104:15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Buchbinder A, Sibai BM, Caritis S, et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes are significantly higher in severe gestational hypertension than in mild preeclampsia. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2002;186:66–71. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.120080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Villar J, Carroli G, Wojdyla D, et al. Preeclampsia, gestational hypertension and intrauterine growth restriction, related or independent conditions? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2006;194:921–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kajantie E, Eriksson JG, Osmond C, Thornburg K, Darker DJ. Pre-eclampsia is associated with increased risk of stroke in the adult offspring: the Helsinki birth cohort study. Stroke. 2009;40:1176–80. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.538025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Barker DJ. Developmental origins of chronic disease. Public Health. 2012;126:185–9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gohir W, Ratcliffe EM, Sloboda DM. Of the bugs that shape us: maternal obesity, the gut microbiome and long-term disease risk. Pediatr Res. 2014;14:169. doi: 10.1038/pr.2014.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Stock J. Gut microbiota: an environmental risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2013;229:440–2. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhang X, Shen D, Fang Z, et al. Human gut microbiota changes reveal the progression of glucose intolerance. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:0071108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Tremaroli V, Backhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 2012;489:242–9. doi: 10.1038/nature11552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Shen J, Obin MS, Zhao L. The gut microbiota, obesity and insulin resistance. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2013;34:39–58. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cani PD, Osto M, Geurts L, Everard A. Involvement of gut microbiota in the development of low-grade inflammation and type 2 diabetes associated with obesity. Gut Microbes. 2012;3:279–88. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Vrachnis N, Belitsos P, Sifakis S, et al. Role of adipokines and other inflammatory mediators in gestational diabetes mellitus and previous gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Endocrinol. 2012;549748:9. doi: 10.1155/2012/549748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wolf M, Sandler L, Jimenez-Kimble R, Shah A, Ecker JL, Thadhani R. Insulin resistance but not inflammation is associated with gestational hypertension. Hypertension. 2002;40:886–91. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000042085.65467.9f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Armanini D, Ambrosini G, Sabbadin C, Dona G, Clari G, Bordin L. Microalbuminuria and hypertension in pregnancy: role of aldosterone and inflammation. Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2013;15:612–4. doi: 10.1111/jch.12135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Santacruz A, Collado MC, Garcia-Valdes L, et al. Gut microbiota composition is associated with body weight, weight gain and biochemical parameters in pregnant women. British Journal of Nutrition. 2010;104:83–92. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510000176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Koren O, Goodrich JK, Cullender TC, et al. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell. 2012;150:470–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mukhopadhya I, Hansen R, El-Omar EM, Hold GL. IBD-what role do Proteobacteria play? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9:219–30. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ide M, Papapanou PN. Epidemiology of association between maternal periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes–systematic review. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2013;40:S181–S94. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Amarasekara R, Jayasekara RW, Senanayake H, Dissanayake VH. Microbiome of the placenta in pre- eclampsia supports the role of bacteria in the multifactorial cause of pre-eclampsia. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2014 doi: 10.1111/jog.12619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kunnen A, Van Doormaal JJ, Abbas F, Aarnoudse JG, Van Pampus MG, Faas MM. Review Article: Periodontal disease and pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2010;37:1075–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01636.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kiel DW, Dodson EA, Artal R, Boehmer TK, Leet TL. Gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in obese women: how much is enough? Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007;110:752–8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278819.17190.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bodnar LM, Hutcheon JA, Platt RW, Himes KP, Simhan HN, Abrams B. Should gestational weight gain recommendations be tailored by maternal characteristics? American journal of epidemiology. 2011;174:136–46. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bodnar LM, Siega-Riz AM, Simhan HN, Himes KP, Abrams B. Severe obesity, gestational weight gain, and adverse birth outcomes. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2010;91:1642–8. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.29008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Davies GA, Maxwell C, McLeod L, et al. Obesity in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:165–73. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34432-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Krakowiak P, Walker CK, Bremer AA, et al. Maternal metabolic conditions and risk for autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e1121–e8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Guidelines CtRIPW. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press: Food and Nutrition Board and Board on Children, Youth, and Families; 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Krukowski RA, Bursac Z, McGehee MA, West D. Exploring potential health disparities in excessive gestational weight gain. Journal of women's health. 2013;22:494–500. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3998. 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Bowers K, Laughon SK, Kiely M, Brite J, Chen Z, Zhang C. Gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy obesity and pregnancy weight gain in relation to excess fetal growth: variations by race/ethnicity. Diabetologia. 2013;56:1263–71. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2881-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Brooten D, Youngblut JM, Golembeski S, Magnus MH, Hannan J. Perceived weight gain, risk, and nutrition in pregnancy in five racial groups. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2012;24:32–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2011.00678.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Gould Rothberg BE, Magriples U, Kershaw TS, Rising SS, Ickovics JR. Gestational weight gain and subsequent postpartum weight loss among young, low-income, ethnic minority women. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2011;204:52.e1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Headen IE, Davis EM, Mujahid MS, Abrams B. Racial-ethnic differences in pregnancy-related weight. Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md) 2012;3:83–94. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Marshall NE, Guild C, Cheng YW, Caughey AB, Halloran DR. Racial disparities in pregnancy outcomes in obese women. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2014;27:122–6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.806478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Misra VK, Hobel CJ, Sing CF. The effects of maternal weight gain patterns on term birth weight in African-American women. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2010;23:842–9. doi: 10.3109/14767050903387037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Paul KH, Graham ML, Olson CM. The web of risk factors for excessive gestational weight gain in low income women. Maternal and child health journal. 2013;17:344–51. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-0979-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Wise LA, Palmer JR, Heffner LJ, Rosenberg L. Prepregnancy body size, gestational weight gain, and risk of preterm birth in African-American women. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass) 2010;21:243–52. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181cb61a9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Amorim Adegboye AR, Linne YM. Diet or exercise, or both, for weight reduction in women after childbirth. UOF - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3):CD005627. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005627.pub3. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013;7:CD005627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Biesmans K, Franck E, Ceulemans C, Jacquemyn Y, Van Bogaert P. Weight during the postpartum period: what can health care workers do? Maternal and child health journal. 2013;17:996–1004. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Boghossian NS, Yeung EH, Lipsky LM, Poon AK, Albert PS. Dietary patterns in association with postpartum weight retention. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2013;97:1338–45. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.048702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Choi J, Fukuoka Y, Lee JH. The effects of physical activity and physical activity plus diet interventions on body weight in overweight or obese women who are pregnant or in postpartum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Preventive medicine. 2013;56:351–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Lipsky LM, Strawderman MS, Olson CM. Maternal weight change between 1 and 2 years postpartum: the importance of 1 year weight retention. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md) 2012;20:1496–502. doi: 10.1038/oby.2012.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Nehring I, Schmoll S, Beyerlein A, Hauner H, von Kries R. Gestational weight gain and long-term postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2011;94:1225–31. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.015289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ruchat SM, Mottola MF. Preventing long-term risk of obesity for two generations: prenatal physical activity is part of the puzzle. Journal of pregnancy. 2012;2012:470247. doi: 10.1155/2012/470247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Davies GA, Maxwell C, McLeod L, et al. Obesity in pregnancy. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC. 2010;32:165–73. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34432-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ismail NA, Ragab SH, ElBaky AA, Shoeib AR, Alhosary Y, Fekry D. Frequency of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in gut microbiota in obese and normal weight Egyptian children and adults. Arch Med Sci. 2010;7:501–7. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2011.23418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wardwell LH, Huttenhower C, Garrett WS. Current concepts of the intestinal microbiota and the pathogenesis of infection. Current Infectious Disease Reports. 2011;13:28–34. doi: 10.1007/s11908-010-0147-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Cox LM, Blaser MJ. Pathways in microbe-induced obesity. Cell Metabolism. 2013;17:883–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Aitken JD, Gewirtz AT. Gut microbiota in 2012: Toward understanding and manipulating hte gut microbiota. Nature Reviews: Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2013;10:72–4. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Backhed F. Programming of host metabolism by the gut microbiota. Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism. 2011;58:44–52. doi: 10.1159/000328042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Santacruz A, Collado MC, Garcia-Valdes L, et al. Gut microbiota composition is associated with body weight, weight gain and biochemical parameters in pregnant women. The British journal of nutrition. 2010;104:83–92. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510000176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Collado MC, Isolauri E, Laitinen K, Salminen S. Distinct composition of gut microbiota during pregnancy in overweight and normal-weight women. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2008;88:894–9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/88.4.894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Collado MC, Laitinen K, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Maternal weight and excessive weight gain during pregnancy modify the immunomodulatory potential of breast milk. Pediatric research. 2012;72:77–85. doi: 10.1038/pr.2012.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Sanz Y. Gut microbiota and probiotics in maternal and infant health. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2011;94:2000S–5S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.001172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Gronlund MM, Grzeskowiak L, Isolauri E, Salminen S. Influence of mother's intestinal microbioa on gut colonization in the infant. Gut Microbes. 2011;2:227–33. doi: 10.4161/gmic.2.4.16799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Dominguez-Bello MG, Costello EK, Contreras M, et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:11971–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002601107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Penders J, Thijs C, Vink C, et al. Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy. Pediatrics. 2006;118:511–21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Barrett E, Kerr C, Murphy K, et al. The individual-specific and diverse nature of the preterm infant microbiota. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2013;98:F334–40. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Karlsson CLJ, Molin G, Cilio CM, Ahrné S. The pioneer gut microbiota in human neonates vaginally born at term-a pilot study. Pediatr Res. 2011;70:282–6. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318225f765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Harmsen HJ, Wildeboer-Veloo aC, Raangs GC, et al. Analysis of intestinal flora development in breast-fed and formula-fed infants by using molecular identification and detection methods. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2000;30:61–7. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200001000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Bezirtzoglou E, Tsiotsias A, Welling GW. Microbiota profile in feces of breast- and formula-fed newborns by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) Anaerobe. 2011;17:478–82. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Ursell LK, Clemente JC, Rideout JR, Gevers D, Caporaso JG, Knight R. The interpersonal and intrapersonal diversity of human associated microbiota in key body sites. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2012;129:1204–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Johnson CL, Versalovic J. The human microbiome and its potential importance to pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2012;129:950–60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Borre YE, O'Keeffe GW, Clarke G, Stanton C, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Microbiota and neurodevelopmental windows: Implications for brain disorders. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2014;20:509–18. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behavior. 2012;13:701–12. doi: 10.1038/nrn3346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Gregory KE. Microbiome aspects of perinatal and neonatal health. The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing. 2011;25:158–62. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3182169346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Kaplan JL, Shi HN, Walker WA. The role of microbes in developmental immunologic programming. Pediatric research. 2011;69:465–72. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318217638a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.LaTuga MS, Stuebe A, Seed PC. A review of the source and function of microbiota in breast milk. Seminars in reproductive medicine. 2014;2014:68–73. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1361824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Behrman RE, Butler AS. Preterm birth: Causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine; 2007. Jul 13, 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Salihu HM, Mbah AK, Alio AP, Clayton HB, Lynch O. Low pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of medically indicated versus spontaneous preterm singleton birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repro Biol. 2009;144:119–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Hendler I, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, et al. The Preterm Prediction study: Association between maternal body mass index and spontaneous and indicated preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:882–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Duda-Chodak A, Tarko T, Satora P, Sroka P. Interaction of dietary compounds, especially polyphenols, with the intestinal microbiota: a review. European Journal of Nutrition. 2015:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0852-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Santacruz A, Marcos A, Wärnberg J, et al. Interplay between weight loss and gut microbiota composition in overweight adolescents. Obesity. 2009;17:1906–15. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Brantsaeter AL, Myhre R, Haugen M, et al. Intake of probiotic food and risk of preeclampsia in primiparous women - the Norwegian mother and child cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:807–15. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Myhre R, Brantsaeter AL, Myking S, et al. Intake of probiotic food and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2011;93:81–6. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.004085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Vitali B, Cruciani F, Baldassarre ME, et al. Dietary supplementation with probiotics during late pregnancy: outcome on vaginal microbiota and cytokine secretion. BMC microbiology. 2012;12:236. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Polatti F. Bacterial vaginosis, Atopobium vaginae and nifuratel. Current clinical pharmacology. 2012;7:36. doi: 10.2174/157488412799218824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Ilmonen J, Isolauri E, Poussa T, Laitinen K. Impact of dietary counselling and probiotic intervention on maternal anthropometric measurements during and after pregnancy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clinical Nutrition. 2011;30:156–64. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Luoto R, Laitinen K, Nermes M, Isolauri E. Impact of maternal probiotic-supplemented dietary counselling on pregnancy outcome and prenatal and postnatal growth: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. British journal of nutrition. 2010;103:1792–9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509993898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Brantsæter AL, Myhre R, Haugen M, et al. Intake of Probiotic Food and Risk of Preeclampsia in Primiparous Women The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. American journal of epidemiology. 2011;174:807–15. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.DiGuilio DB. Diversity of microbes in amniotic fluid. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2012;17:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Kumar PS, Griffen AL, Moeschberger ML, Leys EM. Identification of candidate periodontal pathogens and beneficial species by quantitative 16S clonal analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3944–55. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3944-3955.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Singhal S, Dian D, Keshavarzian A, Fogg L, Fields JZ, Farhadi A. The role of oral hygiene in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:170–5. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1263-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Zaura E, Keijser BJ, Huse SM, Crielaard W. Defining the healthy. BMC microbiology. 2009;9:259. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Hickey RJ, Zhou X, Pierson JD, Ravel J, Forney LJ. Understanding vaginal microbiome complexity from an ecological perspective. Translational Research. 2012;160:267–82. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2012.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev. 2000;21:55–89. doi: 10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Yang EV, Glaser R. Stress-induced immunomodulation and the implications for health. Int Immunopharmacol. 2002;2:315–24. doi: 10.1016/s1567-5769(01)00182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Steptoe A, Hamer M, Chida Y. The effects of acute psychological stress on circulating inflammatory factors in humans: a review and meta-analysis. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2007;21:901–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Romero R, Espinoza J, Goncalves LF, Kusanovic JP, Friel LA, Nien JK. Inflammation in preterm and term labour and delivery. Semin Fetal Neonat M. 2006;11:317–26. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Dizon-Townson DS. Preterm labour and delivery: a genetic predisposition. Paediatr Perinat Ep. 2001;15(Suppl 2):57–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00008.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Ruma M, Horton A, Boggess K, et al. Systemic inflammation: Its role in periodontal disease and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:S73–S. [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Giurgescu C. Are maternal cortisol levels related to preterm birth? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009;38:377–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01034.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Conrad KP, Miles TM, Benyo DF. Circulating levels of immunoreactive cytokines in women with preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1998;40:102–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1998.tb00398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Freeman DJ, McManus F, Brown EA, et al. Short- and long-term changes in plasma inflammatory markers associated with preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2004;44:708–14. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000143849.67254.ca. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Granger JP, Alexander BT, Bennett WA, Khalil RA. Pathophysiology of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2001;14:178S–85S. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(01)02086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Lowe LP, Metzger BE, Lowe WL, Jr, Dyer AR, McDade TW, McIntyre HD. Inflammatory mediators and glucose in pregnancy: results from a subset of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:5427–34. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Kinalski M, Telejko B, Kuzmicki M, Kretowski A, Kinalska I. Tumor necrosis factor alpha system and plasma adiponectin concentration in women with gestational diabetes. Horm Metab Res. 2005;37:450–4. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Richardson AC, Carpenter MW. Inflammatory mediators in gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007;34:213–24. viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Culhane JF, Rauh V, McCollum KF, Elo IT, Vogan V. Exposure to chronic stress and ethnic differences in rates of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1272–6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Nansel TR, Riggs MA, Yu KF, Andrews WW, Schwebke JP, Klebanoff MA. The association of psychosocial stress and bacterial vaginosis in a longitudinal cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:381–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Ait-Belgnaoui A, Durand H, C C, Chaumaz G, et al. Prevention of gut leakiness by a probiotic treatment leads to attenuated HPA response to an acute psychological stress in rats. Psychoneuoendocrinology. 2012;37:1885–95. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES