Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2016 Feb 24;67(8):2425–2437. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw052

OsMPK6 plays a critical role in cell differentiation during early embryogenesis in Oryza sativa

Jakyung Yi 1,†, Yang-Seok Lee 1,†, Dong-Yeon Lee 1, Man-Ho Cho 1, Jong-Seong Jeon 1, Gynheung An 1,*
PMCID: PMC4809295  PMID: 26912801

Highlight

The MAP kinase cascade controls early embryogenesis prior to axis formation.

Key words: Axis formation, embryogenesis, globular embryo, OsMPK6, phytoalexin, rice.

Abstract

The formation of body axes is the basis of morphogenesis during plant embryogenesis. We identified embryo-lethal mutants of rice (Oryza sativa) in which T-DNAs were inserted in OsMPK6. Embryonic organs were absent because their development was arrested at the globular stage. Similar to observations made with gle4, shootless, and organless, the osmpk6 mutations affected the initial step of cell differentiation. Expression of an apical–basal axis marker gene, OSH1, was reduced in the mutant embryos while that of the radial axes marker genes OsSCR and OsPNH1 was not detected. The signal for ROC1, a protodermal cell marker, was weak at the globular stage and gradually disappeared. Transcript levels of auxin and gibberellin biosynthesis genes were diminished in osmpk6 embryos. In addition, phytoalexin biosynthesis genes were down-regulated in osmpk6 and a major diterpene phytoalexin, momilactone A, did not accumulate in the mutant embryos. These results indicate that OsMPK6 begins to play a critical role during early embryogenesis, especially when the L1 radial axis is being formed.

Introduction

Improving our understanding of the molecular mechanisms and cellular events involved in embryogenesis could help us increase grain yields and seed quality. During the early stage of that biological process, the apical–basal axis and the radial axis, perpendicular to it, are the first to be generated. The shoot apical meristem (SAM), cotyledon, hypocotyl, and root apical meristem are then formed along the apical–basal axis, while the epidermis (L1), ground tissue (L2), and central vascular cylinder (L3) are concentrically arranged from outside to inside along the radial axis (Mayer et al., 1991). Monocotyledon plants such as rice (Oryza sativa) and maize (Zea mays) have another axis, the dorsal–ventral axis, and their embryos are not radially symmetrical. There, shoot development is defined on the ventral side, opposite to the dorsal side (Sato, 2008). In Arabidopsis, the genetic control of pattern formation and organ differentiation has been elucidated by analyses of embryonic mutants and marker gene expression (Jenik et al., 2007; ten Hove et al., 2015).

Despite these advancements, little is known about the molecular mechanisms for rice embryogenesis. More than 200 rice embryo mutants have been categorized into phenotypic groups (Hong et al., 1995). Lethal mutant classifications include embryoless, organless, shootless (shl), and radicleless. Seeds of the embryoless mutant have only an endosperm, whereas organless, shl, and radicleless mutants are defective in embryonic organs, shoots, and radicles, respectively. All are characterized by defects during early embryonic development or cell differentiation. The organless1 mutants fail to develop most organs and tissues, although the scutellum and endosperm are normal (Hong et al., 1995). Another mutant, tryptophan deficient dwarf (tdd1), is defective in a gene that encodes a protein homologous to anthranilate synthase β-subunit, which catalyses the first step of the Trp biosynthesis pathway (Sazuka et al., 2009). Because indole acetic acid (IAA) is biosynthesized from Trp, the phenotype is probably due to deficiencies of Trp and IAA.

During embryogenesis the SAM develops first and then serves as the basis for the production of aboveground plant parts, including the leaves, stems, and axial buds (Steeves and Sussex, 1989). In rice, the shl mutants fail to develop the SAM (Satoh et al., 1999), while shoot organization (sho) mutants have a large, flattened shoot apex (Hong et al., 1995). Among these mutants, weak shl alleles show a phenotype similar to that of sho mutants, that is, an increased rate of leaf production and random phyllotaxy (Itoh et al., 2000). This suggests that SHL and SHO genes function in both the initiation and the maintenance of the SAM (Itoh et al., 2000; Satoh et al., 2003). Expression of two Class III homeodomain leucine zipper (HD-ZIPIII) genes, OSHB1 and OSHB2, is decreased in shl2, shl4/sho2, and sho1 mutants, whereas transcript levels of miRNA166 are increased in those mutants. Both OSHB1 and OSHB2 have a miR166 recognition sequence (Nagasaki et al., 2007), indicating that small RNA acts as a signalling molecule to induce SAM initiation. Two other HD-ZIPIII genes, OSHB3 and OSHB4, are also expressed in the central and ventral domains of an embryo, where the SAM is later initiated (Itoh et al., 2008).

Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascades consist of kinase signalling modules that are evolutionarily conserved throughout eukaryotes (Ichimura et al., 2002). The cascade is a hierarchical organization of three classes of functionally related kinases: MAP kinase (MPK), MPK kinase (MAP2K or MKK), and MAP2K kinase (MAP3K or MEKK). This cascade amplifies and integrates the signals between the cellular environment and metabolic/transcriptional responses (Hamel et al., 2006). OsMPK6 (previously referred to as OsMPK2 by Kurusu et al., 2005; OsMAPK6 by Lieberherr et al., 2005; OsSIPK by Lee et al., 2008; and OsMPK1 by Singh et al., 2012) was isolated from a suspension cell culture treated with a sphingolipid elicitor (SE) that was purified from the rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae) (Lieberherr et al., 2005). After SE treatment, OsMPK6 protein and mRNA levels remained unchanged. However, kinase activity of the protein was rapidly induced in response to the elicitor in rice cells. Post-translational activation of OsMPK6 was also observed in OsMKK4-overexpressing cells treated with a chitin elicitor. This indicates that OsMKK4 is an upstream kinase for OsMPK6 and that the OsMKK4–OsMPK6 cascade is activated by the elicitor (Kishi-Kaboshi et al., 2010).

Phytoalexins are low-molecular-weight antimicrobial compounds produced in response to pathogens (Tsuji et al., 1992). Rice plants accumulate diterpenoid phytoalexins, momilactones, and phytocassanes upon M. oryzae infection (Cartwright et al., 1981; Peters, 2006). Phytoalexin levels are increased in cells expressing a constitutively active form of OsMKK4. This demonstrates that the elicitor-responsive OsMKK4–OsMPK6 cascade is essential for phytoalexin biosynthesis (Kishi-Kaboshi et al., 2010). Arabidopsis MPK6 and MPK3 belong to the same clade as rice OsMPK6 in the MPK family. The Arabidopsis proteins function together in a single MAP kinase cascade and are involved in various signalling responses. The MKK4–MPK3/MPK6 cascade leads to phytoalexin biosynthesis upon pathogen infection (Ren et al., 2008). MPK6 activated by Botrytis cinerea phosphorylates WRKY33, which then induces biosynthesis of camalexin, the major phytoalexin in Arabidopsis (Mao et al., 2011).

In addition to the activation of defence genes, MAP kinases regulate stomatal patterning in leaves (Wang et al., 2007), ethylene production by phosphorylating a subset of ACC synthase isoforms (Liu and Zhang, 2004; Joo et al., 2008; Han et al., 2010), generation of reactive oxygen species, and hypersensitive responses such as cell death (Ren et al., 2002; Kim and Zhang, 2004; Liu et al., 2007; Lee, 2014). They are also involved in inflorescence architecture (Bush and Krysan, 2007; Meng et al., 2012), anther and embryo development (Bush and Krysan, 2007; Wang et al., 2007), and seed formation and root development (López-Bucio et al., 2014). Here, we report that OsMPK6 is essential for embryogenesis in rice.

Materials and methods

Genotyping and identification of OsMPK6/osmpk6

Seeds from heterozygote rice lines 3A-60391 (OsMPK6/osmpk6-1) and 2A-10337 (OsMPK6/osmpk6-2) were soaked in water for 12h. After imbibition, embryos were extracted with a razor blade. DNA was isolated by the hexadecyltrimethylammoniumbromide method (CTAB; Chen and Ronald, 1999). Genotypes were determined by PCR, using gene-specific primers and T-DNA primers (see Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online).

RNA extraction and quantitative reverse transcription PCR

Developing embryos were isolated under a microscope after briefly dipping seeds collected at 6 days after pollination (DAP) in liquid nitrogen. Their endosperms were separated under a microscope to avoid pericarp contamination. Total RNA was isolated and cDNAs were synthesized as previously reported (Lee and An, 2015). Gene expression was monitored by quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR as described previously (Lee and An, 2015). All experiments were conducted at least three times, using three or more independent samples per experiment. Primers for analysing transcript levels are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Histochemical analyses

Developing seeds at various stages after pollination were fixed with 3% (w/v) paraformaldehyde and dehydrated in an ethanol series as previously described (Yi et al., 2012). The samples were embedded in Paraplast, then sectioned to an 8 μm thickness with a rotary microtome. After staining with 0.05% toluidine blue, they were observed with an Olympus microscope BX61 (Olympus, http://www.olympus.com).

RNA in situ hybridization

Developing seeds were fixed in 0.05M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.25% glutaraldehyde. Samples were dehydrated, embedded, sliced, and attached to slides as previously described (Lee et al., 2007). For preparation of digoxigenin-labelled RNA probes, the coding regions were PCR-amplified. Primers used for the probes are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The PCR products were cloned into p-GEM-T vectors (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), then linearized and used as templates for making the digoxigenin-labelled sense and antisense RNA probes. Tissue sections were cleared with xylene and dehydrated through a graded ethanol series. After they were hybridized with the labelled RNA probe, the sections were incubated overnight at 60°C and washed with 0.15M sodium chloride and 15mM sodium citrate. The labelled probes were detected with anti-digoxigenin alkaline phosphatase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) in combination with nitro blue tetrazolium chloride/5-bromo-4-chloro-3 indolyl phosphate p-toluidine salt (Roche).

Measurement of phytoalexin content

Wild-type (WT) and osmpk6-1 seeds were imbibed in distilled water for 48h at 28ºC, and subsequently treated for 72h at 28ºC with elicitors—115 µg mL−1 flg22 peptide (AnaSpec, Fremont, CA, USA) and 60 µg mL−1 hexa-N-acetylchitohexaose (Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland)—or water as the mock control. After treatment, embryos (approximately 0.15g) were separated and collected. The samples were pulverized in liquid nitrogen and extracted overnight with ethyl acetate by stirring. After centrifugation, the ethyl acetate extract was dried under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in methanol and used in HPLC-electrospray ionization-MS/MS analysis to measure levels of phytoalexin momilactone A in the embryo samples as described previously, with a minor modification (Shimizu et al., 2008). Standard momilactone A was kindly provided by Dr Morifumi Hasegawa (Ibaraki University, Japan). Each sample was analysed using a reversed-phase HPLC equipped with a ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (2.1mm in diameter, 100mm long; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in MeCN, H2O, and AcOH (70.0:29.9:0.1, v:v:v) at a flow rate of 0.2mL min−1. The eluent was monitored by a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent 6410B; Agilent Technologies) fitted with an electrospray ion source in positive ion mode. The electrospray capillary was 4kV and the source temperature was 350ºC. The precursor and product ions were monitored by the MRM mode to determine momilactone A contents.

Results

Mutations in OsMPK6 cause embryo-lethal phenotypes

To identify genes essential for zygote development, we analysed the genotype data from our T-DNA mutant pool (An et al., 2003; Jeon et al., 2000; Jeong et al., 2002). We selected lines with a segregation ratio close to 1:2:0 (WT to heterozygote to homozygote). Among them, we studied lines 3A-60391 and 2A-10337, in which T-DNA is inserted into the fifth intron and the sixth exon of OsMPK6, respectively (Fig. 1A). Tests of seeds from the heterozygous parent showed that 19.8% (18/91) of osmpk6-1 and 20.75% (22/106) of osmpk6-2 did not germinate (Table 1). The ratio between germinated and non-germinated seeds was approximately 3:1. Genotyping revealed that all of the non-germinated seeds were homozygotes while those that germinated were WT or heterozygotes, thereby indicating that the T-DNA insertion caused the lethality. Furthermore, transcripts of OsMPK6 were not detected in the non-germinated seeds, suggesting that both mutations are null alleles (Fig. 1B). When compared with the WT, mutant seeds had small, flat embryos (Fig. 1C). After 12h of imbibition, embryonic organs, including the coleoptile, first leaf, and radicle, appeared from the WT but not from the mutant (Fig. 1C). To examine whether overexpression of OsMPK6 affects embryo morphology, we identified an activation-tagging line (OsMPK6-D, 2A-10648) in which the 35S enhancer elements are located 2124bp downstream from the stop codon of OsMPK6 (Supplementary Fig. S1A). In that line, transcript levels were significantly enhanced (Supplementary Fig. S1B), but no obvious phenotypic changes were observed in plants, including the embryos (Supplementary Fig. S1C).

Fig. 1.

Characterization of T-DNA insertion mutants in OsMPK6.

(A) Gene structure of OsMPK6. Dark-grey boxes indicate exons; light-grey boxes, UTRs; lines connecting boxes, introns. Triangles are T-DNA insertions of osmpk6-1 (line 3A-60391) and osmpk6-2 (line 2A-10337). Arrows f (forward), r (reverse), and LB (left border) are primers used for genotyping and RT-PCR analyses of OsMPK6 transcript levels. Scale bar = 1kb. (B) Measurement of MPK6 transcript levels by RT-PCR. Rice Ubiquitin 1 (OsUbi1, Os03g0234200) served as control. (C) Embryo phenotypes of WT, osmpk6-1, and osmpk6-2. Upper panel presents mature embryos from dry seeds; lower panel, embryos after imbibition. Red dotted boxes show the mutant embryo regions. cp, coleoptile; el, embryonic leaves; ra, radicle. Bars = 1mm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Table 1.

Segregation analysis of OsMPK6/osmpk6-1 and OsMPK6/osmpk6-2

Germinated seeds (G) Non-germinated seeds (N) Observed ratio (G:N) Expected ratio (G:N) χ2
WT heterozygote homozygote
OsMPK6/osmpk6-1 (n = 91) 23 50 18 4.06:1 3:1 1.322
(P<0.05)
OsMPK6/osmpk6-2 (n = 106) 27 57 22 3.82: 1 3: 1 1.019
(P<0.05)
Open in a new tab

The segregation ratio was analysed in progeny of selfed OsMPK6/osmpk6 mutant lines. χ2 tests were performed to evaluate the relationship between the observed data and the predicted ratio of 3:1.

As a member of the MPK family, OsMPK6 encodes a 398-residue protein that contains Thr-Glu-Tyr residues within the phosphorylation-activation motif (Supplementary Fig. S2A). Among the 20 MPK members in Arabidopsis, OsMPK6 was the most homologous to MPK6, with 85% identity (Supplementary Fig. S2A, B). This protein also had a predicted docking groove for binding substrates as well as the 11 conserved protein kinase domains and conserved MAP kinase domain (Supplementary Fig. S2B; Agrawal et al., 2003).

Embryo development is arrested at the globular stage in osmpk6 mutants

To determine when defects occur in osmpk6 mutants, we analysed the developing embryo. At 3 DAP, the zygote formed a globular embryo in the WT (Fig. 2A). No abnormal embryos were found among the 44 seeds from the heterozygote plants (Fig. 2F, K), and all were globular, indicating that the 3 DAP mutant embryos were also normal. In WT embryos, the coleoptile primordium began to differentiate at 5 DAP, and the SAM was recognizable as a bulge protrusion at the base (Fig. 2B). Mutant embryos differed from the WT at this stage, maintaining their globular shape but still increasing in size when compared with embryos at 3 DAP. However, the coleoptile primordium and SAM were not developed in the mutant at this time (Fig. 2G, L). At 7 DAP, the primordium of the first leaf from the WT had formed below the shoot apex, and the coleoptile and SAM were elongated (Fig. 2C). The scutellum developed at the apical and dorsal ends of the embryo and the epiblast appeared opposite the scutellum. In contrast, the mutant embryos remained globular and lacked any differentiation (Fig. 2H, M). By 10 DAP, all organs had formed in the WT and embryogenesis was complete (Fig. 2D), but the seed continued to enlarge until maturation (Fig. 2E). For the mutant embryo, no further growth or differentiation was noted after 10 DAP, although the ventral side was slightly elongated (Fig. 2I, N). At 25 DAP, the dorsal side of the mutant embryo was protruding while the ventral side was flat and attached to the endosperm (Fig. 2J, O). No cellular differentiation was obvious in the mutants.

Fig. 2.

Median longitudinal sections of WT and osmpk6 embryos at various developmental stages.

Developing embryos of WT (A–E), osmpk6-1 (F–J), and osmpk6-2 (K–O) at 3 DAP (A, F, K), 5 DAP (B, G, L), 7 DAP (C, H, M), 10 DAP (D, I, N), and 25 DAP (E, J, O). Solid boxes in D, I, and N are magnified in Fig. 6. cp, coleoptile; ep, epiblast; lp, leaf primordium; ra, radicle apex; sa, shoot apex; SAM, shoot apical meristem; sc, scutellum. Bars = 50 μm (A-C, F-H, and K-M), 100 μm (D, I, and N), or 200 μm (E, J, and O). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

Expression profiles of OsMPK6

To study the expression pattern of OsMPK6, we performed qRT-PCR with gene-specific primers. Transcripts were detected in all organs tested, including the leaves, roots, flag leaves, and mature spikelets (Fig. 3A). In developing seeds, expression was found at all examined developmental stages (Fig. 3B), and in both the embryo and endosperm (Fig. 3C). This analysis indicated that OsMPK6 is ubiquitously expressed in rice.

Fig. 3.

Expression profiles of OsMPK6.

Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of expression in various organs (A), developing seeds at four different stages (B), and embryo and endosperm from 6 DAP seeds (C). Transcript levels were normalized to OsUbi1. In situ hybridization with antisense OsMPK6 in WT (D) and osmpk6-1 (E) seeds or with sense probe as a negative control in WT seeds (F). Em, embryo; En, endosperm; P, pericarp. Bars = 200 μm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

To monitor spatial expression of this gene, we performed RNA in situ hybridization experiments with developing seeds at 6 DAP. Transcripts were detected in all cell types of the embryo as well as in the endosperm and pericarp (Fig. 3D). In the mutant seeds, OsMPK6 transcripts were not present in the embryo or endosperm, whereas signals were observed in pericarp that was derived from maternal tissues (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, the sense probe that we used as a control did not detect any significant hybridization signal (Fig. 3F).

Mutations of OsMPK6 do not affect endosperm development

Although embryo development was affected by the mutation, seed size and colour were the same between the WT and the mutants (Supplementary Fig. S3A). Cross sections of the mature seeds showed that the pericarp and tegmen, which are maternal tissues, were normal in the mutant seeds (Supplementary Fig. S3B). The endosperm and aleurone cells were also identical between the WT and the mutants (Supplementary Fig. S3B). These findings suggest that the mutations in OsMPK6 do not affect development of the endosperm cells.

To investigate further whether osmpk6 endosperms are normal, we measured transcript levels of the genes involved in starch synthesis in caryopses at 10 DAP, when starch is being actively accumulated (Yamakawa et al., 2007). Expression levels were similar between the WT and mutant seeds for the starch biosynthesis genes ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase large subunit 1 (AGPL1), Starch synthase IIIa (SSIIIa), and Starch branching enzyme I (BEI), and for a starch debranching enzyme, Pullulanase (Ohdan et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2015) (Supplementary Fig. S3C). These data also demonstrate that the OsMPK6 mutations do not affect endosperm development.

OsMPK6 is important for the formation of the basic axis during embryogenesis

To investigate them at the molecular level, we isolated osmpk6 mutant embryos and WT embryos at 6 DAP and measured transcript levels for genes involved in embryogenesis. GLABRA2 (GL2)-type homeobox genes Rice outermost cell-specific gene1 (ROC1) through ROC5 are expressed in developing embryos and show an epidermis-specific pattern of expression in the shoot and crown root apices (Ito et al., 2002, 2003). The ROC proteins form homo- and heterodimers through a leucine zipper motif, and in combination they regulate epidermis differentiation. Transcript levels of ROC1 were decreased in the osmpk6-1 embryos (Fig. 4A), as were those of ROC2 and ROC4, which are two of the three ROC genes expressed in normally developing embryos (Fig. 4B, C). By contrast, transcript levels of ROC3 were similar between the WT and the mutant (Fig. 4D). Like ROC1, HAZ1 expression is restricted to the outermost cells during early embryogenesis but is detected in the outer layer of the ventral part during later stages (Ito et al., 2004). Its expression was also significantly reduced in the mutant embryos (Fig. 4E).

Fig. 4.

Comparisons of expression for molecular marker genes between osmpk6-1 mutant and WT control.

Quantitative RT-PCR of ROC1 (A), ROC2 (B), ROC3 (C), ROC4 (D), HAZ1 (E), RAmy1A (F), HB1 (G), HB2 (H), HB3 (I), HB4 (J), OsSCR (K), OsPNH1 (L), and OSH1 (M). Y-axis is the gene expression relative to OsUbi1 transcript level. Results are averages of three independent experiments. Ten embryos were collected for each sample. Error bars show standard deviations. Statistical significance is indicated by **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Fig. 4.

Open in a new tab

The epithelium of the scutellum functions in transporting nutrients from the endosperm to the embryo during germination. Rice α-amylase 1 (RAmy1A) is expressed on the dorsal side of that epithelium, facing the endosperm tissue (Sugimoto et al., 1997). Its gene expression was also reduced in the osmpk6-1 embryos (Fig. 4F). Transcripts of HB genes, encoding HD-ZIPIIIs, were negatively affected in mutant embryos (Fig. 4G–J). These analyses indicate that mutations in MPK6 influence embryo development at the early globular stage, before the formation of a radial pattern.

SCARECROW (SCR) in Arabidopsis is specifically localized to the endodermis cell layer, which includes the cortex/endodermis initial cells that correspond to the L2 layer (Di Laurenzio et al. 1996). As an ortholog of SCR in rice, OsSCR is preferentially expressed in the endodermis cell layer, including the cortex (Di Laurenzio et al., 1996).

A meristem-defective Arabidopsis mutant, pinhead/zwille (pnh/zll), has a flat meristem and fails to maintain the indeterminate state of the SAM (McConnell and Barton, 1995; Lynn et al., 1999). PNH/ZLL is expressed in the central region of the early embryo, probably corresponding to the provascular region. The rice ortholog OsPNH1 is also expressed in the future vascular regions of leaf primordia (Nishimura et al., 2002) and has been used as an L3 vascular tissue marker (Kamiya et al., 2003). Expression of these two L2 and L3 marker genes, OsSCR and OsPNH1, was decreased in osmpk6 embryos (Fig. 4K, L).

Class 1 KNOTTED-like homeobox genes, such as KNOTTED1 in maize (Smith et al., 1995), Oryza sativa homeobox 1 (OSH1) in rice (Sato et al., 1996), and SHOOT MERISTEMLESS in Arabidopsis (Long et al., 1996), are expressed in the indeterminate cells around the SAM. At the early embryo stages before cell differentiation, they are expressed in the presumptive SAM region. Therefore, OSH1 has been used as a marker for studying the apical region in rice embryos (Sato et al., 1996; Kamiya et al., 2003). We noted that transcript levels of OSH1 were also decreased in the mutant embryos (Fig. 4M). These results support previous findings that the mutants do not differentiate embryonic organs.

To improve our understanding of how osmpk6 mutations affect genes involved in basic pattern formation, we monitored the spatial expression of molecular marker genes. Because ROC1 is specifically expressed in the L1 protoderm (Ito et al., 2002), we performed RNA in situ hybridization experiments. In WT embryos, ROC1 was exclusively detected in the outermost cells of globular-stage embryos at 3 DAP (Fig. 5A), when no distinct protoderm layer was yet visible. This indicates that differentiation of the L1 layer is determined shortly after fertilization. That gene was also preferentially expressed in the outermost cells of coleoptilar-stage embryos at 5 DAP, when a protoderm layer structure was evident (Fig. 5C). In osmpk6-1 embryos, ROC1 was weakly expressed in the outer portions (Fig. 5B, D). Transcripts of the L3 marker gene OsPNH1 were localized in the central region at the late-globular stage (Fig. 5E) and in the vascular cylinder of coleoptilar-stage WT embryos (Fig. 5G). However, those transcripts were not detectable in the osmpk6-1 embryos that remained at the globular stage (Fig. 5F, H).

Fig. 5.

Cellular expression patterns of molecular markers from osmpk6-1 and WT embryos.

RNA in situ hybridization of ROC1 (A–D), PNH1 (E–H), and OSH1 (I–L). Wild type (A, C, E, G, I, and K) and mutant embryos (B, D, F, H, J, and L) were collected at 3 DAP (A, B, E, F, I, and J) or 5 DAP (C, D, G, H, K, and L). Bars = 50 μm (A, B, E, F, I, and J) and 100 μm (C, D, G, H, K, and L). ce, central region; cp, coleoptile; do, dorsal region; ep, epiblast; oc, outermost cell layer; rp, root primordia; sa, shoot apex; SAM, shoot apical meristem; vc, ventral cylinder; ve, ventral region (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Fig. 5.

Open in a new tab

Expression of OSH1, a marker for the apical region, was restricted to a small area just below the ventral part of the globular embryo where the shoot apex arises later (Fig. 5I). In 5 DAP WT embryos, expression was observed in the shoot apex, epiblast, radicle primordia, and their intervening tissue (Fig. 5K). However, OSH1 signals were not found in the mutants at either developmental stage (Fig. 5J, L). All of these results demonstrate that the mutant embryos failed to differentiate. Therefore, formation of the L1 layer was incomplete and embryonic organs such as the shoot apex and radicle did not develop.

During early embryogenesis, a rice embryo first establishes three axes: apical–basal, radial, and dorsal–ventral. Radial symmetry then disappears when organ differentiation begins in specific regions of the globular embryo (Ito et al., 2004). This indicates that the radial axis is formed before that stage. In our osmpk6 embryos, ROC1 was weakly expressed at the globular stage (Fig. 5B). To examine whether protoderm differentiation had occurred in the mutant, we compared its L1 layer cells with those of the WT. In the latter embryos, the surface cells were morphologically distinguishable from the inner cells. Rectangular palisade cells were well-ordered along the outermost layer and were more intensively stained when compared with the inner cells (Fig. 6A). Palisade cells in mutant embryos were developed at the L1 layer, but were shorter than those in the WT (Fig. 6B, C). Staining intensity was similar between the L1 and inner cells, thereby suggesting that L1 cells were partially differentiated in osmpk6 mutant embryos. Taken together, our results indicate that OsMPK6 functions in cell differentiation during early embryo development, when the L1 radial axis is formed (Fig. 7). The gene functions prior to the development of embryonic organs such as the shoot apex and various primordia. Therefore, mutations in that gene cause down-regulation of the early-expressed ROC1 as well as the late-expressed OsSCR, OsPNH1, and OsH1.

Fig. 6.

Enlarged view of L1 layer and embryo from 10 DAP seeds.

(A) WT, magnification of solid box in Fig. 3D. (B) osmkp6-1, magnification of solid box in Fig. 3I. (C) osmkp6-2, magnification of solid box in Fig. 3N. Bars = 20 μm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Fig. 6.

Open in a new tab

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Open in a new tab

Schematic diagram of rice embryogenesis based on embryo mutants and marker genes. Genes involved in this process are presented. Arrows indicate times when mutants exhibit phenotypes. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Activities of auxin and gibberellin biosynthesis genes are reduced in osmpk6 mutants

Expression levels were examined for hormone biosynthesis genes that control embryo development. They included YUCCA genes, which are involved in auxin biosynthesis (Yamamoto et al., 2007), and GA20 oxidases and GA3 oxidases that produce bioactive gibberellins (GAs) (Pearce et al., 2015). Transcript levels of all five OsYUCCA genes (OsYUCCA1–OSYUCCA5) were significantly reduced in the mutant embryos (Supplementary Fig. S4A–E). Similarly, expression levels of OsGA20 oxidase genes (OsGA20 OX-1 and OsGA20 OX-2) and OsGA3 oxidase genes (OsGA3 OX-1 and OsGA3 OX-2) were reduced in the mutant embryos (Supplementary Fig. S4F-I). This result supports our conclusion that mutations in OsMPK6 affect early embryo development.

Phytoalexin biosynthesis is defective in osmpk6 mutants

OsMPK6 controls the biosynthesis of phytoalexins such as momilactones and phytocassanes (Kishi-Kaboshi et al., 2010). Therefore, we monitored expression levels of momilactone biosynthesis genes ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase 4 (OsCPS4), Cyclase 1 (OsCPS4), kaurene synthase-like gene 4 (OsKSL4), CYP99A2, CYP99A3, and momilactone A synthase (OsMAS). OsCPS4 and OsKSL4 are involved in the cyclization of geranylgeranyl diphosphate, a precursor of diterpenoid phytoalexins (Otomo et al., 2004; Wilderman et al., 2004). CYP99A2 and CYP99A3, which encode cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, participate in the downstream oxidation steps of diterpene hydrocarbons (Wang et al., 2011). OsMAS encodes a dehydrogenase that is also involved in momilactone biosynthesis (Shimura et al., 2007). We found that expression levels of the momilactone biosynthesis genes were significantly decreased in the mutant embryos (Fig. 8A–E). In addition, we analysed transcript levels of OsCPS2, which is involved in the biosynthesis of phytocassanes. Its expression was also diminished in the osmpk6-1 mutant embryos (Fig. 8F). These findings indicate that OsMPK6 is involved in the biosynthesis of phytoalexins in developing embryos.

Fig. 8.

Expression profiling for phytoalexin biosynthesis genes in embryos of WT and osmpk6-1.

Quantitative RT-PCR analyses for OsCPS4 (A), OsKSL4 (B), CYP99A2 (C), CYP99A3 (D), OsMAS (E), and OsCPS2 (F). Y-axis is the gene expression relative to OsUbi1 transcript level. Results are averages of three independent experiments, using 10 embryos per sample. Error bars show standard deviations. Statistical significance is indicated by **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Fig. 8.

Open in a new tab

To verify further the biosynthetic regulation of phytoalexins by OsMPK6, we measured phytoalexin levels in embryos from mature seeds of the WT and mutant in response to elicitors. Treatment with flg22 and chitin induced accumulation of the major diterpenoid phytoalexin momilactone A in WT embryos, but elicitor-induced accumulation of the phytoalexin was significantly reduced in osmpk6-1 embryos, and comparable to those of mock-treated controls (Fig. 9). This result is consistent with the decreased expression of phytoalexin biosynthesis genes found in the mutant embryos (Fig. 8).

Fig. 9.

Accumulations of phytoalexin momilactone A in embryos of WT and osmpk6-1 treated with elicitors, flg22 and chitin or water as mock control.

Contents were measured by HPLC-electrospray ionization-MS/MS analysis. Results are averages of duplicated experiments. Error bars show standard deviations. Statistical significance is indicated by **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Fig. 9.

Open in a new tab

Discussion

The mutations of OsMPK6 affect differentiation of L1 layer cells during early embryogenesis

We observed that osmpk6 embryos did not differentiate at the globular stage and their development was arrested. However, mature mutant embryos were larger than globular WT embryos, demonstrating that cell division continued in those mutants. This osmpk6 phenotype is distinctive from other early-embryo mutants studied in rice. In shl mutants, the radicle and scutellum develop normally, although the SAM is lacking (Satoh et al., 2003). In organless mutants, epithelial cells are formed in the outermost cell layer and a cell-dense region is observed (Hong et al., 1995). By comparison, no embryonic organs formed and the epithelial cells were not differentiated in the osmpk6 mutants, such that these phenotypes were apparent at an earlier stage than in those other two mutants (Fig. 7).

Similar to our mutant embryos, the globular embryo 4 (gle4) mutant has globular embryos at the mature stage (Hong et al., 1995). In those embryos, ROC1 is expressed in the outermost cell layer. The palisade-like protoderm cell layer is functionally differentiated to epithelium in the gle4 mutant, whereas those cells are not fully developed in osmpk6 mutants. Transcripts of RAmy1A are also detected in gle4 embryos but were not found in our mutants. Although both OsSCR and PNH1 are expressed in gle4, this happens, abnormally, in the central region rather than in the ground and vascular tissues (Kamiya et al., 2003). Transcripts of those genes were significantly reduced in our osmpk6 mutants. All of these findings are evidence that the defects associated with mutations in OsMPK6 start to occur before L1 differentiation during early embryo development and that OsMPK6 functions before other genes that have been reported for embryogenesis in rice (Fig. 7).

MAP kinase cascade signalling in early embryo development is conserved between Arabidopsis and rice

Arabidopsis MPK6 is involved in embryo development. Bush and Krysan (2007) reported that approximately 7% of mpk6 seeds display burst phenotype. López-Bucio et al (2014) showed that the defects in embryo development caused by mpk6 are connected to post-embryonic root architecture. The mpk6 mutant seeds can be divided into three classes of phenotypes: bigger seeds, raisin seeds, and burst seeds. Seedlings that develop from the ‘bigger’ seeds are characterized by longer primary roots due to enhanced cell production and cell elongation in the embryos. In the other classes, mutant seedlings fail to develop primary roots, possibly as a result of an earlier defect in the division of hypophysis cells during embryo development (López-Bucio et al., 2014). Moreover, the double mutant mpk3/mpk6 is embryo-lethal; its zygotes do not elongate and fail to develop suspensor cells. YODA (YDA), encoding MEKK, acts upstream of MPK3/MPK6, and the basal cell lineage of yda mutants does not differentiate the suspensor (Lukowitz et al., 2004). Mutations of SHORT SUSPENSOR (SSP), which acts upstream of YDA, also display a similar defect during early embryogenesis (Bayer et al., 2009). These observations indicate that SSP functions in the YDA MAP kinase pathway to determine suspensor identity, and that the SSP–YDA–MPK3/6 cascade is involved in specification of the apical–basal axis during embryogenesis (Peris et al., 2010). The suspensor is the first tissue to differentiate during Arabidopsis embryogenesis (Kawashima and Goldberg, 2010). OsMPK6 functions similarly in rice because osmpk6 mutants fail to differentiate any embryonic organs. When one considers axis formation and early cell differentiation, the functional roles of MPK6 in early embryogenesis are conserved between Arabidopsis and rice.

OsMPK6 is highly homologous to OsMPK3. Both are phosphorylated by OsMKK4 and interact with bHLH Rac Immunity1 protein, which functions in the pathway for innate immunity (Kim et al., 2012). Because the Arabidopsis orthologs MPK6 and MPK3 are functionally redundant (Hamel et al., 2006), OsMPK3 may also be redundant to OsMPK6. We observed embryo-lethal phenotypes from single osmpk6 mutants that were probably due to gene transcript levels in the developing seeds. We also showed that OsMPK6 is highly expressed in developing embryos. However, OsMPK3 is only weakly expressed in developing embryos but strongly expressed in the endosperm (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus; GSE11966 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE11966, Xue et al., 2009). Therefore, the lack of abnormal phenotypes in ospmk6 endosperms likely results from the strong expression of OsMPK3 balancing the deficiency of OsMPK6.

OsMPK6 is required for activities of auxin and GA biosynthesis genes

Expression levels of auxin biosynthesis genes were significantly decreased in the defective embryos of osmpk6. In Arabidopsis, YUC1 and YUC4 are specifically expressed in apical protodermal cells from the globular stage (Robert et al., 2013). PIN-FORMED (PIN) auxin transporters participate in apical–basal axis formation by regulating auxin gradients (Friml et al., 2003; Jenik and Barton, 2005). The embryos from Arabidopsis pin7 mutants lack polarity in their cell files and have no recognizable proembryos (Friml et al., 2003). In a rice tdd1 mutant that shows an organless embryo phenotype, the amount of auxin is significantly reduced (Sazuka et al., 2009). Embryogenesis is controlled by auxin distribution in Triticum aestivum and maize (Fischer-Iglesias et al., 2001; Forestan et al., 2010). These previous reports together with our observations indicate that proper auxin levels are needed for normal embryonic organ formation and that OsMPK6 may be involved in auxin biosynthesis during embryogenesis.

GA biosynthesis genes were also affected in osmpk6 mutants. During the globular and heart stages in Arabidopsis, this hormone is quickly accumulated in the seeds (Locascio et al., 2014). In Brassica napus, GA is required for cell elongation in the axis of microspore-derived embryos (Hays et al., 2002). Findings from all of these studies suggest that GA promotes cell growth and expansion during embryo differentiation.

Phytoalexin biosynthesis, directed by OsMKK4-OsMPK6, is a putative signal for cell differentiation

The MPK3/MPK6 cascade is essential for the biosynthesis of phytoalexins. These antimicrobial compounds accumulate rapidly at sites of infection to inhibit the growth of fungi and bacteria (Tsuji et al., 1992). They also play an important role in somatic embryogenesis (Kouakou et al., 2008). Trans-resveratrol, a phytoalexin, is absent in suspension cells of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivar R405-2000, which is unable to produce somatic embryos. By contrast, trans-resveratrol accumulates in cell suspensions of the embryogenic Coker 312 when embryogenic structures are induced (Kouakou et al., 2008). Furthermore, medicarpin (3-hydroxy-9-methoxypterocarpan), one of the major phytoalexins produced by dietary legumes, stimulates osteoblast differentiation in vitro (Bhargavan et al., 2012). Therefore, phytoalexins appear to function as a signal for cell differentiation. Both momilactones and phytocassanes accumulate in WT cells after elicitor treatment, but their levels are significantly reduced in osmpk6 mutant cells (Kishi-Kaboshi et al., 2010). We also found that the level of momilactone A was reduced in osmpk6 mutant embryos (Fig. 9). This suggests that the lack of phytoalexins negatively affects embryo development and that the embryo-lethal phenotype of osmpk6 is possibly due to an insufficient amount of phytoalexins in those mutant embryos. Further studies are needed to clarify the role(s) of these compounds during embryogenesis.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Fig. S1. Characterization of OsMPK6 activation tagging line.

Fig. S2. Alignments of MPK family proteins.

Fig. S3. Analysis of endosperm development in WT and osmpk6.

Fig. S4. Expression profiling of biosynthesis genes for auxin and gibberellin in embryos of WT and osmpk6-1.

Table S1. Primer sequences used in this study.

Supplementary Data
supp_67_8_2425__index.html (951B, html)

Acknowledgements

We thank Kyungsook An and Sunghae Hong for generating the T-DNA insertional lines and handling the transgenic lines, and Priscilla Licht for her critical proofreading of the manuscript. We also thank Dr Morifumi Hasegawa (Ibaraki University, Japan) for providing the momilactone A standard. This work was supported, in part, by grants from the Basic Research Promotion Fund, Republic of Korea (KRF-2007-0093862); the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Plant Molecular Breeding Center, No. PJ01108001); the Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea; and Kyung Hee University (20130214).

References

  1. Agrawal GK, Iwahashi H, Rakwal R. 2003. Rice MAPKs. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 302, 171–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. An S, Park S, Jeong DH, et al. 2003. Generation and analysis of end sequence database for T-DNA tagging lines in rice. Plant Physiology 133, 2040–2047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayer M, Nawy T, Giglione C, Galli M, Meinnel T, Lukowitz W. 2009. Paternal control of embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 323, 1485–1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhargavan B, Singh D, Gautam AK, et al. 2012. Medicarpin, a legume phytoalexin, stimulates osteoblast differentiation and promotes peak bone mass achievement in rats: evidence for estrogen receptor beta-mediated osteogenic action of medicarpin. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 23, 27–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bush SM, Krysan PJ. 2007. Mutational evidence that the Arabidopsis MAP kinase MPK6 is involved in anther, inflorescence, and embryo development. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 2181–2191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cartwright DW, Langcake P, Pryce RJ, Leworthy DP, Ride JP. 1981. Isolation and characterization of two phytoalexins from rice as momilactones A and B. Phytochemistry 20, 535–537. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen DH, Ronald PC. 1999. A rapid DNA minipreparation method suitable for AFLP and other PCR applications. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 17, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  8. Di Laurenzio L, Wysocka-Diller J, Malamy JE, Pysh L, Helariutta Y, Freshour G, Hahn MG, Feldmann KA, Benfey PN. 1996. The SCARECROW gene regulates an asymmetric cell division that is essential for generating the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root. Cell 86, 423–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fischer-Iglesias C, Sundberg B, Neuhaus G, Jones AM. 2001. Auxin distribution and transport during embryonic pattern formation in wheat. The Plant Journal 26, 115–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Forestan C, Meda S, Varotto S. 2010. ZmPIN1-mediated auxin transport is related to cellular differentiation during maize embryogenesis and endosperm development. Plant Physiology 152, 1373–1390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Friml J, Vieten A, Sauer M, Weijers D, Schwarz H, Hamann T, Offringa R, Jurgens G. 2003. Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis . Nature 426, 147–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamel LP, Nicole MC, Sritubtim S, et al. 2006. Ancient signals: comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families. Trends in Plant Science 11, 192–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Han L, Li GJ, Yang KY, Mao GH, Wang RQ, Liu YD, Zhang SQ. 2010. Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 and 6 regulate Botrytis cinerea-induced ethylene production in Arabidopsis . The Plant Journal 64, 114–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hays DB, Yeung EC, Pharis RP. 2002. The role of gibberellins in embryo axis development. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1747–1751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hong S-K, Aoki T, Kitano H, Satoh H, Nagato Y. 1995. Phenotypic diversity of 188 rice embryo mutants. Developmental Genetics 16, 298–310. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ichimura K, Shinozaki K, Tena G, et al. 2002. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants: a new nomenclature. Trends in Plant Science 7, 301–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ito M, Sentoku N, Nishimura A, Hong SK, Sato Y, Matsuoka M. 2002. Position dependent expression of GL2-type homeobox gene, Roc1: significance for protoderm differentiation and radial pattern formation in early rice embryogenesis. The Plant Journal 29, 497–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ito M, Sentoku N, Nishimura A, Hong SK, Sato Y, Matsuoka M. 2003. Roles of rice GL2-type homeobox genes in epidermis differentiation. Breeding Science 53, 245–253. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ito Y, Chujo A, Eiguchi M, Kurata N. 2004. Radial axis differentiation in a globular embryo is marked by HAZ1, a PHD-finger homeobox gene of rice. Gene 331, 9–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Itoh J, Hibara K, Sato Y, Nagato Y. 2008. Developmental role and auxin responsiveness of Class III homeodomain leucine zipper gene family members in rice. Plant Physiology 147, 1960–1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Itoh JI, Kitano H, Matsuoka M, Nagato Y. 2000. Shoot organization genes regulate shoot apical meristem organization and the pattern of leaf primordium initiation in rice. The Plant Cell 12, 2161–2174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jenik PD, Barton MK. 2005. Surge and destroy: the role of auxin in plant embryogenesis. Development 132, 3577–3585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jenik PD, Gillmor CS, Lukowitz W. 2007. Embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana . Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 23, 207–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jeon JS, Lee S, Jung KH, et al. 2000. T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for functional genomics in rice. The Plant Journal 22, 561–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jeong DH, An S, Kang HG, Moon S, Han JJ, Park S, Lee HS, An K, An G. 2002. T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for activation tagging in rice. Plant Physiology 130, 1636–1644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Joo S, Liu Y, Lueth A, Zhang S. 2008. MAPK phosphorylation-induced stabilization of ACS6 protein is mediated by the non-catalytic C-terminal domain, which also contains the cis-determinant for rapid degradation by the 26S proteasome pathway. The Plant Journal 54, 129–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kamiya N, Nishimura A, Sentoku N, Takabe E, Nagato Y, Kitano H, Matsuoka M. 2003. Rice globular embryo 4 (gle4) mutant is defective in radial pattern formation during embryogenesis. Plant Cell Physiology 44, 875–883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kawashima T, Goldberg RB. 2010. The suspensor: not just suspending the embryo. Trends in Plant Science 15, 23–30. [DOI] [PubMed]
  29. Kim CY, Zhang S. 2004. Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade induces WRKY family of transcription factors and defense genes in tobacco. The Plant Journal 38, 142–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim SH, Oikawa T, Kyozuka J, Wong HL, Umemura K, Kishi-Kaboshi M, Takahashi A, Kawano Y, Kawasaki T, Shimamoto K. 2012. The bHLH Rac Immunity1 (RAI1) is activated by OsRac1 via OsMAPK3 and OsMAPK6 in rice immunity. Plant Cell Physiology 53, 740–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kishi-Kaboshi M, Takahashi A, Hirochika H. 2010. MAMP-responsive MAPK cascades regulate phytoalexin biosynthesis. Plant Signal Behavior 5, 1653–1656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kouakou TH, Koné M, Koné D, Kouadio YJ, Amani NG, Waffo TP, Decendit A, Mérillon J-M. 2008. Trans-resveratrol as phenolic indicator of somatic embryogenesis induction in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cell suspensions. African Journal of Biochemistry Research 2, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kurusu T, Yagala T, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Kuchitsu K. 2005. Identification of a putative voltage-gated Ca2+ channel as a key regulator of elicitor-induced hypersensitive cell death and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in rice. The Plant Journal 42, 798–809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee D-W, Lee S-K, Phee B-K, Jeon J-S. 2015. Proteomic analysis of the rice endosperm starch-deficient mutants osagps2 and osagpl2 . Journal of Plant Biology 58, 252–258. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee DY, Lee J, Moon S, Park SY, An G. 2007. The rice heterochronic gene SUPERNUMERARY BRACT regulates the transition from spikelet meristem to floral meristem. The Plant Journal 49, 64–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee H. 2014. Molecular signaling networks in the shoot apical meristem. Journal of Plant Biology 57, 321–326. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee MO, Cho K, Kim SH, et al. 2008. Novel rice OsSIPK is a multiple stress responsive MAPK family member showing rhythmic expression at mRNA level. Planta 227, 981–990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee YS, An G. 2015. OsGI controls flowering time by modulating rhythmic flowering time regulators preferentially under short day in rice. Journal of Plant Biology 58, 137–145. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lieberherr D, Thao NP, Nakashima A, Umemura K, Kawasaki T, Shimamoto K. 2005. A sphingolipid elicitor-inducible mitogen-activated protein kinase is regulated by the small GTPase OsRac1 and heterotrimeric G-protein in rice 1. Plant Physiology 138, 1644–1652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu Y, Ren D, Pike S, Pallardy S, Gassmann W, Zhang S. 2007. Chloroplast-generated reactive oxygen species are involved in hypersensitive response-like cell death mediated by a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. The Plant Journal 51, 941–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu Y, Zhang S. 2004. Phosphorylation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase by MPK6, a stress-responsive mitogen-activated protein kinase, induces ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . The Plant Cell 16, 3386–3399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Locascio A, Roig-Villanova I, Bernardi J, Varotto S. 2014. Current perspectives on the hormonal control of seed development in Arabidopsis and maize: a focus on auxin. Frontiers in Plant Science 5, 412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Long JA, Moan EI, Medford JI, Barton MK. 1996. A member of the KNOTTED class of homeodomain proteins encoded by the STM gene of Arabidopsis . Nature 379, 66–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. López-Bucio JS, Dubrovsky JG, Raya-Gonzalez J, Ugartechea-Chirino Y, Lopez-Bucio J, de Luna-Valdez LA, Ramos-Vega M, Leon P, Guevara-Garcia AA. 2014. Arabidopsis thaliana mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 is involved in seed formation and modulation of primary and lateral root development. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 169–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lukowitz W, Roeder A, Parmenter D, Somerville C. 2004. A MAPKK kinase gene regulates extra-embryonic cell fate in Arabidopsis . Cell 116, 109–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lynn K, Fernandez A, Aida M, Sedbrook J, Tasaka M, Masson P, Barton MK. 1999. The PINHEAD/ZWILLE gene acts pleiotropically in Arabidopsis development and has overlapping functions with the ARGONAUTE1 gene. Development 126, 469–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mao G, Meng X, Liu Y, Zheng Z, Chen Z, Zhang S. 2011. Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by two pathogen-responsive MAPKs drives phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 23, 1639–1653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mayer U, Ruiz RAT, Berleth T, Miseéra S, Juürgens G. 1991. Mutations affecting body organization in the Arabidopsis embryo. Nature 353, 402–407. [Google Scholar]
  49. McConnell JR, Barton MK. 1995. Effect of mutations in the PINHEAD gene of Arabidopsis on the formation of shoot apical meristems. Developmental Genetics 16, 358–366. [Google Scholar]
  50. Meng X, Wang H, He Y, Liu Y, Walker JC, Torii KU, Zhang S. 2012. A MAPK cascade downstream of ERECTA receptor-like protein kinase regulates Arabidopsis inflorescence architecture by promoting localized cell proliferation. The Plant Cell 24, 4948–4960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nagasaki H, Itoh J, Hayashi K, et al. 2007. The small interfering RNA production pathway is required for shoot meristem initiation in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 14867–14871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nishimura A, Ito M, Kamiya N, Sato Y, Matsuoka M. 2002. OsPNH1 regulates leaf development and maintenance of the shoot apical meristem in rice. The Plant Journal 30, 189–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ohdan T, Francisco PB, Jr, Sawada T, Hirose T, Terao T, Satoh H, Nakamura Y. 2005. Expression profiling of genes involved in starch synthesis in sink and source organs of rice. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 3229–3244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Otomo K, Kanno Y, Motegi A, et al. 2004. Diterpene cyclases responsible for the biosynthesis of phytoalexins, momilactones A, B, and oryzalexins A-F in rice. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 68, 2001–2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pearce S, Huttly AK, Prosser IM, et al. 2015. Heterologous expression and transcript analysis of gibberellin biosynthetic genes of grasses reveals novel functionality in the GA3ox family. BMC Plant Biology 15, 130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Peris CI, Rademacher EH, Weijers D. 2010. Green beginnings - pattern formation in the early plant embryo. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 91, 1–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Peters RJ. 2006. Uncovering the complex metabolic network underlying diterpenoid phytoalexin biosynthesis in rice and other cereal crop plants. Phytochemistry 67, 2307–2317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ren D, Yang H, Zhang S. 2002. Cell death mediated by MAPK is associated with hydrogen peroxide production in Arabidopsis . Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 559–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ren D, Liu Y, Yang KY, Han L, Mao G, Glazebrook J, Zhang S. 2008. A fungal-responsive MAPK cascade regulates phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 5638–5643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Robert HS, Grones P, Stepanova AN, Robles LM, Lokerse AS, Alonso JM, Weijers D, Friml J. 2013. Local auxin sources orient the apical-basal axis in Arabidopsis embryos. Current Biology 23, 2506–2512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sato Y. 2008. Genetic control of embryogenesis in rice . Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sato Y, Hong SK, Tagiri A, Kitano H, Yamamoto N, Nagato Y, Matsuoka M. 1996. A rice homeobox gene, OSH1, is expressed before organ differentiation in a specific region during early embryogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93, 8117–8122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Satoh N, Hong SK, Nishimura A, Matsuoka M, Kitano H, Nagato Y. 1999. Initiation of shoot apical meristem in rice: characterization of four SHOOTLESS genes. Development 126, 3629–3636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Satoh N, Itoh J, Nagato Y. 2003. The SHOOTLESS2 and SHOOTLESS1 genes are involved in both initiation and maintenance of the shoot apical meristem through regulating the number of indeterminate cells. Genetics 164, 335–346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sazuka T, Kamiya N, Nishimura T, et al. 2009. A rice tryptophan deficient dwarf mutant, tdd1, contains a reduced level of indole acetic acid and develops abnormal flowers and organless embryos. The Plant Journal 60, 227–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Shimizu T, Jikumaru Y, Okada A, et al. 2008. Effects of bile acid elicitor, cholic acid, on the biosynthesis of diterpenoid phytoalexins in suspension-cultures rice cells. Phytochemistry 69, 973–981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Shimura K, Okada A, Okada K, et al. 2007. Identification of a biosynthetic gene cluster in rice for momilactones. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282, 34013–34018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Smith LG, Jackson D, Hake S. 1995. Expression of knotted1 marks shoot meristem formation during maize embryogenesis. Developmental Genetics 16, 344–348. [Google Scholar]
  69. Singh R, Lee MO, Lee JE, et al. 2012. Rice mitogen-activated protein kinase interactome analysis using the yeast two-hybrid system. Plant Physiology 160, 477–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Steeves TA, Sussex IM. 1989. Patterns in plant development . Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  71. Sugimoto N, Takeda G, Nagato Y, Yamaguchi J. 1997. Temporal and spatial expression pattern of rice alpha-amylase gene Ramy1A during seed development. Rice Genetics Newsletter 14, 148–150. [Google Scholar]
  72. ten Hove CA, Lu KJ, Weijers D. 2015. Building a plant: cell fate specification in the early Arabidopsis embryo. Development 142, 420–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Tsuji J, Jackson EP, Gage DA, Hammerschmidt R, Somerville SC. 1992. Phytoalexin accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana during the hypersensitive reaction to Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae . Plant Physiology 98, 1304–1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Wang H, Ngwenyama N, Liu Y, Walker JC, Zhang S. 2007. Stomatal development and patterning are regulated by environmentally responsive mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis . The Plant Cell 19, 63–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wang Q, Hillwig ML, Peters RJ. 2011. CYP99A3: functional identification of a diterpene oxidase from the momilactone biosynthetic gene cluster in rice. The Plant Journal 65, 87–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wilderman PR, Xu M, Jin Y, Coates RM, Peters RJ. 2004. Identification of syn-pimara-7,15-diene synthase reveals functional clustering of terpene synthases involved in rice phytoalexin/allelochemical biosynthesis. Plant Physiology 135, 2098–2105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Xue LJ, Zhang JJ, Xue HW. 2009. Characterization and expression profiles of miRNAs in rice seeds. Nucleic Acids Research 37, 916–930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Yamakawa H, Hirose T, Kuroda M, Yamaguchi T. 2007. Comprehensive expression profiling of rice grain filling-related genes under high temperature using DNA microarray. Plant Physiology 144, 258–277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Yamamoto Y, Kamiya N, Morinaka Y, Matsuoka M, Sazuka T. 2007. Auxin biosynthesis by the YUCCA genes in rice. Plant Physiology 143, 1362–1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Yi J, Kim SR, Lee DY, Moon S, Lee YS, Jung KH, Hwang I, An G. 2012. The rice gene DEFECTIVE TAPETUM AND MEIOCYTES 1 (DTM1) is required for early tapetum development and meiosis. The Plant Journal 70, 256–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data
supp_67_8_2425__index.html (951B, html)
supp_erw052_supplementary_figures_S1_S4_table_S1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES