Skip to main content
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 2016 Jan;62(1):32–37.

Familial hypercholesterolemia

Review of diagnosis, screening, and treatment

Ricky D Turgeon 1, Arden R Barry 2, Glen J Pearson 3,
PMCID: PMC4721838  PMID: 26796832

Abstract

Objective

To summarize the pathophysiology, epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

Quality of evidence

A PubMed search was conducted (inception to July 2014) for articles on pathophysiology, screening, diagnosis, and management of FH, supplemented with hand searches of bibliographies of guidelines and reviews. A supporting level of evidence for each recommendation was categorized as level I (randomized controlled trial or systematic review of randomized controlled trials), level II (observational study), or level III (expert opinion). The best available evidence is mostly level II or III.

Main message

Familial hypercholesterolemia affects 1 in 500 Canadians. Risk of a coronary event is high in these patients and is underestimated by risk calculators (eg, Framingham). Clinicians should screen patients according to guidelines and suspect FH in any patient with a premature cardiovascular event, physical stigmata of hypercholesterolemia, or an elevated plasma lipid level. Physicians should diagnose FH using either the Simon Broome or Dutch Lipid Network criteria. Management of heterozygous FH includes reducing low-density lipoprotein levels by 50% or more from baseline with high-dose statins and other lipid-lowering agents. Clinicians should refer any patient with homozygous FH to a specialized centre.

Conclusion

Familial hypercholesterolemia represents an important cause of premature cardiovascular disease in Canadians. Early identification and aggressive treatment of individuals with FH reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.


Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder that produces elevations in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol.1 High levels of circulating LDL lead to the rapid development of atherosclerosis early in life, which results in the premature development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In practice, clinicians underrecognize FH and frequently only make the diagnosis once patients present with an ASCVD event at a young age.1,2 Patients with FH require aggressive treatment, often with multiple pharmacologic agents, to reduce their levels of circulating LDL cholesterol in order to curtail ASCVD risk. In this review, we aim to summarize the pathophysiology, epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of FH.

Quality of evidence

We conducted a PubMed search (inception to July 2014), supplemented with hand searches of bibliographies of clinical practice guidelines, position papers, and reviews. Recommendations from Canadian authorities, when available, were prioritized. Recommendations were rated from levels I to III: level I evidence included 1 or more properly conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or systematic reviews of RCTs with or without meta-analysis; level II evidence included 1 or more controlled observational studies (cohort, case-control, or other relevant epidemiologic studies); and level III evidence included all opinion-based statements with no empiric supporting evidence.

Main message

Pathophysiology and epidemiology. Genetic mutations cause FH.3 Defects in the genes that code for the LDL receptor, apolipoprotein B, or proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) ultimately lead to impaired clearance of LDL cholesterol from the plasma. Low-density lipoprotein receptors, found primarily on hepatocyte cell membranes, are responsible for uptake of LDL particles and thus removal of cholesterol from plasma. Apolipoprotein B is the LDL-bound protein that binds to the LDL receptor. Finally, PCSK9 is responsible for the degradation of LDL receptors; thus, genetic defects leading to elevated PCSK9 levels will result in decreased LDL receptors on hepatocytes, and thus hyperlipidemia. A single copy of the defective gene (heterozygous) leads to moderate accumulation of plasma LDL, whereas 2 copies of the same defective gene (homozygous) or 2 coexisting mutations (compound heterozygous) lead to extensive accumulation due to minimal or no LDL cholesterol clearance. Clinically, patients with heterozygous FH (HeFH) typically have an LDL plasma concentration of 5 to 13 mmol/L, whereas patients with homozygous FH (HoFH) have an LDL level well above 13 mmol/L.4

Approximately 1 in 500 Canadians has HeFH. Prevalence of FH varies based on ethnic background, with higher rates among Québécois French Canadians (1 in 270), Lebanese (1 in 85), Afrikaners (1 in 72), and Ashkenazi Jews (1 in 67).5 Homozygous FH, the more severe form, affects approximately 1 out of every 1 million individuals.5

Complications and prognosis. Without early and aggressive treatment, FH manifests as premature ASCVD events, often affecting the coronary arteries. Patients with untreated HeFH tend to experience a first coronary event 20 or more years earlier than the general population (mean age 42 vs 64).6 Consequently, their cumulative risk of a coronary event by age 50 is up to 44% in men and 20% in women.6,7 This cardiovascular risk is far greater than that predicted by cardiovascular risk calculators (eg, Framingham risk score), and therefore these calculators should not be used in patients with FH.8 Untreated HoFH is associated with an even worse prognosis, with many patients experiencing coronary events in childhood or adolescence.9,10

Lipid screening. Table 1 provides a summary of the recommendations on screening for FH. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) dyslipidemia guidelines and FH position statement recommend universal screening of plasma lipids in all men 40 years of age or older and all women 50 years of age or older or after menopause.1,8 Furthermore, they recommend screening individuals with conditions that increase their risk of cardiovascular disease (eg, those who have hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, or who are current smokers) regardless of age.

Table 1.

Summary of recommendations

RECOMMENDATIONS LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Screening and diagnosis of FH
Who should be screened?
  • In adults, screen plasma lipid levels in all men aged ≥ 40 y and all women aged ≥ 50 y or after menopause III
  • In pediatric patients, consider routine universal screening of plasma lipid levels at age 11 y or as early as 12 mo in children with a first-degree family history of ASCVD or FH III
  • Once an FH proband has been identified, perform cascade screening on their relatives II
When should FH be suspected?
  • Any patient with premature ASCVD, physical stigmata of hypercholesterolemia, or a plasma LDL level of ≥ 5 mmol/L should be suspected of having FH II
How should the diagnosis of FH be confirmed?
  • In patients with hypercholesterolemia, rule out secondary causes such as medical conditions (eg, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, nephrotic syndrome, obstructive liver disease), drugs (eg, corticosteroids, diuretics), excess alcohol consumption, very poor diet, and sedentary lifestyle III
  • Diagnose FH using the Simon Broome Register or the Dutch Lipid Network criteria II
Management
Management of FH
  • Do not use cardiovascular risk calculators (eg, Framingham risk score) in patients with FH, as these do not reflect the true risk of ASCVD II
  • Consider enrolling patients with FH in the Canadian FH Registry* by referring them to a participating clinician or centre III
  • Aggressively manage traditional ASCVD risk factors, such as cessation of tobacco use and treatment of hypertension and diabetes II
Management of HeFH
  • Reduce LDL level by ≥ 50% from baseline III
  • Use high-dose statin as first-line therapy II
  • In patients who fail to achieve a ≥ 50% reduction in LDL levels with maximally tolerated statin therapy, add other LDL-lowering agents, such as ezetimibe, bile-acid sequestrants (eg, cholestyramine, colesevelam), fibrates, or niacin II
Management of HoFH
  • Refer patients with HoFH to a specialized centre III

ASCVD—atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, FH—familial hypercholesterolemia, HeFH—heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, HoFH—homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, LDL—low-density lipoprotein.

*

For more information, visit the FH Canada website at www.fhcanada.net/fh-canada-registry.

For pediatric screening, guidelines released by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute recommend routine universal screening of plasma lipids at 11 years of age, or as early as 12 months in children with a first-degree family history of ASCVD or FH.11 As atherosclerosis begins early in life for individuals with FH (especially in HoFH), childhood screening is intended to facilitate early identification and treatment. Despite the theoretical benefits of the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute screening program, there are complex logistical challenges in implementation, as well as limited data for the optimal time to initiate treatment, which have stimulated controversy.12

Once a proband (or index case) of FH has been identified, the CCS position statement on FH recommends further “cascade screening.”1 This involves the screening of first-degree relatives of individuals with confirmed FH to identify undiagnosed cases. If a relative is found to have FH, their relatives should also be screened, and so forth. This strategy is based on the autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of FH. Individuals who are first-, second-, and third-degree relatives of an individual with HeFH will have a 50%, 25%, and 12.5% likelihood, respectively, of also having FH. On average, cascade screening identifies 8 new cases of FH for every proband.13 A number of countries have initiated different variations of cascade screening, which have demonstrated favourable cost-effectiveness.14 Patients can be enrolled into the Canadian FH registry through referral to a participating clinician or centre. Information can be obtained from the FH Canada website (www.fhcanada.net/fh-canada-registry).

Diagnosis. In practice, clinicians frequently miss FH. Of the estimated 83 500 individuals with FH in Canada, only approximately 5% have received an appropriate diagnosis.1,2 Clinicians should suspect FH in any patient with a premature cardiovascular event, physical stigmata of hypercholesterolemia (ie, arcus senilis, xanthoma, or tendinous xanthoma) or a plasma LDL level of 5 mmol/L or higher.15

Once hypercholesterolemia is identified, physicians should rule out secondary causes, such as medical conditions (eg, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, nephrotic syndrome, obstructive liver disease), drugs (eg, corticosteroids, diuretics), excess alcohol consumption, very poor diet, and a sedentary lifestyle (Table 1).

The CCS position statement on FH recommends making the diagnosis of FH using 1 of 2 score-based diagnostic criteria: the Simon Broome Register or the Dutch Lipid Network criteria (Table 2).1,16 Both sets of diagnostic criteria perform reasonably well with no clear criterion standard.17 The diagnosis of FH does not require genetic testing, as approximately 1 in 5 patients with a clinical diagnosis of HeFH have negative test results for all currently known genetic mutations.

Table 2.

Diagnostic criteria of FH

DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA DESCRIPTION DIAGNOSIS
Simon Broome Register
  • DNA mutation consistent with FH (category A)

  • Lipid panel (category B): in adults, a TC level of > 7.5 mmol/L or LDL level of > 4.9 mmol/L; in pediatric patients, TC level of > 6.7 mmol/L or LDL level of > 4.0 mmol/L

  • Tendinous xanthoma in the patient or any first- or second-degree relative (category C)

  • Family history of myocardial infarction (category D): age < 60 y in first-degree relative; age < 50 y in second-degree relative

  • Family history of a TC level of > 7.5 mmol/L in a first- or second- degree relative (category E)

Definite FH:
  • Category A

  • Category B + category C


Probable FH:
  • Category B + category D or E

Dutch Lipid Network History and physical characteristics:
  • Personal history of CAD, or first-degree relative < 18 y with LDL values > 95th percentile or with tendinous xanthoma or arcus senilis (2 points)

  • Personal history of premature cerebral or peripheral vascular disease or first-degree adult relative with premature CAD or LDL values > 95th percentile (1 point)

  • Tendinous xanthoma (6 points)

  • Arcus senilis at age < 45 y (4 points)


LDL levels:
  • > 8.5 mmol/L (8 points)

  • 6.51–8.5 mmol/L (5 points)

  • 4.9–6.5 mmol/L (1 point)


Genetic testing:
  • LDL-R gene functional mutation (8 points)

Definite FH:
  • ≥ 8 points


Probable FH:
  • 6–7 points


Possible FH:
  • 3–5 points

CAD—coronary artery disease, FH—familial hypercholesterolemia, LDL—low-density lipoprotein, LDL-R—low-density lipoprotein receptor, TC—total cholesterol. Data from Varghese.16

Treatment. Despite the high ASCVD risk associated with FH, as many as 50% of patients with a proper diagnosis fail to receive adequately aggressive treatment, possibly owing to an underappreciation of the magnitude of the risk.18,19 The primary goal for the treatment of FH is to reduce mortality and ASCVD events, which is achieved by reducing plasma LDL levels.1,20,21

Although there is no evidence to support any specific LDL target in this population, guidelines generally recommend a reduction of 50% or more from baseline,1,20,21 similar to recommendations for the general population.8 Dietary modifications are important to lower LDL levels; however, it is not possible for most FH patients to achieve their lipid level targets without additional interventions.22 Management of traditional ASCVD risk factors, such as cessation of tobacco use and treatment of hypertension and diabetes, are crucial in FH patients owing to their high baseline ASCVD risk.23

In terms of the pharmacotherapeutic management of HeFH, high-dose statins are first-line therapy. In an RCT of patients with HeFH, treatment with 80 mg of atorvastatin daily reduced LDL levels by an average of 50% from baseline,24 similar to results obtained in the population without FH.25 Beyond LDL reduction, evidence supporting a reduction in clinically relevant outcomes with statin therapy (or any lipid-lowering therapy) in HeFH is primarily observational. One cohort study demonstrated that a moderate dose of statin therapy (eg, 40 mg of atorvastatin daily) reduced the 10-year risk of coronary heart disease from 60% to 10% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.25).19 Furthermore, patients with HeFH taking statin therapy had an ASCVD risk that was only slightly higher than an age-matched sample of the general population (6.7 vs 4.1 events per 1000 patient-years). Other studies show similar improvements in prognosis with statin treatment.26,27

In patients who fail to achieve a 50% or greater reduction in LDL levels with maximally tolerated statin therapy, the CCS position statement on FH recommends adding other LDL-lowering agents.1 Ezetimibe lowers LDL levels by an additional 15% to 20% and generally has few adverse effects when combined with statin therapy.28,29 The Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in Hypercholesterolemia Enhances Atherosclerosis Regression trial (known as the ENHANCE trial), which enrolled patients with HeFH, had insufficient power to detect changes in clinically relevant outcomes.28 The largest ezetimibe RCT, IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial), evaluated the use of ezetimibe in addition to 40 mg of simvastatin daily in 18 144 postacute coronary syndrome patients with LDL levels of 1.3 to 3.2 mmol/L.29 In this secondary prevention population without FH, the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy reduced the absolute risk of cardiovascular events— primarily nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke—by 2% over the course of 7 years, with no increased risk of adverse events. The strong pathologic role of LDL levels in the development of ASCVD in FH would predict similar relative benefit in this population.

Additional options include bile-acid sequestrants (eg, cholestyramine, colesevelam), fibrates, or niacin.20 Bile-acid sequestrants and niacin are often poorly tolerated owing to gastrointestinal adverse effects and skin flushing, respectively. Clinicians must use caution when combining a fibrate or niacin with statin therapy owing to the increased risk of myopathies.30,31 Finally, PCSK9 inhibitors such as evolocumab might provide additional options to further lower LDL levels in the future, pending Health Canada approval. Table 33238 summarizes the new lipid-lowering agents for the treatment of HoFH.

Table 3.

Summary of new lipid-lowering agents for the treatment of HoFH

LIPID-LOWERING AGENT CHARACTERISTICS
AVAILABILITY IN CANADA MECHANISM DOSING REGIMEN MEAN LDL REDUCTION FROM BASELINE CLINICAL OUTCOME EVIDENCE CONTRAINDICATIONS ADVERSE EFFECTS POTENTIAL DRUG INTERACTIONS
Lomitapide* Yes (approved February 4, 2014) An MTP inhibitor that prevents assembly of VLDL thereby reducing LDL levels 5–60 mg orally once daily 38%–50% None Pregnancy; chronic bowel disease (eg, IBD, malabsorption); moderate or severe hepatic impairment; use of a moderate or strong CYP 3A4 inhibitor; coadministration with simvastatin ≥ 40 mg/d Gastrointestinal intolerance, liver enzyme elevations, hepatic steatosis
  • Inhibits CYP 3A4 (eg, interacts with atorvastatin, lovastatin, simvastatin, warfarin)

  • Inhibits P-glycoprotein (eg, interacts with colchicine, dabigatran, digoxin)

  • CYP 3A4 substrate

Mipomersen No An antisense oligonucleotide targeted against Apo B mRNA, which prevents synthesis of Apo B thereby decreasing LDL levels 200 mg SC once weekly 25% None Moderate or severe hepatic impairment Injection-site reaction, flulike symptoms, liver enzyme elevations, hepatic steatosis None known
PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab, bococizumab, evolocumab) No A PCSK9 inhibitor that prevents the breakdown of LDL receptors thereby enhancing LDL elimination
  • 75–150 mg of alirocumab SC every 2 wk

  • 150 mg of bococizumab SC every 2 wk

  • 140 mg of evolocumab SC every 2 wk or 420 mg SC every 4 wk

48%–65% for HeFH; 23% for HoFH None None known Injection-site reaction; musculoskeletal symptoms None known

Apo B—apolipoprotein B, CYP 3A4—cytochrome P450 enzyme subtype 3A4, HeFH—heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, HoFH—homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, IBD—inflammatory bowel disease, LDL—low-density lipoprotein, mRNA—messenger ribonucleic acid, MTP—microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, PCSK9—proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9, SC—subcutaneously, VLDL—very low–density lipoprotein.

*

Data for lomitapide characteristics from Rader and Kastelein,32 Aegerion Pharmaceuticals,33 and Cuchel et al.34

Data for mipomersen characteristics from Rader and Kastelein,32 Genzyme,35 Raal et al,36 and Akdim et al.37

Data for characteristics of PCSK9 inhibitors from Navarese et al.38

Limited data exist for the treatment of HeFH in children. Randomized controlled trials of lipid-lowering agents in pediatric patients have thus far demonstrated an LDL reduction consistent with that seen in adults but, owing to limited enrollment and follow-up, have not demonstrated an effect on clinical outcomes.3941 In general, the management of pediatric patients with HeFH is similar to treatment of adults.

The management of HoFH requires specialist care with aggressive pharmacologic lipid-lowering treatment, as well as lipoprotein apheresis in select patients.1 Lipoprotein apheresis is an expensive procedure that involves extracorporeal filtering of lipoproteins from blood, generally performed over a few hours on a weekly or twice-monthly basis. As with HeFH, statins and ezetimibe are first- and second-line therapy, with bile-acid sequestrants, fibrates, and niacin used less frequently. Two new agents, lomitapide and mipomersen (Table 3),3238 show promise in the treatment of HoFH. In 2014, Health Canada approved lomitapide for use in HoFH, whereas mipomersen is not yet commercially available in Canada. There might also be a future role for PCSK9 inhibitors in the treatment of HoFH patients.

Conclusion

Familial hypercholesterolemia is an underrecognized and undertreated cause of cardiovascular disease. Clinicians should screen patients for FH and diagnose it according to CCS recommendations. Core management of HeFH relies on aggressive pharmacologic lipid lowering and ASCVD risk factor management. Clinicians should refer all patients with HoFH to a specialized centre for aggressive lipid lowering. New and upcoming pharmacologic agents offer additional options for lipid lowering.

EDITOR’S KEY POINTS

  • Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder that produces elevations in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. It is an underrecognized and undertreated cause of cardiovascular disease.

  • The primary goal for the treatment of FH is to reduce mortality and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events, which is achieved by reducing plasma LDL levels. Although there is no evidence to support any specific LDL target in this population, guidelines generally recommend a reduction of 50% or more from baseline. Dietary modifications are important to lower LDL levels; however, additional interventions are required to achieve target lipid levels.

  • Patients with FH require aggressive treatment, often with multiple pharmacologic agents, as well as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factor management (eg, tobacco use, hypertension).

Footnotes

This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

This article has been peer reviewed.

La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro de janvier 2016 à la page e4.

Contributors

All authors contributed to the literature review, analysis, and interpretation, and to preparing the manuscript for submission.

Competing interests

None declared

References

  • 1.Genest J, Hegele RA, Bergeron J, Brophy J, Carpentier A, Couture P, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement on familial hypercholesterolemia. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(12):1471–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.09.028. Epub 2014 Oct 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization . Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). Report of a second WHO consultation. Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 1999. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/66346/1/WHO_HGN_FH_CONS_99.2.pdf. Accessed 2015 Nov 23. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Faiz F, Hooper AJ, van Bockxmeer FM. Molecular pathology of familial hypercholesterolemia, related dyslipidemias and therapies beyond the statins. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2012;49(1):1–17. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2011.646942. Epub 2012 Jan 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cuchel M, Bruckert E, Ginsberg HN, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Hegele RA, et al. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(32):2146–57. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu274. Epub 2014 Jul 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Austin MA, Hutter CM, Zimmern RL, Humphries SE. Genetic causes of monogenic heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a HuGE prevalence review. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(5):407–20. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stone NJ, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS, Verter J. Coronary artery disease in 116 kindred with familial type II hyperlipoproteinemia. Circulation. 1974;49(3):476–88. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.49.3.476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hu M, Lan W, Lam CW, Mak YT, Pang CP, Tomlinson B. Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in Hong Kong Chinese. Study of 252 cases. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(3):762–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.03.048. Epub 2012 Mar 30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anderson TJ, Gregoire J, Hegele RA, Couture P, Mancini GB, McPherson R, et al. 2012 Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29(2):151–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Raal FJ, Pilcher GJ, Panz VR, van Deventer HE, Brice BC, Blom DJ, et al. Reduction in mortality in subjects with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia associated with advances in lipid-lowering therapy. Circulation. 2011;124(20):2202–7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.042523. Epub 2011 Oct 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Macchiaiolo M, Gagliardi MG, Toscano A, Guccione P, Bartuli A. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Lancet. 2012;379(9823):1330. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61476-1. Epub 2012 Jan 27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents: summary report. Pediatrics. 2011;128(Suppl 5):S213–56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2107C. Epub 2011 Nov 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Newman TB, Pletcher MJ, Hulley SB. Overly aggressive new guidelines for lipid screening in children: evidence of a broken process. Pediatrics. 2012;130(2):349–52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0481. Epub 2012 Jul 23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Umans-Eckenhausen MA, Defesche JC, Sijbrands EJ, Scheerder RL, Kastelein JJ. Review of first 5 years of screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia in the Netherlands. Lancet. 2001;357(9251):165–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03587-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ademi Z, Watts GF, Juniper A, Liew D. A systematic review of economic evaluations of the detection and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(6):2391–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.280. Epub 2013 Mar 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hopkins PN, Toth PP, Ballantyne CM, Rader DJ. Familial hypercholesterolemias: prevalence, genetics, diagnosis and screening recommendations from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2011;5(Suppl 3):S9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2011.03.452. Epub 2011 Apr 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Varghese MJ. Familial hypercholesterolemia: a review. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;7(2):107–17. doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.132478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Civeira F, Ros E, Jarauta E, Plana N, Zambon D, Puzo J, et al. Comparison of genetic versus clinical diagnosis in familial hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(9):1187–93. 1193.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.056. Epub 2008 Aug 27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Familial hypercholesterolemia in the Danish general population: prevalence, coronary artery disease, and cholesterol-lowering medication. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(11):3956–64. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1563. Epub 2012 Aug 14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Versmissen J, Oosterveer DM, Yazdanpanah M, Defesche JC, Basart DC, Liem AH, et al. Efficacy of statins in familial hypercholesterolaemia: a long term cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a2423. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, The National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care . Identification and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia. NICE clinical guidelines, no. 71. London, UK: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Watts GF, Gidding S, Wierzbicki AS, Toth PP, Alonso R, Brown WV, et al. Integrated guidance on the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia from the International FH Foundation. Int J Cardiol. 2014;171(3):309–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.11.025. Epub 2013 Nov 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Malhotra A, Shafiq N, Arora A, Singh M, Kumar R, Malhotra S. Dietary interventions (plant sterols, stanols, omega-3 fatty acids, soy protein and dietary fibers) for familial hypercholesterolaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(6):CD001918. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001918.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jansen AC, van Aalst-Cohen ES, Tanck MW, Trip MD, Lansberg PJ, Liem AH, et al. The contribution of classical risk factors to cardiovascular disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia: data in 2400 patients. J Intern Med. 2004;256(6):482–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smilde TJ, van Wissen S, Wollersheim H, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ, Stalenhoef AF. Effect of aggressive versus conventional lipid lowering on atherosclerosis progression in familial hypercholesterolaemia (ASAP): a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2001;357(9256):577–81. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04053-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, Shear C, Barter P, Fruchart JC, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(14):1425–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050461. Epub 2005 Mar 8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Scientific Steering Committee on behalf of the Simon Broome Register Group Mortality in treated heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: implications for clinical management. Atherosclerosis. 1999;142(1):105–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Harada-Shiba M, Sugisawa T, Makino H, Abe M, Tsushima M, Yoshimasa Y, et al. Impact of statin treatment on the clinical fate of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2010;17(7):667–74. doi: 10.5551/jat.4143. Epub 2010 Jun 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kastelein JJ, Akdim F, Stroes ES, Zwinderman AH, Bots ML, Stalenhoef AF, et al. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(14):1431–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800742. Epub 2008 Mar 30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2387–97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1410489. Epub 2015 Jun 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Amend KL, Landon J, Thyagarajan V, Niemcryk S, McAfee A. Incidence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis with statin and fibrate use in an insured US population. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(10):1230–9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q110. Epub 2011 Sep 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC, Parish S, Aung T, Tomson J, et al. Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(3):203–12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rader DJ, Kastelein JJ. Lomitapide and mipomersen: two first-in-class drugs for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2014;129(9):1022–32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aegerion Pharmaceuticals . Juxtapid [product monograph] Toronto, ON: Aegerion Pharmaceuticals; 2014. Available from: www.aegerion.ca/collateral/documents/Canada-English/FINAL%20Pristine%20Monograph%20copy.pdf. Accessed 2015 Nov 23. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cuchel M, Meagher EA, du Toit Theron H, Blom DJ, Marais AD, Hegele RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2013;381(9860):40–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61731-0. Epub 2012 Nov 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Genzyme [website] Kynamaro. Highlights of prescribing information. Cambridge, MA: Genzyme; 2013. Available from: www.genzyme.com/Products/~/media/B866EE59A7C14916BFBFB4ECAA1C7087.pdf. Accessed 2015 Nov 23. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Raal FJ, Santos RD, Blom DJ, Marais AD, Charng MJ, Cromwell WC, et al. Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, for lowering of LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9719):998–1006. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60284-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Akdim F, Visser ME, Tribble DL, Baker BF, Stroes ES, Yu R, et al. Effect of mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105(10):1413–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Mar 30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Schulze V, Gurbel PA, Tantry U, Lin Y, et al. Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies in adults with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(1):40–51. doi: 10.7326/M14-2957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vuorio A, Kuoppala J, Kovanen PT, Humphries SE, Strandberg T, Tonstad S, et al. Statins for children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(7):CD006401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006401.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Avis HJ, Hutten BA, Gagne C, Langslet G, McCrindle BW, Wiegman A, et al. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin therapy for children with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(11):1121–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Van der Graaf A, Cuffie-Jackson C, Vissers MN, Trip MD, Gagne C, Shi G, et al. Efficacy and safety of coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin in adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(17):1421–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES