Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Feb 9;6:20536. doi: 10.1038/srep20536

Precise AuxPt1−x Alloy Nanoparticle Array of Tunable Composition for Catalytic Applications

Sarah Jahn 1,2, Sebastian J Lechner 1,2,3, Helene Freichels 3, Martin Möller 3, Joachim P Spatz 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC4746634  PMID: 26856888

Abstract

A 3-dimensional Block Copolymer Micellar nanoLithography (BCML) process was used to prepare AuxPt1−x alloy nanoparticles (NPs) monodisperse in size and composition, strongly anchored onto SiO2-particles (0.2 wt.% AuxPt1−x/SiO2). The particles possess a face-centered cubic (fcc) crystal structure and their size could be varied from 3–12 nm. We demonstrate the uniformity of the Au/Pt composition by analyzing individual NPs by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The strongly bound AuxPt1−x NPs catalyzed the oxidation of CO with high activity. Thermal ageing experiments in pure CO2 as well as in ambient atmosphere demonstrated stability of the size distribution for times as long as 22 h.

Noble metal nanoparticles (NPs) made from Au and Pt find application in many areas of surface chemistry as well as for biotechnological assays and methods1,2,3. Their specific properties, e.g., in catalytic reactions such as the electrochemical oxidation of methanol4 and the reduction of CO.5,6,7,8,9, depend on both intrinsic and external factors. The former include the NP’s phase behavior and structure as well as its composition and size distribution, the latter refer to the influences stemming from the substrate, dispersion, and the environmental conditions of the reaction5,10. Many applications in nanotechnology harness the well-known fact that NPs made from a combination of two different noble metals have favorable properties concerning their thermal stability, catalytic performance as well as optical and magnetic properties compared to NPs made from pure metals6,11,12. As an example, Ethirajan et al.13 and Wiedwald et al.14 were able to synthesize FePt and CoPt alloy NPs with superior magnetic properties via Block-Copolymer Micellar nanoLithography (BCML). The structure of such mixed NPs depends on the synthesis method and the kinetics of the reaction. Thus, the Au-Pt phase diagram exhibits a miscibility gap in the bulk state15, however at the nanoscale, Au and Pt atoms can form stable bimetallic NPs in a core shell or an alloy structure16.

Concerning the catalytic activities and properties of Pt, Au, and AuPt on different substrates and under various conditions, Haruta et al. have identified Au as a very active catalyst during low temperature CO oxidation5,7. These findings have also been confirmed in studies by other authors, which found the catalytic activity of Au NPs (2–4 nm in diameter) to be much higher than that of Pt NPs6,8,9. However, the low thermal stability of small Au NPs (approximately <5 nm) as well as its rapid decrease in catalytic activity with increasing NP size have, thus far, restricted the use of Au in industrial applications. In contrast, Pt NPs exhibit constant catalytic activity over a wide range of particle sizes. Here, AuxPt1−x NPs can have an advantage by combining high activities in catalytic reactions with improved stability6,12. AuPt nanoalloys have greater catalytic activity and thermal stability than pure Au or Pt6. In addition, Yamamoto et al.17 have reported an improved performance of AuPt compared to pure Pt during CO oxidation6. Still, there is much room for improving the catalytic behavior of noble metal NPs concerning their performance as low temperature catalysts, their sinter behavior, and their stability. Just as important for their industrial application is also an improved understanding of the role of nonmetallic substrates10.

In this work, AuxPt1−x NPs were synthesized and immobilized on 2D and 3D substrates, more specifically Y:ZrO2 wafers and mesoporous silica powder, using BCML. The BCML technique enables the synthesis of NPs with tunable and reproducible composition as well as high monodispersity. In addition, due to the self-assembling character of the loaded micelles, AuxPt1−x NPs can be distributed uniformly and in a predictable hexagonal arrangement on the substrate. Multiple properties of the substrate-bound NPs – including their size and dispersity as well as the crystal structure and composition of alloy NPs –, were analyzed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), high-angle annular dark-field imaging (HAADF), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). CO oxidation studies of monodisperse Au, Pt, and AuxPt1−x alloy NPs were conducted to investigate correlations between the properties of the catalyst and its catalytic activity. Catalytic activity measurements of the NPs were performed by way of a cyclic temperature-programmed CO oxidation reaction.

Results

BCML of bimetallic alloy NPs

AuxPt1−x NPs were synthesized using a previously described block copolymer micellar nanolithography technique (BCML)18,19,20,21,22. The size of the NPs and the distance between individual NPs was tailored through adjusting the choice of the block copolymer, the concentration of the micellar solution, and the metal loading. The amount of metal salt in the micelles is a function of the loading parameter L:

graphic file with name srep20536-m1.jpg

where m represents the mass, M the molar mass and [Units VP] the amount of vinylpyridine monomer. Block copolymers can form self-assembled monomicellar layers. Flat substrates can be spin- or dip-coated by a monomicellar film whereby the noble metal salt is concentrated within the core of the micelles. By a subsequent plasma treatment monodisperse noble metal NPs deposite in a quasi-hexagonal pattern at the interface of the substrate18,19,20. To generate bimetallic alloy noble metal NPs, the micelles are loaded by two different metal salts, a second loading step is applied after the first loading step (MA). The metal ions of the second metal salt (MB) also diffuse into the hydrophilic core of the micelle. MAMB NPs are formed during the following plasma treatment23.

Employing this procedure, we were able to synthesize alloy NPs with diameters between 3–12 nm and desired noble metal ratios AuxPt1−x. The following noble metal ratios were used for the catalytic measurements: Au0.1Pt0.9, Au0.3Pt0.7 and Au0.5Pt0.5. Pure Au NPs and Pt NPs were also compared. The optimization of the diameter, particle size, and interparticle distance of AuxPt1−x alloy NPs based on the utilization of different block copolymers is shown in Fig. 1 using the example of Au0.5Pt0.5NPs.

Figure 1. SEM recorded with back-scattered electrons of alloy NPs.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The images depict Au0.5Pt0.5 alloy NPs with different particle sizes [(a) 6 nm, (b) 10 nm] and interparticle distance [(a) 20 nm, (b) 70 nm] as produced using two different block copolymers [(a) PS(227)-b-P2VP(99) and (b) PS(1056)-b-P2VP(495)]. The concentration of the micellar solutions was identical: c = 3 mg/ml, loading L = 0.4.

For catalytic applications a sufficiently large number of noble metal NPs must be well-dispersed on a carrier with a high surface to volume ratio in order to enable sufficient chemical conversions. This can typically be realized as a washcoat. Washcoats are ceramic powders, comprised typically of SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, or mixtures of these materials, which cover the walls of the honeycomb structures of catalytic converters24,25. Here, mesoporous silica powder is used as a substrate for the immobilization of the AuxPt1−x NPs. The total surface area was calculated from an adsorption-desorption isothermal curve obtained from H adsorption experiments. The silica powder had a total surface area of aBET = 141.1 m2/g.

Gadomska et al.26 established a method for creating well-ordered gold NPs on spheres called BCML. Employing their BCML method, they covered 75 μm glass beads with a monolayer of quasi hexagonally-ordered micelles. Likewise, it is possible to coat the surface of mesoporous silica powder with AuxPt1−x alloy NPs. The SEM and CTEM characterization of the coated powder showed excellent dispersion of the AuxPt1−x alloy NPs on the surface of the ceramic powder particles (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Scheme of the 3D coating process for ceramic powder particles.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The micellar solution loaded with metal salt is mixed with the silica powder and pressed through the powder particles by Argon flux. The micelles form a monolayer covering the entire surface area of the powder particles. After plasma treatment, which burns the polymeric parts and reduces the metal salt to M0, NPs are immobilized on the substrate: (a) SEM (ESB), CTEM (b) BF and (c) DF of Au0.5Pt0.5 NPs immobilized on silica powder (polymer: PS(227)-b-P2VP(99)).

The following analysis and measurement of the catalytic activity in a CO oxidation reaction was performed on AuxPt1−x alloy NPs (approx. 6 nm) synthesized via BCML using the PS(227)-b-P2VP(99) block copolymer. For the size distribution of the AuxPt1−x NPs used for catalytic measurements and characterization see Supplementary Fig. S1 and S2 online.

The AuxPt1−x NPs synthesized using BCML were analyzed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), high-angle annular dark-field imaging (HAADF), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). Our measurements revealed that Au and Pt atoms are randomly distributed inside the NPs (see Fig. 3). Concerning their atomic lattice parameters, the NPs are arranged along the <110> direction and show two (111) lattice planes. The angle between the two (111) lattice planes is 70°, which indicates a face-centered cubic (fcc) crystal structure. The results are in agreement with recent work by Petkov et al.27 who observed a random alloy structure in AuxPt1−x NPs (<10 nm) synthesized by a two-phase method using aqueous solutions of the metal salts.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Au0.5Pt0.5 NP on Y:ZrO2 (100): (a) HAADF Image (200 kV) and EDX mapping of (b) Au (L) and (c) Pt (L). Au and Pt atoms are randomly distributed in the NP.

EDX measurements of single NPs and ICP-OES measurements of the coated silica powder were performed to quantify the atomic ratio of Au to Pt. The NPs designated for catalytic CO oxidation measurements (i.e., Au0.1Pt0.9, Au0.3Pt0.7, and Au0.5Pt0.5NPs) were analyzed. Results are listed in Table 1. The alloy composition in the left column states the originally used Pt and Au amounts. Most importantly, the measurement of the atomic ratio within the overall sample, shown in the column on the right, proves that the designated alloy composition is achieved not only in some but in all NPs. We believe that the precision of this production method with regard to obtaining a particular metal ratio in every single NP is outstanding and cannot be reproduced by any other method for preparing alloy nanoparticles.

Table 1. EDX and ICP-AES characterization of AuxPt1−x NP.

AuxPt1-x EDX [At.%] ICP [At.%]
Au0.5Pt0.5 Au0.48Pt0.52 ± 0.06 Au0.51Pt0.49
Au0.3Pt0.7 Au0.27Pt0.73 ± 0.09 Au0.3Pt0.7
Au0.1Pt0.9 Au0.13Pt0.87 ± 0.05 Au0.16Pt0.84
Open in a new tab

Regarding the thermal stability of the AuxPt1−x alloy NPs EDX measurements were performed to verify that also no phase segregation of Au and Pt takes place. For this, Au0.5Pt0.5NPs were immobilized on Y:ZrO2 (100) planar substrates and aged under CO2 (435 mbar) and atmospheric conditions at 400 °C for 22 hours (Fig. 4). The EDX results reveal that phase segregation does not occur during the aging process. Furthermore, no changes in the size distribution of all used alloy (AuxPt1−x) and pure noble metal (Au, Pt) NPs were observed.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

HAADF image of Au0.5Pt0.5 NPs on Y:ZrO2 (100) after annealing for 22 h at 400 °C in (a) atmosphere and (b) CO2 (both 435 mbar). The samples shown in the EDX linescans (red arrow indicates the scanning direction) were annealed under (c) atmosphere or (d) CO2. They do not show any phase segregation of Au and Pt atoms after the aging process.

ICP-AES analysis not only reveals the ratio of the compounds but also provides information about the quantity of noble metal immobilized on the surface of the silica powder. AuxPt1−x samples of each ratio were prepared using an identical procedure. Our measurements showed that in all cases the amount of noble metal dispersed on the surface of the silica powder constituted about 0.2 wt% of the sample.

Experiments pertaining to the catalytic activity in the CO oxidation reaction were performed in a fully automated set-up, thus allowing the measurement of transient kinetics. Helium was used as the balance gas. The reactor was operated with a theoretical oxygen excess of 100% for the reaction Inline graphic.

It is well known that Pt surfaces show a strong tendency for CO poisoning28; therefore, CO-rich conditions were chosen in order to evaluate the possible contribution of the gold content in CO oxidation. Temperature-programmed oxidation was carried out cyclically with a total volume flow rate of 20 NmL/min and a heating rate of 5 °C/min from 25–400 °C. Ion currents of the molecular ions of CO2, CO, O2, and H2O were evaluated. The ion current of CO was corrected by the theoretical ratio of the produced CO2 (which equals 11,4%), because CO is a fragment of CO2. The results of the CO oxidation measurements are displayed in Fig. 5. The result of the first heating cycle of the 0.2%Au0.5Pt0.5/SiO2 NPs is of particular importance (see Fig. 5a): during this first stage of heating (up to nearly 300 °C), the amount of CO decreased strongly. Simultaneously, the O2 signal decreased to zero before slightly increasing to a constant value at higher temperatures. The CO2 signal – the product of the oxidation reaction – reached a peak before arriving to a steady state regime. The turnover rate of CO oxidation reaches a limiting value determined by the rate of adsorption-desorption of the involved molecules29,30. Furthermore, two clearly separated H2O peaks are visible, one below 100 °C and one at approximately 400 °C. The first peak indicates a significant amount of weakly bound, physisorbed water, whereas the second peak, which is also lower in intensity, suggests strongly bound water. The water peaks only appear during the initial heating of the samples. For the sake of simplicity, only the CO2 signal and the temperature profile of 5 cycles are plotted for the other AuxPt1−x NPs-based catalysts (Fig. 5b–f).

Figure 5. Temperature-controlled CO oxidation between 25 and 400 °C.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The graphs show the first temperature rise with an overview of all measured signals for (a) 0.2%Au0.5Pt0.5/SiO2 and the course of the CO2 signal of 5 measured cycles for (b) 0.2%Au0.5Pt0.5/SiO2, (c) 0.17%Au0.3Pt0.7/SiO2, (d) 0.18%Au0.1Pt0.9/SiO2, (e) 0.15%Pt/SiO2, and (f) 0.23%Au/SiO2.

The catalytic behavior of all AuxPt1−x/SiO2 NP samples was similar with the exception of the 0.23%Au/SiO2 sample. The T50 temperature, at which 50% of the CO streamed in is turned over, is a direct indicator of the catalytic activity. Table 2 gives an overview of the catalytic activity of the five measured cycles. During the first cycle, activation of the catalyst takes place. This activation is demonstrated by the observed removal of stored molecules and water from the Pt sample (see Fig. 5a). Therefore, the T50 temperature of the first cycle is much higher than in later cycles, but reaches a constant value of catalytic activity with the second cycle. Additionally, the 0.17%Au0.3Pt0.7 and 0.18%Au0.1Pt0.9 samples show a higher CO2 discharge during the first cycle compared to the other samples. This higher amount of CO2 discharge could be due to the reaction of stored hydrocarbons on the samples, which also contribute to the signal. The stable T50 values of the subsequent cycles indicate no ageing of the samples for temperature cycles up to 400 °C. The T50 temperature of the fifth cycle for each sample is used to compare the catalytic performance in CO oxidation (Table 2). The pure 0.15%Pt/SiO2 sample showed the highest catalytic activity of all the tested samples with a T50 temperature of 242 °C after activation. In contrast, the 0.23%Au/SiO2 sample showed no catalytic activity under these experimental and evaluation conditions. We do not measure any advantage of Au on Pt-based NPs with respect to improving the catalytic performance during CO oxidation. The correlation between the T50 temperature and NP composition is most evident: T50 increases with increasing amounts of Au and decreasing amounts of Pt in the NPs (Fig. 6). In particular, a comparison of the 0.15%Pt and 0.18%Au0.1Pt0.9 samples clearly shows that, although the amount of Pt is similar in both NPs, the T50 temperature is decidedly different. This finding suggests that Au atoms compete with Pt atoms at the NP surface, which, in turn, reduces the overall catalytic activity of the NPs with increasing amount of Au. In general, the catalytic activity of the AuxPt1−x NPs is in agreement with the published activity of pure Pt catalysts31,32.

Table 2. T50 temperatures of the first 5 cycles of all tested AuxPt1-x/SiO2 samples.

Cycle 0.2%Au0.5Pt0.5 T50 [°C] 0.17%Au0.3Pt0.7 T50 [°C] 0.18%Au0.1Pt0.9 T50 [°C] 0.15%Pt T50 [°C] 0.23%Au T50 [°C]
1 356 337 321 319 <400
2 289 283 273,5 243 <400
3 290 282 271 241 <400
4 292 281,5 270,5 241 <400
5 289 281 270 242 <400
Open in a new tab

Figure 6. T50 temperature related to the Pt content of the AuxPt1−x NPs.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

In other words, the observed T50 for CO oxidation is closer to that of pure Pt catalysts than to the T50 reported for pure Au/support catalysts in ambient temperature ranges32.

Discussion

BCML proved to be a powerful tool to synthesize monodisperse fcc alloy crystal structure NPs of desired composition, size, and interparticle distance with excellent precision. Most importantly, the ratio between Pt and Au that was measured in individual NPs was very consistent between the sampled NPs. It was possible to produce 0.2% AuxPt1−x/SiO2 model catalysts by using a 3D BCML coating process. The catalytic activity of these AuxPt1−x/SiO2 systems during CO oxidation was tested by temperature-controlled oxidation. The level of oxidation activity was determined on the basis of the T50 temperature and the systems ranked according to their activity. The activity of each catalyst as prepared by BCML did not show any ageing effects for temperatures up to 400 °C. The T50 temperature revealed further that catalytic activity correlates with the amount of Pt in the NP. We assume that the observed changes in oxidation activity are due to a higher surface activity of Au atoms on the surface of alloy NPs as Au atoms compete with Pt atoms for surface occupation. However, no core shell structure or other phase segregation structures could be discovered in our alloy NPs. The ability to selectively compose individual metal alloy NPs with high precision opens up new possibilities to study the catalytic performance of alloy noble metal catalysts. It greatly improves the understanding of the role that individual NP components play. Additionally, the role of the support could be the focus of future catalytic experiments, in which the interaction between the support and the noble metal NPs, known as the “Strong Metal-Support Interaction” (SMSI), and the reactivity of the perimeter interface could be further examined. Specifically, supports like TiO2 or CeO2 are known to enhance the catalytic activity of noble metal NPs5,10,33,34. With this knowledge further catalytic applications can be considered.

Methods

Synthesis and deposition of NPs in 2D and 3D

The block copolymer PS(227)-b-P2VP(99) was dissolved in toluene at a concentration of 3 mg/ml and stirred for 24 h. Metal salt loading of the micelles in the solution was performed at L = 0.4. The loading ratios of both metal salts was adjusted individually to produce alloy nanoparticles of different metal compositions. For instance, to compose Au0.5Pt0.5NPs, for which equal parts of gold and platinum were used, the loading ratios of Gold(III)chloridetrihydrate (HAuCl4 • 3H2O) and Hexachloroplatinic(IV) acid hexahydrate (H2PtCl6 • 6H20) were both set to L = 0.2, thus achieving a total loading ratio of L = 0.4. Due to the fact that Au ions stabilize micelles, Au salt was added to the solution and dissolved before adding the Pt salt. The loaded micelles were immobilized on the surface of a Y:ZrO2 (100) wafer by spin coating the solution at 6000 rpm. In order to remove the polymer and reduce the metal salt, the coated wafer was then treated with Hydrogen (10%)-Argon (90%) plasma (45 min, 350 W, 0.4 mbar).

To immobilize the AuxPt1−x NPs on the silica powder (mean density of 300–400 g/l), 3 g of silica powder was mixed with 15 ml of the loaded micellar solution and sonicated for 30 seconds. The wet powder was then put into a glass column sealed with a PFTE frit (pore size 30 μm) and pressed through the powder using an Argon flux. After drying, the powder was treated with pure H-plasma (45 min, 300 W, 0.4 mbar).

Annealing

The Au0.5Pt0.5 NPs immobilized on Y:ZrO2 (100) wafers were annealed in air or under CO2 atmosphere for 22 h at 400 °C (heating rate of 5 K/min). The samples in the CO2 atmosphere were evacuated in a glass tube filled with CO2 (435 mbar/RT).

Characterization

The arrangement and order of the NPs on the substrates in 2D and 3D was analyzed by SEM (Zeiss Ultra 55, 2 and 5 kV). The in-lens and ESB detector were used for imaging. The size distribution of the AuxPt1−x NPs was measured using TEM (CM 200, Philips, 200 kV). For this, the NPs were immobilized on TEM Cu grids with a SiO2 membrane (mesh 300, 20 nm, Plano GmbH). To analyze the NPs immobilized on silica powder, a small amount of the sample was mixed with Ethanol and 5 μl was deposited onto TEM grids (Cu mesh 400) with a carbon film substrate. The TEM measurements to analyze the size distribution as well as the visual analysis of the powder structure were performed on a Philips 200 kV Transmission Microscope in BF, DF, and diffraction mode. EDX/HR-EDX measurements and HAADF imaging were performed on the SESAM (Sub-Electron-volt-Sub-Angstrom TEM, Zeiss, 200 kV) and ARM (JEOL-ARM200CF, 200 kV) microscopes. The EDX measurements of the NPs were performed on the same samples used for size distribution measurements. The crystal structure of the Au0.5Pt0.5 NPs was measured by preparing cross-cut samples of single NPs on a Y:ZrO2 (100) wafer employing a PIPS (precision ion polishing system). The composition of the NPs was also examined by EDX mapping, line scans, and spectra over single NPs. The TEM measurements were performed at the Stuttgart Center for Electron Microscopy (StEM).

Catalytic Measurements

The catalytic measurements were performed at RUBOKAT GmbH, Bochum. The CO oxidation reaction was performed in a fully automated reactor capable of measuring transient kinetics (BELCAT B; BEL corp. Japan). Specifically, ion currents of CO2, CO, O2, and H2O molecular ions were measured. The reactor is attached to a gas mixing unit (BEL (J)) that uses helium as a diluent gas. The gas mixing unit was used to adjust the CO flow so that 1% CO gas was mixed with 1% O2 gas. The reactor was operated with a theoretical oxygen excess of 100% for the reaction Inline graphic.

Temperature-controlled oxidation was carried out cyclically, with a total volume flow rate of 20 Nml/min and a heating rate of 5 K/min from 25–400 °C. The initial weight was about 100 mg per catalytic measurement. The detector consisted of an online quadrupole mass spectrometer (Pfeiffer, GAM 400). The ion current of CO was corrected with the theoretical ratio of 11,4% of the produced CO2, because CO is a fragment of CO2.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Jahn, S. et al. Precise AuxPt1−x Alloy Nanoparticle Array of Tunable Composition for Catalytic Applications. Sci. Rep. 6, 20536; doi: 10.1038/srep20536 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep20536-s1.pdf (195.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Max Planck Society. TEM sample preparation was done at the Stuttgart Center for Electron Microscopy (StEM) and EDX measurements were executed by Dr. Wilfried Sigle. The catalytic measurements were performed by RUBOKAT GmbH, Bochum. J.P.S. is the Weston Visiting Professor at the Weizmann Institute of Science and is a member of the Heidelberg Cluster of Excellence CellNetworks.

Footnotes

Author Contributions S.J., M.M. and J.P.S. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript text. S.J., S.J.L. and H.F. did experiments reported in the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Somorjai G. A. & Li Y. Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis. Wiley (2010). [Google Scholar]
  2. Daniel M. C. & Astruc D. Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 104, 293–346 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lohmüller T. et al. Nanopatterning by block copolymer micelle nanolithography and bioinspired applications. Biointerphases 6, MR1–MR12 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lou Y., Maye M. M., Han L., Luo J. & Zhong C.-J. Gold–platinum alloy nanoparticle assembly as catalyst for methanol electrooxidation. Chem. Commun. 473–474 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  5. Haruta M. Nanoparticulate gold catalysts for low-temperature CO oxidation. Journal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems 7, 163–172 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  6. Luo Y. et al. CO Oxidation of Au–Pt Nanostructures: Enhancement of Catalytic Activity of Pt Nanoparticles by Au. Catal Lett 134, 45–50 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  7. Haruta M., Yamada N., Kobayashi T. & Iijima S. Gold catalysts prepared by coprecipitation for low-temperature oxidation of hydrogen and of carbon monoxide. Journal of Catalysis 115, 301–309 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim S. H. et al. Catalytic activity of Au/TiO2 and Pt/TiO2 nanocatalysts prepared with arc plasma deposition under CO oxidation. ‘Applied Catalysis A, General’ 454, 53–58 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. Rashkeev S. N., Lupini A. R., Overbury S. H., Pennycook S. J. & Pantelides S. T. Role of the nanoscale in catalytic CO oxidation by supported Au and Pt nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 76, 035438 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  10. Cuenya B. R. Synthesis and catalytic properties of metal nanoparticles: Size, shape, support, composition, and oxidation state effects. Thin Solid Films 518, 3127–3150 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  11. Cortie M. B. & McDonagh A. M. Synthesis and optical properties of hybrid and alloy plasmonic nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 111, 3713–3735 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferrando R., Jellinek J. & Johnston R. L. Nanoalloys: From Theory to Applications of Alloy Clusters and Nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 108, 845–910 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ethirajan A., Wiedwald U., Boyen H. G. & Kern B. A micellar approach to magnetic ultrahigh-density data-storage media: extending the limits of current colloidal methods. Advanced Materials 19, 406–410 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. Wiedwald U., Han L., Biskupek J., Kaiser U. & Ziemann P. Preparation and characterization of supported magnetic nanoparticles prepared by reverse micelles. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 1, 24–47 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Möller H. & Pistorius P. C. The electrochemistry of gold–platinum alloys. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 570, 243–255 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  16. An K., Alayoglu S., Ewers T. & Somorjai G. A. Colloid chemistry of nanocatalysts: A molecular view. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 373, 1–13 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yamamoto T. A., Nakagawa T., Seino S. & Nitani H. Bimetallic nanoparticles of PtM (M=Au, Cu, Ni) supported on iron oxide: Radiolytic synthesis and CO oxidation catalysis. ‘Applied Catalysis A, General’ 387, 195–202 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  18. Möller M., Spatz J. P. & Roescher A. Gold nanoparticles in micellar poly(styrene)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) films—size and interparticle distance control in monoparticulate films. Advanced Materials 8, 337–340 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  19. Möller M. & Spatz J. P. Mineralization of nanoparticles in block copolymer micelles. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 2, 177–187 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  20. Glass R., Möller M. & Spatz J. P. Block copolymer micelle nanolithography. Nanotechnology 14, 1153–1160 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  21. Riess G. Micellization of block copolymers. Progress in Polymer Science 28, 1107–1170 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  22. Kästle G. et al. Micellar Nanoreactors—Preparation and Characterization of Hexagonally Ordered Arrays of Metallic Nanodots. Adv. Funct. Mater. 13, 853–861 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  23. Lechner S. J. Entwicklung von Modellkatalysatoren auf Basis der Blockcopolymernanolithographie, PhD thesis, University of Heidelberg (2013).
  24. Zhou T., Li L., Cheng J. & Hao Z. Preparation of binary washcoat deposited on cordierite substrate for catalytic applications. Ceramics International 36, 529–534 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  25. Adamowska M. X. et al. Structured Pd/γ-Al2O3 Prepared by Washcoated Deposition on a Ceramic Honeycomb for Compressed Natural Gas Applications. Journal of Nanoparticles 2015, 1–9 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  26. Gadomska K. M., Lechner S. J. & Spatz J. P. Gold-Nanoparticle-Decorated Glass Microspheres. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 30, 940–944 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  27. Petkov V. et al. Pt–Au Alloying at the Nanoscale. Nano Letters 12, 4289–4299 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ehsasi M. et al. Steady and nonsteady rates of reaction in a heterogeneously catalyzed reaction: Oxidation of CO on platinum, experiments and simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 91, 4949–4960 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  29. Yeo Y. Y., Vattuone L. & King D. A. Calorimetric heats for CO and oxygen adsorption and for the catalytic CO oxidation reaction on Pt{111}. J. Chem. Phys. 106, 392 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  30. Heiz U. & Landman U. Nanocatalysis. Nanoscience and Technology Springer (2007). [Google Scholar]
  31. Narkhede V. V. et al. Pt nanoparticles inside the mesopores of TiO2–MCM-48: synthesis, characterization and catalytic activity for CO oxidation. J Mater Sci 44, 6701–6709 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  32. De Toni A. CO-Oxidation an Au/TiO2 Aggregaten stabilisiert in einer mesoporösen MCM-48 Matrix: Studien zur Aktivität, Vergiftung und Träger/Metall-Wechselwirkung, PhD thesis, Ruhr University Bochum (2010).
  33. Goodman D. W. ‘Catalytically active Au on Titania:’ yet another example of a strong metal support interaction (SMSI)? Catal Lett 99, 1–4 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  34. Parthasarathi Bera et al. Promoting Effect of CeO2 in Combustion Synthesized Pt/CeO2 Catalyst for CO Oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 6122–6130 (2003). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep20536-s1.pdf (195.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES