Skip to main content
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN logoLink to Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN
. 2015 Aug 10;27(4):1213–1224. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015020114

Spectrum and Prognosis of Noninfectious Renal Mixed Cryoglobulinemic GN

Mohamad Zaidan *,†,, Benjamin Terrier ‡,§, Agnieszka Pozdzik , Thierry Frouget , Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq **, Christian Combe ††, Sébastien Lepreux ‡‡, Aurélie Hummel *, Laure-Hélène Noël §§, Isabelle Marie ‖‖, Bruno Legallicier ¶¶, Arnaud François ***, Antoine Huart †††, David Launay ‡‡‡,§§§,‖‖‖,¶¶¶, Gilles Kaplanski ****, Frank Bridoux ††††, Philippe Vanhille ‡‡‡‡, Raifah Makdassi §§§§, Jean-François Augusto ‖‖‖‖, Philippe Rouvier ¶¶¶¶, Alexandre Karras *****, Chantal Jouanneau †††††, Marie-Christine Verpont †††††, Patrice Callard ‡‡‡‡‡, Fabrice Carrat §§§§§,‖‖‖‖‖,¶¶¶¶¶, Olivier Hermine ******, Jean-Marc Léger ††††††, Xavier Mariette ‡‡‡‡‡‡, Patricia Senet §§§§§§, David Saadoun ‖‖‖‖‖‖,¶¶¶¶¶¶,*******, Pierre Ronco †††††,††,‡‡‡‡‡‡‡, Isabelle Brochériou ‡‡‡‡‡, Patrice Cacoub ‖‖‖‖‖‖,¶¶¶¶¶¶,*******, Emmanuelle Plaisier †††††,††,‡‡‡‡‡‡‡,; the CryoVas study group
PMCID: PMC4814186  PMID: 26260165

Abstract

Noninfectious mixed cryoglobulinemic GN (MCGN) has been poorly investigated. We analyzed presentation and outcome of 80 patients with biopsy-proven MCGN, which were identified in the retrospective French CryoVas survey. MCGN was related to primary Sjögren's syndrome in 22.5% of patients and to lymphoproliferative disorders in 28.7% of patients, and was defined as essential in 48.8% of patients. At presentation, hematuria, proteinuria ≥1 g/d, hypertension, and renal failure were observed in 97.4%, 84.8%, 85.3%, and 82.3% of cases, respectively. Mean±eGFR was 39.5±20.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Membranoproliferative GN was the predominant histologic pattern, observed in 89.6% of cases. Renal interstitium inflammatory infiltrates were observed in 50% of cases. First-line treatment consisted of steroids alone (27.6%) or in association with rituximab (21.1%), alkylating agents (36.8%) or a combination of cyclophosphamide and rituximab (10.5%). After a mean follow-up of 49.9±45.5 months, 42.7% of patients relapsed with a renal flare in 75% of cases. At last follow-up, mean eGFR was 50.2±26.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with 9% of patients having reached ESRD; 59% and 50% of patients achieved complete clinical and renal remission, respectively. A rituximab+steroids regimen prevented relapses more effectively than steroids alone or a cyclophosphamide+steroids combination did, but was associated with a higher rate of early death when used as first-line therapy. Severe infections and new-onset B-cell lymphoma occurred in 29.1% and 8.9% of cases, respectively; 24% of patients died. In conclusion, noninfectious MCGN has a poor long-term outcome with severe infections as the main cause of death.

Keywords: membranoproliferative GN; histopathology,


Cryoglobulinemia is defined as the presence in the serum of single or mixed Ig that precipitate in the cold and redissolve on rewarming. Cryoglobulins are grouped into three types according to Brouet classification based on their immunochemical composition.1 Type I cryoglobulins are composed of a single monoclonal Ig and are usually associated with malignant lymphoproliferative disorders. Type II and type III cryoglobulins, also referred to as mixed cryoglobulinemia, are immune complexes. Type II cryoglobulins contain a monoclonal component, mostly of IgM isotype and polyclonal Ig, while type III cryoglobulins are polyclonal Ig. Both have a rheumatoid factor activity. In the early 1990s, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been recognized as the main cause of mixed cryoglobulinemia, accounting for 60%–90% of the cases.25 During the last two decades, many series have investigated patients with HCV-related mixed cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (MCV).59 Renal involvement has been identified as a major risk factor of mortality and morbidity in these patients.59 In contrast, noninfectious MCV remains poorly studied and only small series have documented the spectrum of renal involvement in the course of this disorder. Recently, the CryoVas survey, a French nationwide retrospective study that included 242 patients with noninfectious MCV, showed that pulmonary and gastrointestinal involvement, eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and age >65 years were independently associated with death.10,11 In the present study, we specifically analyzed the clinical, biologic and histopathologic characteristics, and outcome of patients with biopsy-proven mixed cryoglobulinemic GN (MCGN) enrolled in the CryoVas survey. The efficacy and safety of the different therapeutic regimens used were also analyzed. In addition, clinical and renal presentation and outcome were compared with those of 34 patients with HCV-related MCGN.

Results

Patients’ Baseline Characteristics

Eighty patients with noninfectious biopsy-proven MCGN were identified among the 242 cases of MCV included in the CryoVas survey. Twelve additional patients with abnormal renal parameters, but no kidney biopsy, were not included in the present study. Patients’ baseline characteristics are detailed in Table 1, and were compared with patients with noninfectious MCV without renal involvement (n=150). Female-to-male ratio was 5:3. The mean age at diagnosis was 62.6±14.1 years. Mixed cryoglobulinemia was secondary to primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) alone in 18 cases (22.5%), and to hematologic malignancy in 23 cases (28.7%), including B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=17, including marginal zone lymphoma in seven patients, low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in six patients, mantle cell lymphoma in two patients, and other B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in two patients), Waldenström macroglobulinemia (n=5) and multiple myeloma (n=1). Eight of the patients with hematologic malignancy also had a history of pSS. The overall frequency of pSS was 32.5%. The remaining 39 patients (48.8%) were classified as having essential mixed cryoglobulinemia.

Table 1.

Patients’ demographic, clinical and biologic characteristics at baseline

Characteristic All patients (n=230) Kidney (+) MCV (n=80) Kidney (–) MCV (n=150) P Value Multivariate analysis OR (95% CI) P Value
Epidemiologic data
 Age at diagnosis (years), mean ±SD 62.3±14.7 62.6±14.1 62.1±15 0.83
 Women, n (%) 158 (68.7) 50 (62.5) 108 (72) 0.14
Causes
 Autoimmune disorders, n (%) 68 (29.6) 18 (22.5) 50 (33.3) 0.09
 Hematologic malignancies, n (%) 53 (23) 23 (28.7) 30 (20) 0.14
 Essential MCV, n (%) 109 (47.4) 39 (48.8) 70 (46.7) 0.76
Extrarenal manifestations
 Skin lesions, n (%) 188 (81.7) 57 (71.3) 131 (87.3) <0.013 0.26 (0.10 to 0.64) <0.01
 Purpura, n (%) 170 (73.9) 55 (68.8) 115 (76.7) 0.19
 Acrocyanosis, n (%) 58 (25.2) 14 (17.5) 44 (29.3) 0.05
 Ulcers, n (%) 37 (16.1) 6 (7.5) 31 (20.7) 0.01
 Necrosis, n (%) 30 (13) 1 (1.3) 29 (19.3) <0.01
 Peripheral neuropathy, n (%) 118 (51.3) 34 (42.5) 84 (56) 0.05 0.32 (0.15 to 0.68) <0.01
 Sensorimotor, n (%) 71 (60.2) 12 (35.3) 59 (70.2) <0.01
 Arthralgias/Arthritis, n (%) 88 (38.3) 28 (35) 60 (40) 0.46
 Gut vasculitis, n (%) 12 (5.2) 9 (11.3) 3 (2) <0.01
 Lung involvement, n (%) 6 (2.6) 4 (5) 2 (1.3) 0.12
 CNS involvement, n (%) 6 (2.6) 1 (1.3) 5 (3.3) 0.36
Biologic features
 Type II MC, n (%) 194 (89) 75 (97.4) 119 (84.4) 0.01 24.49.2 (2.87 to 209.08) 0.01
 Combined decreased of C3 and C4 levels, n (%) 41 (21.5) 29 (41.4) 12 (9.9) <0.001 8.51 (3.49 to 20.760 <0.001
 Isolated decrease of C4 level, n (%) 103 (53.9) 28 (40) 75 (62) <0.01

Twelve patients with potential renal injury were initially included in the CryoVas survey, but not in the present study because of the absence of kidney biopsy. CNS, central nervous system; MC, mixed cryoglobulinemia; OR, odds ration; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Systemic manifestations of MCV included skin lesions, peripheral neuropathy (determined on the basis of the clinical examination) and joint involvement in 71.3%, 42.5%, and 28.7% of cases, respectively. Gut involvement was observed in 11.3% of patients who presented abdominal pain related to mesenteric infarction, intestinal perforation, or intestinal bleeding. Intra-alveolar hemorrhage defining lung involvement and intracerebral hemorrhage were also present in 5% and 1.3% of cases in the setting of the vasculitis flare. Skin manifestations and peripheral neuropathy were more frequent in patients without renal involvement (87.3 versus 71.3%, P=0.01 and 56.0 versus 42.5%, P=0.05, respectively) whereas gut involvement was more frequent in patients with renal disease (11.3 versus 2.0%, P=0.01). Only 11 patients (13.8%) had an isolated renal involvement.

Compared with patients without renal involvement, patients with a noninfectious MCGN more frequently had type II mixed cryoglobulinemia (97.4% versus 84.4%, P=0.01), with a monoclonal IgM κ component in 81% of cases, a monoclonal IgG κ in 9.5%, and a monoclonal IgG λ in 3.2%. Five patients (6.3%) had a biclonal component mixing either monoclonal IgM κ and IgG λ in four patients, and IgM λ and IgG λ in one patient. Almost 19% of patients had normal C4 levels at diagnosis, 40% of patients had an isolated decrease of C4 with normal C3 level, and 41.4% had a combined decrease of C4 and C3 levels. By multivariate analysis, type II mixed cryoglobulinemia and combined decrease of C3 and C4 levels were each independently associated with renal injury. Conversely, skin and peripheral nerve involvement were significantly associated with the absence of renal disease (Table 1).

Characteristics of Renal Presentation

Sixty-one patients (76.3%) had renal involvement at the diagnosis of MCV, whereas the median delay between diagnosis and renal disease was 43 months (range 12–156), in the remaining cases. As shown in Table 2, 97.4% of patients had microscopic hematuria, 85.3% had hypertension, and 84.8% had proteinuria ≥1 g/d. Mean proteinuria level was 3.5±3 g/d and 49.4% of patients had nephrotic range proteinuria. Renal dysfunction (eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) was observed in 82.3% of patients at the time of diagnosis, with a mean eGFR being 39.5±20.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and four patients (5.1%) requiring dialysis. No difference in the renal parameters at onset was observed according to the underlying etiology.

Table 2.

Renal parameters at presentation and histopathologic characteristics

Characteristic Kidney (+) MCV Essential MCV primary Sjögren Syndrome Hematologic Malignancy P Value
Clinical and biologic parameters n=80 n=39 n=18 n=23
Hypertension, n (%) 58 (85.3) 31 (88.6) 11 (78.6) 16 (84.2) 0.66
Proteinuria, mean±SD 3.5±3 3.7±3.7 3.4±1.7 3.1±2.2 0.80
 ≥ 1 g/d, n (%) 67 (84.8) 31 (79.5) 17 (100) 19 (82.6) 0.14
 ≥ 3 g/d, n (%) 39 (49.4) 20 (51.3) 10 (58.8) 9 (39.1) 0.44
Hematuria, n (%) 76 (97.4) 38 (97.4) 15 (93.8) 23 (100) 0.48
eGFR, mean±SD 39.5±20.4 38.5±22.5 37.9±17.9 42.2±18.9 0.56
 <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, n (%) 65 (82.3) 33 (84.6) 15 (88.2) 17 (73.9) 0.44
 <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, n (%) 30 (38) 17 (43.6) 6 (35.3) 7 (30.4) 0.29
Dialysis, n (%) 4 (5.1) 2 (5.1) 0 (0) 2 (8.7) 0.46
Renal histopathologic lesions n=67 n=29 n=17 n=21
Glomerular lesions
 MPGN, n (%) 62 (92.5) 27 (93.1) 16 (94.1) 19 (90.5) 0.90
 Mesangial proliferative GN, n (%) 5 (7.5) 2 (6.9) 1 (5.9) 2 (9.5) 0.90
 Intraluminal thrombi, n (%) 32 (47.8) 11 (37.9) 13 (76.5) 8 (38.1) 0.02
 Crescentic extracapillary proliferation 9 (13.4) 6 (20.7) 1 (5.9) 2 (9.5) 0.30
 Lobular pattern 10 (14.9) 6 (20.7) 3 (17.6) 1 (4.8) 0.80
Vascular lesions
 Acute vasculitis 12 (17.9) 5 (17.2) 4 (23.5) 3 (14.3) 0.76
 Arteriolosclerosis 24 (35.8) 11 (37.9) 3 (17.6) 10 (47.6) 0.15
 Arteriosclerosis 35 (62.5) 15 (65.2) 6 (42.9) 6 (42.9) 0.18
Tubulointerstitial lesions
 Interstitial fibrosis 41 (61.2) 20 (69.0) 11 (64.7) 10 (47.6) 0.29
 Moderate-to-severe 13 (20.3) 7 (24.1) 4 (23.5) 2 (9.5) 0.10
 Acute tubular necrosis 21 (31.3) 11 (37.9) 4 (23.5) 6 (28.6) 0.56
 Interstitial inflammatory infiltration 38 (56.7) 17 (58.6) 9 (52.9) 12 (57.1) 0.93
 Lymphoid nodules 16 (23.9) 7 (24.1) 5 (29.4) 4 (19.0) 0.76

MCV, mixed cryoglobulinemia vasculitis; MPGN, membranoproliferative GN.

Analysis of the Kidney Biopsy Specimens

Sixty-seven (83.8%) kidney biopsy samples were available for review (Table 3). Membranoproliferative GN was the predominant histologic pattern, seen in 92.5% of cases. It was characterized by mesangial hypercellularity, capillary-wall remodeling with double contours, and focal to diffuse endocapillary leukocyte infiltration (Figure 1, A and B). Intraluminal thrombi were observed in 47.8% of biopsy specimens, mostly in patients with pSS (P=0.02) (Figure 1A). Five patients (7.5%) had lesions consistent with mesangial proliferative GN, characterized by predominant mesangial hypercellularity without endocapillary proliferation and with no or mild capillary wall abnormalities (Figure 1C). Lobular accentuation of the glomerular tuft was observed in 14.9% of cases. Crescentic extracapillary proliferation was described in 13.4% of cases, involving 11.9±8.8% of glomeruli. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy were reported in 61.2% of cases but were classified as moderate-to-severe in <25% of cases. Acute tubular necrosis was seen in 31.3% but was moderate-to-severe in <10% of cases. Inflammatory renal interstitial infiltration was observed in 56.7% of cases, 42.1% of which were characterized by the presence of lymphoid nodules. Immunostaining showed the interstitial infiltrates to be predominantly composed of small normal-appearing CD3+ T lymphocytes, whereas CD20+ B lymphocytes were almost exclusively seen in the lymphoid nodules. Vascular lesions, including arteriolosclerosis, arteriosclerosis, and necrotizing arteritis were reported in 35.8%, 62.5%, and 17.9% of cases, respectively. Granular immune deposits were localized by immunofluorescence in the glomerular capillary wall and less frequently in the mesangium (Figure 1D). The deposits stained mostly for IgG and IgM, and less frequently for IgA. No case showed κ or λ light-chain restriction. C3 staining was observed in all cases, whereas C1q staining was reported in more than one-third of cases. Electron microscopy analysis was performed in seven patients. Granular nonorganized subendothelial dense deposits were observed in most cases (n=5, Figure 1E). Two patients showed organized microtubular deposits in the capillary wall (Figure 1F).

Table 3.

Management and outcome at last follow-up

Characteristic Kidney (+) MCV Essential MCV Primary Sjögren Syndrome Hematologic malignancy P Value
Follow-up (months), mean±SD 49.9±45.5 49.3±40.6 64.8±63.6 39.2±33.8 0.57
Relapses, n (%) 32 (42.7) 16 (45.7) 10 (58.8) 6 (26.1) 0.10
 Delay to 1st relapse (months), mean±SD 28.2±19.4 19.6±10.7 39±24.7 32.3±18.9 0.19
 Renal relapse, n (%) 24 (75) 13 (81.3) 8 (80) 3 (50) 0.29
Administered treatments
 Steroids alone, n (%) 12 (15.8) 11 (30.6) 1 (5.9) 0 (0) 0.003
 RTX + Steroids, n (%) 20 (26.3) 10 (27.8) 3 (17.7) 7 (30.4) 0.64
 CYC + Steroids, n (%) 20 (26.3) 7 (19.4) 7 (41.2) 6 (26.1) 0.25
 CYC + RTX + Steroids, n (%) 21 (27.6) 6 (16.7) 6 (35.3) 9 (39.1) 0.12
 Other treatment, n (%) 3 (3.95) 2 (5.6) 0 (0) 1 (4.4) 0.62
 Plasma exchanges, n (%) 25 (32.9) 8 (22.2) 10 (58.8) 7 (30.4) 0.03
Renal parameters
 Proteinuria >0.5 g/d, n (%) 12 (19) 5 (17.2) 3 (21.4) 4 (20) 0.94
 Hematuria, n (%) 18 (28.6) 7 (24.1) 6 (42.9) 5 (25) 0.41
 GFRLFup, mean±SD 50.2±26.1 48.3±29.3 48.1±23 55±23.1 0.57
 <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, n (%) 45 (57.7) 22 (57.9) 11 (64.7) 12 (52.2) 0.73
  <30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, n (%) 20 (25.6) 13 (34.2) 3 (17.6) 4 (17.4) 0.24
 <15 ml/min per 1.73 m2, n (%) 7 (9) 5 (13.2) 2 (11.8) 0 (0) 0.20
Renal outcome 0.12
 NR, n (%) 21 (26.9) 11 (28.9) 5 (29.4) 5 (21.7)
 PR, n (%) 18 (23.1) 10 (26.3) 3 (17.6) 5 (21.7)
 CR, n (%) 39 (50) 17 (44.7) 9 (52.9) 13 (56.5)
Clinical outcome 0.21
 NR, n (%) 16 (17.9) 6 (15.8) 4 (23.5) 4 (17.4)
 PR, n (%) 18 (23.1) 12 (31.6) 3 (17.6) 3 (13)
 CR, n (%) 46 (59) 20 (52.6) 10 (58.8) 16 (69.6)
New-onset hematologic malignancy, n (%) 5 (8.9) 2 (5.6) 3 (16.7) 0.37
Severe Infections, n (%) 23 (29.1) 12 (31.6) 4 (22.2) 7 (30.4) 0.76
Death, n (%) 19 (24) 9 (23.7) 5 (27.8) 5 (21.7) 0.90

RTX, rituximab; CYC, cyclophosphamide; GFRLFup, glomerular filtration rate at last follow-up expressed in ml/min per1.73 m2; NR, nonresponder; PR, partial remission; CR, complete remission.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Glomerular lesions in the course of noninfectious MCV. Light microscopy examination showing typical MPGN with endocapillary proliferation, capillary lumen infiltration by monocytes–macrophages, and Ig-related protein thrombi in the capillary lumen (A, Masson’s trichrome stain, ×400), typical doubles contours (B, Jones’ staining, ×400) and a case of mesangial proliferative GN (C, Masson’s trichrome stain, ×400). Immunofluorescence study showing granular and immune-complex glomerular deposits composed of IgG (D). IgM, and both κ and λ light chains were also detected in a similar pattern (data not shown). Electron microscopy analysis showing capillary thickening and subendothelial granular dense deposits (E; Po, podocyte; Ec, endothelial cell; Rbc, red blood cell; *, dense deposits), and organized microtubular deposits (F).

Treatments

Treatments are depicted in Tables 3, 4, and 5. Four patients were not treated because of spontaneous complete or partial remission, early death, or decline of the treatment.

Table 4.

Patient’s characteristics at baseline and outcome according to the first-line therapeutic regimensa

Characteristic Steroids alone RTX + Steroidsb CYC + Steroidsb CYC + RTX+ Steroids P Value
n=21 n=16 n=28 n=8
Epidemiologic data
 Age at diagnosis (years), mean±SD 61.9±15 57.6±15.4 63.8±12.7 73.6±7.7 0.05
 Women, n (%) 13 (61.9) 10 (62.5) 19 (67.9) 4 (50) 0.83
Causes 0.001
 Autoimmune disorders, n (%) 5 (23.8) 2 (12.5) 10 (35.7) 0 (0)
 Hematologic malignancies, n (%) 1 (4.8) 6 (37.5) 8 (28.6) 7 (87.5)
 Essential MCV, n (%) 15 (71.4) 8 (50) 10 (35.7) 1 (12.5)
Extrarenal manifestations at presentation
 Skin lesions, n (%) 13 (61.9) 9 (56.3) 24 (85.7) 7 (87.5) 0.08
 Peripheral neuropathy, n (%) 12 (57.1) 5 (31.3) 14 (50.0) 3 (37.5) 0.42
 Arthralgias/Arthritis, n (%) 7 (33.3) 6 (37.5) 10 (35.7) 3 (37.5) 0.99
Biologic features at presentation
 Combined decreased of C3 and C4 levels, n (%) 10 (52.6) 5 (35.7) 10 (40.0) 3 (50.0) 0.75
 Isolated decrease of C4 level, n (%) 6 (31.6) 5 (35.7) 13 (52.0) 2 (33.3) 0.52
Renal parameters at presentation
 Hypertension, n (%) 17 (89.5) 11 (78.6) 19 (82.6) 6 (100) 0.58
 Proteinuria, mean±SD 4±3.0 3.9±4.4 3.3±2.3 2.3±1.2 0.7
 Hematuria, n (%) 21 (100) 15 (93.7) 26 (92.8) 8 (100) 0.65
 eGFR, mean±SD 37.2±14.2 45.3±27.2 41.1±21.0 35±19.1 0.82
 Dialysis, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (3.6) 2 (25.0) 0.02
Relapse, n (%) 8 (40.0) 2 (12.5) 18 (64.3) 1 (12.5) 0.002
Renal parameters
 GFRM6, mean±SD 45.7±16.9 58.1±22.5 50.7±28.3 54.8±22.6 0.55
 DialysisM6, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (6.3) 2 (7.1) 0 (0) 0.57
Renal response after first-line therapy 0.06
 NR, n (%) 9 (45) 3 (18.8) 3 (10.7) 1 (12.5)
 PR, n (%) 4 (20.0) 4 (25.0) 6 (21.4) 4 (50.0)
 CR, n (%) 7 (35.0) 9 (56.3) 19 (67.9) 3 (37.5)
Clinical response after first-line therapy 0.18
 NR, n (%) 7 (35.0) 2 (12.5) 3 (10.7) 1 (12.5)
 PR, n (%) 5 (25.0) 4 (25.0) 6 (21.4) 0 (0)
 CR, n (%) 8 (40.0) 10 (62.5) 19 (67.9) 7 (87.5)
Severe infections, n (%) 3 (15) 6 (37.5) 3 (10.7) 3 (37.5) 0.10
Death <1 year, n (%) 1 (5.0) 4 (25.0) 1 (3.6) 3 (37.5) 0.02

RTX, rituximab; CYC, cyclophosphamide; eGFRM6, estimated glomerular filtration rate at 6 months after first-line therapy, expressed in ml/min per1.73 m2; NR, nonresponder; PR, partial remission; CR, complete remission.

a

Four patients were not treated and three other patients received steroids in addition to immunosuppressant other than RTX or CYC.

b

All patients received steroids in addition to RTX or CYC, except one patient in each group.

Table 5.

Patients’ characteristics at baseline and outcome at last follow-up according to cumulative administered treatments over disease evolutiona

Characteristic Steroids alone RTX + Steroidsb CYC + Steroidsb CYC + RTX + Steroidsc P Value
n=12 n=20 n=20 n=21
Epidemiologic data
 Age at diagnosis (years), mean±SD 67.2±11.2 58.4±14.7 60.7±14.1 67.0±14.0 0.14
 Women, n (%) 6 (50.0) 12 (60.0) 14 (70.0) 14 (66.7) 0.69
Causes 0.02
 Autoimmune disorders, n (%) 1 (8.3) 3 (15.0) 7 (35.0) 6 (28.6)
 Hematologic malignancies, n (%) 0 (0) 7 (35.0) 6 (30.0) 9 (42.9)
 Essential MCV, n (%) 11 (91.7) 10 (50.0) 7 (35.0) 6 (28.6)
Extrarenal manifestations
 Skin lesions, n (%) 6 (50.0) 13 (65.0) 18 (90.0) 16 (76.2) 0.08
 Peripheral neuropathy, n (%) 6 (50.0) 9 (45.0) 9 (45.0) 10 (47.6) 0.10
 Arthralgias/Arthritis, n (%) 3 (25.0) 8 (40.0) 8 (40.0) 7 (33.3) 0.81
Biologic features
 Combined decreased of C3 and C4 levels, n (%) 6 (60.0) 6 (33.3) 7 (38.9) 9 (50.0) 0.51
 Isolated decrease of C4 level, n (%) 2 (20.0) 7 (38.9) 10 (55.6) 7 (38.9) 0.32
Renal parameters
 Hypertension, n (%) 10 (83.3) 13 (81.3) 16 (88.9) 14 (87.5) 0.92
 Proteinuria, mean±SD 4.9±3.5 3.4±4.1 3.8±2.3 2.5±1.6 0.10
 Hematuria, n (%) 12 (100) 19 (100) 19 (100) 20 (95.2) 0.49
 eGFR, mean±SD 34±11.1 42.8±26.3 47.5±19.7 34.8±17.7 0.19
 Dialysis, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (14.3) 0.06
Follow-up (months), mean±SD 51.7±43.4 28.7±25.6 65.0±51.0 61.7±53.3 0.04
Relapses, n (%) 4 (36.4) 4 (20.0) 11 (55.0) 13 (61.9) 0.04
Renal parameters at last follow-up
 eGFR, mean±SD 48.6±22.0 53.7±29.3 48.8±26.4 51.5±25.4 0.90
 Proteinuria >0.5 g/d, n (%) 2 (20.0) 2 (13.3) 5 (27.8) 2 (11.8) 0.61
 Hematuria, n (%) 2 (20.0) 5 (33.3) 6 (33.3) 4 (23.5) 0.82
 Dialysis, n (%) 0 (0) 2 (10.0) 3 (15.0) 1 (4.8) 0.46
Renal response 0.88
 NR, n (%) 3 (27.3) 4 (20.0) 7 (35.0) 4 (19.0)
 PR, n (%) 3 (27.3) 5 (25.0) 3 (15.0) 6 (28.6)
 CR, n (%) 5 (45.5) 11 (55.0) 10 (50.0) 11 (52.4)
Clinical response 0.40
 NR, n (%) 2 (18.2) 2 (10.0) 6 (30.0) 2 (9.5)
 PR, n (%) 2 (18.2) 6 (30.0) 5 (25.0) 3 (14.3)
 CR, n (%) 7 (63.6) 12 (60.0) 9 (45.0) 16 (76.2)
New-onset hematologic malignancy, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (28.6) 1 (8.3) 0.05
Severe infections, n (%) 3 (25) 7 (35.0) 4 (20.0) 9 (42.9) 0.45
Death, n (%) 2 (18.2) 4 (20.0) 6 (30.0) 5 (23.8) 0.90

RTX, rituximab; CYC, cyclophosphamide; NR, nonresponder; PR, partial remission; CR, complete remission.

a

Four patients were not treated and three other received steroids in addition to drugs other than RTX or CYC.

b

All patients received steroids in addition to RTX or CYC except one patient in the RTX group.

c

Combined or sequential.

First-Line Therapy

Of the 76 treated patients, 21 (27.6%) received steroids alone as first-line therapy. Sixteen (21.1%) were treated with rituximab (RTX+steroids group), whereas 28 (36.8%) received cyclophosphamide (CYC+steroids group) as first-line therapy in association with steroids in all but one case in each group. Additionally, 10.5% of patients, mostly presenting with MCGN related to hematologic malignancy, received a combination of steroids, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (CYC+RTX+steroids group) (Table 4). Three additional patients received steroids associated with other immunosuppressant agents. Overall, extrarenal manifestations and renal parameters at presentation were similar, irrespective of the therapeutic regimen used as first-line therapy (Table 4).

Cumulative Therapeutic Regimens at Last Follow-Up

At last follow-up, a total of 15.8% of patients had received steroids alone, 53.9% rituximab, and 53.9% cyclophosphamide. Rituximab was administered using a four perfusion-based schedule at 375 mg/m2 per week in all patients, whereas cyclophosphamide was administered by intravenous pulses or orally in 82.4% and 17.6% of cases, respectively. In addition, 32.9% of patients had undergone plasma exchanges, and 48.7% had received renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocking agents (Table 3). Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the four main therapeutic groups determined at the last follow-up, except for patients receiving steroids alone over the disease course, who were usually diagnosed as having essential mixed cryoglobulinemia (Table 5).

Outcome

Clinical and Renal Responses

Overall, nearly 60% of patients reached complete clinical remission and 50% complete renal remission (Table 3), whereas only 31.3% of patients showed immunologic improvement. No significant difference in the clinical response was observed between the four main first-line treatments, but the rate of complete renal remission tended to be higher in the RTX+steroids and CYC+steroids groups, compared with patients receiving steroids alone or CYC+RTX+steroids (Table 4). At last follow-up, clinical and renal responses were similar between the therapeutic regimens (Table 5). No difference was observed in term of clinical (66.7% versus 64.3%, P=0.72) and renal (66.7% versus 55.6%, P=0.89) responses when comparing oral and intravenous cyclophosphamide administration.

At last follow-up, mean eGFR was 50.2±26.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with a significant improvement of renal function compared with presentation (P<0.001). Isolated decrease of C4 level was the only factor associated with a complete renal remission, whereas arteriolosclerosis, moderate-to-severe interstitial fibrosis, and renal interstitial infiltrates were associated with the absence of complete renal remission at last follow-up. By multivariate analysis, isolated decrease of C4 level remained associated with a complete renal remission, with moderate-to-severe interstitial fibrosis and arteriosclerosis being the two parameters associated with the lack of complete renal remission (Table 6). Seven patients (9%) reached ESRD. By univariate analysis, factors associated with ESRD at last follow-up included eGFR<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at diagnosis, dialysis requirement at diagnosis, and extracapillary proliferation. Nephrotic range proteinuria and intraluminal thrombi also tended to be associated with ESRD. By contrast, skin involvement was associated with a lower risk of progression toward ESRD. By multivariate Cox analysis, dialysis at diagnosis and extracapillary proliferation were the two independent factors associated with ESRD at last follow-up (Table 6). Nephrotic range proteinuria also tended to be associated with a poor renal course.

Table 6.

Prognostic significance of patient characteristics for renal outcome

Variable Complete renal remission, OR (95% CI)
Univariate P Value Multivariate P Value
Clinico-biologic parameters
 Isolated decrease of C4 level, n (%) 3.17 (1.15 to 8.73) 0.06 5.45 (1.49 to 19.88) 0.01
Histopathologic characteristics
 Arteriolosclerosis 0.40 (0.14 to 1.11) 0.08
 Arteriosclerosis 0.30 (0.09 to 0.96) 0.04 0.13 (0.03 to 0.67) 0.01
 Moderate-to-severe interstitial fibrosis 0.28 (0.07 to 1.11) 0.07 0.18 (0.03 to 1.02) 0.05
ESRD at the last follow-up, HR (95% CI)
Univariate P Value Multivariate P Value
Clinico-biologic parameters
 Skin involvement 0.19 (0.04 to 0.87) 0.03
 eGFR<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at diagnosis 6.1 (1.16 to 31.95) 0.03
 Dialysis at diagnosis 21.02 (3.32 to 133.11) 0.001 49.55 (2.12 to 1155.80) 0.02
 Proteinuria ≥3 g/d 6.53 (0.78 to 54.67) 0.08 8.42 (0.85 to 83.56) 0.07
Histopathologic characteristics
 Intraluminal thrombi 5.2 (0.86 to 31.45) 0.07
 Extracapillary proliferation 9.24 (1.54 to 55.48) 0.02 8.97 (1.27 to 63.48) 0.03

OR, odds ration; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Relapses

After a mean follow-up of 49.9±45.5 months, 42.7% of patients relapsed with 75% having at least one renal relapse episode (Table 3). A total of 52 relapse episodes were recorded, with 21 patients presenting with one relapse, and four, five, and two patients experiencing two, three, and four relapses, respectively. Of these relapse episodes, 12 (23.1%) and 13 (25%) were isolated renal or extrarenal flares, respectively, whereas concomitant renal and extrarenal relapses occurred in 22 (42.3%). The nature of the relapse was missing in five cases (9.6%). Relapse rate was lower in patients receiving the rituximab+steroids combination, as compared with other treatment regimens (Tables 4 and 5).

Complications

During follow-up, five patients (8.9%) developed new-onset hematologic malignancy, including B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=3) and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (n=2). They all received six monthly intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide (cumulative doses: 4.5–6 g) as the first-line therapy, followed in one patient by rituximab (375 mg/m2 per week for four perfusions), before the diagnosis of the lymphoproliferative disease (Table 5).

About 29% of patients had severe infections and 24.1% of patients died compared with 12.7% of patients without renal injury (P=0.04). The mean interval between kidney biopsy and death was 23.8±45.7 months, but almost 60% of deaths occurred during the first year after the renal biopsy. Patients receiving rituximab-containing regimens as first-line therapy showed a higher rate of early death (during the first year of follow-up), whereas cumulative exposure to rituximab was not associated with an increased mortality at last follow-up (Tables 4 and 5). Severe infectious episodes only tended to be more frequent under rituximab+steroids treatments, and a non-significant increase of infections was noticed in patients treated with cyclophosphamide orally compared with those receiving the drug intravenously (50% versus 29.6%, P=0.55).

Survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84.4%, 73%, and 73%, respectively. Cause of death included severe infection (47.4%) and bleeding complication (26.3%), and was undetermined in 26.3% of cases. By univariate analysis, the complement profile was the only parameter associated with death. By multivariate analysis, the combined decrease of C3 and C4 levels was the only independent baseline factor associated with death at last follow-up (hazard ratio [HR]=3.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 11.40, P=0.03). In contrast, peripheral nerve involvement at diagnosis tended to be associated with a better outcome (HR=0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 1.16, P=0.09).

Comparison of Noninfectious MCGN to HCV-Related Forms

We compared presentation and outcome of the 80 patients with noninfectious MCGN with a group of 34 patients presenting with HCV-related biopsy-proven MCGN (Supplemental Table 1). Mean age at presentation was not different between the two groups, but there was a higher proportion of men in the HCV-related group. At presentation, hematuria was less frequently recorded in HCV-related MCGN. Although not statistically significant, noninfectious MCGN had more frequently an eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 or required dialysis at diagnosis, whereas proteinuria was comparable between the two groups. All kidney biopsy specimens were classified as membranoproliferative GN in HCV-infected patients. Extrarenal manifestations of MCV were similar between the two groups, except for the central nervous system involvement, which was more frequently reported in HCV-related MCV. At the last follow-up, no difference in the renal parameters was observed between the two groups. However, a lower rate of severe infections was recorded in patients with HCV-related MCGN, which were also less exposed to steroids than the noninfectious forms (Supplementary Table 1).

Discussion

Contrary to HCV-associated forms, noninfectious MCGN has been poorly investigated.4,5,9,10 In a French nationwide survey, we identified 80 patients with noninfectious MCGN and analyzed the renal and extrarenal presentation, prognostic factors, impact of treatments, and outcome. These characteristics were compared with a group of 34 patients with HCV-related MCGN.

Renal involvement has been reported in 30%–40% of patients with MCV, regardless of HCV status.5,10,11 In the absence of infectious cause, autoimmune disorders, particularly pSS, and hematologic malignancies represent more than one-quarter of cases, each, whereas almost half of patients are classified as essential mixed cryoglobulinemia.8,12 Renal lesions are mainly observed in association with systemic manifestations, although they may be occasionally isolated.12 In our study, type II mixed cryoglobulinemia and combined decrease of C4 and C3 levels were associated with renal disease occurrence, contrary to skin and peripheral nerve involvement. Discrepancy between immune complex-related and vasculitis-related manifestations is likely due to different pathophysiologic mechanisms, as pinpointed by Reininger et al. who showed that the cryoglobulin and rheumatoid factor activities were both crucial for skin involvement, whereas only the cryoglobulin activity was necessary for renal injury.13

Similarly to HCV-related forms, noninfectious MCGN is predominantly associated with immune-complex membranoproliferative GN, characterized by mesangial proliferation, endocapillary monocyte–macrophages infiltration, and mesangial matrix expansion with thickening of the capillary wall.79,12 Ig-related protein thrombi are characteristic but inconstantly present. Mesangial proliferative GN is observed in about 10% of our cases, and <20% of HCV-related cases.8 As previously reported, extracapillary proliferation, but not necrotizing arteritis, was associated with a more severe renal outcome.12 Interstitial fibrosis and arteriosclerosis were also associated with the absence of complete renal remission at last follow-up. Interstitial infiltrates, that were associated with a worse renal outcome by univariate analysis, may impact the long-term renal outcome by promoting renal interstitial fibrosis. Immunostaining confirmed that the interstitial infiltrates were predominantly composed of CD3+ T lymphocytes, whereas CD20+ B lymphocytes were almost exclusively restricted to the lymphoid nodules. Similar nodular lesions have been previously observed in >60% of HCV-related MCGN, but also in the portal spaces, salivary glands and bone marrow.9,1420 Winearls and Sissons showed that cells within these lymphoid nodules did not harbor light- or heavy-chain restriction, which argued against a potential localized monoclonal proliferation.16

In two previous studies mostly analyzing HCV-related MCGN, nephrotic proteinuria and eGFR<60 ml/min were less frequently observed than in our noninfectious forms.7,9 In our study, proteinuria was almost similar between the two groups. Only hematuria and to a lesser extent eGFR< 60 ml/min or dialysis at presentation were more frequently observed in patients with noninfectious MCGN than in those with the HCV-related form. However, renal outcome was similar between the two groups, with <10% of patients reaching ESRD.

Almost 25% of patients had died at last follow-up and more than half died during the first year after renal biopsy. Severe infections were the leading cause of death, which contrasts with the high burden of cardiovascular events in HCV-related forms.9

Combined decrease of serum C3 and C4 levels was independently associated with mortality in our study, suggesting that a more severe course of the disease could be driven, at least in part, by a stronger amplification of the complement alternative pathway, as indicated by systemic C3 decrease.

In HCV-related MCV, antiviral therapy combined with rituximab proved to be very effective, whereas the optimal therapeutic strategy has not been established yet for the noninfectious forms.

In our study, most patients received corticosteroids alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and/or rituximab. First-line therapy combining cyclophosphamide, rituximab and steroids was mostly restricted to B-cell lymphoma. Overall, complete clinical and renal remissions were achieved in 59% and 50% of cases, respectively. Only less than one-third of cases achieved immunologic improvement, which underscores the dissociation between the clinical activity of MCV and the persistence of detectable cryoglobulinemia. Clinical responses were similar regardless of the first-line therapies or the cumulative treatments received over the disease course. Complete renal remission was, however, more frequently achieved after first-line therapy with rituximab+steroids or cyclophosphamide+steroids combinations, than with steroids alone. Moreover, rituximab+steroids regimen more effectively prevented relapses. In the cohort of 242 patients with noninfectious MCV, rituximab+steroids was also more effective than steroids alone to achieve complete clinical (HR=3.7), renal (HR=31.6), and immunologic (HR=33.8) improvement.10,11

However, when used as first-line therapy, rituximab+steroid combinations were impacted by a higher rate of early deaths and tended to be associated with the occurrence of severe infections. In the CryoVas survey, serious infectious episodes also most likely developed with this therapeutic association whereas mortality rate was not different compared with steroids alone.11 Reports before the era of rituximab pointed to a significant increase in infections and mortality in patients with noninfectious MCV of >60-year-old (odds ratio=1.06) and with renal involvement (odds ratio=5.2).21 Similarly, in the series of Matignon et al. only 10% of patients received rituximab whereas >25% of patients experienced serious infections, mostly patients >70 years, with an essential mixed cryoglobulinemia, and who had received high doses of steroids.12 We also observed that severe infections occurred less frequently in HCV-related MCGN compared with the noninfectious group, as previously reported.8 Interestingly, whereas exposure to rituximab was similar between the two groups, fewer than half of the HCV-infected patients received steroids.

Other serious complications punctuated the course of MCGN, especially new-onset hematologic malignancy. In previous reports, risk factors of new-onset lymphoma included cryoglobulinemia level >0.6 g/L, vasculitis features and hypogammaglobulinemia.21 In our series, the role of the immunosuppressive therapy in the occurrence of the hematologic malignancies is unlikely, given the low cumulative doses of cyclophosphamide administered.

Altogether, our data suggest that combinations of steroids with either cyclophosphamide or rituximab should be preferred to steroids alone as first-line therapy in noninfectious MCGN. Because the rituximab+steroids combination more efficiently prevented relapses, further studies are required to determine if steroid dose reduction may reverse the excess of adverse events observed with this regimen when used as first-line therapy. Our study did not allow us to determine the preferred treatment for relapsing diseases. Previous analysis in noninfectious MCV showed that alkylating agents plus steroids produced a lower response rate when used as second-line therapy than first-line therapy, whereas efficacy of rituximab+steroids was similar over the disease course.9 Beneficial impact of maintenance therapy with low-dose steroids and/or immunosuppressive treatment in preventing relapses should be evaluated in further studies. The tight control of BP represents another major therapeutic objective, as hypertension is observed in almost all patients in the setting of MCGN and has been recognized as a risk factor for progression to ESRD in HCV-related forms.7

The present study has limitations. The retrospective collection of data accounted for potential biases, notably in the assessment of extrarenal manifestations and the interval between systemic symptoms and renal lesions. In particular, electrophysiologic parameters were not systematically recorded in patients with suspected neuropathy and rheumatoid factor was not available for all patients. Centralized review of renal biopsies could only be performed in 67 of 80 cases. The variability in patients’ follow-up may have contributed to a potential underestimation of outcome events. In addition, comparison with the HCV-related group must be cautiously analyzed, given the shorter period of enrollment and duration of follow-up, as well as the monocentric origin of this group, and the distinct therapeutic regimens used.

In conclusion, our study describes the spectrum and outcome of patients with noninfectious MCGN. The high frequency of hematologic malignancies emphasizes the need for a thorough evaluation of patients with noninfectious MCV over the disease course. Renal interstitial lesions, including inflammatory cell infiltrates and interstitial fibrosis, may impact long-term renal outcome. Patients have a poor long-term survival and complement cascade activation appears to be an independent prognostic factor of mortality. Because rituximab+steroids association might be more efficient to prevent relapses than the other therapeutic options, prospective controlled trials are required to better tailor treatment, especially reducing steroids doses, to lower the risk of severe infections and other life-threatening complications.

Concise Methods

Study Population

The present work is an ancillary study to the CryoVas survey, a French nationwide retrospective study, which included 242 patients with noninfectious MCV diagnosed between January 1995 and July 2010.10 All patients had positive MC and systemic vasculitis, as previously defined.10 Exclusion criteria were the presence of positive anti-HCV and anti-HIV antibodies and hepatitis B surface antigen. Of note, cases of non HCV-related infectious forms of MCV were not included in the study. Among the 242 patients enrolled in the CryoVas survey, only patients with biopsy-proven renal disease were included in the present study, which was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the institutional review board.

Patients’ Characteristics

Clinical and biologic data were recorded for each patient at diagnosis, during and at the end of follow-up.10 The cause of MC was established according to international standard criteria, including the use of the World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases, and the classification criteria for Sjögren syndrome.22,23 The diagnosis of “essential” MCV was retained if no alternative diagnosis could be identified, including exclusion of hematologic malignancy by bone marrow biopsy and imaging. Renal parameters included serum creatinine, urine protein and urine red blood cell count. eGFR was calculated using the four variables Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Proteinuria and nephrotic range proteinuria were defined by urine protein >0.3 g/d and ≥3 g/d, respectively.

Response to Therapy

Complete and partial clinical responses were defined by an improvement of all baseline clinical manifestations, and an improvement of at least half of the manifestations, respectively. All other patients were considered as nonresponders. The complete renal response was defined by a proteinuria of <0.5 g/d and the disappearance of hematuria and an improvement of eGFR of >20% if baseline eGFR was lower than 70 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Partial renal remission was defined as the improvement at least one of the renal parameters (proteinuria of <0.5 g/d, disappearance of hematuria, and/or improvement of eGFR of >20% if lower than 70 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at baseline), whereas all other patients were considered to be nonresponders. Immunologic improvement was assessed by a >50% decrease in the baseline cryoglobulin level and/or a >50% increase in the serum C4 fraction. Extrarenal relapses were defined by the reappearance of clinical signs of vasculitis confirmed when necessary by appropriate investigations, and renal relapses were defined by the decrease of eGFR and/or reappearance or increase of proteinuria and hematuria.

Biopsy Processing

Kidney biopsies were blindly reviewed by two experts in renal pathology (I.B. and A.P.). Renal lesions were evaluated by light microscopy for the presence of glomerular sclerosis, endocapillary and mesangial cell proliferation, double contours, intravascular thrombi, extracapillary proliferation, tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis, and vascular lesions. The presence of immune deposits was determined on the basis of the immunostaining for IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, C1q, κ, and λ light chains, performed at the time of the kidney biopsy. Immunophenotyping of interstitial inflammatory cells was performed using primary antibodies directed against CD20 (clone L26; Dako) and CD3 (clone SP7; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Electron microscopy was performed on kidney biopsies, as previously described.24

HCV-Related MCGN Group

Clinical and biologic data were collected at presentation, during and at the end of follow-up for 34 consecutive patients presenting with HCV-related MCV and a biopsy-proven MCGN seen at the Department of Internal Medicine, Pitié Salpétrière (Paris, France) between 2001 and 2008.

Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics included the mean (±SD) or median (and range) as appropriate for continuous variables, and frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. Univariate analyses were performed using the χ2 or Fisher exact test, as appropriate and the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. Survival analyses were performed using the logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models as appropriate. For multivariate regression models, all covariates with P <0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Then, a backward selection procedure was applied, and only factors associated with the considered outcome with P<0.05 were kept in the final model. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 11.2 for Windows.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

The following are members of the CryoVasc Study Group-Local Investigators: Laurent Aaron, Sébastien Abad, RedouaneBakir, Pauline Belenotti, Lucas Benarous, Nathalie Beneton, Gilles Blaison, Claire Blanchard-Delaunay, Fabrice Bonnet, Pascal Cathébras, Fabrice Carrat, Laurent Chiche, Olivier Chosidow, Bernard Combe, Carole Cordonnier, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Pierre Cougoul, Bernard Cribier, Anne Croue, Laurent Daniel, Gilles Defuentes, Dominique Desvaux, Frédérique Dijoud, Elisabeth Diot, Laurent Doucet, Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen, Isabelle Durieu, Philippe Evon, Sophie Felix, Sophie Ferlicot, Thibault Fraisse, Camille Francès, Hélène Francois, LoikGeffray, Helder Gil, Jean Michel Goujon, Angélique Guillaudeau, Jean Gutnecht, Eric Hachulla, Olivier Hinschberger, Arnaud Hot, Noémie Jourde, Jean-Emmanuel Kahn, Jean Louis Kemmeny, Adeline Lacraz, Olivier Lambotte, Claire Larroche, Estibaliz Lazaro, Guillaume Le Guenno, Véronique Leblond, Nicolas Limal, Eric Liozon, Catherine Lok, Véronique Loustaud-Ratti, Kim Ly, Marie-Christine Machet, Hervé Maillard, Antoine Martin, Marie Matignon, Olivier Meyer, Catherine Michel, Anne Modesto-Segonds, Philippe Modiano, Dominique Nochy, David Noel, Raphaele Nove-Josserand, Céline Onno, Sandra Onuifarasoaniaina, Christian Pagnoux, Caroline Pajot, Géraldine Perceau, Antoinette Perlat, Anne-Marie Piette, Jean-François Pouget-Abadie, Thomas Quemeneur, Viviane Queyrel, Joseph Rivalan, Patricia Rullier, Luc de Saint-Martin, Elisabeth Salles-Thomasson, Françoise Sarrot-Reynauld, Thierry Schaeverbeke, Gwendoline Sebille, RaphaeleSeror, Jacques Serratrice, Alexandre Somogyi, Pascale Soria, Marie-FrancoiseThiercelin-Legrand, François Truchetet, Jean-Paul Vagneur, Bérengère Vivet, Pierre-Jean Weiller, Bernadette Woehl-Kremer, Jean-Marie Woehl, Thierry Zénone.

Footnotes

Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.jasn.org.

References

  • 1.Brouet JC, Clauvel JP, Danon F, Klein M, Seligmann M: Biologic and clinical significance of cryoglobulins. A report of 86 cases. Am J Med 57: 775–788, 1974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Agnello V, Chung RT, Kaplan LM: A role for hepatitis C virus infection in type II cryoglobulinemia. N Engl J Med 327: 1490–1495, 1992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abel G, Zhang QX, Agnello V: Hepatitis C virus infection in type II mixed cryoglobulinemia. Arthritis Rheum 36: 1341–1349, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cacoub P, Fabiani FL, Musset L, Perrin M, Frangeul L, Leger JM, Huraux JM, Piette JC, Godeau P: Mixed cryoglobulinemia and hepatitis C virus. Am J Med 96: 124–132, 1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cacoub P, Poynard T, Ghillani P, Charlotte F, Olivi M, Piette JC, Opolon P: Extrahepatic manifestations of chronic hepatitis C. MULTIVIRC Group. Multidepartment Virus C. Arthritis Rheum 42: 2204–2212, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Monti G, Galli M, Invernizzi F, Pioltelli P, Saccardo F, Monteverde A, Pietrogrande M, Renoldi P, Bombardieri S, Bordin G, et al. Italian Group for the Study of Cryoglobulinaemias : Cryoglobulinaemias: a multi-centre study of the early clinical and laboratory manifestations of primary and secondary disease. GISC. QJM 88: 115–126, 1995 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tarantino A, Campise M, Banfi G, Confalonieri R, Bucci A, Montoli A, Colasanti G, Damilano I, D’Amico G, Minetti L, et al. : Long-term predictors of survival in essential mixed cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 47: 618–623, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Beddhu S, Bastacky S, Johnson JP: The clinical and morphologic spectrum of renal cryoglobulinemia. Medicine (Baltimore) 81: 398–409, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roccatello D, Fornasieri A, Giachino O, Rossi D, Beltrame A, Banfi G, Confalonieri R, Tarantino A, Pasquali S, Amoroso A, Savoldi S, Colombo V, Manno C, Ponzetto A, Moriconi L, Pani A, Rustichelli R, Di Belgiojoso GB, Comotti C, Quarenghi MI: Multicenter study on hepatitis C virus-related cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 49: 69–82, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Terrier B, Krastinova E, Marie I, Launay D, Lacraz A, Belenotti P, de Saint-Martin L, Quemeneur T, Huart A, Bonnet F, Le Guenno G, Kahn JE, Hinschberger O, Rullier P, Diot E, Lazaro E, Bridoux F, Zénone T, Carrat F, Hermine O, Léger JM, Mariette X, Senet P, Plaisier E, Cacoub P: Management of noninfectious mixed cryoglobulinemia vasculitis: data from 242 cases included in the CryoVas survey. Blood 119: 5996–6004, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Terrier B, Carrat F, Krastinova E, Marie I, Launay D, Lacraz A, Belenotti P, de Saint Martin L, Quemeneur T, Huart A, Bonnet F, Le Guenno G, Kahn JE, Hinschberger O, Rullier P, Hummel A, Diot E, Pagnoux C, Lzaro E, Bridoux F, Zenone T, Hermine O, Leger JM, Mariette X, Senet P, Plaisier E, Cacoub P: Prognostic factors of survival in patients with non-infectious mixed cryoglobulinaemia vasculitis: data from 242 cases included in the CryoVas survey. Ann Rheum Dis 72: 374–380, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Matignon M, Cacoub P, Colombat M, Saadoun D, Brocheriou I, Mougenot B, Roudot-Thoraval F, Vanhille P, Moranne O, Hachulla E, Hatron P-Y, Fermand J-P, Fakhouri F, Ronco P, Plaisier E, Grimbert P: Clinical and morphologic spectrum of renal involvement in patients with mixed cryoglobulinemia without evidence of hepatitis C virus infection. Medicine (Baltimore) 88: 341–348, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reininger L, Berney T, Shibata T, Spertini F, Merino R, Izui S: Cryoglobulinemia induced by a murine IgG3 rheumatoid factor: skin vasculitis and glomerulonephritis arise from distinct pathogenic mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 10038–10042, 1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schifferli JA, French LE, Tissot JD: Hepatitis C virus infection, cryoglobulinemia, and glomerulonephritis. Adv Nephrol Necker Hosp 24: 107–129, 1995 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gorevic PD, Kassab HJ, Levo Y, Kohn R, Meltzer M, Prose P, Franklin EC: Mixed cryoglobulinemia: clinical aspects and long-term follow-up of 40 patients. Am J Med 69: 287–308, 1980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Winearls CG, Sissons JG: Use of idiotype markers for cellular detection of monoclonal rheumatoid factor. Springer Semin Immunopathol 10: 67–74, 1988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haddad J, Deny P, Munz-Gotheil C, Ambrosini JC, Trinchet JC, Pateron D, Mal F, Callard P, Beaugrand M: Lymphocytic sialadenitis of Sjögren’s syndrome associated with chronic hepatitis C virus liver disease. Lancet 339: 321–323, 1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dammacco F, Sansonno D: Antibodies to hepatitis C virus in essential mixed cryoglobulinaemia. Clin Exp Immunol 87: 352–356, 1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Bandt M: [Role of hepatitis C virus in “essential” mixed cryoglobulinemias and Gougerot-Sjogren’s syndrome]. Presse Med 21: 1750–1752, 1992 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lau JY, Davis GL, Kniffen J, Qian KP, Urdea MS, Chan CS, Mizokami M, Neuwald PD, Wilber JC: Significance of serum hepatitis C virus RNA levels in chronic hepatitis C. Lancet 341: 1501–1504, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Saadoun D, Sellam J, Ghillani-Dalbin P, Crecel R, Piette JC, Cacoub P: Increased risks of lymphoma and death among patients with non-hepatitis C virus-related mixed cryoglobulinemia. Arch Intern Med 166: 2101–2108, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Campo E, Swerdlow SH, Harris NL, Pileri S, Stein H, Jaffe ES: The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applications. Blood 117: 5019–5032, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexander EL, Carsons SE, Daniels TE, Fox PC, Fox RI, Kassan SS, Pillemer SR, Talal N, Weisman MH, European Study Group on Classification Criteria for Sjögren’s Syndrome : Classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis 61: 554–558, 2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Messiaen T, Deret S, Mougenot B, Bridoux F, Dequiedt P, Dion JJ, Makdassi R, Meeus F, Pourrat J, Touchard G, Vanhille P, Zaoui P, Aucouturier P, Ronco PM: Adult Fanconi syndrome secondary to light chain gammopathy. Clinicopathologic heterogeneity and unusual features in 11 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 79: 135–154, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN are provided here courtesy of American Society of Nephrology

RESOURCES