Abstract
Enhanced rRNA synthesis is a downstream effect of many of the signaling pathways that are aberrantly activated in cancer, such as the PI3K/mTOR and MAP kinase pathways. Recently, two new rRNA synthesis inhibitors have demonstrated therapeutic effects on cancer cells while sparing normal cells. One of them, CX-5461, is currently in phase 1 clinical trials for hematological malignancies. Here, we investigate the effectiveness of transient treatment with this drug on acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Our results show that short exposure to CX-5461 followed by drug washout is sufficient to induce persistent G2 cell-cycle arrest and irreversible commitment to cell death, in spite of rRNA synthesis returning to normal within 24 hours of drug washout. The magnitude of cell death after transient exposure is similar to continuous exposure, but the time to cell death is relatively delayed with transient exposure. In this report, we also investigate rational drug combinations that can potentiate the effect of continuous CX-5461 treatment. We show that the checkpoint abrogator UCN-01 can relieve CX-5461-induced G2 arrest and potentiate the cytotoxic effects of CX-5461. Finally, we show that ERK1/2 is activated upon CX-5461 treatment, and that pharmacological inhibition of MEK1/2 leads to enhanced cell death in combination with CX-5461. In summary, our results provide evidence for the effectiveness of CX-5461 pulse treatment, which may minimize drug related toxicity, and evidence for enhanced effectiveness of CX-5461 in combination with other targeted agents.
Keywords: CX-5461, rRNA synthesis, UCN-01, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, MAP kinase
INTRODUCTION
The primary role of the nucleolus is to synthesize ribosomes. However, identification of the nucleolar proteome showed that a majority of nucleolar proteins have functions unrelated to ribosome biogenesis, such as cell-cycle regulation and stress response, [1, 2] and subsequent studies have discovered novel functions for the nucleolus both in normal and disease states [3]. The nucleolus is a dynamic structure which is formed by the act of making ribosome. Nucleolar stress can be caused by inhibition of any of the many steps involved in ribosome biogenesis including pre-ribosomal RNA (rRNA) synthesis, rRNA processing, and assembly of ribosomal proteins on nascent rRNA transcripts and export of mature ribosome from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [4]. Nucleolar stress caused by drugs or environmental factors can lead to unraveling of the nucleolus and the release of nucleolar proteins into the nucleoplasm. Rubbi et al. [5] first proposed that impairment of nucleolar function in response to cellular stress leads to p53 activation, which in turn leads to cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis.
Ribosome biogenesis is a highly coordinated process that is regulated by tumor suppressor proteins and oncogenes [6]. Morphological and structural changes in the nucleolus were one of the earliest reported markers in cancer. RNA polymerase I (RNA pol I) is responsible for the synthesis of pre-rRNA. Elevated RNA pol I activity due to increased growth and protein synthesis demand is a hallmark of cancer [6, 7]. In fact, some of the major signaling pathways deregulated in cancers directly affect ribosome biogenesis. Among them, c-Myc and PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling directly regulate multiple steps in ribosome biogenesis [8, 9]. As ribosome biogenesis is an essential cellular process for normal cells, its therapeutic targeting in cancer seems unlikely. However, recently, a class of drugs targeting rDNA transcription has shown promise as novel cancer treatment in pre-clinical models [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. These studies have shown that therapeutically inhibiting rDNA transcription with these drugs selectively kills cancer cells and spares normal cells.
CX-5461 is the first potent and selective inhibitor of RNA pol I transcription [16]. Recently, the rRNA synthesis inhibitors, CX-5461 and BMH-21, have shown therapeutic potential in different cancer models [10, 13, 17]. These drugs have distinct mechanisms of action of inhibiting rRNA synthesis. BMH-21 was initially discovered as an activator of p53, and was later found to induce nucleolar stress by inhibiting RNA pol I binding to the rDNA promoter and decreased rRNA synthesis [13, 18]. In contrast, CX-5461 inhibits the interaction between SL1 and rDNA thereby preventing the formation of pre-initiation complex. Bywater et al. [10] showed therapeutic potential of CX-5461 treatment in mouse model of melanoma and MLL-AF9 acute myeloid leukemia. Their work showed that nucleolar stress caused by CX-5461 selectively led to p53 activation and subsequent apoptosis in cancer cells. Recently, we have shown that CX-5461 arrests acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells in G2 phase and induces apoptosis in p53 independent manner [19].
In recent years, potent but transient inhibition of BCR-ABL kinase in CML, and PI3K in breast cancer models has been shown to be an effective therapeutic strategy [20, 21, 22]. Here, we investigated the cellular response to transient inhibition of rRNA synthesis with CX-5461 treatment. We found that short exposure to CX-5461 produces similar effects as seen with continuous treatment. Despite reactivation of rRNA synthesis activity within 24 h of drug washout, transient and potent inhibition of rRNA synthesis with CX-5461 was sufficient to commit ALL cells to irreversible cell death. Apart from acute treatment strategy, we also investigated rational drug combinations that can enhance the cytotoxicity of continuous CX-5461 treatment. In this report we analyzed the effect of inhibiting cellular pathways activated by CX-5461 treatment. We showed that checkpoint kinase inhibitor UCN-01 and MAPK pathway inhibitors enhance CX-5461 mediated cytotoxicity.
RESULTS
Transient exposure to CX-5461 is cytotoxic
We first established a washout procedure to evaluate whether transient exposure to CX-5461 is sufficient to irrevocably induce cell death in ALL cells. Cells were treated with 250 nM CX-5461 or DMSO for 24 hours, washed twice in the culture medium and suspended in drug free medium. We measured cell proliferation using the colorimetric MTS assay at day 1 and 3 after resuspension. All cell lines showed a time dependent reduction in cell proliferation in washout cells relative to control treated cells (Figure 1A). To assess the extent to which reduced proliferation was due to induction of cell death (as opposed to growth arrest only), we measured cell death at day 3 after washout using FACS after staining with propidium iodide (PI). All cell lines showed significant reduction in proportion of live cells (i.e., PI negative) in washout cells compared to DMSO treated controls after 3 days (Figure 1B). To investigate if a shorter incubation with CX-5461 would still result in cytotoxicity, we exposed the cells to CX-5461 for 3 hours and 5 hours. We measured cell viability using trypan blue 4 days after washout. All cell lines showed a reduction in viability in drug washout cells (Figure 1C). We then investigated if transient exposure would lead to cytotoxicity in primary patient samples. We have previously shown that normal bone marrow cells show minimal cell death when treated with 1 μM CX-5461 for two days [19]. For transient exposure, we treated patient samples (n = 3) for 5 hours with 1 μM CX-5461, washed them twice and resuspended in drug free media. Cell death was measured with PI staining. All three samples showed reduced viability in drug washout, and to a similar extent as with continuous treatment compared to DMSO treated controls (Figure 1D). Taken together, these results show that short exposure to CX-5461 is sufficient to induce cell death in acute leukemia cells.
rRNA synthesis recovers in drug washout cells
To further investigate changes induced by transient treatment, we treated SEM and NALM-6 cells with CX-5461 for 3 hours, washed twice and resuspended them in drug free media. We then investigated the effects of drug washout on cell-cycle distribution, rRNA synthesis and cell viability. Cell-cycle results show that 24 hours after washout (CX w/o), cells show an increase in the G2/M population compared to control treated cells, although the magnitude of the increase is less than that seen with continuously treated cells (CX-5461) (Figure 2A and Supplementary Figure 1A). We used 45S pre-rRNA transcript levels, which are known to have a very short half-life (several minutes), as a measure of the rate of rRNA synthesis. We have shown previously that 250 and 500 nM CX-5461 reduces pre-rRNA synthesis by more than 50% by 3 hours in SEM and NALM-6 cells respectively [19]. We first measured 45S pre-rRNA levels at 3 hours after CX-5461 treatment to confirm inhibition of RNA pol I transcription (Supplementary Figure 1B). The cells were then washed and suspended in drug free media for 24 hours to check if pre-rRNA synthesis recovered following washout. Both cell lines showed significant pre-rRNA synthesis inhibition at 3 hours (CX 3 h) and almost complete recovery at 24 hours after washout (CX w/o) (Figure 2B and Supplementary Figure 1B). Ribosome biogenesis is a highly coordinated process and inhibition of rRNA synthesis can lead to pre-rRNA processing defects. In order to make sure that the increase in the levels of 45S pre-rRNA in drug washout cells is not due to pre-rRNA processing defects, we labeled SEM cells with ethynyl uridine (EU) for 30 min followed by chase in EU free media. RNA was isolated at 0 and 3 hours after EU washout from the cells. Newly synthesized EU labeled transcripts were isolated as described in materials and methods. Our results show no difference in the levels of newly transcribed 45S pre-rRNA in DMSO and CX-5461 washout cells at 0 hour (Figure 2C). Moreover, 3 hours after chase, levels of the EU labeled 45S pre-rRNA decreases substantially. The decrease was similar in both DMSO and CX-5461 washout cells suggesting efficient processing of 45S pre-rRNA transcript under both conditions.
Next, we measured cell viability of these cells after washout at day 1 and 3 using trypan blue. The results show that transient inhibition of rRNA synthesis substantially decreased cell viability (Figure 2D). These results confirm that despite reactivation of rRNA synthesis activity within 24 hours of drug washout, short-term rRNA synthesis inhibition with CX-5461 was sufficient to inhibit cell cycling and viability. We have previously shown that p53 levels were increased upon 24 hours CX-5461 treatment in p53 wild-type cell lines, although cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic effects were p53-independent [19]. To investigate if p53 levels remains elevated in CX-5461 washout cells, we measured p53 and phospho-p53 levels in drug treated and drug washout cells (Figure 2E). As shown previously [19], there was no increase in p53 levels in SEM cells (p53 mutant cell line). In NALM-6 cells (p53 wild-type cell line), there was an increase in p53 and phospho-p53 levels initially at 3 hours after drug treatment but drug washout resulted in a decrease in p53 levels when measured after 24 hours.
Washout effectively removes residual drug from the culture medium
We considered the possibility that the cytotoxic effect seen after drug washout is due to incomplete removal of the drug. To test for any residual drug, the cell culture supernatant (S) from drug treated cells after two washes was transferred to previously untreated cells (naïve) (Figure 3A). These cells were allowed to grow for three days and cell viability was measured by trypan blue staining. Our results show no reduction in viability of cells incubated in media from drug wash out cells similar to untreated control cells (Figure 3B). These results show effective removal of the drug from the culture media following two washes. We further tested the effect of washout itself on cell viability. SEM cells were treated with CX-5461 or DMSO for 3 hours followed by two washes in drug free media. As shown in Figure 3C, washout has no effect on cell viability as DMSO washout cell show similar viability as control unwashed cells. Also, these results suggest a lag in cell death in drug washout cells compared to continuously treated cells (Figure 3C).
UCN-01 treatment relieves cell-cycle arrest and shows enhanced cell killing in combination with CX-5461
In addition to transient treatment with CX-5461, we investigated other rational drug combinations that can potentiate the effect of continuous CX-5461 treatment. We have previously shown that CX-5461 activates ATM/ATR pathway in acute leukemia, arrests cells in G2 phase and synergizes with ATR inhibitor in killing these cells [19]. We hypothesized that abolishing cell-cycle arrest in the G2 phase would result in inadequate recovery from cellular stress and lead to increased cell death. Checkpoint kinases 1 and 2 (CHK1/2) are downstream effectors of ATM/ATR pathway and are activated upon CX-5461 treatment [19]. UCN-01, a staurosporine analogue, is a potent inhibitor of CHK1/2 and sensitizes tumor cells to genotoxic agents by abrogating G2 arrest induced by these drugs [23, 24]. Although UCN-01 is an inhibitor of the protein kinase C (PKC) family of enzymes, G2 checkpoint abrogation by inhibiting checkpoint kinases play a major role in its anticancer activity [25, 26, 27]. To determine if UCN-01 can abrogate CX-5461 induced G2 arrest, we pre-treated cells with UCN-01 followed by continuous CX-5461 treatment for 24 hours. Cell-cycle analysis shows that CX-5461 treatment induced G2 arrest in SEM, KOPN-8 and NALM-6 cells. This arrest was completely abolished by UCN-01 pre-treatment (Figure 4A). We then investigated if UCN-01 treatment will enhance the cytotoxicity of CX-5461 as seen previously in combination with ATR inhibitor. We pre-treated cells with UCN-01 for 1 hour followed by CX-5461 and measured cell viability using trypan blue. Combination treatment with CX-5461 and UCN-01 significantly reduced cell viability in all three cell lines compared to CX-5461 or UCN-01 treatment alone (Figure 4B).
CX-5461 activates MAPK signaling pathway
As ribosome biogenesis is a highly regulated process, we investigated other signaling pathways activated by rRNA synthesis inhibition. We incubated a human phospho-kinase protein array with equal amounts of cell lysates from SEM cells treated with CX-5461 or DMSO for one day. CX-5461 treated cells showed an increase in pERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204), pCHK2 (T68) and HSP60 levels (Figure 5A). We further confirmed the activation of ERK1/2 with western blot from CX-5461 treated SEM, NALM-6 and KOPN-8 cells (Figure 5B). We investigated if pharmacological inhibition of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway would abrogate CX-5461 induced ERK1/2 activation and potentiate the effect of rRNA synthesis inhibition. We treated SEM cells with MEK1/2 inhibitor, U-0126, in combination with CX-5461 for one day. Western blot results show that U-0126 reduced the levels of pERK induced by CX-5461 treatment (Figure 6A). More-over, cell viability was substantially reduced in cells treated with a combination of U-0126 and CX-5461 compared to CX-5461 or U-0126 alone (Figure 6B). To further confirm that treatment with MEK/ERK inhibitor can enhance CX-5461 cytotoxic effect, we treated ALL cell lines with another MEK1/2 inhibitor, trametinib. Cells were treated with 150 nM trametinib in combination with CX-5461 for 2 days and cell viability was measured by trypan blue staining. As seen with U-0126, trametinib treated cells show significant increase in cell death in combination with CX-5461 then cells treated with single agent (Figure 6C).
DISCUSSION
In cancer therapy, continuous target inhibition has been seen as a pre-requisite for maximum clinical impact. Our results show that transient treatment with CX-5461 induces cellular changes similar to continuous treatment, albeit with a lag period. Importantly, after drug washout, cells are irreversibly committed to cell death despite complete recovery from rRNA synthesis inhibition. This suggests that short term blockade of rRNA synthesis is sufficient to irreversibly inhibit cellular proliferation. The rationale for continuous target inhibition for maximum efficacy has been challenged in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A series of studies have shown that cytotoxicity in CML cells can be achieved with transient potent BCR-ABL inhibition [20, 21]. Dasatinib, a second-generation BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, with a short half-life of approximately 3–5 hours has been shown to be clinically effective with once-daily administration despite only intermittent BCR-ABL inhibition [28]. More-over, tolerability of once-daily dosing was superior to the twice-daily schedule even with partial kinase inhibition. Recently, transient inhibition of PI3K in breast cancer cells was shown to be an effective therapeutic strategy [22].
Yung et al. [29] have reported that low dose actinomycin D treatment for short duration followed by washout leads to complete recovery of cell growth and rRNA synthesis, whereas higher dose or longer duration lead to irreversible inhibition of rRNA synthesis and cell proliferation. Recently, Ma et al. [30] showed similar results on cell-cycle arrest with actinomycin D treatment as seen with CX-5461. But in contrast to our results, they showed more than 80% inhibition of rRNA synthesis at 20 hours post washout after a 2 and 4 hour actinomycin D treatment. Compared to their results, we achieved 50% inhibition in 3 hours with CX-5461. It is possible that higher inhibition may lead to irreversible repression of rRNA synthesis. Another explanation may be the use of a solid cancer cell line in their study. This difference may also be due to a different mechanism of action. Actinomycin D is a RNA polymerase inhibitor which intercalates into GC rich regions of rDNA and shows selectivity for RNA pol I at low dose. It inhibits Pol I transcription during the elongation step whereas CX-5461 disrupts the binding of the SL1 transcription factor to rDNA promoter, which inhibits initiation of rRNA synthesis by the Pol I complex. Nevertheless, in our case, recovery from rRNA synthesis after washout did not change the eventual fate of these cells.
One of the most studied effects of nucleolar stress is the stabilization of p53 resulting in cell-cycle arrest and/or apoptosis [5]. ARF tumor suppressor has been shown to translocate to the nucleoplasm in response to nucleolar stress where it inhibits the binding of E3 ubiquitin ligase, MDM2, to p53 resulting in p53 stabilization [31]. Recent reports have shown that drugs targeting rRNA synthesis activate a p53-dependent apoptosis pathway in cancer cells displaying high rate of ribosome biogenesis [10, 32]. Although p53 activation upon ribosomal stress is well established, there are reports that provide evidence for a p53-independent mechanism that links nucleolar stress to inhibition of cell proliferation. We have previously shown that rRNA synthesis inhibition by CX-5461 activates ATM/ATR kinase pathway leading to CDC2 phosphorylation, G2 arrest and apoptosis in both p53 mutant and wild-type acute leukemia cells [19]. In line with that report, here we showed that p53 is activated upon 3 hours treatment in p53 wild-type cell line but the levels go down within 24 hours after drug washout suggesting p53-independent downstream effects of CX-5461. Donati et al. [33] showed that knockdown of POLR1A gene, which encodes the catalytic subunit of RNA polymerase I, in p53 null cells leads to cell-cycle arrest due to the down-regulation of transcription factor E2F-1. Ribosomal stress can also reduce the levels of PIM1 kinase leading to inhibition of cell proliferation in p53 null cells by stabilizing cell-cycle inhibitor p27kip1, a target of PIM1 kinase [34]. This reduction in PIM1 levels can be seen as early as 3 hours after rRNA synthesis inhibition, a time frame similar to one used in this study.
Many proteins involved in stress response, proliferation and cell-cycle progression are sequestered in the nucleolus (away from their site of action or interacting partners) thereby controlling their action [31]. At the onset of mitosis, rRNA synthesis is suppressed and nucleolus is disassembled in a highly regulated fashion. Many of the nucleolar proteins are phosphorylated by CDC2/Cyclin B complex (including members of rRNA synthesis and processing machinery) and are dissociated from the nucleolus [35]. One interesting question then is why transient inhibition of rRNA synthesis by CX-5461 affects cellular proliferation but suppression of rRNA synthesis during mitosis does not. We speculate that the untimely release of proteins sequestered in the nucleolus, upon drug treatment, results in cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. For example, tumor suppressor protein ARF is sequestered in the nucleolus in association with NPM1 [36]. On nucleolar disruption by drug treatment or radiation, ARF translocates to the nucleoplasm, binds to E3 ligase MDM2 thereby preventing p53 ubiquitination. Elevated p53 levels then lead to cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis depending on the level of cellular insult [31]. Interestingly, ARF levels decrease during mitosis and recover in early G1 phase [37]. ARF has also been shown to inhibit growth in p53-independent manner by arresting cells in G2 phase which subsequently leads to apoptosis [38]. Also, we cannot rule out the possibility that CX-5461 has other targets in the cells which stay inhibited even after drug removal.
We have previously shown that caffeine and an ATR inhibitor can relieve CX-5461 induced G2 arrest, eventually leading to enhanced apoptosis [19]. Here, we showed that CX-5461 induced G2 arrest can be abolished by the checkpoint inhibitor UCN-01 [23, 26, 39] which also leads to enhanced cell death. This suggests that relieving G2 arrest by checkpoint kinase inhibitor UCN-01 provides no opportunity to the cells to overcome stress induced by CX-5461 treatment. As UCN-01 has been shown to enhance the cytotoxicity of radiation and chemotherapy, combination treatment with UCN-01 represents a therapeutic strategy that can potentiate the effectiveness of CX-5461 [40, 41]. More-over, CX-5461 treatment activates MAP kinase pathway and MEK inhibitors showed increased cell killing in combination with this rRNA synthesis inhibitor (Supplementary Figure 1C). In summary, our data suggests that transient inhibition of rRNA synthesis is sufficient to activate irreversible changes in cell survival and supports the potential for pulse treatment strategy in treating ALL with CX-5461, which in turn may minimize drug related toxicity. Also, we have provided in vitro evidence that rational combinations of CX-5461 with other inhibitors of survival pathways activated upon inhibition of rRNA synthesis can potentiate its effectiveness and should be further investigated in an in vivo model system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines and patient samples
RS4;11, SEM, KOPN-8 and NALM-6 cell lines were purchased from German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ). Informed consent was obtained from patients, in accordance with the institutional review board guidelines, for the samples used in this study. Blasts were isolated from patient samples using Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation and stored in liquid nitrogen for future use. The diagnosis of ALL was based on morphology and flow cytometry data. Cytogenetic was determined by standard procedures. Cell lines and patient samples used in this study are
Patient Sample | Cyto-genotypes | |
P1 | MLL-AF4 | |
P2 | TEL-AML | |
P3 | MLL-ENL | |
Cell Line | Cyto-genotypes | p53 status |
RS4;11 | MLL-AF4 | wild-type |
SEM | MLL-AF4 | mutant |
KOPN-8 | MLL-ENL | mutant |
NALM-6 | t(5;12)(q33.2;p13.2) | wild-type |
Drug treatment and washout
Cells were incubated with CX-5461 for indicated time. Cells were washed twice in culture media and reseeded in drug free media. For experiments with drug naïve cells, CX-5461 treated cells were washed twice and suspended in drug free media. The cells were centrifuged again, supernatant were collected and this supernatant was added to drug naïve cells (denoted as “S” in Figure 3B). Cell viability was measured using trypan blue staining or flow cytometry of PI stained cells. CX-5461 was purchased from Xcess Biosciences; UCN-01 and U-0126 from Sigma-Aldrich; Trametinib from LC laboratories.
Cell proliferation
Cells were treated with DMSO or CX-5461 for 24 hours, washed twice and equal numbers of cells were seeded in 96 well plates. Cell proliferation was measured at 0 hour, 24 hours and 72 hours after washout using CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation solution (MTS reagent) (Promega). MTS reagent was added to each well and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C in dark and absorbance was recorded at 490 nm using Bio-Rad microplate reader. Results were background subtracted and normalized to DMSO treated control.
Flow cytometry
Cells were fixed in methanol and stored at −20°C until further processing. For cell-cycle analysis cells were spun down, washed in PBS and incubated in RNaseA containing propidium iodide (PI) solution at 37°C for 30 min in dark. Cells were run on BD FACScaliber (BD Biosciences) and cell-cycle analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
Phospho kinase proteome array and western blotting
Phospho kinase levels were measured using Proteome Profiler Human Phospho-Kinase Array kit as suggested by the manufacturer (R&D System). Briefly, cells were lysed and protein concentrations were measured. Each phospho kinase array was incubated with 200 μg of protein lysate from DMSO or CX-5461 treated cells. Array was developed according to manufacturer's instructions. For western blots, cell lysates were run on SDS Polyacrylamide gel and transferred to PVDF membrane. Membrane was blocked with 5% milk and incubated with primary antibody against ERK, Phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) and β-Tubulin. Antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology.
EU labeling of RNA transcript
Pre-rRNA synthesis and processing of 45S transcript was determined by Click-iT® Nascent RNA Capture Kit (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer's instructions [42]. Briefly, 0.4 mM ethynyl uridine (EU) was incorporated into SEM cells for 30 min. Cells were allowed to recover in EU free media and RNA was isolated at 0 and 3 hours after washout. EU-labeled RNA was biotinylated and captured on streptavidin magnetic beads according to the protocol. cDNA synthesis was performed directly on the beads. Relative levels of 45S pre-rRNA were measured by qPCR at each time point. All experiments were performed in triplicates.
qPCR
Cells were treated with indicated concentrations of CX-5461. A portion of cells were harvested after 3 hours drug exposure and RNA was isolated. Rest of the cells were washed twice and reseeded in drug-free culture media. RNA was isolated, using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen), from these cells after 24 hours. qPCR was performed using SYBR Green master mix and run on a CFX96 Bio-Rad real time PCR machine. Primer sequences for 45S pre-rRNA are forward 5′ CCGCGCTCTACCTTACCTACCT 3′, reverse 5′ GCATGGCTTAATCTTTGAGACAAG 3′; for βActin are forward 5′ CGTCACCAACTGGGACGACA 3′, reverse 5′ CTTCTCGCGGTTGGCCTTGG 3′. Experiments were repeated three times. Results were normalized to GAPDH and β Actin expression for each sample.
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUNDING
This work was supported by grants from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Clinical Scholar Program (P.B.), and American Cancer Society Research Scholar Program (P.B.). The Giant Food Pediatric Oncology Research Fund supported use of the FACSCalibur.
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Andersen JS, Lyon CE, Fox AH, Leung AK, Lam YW, Steen H, Mann M, Lamond AI. Directed proteomic analysis of the human nucleolus. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1–11. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00650-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scherl A, Coute Y, Deon C, Calle A, Kindbeiter K, Sanchez JC, Greco A, Hochstrasser D, Diaz JJ. Functional proteomic analysis of human nucleolus. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:4100–4109. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-05-0271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boisvert FM, van Koningsbruggen S, Navascués J, Lamond AI. The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:574–585. doi: 10.1038/nrm2184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.James A, Wang Y, Raje H, Rosby R, DiMario P. Nucleolar stress with and without p53. Nucleus. 2014;5:402–426. doi: 10.4161/nucl.32235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rubbi CP, Milner J. Disruption of the nucleolus mediates stabilization of p53 in response to DNA damage and other stresses. Embo j. 2003;22:6068–6077. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.White RJ. RNA polymerases I and III, growth control and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:69–78. doi: 10.1038/nrm1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barna M, Pusic A, Zollo O, Costa M, Kondrashov N, Rego E, Rao PH, Ruggero D. Suppression of myc oncogenic activity by ribosomal protein haploinsufficiency. Nature. 2008;456:971–975. doi: 10.1038/nature07449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.van Riggelen J, Yetil A, Felsher DW. MYC as a regulator of ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:301–309. doi: 10.1038/nrc2819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hsieh AC, Truitt ML, Ruggero D. Oncogenic AKTivation of translation as a therapeutic target. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:329–336. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bywater MJ, Poortinga G, Sanij E, Hein N, Peck A, Cullinane C, Wall M, Cluse L, Drygin D, Anderes K, Huser N, Proffitt C, Bliesath J, et al. Inhibition of RNA polymerase I as a therapeutic strategy to promote cancer-specific activation of p53. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:51–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ruggero D. Revisiting the nucleolus: From marker to dynamic integrator of cancer signaling. Sci Signal. 2012;5:pe38. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2003477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hannan RD, Drygin D, Pearson RB. Targeting RNA polymerase I transcription and the nucleolus for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013;17:873–878. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2013.818658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peltonen K, Colis L, Liu H, Trivedi R, Moubarek MS, Moore HM, Bai B, Rudek MA, Bieberich CJ, Laiho M. A targeting modality for destruction of RNA polymerase I that possesses anticancer activity. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:77–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Peltonen K, Colis L, Liu H, Jaamaa S, Zhang Z, Af Hallstrom T, Moore HM, Sirajuddin P, Laiho M. Small molecule BMH-compounds that inhibit RNA polymerase I and cause nucleolar stress. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:2537–2546. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Colis L, Peltonen K, Sirajuddin P, Liu H, Sanders S, Ernst G, Barrow JC, Laiho M. DNA intercalator BMH-21 inhibits RNA polymerase I independent of DNA damage response. Oncotarget. 2014;5:4361–4369. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haddach M, Schwaebe MK, Michaux J, Nagasawa J, O'Brien SE, Whitten JP, Pierre F, Kerdoncuff P, Darjania L, Stansfield R, Drygin D, Anderes K, Proffitt C, et al. Discovery of CX-5461, the first direct and selective inhibitor of RNA polymerase I, for cancer therapeutics. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2012;3:602–606. doi: 10.1021/ml300110s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Drygin D, Lin A, Bliesath J, Ho CB, O'Brien SE, Proffitt C, Omori M, Haddach M, Schwaebe MK, Siddiqui-Jain A, Streiner N, Quin JE, Sanij E, et al. Targeting RNA polymerase I with an oral small molecule CX-5461 inhibits ribosomal RNA synthesis and solid tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1418–1430. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Peltonen K, Colis L, Liu H, Jaamaa S, Moore HM, Enback J, Laakkonen P, Vaahtokari A, Jones RJ, af Hallstrom TM, Laiho M. Identification of novel p53 pathway activating small-molecule compounds reveals unexpected similarities with known therapeutic agents. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Negi SS, Brown P. rRNA synthesis inhibitor, CX-5461, activates ATM/ATR pathway in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, arrests cells in G2 phase and induces apoptosis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:18094–18104. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shah NP, Kasap C, Weier C, Balbas M, Nicoll JM, Bleickardt E, Nicaise C, Sawyers CL. Transient potent BCR-ABL inhibition is sufficient to commit chronic myeloid leukemia cells irreversibly to apoptosis. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:485–493. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Snead JL, O'Hare T, Adrian LT, Eide CA, Lange T, Druker BJ, Deininger MW. Acute dasatinib exposure commits bcr-abl-dependent cells to apoptosis. Blood. 2009;114:3459–3463. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-113969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Will M, Qin AC, Toy W, Yao Z, Rodrik-Outmezguine V, Schneider C, Huang X, Monian P, Jiang X, de Stanchina E, Baselga J, Liu N, Chandarlapaty S, et al. Rapid induction of apoptosis by PI3K inhibitors is dependent upon their transient inhibition of RAS-ERK signaling. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:334–347. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Graves PR, Yu L, Schwarz JK, Gales J, Sausville EA, O'Connor PM, Piwnica-Worms H. The Chk1 protein kinase and the Cdc25C regulatory pathways are targets of the anticancer agent UCN-01. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:5600–5605. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.8.5600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hirose Y, Berger MS, Pieper RO. Abrogation of the Chk1-mediated G(2) checkpoint pathway potentiates temozolomide-induced toxicity in a p53-independent manner in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61:5843–5849. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bunch RT, Eastman A. Enhancement of cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity by 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01), a new G2-checkpoint inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2:791–797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Busby EC, Leistritz DF, Abraham RT, Karnitz LM, Sarkaria JN. The radiosensitizing agent 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) inhibits the DNA damage checkpoint kinase hChk1. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2108–2112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tse AN, Carvajal R, Schwartz GK. Targeting checkpoint kinase 1 in cancer therapeutics. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:1955–1960. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shah NP, Kantarjian HM, Kim DW, Rea D, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE, Milone JH, Vela-Ojeda J, Silver RT, Khoury HJ, Charbonnier A, Khoroshko N, Paquette RL, Deininger M, et al. Intermittent target inhibition with dasatinib 100 mg once daily preserves efficacy and improves tolerability in imatinib-resistant and -intolerant chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3204–3212. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yung BY, Bor AM, Chan PK. Short exposure to actinomycin D induces “reversible” translocation of protein B23 as well as “reversible” inhibition of cell growth and RNA synthesis in HeLa cells. Cancer Res. 1990;50:5987–5991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ma H, Pederson T. The nucleolus stress response is coupled to an ATR-Chk1-mediated G2 arrest. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:1334–1342. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-12-0881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Olson MO. Sensing cellular stress: Another new function for the nucleolus? Sci STKE. 2004;2004:pe10. doi: 10.1126/stke.2242004pe10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Scala F, Brighenti E, Govoni M, Imbrogno E, Fornari F, Trere D, Montanaro L, Derenzini M. Direct relationship between the level of p53 stabilization induced by rRNA synthesis-inhibiting drugs and the cell ribosome biogenesis rate. Oncogene. 2015 doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.147. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Donati G, Brighenti E, Vici M, Mazzini G, Trere D, Montanaro L, Derenzini M. Selective inhibition of rRNA transcription downregulates E2F-1: A new p53-independent mechanism linking cell growth to cell proliferation. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:3017–3028. doi: 10.1242/jcs.086074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Iadevaia V, Caldarola S, Biondini L, Gismondi A, Karlsson S, Dianzani I, Loreni F. PIM1 kinase is destabilized by ribosomal stress causing inhibition of cell cycle progression. Oncogene. 2010;29:5490–5499. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Olson MO, Dundr M. The moving parts of the nucleolus. Histochem Cell Biol. 2005;123:203–216. doi: 10.1007/s00418-005-0754-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Korgaonkar C, Hagen J, Tompkins V, Frazier AA, Allamargot C, Quelle FW, Quelle DE. Nucleophosmin (B23) targets ARF to nucleoli and inhibits its function. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:1258–1271. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.4.1258-1271.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.David-Pfeuty T, Nouvian-Dooghe Y. Human p14(arf): An exquisite sensor of morphological changes and of short-lived perturbations in cell cycle and in nucleolar function. Oncogene. 2002;21:6779–6790. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Eymin B, Leduc C, Coll JL, Brambilla E, Gazzeri S. p14ARF induces G2 arrest and apoptosis independently of p53 leading to regression of tumours established in nude mice. Oncogene. 2003;22:1822–1835. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yu Q, La Rose J, Zhang H, Takemura H, Kohn KW, Pommier Y. UCN-01 inhibits p53 up-regulation and abrogates gamma-radiation-induced G(2)-M checkpoint independently of p53 by targeting both of the checkpoint kinases, Chk2 and Chk1. Cancer Res. 2002;62:5743–5748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tse AN, Schwartz GK. Potentiation of cytotoxicity of topoisomerase i poison by concurrent and sequential treatment with the checkpoint inhibitor UCN-01 involves disparate mechanisms resulting in either p53-independent clonogenic suppression or p53-dependent mitotic catastrophe. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6635–6644. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mack PC, Jones AA, Gustafsson MH, Gandara DR, Gumerlock PH, Goldberg Z. Enhancement of radiation cytotoxicity by UCN-01 in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. Radiat Res. 2004;162:623–634. doi: 10.1667/rr3253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jao CY, Salic A. Exploring RNA transcription and turnover in vivo by using click chemistry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:15779–15784. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808480105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.