Abstract
Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is a rapidly evolving field for monitoring the spatial distribution and abundance of analytes in biological tissue sections. It allows for direct and simultaneous analysis of hundreds of different compounds in a label-free manner. In order to obtain a comprehensive metabolite and lipid data, a polarity switching MSI method using infrared matrix assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (IR-MALDESI) was developed and optimized where the electrospray polarity was alternated from one voxel to the next. Healthy and cancerous ovarian hen tissue sections were analyzed using this method. Distribution and relative abundance of different metabolites and lipids within each tissue section were discerned, and differences between the two were revealed. Additionally, the utility of using mass spectrometry concepts such as spectral accuracy and sulfur counting for confident identification of analytes in an untargeted method are discussed.
Keywords: Mass Spectrometry Imaging, IR-MALDESI, Tissue Analysis, Lipids, Ovarian Cancer, Hen Model, Lipid Metabolism, Polarity Switching
Graphical Abstract
IR-MALDESI polarity switching mass spectrometry imaging reveals differences in lipid distribution in hen ovarian cancer tissue.
Introduction
The advent of “soft” ionization methods such as electrospray ionization (ESI)1 and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)2,3 over two decades ago helped mass spectrometry (MS) evolve into an indispensable tool for analyzing biological samples.4 Mass spectrometry has been used extensively in cancer research for discovery of novel disease biomarkers and also as a cancer diagnostic and imaging tool.5–7 One of the rapidly evolving fields in MS-based cancer research is mass spectrometry imaging (MSI). In MSI experiments, materials are desorbed directly from tissues, ionized, and sampled by a mass spectrometer. At the same time, the exact location where the tissue-related material was desorbed from is also recorded. The mass spectra along with the locations they were collected from are used to generate heat maps showing relative abundance and distribution of analyte(s) of interest within a tissue section.
The sensitivity and specificity of MS coupled with the label-free nature of imaging have helped MSI become an attractive tool in cancer research for identifying diagnostic biomarkers for early detection of cancer and visualizing tumor margins in cancerous tissues.8–11 The most common ionization method for MSI analyses is MALDI; however, MALDI MSI suffers from drawbacks associated with its requirements for high vacuum and a need for an organic acid matrix.12 Furthermore, MALDI relies on partitioning of analytes into the matrix crystals, which may be variable across different tissues types.13 In order to circumvent these limitations, numerous ionization methods such as atmospheric pressure MALDI (AP-MALDI)14, desorption electrospray ionization (DESI)15, and matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (MALDESI)16 have been developed for MSI at atmospheric pressure. The recent advances in atmospheric pressure MSI were the subject of a recent review.17
MALDESI was the first ionization method combining resonant matrix-assisted laser desorption with electrospray post-ionization.16 In MALDESI experiments, a laser (UV or IR) is used to resonantly excite an endogenous or exogenous matrix in order to desorb material within the focal volume of the laser. MSI of biological tissue sections using MALDESI is performed using a mid-infrared (IR) laser, where a thin layer of ice is used as the energy-absorbing matrix.18 The O-H stretching modes of water present in the tissue and the ice layer are resonantly excited by absorbing the energy of a mid-IR (λ = 2940 nm) laser pulse, facilitating the desorption of neutral material from the tissue section. The plume of desorbed neutrals partitions into the charged droplets of an orthogonal electrospray, and are ionized in an ESI-like mechanism.16 Using ice as an exogenous matrix accounts for variations in the water content in different tissue compartments, and has been shows to greatly improve desorption and the resulting ion abundances.18,19 Additionally, the matrix-related peaks observed in lower m/z regions in MALDI MSI are eliminated.
One of the applications of IR-MALDESI MSI is in the field of lipidomics. Lipids are family of naturally occurring biomolecules, ubiquitous across all living cells, and second only to proteins in abundance.20 Lipid profiles provide valuable information for understanding the biological basis of many disease. Alterations in lipid metabolism have been linked to several diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and cancer.21,22 Most lipid classes consist of a polar headgroup and a non-polar hydrocarbon tail. Differences in the composition of the headgroup, along with variations in the length and saturation of the hydrocarbon tail result in a remarkable diversity in molecular structures of lipids. The differences in the headgroup can also lead to significant differences in ionization efficiency of different lipid classes. For instance, lipids with positively charged headgroups such as phosphatidylcholines (PC) and sphingomyelins (SM) are readily detected in positive-ion mode, whereas other lipid classes such as glycerophosphoinositols (PI) ionize more efficiently in negative-ion mode.23 Therefore, analyzing tissue sections in both polarities is essential to obtaining data representative of all lipids. Two MSI experiments, one in each polarity, could be used at the cost of time and sample. IR-MALDESI MSI using polarity switching affords the same biochemical information, while shortening the data acquisition time drastically and allowing all measurement to be made from the same tissue section. To this end, a polarity switching MSI method was developed where adjacent voxels were analyzed with opposing polarities. Using this method, the distribution and relative abundance of lipids and other metabolites can be simultaneously monitored in an untargeted fashion, and a list of candidates for targeted analyses can be generated. In order to evaluate the utility of the polarity switching MSI for screening alterations in lipid metabolism in cancer tissues, the hen model for ovarian cancer (OVC)24–26 was selected for untargeted lipid analysis.
OVC is the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths in women in the United States, and is the most lethal of gynecologic cancers.27 Despite advancements in medical care for ovarian cancer patients, median survival length for these patients is approximately 40 months28, and mortality rates have remained relatively constant over the past 30 years due to lack of reliable biomarkers for early diagnosis.29,30 Many animal models, including the hen31, mouse32, and rat33 have been developed in order to understand the processes involved in initiation and progression of OVC and control the subjects’ environment. The domestic egg laying hen is the only non-human animal model for spontaneous development of OVC with a high prevalence.31,34,35 The OVC in hen is also histologically similar to that in women36, and its prevalence increases with age.37 Additionally, in both cases the cancer metastasizes to similar tissues with an accumulation of ascites fluid.31
Applications of MSI in OVC research are nascent, with most efforts focusing on protein expression.38–41 However, numerous reports of alterations in lipid metabolism have been reported in OVC patients.42–45 Herein, we present a report of polarity switching MSI performed at atmospheric pressure using IR-MALDESI and its application in untargeted screening of lipids and other metabolites in healthy and cancerous hen ovarian tissues. Spatial distribution and relative abundance of more than 700 metabolites were simultaneously monitored, and differences between the two tissues were discerned.
Experimental
Materials
HPLC-grade methanol and water were purchased from Burdick and Jackson (Muskegon, MI, USA). Acetic acid, ammonium hydroxide, ammonium acetate, and 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and were used without any purification. Nitrogen gas (purity ≥99.999%) used for purging the MALDESI imaging enclosure was obtained from Arc3 Gases (Raleigh, NC, USA).
Samples
Ovarian tissues were obtained from age-matched healthy and cancerous C-strain white leghorn commercial egg laying hens. Birds were managed in accordance with the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Guide, and all husbandry practices were approved by North Carolina State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Tissues were flash frozen in isopentane chilled in a liquid nitrogen bath, and stored at −80 °C until the time of the experiment. The tissues were sectioned into 10-µm-thick sections at −20 °C using a Leica CM1950 cryostat (Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). The tissue sections were thaw mounted onto pre-cleaned glass microscope slides, and were analyzed right away.
IR-MALDESI Imaging Source Coupled to Q Exactive Plus
The details of the IR-MALDESI source design and implementation have been described elsewhere in detail.18,46 In summary, the tissue section mounted on a glass slide is placed on a water-cooled Peltier plate, which is mounted on a computer controlled XY motion stage and housed within a custom-built enclosure. The plate is cooled to −10 °C after the enclosure is purged with dry nitrogen in order to reduce the relative humidity (RH) to <5%. After the tissue section has reached thermal equilibrium (~10 minutes), the sample is then exposed to the laboratory ambient RH by opening the enclosure, and a thin layer of ice is deposited on the surface of the tissue section due to desublimation of water from the air. Once the ice layer is formed, the enclosure is purged with dry nitrogen in order to maintain the RH at ~10%, which has been found to maintain a consistent ice matrix layer throughout the experiment.18 A mid-IR laser (IR Opolette 2371, OPOTEK, Carlsbad, CA, USA) operated at a wavelength of 2940 nm is then used to resonantly excite the O-H stretching mode of water molecules present in biological tissue and exogenous ice layer, facilitating the desorption of neutral molecules from the tissue. The desorbed neutrals then partition into charged droplets of an orthogonal electrospray, and are ionized in an ESI-like fashion.16 Different modifiers at various concentrations (20 mM ammonium hydroxide, 5 mM ammonium acetate, 1 mM acetic acid, and 100 mM TFE) were added to a 50/50 (v/v) solution of methanol/water in order to optimize the electrospray solvent for polarity switching MSI.
The IR-MALDESI imaging source was fully synchronized with a Q Exactive Plus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) mass spectrometer such that laser desorption and ion acquisition events were coordinated at each voxel. Due to the pulsed nature of IR-MALDESI, the automatic gain control (AGC) is turned off for imaging experiments. AGC uses a pre-scan to ensure a consistent number of ions are sampled per spectrum and space charge effects are minimized. When AGC is turned off, ions are accumulated into the C-trap for a fixed injection time (IT), and parts per million (ppm) mass accuracy can be achieved by using lock mass calibrants.47 The peaks of diisooctyl phthalate at 391.28429 [M+H+]+ and 413.26623 [M+Na]+ were used as lock masses in positive-ion mode, and peaks of palmitic acid at 255.2329 [M-H+]− and stearic acid at 283.2643 [M-H+]− were used as lock masses in negative-ion mode.
Two laser pulses (frep = 20 Hz) per voxel were used to facilitate complete and reproducible desorption of material from the tissue. Ions generated by both laser pulses were accumulated into the C-trap for a fixed injection time (IT = 110 ms), and measured in a single Orbitrap acquisition. An instrument acquisition method was created using the accompanied software (Xcalibur, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) to acquire full MS spectra with alternating polarities at each voxel (Fig. 1A). A delay was incorporated into the method using the IR-MALDESI control software, where the signal for laser desorption and the subsequent signal acquisition by MS was delayed by 96 ms in order to allow the electrospray to stabilize upon polarity switching. At each voxel the m/z range of 250–1000 was measured with the resolving power of 140,000 (FWHM, m/z=200). The focal diameter of the laser was ~300 µm on burn paper (Zap-It Corporation, Salisbury, NH, USA); however, the desorption diameter (spot size) on tissue was measured to be 150 µm.18 Spatial resolution of 100 µm was achieved by using the oversampling method.48
Figure 1.
A) Schematic of polarity switching MSI method, where adjacent voxels are analyzed in opposing polarities and a delay incorporated in the method in order to allow the electrospray to stabilize upon switching the polarity. The schematic of electrospray voltage stabilization is shown for demonstration purposes. The stability of electrospray was visually inspected; however, the voltage was not measured. B) Representation of polarity switching MSI on tissue sections. Ion images generated for each polarity will have a resolution in the X dimension (horizontal) that is two times larger than in the Y dimension (vertical). The voxels are drawn much larger than actual voxels to aid with visualization of the concept.
Data Analysis and Metabolite Identification
The raw files generated by the Q Exactive Plus instrument for each tissue section were converted to mzML format using the msConvert tool from ProteoWizard.49 Each mzML file was then converted to imzML format50 using the imzML converter program51, and the imzML files were then combined into one imzML file using the imzML converter.51 This file was subsequently loaded into MSiReader52, a free and open-source software developed for processing high resolving power MSI data, by selecting the desired ionization mode (positive or negative). All images were generated using a bin width of 5 ppm, without any normalization or interpolation. Centroid values for determining MMA of analytes in each ionization mode (Electronic Supplementary Information, Fig. S1 and Fig. S2) were obtained using RawMeat, version 2.1 (VAST Scientific, Cambridge, MA, USA). Box-and-whisker plots of tissue-specific ion abundances (Fig. S3) were generated using JMP Pro, version 12 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
The built-in peak picking tool in MSiReader was used to extract peaks based on spatial distribution and changes in ion abundance between the two tissues. Using this function, the software averages the spectra over a region of interest specified by the user, and identifies peaks that exhibit unique distribution or pronounced changes in ion abundance relative to a user-specified reference region. Unique ions must be present in >80% of interrogated region with respect to a reference region, and have an average abundance ratio greater than 2. The generated peak lists were searched against databases such as METLIN53 and LIPID MAPS54, and putative compound identification was made possible by using the accurate mass in tandem with fundamental mass spectrometry concepts such as spectral accuracy55,56 and sulfur counting.57,58
Results and Discussion
Polarity Switching MSI Method Development
Applications of polarity switching in MSI analyses have emerged recently, with most reports using MALDI as the ionization mode.59–61 Due to limitations of MALDI MSI, some of which were mentioned above, polarity switching IR-MALDESI MSI of tissue sections at atmospheric pressure is of interest. As shown in Figure 1A, the IR-MALDESI polarity switching method was developed such that adjacent voxels are analyzed with opposite polarities. In addition, a delay of 96 ms was incorporated after each polarity switching event to allow the electrospray to stabilize before sampling the subsequent voxel. This pattern is repeated across the area of the tissue, and data is parsed and analyzed according to the polarity. One of the advantages of this polarity switching method is shortening the data acquisition time drastically. In order to obtain the same biochemical information two MSI experiments, one in each ionization mode, could be performed, and the amount of time, in milliseconds, required to analyze the tissue sections in both modes can be calculated as T = 1244x, where x is the number of voxels. However, using the polarity switching MSI method developed in this work, the data acquisition time can be calculated as T = 718x, after accounting for the 96 ms delay after each polarity switching event. Therefore, the polarity switching method reduces the data acquisition time by 42%, while providing the same biochemical information. In addition, since all measurements are made from the same tissue section, sample preparation times are also reduced.
It is worth noting that parsing the data based on polarity will result in ion images with an increased resolution in the X dimension (horizontal) by a factor of two; however, the resolution in the Y dimension (vertical) remains the same (Fig. 1B). Since screening the distribution of hundreds of analytes is the objective in untargeted polarity switching MSI analyses, this loss in spatial resolution in the X dimension will not likely affect the depth of spectral information obtained. Once a list of candidates for targeted analyses has been generated, MSI at higher resolutions can be performed.
One of concerns when performing polarity switching experiments is that switching the polarity will deteriorate the mass accuracy due to temporarily unstable operation of electronics in the instrument. Schuhmann et al. reported a degradation of mass accuracy upon successive polarity switching in shotgun analysis of lipids; however, they showed that using AGC and lock mass calibration will help preserve mass accuracy.62 Since IR-MALDESI MSI analyses are performed with AGC off, the mass measurement accuracy (MMA) of two representative ions, cholesterol in positive-ion mode and glutathione in negative-ion mode, are presented for all scans across both healthy and cancerous tissue sections (Fig. S1 and Fig. S2, respectively), in order to ensure high mass accuracy was preserved throughout the experiments. The mass accuracy of all putatively identified analytes exhibited the same relatively normal distribution, with no biases toward analytes at high or low m/z range. It was confirmed that using lock mass calibration alone with AGC turned off, resulted in preserving high mass accuracy (MMA ≤2.5 ppm) for the duration of analysis time (>4 hours) even with a dynamic number of ions sampled during an imaging experiment.
Polarity Switching MSI Solvent Optimization
In contrast to MALDI MSI where the choice of matrix depends on the analyte(s) and the ionization mode63, the ice matrix in IR-MALDESI MSI can be used universally for analysis of compounds in either positive- or negative-ion modes without imposing any further restrictions on the size of the analytes. This is due to the fact that IR-MALDESI analyses do not rely on efficient extraction of analytes into the matrix crystals, and the ice matrix is solely used to facilitate the desorption of neutral materials from the tissue surface. Therefore, there is no need for optimizing the matrix used. Nevertheless, a crucial step in IR-MALDESI MSI is partitioning of the neutral tissue-related materials into the charged droplets of the orthogonal electrospray. The geometry of the source along with the electrospray solvent composition for positive ionization mode were previously optimized using a statistical design of experiments (DOE).18 However, in order to improve ion abundance in both polarities and achieve the most comprehensive coverage of lipids and metabolites in both polarities, the electrospray solvent composition was optimized for polarity switching MSI.
A mouse liver tissue, representing a “homogeneous” tissue at the spatial resolution of these experiments, was used to investigate the effects of adding different modifiers such as weak acids, salts, and other bases to the electrospray solvent for a polarity switching experiment. Four modifiers (ammonium hydroxide, ammonium acetate, acetic acid, and TFE) were chosen based on literature review61,62,64, and added to the electrospray solvent (50:50 MeOH/H2O) at varying concentrations. The mouse liver tissue section was analyzed in quadrants, where each quadrant was imaged using a specific modifier (Fig. 2). The resulting ion images were then combined in order to reconstruct the original tissue shape and perform side-by-side comparison. The tissue-related peaks in each quadrant along with their average ion abundances were extracted using MSiReader. A total of 583 tissue-specific ions (478 in +ESI, 105 in –ESI) were identified using this method. All tissue-related ions were present in each quadrant; however, their abundance varied from one quadrant to another. Representative ion images of the liver tissue with four modifiers are shown in Fig. 2. Upon visual inspection of ion images, it appeared that images generated using acetic acid as the modifier exhibited the highest ion abundance. In order to test this hypothesis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on datasets obtained in positive- and negative-ion modes, and it was determined that acetic acid and TFE resulted in a significant increase of ion abundance in both ionization modes compared to ammonium hydroxide and ammonium acetate. Since the abundance of ions generated using acetic acid and TFE were not significantly different from each other, additional criteria such as difference in ion abundance between the two ionization modes, total ion current (TIC) stability throughout the experiment, and %RSD per voxel were taken into account. In order to ensure there was no systematic bias for one ionization mode over the other, box-and-whisker plots of abundance of tissue-specific ions in both modes were generated. These plots for acetic acid are presented in Fig. S3, and confirm that the sensitivity in both ionization modes were comparable and no bias was observed. Based on these additional criteria, 1 mM acetic acid was chosen as optimum modifier added to the electrospray solvent for polarity switching.
Figure 2.
Optical image of the tissue showing the modifiers used in each quadrant, along with representative ion images of lipids in positive- and negative-ion modes, demonstrating different ionization efficiencies in presence of each modifier. The lipid classes, annotated on the bottom left of each image, are as follows: sterol (ST), phosphoethanolamine (PE), fatty acid (FA), phosphatidic acid (PA).
Polarity Switching MSI of Healthy and Cancerous Tissue Sections
Healthy and cancerous hen ovarian tissue sections were analyzed using the developed polarity switching method and optimized electrospray solvent. The obtained images were analyzed side-by-side, and tissue-specific ions were extracted using MSiReader. Differences in spatial distribution and relative abundance of analytes between the two tissue sections could be readily discerned. Representative images demonstrating these differences are shown in Fig 3A, and the location of follicles in healthy and cancerous tissue section are denoted with dashed or straight lines, respectively. It can be seen that cholesterol (m/z 369.3516, [M-H2O+H+]+) is relatively homogeneously distributed across the healthy tissue section; whereas, putatively assigned 16:3-Glc-Campesterol (m/z 795.6106, [M+H+]+) is more abundant in one of the follicles of this tissue section. The differences in the relative abundance between the two tissues is of more importance, and could provide molecular insight into the underlying biology. It can be seen that cholesterol, PS (18:4) (m/z 518.2504, [M+H+]+), glutathione (m/z 306.0763, [M-H+]−), and PI (38:4) (m/z 885.5501, [M-H+]−) are present at a higher abundance in the cancerous tissue section. Conversely, putatively assigned α-tocopherol (m/z 429.3739, [M-H+]−) is more abundant in the healthy tissue section. These observations are in good agreement with those reported in the literature obtained using conventional methods.21,42,65 In order to ensure a comprehensive lipid data across different classes was obtained, mass excess66 of tissue-specific ions for each tissue section were overlaid on mass excess distribution of all lipid classes obtained from LIPID MAPS database54, and it was shown that the majority of identified ions belong to lipids from various classes in the m/z range measured (Fig. 3B). Additionally, an approximate 2-fold increase in the number of lipids identified in the cancerous tissue was observed. Lipid classes such as fatty acids, phospholipids, and sphingolipids accounted for most of the difference in the number of identified lipids between the two tissue sections.
Figure 3.
A) Representative ion images of different lipid classes in healthy and cancerous ovarian tissue sections. In each image, the healthy tissue is on the left and the cancerous tissue is on the right, while dashed and solid lines represent the location of follicles in healthy and cancerous tissues, respectively. The metabolite or lipid class in each image, annotated according to the ionization mode that it was detected in, are as follows: sterol (ST), phosphoserine (PS), glutathione (GSH), prenol (PR), and phosphoinositol (PI). B) Mass excess of tissue-specific ions overlaid on mass excess distribution of lipids from LIPIDMAPS Database54, demonstrating a comprehensive lipid coverage. Black and white dots represent ions detected in positive- and negative-ion modes, respectively.
As mentioned in experimental section, metabolites and lipids were identified by searching their accurate mass against METLIN53 and LIPID MAPS54 databases. In many cases where more than one metabolite corresponded to the same accurate mass, fundamental mass spectrometry concepts such as spectral accuracy55 and sulfur counting56 were used to distinguish and validate the identity of an analyte. The ion detected at m/z 306.0766 in negative-ion mode was used as an example to demonstrate this process, since the images obtained for this ion (Fig. 3A) exhibited an 8-fold increase in relative abundance in the cancerous tissue. A METLIN database search for this ion using a 5 ppm window results in four molecules, three of which are isomers, that could potentially represent the ion detected (Fig. 4A). The relative abundance of M+1 peak can be used to calculate the number of carbons present in the molecule, and identify the compound as glutathione (Fig. 4B). Further confirmation can be achieved by inspecting the M+2 peaks from high resolving power MS and their abundance relative to the monoisotopic peak in order to investigate the presence of atoms such as chlorine and sulfur. The natural abundance of 34S is 3.976%–4.734% as reported by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC)67, therefore the relative abundance of M+2 in the inset of Fig. 4B confirms the presence of 1 sulfur atom in the observed ion. These isotopic abundance patterns have been shown to be more powerful for identifying metabolites compared to mass measurement accuracy of <1 ppm alone.68 It is important to remember that utilizing these concepts will require employing of high resolving power instruments. This is especially the case for MSI experiments, since they entail direct analysis of samples from surfaces and chromatographic separations are not used to reduce the complexity of spectra. For instance, a resolving power of >40,000 is required to resolve the 34S1 peak from 18O1 and 13C2 peaks in glutathione (Fig. 4B). It is worth noting that spectral accuracy cannot distinguish between isomers, which demands the use of tandem MS.
Figure 4.
A) Four candidates that could represent the deprotonated species observed at m/z 306.0766 (± 2.5 ppm) identified using METLIN database.53 B) Confident identification of analyte by utilizing concepts such as spectral accuracy55,56 and sulfur counting57,58 in tandem with accurate mass to confidently identify an analyte observed in tissue.
As noted, images presented in Fig. 3A are only a small representative of the differences observed in lipid content of the two tissue section. In order to demonstrate the scale of data generated, the spectra from both healthy and cancerous tissue sections are shown in Fig 5. The complexity of each set of spectra highlights the need for high resolving power instrumentation in ambient MSI applications, and signifies the importance of polarity switching for extensive investigation of metabolites and lipids in tissue sections. Additionally, the number of peaks observed and their relative abundance vary significantly between the cancerous and healthy tissue sections. The m/z range of 250–400, mostly consisting of fatty acids, and the m/z range of 500–850, mostly dominated by phospholipids, sterols, and sphingolipids are two regions that stand out the most. Elevation in levels of these lipid classes are one of the most common alterations observed in cancerous cells.21,42,69 Fatty acids are fundamental building blocks of complex lipids, and are involved in energy storage and membrane proliferation. Elevated levels of fatty acids in many different cancerous cells, including ovarian cancer cells, have been reported.43–45,70 This increase can be attributed to an increase in the de novo biosynthesis or an increase in the rate of uptake of these lipids form the surrounding environment.44,70 These fatty acids can then be stored in lipid droplets to provide necessary energy for rapid proliferation, or they can be incorporated in the synthesis of more complex lipids such as phospholipids. Sterols and different classes of phospholipids are key structural lipids in cell membranes. There have been numerous reports of elevated levels of these lipid classes in cancerous cells, in order to build new membranes and maintain active signaling.21,71,72 Another class of lipids occupying this m/z range are sphingolipids. These lipids, especially ceramides and sphingomyelins, are bioactive lipids that function as effector molecules and have important roles in stimulus-mediated signaling and regulation such as growth, inhibition, and apoptosis.69 Several reports indicate that these lipids are present at higher levels in cancer cells, presumably in order to increase signaling of cell growth receptors and facilitate rapid growth and proliferation of cancerous cells.69,73
Figure 5.
Representative spectra from polarity switching MSI of cancerous (top) and healthy (bottom) tissue sections. The spectra obtained in positive- and negative-ion modes are overlaid and color-coded. It can be seen that lipid classes such as fatty acids (mostly observed in m/z 250–400), phospholipids, sterols, and sphingolipids (often observed in m/z 500–850) are much more abundant in the cancerous tissue compared to the healthy tissue.
The high degree of agreement between these observations and those obtained using conventional methods confirms the utility of polarity switching IR-MALDESI MSI for screening changes in lipid metabolism in cancer cells by simultaneously monitoring the relative abundance of hundreds of metabolites and lipids, as well as their spatial distribution within tissue sections. Current studies are focused on applying this method to analyze tissues from a biorepository generated in our laboratory, which contains healthy tissues, as well as cancerous tissues at different stages (I-IV) from 150 hens. Furthermore, the lipid and metabolite data obtained using polarity switching MSI will be paired with proteomics information26 obtained from serial tissue sections in order to gain insight into metabolic pathways altered in ovarian cancer.
Conclusions
This work demonstrates the development of a polarity switching IR-MALDESI MSI method for screening the spatial distribution and relative abundance of different metabolites and lipids in healthy and cancerous tissues. The electrospray solvent was optimized for these analyses in order to obtain a comprehensive metabolite and lipid data, and fundamental mass spectrometry concepts were used to identify the analytes after database searching. Lipid classes such as fatty acids, phospholipids, and sphingolipids exhibited significantly higher relative abundances in cancerous tissue compared to the healthy tissue. These results indicate the potential of polarity switching IR-MALDESI MSI in discovery of biomarkers for ovarian cancer.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Prof. Troy Ghashghaei from NCSU Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences and Prof. James Petitte from NCSU Department of Poultry Science for providing the mouse liver and hen ovary tissues, respectively. The authors also gratefully acknowledge financial assistance received from the National Institutes of Health (R01GM087964), the W. M. Keck foundation, and North Carolina State University.
Notes and References
- 1.Fenn JB, Mann M, Meng CK, Wong SF, Whitehouse CM. Science. 1989;246:64–71. doi: 10.1126/science.2675315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Karas M, Hillenkamp F. Anal. Chem. 1988;60:2299–2301. doi: 10.1021/ac00171a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tanaka K, Waki H, Ido Y, Akita S, Yoshida Y. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1988;2:151–153. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aebersold R, Mann M. Nature. 2003;422:198–207. doi: 10.1038/nature01511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wulfkuhle JD, Liotta LA, Petricoin EF. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2003;3:267–275. doi: 10.1038/nrc1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Diamandis EP. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2004;3:367–378. doi: 10.1074/mcp.R400007-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van der Merwe DE, Oikonomopoulou K, Marshall J, Diamandis EP. Adv. Cancer Res. 2006;96:23–50. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(06)96002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McDonnell LA, Corthals GL, Willems SM, van Remoortere A, van Zeijl RJM, Deelder AM. J. Proteomics. 2010;73:1921–1944. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Eberlin LS, Dill AL, Costa AB, Ifa DR, Cheng L, Masterson T, Koch M, Ratliff TL, Cooks RG. Anal. Chem. 2010;82:3430–3434. doi: 10.1021/ac9029482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eberlin LS, Norton I, Dill AL, Golby AJ, Ligon KL, Santagata S, Graham Cooks R, Agar NYR. Cancer Res. 2012;72:645–654. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schöne C, Höfler H, Walch A. Clin. Biochem. 2013;46:539–545. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schwartz SA, Reyzer ML, Caprioli RM. J. mass Spectrom. 2003;38:699–708. doi: 10.1002/jms.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chaurand P, Cornett DS, Angel PM, Caprioli RM. Mol. Cell. proteomics. 2011;10 doi: 10.1074/mcp.O110.004259. O110.004259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Laiko VV, Baldwin MA, Burlingame AL. Anal. Chem. 2000;72:652–657. doi: 10.1021/ac990998k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Takáts Z, Wiseman JM, Gologan B, Cooks RG. Science. 2004;306:471–473. doi: 10.1126/science.1104404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sampson JS, Hawkridge AM, Muddiman DC. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006;17:1712–1716. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Robichaud G, Barry JA, Muddiman DC. Encycl. Anal. Chem. 2014 [Google Scholar]
- 18.Robichaud G, Barry JA, Muddiman DC. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2014;25:319–328. doi: 10.1007/s13361-013-0787-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rosen EP, Bokhart MT, Ghashghaei HT, Muddiman DC. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2015;26:899–910. doi: 10.1007/s13361-015-1114-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wenk MR. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005;4:594–610. doi: 10.1038/nrd1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Santos CR, Schulze A. FEBS J. 2012;279:2610–2623. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08644.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goldberg IJ, Trent CM, Schulze PC. Cell Metab. 2012;15:805–812. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pulfer M, Murphy RC. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2003;22:332–364. doi: 10.1002/mas.10061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dixon RB, Bereman MS, Petitte JN, Hawkridge AM, Muddiman DC. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2011;305:79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2010.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Andrews Kingon GL, Petitte JN, Muddiman DC, Hawkridge AM. Methods. 2013;61:323–330. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nepomuceno AI, Shao H, Jing K, Ma Y, Petitte JN, Idowu MO, Muddiman DC, Fang X, Hawkridge AM. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s00216-015-8862-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2014;64:9–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lowe Ka, Chia VM, Taylor A, O’Malley C, Kelsh M, Mohamed M, Mowat FS, Goff B. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013;130:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yurkovetsky Z, Skates S, Lomakin A, Nolen B, Pulsipher T, Modugno F, Marks J, Godwin A, Gorelik E, Jacobs I, Menon U, Lu K, Badgwell D, Bast RC, Lokshin AE. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:2159–2166. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.2484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Menon U, Griffin M, Gentry-Maharaj A. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014;132:490–495. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Johnson PA, Giles JR. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2013;13:432–436. doi: 10.1038/nrc3535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mullany LK, Richards JS. Endocrinology. 2012;153:1585–1592. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-2121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stewart SL, Querec TD, Ochman AR, Gruver BN, Bao R, Babb JS, Wong TS, Koutroukides T, Pinnola AD, Klein-Szanto A, Hamilton TC, Patriotis C. Cancer Res. 2004;64:8177–8183. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hawkridge AM. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2014;8:689–699. doi: 10.1002/prca.201300135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lengyel E, Burdette JE, Kenny Ha, Matei D, Pilrose J, Haluska P, Nephew KP, Hales DB, Stack MS. Oncogene. 2014;33:3619–3633. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Barua A, Bitterman P, Abramowicz JS, Dirks AL, Bahr JM, Hales DB, Bradaric MJ, Edassery SL, Rotmensch J, Luborsky JL. Int. J. Gynecol. cancer. 2009;19:531–539. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a41613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Treviño LS, Buckles EL, Johnson PA. Cancer Prev. Res. 2012;5:343–349. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lemaire R, Menguellet SA, Stauber J, Marchaudon V, Lucot J, Collinet P, Farine M, Vinatier D, Day R, Ducoroy P, Salzet OM, Fournier I. J. Poteome Res. 2007;6:4127–4134. doi: 10.1021/pr0702722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cazares LH, Troyer D, Mendrinos S, Lance RA, Nyalwidhe JO, Beydoun HA, Clements MA, Drake RR, Semmes OJ. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:5541–5551. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gustafsson JOR, Oehler MK, Ruszkiewicz A, McColl SR, Hoffmann P. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011;12:773–794. doi: 10.3390/ijms12010773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Meding S, Martin K, Gustafsson OJR, Eddes JS, Hack S, Oehler MK, Hoffmann P. J. Proteome Res. 2013;12:308–315. doi: 10.1021/pr300996x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Menendez JA, Lupu R. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2007;7:763–777. doi: 10.1038/nrc2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tania M, Khan MA, Song Y. Curr. Oncol. 2010;17:6–11. doi: 10.3747/co.v17i5.668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nieman KM, Kenny HA, Penicka CV, Ladanyi A, Buell-Gutbrod R, Zillhardt MR, Romero IL, Carey MS, Mills GB, Hotamisligil GS, Yamada SD, Peter ME, Gwin K, Lengyel E. Nat. Med. 2011;17:1498–1503. doi: 10.1038/nm.2492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zaidi N, Lupien L, Kuemmerle NB, Kinlaw WB, Swinnen JV, Smans K. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013;52:585–589. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Robichaud G, Barry JA, Garrard KP, Muddiman DC. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2013;24:92–100. doi: 10.1007/s13361-012-0505-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Olsen JV, de Godoy LMF, Li G, Macek B, Mortensen P, Pesch R, Makarov A, Lange O, Horning S, Mann M. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2005;4:2010–2021. doi: 10.1074/mcp.T500030-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jurchen JC, Rubakhin SS, Sweedler JV. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005;16:1654–1659. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kessner D, Chambers M, Burke R, Agus D, Mallick P. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2534–2536. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schramm T, Hester A, Klinkert I, Both JP, Heeren RMA, Brunelle A, Laprévote O, Desbenoit N, Robbe MF, Stoeckli M, Spengler B, Römpp A. J. Proteomics. 2012;75:5106–5110. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Race AM, Styles IB, Bunch J. J. Proteomics. 2012;75:5111–5112. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Robichaud G, Garrard KP, Barry JA, Muddiman DC. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2013;24:718–721. doi: 10.1007/s13361-013-0607-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Smith CA, O’Maille G, Want EJ, Qin C, Trauger SA, Brandon TR, Custodio DE, Abagyan R, Siuzdak G. Ther. Drug Monit. 2005;27:747–751. doi: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000179845.53213.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sud M, Fahy E, Cotter D, Brown A, Dennis EA, Glass CK, Merrill AH, Murphy RC, Raetz CRH, Russell DW, Subramaniam S. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D527–D532. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wang Y, Gu M. Anal. Chem. 2010;82:7055–7062. doi: 10.1021/ac100888b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Blake SL, Walker SH, Muddiman DC, Hinks D, Beck KR. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2011;22:2269–2275. doi: 10.1007/s13361-011-0244-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shi SD, Hendrickson CL, Marshall aG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998;95:11532–11537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hoye TR, Dvornikovs V, Fine JM, Anderson KR, Jeffrey CS, Muddiman DC, Shao F, Sorensen PW, Wang J. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:7544–7550. doi: 10.1021/jo070957l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Thomas A, Charbonneau JL, Fournaise E, Chaurand P. Anal. Chem. 2012;84:2048–2054. doi: 10.1021/ac2033547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Korte AR, Lee YJ. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2013;24:949–955. doi: 10.1007/s13361-013-0613-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Janfelt C, Wellner N, Hansen HS, Hansen SH. J. Mass Spectrom. 2013;48:361–366. doi: 10.1002/jms.3166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Schuhmann K, Almeida R, Baumert M, Herzog R, Bornstein SR, Shevchenko A. J. mass Spectrom. 2012;47:96–104. doi: 10.1002/jms.2031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Goodwin RJA. J. Proteomics. 2012;75:4893–4911. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wu Z, Gao W, Phelps Ma, Wu D, Miller DD, Dalton JT. Anal. Chem. 2004;76:839–847. doi: 10.1021/ac0351670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Balendiran GK, Dabur R, Fraser D. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2004;22:343–352. doi: 10.1002/cbf.1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Frahm JL, Howard BE, Heber S, Muddiman DC. J. Mass Spectrom. 2006;41:281–288. doi: 10.1002/jms.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Berglund M, Wieser ME. Pure Appl. Chem. 2011;83:397–410. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kind T, Fiehn O. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:234. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ogretmen B, Hannun YA. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004;4:604–616. doi: 10.1038/nrc1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Currie E, Schulze A, Zechner R, Walther TC, Farese RV. Cell Metab. 2013;18:153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ackerstaff E, Glunde K, Bhujwalla ZM. J. Cell. Biochem. 2003;90:525–533. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gabitova L, Gorin A, Astsaturov I. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014;20:28–35. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Furuya H, Shimizu Y, Kawamori T. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2011;30:567–576. doi: 10.1007/s10555-011-9304-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






