Abstract
The asymmetric desymmetrization of meso or prochiral compounds containing an all-carbon quaternary center is an attractive alternative to classical synthetic approaches aimed at the asymmetric formation of a new C—C bond. This review focuses on nonenzymatic desymmetrizations that utilize transition metal catalysts or organocatalysts to distinguish between enantiotopic groups to generate enantioenriched compounds containing all-carbon quaternary stereocenters.
Keywords: desymmetrization, all-carbon quatemary center, asymmetric, organocatalysis, transition-metal catalysis
Graphical Abstract
The stereoselective formation of all-carbon quaternary centers remains a significant challenge in synthesis due to the steric repulsion between the carbon substituents.1 Most commonly, construction of stereocenters has focused on the asymmetric formation of a new C–C bond. Desymmetrization of prochiral or meso compounds offers an alternative approach, where the formation of a quaternary center is separate from the enantiodetermining step (Scheme 1). Here a chiral reagent or catalyst is used to distinguish between two enantiotopic groups. This approach is particularly attractive when the meso or achiral precursors are readily available and when low catalyst loadings can be utilized. While previous reviews have focused on enzymatic reactions,2 this review focuses on catalytic nonenzymatic desymmetrization approaches for the enantioselective synthesis of compounds containing all-carbon quaternary centers. The review is divided into transition-metal catalyzed and organocatalyzed reactions.
Scheme 1.
General desymmetrization strategy to set all-carbon quaternary stereocenters
Organometallic
Since the first reports of a homogeneous transition-metal complex catalyzing an asymmetric reaction in 1968, the field has grown in importance and scope.3 Traditionally, these types of enantioselective reactions depend on in situ formation of a tightly bound metal complex of a chiral ligand and transition metal precursor. More recently, formation of ion pairs have been invoked in asymmetric transition-metal catalysis.4 The reactions usually rely on the enantioselective formation of a new bond. Herein we will examine their use in desymmetrization strategies for the formation of enantioenriched quaternary carbon chiral stereocenters.
Cu
Recently, the desymmetrization of 2,2-dicarbon substituted 1,3-diols has successfully been achieved using a functionalized Cu-(II)-pyridinebisoxazoline (Pybox) system.5 Monobenzylation of diols such as 2 to benzoate esters 3 proceeded in overall excellent yield and generally good enantioselectivities following the pre-formation of the catalytic system using copper (II) chloride and Pybox 1 possessing 4-phenyl and 5,5-di-n-butyl substituents (Scheme 2). Remarkably, differentiation of R1 = methyl and R2 = ethyl (2b to 3b) was accomplished in a greater than 10:1 enantiomeric ratio. The authors postulate an octahedral complex between the Pybox-Cu(II) catalyst, 1,3-diol and benzoyl chloride, which allows the two phenyl and oxazoline planes to cross vertically consequently allowing just enough space for the smaller R group to occupy (intermediate I).
Scheme 2.
Desymmetrization of diols using a Cu-Pybox complex
Mikami and co-workers designed an asymmetric synthesis of highly functionalized five-membered-ring compounds bearing quaternary stereocenters through a desymmetrization strategy.6 Their strategy involves the conjugate addition of a zinc alkylating agent to a symmetric cyclopentene-1,3-dione 4 to yield enantioenriched compounds such as 5 using a copper (II) salt and phosphoramidite ligand in as low as 0.5 mol% (Scheme 3). Initial optimization identified Cu(OTf)2 as the ideal copper salt and BINOL based phosphoramidite ligand 6 with a biaryl substituent at the 3 and 3’ position. A broad range of substitution patterns were tolerated on precursor 4 including esters and protected alcohols and various alkyl zinc reagents were appropriate. The one pot reaction proceeded in excellent yield with generally good diastereo- and enantiocontrol. One notable exception was the silyl protectecd alcohol, 5l-Et, which was formed in only 36% ee and as the opposite diastereomer. The methodology was utilized in the synthesis of a precursor of madindolines A and B.7
Scheme 3.
Desymmetrization of cyclopenten-1,3-diones
A method for the desymmetrization of 1,6-heptadiynes via click chemistry,8 Cu(I)-catalyzed azide alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) was recently reported (Scheme 4).9 This novel approach is only the second report of an asymmetric CuAAC reaction.10 Treatment of dialkynes such as 7 in the presence of CuCl and Pybox ligand 11 in the unusual solvent 2,5-hexanedione led to enantiomerically enriched chiral quaternary oxindoles bearing a 1,2,3-triazole moiety 9. In this methodology, generation of triazole 10 was a major side product, although it could generally be limited (typically <15%) through lowering of reaction temperature and increase of catalyst load. Simple manipulation of the resulting monoalkyne readily produced further substituted molecules (Scheme 5).
Scheme 4.
Desymmetrization of dialkynes via CuAAC
Scheme 5.
Synthetic manipulation of alkyne product
A Cu(I)-catalyzed azide alkyne cycloaddition was also used in the desymmetrization of succinimide-derived bis(alkynes 16 to yield 1,2,3-triazoles 18 with a quaternary center (Scheme 6).11 When combined with novel chiral phosphine ligand 19, CuF2 was found to be the most effective catalytic system to limit unwanted bis(triazole) formation (yields ≥60%) and maximize enantiopurity (enantioselectivities ≥70%) of the reaction. The multifunctional nature of the catalyst was determined to be crucial to the success of the reaction. A variety of functional groups and substitution patterns were well tolerated on the aromatic ring of the succinimide (R1) and incorporation of a para-OEt phenyl on the nitrogen (Ar, 18t–18x) was found to have beneficial effects on the enantioselectivity of the reaction.
Scheme 6.
Asymmetric copper catalyzed azide-alkyne click cycloaddition
Cai and co-workers reported that 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines and 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-benzo[b]azepines with quaternary stereocenters could be prepared asymmetrically via a desymmetrization process utilizing a copper-catalyzed N-arylation in combination with binol-derived ligand 22 (Scheme 7).12 Aryl iodides or bromides 20 yielded heterocyclic products 21 containing a cyano-bearing quaternary carbon in a remote position from the reaction center in good yields (47–91%) and enantioselectivities (76–94%). Although, no rational was provided, the cyano group was essential to the reaction, with other functional groups such as methyl or esters giving lower yields and/or enantiopurity of product. The reaction was tolerant to functionalization of the aromatic ring such as ester substituents (21k) and less reactive halogens (21g–21i). A one carbon homologation of the substrate led to formation of a seven-membered ring heterocycle (21n–21p, n = 2). The origin of enantioselectivity is explained through a model involving coordination of an amine-copper(I) complex with the binol OH in the transition state (Figure 1).
Scheme 7.
Desymmetrization by copper-catalyzed N-arylation
Figure 1.
Origin of enantioselectivity for 21q
As a follow-up to their copper-catalyzed asymmetric desymmetrization, which differentiates between two aryl halides, Cai and co-workers reported an analogous reaction that differentiates between two amide moieties (Scheme 8).13 This desymmetrization utilized diamide substrates 23 and a more nucleophilic 1,2-diamine catalyst 25 to control enantioselectivity. Quinolinone products 24 were generally formed in high yields and modest enantiopurity for a variety of substitution patterns.
Scheme 8.
Asymmetric desymmetrization of diamides
Rh
Krische and co-workers utilized a rhodium catalyzed tandem conjugate addition-aldol cyclization of keto-enones to desymmetrize cyclic diones with high stereocontrol (Table 1).14 In this methodology, enone-diones 26 were treated with a phenyl boronic acid in the presence of an oxidation resistant methoxy-bridged rhodium dimer [Rh(COD)(OCH3)]2, (S)-BINAP (28), and KOH to yield bicyclic compounds 27. The rhodium catalyzed conjugate addition was followed by a diastereoselective aldol addition invoking a Z-enolate and a Zimmerman–Traxler type transition state (IV). While the products formed have 4 continuous stereocenters, in all cases essentially a single relative stereoisomer (>99:1 dr) is produced with high levels of enantiopurity (≥85% ee). The process efficiently forms diquinane, hydrindane and cis-decalone ring systems, however the reaction is limited to α,β-unsaturated ketone substrates (esters underwent conjugate addition but failed to undergo subsequent aldolization). Products such as 27ea map nicely onto the ring system of the cardiotonic steroid digitoxin (Scheme 9).15
Table 1.
Conjugate addition-aldol cyclization of prochiral diones
Scheme 9.
Products as precursors to steroids
An enantioselective desymmetrization of boryl-substituted cyclobutanones 29 through cleavage of a carbon–carbon single bond to create 1-indanones 30 containing benzylic quaternary carbon centers was shown by Murakami and co-workers (Scheme 10).16 In this reaction, transmetalation of boron with rhodium (I) is followed by intramolecular addition of the arylrhodium species to the carbonyl. The resultant bicyclic structure undergoes an enantioselective β-elimination and protonolysis. Ideal conditions included the use of the chiral biaryl diphosphine ligand (S)-SEGPHOS (31) with a Rh (I) dimer and was shown to accommodate four different groups at the 3-position including the bulky isopropyl group (29c→30c) with excellent yields (81–96%) and enantioselectivities (79–95%). Indanone 30d was then applied to the formal synthesis of α-herbertenol.17 A drawback of this methodology is that the synthesis of the boryl-substituted cyclobutanones which is quite laborious.
Scheme 10.
Desymmetrization of boryl-substituted cyclcobutanones
Recently, Dong and co-workers reported an enantioselective desymmetrization of cyclopropenes 33 bearing a quaternary carbon through an intermolecular Rh-catalyzed hydroacylation that is favored by the resulting release of strain energy to form cyclopropanes 34 with a quaternary stereocenter (Scheme 11).18 This methodology utilizes a rhodium (I) dimer and a ferrocene-based phosphine ligand 35 for the in situ formation of a chiral catalyst. Salicylaldehyde derivatives 32 were used as hydroacylation agents due to the known coordination of the phenolic oxygen to rhodium. Various arylaldehydes with electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents in the ortho-, meta-, or para-positions were readily oxidized. The cyclopropene structure could be modified to accommodate a wide range of aryl groups. The reaction favors formation of the trans-diastereomer of 34 (dr's range from >20:1–6:1) and the enantiopurity of both diastereomers is generally excellent (≥95%).
Scheme 11.
Hydroacylation of prochiral cyclopropenes
Prochiral γ,δ-unsaturated amides 36 were shown to undergo an enantioselective desymmetrization via a rhodium catalyzed asymmetric hydroboration (Table 2)19. The amide directs a cis addition of boron 39 and BINOL-derived phenyl phosphite 38 controlled the enantioselectivity of the reaction. Organoboronate intermediates were then oxidized to yield the alcohol products 37. Alternatively, intermediates were converted into trifluoroborates 40 and underwent a palladium catalyzed cross-coupling reaction to yield arylated products 41. Modest variation of the substituent α to the amide (R1) and on the amide nitrogen was tolerated (R2).
Table 2.
Desymmetrization via catalytic asymmetric hydroboration
Pd
Asymmetric palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions have been an area of growing interest.20 Other than nucleophilic substitutions pioneered by Trost and Stoltz, palladium-catalyzed methods to generate enantioenriched quaternary carbons have been limited in scope.1c,21 Here the less prominent desymmetrization strategies are examined.
In 2004, Willis and co-workers developed an enantioselective Suzuki reaction that produces compounds with a quaternary carbon center utilizing a desymmetrization strategy (Scheme 12).22 The achiral 5-membered ditriflate 43 was selectively monocoupled with a variety of aromatic boronic esters in the presence of palladium diacetate and the monodentate phosphine ligand 45 to produce mono arylated products, 44. Boronic acids with para, meta, and heterocyclic substitution patterns performed moderately well in the procedure (46–66% yield and 72-85% ee). The exception of ortho-substituted boronic acids (<5% yield, substrate 44c) likely is due to steric factors. The consistent enantioselectivities over a range of boronic acid substrates may indicate that the enantiodetermining step is oxidative addition. While results are moderate, this is the first example of a Suzuki coupling that sets the absolute stereochemistry of quaternary carbon centers.
Scheme 12.
Enantioselective Suzuki reaction
As a follow up to their desymmetrization of ditriflates through a Suzuki reaction, Willis and colleagues developed an asymmetric palladium catalyzed carbonylation reaction of prochiral six-membered ring 1,3-dienes 46 (Scheme 13).23 Again, a monodentate phosphine ligand was utilized now featuring an electron-rich PCy2 substituent, 49. Unfortunately, the reaction produced a mixture of mono- and di-carbonylated product 47 and 48. Enantioselectivies of the chiral products, monoester 47, were seen to improve as a function of the yield of diester 48, which led the authors to propose an in situ kinetic resolution mechanism.
Scheme 13.
Desymmetrization via carbonylation reaction
Other
Jacobsen and co-workers report the desymmetrization of 3,3-disubstituted oxetanes with (salen)Co(III) complexes.24 In this process oxetanes with a pendant hydroxy group such as 50 can undergo enantioselective ring opening to yield tetrahydrofurans with a quaternary center such as 51 using either monomeric or oligomeric (salen)Co(III) complexes 52 or 53 (Table 3). In general, both catalysts were found to be efficient in the transformation (yields ≥77% and ee's ≥96%); however the oligomeric catalyst 53 required lower catalyst loadings and often shorter reaction times.
Table 3.
Desymmetrization of oxetanes with (salen)Co(III) complexes
The gold catalyzed desymmetrization of readily available 1,4-diynamides 54 to yield methylene pyrrolidines 55 (Scheme 14) was recently reported.25 Following pre-formation of gold phosphonate complex 56 using binol derivative TRIP, cyclization of 1,4-diynamides in chlorinated solvents at –55 °C led to high yields (≥67%) of pyrrolidines with quaternary centers in good enantiopurity (ee ≥74%). In general, reactions were conducted using 5 mol% of catalyst and complete in less than 24 hours; however, when R was not an aryl group (55f and 55g), 15 mol% of catalyst 56 and 7 days was required.
Scheme 14.
Enantioselective cyclization of diynamides
Optically active cyclic amines or imines 58 bearing a quaternary stereocenter were formed via an enantioselective hydroamination of dialkenes or dialkynes 57 with oxazolinylborate zirconium catalyst 59 (Table 4).26 In the case of amino dialkenes (58a–58g), two stereocenters are formed in the reaction, one through the desymmetrization of a quaternary center and the other through C–N bond formation. By varying reaction conditions the authors were able to achieve reasonable diastereocontrol. Dilute conditions at room temperature favored the formation of the shown cis diastereomer (under more concentrated conditions the trans isomer was favored). Piperidine formation (entry 6, ee = 32%) is much less selective than pyrrolidine formation (entries 1–5).
Table 4.
Zirconium catalyzed enantioselective desymmetrization of dienes
Organocatalytic
Chiral organic molecules have become attractive catalysts in the development of enantioselective reactions. In contrast to metal catalysts, organocatalysts are typically easier to handle and store, often involving non-inert reaction conditions.27 Commercial availability and lower catalyst loadings have led to their widespread application.
Triazolium salt 62, was utilized to induce an enantioselective Stetter reaction through the desymmetrization of substituted cyclohexadienone 60 available from 3,4,5-trimethylphenol (Scheme 15).28 Product 61 containing a quaternary stereocenter adjacent to a tertiary ether was obtained in good yield and excellent enantioselectivity. While the methodology was thoroughly explored in regards to 2,4,6-trisubstituted phenols which produce neighboring tertiary centers, formation of quaternary carbons was limited to this single example. This was likely due to the lack of readily available starting materials.
Scheme 15.
Desymmetrization via an intramolecular Stetter reaction
Scheidt and co-workers reported an asymmetric synthesis of α,α-disubstituted cyclopentenes 65 via an intramolecular aldol reaction of prochiral diketones 63 catalyzed by chiral N-heterocyclic carbene 66 (Table 5)29 For aryl ketones, the reaction proceeds through a β-lactone intermediate (64), which can eliminate CO2 to generate the cyclopentene in good yield and enantiopurity (entries 1–8). When aliphatic ketones were used, the reaction stopped at the β-lactone (entries 9–10). The resulting enantioselectivities dropped slightly when larger substitution patterns were used at R1 (entries 5–8).
Table 5.
Enantioselective synthesis of cyclopentenes
Spinol-derived phosphoric acid 70 was found to catalyze an intermolecular sulfur nucleophile ring-opening of achiral 3-substituted oxetanes 67 (Scheme 16).30 This desymmetrization process was effective for the formation of highly enantioenriched tertiary stereocenters (R2 = H), but less stereoselective for the formation of alcohols such as 69a and 69b with quaternary carbons (enantiopurity of 71 and 77%). A plausible transition state V is suggested wherein the larger substituent (RL) is positioned away from the catalyst to minimize steric interactions.
Scheme 16.
Desymmetrization of 3,3-disubstituted oxetanes
An organocatalytic desymmetrization of diynoic acids 71 through a bromolactonization was recently reported by Hennecke and co-workers.31 Enantioenriched bromoenol lactones 72 containing a tetrasubstituted alkene and a quaternary center were prepared using dimeric chinchona alkaloid derivative 73 and NBS (Table 6). Internal alkynes generally yielded products with higher enantiopurity. Mechanistically, the catalyst is proposed to activate the carboxylic acid through one of the pyridazine nitrogens and potentially also stabilize the forming intermediate halirenium ion (transition state VI, Figure 2).
Table 6.
Desymmetrization of alkynes via bromolactonization
Figure 2.

Possible transition state
Spirocyclohexadienoneoxindoles 74 were shown to undergo desymmetrization via an organocatalyzed asymmetric sulfa-Michael addition (Table 7).32 This reaction utilizes aminethiourea catalyst 77 and generates spirocyclic oxindoles such as 76 bearing an all-carbon quaternary center with an adjacent chiral sulfur containing stereocenter as a single diastereomer (>20:1 dr). The process tolerates a variety of aryl thiols (entries 1–11) and some modest substitution on the oxindole ring (entries 12–14). Overall yields were excellent (≥77%) and enantioselectivities good (≥82%).
Table 7.
Asymmetric synthesis of spirocyclic oxindoles
The desymmetrization of meso diols such as 78 through selective acylation was recently described by Chuzel, Bressy co-workers (Scheme 17).33 This process, which utilizes ferrocenyl Fu based chiral dialkylaminopyridine derivative 8034 as a catalyst yields monoesters such as 79 bearing 5 contiguous asymmetric centers, including 2 all-carbon quaternary stereocenters with up to 94% enantioselectivity. The authors explored two different sets of conditions. The first condition (A) consisted of standard Fu protocols using t-AmOH as the solvent and led to high enantioselectivity. The second condition (B) utilized a C6F6/CHCl3 solvent mixture and generally gave yields. Mechanistically, the authors postulate that in C6F6 π-π complexation between solvent and the chiral DMAP catalyst led to a standard desymmetrization event. In tert-amyl alcohol however, a desymmetrization reaction followed by a kinetic resolution may have been responsible for the enantioselectivities seen. Manipulation of monoacetate products led to complex polyketide fragments 81 (Scheme 18).
Scheme 17.
Enantioselective desymmetrization of meso primary diols
Scheme 18.
Synthesis of polyketides
Desymmetrization of 2,2-disubstituted 1,3-diols via a chiral phosphoric acid catalyzed oxidative cleavage of benzylidene acetals was recently realized (Scheme 19).35 Dimethyldioxirane (DMDO) was used in combination with catalyst 85 (TRIP) to selectively oxidize benzylidene acetals 82 to esters such as 84 via the proposed intermediate 83 in excellent yields and good enantiopurity. DFT calculations showed that the rate determining step was oxidation by DMDO and that aryl-aryl interactions between the substrate and catalyst are responsible for the high enantioselectivities seen.
Scheme 19.
Asymmetric synthesis of 1,3-diols
We have recently reported the desymmetrization of prochiral diesters 87 through a Brønsted acid catalyzed intramolecular cyclization with phosphoric acid 85 to yield lactones 88 containing an all-carbon quaternary center.36 Desymmetrization substrates were prepared in 3 steps and high yields from commercially available tert-butyl malonate (86). Lactonization yields were generally high and enantioselectivities of products excellent (≥90% ee for γ-lactones and 86% ee for δ-lactone). Recently, we have found that catalyst loading could be reduced to 1 mol% and reaction times lowered through the use of toluene at 80 °C with only minimal loss in yield and no loss in enantioselectivity (88a was prepared in 95% yield and 98% ee).37 Lactone 88a readily underwent synthetic transformations to yield new useful building blocks with little to no loss in enantioselectivity (Scheme 21).
Scheme 21.
Synthetic transformations
Asymmetric synthesis of cycloalkanones with an α-quaternary stereocenter such as 95 was accomplished through a chlorination/ring expansion cascade (Table 8).38 Desymmetrization of cyclic substrates 93 was accomplished using 1,3-dichloro-3,3-dimethylhydantoin (94) as a chlorine source in combination with organocatalysts (DHQD)2PHAL and N-boc-L-phenylglycine. Choice of solvent had a large impact on the enantioselectivity of the reaction, with toluene performing the best and the addition of molecular sieves led to decreased reaction times. Halogens and alkyl groups in the meta or para position were tolerated on the aromatic ring, and notably, this was the first time oxa-cyclobutanol substrates (93h–93l) were used as ring expansion substrates en route to dihydrofuran-4-(2H)-ones.
Table 8.
Enantioselective desymmetrization through chlorination/ring expansion
Olefinic 1,3-diols 96 were shown to undergo a desymmetrization event through bromoetherification catalyzed by C2-symmetric sulfide 98 to yield substituted tetrahedrofurans with 3 stereogenic centers, including a quaternary carbon such as 97 by Yeung and co-workers (Table 9).39 N-Bromosuccinimide (NBS) was used as the halogen source and key to the reaction was addition of 1 equivalent of MsOH (other acids were less effective). In general the reaction proceeded with good diastereoselectivity, the exceptions being for meta-substituted aromatics (entry 8, 96h→97h) and when a methyl replaces the benzyl group at the diol stereocenter (entry 13, 96m→97m). Enantioselectivities for the reaction range from 64–92%. The nature of the substituent on the aromatic ring did not significantly affect the reaction. Notably, the reaction required 3 days at –78 °C for completion. The bromocyclization is thought to go through active species 99 which could deliver Br to olefin 96 through a transition state such as VII (Scheme 22).
Table 9.
Asymmetric bromoetherication and desymmetrization of diols
Scheme 22.
Plausible mechanism for bromocyclization
Yeung and co-workers expanded upon their desymmetrization of diols through bromoetherification by utilizing diolefinic substrates 100 to yield tetrahydrofuran substrates with two quaternary stereogenic carbon atoms such as 101 (Scheme 23).40 This cyclization utilized chiral amino-thiocarbamate catalyst 102 and N-bromophthalimide (NBP) as the bromine source. Substrates with symmetric diolefins (i.e.; R1 = R2) were first examined and yielded heterocycles with reasonable dr and enantioselectivities. Diols with unsymmetric diolefins (R1 ≠ R2), usually favored cyclization onto the phenyl olefin (100h, 100i,100k, and 100l); however, when the mixed methyl olefin was used, cyclization occurred at the less hindered olefin (100j). Interestingly, several of the tetrahydrofuran substrates were able to undergo a second halocyclization of the intermediate olefin to yield spirocyclic compounds 103.
Scheme 23.
Desymmetrization diolefinic diols
Prochiral 2,2-disubstituted cyclopentene-1,3-diones 104 underwent an enantioselective desymmetrization via a formal C(sp2)-H alkylation to substituted products 106 which contain a quaternary carbon (Table 10).41 The reaction is catalyzed by tertiary amino-urea-based catalyst 107 and utilizes readily available nitroalkanes 105 as the alkylating agents. The reaction presumably proceeds via an addition reaction followed by an in situ elimination and isomerization. Choice of the external base, Na2CO3, was carefully examined such that the base would not participate in the conjugate addition (only facilitate the elimination). The substrate scope for the reaction is quite general, accommodating a wide array of substitution on the dione 104 and the nitroalkane 105. Yields were generally good and enantioselectivities of up to 96% were seen for this process. Manipulation of products into more complicated structures was explored and reactions were generally diastereoselective (products 109–111, Scheme 24). A second alkylation of 106aj gave compound 112 which is the core of the antibiotic natural product (+)-madindoline B.42
Table 10.
Enantioselective desymmetrization of cyclopentene-1,3-diones
Scheme 24.
Synthetic transformations of alkenes
The asymmetric synthesis of bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes and bicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes containing an all-carbon quaternary center such as 114 and 115 was achieved via the desymmetrization of 2,2-disubstituted cyclic 1,3-diketones 113 (Table 11).43 The process involves a chiral phosphoric acid (TRIP, 85) promoted reversible enolization followed by an intramolecular Michael addition. The major product for the reaction is a bicyclic compound with the substituent in the equatorial position. Yields and enantioselectivies were good to excellent, although slightly lower for the bicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes 115 (n = 2).
Table 11.
Enantioselective desymmetrizing Michael cyclizations
Conclusion and outlook
The asymmetric formation of all-carbon quaternary centers continues to be of significant interest to the synthetic community as seen by the vast number of publications in recent years. Desymmetrization is an increasingly attractive method for the enantioselective preparation of these challenging stereocenters. Advantages to this strategy are that one can influence stereocenters remote from the reaction site and often set multiple stereocenters in a single operation. The utility of desymmetrizations are best highlighted when the prochiral starting material is readily available and the commercially available catalyst can be used in low loadings. As seen from this review, many of the most efficient desymmetrizations involve an intramolecular process. We expect the future of this field to be in the development of more generalized intermolecular processes.
Scheme 20.
Enantioselective desymmetrization of diesters
Acknowledgments
Financial support is gratefully acknowledged from the National Institutes of Health (GM116041) and the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (53916-DNI).
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References and notes
- 1.a Quasdorf KW, Overman LE. Nature. 2014;516:181–191. doi: 10.1038/nature14007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Das JP, Marek I. Chem. Comm. 2011;47:4593–4623. doi: 10.1039/c0cc05222a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Behenna DC, Mohr JT, Sherden NH, Marinescu SC, Harned AM, Kousuke T, Seto M, Ma S, Novak Z, Krout MR, McFadden RM, Roizen JL, Enquist JA, White DE, Levine SR, Petrova KV, Iwashita A, Virgil SC, Stoltz BM. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:14199–14223. doi: 10.1002/chem.201003383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Trost BM, Jiang C. Synthesis. 2006:369–396. [Google Scholar]; e Douglas CJ, Overman LE. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:5363–5367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307113101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.a Willis MC. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I. 1999:1765–1784. [Google Scholar]; b García-Urdiales E, Alfonso I, Gotor V. Chem. Rev. 2005;105:313–354. doi: 10.1021/cr040640a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.a Knowles WS, Sabacky M. J. Chem. Comm. 1968:1445–1446. [Google Scholar]; b Horner L, Siegel H, Büthe H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1968;7:942. [Google Scholar]
- 4.a Hamilton GL, Kang EJ, Mba M, Toste FD. Science. 2007;317:496–499. doi: 10.1126/science.1145229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Mukherjee S, List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:11336–11337. doi: 10.1021/ja074678r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee JY, You YS, Kang SH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:1772–1774. doi: 10.1021/ja1103102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aikawa K, Okamoto T, Mikami K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:10329–10332. doi: 10.1021/ja3032345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.a Hirose T, Sunazuka T, Shirahata T, Yamamoto D, Harigaya Y, Kuwajima I, Omura S. Org. Lett. 2002;4:501–503. doi: 10.1021/ol017058i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hirose T, Sunazuka T, Yamamoto D, Kojima N, Shirahata T, Harigaya Y, Kuwajima I, Omura S. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:6015–6039. [Google Scholar]; c Hosokawa S, Sekiguchi K, Enemoto M, Kobayashi S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:6429–6433. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kolb HC, Finn MG, Sharpless KB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:2004–2021. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2004::AID-ANIE2004>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhou F, Tan C, Tang J, Zhang Y-Y, Gao W-M, Wu H-H, Yu Y-H, Zhou J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:10994–10997. doi: 10.1021/ja4066656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meng J-C, Fokin VV, Finn MG. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:4543–4546. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Song T, Li L, Zhou W, Zheng Z-J, Deng Y, Xu Z, Xu L-W. Chem. Eur. J. 2015;21:554–558. doi: 10.1002/chem.201405420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhou F, Cheng G-J, Yang W, Long Y, Zhang S, Wu Y-D, Zhang X, Cai Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:9555–9559. doi: 10.1002/anie.201405575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.He N, Huo Y, Liu J, Huang Y, Zhang S, Cai Q. Org. Lett. 2015;17:374–377. doi: 10.1021/ol5035386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.a Bocknack BM, Wang L-C, Krische MJ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:5421–5424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307120101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Cauble DF, Gipson JD, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:1110–1111. doi: 10.1021/ja0211095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aronson JK. Oxford Univ. Press: London. 1985:1785–1985. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Matsuda T, Shigeno M, Makino M, Murakami M. Org. Lett. 2006;8:3379–3381. doi: 10.1021/ol061359g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Paul T, Pal A, Gupta PD, Mukherjee D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:737–740. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Phan DHT, Kou KGM, Dong VM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:16354–16355. doi: 10.1021/ja107738a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hoang GL, Yang Z-D, Smith SM, Pal R, Miska JL, Pérez DE, Pelter LSW, Zeng XC, Takacs JM. Org. Lett. 2015;17:940–943. doi: 10.1021/ol503764d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.a Tietze LF, Ila H, Bell HP. Chem. Rev. 2004;104:3453–3516. doi: 10.1021/cr030700x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Nicolaou KC, Bulger PG, Sarlah D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005;44:4442–4489. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trost BM, Crawley ML. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:2921–2943. doi: 10.1021/cr020027w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Willis MC, Powell LHW, Claverie CK, Watson SJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43:1249–1251. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Byrne SJ, Fletcher AJ, Hebeisen P, Willis MC. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010;8:758–760. doi: 10.1039/b923186b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Loy RN, Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:2786–2787. doi: 10.1021/ja809176m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mourad AK, Leutzow J, Czekelius C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;62:11149–11152. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.a Manna K, Everett WC, Schoendorff G, Ellern A, Windus TL, Sadow AD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:7235–7250. doi: 10.1021/ja4000189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Manna K, Eedugurala N, Sadow AD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:425–435. doi: 10.1021/ja511250m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bertelsen S, Jørgensen KA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:2178–2189. doi: 10.1039/b903816g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu Q, Rovis TJ. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:2552–2553. doi: 10.1021/ja058337u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wadamoto M, Phillips EM, Reynolds TE, Scheidt KA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:10098–10099. doi: 10.1021/ja073987e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang Z, Chen Z, Sun J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:6885–6888. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wilking M, Mück-Lichtenfeld C, Daniliuc CG, Hennecke U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:8133–8136. doi: 10.1021/ja402910d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yao L, Liu K, Tao H-Y, Qiu G-F, Zhou X, Wang C-J. Chem. Comm. 2013;49:6079–6080. doi: 10.1039/c3cc42587h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roux C, Candy M, Pons J-M, Chuzel O, Bressy C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:766–770. doi: 10.1002/anie.201308268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.a Fu GC. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004;37:542–547. doi: 10.1021/ar030051b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Lee SY, Murphy JM, Ukai A, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:15149–15153. doi: 10.1021/ja307425g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meng SS, Liang Y, Cao KS, Zou L, Lin XB, Yang H, Houk KN, Zheng WH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:12249–12252. doi: 10.1021/ja507332x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wilent J, Petersen KS. J. Org. Chem. 2014;79:2303–2307. doi: 10.1021/jo402853v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Unpublished data.
- 38.Yin Q, You S-L. Org. Lett. 2014;16:1810–1813. doi: 10.1021/ol5005565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ke Z, Tan CK, Chen F, Yeung Y-Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:5627–5630. doi: 10.1021/ja5029155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tay DW, Leung GYC, Yeung Y-Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:5161–5164. doi: 10.1002/anie.201310136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Manna MS, Mukherjee S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:130–133. doi: 10.1021/ja5117556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sunazuka T, Hirose T, Shirahata T, Harigaya Y, Komiyama K, Omura S, Smith AB., III J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:2122–2123. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Burns AR, Madec AGE, Low DW, Roy ID, Lam HW. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:3550–3555. doi: 10.1039/c5sc00753d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





































