Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2016 Feb 1;113(7):E932–E941. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517181113

G protein-gated IKACh channels as therapeutic targets for treatment of sick sinus syndrome and heart block

Pietro Mesirca a,b,c,1, Isabelle Bidaud a,b,c, François Briec d, Stéphane Evain d, Angelo G Torrente a,b,c, Khai Le Quang d,e, Anne-Laure Leoni b, Matthias Baudot a,b,c, Laurine Marger a,b,c, Antony Chung You Chong a,b,c, Joël Nargeot a,b,c, Joerg Striessnig f, Kevin Wickman g, Flavien Charpentier d,e,h,i,2, Matteo E Mangoni a,b,c,1,2
PMCID: PMC4763776  PMID: 26831068

Significance

The “sick sinus” syndrome (SSS) is characterized by abnormal formation and/or propagation of the cardiac impulse. SSS is responsible for about half of the total implantations of electronic pacemakers, which constitute the only currently available therapy for this disorder. We show that genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of the muscarinic-gated K+ channel (IKACh) prevents SSS and abolishes atrioventricular block in model mice without affecting the relative degree of heart rate regulation. We propose that “compensatory” genetic or pharmacological targeting of IKACh channels may constitute a new paradigm for restoring defects in the balance between inward and outward currents in pacemaker cells. Our study may thus open a new therapeutic perspective to manage dysfunction of formation and conduction of the cardiac impulse.

Keywords: heart rate regulation, sick sinus syndrome, heart block, GIRK4, Cav1.3

Abstract

Dysfunction of pacemaker activity in the sinoatrial node (SAN) underlies “sick sinus” syndrome (SSS), a common clinical condition characterized by abnormally low heart rate (bradycardia). If untreated, SSS carries potentially life-threatening symptoms, such as syncope and end-stage organ hypoperfusion. The only currently available therapy for SSS consists of electronic pacemaker implantation. Mice lacking L-type Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels (Cav1.3−/−) recapitulate several symptoms of SSS in humans, including bradycardia and atrioventricular (AV) dysfunction (heart block). Here, we tested whether genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of the muscarinic-gated K+ channel (IKACh) could rescue SSS and heart block in Cav1.3−/− mice. We found that genetic inactivation of IKACh abolished SSS symptoms in Cav1.3−/− mice without reducing the relative degree of heart rate regulation. Rescuing of SAN and AV dysfunction could be obtained also by pharmacological inhibition of IKACh either in Cav1.3−/− mice or following selective inhibition of Cav1.3-mediated L-type Ca2+ (ICa,L) current in vivo. Ablation of IKACh prevented dysfunction of SAN pacemaker activity by allowing net inward current to flow during the diastolic depolarization phase under cholinergic activation. Our data suggest that patients affected by SSS and heart block may benefit from IKACh suppression achieved by gene therapy or selective pharmacological inhibition.


Pacemaker activity of the sinoatrial node (SAN) controls heart rate under physiological conditions. Abnormal generation of SAN automaticity underlies “sick sinus” syndrome (SSS), a pathological condition manifested when heart rate is not sufficient to meet the physiological requirements of the organism (1). Typical hallmarks of SSS include SAN bradycardia, chronotropic incompetence, SAN arrest, and/or exit block (13). SSS carries incapacitating symptoms, such as fatigue and syncope (13). A significant percentage of patients with SSS present also with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (3). SSS can also be associated with atrioventricular (AV) conduction block (heart block) (13). Although aging is a known intrinsic cause of SSS (4), this disease appears also in the absence of any associated cardiac pathology and displays a genetic legacy (1, 2). Heart disease or drug intake can induce acquired SSS (2). Symptomatic SSS requires the implantation of an electronic pacemaker. SSS accounts for about half of all pacemaker implantations in the United States (5, 6). The incidence of SSS has been forecasted to increase during the next 50 y, particularly in the elder population (7). Furthermore, it has been estimated that at least half of SSS patients will need to be electronically paced (7). Although pacemakers are continuously ameliorated, they remain costly and require lifelong follow-up. Moreover, the implantation of an electronic pacemaker remains difficult in pediatric patients (8). Development of alternative and complementary pharmacological or molecular therapies for SSS management could improve quality of life and limit the need for implantation of electronic pacemakers.

Recently, the genetic bases of some inherited forms of SSS have been elucidated (recently reviewed in 1, 9) with the discovery of mutations in genes encoding for ion channels involved in cardiac automaticity (4, 9, 10). Notably, loss of function of L-type Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels is central in some inherited forms of SSS. For instance, loss of function in Cav1.3-mediated L-type Ca2+ (ICa,L) current causes the sinoatrial node dysfunction and deafness syndrome (SANDD) (10). Affected individuals with SANDD present with profound deafness, bradycardia, and dysfunction of AV conduction (10). Mutation in ankyrin-B causes SSS by reduced membrane targeting of Cav1.3 channels (11). The relevance of Cav1.3 channels to SSS is demonstrated also by work on the pathophysiology of congenital heart block, where down-regulation of Cav1.3 channels by maternal Abs causes heart block in infants (12). Additionally, recent data show that chronic iron overload induces acquired SSS via a reduction in Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L (13).

In mice and humans, Cav1.3 channels are expressed in the SAN, atria, and the AV node but are absent in adult ventricular tissue (14, 15). Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L plays a major role in the generation of the diastolic depolarization in SAN and AV myocytes, thereby constituting important determinants of heart rate and AV conduction velocity (14, 16). The heart rate of mice lacking Cav1.3 channels (Cav1.3−/− mice) fairly recapitulates the hallmarks of SSS and associated symptoms, including bradycardia and tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (17, 18). In addition, severe AV dysfunction is recorded in Cav1.3−/− mice to variable degrees. Typically, these mice show first- and second-degree AV block (16, 17, 19). Complete AV block with dissociated atrial and ventricular rhythms can also be observed in these animals. The phenotype of Cav1.3−/− mice thus constitutes a unique model for developing new therapeutic strategies against SSS (10).

The muscarinic-gated K+ channel (IKACh) is involved in the negative chronotropic effect of the parasympathetic nervous system on heart rate (20, 21). Two subunits of the G-protein activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels (GIRK1 and GIRK4) of the GIRK/Kir3 subfamily assemble as heterotetramers to form cardiac IKACh channels (22). Indeed, both Girk1−/− and Girk4−/− mice lack cardiac IKACh (20, 21, 23). We recently showed that silencing of the hyperpolarization-activated current “funny” (If) channel in mice induces a complex arrhythmic profile that can be rescued by concurrent genetic ablation of Girk4 (24). In this study, we tested the effects of genetic ablation and pharmacological inhibition of IKACh on the Cav1.3−/− mouse model of SSS. We found that Girk4 ablation or pharmacological inhibition of IKACh rescues SSS and AV dysfunction in Cav1.3−/−. Thus, our study shows that IKACh targeting may be pursued as a therapeutic strategy for treatment of SSS and heart block.

Results

Pharmacological Inhibition of the Autonomic Nervous System Improved Heart Rate of Cav1.3−/− Mice.

We first studied heart rate and rhythm by telemetric recording of ECGs in freely moving WT and Cav1.3−/− mice (Fig. 1 A and B). WT animals displayed a normal heart rate with no signs of SAN dysfunction or AV block (Fig. 1A). In contrast, Cav1.3−/− mice showed typical hallmarks of SSS, including SAN bradycardia, SAN pauses, prolonged AV conduction time (PR interval), and frequent episodes of AV block (Fig. 1B and SI Appendix, Table S1). Pharmacological inhibition of autonomic nervous system input by combined systemic administration of atropine and propranolol significantly reduced heart rate in WT, but not Cav1.3−/−, mice. Instead, injection of atropine and propranolol abolished SAN pauses and AV blocks in Cav1.3−/− mice, suggesting that the activity of the autonomic nervous system induced symptoms of SAN failure and AV dysfunction in these mice (Fig. 1B and SI Appendix, Table S1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Dependence of heart block in Cav1.3−/− mice on autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity. (A) Dot plot of beat-to-beat variability [heart rate (HR) in bpm] of heart rate (Top) and representative samples of telemetric ECG recordings (Bottom) from WT mice before (Left, ANS+) and after (Right, ANS−) combined injection of atropine (A, 0.5 mg/kg) and propranolol (P, 5 mg/kg). (Right) Histogram shows averaged heart rate before (open bar) and after (filled bar) injection of A + P (n = 13). (B) Same as in A, but for Cav1.3−/− mice (n = 8). (C) Same as in A, but for Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice (n = 15). (D) Same as in A, but for Girk4−/− mice (n = 9). Statistics: paired Student’s t test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Genetic or Pharmacological Ablation of IKACh Improved SAN Function and AV Conduction in Cav1.3−/− Mice.

Because inhibition of autonomic input improved SAN and AV conduction of Cav1.3−/− mice, we investigated the functional bases of this SSS-rescuing effect. IKACh is a major cardiac effector of the parasympathetic nervous system (20, 21). We thus hypothesized that genetic inactivation of Girk4, which leads to a complete loss of cardiac IKACh (20), might reduce the influence of the parasympathetic nervous system on rhythmogenic centers of Cav1.3−/− mice, thereby ameliorating the cardiac phenotypes in this mutant mouse strain. Accordingly, we crossed Cav1.3−/− mice with Girk4−/− mice and studied heart rate and rhythm in Girk4−/− mice and Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− double-mutant mice.

As was shown previously (21, 23), the heart rate of Girk4−/− mice was significantly higher than the heart rate of WT controls, and these mice presented normal AV conduction and response to injection of atropine and propranolol (Fig. 1D). The ratio between maximal and minimal heart rates was similar in WT, Cav1.3−/−, Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/−, and Girk4−/− mice, indicating that combined deletion of Cav1.3 and IKACh did not diminish the relative degree of heart rate regulation (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). Remarkably, both the ventricular rate (RR interval) and SAN rate (PP interval) of Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice were higher than the ventricular rate and SAN rate of Cav1.3−/− mice and did not differ from the ventricular rate and SAN rate of WT controls (Fig. 1C and SI Appendix, Table S1). Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice also had shorter AV (PR) intervals than their Cav1.3−/− counterparts (SI Appendix, Table S1), suggesting that IKACh also exerted a tonic inhibition on impulse conduction of Cav1.3−/− animals. Furthermore, the frequency of SAN pauses and AV blocks was reduced by about 10-fold in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice in comparison to Cav1.3−/− mice, showing that Girk4 inactivation strongly improved SAN function and AV conduction. Blocking of muscarinic receptors by injection of atropine mimicked the effects of genetic deletion of IKACh in Cav1.3−/− mice. Indeed, atropine abolished AV block and drastically reduced the frequency of SAN pauses in Cav1.3−/− mice but not in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice (SI Appendix, Table S2), indicating that the effects of autonomic inhibition of the muscarinic pathway on im-pulse generation and conduction were entirely dependent on IKACh function. Analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) spectra of Cav1.3−/− mice showed high variability in comparison to WT mice, a characteristic attributable to the lower and variable SAN rate and to the presence of intermittent SAN pauses and AV blocks (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). Indeed, concurrent genetic ablation of IKACh by Girk4 inactivation significantly reduced the HRV of Cav1.3−/− mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). The HRV of WT and Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice did not significantly differ (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 B and C and Inset). These observations indicated that genetic ablation of IKACh rescued SSS and heart block of Cav1.3−/− mice without reducing heart rate regulation.

The IKACh peptide blocker tertiapin-Q (25) was also effective in rescuing SAN dysfunction and AV block in Cav1.3−/− mice (Fig. 2). Tertiapin-Q did not affect the heart rate of WT, Girk4−/−, and Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice (Fig. 2 AC). In contrast, injection of tertiapin-Q (5 mg/kg) improved the heart rate of Cav1.3−/− mice by increasing SAN rate and abolishing SAN pauses and AV blocks (Fig. 2D and SI Appendix, Table S3). The AV interval was also shortened by tertiapin-Q.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Effect of the IKACh blocker tertiapin-Q on bradycardia and heart block in Cav1.3−/− mice. (A) Dot plot of beat-to-beat variability (HR in bpm) of heart rate (Top) and representative samples of telemetric ECG recordings (Bottom) from WT mice before (Left) and after (Center) i.p. injection of tertiapin-Q (5 mg/kg) in WT mice. (Right) Histogram shows averaged heart rates before (open bar) and after (filled bar) injection of tertiapin-Q (n = 4). (B) Same as in A, but for Girk4−/− mice (n = 4). (C) Same as in A, but for Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice (n = 4). (D) Same as in A, but for Cav1.3−/− mice (n = 5). Statistics: paired Student’s t test. **P < 0.01.

Injection of tertiapin-Q reduced the HRV of Cav1.3−/− mice but did not significantly affect HRV in their Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− counterparts, indicating that the rescuing effect of this GIRK channel blocker was attributable to IKACh inhibition (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). We also tested whether IKACh inhibition could antagonize heart rate slowing and AV block induced by selective pharmacological inhibition of Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). To this end, we used mice in which Cav1.2 channels have been rendered insensitive to dihydropyridines (DHPs) via point mutation, eliminating channel sensitivity to these drugs (Cav1.2DHP−/− mice) (26). Indeed, because the mouse heart expresses both Cav1.2 and Cav1.3 channels, Cav1.2DHP−/− mice permit isolation of the effects of selective inhibition of Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L (26, 27). In vivo telemetric recordings of Cav1.2DHP−/− mice injected with the DHP blocker amlodipine showed heart rate slowing that was quantitatively similar to the heart rate slowing observed in Cav1.3−/− mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S4A). In addition, amlodipine induced slowing of AV conduction and blocks in Cav1.2DHP−/− mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S4B). In contrast, concurrent injection of tertiapin-Q and amlodipine prevented heart rate slowing and AV blocks, demonstrating that pharmacological inhibition of IKACh was effective in antagonizing drug-induced bradycardia (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 B and C). Taken together, these observations demonstrated that IKACh activity underlies the phenotypic manifestations of SSS and AV block in Cav1.3−/− and Cav1.2DHP−/− mice, and that genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of this current can rescue heart rhythm.

IKACh Ablation Reduced A1 Adenosine Receptor-Mediated Bradycardia in Cav1.3−/− Mice.

Adenosine slows SAN rate via activation of A1 adenosine receptors (A1R) and opening of IKACh channels (20, 28, 29). Release of adenosine can worsen SSS by leading to excessive bradycardia (30). We thus assessed the capability of IKACh ablation to moderate bradycardia induced by A1R activation in SSS Cav1.3−/− mice. We used i.p. injection of the A1R-selective agonist 2-chloro, N6-cyclopentyl adenosine (CCPA) in Cav1.3−/− mice to study SAN dysfunction and AV conduction during A1R-induced bradycardia (SI Appendix, Fig. S5). CCPA (0.1 mg/kg) strongly slowed heart rate in WT and Cav1.3−/− mice to a similar degree (55–60%). In addition, CCPA induced deep SAN bradycardia and very low heart rate in Cav1.3−/− mice [≈170 beats per minute (bpm)]. However, CCPA was less effective in slowing heart rate in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice (≈30%), and no deep bradycardia was recorded in these mice. This observation demonstrated the effectiveness of IKACh ablation for preventing excessive A1R-induced bradycardia in SSS Cav1.3−/− mice.

IKACh Ablation Precluded Inducibility of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in Cav1.3−/− Mice.

SSS is often associated with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (1, 2). Consistent with previous work on a different strain of Cav1.3−/− mice (18), we could induce atrial fibrillation and tachycardia without previous addition of carbachol (31, 32), underscoring the strong susceptibility of SSS Cav1.3−/− hearts to atrial tachyarrhythmias (Fig. 3). We thus tested whether Girk4 inactivation could rescue tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome by improving SAN function and reducing the inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmias in sedated SSS Cav1.3−/− mice. We performed intracardiac ECG recordings in sedated Cav1.3−/− and Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice and characterized the properties of atrial rhythm in these strains (Fig. 3 AC and SI Appendix, Table S4). Consistent with the improvement in AV conduction observed in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice in comparison to Cav1.3−/− counterparts (Figs. 1 and 2), genetic ablation of IKACh shortened the AV refractory period and the Wenckebach cycle length of Cav1.3−/− mice (SI Appendix, Table S4). Concurrent inactivation of IKACh also shortened the SAN conduction and recovery time and the SAN-atrium conduction time in Cav1.3−/− mice, which indicated improvement of the SAN function (SI Appendix, Table S5). Intracardiac atrial stimulation induced atrial fibrillation (Fig. 3A, Top) or atrial tachycardia (Fig. 3A, Bottom) in eight of 12 Cav1.3−/− mice tested (Fig. 3D and SI Appendix, Table S6). All arrhythmias in Cav1.3−/− mice terminated spontaneously. In contrast, atrial arrhythmia could be elicited in only two of 10 Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice (Fig. 3D and SI Appendix, Table S6). Taken together, these observations indicated that IKACh deletion could rescue tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and AV block in the Cav1.3−/− mouse model of SSS.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

IKACh ablation suppresses atrial tachyarrhythmias in Cav1.3−/− mice. (A) Representative examples of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation (Top) and atrial tachycardia (Bottom) in Cav1.3−/− mice. Traces represent intracardiac electrogram recordings before pacing (baseline, blue bar), during pacing (stimulation, red bar), and after pacing. (Insets) Close-up views of arrhythmias recorded after pacing. No atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia was recorded in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− (B) and WT (C) mice after intracardiac atrial stimulation. (D) Statistical analysis of the incidence of pacing-induced arrhythmias. Statistics: Fisher’s exact test. CTRL, control.

IKACh Ablation Normalized Action Potential Duration in Cav1.3−/− Atrial Myocytes.

Supraventricular arrhythmia in Cav1.3−/− mice could be due to an alteration in the atrial action potential. We thus compared the action potential duration of atrial myocytes in the different genotypes to test the ability of IKACh ablation to normalize this parameter of atrial excitability (Fig. 4). WT and Girk4−/− myocytes displayed similar action potential durations (Fig. 4A). In contrast, Cav1.3−/− myocytes had shortened action potential durations. However, Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− myocytes displayed normal action potential duration, suggesting that IKACh contributes to action potential repolarization even in the absence of ACh (Fig. 4 AC). Consistent with this hypothesis, tertiapin-Q significantly prolonged the action potential duration of WT and Cav1.3−/− myocytes but had no effect on Girk4−/− and Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− myocytes (SI Appendix, Fig. S6). Comparison between IKACh densities of WT and Cav1.3−/− myocytes showed that SAN myocytes from KO mice had reduced IKACh (Fig. 4 DH), negating the difference in IKACh density between SAN and atrial myocytes observed in WT mice. These observations showed that genetic ablation or pharmacological blockade of IKACh restored the normal action potential waveform of atrial Cav1.3−/− myocytes.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Normalization of action potential duration of Cav1.3−/− atrial myocytes after IKACh ablation. (A) Action potential sample traces of Cav1.3−/− atrial myocytes (red trace) overlapped with action potentials from WT (Left), Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− (Middle), or Girk4−/− myocytes (Right). Action potential durations at 70% (B, APD70) and 90% (C, APD90) of repolarization in n = 14 WT, n = 13 Cav1.3−/−, n = 19 Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/−, and n = 17 Girk4−/− myocytes are shown. Statistics: one-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. Sample traces of IKACh before and after ACh perfusion (0.05 μM) in SAN and atrial myocytes of WT mice (D) and Cav1.3−/− mice (E) are shown. (D, Inset) Voltage clamp protocol. Averaged IKACh densities before and after ACh are shown in the bar plots for SAN (n = 14) and atrial WT myocytes (n = 11) (F) and SAN (n = 18) and atrial Cav1.3−/− myocytes (n = 15) (G). (H) IKACh induced by ACh perfusion measured by subtracting the basal current from the basal current in ACh. Statistics: two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

IKACh Ablation Rescued SSS of Cav1.3−/− Hearts by Reducing ACh-Induced SAN Bradycardia and AV Block.

Because suppression of IKACh significantly reduces the muscarinic regulation of pacemaker activity in SAN myocytes (21), we hypothesized that improvement of SAN rate and AV conduction in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice was due to a decrease in the sensitivity of SAN automaticity and AV conduction to ACh. We thus tested the chronotropic and dromotropic effects of ACh on heart rate and AV conduction in isolated Langendorff-perfused hearts (Fig. 5). Perfusion with 0.3 μM ACh similarly reduced the beating rate of WT and Cav1.3−/− hearts (34% in WT, 39% in Cav1.3−/−). In contrast, Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− hearts showed a reduced chronotropic response to ACh, which was similar to the chronotropic response of Girk4−/− hearts (16% in Girk4−/−, 13% in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/−; Fig. 5). These results indicated that IKACh ablation was the dominant factor in determining the sensitivity of isolated hearts to ACh. ACh had a similar effect (35–37%) on AV conduction time (PR interval) of WT and Girk4−/− hearts. In contrast, the PR interval of Cav1.3−/− hearts was more than doubled by ACh perfusion (77%), whereas the negative dromotropic effect of ACh on Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− hearts was similar to the dromotropic effect observed in Girk4−/− hearts (29%). These observations indicated that IKACh ablation reduced ACh-mediated negative chronotropic and dromotropic effects, preventing excessive rate reduction and AV block in SSS Cav1.3−/− hearts.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

ACh (0.3 μM) effect on heart rate and AV conduction in isolated Langendorff-perfused hearts. (A) Representative traces in CTRL conditions (Top) and ACh-perfused (Bottom) hearts from WT, Cav1.3−/−, Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/−, and Girk4−/− mice. (B) Mean value of heart rate in control (Left; n = 13 WT, n = 8 Cav1.3−/−, n = 7 Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/−, and n = 16 Girk4−/− hearts) and ACh-perfused (Middle; n = 12 WT, n = 9 Cav1.3−/−, n = 7 Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/−, and n = 16 Girk4−/− hearts) hearts. (Right) ACh-dependent heart rate reduction expressed as percentage measured in the different mouse strains studied. (C) Mean value of PR interval in Tyrode’s solution (n = 9 WT, n = 9 Cav1.3−/−, n = 8 Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/−, and n = 10 Girk4−/− hearts; Left) and ACh (n = 9 WT, n = 9 Cav1.3−/−, n = 8 Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/−, and n = 8 Girk4−/− hearts; Middle) perfused hearts. (Right) ACh-dependent PR interval reduction expressed as percentage. Statistics: one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

SAN Myocytes from Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− Mice Have Reduced Muscarinic Regulation of Pacemaker Activity.

The prominent reduction of ACh-induced SAN dysfunction in isolated SSS Cav1.3−/− hearts prompted us to investigate the impact of IKACh ablation on isolated pacemaker myocytes (Fig. 6). Perfusion of spontaneously beating myocytes with ACh dose-dependently decreased the beating rate of WT, Cav1.3−/−, and Girk4−/− myocytes (Fig. 6 A, B, and D and SI Appendix, Table S7). In contrast, Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− SAN myocytes did not show a significant ACh-mediated rate reduction, even in response to 0.05 μM ACh, a concentration sufficient to stop pacemaking in all WT and Cav1.3−/− myocytes (Fig. 6C). This observation indicated that IKACh ablation reduced the negative chronotropic effect mediated by ACh on pacemaker activity in Cav1.3−/− myocytes. IKACh ablation also increased the basal spontaneous pacing rate of Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− myocytes in comparison to the basal spontaneous pacing rate of their Cav1.3−/− counterparts (SI Appendix, Table S7), suggesting that some IKACh channels are open in the SAN in the absence of exogenous ACh.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Slowing of pacemaker activity of Cav1.3−/− SAN myocytes after ACh inhibition. Histograms of spontaneous action potential rate recorded in control conditions and after perfusion of ACh at the indicated doses in SAN myocytes from WT (A, Top), Cav1.3−/− (B, Top), Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− (C, Top), and n = 9 Girk4−/− (D, Top) mice. Examples of spontaneous SAN cells action potentials recorded from WT (A, Bottom), Cav1.3−/− (B, Bottom), Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− (C, Bottom), and Girk4−/− (D, Bottom) mice in control conditions (black traces) and after perfusion of ACh (0.05 μM, gray traces). (AD) Statistics: one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (E and F) Dose–response relation of the percentages of rate reduction at different doses ACh in SAN cells isolated from WT, Cav1.3−/−, Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/−, and Girk4−/− mice. (E) Statistics: two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. The number of SAN cells measured is reported in SI Appendix, Table S7 for each genotype and ACh concentration. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

ACh decreased the pacemaker activity of WT SAN myocytes by reducing the slope of the diastolic depolarization and by increasing the frequency of delayed after-depolarizations (DADs; Fig. 6A and SI Appendix, Fig. S7), low-amplitude depolarizations of the membrane potential (≥10 mV) that failed to reach the action potential threshold. In contrast, ACh decreased pacemaker activity of Cav1.3−/− myocytes by increasing the incidence of DADs, leaving unaffected the slope of the diastolic depolarization (Fig. 6B and SI Appendix, Table S7), suggesting that formation of DADs, rather than normal action potentials, constituted the mechanism underlying ACh-induced SAN dysfunction in SSS Cav1.3−/− hearts. In agreement with this hypothesis, an increase in the frequency of DADs could be observed in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− myocytes at high concentrations of ACh (0.05 μM; SI Appendix, Fig. S7), accounting for the rescuing of the ACh-induced negative chronotropic effect recorded in Cav1.3−/− myocytes. Taken together, these data demonstrated that the rescuing of SSS observed in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice was due to a strong reduction in the sensitivity of SAN pacemaker activity to ACh-mediated negative chronotropy and that Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L contributed to the cholinergic regulation of pacemaker activity in WT and Girk4−/− SAN.

Genetic or Pharmacological Ablation of IKACh Prevented the Formation of [Ca2+]i Waves in Cav1.3−/− SAN Myocytes.

The high incidence of DADs recorded during pacemaker activity under perfusion of ACh suggested altered intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) dynamics and the frequency of [Ca2+]i waves in Cav1.3−/− myocytes. We thus used confocal line scan imaging of Fluo-4–loaded cells to test whether ablation of IKACh could rescue [Ca2+]i dynamics in SAN myocytes from Cav1.3−/− mice (Fig. 7). Consistent with the slow pacemaker activity observed under current-clamp conditions (Fig. 6), we recorded slower frequency of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients in Cav1.3−/− SAN myocytes in comparison to the spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients of WT, Girk4−/−, and Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− myocytes (Fig. 7 AD, Left and Middle).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Suppression of [Ca2+]i waves in Cav1.3−/− SAN myocytes after ablation of IKACh. Sample line scan images (Left), averaged frequency of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients (Middle), and averaged frequency of [Ca2+]i waves (Right) of n = 11 WT (A), n = 9 Cav1.3−/− (B), n = 6 Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− (C), and n = 12 Girk4−/− (D) SAN myocytes. Statistics: one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

In WT, Cav1.3−/−, and Girk4−/− myocytes, ACh reduced the frequency of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients and induced the formation of [Ca2+]i waves (Fig. 7 A, B, and D). In Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− SAN myocytes, the rate of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients was similar to the rate of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients of WT and Girk4−/− cells, and the frequency of [Ca2+]i waves was lower than the frequency of [Ca2+]i waves recorded in the other genotypes (Fig. 7C). In Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− myocytes, ACh failed to decrease the frequency of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients and to increase the frequency of [Ca2+]i waves (Fig. 7C). Consistent with this observation, ACh did not decrease the frequency of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients or increase [Ca2+]i waves in Cav1.3−/− cells when tertiapin-Q was added to the perfusion medium (SI Appendix, Fig. S8).

Because IKACh ablation in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice allowed the formation of cell-wide [Ca2+]i transients instead of [Ca2+]i waves, we tested whether this rescuing effect required functional ryanodine receptor (RyR)-dependent [Ca2+]i release. The dose–response relationship of the frequency of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients to ryanodine showed a differential effect between WT and Girk4−/− SAN myocytes (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). Indeed, whereas 1 μM ryanodine drastically reduced the frequency of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients in WT SAN myocytes, it remained higher in Girk4−/− myocytes (SI Appendix, Fig. S9A). A saturating concentration of ryanodine (3 μM) that completely disabled RyR-dependent Ca2+ release drastically reduced spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients and action potentials in both WT and Girk4−/− SAN myocytes, indicating that pacemaker activity required RyR-dependent Ca2+ release (SI Appendix, Fig. S9B).

Concurrent perfusion of a moderate concentration of ryanodine (0.3 μM) with ACh (0.01 μM) did not significantly affect the frequency of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients in Girk4−/− myocytes. This observation suggested that ablation of IKACh could rescue the loss of RyR-dependent Ca2+ release in WT SAN myocytes at moderate concentrations of ryanodine (SI Appendix, Figs. S10 and S11). Moreover, the relative insensitivity to 0.01 μM ACh of ryanodine-treated Girk4−/− SAN myocytes suggested that regulation of RyR-dependent Ca2+ release contributes to cholinergic regulation of pacemaking. In contrast, the frequencies of spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients of WT, Cav1.3−/−, and Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− SAN myocytes were strongly reduced by ryanodine and ACh, and to comparable levels (SI Appendix, Figs. S10 and S11). These observations showed that although IKACh ablation could antagonize the negative chronotropic effect induced by ryanodine and ACh in WT cells containing functional Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L, rescuing of automaticity in Cav1.3−/− SAN myocytes under ACh required fully functional RyR-dependent Ca2+ release.

IKACh Ablation Maintained the Diastolic Current in the Inward Direction During Muscarinic Activation.

Pacemaker activity requires the presence of a net inward current to sustain the diastolic depolarization. Because cholinergic activation of IKACh generates an outward current, we hypothesized that upon parasympathetic activation, the lack of Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L shifts the net membrane current of SAN and AV node myocytes in the outward direction, thereby inducing SAN failure and AV block. We thus tested the effects of IKACh ablation on the total diastolic current by using a train of spontaneous action potentials recorded in WT SAN cells as voltage-clamp commands (Fig. 8). Cav1.3−/− SAN myocytes showed reduced total inward diastolic current in comparison to their WT counterparts under basal conditions (Fig. 8 A and B). Perfusion with ACh (0.05 μM) shifted the direction of the diastolic current from inward to outward in WT and Cav1.3−/− myocytes (Fig. 8 A and B). ACh reduced the diastolic current also in Girk4−/− myocytes, but the net current direction remained inward (Fig. 8C). This evidence is in line with current-clamp experiments that showed arrest of cell pacemaker activity at this ACh concentration in WT and Cav1.3−/− myocytes, but not in Girk4−/− cells (Fig. 6). In contrast, ACh did not significantly affect the diastolic current in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− SAN myocytes at any concentration tested (Fig. 8D). This observation was consistent with the strong reduction of the cholinergic regulation of cell pacemaker activity of Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− SAN myocytes (Fig. 6) and indicates that, together with IKACh and RyR-dependent [Ca2+]i release, Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L is an effector of cholinergic regulation of pacemaker activity. These results indicate that genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of IKACh prevented ACh-mediated slowing of pacemaker activity by maintaining the net diastolic current in the inward direction and preventing the formation of [Ca2+]i waves (Fig. 7).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Diastolic current in isolated Cav1.3−/− and Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− SAN myocytes and heart rate determination. Sample traces (Upper) and averaged current time integrals (Bottom) measured between the voltage corresponding to the maximum diastolic potential (−61 mV) and the following action potential threshold (−42 mV) of a sample mouse SAN action potential used as voltage-clamp command. Slopes of the linear and exponential parts of the diastolic depolarization were 0.03 and 0.98 mV⋅ms−1, respectively. (A, Upper) Voltage-clamp protocol is shown. Current was measured under control conditions and after perfusion of 0.01 or 0.05 μM ACh in n = 9 WT (A), n = 7 Cav1.3−/− (B), n = 16 Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− (C), and n = 8 Girk4−/− (D) SAN myocytes. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001. (E) Statistics: one-way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. The model of the mechanism of rescue is based on the relationship between the inward-outward current balance that determines the diastolic depolarization and the rate and stability of heart beat. In each panel, sample SAN action potentials (Top), functional ionic currents contributing to the diastolic depolarization (Middle), and sample ECG recordings (Bottom) are shown. The green channel represents IKACh, the red channel represents Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L (ICav1.3), and the blue circle shows the idealized sum of other inward currents involved in the pacemaker mechanism (INCX, If, ICa,T). (Left to Right) Samples of ECG recordings and of pacemaker activity in WT, Cav1.3−/−, and Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice are shown.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of IKACh strongly ameliorates SAN dysfunction, prevents tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome, and normalizes AV impulse conduction in a mouse model of human SSS. IKACh ablation did not reduce the relative degree of heart rate regulation, and we did not observe episodes of ventricular arrhythmia in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− or Cav1.3−/− mice treated with tertiapin-Q. These observations suggest that IKACh inhibition preserves the capability of the organism to regulate heart rate without being, by itself, proarrhythmic. At present, no pharmacological therapy is available to improve heart rate and AV conduction in the context of SSS. Thus, our work suggests that genetic or pharmacological targeting of IKACh channels may be efficacious in the management of SSS and heart block.

Several studies highlight the importance of Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L in human pathologies of heart rhythm and indicate that Cav1.3−/− mice constitute a suitable preclinical model for testing new therapeutic strategies for SSS and heart block. Indeed, Cav1.3−/− mice present several aspects of human SSS (10, 18), including SAN dysfunction (1, 2) and tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (33, 34). In addition, Cav1.3−/− mice reproduce severe AV dysfunction typical of human congenital heart block (16).

Previous studies demonstrated that Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L plays a major role in the determination of heart rate and impulse conduction in mice and humans (10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 19). However, despite the importance of Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L in determining the rate of the diastolic depolarization in isolated SAN and AV node myocytes (14, 16), it was unclear how Cav1.3 loss of function translates into SSS in vivo. In this respect, we show, for the first time to our knowledge, that SSS symptoms and AV block in vivo in Cav1.3−/− mice depend upon IKACh and that targeted inhibition of these channels can rescue SSS. Indeed, we did not record SAN failure or AV block in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice, and we did not detect SAN failure or AV block following injection of tertiapin-Q in Cav1.3−/− or Cav1.2DHP−/− mice treated with amlodipine. In this respect, the rescue of bradycardia was particularly striking, because the heart rate of all these “rescued” mice was normalized, reaching values that were close to the values recorded in WT or control uninjected Cav1.2DHP−/− mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). This result indicates that structural or functional remodeling of rhythmogenic centers of Cav1.3−/− and Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− mice is not the primary mechanism mediating the rescuing effect on heart rate by IKACh targeting.

Normal SAN pacemaker activity is generated by a complex interplay between inward ionic currents of the plasma membrane, such as Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L, Cav3.1-mediated T-type Ca2+ current (ICa,T), hyperpolarization-activated current “funny” (If), and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger current (INCX) activated by RyR-dependent [Ca2+]i release (3537). With regard to the SAN pacemaker mechanism, two mutually connected concepts emerge from our findings. First, although IKACh constitutes an important mechanism in heart rate control (20, 21), its activity becomes detrimental for cardiac automaticity and rhythm following loss of function of ion channels, contributing to the generation of the diastolic depolarization (24) (Figs. 1 and 2). Second, our study indicates that an intrinsic functional redundancy among ion channels involved in the SAN pacemaker mechanism allows viable heart rate and heart rate regulation without SSS symptoms, provided that IKACh activity is abolished or suppressed (Figs. 13 and 8).

Rescuing of tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− demonstrates that IKACh activity constitutes a major mechanism underlying SSS symptoms and associated arrhythmias. In this respect, atrial action potential shortening and reduced ICa,L are important cellular mechanisms underlying atrial fibrillation (3840). Similar to what is observed in experimental animal models of paroxystic atrial fibrillation lacking SSS and heart block (4144), normalization of the atrial action potential duration of Cav1.3−/− myocytes can account for prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmia in this model of SSS. However, because Cav1.3−/− mice have an intrinsically low SAN rate, we cannot exclude the possibility that SAN dysfunction in Cav1.3−/− mice also contributes to the susceptibility to atrial arrhythmias. This mechanism would still be consistent with the observed rescuing of tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome in Cav1.3−/− mice, because IKACh ablation also prevented SAN dysfunction (SI Appendix, Table S4).

In comparison to individuals with sinus rhythm, agonist-independent constitutive IKACh activity (45) and reduced expression of IKACh (46) in atrial myocytes are typical of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Cav1.3−/− SAN myocytes showed reduced basal IKACh and diminished density of agonist-induced current in comparison to WT myocytes (Fig. 4). IKACh down-regulation in pacemaker tissue and/or atria can thus constitute a common compensatory mechanism between mice and humans to counteract IKACh-induced SSS symptoms or atrial arrhythmias.

We attribute the rescue of SAN function in Cav1.3−/− mice to the ability of IKACh ablation or inhibition to prevent ACh-induced formation of [Ca2+]i waves (Fig. 7) and DADs (Fig. 6), as well as to the shift of the total diastolic membrane current to the inward direction under ACh in Cav1.3−/−/Girk4−/− in comparison to Cav1.3−/− pacemaker myocytes (Fig. 8 AD). This view can be summarized by a general model in which pacemaker activity is determined by the balance between inward currents contributing to the diastolic depolarization and IKACh, which brakes automaticity by supplying outward current (Fig. 8E). Loss of Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L generates an imbalance between inward and outward currents that induces dysfunction of pacemaker activity. Normal pacemaking can thus be restored by genetic or pharmacological inhibition of IKACh. Under these conditions, the other currents contributing to the diastolic depolarization, such as INCX (37), ICa,T (47), and If (36), are sufficient to drive normal pacemaker activity (Fig. 8E). This model is consistent also with our evidence showing that IKACh ablation can rescue the slowing of pacemaker activity induced by moderate inhibition of RyR-dependent [Ca2+]i release of WT, but not Cav1.3−/−, SAN myocytes (SI Appendix, Figs. S9–S11). Indeed, although Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L could maintain the balance following concurrent loss of inward INCX and outward IKACh, additional loss of Cav1.3-mediated ICa,L would induce imbalance, and consequently dysfunction of pacemaker activity.

Our evidence indicates that the maintenance of a net inward current in the diastolic phase by IKACh ablation could allow DADs to trigger a full SAN impulse or promote successful AV conduction, thereby preventing SAN pauses and AV block in vivo. [Ca2+]i waves and DADs thus appear to be a major common arrhythmogenic mechanism in the SAN and cardiac conduction system in both Cav1.3−/− mice (this study) and mice carrying silenced cardiac If channels (24). This observation is important, because although these two mouse strains both constitute models of bradycardia, their phenotypes are effectively rescued by IKACh ablation, despite presenting different associations with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (Cav1.3−/−) or ventricular arrhythmia (24).

In conclusion, the ability of IKACh ablation to rescue SAN dysfunction and AV block, as well as tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and ventricular tachycardia, highlights the clinical potential of IKACh targeting for management of SSS and associated arrhythmias in humans. This study may thus foster preclinical research to test IKACh inhibitors in various models of bradycardia and heart block. Importantly, pharmacological inhibitors of IKACh already exist (41, 43). Although these inhibitors have been developed to prevent paroxystic atrial fibrillation, our study suggests that the therapeutic indication of these molecules could be extended to SSS and heart block. Among those compounds, recently described IKACh inhibitors related to the ML297 activator (48) may constitute a potential future pharmacotherapeutical approach for the treatment of SSS.

Materials and Methods

The study conforms to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (49) and to European directives (2010/63/EU), and it was approved by the French Ministry of Agriculture (D34-172-13). An expanded version of the methods is provided in SI Appendix, Expanded Methods.

ECG Recording in Conscious Mice.

Telemetric recordings of ECGs were performed utilizing a Dataquest A.R.T. recording platform (TA10EA-F20; Data Sciences International) using implantable transmitters as described previously (16). Recordings on sedated mice were performed using a six-lead surface ECG recording device with 25-gauge s.c. electrodes (IOX; EMKA Technologies). Mean heart rate values were obtained in each mouse for an overall 24-h period. For evaluating drug effects, heart rate was recorded for a total period of 8 h. Heart rate before drug injection was averaged over a 2-h period following a 2-h stabilization period. Following drug injection, mean heart rate values were calculated in each mouse by analyzing periods of 5 min at different time points corresponding to the peak effect of the drug. Heart rates lower than 400 bpm (20% lower than the mean heart rate recorded in WT mice) were defined as “bradycardia.” Heart rates lower than 300 bpm (40% lower than the mean heart rate recorded in WT mice) were defined as “deep bradycardia.”

Intracardiac Recordings and Pacing in Sedated Mice.

For intracardiac explorations, we used a mouse electrophysiology octapolar catheter positioned in the right atrium and ventricle via the right internal jugular vein (Biosense Webster). Surface ECGs were used as a guide for catheter positioning. Pacing was performed with a modified Biotronik UHS20 stimulator and a digital stimulator (DS8000; World Precision Instruments). Standard pacing protocols were used to determine atrial refractoriness and AV conduction parameters and to trigger atrial arrhythmias (SI Appendix, Expanded Methods). Atrial tachycardia was defined as a salvo of at least four atrial ectopic beats leading to P waves and atrial electrograms with a shape different from the shapes recorded under sinus rate. We considered atrial tachycardia as nonsustained when it lasted for less than 10 complexes. We defined atrial fibrillation as an atrial tachyarrhythmia with marked disorganization both on the surface ECG (with no distinguishable P waves) and on the intracardiac recording, with random AV conduction. SAN function was evaluated by measuring the resting SAN cycle length and the SAN recovery time. Atrial pacing was applied for a period of 30 s at cycle lengths of 100 ms and 80 ms. For each pacing cycle length, SAN recovery time was determined as the longest pause from the last paced atrial depolarization to the first SAN return cycle. The SAN conduction time (SACT) was determined with the Narula method, consisting of eight-stimulus trains at a cycle length slightly shorter than the spontaneous SAN cycle length to avoid overdrive suppression. The SACT was also determined by subtracting the intrinsic SAN cycle length from the interval between the last stimulus and the first spontaneous atrial complex.

Recordings on Isolated Langendorff-Perfused Hearts and Isolated SAN Myocytes.

Excised hearts were mounted on a Langendorff apparatus (EMKA Technologies). The ECG was continuously recorded by Ag-AgCl electrodes positioned on the epicardial side of the right atrium close to the SAN area and near the apex. SAN myocytes were isolated as described previously (14). Recordings of action potentials of SAN myocytes were performed using standard patch-clamp techniques.

Imaging of [Ca2+]i.

Spontaneous [Ca2+]i transients were recorded in SAN pacemaker myocytes loaded with Fluo-4 AM (ThermoFisher Scientific) (20 mM, 35 min) at 36 °C. Images were obtained with confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 780) by scanning the myocyte with an argon laser in line scan configuration (3.78-ms and/or 1.53-ms line rate); fluorescence was excited at 488 nm, and emissions were collected at >505 nm. A 63× oil immersion objective was used to record [Ca2+]i in isolated SAN myocytes. Image analyses were performed by ImageJ software (NIH). Images were corrected for the background fluorescence; waves were defined as a [Ca2+]i release larger than 4 μm and/or with an intrinsic light intensity of >10% of the intensity measured during the following spontaneous [Ca2+]i transient. Image acquisition and analysis were performed on workstations of the MRI (Plate-forme Régionale d'Imagerie du Languedoc - Roussillon) facility.

Statistical Methods.

Results are presented throughout as mean ± SEM. The Student’s t test, the Fisher’s exact test, two-way ANOVA tests followed by Sidak’s post hoc tests, or one-way ANOVA tests followed by Tukey’s (or Dunnett’s) post hoc tests were used to analyze categorical variables. For calculating the level of significance, results were considered significant if P < 0.05. In all figures, a single asterisk indicates P < 0.05, two asterisks indicate P < 0.01, three asterisks indicate P < 0.001, and four asterisks indicate P < 0.0001. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6.01 (GraphPad Software).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File

Acknowledgments

We thank former Prof. Denis Escande (Institut du Thorax) for input and support. We also thank Prof. Philippe Chevalier (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire) for critical reading of the manuscript. We are indebted to the staff of the RAM (Réseau des Animaleries de Montpellier) animal facility of the University of Montpellier for managing mouse lines. The project was supported Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR) Grants ANR-06-PHISIO-004-01, ANR-09-GENO-034, and ANR-2010-BLAN-1128-01 (to M.E.M.); by the Fondation de France, Paris (Cardiovasc 2008002730 to J.N.); by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF F44020 to J.S.); and by NIH Grants R01 HL087120-A2 (to M.E.M.) and R01 HL105550 (to K.W.). P.M. and A.G.T. were supported by the CavNet, a Research Training Network funded through the European Union Research Programme (6FP) MRTN-CT-2006-035367. L.M. received a postdoctoral fellowship from the Fondation Lefoulon-Delalande (Paris). The Institut de Genomique Fonctionnelle group is a member of the Laboratory of Excellence “Ion Channel Science and Therapeutics” supported by a grant from the ANR (ANR-11-LABX-0015).

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1517181113/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Sanders P, Lau DH, Kalman JK. Sinus node abnormalities. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. 6th Ed. Elsevier Saunders; Philadelphia: 2014. pp. 691–696. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fish FA, Benson DW. Disorders of cardiac rhythm and conduction. In: Allen HD, Clark HP, Gutgesell HP, Driscoll DJ, editors. Moss and Adam’s Heart Disease in Infants, Children and Adolescents. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2001. pp. 482–533. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Semelka M, Gera J, Usman S. Sick sinus syndrome: A review. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(10):691–696. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Monfredi O, Boyett MR. Sick sinus syndrome and atrial fibrillation in older persons - A view from the sinoatrial nodal myocyte. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;83:88–100. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Calendar year 2009--a World Society of Arrhythmia’s project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34(8):1013–1027. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Damani S. When the heart forgets to beat. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(76):76ec42. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jensen PN, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for sick sinus syndrome in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(6):531–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rosen MR, Robinson RB, Brink PR, Cohen IS. The road to biological pacing. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8(11):656–666. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dobrzynski H, Boyett MR, Anderson RH. New insights into pacemaker activity: Promoting understanding of sick sinus syndrome. Circulation. 2007;115(14):1921–1932. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.616011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Baig SM, et al. Loss of Ca(v)1.3 (CACNA1D) function in a human channelopathy with bradycardia and congenital deafness. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(1):77–84. doi: 10.1038/nn.2694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Le Scouarnec S, et al. Dysfunction in ankyrin-B-dependent ion channel and transporter targeting causes human sinus node disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(40):15617–15622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805500105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Qu Y, Baroudi G, Yue Y, Boutjdir M. Novel molecular mechanism involving alpha1D (Cav1.3) L-type calcium channel in autoimmune-associated sinus bradycardia. Circulation. 2005;111(23):3034–3041. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.517326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rose RA, et al. Iron overload decreases CaV1.3-dependent L-type Ca2+ currents leading to bradycardia, altered electrical conduction, and atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(5):733–742. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.960401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mangoni ME, et al. Functional role of L-type Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels in cardiac pacemaker activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(9):5543–5548. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0935295100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chandler NJ, et al. Molecular architecture of the human sinus node: Insights into the function of the cardiac pacemaker. Circulation. 2009;119(12):1562–1575. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.804369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marger L, et al. Functional roles of Cav1.3, Cav3.1 and HCN channels in automaticity of mouse atrioventricular cells: Insights into the atrioventricular pacemaker mechanism. Channels (Austin) 2011;5(3):251–261. doi: 10.4161/chan.5.3.15266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Platzer J, et al. Congenital deafness and sinoatrial node dysfunction in mice lacking class D L-type Ca2+ channels. Cell. 2000;102(1):89–97. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00013-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang Z, et al. Functional roles of Cav1.3(alpha1D) calcium channels in atria: Insights gained from gene-targeted null mutant mice. Circulation. 2005;112(13):1936–1944. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.540070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang Z, et al. Functional Roles of Cav1.3 (alpha(1D)) calcium channel in sinoatrial nodes: Insight gained using gene-targeted null mutant mice. Circ Res. 2002;90(9):981–987. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000018003.14304.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wickman K, Nemec J, Gendler SJ, Clapham DE. Abnormal heart rate regulation in GIRK4 knockout mice. Neuron. 1998;20(1):103–114. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80438-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mesirca P, et al. The G-protein-gated K+ channel, IKACh, is required for regulation of pacemaker activity and recovery of resting heart rate after sympathetic stimulation. J Gen Physiol. 2013;142(2):113–126. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201310996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Krapivinsky G, et al. The G-protein-gated atrial K+ channel IKACh is a heteromultimer of two inwardly rectifying K(+)-channel proteins. Nature. 1995;374(6518):135–141. doi: 10.1038/374135a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bettahi I, Marker CL, Roman MI, Wickman K. Contribution of the Kir3.1 subunit to the muscarinic-gated atrial potassium channel IKACh. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(50):48282–48288. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209599200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mesirca P, et al. Cardiac arrhythmia induced by genetic silencing of ‘funny’ (f) channels is rescued by GIRK4 inactivation. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4664. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Drici MD, Diochot S, Terrenoire C, Romey G, Lazdunski M. The bee venom peptide tertiapin underlines the role of IKACh in acetylcholine-induced atrioventricular blocks. Br J Pharmacol. 2000;131(3):569–577. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sinnegger-Brauns MJ, et al. Isoform-specific regulation of mood behavior and pancreatic beta cell and cardiovascular function by L-type Ca 2+ channels. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(10):1430–1439. doi: 10.1172/JCI20208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Christel CJ, et al. Distinct localization and modulation of Cav1.2 and Cav1.3 L-type Ca2+ channels in mouse sinoatrial node. J Physiol. 2012;590(Pt 24):6327–6342. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Belardinelli L, Giles WR, West A. Ionic mechanisms of adenosine actions in pacemaker cells from rabbit heart. J Physiol. 1988;405:615–633. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kirchhof P, et al. Altered sinus nodal and atrioventricular nodal function in freely moving mice overexpressing the A1 adenosine receptor. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285(1):H145–H153. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01036.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lou Q, et al. Upregulation of adenosine A1 receptors facilitates sinoatrial node dysfunction in chronic canine heart failure by exacerbating nodal conduction abnormalities revealed by novel dual-sided intramural optical mapping. Circulation. 2014;130(4):315–324. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wakimoto H, et al. Induction of atrial tachycardia and fibrillation in the mouse heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;50(3):463–473. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00264-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kovoor P, et al. Evaluation of the role of IKACh in atrial fibrillation using a mouse knockout model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(8):2136–2143. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01304-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cunha SR, et al. Defects in ankyrin-based membrane protein targeting pathways underlie atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2011;124(11):1212–1222. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.023986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lin RJ. Ankyring the heart rhythm. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(100):100ec149. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mangoni ME, Nargeot J. Genesis and regulation of the heart automaticity. Physiol Rev. 2008;88(3):919–982. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.DiFrancesco D. The role of the funny current in pacemaker activity. Circ Res. 2010;106(3):434–446. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.208041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lakatta EG, Maltsev VA, Vinogradova TM. A coupled SYSTEM of intracellular Ca2+ clocks and surface membrane voltage clocks controls the timekeeping mechanism of the heart’s pacemaker. Circ Res. 2010;106(4):659–673. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.206078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yue L, et al. Ionic remodeling underlying action potential changes in a canine model of atrial fibrillation. Circ Res. 1997;81(4):512–525. doi: 10.1161/01.res.81.4.512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Qi XY, et al. Cellular signaling underlying atrial tachycardia remodeling of L-type calcium current. Circ Res. 2008;103(8):845–854. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.175463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nattel S, Burstein B, Dobrev D. Atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms and implications. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(1):62–73. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.107.754564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hashimoto N, Yamashita T, Tsuruzoe N. Tertiapin, a selective IKACh blocker, terminates atrial fibrillation with selective atrial effective refractory period prolongation. Pharmacol Res. 2006;54(2):136–141. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2006.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wirth KJ, et al. In vitro and in vivo effects of the atrial selective antiarrhythmic compound AVE1231. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007;49(4):197–206. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318032002f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hashimoto N, Yamashita T, Tsuruzoe N. Characterization of in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological and antiarrhythmic effects of a novel IKACh blocker, NIP-151: A comparison with an IKr-blocker dofetilide. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2008;51(2):162–169. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31815e854c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cho KI, et al. Attenuation of acetylcholine activated potassium current IKACh by simvastatin, not pravastatin in mouse atrial cardiomyocyte: Possible atrial fibrillation preventing effects of statin. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e106570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dobrev D, et al. The G protein-gated potassium current IKACh is constitutively active in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005;112(24):3697–3706. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.575332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Voigt N, et al. Impaired Na+-dependent regulation of acetylcholine-activated inward-rectifier K+ current modulates action potential rate dependence in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;61:142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mangoni ME, et al. Bradycardia and slowing of the atrioventricular conduction in mice lacking CaV3.1/alpha1G T-type calcium channels. Circ Res. 2006;98(11):1422–1430. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000225862.14314.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wydeven N, et al. Mechanisms underlying the activation of G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels by the novel anxiolytic drug, ML297. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(29):10755–10760. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405190111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (1996) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Natl Inst Health, Bethesda), DHHS Publ No. (NIH) 85-23.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES