Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1974 Jul;27(7):569–571. doi: 10.1136/jcp.27.7.569

Evaluation of commercially available antisera for serotyping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

A H Al-Dujaili 1, D M Harris 1
PMCID: PMC475398  PMID: 4214467

Abstract

Commercially available O antisera have been compared with a standard pyocine typing method in the investigation of 156 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A third of the strains belonged to serotypes 3 or 6 and 42·3% to pyocine type 1. Good differentiation of strains belonging to the predominant serotypes was achieved by pyocine typing. Although routine use of both methods provides a more complete discrimination between strains, the simplicity of serotyping renders it more suitable for use in the smaller laboratory, where only one method may be feasible. If desired, pyocine typing can be reserved for the strains which cannot be distinguished serologically.

Full text

PDF
569

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DARRELL J. H., WAHBA A. H. PYOCINE-TYPING OF HOSPITAL STRAINS OF PSEUDOMONAS PYOCYANEA. J Clin Pathol. 1964 May;17:236–242. doi: 10.1136/jcp.17.3.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gillies R. R., Govan J. R. Typing of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by pyocine production. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1966 Apr;91(2):339–345. doi: 10.1002/path.1700910207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Govan J. R., Gillies R. R. Further studies in the pyocine typing of Pseudomonas pyocyanea. J Med Microbiol. 1969 Feb;2(1):17–25. doi: 10.1099/00222615-2-1-17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HABS I. Untersuchungen über die O-Antigene von Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Z Hyg Infektionskr. 1957;144(3):218–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Muraschi T. F., Bolles D. M., Moczulski C., Lindsay M. Serologic types of Pseudomonas aeruginosa based on heat-stable O antigens: correlation of Habs' (European) and Verder and Evans' (North American) classifications. J Infect Dis. 1966 Feb;116(1):84–88. doi: 10.1093/infdis/116.1.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mushin R., Ziv G. An epidemiological study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cattle and other animals by pyocine typing. J Hyg (Lond) 1973 Mar;71(1):113–122. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400046271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Phillips I. Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the clinical laboratory. J Med Microbiol. 1969 Feb;2(1):9–16. doi: 10.1099/00222615-2-1-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wretlind B., Hedén L., Sjöberg L., Wadström T. Production of enzymes and toxins by hospital strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in relation to serotype and phage-typing pattern. J Med Microbiol. 1973 Feb;6(1):91–100. doi: 10.1099/00222615-6-1-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES