Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1993 Nov 1;90(21):10159–10162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10159

Blastocyst's state of activity determines the "window" of implantation in the receptive mouse uterus.

B C Paria 1, Y M Huet-Hudson 1, S K Dey 1
PMCID: PMC47733  PMID: 8234270

Abstract

The present investigation studied the influence of the blastocyst's state of activity on the "window" of implantation in the receptive uterus in the mouse. The receptive state of the uterus is defined as the limited time when the uterine milieu is favorable to blastocyst acceptance and implantation. In the mouse, implantation occurs on day 4 (day 1 = vaginal plug). Ovariectomy in the morning of day 4 prior to preimplantation estrogen secretion results in blastocyst dormancy and delayed implantation. These conditions are maintained by continued progesterone (P4) treatment but can be terminated with an injection of estrogen leading to blastocyst activation and subsequent implantation. Blastocyst transfers into intact pseudopregnant mice demonstrated that the window of implantation on day 4 remains open at least through 1800 h for normal day 4 blastocysts but only up to 1400 h for dormant blastocysts. These results suggested that the blastocyst's state of activity influenced the normally operative window of implantation in the receptive uterus. This finding was further confirmed by inducing conditions of delayed implantation in pregnant donors and pseudopregnant recipients. They were ovariectomized on the morning of day 4 and maintained with daily injections of P4 from days 5 to 7. On day 7, dormant blastocysts from P4-treated delayed donors were transferred into the uteri of P4-treated delayed pseudopregnant recipients at 1, 2, 4, or 8 h after an injection of 17 beta-estradiol (E2). Dormant blastocysts transferred into delayed recipients at 1 h after E2 treatment resulted in implantation in most of the animals as compared to complete failure of blastocysts to implant after transfer to P4-treated delayed recipients at 4 or 8 h after E2 treatment. However, implantation did occur in P4-treated delayed recipients at these later hours of E2 treatment when the P4-treated delayed donors also received E2 prior to blastocyst transfer. Furthermore, the majority of day 4 normal blastocysts implanted when transferred into P4-treated delayed recipients even at 16 h after E2 treatment. Interestingly, day 7 dormant blastocysts cultured for 8 or 24 h for in vitro activation failed to implant after transfer to P4-treated delayed pseudopregnant recipients at 4 ir 8 h after E2 treatment, although they did implant after transfer at 1 h after E2 treatment. As expected, normal day 4 blastocysts failed to implant after transfer to P4-treated delayed pseudopregnant recipients. Thus, these results establish that the blastocyst's state of activity alters the timing of implantation (window) in the receptive uterus. Thus, the window for successful implantation could be defined as a limited time span when the activated stage of the blastocyst is superimposed on the receptive state of the uterus. This window remains open for a shorter period for dormant blastocysts than for a normal or dormant blastocysts after E2 activation. Furthermore, dormant blastocysts, which apparently achieved metabolic activation in vitro, failed to attain the same status as blastocysts activated in utero by E2 for implantation into the receptive uterus. A key finding of this investigation is that E2 induces very rapidly, but transiently (1 h), a factor(s) in the P4-primed uterus that activates the dormant blastocysts for implantation in the receptive uterus.

Full text

PDF
10161

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Huet-Hudson Y. M., Dey S. K. Requirement for progesterone priming and its long-term effects on implantation in the mouse. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1990 Apr;193(4):259–263. doi: 10.3181/00379727-193-43032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Huet Y. M., Dey S. K. Role of early and late oestrogenic effects on implantation in the mouse. J Reprod Fertil. 1987 Nov;81(2):453–458. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0810453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kumar T. C. Modified ependymal cells in the ventral hypothalamus of the rhesus monkey and their possible role in the hypothalamic regulation of anterior pituitary function. J Endocrinol. 1968 Aug;41(4):17–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McCormack J. T., Greenwald G. S. Evidence for a preimplantation rise in oestradiol-17beta levels on day 4 of pregnancy in the mouse. J Reprod Fertil. 1974 Dec;41(2):297–301. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0410297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Paria B. C., Das S. K., Andrews G. K., Dey S. K. Expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene is regulated in mouse blastocysts during delayed implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jan 1;90(1):55–59. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Paria B. C., Dey S. K. Preimplantation embryo development in vitro: cooperative interactions among embryos and role of growth factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4756–4760. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Psychoyos A. Uterine receptivity for nidation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;476:36–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb20920.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Torbit C. A., Weitlauf H. M. Production of carbon dioxide in vitro by blastocysts from intact and ovariectomized mice. J Reprod Fertil. 1975 Jan;42(1):45–50. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0420045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Weitlauf H. M. Metabolic changes in the blastocysts of mice and rats during delayed implantation. J Reprod Fertil. 1974 Jul;39(1):213–224. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0390213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu T. C., Wang L., Wan Y. J. Expression of estrogen receptor gene in mouse oocyte and during embryogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev. 1992 Dec;33(4):407–412. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080330406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yoshinaga K., Adams C. E. Delayed implantation in the spayed, progesterone treated adult mouse. J Reprod Fertil. 1966 Dec;12(3):593–595. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0120593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES