Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1983 Jul;50(1):92–96. doi: 10.1136/hrt.50.1.92

Determinants of recurrent atrial flutter after cardioversion.

R G Pozen, J Pastoriza, J J Rozanski, K M Kessler, R J Myerburg
PMCID: PMC481376  PMID: 6860517

Abstract

Eighteen male patients (mean age 59 years) who were electrically cardioverted for pure atrial flutter were retrospectively studied to determine those factors influencing the maintenance of regular sinus rhythm or reversion to atrial flutter. Six months after successful cardioversion, 10 patients (55%) had recurrent atrial flutter and eight patients (45%) were still in sinus rhythm. The two groups were not significantly different with respect to age, symptomatology, abnormalities on the 12 lead electrocardiogram (during sinus rhythm), or the administration of digoxin and a class Ia antiarrhythmic agent (after cardioversion). There was a trend for those patients with recurrent atrial flutter to have a higher incidence of underlying heart disease and previous episodes of atrial flutter than the non-recurrent group. There were statistically significant differences between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups with respect to echocardiographically determined left atrial size and left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with a left atrial size greater than 45 mm or with an ejection fraction less than 45% were all at high risk for recurrent atrial flutter after successful cardioversion.

Full text

PDF
96

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Byrne-Quinn E., Wing A. J. Maintenance of sinus rhythm after DC reversion of atrial fibrilllation. A double-blind controlled trial of long-acting quinidine bisulphate. Br Heart J. 1970 May;32(3):370–376. doi: 10.1136/hrt.32.3.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ewy G. A., Ulfers L., Hager W. D., Rosenfeld A. R., Roeske W. R., Goldman S. Response of atrial fibrillation to therapy: role of etiology and left atrial diameter. J Electrocardiol. 1980 Apr;13(2):119–123. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(80)80042-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Henry W. L., Morganroth J., Pearlman A. S., Clark C. E., Redwood D. R., Itscoitz S. B., Epstein S. E. Relation between echocardiographically determined left atrial size and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1976 Feb;53(2):273–279. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.53.2.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hillestad L., Bjerkelund C., Dale J., Maltau J., Storstein O. Quinidine in maintenance of sinus rhythm after electroconversion of chronic atrial fibrillation. A controlled clinical study. Br Heart J. 1971 Jul;33(4):518–521. doi: 10.1136/hrt.33.4.518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jensen J. B., Humphries J. O., Kouwenhoven W. B., Jude J. R. Electroshock for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Follow-up studies on 50 patients. JAMA. 1965 Dec 13;194(11):1181–1184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MORRIS J. J., Jr, KONG Y., NORTH W. C., MCINTOSH H. D. EXPERIENCE WITH "CARDIOVERSION" OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND FLUTTER. Am J Cardiol. 1964 Jul;14:94–100. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(64)90112-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McCarthy C., Varghese P. J., Barritt D. W. Prognosis of atrial arrhythmias treated by electrical counter shock therapy. A three-year follow-up. Br Heart J. 1969 Jul;31(4):496–500. doi: 10.1136/hrt.31.4.496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ORAM S., DAVIES J. P. FURTHER EXPERIENCE OF ELECTRICAL CONVERSION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION TO SINUS RHYTHM: ANALYSIS OF 100 PATIENTS. Lancet. 1964 Jun 13;1(7346):1294–1298. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(64)91692-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Razavi M., Duarte E. P., Tahmooressi P. Cardioversion: ten-year Cleveland Clinic experience. Cleve Clin Q. 1976 Fall;43(3):175–180. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.43.3.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Resnekov L., McDonald L. Appraisal of electroconversion in treatment of cardiac dysrhythmias. Br Heart J. 1968 Nov;30(6):786–811. doi: 10.1136/hrt.30.6.786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sahn D. J., DeMaria A., Kisslo J., Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978 Dec;58(6):1072–1083. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.6.1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Teichholz L. E., Kreulen T., Herman M. V., Gorlin R. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1976 Jan;37(1):7–11. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90491-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Waris E., Kreus K. E., Salokannel J. Factors influencing persistence of sinus rhythm after DC shock treatment of atrial fibrillation. Acta Med Scand. 1971 Mar;189(3):161–166. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1971.tb04358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES