Abstract
An assessment of the Coulter model S automatic blood counter has been carried out. The standard deviations for the haemoglobin concentration, haematocrit, red cell count, and white cell count are, respectively, ± 0·15 g/100 ml, ± 0·45%, ± 0·04 m/c mm, and ± 0·47 thous/c mm. These results are clearly more accurate than careful manual estimates, performed for comparison on the same samples. Details of the comparisons are presented. A comparison is also made with routine daily estimations.
`Carryover' from one sample to the next was found to be about 2%, and tests in the ranges likely to be found in practice showed good linearity for the haemoglobin estimation, haematocrit, red cell count, and white cell count. A brief account of instrument failures is given.
The performance of the Coulter model S compares well with that of other automated equipment for which detailed evaluations are available.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f564a/f564a22ba77298cfff831565fff62285130e886e" alt="68"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa43/daa43477f3e9451f063db07b33bf4ecdae80d52d" alt="69"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad0b7/ad0b7f98cc1372e61e9e8e5f9dab1ff12f698b93" alt="70"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4981f/4981f2812989c24d9dc9927e3cd5ea4749356b51" alt="71"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c852a/c852a11c01c9848052fc754a327e943746c83393" alt="72"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59a5a/59a5a872c91e651cd473c9ae92862e621d9c7ca8" alt="73"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9112/a9112ed7067acd0eeed6b1372efba7e6d9a47fb7" alt="74"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9bf0/e9bf06ae221cfaf9828a8be03d0914d6c09d6665" alt="75"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b14c7/b14c798a9c5ca05f19156e9681b27cb41934230c" alt="76"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BRECHER G., SCHNEIDERMAN M., WILLIAMS G. Z. Evaluation of electronic red blood cell counter. Am J Clin Pathol. 1956 Dec;26(12):1439–1449. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/26.12.1439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnard D. F., Carter A. B., Crosland-Taylor P. J., Stewart J. W. An evaluation of the Coulter model S. J Clin Pathol Suppl Coll Pathol. 1969;3:26–33. doi: 10.1136/jcp.s2-3.1.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lappin T. R., Lamont A., Nelson M. G. An evaluation of the autoanalyzer SMA-4. J Clin Pathol. 1969 Jan;22(1):11–18. doi: 10.1136/jcp.22.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson M. G. Automation in the laboratory. J Clin Pathol. 1969 Jan;22(1):1–10. doi: 10.1136/jcp.22.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson M. G. Multichannel continuous flow analysis on the SMA-4--7A. J Clin Pathol Suppl Coll Pathol. 1969;3:20–25. doi: 10.1136/jcp.s2-3.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]