Abstract
Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) have the potential to produce almost all of the cells in the body, including regulatory T cells (Tregs). However, the exact conditions required for the development of antigen (Ag)-specific Tregs from PSCs (i.e., PSC-Tregs) are not well delineated. Ag-specific PSC-Tregs can be tissue/organ-associated and migrate to local inflamed tissues/organs to suppress the autoimmune response after adoptive transfer, thereby avoiding potential overall immunosuppression from non-specific Tregs. In this study, we developed a new approach to generate functional Ag-specific Tregs from induced PSCs (iPSCs), i.e., iPSC-Tregs, which had the ability to generate an Ag-specific immunosuppressive response in a murine model of arthritis. We retrovirally transduced murine iPSCs with a construct containing genes of Ag-specific T cell receptor (TCR) and the transcriptional factor FoxP3. We differentiated the iPSCs into Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs using in vitro or in vivo Notch signaling, and demonstrated that adoptive transfer of such Tregs dramatically suppressed autoimmunity in a well-established Ag-induced arthritis model, including the inflammation, joint destruction, cartilage prostaglandin depletion, osteoclast activity, and Th17 production. Our results indicate that PSCs can be used to develop Ag-specific Tregs, which have a therapeutic potential for Treg-based therapies of autoimmune disorders.
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a component of the normal immune system and contribute to the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. Tregs are a subset of specialized CD4+ helper T (Th) cells defined phenotypically by the expression of the IL-2 receptor α-chain (CD25) and the transcription factor FoxP3, which is required for Treg development and controls a genetic program specifying this cell fate. Tregs can down-regulate immune responses and are essential for immune homeostasis1. Tregs are key effectors in preventing and treating autoimmune disorders, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis (RA), type-1 diabetes (T1D), and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), and controlling both transplant rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)2,3,4,5.
Treg-based immunotherapy is a highly promising treatment for a variety of autoimmune disorders, and facilitation for organ transplantation2. Although a precise understanding of the immunosuppressive mechanism of Tregs remains indefinable, there is increasing evidence that Tregs manifest their function through a myriad of mechanisms that include the secretion of immunosuppressive soluble factors (e.g., TGF-β, IL-10, and IL-35), cell contact mediated regulation via the high affinity TCR and other membrane-bound molecules (e.g., CTLA-4, GITR, LAG-3), and cytolytic activity. Recent advances in the use of large-scale in vitro expansion of Tregs followed by in vivo re-infusion of these cells raise the possibility that this strategy may be successfully utilized for the treatment of autoimmune disorders6,7. Although polyclonally expanded populations of Tregs exhibit suppressive activity, Ag-specific Tregs appear superior in suppressing local autoimmune disorders such as RA, autoimmune diabetes and GVHD8,9,10,11,12. In addition, tissue/organ (e.g., joints, pancreas, intestine)-associated targeting of Tregs stables FoxP3 expression and avoids induction of a potentially detrimental systemic immunosuppression13,14. For Treg-based immunotherapy, the in vitro generation of tissue/organ-associated and non-terminally differentiated effector Tregs for in vivo re-infusion is an optimal approach. However, current methodologies are limited in terms of the capacity to generate, isolate, and expand a sufficient quantity of such Tregs from patients for therapeutic interventions.
Under the right circumstance, PSCs can produce almost all of the cells in the body, including Tregs. PSCs provide a chance to obtain a renewable source of healthy Tregs to treat a wide array of autoimmune disorders. However, the right circumstances for the development of antigen (Ag)-specific Tregs from PSCs (i.e., PSC-Tregs) has not been fully defined, especially the signaling mechanisms that direct differentiation of such PSC-Tregs. Previous studies have shown the successful T cell development from PSCs (5,6), and we have shown T lineage differentiation from iPSCs (7). However, it remains unclear whether iPSCs can differentiate into functional Ag-specific Tregs for Treg-based immunotherapy.
In this study, we developed a new approach to generate Ag-specific Tregs from iPSCs, i.e., iPSC-Tregs, which have the ability to suppress autoimmunity in a murine model of arthritis. We retrovirally transduced murine iPSCs with a DsRed reporter construct containing genes of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II (I-Ab)-restricted ovalbumin (OVA)-specific TCR and the transcriptional factor FoxP3. We differentiated the DsRed+ iPSCs into OVA-specific iPSC-Tregs with an OP9 stromal cell line expressing Notch ligands DL1, DL4 and I-Ab in the presence of recombinant cytokines of rIL-7 and rFlt3L. We visualized the expression of CD3, TCR, CD4, CD25, and CTLA4 on OVA-specific iPSC-Tregs. Adoptive transfer of such Tregs dramatically suppressed autoimmunity in a well-established Ag-induced arthritis (AIA) model, including the inflammation, joint destruction, cartilage proteoglycan depletion, and osteoclast activity. In addition, we measured the IL-17 cytokine secretion from the lymph nodes draining into the joints. We found that FoxP3 and TCR-transduced Tregs reduced the number of Th17 producing cells in the OVA-injected knees, where inflammation, bone destruction, cartilage depletion, and osteoclast-like activity were also reduced. Our results indicate that iPSC-derived Ag-specific Tregs have a great potential to be used for the treatment of autoimmune disorders.
Results
Generation of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs
Previously we have shown that iPSCs have the ability to differentiate into Tregs15, so we sought to investigate whether iPSCs can be induced to differentiate into Ag-specific Tregs. We used the MiDR retrovirus-mediated transduction and transduced mouse iPSCs with MHC II (I-Ab)-restricted OVA323–339-specific TCR and FoxP3 (MiDR-TCR-FoxP3, Fig. 1A), followed by a co-culture with OP9 stromal cells expressing Notch ligands DL1, DL4 and I-Ab (OP9-DL1/DL4/I-Ab) in the presence of recombinant cytokines of rIL-7 and rFlt3L. Upon gene transduction, we visualized the DsRed expression by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1B), and sorted GFP+DsRed+ cells (Fig. 1C). We confirmed FoxP3 expression in the sorted cells by Flow cytometry and Western blotting (Fig. 1D). To determine whether the TCR and FoxP3 gene-transduced iPSCs were capable of undergoing the differentiation of Ag-specific Tregs, we first analyzed the iPSC morphological growth in the presence of Notch signaling. After 7 days of culture with the OP9-DL1/DL4/I-Ab cells, iPSCs differentiated into mesoderm-like cells, and were associated with non-adherent grape-like clusterson on day 14. On day 22, lymphocyte-like cells spread fully in the plate (Fig. 1E). We further analyzed the cell surface markers of the iPSC-derived cells. On day 28 of in vitro co-culture, the iPSC-derived cells substantially expressed CD3 and Ag-specific TCR, two T cell markers. The CD3+TCRVβ5+ population expressed CD4. Most of the CD3+TCRVβ5+CD4+ cells also expressed CD25, CD127, and CTLA-4, which are typically expressed at elevated levels in naturally occurring Tregs (nTregs) (23,24,25) and in T cells expressing FoxP3 ectopically (26,27). We also determined that FoxP3 expression in the iPSC-derived cells persisted even after long-term in vitro stimulation with the Notch ligand as detected by intracellular staining analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 1F). Collectively, our results suggest that iPSCs have the ability to differentiate into Ag-specific CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Tregs by the approach of gene transduction of Ag-specific TCR and FoxP3, followed by stimulation with Notch signaling.
Functional analyses of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs
To determine the functional status of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs, we tested whether these iPSC-Tregs had the capacity to produce the suppressive cytokines of IL-10 and TGF-β, following Ag stimulation. On day 28 of in vitro co-culture, we isolated the CD4+CD8- single-positive (SP) iPSC-Tregs and stimulated with T-depleted splenocytes pulsed with OVA323–339 peptide, and assessed cytokine production. The iPSC-Tregs produced LAP (TGF-β) and IL-10 but not IL-2 and IFN-γ as detected by surface or intracellular staining (Fig. 2A,B), indicating that the iPSC-Tregs are anergic and have potential suppressive activities.
To further show the functional activity of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs, we performed an in vitro suppressive assay. We mixed OVA-specific iPSC-Tregs on day 28 of the in vitro co-culture or nTregs from OT-II TCR Tg mice with naive CD4+CD25− T cells (target cells) from C57BL/6 mice (Tregs/Target cells = 1:10) and stimulated with T-depleted splenocytes pulsed with OVA323–339 peptide (T/APCs = 1:4) for 2 days. Supernatants from target cells stimulated with iPSC-Tregs or nTregs showed a substantial decrease in the amounts of IL-2 and IFN-γ, as compared to those from target cells alone (Fig. 2C). In a separate set of experiments, effector cells significantly suppressed the proliferation of target cells after OVA peptide stimulation (Fig. 2D). Taken together, these results show that in vitro-derived Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs are functionally mature.
In vivo programming of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs
Our previous study showed that TCR gene-transduced iPSCs developed into Ag-specific T cells in vivo16. We tested whether the OVA TCR and FoxP3 gene-transduced iPSCs have the ability to differentiate into OVA-specific Tregs in vivo. We co-cultured the OVA TCR and FoxP3 gene-transduced iPSCs (Thy 1.2+) on the OP9-DL1/DL4/I-Ab cells for 7 days, and then adoptively transferred the iPSC-derived cells into the recipient congenic mice (Thy 1.1+). We i.p. injected agonistic α-Notch2 Ab17,18 and recombinant cytokines (e.g., rIL-7, rFlt3L) twice a week to boost the development of OVA-specific iPSC-Tregs in vivo. After 2 weeks, we analyzed CD4+ TCRVβ5+ cells in the lymph nodes and spleen, gating on Thy1.2+ cell population. The approach resulted in approximately 50% of CD4+TCRVβ5+ cells, gating on Thy1.2+ cell population (Fig. 3a), which expressed CD25 and FoxP3 (Fig. 3b), implying that the administration with in vivo Notch signaling promotes the development of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs. Thy1.2+ TCRVβ5+ cells from the pooled lymph nodes and spleen were able to respond to Ag stimulation and produced IL-10 and TGF-β (Fig. 3c). These results demonstrate the development of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs using in vivo Notch signaling.
Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs ameliorate Ag-induced arthritis (AIA)
Therapies that restore or supplement Treg function and number have the ability to inhibit the onset and progression of a number of autoimmune disorders19,20,21,22,23. To characterize the functional activity of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs in physiological settings, we used the animal protocol wherein murine arthritis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by AIA. In the AIA model, we immunized mice with methylated BSA (mBSA) followed by intra articular knee re-challenge with mBSA to induce T-cell mediated tissue damage9. We co-cultured the OT-II TCR and FoxP3 gene-transduced iPSCs on the OP9-DL1/DL4/I-Ab cells for 7 days, and then adoptively transferred iPSC-derived cells into the recipient mice that were induced AIA two weeks later after the cell transfer. In the first set of experiments, we tested whether the transferred cells were able to home to the appropriate site, suppress in an Ag-specific fashion, and consequently control joint inflammation locally. We challenged each animal in one knee (right) with mBSA and OVA, and in the contralateral control knee (left) with mBSA alone. As a result, only one knee contained the OVA Ag recognized by the Ag-specific Tregs, while both knees contained the mBSA Ag recognized by the arthritis-inducing T cells. The results showed that the transferred iPSC-derived cells substantially decreased the inflammatory knee swelling when OVA was present, but had no effect on the control knee that was injected with mBSA only (Fig. 4). In a control group, FoxP3-transduced T cells also reduced inflammation, but had a lower level than the transduced iPSC-derived cells. On day 7, after AIA, we sacrificed mice and removed both knees for histopathological examination to detect in vivo tissue damage. Using the Safranin O staining, we observed in the vector control (MiDR) group, there was a loss of cartilage and joint destruction over large areas of the joint surface of both bones. In the MiDR-FoxP3 group15, there was a loss of cartilage, but mainly restricted to one bone surface of the joint. In the MiDR-TCR-FoxP3 group, there was no obvious loss of cartilage, showing normal knee architecture with an area of limited cartilage thinning (Fig. 5A,C). Using the HE staining, we identified that compared with the MiDR group in which the right knees showed considerable cellular infiltration over a large proportion of the joint surface, the MiDR-FoxP3 or MiDR-TCR-FoxP3 group had few cellular infiltration areas (Fig. 5B,C). These results showed that lymphocyte infiltration and bone erosion were markedly reduced in the right knees where OVA was present.
In the second set of experiments, we investigated whether Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs could suppress cartilage depletion and prevent osteoclast-like activity. In autoimmune arthritis, bone destruction is attributable to excessive bone resorption by osteoclasts, the formation of which is directly and indirectly regulated by CD4+ T cells infiltrating into the lesion (29,30). Osteoclasts are multinucleated cells of monocyte/macrophage lineage that degrade bone matrix and dynamically remodel the skeleton (31–33). During autoimmune arthritis, cartilage proteoglycan depletion and osteoclast activity are markedly increases. In the AIA model, we identified the increased cartilage proteoglycan depletion and osteoclast-like activity, which was correlated with the increase of joint inflammation and bone erosion. On day 7, after the AIA, we sacrificed mice and removed both knees for histopathological examination to detect osteoclast-like activity and proteoglycan depletion. Using Safranin O staining, we observed in the vector control (MiDR) group, there was severe cartilage proteoglycan depletion, which was reduced or dramatically reduced in the MiDR-FoxP3 or MiDR-TCR-FoxP3 group, separately (Fig. 5D). Using Cathepsin K staining, we identified that compared with the MiDR group in which the right knees showed a number of cellular infiltration areas with multinucleated osteoclasts, the MiDR-FoxP3 or MiDR-TCR-FoxP3 group had reduced or substantially reduced cellular infiltration areas (Fig. 5E). Our results clearly demonstrated that the iPSC-Tregs were successful to reduce cartilage proteoglycan depletion and osteoclast-like activity (Fig. 5F). Of note, in the OVA-injected knee, but not in the PBS treated-knees, reduced the cartilage depletion and osteoclast-like activity existed, suggesting that the iPSC-Tregs are Ag-specific and functional, and Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs are more efficient in suppressing the AIA than non Ag-specific Tregs.
Collectively, these results demonstrate that Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs are tissue-associated, and are able to migrate into local inflammation areas to prevent the joint damage in the AIA model.
In vivo persistence of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs
The stability or plasticity of the Treg phenotype and function is a dynamic process modulated by inflammatory signals, Tregs may down-regulate FoxP3 and lose regulatory activity24. We explored the in vivo persistence of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs. We co-cultured the OT-II TCR and FoxP3 gene-transduced iPSCs (Thy 1.2+) on the OP9-DL1/DL4/I-Ab cells for 7 days, and then adoptively transferred the iPSC-derived cells into the recipient congenic mice (Thy 1.1+) with AIA. Six weeks later, we sacrificed mice and analyzed the population of CD4+ Thy 1.2+ cells in the popliteal lymph nodes from the inflammatory right side. Approximately 6.5% of Thy 1.2+ cells existed in the recipient mice, gated on live CD4+ population, which came from the transferred iPSC-derived cells, similar to the control OVA-specific nTregs from OT-II TCR transgenic (Tg) mice. In addition, these Thy 1.2+ cells highly expressed CD25 and FoxP3 (Fig. 6A). This result indicated that the Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs have a functional stability.
There is evidence that TCR has a key role in influencing the phenotype, function and localization of Tregs in vivo25,26. We analyzed the Ag specificity of OVA-specific iPSC-Tregs by locating these cells in the OVA-treated knees. On day 14, after the AIA, we sacrificed mice and removed both knees for histopathological examination. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that more FoxP3+ cells were present in the OVA-treated than PBS-treated knees; there was no FoxP3+ cells existing in the knees in mice receiving the DsRed+ vector-transduced iPSCs. Of note, much more CD4+FoxP3+ TCRVβ5+ cells presented in the knees in mice receiving iPSCs transduced with the MiDR-TCR-FoxP3 than MiDR-FoxP3 (Fig. 6B). These data clearly suggest that the Ag-specific TCR and FoxP3 stably expressing in the iPSC-Tregs drove them accumulating in the inflamed joints and efficiently suppressed the AIA.
Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs ameliorate AIA by suppressing the development of IL-17 producing cells
To determine the mechanisms by which Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs suppress the development of autoimmune arthritis, we investigated the role of IL-17 producing cells in the AIA model. IL-17 is a pro inflammatory cytokine produced mainly by activated T cells, and plays a pathogenic role in animal arthritis models and in human RA. Neutralizing IL-17 during the induction of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) showed that IL-17 played a role in the early and late stages of the CIA. We monitored the number of Th17 producing cells in the AIA experiments. We adoptively transferred the iPSC-derived cells into the recipient mice before mBSA re-challenge. There were three groups of iPSC-derived cells: the MiDR vector, MiDR-FoxP315, and MiDR-TCR-FoxP3. Compared to the MiDR and MiDR-FoxP3-treated mice, the MiDR-TCR-FoxP3-treated mice showed a significant reduction of Th17 producing cells (Fig. 6C). There were similar numbers of Th17 producing cells in the PBS control knees (left), indicating that the suppression of Th17 numbers required the presence of the OVA Ag recognized by the iPSC-Tregs. Of note, the ability to suppress the numbers of Th17 producing cells and swelling correlated with the ability to reduce joint inflammation, bone destruction, and osteoclast-like activity as judged by histopathology of tissue section. Taken together, these results suggested that Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs ameliorate the development of AIA by suppressing Th17 producing cells and the suppressive activity is in an Ag dependent fashion.
Discussion
In this study, we show the generation of functional Ag-specific Tregs by reprogramming iPSCs. In addition, we demonstrate that adoptive transfer of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs suppresses the development of AIA. Furthermore, we determine that Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs ameliorate the development of AIA by suppressing Th17 producing cells and the suppressive activity is in an Ag dependent fashion. These results show that we develop a novel approach for developing potentially therapeutic Ag-specific Tregs.
Strong arguments support the development of Treg-based therapies in autoimmune disorders using engineered Tregs. While clinical trials show safety, feasibility, and potential therapeutic activity of Treg-based therapies using this approach, concerns about autoimmunity due to cross-reactivity with healthy tissues remains a major safety issue27. In addition, genetically modified Tregs using current approaches are usually intermediate or later effector Tregs that only have short-term persistence in vivo28,29.
There are numerous advantages of Treg-based immunotherapy over conventional treatments. These benefits include: (1) the potential for Ag specificity with the lack of general immunosuppression; (2) the possibility of inducing long-lasting regulation in vivo, and (3) the custom-made product that can be designed for each patient, with very limited or absent side effects. However, due to the lack of Treg specific surface Ags, purification of a more comprehensive Treg subset increases the contamination by the non-regulatory Teffs. Of note, in autoimmune prone mice or humans with autoimmune disorders, contamination of therapeutic Tregs by non-regulatory Teffs can include pathologic autoreactive lymphocytes. In addition, although naive T cells or thymocytes could be easily transduced with retrovirus containing FoxP330,31,32, the transfer of FoxP3 into the cells does not recapitulate the full repertoire of transcripts and functional characteristics of nTregs33. Furthermore, the generated Tregs are not Ag-specific. Many examples exist that Ag-specific Tregs are more effective in autoimmune syndromes when compared to polyclonal populations34,35,36. With this, a major challenge in Ag-specific Treg-based immunotherapy lies in the isolation of sufficient quantities of Ag-specific T cells - a challenge that is not easily overcome in humans where sampling is largely limited to the peripheral blood. A new approach by viral TCR gene transfer has been developed to generate Ag-specific Tregs from a fully mature polyclonal nTregs population isolated from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). This approach augmented the therapeutic profile of Tregs in an arthritis murine model and redirected Tregs in vivo37. However, TCR transduction of PBMCs will induce a T-cell population with mispaired TCRs, thereby reducing the surface density of Ag-specific TCR38. In contrast, transduction of stem cells followed by T cell lineage differentiation by in vitro or in vivo Notch signaling can overcome this problem39,40.
To date, PSCs are the only source available to generate a high number of single-type Ag-specific Tregs15,41,42. The approach to obtain embryonic stem cells (ESCs) from patients is not feasible. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) have a higher potential to pass the bone marrow (BM) barrier and travel in the blood, which allows HSCs to be harvested from the patient blood following mobilization with hematopoietic growth factors. Thus, the use of HSCs for therapeutic purposes has been widely applied in the clinic, especially in HSC transplantations; however, HSCs are similar to other adult stem cells, which can proliferate only for a limited number of cycles. HSCs’ response to differentiation signals decline with each cycle. In other words, compared to ESCs, HSCs have reduced differentiation and proliferative capacities, and the numbers of HSCs are difficult to expand in cell culture43. Human iPSCs can be easily generated from patients’ somatic cells by transduction of various transcription factors and exhibit characteristics identical to those of ESCs44. Many genetic methods as well as the protein-based approaches have been developed to produce iPSCs with potentially reduced risks, including that of immunogenicity and tumorigenicity45. This approach provides an opportunity to generate patient- or disease-specific iPSCs46. Because of the plasticity and the potential for an unlimited capacity for self-renewal, iPSCs have high potential for advancing the field of cell-based therapies. Our laboratory has shown that programming of Ag-specific iPSC-CTLs or iPSC-Tregs can be used for immunotherapy of cancers and autoimmune disorders15,16,42,47; other groups reported related investigations48,49. In this study, we have developed a system to generate Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs. Our research provides a new insight into the methodologies and mechanistic requirements for efficient development of stable tissue-associated or organ-specific iPSC-Tregs. Once such strategies become available, there is the potential to facilitate the generation of immune tolerance.
Although Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs have promising therapeutic effects in cell-based therapies, their efficiency is limited by the need to generate a large number of such cells using complex and expensive in vitro differentiation. In addition, the lengthy duration for generating iPSCs may limit their use in individualized therapies. Alternatively, the TCR/FoxP3 gene-transduced iPSCs can be used to differentiate Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs in vivo and suppress autoimmune disorders. After the adoptive transfer of the gene-transduced iPSCs, Notch agonists or recombinant cytokines (e.g., rIL-7, rFlt3L) can be administrated to boost in vivo development of Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs. Another potential problem could arise including risks from the transferred cells potentially differentiating into other cell types (e.g., leukemia, lymphoma) in vivo or becoming dysfunctional. Alternatively, we will incorporate a suicide gene, the inducible caspase 9 59, into the vector as this allows the removal of the transduced Tregs by the injection of a bioinert small-molecule dimerizing agent (AP1903) to “shut off” the system, which will overcome this potential problem.
For autoimmune disorders like RA, it is unclear which Ags are critical for the disease. Clinical work has been performed targeting the autoAg that are relatively abundantly expressed in the inflamed synovium50,51,52. A clinical trial using heat shock protein (hsp) demonstrated clinical remission in patients with juvenile RA53. Recent studies have uncovered potent disease-suppressive Tregs recognizing hsp self-Ags, enabling selective activity in inflamed tissues8. Generating hsp-specific iPSC-Tregs for immunotherapy has a potential in the therapeutic interventions of autoimmune arthritis and lupus.
In summary, we have developed a new approach to generate functional Ag-specific iPSC-Tregs, which have the ability to suppress autoimmunity in a murine model of arthritis. Targeting tissue/organ-associated iPSC-Tregs may drive forward the use of therapeutic Tregs of cell-based therapies.
Methods
Ethics statement
All animal experiments were approved by the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine Animal Care Committee (IACUC protocol #2008-015) and were conducted in compliance with the guidelines of the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.
Cells and mice
The mouse iPS-MEF-Ng-20D-17 cell line (GFP+), which was induced from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by retroviral transfection of Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc, was obtained from Dr. Shinya Yamanaka (Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan) through the RIKEN Cell Bank (Ibaraki, Japan)16. The OP9-DL1/DL4/I-Ab cell line was generated by a retroviral transduction of the OP9 cells from ATCC (Manassas, VA) with the murine genes of DL1, DL4 and I-Ab 15. OT-II TCR-Tg mice, expressing a TCR composed of variable (Vβ5 and Vα2) chains responsive to an OVA peptide 323-339 (ISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR), were bred on a C57BL/6 background. C57BL/6 (Thy1.2) and Thy1.1 congenic mice (B6.PL-Thy1a/Cy) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME).
Chemicals, peptide and antibodies
Albumin from chicken egg white (whole OVA, # 5503) and albumin methylated from bovine serum (mBSA, #A1009) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Complete Frenud’s adjuvant (CFA, #263810) was purchased from BD Difco (Sparksm MD). OVA323-339 peptide was purchased from the American Peptide Company (Sunnyvale, CA). PE or APC anti-mouse IL-2 (JES6-5H4) IFN-γ (XMG1.2) were obtained from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA). PE, PE/Cy7, APC, APC/Cy7 or Alexa 647- conjugated anti-mouse CD4 (GK1.5), TCRVβ5 (MR9-4), CD3 (17A2), CD25 (3C7), CTLA-4 (UC10-4B9), FoxP3 (MF-14), IL-10 (JES5-16E3), latency associated peptide/LAP (TGF-β1, TW7-16B4), and Th17A (TC11-18H10.1) were obtained from Biolegend (San Diego, CA). Anti-FoxP3 Ab (ab54501) for immunofluorescent staining was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-mouse Nanog (eBioMLC-51) were obtained from eBioscoence (San Diego, CA). FITC- or PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD8 (6A242) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Rabbit polyclonal anti-Cathepsin K Ab (#11239-1-AP) were purchased from Proteintech group (Chicago, IL). Mouse α-Notch2 Ab was kindly provided by Dr. Hideo Yagita (Juntendo University School of Medicine, Japan)18.
Cell cultures
Mouse iPSCs were maintained on feeder layers of irradiated SNL76/7 cells in 6-well culture plates (Nunc) and passaged every 3 days. In brief, iPSCs were maintained in DMEM culture medium (0.1 mmol/L nonessential amino acids, 1 mmol/L L-glutamine from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA), and 0.1 mmol/L β-mercaptoethanol from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 15% fetal calf serum (FCS) from HyClone, (Logan, UT). Monolayers of OP9-DL1/DL4/I-Ab cells were cultured in α-MEM medium supplemented with 20% FCS and 2.2 g/L sodium bicarbonate from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Mouse iPSCs were washed once in DMEM culture medium before plating onto sub confluent OP9-DL1/DL4/I-Ab monolayers for T lineage differentiation in the presence of murine rFlt-3 ligand (5 ng/ml) and rIL-7 (1 ng/ml) from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ)15.
Retroviral transduction
cDNA for FoxP3 or Foxp3 with OVA-specific TCR was subcloned into the murine bicistronic retroviral vector MSCV-IRES-DsRed (MiDR)16, and cloning was confirmed by PCR amplification and gene sequencing. Retroviral transduction was performed as described15.
Adoptive transfer
DsRed+ Treg progenitors (3 × 106) from iPSCs in PBS were injected i.v. into 6-wk-old C57BL/6 mice. After 4-6 wk, mice were scarified, and the lymph nodes, spleen, or knees were removed for histopathological examination.
Flow cytometric analysis
Gene-transduced iPSCs (DsRed+) were co-cultured with OP9-DL1/DL4/I-Ab cells for various days, and the expression of CD3, TCRβ, CD4, CD25, and CTLA-4 was analyzed by flow cytometry, after gating on DsRed+ cells or other markers such as CD3 or TCR. Intracellular IL-10 and surface LAP/TGF-β were analyzed by flow cytometry, after gating on live CD4+ CD25+ cells or Thy1.2+ TCRVβ5+ cells. T cells from the popleteal lymph nodes were collected and intracellular Th17 producing cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, after gating on live CD4+ cells.
Cytokine secretion and proliferation
Cytokines (IL-2 and IFN-γ) were measured by ELISA, and proliferation was measured in triplicate cultures by incorporation of 3H-thymidine (1 μCi/well; ICN Pharmaceuticals) during the last 12 hours of culture15.
Immunoblot
Live cells were lysed in ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer for 30 min. Insoluble material was removed and lysates were used for Western blotting as described15.
Induction of Ag induced arthritis (AIA)
The gene-transduced iPSCs (DsRed+) were co-cultured with OP9-DL1/DL4/I-Ab cells for 7 days. The iPSC-derived cells were adoptively transferred to the female C57BL/6 mice through i.v. injection (day 0). At day 10, mice were s.c. immunized at the base of the tail with 100 μg mBSA emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant. At day 20, arthritis was induced by intra-articular injection of 20 μg mBSA in 10 μL PBS in the left knee and 20 μg mBSA and 100 μg whole OVA in 10 μLPBS in the right knee. Arthritis severity was monitored by measurement of knee diameter using a dial gauge caliper from Kroeplin (Schluchtern, Germany). Increase in knee diameter was calculated based on pre-injection knee diameter for each mouse before injection on day 0 as described9.
Histology and immunofluorescence
Mice were sacrificed on day 7 after AIA induction. Both knees were removed, fixed in 10% formalin, and calcified in Formical-4 from Decal Chemical (Tallman, NY). The tissues were embedded in Paraffin, sectioned at 4 μm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) or Safranin O staining. Safranin O staining for bone erosion and loss of proteoglycans was scored using a semi quantitative scoring system from 0 to 4. For bone erosion, “0” is considered as no erosion, and “4” is considered as extended erosion and destruction of bone. For proteoglycans depletion, “0” represents no loss of proteoglycans, and “4” indicates a complete loss of staining for proteoglycans. HE staining for infiltration of inflammatory cells was scored using a semi quantitative scoring system as described15.
Immunofluorescent staining was performed on the sections after deparaffinization and rehydration as described15. Cathepsin K was diluted at 1:100 and incubated for 32 minutes followed by detection and visualization with Ventana Omnimap DAB anti-Rabbit detection kit.
Statistical analysis
One-way or two-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis between groups and significance was set at 5%. All statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism (San Diego, CA).
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Haque, M. et al. Stem cell-derived tissue-associated regulatory T cells ameliorate the development of autoimmunity. Sci. Rep. 6, 20588; doi: 10.1038/srep20588 (2016).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the cores of Molecular and Histopathology and Flow Cytometry at The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine for providing the histologic staining and cell sorting. This project was funded, in part, under grants with the National Institute of Health Grant R21AI109239 and K18CA151798, Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust 2014PG-T1D049, and the Pennsylvania Department of Health using Tobacco Settlement Fund SAP # 4100057673 to J.S.
Footnotes
Author Contributions J.S. designed the research; M.H., J.S., K.F. and X.S. performed experiments; P.S., F.L., B.N. and D.F. performed analysis; S.Z. provided reagents, and J.S. wrote the paper. All authors were involved in the critical discussion of the manuscript.
References
- Huynh A. et al. Control of PI(3) kinase in Treg cells maintains homeostasis and lineage stability. Nat Immunol 16, 188–196 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y. et al. Two histone/protein acetyltransferases, CBP and p300, are indispensable for Foxp3+ T-regulatory cell development and function. Mol Cell Biol 34, 3993–4007 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baca Jones C. et al. Regulatory T cells control diabetes without compromising acute anti-viral defense. Clin Immunol 153, 298–307 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wing J. B., Ise W., Kurosaki T. & Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T Cells Control Antigen-Specific Expansion of Tfh Cell Number and Humoral Immune Responses via the Coreceptor CTLA-4. Immunity 41, 1013–1025 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maeda Y. et al. Detection of self-reactive CD8(+) T cells with an anergic phenotype in healthy individuals. Science 346, 1536–1540 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lapierre P., Beland K., Yang R. & Alvarez F. Adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells in an autoimmune hepatitis murine model restores peripheral tolerance. Hepatology 57, 217–227 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y. C. et al. Oligodeoxynucleotides stabilize Helios-expressing Foxp3+ human T regulatory cells during in vitro expansion. Blood 119, 2810–2818 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Herwijnen M. J. et al. Regulatory T cells that recognize a ubiquitous stress-inducible self-antigen are long-lived suppressors of autoimmune arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 14134–14139 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright G. P. et al. Adoptive therapy with redirected primary regulatory T cells results in antigen-specific suppression of arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 19078–19083 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen T. L., Sullivan N. L., Ebel M., Teague R. M. & DiPaolo R. J. Antigen-specific TGF-beta-induced regulatory T cells secrete chemokines, regulate T cell trafficking, and suppress ongoing autoimmunity. J Immunol 187, 1745–1753 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Golshayan D. et al. In vitro-expanded donor alloantigen-specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells promote experimental transplantation tolerance. Blood 109, 827–835 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang Q. et al. In vitro-expanded antigen-specific regulatory T cells suppress autoimmune diabetes. J Exp Med 199, 1455–1465 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Komatsu N. et al. Pathogenic conversion of Foxp3+ T cells into TH17 cells in autoimmune arthritis. Nat Med 20, 62–68 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bailey-Bucktrout S. L. et al. Self-antigen-driven activation induces instability of regulatory T cells during an inflammatory autoimmune response. Immunity 39, 949–962 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haque R. et al. Programming of regulatory T cells from pluripotent stem cells and prevention of autoimmunity. J Immunol 189, 1228–1236 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lei F. et al. In vivo programming of tumor antigen-specific T lymphocytes from pluripotent stem cells to promote cancer immunosurveillance. Cancer Res 71, 4742–4747 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sekine C. et al. Differential regulation of osteoclastogenesis by Notch2/Delta-like 1 and Notch1/Jagged1 axes. Arthritis Res Ther 14, R45 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kijima M. et al. Dendritic cell-mediated NK cell activation is controlled by Jagged2-Notch interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 7010–7015 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruzek M. C. et al. Characterization of in vitro antimurine thymocyte globulin-induced regulatory T cells that inhibit graft-versus-host disease in vivo. Blood 111, 1726–1734 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samy E. T., Wheeler K. M., Roper R. J., Teuscher C. & Tung K. S. Cutting edge: Autoimmune disease in day 3 thymectomized mice is actively controlled by endogenous disease-specific regulatory T cells. J Immunol 180, 4366–4370 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huter E. N., Stummvoll G. H., DiPaolo R. J., Glass D. D. & Shevach E. M. Cutting edge: antigen-specific TGF beta-induced regulatory T cells suppress Th17-mediated autoimmune disease. J Immunol 181, 8209–8213 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Semitekolou M. et al. Activin-A induces regulatory T cells that suppress T helper cell immune responses and protect from allergic airway disease. J Exp Med 206, 1769–1785 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds A. D. et al. Regulatory T cells attenuate Th17 cell-mediated nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurodegeneration in a model of Parkinson’s disease. J Immunol 184, 2261–2271 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rubtsov Y. P. et al. Stability of the regulatory T cell lineage in vivo. Science 329, 1667–1671 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levine A. G., Arvey A., Jin W. & Rudensky A. Y. Continuous requirement for the TCR in regulatory T cell function. Nat Immunol 15, 1070–1078 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delpoux A. et al. TCR signaling events are required for maintaining CD4 regulatory T cell numbers and suppressive capacities in the periphery. J Immunol 193, 5914–5923 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Loenen M. M. et al. Mixed T cell receptor dimers harbor potentially harmful neoreactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 10972–10977 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y. C. et al. Engineered antigen-specific human regulatory T cells: immunosuppression of FVIII-specific T- and B-cell responses. Blood 125, 1107–1115 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Passerini L. et al. CD4(+) T cells from IPEX patients convert into functional and stable regulatory T cells by FOXP3 gene transfer. Sci Transl Med 5, 215ra174 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hori S., Nomura T. & Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science 299, 1057–1061 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei J. et al. Antagonistic nature of T helper 1/2 developmental programs in opposing peripheral induction of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 18169–18174 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samon J. B. et al. Notch1 and TGFbeta1 cooperatively regulate Foxp3 expression and the maintenance of peripheral regulatory T cells. Blood 112, 1813–1821 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill J. A. et al. Foxp3 transcription-factor-dependent and -independent regulation of the regulatory T cell transcriptional signature. Immunity 27, 786–800 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sela U., Olds P., Park A., Schlesinger S. J. & Steinman R. M. Dendritic cells induce antigen-specific regulatory T cells that prevent graft versus host disease and persist in mice. J Exp Med 208, 2489–2496 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kasagi S. et al. In vivo-generated antigen-specific regulatory T cells treat autoimmunity without compromising antibacterial immune response. Sci Transl Med 6, 241ra278 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bacher P. et al. Antigen-specific expansion of human regulatory T cells as a major tolerance mechanism against mucosal fungi. Mucosal Immunol 7, 916–928 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hombach A. A., Kofler D., Rappl G. & Abken H. Redirecting human CD4 + CD25+ regulatory T cells from the peripheral blood with pre-defined target specificity. Gene Ther 16, 1088–1096 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cassani B. et al. Altered intracellular and extracellular signaling leads to impaired T-cell functions in ADA-SCID patients. Blood 111, 4209–4219 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haque M., Fino K., Lei F., Xiong X. & Song J. Utilizing regulatory T cells against rheumatoid arthritis. Front Oncol 4, 209 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lei F., Haque R., Xiong X. & Song J. Modulation of autoimmune diseases by iPS cells. Methods Mol Biol 1213, 365–377 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Norell H. et al. CD34-based enrichment of genetically engineered human T cells for clinical use results in dramatically enhanced tumor targeting. Cancer Immunol Immunother 59, 851–862 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lei F., Haque R., Xiong X. & Song J. Directed differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells towards T lymphocytes. J Vis Exp 63, e3986. 10.3791/3986 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Himburg H. A. et al. Pleiotrophin regulates the expansion and regeneration of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med 16, 475–482 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim J. B. et al. Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cells. Cell 136, 411–419 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao T., Zhang Z. N., Rong Z. & Xu Y. Immunogenicity of induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 474, 212–215 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raya A. et al. Disease-corrected haematopoietic progenitors from Fanconi anaemia induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 460, 53–59 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lei F., Haque R., Weiler L., Vrana K. E. & Song J. T lineage differentiation from induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Immunol 260, 1–5 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Themeli M. et al. Generation of tumor-targeted human T lymphocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells for cancer therapy. Nat Biotechnol 31, 928–933 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vizcardo R. et al. Regeneration of human tumor antigen-specific T cells from iPSCs derived from mature CD8(+) T cells. Cell Stem Cell 12, 31–36 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lorenzo N. et al. Therapeutic effect of an altered peptide ligand derived from heat-shock protein 60 by suppressing of inflammatory cytokines secretion in two animal models of rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmunity 45, 449–459 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dominguez Mdel C. et al. An altered peptide ligand corresponding to a novel epitope from heat-shock protein 60 induces regulatory T cells and suppresses pathogenic response in an animal model of adjuvant-induced arthritis. Autoimmunity 44, 471–482 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wieten L. et al. A novel heat-shock protein coinducer boosts stress protein Hsp70 to activate T cell regulation of inflammation in autoimmune arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism 62, 1026–1035 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamphuis S. et al. Tolerogenic immune responses to novel T-cell epitopes from heat-shock protein 60 in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet 366, 50–56 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.