Skip to main content
PMC home page
Clinical & Translational Immunology logoLink to Clinical & Translational Immunology
editorial
. 2016 Jan 22;5(1):e57. doi: 10.1038/cti.2015.38

Nomenclature of CD molecules from the Tenth Human Leucocyte Differentiation Antigen Workshop

Georgina Clark 1,*, Hannes Stockinger 2, Robert Balderas 3, Menno C van Zelm 4, Heddy Zola 5, Derek Hart 1, Pablo Engel 6
PMCID: PMC4735060  PMID: 26900471

Kohler and Milstein's1 description of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in 1975 revolutionised immunology. With the advent of hybridoma technology, immunologists started to produce an ever increasing number of mAbs directed against leukocyte cell-surface molecules. Inevitably, several mAbs produced by different laboratories and given independent names recognised the same molecule. The First International Human Leucocyte Differentiation Antigen (HLDA) Workshop was organised in the early 1980s, and aimed to identify groups of mAbs reacting with a common human cell-surface antigen and to agree a nomenclature that would facilitate better communication amongst the scientific community.2 The outcomes of the Workshops are the ‘CDs', an abbreviation for the non-descriptive ‘cluster of differentiation' number. The CD number is assigned to a group or cluster of mAbs that recognise a molecule expressed on the surface of human leukocytes and other cells relevant to the immune system. The nomenclature has been universally adopted by the scientific community, officially approved by the International Union of Immunological Societies and sanctioned by WHO. Its usage has now evolved and is also commonly used to name the molecules themselves. However, by adding either mAb or molecule/protein it should be made clear whether one means the CDxx mAb or CDxx molecule. Ten HLDA Workshops have been organised to date, with the most recent one held in 2014 in conjunction with the Australasian Society of Immunology in Wollongong, Australia.

HLDA Workshops provide a unique forum based on an international exchange and blind evaluation of mAbs. Despite technological advances, especially in molecular biology, the basic protocol to establish a new CD remains essentially the same. The initial step consists in establishing a panel of mAbs submitted by numerous contributing academic laboratories and companies to an organising laboratory. This central laboratory distributes aliquots of each mAb among participating laboratories that perform specific studies with the blinded panel. Studies are primarily multi-parameter flow cytometry, but include immunohistochemistry and biochemistry. This allows for the testing of mAb-reactivity with multiple cell types including transfectants and healthy and clinical samples. The data are collected by the organising laboratory and analysed by using a hierarchical clustering algorithm.3 This kind of expression analysis is only possible in the context of a combined effort by a large group of laboratories.

Currently, the designation of a new CD requires at least two independent mAbs, submitted to the workshop that recognise the same molecule and have an identical pattern of reactivity. Proof of specific reactivity by using immunobiochemistry (immunoprecipitation, western blotting) and/or transfected cells is mandatory. Such mAbs have to specifically recognise the target protein on transfected cells and, importantly, the endogenous protein on primary cells. Cross reactivity between molecules is assessed and clarified. The collected data are presented at the HLDA Conferences and reviewed formally by the Human Cell Differentiation Molecule (HCDM) council, for mAbs that meet the requirements for a CD. A database with mAbs that have been approved by the HCDM can be found at www.hcdm.org.

The HLDA process provides an increasingly important function in independent validation of mAbs to improve scientific reproducibility. While mAbs have been produced by both academic groups and biotech companies to many molecules, a large number of these remain poorly validated. The use of non-properly validated antibodies has resulted in wastage of time and resources, destruction of research projects and generation of false results that have contaminated the scientific literature. The scientific community is increasingly aware of this serious problem,4 and the need to ensure scientific results are reproducible. The HLDA Workshop protocol reports on the positive validation of the submitted mAbs and is an invaluable tool for safeguarding and improving our knowledge of CD molecules and their function.

The data generated by the Workshops have led to the formal designation of 408 molecules (some of which are grouped within a CD) that has been reviewed recently.5 The HLDA10 Workshop tested a panel of 84 mAb provided by 12 groups, including commercial companies. The full list of mAbs tested is presented on the HCDM website (www.hcdm.org). Fifteen international groups contributed in testing the panel. This resulted in newly designated CD markers. The collection of reports published in the Clinical and Translational Immunology reviews and presents the work performed by HLDA10.

New CD Molecules

CD365 (HAVCR1, TIM-1)

The two antibodies 10-14 (clone FAB1750P) and 10-67 (clone 1D12) recognising TIM-1 (HAVCR1) were tested in the workshop. TIM-1 is a single pass type-1 membrane glycoprotein that is a member of the Ig superfamily. The antibodies bind to transfectants expressing TIM-1, but show little reactivity to fresh healthy blood cells.6, 7

CD366 (HAVCR2, TIM-3)

Transfectants verified that 10-24 (Clone 344823) bound to TIM-3. Like TIM-1, TIM-3 is a single pass type-1 membrane glycoprotein. Two antibodies to TIM-3, 10-24 and 10-75 (clone F38-2E2), were used in the extended testing. They bound weakly to myeloid cell lines NB4, THP-1 and U937, as well as to monocytes and CD1c DC. They showed clear reactivity to the blast population in three AML samples that were tested.8

CD367 (CLEC4A, DCIR)

We demonstrated binding of two antibodies 10-13 (clone 216110) and 10-71 (clone 111F8.04) to transient transfectants expressing DCIR. These antibodies showed strong binding to myeloid populations within PBMC. These antibodies recognise a type II transmembrane protein that is a member of the C-type lectin family.9, 10, 11

CD368 (CLEC4D)

We demonstrated binding of two antibodies 10-21 (clone 413512) and 10-78 (clone 9B9) to transient transfectants expressing CLEC4D. These antibodies showed strong binding to myeloid populations within PBMC. These antibodies recognise a type II transmembrane protein that is a member of the C-type lectin family.12

CD369 (CLEC7A)

Three mAbs 10-01 (clone GE2), 10-35 (clone 259931) and 10-79 (clone 15E2) to CLEC7A were tested. They demonstrated distinct but weak binding to transfectants and all bound well to monocyte and myeloid DC from PBMC. CLEC7A has also been referred to as Dectin-1, beta-glucan receptor and C-type lectin superfamily member 12 among other names.13, 14, 15

CD370 (CLEC9A)

Three different mAbs, 10-02 (10-65, both clone 8F9), 10-09 (clone 9A11) and 10-45 (clone 683409), with reactivity to CLEC9A were submitted and tested in the Workshop studies. All three clones bound to transfectants expressing CLEC9A cDNA. There was only very weak reactivity to any cell line, however, all clones bound to the rare CD141+ DC population in peripheral blood. This was consistent with the reports in the literature. CLEC9A, also known as DNGR, is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein member of the C-type lectin family that functions as an endocytic receptor, particularly for the uptake and processing of dead cells through its ability to bind filamentous actin.16, 17, 18, 19, 20

CD371 (CLEC12A)

Three antibodies 10-17 (clone HB3), 10-51 (clone 687317) and 10-73 (clone 50C1) to CLEC12A were tested in the HLDA10. Two of these mAbs, 10-51 and 10-73, were able to bind transfectants and showed strong binding to the myeloid populations of PBMC and to the three AML samples that were tested in the Workshop. CLEC12A, also known as MICL and CLL, is a type II transmembrane protein.16, 21, 22, 23, 24

Concluding remarks

The HLDA Workshops exemplify the benefits of a remarkably sustained, collective and collaborative international scientific effort. Future Workshops should continue to promote the exchange of reagents between academic groups and industry. They will boost the characterisation of high quality mAbs for all cell-surface molecules and provide an opportunity to check their integrity. The Workshops increase our understanding of leukocyte biology and pathology, and increasingly facilitate the identification of new disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets.24,25

References

  1. 1Kohler G, Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 1975; 256: 495–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. 2Boumsell L. The international workshops and conferences on human leukocyte differentiation antigens. Birth, current status and future. Tissue Antigens 1996; 48: 238–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. 3Bernard A, Boumsell L. The clusters of differentiation (CD) defined by the First International Workshop on Human Leucocyte Differentiation Antigens. Hum Immunol 1984; 11: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. 4Baker M. Reproducibility crisis: Blame it on the antibodies. Nature 2015; 521: 274–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. 5Engel P, Boumsell L, Balderas R, Bensussan A, Gattei V, Horejsi V et al. CD Nomenclature 2015: Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigen Workshops as a Driving Force in Immunology. J Immunol 2015; 195: 4555–4563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. 6Freeman GJ, Casasnovas JM, Umetsu DT, DeKruyff RH. TIM genes: a family of cell surface phosphatidylserine receptors that regulate innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol Rev 2010; 235: 172–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. 7Kobayashi N, Karisola P, Pena-Cruz V, Dorfman DM, Jinushi M, Umetsu SE et al. TIM-1 and TIM-4 glycoproteins bind phosphatidylserine and mediate uptake of apoptotic cells. Immunity 2007; 27: 927–940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. 8Wei F, Zhong S, Ma Z, Kong H, Medvec A, Ahmed R et al. Strength of PD-1 signaling differentially affects T-cell effector functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: E2480–E2489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. 9Lambert AA, Barabe F, Gilbert C, Tremblay MJ. DCIR-mediated enhancement of HIV-1 infection requires the ITIM-associated signal transduction pathway. Blood 2011; 117: 6589–6599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. 10Bates EE, Fournier N, Garcia E, Valladeau J, Durand I, Pin JJ et al. APCs express DCIR, a novel C-type lectin surface receptor containing an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif. J Immunol 1999; 163: 1973–1983. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. 11Huang X, Yuan Z, Chen G, Zhang M, Zhang W, Yu Y et al. Cloning and characterization of a novel ITIM containing lectin-like immunoreceptor LLIR and its two transmembrane region deletion variants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 281: 131–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. 12Graham LM, Gupta V, Schafer G, Reid DM, Kimberg M, Dennehy KM et al. The C-type lectin receptor CLECSF8 (CLEC4D) is expressed by myeloid cells and triggers cellular activation through Syk kinase. J Biol Chem 2012; 287: 25964–25974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. 13Willment JA, Marshall AS, Reid DM, Williams DL, Wong SY, Gordon S et al. The human beta-glucan receptor is widely expressed and functionally equivalent to murine Dectin-1 on primary cells. Eur J Immunol 2005; 35: 1539–1547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. 14Heyl KA, Klassert TE, Heinrich A, Muller MM, Klaile E, Dienemann H et al. Dectin-1 is expressed in human lung and mediates the proinflammatory immune response to nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. MBio 2014; 5: e01492–e01514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. 15Ni L, Gayet I, Zurawski S, Duluc D, Flamar AL, Li XH et al. Concomitant activation and antigen uptake via human dectin-1 results in potent antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses. J Immunol 2010; 185: 3504–3513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. 16Huysamen C, Willment JA, Dennehy KM, Brown GD. CLEC9A is a novel activation C-type lectin-like receptor expressed on BDCA3+ dendritic cells and a subset of monocytes. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 16693–16701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. 17Jongbloed SL, Kassianos AJ, McDonald KJ, Clark GJ, Ju X, Angel CE et al. Human CD141+ (BDCA-3)+ dendritic cells (DCs) represent a unique myeloid DC subset that cross-presents necrotic cell antigens. J Exp Med 2010; 207: 1247–1260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. 18Schreibelt G, Klinkenberg LJ, Cruz LJ, Tacken PJ, Tel J, Kreutz M et al. The C-type lectin receptor CLEC9A mediates antigen uptake and (cross-)presentation by human blood BDCA3+ myeloid dendritic cells. Blood 2012; 119: 2284–2292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. 19Sancho D, Mourao-Sa D, Joffre OP, Schulz O, Rogers NC, Pennington DJ et al. Tumor therapy in mice via antigen targeting to a novel, DC-restricted C-type lectin. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 2098–2110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. 20Poulin LF, Salio M, Griessinger E, Anjos-Afonso F, Craciun L, Chen JL et al. Characterization of human DNGR-1+ BDCA3+ leukocytes as putative equivalents of mouse CD8alpha+ dendritic cells. J Exp Med 2010; 207: 1261–1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. 21Gagne V, Marois L, Levesque JM, Galarneau H, Lahoud MH, Caminschi I et al. Modulation of monosodium urate crystal-induced responses in neutrophils by the myeloid inhibitory C-type lectin-like receptor: potential therapeutic implications. Arthritis Res Ther 2013; 15: R73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. 22Larsen HO, Roug AS, Just T, Brown GD, Hokland P. Expression of the hMICL in acute myeloid leukemia-a highly reliable disease marker at diagnosis and during follow-up. Cytometry B, Clin Cytom 2012; 82: 3–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. 23Lahoud MH, Proietto AI, Ahmet F, Kitsoulis S, Eidsmo L, Wu L et al. The C-type lectin Clec12A present on mouse and human dendritic cells can serve as a target for antigen delivery and enhancement of antibody responses. J Immunol 2009; 182: 7587–7594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. 24Marshall AS, Willment JA, Pyz E, Dennehy KM, Reid DM, Dri P et al. Human MICL (CLEC12A) is differentially glycosylated and is down-regulated following cellular activation. Eur J Immunol 2006; 36: 2159–2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. 25Zola H. Medical applications of leukocyte surface molecules—the CD molecules. Mol Med 2006; 12: 312–316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical & Translational Immunology are provided here courtesy of Australasian Society of Immunology

RESOURCES